XML 34 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.2.0.727

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2015
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Nature of Operations – Unitil Corporation (Unitil or the Company) is a public utility holding company. Unitil and its subsidiaries are subject to regulation as a holding company system by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) under the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The following companies are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Unitil: Unitil Energy Systems, Inc. (Unitil Energy), Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Company (Fitchburg), Northern Utilities, Inc. (Northern Utilities), Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc. (Granite State), Unitil Power Corp. (Unitil Power), Unitil Realty Corp. (Unitil Realty), Unitil Service Corp. (Unitil Service) and its non-regulated business unit Unitil Resources, Inc. (Unitil Resources). Usource Inc. and Usource L.L.C. are subsidiaries of Unitil Resources. The Company’s earnings are seasonal and are typically higher in the first and fourth quarters when customers use natural gas for heating purposes. Unitil’s principal business is the local distribution of electricity in the southeastern seacoast and state capital regions of New Hampshire and the greater Fitchburg area of north central Massachusetts, and the local distribution of natural gas in southeastern New Hampshire, portions of southern and central Maine and in the greater Fitchburg area of north central Massachusetts. Unitil has three distribution utility subsidiaries, Unitil Energy, which operates in New Hampshire, Fitchburg, which operates in Massachusetts and Northern Utilities, which operates in New Hampshire and Maine (collectively referred to as the distribution utilities). Granite State is a natural gas transportation pipeline, operating 86 miles of underground gas transmission pipeline primarily located in Maine and New Hampshire. Granite State provides Northern Utilities with interconnection to three major natural gas pipelines and access to domestic natural gas supplies in the south and Canadian natural gas supplies in the north. Granite State derives its revenues principally from the transportation services provided to Northern Utilities and, to a lesser extent, third-party marketers. A fifth utility subsidiary, Unitil Power, formerly functioned as the full requirements wholesale power supply provider for Unitil Energy. In connection with the implementation of electric industry restructuring in New Hampshire, Unitil Power ceased being the wholesale supplier of Unitil Energy on May 1, 2003 and divested of its long-term power supply contracts through the sale of the entitlements to the electricity associated with various electric power supply contracts it had acquired to serve Unitil Energy’s customers. Unitil also has three other wholly-owned subsidiaries: Unitil Service; Unitil Realty; and Unitil Resources. Unitil Service provides, at cost, a variety of administrative and professional services, including regulatory, financial, accounting, human resources, engineering, operations, technology, energy management and management services on a centralized basis to its affiliated Unitil companies. Unitil Realty owns and manages the Company’s corporate office in Hampton, New Hampshire and leases this facility to Unitil Service under a long-term lease arrangement. Unitil Resources is the Company’s wholly-owned non-regulated subsidiary. Usource, Inc. and Usource L.L.C. (collectively, Usource) are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Unitil Resources. Usource provides brokering and advisory services to large commercial and industrial customers in the northeastern United States. Basis of Presentation – The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of Unitil have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included and are of a normal and recurring nature. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2015. For further information, please refer to Note 1 of Part II to the Consolidated Financial Statements – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on January 28, 2015, for a description of the Company’s Basis of Presentation. Fair Value – The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Codification defines fair value, and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under the FASB Codification are described below:
Level 1 - |  | Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 - |  | Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 - |  | Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant rather than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even when market assumptions are not readily available, the Company’s own assumptions are set to reflect those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The Company uses prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date, including during periods of market dislocation. In periods of market dislocation, the observability of prices and inputs may be reduced for many instruments. This condition could cause an instrument to be reclassified from Level 1 to Level 2 or from Level 2 to Level 3. There have been no changes in the valuation techniques used during the current period. Income Taxes – The Company is subject to Federal and State income taxes as well as various other business taxes. This process involves estimating the Company’s current tax liabilities as well as assessing temporary and permanent differences resulting from the timing of the deductions of expenses and recognition of taxable income for tax and book accounting purposes. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company accounts for income tax assets, liabilities and expenses in accordance with the FASB Codification guidance on Income Taxes. The Company classifies penalty and interest expense related to income tax liabilities as income tax expense and interest expense, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Provisions for income taxes are calculated in each of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates for each period for which a statement of earnings is presented. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the FASB Codification guidance on Income Taxes, which requires an asset and liability approach for the financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. Significant judgments and estimates are required in determining the current and deferred tax assets and liabilities. The Company’s current and deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect its best assessment of estimated future taxes to be paid. In accordance with the FASB Codification, the Company periodically assesses the realization of its deferred tax assets and liabilities and adjusts the income tax provision, the current tax liability and deferred taxes in the period in which the facts and circumstances which gave rise to the revision become known. Deferred income taxes are reflected as Deferred Income Taxes in Current Assets and Noncurrent Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets based on the nature of the underlying timing item. Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash and Cash Equivalents includes all cash and cash equivalents to which the Company has legal title. Cash equivalents include short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less and interest bearing deposits. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are held at financial institutions and at times may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. Under the Independent System Operator – New England (ISO-NE) Financial Assurance Policy (Policy), Unitil’s subsidiaries Unitil Energy, Fitchburg and Unitil Power are required to provide assurance of their ability to satisfy their obligations to ISO-NE. Under this Policy, Unitil’s subsidiaries provide cash deposits covering approximately 2-1/2 months of outstanding obligations. As of June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014, the Unitil subsidiaries had deposited $0.7 million, $8.8 million and $6.3 million, respectively to satisfy their ISO-NE obligations. In addition, Northern Utilities has cash margin deposits to satisfy requirements for its natural gas hedging program. As of June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014, there was $0.1 million, $0 and $0, respectively, deposited for this purpose. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts – The Company recognizes a provision for doubtful accounts each month based upon the Company’s experience in collecting electric and gas utility service accounts receivable in prior years. At the end of each month, an analysis of the delinquent receivables is performed which takes into account an assumption about the cash recovery of delinquent receivables. The analysis also calculates the amount of written-off receivables that are recoverable through regulatory rate reconciling mechanisms. The Company’s distribution utilities are authorized by regulators to recover the costs of their energy commodity portion of bad debts through rate mechanisms. Also, as a result of the MDPU’s final rate order dated May 30, 2014, discussed below, the electric division of Fitchburg is authorized to recover through rates past due amounts associated with hardship accounts that are protected from shut-off. Evaluating the adequacy of the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts requires judgment about the assumptions used in the analysis, including expected fuel assistance payments from governmental authorities and the level of customers enrolling in payment plans with the Company. The Allowance for Doubtful Accounts as of June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014, which are included in Accounts Receivable, net on the accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets, were as follows:
($ millions) |  | June 30, |  |  | December 31, |
|  | 2015 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2014 |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |  | $ | 2.0 |  |  | $ | 1.7 |  |  | $ | 1.8 |
Accrued Revenue – Accrued Revenue includes the current portion of Regulatory Assets and unbilled revenues. The following table shows the components of Accrued Revenue as of June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014.
|  | June 30, |  |  | December 31, |
Accrued Revenue ($ millions) |  | 2015 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2014 |
Regulatory Assets – Current |  | $ | 22.6 |  |  | $ | 27.3 |  |  | $ | 37.8 |
Unbilled Revenues |  |  | 6.0 |  |  |  | 6.1 |  |  |  | 10.7 |
Total Accrued Revenue |  | $ | 28.6 |  |  | $ | 33.4 |  |  | $ | 48.5 |
Exchange Gas Receivable – Northern Utilities and Fitchburg have gas exchange and storage agreements whereby natural gas purchases during the months of April through October are delivered to a third party. The third party delivers natural gas back to the Company during the months of November through March. The exchange and storage gas volumes are recorded at weighted average cost. The following table shows the components of Exchange Gas Receivable as of June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014.
|  | June 30, |  |  | December 31, |
Exchange Gas Receivable ($ millions) |  | 2015 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2014 |
Northern Utilities |  | $ | 6.7 |  |  | $ | 7.6 |  |  | $ | 14.2 |
Fitchburg |  |  | 0.5 |  |  |  | 0.7 |  |  |  | 0.8 |
Total Exchange Gas Receivable |  | $ | 7.2 |  |  | $ | 8.3 |  |  | $ | 15.0 |
Gas Inventory – The Company uses the weighted average cost methodology to value natural gas inventory. The following table shows the components of Gas Inventory as of June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014.
|  | June 30, |  |  | December 31, |
Gas Inventory ($ millions) |  | 2015 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2014 |
Natural Gas |  | $ | 0.2 |  |  | $ | 0.5 |  |  | $ | 0.8 |
Propane |  |  | 0.2 |  |  |  | 0.1 |  |  |  | 0.2 |
Liquefied Natural Gas & Other |  |  | 0.1 |  |  |  | 0.2 |  |  |  | 0.1 |
Total Gas Inventory |  | $ | 0.5 |  |  | $ | 0.8 |  |  | $ | 1.1 |
Utility Plant – The cost of additions to Utility Plant and the cost of renewals and betterments are capitalized. Cost consists of labor, materials, services and certain indirect construction costs, including an allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC). The costs of current repairs and minor replacements are charged to appropriate operating expense accounts. The original cost of utility plant retired or otherwise disposed of is charged to the accumulated provision for depreciation. The Company includes in its mass asset depreciation rates, which are periodically reviewed as part of its ratemaking proceedings, cost of removal amounts to provide for future negative salvage value. At June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014, the Company estimates that the cost of removal amounts, which are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in Cost of Removal Obligations are $68.1 million, $60.8 million, and $63.8 million, respectively. Regulatory Accounting – The Company’s principal business is the distribution of electricity and natural gas by the three distribution utilities: Unitil Energy, Fitchburg and Northern Utilities. Unitil Energy and Fitchburg are subject to regulation by the FERC. Fitchburg is also regulated by the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (MDPU), Unitil Energy is regulated by the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (NHPUC) and Northern Utilities is regulated by the Maine Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) and NHPUC. Granite State, the Company’s natural gas transmission pipeline, is regulated by the FERC. Accordingly, the Company uses the Regulated Operations guidance as set forth in the FASB Codification. The Company has recorded Regulatory Assets and Regulatory Liabilities which will be recovered from customers, or applied for customer benefit, in accordance with rate provisions approved by the applicable public utility regulatory commission.
|  | June 30, |  |  | December 31, |
Regulatory Assets consist of the following ($ millions) |  | 2015 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2014 |
Retirement Benefits |  | $ | 65.1 |  |  | $ | 42.2 |  |  | $ | 65.1 |
Energy Supply & Other Regulatory Tracker Mechanisms |  |  | 17.4 |  |  |  | 17.7 |  |  |  | 31.0 |
Deferred Storm Charges |  |  | 18.6 |  |  |  | 22.3 |  |  |  | 21.2 |
Environmental |  |  | 10.9 |  |  |  | 10.6 |  |  |  | 11.0 |
Income Taxes |  |  | 9.1 |  |  |  | 10.4 |  |  |  | 9.7 |
Deferred Restructuring Costs |  |  | — |  |  |  | 4.7 |  |  |  | 1.6 |
Other |  |  | 5.8 |  |  |  | 7.5 |  |  |  | 5.8 |
Total Regulatory Assets |  | $ | 126.9 |  |  | $ | 115.4 |  |  | $ | 145.4 |
Less: Current Portion of Regulatory Assets(1) |  |  | 22.6 |  |  |  | 27.3 |  |  |  | 37.8 |
Regulatory Assets – noncurrent |  | $ | 104.3 |  |  | $ | 88.1 |  |  | $ | 107.6 |
(1) | Reflects amounts included in Accrued Revenue, discussed above, on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|  | June 30, |  |  | December 31, |
Regulatory Liabilities consist of the following ($ millions) |  | 2015 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2014 |
Regulatory Tracker Mechanisms |  | $ | 20.2 |  |  | $ | 13.0 |  |  | $ | 8.8 |
Gas Pipeline Refund (Note 6) |  |  | 22.0 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Total Regulatory Liabilities |  |  | 42.2 |  |  |  | 13.0 |  |  | $ | 8.8 |
Less: Current Portion of Regulatory Liabilities |  |  | 31.2 |  |  |  | 13.0 |  |  |  | 8.7 |
Regulatory Liabilities – noncurrent |  | $ | 11.0 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 0.1 |
Generally, the Company receives a return on investment on its regulated assets for which a cash outflow has been made. Regulatory commissions can reach different conclusions about the recovery of costs, which can have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company believes it is probable that its regulated distribution and transmission utilities will recover their investments in long-lived assets, including regulatory assets. If the Company, or a portion of its assets or operations, were to cease meeting the criteria for application of these accounting rules, accounting standards for businesses in general would become applicable and immediate recognition of any previously deferred costs, or a portion of deferred costs, would be required in the year in which the criteria are no longer met, if such deferred costs were not recoverable in the portion of the business that continues to meet the criteria for application of the FASB Codification topic on Regulated Operations. If unable to continue to apply the FASB Codification provisions for Regulated Operations, the Company would be required to apply the provisions for the Discontinuation of Rate-Regulated Accounting included in the FASB Codification. In the Company’s opinion, its regulated operations will be subject to the FASB Codification provisions for Regulated Operations for the foreseeable future. Derivatives – The Company’s regulated energy subsidiaries enter into energy supply contracts to serve their electric and gas customers. The Company follows a procedure for determining whether each contract qualifies as a derivative instrument under the guidance provided by the FASB Codification on Derivatives and Hedging. For each contract, the Company reviews and documents the key terms of the contract. Based on those terms and any additional relevant components of the contract, the Company determines and documents whether the contract qualifies as a derivative instrument as defined in the FASB Codification. The Company has determined that none of its energy supply contracts, other than the regulatory approved hedging program, described below, qualifies as a derivative instrument under the guidance set forth in the FASB Codification. The Company has a regulatory approved hedging program for Northern Utilities designed to fix or cap a portion of its gas supply costs for the coming years of service. Prior to April 2013 Northern Utilities purchased natural gas futures contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) that correspond to associated delivery months. Beginning in April 2013, the hedging program was redesigned and the Company began purchasing call option contracts on NYMEX natural gas futures contracts for future winter period months. As of June 30, 2015, all futures contracts purchased under the prior program design were sold and the hedging portfolio now consists entirely of call option contracts. Any gains or losses resulting from the change in the fair value of these derivatives are passed through to ratepayers directly through Northern Utilities’ Cost of Gas Adjustment Clause. The fair value of these derivatives is determined using Level 2 inputs (valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly), specifically based on the NYMEX closing prices for outstanding contracts as of the balance sheet date. As a result of the ratemaking process, the Company records gains and losses resulting from the change in fair value of the derivatives as regulatory liabilities or assets, then reclassifies these gains or losses into Cost of Gas Sales when the gains and losses are passed through to customers through the Cost of Gas Adjustment Clause. As of June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014 the Company had 2.9 billion, 2.3 billion and 2.4 billion cubic feet (BCF), respectively, outstanding in natural gas futures and options contracts under its hedging program. The tables below show derivatives, which are part of the regulatory approved hedging program, that are not designated as hedging instruments under FASB ASC 815-20. The tables below include disclosure of the derivative assets and liabilities and the recognition of the charges from their corresponding regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively into Cost of Gas Sales. The current and noncurrent portions of these regulatory assets are recorded as Accrued Revenue and Regulatory Assets, respectively, on the Company’s unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets. The current and noncurrent portions of these regulatory liabilities are recorded as Regulatory Liabilities and Other Noncurrent Liabilities, respectively, on the Company’s unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Fair Value Amount of Derivative Assets / Liabilities ($ millions) Offset in Regulatory Liabilities / Assets, as of: |
|  |  |  | Fair Value |
Description |  | Balance Sheet Location |  | June 30, 2015 |  |  | June 30, 2014 |  |  | December 31, 2014 |
Derivative Assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Natural Gas Options Contracts |  | Prepayments and Other |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |
Natural Gas Options Contracts |  | Other Assets |  |  | 0.1 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 0.1 |
Total Derivative Assets |  |  |  | $ | 0.1 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 0.1 |
Derivative Liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Natural Gas Options Contracts |  | Other Current Liabilities |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 0.1 |  |  | $ | — |
Natural Gas Options Contracts |  | Other Noncurrent Liabilities |  |  | — |  |  |  | 0.1 |  |  |  | — |
Total Derivative Liabilities |  |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 0.2 |  |  | $ | — |
|  | Three Months Ended June 30, |  |  | Six Months Ended June 30, |
($ millions) |  | 2015 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |  |  | 2014 |
Amount of Loss / (Gain) Recognized in Regulatory Assets (Liabilities) for Derivatives: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Natural Gas Futures / Options Contracts |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 0.4 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | (0.5 | )
Amount of Loss / (Gain) Reclassified into unaudited Consolidated Statements of Earnings(1): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost of Gas Sales |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | (0.9 | )
(1) | These amounts are offset in the unaudited Consolidated Statements of Earnings with Accrued Revenue and therefore there is no effect on earnings.
Energy Supply Obligations – The following discussion and table summarize the nature and amounts of the items recorded as current and noncurrent Energy Supply Obligations on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|  | June 30, |  |  | December 31, |
Energy Supply Obligations ($ millions) |  | 2015 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2014 |
Current: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Exchange Gas Obligation |  | $ | 6.7 |  |  | $ | 7.6 |  |  | $ | 14.2 |
Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards |  |  | 6.7 |  |  |  | 4.0 |  |  |  | 7.4 |
Power Supply Contract Divestitures |  |  | 0.4 |  |  |  | 0.7 |  |  |  | 0.5 |
Total Energy Supply Obligations – Current |  |  | 13.8 |  |  |  | 12.3 |  |  |  | 22.1 |
Long-Term: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Power Supply Contract Divestitures |  |  | 1.8 |  |  |  | 2.2 |  |  |  | 1.9 |
Total Energy Supply Obligations |  | $ | 15.6 |  |  | $ | 14.5 |  |  | $ | 24.0 |
Exchange Gas Obligation – Northern Utilities enters into gas exchange agreements under which Northern Utilities releases certain natural gas pipeline and storage assets, resells the natural gas storage inventory to an asset manager and subsequently repurchases the inventory over the course of the natural gas heating season at the same price at which it sold the natural gas inventory to the asset manager. The gas inventory related to these agreements is recorded in Exchange Gas Receivable on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets while the corresponding obligations are recorded in Energy Supply Obligations. Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards – Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards (RPS) require retail electricity suppliers, including public utilities, to demonstrate that required percentages of their sales are met with power generated from certain types of resources or technologies. Compliance is demonstrated by purchasing and retiring Renewable Energy Certificates (REC) generated by facilities approved by the state as qualifying for REC treatment. Unitil Energy and Fitchburg purchase RECs in compliance with RPS legislation in New Hampshire and Massachusetts for supply provided to default service customers. RPS compliance costs are a supply cost that is recovered in customer default service rates. Unitil Energy and Fitchburg collect RPS compliance costs from customers throughout the year and demonstrate compliance for each calendar year on the following July 1. Due to timing differences between collection of revenue from customers and payment of REC costs to suppliers, Unitil Energy and Fitchburg typically maintain accrued revenue for RPS compliance which is recorded in Accrued Revenue with a corresponding liability in Energy Supply Obligations on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Fitchburg has a contract for energy procurement with a renewable energy developer which began commercial production in September 2013. Fitchburg will recover its costs under this contract through a regulatory approved cost tracker reconciling rate mechanism. Power Supply Contract Divestitures – As a result of the restructuring of the utility industry in New Hampshire and Massachusetts, Unitil Energy’s and Fitchburg’s customers have the opportunity to purchase their electric or natural gas supplies from third-party suppliers. In connection with the implementation of retail choice, Unitil Power, which formerly functioned as the wholesale power supply provider for Unitil Energy, and Fitchburg divested their long-term power supply contracts through the sale of the entitlements to the electricity sold under those contracts. Unitil Energy and Fitchburg recover in their rates all the costs associated with the divestiture of their power supply portfolios and have secured regulatory approval from the NHPUC and MDPU, respectively, for the recovery of power supply-related stranded costs. The current and noncurrent obligations related to these divestitures are recorded in Energy Supply Obligations and Other Noncurrent Liabilities, respectively, on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets with corresponding regulatory assets recorded in Accrued Revenue (current portion) and Regulatory Assets (long-term portion). Massachusetts Green Communities Act – In compliance with the Massachusetts Green Communities Act, discussed below in Note 6, Regulatory Matters, Fitchburg has entered into long-term renewable contracts for electric energy and/or renewable energy credits. The facility associated with one of these contracts has been constructed and is operating. The other contracts are pending approval by the MDPU as well as subsequent facility construction and operation. These facilities are anticipated to begin operation by the end of 2016. Fitchburg will recover its costs associated with long-term renewable contracts on a fully reconciling basis through a MDPU-approved cost recovery mechanism. Recently Issued Pronouncements – On April 7, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03 which requires entities to present debt issuance costs related to a debt liability as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability on the balance sheet as opposed to being presented as a deferred charge. The effective date of this pronouncement is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact that this new guidance will have on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The effective date of this pronouncement is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date. The Company is evaluating the impact that this new guidance will have on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. Other than ASU 2015-03 and ASU 2014-09, there are no recently issued pronouncements that the Company has not already adopted or that have a material impact on the Company. Subsequent Events – The Company has evaluated all events or transactions through the date of this filing. During this period the Company did not have any material subsequent events that impacted its unaudited consolidated financial statements.

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for all significant accounting policies of the reporting entity. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 6 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=51655414&loc=d3e18861-107790 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 3 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=51655414&loc=d3e18780-107790 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=51655414&loc=d3e18726-107790 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=51655414&loc=d3e18743-107790 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 5 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=51655414&loc=d3e18854-107790 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_SignificantAccountingPoliciesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration