20-F 1 d527345d20f.htm FORM 20-F

##### Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 20-F

¨ | REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED ON DECEMBER 31, 2012

OR

¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO

OR

¨ | SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 001-35052

Adecoagro S.A.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

N/A

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

13-15 Avenue de la Liberté

L-1931 Luxembourg

R.C.S. Luxembourg B 153 681

+352 2689-8213

(Address of principal executive offices)

Abdelhakim Chagaar

13-15, avenue de la Liberté

L — 1931 Luxembourg

Email: abdelhakim.chagaar@atcgroup.com

Tel: +352.2689.0112

(Name, Telephone, E-Mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class |  | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Shares |  | New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

None

The number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital stock

as of December 31, 2012:

122,220,606 Common Shares, par value $1.50 per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act Yes ¨ No x

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). (*) Yes ¨ No ¨

(*) | This requirement does not apply to the registrant in respect of this filing.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨ |  | Accelerated filer x |  | Non-accelerated filer ¨

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP ¨ |  | International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board x |  | Other ¨

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the Registrant has elected to follow: Item 17 ¨ Item 18 ¨

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

##### Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS |  |  | iv |
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION |  |  | v |
PART I |  |  | 1 |
Item 1. |  | Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers |  |  | 1 |
Item 2. |  | Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable |  |  | 1 |
Item 3. |  | Key Information |  |  | 1 |
|  | A. |  | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |  |  | 1 |
|  | B. |  | CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS |  |  | 9 |
|  | C. |  | REASONS FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS |  |  | 9 |
|  | D. |  | RISK FACTORS |  |  | 9 |
Item 4. |  | Information on the Company |  |  | 37 |
|  | A. |  | HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY |  |  | 37 |
|  | B. |  | BUSINESS OVERVIEW |  |  | 41 |
|  | C. |  | ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE |  |  | 86 |
|  | D. |  | PROPERTY, PLANTS AND EQUIPMENT |  |  | 86 |
Item 4B. |  | Unresolved Staff Comments |  |  | 86 |
Item 5. |  | Operating and Financial Review and Prospects |  |  | 86 |
|  | A. |  | OPERATING RESULTS |  |  | 89 |
|  | B. |  | LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES |  |  | 124 |
|  | C. |  | RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, PATENTS AND LICENSES, ETC. |  |  | 131 |
|  | D. |  | TREND INFORMATION |  |  | 131 |
|  | E. |  | OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS |  |  | 131 |
|  | F. |  | TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS |  |  | 131 |
|  | G. |  | SAFE HARBOR |  |  | 132 |
Item 6. |  | Directors, Senior Management and Employees |  |  | 132 |
|  | A. |  | DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT |  |  | 132 |
|  | B. |  | COMPENSATION |  |  | 136 |
|  | C. |  | BOARD PRACTICES |  |  | 136 |
|  | D. |  | EMPLOYEES |  |  | 139 |
|  | E. |  | SHARE OWNERSHIP |  |  | 139 |
Item 7. |  | Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions |  |  | 142 |
|  | A. |  | MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS |  |  | 142 |
|  | B. |  | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |  |  | 143 |
|  | C. |  | INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL |  |  | 145 |

i

##### Table of Contents

Item 8. |  | Financial Information |  |  | 145 |
|  | A. |  | CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION. |  |  | 145 |
|  | B. |  | SIGNIFICANT CHANGES |  |  | 146 |
Item 9. |  | The Offer and Listing |  |  | 146 |
|  | A. |  | OFFER AND LISTING DETAILS |  |  | 146 |
|  | B. |  | PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION |  |  | 146 |
|  | C. |  | MARKETS |  |  | 146 |
|  | D. |  | SELLING SHAREHOLDERS |  |  | 146 |
|  | E. |  | DILUTION |  |  | 146 |
|  | F. |  | EXPENSES OF THE ISSUE |  |  | 146 |
Item 10. |  | Additional Information |  |  | 147 |
|  | A. |  | SHARE CAPITAL |  |  | 147 |
|  | B. |  | MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION |  |  | 147 |
|  | C. |  | MATERIAL CONTRACTS |  |  | 155 |
|  | D. |  | EXCHANGE CONTROLS |  |  | 155 |
|  | E. |  | TAXATION |  |  | 158 |
|  | F. |  | DIVIDENDS AND PAYING AGENTS |  |  | 164 |
|  | G. |  | STATEMENT BY EXPERTS |  |  | 165 |
|  | H. |  | DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY |  |  | 165 |
|  | I. |  | SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION |  |  | 165 |
Item 11. |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |  |  | 165 |
Item 12. |  | Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities |  |  | 165 |
|  | A. |  | DEBT SECURITIES |  |  | 165 |
|  | B. |  | WARRANTS AND RIGHTS |  |  | 165 |
|  | C. |  | OTHER SECURITIES |  |  | 165 |
|  | D. |  | AMERICAN DEPOSITORY SHARES |  |  | 165 |
PART II |  |  | 165 |
Item 13. |  | Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies |  |  | 165 |
Item 14. |  | Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds |  |  | 165 |
Item 15. |  | Controls and Procedures |  |  | 166 |
Item 16A. |  | Audit Committee Financial Expert |  |  | 167 |
Item 16B. |  | Code of Ethics |  |  | 167 |
Item 16C. |  | Principal Accountant Fees and Services |  |  | 167 |
Item 16D. |  | Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees |  |  | 167 |
Item 16E. |  | Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers |  |  | 168 |
Item 16F. |  | Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant |  |  | 168 |
Item 16G. |  | Corporate Governance |  |  | 168 |
Item 16H. |  | Mine Safety Disclosure |  |  | 170 |

ii

##### Table of Contents

PART III |  |  | 170 |
Item 17. |  | Financial Statements |  |  | 170 |
Item 18. |  | Financial Statements. |  |  | 170 |
Item 19. |  | Exhibits |  |  | 170 |

iii

##### Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report contains forward-looking statements that are based on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about us and our industry. These forward-looking statements can be identified by words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “is/are likely to,” “may,” “plan,” “should,” “would,” or other similar expressions. The forward-looking statements included in this annual report relate to, among others:

| • |  | our business prospects and future results of operations;

| • |  | weather and other natural phenomena;

| • |  | developments in, or changes to, the laws, regulations and governmental policies governing our business, including limitations on ownership of farmland by foreign entities in certain jurisdiction in which we operate, environmental laws and regulations;

| • |  | the implementation of our business strategy, including our development of the Ivinhema mill and other current projects;

| • |  | our plans relating to acquisitions, joint ventures, strategic alliances or divestitures;

| • |  | the implementation of our financing strategy and capital expenditure plan;

| • |  | the maintenance of our relationships with customers;

| • |  | the competitive nature of the industries in which we operate;

| • |  | the cost and availability of financing;

| • |  | future demand for the commodities we produce;

| • |  | international prices for commodities;

| • |  | the condition of our land holdings;

| • |  | the development of the logistics and infrastructure for transportation of our products in the countries where we operate;

| • |  | the performance of the South American and world economies;

| • |  | the relative value of the Brazilian Real, the Argentine Peso, and the Uruguayan Peso compared to other currencies; and

| • |  | the factors discussed under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in this annual report.

These forward-looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties. Although we believe that our expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, our expectations may turn out to be incorrect. Our actual results could be materially different from our expectations. In light of the risks and uncertainties described above, the estimates and forward-looking statements discussed in this annual report might not occur, and our future results and our performance may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements due to, inclusive, but not limited to, the factors mentioned above. Because of these uncertainties, you should not make any investment decision based on these estimates and forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements made in this annual report relate only to events or information as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

iv

##### Table of Contents

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

Certain Defined Terms

In this annual report, unless otherwise specified or if the context so requires:

| • |  | References to the terms “Adecoagro S.A.,” “Adecoagro,” “we,” “us,” “our,” “Company” and “our company” refer to, Adecoagro S.A., a corporation organized under the form of a société anonyme under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, and its subsidiaries, except in the case of historical financial and operating information and results where we are referring to IFH LLC and unless otherwise indicated.

| • |  | References to “IFH” and “IFH LP” mean International Farmland Holdings, LP, a limited partnership (previously International Farmland Holdings, LLC, or IFH LLC) organized under the laws of Delaware, and its subsidiaries.

| • |  | References to “Adecoagro LP” mean Adecoagro, LP, a limited partnership (previously Adecoagro, LLC) organized under the laws of Delaware, and its subsidiaries.

| • |  | References to “$,” “US$,” “U.S. dollars” and “dollars” are to U.S. dollars.

| • |  | References to “Argentine Pesos,” “Pesos” or “Ps.” are to Argentine Pesos, the official currency of Argentina.

| • |  | References to “Brazilian Real,” “Real,” “Reais” or “R$” are to the Brazilian Real, the official currency of Brazil.

| • |  | Unless stated otherwise, references to “sales” are to the consolidated sales of manufactured products and services rendered plus sales of agricultural produce and biological assets.

| • |  | References to “IFRS” are International Financial Reporting Standards issued by the the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and the interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”), together “IFRS.”

Financial Statements

Background

As part of a corporate reorganization (the “Reorganization”), Adecoagro, a Luxembourg corporation under the form of a société anonyme, was formed as a holding company for IFH for the purpose, among others, of facilitating the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of our common shares, completed on January 28, 2011. Before the IPO, Adecoagro had not engaged in any business or other activities except in connection with its formation and the Reorganization. For an additional discussion of the Reorganization, see “Item 4. Information of the Company—A. History and Development of the Company—History.”

The Reorganization was limited to entities which were all under the control of the same shareholder group and was implemented in part to facilitate the IPO. In accordance with IFRS, the Reorganization did not qualify as a business combination under common control; rather, it was a simple reorganization of the capital of IFH. The Reorganization was completed on October 30, 2010. In accordance with IFRS, the Reorganization was retroactively reflected in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010. Therefore, all financial and other information herein relating to December, 2010 and 2009 are presented using the historical values from the consolidated financial statements of IFH. However, the issued share capital reflects that of Adecoagro as of the Reorganization date.

On January 10, 2011, our board of directors voted in favor of a proposal to change the nominal value of the equity shares of the Company from the nominal value of $1 each to the nominal value of US$1.50 each (the “Reverse Stock Split”). This proposal was approved at a duly convened extraordinary general meeting of shareholders held on January 24, 2011, pursuant to Luxembourg law, which reduced our total shares outstanding

v

##### Table of Contents

from 119,999,997 shares to 79,999,985 shares. On February 2, 2011, the Company completed its IPO when it increased its total shares outstanding from 79,999,985 shares to 120,069,222, after giving effect to the exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option on February 11, 2011.

During 2011, we contributed the net proceeds of the IPO to increase our interest in IFH from 98% to 98.64%.

During 2012, we issued, in a series of transactions, 1,654,752 shares to certain limited partners of IFH in exchange for their residual interest in IFH, totaling 1.3595%, thereby increasing our interest in IFH to approximately 100%. The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010 and for the years then ended included in this annual report have been prepared in accordance with IFRS. All IFRS effective at the time of preparing the consolidated financial statements have been applied. The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 and for the years then ended are hereinafter referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”.

Non-IFRS Financial Measures

We present Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA, Adjusted Segment EBITDA, Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT in this annual report as supplemental measures of performance of our company and of each operating segment, respectively, that are not required by, or presented in accordance with IFRS. Our Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA equals the sum of our Adjusted Segment EBITDA for each of our operating segments. We define “Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA” as consolidated net profit (loss) for the year, as applicable, before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, foreign exchange gains or losses, other net financial expenses and unrealized changes in fair value of our long-term biological assets, primarily our sugarcane and coffee plantations and cattle stocks. We define “Adjusted Segment EBITDA” for each of our operating segments as the segment’s share of consolidated profit (loss) from operations before financing and taxation for the year, as applicable, before depreciation and amortization and unrealized changes in fair value of our long-term biological assets. We believe that Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA are important measures of operating performance for our company and each operating segment, respectively, because they allow investors and others to evaluate and compare our consolidated operating results and to evaluate and compare the operating performance of our segments, respectively, including our return on capital and operating efficiencies, from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure (interest expense from our outstanding debt), asset base (depreciation and amortization), tax consequences (income taxes), unrealized changes in fair value of biological assets (a significant non-cash gain or loss to our consolidated statements of income following IAS 41 accounting), foreign exchange gains or losses and other financial expenses. Other companies may calculate Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA differently, and therefore our Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA are not measures of financial performance under IFRS, and should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to consolidated net profit (loss), cash flows from operating activities, segment’s profit from operations before financing and taxation and other measures determined in accordance with IFRS. Items excluded from Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA are significant and necessary components to the operations of our business, and, therefore, Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA should only be used as a supplemental measure of our company’s operating performance, and of each of our operating segments, respectively. We also believe Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA are useful for securities analysts, investors and others to evaluate the financial performance of our company and other companies in the agricultural industry. These non-IFRS measures should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for or superior to, the information contained in either our statements of income or segment information.

Our Adjusted Consolidated EBIT equals the sum of our Adjusted Segment EBITs for each of our operating segments. We define “Adjusted Consolidated EBIT” as consolidated net profit (loss) for the year, as applicable, before interest expense, income taxes, foreign exchange gains or losses, other net financial expenses and unrealized changes in fair value of our long-term biological assets, primarily our sugarcane and coffee plantations and cattle stocks. We define “Adjusted Segment EBIT” for each of our operating segments as the segment’s share of consolidated profit from operations before financing and taxation for the year, as applicable, before unrealized changes in fair value of our long-term biological assets. We believe that Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT are important measures of operating performance, for our company and each operating segment,

vi

##### Table of Contents

respectively, because they allow investors and others to evaluate and compare our consolidated operating results and to evaluate and compare the operating performance of our segments, from period to period by including the impact of depreciable fixed assets and removing the impact of our capital structure (interest expense from our outstanding debt), tax consequences (income taxes), unrealized changes in fair value of biological assets (a significant non-cash gain or loss to our consolidated statements of income following IAS 41 accounting), foreign exchange gains or losses and other financial expenses. Other companies may calculate Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT differently, and therefore our Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT are not measures of financial performance under IFRS, and should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to consolidated net profit (loss), cash flows from operating activities, segment’s profit from operations before financing and taxation and other measures determined in accordance with IFRS. Items excluded from Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT are significant and necessary components to the operations of our business, and, therefore, Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT should only be used as a supplemental measure of the operating performance of our company, and of each of our operating segments, respectively. We also believe Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT are useful for securities analysts, investors and others to evaluate the financial performance of our company and other companies in the agricultural industry.

Fiscal Year and Harvest Year

Our fiscal year begins on January 1 and ends on December 31 of each year. However, our production is based on the harvest year for each of our crops, rice and coffee. A harvest year varies according to the crop, rice or coffee plant and to the climate in which it is grown. Due to the geographic diversity of our farms, the planting period for a given crop, rice or coffee may start earlier on one farm than on another, causing differences in their respective harvesting periods. The presentation of production volume (tons) and product area (hectares) in this annual report, in respect of the harvest years for each of our crops, rice and coffee, starts with the first day of the planting period at the first farm to start planting that harvest year and continues to the last day of the harvesting period of the respective crop, rice or coffee on the last farm to finish harvesting that harvest year, as shown in the table below.

Product area for cattle is presented on a harvest year basis given that land utilized for cattle operations is linked to our farming operations and use of farmland during a harvest year. Production volumes for dairy and cattle operations are presented on a fiscal year basis. On the other hand, production volumes and product area in our sugar, ethanol and energy business are presented on a fiscal year basis.

The financial results for all of our products are presented on a fiscal year basis.

vii

##### Table of Contents

Certain Weight Units and Measures in the Agricultural Business

Weight units and measures used in agriculture vary according to the crop and producing country. In order to permit comparability of our operating data with operating data from the international markets, the following table sets forth key weight units and measures used in the agriculture industry:

Agricultural weight units and measures |  |  |  |
1 metric ton |  | 1,000 kg |  | 1.102 U.S. (short) tons
1 cubic meter |  | 1,000 liters |  |
1 kilogram (kg) |  | 2.20462 pounds |  |
1 pound |  | 0.45359 kg |  |
1 acre |  | 0.40469 hectares |  |
1 hectare (ha) |  | 2.47105 acres |  |
Soybean and Wheat |  |  |  |
1 bushel of soybean |  | 60 pounds |  | 27.2155 kg
1 bag of soybean |  | 60 kg |  | 2.20462 bushels
1 bushel/acre |  | 67.25 kg/ha |  |
1.00 U.S. dollar/bushel |  | 2.2046 U.S. dollar/bag |  |
Corn |  |  |  |
1 bushel of corn |  | 56 pounds |  | 25.4012 kg
1 bag of corn |  | 60 kg |  | 2.36210 bushels
1 bushel/acre |  | 62.77 kg/ha |  |
1.00 U.S. dollar/bushel |  | 2.3621 U.S. dollar/bag |  |
Cotton |  |  |  |
1 bale |  | 480 pounds |  | 217.72 kg
1 arroba |  | 14.68 kg |  |
Coffee |  |  |  |
1 bag of coffee |  | 60 kg |  | 132.28 pounds
1.00 US$ cents/pound |  | 1.3228 U.S. dollar/bag |  |
Dairy |  |  |  |
1 liter |  | 0.264 gallons |  | 2.273 pounds
1 gallon |  | 3.785 liters |  | 8.604 pounds
1 lbs |  | 0.440 liters |  | 0.116 gallons
1.00 U.S. dollar/liter |  | 43.995 U.S. dollar/cwt |  | 3.785 U.S. dollar/gallon
1.00 U.S. dollar/cwt |  | 0.023 U.S. dollar/liter |  | 0.086 U.S. dollar/gallon
1.00 U.S. dollar/gallon |  | 0.264 U.S. dollar/liter |  | 11.622 U.S. dollar/cwt
Sugar & Ethanol |  |  |  |
1 kg of TRS equivalent |  | 0.95 kg of VHP Sugar |  | 0.59 liters of Hydrated Ethanol
1.00 US$ cents/pound |  | 22.04 U.S. dollar/ton |  |

Presentation of Information — Market Data and Forecasts

This annual report is based on information provided by us and by third-party sources that we believe are reliable, including data related to the economic conditions in the markets in which we operate. Unless otherwise indicated, information in this annual report concerning economic conditions is based on publicly available information from third-party sources which we believe to be reasonable. The economic conditions in the markets in which we operate may deteriorate, and those economies may not grow at the rates projected by market data, or at all. The deterioration of the economic conditions in the markets in which we operate may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and the market price of our common shares.

Rounding

We have made rounding adjustments to reach some of the figures included in this annual report. Accordingly, numerical figures shown as totals in some tables may not be an arithmetic aggregation of the figures that preceded them.

viii

##### Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. | Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

Not applicable.

Item 2. | Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

Not applicable.

Item 3. | Key Information

| A. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following tables present selected historical consolidated financial data of Adecoagro for the periods indicated below. We have derived the selected historical statement of income and cash flow data for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 and the selected historical statement of financial position data as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 from our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. The historical results for any prior period presented are not necessarily indicative of our results to be expected for any future period.

We have derived the selected historical statement of income and cash flow data for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the selected historical statement of financial position data as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 from our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 which are not included in this annual report (the “2011 consolidated financial statements”).

We have derived the selected historical statement of income and cash flow data for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the selected historical statement of financial position data as of December 31, 2008 from our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 which are not included in this annual report.

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS . All IFRS effective at the time of preparing the consolidated financial statements have been applied.

You should read the information contained in these tables in conjunction with “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”, “Item 8. Financial Information”, “Item 18. Financial Statements” and the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this annual report.

1

##### Table of Contents

|  | For the Year Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |  |  | 2008 |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
Statement of Income Data: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Sales of manufactured products and services rendered |  |  | 379,526 |  |  |  | 365,857 |  |  |  | 294,529 |  |  |  | 183,386 |  |  |  | 117,173 |
Cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered |  |  | (263,978 | ) |  |  | (237,404 | ) |  |  | (219,201 | ) |  |  | (180,083 | ) |  |  | (105,583 | )
Gross profit from manufacturing activities |  |  | 115,548 |  |  |  | 128,453 |  |  |  | 75,328 |  |  |  | 3,303 |  |  |  | 11,590 |
Sale of agricultural produce and biological assets |  |  | 225,174 |  |  |  | 182,227 |  |  |  | 131,738 |  |  |  | 130,217 |  |  |  | 127,036 |
Cost of agricultural produce sold and direct agricultural selling expenses(l) |  |  | (225,174 | ) |  |  | (182,227 | ) |  |  | (131,738 | ) |  |  | (130,217 | ) |  |  | (127,036 | )
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce |  |  | 16,643 |  |  |  | 86,811 |  |  |  | (30,528 | ) |  |  | 71,668 |  |  |  | 61,000 |
Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest |  |  | 16,004 |  |  |  | 10,523 |  |  |  | 7,999 |  |  |  | 12,787 |  |  |  | 1,261 |
Gross profit/ (loss) from agricultural activities |  |  | 32,647 |  |  |  | 97,334 |  |  |  | (22,529 | ) |  |  | 84,455 |  |  |  | 62,261 |
Margin on manufacturing and agricultural activities before operating expenses |  |  | 148,195 |  |  |  | 225,787 |  |  |  | 52,799 |  |  |  | 87,758 |  |  |  | 73,851 |
General and administrative expenses |  |  | (57,691 | ) |  |  | (65,142 | ) |  |  | (56,562 | ) |  |  | (52,393 | ) |  |  | (45,633 | )
Selling expenses |  |  | (58,602 | ) |  |  | (59,404 | ) |  |  | (52,528 | ) |  |  | (31,169 | ) |  |  | (24,496 | )
Other operating income, net |  |  | 29,818 |  |  |  | 24,581 |  |  |  | 18,224 |  |  |  | 13,071 |  |  |  | 17,323 |
Excess of fair value of net assets acquired over cost |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,227 |
Share of loss of joint ventures |  |  | (2,761 | ) |  |  | (1,034 | ) |  |  | (50 | ) |  |  | (294 | ) |  |  | (838 | )
Profit / (loss) from operations before financing and taxation |  |  | 58,959 |  |  |  | 124,788 |  |  |  | (38,117 | ) |  |  | 16,973 |  |  |  | 21,434 |
Finance income |  |  | 11,538 |  |  |  | 9,132 |  |  |  | 16,559 |  |  |  | 11,553 |  |  |  | 2,552 |
Finance costs |  |  | (66,654 | ) |  |  | (62,341 | ) |  |  | (39,496 | ) |  |  | (34,216 | ) |  |  | (50,860 | )
Financial results, net |  |  | (55,116 | ) |  |  | (53,209 | ) |  |  | (22,937 | ) |  |  | (22,663 | ) |  |  | (48,308 | )
Profit/ (loss) before income tax |  |  | 3,843 |  |  |  | 71,579 |  |  |  | (61,054 | ) |  |  | (5,690 | ) |  |  | (26,874 | )
Income tax benefit/(expense) |  |  | 5,436 |  |  |  | (14,662 | ) |  |  | 16,263 |  |  |  | 5,415 |  |  |  | 10,449 |
Profit/ (loss) for the year |  |  | 9,279 |  |  |  | 56,917 |  |  |  | (44,791 | ) |  |  | (275 | ) |  |  | (16,425 | )
Attributable to: Equity holders of the parent |  |  | 9,397 |  |  |  | 56,018 |  |  |  | (43,904 | ) |  |  | (260 | ) |  |  | (18,947 | )
Non-controlling interest |  |  | (118 | ) |  |  | 899 |  |  |  | (887 | ) |  |  | (15 | ) |  |  | 2,522 |
Earnings/ (Losses) per share for (loss)/profit attributable to the equity holders of the parent during the year: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  |  | 0.077 |  |  |  | 0.479 |  |  |  | (0.549 | ) |  |  | (0.003 | ) |  |  | (0.253 | )
Diluted |  |  | 0.077 |  |  |  | 0.475 |  |  |  | (0.549 | ) |  |  | (0.003 | ) |  |  | (0.253 | )

2

##### Table of Contents

|  | For the Year Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |  |  | 2008 |
Cash Flow Data: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net cash generated from/ (used in) operating activities |  |  | 67,823 |  |  |  | 56,586 |  |  |  | 60,221 |  |  |  | (20,010 | ) |  |  | (5,115 | )
Net cash used in investing activities |  |  | (300,215 | ) |  |  | (140,493 | ) |  |  | (111,725 | ) |  |  | (114,386 | ) |  |  | (188,515 | )
Net cash generated from financing activities |  |  | 133,508 |  |  |  | 360,792 |  |  |  | 46,545 |  |  |  | 130,250 |  |  |  | 196,888 |
Other Financial Data: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited)(2) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Crops |  |  | 34,313 |  |  |  | 42,563 |  |  |  | 33,613 |  |  |  | 21,120 |  |  |  | 34,040 |
Rice |  |  | 4,943 |  |  |  | 6,639 |  |  |  | 7,121 |  |  |  | 13,244 |  |  |  | 13,966 |
Dairy |  |  | (2,402 | ) |  |  | 3,426 |  |  |  | 2,649 |  |  |  | 484 |  |  |  | (2,159 | )
Coffee |  |  | 161 |  |  |  | 1,285 |  |  |  | (2,854 | ) |  |  | (3,550 | ) |  |  | (1,693 | )
Cattle |  |  | 4,119 |  |  |  | 4,686 |  |  |  | 4,369 |  |  |  | 1,525 |  |  |  | (761 | )
Farming subtotal |  |  | 41,134 |  |  |  | 58,599 |  |  |  | 44,898 |  |  |  | 32,823 |  |  |  | 43,393 |
Ethanol, sugar and energy |  |  | 97,505 |  |  |  | 109,520 |  |  |  | 51,735 |  |  |  | (26,903 | ) |  |  | (6,979 | )
Land transformation |  |  | 27,513 |  |  |  | 8,832 |  |  |  | 20,837 |  |  |  | 18,839 |  |  |  | 15,201 |
Corporate |  |  | (25,442 | ) |  |  | (26,885 | ) |  |  | (22,353 | ) |  |  | (22,262 | ) |  |  | (23,077 | )
Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA |  |  | 140,710 |  |  |  | 150,066 |  |  |  | 95,117 |  |  |  | 2,497 |  |  |  | 28,539 |

(1) | Consists of two components: (i) the cost of our agricultural produce and/or biological assets sold as appropriate plus (ii) in the case of agricultural produce, the direct costs of selling, including but not limited to, transportation costs, export taxes and other levies. The cost of our agricultural produce sold represents the recognition as an expense of our agricultural produce held in inventory valued at net realizable value. The cost of our biological assets and/or agricultural produce sold at the point of harvest represents the recognition as an expense of our biological assets and/or agricultural produce measured at fair value less costs to sell, generally representing the applicable quoted market price at the time of sale. Accordingly, the line item “Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets” is equal to the line item “Cost of agricultural produce plus direct agricultural selling expenses.” See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Biological Assets and Agricultural Produce.”

(2) | See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information” for the definitions of Adjusted Segment EBITDA and Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and reconciliation table below.

|  | As of December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |  |  | 2008 |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
Statement of Financial Position Data: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Biological assets |  |  | 298,136 |  |  |  | 239,600 |  |  |  | 186,757 |  |  |  | 230,454 |  |  |  | 125,948 |
Inventories |  |  | 95,321 |  |  |  | 96,147 |  |  |  | 57,170 |  |  |  | 57,902 |  |  |  | 61,221 |
Property, plant and equipment, net |  |  | 880,897 |  |  |  | 759,696 |  |  |  | 751,992 |  |  |  | 682,878 |  |  |  | 571,419 |
Total assets |  |  | 1,777,955 |  |  |  | 1,700,695 |  |  |  | 1,320,444 |  |  |  | 1,239,717 |  |  |  | 1,028,105 |
Non-current borrowings |  |  | 354,249 |  |  |  | 203,409 |  |  |  | 250,672 |  |  |  | 203,134 |  |  |  | 4,099 |
Total borrowings |  |  | 539,133 |  |  |  | 360,705 |  |  |  | 389,472 |  |  |  | 306,781 |  |  |  | 228,313 |
Share Capital |  |  | 183,331 |  |  |  | 180,800 |  |  |  | 120,000 |  |  |  | 120,000 |  |  |  | 112,421 |
Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent |  |  | 1,025,978 |  |  |  | 1,079,876 |  |  |  | 708,532 |  |  |  | 741,934 |  |  |  | 581,159 |
Non-controlling interest |  |  | 65 |  |  |  | 14,993 |  |  |  | 14,570 |  |  |  | 15,222 |  |  |  | 57,269 |
Number of shares (1) |  |  | 122,221 |  |  |  | 120,533 |  |  |  | 80,000 |  |  |  | 80,000 |  |  |  | 74,947 |

(1) | After giving effect to the Reorganization and the Reserve Stock Split.

3

##### Table of Contents

The following tables show a reconciliation of our segments’ profit / (loss) from operations before financing and taxation, the most directly comparable IFRS financial measure, to Adjusted Segment EBITDA, and a reconciliation of our net profit (loss) for the year, the most directly comparable IFRS financial measure, to Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA:

|  | As of December 31, 2012 |
|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Farming Subtotal |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Land Trans- formation |  |  | Corporate |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Profit/(Loss) from |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Operations Before Financing and Taxation |  |  | 32,240 |  |  |  | 1,120 |  |  |  | (3,183 | ) |  |  | (3,041 | ) |  |  | 3,930 |  |  |  | 31,066 |  |  |  | 25,822 |  |  |  | 27,513 |  |  |  | (25,442 | ) |  |  | 58,959 |
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of “long term” biological assets(l) (unrealized) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (115 | ) |  |  | 2,615 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,500 |  |  |  | 24,783 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 27,283 |
Adjusted Segment EBIT (unaudited)(2) |  |  | 32,240 |  |  |  | 1,120 |  |  |  | (3,298 | ) |  |  | (426 | ) |  |  | 3,930 |  |  |  | 33,566 |  |  |  | 50,605 |  |  |  | 27,513 |  |  |  | (25,442 | ) |  |  | 86,242 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 2,073 |  |  |  | 3,823 |  |  |  | 896 |  |  |  | 587 |  |  |  | 189 |  |  |  | 7,568 |  |  |  | 46,900 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54,468 |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited)(2) |  |  | 34,313 |  |  |  | 4,943 |  |  |  | (2,402 | ) |  |  | 161 |  |  |  | 4,119 |  |  |  | 41,134 |  |  |  | 97,505 |  |  |  | 27,513 |  |  |  | (25,442 | ) |  |  | 140,710 |
Reconciliation to Profit |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Profit for the year |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9,279 |
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of “long term” biological assets(l) (unrealized) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27,283 |
Income tax(expense) / benefit |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (5,436 | )
Interest expense, net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16,423 |
Foreign exchange, net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26,080 |
Other financial results, net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12,613 |
Adjusted Consolidated EBIT (unaudited)(2) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 86,242 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54,468 |
Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (unaudited)(2) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 140,710 |

4

##### Table of Contents

|  | As of December 31, 2011 |
|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Farming Subtotal |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Land Trans- formation |  |  | Corporate |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Profit/(Loss) from |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Operations Before Financing and Taxation |  |  | 41,094 |  |  |  | 3,547 |  |  |  | 4,329 |  |  |  | (639 | ) |  |  | 4,460 |  |  |  | 52,791 |  |  |  | 90,050 |  |  |  | 8,832 |  |  |  | (26,885 | ) |  |  | 124,788 |
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of “long term” biological assets(l) (unrealized) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,503 | ) |  |  | 1,394 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (109 | ) |  |  | (8,797 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (8,906 | )
Adjusted Segment EBIT (unaudited)(2) |  |  | 41,094 |  |  |  | 3,547 |  |  |  | 2,826 |  |  |  | 755 |  |  |  | 4,460 |  |  |  | 52,682 |  |  |  | 81,253 |  |  |  | 8,832 |  |  |  | (26,885 | ) |  |  | 115,882 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 1,469 |  |  |  | 3,105 |  |  |  | 600 |  |  |  | 530 |  |  |  | 226 |  |  |  | 5,930 |  |  |  | 28,254 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 34,184 |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited)(2) |  |  | 42,563 |  |  |  | 6,652 |  |  |  | 3,426 |  |  |  | 1,285 |  |  |  | 4,686 |  |  |  | 58,612 |  |  |  | 109,507 |  |  |  | 8,832 |  |  |  | (26,885 | ) |  |  | 150,066 |
Reconciliation to Profit |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Profit for the year |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 56,917 |
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of “long term” biological assets(l) (unrealized) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (8,906 | )
Income tax(expense) / benefit |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14,662 |
Interest expense, net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25,998 |
Foreign exchange, net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12,683 |
Other financial results, net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14,528 |
Adjusted Consolidated EBIT (unaudited)(2) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 115,882 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34,184 |
Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (unaudited)(2) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 150,066 |

5

##### Table of Contents

|  | As of December 31, 2010 |
|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Farming Subtotal |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Land Trans- formation |  |  | Corporate |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Profit/(Loss) from |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Operations Before Financing and Taxation |  |  | 31,902 |  |  |  | 5,041 |  |  |  | 5,836 |  |  |  | (5,753 | ) |  |  | 4,000 |  |  |  | 41,026 |  |  |  | (77,627 | ) |  |  | 20,837 |  |  |  | (22,353 | ) |  |  | (38,117 | )
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of “long term” biological assets(l) (unrealized) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (3,610 | ) |  |  | 2,450 |  |  |  | 36 |  |  |  | (1,124 | ) |  |  | 96,795 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 95,671 |
Adjusted Segment EBIT (unaudited)(2) |  |  | 31,902 |  |  |  | 5,041 |  |  |  | 2,226 |  |  |  | (3,303 | ) |  |  | 4,036 |  |  |  | 39,902 |  |  |  | 19,168 |  |  |  | 20,837 |  |  |  | (22,353 | ) |  |  | 57,554 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 1,711 |  |  |  | 2,080 |  |  |  | 423 |  |  |  | 449 |  |  |  | 333 |  |  |  | 4,996 |  |  |  | 32,567 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 37,563 |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited)(2) |  |  | 33,613 |  |  |  | 7,121 |  |  |  | 2,649 |  |  |  | (2,854 | ) |  |  | 4,369 |  |  |  | 44,898 |  |  |  | 51,735 |  |  |  | 20,837 |  |  |  | (22,353 | ) |  |  | 95,117 |
Reconciliation to (Loss) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(Loss) for the year |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (44,791 | )
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of “long term” biological assets(l) (unrealized) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 95,671 |
Income tax benefit |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (16,263 | )
Interest expense, net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33,028 |
Foreign exchange, net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (7,324 | )
Other financial results, net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2,767 | )
Adjusted Consolidated EBIT (unaudited)(2) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 57,554 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 37,563 |
Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (unaudited)(2) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 95,117 |

6

##### Table of Contents

|  | As of December 31, 2009 |
|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Farming Subtotal |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Land Trans- formation |  |  | Corporate |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Profit/(Loss) from Operations Before Financing and Taxation |  |  | 19,054 |  |  |  | 11,792 |  |  |  | 113 |  |  |  | (16,782 | ) |  |  | 1,299 |  |  |  | 15,476 |  |  |  | 4,920 |  |  |  | 18,839 |  |  |  | (22,262 | ) |  |  | 16,973 |
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of “long term” biological assets(l)(unrealized) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (32 | ) |  |  | 12,662 |  |  |  | (127 | ) |  |  | 12,503 |  |  |  | (57,335 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (44,832 | )
Adjusted Segment EBIT (unaudited)(2) |  |  | 19,054 |  |  |  | 11,792 |  |  |  | 81 |  |  |  | (4,120 | ) |  |  | 1,172 |  |  |  | 27,979 |  |  |  | (52,415 | ) |  |  | 18,839 |  |  |  | (22,262 | ) |  |  | (27,859 | )
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 2,066 |  |  |  | 1,452 |  |  |  | 403 |  |  |  | 570 |  |  |  | 353 |  |  |  | 4,844 |  |  |  | 25,512 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 30,356 |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited)(2) |  |  | 21,120 |  |  |  | 13,244 |  |  |  | 484 |  |  |  | (3,550 | ) |  |  | 1,525 |  |  |  | 32,823 |  |  |  | (26,903 | ) |  |  | 18,839 |  |  |  | (22,262 | ) |  |  | 2,497 |
Reconciliation to (Loss) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(Loss) for the year |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (275 | )
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of “long term” biological assets(l) (unrealized) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (44,832 | )
Income tax benefit |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (5,415 | )
Interest expense, net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27,750 |
Foreign exchange, net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (10,903 | )
Other financial results, net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5,816 |
Adjusted Consolidated EBIT (unaudited)(2) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (27,859 | )
Depreciation and amortization |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30,356 |
Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (unaudited)(2) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,497 |

7

##### Table of Contents

|  | As of December 31, 2008 |
|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  | Dairy |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  | Farming Subtotal |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Land Trans- formation |  |  | Corporate |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Profit/(Loss) from Operations Before Financing and Taxation |  |  | 27,523 |  |  |  | 13,256 |  |  | (667) |  |  | 864 |  |  |  | 1,289 |  |  | 42,265 |  |  | (12,955 | ) |  |  | 15,201 |  |  |  | (23,077 | ) |  |  | 21,434 |
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of “long term” biological assets(l) (unrealized) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  | (1,840) |  |  | (3,355 | ) |  |  | (2,567 | ) |  | (7,762) |  |  | (13,448 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (21,210 | )
Adjusted Segment EBIT (unaudited)(2) |  |  | 27,523 |  |  |  | 13,256 |  |  | (2,507) |  |  | (2,491 | ) |  |  | (1,278 | ) |  | 34,503 |  |  | (26,403 | ) |  |  | 15,201 |  |  |  | (23,077 | ) |  |  | 224 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 6,517 |  |  |  | 710 |  |  | 348 |  |  | 798 |  |  |  | 517 |  |  | 8,890 |  |  | 19,424 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 28,314 |
Adjusted Segment EBITDA (unaudited)(2) |  |  | 34,040 |  |  |  | 13,966 |  |  | (2,159) |  |  | (1,693 | ) |  |  | (761 | ) |  | 43,393 |  |  | (6,979 | ) |  |  | 15,201 |  |  |  | (23,077 | ) |  |  | 28,538 |
Reconciliation to (Loss) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(Loss) for the year |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (16,425 | )
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of “long term” biological assets(l) (unrealized) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (21,210 | )
Income tax benefit |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (10,449 | )
Interest expense, net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 21,830 |
Foreign exchange, net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24,932 |
Other financial results, net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,546 |
Adjusted Consolidated EBIT (unaudited)(2) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 224 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28,314 |
Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (unaudited)(2) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28,538 |

(1) | Long-term biological assets are sugarcane, coffee, dairy and cattle.

(2) | See “Presentation of Financial and Other Information” for the definitions of Adjusted Segment EBIT, Adjusted Consolidated EBIT, Adjusted Segment EBITDA and Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA.

8

##### Table of Contents

| B. | CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS

Not Applicable.

| C. | REASONS FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not Applicable.

| D. | RISK FACTORS

Investing in our common shares involves a high degree of risk. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the information contained in this annual report, particularly the risks described below, as well as in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Our business activities, cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks. The market price of our common shares may decrease due to any of these risks or other factors, and you may lose all or part of your investment. The risks described below are those that we currently believe may materially affect us.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industries

Unpredictable weather conditions, pest infestations and diseases may have an adverse impact on agricultural production and may reduce the volume and sucrose content of sugarcane that we can cultivate and purchase in a given harvest.

The occurrence of severe adverse weather conditions, especially droughts, hail, floods or frost or diseases are unpredictable and may have a potentially devastating impact on agricultural production and may otherwise adversely affect the supply and price of the agricultural commodities that we sell and use in our business. Adverse weather conditions may be exacerbated by the effects of climate change. The effects of severe adverse weather conditions may reduce yields of our agricultural activities. Additionally, higher than average temperatures and rainfall can contribute to an increased presence of insects. Commencing during the middle of 2008 and lasting until the middle of 2009, the areas in which we operate suffered one of the worst droughts of the last 50 to 70 years, which resulted in a reduction of approximately 15% to 40% of our agricultural production per hectare, depending on the affected commodity, compared with our historical averages.

We experienced drought conditions during the last months of 2011 affecting some of our farms in Argentina and Uruguay. As a result, for the year 2012, actual yields were lower than originally expected and generated a negative impact of US$ 27.3 million in our Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation for 2012.

The occurrence and effects of disease and plagues can be unpredictable and devastating to agricultural products, potentially rendering all or a substantial portion of the affected harvests unsuitable for sale. Our Agricultural products are also susceptible to fungus and bacteria that are associated with excessively moist conditions. Even when only a portion of the production is damaged, our results of operations could be adversely affected because all or a substantial portion of the production costs have been incurred. Although some diseases are treatable, the cost of treatment is high, and we cannot assure you that such events in the future will not adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. Furthermore, if we fail to control a given plague or disease and our production is threatened, we may be unable to supply our main customers, which could affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our sugar production depends on the volume and sucrose content of the sugarcane that we cultivate or that is supplied to us by growers located in the vicinity of our mills. Both sugarcane yields and sucrose content depend primarily on weather conditions such as rainfall and temperature, which vary. Weather conditions have historically caused volatility in the ethanol and sugar industries. Future weather patterns may reduce the amount of sugarcane that we can harvest or purchase, or the sucrose content in such sugarcane, and, consequently, the amount of sugar we can recover in any given harvest. Any reduction in the volume of sugar recovered could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

9

##### Table of Contents

As a result, we cannot assure you that future severe adverse weather conditions or pest infestations will not adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

Fluctuation in market prices for our products could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Prices for agricultural products and by-products, including, among others, sugar, ethanol, grains and coffee, like those of other commodities, have historically been cyclical and sensitive to domestic and international changes in supply and demand and can be expected to fluctuate significantly. In addition, the agricultural products and by-products we produce are traded on commodities and futures exchanges and thus are subject to speculative trading, which may adversely affect us. The prices that we are able to obtain for our agricultural products and by-products depend on many factors beyond our control including:

| • |  | prevailing world commodity prices, which historically have been subject to significant fluctuations over relatively short periods of time, depending on worldwide demand and supply;

| • |  | changes in the agricultural subsidy levels of certain important producers (mainly the U.S. and the European Union (“E.U.”) and the adoption of other government policies affecting industry market conditions and prices;

| • |  | changes to trade barriers of certain important consumer markets (including China, India, the U.S. and the E.U.) and the adoption of other governmental policies affecting industry market conditions and prices;

| • |  | changes in government policies for biofuels;

| • |  | world inventory levels, i.e., the supply of commodities carried over from year to year;

| • |  | climatic conditions and natural disasters in areas where agricultural products are cultivated;

| • |  | the production capacity of our competitors; and

| • |  | demand for and supply of competing commodities and substitutes.

For example, we reported a loss of $23 million for 2012 compared to a gain of $31.9 million for 2011 for our sugarcane business segment in the line item “Initial recognition and Changes in Fair Value of Biological Assets and Agricultural produce.” This loss was generated mainly by a decrease in price estimates used in the discounted cash flow (“DCF”) model to determine the fair value of our sugarcane plantations. In the DCF model, the price of future harvested sugarcane is calculated based on estimates of sugar price derived from the No. 11 futures contract (“NY11”) quoted on the ICE-NY. Sugar price estimates decreased due to lower sugar market prices. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to year ended December 31, 2011.”

Further, because we intentionally do not hedge 100% of the price risk on our agricultural products, we are unable to have minimum price guarantees for all of our production and are, therefore, exposed to risks associated with the prices of agricultural products and their volatility. We are subject to fluctuations in prices of agricultural products that could result in our receiving lower prices for our agricultural products than our production costs.

In addition, there is a strong relationship between the value of our land holdings and market prices of the commodities we produce, which are affected by global economic conditions. A decline in the prices of grains, coffee, sugar, ethanol, or related by-products below their current levels for a sustained period of time could significantly reduce the value of our land holdings and materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

10

##### Table of Contents

Ethanol prices are correlated to the price of sugar and are becoming closely correlated to the price of oil, so that a decline in the price of sugar will adversely affect both our ethanol and sugar businesses, and a decline in the price of oil may adversely affect our ethanol business.

A vast majority of ethanol in Brazil is produced at sugarcane mills that produce both ethanol and sugar. Because sugarcane millers are able to alter their product mix in response to the relative prices of ethanol and sugar, this results in the prices of both products being directly correlated, and the correlation between ethanol and sugar may increase over time. In addition, sugar prices in Brazil are determined by prices in the world market, so that there is a strong correlation between Brazilian ethanol prices and world sugar prices.

Because flex-fuel vehicles, which have become popular in Brazil, allow consumers to choose between gasoline and ethanol at the pump rather than in the showroom, ethanol prices are now becoming increasingly correlated to gasoline prices and, consequently, oil prices. We believe that the correlation among the three products will increase over time. Accordingly, a decline in sugar prices would have an adverse effect on the financial performance of our ethanol and sugar businesses, and a decline in oil prices might have an adverse effect on that of our ethanol business.

The expansion of our business through acquisitions poses risks that may reduce the benefits we anticipate from these transactions.

As part of our business strategy, we have grown through acquisitions. We plan to continue growing by acquiring other farms and production facilities throughout South America. We believe that the agricultural industry and agricultural activity in the region are highly fragmented and that our future consolidation opportunities will continue to be significant to our growth. However, our management is unable to predict whether or when any prospective acquisitions or strategic alliances will occur, or the likelihood of a certain transaction being completed on favorable terms and conditions. In addition, we are unable to predict the effect that changes in Argentine or Brazilian legislation regarding foreign ownership of rural properties could have in our business. See “—Risks Related to Argentina— Argentine law concerning foreign ownership of rural properties may adversely affect our results of operations and future investments in rural properties in Argentina” and “—Risks Related to Brazil— Recent changes in Brazilian rules concerning foreign investment in rural properties may adversely affect our investments.” Our ability to continue to expand our business successfully through acquisitions depends on many factors, including our ability to identify acquisitions or access capital markets at an acceptable cost and negotiate favorable transaction terms. Even if we are able to identify acquisition targets and obtain the necessary financing to make these acquisitions, we could financially overextend ourselves, especially if an acquisition is followed by a period of lower than projected prices for our products.

Acquisitions also expose us to the risk of successor liability relating to actions involving an acquired company, its management or contingent liabilities incurred before the acquisition. The due diligence we conduct in connection with an acquisition, and any contractual guarantees or indemnities that we receive from the sellers of acquired companies, may not be sufficient to protect us from, or compensate us for, actual liabilities. Any material liability associated with an acquisition could adversely affect our reputation and results of operations and reduce the benefits of the acquisition.

To support the acquisitions we hope to make, we may need to implement new or upgraded strategies, systems, procedures and controls for our operations and will face risks, including diversion of management time and focus and challenges associated with integrating new managers and employees. Our failure to integrate new businesses successfully could adversely affect our business and financial performance.

Adverse conditions may create delays in or the suspension of the construction of our Ivinhema mill and/or significantly increase the amount of our expected investments.

As part of our strategy to increase our production and increase our competitiveness through economies of scale, we are in the process of constructing the Ivinhema mill, which -is expected to commence commercial operations during the second quarter of 2013. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview.” As of December 31, 2012 we have incurred $280 million for the acquisition and assembly of industrial equipment manufacturing costs, agricultural equipment and sugarcane planting expenses. We estimate that we will need to invest an additional $418 million to complete the construction of the Ivinhema mill (of which $230 million were raised through the IPO). See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview.” We cannot assure you that we will be able to borrow the additional funds we will need to complete the project on acceptable terms, or at all.

11

##### Table of Contents

As of the date of this report, the first phase of the construction of Ivinhema was completed, reaching a nominal crushing capacity of 2.0 million tons per year. The completion of the second and third phase of the project involves various risks, including engineering, construction and regulatory risks, such as obtaining necessary permits and licenses as well as other significant challenges that can suspend the construction of the Ivinhema mill, hinder or delay the project’s scheduled completion date and successful operation or that can result in significant cost increases as well as foreign exchange risks associated with incurring costs in Brazilian Reais. In addition, the Ivinhema mill may not operate at projected capacity or may incur higher operating costs than estimated, and we may not be able to sell the ethanol and sugar produced by the Ivinhema mill at competitive prices. If (i) construction is delayed or suspended, (ii) we are required to invest more than the budgeted amount to complete the project, (iii) we are unable to borrow the funds needed to complete the project on acceptable terms, or at all, (iv) we fail to operate the mill or operate it at a lower capacity than we anticipate or (v) we are unable to sell all of the ethanol and sugar produced by the mill, our results of operations and financial condition will be materially adversely affected.

A significant increase in the price of raw materials we use in our operations, or the shortage of such raw materials, could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our production process requires various raw materials, including primarily fertilizer, pesticides and seeds, which we acquire from local and international suppliers. We do not have long-term supply contracts for most of these raw materials. A significant increase in the cost of these raw materials, especially fertilizer and agrochemicals, a shortage of raw materials or the unavailability of these raw materials entirely could reduce our profit margin, reduce our production and/or interrupt the production of some of our products, in all cases adversely affecting the results of our operations and our financial condition.

For example, we rely on fertilizers and agrochemicals, many of which are petro-chemical based. For the year ended December 31, 2012, in our farming business, fertilizers and agrochemicals constituted approximately 21.6% of our cost of production for the 2011/2012 harvest year. In our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy business, fertilizers and agrochemicals constituted 13.5% of our cost of production for 2012. On a consolidated basis, fertilizers and agrochemicals constituted 17.0% of our cost of production for 2012. Worldwide production of agricultural products has increased significantly in recent years, increasing the demand for agrochemicals and fertilizers. This has resulted, among other things, in increased prices for agrochemicals and fertilizers.

Increased energy prices and frequent interruptions of energy supply could adversely affect our business.

We require substantial amounts of fuel oil and other resources for our harvest activities and transport of our agricultural products. For the year ended December 31, 2012, fuel constituted 10.3% of the cost of production of our farming business during the 2011/2012 harvest year. In our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy business, fuel constituted 9.3% of our cost of production for 2012. On a consolidated basis, fuel constituted 9.7% of our cost of production for 2012. We rely upon third parties for our supply of energy resources used in our operations. The prices for and availability of energy resources may be subject to change or curtailment, respectively, due to, among other things, new laws or regulations, imposition of new taxes or tariffs, interruptions in production by suppliers, imposition of restrictions on energy supply by government, worldwide price levels and market conditions. Over the last few years, the Argentine government has taken certain measures in order to reduce the use of energy during peak months of the year by frequently cutting energy supply to industrial facilities and large consumers to ensure adequate supply for residential buildings. For example, certain of our industrial facilities have been subject to a quota system whereby electricity cuts occur on a work shift basis, resulting in our facilities being shut down during certain work shifts. While some of our facilities utilize different sources of energy, such as firewood and liquefied natural gas, and have attempted to stock their required supplies ahead of higher demand periods, we cannot assure you that we will be able to procure the required energy inputs at acceptable prices. If energy supply is cut for an extended period of time and we are unable to find replacement sources at comparable prices, or at all, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.

12

##### Table of Contents

We depend on international trade and economic and other conditions in key export markets for our products.

Our operating results depend largely on economic conditions and regulatory policies for our products in major export markets. The ability of our products to compete effectively in these export markets may be adversely affected by a number of factors that are beyond our control, including the deterioration of macroeconomic conditions, volatility of exchange rates, the imposition of greater tariffs or other trade barriers or other factors in those markets, such as regulations relating to chemical content of products and safety requirements. Due to the growing participation in the worldwide agricultural commodities markets by commodities produced in South America, South American growers, including us, are increasingly affected by the measures taken by importing countries in order to protect their local producers. Measures such as the limitation on imports adopted in a particular country or region may affect the sector’s export volume significantly and, consequently, our operating results.

The European Union limits the import of genetically modified organisms, or “GMOs”. See “Some of the agricultural commodities and food products that we produce contain genetically modified organisms. If the sale of our products into a particular importing country is adversely affected by trade barriers or by any of the factors mentioned above, the relocation of our products to other consumers on terms equally favorable could be impaired, and our business, financial condition and operating results may be adversely affected.

A worldwide economic downturn could weaken demand for our products or lower prices.

The demand for the products we sell may be affected by international, national and local economic conditions. Adverse changes in the perceived or actual economic climate, such as higher fuel prices, higher interest rates, stock and real estate market declines and/or volatility, more restrictive credit markets, higher taxes, and changes in governmental policies could reduce the level of demand or prices of the products we produce. We cannot predict the duration or magnitude of this downturn or the timing or strength of economic recovery. If the downturn continues for an extended period of time or worsens, we could experience a prolonged period of decreased demand and price. In addition, the economic downturn has and may continue to adversely impact our suppliers, which can result in disruptions in service and financial losses.

Our business is seasonal, and our results may fluctuate significantly depending on the growing cycle of our crops.

As with any agricultural business enterprise, our business operations are predominantly seasonal in nature. The harvest of corn, soybean and rice generally occurs from January to May. Wheat is harvested from December to January. Coffee and cotton are harvested from June to August, but require processing which takes approximately two to three months. Our operations and sales are affected by the growing cycle of the crops we process and the timing of our harvest sales. In addition, our sugar and ethanol business is subject to seasonal trends based on the sugarcane growing cycle in the center-south region of Brazil. The annual sugarcane harvesting period in the center-south region of Brazil begins in April and ends in November/December. This creates fluctuations in our inventory, usually peaking in December to cover sales between crop harvests (i.e., January through April), and a degree of seasonality in our gross profit. Seasonality could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial performance. In addition, our quarterly results may vary as a result of the effects of fluctuations in commodities prices, production yields and costs. Therefore, our results of operations have varied significantly from period to period and are likely to continue to vary, due to seasonal factors.

Our dairy and beef cattle are vulnerable to diseases.

Diseases among our cattle herds, such as mastitis, tuberculosis, brucellosis and foot-and-mouth disease, can have an adverse effect on the productivity of our dairy cows. Outbreaks of cattle diseases may also result in the closure of certain important markets to our cattle-derived products. Although we abide by national veterinary health guidelines, including laboratory analyses and vaccination, to control diseases among our herds, especially foot-and-mouth disease, we cannot assure you that future outbreaks of cattle diseases will not occur. A future outbreak of diseases among our cattle herds could adversely affect our milk sales and operating results and financial condition.

13

##### Table of Contents

Our current insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover our potential losses.

Our production is, in general, subject to different risks and hazards, including adverse weather conditions, fires, diseases and pest infestations, other natural phenomena, industrial accidents, labor disputes, changes in the legal and regulatory framework applicable to us, environmental contingencies and other natural phenomena. Our insurance currently covers only part of the losses we may incur and does not cover losses on crops due to hail storms, fires or similar risks. Furthermore, although we maintain insurance at levels that are customary in our industry, certain types of risks may not be covered by the policies we have for our industrial facilities. Additionally, we cannot guarantee that the indemnification paid by the insurer due to the occurrence of a casualty covered by our policies will be sufficient to entirely compensate us for the damages suffered. Moreover, we may not be able to maintain or obtain insurance of the type and amount desired at reasonable costs. If we were to incur significant liability for which we were not fully insured, it could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A reduction in market demand for ethanol or a change in governmental policies reducing the amount of ethanol required to be added to gasoline may adversely affect our business.

Government authorities of several countries, including Brazil and certain states of the United States, currently require the use of ethanol as an additive to gasoline. Since 1997, the Sugar and Alcohol Interministerial Council of Brazil (Conselho Interministerial do Açúcar e Álcool) has set the required blend of anhydrous ethanol to gasoline (currently, which by law may vary between 18% and 25%). Since October 1, 2011, the required blend has been set at 20%, pursuant to Ministry of Agriculture Ordinance Rule No. 678/2011 (Portaria MAPA no. 67812011).

Approximately 45% of all fuel ethanol in Brazil is consumed in the form of anhydrous ethanol blended with gasoline; the remaining 68.6% of fuel ethanol is consumed in the form of hydrous ethanol, which is mostly used to power flex-fuel vehicles. Flex-fuel vehicles have the flexibility to run either on gasoline (blended with anhydrous ethanol) or hydrous ethanol. In the United States, almost all gasoline sold contains 10% ethanol. The European Union aims for 10% of the energy used in the transport sector to derive from renewable energy sources by 2020, without specific targets for certain renewable energy sources and without intermediate targets, leaving for each Member State to rule on this. As an example, in Sweden the ethanol blending ratio is 5%, which is the same mandate for other non-European countries, such as Argentina, Canada and the India. Other countries in the world such as Colombia, South Africa, Thailand and China have a 10% biofuel blending mandate. In addition, flex-fuel vehicles in Brazil have a tax benefit in the form of a lower tax rate on manufactured products (Imposto sobre Produtos Industrializados) and therefore are currently taxed at lower levels than gasoline-only vehicles, which has contributed to the increase in production and sale of flex-fuel vehicles. For example, from May 2012 to June 2013 (subject to further extension) flex-fuel vehicles are being taxed at a reduced industrial products tax rate. Many of these policies and incentives stem from, and are mostly driven by, climate change concerns and the positive perceptions regarding the use of ethanol as a solution to the climate change problem. If such concerns or perception were to change, the legal framework and incentive structure promoting the use of ethanol may be revised, leading to a reduction in the demand for ethanol. In addition, any reduction in the percentage of ethanol required in fuel blended with gasoline or increase in the levels at which flex-fuel vehicles are taxed in Brazil, or any growth in the demand for natural gas and other fuels as an alternative to ethanol, lower gasoline prices or an increase in gasoline consumption (versus ethanol), may cause demand for ethanol to decline and affect our business.

Growth in the sale and distribution of ethanol depends in part on infrastructure improvements, which may not occur on a timely basis, if at all.

In contrast to the well-established logistical operations and infrastructure supporting sugar exports, ethanol exports inherently demand much more complex preparation and means of distribution, including outlets from our facilities to ports and shipping to other countries. Substantial infrastructure development by persons and entities outside our control is required for our operations, and the ethanol industry generally, to grow. Areas requiring expansion include, but are not limited to, additional rail capacity, additional storage facilities for ethanol, increases

14

##### Table of Contents

in truck fleets capable of transporting ethanol within localized markets, expansion of refining and blending facilities to handle ethanol, growth in service stations equipped to handle ethanol fuels, and growth in the fleet of flex-fuel vehicles. Specifically, with respect to ethanol exports, improvements in consumer markets abroad are needed in the number and capacity of ethanol blending industrial plants, the distribution channels of gasoline-ethanol blends and the chains of distribution stations capable of handling fuel ethanol as an additive to gasoline. Substantial investments required for these infrastructure changes and expansions may not be made or they may not be made on a timely basis. Any delay or failure in making the changes in or expansion of infrastructure may hurt the demand for or prices of our products, prevent our products’ delivery, impose additional costs on us or otherwise have a serious adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial status. Our business relies on the continuing availability of infrastructure, and any infrastructure disruptions may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

We may be harmed by competition from alternative fuels, products and production methods.

Ethanol competes in the biofuel market with other, established fuels such as biodiesel, as well as fuels that are still in the development phase, including methanol and butanol from biomass. Alternative fuels could become more successful than ethanol in the biofuels market over the medium or long term due, for example, to lower production costs, greater environmental benefits or other more favorable product characteristics. In addition, alternative fuels may also benefit from tax incentives or other favorable governmental treatment, from which they may benefit at the expense of ethanol. Furthermore, our success depends on early identification of new developments relating to products and production methods and continuous expansion and preservation of our existing expertise in order to ensure that our product range keeps pace with technological change. Competitors may gain an advantage over us by, for example, developing or using new products and production methods, introducing new products to the market sooner than we do, or securing exclusive rights to new technologies, thereby significantly harming our competitive position.

A substantial portion of our assets is farmland that is highly illiquid.

We have been successful in partially rotating and monetizing a portion of our investments in farmland. During the last eleven years, we have executed transactions for the purchase and disposition of land for over $542 million. Ownership of a significant portion of the land we operate is a key part of our business model. However, agricultural real estate is generally an illiquid asset. Moreover, the adoption of laws and regulations that impose limitations on ownership of rural land by foreigners in the jurisdictions in which we operate may also limit the liquidity of our farmland holdings. See “—Risks Related to Argentina—Argentine law concerning foreign ownership of rural properties may adversely affect our results of operations and future investments in rural properties in Argentina” and “—Risks Related to Brazil— Recent changes in Brazilian rules concerning foreign investment in rural properties may adversely affect our investments.” As a result, it is unlikely that we will be able to adjust our owned agricultural real estate portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic, business or regulatory conditions. Illiquidity in local market conditions may adversely affect our ability to complete dispositions, to receive proceeds generated from any such sales or to repatriate any such proceeds.

We have agriculture partnerships relating to a significant portion of our sugarcane plantations.

As of December 31, 2012, approximately 89% of our sugarcane plantations were leased through agriculture partnership agreements, for periods of an average of six to twelve years. We cannot guarantee that these agriculture partnerships will be renewed after their respective terms. Even if we are able to renew these agreements, we cannot guarantee that such renewals will be on terms and conditions satisfactory to us. Any failure to renew the agriculture partnerships or obtain land suitable for sugarcane planting in sufficient quantity and at reasonable prices to develop our activities could adversely affect our results of operations, increase our costs or force us to seek alternative properties, which may not be available or be available only at higher prices.

We may be subject to labor disputes from time to time that may adversely affect us.

Our employees are represented by unions or equivalent bodies and are covered by collective bargaining or similar agreements which are subject to periodic renegotiation. We may not successfully conclude our labor

15

##### Table of Contents

negotiations on satisfactory terms, which may result in a significant increase in the cost of labor or may result in work stoppages or labor disturbances that disrupt our operations. Cost increases, work stoppages or disturbances that result in substantial amounts of raw product not being processed could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may not possess all of the permits and licenses required to operate our business, or we may fail to maintain the licenses and permits we currently hold. This could subject us to fines and other penalties, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations.

We are required to hold a variety of permits and licenses to conduct our farming and industrial operations, including but not limited to permits and licenses concerning land development, agricultural and harvesting activities, seed production, labor standards, occupational health and safety, land use, water use and other matters. We may not possess all of the permits and licenses required for each of our business segments. In addition, the approvals, permits or licenses required by governmental agencies may change without substantial advance notice, and we could fail to obtain the approvals, permits or licenses required to expand our business. If we fail to obtain or to maintain such permits or licenses, or if renewals are granted with onerous conditions, we could be subject to fines and other penalties and be limited in the number or the quality of the products that we could offer. As a result, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected

We are subject to extensive environmental regulation, and concerns regarding climate change may subject us to even stricter environmental regulations.

Our activities are subject to a broad set of laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. Such laws include compulsory maintenance of certain preserved areas within our properties, management of pesticides and associated hazardous waste and the acquisition of permits for water use and effluents disposal. In addition, the storage and processing of our products may create hazardous conditions. We could be exposed to criminal and administrative penalties in addition to the obligation to remedy the adverse affects of our operations on the environment and to indemnify third parties for damages. Environmental laws and their enforcement are becoming more stringent in Argentina and Brazil increasing the risk of and penalties associated with violations, which could impair or suspend our operations or projects (e.g., Ivinhema mill licensing and pending investigation on alleged environmental damage on lvinhema river), and our operations expose us to potentially adverse environmental legislation and regulation. Failure to comply with past, present or future laws could result in the imposition of fines, third party claims, and investigation by environmental authorities and the relevant public attorney office. For example, the perceived effects of climate change may result in additional legal and regulatory requirements to reduce or mitigate the effects of our industrial facilities’ emissions. Such requirements, if enacted, could increase our capital expenditures and expenses for environmental compliance in the future, which may have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, the denial of any permit that we have requested, or the revocation of any of the permits that we have already obtained, may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Some of the agricultural commodities and food products that we produce contain genetically modified organisms.

Our soybean, corn and cotton products contain GMOs in varying proportions depending on the year and the country of production. The use of GMOs in food has been met with varying degrees of acceptance in the markets in which we operate. The United States, Argentina and Brazil, for example, have approved the use of GMOs in food products, and GMO and non-GMO grain in those countries is produced and frequently commingled during the grain origination process. Elsewhere, adverse publicity about genetically modified food has led to governmental regulation limiting sales of GMO products in some of the markets in which our customers sell our products, including the European Union. It is possible that new restrictions on GMO products will be imposed in major markets for some of our products or that our customers will decide to purchase fewer GMO products or not buy GMO products at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects.

16

##### Table of Contents

If our products become contaminated, we may be subject to product liability claims, product recalls and restrictions on exports that would adversely affect our business.

The sale of food products for human consumption involves the risk of injury to consumers. These injuries may result from tampering by third parties, bioterrorism, product contamination or spoilage, including the presence of bacteria, pathogens, foreign objects, substances, chemicals, other agents, or residues introduced during the growing, storage, handling or transportation phases.

We cannot be sure that consumption of our products will not cause a health-related illness in the future or that we will not be subject to claims or lawsuits relating to such matters. Even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our products caused illness or injury could adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and our corporate and brand image, and we could also incur significant legal expenses. Moreover, claims or liabilities of this nature might not be covered by any rights of indemnity or contribution that we may have against others, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Our principal shareholders have the ability to direct our business and affairs, and their interests could conflict with yours

As of the date of this annual report, our principal shareholders are the beneficial owners of approximately 45.5% of our common shares. As a result of this significant influence over us, our principal shareholders may be able to elect a majority of the members of our board of directors, direct our management and determine the result of substantially all resolutions that require shareholders’ approval, including fundamental corporate transactions and the payment of dividends by us. The interests of our principal shareholders may differ from, and could conflict with, those of our other shareholders.

IFRS accounting standards related to biological assets require us to make numerous estimates in the preparation of our financial statements and therefore limit the comparability of our financial statements to similar issuers using U.S. GAAP

IAS 41 “Biological Assets” requires that we measure our biological assets and agriculture produce at the point of harvest at fair value. Therefore, we are required to make assumptions and estimates relating to, among other things, future agricultural commodity yields, prices, and production costs extrapolated through a discounted cash flow method. For example, the value of our biological assets with a production cycle lasting more than one year (i.e., sugarcane, coffee, dairy and cattle) generated initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets amounting to 25.3 million loss in 2012, $38.7 million gain in 2011and $78.8 million loss in 2010 The assumptions and estimates used to determine the fair value of biological assets, and any changes to such prior estimates, directly affect our reported results of operations. If actual market conditions differ from our estimates and assumptions, there could be material adjustments to our results of operations. In addition, the use of such discounted cash flow method utilizing these future estimated metrics differs from generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). As a result, our financial statements and reported earnings are not directly comparable to those of similar companies in the United States.

Certain of our subsidiaries have substantial indebtedness which could impair their financial condition and decrease the amount of dividends we receive.

Certain of our subsidiaries in Argentina and Brazil have a substantial amount of debt, which requires significant principal and interest payments. As of December 31, 2012, we had 539.1 million of debt outstanding on a consolidated basis, all of which was incurred by our subsidiaries and not guaranteed by Adecoagro. Such indebtedness could affect our subsidiaries’ future operations, for example, by requiring a substantial portion of their cash flows from operations to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on indebtedness instead of funding working capital and other business purposes, making it more difficult for them to satisfy all of their debt obligations, increasing their cost of borrowing to satisfy business needs and limiting their ability to obtain additional financing.

The substantial level of indebtedness borne by certain of our subsidiaries also affects the amount of cash available to them to pay as dividends, increasing our vulnerability to economic downturns or other adverse developments

17

##### Table of Contents

relative to competitors with less leverage; and limiting our ability to obtain additional financing on their behalf for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other corporate purposes in the future. Moreover, by reducing the level of dividends we may receive, such indebtedness places limits on our ability to make acquisitions or needed capital expenditures or to pay dividends to our shareholders. See Item 5. – Operating “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results and Prospects - of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness and Financial Instruments.” .”

The terms of the indebtedness of, and past breaches of financial ratio covenants by, certain of our subsidiaries impose significant restrictions on their operating and financial flexibility.

The debt instruments of certain of our subsidiaries contain customary covenants including limitations on their ability to, among other things, incur or guarantee additional indebtedness; make restricted payments, including dividends and prepaying indebtedness; create or permit certain liens; enter into business combinations and asset sale transactions; make investments, including capital expenditures; and enter into new businesses. Certain of these debt instruments are also secured by various collateral including mortgages on certain farms, pledges of subsidiary stock and liens on certain facilities, equipment and accounts. Certain of these debt instruments also contain cross-default provisions, where a default on one loan by one subsidiary could result in lenders of otherwise performing loans declaring a default on the otherwise performing loans. For more information regarding the covenants, collateral, and cross-default provisions of our subsidiaries’ indebtedness, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness and Financial Instruments.” These restrictions could limit our subsidiaries’ ability to obtain future financing, withstand a future downturn in business or the economy in general, conduct operations or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities that may arise. Moreover, by reducing the level of dividends we may receive, such indebtedness places limits on our ability to make acquisitions or needed capital expenditures or to pay dividends to our shareholders.

The terms of certain of our subsidiaries’ debt instruments contain financial ratio covenants, limitations on their levels of debt and capital expenditures and requirements on maintaining various levels of EBITDA. During 2009 and 2010, certain of our operating subsidiaries in Argentina and Brazil breached certain financial ratio covenants under their debt instruments, and subsequently entered with the lenders into amendments to redefine the terms of such financial ratio covenants. The financial ratio covenants we are currently required to meet, some of which are measured on a combined basis aggregating results of the borrowing subsidiaries and others which are measured on an individual debtor basis, include, among others, debt service coverage, minimum liquidity and leverage ratios. For detailed information regarding the financial ratio covenants, limitations on levels of debt and capital expenditures and requirements on EBITDA, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness and Financial Instruments.”

The failure by our subsidiaries to maintain applicable financial ratios, in certain circumstances, would prevent them from borrowing additional amounts and could result in a default under such indebtedness. If we or our subsidiaries are unable to repay those amounts, the affected lenders could initiate bankruptcy-related proceedings or enforce their rights to the collateral securing such indebtedness, which would have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. For detailed information regarding the terms of our subsidiaries’ indebtedness, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness and Financial Instruments.”

Fluctuations in interest rates could have a significant impact on our results of operations, indebtedness and cash flow.

As of December 31, 2012, approximately 61.3% of our total debt was subject to variable interest rates and 38.7% was subject to fixed interest rates. As of December 31, 2012, the variable-rate interest bearing indebtedness of our Argentine subsidiaries had a rate of LIBOR plus 4.45%, and the variable-rate interest bearing indebtedness of our Brazilian subsidiaries had a rate of LIBOR or other country-specific rates such as the Taxa de Juros de Longo Prazo (TJLP) or Certificado de Depósito Interbancario (CDI) plus spreads ranging between 4.05% and 7.0% per annum. Significant interest rate increases can have an adverse effect on our profitability, liquidity and financial position. Currently, our variable interest rate exposure is mainly linked to the LIBOR rate plus specified spreads. If interest rates increase, whether because of an increase in market interest rates or an increase in our own cost of borrowing, our debt service obligations for our variable rate indebtedness would increase even though the amount of borrowings remained the same, and our net income could be adversely affected. See also “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

18

##### Table of Contents

We occasionally use interest rate swaps and forward interest rate contracts to reduce interest rate volatility and funding costs associated with certain debt issues and to achieve a desired proportion of variable-versus fixed-rate debt, based on current and projected market conditions. We have not applied hedge accounting to these transactions and may not do so in the future. Therefore, changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments can result in a non-cash charge or gain being recognized in our financial results for a period preceding the period or periods in which settlement occurs under the derivative instruments and interest payments are made. Changes or shifts in interest rates can significantly impact the valuation of our derivatives and therefore could expose us to substantial mark-to-market losses or gains if interest rates fluctuate materially from the time when the derivatives were entered into. Accordingly, fluctuations in interest rates may impact our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. See “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

We may not be able to renew our credit lines when they mature, depriving us of needed liquidity.

Certain of our subsidiaries rely substantially on existing uncommitted credit lines to support their operations and business needs through the agricultural harvest cycle. If we are unable to renew these credit lines, or if we cannot replace such credit lines with other borrowing facilities, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

There is a risk that we could be treated as a U.S. domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which could materially increase our U.S. federal income tax liability and subject any dividends we pay to U.S. federal withholding tax.

We acquired approximately 98% of IFH, a holding company which is a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes organized under the laws of Delaware, immediately prior to our IPO, in exchange for our stock. Under U.S. Internal Revenue Code section 7874(b), we would be treated as a U.S. domestic corporation if we were deemed to have acquired substantially all of the assets constituting the trade or business of a U.S. domestic partnership and former members of IFH were deemed to own at least 80% of our stock by reason of the transfer of those trade or business assets (ignoring stock issued in our IPO for purposes of the 80% threshold). Although we and our subsidiaries conduct no direct business activity in the United States and we believe that our acquisition of IFH should not be subject to the rules above, those rules are unclear in certain respects and there is limited guidance on the application of the rules to partnership acquisitions. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) will not seek to assert that we are a U.S. domestic corporation, which assertion if successful could materially increase our U.S. federal income tax liability and require us to withhold tax from any dividends we pay. See “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation.”

Risks associated with the Countries in which we operate

We operate our business in emerging markets. Our results of operations and financial condition are dependent upon economic conditions in those countries in which we operate, and any decline in economic conditions could harm our results of operations or financial condition.

All of our operations and/or development activities are in South America. As of December 31, 2012, based on the net book value of our consolidated investment property and property, plant and equipment, approximately 32.2% of our assets were located in Argentina, 66.6% in Brazil and 1.2% in Uruguay. During the year ended 2012, 52.3% of our consolidated sales of manufactured products and services rendered and sales of agricultural produce and biological assets were attributable to our Brazilian operations, 45.4% were attributable to our Argentine operations and 2.3% were attributable to our Uruguayan operations. In the future we expect have additional operations in the South American countries in which we now operate or in other countries with similar political, economic and social conditions. Many of these countries have a history of economic instability or crises (such as inflation or recession), government deadlock, political instability, civil strife, changes in laws and regulations, expropriation or nationalization of property, and exchange controls which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

19

##### Table of Contents

In particular, fluctuations in the economies of Argentina and Brazil and actions adopted by the governments of those countries have had and may continue to have a significant impact on companies operating in those countries, including us. Specifically, we have been affected and may continue to be affected by inflation, increased interest rates, fluctuations in the value of the Argentine Peso and Brazilian Real against foreign currencies, price and foreign exchange controls, regulatory policies, business and tax regulations and in general by the political, social and economic scenarios in Argentina and Brazil and in other countries that may affect Argentina and Brazil.

The economies of the countries in which we operate may be adversely affected by the deterioration of other global markets.

Financial and securities markets in the countries in which we operate are influenced, to different degrees, by the economic and market conditions in other countries, including other South American and emerging market countries and other global markets. Although economic conditions in these countries may differ significantly from economic conditions in the countries in which we operate, investors’ reactions to developments in these other countries, such as the recent developments in the global financial markets, may substantially affect the capital flows into, and the market value of securities of issuers with operations in, the countries in which we operate. A crisis in other emerging market countries could dampen investor enthusiasm for securities of issuers with South American operations, including our common shares. This could adversely affect the market price for our common shares, as well as make it difficult for us to access capital markets and obtain financing for our operations in the future, on acceptable terms or under any conditions.

A significant deterioration in the economic growth of any of the main trading partners of Brazil or Argentina could have a material impact on the trade balance of those countries and could adversely affect their economic growth.

Governments have a high degree of influence in the economies in which we operate, which could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.

Governments in many of the markets in which we currently, or may in the future operate frequently intervene in their respective economies and occasionally make significant changes in monetary, credit, industry and other policies and regulations. Government actions to control inflation and other policies and regulations have often involved, among other measures, price controls, currency devaluations, capital controls and limits on imports. We have no control over, and cannot predict what measures or policies governments may take in the future. The results of operations and financial condition of our businesses may be adversely affected by changes in governmental policy or regulations in the jurisdictions in which they operate that impact factors such as:

| • |  | labor laws;

| • |  | economic growth;

| • |  | currency fluctuations;

| • |  | inflation;

| • |  | exchange and capital control policies;

| • |  | interest rates;

| • |  | liquidity of domestic capital and lending markets;

| • |  | monetary policy;

| • |  | liquidity and solvency of the financial system;

| • |  | limitations on ownership of rural land by foreigners;

20

##### Table of Contents

| • |  | developments in trade negotiations through the World Trade Organization or other international organizations;

| • |  | environmental regulations;

| • |  | tax laws, including royalties and the effect of tax laws on distributions from our subsidiaries;

| • |  | restrictions on repatriation of investments and on the transfer of funds abroad;

| • |  | expropriation or nationalization;

| • |  | import/export restrictions or other laws and policies affecting foreign trade and investment;

| • |  | price fixing regulations;

| • |  | restrictions on land acquisition or use or agricultural commodity production; and

| • |  | other political, social and economic developments, including political, social or economic instability, in or affecting the country where each business is based.

Uncertainty over whether governments will implement changes in policy or regulation affecting these or other factors in the future may contribute to economic uncertainty and heightened volatility in the securities markets, which may have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Currency exchange rate fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar in the countries in which we operate our businesses may adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

We operate exclusively outside the United States, and our businesses may be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Our exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations results from the translation exposure associated with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, the transaction exposure associated with generating revenues and incurring expenses in different currencies and the devaluation of local currency revenues impairing the value of investments in U.S. dollars. While the consolidated financial statements presented herein are, and our future consolidated financial statements will be, presented in U.S. dollars, the financial statements of our subsidiaries are prepared using the local currency as the functional currency and translated into U.S. dollars by applying: (i) a year-end exchange rate for assets and liabilities; and (ii) an average exchange rate for the year for income and expenses. Resulting exchange differences arising from the translation to our presentation currency are recognized as a separate component of equity. Currencies in Argentina and Brazil have fluctuated significantly against the U.S. dollar in the past. Accordingly, fluctuations in exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar could impair the comparability of our results from period to period and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

After reaching a high of Ps.3.87 per $1 in June 2002, the exchange rate of the Argentine Peso to the dollar has remained relatively stable. However, the increasing level of inflation is generating pressure for further depreciation of the Peso. The Peso depreciated 2.27% against the U.S. dollar in 2007, 9.49% in 2008, 10.40% in 2009, 4.72% in 2010, 5.89% in 2011 and 14.27% in 2012. However, due to the strength of the restrictions for the purchase of foreign currency (see “- Risks Related to Argentina-Exchange controls could restrict the inflow and outflow of funds in Argentina.”) the official exchange rate is not floating freely and is arbitrarily set by the government. This gave rise to the development of unofficial markets where the dollar is trading at a different market value and to an increase of the purchase price in Pesos of securities denominated in foreign currency. The gap between the official rate and these rates is of approximately 50% and may increase or decrease in the future. We cannot predict future fluctuations in the exchange rate of the Argentine Peso or whether the Argentine government will change its currency policy.

The Brazilian currency has historically suffered frequent fluctuations. As a consequence of inflationary pressures, in the past, the Brazilian government has implemented various economic plans and adopted a number of

21

##### Table of Contents

exchange rate policies, including sudden devaluations, periodic mini-devaluations during which the frequency of adjustments has ranged from daily to monthly, floating exchange rate systems, exchange controls and dual exchange rate markets. Formally the value of the Real against foreign currencies is determined under a free-floating exchange rate regime, but in fact the Brazilian government is actually intervening on the Market every time the currency exchange rate is above or below the levels that the Brazilian government considers right for the economic balance. Periodically, there are significant fluctuations in the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar. The Real appreciated 17.2% against the U.S. dollar in 2007, depreciated 31.9% in 2008, appreciated 25.5% in 2009, appreciated 4.3% in 2010, depreciated 12.6% in 2011 and depreciated 8.94% in 2012. Against the euro, the Real appreciated 7.5% in 2007, depreciated 24.1% in 2008, appreciated 22.6% in 2009, appreciated 11.14% in 2010, depreciated 9.3% in 2011 and depreciated 10.7% in 2012. On December 31, 2012, the Real/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$2.0435 per U.S. dollar, and the Real/euro exchange rate was R$26954 per euro, as reported by the Central Bank of Brazil. We cannot predict whether the Brazilian Central Bank will continue to let the Real float freely. Accordingly, it is not possible to predict what impact the Brazilian government’s exchange rate policies may have on us. We cannot assure you that the Brazilian government will not in the future impose a band within which the Real/U.S. dollar exchange rate could fluctuate or set a fixed exchange rate, nor can we predict what impact such an event might have on our financial condition or results of operations.

Future fluctuations in the value of the local currencies relative to the U.S. dollar in the countries in which we operate may occur, and if such fluctuations were to occur in one or a combination of the countries in which we operate, our results of operations or financial condition could be adversely affected.

Inflation in some of the countries in which we operate, along with governmental measures to combat inflation, may have a significant negative effect on the economies of those countries and, as a result, on our financial condition and results of operations.

In the past, high levels of inflation have adversely affected the economies and financial markets of some of the countries in which we operate, particularly Argentina and Brazil, and the ability of their governments to create conditions that stimulate or maintain economic growth. Moreover, governmental measures to curb inflation and speculation about possible future governmental measures have contributed to the negative economic impact of inflation and have created general economic uncertainty. A portion of our operating costs in Argentina are denominated in Argentine Pesos and most of our operating costs in Brazil are denominated in Brazilian Reais. Inflation in Argentina or Brazil, without a corresponding Peso or Real devaluation could result in an increase in our operating costs without a commensurate increase in our revenues, which could adversely affect our financial condition and our ability to pay our foreign denominated obligations.

After several years of price stability in Argentina, the devaluation of the Peso in January 2002 imposed pressures on the domestic price system that generated high inflation throughout 2002. In 2003, inflation decreased significantly and stabilized. However, since 2004, encouraged by the pace of economic growth, according to the Argentine Statistics and Census Agency (Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos, or “INDEC”), the consumer price index increased by 6.1% in 2004, 12.3% in 2005, 9.8% in 2006, 8.5% in 2007, 7.2% in 2008, 7.7% in 2009 , 10.9% in 2010, 9.5% in 2011 and 10.8% in 2012; while the wholesale price index went up 7.9% in 2004, 10.6% in 2005, 7.2% in 2006, 14.6% in 2007, 8.8% in 2008, 10.3% in 2009, 14.6% in 2010 12.7% in 2011 and 13.1% in 2012. The accuracy of the measurements of the INDEC is in doubt, and the actual consumer price index and wholesale price index could be substantially higher than those indicated by the INDEC. For example, according to a research center of the University of Buenos Aires, School of Economics, the consumer price index increased by 10.7% (rather than 9.8%) in 2006, 25.7% (rather than 8.5%) in 2007, 23.0% (rather than 7.2%) in 2008 and 15.0% (rather than 7.7%) in 2009 (last published information). Moreover, according to InflacionVerdadera.com, an initiative that is part of the Billion Prices Project at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the consumer price index increased by 25.77% (rather than 10.9%) in 2010, by 30.18% (rather than 9.5%) in 2011, and 25.9% (rather than 10.8%) in 2012.

During 2011 the Argentine Secretary of Commerce imposed fines on some private consulting firms for releasing inflation measurements. Since then, private inflation measurements have been released mainly by the Commission of Freedom of Expression of the Argentine Congress (the “Expression Commission”). After the change in the composition of the Argentine Congress on December 2011, the Argentine Congress may no longer release private inflation measurements According to the last information released by the Expression Commission and published in

22

##### Table of Contents

local newspapers, in 2011 the consumer price index increased by 22.8% (rather than 9.5%) and by 25.6% (rather than 10.8%) in 2012. See “—Risks Related to Argentina—There are concerns about the accuracy of the INDEC’s measurements.”

Brazil has historically experienced high rates of inflation. Inflation, as well as government efforts to curb inflation, had significant negative effects on the Brazilian economy, particularly prior to 1995. Inflation rates were 7.7% in 2007 and 9.8% in 2008, compared to deflation of 1.7% in 2009, inflation of 11.3% in 2010, inflation of 5.1% in 2011 and inflation of 7.8% in 2012 as measured by the General Market Price Index (Indice Geral de Preços — Mercado), compiled by the Getúlio Vargas Foundation (Fundação Getúlio Vargas). A significant proportion of our cash costs and our operating expenses are denominated in Brazilian Reais and tend to increase with Brazilian inflation. The Brazilian government’s measures to control inflation have in the past included maintaining a tight monetary policy with high interest rates, thereby restricting the availability of credit and reducing economic growth. Nowadays, the Brazilian government has adopted other measures to control inflation, such as tax relief for several sectors of the economy and tax cuts for the products included in the basic food basket. As a result, interest rates have fluctuated significantly. The Special System for Settlement and Custody (Sistema Especial de Liquidação e Custódia, or “SELIC”) interest rate in Brazil at year-end was 13.25% in 2006, 11.25% in 2007, 13.75% in 2008, 8.75% in 2009,10.75% in 2010, 11.0% in 2011 and 7.25% in 2012, as determined by the Comitê de Política Monetária, or COPOM. If inflation in Brazil increases, the Brazilian government may choose to increase the SELIC interest rate, besides maintaining the measures mentioned above.

Argentina and/or Brazil may experience high levels of inflation in the future, which may impact domestic demand for our products. Inflationary pressures may also weaken investor confidence in Argentina and/or Brazil, curtail our ability to access foreign financial markets and lead to further government intervention in the economy, including interest rate increases, restrictions on tariff adjustments to offset inflation, intervention in foreign exchange markets and actions to adjust or fix currency values, which may trigger or exacerbate increases in inflation, and consequently have an adverse impact on us. In an inflationary environment, the value of uncollected accounts receivable, as well as of unpaid accounts payable, declines rapidly. If the countries in which we operate experience high levels of inflation in the future and price controls are imposed, we may not be able to adjust the rates we charge our customers to fully offset the impact of inflation on our cost structures, which could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.

Depreciations of the Peso or the Real relative to the U.S. dollar or the euro may also create additional inflationary pressures in Argentina or Brazil that may negatively affect us. Depreciations generally curtail access to foreign financial markets and may prompt government intervention, including recessionary governmental policies. Depreciations also reduce the U.S. dollar or euro value of dividends and other distributions on our shares and the U.S. dollar or euro equivalent of the market price of our shares. Any of the foregoing might adversely affect our business, operating results, and cash flow, as well as the market price of our common shares.

Conversely, in the short term, a significant increase in the value of the Peso or the Real against the U.S. dollar would adversely affect the respective Argentine and/or Brazilian government’s income from exports. This could have a negative effect on gross domestic product (“GDP”) growth and employment and could also reduce the public sector’s revenues in those countries by reducing tax collection in real terms, as a portion of public sector revenues are derived from the collection of export taxes.

Disruption of transportation and logistics services or insufficient investment in public infrastructure could adversely affect our operating results.

One of the principal disadvantages of the agricultural sector in the countries in which we operate is that key growing regions lie far from major ports. As a result, efficient access to transportation infrastructure and ports is critical to the growth of agriculture as a whole in the countries in which we operate and of our operations in particular. Improvements in transportation infrastructure are likely to be required to make more agricultural production accessible to export terminals at competitive prices. A substantial portion of agricultural production in the countries in which we operate is currently transported by truck, a means of transportation significantly more expensive than the rail transportation available to U.S. and other international producers. Our dependence on truck transportation may affect our position as a low-cost producer so that our ability to compete in the world markets may be impaired.

23

##### Table of Contents

Even though road and rail improvement projects have been considered for some areas of Brazil, and in some cases implemented, substantial investments are required for road and rail improvement projects, which may not be completed on a timely basis, if at all. Any delay or failure in developing infrastructure systems could reduce the demand for our products, impede our products’ delivery or impose additional costs on us. We currently outsource the transportation and logistics services necessary to operate our business. Any disruption in these services could result in supply problems at our farms and processing facilities and impair our ability to deliver our products to our customers in a timely manner.

Risks Related to Argentina

Argentine economic and political conditions and perceptions of these conditions in the international market may have a direct impact on our business and our access to international capital and debt markets, and could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

A significant portion of our operations, properties and customers are located in Argentina. The Argentine economy has experienced significant volatility in recent decades, characterized by periods of low or negative growth, high and variable levels of inflation and currency devaluation. Between 2001 and 2003 Argentina experienced a period of severe political, economic and social crisis. In 2002, the enactment of Law No. 25,561 (the “Public Emergency Law”) ended more than a decade of uninterrupted Peso/dollar parity, and the value of the Peso against the U.S. dollar has fluctuated significantly since then.

Although general economic conditions in Argentina have recovered significantly during the past years, there is uncertainty as to whether this growth is sustainable. This is mainly because the economic growth was initially dependent on a significant devaluation of the Argentine Peso, a high excess production capacity resulting from a long period of deep recession and high commodity prices. The global economic crisis of 2008 has led to a sudden economic decline, accompanied by political and social unrest, inflationary and Peso depreciation pressures and lack of consumer and investor confidence. According to the INDEC, Argentina’s GDP, in real terms, grew by 8.7% in 2007, 6.8% in 2008, 0.9% in 2009, 9.2% in 2010, 8.9% in 2011 and 1.9% in 2012. See “—There are concerns about the accuracy of the INDEC’s measurements” and “—Risks Associated with the Countries in which We Operate—Inflation in some of the countries in which we operate, along with governmental measures to combat inflation, may have a significant negative effect on the economies of those countries and, as a result, on our financial condition and results of operations” in this section. We cannot assure you that GDP will increase or remain stable in the future. The economic crisis in Europe, beginning with the financial crisis in Greece, Spain, Italy and Portugal, the international demand for Argentine products, the stability and competitiveness of the Peso against foreign currencies, confidence among consumers and foreign and domestic investors, a stable and relatively low rate of inflation and the future political uncertainties, among other factors, may affect the development of the Argentine economy.

In October 2011, Mrs. Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner was re-elected. During her presidential campaign Mrs. Fernandez de Kirchner did not announce any particular actions to be undertaken by her new administration. However, the prevailing economic conditions during 2011 and the beginning of 2012, including the rise of inflation, the continued demand for salary increases, the growth of the fiscal deficit (the highest since the first Kirchner administration despite the use of resources from the National Social Security System and the Central Bank), the required payments to be made on public debt in 2012 (including the Bonos del Gobierno Nacional en Dólares Estadounidenses Libor 2012), the reduction of the industrial growth and the increase of the capital flow out of Argentina have forced the Argentine government to adopt different measures, including the tightening of foreign exchange controls, the elimination of subsidies to the private sector and the proposal for new taxes. See “Changes in the Argentine tax laws may adversely affect the results of our operations”.

Moreover, the Argentine government may increase its level of intervention in certain areas of the economy. For example, on April 16, 2012, the Argentine government sent a bill to the Argentine Congress to expropriate 51% of the Class D Shares of YPF, S.A. (“YPF”), the largest Argentine oil and gas company in Argentina. The expropriation law was passed by Congress on May 3, 2012 and provided for the expropriation of 51% of the share capital of YPF, represented by an identical stake of Class D shares owned, directly or indirectly, by Repsol YPF S.A., a Spanish integrated oil and gas company. The national government and the Argentine provinces that are

24

##### Table of Contents

members of the Federal Organization of Hydrocarbon Producing Provinces now own 51% and 49%, respectively, of the YPF shares subject to the seizure. This particular measure has also sparked a strong international condemnation and could have a significant negative impact on future foreign direct investment in Argentina as well as potentially limit the country’s access to international capital and debt markets. In response to the nationalization of YPF by the Argentine government, the European Union Commission announced it may impose a partial suspension of the unilateral tariff preferences to Argentina. If sanctions by international trading blocks like the European Union are imposed on Argentina or on its agricultural exports, it may have a negative impact on our Argentine subsidiaries’ operations.

In addition, on November 28, 2012, the Argentine government, through YPF Inversora Energética S.A., YPF’s controlled company, exercised an option for the purchase of the shares of BG Inversiones Argentinas S.A. in Gas Argentino S.A. (the controlling company of Metrogas S.A., the major gas distributor in Argentina). Through this transaction, the Argentine government indirectly acquired control of Metrogas S.A.

Expropriations and other interventions by the Argentine government such as the one relating to YPF can have an adverse impact on the level of foreign investment in Argentina, the access of Argentine companies to the international capital markets and Argentina’s commercial and diplomatic relations with other countries. In the future, the level of governmental intervention in the economy may continue, which may have adverse effects on Argentina’s economy and, in turn, our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The economy of Argentina may be affected by its government’s limited access to financing from international markets.

As of December 31, 2001, Argentina’s total public debt amounted to $144.5 billion (including $6.6 billion owed to the Paris Club, an informal group of financial officials from some of the worlds biggest economies). In December 2001, Argentina defaulted on over $81.8 billion in external debt to bondholders. In addition, since 2002, Argentina suspended payments on over $15.7 billion in debt to multilateral financial institutions (e.g. International Monetary Fund and the Paris Club) and other financial institutions. In 2006, Argentina cancelled all its outstanding debt with the International Monetary Fund totaling approximately $9.5 billion, and through various exchange offers made to bondholders between 2004 and 2010, restructured over approximately $74.2 billion of the defaulted debt. As of December 31, 2010, the Argentine government was still in default with respect of over $6.8 billion of debt to bondholders. As of December 31, 2011, Argentina’s total public debt amounted to $178.9 billion and as of June 30, 2012, Argentina’s total public debt amounted to $182.7 billion (excluding the debt in default to bondholders).

In 2010, the Argentine government applied US$6.4 billion of the Argentine Central Bank’s reserves to the payment of public debt. In the first quarter of 2011, the Argentine government applied US$7.5 billion from the Central Bank’s reserves to repay indebtedness maturing in 2011. In March 2011, the Argentine government applied US$2.1 billion of the Argentine Central Bank’s reserves to the payment of public debt, cancelling the entire debt with international financial institutions. During 2013, the Argentine government faces the payment of approximately US$16 billion of public debt. In addition, the Argentine government faces several claims at the World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes for approximately $65 billion (on some of which the arbitral tribunal has already ruled against Argentina).

Pursuant to an order dated February 23, 2012, as amended by an order dated November 21, 2012, based on the equal treatment provision under the defaulted debt, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted an injunction requiring Argentina to pay the holders of the defaulted debt as a precondition to making a single interest payment under the restructured debt. The injunction further required Argentina to pay into an escrow account over $1.3 billion prior to making the payment of the restructured debt on the December 15, 2012 scheduled payment).

However, on November 28, 2012, the U.S. 2 nd Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay on the above-mentioned orders and scheduled oral arguments by the parties for February 27, 2013. At the hearing the Argentine representatives argued that Argentina would be willing to pay to the holders of the defaulted debt on the same terms as those of the restructured debt, but would not voluntarily comply with the injunction ordered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Since Argentina had another payment on the restructured debt due on March 2013. On March 1, 2013, the U.S. 2 nd Circuit Court of Appeals requested Argentina that it submit in

25

##### Table of Contents

writing to the Court the precise terms of any payment alternatives and repayment schedule. On March 29, 2013, Argentina offered an alternative of payment at par or discount option packages, pursuant to which the holders of defaulted debt would receive new bonds in exchange for the defaulted bonds. On April 4, 2013, the court instructed the plaintiffs to respond to the payment proposal submitted by Argentina. On April 19, the plaintiffs filed a response rejecting the Argentine offer. The U.S. 2 nd Circuit Court of Appeals may now either request more expert opinions or decide the case in a four to six week period. If the court ratifies the order of the district court of the Southern District of New York, Argentina may be required to make a single payment of a 100% of the entire amount owed to the holders of the defaulted debt.

The lack of a final solution on the outstanding defaulted debt limits the access of Argentina to foreign financing in the international markets. Due to the lack of access to the international capital markets on March 28, 2012, the Argentine government approved a reform of the Argentine Central Bank’s Charter by which, among other things: (i) limited the availability of economic information (i.e. expected rate of inflation, amount and composition of reserves and of the monetary base); (ii) significantly increased the Argentine government’s access to financing from the Argentine Central Bank; (iii) granted the Board of Directors of the Argentine Central Bank the discretion to determine the required level of reserves; (iv) determined that any reserves above the required level fixed by the Board of Directors constitutes freely available reserves; and (v) provided that in addition to the payment of obligations with international financial institutions, the freely available reserves may also be applied to the payment of official bilateral external debt (i.e. Paris Club).

The reduction of the Argentine Central Bank’s reserves may weaken Argentina’s ability to overcome economic deterioration in the future. As a result of this economic instability, the foreign debt rating of Argentina has been downgraded on multiple occasions based upon concerns regarding economic conditions and rising fears of increased inflationary pressures. This uncertainty may also adversely impact Argentina’s ability to attract capital. Without access to international private financing, Argentina may not be able to finance its obligations, and financing from multilateral financial institutions may be limited or not available. This could also inhibit the ability of the Argentine Central Bank to adopt measures to curb inflation and could adversely affect Argentina’s economic growth and public finances, which could, in turn, adversely affect our operations in Argentina, our financial condition or the results of our operations.

Argentine law concerning foreign ownership of rural properties may adversely affect our results of operations and future investments in rural properties in Argentina.

Law No. 26,737, passed by the Argentine congress in December 2011, and its implementing regulation Decree No. 274/2012 of February 28, 2012, impose limits on the ownership or possession of rural land by foreign legal entities or foreign individuals (excluding foreign individuals who have resided in Argentina ten years or more; who have Argentine children and also have resided at least five-years in Argentina; or who have been married to Argentine citizens for at least five years prior to the transfer of the property rights over rural land and have resided in Argentina for at least five years).

Law No. 26,737 and its implementing regulation require that, “foreign ownership” of rural land may not exceed 15% of the total amount of rural land in the Argentine territory calculated also in relation to the territory of the Province, Department or Municipality where the relevant lands are located. For purposes of the law, “foreign ownership” means the ownership (whether by acquisition, transfer, assignment of rights or otherwise) over rural land by: (i) foreign individuals, regardless of whether they are Argentine residents or not; (ii) legal entities where more than 51% of the stock is directly owned by foreign individuals or entities; (iii) legal entities which are indirectly linked to or controlled by foreign entities or individuals through ownership of (a) 25% or more of their stock or (b) a number of votes sufficient to prevail in the local entity’s decision-making process; (iv) any foreign legal entity or individual operating as de facto shareholder; (v) companies that issue bonds (a) convertible in stock representing 25% or more of the company’s stock and (b) whose holders are foreign individuals or entities; (vi) trusts whose beneficiaries are foreign individuals or entities, as defined pursuant to (ii), (iii), (iv) or (v) above; (vii) joint ventures in which foreign entities or individuals hold a participating interest higher than those set forth by the law (51% under (ii) or 25% under (iii), (iv), (v) or (vi) above); (viii) foreign public law-governed legal entities; and (ix) simple associations or de facto corporations in which foreigners hold shares in the percentage set forth by the new law in relation to corporations or which are controlled by foreigners. Any modification to the capital stock of companies that own or possess rural land, by public or private instrument, may be reported to the National Registry of Rural Land (Registro Nacional de Tierras Rurales) within 30 days from the date of such modification.

26

##### Table of Contents

In addition, foreign entities or individuals of the same nationality may not own more than 4.5% of rural land in Argentina and a single foreign entity or individual may not own more than 1,000 hectares in the “core area”, or the “equivalent surface”, as determined by the Interministerial Council of Rural Land (Consejo Interministerial de Tierras Rurales) in accordance with the provinces’ proposal, specifying districts, sub-regions or areas and taking into consideration the location of the land, the proportion of the land area in respect of the total territory of the relevant Province, Department or Municipality and, the quality of the land for use and exploitation. The “equivalent surface” regime may be modified by the Interministerial Council of Rural Lands (Consejo Interministerial de Tierras Rurales) taking into account possible changes in the quality of the land or the growth of urban populations. Pursuant to Decree No. 274/2012 the departments that comprise the “core area” are: Marcos Juarez and Union in the Province of Córdoba; Belgrano, San Martin, San Jeronimo, Iriondo, San Lorenzo, Rosario, Constitución, Caseros and General Lopez in the Province of Santa Fe; and the districts of Leandro N. Alem, General Viamonte, Bragado, General Arenales, Junin, Alberti, Rojas, Chivilcoy, Chacabuco, Colon, Salto, San Nicolas, Ramallo, San Pedro, Baradero, San Antonio de Areco, Exaltacion de La Cruz, Capitan Sarmiento and San Andres de Giles in the Province of Buenos Aires.

Foreign legal entities or individuals may not own rural land that comprise or are located beside permanent and significant bodies of water to be determined by the Interministerial Council of Rural Land (Consejo Interministerial de Tierras Rurales) and will include hydrological works and projects considered strategic and of public interest.

Law No. 26,787 created a National Registry of Rural Land (Registro Nacional de Tierras Rurales) in charge of the enforcement of the provisions of the law and registry of rural land. Foreign owners were required to report their ownership of rural land to the National Registry of Rural Land within the 180 days immediately following the issuance of the law’s implementing regulations.

Acquisition of rural land will not be deemed as an “investment” under bilateral investment treaties signed by the Argentine Republic, since rural land is deemed as “a non-renewable natural resource”.

Certain provisions of Law No. 26,787 and its implementing regulation raise questions over their precise meaning. Law No. 26,787 states that any act in violation of its provisions will be considered null and void, notwithstanding, the law expressly provides that it “does not affect any vested rights”. Hence, it should not have an adverse effect on the current rural land owned by our Argentine subsidiaries. However, our Argentine subsidiaries may be prevented from acquiring additional rural land in Argentina, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of our operations.

The lack of financing for Argentine companies may have an adverse effect on the results of our operations in Argentina and on the market price of our common shares.

The prospects for Argentine companies accessing financial markets are limited in terms of the amount of the financing available and the conditions and costs of such financing. The default on the Argentine sovereign debt and the global economic crisis have significantly limited the ability of Argentine companies to access international financial markets.

In addition, in November 2008, the Argentine Congress passed a law eliminating the private pension fund system and transferring all retirement and pension funds held by the pension fund administrators (Administradoras de Fondos de Jubilaciones y Pensiones, or “AFJPs”) to the National Social Security Administrative Office (Administración Nacional de la Seguridad Social). Because the AFJPs had been the major institutional investors in the Argentine capital markets, the nationalization of the pension fund system has led to a reduction of the liquidity available in the local Argentine capital markets. As of December 31, 2012, our subsidiaries in Argentina have relied on local Argentine financing for 50% of our total indebtedness. Lack of access to international or domestic financial markets could affect the projected capital expenditures for our operations in Argentina and, therefore, may have an adverse effect on the results of our operations in Argentina and on the market price of our common shares.

27

##### Table of Contents

Official data regarding inflation may be unreliable.

Since 2007, the INDEC has experienced a process of institutional and methodological reforms that have given rise to controversy with respect to the reliability of the information produced by the INDEC. The intervention of the Argentine government in the INDEC and the change in the way the inflation index is measured have resulted in disagreements between the Argentine government and private consultants as to the country’s actual annual inflation rate. Members of the political opposition in the House of Representatives of the Argentine Congress periodically disseminate inflation data produced by certain private analysts and non-governmental sources which differ significantly from, and which present higher estimates of inflation than) those published by the INDEC. According to the INDEC inflation was approximately 8.5% for 2007, 7.2% for 2008, 7.7% for 2009, 9.5% for 2011 and 10.8% for 2012. Uncertainty surrounding future inflation rates has slowed the rebound in the long-term credit market. Private estimates, on average, refer to annual rates of inflation substantially in excess of those published by the INDEC. In the past, inflation has materially undermined the Argentine economy and the government’s ability to create conditions that would permit stable growth. High inflation may also undermine Argentina’s foreign competitiveness in international markets and adversely affect economic activity and employment, as well as our business and results of operation. In June 2008, the INDEC published a new consumer price index, which has been criticized by economists and investors after its initial report found prices rising below expectations. These events have affected the credibility of the consumer price index published by the INDEC, as well as other indices published by the INDEC that use the consumer price index in their calculation, including the poverty index, the unemployment index and real GDP. Beginning November 23, 2010, the Argentine government consulted with the IMF for technical assistance in order to prepare a new national consumer price index with the aim of modernizing the current statistical system. During the first quarter of 2011, a team from the IMF started working in conjunction with the INDEC to create such new national consumer price index. Notwithstanding the foregoing, reports published by the IMF state that their staff also uses alternative measures of inflation for macroeconomic surveillance, including data produced by private sources, which have shown inflation rates considerably higher than those issued by the INDEC since 2007, and the IMF has called on Argentina to adopt remedial measures to address the quality of official data. In its meeting held on February 1, 2013, the Executive Board of the IMF found that Argentina’s progress in implementing remedial measures since September 2012 has not been sufficient, and as a result, the IMF issued a declaration of censure against Argentina in connection with its breach of its related obligations to the IMF under the Articles of Agreement, and called on Argentina to adopt remedial measures to address the inaccuracy of inflation and GDP data without further delay. Any required correction or restatement of the INDEC indices could result in a further decrease in confidence in Argentina’s economy, which could, in turn, have an adverse effect on our ability to access the international credit markets at markets rates to finance our operations and growth.

Government intervention in Argentina may have a direct impact on our prices and sales.

The Argentine government has in the past set certain industry market conditions and prices. In March 2002, the Argentine government fixed the price for milk after a conflict among producers and the government. In 2005, the Argentine government adopted measures in order to increase the domestic availability of beef and reduce domestic prices. The export tax rate was increased and a minimum weight requirement for animals to be slaughtered was established. In March 2006, sales of beef products to foreign markets were temporarily suspended until prices decreased. Furthermore, in 2007 the Argentine government significantly increased export tax rates on exports of crops. A number of restrictions are also imposed on the grain and oilseed markets that essentially limit the access of traders to exports, resulting in a disparity between domestic and world prices. In March 2012, the Undersecretary of Transport created an “indicative price” for the transportation of grains by road which will be fixed on a quarterly basis. The actual price paid for the road transportation of grains should not be lower than 5% or higher than 15% of the “indicative price” fixed for the applicable period. In some cases, the imposition of this “indicative price” would produce increases in our transportation costs. In addition, on April 9, 2013, the Secretary of Commerce issued a resolution that established a fixed price for selling liquid hydrocarbons for a six months period. The fixed price would be the highest selling price on the date of issuance of the resolution, in certain regions of the country.

We cannot assure you that the Argentine government will not interfere in other areas by setting prices or regulating other market conditions. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will be able to freely negotiate the prices of all our Argentine products in the future or that the prices or other market conditions that the Argentine government might impose will allow us to freely negotiate the prices of our products, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

28

##### Table of Contents

The approval of judicial reforms proposed by the Argentine government could adversely affect the operation of our business

On April 8 2013, the Argentine government submitted to the Argentine Congress three bills for: (a) the creation of three courts of cassation and the amendment to the Civil and Commercial Procedure Code (“Courts of Cassation Bill”); (b) the amendment to the Law which regulates the Council of the Judiciary No. 24,937 (“Council of the Judiciary Bill”); and (c) a new regulation of precautionary measures in proceedings involving the federal government or any of its decentralized entities (“Precautionary Proceedings Bill”).

The Court of Cassation Bill, proposes the creation of (i) a federal court of cassation on Administrative Law matters; (ii) a federal and national court of cassation on Labor and Social Security law matters; and (iii) a federal and national court of cassation on Civil and Commercial law matters, which will have jurisdiction to decide the cassation, unconstitutionality and to review appeals against the decisions rendered the by Federal and National Court of Appeals on Administrative Law, Labor and Social Security and Civil and Commercial matters, respectively. The proposed bill sets forth that the judges of the Cassation Courts have to meet the conditions required to be a Supreme Court judge and will be similarly appointed. Abbreviated designations may be followed to speed up the appointment. Finally, such bill reduces the members of the Supreme Court of Argentina from seven to five. The passing of this bill would imply that, since there would be a new instance for judicial review before having access to the Federal Supreme Court, judicial proceedings before federal and national courts would probably take longer and likely result in higher legal costs.

The Council of the Judiciary Bill increases the number of members of the Council of the Judiciary from thirteen to nineteen, which will include three judges, three lawyer’s representatives, six representatives from academia, six congressmen (4 selected by the majority in the Argentine Congress and two selected by the minority) and a Federal Executive Branch representative. Furthermore, the Bill changes the method for appointing the Members of the Council, while they are currently appointed by their peers, after the passing of the bill, would be appointed together with the general presidential elections by means of a previous open, compulsory and simultaneous primary elections. The Council of the Judiciary is entrusted with broad powers to organize and run the system to train, appoint and remove judges; approve the draft proposal for the annual budget, establish the system of compensation of all the judicial system and provide for the administration of all the judicial personnel; sanction judges and retired judges; and amend the regime applicable to the judiciary system. Pursuant to this bill the election of the members of the Council of the Judiciary would be politically based and the majorities for the removal of judges would be limited.

According to the Precautionary Proceedings Bill, when granting a precautionary measure against the Argentine government and its agencies, judges will have to establish, under penalty of nullity, a period of effectiveness of such measure of no longer than six months in normal proceedings and three months in abbreviated proceedings and in the cases of “amparo”. The term can be extended for six months considering that the public interest involved in the process. Special consideration will be given to the dilatory tactics or proactive measures taken by the party that was awarded the measure. In addition, under such legislation Judges are not allowed to grant precautionary measures that will affect or detract from its purposes or in any way disrupt the property or revenues of the Federal Government, nor impose personal monetary charges to public officers. Moreover, the bill establishes that the precautionary measures against the Federal Government or its decentralized entities will be effective once the requesting party places an injunction bond for the expenditures or damages that the measure may cause. The injunction bond will not be required when the precautionary measure is granted in favor of the Federal Government or any of its decentralized entities.

As of the date of this annual report, the Council of the Judiciary Bill and the Precautionary Proceedings Bill have been passed into law by the Argentine Congress. While an earlier version of the Court of Cassation Bill was approved by the Argentine Senate, due to the inclusion of certain amendments by the Argentine House of Representatives, the legislation will be subject to debate in Senate in its current form before it is passed into law. When these legislative measures become effective, they may have a negative impact on our business and operations as such legislation could make a timely and impartial administrative process more difficult.

Government measures to preempt or respond to social unrest may adversely affect the Argentine economy and our business.

During the Argentine economic crisis in 2001 and 2002, Argentina experienced significant social and political turmoil, including civil unrest, riots, looting, nationwide protests, strikes and street demonstrations. Despite

29

##### Table of Contents

Argentina’s economic recovery and relative stabilization, social and political tension and high levels of poverty and unemployment continue. In 2008, Argentina faced nationwide strikes and protests from farmers due to increased export taxes on agricultural products, which disrupted economic activity and have heightened political tensions. Currently, Argentina is facing national protests from the Argentine population. On November 8, 2012 there was a massive protest against the government and on November 20, 2012 a general strike led by opposition trade unions. The social unrest increased during the last months of 2012, and in December there were new riots and lootings to shops and supermarkets in various cities around the country. In addition, on April 18, 2013 there was a new protest against the government mainly due to the proposed judicial reforms.

Future government policies to preempt, or in response to, social unrest may include expropriation, nationalization, forced renegotiation or modification of existing contracts, suspension of the enforcement of creditors’ rights, new taxation policies, including royalty and tax increases and retroactive tax claims, and changes in laws and policies affecting foreign trade and investment. Such policies could destabilize the country and adversely and materially affect the Argentine economy, and thereby our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Disputes between the Argentine government and the agricultural sector may adversely affect the Argentine economy and our business.

In 2008, the Ministry of Economy and Public Finance issued a resolution which applied variable export tariffs (retenciones móviles) to the agricultural sector, thereby increasing the tariffs applicable to such exports. The resolution caused a strong reaction by organizations and individuals related to the agricultural sector, who considered the increase a direct confiscation of their private property. This reaction was publicly evidenced by large-scale demonstrations all over the country, resulting in the largest agricultural strike in Argentina’s history, which included road blocks by strikers to prevent traffic of any freight related to agricultural production. As a consequence, markets reacted adversely, causing a recession in local demand and a disruption in the local financial markets. After a serious institutional crisis between the Argentine congress and the executive branch, the Argentine government issued decrees limiting the effectiveness of the original resolution. However, we cannot assure you that the government’s dispute with the agricultural sector will not resume or whether a similar reaction or conflict with the same sector will not arise. In fact, on December 21, 2012, through Decree No. 2552 the Argentine government revoked the sale of a facility of the Argentine Rural Society (Sociedad Rural Argentina) in the City of Buenos Aires that has been occupied by the Argentine Rural Society since 1875 and title was transferred to it pursuant to Decree No. 2699 of the Argentine government in the 1990’s. Cattle farmers engaged in a one-day strike in protest of this decision and the Argentine Rural Society has warned that it will organize new protests against this decision and all other actions of the Argentine government against the agricultural and cattle sectors.

Although, to date, the dispute has not materially affected us, we cannot assure you that a similar dispute will not arise and, if it were to arise, that it will not have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition in the future.

The Argentine government may order salary increases to be paid to employees in the private sector, which would increase our operating costs.

In August 2012, the Argentine government established a 25% increase in the minimum salary and as of February 2013 the applicable minimum salary is AR$2.875. Due to the high levels of inflation, employers both in the public and private sectors are experiencing significant pressure from organized labor and their employees to further increase salaries. During the beginning of 2013, organized labor has agreed with employers’ associations on salary increases between 22% and 25%. It is possible that the Argentine government could adopt measures establishing further minimum salary increases, and/or the provision of additional employee benefits in the future. Any such measures could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

An increase in export and import duties and controls may have an adverse impact on our sales.

Since 2002, the Argentine government has imposed duties on the exports of various primary and manufactured products, including some of our products. During the last ten years, such export taxes have undergone significant increases, reaching a maximum of 35% in the case of soybean. We cannot assure you that there will not be further

30

##### Table of Contents

increases in the export taxes or that other new export taxes or quotas will not be imposed. Imposition of new export taxes or quotas or a significant increase in existing export taxes or the application of export quotas could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

Pursuant to a resolution of the Argentine Federal Tax Authority (“Administración Federal de Ingresos Públicos - AFIP”) since February 2012, prior to the execution of any purchase order or similar document, Argentine importers are required to file before the AFIP a “Prior Import Statement” (Declaración Jurada Anticipada de Importación) providing information on future imports. Compliance with this requirement will be verified by the Argentine Customs upon arrival of the goods into Argentina and will be condition for the authorization of the payment of the purchase price by the Argentine financial entities. Even though this is intended merely as an information regime, it may be used for purposes of restricting imports into Argentina. A similar regime was also imposed in respect of the import and export of services, and could result in additional restrictions being imposed on the payments made by Argentine residents on services provided by foreign residents. The imposition of this regime may restrict the exports of goods and services of our Argentine subsidiaries which may adversely affect our financial conditions or results of operations.

Exchange controls could restrict the inflow and outflow of funds in Argentina.

In 2001 and 2002, the Argentine government implemented a number of monetary and currency exchange control measures that included restrictions on the withdrawal of funds deposited with banks and stringent restrictions on the outflow of foreign currency from Argentina, including for purposes of paying principal and interest on debt and distributing dividends.

Although most of these restrictions were eased in the past, as a consequence of the increase of the demand in Argentina for U. S. Dollars and the capital flows out of Argentina during 2011, the Argentine government imposed additional restrictions on the purchase of foreign currency and on the transfer of funds from Argentina (e.g., to make portfolio investments) and reduced the time required to comply with the mandatory transfer of funds into Argentina (e.g., the mandatory transfer into Argentina of the proceeds of loans disbursed outside of Argentina). Since January 2012, the term for mandatory transfer was reduced from 365 days to 30 or 10 days following disbursement depending on the indebtedness. Accordingly, we may face difficulties in the payment of external debt obligations from Argentina, we may not be able to fund and/or finance our operations in Argentina, or we may not be able to distribute dividends from Argentina. Additionally, by means of resolution 142/2012 issued by the Ministry of Economy on April 24, 2012, and Communication “A” 5300 issued by the Central Bank on April 27, 2012, the term to comply with the mandatory transfer into Argentina of export proceeds was reduced to 15 days following shipment. This last term was increased to 30 days pursuant to Resolution 231/2012 issued by the Ministry of Economy on May 24, 2012. These restrictions and requirements could adversely affect our financial condition and the results of our operations, or the market price of our common shares

Changes in the Argentine tax laws may adversely affect the results of our operations.

The Argentine government is currently developing a bill to amend the Income Tax Law denominated “Anti-Evasion Plan III”. Pursuant to the proposed bill, among other things, deductible losses (that can be deducted within the following five years) would be limited to a 30% of the gains earned in each fiscal year; capital gains obtained from foreign individuals or entities from the sale, exchange or disposition of shares and other securities would be subject to the income tax at a rate of 35%; and payments made to individuals or entities located or incorporated in countries with no income taxation would be subject to withholding at a rate of 35% and would not be deductible. If these amendments are passed into law, the limitations on the deductions may adversely affect the results of our Argentine subsidiaries operations; and the taxation of the capital gains will adversely impact the results of the sale or disposition of our Argentine subsidiaries’ shares.

31

##### Table of Contents

Risks Related to Brazil

Brazilian economic and political conditions and perceptions of these conditions in international markets have a direct impact on our business and our access to international capital and debt markets and could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

A significant portion of our operations, properties and customers are located in Brazil. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations are substantially dependent on economic conditions in Brazil. The Brazilian economy has experienced significant volatility in recent decades, characterized by periods of low or negative growth, high and variable levels of inflation and currency devaluation. Brazil’s GDP, in real terms, grew by 6.1% in 2007, 5.1% in 2008, decreased 0.2% in 2009, increased by 7.5% in 2010, increased 3.0% in 2011 and increased 0.9% in 2012. We cannot assure you that GDP will increase or remain stable in the future. Future developments in the Brazilian economy may affect Brazil’s growth rates and, consequently, the consumption of sugar, ethanol, and our other products. As a result, these developments could impair our business strategies, results of operations and financial condition.

Historically, Brazil’s political situation has influenced the performance of the Brazilian economy, and political crises have affected the confidence of investors and the general public, which has resulted in economic deceleration and heightened volatility in the securities issued abroad by Brazilian companies. Future developments in policies of the Brazilian government and/or the uncertainty of whether and when such policies and regulations may be implemented,.

Changes in Brazilian tax laws may increase our tax burden. have a material adverse impact on the taxes applicable to our business

The Brazilian government frequently implements changes to the Brazilian tax regime that may affect us and our clients. These changes include changes in prevailing tax rates and, occasionally, imposition of temporary taxes, the proceeds of which are earmarked for designated government purposes. Some of these changes may result in increases in our tax payments, which could adversely affect industry profitability and increase the prices of our products, restrict our ability to do business in our existing and target markets and cause our financial results to suffer. For example, in September 2011, the Brazilian government introduced a tax on currency derivative securities transactions (“IOF/Securities”) (where the underlying asset is linked to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the Reais) that are executed through the Brazilian markets at the time of the acquisition, sale or maturity of IOF/Securities. The tax is calculated at the rate of 1.0% on the notional adjusted value of the financial derivative transaction. The government also implemented several changes to the tax charged on consumer financial credit transactions . In April 2011, the rate was increased from 0.0041% per day to 0.0082% per day, which represents an increase of 1.5% per year. In December 2011, it was changed again, to a rate of 0.0068% per day, representing a reduction of 0.5% per year. In May 2012, it was reduced again to 0.0041% per day. On March 1, 2012, the Brazilian government issued new regulations effective immediately relating to new export prepayment financing, limiting the tenor of these financings to 360 days and excluding financial institutions as eligible lenders. In addition, the Brazilian government implemented a 6% IOF/Exchange tax rate applicable to foreign exchange transactions related to financing from foreign financial institutions (“IOF/Exchange”) on loan transactions with an average maturity of less than five years and reduced the IOF/Exchange rate for 360 days. In December 2012, the Brazilian government modified the regulation , allowing early receipt of resources for Brazilian exporters, for prepayment export facilities by importers or any corporate entity operating abroad, including financial institutions, without any incidence of taxes in certain cases. The effects of these changes and any other change that could result from the enactment of additional legislation cannot be quantified. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our projected cash flow and profitability following any increases in Brazilian taxes applicable to us and our operations.

Widespread corruption and fraud relating to ownership of real estate may adversely affect our business, especially our land transformation business.

Under Brazilian Legislation, real property ownership is normally transferred by means of a transfer deed, and subsequently registered at the appropriate Real Estate Registry Office under the corresponding real property record. There are uncertainties, corruption and fraud relating to title ownership of real estate in Brazil, mostly in rural areas. In certain cases, the Real Estate Registry Office may register deeds with errors, including duplicate and/or fraudulent entries, and, therefore, deed challenges frequently occur, leading to judicial actions. Property disputes over title ownership are frequent in Brazil, and, as a result, there is a risk that errors, fraud or challenges could adversely affect us.

32

##### Table of Contents

Social movements and the possibility of expropriation may affect the normal use of, damage, or deprive us of the use of or fair value of, our properties.

Social movements, such as Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra and Comissão Pastoral da Terra, are active in Brazil and advocate land reform and mandatory property redistribution by the federal government. Land invasions and occupations of rural areas by a large number of individuals is common practice for these movements, and, in certain areas, including those in which we have invested or are likely to invest, police protection and effective eviction proceedings are not available to land owners. As a result, we cannot assure you that our properties will not be subject to invasion or occupation by these groups. A land invasion or occupation could materially impair the normal use of our lands or have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or the value of our common shares In addition, our land may be subject to expropriation by the federal government. Under Article 184 of the Brazilian legal system Constitution, the federal government may expropriate land that is not in compliance with mandated local ““social functions”” for purposes of land reform. “, upon prior and fair compensation by means of rural debt bonds (títulos da dívida agrária). “Social function”” is described in Article 186 of the Brazilian Constitution as (i) rational and adequate exploitation of land,; (ii) adequate use of natural resources available and preservation of the environment,; (iii) compliance with labor laws,; and (iv) and exploitation of land to promote welfare of owners and employees. If the Brazilian government decides to expropriate any of our properties, our results of operations may be adversely affected, to the extent that potential compensation to be paid by the federal government may be less than the profit we could make from the sale or use of such land. Disputing the federal government’s government’s expropriation of land is usually time-consuming and the outcomes atof such challenges are uncertain. In addition, we may be forced to accept public debt bonds, which have limited liquidity, as compensation for expropriated land instead of cash. A land invasion or occupation also could materially impair the normal use of our lands or have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or the value of our common shares.

Recent changes in Brazilian rules concerning foreign investment in rural properties may adversely affect our investments.

Brazilian Federal Law No. 5,709, effective October 7, 1971 (“Law 5709”) established certain restrictions on the acquisition of rural property by foreigners, including that (i) foreign investors may only acquire rural properties in which agricultural, cattle-raising, industrial or colonization projects are going to be developed as approved by the relevant authorities; (ii) the total rural area to be acquired by a foreign investor cannot exceed one quarter of the surface of the municipality where it is located, and foreigners with the same nationality may not own, cumulatively, more than 10% of the surface of the municipality in which it is located; and (iii) the acquisition or possession (or any in rem right) by a foreigner of rural property situated in an area considered important to national security must be previously approved by the General Office of the National Security Council (Secretaria-Geral do Conselho de DefesaSeguran;a Nacional). The Pursuant to Article 23 of Law No. 8,629, of February 25, 1993 (“Law 8629”), the restrictions mentioned in items (i) and (ii) above established by Law 5709 are also applicable for rural lease agreements executed by foreigners. ““Parcerias Rurales“Rurais” (agriculture partnerships agreements) have not been subject to these restrictions. Although, a broader interpretation of the existing regulations could have also included these agreements within the limitations for foreigners., the Federal General Attorney’s Office (“AGU”) on October 8, 2012 issued a legal opinion 005/2012, pursuant to which the AGU confirmed the understanding that the “Parcerias Rurais” are not subject to the restrictions or limitations of Law 5709 In addition, pursuant to Law 8629, the acquisition or lease by a foreigner of a rural property exceeding 100 módulos de exploração indefinida (“MEI,” a measurement unit defined by the National Institute for Colonization and Agrarian Reform (Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agraria, or “INCRA”) in hectares for each region of the country) must be previously approved by the Brazilian National Congress. Law 5709 also establishes that the same restrictions apply to Brazilian companies that are controlled by foreign investors. Any acquisition or lease of rural property by foreigners in violation of the terms of law 5709 would be considered null and void under Brazilian law.

However, the Brazilian Constitution enacted in 1988 and its amendments, in particular Constitutional Amendment No. 6, of August 15, 1995, provides that (i) no restrictions on the acquisition of rural land in Brazil should apply to Brazilian companies; and (ii) any company incorporated and headquartered in Brazil and controlled by foreign investors must receive the same treatment as any other company incorporated and headquartered in Brazil

33

##### Table of Contents

and controlled by Brazilian investors. Since the enactment of the Brazilian Constitution in 1988, the interpretation had been that the restrictions imposed by federal lawLaw 5709 on the acquisition or lease of rural property above-mentioned did not apply to Brazilian companies controlled by foreigners, pursuant to the legal opinion No. GQ-22, issued by the Federal General Attorney’s Office (the “AGU”) in 1994, which was ratified by legal opinion No. GQ-181, also issued by the AGU’ in 1998. However, the Brazilian Justice National Council issued an Official Letter on July 13, 2010 addressed to all the Brazilian local State Internal Affairs Bureaus in order for them to adopt procedures within 60 days and instruct the local State Notary and Real Estate Registry Offices to observe the restrictions of the Brazilian law on the acquisitions of rural land by Brazilian companies with foreign equity holders. Thereafter, on August 19, 2010, the AGU revised its prior opinion, and published a new legal opinion confirming, which: (i) revoked the AGU’s legal opinions No. GQ-22 and GQ-181; and (ii) confirmed that Brazilian entities controlled by foreigners should be subject to the restrictions described above, and the transactions entered into by foreigners in connection with rural properties shall be subject to the analysis and approval from INCRA, the Ministry of Agrarian Development and the Brazilian National Congress, when applicable. This revised opinion was ratified by the President of Brazil and published in the Official Gazette of the Federal Executive on August 23, 2010, becoming binding as of such date. We therefore believe that the acquisitions of rural properties by Brazilian companies controlled by foreigners registered in the appropriate real estate registry prior to August 23, 2010 are not be affected by the AGU’s legal opinion. As a confirmation of such understanding, pursuant to the Joint Normative Ruling N. 1 issued on September 27, 2012 by the Ministries of: (i) Agricultural Development; (ii) Agriculture, Cattle-raising and Supply; (iii) Industry Development and Foreign Commerce; and (iv) Tourism, a Brazilian company controlled by foreign individuals or companies which acquired or leased rural properties, by means of an act or agreement entered into from June 7, 1994 and August 22, 2010, may register such property before the National System of Rural Registry (Sistema Nacional de Catastro Rural-SNCR), without any administrative sanction. However, in the future, the acquisition and leasing of rural land in Brazil, including through corporate transactions, will be subject to the above-mentioned restrictions, and will require several additional layers of review and approvals which may be discretionary (including the approvals from INCRA, Ministry of Agrarian Development and the Brazilian National Congress, when applicable), burdensome and time consuming. . Additionally, the Joint Normative Ruling N. 1 sets forth the administrative procedures applicable to requests for authorization for the acquisition or lease of rural properties by foreign investors pursuant to Law 5709. Under the Joint Normative Ruling, in order to obtain the authorization for the acquisition or lease of rural properties, foreign investors shall present a project to the Regional Superintendence of the National Institute of Colonizaçao and Land Reform (Superintendéncia Regional do Instituto Nacional de Coloniza;iio e Reforma Agrária), containing the following information: (i) the rationale for the relationship between the property to be acquired or leased and the project size; (ii) physical and financial schedule of the investment and implementation of the project; (iii) use of official credit (governmental funds) for the total or partial finance of the project; (iv) logistic viability of the execution of the project and, in case of a industrial project, proof of compatibility between the local industrial sites and the geographic location of the lands; and (v) proof of compatibility with the criteria established by the Brazilian Ecological and Economical Zoning (Zoneamento Ecológico Económico do Brasil- ZEE), relating to the location of the property.

While we conduct our operations in Brazil through local subsidiaries, we would be considered a foreign controlled entity within the meaning of the restrictions articulated above. Therefore, if we are not able to comply with these restrictions and obtain the required approvals in connection with future acquisitions, our business plan, contemplated expansion in Brazil and results of operations will be adversely affected.

Furthermore, there is currently proposed legislation under analysis in the Brazilian National Congress regarding the acquisition of rural land by Brazilian companies controlled by foreign holders, which if approved may further limit and restrict the investments of companies with foreign equity capital in rural land in Brazil. Such further restrictions, if adopted, may place more strain on our ability to expand our operations in Brazil.

The Brazilian government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy.

The Brazilian government frequently intervenes in the Brazilian economy and occasionally makes significant changes in policy and regulations. The Brazilian government’s actions to control inflation and other policies and regulations have often involved, among other measures, increases in interest rates, changes in tax policies, price controls, currency devaluations, capital controls and limits on exports and imports. We may be adversely affected by changes in policy or regulations involving or affecting factors such as:

| • |  | interest rates;

34

##### Table of Contents

| • |  | monetary policy;

| • |  | limitation on ownership of rural land by foreigners;

| • |  | exchange controls and restrictions on remittances abroad;

| • |  | currency fluctuations;

| • |  | inflation;

| • |  | the liquidity of domestic capital and financial markets;

| • |  | tax policy; and

| • |  | other political, social and economic policies or developments in or affecting Brazil.

Uncertainty over whether the Brazilian government will implement changes in policy or regulations affecting these or other factors in the future may contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets and securities issued abroad that are supported by Brazilian issuers. As a result, these uncertainties and other future developments in the Brazilian economy may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and may adversely affect the price of our common shares.

Our business in Brazil is subject to governmental regulation.

Our Brazilian operations are subject to a variety of national, state, and local laws and regulations, including environmental, agricultural, health and safety and labor laws. We invest financial and managerial resources to comply with these laws and related permit requirements. Our failure to do so could subject us to fines or penalties, enforcement actions, claims for personal injury or property damages, or obligations to investigate and/or remediate damage or injury. Moreover, if applicable laws and regulations, or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, become more stringent in the future, our capital or operating costs could increase beyond what we currently anticipate, and the process of obtaining or renewing licenses for our activities could be hindered or even opposed by the competent authorities.

We are also subject to several laws and regulations, among others, imposed in Brazil by (i) the National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels (Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustível) and by the Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency (Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica) (“ANEEL”) due to our production of sugarcane and ethanol and (ii) the Ministry of Agriculture, Breeding Cattle and Supply (Ministerio da Agricultura, Pecuaria e Abastecimento), due to our agricultural, sugarcane and ethanol production activities. If an adverse final decision is issued in an administrative process, we could be exposed to penalties and sanctions derived from the violation of any of these laws and regulations, including the payment of fines, and, depending on the level of severity applied to the infraction, the closure of facilities and/or stoppage of activities and the cancellation or suspension of the registrations, authorizations and licenses, which may also result in temporary interruption or discontinuity of activities in our plants, and adversely affect our business, financial status, and operating results.

Government laws and regulations in Brazil governing the burning of sugarcane could have a material adverse impact on our business or financial performance.

In Brazil, approximately 54% of sugarcane is currently harvested by burning the crop, which removes leaves in addition to eliminating insects and other pests. The state of São Paulo and some local governments have established laws and regulations that limit and/or entirely prohibit the burning of sugarcane and there is a likelihood that increasingly stringent regulations will be imposed by the state of São Paulo and other governmental agencies in the

35

##### Table of Contents

near future. We currently make significant investments to comply with these laws and regulations. Although our plans for the implementation of mechanized harvesting are underway, with 90% of our sugarcane harvest mechanized during the 2011-2012 harvest, the strengthening of these laws and regulations or the total prohibition of sugarcane burning would require us to increase our planned investment in harvesting equipment, which, in turn, would limit our ability to fund other investments. In addition, the state of São Paulo has imposed an obligation on growers to dedicate a certain percentage of land used for sugarcane cultivation for native or reclaimed forest area. The cost of setting aside this land is difficult to predict and may increase costs for us or our sugarcane suppliers. As a result, the costs to comply with existing or new laws or regulations are likely to increase, and, in turn, our ability to operate our plants and harvest our sugarcane crops may be adversely affected.

Any failure to comply with these laws and regulations may subject us to legal and administrative actions. These actions can result in civil or criminal penalties, including a requirement to pay penalties or fines, which may range from US$5 to US$50 million and can be doubled or tripled in case of recidivism, an obligation to make capital and other expenditures or an obligation to materially change or cease some operations.

Risks Related to a Luxembourg Company

We are a Luxembourg corporation (“société anonyme”) and it may be difficult for you to obtain or enforce judgments against us or our executive officers and directors in the United States.

We are organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Most of our assets are located outside the United States. Furthermore, most of our directors and officers and the experts named in this annual report reside outside the United States, and most of their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, you may find it difficult to effect service of process within the United States upon these persons or to enforce outside the United States judgments obtained against us or these persons in U.S. courts, including judgments in actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. Likewise, it may also be difficult for you to enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained against us or these persons in courts located in jurisdictions outside the United States, including actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. It may also be difficult for an investor to bring an action in a Luxembourg court predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us or these persons. Luxembourg law, furthermore, does not recognize a shareholder’s right to bring a derivative action on behalf of the company.

Service of process within Luxembourg upon the Company may be possible, provided that The Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters of November 15, 1965 is complied with.

As there is no treaty in force on the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters between the United States and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, courts in Luxembourg will not automatically recognize and enforce a final judgment rendered by a U.S. court. The enforceability in Luxembourg courts of judgments entered by U.S. courts will be subject prior any enforcement in Luxembourg to the procedure and the conditions set forth in particular in the Luxembourg procedural code, which conditions may include the following (subject to court interpretation which may evolve):

| • |  | the judgment of the U.S. court is final and duly enforceable (exécutoire) in the United States;

| • |  | the U.S. court had jurisdiction over the subject matter leading to the judgment (that is, its jurisdiction was established in compliance both with Luxembourg private international law rules and with the applicable domestic U.S. federal or state jurisdictional rules);

| • |  | the U.S. court has applied to the dispute the substantive law which would have been applied by Luxembourg courts;

| • |  | the judgment was granted following proceedings where the counterparty had the opportunity to appear, and if it appeared, to present a defense;

| • |  | the U.S. court has acted in accordance with its own procedural laws; and

| • |  | the judgment of the U.S. court does not contravene Luxembourg international public policy.

36

##### Table of Contents

Under our articles of incorporation, we indemnify and hold our directors harmless against all claims and suits brought against them, subject to limited exceptions. Under our articles of incorporation, to the extent allowed or required by law, the rights and obligations among or between us, any of our current or former directors, officers and company employees and any current or former shareholder will be governed exclusively by the laws of Luxembourg and subject to the jurisdiction of the Luxembourg courts, unless such rights or obligations do not relate to or arise out of their capacities as such. Although there is doubt as to whether U.S. courts would enforce such provision in an action brought in the United States under U.S. securities laws, such provision could make the enforcement of judgments obtained outside Luxembourg more difficult as to the enforcement against our assets in Luxembourg or jurisdictions that would apply Luxembourg law.

You may have more difficulty protecting your interests than you would as a shareholder of a U.S. corporation.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our articles of incorporation and by the laws governing joint stock companies organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg as well as such other applicable local law, rules and regulations. The rights of our shareholders and the responsibilities of our directors and officers under Luxembourg law are different from those applicable to a corporation incorporated in the United States. There may be less publicly available information about us than is regularly published by or about U.S. issuers. Also, Luxembourg regulations governing the securities of Luxembourg companies may not be as extensive as those in effect in the United States, and Luxembourg law and regulations in respect of corporate governance matters may not be as protective of minority shareholders as state corporation laws in the United States. Therefore, you may have more difficulty protecting your interests in connection with actions taken by our directors and officers or our principal shareholders than you would as a shareholder of a corporation incorporated in the United States.

You may not be able to participate in equity offerings, and you may not receive any value for rights that we may grant.

Pursuant to Luxembourg corporate law, existing shareholders are generally entitled to preemptive subscription rights in the event of capital increases and issues of shares against cash contributions. However, under our articles of incorporation, the board of directors has been authorized to waive, limit or suppress such preemptive subscription rights until the fifth anniversary of the publication of the authorization granted to the board in respect of such waiver by the general meeting of shareholders.

Item 4. | Information on the Company

| A. | HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY

General Information

Adecoagro is a Luxembourg société anonyme (a joint stock company). The Company’s legal name is “Adecoagro S.A.” Adecoagro was incorporated on June 11, 2010 and on October 26, 2010 all the shares in issue in Adecoagro were acquired by IFH LLC.

On October 30, 2010, the members of IFH LLC transferred pro rata approximately 98% of their membership interests in IFH LLC to Adecoagro in exchange for common shares of Adecoagro.

On January 28, 2011, Adecoagro completed the IPO of its shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The shares are traded under the symbol “AGRO.”

During 2011, we contributed net proceeds of the IPO to increase our interest in IFH from 98% to 98.64%. In a series of transactions during 2012, we transferred shares of Adecoagro to certain limited partners of IFH in exchange for their residual interest in IFH increasing our interest in IFH to approximately 100%.

37

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro is registered with the Luxembourg Registry of Trade and Companies under number B153681. Adecoagro has its registered office at 13-15 Avenue de la Liberté, L-1931, Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Our telephone number is (+352) 2689-8213.

History

Since our inception in 2002, we have optimized the use of our portfolio of land acquired from time to time and effectively worked towards reaching its productive potential. We replaced the production model used by former owners of our assets with one that is more efficient and sustainable at the same time. Every hectare of our land capable of growing crops, other than land subject to land reserve requirements, is allocated to growing crops or producing sugarcane, while our other land is used for raising dairy cows or leased for raising cattle.

In September 2002, we commenced our operations with the acquisition of 100% of the equity interests of Pecom Agropecuaria S.A., an Argentine corporation (sociedad anónima), and we rapidly became one of the largest agricultural companies in Argentina. Involving more than 74,000 hectares of farmland, this acquisition represented one of the largest stock purchase transactions in South America in 2002. In connection with the acquisition, Pecom Agropecuaria S.A. changed its name to Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. (“Adeco Agropecuaria”).

Adeco Agropecuaria was the platform from which we executed our expansion plans, including the acquisition of additional land and the diversification of our business activities.

In 2004, we began our regional expansion and acquired our farm in Uruguay (approximately 5,000 hectares). In 2005, we continued the expansion of our crop business in Argentina with the acquisitions of La Agraria S.A. (approximately 4,857 hectares) and Establecimientos El Orden S.A. and Cavok S.A. (approximately 15,157 hectares). In 2005, we acquired our first sugar and ethanol mill, Usina Monte Alegre S.A., with a crushing capacity of 0.9 million tons of sugarcane per year at that time.

In 2006 and 2007, we continued our land portfolio expansion and vertical integration through the acquisitions of Pilagá S.A. (formerly Pilagá S.R.L. and before that, Pilagá S.A.G.), one of the largest and oldest agriculture companies in Argentina, with more than 88,000 hectares and two rice processing facilities, and one additional farm of approximately 2,400 hectares in Argentina and five farms of approximately 24,000 hectares in Brazil for the production of sugarcane and coffee. In 2007, we also acquired La Lácteo S.A., our Argentine dairy processing joint venture company, with two milk production facilities and an installed processing capacity of 150,000 liters of milk per day at that time. This joint-venture was entered with Agropur Cooperative, Canada’s second largest milk processing company.

Also, in December 2007, we acquired Bañado del Salado S.A. and Agro Invest S.A., with more than 43,000 hectares for crop production in Argentina, and one farm in Uruguay of approximately 3,177 hectares. In Brazil, we bought more than 13,000 hectares for the planting of sugarcane for our sugarcane cluster in Mato Grosso do Sul.

Additionally, in August 2010, we acquired Dinaluca S.A., an agricultural company consisting of a farm located in the province of Corrientes, Argentina, and with more than 14,000 hectares for crop production in Argentina.

On October 30, 2010, as part of the corporate reorganization, referred to herein as the Reorganization, AFI Ltd., a subsidiary of IFH LLC and the parent of Adecoagro LLC, distributed its interest in Adecoagro LLC to IFH LLC and commenced a process of dissolution, making IFH LLC the direct parent of Adecoagro LLC. Thereafter, our shareholders transferred pro rata 98% of their membership interests in IFH LLC to Adecoagro (a corporation organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg with no prior holdings or operations, formed for the purpose, among others, of facilitating our IPO) in exchange for 100% of the common shares of Adecoagro.

In connection with the Reorganization, Adecoagro converted IFH LLC from a limited liability company to a limited liability partnership, IFH LP, a Delaware limited partnership. Following the Reorganization, IFH LP was owned 2% by our shareholders, approximately 98% by Adecoagro, in each case as limited partners, and the remainder by Ona Ltd., a newly formed Maltese corporation, as its general partner. IFH LLC also converted Adecoagro LLC to Adecoagro LP, a Delaware limited partnership. Following the Reorganization, Adecoagro LP was owned approximately 100% by IFH LP as limited partner, and the remainder by Toba Ltd., a newly formed Maltese corporation, as its general partner.

38

##### Table of Contents

On January 28, 2011, we successfully completed the IPO of our shares listed on the NYSE and on February 2, 2011 we issued 28,405,925 shares, at a price of US$11 per share. The shares trade under the symbol “AGRO.”

On February 2, 2011, we also issued and sold to Al Gharrafa Investment Company (“Al Gharrafa”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Qatar Holding LLC and one of our shareholders, 7,377,598 common shares at a purchase price of $10.65 per share, which is equal to the price per common share paid by the underwriters acting in the initial public offering of the Company, pursuant to an agreement entered into on January 6, 2011.

In addition, on February 11, 2011, we issued 4,285,714 shares when the over-allotment option was exercised by the underwriters in our IPO.

During 2011, we contributed net proceeds of the IPO to IFH and increased our interest in IFH from 98% to 98.64%.

Furthermore, between August and November 2011, we acquired in Argentina: (i) Compañía Agroforestal de Servicios y Mandatos S.A., an agricultural Argentine company owner of more than 4,900 hectares of land in the province of Santiago del Estero, (ii) Simoneta S.A., an agricultural Argentine company owner of more than 4,600 hectares of land in the province of La Pampa, and (iii) 3,400 hectares of land for crop production in the province of San Luis.

During 2012, the Company issued in a series of transactions 1,654,752 shares to certain limited partners of International Farmland Holdings LP (“IFH”) in exchange for their residual interest, totaling 1.36% interest in IFH. After giving effect to this exchange, the Company held approximately 100% of IFH.

On February 26, 2013, Adecoagro formed CHS Agro, a joint venture with CHS Inc. CHS Inc. (www.chsinc.com) a leading farmer-owned energy, grains and foods company based in the United States. We hold 50% interest in CHS Agro. CHS Agro will build a sunflower processing facility located in the city of Pehuajo, Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina. The facility will process blackoil and confectionary sunflower into specialty products such as in-shell seeds and oil seeds, which will be entirely exported to markets in Europe and the Middle East. The joint venture will grow confectionary sunflower on leased farms, while blackoil sunflower will be originated from third parties. We and CHS Inc. are committed to make a capital contribution to CHS Agro of approximately US$ 4 million each during 2013.

On February 5, 2013, we completed an underwritten secondary offering of 13.9 million common shares of Adecoagro offered by our shareholder, HBK Master Fund LP at a price per share to the public of $8.00. The shares were offered pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement on Form F-3 filed with the SEC.

On February 13, 2013, HBK Master Fund LP sold an additional 2,1 million common shares of Adecoagro pursuant to the overallotment option it granted to Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, the sole underwriter in the secondary offering. As of March 31, 2013, and after the completion of the offering, public shareholders held approximately 51.9% of our capital stock.

39

##### Table of Contents

The diagram below illustrates our corporate structure as of March 31, 2013.

* | Private Shareholders refer to shareholders of record prior to our IPO and transferees.

** | Does not account for an immaterial amount of shares required to be owned by other persons pursuant to Maltese law.

40

##### Table of Contents

Principal Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures totaled $ 301.7 million, $165.3 million and $130.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

For a discussion of our capital expenditures and future projections, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Expenditure Commitments.”

| B. | BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Our Company

We are a leading agricultural company in South America, with operations in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay. We are currently involved in a broad range of businesses, including farming crops and other agricultural products, cattle and dairy operations, sugar, ethanol and energy production and land transformation. Our sustainable business model is focused on (i) a low-cost production model that leverages growing or producing each of our agricultural products in regions where we believe we have competitive advantages, (ii) reducing the volatility of our returns through product and geographic diversification and use of advanced technology, (iii) benefiting from vertical integration in key segments of the agro-industrial chain, (iv) acquiring and transforming land to improve its productivity and realizing land appreciation through strategic dispositions; and (v) promoting sustainable agricultural production and development.

As of December 31, 2012, we owned a total of 283,942 hectares, comprised of 22 farms in Argentina, 15 farms in Brazil and 1 farm in Uruguay. In addition we own and operate several agro-industrial production facilities including four rice processing facilities in Argentina, a dairy operation with approximately 6,765 milking cows in Argentina, two coffee processing plants in Brazil, twelve grain and rice conditioning and storage plants in Argentina and three sugar and ethanol mills in Brazil with a sugarcane crushing capacity of 7.2 million tons as of December 31, 2012.

We believe that we are:

| • |  | one of the largest owners of productive farmland in South America, with more than 228,601 owned hectares as of December 31, 2012 used in productive activities (excluding legal land reserves pursuant to local regulations and other land reserves) located in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay, producing a wide range of agricultural products.

| • |  | a leading producer of agricultural commodities in South America. During the 2011/2012 harvest year, we harvested 199,418 hectares (including 55,754 leased hectares and 48,286 second crop hectares) and produced 564,800 tons of grains, including soybeans, corn, wheat, sunflower and cotton.

| • |  | one of the largest producers of rough (unprocessed) rice in the world, planting 31,497 hectares (including 4,255 leased hectares) and producing 171,137 tons during the 2011/2012 harvest year, which accounted for 13% of the total Argentine production according to the Confederacion de Molinos Arroceros del Mercosur (“Conmasur”). We are also a large processor and exporter of white rice in Argentina, accounting for 18% of total white rice production capacity in Argentina and 21% of total Argentine white rice exports during 2012, according to Camara de Industriales Arroceros de Entre Ríos and the Federacion de Entidades Arroceras, respectively.

| • |  | a leading dairy producer in South America in terms of our cutting-edge technology, productivity per cow and grain conversion efficiencies, producing approximately 55.0 million liters of raw milk during 2012.

| • |  | one of the largest producers of green bean coffee in the world, with 1,632 fully integrated and mechanized hectares devoted to coffee production as of December 31, 2012.

41

##### Table of Contents

| • |  | a growing producer of sugar and ethanol in Brazil, where we are in the process of building what we expect will be one of the most cost-efficient sugarcane crushing clusters in Brazil. We currently own three sugar and ethanol mills in Brazil (two in operation and one under construction) with an aggregate installed capacity of 7.2 million tons per year and cogeneration (the generation of electricity from sugarcane bagasse, the fiber portion of sugarcane that remains after the extraction of sugarcane juice) capacity of 148 MW as of December 31, 2012;

| • |  | we are currently building our third sugar and ethanol mill in Brazil, named Ivinhema. As of December 31, 2012, we had completed the assembly of the first phase of the mill, with a total crushing capacity of 2.0 million tons per year. We expect to complete the second phase of the mill in 2015, reaching a total crushing capacity of 4.0 million tons per year, and the third and final phase is expected to be completed in 2017, reaching a total crushing capacity of 6.3 million tons per year. Once the construction of Ivinhema is completed, when combined with our existing Angélica mill (“Angélica”), it will form a cluster that we believe will allow us to become one of the lowest-cost producers of sugar, ethanol and energy from sugarcane in Brazil; and,

| • |  | we expect our planned cluster to have a total installed sugarcane crushing capacity of 10.3 million tons per year and a cogeneration capacity of 296 MW once it reaches full capacity in 2017, resulting in a total sugarcane crushing capacity of 11.5 million tons per year for our three mills together at that time.

| • |  | one of the leading companies in South America involved in the acquisition and transformation of undermanaged land to more productive uses, generating higher cash yields. During the last seven fiscal years we have consistently sold a portion of our fully mature farmland every year. In aggregate, we have sold 11 farms generating capital gains of approximately $132 million.

We are engaged in three main businesses:

Farming Business: We believe we are one of the largest owners of productive farmland in South America. As of December 31, 2012 we owned 270,721 hectares (excluding sugarcane farms) of farmland in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay, of which 138,154 hectares are croppable, 13,508 hectares are being evaluated for transformation, 67,794 hectares are suitable for raising beef cattle and are mostly leased to a third party beef processor, constituting a total of 219,456 productive hectares, and 51,265 hectares are legal land reserves pursuant to local regulations or other land reserves. During 2012/2013 harvest year we held leases or have entered into agriculture partnerships for an additional 54,250 croppable hectares. We own the facilities and have the resources to store and condition 100% of our crop and rice production. We do not depend on third parties to condition our production for sale. Our farming business is subdivided into five business areas:

| • |  | Crop business: We produce a wide range of agricultural commodities including soybeans, corn, wheat, sunflower and cotton, among others. In Argentina, our farming activities are conducted mainly in the Argentine humid pampas region, where agro-ecological conditions are optimal for low-cost production. Since 2004, we have expanded our operations throughout the center-west region of Uruguay and the western part of the state of Bahia, Brazil, as well as in the northern region of Argentina. During the 2011/2012 harvest year, we planted approximately 199,418 hectares of crops, including second harvests, producing 564,800 tons of grains, including soybeans, wheat and corn, sunflower and cotton. We also planted an additional 4,679 hectares where we produced over 62,636 tons of forage that we used for cow feed in our dairy operation. During the 2012/13 harvest year, we planted approximately 181,876 hectares of crops, including second harvest, and also planted an additional 4,727 hectares of forage .

| • |  | Rice business: We own a fully-integrated rice operation in Argentina. We produce irrigated rice in the northeast provinces of Argentina, where the availability of water, sunlight, and fertile soil results in one of the most ideal regions in the world for producing rice at low cost. We believe that we are one of the largest producers of rough (unprocessed) rice in Argentina, producing 171,137 tons during the 2011/2012 harvest year, which accounted for 13% of the total Argentine production according to Conmasur. We own four rice mills that process our own production, as well as rice purchased from third parties. We produce different types of white and brown rice that are both sold in the domestic Argentine retail market and exported. During the 2012/13 harvest year, we planted 35,249 hectares of rice.

42

##### Table of Contents

| • |  | Coffee business: Our integrated coffee operation is located in the western part of the state of Bahia, Brazil, where conditions are well-suited for producing “specialty coffee” due to the availability of water for irrigation, the absence of frosts and the flat topography that allows for a fully mechanized harvest. We grow coffee on 1,632 owned hectares and have available land and water to expand our operations to 2,700 hectares.

| • |  | Dairy business: We believe that we are a leading dairy producer in South America in terms of our utilization of cutting-edge technology, productivity per cow and grain conversion efficiencies, producing approximately 55.0 million liters of raw milk during 2012, with an average of 5,025 milking cows, delivering an average of 30.0 liters of milk per cow per day. Through the production of raw milk, we are able to transform forage and grains into value-added animal protein. We believe that our “free-stall” dairy in Argentina is the first of its kind in South America and allows us to optimize our use of resources (land, dairy cow feed and capital), increase our productivity and maximize the conversion of forage and grain into raw milk.

| • |  | Cattle business: Our cattle business consists primarily of a long-term lease agreement pursuant to which a meat processor leases approximately 69,369 hectares of grazing land from us to raise and fatten beef cattle. The lease agreement is tied to the market price of beef at the end of each quarter.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain data relating to our farming business:

|  | Year Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Sales |  | (In thousands of $) |
Crops(l) |  |  | 196,206 |  |  |  | 147,946 |  |  |  | 108,162 |
Rice(2) |  |  | 93,904 |  |  |  | 83,244 |  |  |  | 61,585 |
Coffee |  |  | 8,363 |  |  |  | 14,170 |  |  |  | 7,572 |
Dairy |  |  | 18,868 |  |  |  | 19,697 |  |  |  | 14,297 |
Cattle(3) |  |  | 5,027 |  |  |  | 5,709 |  |  |  | 6,125 |
Total |  |  | 322,368 |  |  |  | 270,766 |  |  |  | 197,741 |

Production |  | 2012/2013 Harvest Year |  |  | 2011/2012 Harvest Year |  |  | 2010/2011 Harvest Year |  |  | 2009/2010 Harvest Year |
Crops (tons)(4)(5) |  |  | 52,353 |  |  |  | 564,800 |  |  |  | 488,185 |  |  |  | 524,360 |
Rice (tons)(6) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 171,137 |  |  |  | 172,034 |  |  |  | 91,723 |
Coffee (tons) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,873 |  |  |  | 2,742 |  |  |  | 2,221 |
Total |  |  | 52,353 |  |  |  | 738,810 |  |  |  | 662,961 |  |  |  | 618,304 |

|  | Year Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Dairy (thousands of liters)(7) |  |  | 54,954 |  |  |  | 51,239 |  |  |  | 41,597 |
Cattle (tons)(3)(8) |  |  | 416 |  |  |  | 118 |  |  |  | 359 |

|  | 2012/2013 Harvest Year |  |  | 2011/2012 Harvest Year |  |  | 2010/2011 Harvest Year |  |  | 2009/2010 Harvest Year |
Planted Area |  | (In hectares, including second harvest) |
Crops (9) |  |  | 186,418 |  |  |  | 204,097 |  |  |  | 167,104 |  |  |  | 168,680 |
Rice |  |  | 35,249 |  |  |  | 31,497 |  |  |  | 27,542 |  |  |  | 18,142 |
Coffee (10) |  |  | 1,632 |  |  |  | 1,632 |  |  |  | 1,632 |  |  |  | 1,632 |
Cattle (11) |  |  | 69,369 |  |  |  | 74,017 |  |  |  | 78,891 |  |  |  | 82,157 |

(1) | Includes soybeans, corn, wheat, sunflower and cotton, among others.

(2) | Sales of processed rice, including rough rice purchased from third parties and processed in our facilities.

43

##### Table of Contents

(3) | In December 2009, we sold 55,543 head of cattle to a third party who leases grazing land from us to raise and fatten the cattle. Our payments under the lease are tied to the market price of beef. See “—Operations and Principal Activities—Farming—Cattle Business.”

(4) | As of the date of this annual report, the 2012/2013 harvest year crops were not fully harvested. Harvested tons correspond to wheat, which had been harvested as of 31th of December, 2012.

(5) | Crop production does not include 62,636 tons, 46,749 tons and 52,482 tons of forage produced in the 2012/2011, 2010/2011, and 2009/2010 harvest years, respectively.

(6) | Expressed in tons of rough rice produced on owned and leased farms. As of December 31, 2012, the 2012/2013 harvest year of rice harvest had not began.

(7) | Raw milk produced at our dairy farms.

(8) | Measured in tons of live weight. Production is the sum of the net increases (or decreases) during a given period in “live weight” of each head of beef cattle.

(9) | Includes 4,727 hectares, 4,679 hectares, 3,841 hectares and 3,653 hectares used for the production of forage during the 2012/2013, 2011/2012, 2010/2011 and 2010/2009 harvest years, respectively.

(10) | Reflects the size of our coffee plantations, which are planted only once every 18 to 20 years.

(11) | Comprised of land devoted to raising beef cattle, which, since December 2009, is mostly leased to a third party. See “—Operations and Principal Activities—Farming—Cattle Business.”

Sugar, Ethanol and Energy Business: We believe we are a growing and efficient producer of sugar and ethanol in Brazil. We cultivate and harvest sugarcane which is then processed in our own mills to produce sugar, ethanol and energy. As of December 31, 2012, our total sugarcane plantation consisted of 85,531 hectares, planted over both own and leased land. We currently own and operate three sugar and ethanol mills, UMA, Angélica and Ivinhema, with a total crushing capacity of 7.2 million tons of sugarcane per year. UMA is a small but efficient mill with over 75 years of history which is located in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, with a sugarcane crushing capacity of 1.2 million tons per year, full cogeneration capacity and an associated sugar brand with strong presence in the regional retail market (Açúcar Monte Alegre). We plant and harvest 99% of the sugarcane milled at UMA, with the remaining 1% acquired from third parties. Angélica and Ivinhema are two new, advanced mills, which we built in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, with current sugarcane crushing capacities of 4.0 and 2.0 million tons per year, respectively. They both have highly mechanized harvest, high pressure boilers and turbo-generators with the capacity to use all the sugarcane bagasse by-product to generate electricity that is used to power the mill, with excess electricity being sold to the grid, resulting in the mills having full cogeneration capacity. We plant and harvest 95% of the sugarcane milled at Angélica and Ivinhema and we are able to vary the product slate between ethanol and sugar with a 60%/40% production ratio for both sugar and ethanol.

The construction of the first phase of the Ivinhema mill was completed as of December 31, 2012. The Ivinhema mill is located in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, 45 km from our Angélica mill. It was built in order to complete our planned sugarcane cluster (consisting of Angélica and Ivinhema) in that region. As of December 31, 2012, we had incurred a total of $280 million for the acquisition and assembly of industrial equipment, manufacturing costs, agricultural equipment and sugarcane planting expenses. We estimate that we will need to invest an additional $418 million to complete the construction of the Ivinhema mill. Subject to procuring the necessary licenses and the remainder of the required funding, we anticipate completing the construction of the Ivinhema mill in 2017. See “—Sugar, Ethanol and Energy—Our Mills” and “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industries—Adverse conditions may create delays in or the suspension of the construction of our Ivinhema mill and/or significantly increase the amount of our expected investments.” We expect the Ivinhema mill to begin operating during the second quarter of 2013, with 2.0 million tons of nominal crushing capacity, and gradually increase its milling capacity until it reaches a full milling capacity of 6.3 million tons of sugarcane per year by 2017.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, we crushed 4.5 million tons of sugarcane. Our mills produce both sugar and ethanol, and accordingly, we have some flexibility to adjust our production (within certain capacity limits that

44

##### Table of Contents

generally vary between 40% and 60%) between sugar and ethanol, to take advantage of more favorable market demand and prices at given points in time. For the year ended December 31, 2011, sugar production was 247,805 tons while ethanol production reached 161,385 cubic meters. For the year ended December 31, 2012 we produced 281,622 tons of sugar and 183,713 cubic meter of ethanol.

As of December 31, 2012, our overall sugarcane plantation consisted of 85,531 hectares of sugarcane in the states of Mato Grosso do Sul and Minas Gerais, Brazil, of which 9,145 hectares of sugarcane were planted on owned land, and 76,386 hectares were planted on land leased from third parties under long term agreements.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain data relating to our sugar, ethanol and energy business:

|  | Year Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Sales |  | (In thousands of $) |
Sugar |  |  | 134,766 |  |  |  | 130,348 |  |  |  | 98,385 |
Ethanol |  |  | 121,544 |  |  |  | 116,599 |  |  |  | 114,793 |
Energy |  |  | 25,649 |  |  |  | 24,393 |  |  |  | 15,040 |
Other |  |  | 373 |  |  |  | 5,978 |  |  |  | 308 |
Total |  |  | 282,332 |  |  |  | 277,318 |  |  |  | 228,526 |

|  | Year Ended December 31, |
Production |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Sugar (tons) |  |  | 281,622 |  |  |  | 247,805 |  |  |  | 235,690 |
Ethanol (cubic meters) |  |  | 183,713 |  |  |  | 161,385 |  |  |  | 174,303 |
Energy (MWh exported) |  |  | 238,540 |  |  |  | 245,474 |  |  |  | 168,644 |

|  | Year Ended December 31, |
Other Metrics |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Sugarcane milled (% owned) |  |  | 96 | % |  |  | 93 | % |  |  | 95 | %
Sugarcane crushing capacity (millions of tons) |  |  | 7.2 |  |  |  | 5.2 |  |  |  | 5.2 |
% Mechanized harvesting operations — Consolidated |  |  | 90 | % |  |  | 87 | % |  |  | 80 | %
% Mechanized /harvesting operations — Angélica mill |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | %

Land Transformation Business: We believe we are one of the leading companies in South America involved in the acquisition and transformation of land. We acquire farmlands we believe are underdeveloped or underutilized and, by implementing cutting-edge production technology and agricultural best practices, transform the land to be suitable for more productive uses, enhance yields and increase the value of the land. During the ten-year period since our inception, we have effectively put into production 162,768 hectares of land that was previously undeveloped or undermanaged. During 2012, we put into production 8,961 hectares and in addition continued the transformation process of over 128,133 hectares we own. We realize and capture land transformation value through the strategic disposition of assets that have reached full development potential. We believe that the rotation of our land portfolio allows us to re-allocate capital efficiently, maximizing our return on invested capital. Our current owned land portfolio consists of 283,942 hectares, distributed throughout our operating regions as follows: 86% in Argentina, 13% in Brazil, and 1% in Uruguay. During the last seven years, we sold 11 of our fully mature farms, generating capital gains of approximately $132 million.

We promote sustainable land use through our land transformation activities, which seek to promote environmentally responsible agricultural production and a balance between production and ecosystem preservation. We do not operate in heavily wooded areas or primarily wetland areas.

From time to time, the company seeks to recycle its capital by disposing of a portion of its fully developed mature farms in order to acquire farms with higher potential for transformation. This allows the company to monetize the capital gains generated by its fully transformed farms and allocate its capital to acquire land with higher transformation potential, thereby enhancing the return on invested capital. Please see also “—Risks Related to Argentina—Recent Changes in Argentine law concerning foreign ownership of rural properties may adversely affect our results of operations and future investments in rural properties in Argentina” and “—Risks Related to Brazil— Recent changes in Brazilian rules concerning foreign investment in rural properties may adversely affect our investments.”

45

##### Table of Contents

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain data relating to our land transformation business:

|  | Year Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Undeveloped/Undermanaged land put into production (hectares) |  |  | 8,961 |  |  |  | 13,676 |  |  |  | 6,490 |
Ongoing transformation of croppable land (hectares) |  |  | 128,133 |  |  |  | 120,460 |  |  |  | 120,738 |
Number of farms sold |  |  | 2 | (*) |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 1 |
Hectares sold |  |  | 9,475 |  |  |  | 2,439 |  |  |  | 5,086 |
Capital gains from the sale of land ($ thousands) |  |  | 27,513 |  |  |  | 8,832 |  |  |  | 20,837 |

* | On June 29, 2012, we completed the sale of San Jose, a 7,630 hectare farm located in the Province of Santa Fe for US$ 9.3 million, 31% over the Cushman & Wakefield independent appraisal dated September 30, 2011. On December 27, 2012, we completed the sale of a 51% stake of Santa Regina S.A for $12.4 million, 11% above Cushman & Wakefield independent appraisal dated September 30, 2012. The sale of the 51% stake and the fair value adjustment of the remaining 49% still owned by Adecoagro generated a $19.4 million capital gain.

Our Strengths

We believe the following are our competitive strengths:

| • |  | Unique and strategic asset base. We own strategically located farmland and agro-industrial assets in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay. We engage in continued improvement of our operations and practices, resulting in the reduction of operating costs and an increase in productivity, ultimately enhancing the value of our properties and generating capital gains. Our operations also benefit from strategically located industrial facilities throughout Argentina and Brazil, increasing operating efficiencies and reducing operating and logistical costs. We are vertically integrated where economics and returns are attractive, where the efficiency of our primary operation is significantly enhanced, or where lack of a competitive market results in the absence of a transparent price determination mechanism. Our diversified asset base creates valuable synergies and economies of scale, including (i) the ability to transfer the technologies and best practices that we have developed across our business lines, (ii) the ability to apply value-adding land transformation strategies to farmland in connection with our farming and sugarcane operations, and (iii) a greater ability to negotiate more favorable terms with our suppliers and customers.

Owning a significant portion of the land on which we operate is a key element of our business model.

| • |  | Low-cost production leveraging agro-ecological competitive advantages. Each of the commodity products we grow is produced in regions where agro-ecological conditions provide competitive advantages and which, through the implementation of our efficient and sustainable production model, allow us to become one of the lowest cost producers.

| • |  | Our grain and oilseed production is based in the Argentine humid pampas region where soil fertility, regular rainfalls, temperate climate, availability of land and proximity to ports contribute to the reduced use of fertilizers and agrochemicals, high productivity and stable yields and efficient logistics, ultimately resulting in one of the lowest costs per ton of grain produced and delivered.

| • |  | Our cotton and coffee production is focused in western Bahia, Brazil. This region is excellent for producing high quality cotton fiber and specialty coffee at a low cost due to its ideal climate, well drained soils, high altitude, availability of water for irrigation, and absence of frosts.

| • |  | Our rice operation is located in the northeast provinces of Argentina, one of the best rice farming regions in the world due to plentiful sunlight, abundant availability of water for low cost irrigation and large potential for expansion.

| • |  | Our dairy operation is situated in the Argentine humid pampas region, where cow feed (grains, oilseeds and forage) is efficiently and abundantly produced at a low cost and climate and sanitary conditions are optimal for cow comfort, which enhances productivity, cow reproduction rates and milk quality.

| • |  | We produce sugarcane in the center-south region of Brazil, which has the lowest production costs in the world, significantly lower than other major sugar producing regions, including India, China, the United States, the United Kingdom, France and Germany.

46

##### Table of Contents

| • |  | Standardized and scalable agribusiness model applying technological innovation. We have consistently used innovative production techniques to ensure that we are at the forefront of technological improvements and environmental sustainability standards in our industry. We are implementing an agribusiness model that consists of specializing our workforce and defining standard protocols to track crop development and control production variables, thereby enhancing management decision-making. We further optimize our agribusiness model through the effective implementation and constant adaptation of a portfolio of advanced agricultural and information technologies and best practices tailored to each region in which we operate and commodity we produce, allowing us to improve our crop yields, reduce operating costs and maximize margins in a sustainable manner.

| • |  | In our farming business, we use “no-till” technology as the cornerstone of our crop production and have been able to implement this technique in areas within our production regions where it had not been used before. Furthermore, we also utilize crop rotation, second harvests, integrated pest management, balanced fertilization, water management and mechanization. Additionally, we use the innovative silo bag storage method, utilizing large polyethylene bags with a capacity of 180-200 tons which can be left on the field for 12 months, resulting in low-cost, scalable and flexible storage on the field during harvest, which we believe allows us to expand our crop storage capacity at a low cost, generate important logistic and freight savings by moving our production in the off-season when freight fares are lower, and time the entry of our production into the market at optimal price points. See “—Operations and Principal Activities—Farming—Storage and Conditioning.”

| • |  | In our dairy business, we believe that we were the first company in South America to implement the “free-stall” infrastructure in dairy operations, resulting in more efficient conversion of feed to raw milk and higher production rates per cow compared to our peers in the region.

| • |  | In our sugar, ethanol and energy business, our Cluster, constituted by the Ivinhema and Angélica mills (i) has a highly mechanized planting and harvesting operation, which has increased our sugarcane production, reduced our operating costs and contributed to environmental sustainability by eliminating the need to burn the sugarcane before harvest; (ii) has the capacity to use all the bagasse (a by-product of the sugar and ethanol production process) that is produced, with no incremental cost, to cogenerate 132 MW of clean and renewable electricity; (iii) is what we believe to be one of the largest continuously operating clusters in Brazil designed for enhanced efficiency and non-stop processing, with a production capacity of 2,800 tons of sugar per day; and (iv) has the ability to recycle by-products such as filter cake and vinasse by using them as fertilizers in our sugarcane fields, as well as recycling water and other effluents, generating important savings in input costs and protecting the environment.

| • |  | Unique diversification model to mitigate cash flow volatility. We pursue a unique multi-tier diversification strategy to reduce our exposure to production and market fluctuations that may impact our cash flow and operating results. We seek geographic diversification by spreading our portfolio of farmland and agro-industrial assets across different regions of Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay, thereby lowering our risk exposure to weather-related losses and contributing to stable cash flows. Additionally, we produce a variety of products, including cotton, coffee, soybeans, corn, wheat, sunflower, rice, barley, sorghum, raw milk, sugar, ethanol and energy, which lowers our risk exposure to potentially depressed market conditions of any specific product. Moreover, through vertical integration in the rice, dairy, sugar, ethanol and energy businesses, and to a lesser extent in our coffee business, we process and transform a portion of our agricultural commodities into branded retail products, reducing our commodity price risk and our reliance on the standard market distribution channels for unprocessed products. Finally, our commercial committee defines our commercial policies based on market fundamentals and the consideration of logistical and production data to develop a customized sale/hedge risk management strategy for each product.

| • |  | Expertise in acquiring farmland with transformation and appreciation potential. During the last eleven fiscal years, we have executed transactions for the purchase and disposition of land for over $542 million and sold 39,083 hectares of developed land, generating capital gains of approximately $132 million. We believe we

47

##### Table of Contents

| have a superior track record and have positioned ourselves as a key player in the land business in South America. Our business development team has gained extensive expertise in evaluating and acquiring farmland throughout South America and has a solid understanding of the productivity potential of each region and of the potential for land transformation and appreciation. To date, we have analyzed over 9.7 million hectares of farmland spread throughout the regions in which we operate and other productive regions in the world. We have developed a methodology to assess farmland and to appraise its potential value with a high degree of accuracy and efficiency by using information generated through sophisticated technology, including satellite images, rain and temperature records, soil analyses, and topography and drainage maps. Our management team has gained extensive experience in transforming and maximizing the appreciation potential of our land portfolio through the implementation of our agribusiness techniques described above. We also have an extensive track record rotating our asset portfolio to generate capital gains and monetize the transformation and appreciation generated through our operations.

| • |  | Experienced management team, knowledgeable employees. Our people are our most important asset. We have an experienced senior management team with an average of more than 20 years of experience working in our sector and a solid track record of implementing and executing large scale growth projects such as land transformations, greenfield developments of industrial plants, and integrating acquisitions within our organization. Recruiting technically qualified employees at each of our farms and operating sites is a main focus of our senior management and a key to our success.

Our Business Strategy

We intend to maintain our position as a leading agricultural company in South America by expanding and consolidating each of our business lines, creating value for our shareholders. The key elements of our business strategy are:

| • |  | Expand our farming business through organic growth, leasing and strategic acquisitions. We will continue to seek opportunities for organic growth, target attractive acquisition and leasing opportunities and strive to maximize operating synergies and achieve economies of scale in each of our four main farming business areas (crops, rice, dairy and coffee). We plan to continue expanding and consolidating our crop production throughout South America. We also intend to continue expanding our rice segment in terms of production and processing capacity, consolidating our leading position in Argentina and increasing our presence throughout Brazil, Uruguay and other regions, to become a leading regional player. We plan to increase our current milk production using the “free-stall” model. We completed the assembly of our second free-stall in August 2012. We expect to gradually populate this facility until it reaches its full capacity of 3,500 cows by the end of 2013. We believe that the know-how and skills gained from the construction of our first “free-stall” module can be easily replicated, allowing us to scale-up our production efficiently and at a fast rate.

| • |  | Consolidate our sugar and ethanol cluster in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Our main strategy for our sugar and ethanol business is to build our cluster in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, through the construction of the Ivinhema mill, our second greenfield project, which we expect to reach a full crushing capacity of 6.3 million tons per year by 2017. See “—Sugar, Ethanol and Energy—Our Mills.” Completion of the Ivinhema mill will allow us to complete our advanced cluster with a planned total crushing capacity of 10.3 million tons per year. The consolidation of the cluster will generate important synergies, operating efficiencies and economies of scale such as (i) one centralized management team, reducing total administration cost per ton of sugarcane milled; (ii) a large sugarcane plantation supplying two mills, allowing for non-stop harvesting; and (iii) a reduction in the average distance from the sugarcane fields to the mills, generating important savings in sugarcane transportation expenses. We believe that the Ivinhema mill will allow us to become one of the most efficient and low cost producers of sugar, ethanol and energy in Brazil. Additionally, we plan to continue to monitor closely the Brazilian sugar and ethanol industries and may pursue selective acquisitions that provide opportunities to increase our economies of scale, operating synergies and profitability.

| • |  | Further increase our operating efficiencies while maintaining a diversified portfolio. We intend to continue to focus on improving the efficiency of our operations and maintaining a low-cost structure to increase our profitability and protect our cash flows from commodity price cycle risk. We seek to maintain our low-cost platform by (i) making additional investments in advanced technologies, including those related to agricultural, industrial and logistical processes and information technology, (ii) improving our economies of scale through organic growth, strategic acquisitions, and more efficient production methods, and (iii) fully utilizing our resources to increase our production margins. In addition, we intend to mitigate commodity price cycle risk and minimize our exposure to weather related losses by (i) maintaining a diversified product mix and vertically integrating production of certain commodities and (ii) geographically diversifying the locations of our farms.

| • |  | Continue to implement our land transformation strategy. We plan to continue to enhance the value of our owned farmland and future land acquisitions by making them suitable for more profitable agricultural activities, thereby seeking to maximize the return on our invested capital in our land assets. In addition, we expect to continue rotating our land portfolio through strategic dispositions of certain properties in order to realize and monetize the transformation and appreciation value created by our land transformation activities. We also plan to leverage our knowledge and experience in land asset- management to identify superior buying and selling opportunities.

48

##### Table of Contents

Operations and Principal Activities

Farming

Our Farming business line is divided into five main reportable operating businesses, namely crops, rice, coffee, dairy and cattle. We conduct our farming operations primarily on our own land and, to a lesser extent, on land leased from third parties. During harvest year 2011/12 our farming operations were conducted on a total of 262,957 hectares of land, of which we own 202,948 hectares (excluding sugarcane farms) and we leased the remaining 60,009 hectares from third parties. Some of the farms we own are used for more than one production activity at a time. The following table sets forth our production volumes for each of our farming business lines.

|  | Harvest Year |
|  | 2012/2013(1) |  |  | 2011/2012 |  |  | 2010/2011 |  |  | 2009/2010 |
Crops (thousands of tons)(2)(3) |  |  | 52,353 |  |  |  | 564,800 |  |  |  | 488,185 |  |  |  | 524,360 |
Rice (thousands of tons)(4) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 171,137 |  |  |  | 172,034 |  |  |  | 91,723 |
Coffee (thousands of tons) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,873 |  |  |  | 2,742 |  |  |  | 2,221 |

|  | Year Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Dairy (thousands of liters)(5) |  |  | 54,954 |  |  |  | 51,239 |  |  |  | 41,597 |
Cattle (thousands of tons)(6) |  |  | 416 |  |  |  | 118 |  |  |  | 359 |

(1) | As of the date of this annual report, the harvest of soybean, corn, sunflower and cotton, rice and coffee pertaining to the 2012/2013 harvest year is ongoing. The only crop which has been fully harvested for the 2012/2013 harvest year is wheat, with a total production of 52,353 tons.

(2) | Crop production does not include 62,636 tons, 46,719 tons and 52,482 tons of forage produced in the 2011/2012, 2010/2011, and 2009/2010 harvest years respectively.

(3) | As of the date of this annual report, the 2012/2013 harvest years crops were not fully harvested. Harvested tons correspond only to the wheat harvest

(4) | Expressed in tons of rough rice. As of the date of this annual report, the 2012/2013 harvest year of rice harvest is ongoing.

(5) | Raw milk produced.

(6) | Measured in tons of live weight. Production is the sum of the net increases (or decreases) during a given period in live weight of each head of beef cattle we own.

Crops Business (Grains, Oilseeds and Cotton)

Our agricultural production is mainly based on planting, growing and harvesting crops over our owned croppable area. During the 2011/12 harvest year, we planted crops over a total area of approximately 204,097 hectares, including our owned land, land leased from third parties and hectares planted in second harvests. During mid 2012 we began the planting of crops pertaining to the 2012/13 harvest year, which was concluded during the first quarter of 2013, with a total planted area of 186,418 hectares. Our main products include soybean, corn, wheat, sunflower, and cotton. Other products, such as sorghum and barley, among others, are sown occasionally and represent only a small percentage of total sown land.

49

##### Table of Contents

The following table sets forth, for the harvest years indicated, the planted hectares for our main products:

|  | Harvest Year |
|  | 2012/2013 |  |  | 2011/2012 |  |  | 2010/2011 |  |  | 2009/2010 |
Product Area |  | (In hectares) |
Soybeans(l) |  |  | 91,746 |  |  |  | 92,789 |  |  |  | 90,126 |  |  |  | 87,522 |
Corn(2) |  |  | 45,795 |  |  |  | 47,409 |  |  |  | 31,894 |  |  |  | 34,617 |
Wheat(3) |  |  | 28,574 |  |  |  | 43,235 |  |  |  | 28,058 |  |  |  | 26,332 |
Sunflower |  |  | 12,478 |  |  |  | 9,596 |  |  |  | 9,943 |  |  |  | 14,784 |
Cotton |  |  | 3,098 |  |  |  | 6,389 |  |  |  | 3,242 |  |  |  | 425 |
Forage(4) |  |  | 4,727 |  |  |  | 4,679 |  |  |  | 3,841 |  |  |  | 4,561 |
Total |  |  | 186,418 |  |  |  | 204,097 |  |  |  | 167,104 |  |  |  | 168,241 |

(1) | Includes soybean first crop and second crop planted area.

(2) | Includes sorghum crop.

(3) | Includes barley crop.

(4) | Forage includes corn silage, wheat silage and alfafa used for cow feed in our dairy operation.

The following table sets forth, for the harvest years indicated, the production volumes for our main products

|  | Harvest Year |
|  | 2012/2013(2) |  |  | 2011/2012 |  |  | 2010/2011 |  |  | 2009/2010 |
Crop Production(1) |  | (In thousands of tons) |
Soybeans |  |  | — |  |  |  | 189,014 |  |  |  | 199,533 |  |  |  | 241,848 |
Corn |  |  | — |  |  |  | 237,294 |  |  |  | 169,711 |  |  |  | 203,573 |
Wheat |  |  | 52,353 |  |  |  | 113,121 |  |  |  | 92,908 |  |  |  | 61,208 |
Sunflower |  |  | — |  |  |  | 18,667 |  |  |  | 20,916 |  |  |  | 17,193 |
Cotton lint |  |  | — |  |  |  | 6,704 |  |  |  | 5,117 |  |  |  | 539 |
Total |  |  | 52,353 |  |  |  | 564,800 |  |  |  | 488,185 |  |  |  | 524,360 |

(1) | Does not include 62,636 tons, 46,749 tons and 52,482 tons of forage produced in the 2011/2012, 2010/2011, and 2009/2010 harvest years respectively.

(2) | As of the date of this annual report, the harvest of soybean, corn, sunflower and cotton pertaining to the 2012/13 harvest year is ongoing. The only crop which has been fully harvested is wheat.

The following table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the sales for our main products:

|  | Year Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Sales |  | (In thousands of $) |
Soybeans |  |  | 66,721 |  |  |  | 61,385 |  |  |  | 64,890 |
Corn (l) |  |  | 68,790 |  |  |  | 44,196 |  |  |  | 23,968 |
Wheat (2) |  |  | 34,831 |  |  |  | 25,060 |  |  |  | 9,110 |
Sunflower |  |  | 7,887 |  |  |  | 7,413 |  |  |  | 4,880 |
Cotton |  |  | 16,489 |  |  |  | 9,101 |  |  |  | 2,395 |
Other crops(3) |  |  | 1,488 |  |  |  | 791 |  |  |  | 2,919 |
Total |  |  | 196,206 |  |  |  | 147,946 |  |  |  | 108,162 |

(1) | Includes sorghum.

(2) | Includes barley.

(3) | Includes other crops and farming services.

Soybeans

Soybeans are an annual legume widely grown due to their high content of protein (40%) and oil (20%). They have been grown for over 3,000 years in Asia and, more recently, have been successfully cultivated around the world. The world’s top producers of soybeans currently are the United States, Brazil, Argentina, China and India. Soybeans are one of the few plants that provide a complete protein supply as they contain all eight essential amino

50

##### Table of Contents

acids. About 85% of the world’s soybeans are processed, or “crushed,” annually into soybean meal and oil. Approximately 98% of soybean meal is further processed into animal feed, with the balance used to make soy flour and proteins. Of the oil content, 85% is consumed as edible oil and the rest is used for industrial products such as fatty acids, soaps and biodiesel. We sell our soybeans mainly to crushing and processing industries, which produce soybean oil and soybean meal used in the food, animal feed and biofuel industries.

We grow soybeans in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay. In the 2009/2010 harvest year, we planted a total area of 87,522 hectares of soybeans, producing a total of 241,848 tons representing 52% of our total planted area that year, and 46% of our total crop production. In the 2010/2011 harvest year, we planted a total area of 90,126 hectares of soybeans, producing a total of 199,533 tons representing 54% of our total planted area that year, and 41% of our total crop production. In the 2011/ 2012 harvest year, we planted a total area of 92,789 hectares of soybeans, producing a total of 189,014 tons representing 45% of our total planted area that year, and 33% of our total crop production.

Soybeans comprised 15% of our total consolidated sales in 2010 and 11 % of our total consolidated sales in 2011 and 2012.

Corn

Corn is a cereal grown around the world and is one of the world’s most widely consumed foods. The main component of corn grain is starch (72% to 73% of grain weight), followed by proteins (8% to 11%). Corn grain is directly used for food and animal feed (beef, swine and poultry meat production and dairy). Corn is also processed to make food and feed ingredients (such as high fructose corn syrup, corn starch and lysine), or industrial products such as ethanol and polylactic acid (PLA). Oil, flour and sugar are also extracted from corn, with several uses in the food, medicine and cosmetic industries. Additionally, there are specific corn types used for direct human consumption such as popcorn and sweet corn.

We grow corn in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay. In the 2009/10 harvest year, we planted approximately 34,617 hectares of corn, including the second harvest, producing a total of 203,573 tons of corn representing 21% of our total planted area that year, and 39% of our total crop production. In the 2010/2011 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 31,894 hectares of corn, including the second harvest, producing a total of 169,711 tons of corn representing 19% of our total planted area that year, and 35% of our total crop production. In the 2011/2012 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 47,409 hectares of corn, including the second harvest, producing a total of 237,294 tons representing 24% of our total planted area that season and 42% of our total production.

Corn comprised 8% of our total consolidated sales in 2010 and 2011, and 11% of our total consolidated sales in 2012.

Wheat

Wheat is the world’s largest cereal-grass crop. Unlike other cereals, wheat grain contains a high amount of gluten, the protein that provides the elasticity necessary for excellent bread making. Although most wheat is grown for human consumption, other industries use small quantities to produce starch, paste, malt, dextrose, gluten, alcohol, and other products. Inferior and surplus wheat and various milling byproducts are used for livestock feed. We sell wheat to exporters and to local mills that produce flour for the food industry.

We grow wheat in Argentina and Uruguay. In the 2009/2010 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 26,332 hectares of wheat, producing a total of 61,208 tons of wheat representing 16% of our total planted area that year, and 12% of our total crop production. In the 2010/2011 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 28,058 hectares of wheat, producing a total of 92,908 tons of wheat representing 17% of our total planted area that year, and 16% of our total crop production. In the 2011/12 harvest year we planted a total area of approximately 43,235 hectares of wheat, producing a total of 113,121 tons of wheat representing 21% of our total planted area that year, and 20% of our total crop production. In the 2012/13 harvest year we planted a total area of approximately 28,574 hectares of wheat, producing a total of 52,353 tons of wheat.

51

##### Table of Contents

Wheat comprised 2% of our total consolidated sales in 2010, 4% of our total consolidated sales in 2011 and 6% of our total consolidated sales in 2012.

Sunflower

There are two types of sunflower, the most important in terms of volume being the oilseed sunflower, which is primarily grown for the oil extracted from the seed. Sunflower oil is considered one of the top three oils for human consumption, due to its high oil content (39-49%) and its oil composition (90% of oleic and linoleic oil). The other type of sunflower is the confectionary sunflower, which is used for direct human consumption. Sunflower seeds are an exceptional source of vitamin E, omega-6 fatty acids, dietary fiber and minerals. We grow both types of sunflower.

We grow sunflower in Argentina and Uruguay. In the 2009/2010 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 14,784 hectares of sunflower, producing a total of 17,193 tons of sunflower, representing 9% of our total planted area that year, and 3% of our total crop production. In the 2010/2011 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 9,943 hectares of sunflower, producing a total of 20,916 tons of sunflower, representing 6% of our total planted area that year, and 4% of our total crop production. In the 2011/2012 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 9,596 hectares of sunflower producing a total of 18,668 tons of sunflower representing 5% of our total planted area that year, and 3% of our total crop production.

Sunflower comprised 1% of our total consolidated sales in 2010, 2011 and 2012.

Cotton

Cotton is the world’s most popular natural fiber. The cotton fiber is made primarily into yarns and threads for use in the textile and apparel sectors. Clothing accounts for approximately 60% of cotton consumption. Cotton is also used to make home furnishings, such as draperies (the third major end use), or professional garments (about 5% of cotton fiber demand). The cottonseed is used in animal feeding or crushed in order to separate its three products — oil, meal and hulls. Cottonseed oil is used primarily for cooking oil and salad dressing. In recent years, there has been a growing demand for cotton oil for biodiesel production.

We plant upland cotton, the most common type of cotton planted and processed around the world. We produce and sell cotton lint and cotton seed.

We grow cotton in northern Argentina and in the western part of Bahia, Brazil. In the 2009/2010 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 425 hectares of cotton, including the second harvest, producing a total of 539 tons of cotton lint, representing 1% of our total planted area that year, and less than 1% of our total crop production. In the 2010/2011 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 3,242 hectares of cotton producing a total of 5,117 tons of cotton lint, representing 2% of our total planted area that year, and 2% of our total crop production. In the 2011/12 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 6,389 hectares of cotton, including the second harvest, producing a total of 6,704 tons of cotton lint, representing 1% of our total planted area that year, and 1% of our total crop production.

Cotton comprised 1% of our total consolidated sales in 2010, 2% of our total consolidated sales in 2011 and 3% of our total consolidated sales in 2012.

Forages

In addition to the above mentioned crops, we are engaged in the production of forage in Argentina, including corn silage, wheat silage, soybean silage and alfalfa silage. We use forage as cow feed in our dairy operation. During the 2011/2012 harvest year, we planted 4,679 hectares of forage and produced 46,749 tons of forage.

Crop Production Process

Our crop production process is directly linked to the geo-climatic conditions of our farms and our crop cycles, which define the periods for planting and harvesting our various products. Our crop diversification and the location

52

##### Table of Contents

of our farms in various regions of South America enable us to implement an efficient planting and harvesting system throughout the year, which includes second harvests in many cases. Our production process begins with the planting of each crop. After harvesting, crops may go through a processing phase where the grain or seeds are cleaned and dried to reach the required market standards.

For additional discussion of our harvest years and the presentation of production and product area information in this annual report, see “Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Fiscal Year and Harvest Year.”

Rice Business

Rice is the main food staple for about half of the world’s population. Although it is cultivated in over 100 countries and on almost every continent, 90% of the world’s rice is grown and consumed in Asia. Globally, rice is the most important crop in terms of its contribution to human diets and production value. There are three main types of rice: short grain, medium grain and long grain rice. Each one has a different taste and texture. We produce long grain rice and Carolina double rice, a variety of medium grain rice.

We conduct our rice operation in the northeast of Argentina, which is one of the most efficient locations in the world for producing rice at a low cost. This is a result of optimum natural agronomic conditions, including plentiful sunlight, abundant availability of water for low cost irrigation and large quantities of land. The use of public water for artificial irrigation is governed by provincial regulations and is subject to the granting of governmental permits. We have current permits for our use of water in our production of rice in the provinces of Corrientes and Santa Fe. Maintenance of our permits is subject to our compliance with applicable laws and regulations, which is supervised by the corresponding governmental authority (e.g., the Ministry of Water, Public Services and Environment (Ministerio de Agua, Servicios Publicos y Medio Ambiente), in the province of Santa Fe, and the Water Institute of the Province of Corrientes (Instituto Correntino del Agua).

The following table sets forth, for the harvest years indicated, the total number of planted rice hectares we owned and leased as well as the overall rough rice we produced:

|  | Harvest Year |
Rice Product Area & Production |  | 2012/2013 |  |  | 2011/2012 |  |  | 2010/2011 |  |  | 2009/2010 |
Owned planted area (hectares) |  |  | 32,167 |  |  |  | 27,242 |  |  |  | 22,973 |  |  |  | 10,831 |
Leased planted area (hectares) |  |  | 3,082 |  |  |  | 4,255 |  |  |  | 4,568 |  |  |  | 7,311 |
Total rice planted (hectares) |  |  | 35,249 |  |  |  | 31,497 |  |  |  | 27,542 |  |  |  | 18,142 |
Rough rice production (thousands of tons) (1) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 171,137 |  |  |  | 172,034 |  |  |  | 91,723 |

(1) | As of the date of this annual report, the harvest of rice pertaining to the 2012/2013 harvest year is ongoing.

We grow rice on 5 farms we own and 2 farms we lease, all located in Argentina. In the 2009/2010 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 18,142 hectares of rice our total rice producing a total of 91,723 tons, representing 15% of our total farming production and 7% of our total planted area. In the 2010/2011 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 27,542 hectares of rice producing a total of 172,034 tons, representing 26% of our total farming production and 10% of our total planted area. In the 2011/2012 harvest year, we planted a total area of approximately 31,497 hectares of rice, producing a total of 171,137 tons, representing 10% of our total planted area that year, and 23% of our total farming production.

In August 2012, we completed the construction of the Franck rice mill, which has a total processing capacity of 120,000 tons per year.

Production Process

The rice production year lasts approximately five to six months, beginning in September of each year and ending in April of the following year. Rice planting continues until November, followed by treatment of the rice, which lasts approximately three months, until January. In February we begin harvesting, which lasts until April. After harvesting, the rice is ready for processing.

53

##### Table of Contents

We process rice in our 4 rice mills in Argentina, where we are able to process our entire rice crop and utilize our excess milling capacity to process rough rice we purchase from third party growers.

At the mill, we clean the rice to remove all impurities. We then put it through a dryer to remove excess moisture from the grains. Proper drying results in increased storage life, prevents deterioration in quality and leads to optimum milling. Once dried, the rice grain, now known as rough rice or paddy rice, is ready for storage. We store rice in elevators or in silo bags until milling. During the milling process, the rough rice goes through a de-husking machine that removes the husk from the kernel. The rice that is obtained after this process is known as brown rice and is ready for human consumption. Brown rice becomes white rice after it is polished to remove the excess bran.

The main objective of the milling process is to remove the husk and the bran, preserving the quality of the whole grain. Although the process is highly automated and uses advanced technology, some rice grains are broken in the process. The percentage of broken rice depends on a number of factors such as the crop development cycle at the farm, the variety of the grain, the handling and the industrial process. Average processing of rough rice results in 58% white rice, 11% broken rice and 31% rice husk and bran which is sold for use as cattle feed or floor bedding in the poultry business.

|  | Year Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Processed Rice Production |  | (In thousands of tons) |
Rough rice processed — own |  |  | 163,035 |  |  |  | 163,033 |  |  |  | 75,752 |
Rough rice processed — third party |  |  | 86,512 |  |  |  | 58,720 |  |  |  | 52,957 |
Total rough rice processed |  |  | 249,587 |  |  |  | 221,753 |  |  |  | 128,709 |
White rice |  |  | 86,092 |  |  |  | 91,176 |  |  |  | 66,035 |
Brown rice |  |  | 57,505 |  |  |  | 33,166 |  |  |  | 6,699 |
Broken rice |  |  | 28,787 |  |  |  | 23,880 |  |  |  | 14,792 |
Total processed rice |  |  | 172,383 |  |  |  | 148,223 |  |  |  | 87,526 |
|  | Year Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Processed Rice Sales |  | (In thousand of $) |
Total Sales |  |  | 93,904 |  |  |  | 83,244 |  |  |  | 61,585 |

Rice comprised 14% of our total consolidated sales in 2010, 15% of our total consolidated sales in 2011 and 16% 2012.

Rice Seed Production

In our rice seed facility in Argentina, we are involved in the genetic development of new rice varieties adapted to local conditions to increase rice productivity and quality to improve both farm production as well as the manufacturing process. In connection with these efforts, we have entered into agreements with selected research and development institutions such as the National Institute of Agriculture Technology (Institute Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, or “INTA”) in Argentina, the Latin American Fund for Irrigated Rice (Fondo Latinoamericano para Arroz de Riego, or “FLAR”) in Colombia, the Santa Catarina State Agricultural Research and Rural Extension Agency (Empresa de pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina, or “EPAGRI”) in Brazil and Badische Anilin- und Soda-Fabrik (“Basf”) in Germany. Our own technical team is continuously testing and developing new rice varieties. Our first rice seed variety was released to the market in 2008, and we are currently in the final stages of releasing three new varieties. These seeds are both used at our farms and sold to rice farmers in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay. We are also developing, alongside Basf, a herbicide-tolerant rice variety to assist in the control of harmful weeds.

Coffee Business

The coffee plant is a woody perennial evergreen. Brazil is the biggest coffee producing country in the world, followed by Vietnam and Colombia. Coffee is exported as a green bean and is then processed depending on the market. While there are several different coffee species, two main species of coffee are cultivated today. Arabica coffee accounts for approximately 60% of the world’s production, and Robusta coffee accounts for about 40% and

54

##### Table of Contents

differs from the Arabica coffees in terms of quality and taste. We produce Arabica coffee, distinguished by its high quality, that is considered to be an “estate coffee,” which, according to international markets standards, is coffee produced and processed on a specific farm and thus not mixed with coffee from other farms or farmers.

Our Mimoso farm produces world renowned “specialty coffee,” which is sold to the best roasters in Europe, the U.S. and Japan. Coffee quality experts consistently select our coffee as a top quality estate coffee. It is certified according to the rigorous sustainability standards of the Rainforest Alliance, Utz and the Brazil Specialty Coffee Association — BSCA. We are equally concerned with the quality of our coffee and with bridging the gap between the consumer and the producer to assure the sustainable quality demanded in the specialty market. We strive to develop long-term relationships with our clients to guarantee consistent supply.

We grow mainly high quality coffee varieties, using center pivot and drip irrigation, adopting a stress period to induce flowering, which guarantees a gradual and uniform maturation.

The following table sets forth, for the harvest years indicated, the production and sales volumes for our coffee business:

|  | Harvest Year |
Coffee Production & Sales |  | 2012/2013 |  |  | 2011/2012 |  |  | 2010/2011 |  |  | 2009/2010 |
Coffee plantation (hectares) |  |  | 1,632 |  |  |  | 1,632 |  |  |  | 1,632 |  |  |  | 1,632 |
Coffee pruning area (hectares) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 62 |  |  |  | 227 |  |  |  | 406 |
Coffee production (thousands of tons) (1) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,873 |  |  |  | 2,742 |  |  |  | 2,220 |

(1) | As of the date of this annual report, the 2012/2013 harvest year coffee had not yet been harvested.

|  | Year Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
Coffee sales |  |  | 8,363 |  |  |  | 14,170 |  |  |  | 7,572 |

We grow coffee in western Bahia, Brazil, where agro-ecological conditions are well-suited for producing “specialty coffee” due to the availability of water for irrigation, the absence of frosts, and the possibility of having a fully mechanized harvest due to flat topography. These conditions allow us to obtain a stable bean quality and to reduce yield volatility. We grow coffee on 3 farms and have 1,632 hectares of planted coffee trees and have available land and water to expand our operations to 2,700 hectares. In the 2009/2010 harvest year, we produced 2,412 tons of coffee. In the 2010/11 harvest year, we produced 2,742 tons of coffee. In the 2011/12 harvest year, we produced 2,873 tons of coffee. Coffee comprised 5% of our total consolidated sales in 2009, 2% of our total consolidated sales 2010, 3% of our total consolidated sales in 2011 and 1% of our total consolidated sales in 2012.

Coffee Production Process

Coffee seeds are initially planted in nursery beds where they are raised and nurtured in a protected environment until they reach a height of approximately 50 to 60 cm, which takes between 8 to 12 months. Coffee plants are then transplanted to the coffee fields where they grow for about two years, after which the coffee tree is harvested for the first time and begins its productive cycle. Productive maturity is achieved during the fifth year, and coffee trees remain productive until the tree reaches 15 to 20 years of age, at which point the tree must be replaced. Coffee trees require annual maintenance consisting of fertilization, pest and disease control and irrigation if necessary. Additionally, coffee trees must undergo a pruning program every 4 to 5 years to maintain the shape of the tree adequate for mechanized harvesting, which usually results in higher yields.

The coffee harvest year lasts from August of each year to August of the following year. The plantation is treated for approximately nine months, from August of each year until May of the following year. In late May or early June, the harvest begins, which lasts until September. After harvesting, we begin the processing process, which lasts until the end of October.

We process coffee at our facilities. The three processing stages coffee undergoes prior to commercialization are pulping, drying and sorting into various types according to world market demand.

55

##### Table of Contents

Dairy Business

We conduct our dairy operation in two of our farms located in the Argentine humid pampas region. This region is one of the best places in the world for producing raw milk at a low cost, due to the availability of grains, forage and grass produced efficiently and at low cost, and the favorable weather for cow comfort.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated below, the total number of our dairy cows, average daily liter production per cow and our total milk production:

|  | Year Ended December 31, |
Dairy Herd & Production |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Total dairy herd (head) |  |  | 6,765 |  |  |  | 10,803 |  |  |  | 9,178 |
Average milking cows |  |  | 5,025 |  |  |  | 4,603 |  |  |  | 4,225 |
Average daily production (liters per cow) |  |  | 30.0 |  |  |  | 30.5 |  |  |  | 27.0 |
Total production (thousands of liters) |  |  | 54,954 |  |  |  | 51,239 |  |  |  | 41,597 |

|  | Year Ended December, 31 |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
Sales |  |  | 18,868 |  |  |  | 19,697 |  |  |  | 14,297 |

As of December 31, 2010, we owned a dairy herd of 9,178 head, including 4,225 cows and heifers in milk. In 2010, our cows produced an average of 27.0 liters of milk per cow per day compared to approximately 28.3 liters per cow per day in 2009. Our facilities allow us to milk 5,000 cows per day. As of December 31, 2011, we owned a dairy herd of 10,803 head, including 4,603 milking cows with an average production of 30.5 liters per cow per day. As of December 31, 2012, we owned a dairy herd of 6,765 head, including 5,025 milking cows with an average production of 30.0 liters per cow per day. Our dairy operation consists of three dairy facilities — one traditional grazing dairy and two advanced “free-stall” dairies. We completed the construction of the second free stall dairy in August 2012, and as of December 31, 2012, the new facility held over 1,500 cows. We expect to continue gradually populating this facility until it reached its maximum capacity of 3,500 cows by the end of 2013.

Dairy comprised 3% of our total consolidated sales in 2010, 4% of our total consolidated sales in 2011 and 3% of our total consolidated sales in 2012.

Production Process

We have genetically improved our Holando Argentine Holstein dairy herd through the use of imported semen from North American Holstein bulls. We wean calves during the 24 hours subsequent to birth and during the next 60 days raise them on pasteurized milk and high protein meal. Male calves are fed concentrates and hay for an additional 30 days in the farm before they are sent to our feedlot to be fattened for sale. Young heifers remain in open corrals during the next 13 months where they are fed with concentrates and forage until they are ready for breeding. Calving occurs nine months later. Heifers are subsequently milked for an average of 320 days. Dairy cows are once again inseminated during the 60- to 90-day period following calving. This process is repeated once a year for a period of six or seven years. The pregnancy rate for our herd is between 85% and 90% per year.

Each cow in our dairy herd is mechanically milked two or three times a day depending on the production system. The milk obtained is cooled to less than four degrees centigrade in order to preserve its quality and is then stored in a tank. Milk is delivered to our joint venture, “La Lácteo,” on a daily basis by tank trucks. We feed our dairy cows mainly with corn and alfalfa silages, some grass and corn grain, supplemented as needed with soybean by-products, hay, vitamins and minerals.

We have invested in technology to improve the genetics of our cows, animal health and feeding in order to enhance our milk production. These investments include top quality semen from genetically improved North American Holstein bulls, agricultural machinery and devices, use of dietary supplements and modern equipment to control individual milk production and cooling. Our feeding program is focused on high conversion of feed into milk, while maintaining cows in good health and comfort. We have also invested in technology and know-how so as to increase our forage production and utilization.

56

##### Table of Contents

In 2007, we began the construction of an advanced “free-stall” dairy in Argentina, which we believe was the first of its kind in South America, and started operating in March 2008. This new technology allows large- scale milk production at increased efficiency levels. Our free-stall dairy model consists of 3,000 cows confined inside a large barn where they are free to move within the indoor corrals. We feed our cows specific protein rich diets composed of corn grain and silage and milk them three times a day, using a milking mechanism consisting of an 80-cow rotary platform, which milks an average of 400 cows per hour. In 2011, we started the construction of the second free stall, which started operating in August 2012. We expect to gradually populate this facility until it reaches its full capacity (3,500 milking cows) by the end of 2013.

Implementation of the free-stall system allows us to position ourselves as a key player in the dairy industry and will boost our agricultural and industrial integration presence in the South American agricultural sector. By eliminating cow grazing, we reduce the amount of land utilized for milk production, which frees up more land for our agricultural and land development activities. Cow productivity (measured in liters of milk produced per day) using the free-stall system increases by up to 40% compared to traditional grazing systems. These productivity gains are because the free-stall system significantly improves the conversion rate of animal feed to milk, resulting in an approximate 40% increase in the conversion ratio, or the production of 1.4 liters of milk for each 1 kg of animal feed as compared to the average of 1 liter of milk for each 1 kg of feed associated with the usual grazing model.

This increased productivity and conversion rate are mainly due to improved cow comfort and an enhanced diet quality. We assess cow comfort through the engagement of expert consultants, who recommended designing beds covered with sand. The sand plays a significant role in helping cows to rest comfortably. Additionally, we installed a cooling system to increase cow comfort as well. This system relies on water sprinklers and ventilation fans located all over the facility to create a controlled, cool atmosphere, which improves cow comfort since the Holstein herd is originally adapted to cold regions. Additionally, we manage diet quality by adapting our feeding regimen based on the various feeding stages in the lifetime of each cow. The actual feeding is fully mechanized, and we carefully control the harvesting and storage of feed. The control of all productivity variables, such as reproduction, health and operations, supports efficiency gains through standardized processes. Finally, the physical concentration of the animals facilitates efficient overall management of the dairy business as a whole. In terms of the environment, the free-stall model allows for a better effluent treatment, which includes a sand-manure separator stage, a decantation pool and an anaerobic lagoon. All these processes help to decrease the organic matter content of the effluent and deliver a cleaner output. The final treated effluent is used to fert-irrigate crops adjacent to the dairy operation. Accordingly, we transform dairy waste into a high value-added by-product, which reduces fertilizer usage.

The free-stall dairy is expected to allow us to become an efficient large-scale milk producer and optimize the use of our resources (land, cattle and capital) through the standardization of processes. Process standardization provides high operational control and allows us to scale-up our production efficiently and quickly.

La Lácteo Joint Venture

In 2007, Adecoagro entered into an agreement with Agropur Cooperative, a Canadian-based dairy cooperative, to form a joint venture named Grupo La Lácteo. In this transaction, we contributed our wholly owned subsidiary La Lácteo S.A., an entity engaged in the processing and sale of milk and milk-related products (previously acquired in August 2007), while Agropur Cooperative contributed cash. Each of us and Agropur Cooperative owns 50% of the joint venture, and the joint venture agreement in place creates joint control over Grupo La Lácteo. The formation of this joint venture was completed in December 2007. As of December 31, 2012, La Lácteo manages approximately 183,000 liters of milk per day, producing a broad variety of dairy products including fluid milk, yogurt, butter, cheese, and others.

On November 7, 2007, Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. entered into a Milk Supply Offer Agreement with La Lácteo S.A. (as amended on February 1, 2010), pursuant to which we committed to sell and La Lácteo S.A. committed to purchase, approximately 80,000 liters of Adeco Agropecuaria S.A.’s milk production per day. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Milk Supply Agreement.” All of our production for the domestic market is industrialized at La Lácteo S.A., while our export volumes of powdered milk are industrialized in plants operated by third parties.

57

##### Table of Contents

Cattle Business

In December 2009, we strategically decided to sell almost all of our cattle herd — other than our dairy cows — to Quickfood S.A. (now “Marfrig Argentina S.A.”), an Argentine company and a subsidiary of the Brazilian company, Marfrig Alimentos S.A. (“Marfrig”), for a purchase price of $14.2 million. Additionally, we entered into a lease agreement under which Marfig Argentina S.A. leases grazing land from us to raise and fatten cattle. See “—Material Agreements—Argentina—Agreement with Quickfood S.A.”

The agreement consists of leasing (i) approximately 69,369 hectares of grazing land located in the Argentine provinces of Corrientes, Formosa, Santa Fe and Santiago del Estero, for an annual price equal to the equivalent in Argentine Pesos of 30 kilograms of meat per hectare, calculated in accordance with the Steer Index of the Liniers Market (INML), for a period of 10 years, renewable by the parties and (ii) two feed lots located in the Argentine provinces of Corrientes and Santa Fe, for an annual price of $25,000 each. Additionally, as of December 31, 2012, we owned approximately 1,375 head of cattle. We may purchase additional cattle in the future.

The following table indicates, for the periods set forth below, the number of cattle (other than dairy cows) for each activity we pursued:

|  | Year Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
|  | (Head of cattle) |
Breeding(l) |  |  | 1,375 |  |  |  | 2,039 |  |  |  | — |
Fattening |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,254 |
Total |  |  | 1,375 |  |  |  | 2,039 |  |  |  | 1,254 |

(1) | For classification purposes, upon birth, all calves are considered to be in the breeding process.

The cattle business comprised 1% of our total consolidated sales in 2010, 2011 and 2012.

Storage and Conditioning

Our storage and conditioning facilities for our farming line of business allow us to condition, store and deliver our products with no third-party involvement. All our crop storage facilities are located close to our farms, allowing us to (i) reduce storage and conditioning costs; (ii) reduce freight costs since we only commence moving the product once the final destination is determined, whether locally or to a port, (iii) capitalize on fluctuations in the prices of commodities; and (iv) improve commercial performance by mixing grains to avoid discounts due to sub-standard quality.

We own five conditioning and storage facilities for grains and oilseeds, with a total built storage capacity of 28,800 tons. Our largest storage facility, with a capacity of 18,700 tons, is located in the province of Santa Fe, Argentina, in the town of Christophersen. It has a railway loading terminal, providing logistical flexibility and savings. We also own in Argentina four rice mills, which account for over 135,919 tons of total storage capacity, and two additional storage and conditioning facilities for rice handling, with a total storage capacity of 5,700 tons.

Set forth below is our storage capacity as of December 31, 2012:

Storage Capacity |  | Nominal |
Crops (tons) |  |  | 28,800 |
Rice (tons) |  |  | 135,919 |

58

##### Table of Contents

In addition, we use silo bags to increase our storage capacity at low cost. Silo bags are an efficient low-cost method for grain storage. As crops are harvested, they are placed inside large polyethylene bags that can be left in the fields for approximately 12 months without damaging the grain. Each silo bag can hold up to 180 to 200 tons of product, depending on the type of grain. During the 2011/2012 harvest year, we stored approximately 36 % of our grain production through silo bags.

Silo bags offer important operational and logistic advantages, such as (i) low cost storage; (ii) flexible and scalable capacity that is adapted based on production and commercial strategy; (iii) harvest efficiencies since the bags are filled on the field allowing for a non-stop harvest operation regardless of any logistical setbacks; (iv) logistic efficiencies leading to lower freight since grains are transported during the off-season when truck fares are lower; (v) increased ability to monitor quality and identify different grain qualities, since grains are stored in relatively small amounts (200 tons) and easily monitored, maximizing our commercial performance; and (vi) better use of our drying capacity throughout the year. Silo bags are commercially accepted. Grains stored in silo bags can be sold in the market, and if such grains are to be delivered post harvest, we charge storage costs. Additionally, we can store grains to be used as seed during the following season (soybeans, rice and wheat), achieving quality seed management. We have expanded the use of silo bags from Argentina to our operations in Brazil and Uruguay. Currently, we are extending the usage of silo bags to store fertilizers and are developing their use with respect to coffee beans.

Grain conditioning facilities at our farms allow our trade desk to optimize commercialization costs and to achieve commercial quality standards and avoid price discounts. These facilities are operated to dry, clean, mix and separate different qualities of each grain in order to achieve commercial standards. By mixing different batches of a same grain type, differentiated by quality parameters such as moisture, percentage broken, and percentage damaged, among others, we can achieve commercial standards without having to discount a lower-quality stand-alone batch. Efficient management of these facilities results in a lower cost for grain conditioning and a better achievable price. In order to maximize this situation, our conditioning facilities trend to process as much grain as possible, which is roughly more than four times their storage capacity.

Set forth below is our drying capacity as of December 31, 2012:

Drying Capacity |  | Nominal |
Crops (tons/day) |  |  | 2,400 |
Rice (tons/day) |  |  | 6,700 |

Some grains such as soybeans, wheat and rice, can be used for seed during the next planting season. We produce almost 97% of the seed used for planting these crops in our fields. The seed is stored in silo bags and/or grain facilities, where it can be processed, classified, and prepared for planting during next crop season. A deep survey and monitoring process is carried out in order to evaluate, control and deliver high quality seed to our farms.

The rest of our seed requirements are purchased from seed suppliers in order to incorporate new enhanced varieties into our planting plan.

Additionally, as of December 31, 2012, we owned two coffee processing facilities in Brazil, where we clean, dry and classify different types of commercial coffee beans. Apart from processing, those facilities have a storage capacity of 30,400 bags, or 1,800 tons of processed coffee.

Marketing, Sales and Distribution

Crops

In Argentina, grain prices are based on the market prices quoted on Argentine grain exchanges, such as the Bolsa de Cereales de Buenos Aires and the Bolsa de Cereales de Rosario, which use as a reference the prevailing prices in international grain exchanges (including CBOT and ICE-NY). In Uruguay, local prices are based on an export parity (during harvest) or import parity in the case of post-harvest sales, which, in each case, take into account the prices and costs associated with each market. In Brazil, the grain market includes the Bolsa de Mercadorias e Futuros

59

##### Table of Contents

(Brazilian Grain Exchange), which, as in Argentina, uses as a price reference the international grain exchanges (including CBOT and ICE-NY). Prices are quoted in relation to the month of delivery and the port in which the product is to be delivered. Different conditions in price, such as terms of storage and shipment, are negotiated between us and the end buyer. We negotiate sales with the top traders and industrial companies in our markets. We also engage in hedging positions by buying and selling futures and options in commodities exchanges, including the Chicago Board of Trade, the New York Board of Trade, BM&FBOVESPA and the Mercado a Término de Buenos Aires (MATBA).

Soybeans: Our soybean crop is sold to local companies and is ultimately exported or diverted to the crushing industry. Approximately 80% of the soybean crop is hedged pre-harvest, by forward sales, sales in the futures markets, and production agreements. Post-harvest sales are a function of the export market versus local premiums paid by crushers (oil, meal and biodiesel). Our largest customers are Molinos Rio de la Plata S.A, Noble Americas Corp. (“Noble”), Louis Dreyfus Co., Bunge International Commerce Ltd. (“Bunge”) and Cargill SACI, comprising approximately 74% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2012. In Argentina, the applicable export tax rate on soybeans is 35%.

Corn: Approximately 95% of our total production, is exported, of which 24% are FOB sales, with the remainder destined for domestic use in feedlots, the poultry industry and in our dairy operations. All of our Brazilian production is sold domestically for regional consumption. Approximately 66% of the crop corn is hedged pre-harvest, due to logistical issues. We sell approximately 5% of our corn production for special products such as corn seed. Our largest customers Alfred C. Toepfer International, Seaboard Overseas Ltd., Nidera, Multigrain Argentina and Molino Americano, comprising approximately 56% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2012. In Argentina, the applicable export tax rate on corn is 20%.

Wheat: Approximately 95% our total production is exported, of which 78% are FOB sales, with the remainder destined for domestic use. Approximately 31% of the wheat crop is hedged pre-harvest through forward sales, futures markets sales and production agreements. Brazil is the main importer of Argentine wheat. Due to logistics, we sell to the export market during harvest time and store the higher quality wheat to sell later in the year to local millers. We typically sell half of our wheat production pre-harvest. Our five largest customers are Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse S.A, NIDERA S.A., Seaboard Overseas Ltd., Amaggi Argentina S.A. and Agrograin Ltd, comprising approximately 76% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2012. In Argentina, the applicable export tax rate on wheat is 23%.

Sunflower: Our sunflower production from Argentina and Uruguay is sold to local companies. Sales are made pursuant to forward sales, spot sales and production agreements (as sunflower for confectionary, high oil content sunflower and seed). Our largest customers are Dow Agrosciences Argentina S.A., Argensun S.A. and CHS Argentina S.A., comprising approximately 97% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2012. In Argentina, the applicable export tax rate is 32%.

Cotton: We typically make pre-harvest sales of cotton fiber produced in Brazil and Argentina into the export market. Sales for the textile industry are based on domestic demand and premiums. Our largest customers are CGG Trading, OLAM, Algodoeira Ouro Branco Ltda, Plexus Cotton LTD and Algodoeira Serrana, comprising approximately 64% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2012. Cottonseed is sold in the domestic market to meet feed demand.

Rice: Rough rice is available for sale commencing after the harvest of each year. White rice availability is based on our milling capacity. 78% of our total rice production is sold into the export market, with the remainder sold in Argentina in the retail market. Brazil is the largest importer of our rice with 28% of our exported volume, followed by Angola with 25%, Europe with 21%, Iraq and Iran with 12% and the remainder is exported to Southamerican countries. Argentina’s retail market is comprised of four types of rice and four brands that have a 16.6% market share. Rice prices are based on regional supply demand and exchange rate in Brazil.

Our largest customers for rice are Herba Rice Mills, Camil Alimentos, Webcor S.A., Glencore Grains, Ameropa AG, Josapar Joaquim Oliveira S.A. Participacoes, comprising approximately 42% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2012. In Argentina, the applicable export tax rate is 10% for rough rice and 5% for white rice.

60

##### Table of Contents

Coffee: Coffee is available for sale commencing after it is harvested and processed since July of each year. We export our own high quality coffee to the European, U.S. and Japanese markets, where our “specialty coffee” grade product is received by the gourmet segment. Our coffee is certified by the most respected organizations in the sector such as UTZ and Rainforest Alliance. Our largest importer is the European Union with 49%, followed by Japan with 38% and the United States with 13% of our sales. 73% of our coffee production is sold in the domestic Brazilian market. Coffee prices are based on international grain exchanges (ICE-NY) and have a local reference in BM&FBOVESPA. We negotiate quality premiums or discounts and delivery conditions to the end buyer. Our largest customers for coffee are Outspan Brasil Importacao e Exportacao LTDA (“Olam”), Mitsui Foods Inc., Paragon Coffee Trading Company L.P. and Empresa Interagricola S.A. (Eisa), comprising approximately 63% of our net sales in the year ended December 31, 2012.

Dairy

During most of 2007, we sold our entire raw milk production to top Argentine dairy companies such as Groupe Danone, Nestlé Dairy Partners Americas and Mastellone Hermanos S.A. These companies manufacture a range of consumer products sold in Argentina and abroad. On November 7, 2007, we entered into a Milk Supply Agreement with La Lácteo S.A., pursuant to which we committed to sell to La Lácteo S.A. approximately 80,000 liters of our milk production per day subject to certain conditions. See “Material Agreements—Argentina—Milk Supply Agreement” and “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions.” We negotiate the price of raw milk on a monthly basis in accordance with domestic supply and demand with these companies, including La Lácteo S.A. The price of the milk we sell is mainly based on the percentage of fat and protein that it contains and the temperature at which it is cooled. The price we obtain for our milk also rises or falls based on the content of bacteria and somatic cells.

Sugar, Ethanol and Energy

Sugarcane

Sugarcane is the most efficient agricultural raw material used in the production of sugar and ethanol. Ethanol produced from sugarcane is highly regarded as an environmentally friendly biofuel with the following characteristics.

• |  | Renewable: Sugarcane ethanol, unlike coal or oil, which can be depleted, is produced from sugarcane plants that grow back year after year, provided that they are replanted every six to eight years.

• |  | Sustainable: Sugarcane only needs to be replanted every five to seven years, as a semi-perennial crop. It can be harvested without uprooting the plant, and therefore its cultivation has less of an impact on the soil and the surrounding environment. The mechanization of the harvesting and planting process further improves sustainable agricultural management.

• |  | Energy Efficient: Sugarcane is highly efficient in converting sunlight, water and carbon dioxide into stored energy. The energy output of sugarcane is equal to nine times the energy input used in the production process, whereas the energy output of corn ethanol is only about 1.9 to 2.3 times the energy input used in its production process. Sugarcane produces seven times more energy compared to corn in ethanol production.

• |  | Low Carbon Emissions: Compared to gasoline, sugarcane ethanol reduces greenhouse gases by more than 61%, which is the greatest reduction of any other liquid biofuel produced today in large quantities. Ethanol made from sugarcane is deemed an advanced biofuel by the United States EPA.

• |  | Synergies: The main raw material used in the production of electricity in sugar mills is bagasse, which is a by-product of the sugarcane milling process, allowing for a renewable source of co- generated electricity.

Sugarcane is a tropical grass that grows best in locations with stable, warm temperatures and high humidity, although cold and dry winters are an important factor for the sucrose concentration of sugarcane. The climate and topography of the center-south region of Brazil is ideal for the cultivation of sugarcane and accounts for approximately 85% of Brazil’s sugarcane production.

As of December 31, 2012, we grow sugarcane in the center-south region of Brazil on 9,145 hectares of our own land and 76,386 hectares of land leased through agriculture partnerships. Under these agreements, our partners lease

61

##### Table of Contents

land to us for periods of between one and two sugarcane cycles, equivalent to periods of between 10 to 12 years, on which we cultivate sugarcane. Lease payments are based on the market value of the sugarcane set forth by the regulations of the State of Sao Paulo Sugarcane, Sugar and Alcohol Growers Counsel (Conselho dos Produtores de Cana-de-Açúcar, Açúcar e Álcool do Estado de Sao Paulo, or “Consecana”). We planted and harvested approximately 96% of the total sugarcane we milled during 2012, with the remaining 4% purchased directly from third parties at prices set forth by the Consecana system, based on the sucrose content of the cane and the prices of sugar and ethanol. The following table sets forth a breakdown during the time periods indicated of the amount of sugarcane we milled that was grown on our owned and leased land or purchased from third parties:

|  | Year Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Grown on our owned and leased land (tons) |  |  | 4,304,038 |  |  |  | 3,891,125 |  |  |  | 3,869,283 |
Purchased from third parties (tons) |  |  | 184,897 |  |  |  | 276,957 |  |  |  | 196,833 |
Total (tons) |  |  | 4,488,935 |  |  |  | 4,168,081 |  |  |  | 4,066,115 |

Sugarcane Harvesting Cycle

The annual sugarcane harvesting period in the center-south region of Brazil begins in April and ends in November/December of each year. We plant several sugarcane varieties, depending on the quality of the soil, the local microclimate and the estimated date of harvest of such area. Once planted, sugarcane can be harvested, once a year, up to six to eight consecutive years. With each subsequent harvest, agricultural yields decrease. The plantations must be carefully managed and treated during the year in order to continue to attain sugar yields similar to a newly-planted crop.

We believe we own one of the most mechanized harvesting operations in Brazil. Our sugarcane harvesting process is currently 90% mechanized (100% at Angélica mill and 50% at UMA mill) and the remaining 10% is harvested manually. Mechanized harvesting does not require burning prior to harvesting, significantly reducing environmental impact when compared to manual harvesting. In addition, the leaves that remain on the fields after the sugarcane has been harvested mechanically create a protective cover for the soil, reducing evaporation and protecting it from sunlight and erosion. This protective cover of leaves decomposes into organic material over time, which increases the fertility of the soil. Mechanized harvesting is more time efficient and has lower costs when compared to manual harvesting. Sugarcane is ready for harvesting when the crop’s sucrose content is at its highest level. Sucrose content and sugarcane yield (tons of cane per hectare) are important measures of productivity for our harvesting operations. Geographical factors, such as soil quality, topography and climate, as well as agricultural techniques that we implement, affect our productivity. Since most sugar mills produce both sugar and ethanol in variable mixes, the industry has adopted a conversion index for measuring sugar and ethanol production capacity, the Total Recoverable Sugar (“TRS”) index, which measures the amount of kilograms of sugar per ton of sugarcane.

During the 2012 harvest, UMA and Angelica harvested sugarcane with an average TRS content of 134, compared to an average of 136 in the center-south region of Brazil generally. In addition, during the 2012 harvest, we harvested an average of 71.4 tons of sugarcane per hectare of our own and leased land.

Once the sugarcane is harvested, it is transported to our mills for inspection and weighing. We utilize our own trucks and trailers for transportation purposes. The average transportation distance from the sugarcane fields to the mills is approximately 26 kilometers at UMA and 35 kilometers at Angélica. The construction of our new mill at Ivinhema is expected to halve the average transportation distance for Angélica, significantly reducing our transportation costs, as 35% of the cane currently processed at Angélica has been planted closer to the site where the Ivinhema mill is being built.

Our Mills

We currently own three sugar mills in Brazil, UMA and Angélica, which are currently operating, and Ivinhema, whose first phase of the construction was completed in 2012 and will start operating in the first half of 2013. Our mills produce sugar, ethanol and energy, and accordingly, we have some flexibility to adjust our production between sugar and ethanol, to take advantage of more favorable market demand and prices at given points in time. As of December 31, 2012, our sugar mills had a total installed crushing capacity of 7.2 million tons of sugarcane, out of which 2.0 million tons of crushing capacity correspond to the Ivinhema mill, which will start operating in 2013. As of the date of this annual report, we concluded the 2012 harvest at the Angélica and UMA mills, crushing an aggregate volume of 4.16 million tons of sugarcane.

62

##### Table of Contents

The Usina Monte Alegre mill (“UMA”) is located in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, and has a sugarcane crushing capacity of 1.2 million tons per year, full cogeneration capacity and an associated sugar brand with strong presence in the regional retail market (Açúcar Monte Alegre). We plant and harvest 98.9% of the sugarcane milled at UMA, with the remaining 1.1% acquired from third parties. On December 31, 2012, UMA concluded its harvest operations for the 2012 season, crushing 1.0 million tons of sugarcane.

Angélica is a new, advanced mill, which we built in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, with a total sugarcane crushing capacity of 4.0 million tons per year. Angélica has been equipped with two modern high pressure boilers and three turbo-generators with the capacity to use all the sugarcane bagasse by-product to generate approximately 96 MW of electricity that is used to power the mill with an excess of 64MW available for sale to the power grid. During the first half of 2010, we concluded the construction of the sugar factory commencing the production of sugar in July 2010. Angélica now has the flexibility to vary the product slate between 60% to 40% for either product. During the 2012/2013 harvest, we grew and harvested over 95% of the sugarcane milled at Angélica, allowing us to have a stable supply and superior quality control of our raw material. As of December 31, 2012, Angélica concluded its harvest operations for the 2012/2013 season, crushing a total of 3.5 million tons of sugarcane. Although construction of the mill and industrial equipment has been concluded, Angélica will not mill at full capacity until 2013, when the size of our sugarcane plantations are expected to support the capacity of the mill.

The construction of the Angelica mill was completed by the end of 2011. Accumulated capital expenditures, including cost expensed in cane planting and excluding investments in land and working capital, reached R$1,013 million, or approximately $134.7 per ton of crushing capacity. The table below shows our investment breakdown:

Capital Expenditures |  | R$ millions |  |  | US$ per ton(l) |
Industrial equipment |  |  | 541 |  |  |  | 72 |
Agricultural equipment |  |  | 144 |  |  |  | 19 |
Sugarcane planting cost |  |  | 327 |  |  |  | 44 |
Total |  |  | 1,013 |  |  |  | 135 |

(1) | Considers an average R$/US$ exchange rate of 1.876.

During mid 2011, we started the construction of our third mill, Ivinhema, located in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, approximately 45 kilometers south of our existing Angelica mill, in order to complete our planned sugarcane cluster in that region. The Ivinhema mill is expected to have a crushing capacity of 6.3 million tons of sugarcane per year when it reaches full capacity in 2017, increasing our total sugarcane crushing capacity to 11.5 million tons per year. We expect the Angelica and Ivinhema mills to form a cluster of 10.3 million tons of crushing capacity, which we expect will generate operational synergies and economies of scale that will result from a large-scale sugarcane production and industrial operation, including centralized management of both mills, harvesting efficiencies due to the ability to conduct non-stop harvesting and a reduction in sugarcane transportation costs. Ivinhema mill will be equipped with state-of-the-art technology including full cogeneration capacity, flexibility to produce sugar and ethanol and fully mechanized agricultural operations. We expect to source a majority of sugarcane for the Invinhema mill from our own supply and expand our cluster’s plantation to over 120,000 hectares.

As of the date of this report, the first phase of the construction of Ivinhema was completed, reaching a nominal crushing capacity of 2.0 million tons per year. We expect the Ivinhema mill to begin operating during the second quarter of 2013, increasing its milling capacity to 4.0 million tons in 2015 and finally reach full capacity of 6.3 million tons by 2017.

The Ivinhema mill is located in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, 45 km from our Angélica mill. It was built in order to complete our planned sugarcane cluster (consisting of Angélica and Ivinhema) in that region. As of December 31, 2012, we had incurred a total of $280 million for the acquisition and assembly of industrial equipment, manufacturing costs, agricultural equipment and sugarcane planting expenses. We estimate that we will need to invest an additional $418 million to complete the construction of the Ivinhema mill. Subject to procuring the necessary licenses and the remainder of the required funding, we anticipate completing the construction of the Ivinhema mill in 2017. See “—Sugar, Ethanol and Energy—Our Mills” and “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industries—Adverse conditions may create delays in or the suspension of the construction of our Ivinhema mill and/or significantly increase the amount of our expected investments.”

63

##### Table of Contents

The construction and operation of the Ivinhema mill is subject to environmental licensing. Generally, the environmental agencies of each state are responsible for issuing environmental permits. The criteria for environmental licensing is defined and regulated by the National Council of the Environment (CONAMA), under Resolution No. 237 of December 19, 1997. On March 23, 2012, we obtained the installation license (licença de instalaçâo) from Instituto de Meio Ambiente de Mato Grosso do Sul (“IMASUL”) for the commencement of the construction and assembly of the first and second phase of the Ivinhema mill, for a nominal crushing capacity of up to 4.1 million tons of sugarcane.

In addition to the installation license, the Ivinhema mill must obtain operational licenses and other permits including licenses for water capture and use of controlled products, among others. Failure to obtain the necessary environmental licenses may prevent us from operating the Ivinhema mill or may subject us to sanctions.

Our Main Products

The following table sets forth a breakdown of our production volumes by product for the years indicated:

|  | Year Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Sugar |  |  | 281,662 |  |  |  | 247,805 |  |  |  | 235,690 |
Ethanol |  |  | 183,713 |  |  |  | 161,385 |  |  |  | 174,303 |
Energy (MWh exported) |  |  | 238,540 |  |  |  | 245,389 |  |  |  | 168,644 |

Note: Sugar volumes are measured in thousands of tons (raw value), ethanol volumes are measured in thousand cubic meters and electricity is measured in MWh.

The following table sets forth our sales for each of the sugarcane by-products we produce for the years indicated:

|  | Year Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
Sugar |  |  | 134,766 |  |  |  | 130,348 |  |  |  | 98,385 |
Ethanol |  |  | 121,544 |  |  |  | 116,599 |  |  |  | 114,793 |
Energy |  |  | 25,649 |  |  |  | 24,393 |  |  |  | 15,040 |
Other |  |  | 373 |  |  |  | 5,978 |  |  |  | 308 |
Total |  |  | 282,332 |  |  |  | 277,318 |  |  |  | 228,526 |

Sugar

During 2012, sugar production capacity increased by approximately 1,000 tons per day, as a result of the completion of the first phase of the construction of the Ivinhema Mill. Our current maximum sugar production capacity is now of 3,400 tons per day which, in a normal year of 4,500 hours of milling, results in an annual sugar maximum production capacity of over 637,515 tons of sugar. In 2012, we produced 281,662 tons of sugar, compared to 247,805 tons of sugar in 2011 and 235,690 tons of sugar in 2010.

We produce two types of sugar: very high polarization (“VHP”) standard draw sugar and white crystal sugar. VHP sugar, a raw sugar with a 99.3% or higher sucrose content, is similar to the type of sugar traded in major commodities exchanges, including the standard NY11 contract. The main difference between VHP sugar and NY11 raw sugar is the sugar content of VHP sugar, and it therefore commands a price premium over NY11 raw sugar. Crystal sugar is a non-refined white sugar (color 150 ICUMSA) produced directly from sugarcane juice.

Sugar sales comprised 23% of our total consolidated sales in 2010, 24% of our total consolidated sales in 2011 and 22% of our total consolidated sales in 2012.

64

##### Table of Contents

Ethanol

During 2012, ethanol production capacity increased by approximately 624 cubic meters per day, as a result of the completion of the first phase of the construction of the Ivinhema Mill. Our current maximum ethanol production capacity is now of 2,024 cubic meters per day which, in a normal year of 4,500 hours of milling, results in an annual ethanol maximum production capacity of over 379,845 cubic meters of ethanol. In 2010, we produced 174,303 cubic meters of ethanol compared to 161,385 cubic meters of ethanol in 2011 and 183,713 cubic meters in 2012

We produce and sell two different types of ethanol: hydrous ethanol and anhydrous ethanol (as further described in “—Production Process—Ethanol”). Ethanol sales comprised 23% of our total consolidated sales in 2010, 21% or our total consolidated sales in 2011 and 20% of our total consolidated sales in 2012.

Cogeneration

We generate electricity from sugarcane bagasse (the fiber portion of sugarcane that remains after the extraction of sugarcane juice) in our three mills located in Brazil. During 2012, our cogeneration production and export capacity increased by 36 MW and 22 MW, respectively, as a result of the completion of the first phase of the construction of our Ivinhema mill. Our total installed cogeneration capacity is now of approximately 148 MW, and 97 MW are available for resale to third parties after supplying our mills’ energy requirements. Having this ability to generate electricity from the by-product of the sugarcane crushing process on a large enough scale to fully power a mill with excess electricity being available is referred to as having full cogeneration capacity. Our three mills are duly licensed by the Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica (“ANEEL”) to generate and sell electricity. During the year ended December 31, 2012 , 2011 and 2010 we sold 317,211 MWh, 245,389 MWh and 178,914 MWh to the local electricity market, comprising 3%, 4% and 3.1% of our consolidated sales respectively.

Production Process

Sugar. There are essentially five steps in the sugar manufacturing process. First, we crush the sugarcane to extract the sugarcane juice. We then treat the juice to remove impurities. The residue is used to make an organic compost used as fertilizer in our sugarcane fields. The juice is then boiled until the sugar crystallizes, and sugar is then separated from the molasses (glucose which does not crystallize) by centrifugation. The resulting sugar is dried and sent to storage and/or packaging. We use the molasses in our production of ethanol.

Ethanol. Ethanol is produced through the fermentation of sugarcane juice or diluted molasses. Initially, we process the sugarcane used in ethanol production the same way that we process it for sugar production. The molasses resulting from this process is mixed with clear juice and then with yeast in fermentation vats, and the resulting wine has an ethanol content of approximately 8% to 10%. After the fermentation is complete, the yeast is separated for recycling in the ethanol production process. We distill the wine to obtain hydrous ethanol. In order to produce anhydrous ethanol, hydrous ethanol undergoes a dehydration process in a molecular sieve. The liquid remaining after these processes is called vinasse, which we further process to make liquid organic fertilizer that we use in our sugarcane plantations.

Cogeneration. Sugarcane is composed of water, fibers, sucrose and other sugars and minerals. When the sugarcane goes through the milling process, we separate the water, sugar and minerals from the fibers or sugarcane bagasse. Bagasse is an important sub-product of sugarcane, and it is used as fuel for the boilers in our mills. Sugarcane bagasse is burned in our state-of-the-art boilers to produce high pressure steam (67 atm) which is used in our high-efficiency turbo-generators to generate electricity to power our mills. The excess electricity, about 66% of production, is sold to the national power grid.

65

##### Table of Contents

The following flow chart demonstrates the sugar, ethanol and cogeneration production process:

Historically, the energy produced by Brazilian mills has not been price competitive when compared to the low-cost Brazilian hydro-electricity, which accounts for almost 90% of the country’s electricity matrix. Consequently, the majority of the groups in the sugar and ethanol sector have not invested in expanding their energy generation for sale, and the majority of the mills were constructed with less efficient, low-pressure boilers. Since 2000, the Brazilian economy has experienced significant growth, which in turn has resulted in increased demand for energy.

However, hydro- and thermo-electricity have not been able to keep pace for the following reasons: (1) new hydro-electric plants are located in regions (such as the Amazon) distant from consumption centers; (2) significant lead-time is required to construct new hydro- and thermo-electric plants; (3) significant investments are required for transmission lines, pipelines (for natural gas used in thermo-electric plants) and barges; (4) significant environmental costs are associated with both types of electricity generation; and (5) prices for fuel (natural gas) used in the generation of thermo-electricity have increased resulting in greater dependence on Bolivia (Brazil’s principal natural gas supplier). As a result, energy prices in Brazil have been increasing, and alternative sources, such as the electricity from the cogeneration of sugarcane bagasse, have become increasingly competitive and viable options to satisfy the increasing energy demands. Sugarcane bagasse cogeneration is particularly competitive since sugarcane-based electricity is generated following the sugarcane harvest and milling which occurs during the dry season in Brazil, when hydroelectric generation is at its lowest levels.

The main advantages of energy generated by sugarcane bagasse are:

| • |  | It is a clean and renewable energy;

| • |  | It complements hydropower, the main source of Brazilian energy, as it is generated during the sugarcane harvest period (April to December) when water reservoirs are at their lowest level;

| • |  | It requires a short period of time to start operations; and

| • |  | It requires only a small investment in transmission lines when plants are located close to consumer centers.

Our total installed cogeneration capacity at the Angélica and UMA mills together is 112 MW, of which 75 MW are available for sale to the market. The Ivinhema mill is planned to have full cogeneration capacity as well and is expected to generate 184 MW by 2017, of which 131 MW are expected to be available for sale to the market.

66

##### Table of Contents

We believe that there is a high potential for growth in the generation of electricity, and we are prepared to make investments to the extent that prices of Brazilian energy justify making such investments. We are currently investing $7.2 million in a “trash separation” system at Angélica, which will allow us to increase our energy output by over 50%.

Storage and Conditioning

Our sugar and ethanol storage and conditioning facilities are located at our mill sites and allow us to deliver our products when they are ready to be commercialized with no third-party involvement. Having such facilities at mill sites allows us to (i) reduce storage and conditioning costs; (ii) reduce freight costs since we only commence moving the product once the final destination is determined, whether locally or to a port; and (iii) capitalize on fluctuations in the prices of sugar and ethanol

Nominal Storage Capacity |  | Angélica |  |  | Ivinhema |  |  | UMA |  |  | Total |
Ethanol (cubic meters) |  |  | 120,800 |  |  |  | 20,000 |  |  |  | 27,000 |  |  |  | 167,800 |
Sugar (tons) |  |  | 90,000 |  |  |  | 65,000 |  |  |  | 36,400 |  |  |  | 191,400 |

Marketing, Sales and Distribution

Sugar: We sell sugar both in the domestic and the international markets at prices that depend on our price parity calculation, which considers each market’s price and the associated costs. Prices for the sugar we sell in Brazil are set, using an index calculated by the Agriculture College of the University of São Paulo (Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, or “ESALQ”), with a premium in the state of Minas Gerais due to the use of our regional brand, “Monte Alegre,” the market leader in the southern part of that state. Prices for the sugar we export are set in accordance with international market prices. International prices for raw sugar are established in accordance with the NY11 futures contracts. Our largest customers for sugar are Dreyfus., Bunge, Noble and Copersucar Trading AVV and ED&F MAN, comprising approximately 75% of our sales in the period ended December 31, 2012.

Ethanol: Almost all of our ethanol sales are in the domestic Brazilian market given the increasing demand generated from the increase in flex-fuel vehicles in Brazil. Our ethanol sales are not made through the execution of formal agreements. Instead, sales are made through daily sale orders intermediated by specialized brokerage firms that act in the ethanol domestic market, whose role is to intermediate the sale of ethanol between the ethanol producers and the domestic ethanol distribution companies, and prices are set using the ESALQ and the futures and commodity exchange of the BM&FBOVESPA indices for ethanol as a reference. Our largest customers by volume were Raizen Combustives, Ipiranga Produtos de Petróleo S/A, Petrobras Distribuidora S/A, Cargill Agricola S.A., Dreyfus and Vitol INC comprising approximately 80% of our sales in the period ended December 31, 2012.

Cogeneration: We also sell electricity co-generated at our sugar and ethanol mills to local electricity commercialization companies and directly to the spot market. Sales are made in the spot market with brokers, through government auctions, to distributors and through long-term contracts. Our largest customers are CEMIG, a state-owned power generator and distributor, Geração e Transmissão S/A, Câmara de Comercialização de Energia Elétrica and Nova Energia Comercializadora Ltda., comprising 100% of our sales in the period ended December 31, 2012.

The Brazilian energy agency, ANEEL, has organized yearly auctions for alternative energy and for renewable sources at favored rates. As a hedging strategy, we sell the electricity production of our mills through long-term contracts adjusted for inflation by reference to the National Index of Consumer Prices (“IPCA”)

In 2009, UMA entered into a 10-year agreement with CEMIG for the sale of 9 MWh (approximately 52,704 MWh) during the harvest periods each year (May to November of each year) at a rate of R$184,15 per megawatt hour. In 2009, Angélica sold energy in a public auction carried out by Camara de Comercialização de Energia Elétrica (“CCEE”), whereupon Angélica entered into a 15-year agreement with CCEE for the sale of 87,600 MWh per year at a rate of R$180,26 per MWh. In August 2010, Angélica participated in a public auction, whereupon Angélica entered into a second 15-year agreement with CCEE starting in 2011, for the sale of 131,400 MWh per year at a rate of R$154.25/MWh. The delivery period for both agreements starts in May and ends in November of each year. The rates under both agreements are adjusted annually for inflation by reference to the IPCA. In July

67

##### Table of Contents

2012, Ivinhema entered into an agreement with CEMIG for the sale of 5 MWh (approximately 25,675 MWh) during the harvest period (May to November of each year) of 2013 at a rate of R$134/MWh. In January 2013, Ivinhema entered into an agreement with BTG Pactual comercializadora de energia, for the sale of 5 MW (approximately 21,960 MWh) between June 1, 2013, and November 30, 2013 at a rate of R$131.50 per megawatt hour.

Land Transformation

Land transformation is an important element of our business model and a driver of value creation. Through land transformation, we optimize land use and increase the productive potential and value of our farmland. Our land transformation model consists of changing the use of underutilized or undermanaged agricultural land to more profitable cash generating agricultural activities, such as turning low cash-yielding cattle pasture land into high cash-yielding croppable land, allowing profitable agricultural activities, such as crop, rice and sugarcane production.

Since our inception, we have successfully identified multiple opportunities for the acquisition of undeveloped or undermanaged farmland with high potential for transformation. During the ten-year period since our inception, we have effectively put into production over 154,248 and that were previously undeveloped or inefficiently managed and are undergoing the transformation process.

The land transformation process begins by determining the productive potential of each plot of land. This will vary according to soil properties, climate, productive risks, and the available technology in each specific region. Before commencing the transformation process, we perform environmental impact studies to evaluate the potential impact on the local ecosystem, with the goal of promoting environmentally responsible agricultural production and ecosystem preservation, thereby supporting sustainable land use. We do not operate in heavily wooded areas or primarily wetland areas.

The transformation process for underdeveloped and undermanaged land requires us to make initial investments during a period of one to up to three years, and the land reaches stable productive capability the third to seventh year following commencement of the land transformation activities.

We are engaged in three different categories of the land transformation process, which are defined by the previous use of the land:

(i) Undeveloped land (savannahs and natural grasslands): This is the most drastic transformation phase since it demands both physical and chemical transformation of the soil. First, the land is mechanically cleared to remove native vegetation. The soil is then mechanically leveled for agricultural operations: in the case of land being transformed for rice production, this process involves heavy land movements and systematization required for irrigation and drainage channels, roads and bridges. In the case of land destined for sugarcane plantations, land movements will also be necessary for the construction of terraces to prevent the excess of water runoff. Certain soils must be chemically treated and corrected by incorporating nutrients such as limestone, gypsum and phosphorous, as is the case of the Brazilian ‘Cerrado’. Soil correction is not required in Argentina or Uruguay due to the natural fertility of the soil. Pesticides and fertilizers are then applied to the soil in preparation for planting. In the case of land destined for crop production (grains and oilseeds), soybean, which is sometimes referred to as a colonizing crop, is usually planted during the first years due to its resistance to pests, weeds and extreme weather and soil conditions. Thereafter, the land will enter into a crop rotation scheme to reduce the incidence of plague and disease and to balance soil nutrients. In the case of rice and sugar cane, which are produced in a monoculture system, there is no colonizing crop or rotation involved. Intensive plague and weed controls and additional soil correction will take place during these first three to five years. Land productivity or yields, measured in tons of soybean or other crops per hectare, will be initially low and will gradually increase year by year. During the first five to seven years, the yields will increase at high and sustained rates. After the seventh year we consider the land developed as yield volatility is reduced and growth is only achievable at marginal rates. Since our inception in 2002, we have put into production 62,541 hectares of undeveloped land into productive croppable land.

(ii) Undermanaged or underutilized farmland (cultivated pastures and poorly managed agriculture): This transformation process is lighter than the one described above since it does not require the initial mechanical clearing of vegetation or land leveling. Only in the case of land being prepared for rice production will leveling

68

##### Table of Contents

be required for efficient flood-irrigation. The transformation of cattle pastures or poor agriculture in the Brazilian ‘Cerrado’ will begin with soil correction and soil tillage in preparation for planting of the first soybean or sugarcane crop. The process will then continue as described in the case above. Land productivity or crop yields will grow at high rates during the first three to five years of the transformation process and will then commence to stabilize and grow at marginal rates, at which point we consider the land developed. Since our inception in 2002 we have put into production 100,227 hectares of undermanaged or underutilized farmland into croppable land.

(iii) Ongoing transformation of croppable land: The application of efficient and sustainable crop production technologies and best practices such as “no-till”, crop rotations, integrated pest and weed management and balanced fertilization, among others, incrementally increases soil quality and land productivity over time, maximizing return on invested capital and increasing the land value of our properties. Our entire farmland portfolio is constantly undergoing this phase of land transformation. During the 2011/2012 harvest year, we operated 120,160 hectares of own developed farmland which were enhanced by the use of best productive practices and technology.

In each of these categories of transformation, the metric the company uses to track the level and analyze the progress of the transformation process is the level and tendency of crop yields and the number of years the land has been under crop production. Consequently, the process of land transformation is evidenced by the results of the activities within our other business segments, primarily our crops, rice and sugarcane segments. Accordingly the costs associated to the transformation process described above are allocated within these other business segments. As a result, there may be variations in our results from one season to the next according to the amount of farmland undergoing transformation and the amount of land sold and our ability to identify and acquire new farmland.

Our land transformation segment seeks not only to profit from crop and rice cultivation, but also from the opportunistic disposition of successfully transformed farmland. We strategically sell farms that have reached productive maturity with marginal potential for further productivity increases (years three to seven after commencing the land transformation process) to realize and monetize the capital gains arising from the land transformation process. Land transformation proceeds are in turn reinvested in the purchase of strategic farmland with potential for transformation and appreciation. The rotation of our land portfolio allows us to allocate capital efficiently. Since 2006 we have had a solid track record of selling farmland for highly profitable returns. During the last seven years, we have sold 11 farms, generating capital gains of approximately $132 million.

These capital gains are generated by three main factors:

(i) the acquisition of land at opportunistic prices below the market value or fair value of the land;

(ii) the land transformation and ongoing land transformation process described above enhances the productivity and profitability of land, ultimately increasing the value of the land; and

(iii) general market appreciation of land driven by increase in commodity prices and supply and demand dynamics in the land market. In this regard, during the last 30 years, since 1977, farmland prices in Argentina’s core production region have increased an average of 7.3% per year according to data published by Margenes Agropecuarios. The value of the farms we sold between 2006 and 2012, as well as our overall land portfolio, has been positively impacted by this external factor.

We believe we are one of the most active players in the land business in South America. Since our inception in 2002, we have executed transactions for the purchase and sale of land for over $542 million. Our business development team is responsible for analyzing, selecting, acquiring and selling land. The team has gained extensive expertise in evaluating and acquiring farmland throughout South America, and has a solid understanding of the productivity potential of each region and of the potential for land transformation and appreciation. Since 2002, the team has analyzed over 9.7 million hectares of farmland with a total value of approximately $13 billion. We have developed a methodology to analyze investment opportunities, taking into account price, transformation potential, productive model, financial projections, and investment requirements, among others. Our analysis also employs advanced information technology, including the use of satellite images, rain and temperature records, soil analyses, and topography and drainage maps. From time to time, we may leverage our favorable position in and knowledge of the land market to engage in opportunistic buying and selling transactions.

69

##### Table of Contents

The following table sets forth our acquisitions and divestitures since our inception:

|  | Acquisition |  |  | Divestitures |  |  | Total Land Holdings |
Year Ended December 31, |  | (In hectares) |
2002 |  |  | 74,898 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 74,898 |
2003 |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 74,898 |
2004 |  |  | 34,659 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 109,557 |
2005 |  |  | 22,262 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 131,819 |
2006 |  |  | 5,759 |  |  |  | 3,507 |  |  |  | 134,071 |
2007 |  |  | 113,197 |  |  |  | 8,714 |  |  |  | 239,274 |
2008 |  |  | 43,783 |  |  |  | 4,857 |  |  |  | 278,200 |
2009 |  |  | — |  |  |  | 5,005 |  |  |  | 273,195 |
2010 |  |  | 14,755 |  |  |  | 5,086 |  |  |  | 282,864 |
2011 |  |  | 12,992 |  |  |  | 2,439 |  |  |  | 293,417 |
2012 |  |  | — |  |  |  | 9,475 |  |  |  | 283,942 |

Our Farms

Appraisal of Farms. In September 2012, in order to assess the market value of rural properties in Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay, we requested an appraisal by Cushman & Wakefield Argentina S.A., independent real estate valuation firm knowledgeable about the agriculture industry and the local real estate market. As part of these appraisals, the value of each of our properties was determined using the sales comparison approach taking into account current offerings and analyzed prices buyers had recently paid for comparable sites, adjusted for the differences between comparable properties and the subject property to arrive at an estimate of the value of the subject property. The major elements of comparison used to value the properties included the property rights conveyed, the financial terms incorporated into the transaction, the conditions or motivations surrounding the sale, changes in market conditions since the sale, the location of the real estate and the physical characteristics of the property.

The abovementioned valuations assumed good and marketable title to subject properties, which were assumed to be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. The valuation did not include site measurements and no survey of the subject properties were undertaken. In addition, the valuations also assumed (a) responsible ownership and competent management of the subject properties; (b) there were no hidden or unapparent conditions of the subject properties, subsoil or structures that render the subject properties more or less valuable; (c) full compliance with all applicable federal, state and local zoning and environmental regulations and laws and (d) all required licenses, certificates of occupancy and other governmental consents were or can be obtained and renewed for any use on which the value opinion contained in the appraisals is based. Unless otherwise stated in the appraisals, the existence of potentially hazardous or toxic materials that may have been used in the construction or maintenance of the improvements or may be located at or about the subject properties was not considered in arriving at the opinion of value. These materials (such as formaldehyde foam insulation, asbestos insulation and other potentially hazardous materials) may adversely affect the value of the subject properties.

Cushman & Wakefield has informed us their assessment of the market value of our farmland as of September 30, 2012. According to Cushman & Wakefield, the market value of our farmland totaled $938.0 million, out of which $800.3 million correspond to the market value of our farmland in Argentina and Uruguay, and the remaining $137.7 million correspond to the market value of our farmland in Brazil. These valuations are only intended to provide an indicative approximation of the market value of our farmland property as of September 30, 2012 based on then current market conditions. This information is subject to change based on a host of variables and market conditions.

70

##### Table of Contents

Farm |  | State, Country |  | Gross Si (Hectares) |  |  | Current Use
El Meridiano |  | Buenos Aires, Argentina |  |  | 6,302 |  |  | Grains
Las Horquetas |  | Buenos Aires, Argentina |  |  | 2,086 |  |  | Grains & Cattle
San Carlos |  | Buenos Aires, Argentina |  |  | 4,215 |  |  | Grains
Santa Regina(*) |  | Buenos Aires, Argentina |  |  | 1,773 |  |  | Grains
Huelen |  | La Pampa, Argentina |  |  | 4,633 |  |  | Grains
La Carolina |  | Santa Fe, Argentina |  |  | 8,444 |  |  | Grains & Cattle
El Orden |  | Santa Fe, Argentina |  |  | 6,875 |  |  | Grains & Cattle
La Rosa |  | Santa Fe, Argentina |  |  | 4,087 |  |  | Grains & Cattle
San Joaquín |  | Santa Fe, Argentina |  |  | 37,273 |  |  | Rice, Grains & Cattle
Carmen |  | Santa Fe, Argentina |  |  | 10,021 |  |  | Grains
Abolengo |  | Santa Fe, Argentina |  |  | 7,473 |  |  | Grains
La Cañada |  | San Luis, Argentina |  |  | 3,399 |  |  | Grains
Santa Lucia |  | Santiago del Estero, Argentina |  |  | 17,484 |  |  | Grains & Cattle
El Colorado |  | Santiago del Estero, Argentina |  |  | 4,960 |  |  | Grains
La Guarida |  | Santiago del Estero, Argentina |  |  | 15,451 |  |  | Grains & Cattle
La Garrucha |  | Salta, Argentina |  |  | 3,606 |  |  | Grains
Los Guayacanes |  | Salta, Argentina |  |  | 7,242 |  |  | Grains
Ombú |  | Formosa, Argentina |  |  | 18,321 |  |  | Grains & Cattle
Oscuro |  | Corrientes, Argentina |  |  | 33,429 |  |  | Rice, Grains & Cattle
Itá Caabó |  | Corrientes, Argentina |  |  | 26,396 |  |  | Rice, Grains & Cattle
San Agustín |  | Corrientes, Argentina |  |  | 5,067 |  |  | Rice, Grains & Cattle
Alto Alegre |  | Tocantins, Brazil |  |  | 6,082 |  |  | Grains & Cotton
Conquista |  | Tocantins, Brazil |  |  | 4,325 |  |  | Grains & Cotton
Lagoa de Oeste |  | Bahia, Brazil |  |  | 1,132 |  |  | Coffee
Palmeira |  | Bahia, Brazil |  |  | 1,000 |  |  | Coffee
Heloisa |  | Bahia, Brazil |  |  | 800 |  |  | Coffee
Mimoso |  | Bahia, Brazil |  |  | 902 |  |  | Coffee
Rio de Janeiro |  | Bahia, Brazil |  |  | 10,012 |  |  | Grains & Coffee
Bela Manhã |  | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil |  |  | 381 |  |  | Sugarcane
Ouro Verde |  | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil |  |  | 683 |  |  | Sugarcane
Don Fabrício |  | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil |  |  | 3,304 |  |  | Sugarcane
Takuarê |  | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil |  |  | 490 |  |  | Sugarcane
Agua Branca |  | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil |  |  | 1,614 |  |  | Sugarcane
Nossa Senhora Aparecida |  | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil |  |  | 540 |  |  | Sugarcane
Sapálio |  | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil |  |  | 6,062 |  |  | Sugarcane
Carmen (Agua Santa) |  | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil |  |  | 146 |  |  | Sugarcane
La Pecuaria |  | Duranzo, Uruguay |  |  | 3,177 |  |  | Grains
Doña Marina |  | Corrientes, Argentina |  |  | 14,755 |  |  | Rice
Total |  |  |  |  | 283,942 |  |  |

(*) | Accounts for 49% of the area of the Santa Regina farm.

A substantial portion of our assets consists of rural real estate. The agricultural real estate market in Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay is particularly characterized by volatility and illiquidity. As a result, we may experience difficulties in immediately adjusting our portfolio of rural properties in response to any alterations in the economic or business environments. The volatility of the local market could affect our ability to sell and receive the proceeds from such sales, which could give rise to a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industries—A substantial portion of our assets is farmland that is highly illiquid.”

71

##### Table of Contents

Land Leasing and Agriculture Partnerships. We enter into operating lease agreements based on criteria regarding the quality and projected profitability of the property, as well as our production and yield objectives in the short or medium term. Generally, we become aware of farms available for lease directly through the owners of farms near our farms and in some cases through regional brokers.

We tend to be more open to leasing farmland for sugarcane production than for our farming businesses, where we own the majority of the land that we farm. We lease land for our sugarcane production primarily because leases in this sector are long term, lasting between one or two sugarcane cycles (with each cycle lasting generally 6 years), which allows us to implement and reap the productivity benefits of our land transformation strategies. Sugarcane lease payments are established in terms of tons of sugarcane per hectare, depending on the productivity of the land in terms of tons per hectare and sucrose content per hectare and also on the distance from the land to the mill. Sugarcane prices are based on the market value of the sugarcane set forth by the regulations of the State of Sao Paulo Sugarcane, Sugar and Alcohol Growers Counsel (Conselho dos Produtores de Cana-de-Açúcar, Açúcar e Álcool do Estado de Sao Paulo, or “Consecana”). Given the strategic location of our mills in the region and the inherent inefficiency of growing crops other than sugarcane in this region, we expect to be able to renew our leases for the sugarcane farmland with minimal issues.

With respect to our farming business, the initial duration of lease agreements is generally one harvest year. Leases of farmland for production of grains include agreements with both fixed and variable lease payments in local currency or U.S. dollars per hectare.

Land Management. We manage our land through an executive committee composed of a country manager, regional manager, farm manager and members of the Technology Adecoagro Group (“TAG”) that meet on a monthly basis. We delegate individual farm management to farm managers, who are responsible for farm operations and receive advisory support from TAG to analyze and determine the most suitable and efficient technologies to be applied. Our executive committee establishes commercial and production rules based on sales, market expectations and risk allocation, and fulfilling production procedures and protocols.

Following an acquisition of property, we make investments in technology in order to improve productivity and to increase its value. Occasionally when we purchase property, a parcel of the property is sub-utilized or the infrastructure may be in need of improvement, including traditional fencing and electrical fencing, irrigation equipment and machinery, among other things.

Property, Plant and Equipment

In addition to our farmland, we also own the following principal industrial facilities:

Facility |  | Province, Country |  | Relevant Operational Data |  | Current Use
“Christophersen” |  | Santa Fe, Argentina |  | 18,700 tons of storage capacity. 2,400 tons per day of drying Capacity |  | Seedbed and stockpiling plant (1)
“La Lácteo”(2) |  | Cordoba, Argentina |  | 250,000 liters per day processing capacity |  | Dairy processing facilities
“Semillero Itá Caabó” |  | Corrientes, Argentina |  |  |  | Rice genetic improvement program
“Molino San Agustín” |  | Corrientes, Argentina |  | Processing capacity of 3,500 tons of brown rice monthly, and husk rice drying capacity of 450 tons per day |  | Brown rice processing and drying plant
“Molino Ala — Mercedes” |  | Corrientes, Argentina |  | Installed capacity of 5,000 tons of white rice monthly, and husk rice drying capacity of 2,400 tons per day |  | Rice processing and drying plant

72

##### Table of Contents

“Molino Ala — San Salvador” |  | Entre Ríos, Argentina |  | Installed capacity of 5,000 tons of white rice monthly, and husk rice drying capacity of 1,100 tons per day |  | Rice processing and drying plant
Molino Franck |  | Santa Fe, Argentina |  | Processing capacity of 5,600 tons of white rice monthly, and husk rice drying capacity of 1,800 tons per day |  | Rice processing and drying plant
“Angélica Agroenergía” |  | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil |  | Installed milling capacity of 4.0 million tons of sugarcane annually, 330,000 tons of VHP sugar and over 220,000 cubic meters of ethanol, and over 250,000 MWh |  | Sugar and ethanol mill producing hydrated ethanol, anhydrous ethanol and VHP sugar. Sells energy to local network
“Ivinhema Agroenergía” |  | Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil |  | Installed milling capacity of 2.0 million tons of sugarcane annually, 187,500 tons of VHP sugar, 117,000 cubic meters of ethanol, and over 82,000 MWh |  | Sugar and ethanol mill producing hydrated ethanol and VHP sugar. Sells energy to local network
“Usina Monte Alegre” |  | Monte Belo, Brazil |  | Present milling capacity of 1.2 million tons of sugarcane annually, 120,000 tons of VHP and white sugar and over 40,000 cubic meters of ethanol and 50,000 MWh |  | Sugar mill producing VHP and white sugar and hydrated ethanol. Sells energy to local network

(1) | Classification of wheat and soybean seeds.

(2) | Joint venture of which we own 50%.

For additional information regarding our property, plant and equipment, see Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements.

Customers

We sell manufactured products, agricultural products and offer services to a large base of customers. The type and class of customers may differs depending on our business segments. For the year ended December 31, 2012 more than 55% of our sales of crops were sold to 11 well-known customers (both multinational or local) with good credit history with us. In the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment, sales of ethanol were concentrated in 10 customers, which represented 89% of total sales of ethanol for the year ended December 31, 2012. Approximately 79% of our sales of sugar were concentrated in 5 well-known traders for the year ended December 31, 2012. The remaining 21%, which mainly relates to “crystal sugar”, were dispersed among several customers. In 2012, energy sales are 100% concentrated in 3 major customers. In the dairy segment, 43% of the sales were completed with our joint venture La Lacteo.

Competition

The farming sector is highly fragmented. Although we are one of South America’s leading producers, due to the atomized nature of the farming sector, our overall market share in some of the industries in which we participate is insubstantial. Our production volume, however, improves our ability to negotiate favorable supply, transportation and delivery logistics with our suppliers, third-party transporters, ports and other facilities, and customers. Although

73

##### Table of Contents

competition in agriculture varies considerably by product and sector, in general, there are a large number of producers, and each one of them controls only a small portion of the total production. Therefore individual producers often have little influence on the market and cause little or no effect on market prices as a result of their individual strategies, explaining why producers are price takers and not price makers. In many cases, the price is established in international market exchanges. As the majority of agricultural products are commodities, which stifles product differentiation, the principal competition factors are cost of production and volume efficiency gains. In addition, agricultural producers face strong foreign competition, and with this competition the factors are often more difficult to identify.

The majority of farming producers in developed countries can rely on specific protectionist policies and subsidies from their governments in order to maintain their position in the market. In general, we have been able to obtain discounts for the acquisition of supplies and excess prices for our production in the farming sector. In this sector, we view SLC Agrícola S.A., BrasilAgro — Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas, Sollus Agrícola, Radar Propriedades Agrícolas, El Tejar S.A., Cresud SACIF y A, MSU S.A. and Los Grobo Agropecuaria, among others, as our competitors. We also compete in Argentina with retailers of agricultural products, including other branded rice products, such as Molinos Río de la Plata S.A., Dos Hermanos S.H., Sagemüller S.A. and Cooperativa Arroceros Villa Elisa Ltda.

The sugar and ethanol industries are highly competitive. In Brazil, we compete with numerous small-and medium-sized sugar and ethanol producers. Despite increased consolidation, the Brazilian sugar and ethanol industries remain highly fragmented, with more than 436 sugar mills. Some of the largest industry players with whom we compete are Cosan Ltd., Grupo São Martinho S.A., Açúcar Guarani S.A., Louis Dreyfus Commodities Brasil S.A., ETH Bioenergia S.A., Bunge, Grupo Zillo Lorenzetti, Grupo Carlos Lyra S.A. and Grupo Irmãos Biaggi. We also face competition from international sugar producers, such as those in the U.S. and the European Union, where local regulators have historically implemented tariffs, agriculture subsidies and/or other governmental incentive programs, of which some remain, to protect local sugar producers from foreign competition. The following table describes the Brazilian competitive landscape:

2012/2013 Harvest Year |  | Brazil |
Number of Mills |  |  | 401 |
Sugarcane crushed (million tons) |  |  | 588.9 |
Ethanol Production (million cubic meters) |  |  | 23.6 |
Sugar Production (million tons) |  |  | 38.3 |

Source: Ministry of Agriculture & CONAB

With respect to farmland, there have historically been few companies competing to acquire and lease farmland for the purpose of benefiting from land appreciation and optimization of yields in different commercial activities. However, we believe that new companies, may become active players in the acquisition of farmland and the leasing of sown land, which would add competitors to the market in coming years.

Supplies and Suppliers

Our principal supplies for our farming business are seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and fuel, which represented 9%, 11%, 12% and 12%, respectively, of our total direct expenditures (including leasing cost) for supplies and services and were collectively 45% of our total expenditure for supplies in the farming business for 2012. Further, these supplies represented 38% of our total production cost for 2012. As we use direct sowing in 99% of our planted area, without requiring soil preparation, fuel represents only 12% of the direct cost of production for 2012.

Our principal supplies for our sugar, ethanol and energy business are diesel lubricants and fertilizers, which collectively represented 25% of our total expenditures incurred in the sugar, ethanol and energy business for 2012. Further, these supplies represented 23% of our total production cost for 2012. We have an extensive network of suppliers for each of our business segments and for each required input within each segment, resulting in lower reliance on any particular supplier. Our ten largest suppliers account for 49% of our total expenditures for supplies in 2012. While we value the relationships we have developed with each of our suppliers given the quality we have come to expect, we do not consider any single supplier to be key to our production.

74

##### Table of Contents

We have been able to obtain lower prices particularly due to the volume that derives from our large-scale operations.

Seasonality

Our business activities are inherently seasonal. We generally harvest and sell our grains (corn, soybean, rice and sunflower) between February and August, with the exception of wheat, which is harvested from December to January. Coffee and cotton are unique in that while both are typically harvested from June to August, they require processing which takes about two to three months. Sales in our dairy business segment tend to be more stable. However, milk production is generally higher during the fourth quarter, when the weather is more suitable for production. The sugarcane harvesting period typically begins in April/May and ends in November/December. This creates fluctuations in our sugarcane inventory, usually peaking in December to cover sales between crop harvests (i.e., January through April). As a result of the above factors, there may be significant variations in our financial results from one quarter to another. In addition our quarterly results may vary as a result of the effects of fluctuations in commodities prices, production yields and costs on the determination of changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Biological Assets and Agricultural Produce.”

Sustainability

Our production model is based on sustainability standards that seek to produce food and renewable energy on a long-term basis by preserving the natural resources involved in the production process. The sustainable approach to farming requires taking into account economic, social and environmental factors adapted to local circumstances. Natural resources are the main foundation of our activities, with land being the most relevant natural resource in our operations. We have developed a sustainable land use strategy that considers factors beyond the requirements of local law and regulations. There are ecosystems that we do not consider appropriate for the use of agricultural development, such as heavy forest and key wetlands, and there are others that we evaluate using (savannahs, natural grasses, bush land, lowlands) only after carrying out an environmental impact assessment. In addition to such evaluations, we analyze the agricultural potential of the land in respect of the soil, the climate, crop productivity and available technology, among other factors. We then consolidate our analysis into a land transformation plan, which includes the best land use option and implements best practices such as the “no-till” technology, crop rotations, integrated pest and weed management, balanced fertilization, responsible pesticide usage and water management. All these best practices aim to increase resource efficiency and to decrease the risk of contamination and waste production and are consolidated into an environmental management plan, which includes biodiversity management when applicable. We aim to properly implement our sustainable production model to enhance land productivity and therefore increase land value.

Standardized and Scalable Agribusiness Model

We are developing an agribusiness model that allows us to engage in large-scale farming activities in an efficient and sustainable manner. Our agribusiness model consists of developing a specialized workforce and defining standard protocols to track crop development and control production variables, thereby enhancing efficient decision making and facilitating continuous improvement. This approach allows us to grow in scale and execute our expansion plan and efficiently manage various production units spread across different regions by effectively replicating our productive model. Process standardization also helps us assure compliance with local law and regulations and reduce social and environmental risks.

We continue to develop and implement crop protocols. The purpose of these protocols is to coordinate and consolidate the knowledge on crop management for each area in order to standardize the implementation of these protocols. The protocols contain all the technical information for managing crops. This information is constantly reviewed by agricultural teams and their advisors, making it possible to preserve the technical knowledge of the company and at the same time improve agricultural production and make decisions pursuant to the company’s guidelines. Based on the results of the application of these protocols, we conduct an annual review of the techniques used and their results. This evaluation is done by means of crop campaign analysis, in which all teams review and discuss the last harvest year’s productive performance and the technological package for the new harvest year.

75

##### Table of Contents

When processes and protocols are defined they can be audited and certified by qualified third parties. Adecoagro is currently in the process of certifying its crop production in Argentina under ISO 9001. We are also working to implement ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 in some operating units.

In order to achieve efficient scales of production, we have redesigned our field sizes by removing useless cattle infrastructure such as fencing. Larger fields reduce the overlapping of farmworks, enhancing operating efficiency, reducing the use of inputs and achieving agronomic timing (planting or harvesting on time). The goal is to reduce operative time and to improve efficiency in the use of inputs. Large-scale production also requires the implementation of advanced technology such as GPS (Global Positioning System), GIS (Geographic Information System) and modern machinery as well.

Contractors

Contractors play a significant role in our farming business model. We seek to outsource most of the typical farmwork, such as planting, spraying and harvesting. Outsourcing allows us to reduce our investments in heavy machinery and equipments such as tractors or harvesters, enhancing the efficient allocation of our capital in our core productive activities.

The contractor model in the Argentine humid pampas region has existed for over fifty years and has developed into a highly competitive market. Contractors have gained extensive expertise and skill in the management of agricultural machinery and have access to modern advanced technology. We seek to develop win-win relationships with our contractors by considering them as partners in our production and providing constant technical training and support through our TAG (as defined below) activities. We strive to have a number of contractors associated with each farm to generate competition and allow benchmarking to enhance operational efficiency and ensure high-quality service.

In regions where this model is not fully developed, we use a mixed system where we hire the most experienced contractors in the region and we also operate our own machinery. We promote the development of new contractors by providing training and selling them our used machinery. We also promote the movement of selected contractors from developed regions into new marginal regions by offering them an opportunity to grow their businesses. In other regions where there is no established contractor system or there is specific farmwork (rice land leveling for instance), we own 100% of the machinery. In our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy business, we own or lease and operate all the agricultural equipment and machinery needed for sugarcane planting and harvesting operations. Our main goal is to achieve high-quality farmwork, both when selecting any contractor or when using our own machinery. In Brazil we partially employ the contractor model only for specific tasks such as grain harvesting, land leveling, and aerial spraying among others.

Technical Adecoagro Group (TAG)

The TAG is an internal group formed by agronomists, farm managers, external advisors, contractors, trainees and suppliers, whose main goal is to excel in production management by providing constant technical education and analysis regarding production technologies. Although the TAG is focused on developing such knowledge under a common criteria for the whole company, it also considers different production systems, such as crops, rice and dairy in Argentina and Uruguay, crops in western Bahia, Brazil and sugarcane in Minas Gerais and Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. In order to achieve their goals, the group meets every 20 days to analyze and discuss technical aspects of the farming production processes.

The TAG participates in the design of the most efficient and productive land use strategies, the definition of the optimal crop production mix for each farm and region, and supervises and evaluates the implementation of the most profitable and sustainable technologies to be adapted and applied in each region. Additionally, the TAG promotes specific external training courses, facilitates participation in external technical groups, organizes technical farm tours, offers support in establishing the crop planting plan and delivers a full-season analysis for each crop annually. The crop analysis is essential in order to allow technical improvements to be implemented for the following crop season.

76

##### Table of Contents

Since the TAG is involved in different regions, it plays a relevant role in spreading best practices among productive regions, including “no-till” in western Bahia. In order to evaluate and adapt the proper technologies locally, a vast network of test plots in agrochemicals, seeds, and farm-works are being carried out under specific technical guidelines. Such development is performed to make the necessary technological adjustments in respect of fertilizer levels, choice of the best product varieties for each crop, determination of the best planting periods and improvement in crop management and agricultural mechanization, resulting in higher yields coupled with reduced costs.

In order to continually improve our technical development, we participate in specialized industry groups, such as CREA and AAPRESID, with which we share values and goals. “CREA” is a 50-year-old farmers’ association focused on developing and supporting technical excellence with local farmers. “AAPRESID” is a technical association of highly innovative farmers specializing in no-till development. We participate in certain CREA and AAPRESID discussion groups in which we share and evaluate common technical matters. We take advantage of their vast network of test plots and we constantly exchange technological knowledge for implementation in our farms.

In addition, the TAG is focusing its resources on pursuing improvements trough implementing advanced techniques such as variable inputs usage by type of soil based on precision agriculture technology, intensification techniques relating to soil occupation times and diversified crop rotations, adjusting “no-till” in rice production, developing sugarcane production technologies involving agricultural mechanization and minimum tillage, and developing cotton production technologies involving “no-till” and crop rotation among others.

By implementing all these education programs and development activities, the TAG provides to the company a network that focuses on the fine-tuning and optimization of the efficiencies throughout all the production processes of each business line.

Technology and Best Practices

We have consistently used innovative production techniques to ensure that we are at the forefront of technological improvements and standards in our industry. For example, we use the “no-till” technology and “crop rotation” to improve our crop yields. We also practice the use of “second harvests” where conditions permit, allowing us to plant and harvest a second crop from the same farmland in the same harvest year. Our crop production model is based on balanced fertilization, integrated pest and weed management and crop intensification. We use the innovative silo bag storage method in our rice and crop businesses allowing us to time the entry of our rice production into the market at optimal price points. Additionally, we believe we were the first company in South America to implement the innovative “free-stall” infrastructure in dairy operations resulting in increased raw milk production compared to our peers. The free-stall method is a model that provides for better control over production variables by confining dairy cows to a large barn that is equipped with indoor corrals and a mechanical advanced milking system on a rotary platform, allowing us to utilize production efficiencies and thereby increase milk production volumes while maximizing our land use and resulting in significantly higher conversion rates of animal feed into milk.

Our sugarcane harvesting is 90% mechanized, which has significantly improved operating efficiency, therefore reducing operating costs. We have modern facilities in the sugar and ethanol business including advanced sugar and ethanol mills with high-pressure boilers and that achieve one of the highest ratios of energy produced per ton of cane milled, according to the Cane Technology Center Benchmark program. Our Angélica sugar plant was the first continuously operative facility in Brazil, requiring no production stoppages between sugar batches.

No-Till

“No-till” is the cornerstone of our crop production technology and the key to maintaining and even increasing the value and productivity of our land assets. “No-till” — often called zero tillage or direct sowing — is a technology developed approximately 25 years ago to grow crops from year to year without disturbing the soil through tillage, and arose as an opposition to conventional tillage.

77

##### Table of Contents

Conventional farming consists of using plows to turn and till the soil to remove weeds, mix in soil additives such as fertilizers, and prepare the surface for seeding. Soil tillage leads to unfavorable effects such as soil compaction, loss of organic matter, degradation of soil components, death or disruption of microorganisms, evaporation of soil humidity and soil erosion where topsoil is blown or washed away by wind or rain.

“No-till” farming avoids these negative effects by excluding the use of tillage. The “no-till” technology consists of leaving crop plant residues on the surface of the soil after harvesting a crop. These residues form a mulch or permanent cover protecting the soil from erosion risks caused by heavy rains and strong winds. This protective cover also helps natural precipitation and irrigation water infiltrate the soil effectively while decreasing water loss from evaporation. Absence of tillage helps prevent soil compaction, allowing the soil to absorb more water and roots to grow deeper into the soil. Furthermore, “no-till” reduces the emergence of weeds and enhances biological processes that positively impact soil properties, conserving and even improving the presence of organic matter and microorganisms and associated nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorous, etc).

The combination of these advantages results in important cost reductions due to a lower use of inputs, mainly diesel, fertilizers and pesticides, and higher crop yields, thus increasing the profitability of our business. These benefits are achieved in the medium to long term, resulting in a continuous increase of land productivity and thus its value. From an operational standpoint, “no-till” facilitates the conditions to perform most of the operations on time such as planting, spraying and harvesting, which enhances the development of large-scale operations and specially improves the probability of planting each crop at the optimum moment.

Crop Rotation

Crop rotation is the practice of growing a series of dissimilar types of crops in the same area in sequential seasons. Crop rotation allows us to better control the buildup of harmful weeds and reduces the incidence of plagues and diseases that often occur when the same commodity is continuously cropped. Crop rotation also allows us to balance the fertility demands of various crops to avoid the excessive depletion of soil nutrients, contributing to a more efficient use of fertilizers and a sustainable use of herbicides and pesticides. Crop rotation results in increased yields and reduced production costs, providing a high rate of return. Our crop rotation model is tailored to each of our farming regions based on climatic and soil conditions. For example, in Argentina’s Humid Pampas, our three-year crop rotation cycle involves the planting of a wheat crop followed by a soybean double-crop in the first year, a corn crop in the second year, and a soybean crop in the third year. In Brazil, we pursue a six-year crop rotation cycle whereby we plant the following crop sequence: corn, cotton, soybeans, cotton, soybeans and cotton.

Second Harvest — Double Cropping

Second harvest, also known as “double cropping”, is the practice of consecutively producing two crops on the same land within the same growing year. Double cropping is possible only in regions with long growing seasons, which is determined mainly by climate conditions such as rain and temperature. Double cropping allows us to increase the profitability of our land, diversify our production and commercial risk and enhance operational efficiencies through a better utilization of machinery, freight, labor and other resources, resulting in a dilution of our fixed costs. Double cropping has important agronomical advantages as well, such as having crops on the land for a longer period of time, which, enhanced by “no-till” and crop rotation practices results in the improvement of the physical and chemical properties of the soil in the long term. We implement and adapt different double cropping systems for each of our productive regions in Argentina and Uruguay, with the most frequent being wheat/soybean, wheat/corn, sunflower/soybean, corn/soybean and sunflower/corn.

Integrated Pest Management (IPM)

Integrated pest management (“IPM”) involves a deep analysis of agronomical, economical and environmental aspects with the goal of determining the most efficient way to control the pests. It simultaneously achieves two main goals: (i) enhancing crop productivity and (ii) decreasing the risk of agrochemical contamination. The first stage of IPM is to train the people who will be involved in pesticide usage. The pesticide to be applied is selected considering local regulations (only locally approved pesticides are used) and the minimum resulting environmental risks due to its chemical classification. Additionally, when selecting biotechnologically developed crops, we

78

##### Table of Contents

evaluate the potential reduction of pesticide uses that may be achieved. The doses of pesticides are defined by vendor recommendations and adjusted through agronomical expertise (specific to a crop and a pest). The timing of pesticide application is based on economic threshold that takes into account the crop situation (growing stage, climate conditions), the potential damage of the pest (type, population, growing stage), the presence of “beneficial” pests, and finally, the price relationship between grains and pesticides. We also use biological pest controls by breeding and releasing natural enemies of the relevant pest, as is the case with the borer plague in sugarcane. The relevance of the pest is measured by implementing specific scouting methodologies, which are adapted to large-scale farming. Scouting is carried out by trained employees who supervise all the fields on a weekly basis. The pesticide doses are applied by high-tech machinery, the majority of which is outsourced. IPM machinery is accurately calibrated to increase its application efficiency and to reduce any potential contamination risk. Climate conditions are taken into account, as well, in determining the optimal timing for spraying, to avoid drifting, evaporation and leakage risks.

Balanced Fertilization

Balanced fertilization consists of determining an optimum use of fertilizers at the proper grades and in the proper amounts to supply the correct ratio of nutrients and to ensure that the soil will sustain high crop yields over time, consequently decreasing contamination risks. At the beginning of each crop season, we perform extensive soil studies in each of our farms to control the amount of organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium levels in each field. Based on this analysis and considering the potential yield for each field, the crop rotation, and relative prices between fertilizers and agricultural products, we determine the optimum amount of fertilizer to be applied in order to maximize the economic response of the crop.

Water management

Since crops need sufficient water to achieve their potential yields, we are engaged in techniques aimed to increase the efficiency of water usage and at the same time decrease soil erosion risks. In that regard, “no-till” presents strong advantages since it improves rainfall infiltration and increases the soil’s water storage capacity. In areas that may be subject to excess water, we are developing terraces, soil leveling and other techniques intended to decrease runoff and erosion risks. In some of the jurisdictions in which we operate, the use of water for irrigation requires obtaining special permits. For certain irrigated crops such as rice, we focus on the design and operation of rainwater harvesting, collecting water from rain in semi-natural reservoirs destined for future irrigation. Channels to conduct the water and drain the fields are developed by experts in order to deliver water in the most efficient manner. We are also developing the zero grade level system in some of our rice farms to increase productivity and reduce production costs. This technique involves a precise leveling of the land based on GPS and Laser technology. When fields are accurately leveled, water irrigation requirements are reduced, thus lowering the cost of labor and energy. Efficient management of irrigation results in a positive impact on yields. Additionally, as the fields can be larger, there are some operational benefits that can be achieved by reducing machinery working times. Other crops such corn seed, sunflower seed and coffee are irrigated by highly efficient pivot spraying systems. This type of irrigation system allows us to distribute water uniformly throughout the field, improving the use of water in terms of total millimeters per year. We conduct soil moisture sampling to define the best moment and amount of water to be used for irrigation in each plot.

Mechanization

We incorporate all available mechanization technology into our business that is cost-effective. We believe that by employing mechanization technology we improve our operating efficiency and are better able to reach desired economies of scale in our operations. Mechanization also enables us to adopt new associated technologies faster and hastens our development efforts. In our farming business, we are using cutting-edge mechanized technology for planting, spraying, harvesting and irrigating and for soil preparation and management. We also employ advanced mechanization technology in our logistics and product processing operations, including transportation, drying operations and grain sorting and storage. We are in the process of developing mechanization technology to benefit our other businesses, such as coffee and sugarcane planting, which traditionally have not benefitted from such mechanization.

79

##### Table of Contents

Synergies

The technologies we employ are very closely linked, and the joint implementation of a number of them will result in positive synergies for our entire production system. For example, implementation of the “no-till” technology can be enhanced by crop rotations, due to the positive biological effects generated by the different types of roots from each crop in the soil. Benefits of integrated pest management are improved when combined with the “no-till” and crop rotation strategies, since the crop stubble that remains on the soil can be a barrier to some plagues, and because some other pests are specific to a particular crop and the crop rotation can be sufficient to control them. We consider these synergies when we develop our crop seeding schedule.

Information Technology

We employ the World Class ERP Oracle eBusiness Suite to standardize and integrate our processes throughout the company and improve controls and information accuracy and consolidation. The Oracle eBusiness Suite allows us to fulfill our local accounting and fiscal needs while facilitating operational coordination across our geographic areas and lines of business, reducing our operational costs and minimizing duplication and inefficiencies. It also provides our management with consolidated results in a timely manner. In addition, our integrated security plan includes an offsite safeguarded system that guarantees business continuity.

Environmental Responsibility

We are developing a production model that reflects a strong commitment to the environment. Our responsibility to the environment begins with complying with local regulations. Natural resources such as land, water and biodiversity are taken into account when we evaluate both the development of a new production project and the operation of an on-going one. In that regard, we are constantly evaluating best practices to be implemented in our operations. See “—Technology and Best Practices.” In order to be better stewards of the environment, we are in the process of developing and implementing environmental management plans for our operations. Those plans involve different stages, which are mainly educating our own and outsourced staff, monitoring ecological parameters, preventing negative effects, and correcting deviations. With respect to pesticide contamination risks, we are implementing a responsible pesticide use program, which includes personnel training, personnel protection elements, application recommendations, pesticide selection criteria, pesticide handling and storage and after-use pesticide packages management (which are specifically cleaned, collected and stored for recycling purposes under third parties’ programs such as AgroLimpio of Argentina).

Additionally, in some regions where biodiversity matters are relevant, we are implementing biodiversity management plans, which mainly consists of periodically monitoring flora and fauna, detecting significant variations of their populations, and proposing measures to reduce any potential threats to local species. As a result of this, we are implementing some practices such as prohibiting hunting on our farms in Argentina, developing environmental private protection areas (where natural vegetation is protected by implementing sustainable production practices). As environmental matters require specific expertise and an understanding of complex relationships, we are entering into cooperative arrangements and agreements with educational institutions. We are also developing relationships with well recognized environmental non-governmental organizations, such as The Nature Conservancy.

In Brazil, one of our main environmental focuses is compliance with the applicable provisions of the Brazilian Forestry Code (Código Florestal). Accordingly, we analyze and identify all natural areas inside our own farms and inside leased areas, and make a development plan that defines actions for their preservation. Some examples of these activities are the reforestation of Permanent Preservation Areas (Áreas de Preservación Permanente) and Legal Reserve Areas (Áreas de Reserva Legal), for which we are producing seedlings of more than 70 native species to reforest those areas. We are strongly committed to the preservation of forests, and we only develop areas for farming if they were previously used for agricultural purposes or for pasture. We do not engage in deforestation. We concern ourselves with the protection of riverbanks and surrounding areas of streams and springs, as they are important for soil conservation and as refuges for native fauna. In that regard, we are implementing periodic monitoring of wildlife and native flora as well. We have a partnership with The Nature Conservancy (“TNC”), an international environmental non-governmental organization, to organize the environmental preservation of areas of ecological importance by acquiring such areas to replace reserve areas on our own land and land we lease, through a reserve

80

##### Table of Contents

compensation scheme developed by TNC and adopted by the regional environmental authorities. This program will allow us to protect larger blocks of critical ecosystems instead of having smaller reserve areas in each farm, while allowing us to use areas in our farms that were previously developed and would have lesser environmental value as reserve areas.

We are also evaluating bio-gas production from manure in our free-stall dairy operation in Argentina as another emissions reduction program. In that regard, we received a grant from Sustainable Energy and Climate Change Initiative from Inter-American Development Bank (SECCI) in order to carry out a pre-feasibility assessment. This project is currently under development and it plans to consider the potential of capturing methane gas from adequately managed manure of dairy cows, which could be used to co-generate electricity. This emission reduction could also generate extra income from carbon credits under the CDM program. At UMA, we have implemented a pilot plant that produces biogas from vinasse, developed in partnership with Efficiencia, a subsidiary of Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (“CEMIG”). The technology developed during this project will allow us to generate additional energy from vinasse while maintaining the fertilizer recycling potential of UMA.

Social Programs

Apart from complying with local labor regulations, we seek to promote the personal and professional development of our employees by offering them an adequate working environment with proper health and safety protections. We aim to develop a transparent relationship with local authorities. Finally, one of our main goals is to contribute positively to the social development of the communities in which we operate, creating new jobs, preserving the environment, providing training opportunities through our internship program and assisting with social development. In order to implement our social development programs, we analyze the areas in which we operate and give special attention to , education and poverty rates, possible alliances with other social actors, and potential synergies with local government programs. In addition to social development programs, we contribute to community organizations in each area where we operate, such as hospitals, schools, daycare centers and fire stations, among others. We also have a voluntary matching program where each donation from our employees is matched two times by Adecoagro.

Education

Our sugarcane and rice operations have a very important economic impact in the communities where we are located, and we have developed a Social Action Program in the various municipalities. In 2005, we commenced a partnership with Cimientos in Corrientes and Santa Fe in Argentina, through which we have awarded 26 educational programs in 36 urban and rural schools located close to our rice operations. Cimientos is a non-profit organization that promotes equal educational opportunities for children and youth from low income families in Argentina.

Additionally, we have partnered with Fundação Bradesco in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, working with the local municipalities of Angélica and Ivinhema to re-train teachers at their schools, aiming to improve the performance of public schools to a level of regional excellence. In addition, our technical teams, such as our Sugar & Ethanol Environmental Team, hold regular seminars at local schools where they promote the participation of students in environmental related projects, such as the reforestation efforts at the Angélica mill site. In addition, our employees perform educational volunteer work at several local institutions and non-governmental organizations.

Nutrition

In Argentina, we work in partnership with Conin Foundation, which fights malnourishment in children, dealing with malnutrition in an integral way and focusing its actions in three main aspects: education, assistance and research. In 2012, we donated nearly 16 tons of powdered milk and 1 ton of processed rice. We also work in partnership with the Argentine Food Bank Network, to whom we are currently donating approximately 75 tons of processed rice. This network operates in 15 cities and is a nonprofit distribution enterprise that serves the community by acquiring donated food and making it available to people who are hungry through a network of community agencies. These agencies include school feeding programs, food pantries, soup kitchens, hospices, substance abuse clinics, after-school programs and other nonprofit organizations. Additionally, we have been contributing food to Solidagro, an alliance between rural corporate institutions and civic organizations that seek to solve famine and malnutrition problems, since 2007. We are also collaborating with selected soup kitchen initiatives such as Caritas Christophersen, San Gregorio Foundation and Mercedes City Soup Kitchen.

81

##### Table of Contents

In Brazil, we support various local schools, daycare centers, homes for the elderly, and APAEs (local associations supporting the seriously handicapped in the community) through sugar donations. Due to these initiatives, UMA was certified by the ABRINQ Foundation as a Child Friendly Enterprise.

Internship Program

The purpose of our internship program is to promote the development of highly qualified professionals for the community by providing first-time work experience, good quality training and access to highly technology-oriented operations. We seek to facilitate interns’ future access to the job market while detecting potential key employees. The interns actively participate in the TAG training program which includes monthly technical meetings, external training and farm tours. In order to accomplish these goals we promote institutional relationships with local and international universities and high schools. Over 266 interns have participated in our program during the last 10 years, of which 58 were subsequently incorporated into our teams.

Material Agreements

For a description of the material agreements relating to our indebtedness, please see “Item 5.—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness and Financial Instruments.”

Argentina

Agreement with Quickfood S.A.

Until December 2009, we owned approximately 58,348 head of cattle — other than our cattle used for the production of raw milk — which we fattened for sale to meat processors and in local livestock auction markets. Our cattle business primarily consisted of beef fattening activities during the year ended December 31, 2009. In December 2009, we strategically decided to sell substantially all of our cattle herd — other than our cattle used for the production of raw milk — to Quickfood (now “Marfrig Argentina S.A.”), an Argentine company that is a subsidiary of the Brazilian company Marfrig. In addition, we agreed to lease to Marfrig Argentina S.A. (i) approximately 74,000 hectares of grazing land located in the Argentine provinces of Corrientes, Formosa, Santa Fe and Santiago del Estero, under an operating lease agreement for an annual price equal to the equivalent in Argentine Pesos of 30 kilograms of meat per hectare, calculated in accordance with the Steer Index of the Liniers Market (INML), for a period of 10 years, renewable by the parties; and (ii) two feed lots located in the provinces of Corrientes and Santa Fe, Argentina, for an annual price of $25,000 each. As required by antitrust law, we reported this transaction to the CNDC. The CNDC’s administrative approval of the transaction is pending. We do not believe that the CNDC will object to the form and substance of the transaction.

Milk Supply Agreement

In November 2007, Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. entered into a milk supply offer agreement with La Lácteo S.A., which was later amended on February 1, 2010, and pursuant to which Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. committed to sell to La Lácteo, and La Lácteo committed to purchase, approximately 80,000 liters of our milk production per day, subject to certain conditions. Notwithstanding the above, Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. is not obligated to sell to La Lácteo and La Lácteo is not obligated to purchase from Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. more than 50% of its milk requirements for a four-month period, provided however, that our milk production in excess of such volume is managed by La Lácteo S.A. in order to take advantage of the best valuation opportunities as industry sales in the raw milk spot market. The milk supply offer agreement fixes the price of milk that La Lácteo pays to Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. at the average milk price for each month plus a 3% premium. The milk supply agreement terminates in November 2017. In addition, if Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. receives a proposal from a third party for the supply of milk that is more favorable to Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. than the terms set forth in the milk supply agreement with La Lácteo, Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. may sell milk to such third party. However, La Lácteo has a right of first refusal upon Adeco Agropecuaria S.A.’s receipt of such third-party offer to purchase milk from Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. at the specified higher price.

82

##### Table of Contents

Consignment Contract with Establecimiento Las Marías

Pursuant to a consignment contract dated February 19, 2000, entered into by Establecimiento Las Marias S.A.C.I.F.A. (“Las Marias”) and Molinos Ala S.A. (currently Pilagá S.A.), Las Marias has an exclusive license to sell the products or imports of Pilagá S.A. in Argentina. For its services, Las Marias collects a commission of 11.56%, calculated over the gross amounts of the sales made by Las Marias on behalf of Pilagá S.A., net of commercial discounts, before VAT and any other applicable tax that is applied in any invoicing. The term of the agreement is one year as from March 1, 2000, automatically renewable for additional one-year periods.

Brazil

Sugar Sale Agreement

On September 5, 2012, Angélica entered into a Sugar Sales Agreement with Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse S.A. Under this agreement, Angélica will sell to Louis Dreyfus a total amount of 75,000 metric tons of Brazilian VHP (very high polarization) raw sugar which will be delivered throughout 2013. The term of the agreement is only for 2013/2014 harvest year. The price shall be fixed by Angélica and as agreed to by the parties in reference to the NY11 futures contract prices for any specific month and the degree of polarization, less certain defined delivery costs. Deliveries will take place between May and November.

On November 30, 2011, Angélica entered into a Sugar Sales Agreement with Copersucar. Under this agreement, Angélica sold to Copersucar a total amount of 70,000 metric tons of Brazilian VHP (very high polarization) raw sugar which will be delivered between May and November of 2013 in the port of Paranaguá. The price will be fixed by Angélica and agreed to by the parties in reference to the NY11 futures contract price for any specific month and degree of polarization, less certain defined delivery costs.

Electric Energy Agreements

In the beginning of 2009, UMA entered into a 10-year agreement for the sale of energy to CEMIG, under which UMA sells to CEMIG 9 MW of energy (approximately 52,704 MWh) during the harvest periods each year (May to November of each year) at a rate of R$184.15 per megawatt hour. As of December 31, 2012, UMA had received R$38 million under this agreement corresponding to the full contractual supply. The above-mentioned rate is adjusted annually to account for inflation and tariff discounts.

Angélica entered into an agreement under which it supplies energy to CCEE. This agreement is a result of a public auction promoted by the Brazilian federal government in August 2008, carries a term of 15 years, and involves Angélica supplying CCEE with 87,600 MWh annually during the harvest periods each year (May to November), at a rate of R$180.26 per megawatt hour. The agreement sets forth annual fixed revenues for Angélica of R$13.8 million, adjusted annually to account for inflation. As of December 31, 2012 Angélica had received R$60 million under this agreement.

In August 2010, Angélica participated in a public auction promoted by the Brazilian federal government. As a result of this auction, Angélica entered into second 15-year agreement with CCEE starting in 2011, for the sale of 131,400 MWh per year at a rate of R$154.25/MWh. The delivery period for both agreements starts in May and ends in November of each year. The rates under both agreements are adjusted annually for inflation by reference to the IPCA.

In July 2012, Ivinhema entered into an agreement with CEMIG, a state distribution company, for the sale of 5 MW (approximately 25,675 MWh) during the harvest period (May to November of each year) of 2013 at a rate of R$134.00/MWh. In January 2013, Ivinhema entered into an agreement with BTG Pactual comercializadora de energia, for the sale of 5 MW (approximately 21,960 MWh) between June 1, 2013, and November 30, 2013 at a rate of R$131.50 per megawatt hour.

83

##### Table of Contents

Intellectual Property

As of December 31, 2012, our corporate group owned 49 trademarks registered with the Argentine National Intellectual Property Institute and had 8 trademarks in the process of registration. Also, Adeco Brasil and UMA owned 7 trademarks registered with the Brazilian National Industrial Property Institute (“INPI”), and had submitted 17 trademark registration requests, all of which are currently being challenged by third parties or were initially denied by INPI. In addition, Adeco Agropecuária Brasil S.A. had submitted one trademark registration request for rice.

In Argentina, we are required to renew our trademark registrations when they expire at the end of their respective terms. Under the Argentine Trade and Service Marks Law No. 22,362, the term of duration of a registered trademark is 10 years from its issue date, and a trademark may be indefinitely renewed for equal periods thereafter if, within the five-year period prior to each expiration, the trademark was used in the marketing of a product, in the rendering of a service or as the designation of an activity.

In Brazil, title to a trademark is acquired only once its valid registration has been issued by the INPI. During the registration process, the person requesting the trademark merely has an expectation of the right to use the trademark to identify its products or services. Under Law No. 9,279, of May 14, 1996 (the Brazilian Industrial Property Law), the holder of a trademark has the right to its exclusive use throughout Brazil. The term of duration of a registered trademark is 10 years from its issue date, and a trademark may be indefinitely renewed for equal periods thereafter. Within a five-year period from the issue date, the owner has an obligation to use the trademark in the marketing of a product, in the rendering of a service or as the designation of an activity. If the owner does not use the trademark within such five-year period, it may be subject to a forfeiture process, upon request of any third party with legitimate interest in the trademark. The same forfeiture process may occur if the owner fails to use the trademark for any five-year period, continuously. If the trademark is declared forfeited, the trademark rights are terminated.

We do not own any registered patents, industrial models or designs.

Insurance

The type and level of insurance coverage we obtain is determined based on consultation with leading insurance brokers. We carry policies with leading U.S., European, and local insurance companies, and we are currently insured against a variety of risks, including losses and damages relating to our plants, equipment and buildings. We believe our level of insurance coverage is customary and appropriate for a company of our size and with respect to our activities. Our insurance currently covers only part of the losses we may incur and does not cover losses on crops due to hail storms, fires or similar risks.

Legal and Administrative Proceedings

In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to certain contingent liabilities with respect to existing or potential claims, lawsuits and other proceedings, including those involving tax, social security, labor lawsuits and other matters. We accrue liabilities when it is probable that future costs will be incurred and such costs can be reasonably estimated. See “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal and Administrative Proceedings.”

Environmental Regulations and Compliance

Our businesses in the various emerging market countries in which we operate are subject to comprehensive national, state and municipal laws and regulations relating to the preservation and protection of the environment to which those businesses must adhere. These laws and regulations require some of our businesses to obtain permits or licenses that have to be renewed periodically in order to allow us to continue to operate. If such permits or licenses lapse or are not renewed or if we fail to obtain any required environmental licenses and permits, or if we do not comply with any other requirements or obligations established under the applicable environmental laws and regulations, we may be subject to fines or criminal sanctions and might face partial or total suspension of our operations and suspension or cancellation of our environmental licenses and permits. In addition, our businesses which hold debt from banks, and multilateral lenders in particular, are typically required to adhere to environmental standards that exceed those of the country in which the business operates (e.g., World Bank standards).

84

##### Table of Contents

We are currently either in compliance with or are in the process of applying for permits that would put us in compliance with all applicable environmental laws and material environmental licenses and permits. Specifically, the operational license of UMA is currently being renewed. In December 2008 we requested operational licenses for our Lagoa do Oeste, Heloísa, Palmeira and Mimoso farms in Brazil, which as of December 31, 2012 are still pending. We are currently finalizing the process of “geo-referencing” our Conquista and Alto Alegre farms in Brazil in order to apply for the relevant operational licenses. On May 25, 2010, we applied for the operational license for the Angélica mill to mill up to 4 million tons of sugarcane per year, and the license was granted by IMASUL on November 11, 2010. On November 26, 2010, we obtained a preliminary license (licença prévia) for the Ivinhema mill, and on June 27, 2011, we obtained the installation license (licença de instalação) from IMASUL for the commencement of the construction and assembly of the first and second phase of the Invinhema mill, for a nominal crushing capacity of up to 3.6 million tons of sugarcane. On March 23, 2012, we obtained the installation license (licença de instalação) from IMASUL authorizing us to increase the nominal crushing capacity of Ivinhema to up to 4.1 million tons of sugarcane per year

Our operating businesses have the required environmental monitoring, equipment and procedures, and we utilize third-party contractors to conduct regular environmental audits. Our environmental expenses relate to consultants we use to perform environmental impact studies for our development projects and control and monitoring procedures. However, as environmental regulations are expected to become more stringent in some of the countries where we operate, our environmental compliance costs are likely to increase due to the cost of compliance with any future environmental regulations. While we are not aware of any material environmental liabilities related to our ongoing operations, we may be subject to cleanup costs, which we do not expect to be material.

Regulation and Control of Agri-Food Production in Argentina

The National Office of Agricultural Commerce Control (Oficina Nacional de Control Comercial Agropecuario, or “ONCCA”) created on November 27, 1996, as a decentralized entity of the Ministry of Agriculture was the agency responsible for controlling the commercialization and manufacturing of agricultural livestock, meat and dairy products in Argentina.

As of February 25th, 2011 the ONCCA was dissolved pursuant to Decree No. 192/2011. The faculties previously held by the ONCCA have been transferred to the Ministry of Agriculture and to a new entity incorporated (Unidad de Coordinacion y Evaluacion de Subsidios al Consumo Interno) by means of Decree No. 193/2011, intended exclusively for the protection and promotion of activities and granting subsidies. As a result, the Ministry of Agriculture is the enforcement authority of the decrees issued by the ONCCA and is in charge of monitoring the agricultural compliance with the commercialization regulations. Furthermore, the new entity integrated by Ministers and officials from the Ministry of Economy, Ministry Agriculture and Industry and the AFIP will be responsible for the administration, allocation and payment of subsidies to wheat, corn and soybean, and will be in charge of the registry for the export of cattle.

Under applicable regulations, all persons involved in the commercialization and manufacturing of grains and dairy products must be registered with the National Registry of Operators of the Commercial Agri-Food Chain (Registro Único de Operadores de la Cadena Comercial Agropecuaria Alimentaria, or “RUO”), which provides for registration of any individual or company involved in the trade and industrialization of agri-food products in the markets for grains, livestock and dairy products and their by-products and/or derivatives. This registration must be renewed each year. Grain producers must stock grains at facilities and must keep a record of the grain stock stored at such facilities. Failure to register with the RUO, or cancellation of such registration, will lead to requirements that the operator cease its operating activities and closure its facilities.

In the event of a violation of any of the applicable regulations, sanctions may be imposed, including fines and suspension or cancellation of the registration, which would result in the immediate cessation of activities and closure of facilities.

85

##### Table of Contents

| C. | ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

Corporate Structure

As of December 31, 2012, we hold 100% of the interests in IFH with a de minimis remaining interest owned by Ona Ltd., our substantially wholly-owned subsidiary. IFH directly and indirectly, owns approximately 100% of the outstanding interests in Adecoagro LP, a holding company with operating subsidiaries owning farmland and facilities throughout Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay. We are a corporation organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg under the form of a société anonyme and were formed as a holding company for the purpose, among others, of facilitating an IPO of common shares. Prior to the IPO, IFH completed certain reorganization transactions, which we refer to as the “Reorganization”, and became our majority-owned subsidiary.

As of December 31, 2012, our principal shareholders were Quantum Partners LP (Soros Fund Management LLC serves as principal investment adviser to Quantum Partners LP), HBK Master Fund LP, Al Gharrafa Investment Company, and Stichting Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—A. Major Shareholders.”

For a diagrame of our Organizational structure as of March 31, 2013, please see “ Item 4. Information of the Company – A.HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY. History”

During 2011, Adecoagro contributed the IPO net proceeds in IFH LP, increasing its interest to 98.64%.

During March, 2012, we issued 696,562 shares to certain limited partners of IFH in exchange for their residual interest in IFH, totaling 0.57230%, interest in IFH thereby increasing our interest in IFH to 99.2%.

During September 2012, we issued 958,190 shares which increased our interest in IFH to approximately 100%.

On February 5, 2013, we completed an underwritten secondary offering of 13,900,000 common shares of Adecoagro offered by our shareholder, HBK Master Fund LP at a price per share to the public of $8.00. The shares were offered pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement on Form F-3 filed with the SEC. On February 13, 2013, HBK Master Fund LP sold an additional 2,085,000 common shares of Adecoagro pursuant to the overallotment option it granted to Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, the sole underwriter in the secondary offering. Adecoagro did not receive any of the proceeds from the sale by the selling shareholder of the common shares in the offering. As of March 31 2013, and after the completion of the offering, public shareholders held approximately 51.9% of our capital stock.

| D. | PROPERTY, PLANTS AND EQUIPMENT

See “—B. Business Overview—Land Transformation—Our Farms”; “—Property, Plant and Equipment.”

| Item 4B. | Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Item 5. | Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

Overview

We are engaged in agricultural, manufacturing and land transformation activities. Our agricultural activities consist of harvesting certain agricultural products, including crops (soybeans, corn, wheat, etc.), rough rice, coffee and sugarcane, for sale to third parties and for internal use as inputs in our various manufacturing processes, and producing raw milk. Our manufacturing activities consist of (i) selling manufactured products, including processed rice, sugar, ethanol and energy, among others, and (ii) providing services, such as grain warehousing and conditioning and handling and drying services, among others. Our land transformation activities consist of the acquisition of farmlands or businesses with underdeveloped or underutilized agricultural land and implementing production technology and agricultural best practices to enhance yields and increase the value of the land. Please see also “Risk Factors-Risks Related to Argentina- Argentine law concerning foreign ownership of rural properties may

86

##### Table of Contents

adversely affect our results of operations and future investments in rural properties in Argentina” and “Risk Factors-Risks Related to Brazil- Recent changes in Brazilian rules concerning foreign investment in rural properties may adversely affect our investments.”

We are organized into three main lines of business: farming; land transformation; and sugar, ethanol and energy. These lines of business consist of seven reportable operating segments, which are evaluated by the chief operating decision-maker based upon their economic characteristics, the nature of the products they offer, their production processes and their type and class of customers and distribution methods. Our farming business is comprised of five reportable operating segments: Crops, Rice, Dairy, Coffee and Cattle. Each of our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy and Land Transformation lines of business is also a reportable operating segment.

There are significant economic differences between our agricultural and manufacturing activities. Some of our agricultural activities generally do not involve further manufacturing processes, including those within the crops, dairy, coffee and cattle segments. Our other agricultural activities in the rice and sugar, ethanol and energy segments generally involve further manufacturing processes, comprising our manufacturing activities. The table below sets forth our agricultural and manufacturing activities by segment.

Segment |  | Agricultural Product |  | Manufactured Product & Services Rendered
Crops |  | Soybean Corn Wheat Sunflower Cotton |  | Grain drying & conditioning
Rice |  | Rough rice |  | White rice & brown rice
Dairy |  | Raw milk |  | Processed milk, and dairy products
Coffee |  | Coffee |  | —
Cattle |  | Head or kilograms of cattle |  | Land leasing
Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  | Sugarcane |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy

We structure the revenue and cost section of our statement of income to separate our “Gross Profit from Manufacturing Activities” from our “Gross Profit from Agricultural Activities” as further described below:

Manufacturing Activities

The gross profit of our manufacturing activities is a function of our sales of manufactured products and services rendered and the related costs of manufacturing those products or delivering those services. We recognize an amount of revenue representing the actual dollar amount collected or to be collected from our customers. Our principal costs consist of raw materials, labor and social security expenses, maintenance and repairs, depreciation, lubricants and other fuels, among others. We obtain our raw materials principally from our own agricultural activities and, to a lesser extent, from third parties.

Agricultural Activities

Our agricultural activities involve the management of the biological transformation of biological assets into agricultural produce for sale to third parties, or into agricultural products that we use in our manufacturing activities. We measure our biological assets and agricultural produce in accordance with lAS 41 “Agriculture.” lAS 41 requires biological assets to be measured on initial recognition and at each balance sheet date at their fair value less cost to sell, with changes in fair value recognized in the statement of income as they occur. As market determined prices are generally not available for biological assets while they are growing, we use the present value of expected net cash flows as a valuation technique to determine fair value, as further discussed below in “-Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.” ln addition, agricultural produce at the point of harvest is measured at fair value less cost to sell, which is generally determined by reference to the quoted market price in the relevant market. Consequently, the gains and losses arising on initial recognition and changes in fair value of our biological assets and the initial recognition of our agricultural produce at the point of harvest are accounted for in the statement of income in the line item “lnitial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce.”

87

##### Table of Contents

After agricultural produce is harvested, we may hold it in inventory at net realizable value up to the point of sale, which includes market selling price less direct selling expenses, with changes in net realizable value recognized in the statement of income when they occur. When we sell our inventory, we sell at the prevailing market price and we incur direct selling expenses.

We generally recognize the agricultural produce held in inventory at net realizable value with changes recognized in the statement of income as they occur. Therefore, changes in net realizable value represent the difference in value from the last measurement through the date of sale on an aggregated basis.

We consider gains and losses recorded in the line items of the statement of income “lnitial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” and “Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest” to be realized only when the related produce or manufactured product is sold to third parties and, therefore, converted into cash or other financial assets. Therefore, “realized” gains or losses mean that the related produce or product has been sold and the proceeds are included in revenues for the year.

The sale of agricultural produce is revenue as defined in lAS 18. However, lAS 41 does not provide guidance on the presentation of revenues and costs arising from the selling of biological assets and agricultural produce. Due to the lack of guidance in lAS 41 and based on lAS 1, “Presentation of financial statements,” we present, as a matter of accounting policy, our sales of biological assets and agricultural produce and their respective costs of sale separately in two line items in the statement of income. The line item “Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets” represents the consideration received or receivable for the sale to third parties based generally on the applicable quoted market prices of the respective produce or biological asset in the relevant markets at the point of sale. At the point of sale, our agricultural produce is measured at net realizable value, which reflects the sale price less the direct cost to sell, and our biological assets are measured at fair value less cost to sell, in each case, using the applicable quoted market prices in the relevant markets.

The line item “Cost of agricultural produce sold and direct agricultural selling expenses” consists of two components: (i) the cost of our sold agricultural produce and/or biological assets as appropriate, plus (ii) in the case of agricultural produce, the direct costs of selling, including but not limited to, transportation costs, export taxes and other levies. The cost of our agricultural produce sold represents the recognition as an expense of our agricultural produce held in inventory valued at net realizable value. The cost of our biological assets and/or agricultural produce sold at the point of harvest represents the recognition as an expense of our biological assets and/or agricultural produce measured at fair value less costs to sell, generally representing the applicable quoted market price at the time of sale. Accordingly, the line item “Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets” is equal to the line item “Cost of agricultural produce plus direct agricultural selling expenses.”

Accordingly, we receive cash or consideration upon the sale of our inventory of agricultural produce to third parties but we do not record any additional profit related to that sale, as that gain or loss had already been recognized under the line items “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” and “Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest,” as described above.

Land Transformation

The Land Transformation segment includes two types of operations. The first relates to the acquisition of farmlands or businesses with underdeveloped or underutilized agricultural land (land which we have identified as capable of being transformed into more productive farmland by enhancing yields and increasing its future value). When we acquire a farmland business for an acquisition price below its estimated fair value, we recognize an immediate gain (a “purchase bargain gain”). The land acquired is recognized at its fair value at the acquisition date and is subsequently carried at cost under the cost model in IAS 16.

The second type of operation undertaken within this segment relates to the realization of value through the strategic disposition of assets (i.e. farmland) that may have reached full development potential. Once we believe certain land has reached full growth potential, we may decide to realize such incremental value through the disposition of the land.

88

##### Table of Contents

The results of these two activities (purchase bargain gains as a result of opportunistic acquisitions of businesses with underdeveloped or underutilized land below fair market value, and gains on dispositions reflecting the ultimate realization of cash value on dispositions of transformed farmlands) are included separately in the Land Transformation segment.

Land transformation activities themselves are not reflected in this segment; rather, they are reflected in all of our other agricultural activities in other segments. The results of our land transformation strategy are realized as a separate activity upon disposition of transformed farmlands and other rural properties.

| A. | OPERATING RESULTS

Trends and Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations

Our results of operations have been influenced and will continue to be influenced by the following factors:

(i) Effects of Yield Fluctuations

The occurrence of severe adverse weather conditions, especially droughts, hail, floods or frost, are unpredictable and may have a potentially devastating impact on agricultural production and may otherwise adversely affect the supply and prices of the agricultural commodities that we sell and use in our business. The effects of severe adverse weather conditions may also reduce yields at our farms. Yields may also be affected by plague, disease or weed infection and operational problems. In the second half of 2011, the countries in which we operate suffered a severe drought, which resulted in a reduction of approximately 11% to 27% in our yields for the 2011/2012 harvest, depending on the affected commodity, compared with our historical averages. These yield reductions directly impacted the yields of our Crops segment, which is reflected in the line item “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” of the statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The average expected yields for the 2011/2012 harvest for crops before the drought were 6.7 tons per hectare for corn and 2.5 tons per hectare for soybean. The actual yields following the drought were 5.0 tons per hectare for corn and 2.0 tons per hectare for soybean, which generated a decrease in initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce in respect of corn, soybean and the remaining crops of $13.7 million, $9.8 million and $3.9 million respectively in 2012.

The following table sets forth our average crop, rice and sugarcane yields for the periods indicated:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | % Change |
|  | 2011/2012 |  |  | 2010/2011 |  |  | 2009/2010 |  |  | 2010/2011 - |  |  | 2009/2010 - |
| Harvest Year |  |  | Harvest Year |  |  | Harvest Year |  |  | 2011/2012 |  |  | 2010/2011 |
Corn |  |  | 5.0 |  |  |  | 5.4 |  |  |  | 5.9 |  |  |  | (7.3 | %) |  |  | (8.9 | %)
Soybean |  |  | 2.5 |  |  |  | 2.6 |  |  |  | 3.1 |  |  |  | (3.2 | %) |  |  | (17.3 | %)
Soybean (second harvest) |  |  | 1.5 |  |  |  | 1.6 |  |  |  | 1.9 |  |  |  | (5.8 | %) |  |  | (17.8 | %)
Cotton lint |  |  | 1.0 |  |  |  | 1.6 |  |  |  | 1.3 |  |  |  | (33.5 | %) |  |  | 24.7 | %
Wheat |  |  | 2.6 |  |  |  | 3.3 |  |  |  | 2.3 |  |  |  | (21.1 | %) |  |  | 42.6 | %
Rice |  |  | 5.4 |  |  |  | 6.2 |  |  |  | 5.1 |  |  |  | (13.0 | %) |  |  | 23.5 | %
Coffee |  |  | 1.9 |  |  |  | 2.0 |  |  |  | 1.8 |  |  |  | (5.0 | %) |  |  | 7.7 | %
Sugarcane |  |  | 68.6 |  |  |  | 75.6 |  |  |  | 96.1 |  |  |  | (9.2 | %) |  |  | (21.4 | %)

(ii) Effects of Fluctuations in Production Costs

We have been experiencing fluctuations in our production costs. The primary reason is the fluctuation in the costs of (i) fertilizers, (ii) agrochemicals, (iii) seeds, (iv) fuel and (v) farm leases. The use of advanced technology, however, allowed us to increase our efficiency, in large part mitigating the fluctuations in production costs. Some

89

##### Table of Contents

examples of how the implementation of production technology has allowed us to increase our efficiency and reduce our costs include using no-till (also known as “direct sowing”, which involves farming without the use of tillage, leaving plant residues on the soil to form a protective cover which positively impacts costs, yields and the soil), crop rotation, second harvest in one year, integrated pest management, and balanced fertilization techniques to increase the productive efficiency in our farmland. Increased mechanization of harvesting and planting operations in our sugarcane plantations and utilization of modern, high pressure boilers in our sugar and ethanol mills has also yielded higher rates of energy production per ton of sugarcane.

(iii) Effects of Fluctuations in Commodities Prices

Commodity prices have historically experienced substantial fluctuations. For example, based on Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”) data, from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012, wheat prices increased by 18.4%, soybean prices increased by 16.5% and corn prices increased 6.0%. Also, between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2012, ethanol prices decreased by 13.5%, according to ESALQ data, and sugar prices decreased by 20.4%, according to Intercontinental Exchange of New York (“ICE-NY”) data. Commodity price fluctuations impact our statement of income as follows:

• |  | Initial recognition and changes in the fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce in respect of not harvested biological assets undergoing biological transformation;

• |  | Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce for inventory carried at its net realizable value; and

• |  | Sales of manufactured products and sales of agricultural produce and biological assets sold to third parties.

The following graphs show the spot market price of some of our products for the periods indicated:

Soybean in U.S. cents per bushel (CBOT) |  | Corn in U.S. cents per bushel (CBOT)

90

##### Table of Contents

Sugar in U.S. cents per pound (ICE-NY) |  | Ethanol in Reais per cubic meter (ESALQ)

(iv) Fiscal Year and Harvest Year

Our fiscal year begins on January 1 and ends on December 31 of each year. However, our production is based on the harvest year for each of our crops and rice. A harvest year varies according to the crop or rice plant and to the climate in which it is grown. Due to the geographic diversity of our farms, the planting period for a given crop or rice may start earlier on one farm than on another, causing differences for their respective harvesting periods. The presentation of production volume (tons) and production area (hectares) in this annual report in respect of the harvest years for each of our crops and rice starts with the first day of the planting period at the first farm to start planting in that harvest year to the last day of the harvesting period of the crop, rice or coffee planting on the last farm to finish harvesting that harvest year.

Production area for cattle is presented on a harvest year basis, as land used for cattle operations is linked to our farming operations and use of farmland during a harvest year, while production volumes for dairy and cattle are presented on a fiscal year basis. On the other hand, production volume and production area in our sugar, ethanol and energy business are presented on a fiscal year basis.

The financial results in respect of all of our products are presented on a fiscal year basis. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview.”

(v) Effects of Fluctuations of the Production Area

Our results of operations also depend on the size of the production area. The size of our own and leased area devoted to crop, rice, coffee and sugarcane production fluctuates from period to period in connection with the purchase and development of new farmland, the sale of developed farmland, the lease of new farmland and the termination of existing farmland lease agreements. Lease agreements are usually settled following the harvest season, from July to June in crops and rice, and from May to April in sugarcane. The length of the lease agreements are usually one year for crops, one to five years for rice and five to six years for sugarcane. Regarding crops, the production area can be planted and harvested one or two times per year. As an example, wheat can be planted in July and harvested in December. Right after its harvest, soybean can be planted in the same area and harvested in April. As a result, planted and harvested area can exceed the production area during one year. Regarding sugarcane and coffee, the production area can exceed the harvested area in one year. Grown sugarcane can be left in the fields and then harvested the following year. Coffee trees are pruned from time to time, in which case they do not produce beans and accordingly, are not harvested the following year. The increase in rice production area in 2012 was mainly driven by the transformation of undeveloped/undermanaged owned land that was put into production. The increase in crop production area in 2012 compared to 2011 was mainly driven by an increase in leased hectares during this year. The increase in sugar, ethanol and energy production area in 2012 is explained by an increase in leased hectares during this year.

91

##### Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the fluctuations in the production area for the periods indicated:

|  | Year ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
|  |  |  |  | Hectares |  |  |  |
Crops |  |  | 151,132 |  |  |  | 127,436 |  |  |  | 134,562 |
Rice |  |  | 31,497 |  |  |  | 27,542 |  |  |  | 18,142 |
Coffee |  |  | 1,632 |  |  |  | 1,632 |  |  |  | 1,632 |
Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | 85,531 |  |  |  | 65,308 |  |  |  | 53,799 |

(vi) Effect of Acquisitions and Dispositions

The comparability of our results of operations is also affected by the completion of significant acquisitions and dispositions. Our results of operations for earlier periods that do not include a recently completed acquisition or do include farming operations subsequently disposed of may not be comparable to the results of a more recent period that reflects the results of such acquisition or disposition.

(vii) Macroeconomic Developments in Emerging Markets

We generate nearly all of our revenue from the production of food and renewable energy in emerging markets. Therefore, our operating results and financial condition are directly impacted by macroeconomic and fiscal developments, including fluctuations in currency exchange rates, inflation and interest rate fluctuations, in those markets. In recent years, the emerging markets where we conduct our business (including Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay) have generally experienced significant macroeconomic improvements but remain subject to such fluctuations.

(viii) Effects of Export Taxes on Our Products

Following the economic and financial crisis experienced by Argentina in 2002, the Argentine government increased export taxes on agricultural products, mainly on soybean and its derivatives, wheat, rice and corn. Soybean is subject to an export tax of 35.0%; wheat is subject to an export tax of 23.0%, rough rice is subject to an export tax of 10.0%, processed rice is subject to an export tax of 5.0%, corn is subject to an export tax of 20.0% and sunflower is subject to an export tax of 32.0%.

As local prices are determined taking into consideration the export parity reference, any increase in export taxes would affect our financial results.

(ix) Effects of Foreign Currency Fluctuations

Each of our Argentine, Brazilian and Uruguayan subsidiaries uses local currency as its functional currency. A significant portion of our operating costs in Argentina are denominated in Argentine Pesos and most of our operating costs in Brazil are denominated in Brazilian Reais. For each of our subsidiaries’ statements of income, foreign currency transactions are translated into the local currency, as such subsidiaries’ functional currency, using the exchange rates prevailing as of the dates of the relevant specific transactions. Exchange differences resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the statement of income under “finance income” or “finance costs,” as applicable. Our consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, and foreign exchange differences that arise in the translation process are disclosed in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

As of December 31, 2012, the Peso-U.S. dollar exchange rate was Ps.4.92 per U.S. dollar as compared to Ps. 4.30 and Ps.3.97 per U.S. dollar as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, the Real-U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$2.04 per U.S. dollar as compared to R$1.86 and R$1.65 per U.S. dollar as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

92

##### Table of Contents

The following graph shows the Real-U.S. dollar rate of exchange for the periods indicated:

Our principal foreign currency fluctuation risk involves changes in the value of the Real relative to the U.S. dollar. Periodically, we evaluate our exposure and consider opportunities to mitigate the effects of currency fluctuations by entering into currency forward contracts and other hedging instruments. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we entered into several currency forward contracts with Brazilian banks in order to hedge the fluctuation of the Brazilian Reais against the US Dollar for a total aggregate amount of US$ 56 million and US$ 74.0 million, respectively. The currency forward contracts entered in 2012 had maturity dates between May 2013 and December 2013, while those entered in 2011 had maturity dates ranging between February and December 2012. The outstanding contracts resulted in a recognition of a gain of US$ 1.9 million in 2012 and of a loss of US$ 9.1 million in 2011. Gains and losses on currency forward contracts are included within “Financial results, net” in the statement of income. During 2010 the Company did not enter in any currency forward contracts.

(x) Seasonality

Our business activities are inherently seasonal. We generally harvest and sell corn, soybean, rice and sunflower between February and August, and wheat from December to January. Coffee and cotton are unique in that while both are typically harvested from May to August, they require a conditioning process that takes about two to three months before being ready to be sold. Sales in other business segments, such as in our Cattle and Dairy segments, tend to be more stable. However, milk sales are generally higher during the fourth quarter, when weather conditions are more favorable for production. The sugarcane harvesting period typically begins between April and May and ends between November and December. As a result of the above factors, there may be significant variations in our results of operations from one quarter to another, since planting activities may be more concentrated in one quarter whereas harvesting activities may be more concentrated in another quarter. In addition our quarterly results may vary as a result of the effects of fluctuations in commodity prices and production yields and costs related to the “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” line item. See “—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Biological Assets and Agricultural Produce.”

(xi) Land Transformation

Our business model includes the transformation of pasture and unproductive land into land suitable for growing various crops and the transformation of inefficient farms into farms suitable for more efficient uses through the implementation of advanced and sustainable agricultural practices, such as “no-till” technology and crop rotation. During approximately the first three to five years of the land transformation process of any given parcel, we must invest heavily in transforming the land, and, accordingly, crop yields during such period tend to be lower than crop yields once the land is completely transformed. After the transformation process has been completed, the land requires less investment, and crop yields gradually increase. As a result, there may be variations in our results from one season to the next according to the amount of land in the process of transformation.

Our business model also includes the identification, acquisition, development and selective disposition of farmlands or other rural properties that after implementing agricultural best practices and increasing crop yields we believe have the potential to appreciate in terms of their market value. As a part of this strategy, we purchase and sell farms and other rural properties from time to time. Please see also “Risk Factors-Risks Related to Argentina-Argentine

93

##### Table of Contents

law concerning foreign ownership of rural properties may adversely affect our results of operations and future investments in rural properties in Argentina” and “Risk Factors-Risks Related to Brazil- Recent changes in Brazilian rules concerning foreign investment in rural properties may adversely affect our investments.”

The results included in the Land Transformation segment are related to the acquisition and disposition of farmland businesses and not to the physical transformation of the land. The decision to acquire and/or dispose of a farmland business depends on several market factors that vary from period to period, rendering the results of these activities in one financial period when an acquisition of disposition occurs not directly comparable to the results in other financial periods when no acquisitions or dispositions occurred.

(xii) Capital Expenditures and Other Investments

Our capital expenditures during the last three years consisted mainly of expenses related to (i) acquiring land, (ii) transforming and increasing the productivity of our land, (iii) planting non-current sugarcane and coffee and (iv) expanding and upgrading our production facilities. Our capital expenditures incurred in connection with such activities were $130.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, $165.3 million for the year ended December 2011 and $301.4 million for the year ended December 2012. See also “-Capital Expenditure Commitments.”

(xiii) Effects of Corporate Taxes on Our Income

We are subject to a variety of taxes on our results of operations. The following table shows the income tax rates in effect for 2012 in each of the countries in which we operate:

|  | Tax Rate (%) |
Argentina |  |  | 35 |
Brazil(1) |  |  | 34 |
Uruguay |  |  | 25 |

(1) | Including the Social Contribution on Net Profit (CSLL)

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We prepared our consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS . The critical accounting policies are policies important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and operating results, and which require management to make difficult and subjective judgments that are inherently uncertain. Based on this definition, we have identified the following significant accounting policies as critical to the understanding of our consolidated financial statements. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting periods. The principal area where our management is required to make significant judgments about estimates where actual results could differ materially from such estimates is in the carrying amount of our biological assets. These estimates and judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. We believe that the estimates and judgments upon which we rely are reasonable based upon information available to us at the time that these estimates and judgments are made. We continually evaluate our judgments, estimates and assumptions. To the extent there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, our consolidated financial statements will be affected.

We believe the following to be our more significant critical accounting policies and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements:

Biological Assets and Agricultural Produce

Before harvest, our crops are biological assets. Subsequent to harvest, biological transformation ceases and the harvested crops meet the definition of agricultural produce under IAS 41 “Biological Assets.” As prescribed by IAS 41, we measure growing crops which have not attained significant biological growth at cost less any impairment losses, which approximates fair value. Capitalized expenses for growing crops include land preparation expenses

94

##### Table of Contents

and other direct production expenses incurred during the sowing period including costs of labor, fuel, seeds, agrochemical and fertilizer, among others. We measure biological assets (at initial recognition, when the biological asset has attained significant biological growth, and at each subsequent measurement reporting date) and agricultural produce at the point of harvest at fair value less selling costs. The objective of the fair value model under IAS 41 is to recognize gains and losses arising from such measurements gradually over the asset’s life rather than only on sale or realization. IAS 41 prescribes, among other things, the accounting treatment for biological assets during the period of growth, degeneration, production and procreation, and for the initial measurement of agricultural produce at the point of harvest.

We account for agricultural produce after harvest as inventory, as further described below.

The following table sets forth the way in which we value biological assets and agricultural produce for each of our principal products:

|  | Biological Asset |  |  |  |
|  | No significant biological growth |  | Significant biological growth |  | Agricultural Produce |  | Manufactured Product
Crops |  | Crop from planting through approximately 60 days |  | Crop, approximately 60 days after planting up to the moment of harvest (total period of approximately 3 to 5 months). |  | Harvested crop (soybean, corn, wheat, etc.) |  | N/A
Rice |  | Rice plant from planting through approximately 60 days |  | Rice plant, approximately 60 days after planting up to the moment of harvest (total period of approximately 3 to 4 months). |  | Harvested rough rice |  | Processed Rice
Coffee |  | Coffee tree from planting through approximately 18 months |  | Coffee tree, approximately 18 months after planting until exhausted in 15-20 harvests (total period of approximately 16 years). |  | Harvested coffee |  | Coffee
Dairy |  | Dairy cow is considered a biological asset from birth/purchase to death or sale. |  | Raw milk |  | Processed milk and dairy products
Cattle |  | Beef cattle are considered a biological asset from birth/purchase to death or sale. |  | N/A |  | N/A
Sugar, ethanol and energy |  | Sugarcane from planting through approximately 30 days |  | Sugarcane, approximately 30 days after planting until exhausted in 5-6 harvests (total period of approximately 5.5 years). |  | Sugarcane |  | Sugar, ethanol and energy
VALUATION CRITERIA |  | Cost, which approximates fair value less accumulated impairment losses, if any. For dairy and cattle, fair value less estimated cost to sell. |  | Fair value (using discounted cash flow valuation) less cost to sell. |  | Net realizable value, except for rough rice and milk which are valued at cost. |  | Cost

Gains and losses that arise from measuring biological assets at fair value less selling costs and measuring agricultural produce at the point of harvest at fair value less selling costs are recognized in the statement of income in the period in which they arise as “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce.” We value our inventories of agricultural produce after harvest at net realizable value, except for rough rice, which is valued at cost.

95

##### Table of Contents

When an active market exists for biological assets, we use the quoted market price in the most relevant market as a basis to determine the fair value of our biological assets, as in the case of cattle. For other biological assets where there is neither an active market nor market-determined prices during the growth cycle, we determine their fair value through the use of DCF valuation techniques. Therefore, we generally derive the fair value of our growing biological assets from the expected cash flows of the related agricultural produce. The DCF method requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including observable and unobservable data. Generally, the estimation of the fair value of biological assets is based on models or inputs that are not observable in the market, and the use of unobservable inputs is significant to the overall valuation of the assets. Various factors influence the availability of observable inputs, including, but not limited to, the type of asset and its location, climate changes and the technology used, among others.

Unobservable inputs are determined based on the best information available, for example, by reference to historical information regarding past practices and results, statistical and agronomical information and other analytical techniques. Changes in the assumptions underlying such subjective inputs can materially affect the fair value estimate and impact our results of operations and financial condition from period to period.

The DCF method requires the following significant inputs to project revenues and costs:

| • |  | Production cycles or number of harvests;

| • |  | Production area in hectares;

| • |  | Estimated crop and rice yields;

| • |  | Estimated sucrose content (Total Recoverable Sugar or TRS) for sugarcane;

| • |  | Estimated costs of harvesting and other costs to be incurred until the crops and rice reach maturity (mainly costs of pesticides, herbicides and spraying);

| • |  | Estimated transportation costs;

| • |  | Market prices; and

| • |  | Discount rates.

In contrast to biological assets whose fair value is generally determined using the DCF method, we typically determine the fair value of our agricultural produce at the point of harvest using market prices.

Market prices used in the DCF model are determined by reference to observable data in the relevant market (e.g. for crops, sugar and coffee). Harvesting costs and other costs are estimated based on historical and statistical data. Yields are estimated by our agronomic engineers based on several factors, including the location of the farmland, soil type, environmental conditions, infrastructure and other restrictions and growth at the time of measurement. Yields are subject to a high degree of uncertainty and may be affected by several factors out of our control, including but not limited to extreme or unusual weather conditions, plagues and other diseases. Discount rates reflect current market assessments of the assets involved and the time value of money.

As of December 31, 2012, the impact of a reasonable 10% increase (decrease) in estimated market prices, with all other variables held constant, would result in an increase (decrease) in the fair value of our plantations less cost to sell of $54.1 million for sugarcane, $16.9 million for coffee, $2.7 million for crops and $4.0 million for rice. As of December 31, 2012, the impact of a reasonable 10% increase (decrease) in estimated costs, with all other variables held constant, would result in a increase (decrease) in the fair value of our plantations less cost to sell of $30.7 million for sugarcane, $11.8 million for coffee, $2.0 million for crops and $3.0 million for rice. As of December 31, 2012, the impact of a reasonable 5% increase (decrease) in estimated yields, with all other variables held constant, would result in an increase (decrease) in the fair value of our plantations less cost to sell of $29.2 million for sugarcane and $12.4 million for coffee. As of December 31, 2012, the impact of a reasonable 20% increase (decrease) in estimated yields, with all other variables held constant, would result in an increase (decrease) in the fair value of our plantations less cost to sell of $5.5 million for crops and $7.9 million for rice. As of December 31, 2012, the impact of a reasonable 100 basic points increase (decrease) in discount rates, with all other variables held constant, would result in an increase (decrease) in the fair value of our plantations less cost to sell of $3.1 million for sugarcane and $1.2 million for coffee.

96

##### Table of Contents

All of the key assumptions discussed above are highly sensitive. Reasonable shifts in assumptions, including but not limited to increases or decreases in prices and discount rates used would result in a significant increase or decrease of the fair value of biological assets and significantly impact our statement of income. In addition, cash flows are projected over the following year or a number of years (depending on the type of biological asset) and based on estimated production. Estimates of production in and of themselves depend on various assumptions, in addition to those described above, including but not limited to several factors such as location, environmental conditions and other restrictions. Changes in these estimates could materially impact estimated production and could, therefore, affect estimates of future cash flows used in the assessment of fair value.

The valuation models and their assumptions are reviewed annually, or quarterly if warranted, and, if necessary, adjusted. During the year ended December 31, 2010, new information was gained and accordingly we introduced an adjustment to the valuation model for sugarcane. Projected revenues are now calculated based on the average of daily prices for sugar future contracts (Sugar # 11 ICE-NY contract) during the six-month period ended at period end rather than the single price for sugar future contracts at year end used during 2009. We determined that the use of 6-month average of daily prices of future contracts was a more appropriate estimate for price inputs in the valuation model than the single price for sugar future contracts at period-end, as it would mitigate any additional variability that a single-day price may have on the sugarcane valuation model and was necessary to properly measure the fair value of the related biological assets given changes in market conditions. The effect of this change in the valuation model recognized in the line item “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” was an increase in the loss before income tax for $90.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012, we made no changes to the models and assumptions.

The aggregate gains and losses arising during a period on initial recognition and from the changes in fair value less costs to sell of biological assets is affected by the way we treat our harvesting and production costs for accounting purposes. Since IAS 41 does not provide guidance on the treatment of these costs, we generally capitalize all costs directly involved with the management of biological assets. These costs may include labor, planting, fertilizers, agrochemicals, harvesting, irrigation and feeding, among others. Then, the cost of the biological asset is adjusted periodically by the re-measurement of the biological asset at fair value less cost to sell. For example, before significant biological growth is attained, costs and expenses are capitalized as biological assets, and once biological assets reach significant biological growth we adjust biological assets to fair value less cost to sell. Accordingly, capitalized biological assets are adjusted periodically at fair value less cost to sell. At the point of harvest, we recognize the agricultural produce at fair value less cost to sell. The periodic adjustments in fair value less cost to sell reflect period to period gains or losses. After agricultural produce is harvested, we may hold it in inventory at net realizable value up to the point of sale, which includes market selling price less direct selling expenses, with changes in net realizable value recognized in the statement of income as incurred. When we sell our inventory, we sell at the prevailing market price and we incur direct selling expenses.

We generally recognize the agricultural produce held in inventory at net realizable value with changes recognized in the statement of income as they occur. Therefore, changes in net realizable value represent the difference in value from the last measurement through the date of sale on an aggregated basis.

We consider gains and losses recorded in the line items of the statement of income “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” and “Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest” to be realized only when the related produce or manufactured product is sold to third parties and, therefore, converted into cash or other financial assets. Therefore, “realized” gains or losses means that the related produce or product has been sold and the proceeds are included in revenues for the year.

The sale of agricultural produce is revenue as defined in IAS 18. However, IAS 41 does not provide guidance on the presentation of revenues and costs arising from the selling of biological assets and agricultural produce. Due to the lack of guidance in IAS 41 and based on IAS 1, “Presentation of financial statements,” we present, as a matter of accounting policy, our sales of biological assets and agricultural produce and their respective costs of sale separately in two line items in the statement of income. The line item “Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets” represents the consideration received or receivable for the sale to third parties based generally on the applicable quoted market prices of the respective produce or biological asset in the relevant markets at the point of sale. At the

97

##### Table of Contents

point of sale, our agricultural produce is measured at net realizable value, which reflects the sale price less the direct cost to sell, and our biological assets are measured at fair value less cost to sell, in each case, using the applicable quoted market prices in the relevant markets.

The line item “Cost of agricultural produce sold and direct agricultural selling expenses” consists of two components: (i) the cost of our sold agricultural produce and/or biological assets as appropriate plus (ii) in the case of agricultural produce, the direct costs of selling, including but not limited to, transportation costs, export taxes and other levies. The cost of our agricultural produce sold represents the recognition as an expense of our agricultural produce held in inventory valued at net realizable value. The cost of our biological assets and/or agricultural produce sold at the point of harvest represents the recognition as an expense of our biological assets and/or agricultural produce measured at fair value less costs to sell, generally representing the applicable quoted market price at the time of sale. Accordingly, the line item “Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets” is equal to the line item “Cost of agricultural produce plus direct agricultural selling expenses.”

Accordingly, we receive cash or consideration upon the sale of our inventory of agricultural produce to third parties but we do not record any additional profit related to that sale, as that gain or loss had already been recognized under the line items “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” and “Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest,” as described above.

Based on the foregoing, the gross profit of our agricultural activities is solely a function of the “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” and of the “Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest.”

Business Combinations—Purchase Price Allocation

Accounting for business combinations requires the allocation of our purchase price to the various assets and liabilities of the acquired business at their respective fair values. We use all available information to make these fair value determinations. In some instances, assumptions with respect to the timing and amount of future revenues and expenses associated with an asset might have to be used in determining its fair value. Actual timing and amount of net cash flows from revenues and expenses related to that asset over time may differ materially from those initial estimates, and if the timing is delayed significantly or if the net cash flows decline significantly, the asset could become impaired.

Impairment Testing

We review the carrying amounts of our property, plant and equipment and finite lived intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, we estimate the recoverable amount of the asset in order to determine the extent, if any, of the impairment loss. Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from other assets, we estimate the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. Our property, plant and equipment items generally do not generate independent cash flows.

We initially measure goodwill on acquisition at cost being the excess of the cost of the business combination over our interest in the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities. As of the acquisition date, we allocate any goodwill acquired to the cash-generating unit (‘CGU’) expected to benefit from the business combination.

Following initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. We test goodwill for impairment annually as of September of each year, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired. The impairment review requires us to undertake certain judgments, including estimating the recoverable value of the CGU to which the goodwill relates, based on either fair value less costs-to-sell or the value-in-use, as appropriate, in order to reach a conclusion on whether it deems the goodwill is impaired or not.

98

##### Table of Contents

For purposes of the impairment testing, each CGU represents the smallest identifiable group of assets that generate cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or group of assets.

Farmland businesses may be used for different activities that may generate independent cash flows. When farmland businesses are used for single activities (i.e. crops), these are considered as one CGU. Generally, each separate farmland business within Argentina and Uruguay are treated as single CGUs. Otherwise, when farmland businesses are used for more than one segment activity (i.e. crops and cattle or rental income), the farmland is further subdivided into two or more CGUs, as appropriate, for purposes of impairment testing. For our properties in Brazil, we identified a farmland together with its related mill as separate CGUs.

We reviewed the carrying amounts of our property, plant and equipment and finite lived intangible assets as of December 31, 2012 to determine whether there was any indication of potential impairment. We concluded that no impairment testing for property, plant and equipment and finite lived intangible assets was necessary as of year-end. As regards the mandatory impairment testing of goodwill, we tested all CGUs with allocated goodwill in Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil as of September 30, 2012 and determined that none of the CGUs were impaired as of that date. There were no events or changes in circumstances, which would warrant an impairment testing of goodwill as of December 31, 2012.

CGUs tested based on a fair-value-less-costs-to-sell model at September 30, 2012 and 2011:

Based on the criteria described above, we identified a total amount of forty-three CGUs as of September 30, 2012 and forty-four CGUs as of September 30, 2011 for purposes of the impairment testing.

As of September 30, 2012, we identified 10 CGUs in Argentina and Uruguay to be tested based on this model (all CGUs with allocated goodwill). As of September 30, 2011, we identified 35 CGUs in Argentina and Uruguay and 2 CGUs in Brazil to be tested based on this model (regardless of any goodwill allocated to them). Estimating the fair value less costs-to-sell is based on the best information available, and refers to the amount at which the CGU could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties. In calculating the fair value less costs-to-sell, we may be assisted by the work of external advisors. When using this model, we apply the “sales comparison approach” as our method of valuing most properties. This method relies on results of sales of similar agricultural properties to estimate the value of the CGU. This approach is based on the theory that the fair value of a property is directly related to the selling prices of similar properties.

Fair values are determined by extensive analysis, which includes current and potential soil productivity of the land (the ability to produce crops and maintain livestock) projected margins derived from soil use, rental value obtained for soil use, if applicable, and other factors such as climate and location. Farmland ratings are established by considering such factors as soil texture and quality, yields, topography, drainage and rain levels. Farmland may contain farm outbuildings. A farm outbuilding is any improvement or structure that is used for farming operations. Outbuildings are valued based on their size, age and design.

Based on the factors described above, each farm property is assigned different soil classifications for the purposes of establishing a value. Soil classifications quantify the factors that contribute to the agricultural capability of the soil. Soil classifications range from the most productive to the least productive.

The first step to establishing an assessment for a farm property is a sales investigation that identifies the valid farm sales in the area where the farm is located.

A price per hectare is assigned for each soil class within each farm property. This price per hectare is determined based on the quantitative and qualitative analysis mainly described above.

The results are then tested against actual sales, if any, and current market conditions to ensure the values produced are accurate, consistent and fair.

Based on the testing above, we determined that none of the CGUs, with allocated goodwill, were impaired at September 30, 2012.

99

##### Table of Contents

None of the CGUs with or without allocated goodwill were impaired at September 30, 2012.

CGUs tested based on a value-in-use model at September 30, 2012 and 2011:

Based on the criteria described above, we identified a total amount of forty-three CGUs as of September 30, 2012 and forty-four CGUs as of September 30, 2011 for purposes of the impairment testing.

As of September 30, 2012, we identified 3 CGUs in Brazil to be tested based on this model (all CGUs with allocated goodwill). As of September 30, 2011, we identified 3 CGUs in Argentina and 4 CGUs in Brazil to be tested based on this model (regardless of any goodwill allocated to them). In performing the value-in-use calculation, we applied pre-tax rates to discount the future pre-tax cash flows. In each case, we made these key assumptions which reflect past experience and are consistent with relevant external sources of information, such as appropriate market data. In calculating value-in-use, we may also be assisted by the work of external advisors.

The key assumptions used by us in the value-in-use calculations which are considered to be most sensitive to the calculation are:

Key Assumptions |  | September 30, 2012 |  | September 30, 2011
Financial projections |  | Covers 4 years for UMA Covers 8 years for AVI |  | Covers 4 years for Angelica and UMA
Yield average growth rates |  | 0-3% |  | 0-3%
Future pricing increases |  | 3% per annum |  | Between 3% and 5%
Future cost increases |  | 3% per annum |  | Expected USD Inflation
Discount rates |  | 9.16% |  | 8.91%
Perpetuity growth rate |  | 4.5% |  | 4.5%

Discount rates are based on the risk-free rate for U.S. government bonds, adjusted for a risk premium to reflect the increased risk of investing in South America and Brazil in particular. The risk premium adjustment is assessed for factors specific to the respective CGUs and reflects the countries that the CGUs operate in.

Based on the testing above, we determined that none of the CGUs, with allocated goodwill, were impaired at September 30, 2012.

For additional information regarding our impairment testing, please see Note 4(b) to our consolidated financial statements.

Fair Value of Derivatives and Other Financial Instruments

Fair values of derivative financial instruments are computed with reference to quoted market prices on trade exchanges, when available. The fair values of commodity options are calculated using year-end market value together with common option pricing models. The fair value of interest rate swaps has been calculated using a DCF analysis.

Income Taxes

Adecoagro is a société anonyme (public company limited by shares) organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. We believe that Adecoagro’s corporate structure is organized in a form that will meet substantially all of the requirements provided for by Luxembourg law to benefit from the participation exemption regime, and we have not received an objection, nor any indication to the contrary, from the relevant Luxembourg tax authorities, to whom the proposed structure has been disclosed. Accordingly, Adecoagro believes that it can rely on the participation exemption from tax on income pursuant to the laws of Luxembourg. Our operating subsidiaries in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay are subject to income taxes. We do not prepare or file a consolidated income tax return. Each operating subsidiary prepares and files its respective income tax returns based on the applicable tax legislation in the country in which the subsidiary operates. There are many transactions and calculations for which

100

##### Table of Contents

the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We recognize liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact our current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities in the period in which such determination is made.

Income taxes of each subsidiary are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, as well as operating losses and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Deferred income tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilized.

Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable income will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are not discounted. In certain jurisdictions, the annual effect of available tax losses is limited to a percentage of taxable income. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is probable that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. We consider the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.

Allowance for Trade Receivables

We maintain an allowance for trade receivables to account for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make required payments. When evaluating the adequacy of an allowance for trade receivables, we base our estimates on the aging of accounts receivable balances and historical write-off experience, customer credit worthiness and changes in customer payment terms. If the financial condition of customers were to deteriorate, actual write-offs might be higher than expected.

Operating Segments

IFRS 8 “Operating Segments” requires an entity to report financial and descriptive information about its reportable segments, which are operating segments or aggregations of operating segments that meet specified criteria. Operating segments are components of an entity about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The CODM evaluates the business based on the differences in the nature of its operations, products and services. The amount reported for each segment item is the measure reported to the CODM for these purposes.

We operate in three major lines of business, namely, Farming; Sugar, Ethanol and Energy; and Land Transformation.

| • |  | Our ‘Farming’ is further comprised of five reportable segments:

| • |  | Our ‘Crops’ Segment consists of planting, harvesting and sale of grains, oilseeds and fibers (including wheat, corn, soybeans, cotton and sunflowers, among others), and to a lesser extent the provision of grain warehousing/conditioning and handling and drying services to third parties. Each underlying crop in the Crops segment does not represent a separate operating segment. We seek to maximize the use of the land through the cultivation of one or more types of crops. Types and surface amount of crops cultivated may vary from harvest year to harvest year depending on several factors, some of which are out of our control. We are focused on the long-term performance of the productive land, and to that extent, the performance is assessed considering the aggregated combination, if any, of crops planted in the land. A single manager is responsible for the management of operating activity of all crops rather than for each individual crop.

101

##### Table of Contents

| • |  | Our ‘Rice’ Segment consists of planting, harvesting, processing and marketing of rice;

| • |  | Our ‘Dairy’ Segment consists of the production and sale of raw milk, as well as an equity interest in La Lacteo, a dairy processing Joint Venture;

| • |  | Our ‘Coffee’ Segment consists of cultivating coffee beans and marketing own and third party’s coffee production;

| • |  | Our ‘Cattle’ Segment consists mainly in the lease of cattle grazing land (not suitable for crop production) to an international meat processor;

| • |  | Our ‘Sugar, Ethanol and Energy’ Segment consists of cultivating sugarcane which is processed in owned sugar mills, transformed into ethanol, sugar and electricity and marketed;

| • |  | Our ‘Land Transformation’ Segment comprises the (i) identification and acquisition of underdeveloped and undermanaged farmland businesses; and (ii) realization of value through the strategic disposition of assets (generating profits).

The following table presents selected historical financial and operating data solely for the periods indicated below as it is used for our discussion of results of operations.

|  | Year Ended December 31, |  |  |  |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Sales |  | ( In thousands of $) |  |  |  |
Farming Business |  |  | 322,368 |  |  |  | 270,766 |  |  |  | 197,741 |
Crops |  |  | 196,206 |  |  |  | 147,946 |  |  |  | 108,162 |
Soybean(1) |  |  | 66,721 |  |  |  | 61,385 |  |  |  | 64,890 |
Corn (2) |  |  | 68,790 |  |  |  | 42,959 |  |  |  | 25,881 |
Wheat (3) |  |  | 34,831 |  |  |  | 25,060 |  |  |  | 9,110 |
Sunflower |  |  | 7,887 |  |  |  | 7,413 |  |  |  | 4,880 |
Cotton Lint |  |  | 15,297 |  |  |  | 9,101 |  |  |  | 2,395 |
Other crops(4) |  |  | 2,680 |  |  |  | 2,028 |  |  |  | 1,006 |
Rice(5) |  |  | 93,904 |  |  |  | 83,244 |  |  |  | 61,585 |
Coffee |  |  | 8,363 |  |  |  | 14,170 |  |  |  | 7,572 |
Dairy |  |  | 18,868 |  |  |  | 19,697 |  |  |  | 14,297 |
Cattle(6) |  |  | 5,027 |  |  |  | 5,709 |  |  |  | 6,125 |
Sugar, Ethanol and Energy Business |  |  | 282,332 |  |  |  | 277,318 |  |  |  | 228,526 |
Sugar |  |  | 134,766 |  |  |  | 130,348 |  |  |  | 98,385 |
Ethanol |  |  | 121,544 |  |  |  | 116,599 |  |  |  | 114,793 |
Energy |  |  | 25,649 |  |  |  | 24,393 |  |  |  | 15,040 |
Other (7) |  |  | 373 |  |  |  | 5,978 |  |  |  | 308 |
Total |  |  | 604,700 |  |  |  | 548,084 |  |  |  | 426,267 |
Land Transformation Business(8) |  |  | 27,513 |  |  |  | 8,832 |  |  |  | 20,837 |

102

##### Table of Contents

Production |  | 2012/2013 Harvest Year (18) |  |  | 2011/2012 Harvest Year |  |  | 2010/2011 Harvest Year |  |  | 2009/2010 Harvest Year |
Farming Business |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Crops (tons)(9) |  |  | 52,353 |  |  |  | 564,800 |  |  |  | 488,185 |  |  |  | 524,360 |
Soybean (tons) |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 189,014 |  |  |  | 199,533 |  |  |  | 241,848 |
Corn (tons) (2) |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 237,294 |  |  |  | 169,711 |  |  |  | 203,573 |
Wheat (tons) (3) |  |  | 52,353 |  |  |  | 113,121 |  |  |  | 92,908 |  |  |  | 61,208 |
Sunflower (tons) |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 18,667 |  |  |  | 20,916 |  |  |  | 17,193 |
Cotton Lint (tons) |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 6,704 |  |  |  | 5,117 |  |  |  | 539 |
Rice(10) (tons) |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 171,137 |  |  |  | 172,034 |  |  |  | 91,723 |
Coffee (tons) |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 2,873 |  |  |  | 2,742 |  |  |  | 2,221 |

|  | Year Ended December 31, |  |  |  |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Processed rice(11) (tons) |  |  | 172,383 |  |  |  | 148,223 |  |  |  | 87,526 |
Dairy(12) (liters) |  |  | 54,954 |  |  |  | 51,239 |  |  |  | 41,597 |
Cattle (tons)(6)(13) |  |  | 416 |  |  |  | 118 |  |  |  | 359 |
Sugar, Ethanol and Energy Business |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Sugar (tons) |  |  | 281,622 |  |  |  | 247,805 |  |  |  | 235,690 |
Ethanol (cubic meters) |  |  | 183,713 |  |  |  | 161,385 |  |  |  | 174,303 |
Energy (MWh) |  |  | 238,540 |  |  |  | 245,474 |  |  |  | 168,644 |
Land Transformation Business (hectares traded) |  |  | 9,475 |  |  |  | 2,439 |  |  |  | 5,086 |

103

##### Table of Contents

|  | 2012/2013 |  |  | 2011/2012 |  |  | 2010/2011 |  |  | 2009/2010 |
|  | Harvest |  |  | Harvest |  |  | Harvest |  |  | Harvest |
Planted Area |  | Year (18) |  |  | Year |  |  | Year |  |  | Year |
|  | (Hectares) |  |  |  |
Farming Business(14) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Crops(15) |  |  | 186,418 |  |  |  | 204,097 |  |  |  | 167,104 |  |  |  | 168,241 |
Soybean |  |  | 91,746 |  |  |  | 92,789 |  |  |  | 90,126 |  |  |  | 87,522 |
Corn (2) |  |  | 45,795 |  |  |  | 47,409 |  |  |  | 31,894 |  |  |  | 34,617 |
Wheat (3) |  |  | 28,574 |  |  |  | 43,235 |  |  |  | 28,058 |  |  |  | 26,332 |
Sunflower |  |  | 12,478 |  |  |  | 9,596 |  |  |  | 9,943 |  |  |  | 14,784 |
Cotton |  |  | 3,098 |  |  |  | 6,389 |  |  |  | 3,242 |  |  |  | 425 |
Forage |  |  | 4,727 |  |  |  | 4,679 |  |  |  | 3,841 |  |  |  | 4,561 |
Rice |  |  | 35,249 |  |  |  | 31,497 |  |  |  | 27,542 |  |  |  | 18,142 |
Coffee(16) |  |  | 1,632 |  |  |  | 1,632 |  |  |  | 1,632 |  |  |  | 1,632 |
Total Planted Area |  |  | 223,299 |  |  |  | 237,226 |  |  |  | 196,277 |  |  |  | 188,015 |
Second Harvest Area |  |  | 34,057 |  |  |  | 48,286 |  |  |  | 36,351 |  |  |  | 29,119 |
Leased Area |  |  | 54,250 |  |  |  | 60,009 |  |  |  | 37,694 |  |  |  | 47,709 |
Owned Croppable Area(17) |  |  | 134,992 |  |  |  | 128,931 |  |  |  | 122,233 |  |  |  | 111,187 |

|  | Year Ended December 31, |  |  |  |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Sugar, Ethanol and Energy Business |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Sugarcane plantation |  |  | 85,531 |  |  |  | 65,308 |  |  |  | 53,799 |
Owned land |  |  | 9,145 |  |  |  | 9,145 |  |  |  | 9,907 |
Leased land |  |  | 76,386 |  |  |  | 56,163 |  |  |  | 43,892 |
Land Transformation Business |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Undeveloped/Undermanaged land put into production (hectares) |  |  | 8,961 |  |  |  | 13,237 |  |  |  | 6,490 |

(1) | Includes soybean, soybean oil and soybean meal.

(2) | Includes sorghum.

(3) | Includes barley and rapeseed.

(4) | Includes cotton seeds and farming services.

(5) | Sales of processed rice including rough rice purchased from third parties and processed in our own facilities, rice seeds and services.

104

##### Table of Contents

(6) | Our cattle business primarly consists of leasing land to a third party based on the price of beef. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Cattle Business.”

(7) | Includes sales of sugarcane and other miscellaneous items to third parties

(8) | Represents capital gains from the sale of land.

(9) | Crop production does not include 62,636 tons, 46,749 tons, 52,482 tons of forage produced in the 2011/2012, 2010/2011 and 2009/20010 harvest years, respectively.

(10) | Expressed in tons of rough rice produced on owned and leased farms. The rough rice we produce, along with additional rough rice we purchase from third parties, is ultimately processed and constitutes the product sold in respect of the rice business.

(11) | Includes rough rice purchased from third parties and processed in our own facilities. Expressed in tons of processed rice (1 ton of processed rice is approximately equivalent to 1.6 tons of rough rice).

(12) | Raw milk produced at our dairy farms.

(13) | Measured in tons of live weight. Production is the sum of the net increases (or decreases) during a given period in live weight of each head of beef cattle we own.

(14) | Includes hectares planted in the second harvest.

(15) | Includes 3,841 hectares, 4,561 hectares and 5,382 hectares used for the production of forage during the 2011/2012; 2010/2011 and 2009/2010 harvest years, respectively.

(16) | Reflects the size of our coffee plantations, which are planted only once every 18 to 20 years.

(17) | Does not include potential croppable areas being evaluated for transformation.

(18) | As of the date of this annual report, we had not yet completed the 2012/2013 harvest year crops. Harvested tons corresponds to wheat harvested.

105

##### Table of Contents

Year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to year ended December 31, 2011

The following table sets forth certain financial information with respect to our consolidated results of operations for the periods indicated.

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
Sales of manufactured products and services rendered |  |  | 379,526 |  |  |  | 365,857 |
Cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered |  |  | (263,978 | ) |  |  | (237,404 | )
Gross Profit from Manufacturing Activities |  |  | 115,548 |  |  |  | 128,453 |
Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets |  |  | 225,174 |  |  |  | 182,227 |
Cost of agricultural produce sold and direct agricultural selling expenses |  |  | (225,174 | ) |  |  | (182,227 | )
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce |  |  | 16,643 |  |  |  | 86,811 |
Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest |  |  | 16,004 |  |  |  | 10,523 |
Gross Profit from Agricultural Activities |  |  | 32,647 |  |  |  | 97,334 |
Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses |  |  | 148,195 |  |  |  | 225,787 |
General and administrative expenses |  |  | (57,691 | ) |  |  | (65,142 | )
Selling expenses |  |  | (58,602 | ) |  |  | (59,404 | )
Other operating income, net |  |  | 29,818 |  |  |  | 24,581 |
Share of loss of joint ventures |  |  | (2,761 | ) |  |  | (1,034 | )
Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation |  |  | 58,959 |  |  |  | 124,788 |
Finance income |  |  | 11,538 |  |  |  | 9,132 |
Finance costs |  |  | (66,654 | ) |  |  | (62,341 | )
Financial results, net |  |  | (55,116 | ) |  |  | (53,209 | )
(Loss)/Profit Before Income Tax |  |  | 3,843 |  |  |  | 71,579 |
Income Tax benefit / (charge) |  |  | 5,436 |  |  |  | (14,662 | )
Gain for the Year |  |  | 9,279 |  |  |  | 56,917 |

Sales of Manufactured Products and Services Rendered

|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
2012 |  |  | 589 |  |  |  | 92,438 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 4,390 |  |  |  | 282,109 |  |  |  | 379,526 |
2011 |  |  | 557 |  |  |  | 82,523 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 713 |  |  |  | 4,746 |  |  |  | 277,318 |  |  |  | 365,857 |

Sales of manufactured products and services rendered increased 3.7%, from $365.9 million in 2011 to $379.5 million in 2012, primarily as a result of:

| • |  | a $9.9 million increase in our Rice segment, mainly due to: (i) a 5.8% increase in the average sales price, from $385.1 per ton of rough rice equivalent in 2011 to $407.6 per ton of rough rice equivalent in 2012; and (ii) a 6.6% increase in the volume of white and brown rice sold measured in tons of rough rice, from 216,148 tons in 2011 to 230,378 tons in 2012, mainly explained by: (a) a 44.5% increase in the volume of rough rice purchased from third parties, from 59,842 tons in 2011 to 86,481 tons in 2012; (b) a 14.4% increase in planted hectares, from 27,542 hectares in 2011 to 31,497 hectares in 2012; partially offset by (c) a 13.0% decrease in average yields, from 6.2 tons per hectare in 2011 to 5.4 tons per hectare in 2012, due to the lower than average temperatures during the initial growth stage and flowering periods of the crop, which affected its normal development;

106

##### Table of Contents

| • |  | a $4.8 million increase in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment mainly due to: (i) a 28.0% increase in the volume of sugar and ethanol sold, measured in TRS, from 462,940 tons in 2011 to 592,561 tons in 2012; partially offset by (ii) a 25.8% decrease in the average sales price of ethanol, from $920.0 per cubic meter in 2011 to $682.9 per cubic meter in 2012; (iii) a 10.8% decrease in the average sales price of sugar, from $553.6 per ton in 2011 to $493.8 per ton in 2012; and (iv) a 3.9% decrease in the volume of energy sold, from 245.0 MWh in 2011 to 235.5 MWh in 2012, mainly as a result of a 68.6% increase in the production of anhydrous ethanol in 2012, which requires an additional process (dehydration) compared to producing hydrous ethanol, therefore reducing the amount of energy available for sale.

| • |  | On average, one metric ton of sugarcane is equivalent to 140 kilograms of TRS equivalent. While a mill can produce either sugar or ethanol, the TRS input requirements differ between these two products. On average, 1.045 kilograms of TRS equivalent are required to produce 1.0 kilogram of sugar, while the amount of TRS required to produce 1 liter of ethanol is 1.691 kilograms

| • |  | The increase in the volume of TRS equivalent sold in 2012 mentioned above was primarly the result of: (i) a lower ethanol inventory build-up, which stands at 12,491 m3 in 2012 compared to 33,608 m3 in 2011; and (ii) a 14.3% increase in production measured in TRS, from 535,080 tons in 2011 to 611,653 tons in 2012. The increase in production measured in TRS was the result of (a) a 4.6% increase in the TRS content of the milled cane, from 128.0 kg/ton in 2011 to 133.8 kg/ton in 2012, mainly explained by the low level of TRS content in 2011 as a result of the frost in Mato Grosso do Sul on the first semester; and (b) a 7.7% increase in milled cane, from 4,169 thousand tons in 2011 to 4,489 thousand tons in 2012, mainly due to a 21.8% increase in harvested area, from 51,500 hectares in 2011 to 62,717 hectares in 2012, and partially offset by a 9.2% decrease in average yields, from 75.6 tons per hectare in 2011 to 68.6 tons per hectare in 2012. The decrease in yields is attributable to the effects of the drought that occurred in the main productive regions of Brazil on the first quarter of 2012. The following figure sets forth the variables that determine our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy sales:

The following table sets forth the breakdown of sales of manufactured products for the periods indicated.

|  | Period Ended December 31, |  |  | Period Ended December 31, |  |  | Period Ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | Chg % |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | Chg % |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | Chg % |
|  | (in million of $) |  |  |  |  |  | (in thousand units) |  |  |  |  |  | (in dollars per unit) |  |  |  |
Ethanol (M3) |  |  | 121.5 |  |  |  | 116.6 |  |  |  | 4.2 | % |  |  | 178.0 |  |  |  | 126.7 |  |  |  | 40.4 | % |  |  | 683.0 |  |  |  | 920.0 |  |  |  | (25.8 | %)
Sugar (tons) |  |  | 134.8 |  |  |  | 130.3 |  |  |  | 3.4 | % |  |  | 272.9 |  |  |  | 235.5 |  |  |  | 15.9 | % |  |  | 493.8 |  |  |  | 553.6 |  |  |  | (10.8 | %)
Energy (MWh) |  |  | 25.6 |  |  |  | 24.4 |  |  |  | 5,1 | % |  |  | 235.5 |  |  |  | 245.0 |  |  |  | (3.9 | %) |  |  | 108.9 |  |  |  | 99.6 |  |  |  | 9.4 | %
Others |  |  | 0.4 |  |  |  | 6.0 |  |  |  | (93.8 | %) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
TOTAL |  |  | 282.3 |  |  |  | 277.3 |  |  |  | 1.8 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

107

##### Table of Contents

During 2012, the production mix measured remained essentially unchanged compared to 2011, with sugar and ethanol accounting for 48% and 52% of the production measured in TRS respectively.

partially offset by:

| • |  | a $0.7 million decrease in our Coffee segment resulting from the complete cessation of coffee trading activities related to third-party production. We continue to commercialize our own coffee production, which is reflected in the “Sales and Cost of Agricultural Produce and Biological Assets” line item.

Cost of Manufactured Products Sold and Services Rendered

|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
2012 |  |  | — |  |  |  | (78,617 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (230 | ) |  |  | (185,131 | ) |  |  | (263,978 | )
2011 |  |  | — |  |  |  | (68,721 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (629 | ) |  |  | (408 | ) |  |  | (167,646 | ) |  |  | (237,404 | )

Cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered increased 11.2%, from $237.4 million in 2011, to $264.0 million in 2012. This increase was primarily due to:

| • |  | a $17.5 million increase in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment mainly due to (i) a 28.0% increase in the volume of sugar and ethanol sold measured in TRS; partially offset by (ii) a 14.5% decrease in the price of our sugarcane production, from $40.6 per ton in 2011 to $34.8 per ton in 2012, as a result of lower sugar and ethanol market prices.

| • |  | a $9.9 million increase in our Rice segment mainly due to: (i) a 6.6% increase in the volume of white and brown rice sold, and (ii) a 7.3% increase in the cost per unit sold.

Partially offset by:

| • |  | a $0.6 million decrease in our Coffee segment as a result of the complete cessation of coffee trading activities related to third party production.

Sales and Cost of Agricultural Produce and Biological Assets

|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
2012 |  |  | 195,617 |  |  |  | 1,466 |  |  |  | 18,868 |  |  |  | 8,363 |  |  |  | 637 |  |  |  | 223 |  |  |  | 225,174 |
2011 |  |  | 147,389 |  |  |  | 721 |  |  |  | 19,697 |  |  |  | 13,457 |  |  |  | 963 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 182,227 |

Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets increased 23.6%, from $182.2 million in 2011 to $225.2 million in 2012, primarily as a result of:

| • |  | a $48.2 million increase in our Crops segment mainly due to: (i) an increase in soybean and corn average sales prices, partially offset by lower wheat average sales prices, and (ii) an increase in the volume of crops sold mainly as a result of an increase in leased area coupled with an increase in double crops area; partially offset by the general decrease in the average yields obtained for the 2011/2012 harvest compared to the 2010/2011 harvest. Crops suffered a severe drought during the summer period, which affected its normal

108

##### Table of Contents

| development. Corn yields decreased from an average of 5.4 tons per hectare in the 2010/2011 harvest to 5.0 tons per hectare in the 2011/2012 harvest and first soybean yields decreased from an average of 2.6 tons per hectare in the 2010/2011 harvest to 2.5 tons per hectare in the 2011/2012 harvest. For a full list of crops yield fluctuations, please see “Trends and Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations—Effect of Yields Fluctuations”.

The following table sets forth the breakdown of sales for the periods indicated.

|  | Period ended December 31, |  |  | Period ended December 31, |  |  | Period ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | % Chg |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | % Chg |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | % Chg |
|  | (In millions of $) |  |  |  |  |  | (In thousands of tons) |  |  |  |  |  | (In $ per ton) |  |  |  |
Soybean |  |  | 66.7 |  |  |  | 61.4 |  |  |  | 8.7 | % |  |  | 191.6 |  |  |  | 208.1 |  |  |  | (7.9 | %) |  |  | 348.2 |  |  |  | 295.0 |  |  |  | 18.0 | %
Corn (1) |  |  | 68.8 |  |  |  | 43.0 |  |  |  | 60.1 | % |  |  | 313.5 |  |  |  | 201.2 |  |  |  | 55.8 | % |  |  | 219.4 |  |  |  | 213.5 |  |  |  | 2.8 | %
Cotton lint |  |  | 15.3 |  |  |  | 9.1 |  |  |  | 68.1 | % |  |  | 8.7 |  |  |  | 6.7 |  |  |  | 29.3 | % |  |  | 1,757.3 |  |  |  | 1,351.7 |  |  |  | 30.0 | %
Wheat (2) |  |  | 34.8 |  |  |  | 25.1 |  |  |  | 39.0 | % |  |  | 150.3 |  |  |  | 101.3 |  |  |  | 48.4 | % |  |  | 231.8 |  |  |  | 247.4 |  |  |  | (6.3 | %)
Sunflower |  |  | 7.9 |  |  |  | 7.4 |  |  |  | 6.4 | % |  |  | 19.7 |  |  |  | 23.1 |  |  |  | (14.4 | %) |  |  | 399.7 |  |  |  | 321.5 |  |  |  | 24.3 | %
Others |  |  | 2.7 |  |  |  | 2.0 |  |  |  | 32.1 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total |  |  | 196.2 |  |  |  | 147.9 |  |  |  | 32.6 | % |  |  | 683.8 |  |  |  | 540.4 |  |  |  | 26.5 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

(1) | Includes sorghum

(2) | Includes barley

partially offset by:

| • |  | a $5.1 million decrease in our Coffee segment, mainly as a result of (i) a 23.8% decrease in coffee sales price, from $3,967 per ton in 2011 to $3,025 per ton in 2012; and (ii) a 22.6% decrease in the volume sold, from 3,572 tons in 2011 to 2,765 tons in 2012, as a result of: (a) a 768 ton inventory reduction in 2011 compared to a 75 ton inventory build-up in 2012; partially offset by (b) a 11.7% increase in harvested area, from 1,405 hectares in 2011 to 1,570 hectares in 2012.

While we receive cash or consideration upon the sale of our inventory of agricultural produce to third parties, we do not record any additional profit related to that sale, as that gain or loss had already been recognized under the line items “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” and “Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest.” Please see “—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Biological Assets and Agricultural Produce” above for a discussion of the accounting treatment, financial statement presentation and disclosure related to our agricultural activity.

Initial Recognition and Changes in Fair Value of Biological Assets and Agricultural Produce

|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
2012 |  |  | 35,471 |  |  |  | 6,463 |  |  |  | 2,060 |  |  |  | (4,196 | ) |  |  | (131 | ) |  |  | (23,024 | ) |  |  | 16,643 |
2011 |  |  | 38,014 |  |  |  | 10,139 |  |  |  | 6,939 |  |  |  | (697 | ) |  |  | 468 |  |  |  | 31,948 |  |  |  | 86,811 |

109

##### Table of Contents

Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce decreased 80.8%, from a gain of $86.8 million in 2011 to a gain of $16.6 million in 2011, primarily due to:

| • |  | a $55.0 million decrease in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment due to:

| • |  | a $33.6 million decrease, from a gain of $8.8 million in 2011 to a loss of $24.8 million in 2012, mainly generated by a decrease in price estimates used in the DCF model to determine the fair value of our sugarcane plantations. In the DCF model, the price of future harvested sugarcane is calculated based on estimates of sugar price derived from the NY11 futures contract. Sugar price estimates as of December 31, 2012, which are calculated based on the average of daily prices for sugar future contracts for the period July 1 to December 31 (i.e. 6-month moving average), decreased 17.7% compared to sugar price estimates as of December 31, 2011, for the same period.

| • |  | a $21.4 million decrease, from a gain of $23.2 million in 2011 to a gain of $1.8 million in 2012, generated by the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of sugarcane at the point of harvest mainly due to: (i) a 9.2% decrease in yields obtained; (ii) a 14.5% decrease in the price of our sugarcane production, which was partially offset by: (iii) a 21.8% increase in harvested area; and (iv) a 4.6% increase in TRS content in sugarcane.

| • |  | Of the $23.0 million loss of initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce in 2012, $24.8 million loss represents the unrealized portion, as compared to the $8.8 million gain unrealized portion of the $31.9 million gain of initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce in 2011.

| • |  | a $4.9 million decrease in our Dairy segment mainly due to:

| • |  | a $3.5 million decrease in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of raw milk, from a gain of $5.4 million in 2011 to a gain of $1.9 million in 2012, mainly due to (i) a 19.9% increase in direct expenses due to higher nutrition expenses (mainly as a result of higher corn prices) and labor costs; and (ii) a 10.7% decrease in milk sales average prices, from 38.4 cents per liter in 2011 to 34.3 cents per liter in 2012; partially offset by (iii) a 9.2% increase in the number of milking cows, from 4,603 heads in 2011 to 5,025 heads in 2012;

| • |  | a $1.4 million decrease in the revaluation of the dairy herd, from a $1.5 million increase in value in 2011 to a $0.1 million increase in value in 2012, as a result of a slight increase in the market price of dairy cows in 2012 compared to a significant increase in market prices in 2011.

| • |  | Of the $2.1 million gain in initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce for 2012, $0.1 million gain represents the unrealized portion, as compared to the $1.5 million unrealized gain portion of the $6.9 million gain in initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce in 2011.

| • |  | a $3.7 million decrease in our Rice segment, as a result of:

| • |  | a $6.2 million decrease in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of rice at the point of harvest, mainly due to (i) a 13.0% decrease in average yields; (ii) a 5.8% increase in production costs, from $879 per hectare in 2011 to $930 per hectare in 2012, (i.e. fuel, agrochemical and fertilizers costs); partially offset by (iii) a 14.4% increase in harvested area, from 27,542 hectares in 2011 to 31,497 hectares in 2012.

| • |  | a $2.6 million increase in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of non-harvested rice, from $1.8 million gain in 2011 to $4.4 million gain in 2012, as a result of higher rough rice price estimate for the 2012/2013 harvest.

| • |  | Of the $6.5 million gain of initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce for 2012, $4.4 million gain represents the unrealized portion, as compared to the $1.8 million gain unrealized portion of the $10.1 million gain of initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce in 2011;

| • |  | a $3.5 million decrease in our Coffee segment mainly due to:

| • |  | a $2.3 million decrease in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of coffee at the point of harvest, from a gain of $0.7 million in 2011 to a loss of $1.6 million in 2012, mainly due to: (i) a 34.3% decrease in the

110

##### Table of Contents

| average price of coffee at the point of harvest, based on Intercontinental Exchange of New York (“ICE-NY”) data; and (ii) a 13.1% increase in production costs per hectare mainly due to higher fertilizer expenses; partially offset by (iii) a 11.7% increase in harvested area;

| • |  | a $1.2 million decrease in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of non-harvested coffee, from a loss of $1.4 million in 2011 to a loss of $2.6 million in 2012, mainly due to a 30.2% decrease in the coffee price estimates used in the DCF model to determine the fair value of our coffee plantations as of December 31, 2012;

| • |  | Of the $4.2 million loss of initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce in 2012, $2.6 million loss represents the unrealized portion, as compared to the $1.4 million loss unrealized portion of the $0.7 million loss of initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce in 2011;

| • |  | a $2.5 million decrease in our Crops segment mainly due to:

| • |  | a $10.3 million decrease in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of crops at the point of harvest, from a gain of $39.6 million in 2011 to a gain of $29.3 million in 2012, mainly due to: (i) lower yields as a result of the dry weather conditions during the summer period; and (ii) higher production costs (i.e. fuel, agrochemical and fertilizers costs); partially offset by (iii) higher market prices (see “Trends and Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations—Effects of Fluctuations in Commodities Prices”). The resulting actual average margin per hectare for our summer crops (i.e. soybean, corn, sunflower and cotton) decreased from $300.6 per hectare in 2011 to $231.3 per hectare in 2012.

| • |  | a $7.8 million increase in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell for non-harvested crops as of year end, from a loss of $1.6 million in 2011 to a gain of $6.2 million in 2012, primarily due to the lack of rains during November and December 2011, which affected expected yields for the 2011/2012 season, mainly in the Humid Pampas region. In 2012, in contrast, the high level of rains in Argentina during the fourth quarter of 2012 derived in higher yields potential measured as of December 31.

The following table sets forth actual production costs by crop for the periods indicated:

|  | Harvest |  |  | Harvest |  |  | % Change |
|  | 2011/2012 |  |  | 2010/2011 |  |  |  |
|  | (In $ per hectare) |  |  |  |
Corn |  |  | 535.7 |  |  |  | 423.6 |  |  |  | 26.5 | %
Soybean |  |  | 470.8 |  |  |  | 379.9 |  |  |  | 23.9 | %
Soybean (second harvest) |  |  | 278.6 |  |  |  | 210.4 |  |  |  | 32.4 | %
Cotton |  |  | 1,765.2 |  |  |  | 2,377.8 |  |  |  | (25.8 | %)
Wheat |  |  | 324.3 |  |  |  | 331.5 |  |  |  | (2.2 | %)

Changes in Net Realizable Value of Agricultural Produce after Harvest

|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Corporate |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
2012 |  |  | 15,850 |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 154 |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 16,004 |
2011 |  |  | 10,953 |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | (430 | ) |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 10,523 |

Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest is mainly composed by: (i) profit or loss from commodity price fluctuations during the period of time the agricultural produce is in inventory which impacts its fair value, (ii) profit or loss from the valuation of forward contracts related to agricultural produce in inventory and (iii) profit from direct exports. Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest increased 52.1% from $10.5 million in 2011 to $16.0 million in 2012.

111

##### Table of Contents

The change in net realizable value of $15.9 million gain in our Crops segment in 2012 was mainly generated by (i) gains from inventory valuation as a result of fluctuations in market prices. Based on Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”) data, from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012, wheat, soybean and corn increased 18.4%, 16.5% and 6.0% respectively; and (ii) profit from direct exports; partially offset by (iii) losses from the valuation of forward contracts related to agricultural produce in inventory.

The change in net realizable value of $11.0 million gain in our Crops segment in 2011 was mainly generated by (i) profits from the valuation of forward contracts, mainly due to a decrease of soybean and wheat market prices during this year. Based on Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”) data, from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011, soybean and wheat prices decreased 12.5% and 19.0% respectively; and (ii) profit from direct exports; partially offset by (iii) losses from inventory valuation as a result of fluctuations in market prices.

General and Administrative Expenses

|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Corporate |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
2012 |  |  | (4,436 | ) |  |  | (4,072 | ) |  |  | (906 | ) |  |  | (1,082 | ) |  |  | (23 | ) |  |  | (22,239 | ) |  |  | (24,933 | ) |  |  | (57,691 | )
2011 |  |  | (8,003 | ) |  |  | (6,278 | ) |  |  | (1,173 | ) |  |  | (1,153 | ) |  |  | (269 | ) |  |  | (21,082 | ) |  |  | (27,184 | ) |  |  | (65,142 | )

Our general and administrative expenses decreased 11.4%, from $65.1 million in 2011 to $57.7 million in 2012, mainly due to the stabilization of operations following a period of significant growth, in terms of scale but also in terms of corporate standards (migrating to IFRS, implementing Oracle ERP, complying with Sarbanes-Oxley, among other things).

Selling Expenses

|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Corporate |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
2012 |  |  | (5,904 | ) |  |  | (16,157 | ) |  |  | (319 | ) |  |  | (304 | ) |  |  | (60 | ) |  |  | (35,690 | ) |  |  | (168 | ) |  |  | (58,602 | )
2011 |  |  | (2,270 | ) |  |  | (14,488 | ) |  |  | (401 | ) |  |  | (463 | ) |  |  | (74 | ) |  |  | (41,708 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (59,404 | )

Selling expenses decreased 1.4%, from $59.4 million in 2011 to $58.6 million in 2012, mainly driven by: (i) a $6.0 million decrease in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment, from $41.7 million in 2011 to $35.7 million in 2012, mainly explained by a decrease in sugar and ethanol sales prices; partially offset by (ii) a $2.8 million increase in our Crops segment, from $2.3 million in 2011 to $5.9 million in 2012, mainly due to the higher volume of direct exports that implied higher commissions and expenses; and (iii) a $1.7 million increase in our Rice segment, from $14.5 million in 2011 to $16.2 million in 2012, mainly due to an increase in sales volume.

Selling expenses of our Dairy, Coffee and Cattle segments remained essentially unchanged.

112

##### Table of Contents

Other Operating Income, Net

|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Land Transformation |  |  | Corporate |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
2012 |  |  | (9,330 | ) |  |  | 1,065 |  |  |  | (1,257 | ) |  |  | 2,387 |  |  |  | (16 | ) |  |  | 9,797 |  |  |  | 27,513 |  |  |  | (341 | ) |  |  | 29,818 |
2011 |  |  | 1,843 |  |  |  | 372 |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | 2,020 |  |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | 11,220 |  |  |  | 8,832 |  |  |  | 299 |  |  |  | 24,581 |

Other operating income, net increased 21.3%, from $24.6 million in 2011 to $29.8 million in 2012, primarily due to:

| • |  | a $18.7 million increase in our Land Transformation segment due to the sale of two farms in 2012, resulting in capital gains of $27.5 million, compared to the sale of one farm in 2011 that generated a $8.8 million capital gain.

partially offset by:

| • |  | a $11.2 million decrease in our Crops segment due to the mark-to-market effect of outstanding hedge positions, which had a negative impact during 2012; and

| • |  | a $1.4 million decrease in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment due to the mark-to-market effect of future sales contracts for sugar;

| • |  | a $1.3 million decrease in our Dairy segment due to the impairment loss recognized as a result of the lack of operating profits in La Lacteo.

Other operating income, net of our Rice, Coffee, Cattle and Corporate segments remained essentially unchanged.

Share of Loss of Joint Ventures

Share of loss of joint ventures varied from a loss of $1.0 million in 2011 to a loss of $2.8 million in 2012, driven by the negative results of Grupo La Lácteo S.A. The lower result is mainly explained by a combination of: (i) lower international powdered milk prices which generated a downward pressure on prices of processed dairy products in the domestic market; and (ii) an increase in production costs. Industrial capacity of Grupo La Lácteo S.A. is only suitable for products for the domestic market.

Financial Results, Net

Our net financial results varied from a loss of $53.2 million in 2011 to a loss of $55.1 million in 2012, primarily due to: a $26.1 million non-cash loss in 2012, compared to a $12.7 million non-cash loss in 2011, caused by a depreciation of the Brazilian Real and Argentine Peso in both years, since a portion of our net liability position in Brazil and Argentina is nominated in foreign currency. In 2012 we increased the amount of debt nominated in US dollars, which mainly explains this higher non-cash loss, which was partially offset by (i) lower interest expenses nominated in US dollar terms mainly due to the depreciation of the Brazilian Real and the Argentine Peso; and (ii) higher interests income as a result of a higher amount of excess cash invested in fixed term deposits.

113

##### Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the breakdown of financial results for the periods indicated.

|  | Year Ended December 31, |  |  |  |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  |  |
|  | (In $thousand) |  |  | % Change |
Interest income |  |  | 11,249 |  |  |  | 8,019 |  |  |  | 40.3 | %
Interest expense |  |  | (27,672 | ) |  |  | (34,017 | ) |  |  | (18.7 | %)
Foreign Exchange loss - net |  |  | (26,080 | ) |  |  | (12,683 | ) |  |  | 105.6 | %
Loss from derivative financial Instruments |  |  | (5,823 | ) |  |  | (2,247 | ) |  |  | 159.1 | %
Taxes |  |  | (4,265 | ) |  |  | (5,273 | ) |  |  | (19.1 | %)
Other Expenses – net |  |  | (2,525 | ) |  |  | (7,008 | ) |  |  | (64.0 | %)
Total Financial Results |  |  | (55,116 | ) |  |  | (53,209 | ) |  |  | 3.6 | %

Income Tax benefit / (expense)

For the year ended December 31, 2012, we recognized a consolidated income tax benefit of $5.4 million on income before income taxes of $3.8 million. For the comparable 2011 period, we recognized a consolidated income tax expense of $14.6 million on income before income taxes of $71.5 million. On a consolidated basis, the change from an income tax expense in 2011 to an income tax benefit in 2012 reflects, among other items, a change in our mix of pre-tax income from our various jurisdictions, each of them responsible for paying their own income taxes. We do not pay a consolidated income tax return. The income tax benefit in 2012 was mainly due to the recognition of previously unrecognized tax losses in Brazil and the gain from the sale of Santa Regina Agropecuaria S.A. which did not result income tax expense. In 2011, our consolidated effective tax rate approximated 20.5% (which differed from our statutory income tax rates) mainly due to the recognition of previously unrecognized tax losses in Brazil.

Profit for the Year

As a result of the foregoing, our net income for the year decreased from a gain of $56.9 million in 2011 to a gain of $9.3 million in 2012.

114

##### Table of Contents

Year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to year ended December 31, 2010

The following table sets forth certain financial information with respect to our consolidated results of operations for the periods indicated.

|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
Sales of manufactured products and services rendered |  |  | 365,857 |  |  |  | 294,529 |
Cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered |  |  | (237,404 | ) |  |  | (219,201 | )
Gross Profit from Manufacturing Activities |  |  | 128,453 |  |  |  | 75,328 |
Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets |  |  | 182,227 |  |  |  | 131,738 |
Cost of agricultural produce sold and direct agricultural selling expenses |  |  | (182,227 | ) |  |  | (131,738 | )
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce |  |  | 86,811 |  |  |  | (30,528 | )
Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest |  |  | 10,523 |  |  |  | 7,999 |
Gross Profit from Agricultural Activities |  |  | 97,334 |  |  |  | (22,529 | )
Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses |  |  | 225,787 |  |  |  | 52,799 |
General and administrative expenses |  |  | (65,142 | ) |  |  | (56,562 | )
Selling expenses |  |  | (59,404 | ) |  |  | (52,528 | )
Other operating income, net |  |  | 24,581 |  |  |  | 18,224 |
Share of loss of joint ventures |  |  | (1,034 | ) |  |  | (50 | )
Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation |  |  | 124,788 |  |  |  | (38,117 | )
Finance income |  |  | 9,132 |  |  |  | 16,559 |
Finance costs |  |  | (62,341 | ) |  |  | (39,496 | )
Financial results, net |  |  | (53,209 | ) |  |  | (22,937 | )
Profit / (Loss) Before Income Tax |  |  | 71,579 |  |  |  | (61,054 | )
Income Tax benefit / (charge) |  |  | (14,662 | ) |  |  | 16,263 |
Profit/ (Loss) for the Year |  |  | 56,917 |  |  |  | (44,791 | )

Sales of Manufactured Products and Services Rendered

|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
2011 |  |  | 557 |  |  |  | 82,523 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 713 |  |  |  | 4,746 |  |  |  | 277,318 |  |  |  | 365,857 |
2010 |  |  | 344 |  |  |  | 59,280 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,709 |  |  |  | 3,718 |  |  |  | 228,478 |  |  |  | 294,529 |

Sales of manufactured products and services rendered increased 24.2%, from $294.5 million in 2010 to $365.9 million in 2011, primarily as a result of:

| • |  | a $48.8 million increase in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment due to: (i) a 51.4% increase in the average sales price of ethanol, from $607.5 per cubic meter in 2010 to $920.0 per cubic meter in 2011; (ii) a 31.5% increase in the average market price of sugar, from $421.1 per ton in 2010 to $553.6 per ton in 2011; (iii) a 36.9% increase in the volume of energy sold, from 178.9 thousand MWh in 2010 to 245.0 thousand MWh in 2011, mainly due to: (a) gained efficiencies due to the completion of Angelica facility, with its boilers and generators working at full cogeneration capacity during 2011; and (b) a 31,541 tons of bagasse purchased to third parties in 2011. This was partially offset by (iv) a 17.5% decrease in the volume of sugar and ethanol sold, measured in TRS. On average, one metric ton of sugarcane is equivalent to 140 kilograms of TRS equivalent. While a mill can produce either sugar or ethanol, the TRS input requirements differ between these two products. On average, 1.045 kilogram of TRS equivalent is required to produce 1.0

115

##### Table of Contents

| kilogram of sugar, while 1.691 kilograms of TRS equivalent is required to produce a liter of ethanol. The decrease in the volume of TRS equivalent sold in 2011 was mainly due to: (a) a decrease of 5.8% in the TRS content of the milled cane, from kg/ton 135.8 in 2010 to kg/ton 128.0 in 2011, caused by the frost in Mato Grosso do Sul on the first semester of 2011; and (b) an increase in inventory levels, from 11,211 tons and 4,943 m3 of sugar and ethanol respectively in 2010 to 21,283 tons and 38,551 m3 of sugar and ethanol respectively in 2011. This was partially offset by (c) a 2.5% increase in milled cane, due to: (ci) a 27.9% increase in harvested area, from 40,263 hectares in 2010 to 51,500 hectares in 2011; (cii) a 40.7% increase in the amount of cane purchased to third parties, from 196,833 tons in 2010 to 276,957 tons in 2011; partially offset by (ciii) a 21.4% decrease in the average yields, from 96.1 tons per hectare in 2010 to 75.6 tons per hectare in 2011, due to the drought occurred in the 2nd semester of 2010 and the frost occurred during the first semester of 2011, which affected most of rural areas in center-south Brazil. The following table sets forth the breakdown of sales of manufactured products for the periods indicated.

|  | Period Ended December 31, |  |  | Period Ended December 31, |  |  | Period Ended December 31, |
|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | Chg % |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | Chg % |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | Chg % |
|  | (in million of $) |  |  |  |  |  | (in thousand units) |  |  |  |  |  | (in dollars per unit) |  |  |  |
Ethanol (M3) |  |  | 116.6 |  |  |  | 114.8 |  |  |  | 1.6 | % |  |  | 126.7 |  |  |  | 189.0 |  |  |  | (32.9 | %) |  |  | 920.0 |  |  |  | 607.5 |  |  |  | 51.4 | %
Sugar (tons) |  |  | 130.3 |  |  |  | 98.4 |  |  |  | 32.5 | % |  |  | 235.5 |  |  |  | 233.6 |  |  |  | 0.8 | % |  |  | 553.6 |  |  |  | 421.1 |  |  |  | 31.5 | %
Energy (MWh) |  |  | 24.4 |  |  |  | 15.0 |  |  |  | 62.2 | % |  |  | 245.0 |  |  |  | 178.9 |  |  |  | 36.9 | % |  |  | 99.6 |  |  |  | 84.1 |  |  |  | 18.4 | %
Others |  |  | 6.0 |  |  |  | 0.3 |  |  |  | 1,840.9 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
TOTAL |  |  | 277.3 |  |  |  | 228.5 |  |  |  | 21.4 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

During 2011, the production mix was more inclined towards sugar, which resulted in a reduction of ethanol sales and a slight increase in sugar sales. The production mix changed from 45.5% sugar and 54.5% ethanol in 2010 to 51.0% sugar and 49.0% ethanol in 2011.

| • |  | a $23.2 million increase in our Rice segment, mainly due to: (i) a 44.8% increase in the volume of white and brown rice sold, mainly as a result of a 64.9% increase in the volume of rough rice processed in our mills, due to (a) a 51.8% increase in planted hectares, from 18,142 hectares in 2010 to 27,542 hectares in 2011; (b) a 23.5% increase in average yields, from 5.1 tons per hectare in 2010 to 6.2 tons per hectare in 2011, due to the gradual stabilization of land under transformation coupled with an improvement in weather conditions. As a result, our rough rice production increased 87.6%, from 91,723 tons in 2010 to 172,034 tons in 2011; and (c) beginning of operations of our Mill located in Franck, Santa Fe, Argentina, during the second semester of 2011; partially offset by (ii) a 6.6% decrease in price, from $412.5 per ton of rough rice equivalent in 2010 to $385.1 per ton of rough rice equivalent in 2011; and

| • |  | a $1.0 million increase in our Cattle segment due to a 35.6% increase in the average beef cattle price which impacts the leasing agreement of our cattle land (settled in kilograms of beef per hectare), from an average of $1.46 per kilogram in 2010 to an average of $1.98 per kilogram in 2011. For a detailed description of the leasing agreement, please see “Item 4.— Information on the Company— B. Business Overview—Material Agreements—Argentina—Agreement with Quickfood S.A.”

partially offset by:

• |  | a $2.0 million decrease in our Coffee segment resulting from the cessation of coffee trading activities related to third-party production. We continue to commercialize our own coffee production, which is reflected in the “Sales and Cost of Agricultural Produce and Biological Assets” line item.

116

##### Table of Contents

Cost of Manufactured Products Sold and Services Rendered

|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
2011 |  |  | — |  |  |  | (68,721 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (629 | ) |  |  | (408 | ) |  |  | (167,646 | ) |  |  | (237,404 | )
2010 |  |  | — |  |  |  | (52,017 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (2,546 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (164,638 | ) |  |  | (219,201 | )

Cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered increased 8.3%, from $219.2 million in 2010, to $237.4 million in 2011. This increase was primarily due to:

| • |  | a $16.7 million increase in our Rice segment due to: (i) a 44.8% increase in the volume of white and brown rice sold, partially offset by (ii) a 8.7% decrease in the cost per unit sold, mainly as a result of a 10.9% decrease in the market price of rough rice (which is the main component of the cost of the processed rice) and cost efficiency gains resulting from the scale increase;

| • |  | a $3.0 million increase in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment mainly due to: (i) a 34.2% increase in the price of sugarcane, from $30.3 in 2010 to $40.6 in 2011; and (ii) a 8.9% increase in industry expenses; partially offset by (iii) a 17.5% decrease in the volume of sugar and ethanol sold measured in TRS; and

| • |  | a $0.4 million increase in our Cattle segment, due to maintenance expenses incurred in 2011 related to our cattle land leased.

Partially offset by:

| • |  | a $1.9 million decrease in our Coffee segment mainly due to a decrease in the volume of coffee traded, as a result of the cessation of coffee trading activities related to third party production.

Sales and Cost of Agricultural Produce and Biological Assets

|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
2011 |  |  | 147,389 |  |  |  | 721 |  |  |  | 19,697 |  |  |  | 13,457 |  |  |  | 963 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 182,227 |
2010 |  |  | 107,818 |  |  |  | 2,305 |  |  |  | 14,297 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,407 |  |  |  | 48 |  |  |  | 131,738 |

Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets increased 38.3%, from $131.7 million in 2010, to $182.2 million in 2011, primarily as a result of:

| • |  | a $39.6 million increase in our Crops segment mainly due to (i) an increase in the average sales prices, partially offset by (ii) a decrease in the average yields obtained in 2010/2011 harvest season as a result of worse weather conditions, compared to the 2009/2010 harvest. Corn yields decreased from an average of 5.9 tons per hectare in 2009/2010 harvest to 5.4 tons per hectare in 2010/2011, and first soybean yields decreased from an average of 3.1 in 2009/2010 harvest to 2.6 in 2010/2011 harvest. For a full list of crops yield fluctuations, please see “Trends and Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations—Effect of Yields Fluctuations”.

117

##### Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the breakdown of sales for the periods indicated.

|  | Period ended December 31, |  |  | Period ended December 31, |  |  | Period ended December 31, |
|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | % Chg |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | % Chg |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | % Chg |
|  | (In millions of $) |  |  |  |  |  | (In thousands of tons) |  |  |  |  |  | (In $ per ton) |  |  |  |
Soybean |  |  | 61.4 |  |  |  | 64.9 |  |  |  | (5.4 | %) |  |  | 208.1 |  |  |  | 250.3 |  |  |  | (16.9 | %) |  |  | 295.0 |  |  |  | 259.3 |  |  |  | 13.8 | %
Corn (1) |  |  | 43.0 |  |  |  | 25.9 |  |  |  | 66.0 | % |  |  | 201.2 |  |  |  | 201.7 |  |  |  | (0.2 | %) |  |  | 213.5 |  |  |  | 128.3 |  |  |  | 66.4 | %
Cotton lint |  |  | 9.1 |  |  |  | 2.4 |  |  |  | 280.0 | % |  |  | 6.7 |  |  |  | 1.8 |  |  |  | 269.6 | % |  |  | 1,351.7 |  |  |  | 1,314.7 |  |  |  | 2.8 | %
Wheat (2) |  |  | 25.1 |  |  |  | 9.1 |  |  |  | 175.1 | % |  |  | 101.3 |  |  |  | 60.4 |  |  |  | 67.8 | % |  |  | 247.4 |  |  |  | 150.9 |  |  |  | 63.9 | %
Sunflower |  |  | 7.4 |  |  |  | 4.9 |  |  |  | 51.9 | % |  |  | 23.1 |  |  |  | 16.7 |  |  |  | 37.9 | % |  |  | 321.5 |  |  |  | 291.8 |  |  |  | 10.2 | %
Others |  |  | 2.0 |  |  |  | 1.0 |  |  |  | 101.6 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total |  |  | 147.9 |  |  |  | 108.2 |  |  |  | 36.8 | % |  |  | 540.4 |  |  |  | 530.9 |  |  |  | 1.8 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

(3) | Includes sorghum

(4) | Includes barley

| • |  | a $8.6 million increase in our Coffee segment, mainly due to (i) a 62.9% increase in coffee sales price in 2011; (ii) a 69.8% increase in the volume sold, from 1,989 tons in 2010 to 3,378 tons in 2011, as a result of (a) a 23.5% increase in production from 2,221 tons in 2010 to 2,742 tons in 2011, mainly due to (ai) a 7.7% increase in the average yields and (aii) a 14.6% increase in harvested area, from 1,226 hectares in 2010 to 1,405 hectares in 2011, due to a reduction in coffee pruning area, from 406 hectares in 2010 to 227 hectares in 2011; and (b) a 86.3% decrease of inventories at the end of period, from 890 tons in 2010 to 122 tons in 2011; and

| • |  | a $5.4 million increase in our Dairy segment due to: (i) a 11.8% increase in the sales average price of raw milk, from 34.4 cents per liter in 2010 to 38.4 cents per liter in 2011; and (ii) a 23.2% increase in the volume of liters produced, from 41.6 million liters in 2010 to 51.2 million liters in 2011, due to (a) a 8.9% increase in the amount of milking cows, from 4,225 heads in 2010 to 4,603 heads in 2011, and (b) a 13.1% increase in the average individual daily production, from 27.0 liters/Milking Cow/day in 2010 to 30.5 liters/ Milking Cow/day in 2011. The increase in the average individual daily production is mainly due to the stabilization of our free stall dairy production unit.

partially offset by:

| • |  | a $1.6 million decrease in our Rice segment mainly attributable to a reduction in the amount of sales of rice seed; and

| • |  | a $1.4 million decrease in our Cattle segment due to a 60.9% decrease in the number of head of beef cattle sold, from 3.7 thousand heads in 2010 to 1.5 thousand heads in 2011, as a result of the disposal of feedlot livestock in 2010.

While we receive cash or consideration upon the sale of our inventory of agricultural produce to third parties, we do not record any additional profit related to that sale, as that gain or loss had already been recognized under the line items “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” and “Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest.” Please see “—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Biological Assets and Agricultural Produce” above for a discussion of the accounting treatment, financial statement presentation and disclosure related to our agricultural activity.

118

##### Table of Contents

Initial Recognition and Changes in Fair Value of Biological Assets and Agricultural Produce

|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
2011 |  |  | 38,014 |  |  |  | 10,139 |  |  |  | 6,939 |  |  |  | (697 | ) |  |  | 468 |  |  |  | 31,948 |  |  |  | 86,811 |
2010 |  |  | 38,879 |  |  |  | 9,360 |  |  |  | 9,129 |  |  |  | (2,630 | ) |  |  | 737 |  |  |  | (86,003 | ) |  |  | (30,528 | )

Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce generated a gain of $86.8 million in 2011, compared to a loss of $30.5 million in 2010, primarily due to:

| • |  | a $118.0 million increase in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment due to:

| • |  | a $105.6 million increase, from a loss of $96.8 million in 2010 to a gain of $8.8 million in 2011, mainly generated by an increase in price estimates used in the DCF model to determine the fair value of our sugarcane plantations. In the DCF model, the price of future harvested sugarcane is calculated based on estimates of sugar price derived from the NY11 futures contract. Sugar price estimates as of December 31, 2011, which are calculated based on the average of daily prices for sugar future contracts for the period July 1 to December 31 (i.e. 6-month moving average), increased 14.7% compared to sugar price estimates as of December 31, 2010, for the same period.

| • |  | a $12.4 million increase, from a gain of $10.8 million in 2010 to a gain of $23.2 million in 2011, generated by the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of sugarcane at the point of harvest due to: (i) a 27.9% increase in harvested area from 40,263 hectares in 2010 to 51,500 hectares in 2011, (ii) a 34.2% increase in the price of sugarcane from $30.3 per ton in 2010 to $40.6 per ton in 2011, as a result of higher sugar and ethanol market prices, which was partially offset by: (iii) a 26.9% increase in actual production costs, mainly as a result of higher costs of inputs and salaries; and (iv) a 21.4% decrease in yields obtained, from 96.1 tons per hectare in 2010 to 75.6 tons per hectare in 2011.

| • |  | Of the $31.9 million gain of initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce for 2011, $8.8 million gain represents the unrealized portion, as compared to the $96.4 million loss unrealized portion of the $86.0 million loss of initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce in 2010.

| • |  | a $0.8 million increase in our Rice segment, as a result of:

| • |  | a $5.1 million increase in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of rice at the point of harvest, mainly due to (i) a 51.8% increase in harvested area, from 18,142 hectares in 2010 to 27,542 hectares in 2011, due to (a) a 112.1% increase in owned planted hectares, from 10,831 hectares in 2010 to 22,973 hectares in 2011, as a result of the purchase of “Dinaluca” farm, which was put into production in the 2010/2011 harvest season, and (b) the transformation of cattle pastures into rice area; and (ii) a 23.5% increase in average yields, from 5.1 tons per hectare in 2010 to 6.2 tons per hectare in 2011; partially offset by (iii) a 10.9% decrease in the market price of rough rice, from $243.9 per ton in 2010 to $220.0 per ton in 2011; and (iv) a 12.6% increase in actual production costs (i.e. fuel and fertilizer expenses). Partially offset by:

| • |  | a $4.4 million decrease in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of non-harvested rice, mainly due to (i) a lower rough rice price estimate and higher costs for 2011/2012 harvest; partially offset by (ii) a 10.9% increase in the rice plantation area at fair value as of December 31, from 23,934 hectares (out of 27,542 planted hectares) to 26,546 hectares (out of 31,497 planted hectares) for the 2010/2011 and the 2011/2012 harvest season respectively.

| • |  | Of the $10.1 million of initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce for 2011, $1.9 million represents the unrealized portion, as compared to the $6.3 million unrealized portion of the $9.4 million of initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce in 2010;

119

##### Table of Contents

| • |  | a $1.9 million increase in our Coffee segment mainly due to:

| • |  | a $1.1 million increase in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of non-harvested coffee, from a loss of $2.5 million in 2010 to a loss of $1.4 million in 2011, mainly due to: (i) a 31% increase in the coffee price estimates used in the DCF model to determine the fair value of our coffee plantations as of December 31, 2011; partially offset by: (ii) a 25.5% increase in production costs; and (iii) increase in the average aging of our coffee plantations;

| • |  | a $0.8 million increase in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of coffee at the point of harvest, from a loss of $0.2 million in 2010 to a gain of $0.7 million in 2011, mainly due to: (i) a 54.7% increase in the average price of coffee at the point of harvest, based on Intercontinental Exchange of New York (“ICE-NY”) data.; (ii) a 7.7% increase in average yields, from 1.8 tons per hectare in 2010 to 2.0 tons per hectare in 2011, mainly due to efficiencies gained in the use of inputs and machinery; and (iii) a 14.6% increase in harvested area, from 1,226 hectares in 2010 to 1,405 hectares in 2011; partially offset by (iv) a 5.7% increase in production costs per hectare due to an increase in fertilizers prices.

| • |  | Of the $0.7 million loss of initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce for 2011, $1.4 million loss represents the unrealized portion, as compared to the $2.5 million loss unrealized portion of the $2.6 million loss of initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce in 2010;

partially offset by:

| • |  | a $2.2 million decrease in our Dairy segment mainly due to:

| • |  | a $1.0 million decrease in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of raw milk, from $5.9 million in 2010 to $4.9 million in 2011, mainly due to (i) an increase in direct expenses, partially offset by (ii) a 8.9% increase in the amount of milking cows; (iii) a 13.1% increase in the average individual daily production; and (iii) a 11.8% increase in milk sales average prices; and

| • |  | a $1.2 million decrease in the revaluation of the dairy herd, from a $3.2 million increase in value in 2010 to a $2.0 million increase in value in 2011, as a result of a 32.2% increase in the market prices of dairy cows in 2011 compared to a 78.1% increase in 2010.

| • |  | Of the $6.9 million gain in initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce for 2011, $1.5 million gain represents the unrealized portion, as compared to the $3.6 million unrealized gain portion of the $9.1 million gain in initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce in 2010.

| • |  | a $0.9 million decrease in our Crops segment mainly due to:

| • |  | a $10.3 million decrease in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell for non-harvested crops as of year-end, from a gain of $8.7 million in 2010 to a loss of $1.6 million in 2011, primarily due to: (i) lower commodity prices estimates for 2012; (ii) low level of rains in the Humid Pampas region during September, which delayed the sowing of Corn; and (iii) lack of rains during November and December, which affected expected yields for the 2011/2012 season, mainly in the Humid Pampas region, measured as of December 31, 2011.

| • |  | a $9.4 million increase in the recognition at fair value less cost to sell of crops at the point of harvest, from $30.2 million in 2010 to $39.7 million in 2011, mainly due to: (i) higher crop sales prices (see “Trends and Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations—Effects of Fluctuations in Commodities Prices”); partially offset by (ii) an increase of 34.7% in fertilizer prices. The resulting actual average margin per hectare for our summer crops (i.e. soybean, corn, sunflower and cotton) increased from $198.9 per hectare in 2010 to $300.6 per hectare in 2011.

120

##### Table of Contents

The following table sets forth actual production costs by crop for the periods indicated:

|  | Harvest 2010/2011 |  |  | Harvest 2009/2010 |  |  |  |
|  | (In $per hectare) |  |  | % Change |
Corn |  |  | 423.6 |  |  |  | 337.9 |  |  |  | 25.4 | %
Soybean |  |  | 379.9 |  |  |  | 374.6 |  |  |  | 1.4 | %
Soybean (second harvest) |  |  | 210.4 |  |  |  | 219.7 |  |  |  | (4.2 | )%
Cotton |  |  | 2,377.8 |  |  |  | 1,628.5 |  |  |  | 46.0 | %
Wheat |  |  | 331.5 |  |  |  | 219.1 |  |  |  | 51.3 | %

| • |  | a $0.3 million decrease in our Cattle segment as a result of a 54.0% decrease in the average amount of head of cattle, from 1.3 thousand in 2010 to 0.6 thousand in 2011.

Changes in Net Realizable Value of Agricultural Produce after Harvest

|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Corporate |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
2011 |  |  | 10,953 |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | (430 | ) |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 10,523 |
2010 |  |  | 7,482 |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 517 |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 7,999 |

Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest is mainly composed by: (i) profit or loss from commodity price fluctuations during the period of time the agricultural produce is in inventory which impacts its fair value, (ii) profit or loss from the valuation of forward contracts related to agricultural produce in inventory and (iii) profit from direct exports. Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest increased 31.3% from $8.0 million in 2010 to $10.5 million in 2011.

The change in net realizable value of $11.0 million gain in our Crops segment in 2011 was mainly generated by (i) profits from the valuation of forward contracts, mainly due to a decrease of soybean and wheat market prices during this year. Based on Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”) data, from January 3, 2011 to December 31, 2011, soybean and wheat prices decreased 12.5% and 19.0% respectively ; and (ii) profit from direct exports; partially offset by (iii) losses from inventory valuation as a result of fluctuations in market prices. The change in net realizable value of $0.4 million loss in our Coffee segment in 2011 was mainly generated by a 14.2% decrease in coffee prices from the point of harvest to the end of December 2011, based on Intercontinental Exchange of New York (“ICE-NY”) data.

The changes in net realizable value of $8.0 million in 2010 was mainly generated by increases of crop prices (i.e. soybean, corn and sunflower) of between 2.9% to 57.5%, depending on the crop, and a 48.1% increase, from the point of harvest to the end of December 2011, based on Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”) and Intercontinental Exchange of New York (“ICE-NY”) data.

General and Administrative Expenses

|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Corporate |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
2011 |  |  | (8,003 | ) |  |  | (6,278 | ) |  |  | (1,173 | ) |  |  | (1,153 | ) |  |  | (269 | ) |  |  | (21,082 | ) |  |  | (27,184 | ) |  |  | (65,142 | )
2010 |  |  | (7,087 | ) |  |  | (3,773 | ) |  |  | (2,910 | ) |  |  | (983 | ) |  |  | (350 | ) |  |  | (19,080 | ) |  |  | (22,379 | ) |  |  | (56,562 | )

121

##### Table of Contents

Our general and administrative expenses increased 15.2% from $56.6 million in 2010 to $65.1 million in 2011. General and administrative expenses for our Crops, Rice, Coffee and Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segments increased mainly due to (i) hiring additional personnel and paying higher salaries; (ii) the higher related fuel and maintenance expenses resulting from the larger scale of operations; (iii) an increase in professional fees, reflecting our effort to improve and enhance controls and management efficiency according to best corporate governance practices, and (iv) higher depreciations and amortizations mainly as a result of an increase in property, plant and equipment assets and intangible assets in year ended December 31, 2011 compared to year ended December 31, 2010. This increase was partially offset by (v) a decrease of $1.7 million in our Dairy segment, due to additional expenses incurred in 2010 related to the start up of our advanced free-stall dairy unit.

General and administrative expenses for our Corporate segment increased 21.5%, from $22.4 million in 2010 to $27.2 million in 2011, mainly due to: (i) higher labor costs in Argentina and Brazil due to salary inflation; (ii) higher general and professional fees (including auditor fees, listing fees, directors compensations, restricted shares plans and legal fees, among others), related to being a public company; and (iii) higher travel expenses, partly associated to being a public company.

Selling Expenses

|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Corporate |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
2011 |  |  | (2,270 | ) |  |  | (14,488 | ) |  |  | (401 | ) |  |  | (463 | ) |  |  | (74 | ) |  |  | (41,708 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (59,404 | )
2010 |  |  | (1,522 | ) |  |  | (8,154 | ) |  |  | (333 | ) |  |  | (655 | ) |  |  | (175 | ) |  |  | (41,689 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (52,528 | )

Selling expenses increased 13.1%, from $52.5 million in 2010 to $59.4 million in 2011, mainly driven by (i) an increase of $6.3 million for our Rice segment, from $8.2 million in 2010 to $14.5 million in 2011, mainly due to an increase in sales volume; and (ii) an increase of $0.7 million for our Crops segment, mainly due to an increase in commissions and expenses related to direct exports.

Selling expenses of our Dairy, Coffee, Cattle and Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segments remained essentially unchanged.

Other Operating Income, Net

|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | Land Transformation |  |  | Corporate |  |  | Total |
|  | (In thousands of $) |
2011 |  |  | 1,843 |  |  |  | 372 |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | 2,020 |  |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | 11,220 |  |  |  | 8,832 |  |  |  | 299 |  |  |  | 24,581 |
2010 |  |  | (6,194 | ) |  |  | 345 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (2,165 | ) |  |  | 70 |  |  |  | 5,305 |  |  |  | 20,837 |  |  |  | 26 |  |  |  | 18,224 |

Other operating income, net increased 34.9%, from $18.2 million in 2010 to $24.6 million in 2011, primarily due to:

| • |  | a $8.0 million increase in our Crops segment due to the mark-to-market effect of outstanding hedge positions, which had a positive impact during 2011;

| • |  | a $5.9 million increase in our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment due to the mark-to-market effect of future sales contracts for sugar; and

| • |  | a $4.2 million increase in our Coffee segment due to the mark-to-market effect of outstanding hedge positions.

122

##### Table of Contents

partially offset by:

| • |  | a $12.0 million decrease in our Land Transformation segment due to the sale of a farm of 2,439 hectares in December 2011, which resulted in a $8.8 million gain, compared to the sale of a farm of 5,086 hectares in December 2010, which generated a $20.8 million gain;

Other operating income, net of our Rice, Dairy, Cattle and Corporate segments remained essentially unchanged.

Share of Loss of Joint Ventures

Share of loss of joint ventures decreased $0.95 million, from a loss of $0.05 million in 2010 to a loss of $1.0 million in 2011, driven by the negative results of Grupo La Lácteo S.A. The loss of 2011 is mainly explained by a downward trend on prices of processed dairy products in the domestic market coupled with an increase in production costs. Our industrial capacity is only suitable for products for the domestic market.

Financial Results, Net

Our net financial results varied from a loss of $22.9 million in 2010 to a loss of $53.2 million in 2011, primarily due to: (i) a 13.4% and a 8.3% depreciation of the Brazilian Real and Argentine Peso respectively in 2011, generating a $12.7 million non-cash loss during this year, compared to a $7.3 million non-cash gain in 2010 caused by an appreciation of 4.0% of Brazilian Real and partially offset by a 4.8% depreciation of the Argentina Peso during this period, since a portion of our net liability position in Brazil and Argentina is nominated in foreign currency; and (ii) a $2.2 million mostly non-cash loss due to the mark-to-market of our currency derivatives, compared to a $5.0 million mostly non-cash gain in 2010.

The following table sets forth the breakdown of financial results for the periods indicate.

|  | Year Ended December 31, |
|  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  |  |
|  | (In thousands of $) |  |  | % Change |
Interest income |  |  | 8,019 |  |  |  | 1,341 |  |  |  | 658.5 | %
Interest costs |  |  | (34,017 | ) |  |  | (34,369 | ) |  |  | 5.2 | %
FX Gain/(Loss) |  |  | (12,683 | ) |  |  | 7,324 |  |  |  | N/A |
Gain/(Loss) from derivative financial Instruments |  |  | (2,247 | ) |  |  | 5,018 |  |  |  | N/A |
Taxes |  |  | (5,273 | ) |  |  | (2,104 | ) |  |  | 150.6 | %
Other Income/(Expenses) |  |  | (7,008 | ) |  |  | (147 | ) |  |  | 4,509.9 | %
Total Financial Results |  |  | (53,209 | ) |  |  | (22,937 | ) |  |  | 131.0 | %

Income Tax

Current income tax expense totaled $14.7 million in fiscal year 2011, which equates to a consolidated effective tax rate of 20.5%. Our consolidated income tax benefit for 2010 totaled $16.3 million, which equates to a consolidated effective tax rate of 26.6%.

On a consolidated basis, the change in our annual effective tax rate from 26.6% for the year ended December 31, 2010 to 20.5% for the year ended December 31, 2011, reflects, among other items, a change in our mix of pretax income from our various jurisdictions. On a disaggregated basis, our effective tax rate in Brazil for 2010 was a benefit of 24.6% as compared to an expense of 14% in 2011. The main reason for the lower effective tax rate for the year ended December 31,2011, as compared to the same period in 2010, is attributable to the recognition of deferred tax assets not previously recognized , (mainly tax loss carryforward), as a result of an improvement in the projections of our Brazilian operations mainly due to better results in Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment. Our effective tax rate in Argentina remain stable in both periods. Our income taxes in Uruguay are not significant to our consolidated taxes.

123

##### Table of Contents

Profit for the Year

As a result of the foregoing, our net income for the year increased from a loss of 44.8 million in 2010 to a profit of $56.9 million in 2011.

| B. | LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our liquidity and capital resources are and will be influenced by a variety of factors, including:

| • |  | our ability to generate cash flows from our operations;

| • |  | the level of our outstanding indebtedness and the interest that we are obligated to pay on such outstanding indebtedness;

| • |  | our capital expenditure requirements, which consist primarily of investments in new farmland, in our operations, in equipment and plant facilities and maintenance costs; and

| • |  | our working capital requirements.

Our principal sources of liquidity have traditionally consisted of shareholders’ contributions, short and long term borrowings and proceeds received from the disposition of transformed farmland or subsidiaries.

We believe that our working capital will be sufficient during the next 12 months to meet our liquidity requirements.

Years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

The table below reflects our statements of Cash Flow for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

|  | Year ended December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Cash and cash equivalent at the beginning of the year |  |  | 330,546 |  |  |  | 70,269 |  |  |  | 74,806 |
Cash generated from (used in) operating activities |  |  | 67,823 |  |  |  | 56,586 |  |  |  | 60,221 |
Net cash used in investing activities |  |  | (300,215 | ) |  |  | (140,493 | ) |  |  | (111,725 | )
Cash generated by Financial activities |  |  | 133,508 |  |  |  | 360,792 |  |  |  | 46,545 |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |  |  | (12,853 | ) |  |  | (16,608 | ) |  |  | 423 |
Cash and cash equivalent at the end of the year |  |  | 218,809 |  |  |  | 330,546 |  |  |  | 70,269 |

Operating Activities

Year ended December 31, 2012

Net cash generated by operating activities was $67.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. During this year, we generated a net profit of $9.3 million that included non-cash charges relating primarily to depreciation and amortization of $54.5 million, interest expense, net of $18.9 million, $13.3 million of unrealized portion of the “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce,” $26.1 million of foreign exchange losses and $6.3 million loss from derivative financial instruments and forward. All these effects were partially offset by gain from the disposal of subsidiaries of $27.5 million and $5.4 million of income tax benefit.

In addition, other changes in operating asset and liability balances resulted in a net decrease in cash of $29.0 million, primarily due to an increase of $39.2 million in trade and other receivables, due to the build up of working capital of the Sugar and Ethanol operations (mainly advances to suppliers and long term tax credits related to the lvinhema project development), partially offset by an increase of 21.1 in liabilities.

124

##### Table of Contents

Year ended December 31, 2011

Net cash generated by operating activities was $56.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2011. During 2011, we generated a net profit of $56.9 million that included non-cash charges relating primarily to depreciation and amortization of $34.1 million, interest expense, net of $33.0 million and income tax expense of $14.7 million, partially offset by $17.1 million of unrealized portion of the “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce,” and by a gain of $8.8 million related to the sale of farmland.

In addition, other changes in operating asset and liability balances resulted in a net decrease in cash of $39.5 million, primarily due to an increase of $49.8 million in inventories (mainly due to an increase of Sugar and Ethanol stocks as a result of a commercial strategic decision to sell most of these inventorioes at the end of 2010) and 15.9 million in trade and other receivables (in line with increase of operations), partially compensated by an increase in trade and other payables of $19.8 million (also in line with increase of operations), and a decrease of $6.7 million in biological assets.

Our operating cash was affected by the payment of $16.7 million in taxes related to our subsidiaries.

Year ended December 31, 2010

Net cash generated by operating activities was $60.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2010. During 2010, we generated a net loss of $44.8 million that included non-cash charges relating primarily to depreciation and amortization of $37.6 million (reflecting the impact in depreciation of a higher asset base due to the development of our operations in Brazil), interest expense of $33.0 million (due to the higher indebtedness incurred to fund operations and capital investment), $72.3 million of unrealized portion of the “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce,” offset in part by a non-cash gain of $20.8 million related to the sale of farmland, and other non-cash gains, net of $19.1 million. In addition, other changes in operating asset and liability balances resulted in a net increase in cash of $11.0 million, primarily due to a reduction of $7.1 million in biological assets, $3.6 million in trade and other receivables, $2.2 million in inventories and an increase of $5.4 in payroll and social security liabilities, offset in part by an decrease of $3.5 million in liabilities related to derivative financial instruments and $4.2 million in trade and other payables.

Our operating cash was affected by the payment of $7.8 million in taxes related to our subsidiaries.

Investing Activities

Year ended December 31, 2012

Net cash used in investing activities totaled $300.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2012, primarily due to the purchases of property, plant and equipment (mainly acquisitions of machinery, buildings and facilities for our Brazilian operations for the lvinhema project, the second free stall facility and Franck rice mill) totaling $218.7 million; $82.6 million in biological assets related mainly to the expansion of our sugarcane plantation area in Mato Grosso do Sul and the payment of the balance of the acquisitions of Dinaluca, Agroforestal and Simoneta, wholly owned subsidiaries for $33.5 million. Net inflows from investing activities were primarily related to proceeds of $25.9 million from the sale of farmlands and subsidiaries and $11.2 million of interest received.

Year ended December 31, 2011

Net cash used in investing activities totaled $140.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2011, primarily due to the purchases of property, plant and equipment (mainly acquisitions of machinery, buildings and facilities for our Brazilian operations) totaling $90.4 million and $63.1 million in biological assets related to the expansion of our sugarcane plantation area in Mato Grosso do Sul. Net inflows from investing activities were primarily related to proceeds of $23.1 million from the sale of farmlands and $8.0 million of interest received.

Year ended December 31, 2010

Net cash used in investing activities was $111.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily due to the purchases of property, plant and equipment (mainly acquisitions of machinery, buildings and facilities for our Brazilian operations) totaling $87.7 million and $35.1 million in biological assets related to the expansion of our

125

##### Table of Contents

sugarcane plantation area in Mato Grosso do Sul. Net inflows from investing activities were primarily related to proceeds of $12.1 million from the sale of Macarena and $5.5 million received for the disposal of La Paz Agropecuaria in December 2009, a farmland business in Argentina.

Financing Activities

Year ended December 31, 2012

Net cash provided by financing activities was $133.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2012, primarily derived from borrowings under long term credit facilities in the net amount of $150.8 million . (see “Indebtedness and Financial Instruments”) During 2012, the payment of interest totaled $34.5 million.

Year ended December 31, 2011

Net cash provided by financing activities was $360.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2011, primarily derived from the IPO net proceeds, which total 421.8 million, partially compensated by a reduction of our long term borrowings, as a consequence of the advanced payment of the Loan Facillity with Deutsche bank totaling $47 million. During 2011, the payment of interest totaled $33.5 million.

Year ended December 31, 2010

Net cash provided by financing activities was $46.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily derived from additional long term indebtedness from Banco do Brasil S.A. and Deutsche Bank AG London Branch, partially compensated by the payment of $33.2 million in interest due on our indebtedness.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Historically since our cash flows from operations were insufficient to fund our working capital needs and investment plans, we funded our operations with proceeds from short-term and long-term indebtedness and capital contributions from existing and new private investors. In 2011 we obtained $421.8 millions from the IPO and the Private placement (See “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company.”). As of December 31, 2012, our cash and cash equivalents amounted to $ 218.8 million.

However, we may need additional cash resources in the future to continue our investment plans. Also, we may need additional cash if we experience a change in business conditions or other developments. We also might need additional cash resources in the future if we find and wish to pursue opportunities for investment, acquisitions, strategic alliances or other similar investments. If we ever determine that our cash requirements exceed our amounts of cash and cash equivalents on hand, we might seek to issue debt or additional equity securities or obtain additional credit facilities or realize the disposition of transformed farmland and/or subsidiaries. Any issuance of equity securities could cause dilution for our shareholders. Any incurrence of additional indebtedness could increase our debt service obligations and cause us to become subject to additional restrictive operating and financial covenants, and could require that we pledge collateral to secure those borrowings, if permitted to do so. It is possible that, when we need additional cash resources, financing will not be available to us in amounts or on terms that would be acceptable to us or at all.

Projected Sources and Uses of Cash

We anticipate that we will generate cash from the following sources:

| • |  | operating cash flow;

| • |  | debt financing;

| • |  | the dispositions of transformed farmland and/or subsidiaries; and

| • |  | debt or equity offerings.

We anticipate that we will use our cash:

| • |  | for other working capital purposes;

| • |  | to meet our budgeted capital expenditures;

| • |  | to make investment in new projects related to our business; and

| • |  | to refinance our current debts.

126

##### Table of Contents

Indebtedness and Financial Instruments

The table below illustrates the maturity of our indebtedness (excluding obligations under finance leases) and our exposure to fixed and variable interest rates:

|  | As of December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
|  | (In thousands is of $) |
Fixed rate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Less than 1 year(l) |  |  | 60,049 |  |  |  | 70,007 |  |  |  | 52,326 |
Between 1 and 2 years |  |  | 19,066 |  |  |  | 25,554 |  |  |  | 22,425 |
Between 2 and 3 years |  |  | 24,364 |  |  |  | 12,426 |  |  |  | 7,661 |
Between 3 and 4 years |  |  | 21,760 |  |  |  | 8,902 |  |  |  | 7,394 |
Between 4 and 5 years |  |  | 20,870 |  |  |  | 7,551 |  |  |  | 5,920 |
More than 5 years |  |  | 62,036 |  |  |  | 22,866 |  |  |  | 22,555 |
Total fixed rate: |  |  | 208,145 |  |  |  | 147,306 |  |  |  | 118,281 |
Variable rate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Less than 1 year(l) |  |  | 124,423 |  |  |  | 87,170 |  |  |  | 86,107 |
Between 1 and 2 years |  |  | 71,978 |  |  |  | 40,353 |  |  |  | 70,905 |
Between 2 and 3 years |  |  | 73,684 |  |  |  | 24,756 |  |  |  | 54,436 |
Between 3 and 4 years |  |  | 45,969 |  |  |  | 23,507 |  |  |  | 17,506 |
Between 4 and 5 years |  |  | 11,100 |  |  |  | 26,369 |  |  |  | 15,619 |
More than 5 years |  |  | 2,713 |  |  |  | 14,016 |  |  |  | 26,170 |
Total variable rate: |  |  | 329,867 |  |  |  | 213,201 |  |  |  | 270,743 |
Total: |  |  | 538,012 |  |  |  | 360,507 |  |  |  | 389,024 |

(1) | The Company plans to partially rollover its short term debt using new available lines of credit, or on using operating cash flow to cancel such debt.

Borrowings incurred by our subsidiaries in Brazil are repayable at various dates between January 2013 and November 2022 and bear either fixed interest rates ranging from 2.45% to 10% per annum or variable rates based on LIBOR or other specific base-rates plus spreads ranging from 4.05% to 7% per annum. At December 31, 2012 LIBOR (six months) was 0.51% (2011: 0. 81%).

Borrowings incurred by our subsidiaries in Argentina are repayable at various dates between January 2013 and November 2019 and bear either fixed interest rates ranging from 5.00% and 7.00% per annum and variable rates based on LIBOR + 4.45% per annum.

Brazilian Subsidiaries

The main loans of our Brazilian Subsidiaries are:

| • |  | BNDES Loan Facility

As of December 31, 2012, the BNDES Loan Facility is divided in two tranches of Reais 9.5 million for Tranche “A” and Reais 90.3 million for Tranche “B” (equivalent to US$ 4.6 million and US$ 44.3 million, respectively). As of December 31, 2012, tranches “A” bears an interest at a Brazilian-specific variable rate “Taxa de Juros Resolução 635/87”, 3.56%, plus 4.05% per annum, and Tranches “B” bears an interest variable rate “TJLP rate”, 5.5%, plus 4.05% per annum. The BNDES Loan Facility contains certain customary financial covenants, events of default and restrictions which require us to meet pre-defined financial ratios, among other restrictions. These financial covenants are measured on an annual basis as of the end of each fiscal year. Certain covenants are measured on a combined basis aggregating the borrowing subsidiaries and others are measured on an individual basis. The obligations under the BNDES Loan Facility are secured by (i) a first degree mortgage of the Takuare farm; (ii) a pledge on the capital stock (“quotas”) of Adecoagro Brasil Participações S/A; and (iii) liens over the Angélica mill and equipment, all of which are property of Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema.

127

##### Table of Contents

The financial covenants are defined as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 to 2018 |
Financial ratios: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net Bank Debt / EBITDA |  |  | [£] 4 |  |  |  | [£] 4.5 |  |  |  | [£] 4.5 |
Solvency Ratio |  |  | [³] 40 | % |  |  | [³] 40 | % |  |  | [³] 40 | %
Interest Coverage Ratio |  |  | [³] 2 |  |  |  | [³] 2 |  |  |  | [³] 2 |

| • |  | BNDES Loan 2012

On December 27, 2012, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema entered into a new loan with BNDES in an amount equal to Reais-denominated 488.6 million for a term of 10 years bearing interest at an average rate of 4.65% per year. The proceeds from the loan will be drawn during the next 24 months and will be used to finance the expansion of the construction of the Ivinhema Mill, which is expected to reach a crushing capacity of 6.3 million tons per year by 2017.

| • |  | BDB Facility 2010

In July 2010, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema entered into a Reais-denominated 70.0 million loan (equivalent to US$ 34.3 million as of December 31, 2012) with Banco do Brasil S.A. As of December 31, 2012, the remaining amount was Reais-denominated 66.9 million (equivalent to US$ 32.7 million). The BDB Facility bears a fixed interest rate of 10% per annum with a bonus performance of 15% and is repayable on a monthly basis starting in August 2012 and ending in July 2020. Under this facility, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema is required to meet the following financial ratio:

Financial Ratio |  | 2012 to 2020 |
Debt Service Coverage Ratio |  |  | [³] 1,2 |

| • |  | BDB Loan 2012

In October 2012, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema entered into a Reais-denominated 130.0 million loan (equivalent to US$ 63.6 million as of December 31, 2012) with Banco do Brasil S.A. due 2022. As of December 31, 2012, the remaining amount was Reais-denominated 130.8 million (equivalent to US$ 64 million). This loan bears a fixed interest rate of 2.94% per annum with a bonus performance of 15%. The obligations under this loan are secured by (i) a second degree mortgage of the Sapalio farm and (ii) liens over the Ivinhema mill and equipment, all of which are property of Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema. Under this loan, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema is required to meet the following financial ratio:

Financial Ratio |  | 2012 to 2022 |
Debt Service Coverage Ratio |  |  | [³] 1,2 |

| • |  | Itau BBAFacility

128

##### Table of Contents

In December 2012, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema entered into a Reais-denominated 16.5 million loan (equivalent to US$ 8.1 million as of December 31, 2012) with Banco ITAU BBA due 2022. As of December 31, 2012, the remaining amount was Reais-denominated 16.6 million (equivalent to US$ 8.1 million. This loan bears a fixed interest rate of 2.5% per annum. Under this loan, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema is required to meet the following financial ratio:

Financial Ratios |  | 2012 |  |  | 2013 to 2022 |
Net Bank Debt |  |  | [£] 4 |  |  |  | [£] 4,5 |

| • |  | Working capital funding

Brazilian subsidiaries entered in several borrowings to fund its working capital needs.

Working Capital -BTG Pactual - HSBC- Votorantim – Rabobank

In July 2012, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema entered into a Reais-denominated 230.0 million loan with a syndicate of banks, led by Rabobank International Brasil S/A, due 2015. As of December 31, 2012, the remaining amount was Reais-denominated 233.8 (equivalent to US$ 114.4 million). This syndicate loan bears a variable interest rate of CDI plus 3.6% per annum. We entered into a currency swap which fixed the loan in USD 113 million at a fixed rate of 7.7%.

The loan is collateralized by (i) a first-degree mortgage of the Conquista, Alto Alegre, Dom Fabrício, Nossa Senhora Aparecida, Água Branca e Lagoa D’Oeste farms, (ii) pledge of sugarcane and (iii) sugar export contracts. Under this loan, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema is required to meet the following financial ratios:

Financial Ratios |  | 2012 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 to 2015 |
Interest Coverage Ratio |  |  | [³] 2 |  |  |  | [³] 2 |  |  |  | [³] 2 |
Net Bank Debt / EBITDA |  |  | [£] 4 |  |  |  | [£] 5 |  |  |  | [£] 6 |
Solvency / EBITDA |  |  | [³] 40 | % |  |  | [³] 40 | % |  |  | [³] 40 | %

Working Capital – Bradesco

In May 2012, Usina Monte Alegre Ltda. entered into a US Dollar-denominated 11.7 million loan (equivalent to Reais-denominated 23.9 million as of December 31, 2012) with Banco Bradesco S.A. due 2016. This loan bears a fixed interest rate of 7.2% per annum. Under this loan, Usina Monte Alegre Ltda. is required to meet the following financial ratios:

Financial Ratios |  | 2012 to 2016 |
Net debt / milled sugarcane tons |  |  | [£] 80 |
Net debt / Equity |  |  | [£] 80 | %

Working Capital - ING Bank- Banco of China – Deutsche Bank

In August 2012, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema Ltda. entered into a US Dollar-denominated 60.0 million loan (equivalent to Reais-denominated 122.6 million as of December 31, 2012) with a syndicate of banks led by ING Bank, due in 2013. This loan bears a fixed interest rate of 4.34% per annum. Under this loan, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema Ltda. is required to meet the following financial ratios:

Financial Ratios |  | 2012 |
Net debt / EBITDA |  |  | [£] 4 |
Solvency / EBITDA |  |  | [³] 40 | %
Interest Coverage Ratio |  |  | [£] 2 |

During 2012 and 2011 the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants.

Argentinian Subsidiaries

| • |  | IDB Facility

129

##### Table of Contents

The amended IDB Facility is divided into a seven-year US$ 18.462 million tranche (“Tranche A”) and a five-year US$ 53.333 million tranche (“Tranche B”). Tranche A bears interest at fixed rate of 6.11% per annum. Tranche B bears interest at 180-day LIBOR plus 4.45% per annum. We entered into a floating to fix interest rate forward swap, fixing LIBOR at 1.25%, effective May 2012.

Payment of principal plus interest of both tranches are made on a bi-annual basis. The proceeds of this loan were used to make capital investments and refinance short-term debt. The IDB Facility is collateralized by property, plant and equipment with a net book value of US$ 36.357 million, by a mortgage over (i) Carmen and La Rosa farms which are property of Adeco Agropecuaria S.A.; and (ii) El Meridiano farm which is the property of Pilagá S.A.

Defaults by either Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. or Pilagá S.A. on any indebtedness with an aggregate principal amount over US$ 3.0 million can result in acceleration of the full outstanding loan amount due to the IDB. The IDB Facility also contains certain customary financial covenants and restrictions which require us to meet pre-defined financial ratios, among other restrictions, as well as restrictions on the payment of dividends. The financial covenants are measured in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Argentina. Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. and Pilagá S.A. are required to meet the following financial ratios (measured on a combined basis):

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |  |  | 2016 |  |  | 2017 |  |  | 2018 |
Total Debt (>; in million) (i) |  |  | 155,000 |  |  |  | 160,000 |  |  |  | 160,000 |  |  |  | 160,000 |  |  |  | 160,000 |  |  |  | 160,000 |  |  |  | 160,000 |
Current Ratio (>) (ii) |  |  | 1.10x |  |  |  | 1.15x |  |  |  | 1.20x |  |  |  | 1.20x |  |  |  | 1.20x |  |  |  | 1.20x |  |  |  | 1.20x |
Interest Coverage Ratio (>) (ii) |  |  | 2.15x |  |  |  | 2.20x |  |  |  | 2.25x |  |  |  | 2.30x |  |  |  | 2.40x |  |  |  | 2.50x |  |  |  | 2.60x |
Liabilities to Equity (<) (ii) |  |  | 1.40x |  |  |  | 1.40x |  |  |  | 1.40x |  |  |  | 1.40x |  |  |  | 1.40x |  |  |  | 1.40x |  |  |  | 1.40x |

(i) | Measured on a quarterly basis.

(ii) | Measured on yearly basis

In addition, the IDB Facility contains a change of control provision requiring acceleration of amounts due under the facility.

During 2012 and 2011 the Group was in compliance with all financial covenants.

Short-term Debt.

As of December 31,2012, our short term debt totaled $184.5 million.

We maintain lines of credit with several banks in order to finance our working capital requirements. We believe that we will continue to be able to obtain additional credit to finance our working capital needs in the future based on our past track record and current market conditions.

Capital Expenditure Commitments

Capital expenditures totaled $ 301.7 million, $165.3 million and $130.6 million for the December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

See “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company—Principal Capital Expenditures”.

We expect continuous capital expenditures for the foreseeable future as we expand and consolidate each of our business segments.

We expect to finance our future capital expenditures with (i) the remaining net proceeds of our IPO and the sale of common shares to Al Gharrafa, (ii) future indebtedness in the form of bank loans and/or offerings of debt, and (iii) operating cash flow as a supplemental source of funding. We expect our operating cash flow to be positive in the foreseeable future as we reach full production capacity for our sugar operations in Brazil.

130

##### Table of Contents

| C. | RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, PATENTS AND LICENSES, ETC.

With regards to our rice seed production, in our rice seed facility in Argentina, we are involved in the genetic development of new rice varieties adapted to local conditions to increase rice productivity and quality to improve both farm production as well as the manufacturing process. In connection with these efforts, we have entered into agreements with selected research and development institutions such as INTA in Argentina, FLAR in Colombia, EPAGRI in Brazil and Basf in Germany. In addition, our own technical team is continuously testing and developing new rice varieties. Since 2008 we have developed and released three new own varieties of rice seed to the market, , and we are currently in the final stages of releasing the fourth We have registered our own rice seed varieties with the corresponding Argentine authorities; the National Institute of Seeds (Instituto Nacional de Semillas) (INASE) and National Registry of Property of Seed Varieties (Registro Nacional de la Propiedad de Cultivares) (RNPC).

We both use these seeds at our farms and sell them to rice farmers in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay. We are also developing, in collaboration with BASF, a herbicide-tolerant rice variety to assist in the control of harmful weeds.

With regards to our dairy business in Argentina, we have invested in technology to improve the genetics, health and feeding techniques of our cows in order to enhance our milk production. These investments include top quality semen from genetically improved North American Holstein bulls, agricultural machinery and devices, use of dietary supplements and modern equipment to control individual milk production and cooling. Our feeding program is focused on high conversion of feed into milk, while maintaining cows in good health and comfort. We have also invested in technology and know-how so as to increase our forage production and utilization.

In connection with our Sugar, Ethanol and Energy business in Brazil, we have entered into an agreement with Syngenta Proteção de Cultivos Ltda. (“Syngenta”) for the development of new sugarcane planting technology, known as Plene. Syngenta has developed this new innovative technology based on a novel approach for planting sugarcane from smaller cane segments using proprietary treatments that aims to reduce planting costs.

We do not own any registered patents, industrial models or designs.

| D. | TREND INFORMATION

See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Trends and Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations.”

| E. | OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

For any of the periods presented, we did not have any off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements or obligations with unconsolidated entities or otherwise that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

| F. | TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2012:

|  | Less than 1 year |  |  | Between 1 and 2 years |  |  | Between 2 and 5 years |  |  | Over 5 Years |  |  | Total |
|  | (in million of $) |
Bank loans (1) |  |  | 208,6 |  |  |  | 118,6 |  |  |  | 227,9 |  |  |  | 53,9 |  |  |  | 608,9 |
Leases |  |  | 19,7 |  |  |  | 8,7 |  |  |  | 12,4 |  |  |  | 3,5 |  |  |  | 44,3 |
Total |  |  | 228,3 |  |  |  | 127,3 |  |  |  | 240,3 |  |  |  | 57,4 |  |  |  | 653,2 |

(1) | Includes interest.

131

##### Table of Contents

| G. | SAFE HARBOR

See section entitled “Forward-Looking Statements” in this annual report for forward-looking statement safe harbor provisions.

Item 6. | Directors, Senior Management and Employees

| A. | DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT

Board of Directors

The following table sets forth information for our directors as of the date of this annual report:

Name |  | Position |  | Date of appointment |  | Age |  |  | Year term expires
Abbas Farouq Zuaiter |  | Chairman |  | 2012 |  |  | 45 |  |  | 2015
Alan Leland Boyce |  | Director |  | 2013 |  |  | 53 |  |  | 2016
Guillaume van der Linden |  | Director |  | 2012 |  |  | 54 |  |  | 2015
Paulo Albert Weyland Vieira |  | Director |  | 2013 |  |  | 46 |  |  | 2016
Mariano Bosch |  | Director |  | 2011 |  |  | 43 |  |  | 2014
Plínio Musetti |  | Director |  | 2011 |  |  | 60 |  |  | 2014
Mark Schachter |  | Director |  | 2012 |  |  | 33 |  |  | 2015
Julio Moura Neto |  | Director |  | 2011 |  |  | 61 |  |  | 2014
Andrés Velasco Brañes |  | Director |  | 2013 |  |  | 52 |  |  | 2016

Plínio Musetti, Mark Schachter and Julio Moura Neto qualify as independent directors, and the other directors are not independent in accordance with the SEC rules.

A description of the main tasks currently performed by each director as well as a description of each director’s employment history and education follows:

Abbas (“Eddy”) Farouq Zuaiter. Mr. Zuaiter has been a member of the Company’s board of directors since 2003. Mr. Zuaiter was formerly Chief Operating Officer and member of the Management committee of Soros Fund Management LLC (SFM) and as of April 1, 2013, will serve as a consultant to SFM. Prior to his joining Soros Fund Management LLC in October 2002, Mr. Zuaiter was an Assurance and Business Advisory Partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP where he was employed from April 1994 to September 2002, and Chief Financial Officer and Head of Fixed Income, Currency and Commodity Trading at AFN Associates, Inc in David, California from September 1991 until March 1994. Mr. Zuaiter currently serves on the boards of Gavilon Holdings LLC, an Omaha, Nebraska based private company providing physical distribution, merchandising and trading across grains, feed ingredients, fertilizers and energy products. He is also currently a member of the board of directors of several charitable organizations or non-profit entities. Mr. Zuaiter received his BSBA in Accounting and Finance from Georgetown University in May 1989. Mr. Zuaiter is an American citizen.

Alan Leland Boyce. Mr. Boyce is a co-founder of Adecoagro and has been a member of the Company’s board of directors since 2002. Since 2005, Mr. Boyce has been the Chief Executive Officer of Absalon, a joint venture between Soros and the financial system of Denmark that assists in organizing a standardized mortgage-backed securities market in Mexico. Mr. Boyce is co-founder and Chairman of Materra LLC, a California based farming company with a focus on growing and exporting animal forages. Since 2007, he has also been a consultant for Soros, where he works to implement the Danish mortgage system in the United States. Since 1985, Mr. Boyce has served as the Chief Financial Officer of Boyce Land Co. Inc., a farmland management company that runs 10 farmland limited partnerships in the U.S. Mr. Boyce formerly served as the director of special situations at Soros from 1999 to 2007, where he managed an asset portfolio of the Quantum Fund and had principal operational responsibilities for the bulk of the fund’s investments in South America. Mr. Boyce also served as managing director in charge of fixed-income arbitrage at Bankers Trust from 1986 to 1999, as senior managing director for investment strategy at Countrywide Financial from 2007 to 2008, and worked at the U.S. Federal Reserve Board from 1982 to 1984. He graduated with a degree in Economics from Pomona College, and has a Masters in Business Administration from Stanford University. Mr. Boyce is an American citizen.

Guillaume van der Linden Mr. van der Linden has been a member of the Company’s board of directors since 2009. Since 2007, Mr. van der Linden has been Head of Investment Management at PGGM Vermogensbeheer B.V.,

132

##### Table of Contents

responsible for investments in emerging markets credit. From 1993 to 2007, Mr. van der Linden worked for ING Bank in various roles, including in risk management and derivatives trading. From 1988 to 1993, Mr. van der Linden was employed as a management consultant for KPMG and from 1985 to 1988 as a corporate finance analyst for Bank Mees & Hope. Mr. van der Linden graduated with Masters degrees in Economics from Erasmus University Rotterdam and Business Administration from the University of Rochester. Mr. van der Linden is a Dutch citizen.

Paulo Albert Weyland Vieira. Mr. Vieira has been a member of the Company’s board of directors since 2005. Since 1995, Mr. Vieira has been the founding partner of Vieira, Rezende, Barbosa e Guerreiro Advogados, a law firm in Brazil. Mr. Vieira’s family has been in the sugar and ethanol business for over 50 years, and Mr. Vieira served as a Director of UMA, a sugar and ethanol mill in Brazil, from 1990 to 2006, when UMA was acquired by us. From 1995 to 2006, Mr. Vieira served as a professor of banking and commercial law at the Faculdade de Direito da Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro. He graduated with a degree in law from the Faculdade de Direito da Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro and has a Masters in Law from Cambridge University Law School. Mr. Vieira is a Brazilian citizen.

Mariano Bosch. Mr. Bosch is a co-founder of Adecoagro and has been the Chief Executive Officer for all operations in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay since inception and a member of the Company’s board of directors. From 1995 to 2002, Mr. Bosch served as the founder and Chief Executive Officer of BLS Agribusiness, an agricultural consulting, technical management and administration company. Mr. Bosch is also currently a member of the advisory board of Teays River Investments LLC, a farmland investment management firm in North America. Mr. Bosch has over 18 years of experience in agribusiness development and agricultural production. He actively participates in organizations focused on promoting the use of best practices in the sector, such as the Argentine Association of Regional Consortiums for Agricultural Experimentation (AACREA) and the Conservational Production Foundation (Producir Conservando). He graduated with a degree in Agricultural Engineering from the University of Buenos Aires. Mr. Bosch is an Argentine citizen.

Plínio Musetti. Mr. Musetti has been a member of the Company’s board of directors since 2011 and an observer since 2010. Mr. Musetti is a partner responsible for the private equity investments at Pragma Patrimonio, a Brazilian family office, since June 2010. From 2008 to 2009, Mr. Musetti served as the Chief Executive Officer of Satipel Industrial S.A., leading the company’s initial public offering process and aiding its expansion plan and merger with Duratex S.A. From 1992 to 2002, Mr. Musetti served as the Chief Executive Officer of Elevadores Atlas, during which time he led the company’s operational restructuring, initial public offering process and the sale to the Schindler Group. From 2002 to 2008, Mr. Musetti served as a partner at JP Morgan Partners and Chief Executive Officer of Vitopel S.A. (JP Morgan Partners’ portfolio company), where he led its private equity investments in Latin America. Mr. Musetti has also served as a Director of Diagnósticos de America S.A. from 2002 to 2009. In addition, Mr. Musetti is currently serving as a Board member of Elevadores Atlas S.A., Portobello S.A. and RaiaDrogasil S.A. Mr. Musetti graduated with degrees in Civil Engineering and Business Administration from Mackenzie University and attended the Program for Management Development at Harvard Business School in 1989. Mr. Musetti is a Brazilian citizen.

Mark Schachter. Mr. Schachter has been a member of the Company’s board of directors since 2009. Mr. Schachter has been a Managing Partner of Elm Park Capital Management since 2010. From 2004 to 2010, he was a Portfolio Manager with HBK Capital Management where he was responsible for the firm’s North American private credit activities. His responsibilities included corporate credit investments with a primary focus on middle-market lending and other special situation investment opportunities. From 2003 to 2004, Mr. Schachter worked for American Capital, a middle-market private equity and mezzanine firm and worked in the investment banking division of Credit Suisse Group from 2001 to 2003. Mr. Schachter received a degree in Business Administration from the Ivey Business School at the University of Western Ontario and completed the Program for Leadership Development at Harvard Business School. Mr. Schachter is a Canadian citizen and has permanent American residence.

Julio Moura Neto. Mr. Moura has been a member of the Company’s board of directors since 2011. Mr. Moura has been a board member of Natura Cosméticos since 2007, and also a member of the board of directors of Cencosud as well as of Brinox Metalúrgica S.A. since 2011. From 1997 to 2007, he was Chairman of the board of directors and CEO of Nueva Group, a Swiss holding company with leading positions in planted, certified forests, agricultural products and building materials sectors. From 2002 to 2007, Mr. Moura served as chairman of the board

133

##### Table of Contents

of Terranova, a public Chilean forestry company and as chairman of the board of Masisa S.A., a public Chilean forestry and wooden boards company. He also served as chairman and CEO of Amanco, the leading Latin American plastic pipes producer, from 1997 to 2007; as a member of the executive board of Schindler, the Swiss Elevator Company from 1992 to 1997; as a member of the executive board and head of the Latin American Division of Sika, a Swiss specialty chemicals company, from 1984 to 1992; and as a member of the board of directors of Swiss companies Messerli AG and of Aliva AG from 1988 to 1992. From 1980 to 1983, Mr. Moura worked for Booz, Allen & Hamilton, participating and leading several assignments in Europe in strategy and supply chain management. Mr. Moura graduated with a degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) in Zurich, Switzerland and holds a Masters degree in Science from MIT Sloan School of Management. Mr. Moura is a dual Brazilian and Swiss citizen.

Andres Velasco Brañes. Mr. Velasco has been a member of the Company’s board of directors since 2011. Mr. Velasco was the Minister of Finance of Chile between March 2006 and March 2010, and was also the president of the Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association from 2005 to 2007. Prior to entering the government sector, Mr. Velasco was Sumitomo-FASID Professor of Development and International Finance at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, an appointment he had held since 2000. From 1993 to 2000, he was Assistant and then Associate Professor of Economics and the director of the Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies at New York University. During 1988 to 1989, he was Assistant Professor at Columbia University. Currently Mr. Velasco serves as Adjunct Professor of Public Policy at Harvard University, and a Tinker Visiting Professor at Columbia University. He also performs consulting services on various economic matters rendering economic advice to an array of clients, including certain of our shareholders. Mr. Velasco holds a Ph.D. in economics from Columbia University and was a postdoctoral fellow in political economy at Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He received an B.A. in economics and philosophy and an M.A. in international relations from Yale University. Mr. Velasco is a Chilean citizen.

Executive Officers

The following table shows certain information with respect to our senior management as of the date of this annual report:

Name |  | Position |  | Year Designated |  | Age |
Mariano Bosch |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | 2002 |  |  | 43 |
Carlos A. Boero Hughes |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | 2008 |  |  | 47 |
Emilio F. Gnecco |  | Chief Legal Officer |  | 2005 |  |  | 37 |
Walter Marcelo Sanchez |  | Chief Commercial Officer |  | 2002 |  |  | 51 |
Mario José Ramón Imbrosciano |  | Director of Business Development |  | 2003 |  |  | 43 |
Leonardo Berridi |  | Country Manager for Brazil |  | 2004 |  |  | 53 |
Marcelo Vieira |  | Director of Sugar and Ethanol Operations |  | 2005 |  |  | 61 |
Ezequiel Garbers |  | Country Manager for Argentina and Uruguay |  | 2003 |  |  | 47 |

Mariano Bosch. See “—Board of Directors.”

Carlos A. Boero Hughes. Mr. Boero Hughes is our Chief Financial Officer, covering the company’s operations in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay, and a member of Adecoagro’s Senior Management since 2008. He began working at Adecoagro in August 2008 overseeing our finance and administrative departments. Mr. Boero Hughes has over 20 years of experience in agricultural business and financial markets. Prior to joining us, he was Chief Financial Officer for South America and Co-Chief Executive Officer for Noble Group LTD operations in Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay from October 2006 to July 2008. From 2003 to 2006, he worked at Noble Group LTD as Financial Director for Argentina and Structure Finance Manager for South America. He worked at Citibank N.A. from 1997 to 2003 as Relationship and Product Manager, focused in the agrobusiness industry, and at Banco Privado de Inversiones S.A. as Relationship Manager. He also worked for six years at Carlos Romano Boero S.A.I.C., a flour and dairy cow feed mill family company, as Commercial Manager, Local Grain Elevator and Nursery Manager and finally as General Manager. Mr. Boero Hughes holds a degree in Business Administration from the University of Buenos Aires and a Masters in Business Administration from the Argentine Catholic University. He also graduated from INSEAD’s Executive Program in 2007.

134

##### Table of Contents

Emilio Federico Gnecco. Mr. Gnecco is our Chief Legal Officer for all operations in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay and a member of Adecoagro’s Senior Management since 2005. He is responsible for all legal and corporate matters. Before joining us, he was a corporate law associate at the law firm of Marval, O’Farrell & Mairal for more than 8 years, where he was in charge of Adecoagro’s corporate matters and mergers and acquisitions since our inception in 2002. Prior to that, he worked at the National Civil Court of Appeals of the City of Buenos Aires for four years. Mr. Gnecco has a law degree from the University of Buenos Aires, where he graduated with honors.

Walter Marcelo Sanchez. Mr. Sanchez is a co-founder of Adecoagro and our Chief Commercial Officer for all operations in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay and a member of Adecoagro’s Senior Management since 2002. He coordinates the Commercial Committee and is responsible for the trading of all commodities produced by Adecoagro. Mr. Sanchez has over 22 years of experience in agricultural business trading and market development. Before joining us, he was the head of the business development department at Agroexpress.com S.A., an agriculture e-business marketplace. He has extensive international commercial expertise. He worked with South American Meat Products Company (SAMPCO) in Chicago, Illinois and traveled through Western Europe marketing beef products to restaurant chains such as MAREDO. Mr. Sanchez also worked as the commercial director of various agricultural companies, such as Distribuidora Chinquihue S.A. (a Chilean fish and shellfish trading company), Frigolomas S.A. (a beef processing company) and Fleimar S.A. (a marketer of meat products). Mr. Sanchez also had commercial responsibilities at Nutryte S.A. and Estancias y Cabana Las Lilas S.A. (formerly COMEGA S.A.), an Argentine farmland agribusiness company. Mr. Sanchez graduated from Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata with a degree in Agricultural Engineering.

Mario José Ramón Imbrosciano. Mr. Imbrosciano is the head of our Business Development Department for all operations in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay where he oversees all new business initiatives, and a member of Adecoagro’s Senior Management since 2003. He has over 17 years of experience in farm management and agriculture production. Prior to joining Adecoagro, Mr. Imbrosciano was the Chief Operating Officer of Beraza Hnos. S.C., a farming company that owns farms in the humid pampas region of Argentina. He was in charge of production, commercialization and logistics for a 60,000 hectare operation. Mr. Imbrosciano has also worked as a private consultant for various clients. Mr. Imbrosciano received a degree in Agricultural Production Engineering from the Argentine Catholic University and holds a Masters in Business Administration from the Instituto de Altos Estudios of the Austral University.

Leonardo Raúl Berridi. Mr. Berridi is our Country Manager for Brazil and, prior to the Reorganization, had been Adecoagro’s Country Manager for Brazil since the beginning of its operations in Brazil and a member of Adecoagro’s Senior Management since 2004. He coordinates all of our operations and human resources development activities in Brazil. Mr. Berridi has over 27 years of international experience in agricultural business. Prior to joining us, Mr. Berridi was Vice President of Pago Viejo S.A., a company dedicated to agriculture production and dairy farming in the western part of the province of Buenos Aires, Argentina. He also worked for Trans-Continental Tobacco Corporation as Chief Operating Officer of Epasa (Exportadora de Productos Agrarios S.A.), a company dedicated to producing, processing and exporting tobacco in the north east and north west of Argentina, and Production Manager of World Wide Tobacco España S.A. in the Caceres and Zamora provinces in Spain. Mr. Berridi holds a degree in Forestry Engineering from the Universidad Nacional de La Plata.

Marcelo Vieira. Mr. Vieira is the head of Adecoagro’s sugar, ethanol and energy operations and a member of Adecoagro’s Senior Management since 2005. He was the Chief Executive Officer and owner of Usina Monte Alegre Ltda. at the time of our purchase of the company. He is currently a member of the Board of Directors of Uniäo da Industria de Cana-de-Acucar (ÚNICA). He has managed agricultural and agribusiness companies for over 34 years, including at Usina Monte Alegre Ltda., Alfenas Agrícola Ltda., Alfenas Café Ltda. and Fazenda Mimoso S.A., and has been President or Director of various industry associations, such as the Brazil Specialty Coffee Association, the Specialty Coffee Association of Europe, Sociedade Rural Brasileira and the Sindicato do Acucar de Minas Gerais. Mr. Vieira holds a degree in Mechanical Engineering from PUC University in Rio de Janeiro and graduate degree in Food Industry Management and Marketing from the University of London’s Imperial College.

Ezequiel Garbers. Mr. Garbers is the Country Manager for Argentina and Uruguay and a member of Adecoagro’s Senior Management and the Country Manager since 2003. He coordinates all of our production and human resources development activities in Argentina and Uruguay. Mr. Garbers has over 20 years of experience in agriculture production. Prior to joining Adecoagro, he was the Chief Operating Officer of an agricultural consulting and investment company he co-founded, developing projects both within and outside of Argentina, related to crop

135

##### Table of Contents

production and the cattle and dairy business. Mr. Garbers holds a degree in Agronomic Engineering from the University of Buenos Aires and a Masters in Business Administration from the Instituto de Altos Estudios of the Austral University.

Our managers supervise our day-to-day transactions so as to ensure that all of our general strategic objectives are carried out, and they report to our board of directors.

| B. | COMPENSATION

Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers

The compensation of the Company’s directors is approved annually at the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting. The aggregate compensation earned by our directors amounted to a grant of up to a total of 44,192 restricted stock units for the year 2012 and 48,603 restricted stock units for the year 2013 and $480 thousand in cash for each year. These figures do not include Mr. Mariano Bosch’s compensation since he declined his fees in cash and in restricted units both years

The aggregate compensation of our executive officers during 2012 amounted to approximately $3,758,997 in cash and 188,535 restricted stock units granted to our senior management. These grants were made under the Adecoagro Amended and Restated Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan. See “—E. Share Ownership—Share Options and Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan.”

Annual cash bonuses are designed to incentivize our named executive officers at a variable level of compensation based on such individual’s performance. Annual executive cash bonuses and option awards are impacted by seniority and individual executive performance based on the achievement of individual objectives and by evaluating each executive’s level of proficiency in the following competencies: general characteristics, teamwork, professional competencies, problem solving and thinking skills and managerial skills. In the past, actual bonus amounts have been determined shortly after fiscal year end. Our Chief Executive Officer presents the final calculation of the annual cash bonuses for our named executives to the Compensation Committee of the board of directors. The Compensation Committee then reviews actual Company and individual performance, and determines the amount payable consistent with the attainment of such individual’s performance based on the above criteria.

We do not pay or set aside any amounts for pension, retirement or other similar benefits for our officers and directors.

| C. | BOARD PRACTICES

Pursuant to our articles of incorporation, the board of directors must be composed of between three and eleven members. The number of directors is determined and the directors are appointed at the general meeting of shareholders (except in case of a vacancy in the office of a director because of death, retirement, resignation, dismissal, removal or otherwise, the remaining directors may fill such vacancy and appoint a successor in accordance with applicable Luxembourg law).

Currently, the board of directors has nine members. The directors are appointed by the general meeting of shareholders for a period of up to three years; provided, however, the directors shall be elected on a staggered basis, with one-third of the directors being elected each year and provided further that such three year term may be exceeded by a period up to the annual general meeting held following the third anniversary of the appointment. Directors may be removed with or without cause (ad nutum) by the general meeting of shareholders by a simple majority of votes cast at a general meeting of shareholders. The directors are eligible for re-election indefinitely.

There are no agreements with majority shareholders, customers, suppliers or others governing the selection of any of the directors or members of senior management. None of our non-executive directors has a service contract with us that provides for benefits upon termination of employment.

136

##### Table of Contents

The board of directors is empowered to manage Adecoagro and carry out our operations. The board of directors is vested with the broadest powers to manage the business of the Company and to authorize and/or perform all acts of disposal, management and administration falling within the purposes of Adecoagro and all powers not expressly reserved by Luxembourg law or by our articles of incorporation to the general meeting of shareholders is within the competence of the board of directors.

Accordingly, within the limitations established by Luxembourg law and in particular the Luxembourg law of August 10, 1915 on commercial companies (as amended) and our articles of incorporation, the board of directors can take any action (by resolution or otherwise) it deems necessary, appropriate, convenient or fit to implement the purpose of the Company, including without limitation:

| a. | execute any acts or contracts on our behalf aimed at fulfilling our corporate purpose, including those for which a special power of attorney is required;

| b. | carry out any transactions;

| c. | agree, establish, authorize and regulate our operations, services and expenses;

| d. | delegate special tasks to directors, regulate the formation and operation of committees and fix the remuneration and compensation of expenses of advisors and/or staff with special duties, with a charge to overhead;

| e. | appoint, suspend or remove agents or employees, establish their duties, remuneration, and bonuses and grant them the powers that it deems advisable;

| f. | grant signature authorization to directors and officers, grant general or special powers of attorney, including those to prosecute;

| g. | call regular and special shareholders’ meetings and establish agendas, submit for the shareholders’ approval our inventory, annual report, balance sheet, statement of income and exhibits, propose depreciation, amortization and reserves that it deems advisable, establish the amount of gains and losses, propose the distribution of earnings and submit all this to the shareholders’ meeting for consideration and resolution;

| h. | fix the date for the payment of dividends established by the shareholders’ meeting and make their payment; and

| i. | make decisions relating to the issuance, subscription or payment of shares pursuant to our articles of incorporation and decision of the regular or special shareholders’ meetings.

As of the date of this annual report, the board of directors has the following four committees: Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Risk and Commercial Committee and Strategy Committee. On May 13, 2011, the former Risk and Strategy Committee split into the current Risk and Commercial Committee and the Strategy Committee.

Audit Committee

The Company’s articles of incorporation provide that the board of directors may set up an audit committee. The board of directors has set up an Audit Committee composed by independent directors and has appointed, pursuant to board resolutions dated January 10, 2011, Mr. Plínio Musetti (Chairman) , Mr. Mark Schachter and Mr. Julio Moura Neto, as members of its audit committee.

The Company’s articles of incorporation provide that the audit committee shall (a) assist the board of directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, including periodically reporting to the board of directors on its activity and the adequacy of the Company’s systems of internal controls over financial reporting; (b) make recommendations for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of, and consider the independence of, the Company’s external auditors; (c) review material transactions (as

137

##### Table of Contents

defined in the articles) between the Company or its subsidiaries with related parties (other than transactions that were reviewed and approved by the independent members of the board of directors (as defined in the articles of the Company) or other governing body of any subsidiary of the Company or through any other procedures as the board of directors may deem substantially equivalent to the foregoing) to determine whether their terms are consistent with market conditions or are otherwise fair to the Company and its subsidiaries; and (d) perform such other duties imposed on it by the laws and regulations of the regulated market(s) on which the shares of the Company are listed, applicable to the Company, as well as any other duties entrusted to it by the board of directors.

In addition, the charter of the audit committee sets forth, among other things, the audit committee’s purpose and responsibilities.

Compensation Committee

The Company has a Compensation Committee that reviews and approves the compensation and benefits of the executive officers and other key employees, and makes recommendations to the board of directors regarding principles for compensation, performance evaluation, and retention strategies. It is responsible for administering our share option plans and our restricted share and restricted stock unit plan for executive officers and other key employees. See “—E. Share Ownership—Share Options and Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan.” The committee has the discretion to interpret and amend the Plan, and delegate to the Chief Executive Officer the right to award equity-based compensation to executive officers and other key employees. The committee meets at least once a year and as needed on the initiative of the Chief Executive Officer or at the request of one of its members. The members of the Compensation Committee, appointed pursuant to board resolutions dated January 10, 2011 and November 11, 2011, are Mr. Julio Moura Neto (Chairman), Abbas Farouq Zuaiter and Mr. Paulo Albert Weyland Vieira.

Risk and Commercial Committee

The Company has a Risk and Commercial Committee that has the duty to (i) make such inquiries as are necessary or advisable to understand and evaluate material business risks and risk management processes as they evolve from time to time; (ii) review with the board of directors and management the guidelines and policies to govern the process for assessing and managing risks; (iii) discuss and review with the board of directors management’s efforts to evaluate and manage the Company’s business from a risk perspective; (iv) request input from the board of directors, management and operating staff, as well as from outside resources, as it may deem necessary; (v) discuss with the board of directors and management which elements of enterprise risk are most significant, the prioritization of business risks, and make recommendations as to resource allocation for risk management and risk mitigation strategies and activities; and (vi) oversee the development of plans for risk mitigation in any area which it deems to be a material risk to the Company; and monitor management’s implementation of such plans, and the effectiveness generally of its risk mitigation strategies and activities.

The committee meets at least four times a year and as often as deemed necessary or appropriate in its judgment. The members of the Risk and Commercial Committee appointed by the board meeting held on May 13, 2011 are Mr. Alan Leland Boyce (Chairman), Mr. Abbas Farouq Zuaiter and Mr. Andrés Velasco Brañes.

Strategy Committee

The Company’s Strategy Committee has the duty to: (i) discuss and review with the board management’s identification and setting of strategic goals; including potential acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic alliances and dispositions; (ii) make recommendations to the board of directors as to the means of pursuing strategic goals; and (iii) review with the board management’s progress in implementing its strategic decisions and suggest appropriate modifications to reflect changes in market and business conditions.

The committee meets at least four times a year and as often as deemed necessary or appropriate in its judgment. The members of Strategy Committee appointed by the board meetings held on May 13, 2011 and November 11, 2011 are Mr. Abbas Farouq Zuaiter (Chairman), Guillaume van der Linden and Mr. Plinio Mussetti.

138

##### Table of Contents

| D. | EMPLOYEES

Employees

On December 31, 2012, we had 7,051 employees, of whom 94% were unionized. Approximately 7% of our workforce is comprised of temporary workers. We comply with all labor laws. Historically, we have had a positive relationship with the trade unions.

The following table sets forth our number of employees by each of our business segments:

|  | As of December 31, |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |
Farming and Land Transformation |  |  | 1,472 |  |  |  | 1,534 |  |  |  | 1,425 |  |  |  | 1,231 |
Sugar , Ethanol and Energy |  |  | 4,832 |  |  |  | 3,383 |  |  |  | 3,276 |  |  |  | 3,567 |
Administrative |  |  | 747 |  |  |  | 643 |  |  |  | 562 |  |  |  | 492 |
Total |  |  | 7,051 |  |  |  | 5,560 |  |  |  | 5,263 |  |  |  | 5,290 |

We do not have any severance agreements with our senior executive directors and managers.

Benefits

The benefits granted to our employees follow the market standard, including meals, health plans, Spanish and English language lessons, financial aid for junior employees who are still in college, transportation and parking. For senior management, we also provide vehicles.

| E. | SHARE OWNERSHIP

Share Ownership

The total number of shares of the Company beneficially owned by our directors and executive officers, as of the date of this annual report, was 5,997,1461, which represents 4.90% of the total shares of the company. See table in “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions” for information regarding share ownership by our directors and executive officers.

Share Options and Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan

Adecoagro/IFH 2004 Stock Incentive Option Plan and Adecoagro/IFH 2007/2008 Equity Incentive Plan

The Company maintains the Adecoagro/IFH 2004 Incentive Option Plan (formerly, the International Farmland Holdings, LLC 2004 Incentive Option Plan, and referred to herein as the “2004 Plan”) and the Adecoagro/IFH 2007/2008 Equity Incentive Plan (formerly, the International Farmland Holdings, LLC 2007/2008 Equity Incentive Plan, and referred to herein as the “2007/2008 Plan”). The 2004 Plan and the 2007/2008 Plan are collectively referred to herein as the “Option Plans.” Initially, the Option Plans provided for the grant of options to purchase ordinary units of IFH. In connection with the Reorganization, the Option Plans were amended and restated to provide for the grant of options to purchase ordinary shares of the Company, and all then-outstanding options to purchase IFH ordinary units were converted into options to purchase the Company’s ordinary shares.

The number of ordinary shares reserved and available for issuance under the 2004 Plan and the 2007/2008 Plan are 2,401,228 and 2,355,743, respectively. Shares subject to awards that become forfeited, cancelled, expired, withheld upon exercise, reacquired by the Company prior to vesting or otherwise terminated will again be available for future awards under the Option Plans.

Administration and Eligibility

The Option Plans are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s board of directors (the “Committee”). The Committee has general authority to, among other things, select individuals for participation,

139

##### Table of Contents

determine the time and amount of grants, and interpret the plans and awards. The Committee determines the vesting requirements of the awards. The Option Plans require that the exercise price of any future grants shall be no less than the greater of the fair market value of our ordinary shares on the date of grant and the par value per ordinary share.

Individuals eligible to receive options under the 2004 Plan include officers and employees, and under the 2007/2008 Plan include officers, employees, directors, prospective employees and consultants.

Amendment and Termination

The board of directors may amend or terminate the Option Plans in its discretion, and the Committee may amend any outstanding options in its discretion, except participant consent will be needed if a participant’s rights are adversely affected. If not previously terminated by the board of directors, the Option Plans will terminate on the 10th anniversary of its adoption.

Granted Options

Under the 2004 Plan, as of December 31, 2012, options to purchase 2,099,642 ordinary shares were granted and the weighted average exercise price of all granted options was $6.68. Under the 2007/2008 Plan, as of the same date, options to purchase 2,013,057 ordinary shares were granted, and the weighted average exercise price of all granted options was $13.06.

Outstanding options under the 2004 Plan generally vest in three equal installments on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant, and options under the 2007/2008 Plan generally vest in four equal installments on the first four anniversaries of the date of grant. Vesting under each of the Option Plans is generally subject to the participant’s continued service as of each applicable vesting date, and all options terminate 10 years from the date of grant.

Adecoagro S.A. Amended and Restated Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan

On November 11, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the amendment and restatement of the Adecoagro S.A. Restricted Share Plan, now known as the Amended and Restated Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan (the “Plan).

The Plan provides for awards of restricted shares or restricted stock units to employees, officers, members of the board of directors and other service providers of the Company. The purpose of the Plan is to further align the interests of participants with those of the shareholders by providing participants with long-term incentive compensation opportunities tied to the performance of the Company’s ordinary shares.

The maximum number of ordinary shares with respect to which awards may be made under the Plan is 1,801,038 ordinary shares. The Committee anticipates that such number of shares will be sufficient for grants of awards under the Plan for a period of five years. To the extent any award under the Plan is canceled, expired, forfeited, surrendered settled in cash, or otherwise terminated without delivery of shares the shares retained by or returned to the Company will again be available for future awards under the Plan. The shares available for issuance as well as outstanding awards under the Plan are subject to adjustment in the event of a reorganization, stock split, merger or similar change. Under the Plan, as of the date of this annual report, only 1,131,190 restricted shares were granted to directors, senior management and employees.

Administration and Eligibility

The Plan is administered by the Committee. The Committee has general authority to grant awards, determine the recipients of awards and prescribe the terms of awards, as well as authority to interpret and apply the terms of the Plan and individual awards. The Committee determines the amount and the vesting requirements of the awards.

Terms of Awards

A grant of restricted shares represents ordinary shares that are issued subject to vesting requirements and transfer restrictions, as determined by the Committee in its discretion. The vesting requirements may be based on the

140

##### Table of Contents

continued employment or service of the participant for a specified time period or on the attainment of specified business performance goals established by the Committee. Subject to the transfer restrictions and vesting requirements of the award, the participant will have the rights of a stockholder of the Company, including voting rights and the right to receive dividends.

The number of restricted shares or restricted stock units awarded to individuals each year will be based on Company performance. Once awarded, the restricted shares or restricted stock units are subject to a service-based vesting schedule and vest in three equal annual installments on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant, subject only to the participant’s continued service to the Company as of each applicable vesting date. Restricted stock units are payable following the vesting of an award in shares.

Amendment and Termination

The board of directors may amend, modify, suspend or terminate the Plan in its discretion, except participant consent will be needed if participants’ rights are adversely affected. If not previously terminated by the board of directors, the Plan will terminate on the 10th anniversary of its adoption.

Share Options and Restricted Shares

The following tables set forth the total number of ordinary and restricted shares to be issued upon exercise of the options to directors and executives officers, the exercise price of the options awarded, the date of grant and the date of expiration, as of the date of this annual report.

Stock Option Plans |  | Plan under which awards were granted |  | Number of ordinary shares to be issued upon exercise of options |  |  | Range of Exercise prices per ordinary share ($) |  | Range of Dates of Grant (1)
Directors and Executive Officers |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Mariano Bosch |  | 2004 |  |  |  | * |  | $ 5.83 to $ 8.62 |  | 05/01/2004 to 07/01/2006
|  | 2007 |  |  |  | * |  | $12.82 to $13.40 |  | 11/13/2007 to 01/30/2009
Carlos A. Boero Hughes |  | 2004 |  |  |  | * |  | $ 5.83 to $ 7.11 |  | 08/25/2008
|  | 2007 |  |  |  | * |  | $12.82 to $13.40 |  | 11/13/2007 to 01/30/2009
Emilio F. Gnecco |  | 2004 |  |  |  | * |  | $ 5.83 to $ 8.62 |  | 01/06/2007
|  | 2007 |  |  |  | * |  | $12.82 to $13.40 |  | 11/13/2007 to 01/30/2009
Walter Marcelo Sanchez |  | 2004 |  |  |  | * |  | $ 5.83 to $ 8.62 |  | 05/01/2004 to 07/01/2006
|  | 2007 |  |  |  | * |  | $12.82 to $13.40 |  | 11/13/2007 to 01/30/2009
Mario José Ramón Imbrosciano |  | 2004 |  |  |  | * |  | $ 5.83 to $ 8.62 |  | 05/01/2004 to 07/01/2006
|  | 2007 |  |  |  | * |  | $12.82 to $13.40 |  | 11/13/2007 to 01/30/2009
Leonardo Berridi |  | 2004 |  |  |  | * |  | $ 5.83 to $ 8.62 |  | 05/01/2004 to 07/01/2006
|  | 2007 |  |  |  | * |  | $12.82 to $13.40 |  | 11/13/2007 to 01/30/2009
Marcelo Vieira |  | 2004 |  |  | 107.857 |  |  | $ 5.83 to $ 8.62 |  | 02/01/2006 to 06/01/2006
|  | 2007 |  |  | 165.394 |  |  | $12.82 to $13.40 |  | 11/13/2006 to 01/30/2009
Ezequiel Garbers |  | 2004 |  |  |  | * |  | $ 5.83 to $ 8.62 |  | 05/01/2004 to 07/01/2006
|  | 2007 |  |  |  | * |  | $12.82 to $13.40 |  | 11/13/2007 to 01/30/2009
Directors and Executive Officers as a group |  |  |  |  | 2.996.971 |  |  |  |  |

* | Upon the exercise of all options, would beneficially own less than 1% of total outstanding shares.

(1) | All share options have an expiration date 10 years after date of grant.

141

##### Table of Contents

Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan |  | Number of restricted shares |  |  | Number of restricted stock units |  |  | Range of Dates of Grant |
Directors and Executive Directors |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Abbas Farouq Zuaiter |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |  |  | 05/13/2011 to 05/15/2012 |
Alan Leland Boyce |  |  | 4,937 |  |  |  | 5,524 |  |  |  | 05/13/2011 to 05/15/2012 |
Guillaume van der Linden |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |  |  | 05/13/2011 to 05/15/2012 |
Paulo Albert Weyland Vieira |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |  |  | 05/13/2011 to 05/15/2012 |
Plínio Musetti |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |  |  | 05/13/2011 to 05/15/2012 |
Mark Schachter |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |  |  | 05/13/2011 to 05/15/2012 |
Julio Moura Neto |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |  |  | 05/13/2011 to 05/15/2012 |
André Velasco Brañes |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |  |  | 05/13/2011 to 05/15/2012 |
Mariano Bosch |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |  |  | 04/01/2011 to 04/01/2013 |
Carlos A. Boero Hughes |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |  |  | 04/01/2011 to 04/01/2013 |
Emilio F. Gnecco |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |  |  | 04/01/2011 to 04/01/2013 |
Walter Marcelo Sanchez |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |  |  | 04/01/2011 to 04/01/2013 |
Mario José Ramón Imbrosciano |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |  |  | 04/01/2011 to 04/01/2013 |
Leonardo Berridi |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |  |  | 04/01/2011 to 04/01/2013 |
Marcelo Vieira |  |  | 44,538 |  |  |  | 56,325 |  |  |  | 04/01/2011 to 04/01/2013 |
Ezequiel Garbers |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |  |  | 04/01/2011 to 04/01/2013 |
Directors and Executive Officers as a group |  |  | 308,810 | (1) |  |  | 360,627 | (2) |  |  |  |

* | Upon receipt of common shares pursuant to plan, would beneficially own less than 1% of total outstanding shares.

(1) | Consist of 210,662 vested restricted shares as of April 18, 2013 and 98,148 unvested restricted shares

(2) | Consist of 104,420 vested restricted stock units as of April 18, 2013 and 256,207 unvested restricted stock units

Item 7. | Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

| A. | MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our shares for (1) each person known to us to own beneficially at least 5% of our common shares and (2) our directors and executive officers, based on the information most recently available to the Company, as of December 31, 2012.

As of April 18, 2013, we had 122,367,137 outstanding shares. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, we have included shares that the person has the right to acquire within 60 days from December 31, 2012, including through the exercise of any option, warrant or other right or the conversion of any other security. These shares, however, are not included in the computation of the percentage ownership of any other person.

142

##### Table of Contents

|  | Number |  |  | Percent |
Principal Shareholders: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Quantum Partners LP (l) |  |  | 25,910,004 |  |  |  | 21.2 | %
Stichting Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (2) |  |  | 15,531,385 |  |  |  | 12.7 | %
Al Gharrafa Investment Company (3) |  |  | 12,670,165 |  |  |  | 11.7 | %
Directors and Executive Officers |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Abbas Farouq Zuaiter |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | *
Alan Leland Boyce |  |  | 1,243,864 |  |  |  | 1.02 | %
Guillaume van der Linden |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | *
Paulo Albert Weyland Vieira (4) |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | *
Mariano Bosch(5) |  |  | 838,901 |  |  |  | 0.69 | %
Plínio Musetti |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | *
Mark Schachter |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | *
Julio Moura Neto |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | *
Andrés Velasco Brañes |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | *
Carlos A. Boero Hughes |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | *
Emilio F. Gnecco |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | *
Walter Marcelo Sanchez |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | *
Mario José Ramón Imbrosciano |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | *
Leonardo Berridi |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | *
Marcelo Vieira(6) |  |  | 1,144,032 |  |  |  | 0.93 | %
Ezequiel Garbers |  |  |  | * |  |  |  | *
Directors and Executive Officers as a group |  |  | 5,997,146 |  |  |  | 4.90 | %

* | Beneficially owns less than 1% based on the total number of outstanding shares.

(1) | Soros Fund Management LLC serves as principal investment adviser to Quantum Partners LP.

(2) | Includes the purchase of 4,500,000 shares by Stichting, Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn in our IPO. The address of Stichting Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn is P.O. BOX 4001 NL-3700 KA Zeist The Netherlands.

(3) | The address of Al Gharrafa Investment Company is Walker House, 87 Main Street, George Town, Grand Cayman, KY1-9005, Cayman Islands. Includes 7,377,598 common shares we issued and sold to Al Gharrafa at a purchase price of $10.65 per share, pursuant to an agreement entered into on January 6, 2011. See exhibit 4.28.

(4) | Mr. Vieira filed a motion of Proposed Sale on Form 144 with the SEC dated April 10, 2012 with respect to 96,827 shares of the Company.

(5) | Includes 656,394 shares issuable upon exercise of options held by Mr. Bosch that are exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2011. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership—Share Options and Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan.”

(6) | Includes 257,546 shares issuable upon exercise of options held by Mr. Vieira that are exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2011. Mr. Vieira is the owner of Liuede Holdings Ltd. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership—Share Options and Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan.”

As of April 18, 2013, 96,456,083 shares, representing 78.82% of our outstanding common shares are held by United States record holders.

143

##### Table of Contents

| B. | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Share Purchase and Sale Agreement and UMA Right of First Offer Agreement

In connection with the Share Purchase and Sale Agreement, the IFH Parties also entered into a Right of First Offer Agreement with Marcelo Weyland Barbosa Vieira, Paulo Albert Weyland Vieira, Mario Jorge de Lemos Vieira, and Corina de Almeida Leite, each of which is a current indirect shareholder in IFH, (together the “UMA Members”), dated February 16, 2006, whereby the IFH Parties agreed to grant the UMA Members a right of first offer to acquire the shares of UMA, or all or substantially all of the assets of UMA, or the real property or plot of land where the commercial offices of UMA is currently located and which is currently subject to a right-of-way and easement agreement granted to Mario Corina, AlFenas Agrícola Ltda. The rights granted to each of the UMA Members, their permitted affiliates, assignees, successors or heirs under such agreement are only in effect for as long as such entities hold such an equity interest in IFH or any of its affiliates.

Milk Supply Agreement

In November 2007, Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. entered into a milk supply offer agreement with La Lácteo S.A., which was later amended on February 1, 2010, and pursuant to which Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. committed to sell to La Lácteo, and La Lácteo committed to purchase, approximately 80,000 liters of our milk production per day, subject to certain conditions. Notwithstanding the above, Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. is not obligated to sell to La Lácteo and La Lácteo is not obligated to purchase from Adeco Agropecuaria S.A., more than 50% of its milk requirements for a four-month period, provided, however, that our milk production in excess of such volume is managed by La Lácteo S.A. in order to take advantage of the best valuation opportunities as industry sales in the raw milk spot market. The milk supply offer agreement fixes the price of milk that La Lácteo pays to Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. at the average milk price for each month plus a 3% premium. The milk supply agreement terminates in November 2017. If Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. receives a proposal from a third party to purchase milk that is more favorable to Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. than the terms set forth in the milk supply agreement with La Lácteo, Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. may sell milk to such third party. However, La Lácteo has a right of first refusal on Adeco Agropecuaria S.A.’s receipt of such third-party offer to purchase milk from Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. at the specified higher price. For the years ended December 31 2012, 2011 and 2010, we recognized sales of goods net of related expenses, amounting to $8.2, $ 16.5 million and $13.4 million respectively, in connection with this agreement.

Agriculture Partnership Agreements

Some of our agriculture partnership agreements are entered into with certain minority shareholders of the Company, for a total of 8,231.58 hectares. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, we recorded other net amount (payables) or receivables for payments in advance amounting to $(0.5) million, ($0.3) million and $(4.8) million, respectively, and recognized expenses amounting to $4.2 million, $3.1 million and $3.3 million, respectively, in connection with these agreements.

Registration Rights Agreement

In connection with the Reorganization, we entered into a registration rights agreement providing holders of our issued and outstanding common shares on January 28, 2011 (such holders being hereinafter referred to as the “Existing Investors” and such common shares subject to the agreement being hereinafter referred to as the “Registrable Securities”) with certain rights to require us to register their shares for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”). Pursuant to the agreement, if holders of a majority of the Registrable Securities notify us, no earlier than 180 days after the effective date of the registration statement previously filed by us on Form F-1, we are required, subject to certain limitations, to file a registration statement under the Securities Act in order to register the resale of the amount of ordinary shares requested by such holders. The underwriters in such an offering will have the right, subject to certain limitations, to limit the number of shares included in such registration. The Existing Investors have the right to require us to file one such registration. In addition, if we propose to register any of our securities under the Securities Act, Existing Investors are entitled to notice of such registration and are entitled to certain “piggyback” registration rights allowing such holders to include their common shares in such registration, subject to certain restrictions. Furthermore, Existing Investors may require us to register the resale of all or a portion of their shares on a registration statement on Form F-3 once we are eligible to use Form F-3. In an underwritten offering, the underwriters have the right, subject to certain restrictions, to limit the number of Registrable Securities Existing Investors may include.

144

##### Table of Contents

| C. | INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL

Not applicable.

Item 8. | Financial Information

| A. | CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION.

See Item 18. Financial Statements and page F-1 through F-90 for our consolidated financial statements.

Legal and Administrative Proceedings

We are subject to several laws, regulations and business practices of the countries in which we operate. In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to certain contingent liabilities with respect to existing or potential claims, lawsuits and other proceedings, including those involving tax, social security, labor lawsuits and other matters. We accrue liabilities when it is probable that future costs will be incurred and such costs can be reasonably estimated. Currently, we are not engaged in any material litigation or arbitration and no material litigation or claims are known to us to be pending or threatened against us which, either alone or on a combined basis, may result in an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or cash flows.

As of December 31, 2012, the total amounts accrued in respect of legal and administrative proceedings was $ 2.7 million.

Dividend Policy

We currently intend to retain any future earnings to finance operations and the expansion of our business and do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends on our common shares in the foreseeable future. The amount and payment of dividends will be determined by a simple majority vote at a general shareholders’ meeting, typically but not necessarily, based on the recommendation of our board of directors. All shares of our capital stock rank pari passu with respect to the payment of dividends. Pursuant to our articles of incorporation, the board of directors has the power to distribute interim dividends in accordance with applicable Luxembourg law. Dividends may be lawfully declared and paid if our net profits and distributable reserves are sufficient under Luxembourg law.

Under Luxembourg law, at least 5% of our net profits per year must be allocated to the creation of a legal reserve until such reserve has reached an amount equal to 10% of our issued share capital. If the legal reserve subsequently falls below the 10% threshold, at least 5% of the annual net profits again must be allocated toward the reserve. The legal reserve is not available for distribution.

Adecoagro is a holding company and has no material assets other than its ownership of partnership interests in IFH. IFH, in turn, is a holding entity with no material assets other than its indirect ownership of shares in operating subsidiaries in foreign countries. If we were to distribute a dividend at some point in the future, we would cause the operating subsidiaries to make distributions to IFH, which in turn would make distributions to Adecoagro in an amount sufficient to cover any such dividends.

Our subsidiaries are subject to certain restrictions on their ability to declare or pay dividends. For example, the loan agreement with the Inter-American Development Bank prohibits Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. and Pilagá S.A. from paying dividends or other restricted payments if such payments would cause these two subsidiaries to exceed certain financial ratios or in the case of an event of default. The Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema Prepayment Export Facility also imposes similar limitations on the ability of our Brazilian subsidiaries to pay dividends. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness and Financial Instruments”, and also see “—Risks Related to Argentina—Certain of our subsidiaries have substantial indebtedness which could impair their financial condition and decrease the amount of dividends we receive.

145

##### Table of Contents

| B. | SIGNIFICANT CHANGES

Except as otherwise disclosed in this annual report, there has been no undisclosed significant change since the date of the annual consolidated financial statements.

Item 9. | The Offer and Listing

| A. | OFFER AND LISTING DETAILS

Our common shares have been listed on the NYSE under the symbol “AGRO” since January 28, 2011. Our issued share capital amounts to $180,800,123, represented by 120,533, 415 (of which 2,370 were treasury shares) shares with a nominal value of $1.50 each. All issued shares are fully paid up.

The table below sets forth, for the period indicated, the reported high and low closing prices for our common shares listed on the NYSE.

Full Financial Quarters Since Listing |  | High |  |  | Low |
January 28, 2011 to March 31, 2011 |  | $ | 13.50 |  |  | $ | 11.99 |
Second Quarter 2011 |  |  | 13.47 |  |  |  | 10.27 |
Third Quarter 2011 |  |  | 11.97 |  |  |  | 8.62 |
Fourth Quarter 2011 |  |  | 9.72 |  |  |  | 7.42 |
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2011 |  |  | 13.50 |  |  |  | 7.42 |
First Quarter 2012 |  |  | 11.05 |  |  |  | 8.03 |
Second Quarter 2012 |  |  | 10.81 |  |  |  | 8.51 |
Third Quarter 2012 |  |  | 10.80 |  |  |  | 9.33 |
Fourth Quarter 2012 |  |  | 9.91 |  |  |  | 8.05 |
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2012 |  |  | 11.05 |  |  |  | 8.03 |
First Quarter 2013 |  |  | 9.56 |  |  |  | 7.69 |
April 2013 (to April 26, 2013) |  |  | 7.65 |  |  |  | 7.00 |

| B. | PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

Not applicable.

| C. | MARKETS

Our common shares have been listed on the NYSE under the symbol “AGRO” since January 28, 2011. See “—A. Offer and Listing Details.”

| D. | SELLING SHAREHOLDERS

Not applicable.

| E. | DILUTION

Not applicable.

| F. | EXPENSES OF THE ISSUE

Not applicable.

146

##### Table of Contents

Item 10. Additional Information

| A. | SHARE CAPITAL

Not applicable.

| B. | MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

The following is a summary of some of the terms of our common shares, based in particular on our articles of incorporation and the Luxembourg law of August 10, 1915 on commercial companies.

Adecoagro’s shares are governed by Luxembourg law and its articles of incorporation. More information concerning shareholders’ rights can be found in the Luxembourg law on commercial companies dated August 10, 1915, as amended from time to time, and the articles of incorporation.

The following is a summary of the rights of the holders of our shares that are material to an investment in our common shares. These rights are set out in our articles of association or are provided by applicable Luxembourg law, and may differ from those typically provided to shareholders of U.S. companies under the corporation laws of some states of the United States. This summary does not contain all information that may be important to you. For more complete information, you should read our updated articles of association, which are attached as an exhibit to this annual report.

General

Adecoagro is a Luxembourg société anonyme (a joint stock company). The Company’s legal name is “Adecoagro S.A.” Adecoagro was incorporated on June 11, 2010 and on October 26, 2010 all the shares in issue in Adecoagro were acquired by IFH LLC.

On October 30, 2010, the members of IFH LLC transferred pro rata approximately 98% of their membership interests in IFH LLC to Adecoagro in exchange for common shares of Adecoagro. In a series of transactions during 2012, we transferred shares of Adecoagro to certain limited partners of IFH in exchange for their residual interest in IFH, increasing our interest in IFH to approximately 100%.

On January 28, 2011, Adecoagro completed the IPO of its shares on the NYSE. The shares are traded under the symbol “AGRO.”

Adecoagro is registered with the Luxembourg Registry of Trade and Companies under number B153681. Adecoagro has its registered office at 13-15 Avenue de la Liberté, L-1931, Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

The corporate purpose of Adecoagro, as stated in Article 4 of our articles of incorporation (Purpose Object), is the following: The object of Adecoagro is the holding of participations, in any form whatsoever, in Luxembourg and foreign companies, or other entities or enterprises, the acquisition by purchase, subscription, or in any other manner as well as the transfer by sale, exchange or otherwise of stock, bonds, debentures, notes and other securities or rights of any kind including interests in partnerships, and the holding, acquisition, disposal, investment in any manner (in), development, licensing or sub licensing of, any patents or other intellectual property rights of any nature or origin as well as the ownership, administration, development and management of its portfolio. Adecoagro may carry out its business through branches in Luxembourg or abroad.

Adecoagro may borrow in any form and proceed to the issuance by private or public means of bonds, convertible bonds and debentures or any other securities or instruments it deems fit.

In a general fashion it may grant assistance (by way of loans, advances, guarantees or securities or otherwise) to companies or other enterprises in which Adecoagro has an interest or which form part of the group of companies to which Adecoagro . belongs or any entity as Adecoagro may deem fit (including up stream or cross stream), take any controlling, management, administrative and/or supervisory measures and carry out any operation which it may deem useful in the accomplishment and development of its purposes.

147

##### Table of Contents

Finally, Adecoagro can perform all commercial, technical and financial or other operations, connected directly or indirectly in all areas in order to facilitate the accomplishment of its purpose.

Share Capital

As of December 31, 2012 our issued share capital amounted to $183,330,909, represented by 122,220,606 shares in issue (of which 3,860 were treasury shares) with a nominal value of $1.50 each. All issued shares are fully paid up.

There were 122,216,746 common shares outstanding.

We have an authorized unissued share capital of $3,000,000,000, including the issued share capital as of December 31, 2012 of $183,330,909 and are authorized to issue up to 2,000,000,000 shares of a nominal value of $1.50 each (taking into account the shares issued as of December 31, 2012) out of such authorized share capital. Our authorized unissued share capital as of December 31, 2012 is $2,816,669,091.

Our articles of incorporation authorize the board of directors to issue shares within the limits of the authorized un-issued share capital at such times and on such terms as the board or its delegates may decide for a period commencing on January 10, 2011 and ending on the date five years after the date that the minutes of the shareholders’ meeting approving such authorization have been published in the Luxembourg official gazette (unless it is extended, amended or renewed and we currently intend to seek renewals and/or extensions as required from time to time). Such publication occurred on April 22, 2011. Accordingly, the board may issue shares up to the number of authorized un-issued shares pursuant to the above until the latter date against contributions in cash, contributions in kind or by way of incorporation of available reserves at such times and on such terms and conditions, including the issue price, as the board of directors or its delegate(s) may in its or their discretion resolve and the general meeting of shareholders dated January 10, 2011 has waived and has authorized the board of directors to waive, suppress or limit, any pre-emptive subscription rights of shareholders provided for by law to the extent it deems such waiver, suppression or limitation advisable for any issue or issues of shares within the authorized share capital.

Our authorized share capital is determined (and may be increased, reduced or extended) by our articles of incorporation, as amended from time to time, by the decision of our shareholders at an extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting with the necessary quorum and majority provided for the amendment of our articles of incorporation. See “—Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation” and “—General Meeting of Shareholders”.

Under Luxembourg law, existing shareholders benefit from a preemptive subscription right on the issuance of shares for cash consideration. However, our shareholders have, in accordance with Luxembourg law, authorized the board to suppress, waive or limit any preemptive subscription rights of shareholders provided by law to the extent the board deems such suppression, waiver or limitation advisable for any issuance or issuances of shares within the scope of our authorized unissued share capital. Such shares may be issued above, at or below market value (down to zero) as well as by way of incorporation of available reserves and premium for a period ending on the fifth anniversary of the date of the publication of the notarial deed recording the minutes of the extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting of January 10, 2011 in the Luxembourg official gazette (which occurred on April 22, 2011).

Form and Transfer of shares

Our shares are issued in registered form only and are freely transferable. Luxembourg law does not impose any limitations on the rights of Luxembourg or non-Luxembourg residents to hold or vote our shares.

Under Luxembourg law, the ownership of registered shares is evidenced by the inscription of the name of the shareholder, the number of shares held by him or her in the register of shares held at the registered office of the Company. Each transfer of shares in the share register shall be effected by written declaration of transfer to be recorded in the register of shares, such declaration to be dated and signed by the transferor and the transferee, or by

148

##### Table of Contents

their duly appointed agents. We may accept and enter into its share register any transfer effected pursuant to an agreement or agreements between the transferor and the transferee, true and complete copies of which have been delivered to us.

We may appoint registrars in different jurisdictions, each of whom may maintain a separate register for the shares entered in such register. We have appointed Bank of New York Mellon (operating with the service name BNY Mellon Shareowner Services) as our New York registrar and transfer agent, and all shares and shareholders have been transferred from the register held at our registered office to the register held on our behalf by Bank of New York Mellon (operating with the service name BNY Mellon Shareowner Services) as our registrar and transfer agent. The holders of our shares may elect to be entered in one of the registers and to be transferred from time to time from one register to another register provided that our board of directors may however impose transfer restrictions for shares that are registered, listed, quoted, dealt in, or have been placed in certain jurisdictions in compliance with the requirements applicable therein. The transfer to the register kept at the Company’s registered office may always be requested by a shareholder.

In addition, our articles of incorporation provide that our shares may be held through a securities settlement system or a professional depository of securities. Shares held in such manner have the same rights and obligations as shares recorded in our shareholder register(s) (subject to complying with certain formalities). Shares held through a securities settlement system or a professional depository of securities may be transferred in accordance with customary procedures for the transfer of securities in book-entry form.

Issuance of Shares

Pursuant to Luxembourg law of August 10, 1915 on commercial companies, the issuance of shares in Adecoagro requires the approval by the general meeting of shareholders at the quorum and majority provided for the amendment of our articles of incorporation. See “—Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation” and “—General Meeting of Shareholders”. The general meeting of shareholders may however approve an authorized unissued share capital and authorize the board of directors to issue shares up to the maximum amount of such authorized unissued share capital for a maximum period of five years from the date of publication in the Luxembourg official gazette of the minutes of the relevant general meeting. The general meeting may amend, renew or extend such authorized share capital and authorization to the board of directors to issue shares.

We have currently an authorized share capital of $3,000,000,000, including the issued share capital as of December 31, 2012 of $183,330,909, and are authorized to issue up to 2,000,000,000 shares of a nominal value of $1.50 each (taking into account the shares already issued) out of such authorized share capital. As of December 31, 2012 the authorized un-issued share capital was $2,816,669,091. Our board has been authorized to issue shares within the limits of the authorized un-issued share capital at such times and on such terms as the board or its delegates may decide for a period commencing on January 10, 2011 and ending on the date five years after the date that the minutes of the shareholders’ meeting approving such authorization have been published in the Luxembourg official gazette (unless it is extended, amended or renewed). The publication occurred on April 22, 2011. Accordingly, the board may issue shares up to the total number of authorized un-issued shares until the latter date against contributions in cash, contributions in kind or by way of incorporation of available reserves at such times and on such terms and conditions, including the issue price, as the board of directors or its delegate(s) may in its or their discretion resolve while waiving, suppressing or limiting, any pre-emptive subscription rights of shareholders provided for by law to the extent it deems such waiver, suppression or limitation advisable for any issue or issues of shares within the authorized share capital.

Our articles provide that no fractional shares may be issued.

Our shares have no conversion rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to our common shares.

Preemptive Rights

Unless limited or cancelled by the board of directors as described above, holders of our shares have a pro rata preemptive right to subscribe for any new shares issued for cash consideration. Our articles, provide that preemptive

149

##### Table of Contents

rights can be waived, suppressed or limited by the board of directors for a period ending on April 22, 2016, in the event of an increase of the issued share capital by the board of directors within the limits of the authorized un-issued share capital

Repurchase of Shares

We cannot subscribe for our own shares.

We may, however, repurchase issued shares or have another person repurchase issued shares for our account, subject to the following conditions:

| • |  | the prior authorization of the general meeting of shareholders (at the quorum and majority for ordinary resolutions), which authorization sets forth the terms and conditions of the proposed repurchase and in particular the maximum number of shares to be repurchased, the duration of the period for which the authorization is given (which may not exceed five years) and, in the case of repurchase for consideration, the minimum and maximum consideration per share, must have been obtained;

| • |  | the repurchase may not reduce our net assets on a non-consolidated basis to a level below the aggregate of the issued share capital and the reserves that we must maintain pursuant to Luxembourg law or its articles of incorporation; and

| • |  | only fully paid up shares may be repurchased.

The general meeting of shareholders has authorized that the Company, and/or any wholly-owned subsidiary (and/or any person acting on their behalf), may purchase, acquire, receive or hold shares in the Company under article 49-2 of the Luxembourg law of August 10, 1915, from time to time up to 20% of the issued share capital, on the following terms and on such terms as referred to below and as shall further be determined by the board of directors of the Company, such authorization being valid (subject to renewal) for a period of five years from January 10, 2011.

Acquisitions may be made in any manner including without limitation, by tender or other offer(s), buy back program(s), over the stock exchange or in privately negotiated transactions or in any other manner as determined by the board of directors (including derivative transactions or transactions having the same or similar economic effect than an acquisition).

In the case of acquisitions for value:

(i) in the case of acquisitions other than in the circumstances set forth under (ii), for a net purchase price being (x) no less than fifty per cent of the lowest stock price and (y) no more than fifty per cent above the highest stock price, in each case being the closing price, as reported by the New York City edition of the Wall Street Journal, or, if not reported therein, any other authoritative source to be selected by the board of directors of the Company (hereafter, the closing price), over the ten (10) trading days preceding the date of the purchase (or as the case may be the date of the commitment to the transaction);

(ii) in case of a tender offer (or if deemed appropriate by the board of directors, a buy back program),

a. in case of a formal offer being published, for a set net purchase price or a purchase price range, each time within the following parameters: no less than fifty per cent of the lowest stock price and (y) no more than fifty per cent above the highest stock price, in each case being the closing price over the ten (10) trading days preceding the publication date, provided however that if the stock exchange price during the offer period fluctuates by more than 10%, the board of directors may adjust the offer price or range to such fluctuations;

b. in case a public request for sell offers is made, a price range may be set (and revised by the board of directors as deemed appropriate) provided that acquisitions may be made at a price which is no less than fifty per cent of the lowest stock price and (y) no more than fifty per cent above the highest stock price, in each case being the closing price over a period determined by the board of directors provided that such period may not start more than five (5) trading days before the sell offer start date of the relevant offer and may not end after the last day of the relevant sell offer period.

150

##### Table of Contents

In addition, pursuant to Luxembourg law the board of directors may repurchase shares without the prior approval of the general meeting of shareholders if necessary to prevent serious and imminent harm to us or if the acquisition of shares has been made in view of the distribution thereof to the employees.

Capital Reduction

The articles of incorporation provide that the issued share capital may be reduced, subject to the approval by the general meeting of shareholders at the quorum and majority provided for the amendment of our articles of incorporation. See “—Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation” and “—General Meeting of Shareholders”.

General Meeting of Shareholders

In accordance with Luxembourg law and our articles of incorporation, any regularly constituted general meeting of shareholders of Adecoagro represents the entire body of shareholders of the Company. It shall have the broadest powers to order, carry out or ratify acts relating to the operations of the Company.

The annual general meeting of shareholders of Adecoagro is held at 4:00pm (Luxembourg time) on the third Wednesday of April of each year in Luxembourg. If that day is a legal or banking holiday, the meeting will be held on the next following business day. Other general meetings of shareholders may be convened at any time.

Each of our shares entitles the holder thereof to attend our general meeting of shareholders, either in person or by proxy, to address the general meeting of shareholders, and to exercise voting rights, subject to the provisions of our articles of incorporation. Each share entitles the holder to one vote at a general meeting of shareholders. There is no minimum shareholding required to be able to attend or vote at a general meeting of shareholders.

A shareholder may act at any general meeting of shareholders by appointing another person (who need not be a shareholder) as his proxy, which proxy shall be in writing and comply with such requirements as determined by our board with respect to the attendance to the general meeting, and proxy forms in order to enable shareholders to exercise their right to vote. All proxies must be received by us (or our agents) no later than the day preceding the fifth (5th) working day before the date of the general meeting except if our board of directors decides to change such time frame.

Our articles of incorporation provide that in the case of shares held through the operator of a securities settlement system or depository, a holder of such shares wishing to attend a general meeting of shareholders must receive from such operator or depository a certificate certifying the number of shares recorded in the relevant account on the blocking date and certifying that the shares in the account shall be blocked until the close of the general meeting. Such certificates should be submitted to us no later than the day preceding the fifth working day before the date of the general meeting unless our board fixes a different period.

Our board of directors may determine a date preceding a general meeting as the record date for admission to such general meeting. When convening a general meeting of shareholders, we will publish two notices (which must be published at least eight days apart and in the case of the second notice, eight days before the meeting) in the Mémorial, Recueil des Sociétés et Association, and in a Luxembourg newspaper and in the case the shares of the Company are listed on a regulated market, in accordance with the publicity requirements of such regulated market applicable to the Company. If all of the shareholders are present or represented at a general meeting of shareholders, the general meeting may be held without prior notice or publication. These convening notices must contain the agenda of the meeting and set out the conditions for attendance and representation at the meeting.

All materials relating to a general meeting of shareholders (including the notice) will be available at the website of Adecoagro at www.adecoagro.com and will be filed with the SEC on Form 6-K. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference in, and does not constitute a part of, this annual report.

151

##### Table of Contents

Luxembourg law provides that the board of directors is obliged to convene a general meeting of shareholders if shareholders representing, in the aggregate, 10% of the issued share capital so require in writing with an indication of the agenda. In such case, the general meeting of shareholders must be held within one month of the request. If the requested general meeting of shareholders is not held within one month, shareholders representing, in the aggregate, 10% of the issued share capital, may petition the competent president of the district court in Luxembourg to have a court appointee convene the meeting. Luxembourg law provides that shareholders representing, in the aggregate, 10% of the issued share capital may request that additional items be added to the agenda of a general meeting of shareholders. That request must be made by registered mail sent to the registered office at least five days before the holding of the general meeting of shareholders.

Voting Rights

Each share of our shares entitles the holder thereof to one vote at a general meeting of shareholders.

Luxembourg law distinguishes between “ordinary” general meetings of shareholders and “extraordinary” general meetings of shareholders.

Extraordinary general meetings of shareholders are convened to resolve in particular upon an amendment to the articles of incorporation and certain other limited matters described below and are subject to the quorum and majority requirements described below. All other general meetings of shareholders are ordinary general meetings of shareholders.

Ordinary General Meetings of Shareholders. At an ordinary general meeting of shareholders there is no quorum requirement, and resolutions are adopted by a simple majority of the votes validly cast, irrespective of the number of shares present or represented. Abstentions are not considered “votes”.

Extraordinary General Meetings of Shareholders. An extraordinary general meeting of shareholders convened for the purpose of in particular (a) an increase or decrease of the authorized or issued share capital, (b) a limitation or exclusion of preemptive rights, (c) approving a legal merger or de-merger of Adecoagro, (d) dissolution of the Company or (e) an amendment of the articles of incorporation must generally have a quorum of at least 50% of our issued share capital except in limited circumstances provided for by Luxembourg law. If such quorum is not reached, the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders may be reconvened, pursuant to appropriate notification procedures, at a later date with no quorum requirement applying

Irrespective of whether the proposed actions described in the preceding paragraph will be subject to a vote at the first or a subsequent extraordinary general meeting of shareholders, such actions are subject to the approval of at least two-thirds of the votes validly cast at such extraordinary general meeting of shareholders (except in limited circumstances provided for by Luxembourg law). Abstentions are not considered “votes”.

Appointment and Removal of Directors. Members of the board of directors may be elected by simple majority of the votes validly cast at any general meeting of shareholders. Under the articles of incorporation, all directors are elected for a period of up to three years with such possible extension as provided therein provided however the directors shall be elected on a staggered basis, with one third (1/3) of the directors being elected each year and provided further that such three year term may be exceeded by a period up to the annual general meeting held following the third anniversary of the appointment. Any director may be removed with or without cause by a simple majority vote at any general meeting of shareholders. The articles of incorporation provide that in case of a vacancy the board of directors may co-opt a director.

Neither Luxembourg law nor our articles of incorporation contain any restrictions as to the voting of our shares by non-Luxembourg residents.

Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation

Luxembourg law requires an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders to resolve upon an amendment to the articles of incorporation. The agenda of the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders must indicate the proposed amendments to the articles of incorporation.

152

##### Table of Contents

An extraordinary general meeting of shareholders convened for the purpose of amending the articles of incorporation must generally have a quorum of at least 50% of our issued share capital. If such quorum is not reached, the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders may be reconvened at a later date with no quorum according to the appropriate notification procedures. Irrespective of whether the proposed amendment will be subject to a vote at the first or a subsequent extraordinary general meeting of shareholders, the amendment is generally subject to the approval of at least two-thirds of the votes cast at such extraordinary general meeting of shareholders.

Any resolutions to amend the articles of incorporation must be taken before a Luxembourg notary and such amendments must be published in accordance with Luxembourg law.

Merger and Division

A merger by absorption whereby a Luxembourg company, after its dissolution without liquidation transfers to another company all of its assets and liabilities in exchange for the issuance to the shareholders of the company being acquired of shares in the acquiring company, or a merger effected by transfer of assets to a newly incorporated company, must, in principle, be approved by an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of the Luxembourg company to be held before a notary. Similarly the de-merger of a Luxembourg company is generally subject to the approval by an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders.

Liquidation

In the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of Adecoagro, the assets remaining after allowing for the payment of all liabilities will be paid out to the shareholders pro rata to their respective shareholdings. The decision to voluntarily liquidate, dissolve or wind-up require the approval by an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of the Company to be held before a notary.

No Appraisal Rights

Neither Luxembourg law nor our articles of incorporation provide for any appraisal rights of dissenting shareholders.

Distributions

Subject to Luxembourg law, each share is entitled to participate equally in distributions if and when if declared by the general meeting of shareholders out of funds legally available for such purposes. Pursuant to the articles of incorporation, the general meeting of shareholders may approve distributions and the board of directors may declare interim distribution, to the extent permitted by Luxembourg law.

Declared and unpaid distributions held by us for the account of the shareholders shall not bear interest. Under Luxembourg law, claims for unpaid distributions will lapse in our favor five years after the date such distribution has been declared.

Annual Accounts

Each year the board of directors must prepare annual accounts, that is, an inventory of the assets and liabilities of Adecoagro together with a balance sheet and a profit and loss account. The board of directors must also prepare, each year, consolidated accounts and management reports on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts. The annual accounts, the consolidated accounts, the management report and the auditor’s reports must be available for inspection by shareholders at the registered office of Adecoagro at least 15 calendar days prior to the date of the annual general meeting of shareholders.

The annual accounts and the consolidated accounts, after approval by the annual general meeting of shareholders, will need to be filed with the Luxembourg registry of trade and companies within one month after the approval and no more than seven months after the close of the financial year.

153

##### Table of Contents

Information Rights

Luxembourg law gives shareholders limited rights to inspect certain corporate records 15 calendar days prior to the date of the annual general meeting of shareholders, including the annual accounts with the list of directors and auditors, the consolidated accounts, the notes to the annual accounts and the consolidated accounts, a list of shareholders whose shares are not fully paid-up, the management reports and the auditor’s report.

The annual accounts, the consolidated accounts, the auditor’s reports and the management reports are made available to registered shareholders at the same time as the convening notice for the annual general meeting of shareholders is sent. In addition, any registered shareholder is entitled to receive a copy of these documents free of charge 15 calendar days prior to the date of the annual general meeting of shareholders upon request.

Under Luxembourg law, it is generally accepted that a shareholder has the right to receive responses to questions concerning items on the agenda for a general meeting of shareholders, if such responses are necessary or useful for a shareholder to make an informed decision concerning such agenda item, unless a response to such questions could be detrimental to our interests.

Board of Directors

The management of Adecoagro is vested in a board of directors. Our articles of incorporation provide that the board must comprise at least three members and no more than eleven members. The number of directors is determined and the directors are appointed at the general meeting of shareholders (except in case of a vacancy in the office of a director because of death, retirement, resignation, dismissal, removal or otherwise, the remaining directors may fill such vacancy and appoint a successor in accordance with applicable Luxembourg law).

The directors are appointed for a period of up to three years; provided however the directors shall be elected on a staggered basis, with one-third of the directors being elected each year and provided further that such three year term may be exceeded by a period up to the annual general meeting held following the third anniversary of the appointment. Directors may be removed with or without cause (ad nutum) by the general meeting of shareholders by a simple majority of votes cast at a general meeting of shareholders. The directors shall be eligible for re-election indefinitely. The general shareholders’ meeting may dismiss one or more directors at any time, with or without cause by a resolution passed by simple majority vote, irrespective of the number of shares present at such general shareholders’ meeting.

Currently our board has 9 members (see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management—Board of Directors”). The board meets as often as required by our interests.

A majority of the members of the board in office (and able to vote) present or represented at a board meeting constitutes a quorum, and resolutions are adopted by the simple majority vote of the board members present or represented (and able to vote). The board may also take decisions by means of resolutions in writing signed by all directors.

Our board may delegate the daily management of the business of Adecoagro, as well as the power to represent Adecoagro in its day to day business, to individual directors or other officers or agents of the Company (with power to sub-delegate). In addition the board of directors may delegate the daily management of the business of Adecoagro, as well as the power to represent Adecoagro in its day to day business to an executive or other committee as it deems fit. The board of directors shall determine the conditions of appointment and dismissal as well as the remuneration and powers of any person or persons so appointed.

Currently the board of directors has appointed the officers listed under “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management.”

The board of directors may (but shall not be obliged to unless required by law) establish one or more committees (including without limitation an audit committee, a risk and commercial committee, a strategy committee and a compensation committee) and for which it shall, if one or more of such committees are set up, appoint the members (who may be but do not need to be board members), determine the purpose, powers and authorities as well as the procedures and such other rules as may be applicable thereto (subject as to the audit committee as set forth therein).

154

##### Table of Contents

Currently our board has set up an audit committee. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices.” Our board has set up a compensation committee. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices.” Our board has set up a risk and commercial committee. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices.” Our board has set up a strategy committee. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices.”

No director shall, solely as a result of being a director, be prevented from contracting with us, either with regard to his tenure of any office or place of profit or as vendor, purchaser or in any other manner whatsoever, nor shall any contract in which any director is in any way interested be liable to be avoided, in account of his position as director nor shall any director who is so interested be liable to account for us or the shareholders for any remuneration, profit or other benefit realized by the contract by reason of the director holding that office or of the fiduciary relationship thereby established.

Any director having an interest in a transaction submitted for approval to the board conflicting with our interest shall be obliged to advise the board thereof and to cause a record of his statement to be included in the minutes of the meeting. He may not take part in these deliberations nor in the vote of the resolution. At the next following general meeting, before any resolution is put to vote, a special report shall be made on any transactions in which any of the directors may have had an interest conflicting with our interest.

No shareholding qualification for directors is required.

Directors and other officers, past and present, are entitled to indemnification from us to the fullest extent permitted by law against liability and all expenses reasonably incurred by him in connection with any claim, action, suit or proceeding in which he is involved by virtue of his being or having been a director. We may purchase and maintain for any director or other officer insurance against any such liability.

No indemnification shall be provided against any liability to us or our shareholders by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of his office. No indemnification will be provided in the event of a settlement (unless approved by a court of competent jurisdiction or the board), nor will indemnification be provided in proceedings in which that director or officer has been finally adjudicated to have acted in bad faith and not in the interest of the Company.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

The transfer agent and registrar for our common shares is Computershare and all shares and shareholders have been transferred from the register held in Luxembourg to the register held on our behalf by Computershare as our registrar and transfer agent. The holders of our shares may elect to be entered in one of the registers and to be transferred from time to time from one register to another register provided that our board of directors may however impose transfer restrictions for shares that are registered, listed, quoted, dealt in, or have been placed in certain jurisdictions in compliance with the requirements applicable therein. The transfer to the register kept in Luxembourg may always be requested by a shareholder.

| C. | MATERIAL CONTRACTS

See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview.”

| D. | EXCHANGE CONTROLS

Foreign Exchange Controls

In 1991, the Argentine Convertibility Law established a fixed exchange rate according to which the Argentine Central Bank was statutorily obliged to sell U.S. dollars to any individual at a fixed exchange rate of Ps.1.00 per

155

##### Table of Contents

$1.00. In 2001 Argentina experienced a period of severe political, economic and social crisis, and on January 6, 2002, the Argentine congress enacted the Public Emergency Law abandoning more than ten years of fixed Peso-U.S. dollar parity. After devaluing the Peso and setting the official exchange rate at Ps.1.40 per $1.00, on February 11, 2002, the Argentine government allowed the Peso to float. The shortage of U.S. dollars and their heightened demand caused the Peso to further devaluate significantly in the first half of 2002. The Argentine Central Bank may indirectly affect this market through its active participation. Due to the deterioration of the economic and financial situation in Argentina during 2001 and 2002, in addition to the abandonment of the Peso-U.S. dollar parity, the Argentine government established a number of monetary and currency exchange control measures, including a partial freeze on bank deposits, the suspension on payments of its sovereign foreign debt, restrictions on the transfer of funds out of, or into, Argentina, and the creation of the Single Free Foreign Exchange Market (“Mercado Único y Libre de Cambios”, or the “FX Market”) through which all purchases and sales of foreign currency must be made. Since 2003, these restrictions have been progressively eased to some extent until 2011. However due to the increase of the capital flow out of Argentina, the Argentine government recently imposed some additional restrictions on the transfer of funds from Argentina. Accordingly, the following restrictions that could affect our Argentine operations are in effect:

(1) Argentine entities have access to the FX Market for the purchase of foreign currency and its transfer abroad for, among other things:

(a) Making payments of principal on foreign financial indebtedness at maturity or less than 10 days in advance of the stated maturity to the extent that the proceeds of the foreign indebtedness have remained in Argentina at least during the Waiting Period (as defined below) or to make partial or full payments more than 30 days in advance of the stated maturity, provided that, among other cases, (i) the payment is made with funds received from abroad as capital contributions or (ii) the payment is made with funds obtained from new indebtedness granted by international Organizations and Official Export Credit Agencies provided that certain requirements are met;

(b) Making payments of interest on foreign indebtedness on the stated interest payment date or less than 5 days prior to such stated interest payment date, provided that the foreign debt has been disclosed under the Foreign Debt Information Regime and that the interest to be paid accrued starting either (i) on the date the proceeds received from foreign indebtedness were sold in the FX Market or (ii) on the date of disbursement of funds, provided that the foreign debt has been disclosed under the Foreign Debt Information Regime and that those funds were credited in accounts of correspondent banks that are authorized to sell foreign exchange proceeds in the FX Market within 2 days of disbursement thereof;

(c) Making payments for services rendered by foreign residents provided that certain requirements are met;

(d) Making payments for imported goods, on demand or in advance, provided that certain requirements are met (e.g., nationalization of the imported goods within certain specific terms and filing of the import documentation with the financial entity); and

(e) Making payments of corporate profits and dividends to non-Argentine-resident shareholders, provided that the distribution of dividends is approved on the basis of audited financial statements issued by the Argentine entity and certified by external auditors.

(2) Argentine entities are required to transfer into Argentina and sell for Pesos through the FX Market, among others, the proceeds from foreign financial indebtedness and from foreign indebtedness qualifying as pre-export financing under the rules of the Argentine Central Bank (the “Pre-Export Financings”) within the following 30 days and 10 days after disbursement respectively;

(3) Argentine entities are required to transfer into Argentina and sell for Pesos in the FX Market all foreign currency proceeds from exports of goods (except those that are applied to the repayment of Pre-Export Financings) and services within the certain times established by the Ministry of Economy and the Argentine Central Bank;

156

##### Table of Contents

(4) No payments on new foreign financial indebtedness (other than debt securities issued under a primary public offering and listed in self-regulated markets, Pre-Export Financings, and indebtedness with multilateral and bilateral credit institutions and official credit agencies granted to Argentine residents directly through related agencies) or their renewals or extensions can be made by any means before a 365-day term has elapsed from the date on which the proceeds of the new foreign indebtedness have been transferred into Argentina and converted into Pesos through the FX Market, or from the date of their renewal or extension (the “Waiting Period”) unless the transaction qualifies for an exemption;

(5) Upon their transfer into Argentina and sale for Pesos through the FX Market, the proceeds of foreign financial indebtedness are subject to the placement of a mandatory, non-interest bearing and non-transferrable bank deposit in U.S. dollars with an Argentine financial entity in an amount equal to 30% of the aggregate amount of such proceeds so transferred for a term of 365 days (the “Mandatory Deposit”). The Mandatory Deposit shall be applicable to the following transactions, among others: (i) incurrence of foreign indebtedness; (ii) offerings involving primary or secondary offerings of capital stock or debt securities issued by companies domiciled in Argentina which are not listed on self-regulated markets, to the extent they do not constitute direct investments (i.e., less than 10% of capital stock); (iii) non-residents’ portfolio investments made for the purpose of holding Argentine currency and assets and liabilities in the financial and non-financial private sector in excess of $5,000 per calendar month, to the extent that such investments are not the result of primary subscriptions of debt securities issued pursuant to a public offering and listed in self-regulated markets and/or primary subscriptions of capital stock of companies domiciled in Argentina issued pursuant to a public offering and listed in self regulated markets; (iv) non-residents’ portfolio investments made for the purpose of purchasing any right in securities in the secondary market issued by the public sector; (v) non-residents’ portfolio investments made for the purpose of purchasing primary offers of Central Bank securities issued in primary offerings; (vi) inflows of funds to the Argentine foreign exchange market derived from the sale of foreign portfolio investments of Argentine residents within the private sector in an amount in excess of $2.0 million per calendar month; and (vii) any inflow of funds to the Argentine foreign exchange market made for the purpose of primary offers of bonds and other securities issued by a trust, whether or not issued pursuant to a public offering and whether or not they are listed in self-regulated markets, to the extent that the funds to be used for the purchase of any of the underlying assets would be subject to the non-interest bearing deposit requirement.

The following transactions are exempted from the application of the Mandatory Deposit, among others: (i) primary or secondary offerings of debt securities or stock issued pursuant to a public offering and listed on a self-regulated market; (ii) foreign currency denominated loans granted by a local financial entity under certain conditions; (iii) indebtedness with multilateral and bilateral credit institutions and official credit agencies; (iv) the proceeds of foreign financial indebtedness; provided that (a) the proceeds from the exchange settlement, net of taxes and expenses, are used to purchase foreign currency in order to pay principal on foreign debt and/or to invest in long term foreign assets; or (b) the loan has a minimum average life of not less than two years, including payments of principal and interest, and to the extent the proceeds of such loan are applied to make investments which are then registered among other capitalized cost categories as “property, plant and equipment” (bienes de uso), “research/exploration costs” (gastos de investigation, prospección y exploration) or “intangible assets” (activos intangibles) as part of the relevant debtor’s balance sheet or “inventory” (bienes de cambio); and (v) foreign trade financings; and

(6) Transfer into Argentina and sale for Pesos through the FX Market of foreign investments of Argentine entities is subject to the Mandatory Deposit on the amounts exceeding $2.0 million per calendar month.

(7) Non-Argentine residents require prior Argentine Central Bank approval to purchase foreign currency in the FX Market, unless the transaction qualifies for an exemption. The Argentine Central Bank has established the following exemptions: (a) without limitation on the amount: for the total amounts collected in Argentina under the sale and liquidation of a “direct investment” in Argentina (i.e. sale of real property, sale of equity holdings, capital reduction and reimbursement of capital contributions in an Argentine company where the investor holds more than 10% of the aggregate equity); and (b) up to the amount of US$ 500,000 per calendar month: for the amounts collected under portfolio investments (including interest) and/or resulting from the sale of such portfolio investments (i.e. stock portfolio and stockholdings in local companies, investment in mutual investment funds and local trusts, purchases of bank credit portfolios, investments in local bonds issued in Argentine Pesos and purchases of other local credits).

157

##### Table of Contents

The above exemptions are subject to compliance with certain requirements, including: (a) in the case of sale of portfolio investment, the non-Argentine resident must file a certificate issued by a financial entity or exchange agency stating the amount of the investment and the date in which the funds paid for such investment were transferred to Argentina and, if applicable, sold in the FX Market; and (b) in the case of the re-patriation of “direct investments”, among other requirements, the non-Argentine investor was not obliged to demonstrate that the funds paid for its investment or disbursement for its capital contribution were transferred and sold in the FX Market (i.e. brought to Argentina and sold for Argentine pesos) in order to be allowed to repatriate (i.e. have access to the FX Market to purchase foreign currency with Argentine pesos and transfer it abroad) the funds collected in Argentina as a consequence of a subsequent sale or liquidation of such investment, or capital reduction or reimbursement.

In both cases, 365 days period shall be elapsed since the investment has been made.

On October 28, 2011, the Argentine Central Bank issued the Communication “A” 5237 that added new requirements for non-Argentine investors to repatriate funds collected in Argentina as a consequence of a sale or liquidation of a “direct investment”.

Pursuant to this Communication, in order for a non-Argentine investor to be allowed to have access to the FX Market to purchase foreign currency with Argentine pesos collected in Argentina and transfer it abroad as a result of a subsequent sale or liquidation of a “direct investment”, the non-Argentine investor must evidence that the funds originally paid for such investment, were transferred into Argentina and sold for pesos in the FX Market (the “Transfer Requirement”). All “direct investments” made before October 28, 2011 are exempted from the Transfer Requirement. The Communication sets a “burden” to be met by any non-Argentine resident who eventually needs to purchase foreign currency in the FX Market to repatriate Argentine-Peso denominated funds collected as a result of the sale or liquidation of an investment. Conversely, if the foreign investor believes that it will not need to repatriate, it is not required to comply with the Transfer Requirement, and therefore, the purchase price of such investment and any capital contribution may be kept abroad. The Communication does not restrict the purchase of foreign currency to pay dividends to non-Argentine residents.

The Communication additionally sets forth that in case of a transfer of rights of a foreign direct investment between non-Argentine residents, the Transfer Requirement will be deemed complied with by the transferor if the investor (the “Prior Investor”) who sold the investment to the transferor complied with the Transfer Requirement, as long as the Transfer Requirement were complied with by the Prior Investor because its investment had been made as from the Effective Date. Therefore, the Communication allows repatriation to the selling investor if the investor who originally sold the investment had already complied with the Transfer Requirement.

| E. | TAXATION

Material Luxembourg Tax Considerations for Holders of Shares

The following is a summary discussion of certain Luxembourg tax considerations of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of your shares that may be applicable to you if you acquire our shares. This does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to any of the Company’s common shares, and does not purport to include tax considerations that arise from rules of general application or that are generally assumed to be known to holders. This discussion is not a complete analysis or listing of all of the possible tax consequences of such transactions and does not address all tax considerations that might be relevant to particular holders in light of their personal circumstances or to persons that are subject to special tax rules.

It is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice. This discussion is based on Luxembourg laws and regulations as they stand on the date of this annual report and is subject to any change in law or regulations or changes in interpretation or application thereof (and which may possibly have a retroactive effect). Prospective investors should therefore consult their own professional advisers as to the effects of state, local or foreign laws and regulations, including Luxembourg tax law and regulations, to which they may be subject.

158

##### Table of Contents

As used herein, a “Luxembourg individual” means an individual resident in Luxembourg who is subject to personal income tax (impôt sur le evenue) on his or her worldwide income from Luxembourg or foreign sources, and a “Luxembourg corporate holder” means a company (that is, a fully taxable entity within the meaning of Article 159 of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law) resident in Luxembourg subject to corporate income tax (impôt sur le evenue des collectivités) on its worldwide income from Luxembourg or foreign sources. For purposes of this summary, Luxembourg individuals and Luxembourg corporate holders are collectively referred to as “Luxembourg Holders”. A “non-Luxembourg Holder” means any investor in shares of Adecoagro other than a Luxembourg Holder.

Tax regime applicable to realized capital gains

Luxembourg Holders

Luxembourg resident individual holders

Capital gains realized by Luxembourg resident individuals who do not hold their shares as part of a commercial or industrial business and who hold no more than 10% of the share capital of the Company will only be taxable if they are realized on a sale of shares that takes place before their acquisition or within the first six months following their acquisition.

If such shares are held as part of a commercial or industrial business, capital gains would be taxable in the same manner as income from such business.

For Luxembourg resident individuals holding (together with his/her spouse or civil partner and underage children) directly or indirectly more than 10% of the capital of Adecoagro, capital gains will be taxable, regardless of the holding period. In case of a sale of shares after six months following their acquisition, a more favorable tax rate will apply.

Luxembourg resident corporate holders

Capital gains realized upon the disposal of shares by a fully taxable resident corporate holder will in principle be subject to corporate income tax and municipal business tax. The combined applicable rate (including an unemployment fund contribution) is 29.22% for the fiscal year ending 2013 for a corporate holder established in Luxembourg-City. An exemption from such taxes may be available to the holder pursuant to article 166 of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law subject to the fulfillment of the conditions set forth therein. The scope of the capital gains exemption can be limited in the cases provided by the Grand Ducal Decree of December 21,2001.

Non-Luxembourg Holders

An individual who is a non-Luxembourg Holder of shares (and who does not have a permanent establishment, a permanent representative or a fixed place of business in Luxembourg) will only be subject to Luxembourg taxation on capital gains arising upon disposal of such shares if such holder has (together with his or her spouse and underage children) directly or indirectly held more than 10% of the capital of Adecoagro at any time during the past five years, and either (i) such holder has been a resident of Luxembourg for tax purposes for at least 15 years and has become a non-resident within the last five years preceding the realization of the gain, subject to any applicable tax treaty, or (ii) the disposal of shares occurs within six months from their acquisition (or prior to their actual acquisition), subject to any applicable tax treaty.

A corporate non-Luxembourg Holder (that is, an entity within the meaning of Article 159 of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law), which has a permanent establishment, a permanent representative or a fixed place of business in Luxembourg to which shares are attributable, will bear corporate income tax and municipal business tax on a gain realized on a disposal of such shares as set forth above for a Luxembourg corporate holder. However, gains realized on the sale of the shares may benefit from the full exemption provided for by Article 166 of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law and by the Grand Ducal Decree of December 21, 2001 subject in each case to fulfillment of the conditions set out therein.

159

##### Table of Contents

A corporate non-Luxembourg Holder, which has no permanent establishment in Luxembourg to which the shares are attributable, will bear corporate income tax on a gain realized on a disposal of such shares under the same conditions applicable to an individual non-Luxembourg Holder, as set out above.

Tax regime applicable to distributions

Withholding tax

Distributions imputed for tax purposes on newly accumulated profits are subject to a withholding tax of 15%. The rate of the withholding tax may be reduced pursuant to double tax avoidance treaty existing between Luxembourg and the country of residence of the relevant holder, subject to the fulfillment of the conditions set forth therein.

No withholding tax applies if the distribution is made to (i) a Luxembourg resident corporate holder (that is, a fully taxable entity within the meaning of Article 159 of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law), (ii) an undertaking of collective character which is resident of a Member State of the European Union and is referred to by article 2 of the Council Directive of 2011/96 concerning the common fiscal regime applicable to parent and subsidiary companies of different member states of November 20, 2011, (iii) a corporation or a cooperative company resident in Norway, Iceland or Liechtenstein and subject to a tax comparable to corporate income tax as provided by the Luxembourg Income Tax Law, (iv) an undertaking with a collective character subject to a tax comparable to corporate income tax as provided by the Luxembourg Income Tax Law which is resident in a country that has concluded a tax treaty with Luxembourg, (v) a Luxembourg permanent establishment of one of the afore-mentioned categories and (vi) a corporation company resident in Switzerland which is subject to corporate income tax in Switzerland without benefiting from an exemption, provided that at the date of payment, the holder holds or commits to hold directly or through a tax transparent vehicle, during an uninterrupted period of at least twelve months, shares representing at least 10% of the share capital of Adecoagro or acquired for an acquisition price of at least EUR 1,200,000.

Luxembourg Holders

With the exception of a Luxembourg corporate holders benefitting from the exemption referred to above, Luxembourg individual holders, and Luxembourg corporate holders subject to Luxembourg corporation taxes, must include the distributions paid on the shares in their taxable income, 50% of the amount of such dividends being exempted from tax. The applicable withholding tax can, under certain conditions, entitle the relevant Luxembourg Holder to a tax credit.

Net wealth tax

Luxembourg Holders

Luxembourg net wealth tax will not be levied on a Luxembourg Holder with respect to the shares held unless (i) the Luxembourg Holder is a legal entity subject to net wealth tax in Luxembourg; or (ii) the shares are attributable to an enterprise or part thereof which is carried on through a permanent establishment, a fixed place of business or a permanent representative in Luxembourg.

Net wealth tax is levied annually at the rate of 0.5% on the net wealth of enterprises resident in Luxembourg, as determined for net wealth tax purposes. The shares may be exempt from net wealth tax subject to the conditions set forth by Paragraph 60 of the Law of October 16, 1934 on the valuation of assets (Bewertungsgesetz), as amended.

Non-Luxembourg Holders

Luxembourg net wealth tax will not be levied on a non-Luxembourg Holder with respect to the shares held unless the shares are attributable to an enterprise or part thereof which is carried on through a permanent establishment or a permanent representative in Luxembourg.

160

##### Table of Contents

Stamp and registration taxes

No registration tax or stamp duty will be payable by a holder of shares in Luxembourg solely upon the disposal of shares by sale or exchange.

Estate and gift taxes

No estate or inheritance tax is levied on the transfer of shares upon the death of a holder of shares in cases where the deceased was not a resident of Luxembourg for inheritance tax purposes and no gift tax is levied upon a gift of shares if the gift is not passed before a Luxembourg notary or recorded in a deed registered in Luxembourg. Where a holder of shares is a resident of Luxembourg for tax purposes at the time of his death, the shares are included in its taxable estate for inheritance tax or estate tax purposes.

United States Federal Income Taxation of the Company

Our business assets and properties are located, and all of our employees and executives are based outside the United States. Our business is directly conducted through operating companies organized under the laws of countries other than the United States. These non-U.S. operating companies are indirectly owned by IFH, a holding company which is a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes organized under the laws of Delaware. As a partnership that is not engaged in a trade or business within the United States within the meaning of section 864 of the Internal Revenue Code, IFH is not itself subject to U.S. federal net income taxes. We acquired approximately 98 percent of IFH prior to undertaking the IPO in exchange for our stock.

Under rules to prevent expatriation of and by U.S. corporations and certain U.S. partnerships under Code section 7874(b), we would be treated as a U.S. domestic corporation if for this purpose (i) we were deemed to have acquired substantially all of the assets constituting the trade or business of a U.S. domestic partnership and (ii) former members of IFH were deemed to own at least 80% of our stock by reason of the transfer of those trade or business assets (ignoring stock issued in the IPO for purposes of the 80% threshold) and (iii) we were found not to conduct substantial business activities in Luxembourg. In that event, we would be subject to U.S. federal net income tax on our worldwide income and dividends we pay would be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax at a 30% rate (subject to reduction, to the extent the beneficial owner of the dividend is entitled to claim a reduced rate of withholding under an applicable income tax treaty).

We believe that the restructuring transactions executed prior to or in connection with the IPO should not be subject to section 7874(b). Accordingly, we do not believe that we will be subject to U.S. taxation on a net income basis nor do we anticipate paying dividends subject to U.S. federal withholding tax. However, the relevant rules are unclear in certain respects and there is limited guidance on the application of the rules to acquisitions of partnerships or partnership assets constituting a trade or business. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that the IRS will not seek to assert that we are a U.S. domestic corporation, which assertion if successful could materially increase our U.S. federal income tax liability. Prospective holders who are non-United States persons should also note that, in that event, we would be required to withhold tax from any dividends we pay to non-U.S. Holders (subject to any applicable income tax treaties applicable to those non-U.S. Holders).

Shareholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors about the possible application of section 7874. The remainder of this discussion assumes that we are not treated as a U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Holders

The following is a discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common shares. This discussion applies only to beneficial owners of common shares that are “U.S. Holders” (as defined below) and that hold our common shares as “capital assets” (generally, property held for investment). This discussion is based on the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the “Code”), final, temporary and proposed Treasury regulations, administrative pronouncements and judicial decisions, all as currently in effect and all of which are subject to change (possibly with retroactive effect) and to differing interpretations.

161

##### Table of Contents

This discussion does not address all U.S. federal income tax considerations that may be relevant to a particular holder based on its particular circumstances, and you are urged to consult your own independent tax advisor regarding your specific tax situation. For example, the discussion does not address the tax considerations that may be relevant to U.S. Holders in special tax situations, such as:

| • |  | insurance companies;

| • |  | tax-exempt organizations;

| • |  | brokers or dealers in securities or currencies and traders in securities that elect to mark to market;

| • |  | certain financial institutions;

| • |  | partnerships or other pass-through entities;

| • |  | holders whose functional currency for U.S. federal income tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar;

| • |  | U.S. expatriates;

| • |  | holders that hold our common shares as part of a hedge, straddle or conversion or other integrated transaction; or

| • |  | holders that own, directly, indirectly, or constructively, 10% or more of the total combined voting power of our common shares.

This discussion does not address the alternative minimum tax consequences of holding common shares or the indirect consequences to holders of equity interests in partnerships or other entities that own our common shares. Moreover, this discussion does not address the state, local and foreign tax consequences of holding our common shares, or any aspect of U.S. federal tax law (such as the estate and gift tax or the Medicare tax on net investment income) other than U.S. federal income taxation.

You are a “U.S. Holder” if you are a beneficial owner of our common shares and you are, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

| • |  | an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;

| • |  | a corporation, or any other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any State thereof, including the District of Columbia;

| • |  | an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source;

| • |  | a trust (a) if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of its substantial decisions or (b) that has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

If a partnership (or an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds our common shares, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. A partner of a partnership considering the purchase of our common shares should consult its own independent tax advisor.

You should consult your own independent tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. income and other tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of our common shares in your particular circumstances.

162

##### Table of Contents

Passive Foreign Investment Company (“PFIC”) Rules

U.S. Holders generally will be subject to a special, adverse tax regime that would differ in certain respects from the tax treatment described below if we are, or were to become, a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

In general, we will be a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder if, for any taxable year in which the U.S. Holder held our common shares, either (i) at least 75% of our gross income for the taxable year is passive income or (ii) at least 50% of the value (determined on the basis of a quarterly average) of our assets is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. For this purpose, passive income generally includes, among other things, dividends, interest, royalties, rents, annuities and gains from assets that produce passive income. If a foreign corporation owns at least 25% by value of the stock of another corporation, the foreign corporation is treated for purposes of the PFIC tests as owning its proportionate share of the assets of the other corporation, and as receiving directly its proportionate share of the other corporation’s income.

Although the determination of whether a corporation is a PFIC is made annually, and thus may be subject to change, we do not believe that we were a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for our most recently completed taxable year, nor that we will be one for our current taxable year and we do not currently expect to become one in the foreseeable future. The remainder of this discussion assumes that we are not a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Dividends

Distributions with respect to our common shares will, to the extent made from our current or accumulated earnings and profits as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles, constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes. To the extent that any distribution exceeds the amount of our earnings and profits, it will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the common shares, and thereafter as capital gain.

We do not currently maintain calculations of our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles. Unless and until these calculations are made, distributions should be presumed to be taxable dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As used below, the term “dividend” means a distribution that constitutes a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Cash dividends (including amounts withheld on account of foreign taxes) paid with respect to our common shares generally will be includible in the gross income of a U.S. Holder as ordinary income on the day on which the dividends are received by the U.S. Holder. Dividends with respect to our common shares will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to corporations.

Certain non-corporate U.S. Holders, including individuals, may be entitled to preferential rates of taxation with respect to dividends. . Such preferential rates of taxation are available for dividends paid by qualified foreign corporations. A foreign corporation will be treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends received from that corporation on common shares that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. As our shares will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange, we believe dividends paid by us will be eligible for these preferential rates. There can, however, be no assurance that our common shares will be considered readily tradable on an established securities market in the future. A qualified foreign corporation also includes foreign corporations eligible for the benefits of certain income tax treaties with the United States. If, as we anticipate, we are eligible for the benefits of the income tax treaty between Luxembourg and the United States, dividends paid on our common shares would be eligible for preferential rates of taxation without regard to the trading status of our common shares.

The amount of any cash dividend paid in foreign currency will equal the U.S. dollar value of the distribution, calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date the distribution is received, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted to U.S. dollars at that time. A U.S. Holder should not recognize any foreign currency gain or loss in respect of such distribution if such foreign currency is converted into U.S. dollars on the date received. If the foreign currency is not converted into U.S. dollars on the date received, however, gain or loss may be recognized upon a subsequent sale or other disposition of the foreign currency. Such foreign currency gain or loss, if any, will be U.S.-source ordinary income or loss.

163

##### Table of Contents

Dividends received by most U.S. Holders will constitute foreign-source “passive category” income (“general category income” for certain U.S. Holders) for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Subject to limitations under U.S. federal income tax law concerning credits or deductions for foreign taxes and certain exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, a Luxembourg withholding tax imposed on dividends described above under “Material Luxembourg Tax Considerations for Holders of Shares—Tax regime applicable to distributions—Withholding tax” would be treated as a foreign income tax eligible for credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability (or at a U.S. Holder’s election, may be deducted in computing taxable income if the U.S. Holder has elected to deduct all foreign income taxes for the taxable year). Special limitations on foreign tax credits apply to dividends subject to the preferential rate of taxation for qualified dividends. The rules with respect to foreign tax credits are complex and U.S. Holders are urged to consult their independent tax advisors regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit under their particular circumstances.

Taxation of Capital Gains

Gain or loss realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares will be subject to U.S. federal income taxation as capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized (including the gross amount of the proceeds before the deduction of any foreign tax) on the sale or other taxable disposition and such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the common shares. Capital gains of certain non-corporate U.S. Holders, including individuals, derived with respect to capital assets held for more than one year generally are eligible for various reduced rates of taxation. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations under the Code.

Capital gain or loss, if any, realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of a common share generally will be treated as U.S. source income or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Consequently, in the case of a disposition of a share that is subject to Luxembourg or other foreign income tax imposed on the gain, the U.S. Holder may not be able to benefit from the foreign tax credit for that foreign income tax (i.e., because the income or loss on the disposition would be U.S. source). Alternatively, the U.S. Holder may take a deduction for the foreign income tax if such holder does not take a credit for any foreign income tax during the taxable year.

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

In general, dividends on common shares, and payments of the proceeds of a sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares, paid within the U.S. or through certain U.S. related financial intermediaries to a U.S. Holder are subject to information reporting and may be subject to backup withholding unless the holder is an exempt recipient or, in the case of backup withholding, provides an accurate taxpayer identification number and certifies under penalty of perjury that the holder is a U.S. person and is not subject to backup withholding.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Generally, you may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules that exceed your U.S. federal income tax liability by timely filing a refund claim with the IRS. The amount of any backup withholding withheld from a payment to a U.S. Holder will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

Recently enacted legislation requires certain U.S. Holders to report to the IRS information with respect to their investment in certain “foreign financial assets,” including our common shares, not held through a custodial account with a U.S. financial institution. Investors who fail to report this required information could become subject to substantial penalties. Prospective investors are encouraged to consult with their own tax advisors regarding the possible implications of this new legislation on their investment in our common shares.

| F. | DIVIDENDS AND PAYING AGENTS

Not applicable.

164

##### Table of Contents

| G. | STATEMENT BY EXPERTS

Not applicable.

| H. | DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY

We are required to file annual and special reports and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any documents filed by the Company at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. The SEC also maintains a website at http://www.sec.gov which contains reports and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC.

| I. | SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION

Not applicable.

Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

In the normal course of business, we are exposed to commodity price and interest rate risks, primarily related to our crop production activities and changes in exchange rates and interest rates. We manage our exposure to these risks through the use of various financial instruments, none of which are entered into for trading purposes. We have established policies and procedures governing the use of financial instruments, specifically as they relate to the type and volume of such financial instruments. Our use of financial derivative instruments is associated with our core business and is regulated by internal control policies. For further information on our market risks, please see Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements.

Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities

| A. | DEBT SECURITIES

Not applicable.

| B. | WARRANTS AND RIGHTS

Not applicable.

| C. | OTHER SECURITIES

Not applicable.

| D. | AMERICAN DEPOSITORY SHARES

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

Not applicable.

Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

165

##### Table of Contents

Item 15. Controls and Procedures

a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation pursuant to Rule 13a-15 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2012. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based on this evaluation, our company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2012.

b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company’s Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer that: (i) pertains to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Company’s assets; (ii) provides reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements for external reporting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of the Company’s management and directors; and (iii) provides reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedure may deteriorate. The Company, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012.

We assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. In making this assessment, management used the criteria established in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). As a result of this assessment, the Company’s management has determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012.

c) Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

Price Waterhouse & Co S.R.L, an independent registered public accounting firm, our independent auditor, issued an attestation report on Internal Control Over Financing Reporting on April 29, 2013. The report of Price Waterhouse & Co S.R.L, our independent auditor, on our internal control over financial reporting is included herein at page F-2 of our consolidated financial statements.

d) Changes in internal control over financial reporting

As required by Rule 13a-15(d), under the Exchange Act, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any change occurred during the period covered since the last report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, it has been determined that there has been no change during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

166

##### Table of Contents

| Item 16A. | Audit Committee Financial Expert

Our audit committee consists of three independent directors: Mr. Plínio Musetti, Mr. Mark Schachter and Mr. Julio Moura Neto. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Mark Schachter has the attributes of an “audit committee financial expert” and is independent within the meaning of this Item 16A and satisfies the financial literacy requirements of the NYSE.

| Item 16B. | Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics and business conduct that applies to our directors, executive officers and all employees. The text of our code of ethics is posted on our web site at: www.adecoagro.com.

| Item 16C. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees by categories specified below in connection with certain professional services rendered by Price Waterhouse & Co. S.R.L., a member firm of Price WaterhouseCoopers International Limited Network, an independent registered accounting public firm and our principal external auditors, for the periods indicated. Except as set forth below, we did not pay any other fees to our auditors during the periods indicated below.

|  | For the year ended December 31, |
|  | (in thousands of $) |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Audit Fees (1) |  |  | 1,983 |  |  |  | 1,381 |
Audit- Related Fees (2) |  |  | 56 |  |  |  | — |
Total |  |  | 2,039 |  |  |  | 1,381 |

(1) | “Audit fees” means the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by our principal auditors for the audit of our annual financial statements.

(2) | “Audit-related fees” represents aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by our principal auditors for the assurance and related services, as well as in connection with audit related services for SEC or other regulatory filings.

Audit Committee Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee has adopted pre-approval policies and procedures requiring that all audit and non-audit services performed by our independent auditors must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee annually reviews and pre-approves the services that may be provided by the independent auditors without obtaining specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee. Any service proposals submitted by external auditors that are not pre-approved services need to be discussed and approved by the Audit Committee during its meetings. Once the proposed service is approved, we or our subsidiaries formalize the engagement of services.

The Audit Committee or its Chairman, or any member of the Audit Committee to whom such authority is delegated, may approve in advance any permitted audit or permited non-audit services and fees up to a predetermined amount. The Audit Committee is authorized to establish other policies and procedures for the pre-approval of such services and fees. The Audit Committee approved all of the non-audit services described above and determined that the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining the independence of Price Waterhouse & Co. S.R.L.

| Item 16D. | Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

Not applicable.

167

##### Table of Contents

| Item 16E. | Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

Not applicable.

| Item 16F. | Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

Not applicable.

| Item 16G. | Corporate Governance

Our corporate governance practices are governed by Luxembourg law (particularly the law of August 10th, 1915 on commercial companies) and our articles of association. As a Luxembourg company listed on the NYSE, we are not required to comply with all of the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE. We, however, believe that our corporate governance practices meet or exceed, in all material respects, the corporate governance standards that are generally required for controlled companies by the NYSE. The following is a summary of the significant ways that our corporate governance practices differ from the corporate governance standards required for listed U.S. companies by the NYSE (provided that our corporate governance practices may differ in non-material ways from the standards required by the NYSE that are not detailed here):

Majority of Independent Directors

Under NYSE standards, U.S. listed companies must have a majority of independent directors. There is no legal obligation under Luxembourg law to have a majority of independent directors on the board of directors.

Non-management Directors’ Meetings

Under NYSE standards, non-management directors must meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management present and, if such group includes directors who are not independent, a meeting should be scheduled once per year including only independent directors. Luxembourg law does not require holding of such meetings. For additional information, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management.”

Communication with Non-Management Directors

NYSE-listed companies are required to provide a method for interested parties to communicate directly with the non-management directors as a group. Shareholders may send communications to the Company’s non-management directors by writing to Mr. Plínio Musetti at Rua Amauri, 255 - 17th Floor, Jardim Europa, São Paulo, SP 01448-000, Brazil, telephone: (5511) 3035-1588. Communications will be referred to the Presiding Director for appropriate action. The status of all outstanding concerns addressed to the Presiding Director will be reported to the board of directors as appropriate.

Audit Committee

Under NYSE standards, listed U.S. companies are required to have an audit committee composed of independent directors that satisfies the requirements of Rule 10A-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act of 1934. Our Articles of Association provide that the board of directors may set up an audit committee. The board of directors has set up an Audit Committee and has appointed Mr. Plínio Musetti, Mr. Mark Schachter and Mr. Julio Moura Neto as members of its audit committee. In accordance with NYSE standards, we have an audit committee entirely composed of independent directors. For additional information, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices”.

Under NYSE standards, all audit committee members of listed U.S. companies are required to be financially literate or must acquire such financial knowledge within a reasonable period and at least one of its members shall have experience in accounting or financial administration. In addition, if a member of the audit committee is simultaneously a member of the audit committee of more than three public companies, and the listed company does not limit the number of audit committees on which its members may serve, then in each case the board must

168

##### Table of Contents

determine whether the simultaneous service would prevent such member from effectively serving on the listed company’s audit committee and shall publicly disclose its decision. No comparable provisions on audit committee membership exist under Luxembourg law or our articles of association.

Standards for Evaluating Director Independence

Under NYSE standards, the board is required, on a case by case basis, to express an opinion with regard to the independence or lack of independence of each individual director. Neither Luxembourg law nor our Articles of Association require the board to express such an opinion. In addition, the definition of “independent” under the rules of the NYSE differs in some non-material respects from the definition contained in our Articles of Association.

Audit Committee Responsibilities

Pursuant to our Articles of Association, the audit committee shall assist the board of directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, including periodically reporting to the board of directors on its activity and the adequacy of the Company’s system of internal controls over financial reporting. As per the audit committee charter, as amended, the audit committee shall make recommendations for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of, and consider the independence of, the company’s external auditors. The audit committee is required to review material transactions (as defined by the Articles of Association) between us or our subsidiaries with related parties, perform such other duties imposed to it by laws and regulations of the regulated market(s) on which the shares of the Company are listed, and also perform the other duties entrusted to it by the board.

The NYSE requires certain matters to be set forth in the audit committee charter of U.S. listed companies. Our audit committee charter provides for many of the responsibilities that are expected from such bodies under the NYSE standard; however, due to our equity structure and holding company nature, the charter does not contain all such responsibilities, including provisions related to setting hiring policies for employees or former employees of independent auditors.

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee.

The NYSE requires that a listed U.S. company have a nominating/corporate governance committee of independent directors and a committee charter specifying the purpose, duties and evaluation procedures of the committee. As permitted under Luxembourg law and our Articles of Association, we do not currently have a nominating or corporate governance committee.

Shareholder Voting on Equity Compensation Plans

Under NYSE standards, shareholders of U.S. listed companies must be given the opportunity to vote on equity compensation plans and material revisions thereto, except for employment inducement awards, certain grants, plans and amendments in the context of mergers and acquisitions, and certain specific types of plans. Neither Luxembourg corporate law nor our articles of incorporation require shareholder approval of equity based compensation plans. Luxembourg law only requires approval of the board of directors for the adoption of equity based compensation plans.

Disclosure of Corporate Governance Guidelines

NYSE-listed companies must adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. Neither Luxembourg law nor our Articles of Association require the adoption or disclosure of corporate governance guidelines. Our board of directors follows corporate governance guidelines consistent with our equity structure and holding company nature, but we have not codified them and therefore do not disclose them on our website.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Under NYSE standards, listed companies must adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees, and promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or executive officers. Neither Luxembourg law nor our Articles of Association require the adoption or disclosure of such a code of conduct.

169

##### Table of Contents

We have adopted a code of ethics and business conduct that applies to our directors, executive officers and all employees. The text of our code of ethics is posted on our web site at: www.adecoagro.com.

Chief Executive Officer Certification

A chief executive officer of a U.S. company listed on NYSE must annually certify that he or she is not aware of any violation by the company of NYSE corporate governance standards. In accordance with NYSE rules applicable to foreign private issuers, our chief executive officer is not required to provide NYSE with this annual compliance certification. However, in accordance with NYSE rules applicable to all listed companies, our chief executive officer must promptly notify NYSE in writing after any of our executive officers becomes aware of any noncompliance with any applicable provision of NYSE’s corporate governance standards. In addition, we must submit an executed written affirmation annually and an interim written affirmation each time a change occurs to the board or the audit committee.

| Item 16H. | Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

PART III

Item 17. Financial Statements

We have responded to Item 18 in lieu of responding to this item.

Item 18. Financial Statements.

See pages F-1 through F-90 of this annual report.

Item 19. Exhibits

Exhibit Number |  | Description
1.1 |  | Amended and Restated Articles of Association of Adecoagro S.A. dated April 9, 2013.
4.1 |  | Loan Agreement, dated December 19, 2008, between Adeco Agropecuaria S.A., Pilagá S.R.L. and Inter-American Development Bank, previously filed as exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-171683) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 13, 2011 (“Form F-1”) and incorporated by reference herein.
4.2 |  | First Amendment Offer to Loan Agreement, dated February 20, 2009, between Adeco Agropecuaria S.A., Pilagá S.R.L. and Inter-American Development Bank, previously filed as exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.3 |  | Second Amendment Offer to Loan Agreement, dated December 29, 2009, between Adeco Agropecuaria S.A., Pilagá S.R.L. and Inter-American Development Bank, previously filed as exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.4 |  | Third Waiver Request to Loan Agreement, dated March 30, 2010, between Adeco Agropecuaria S.A., Pilagá S.R.L. and Inter-American Development Bank, previously filed as exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.5 |  | Fourth Amendment Offer to Loan Agreement, dated May 14, 2010, between Adeco Agropecuaria S.A., Pilagá S.R.L. and Inter-American Development Bank, previously filed as exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.

170

##### Table of Contents

4.6 |  | Fifth Amendment Offer to Loan Agreement, dated November 8, 2010, between Adeco Agropecuaria S.A., Pilagá S.R.L. and Inter-American Development Bank, previously filed as exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.7 |  | Amendment Offer to Loan Agreement, dated March 24, 2011, between Adeco Agropecuaria S.A., Pilagá S.R.L. and Inter-American Development Bank., previously filed as Exhibit 4.7 to the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference.
4.8 |  | Amendment Offer 02/2011 to Loan Agreement, dated November 9, 2011, between Adeco Agropecuaria S.A., Pilagá S.A. and Inter-American Development Bank., previously filed as Exhibit 4.8 to the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference.
4.9 |  | Senior Secured Loan Facility, dated July 28, 2010, between Angélica Agroenergia Ltda. and Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch, previously filed as exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.10 |  | Export Prepayment Financing Agreement, dated July 13, 2007, between Angélica Agroenergia Ltda. and a syndicate of banks, previously filed as exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.11 |  | First Amendment to Export Prepayment Financing Agreement, dated March 4, 2010, between Angélica Agroenergia Ltda. and a syndicate of banks, previously filed as exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.12 |  | English translation of Financing Agreement through BNDES Repasse, dated February 1, 2008, between Adeco Brasil Participações S.A. and a syndicate of banks, previously filed as exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.13 |  | English translation of First Amendment to Financing Agreement BNDES Repasse, dated July 1, 2008, between Angélica Agroenergia Ltda. and a syndicate of banks, previously filed as exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.14 |  | English translation of Second Amendment to Financing Agreement BNDES Repasse, dated March 4, 2010, between Angélica Agroenergia Ltda. and a syndicate of banks, previously filed as exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.15 |  | English translation of Credit Facility, dated July 30, 2010, between Angélica Agroenergia Ltda. and Banco do Brasil S.A., previously filed as exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.16 |  | Unit Issuance Agreement, dated February 16, 2006, between International Farmland Holdings LLC and Usina Monte Alegre S.A., previously filed as exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.17 |  | Share Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated February 16, 2006, between International Farmland Holdings LLC and Usina Monte Alegre S.A., previously filed as exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.18 |  | Right of First Offer Agreement, dated February 16, 2006, between International Farmland Holdings LLC and Usina Monte Alegre S.A., previously filed as exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.19 |  | Supply Offer Letter for milk, dated November 7, 2007, between La Lácteo S.A. and Adeco Agropecuaria S.R.L., previously filed as exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.20 |  | Amendment to Supply Offer Letter for milk, dated February 1, 2010, between La Lácteo S.A. and Adeco Agropecuaria S.R.L., previously filed as exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.

171

##### Table of Contents

4.21 |  | Commercial Contract for sugar, dated March 23, 2010, between Angélica Agroenergia Ltda. and Bunge International Commerce Ltd., previously filed as exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.22 |  | Amendment to Commercial Contract for sugar, dated June 17, 2010, between Angélica Agroenergia Ltda. and Bunge International Commerce Ltd., previously filed as exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.23 |  | English translation of Consignment Contract, dated February 19, 2000, between Molinos Ala S.A. (currently Pilagá S.R.L.) and Establecimiento Las Marías S.A.C.I.F.A., previously filed as exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.24 |  | English translation of Sale Agreement, dated July 8, 2009, between Pilagá S.R.L. and Galicia Warrants S.A., previously filed as exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.25 |  | English translation of Mortgage, dated July 8, 2009, between Pilagá S.R.L. and Galicia Warrants S.A., previously filed as exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.26 |  | English translation of Reserve Power Agreement, dated February 6, 2009, between Angélica Agroenergia Ltda. and Câmara de Comercialização de Energia Elétrica, previously filed as exhibit 10.23 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.27 |  | English translation of Energy Purchase Contract, dated January 19, 2009, between Usina Monte Alegre Ltda. and Cemig Geração e Transmissão S.A., previously filed as exhibit 10.24 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.28 |  | English translation of Energy Distribution Contract, dated June 3, 2008 between Angélica Agroenergia Ltda. and Empresa Energética do Mato Grosso do Sul., previously filed as exhibit 10.25 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.29 |  | English translation of First Amendment to Energy Distribution Contract, dated April 6, 2009 between Angélica Agroenergia Ltda. and Empresa Energética do Mato Grosso do Sul., previously filed as exhibit 10.26 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.30 |  | English translation of Second Amendment to Energy Distribution Contract, dated May 1, 2010 between Angélica Agroenergia Ltda. and Empresa Energética do Mato Grosso do Sul., previously filed as exhibit 10.27 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.31 |  | English translation of Sale Agreement for cattle, dated December 14, 2009, between Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. and Quickfood S.A., previously filed as exhibit 10.29 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.32 |  | English translation of First Amendment to Sale Agreement for cattle, dated December 16, 2009, between Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. and Quickfood S.A., previously filed as exhibit 10.30 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.33 |  | English translation of Second Amendment to Sale Agreement for cattle, dated December 17, 2009, between Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. and Quickfood S.A., previously filed as exhibit 10.31 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.

172

##### Table of Contents

4.34 |  | English translation of Stock Purchase Agreement, dated August 23, 2010, between Kadesh Hispania, S.L., Leterton España, S.L. and Dinaluca S.A., previously filed as exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.35 |  | Form of Registration Rights Agreement between Adecoagro S.A. and certain shareholders, previously filed as exhibit 10.33 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.36 |  | Second Amendment to Export Prepayment Financing Agreement, dated December 14, 2010, between Angélica Agroenergia Ltda. and a syndicate of banks, previously filed as exhibit 10.38 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.37 |  | English translation of Third Amendment to Financing Agreement BNDES Repasse, dated December 14, 2010, between Angélica Agroenergia Ltda. and a syndicate of banks, previously filed as exhibit 10.39 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.38 |  | English translation of First Amendment to Credit Facility, dated December 18, 2010, between Angélica Agroenergia Ltda. and Banco do Brasil S.A., previously filed as exhibit 10.40 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.39 |  | Stock Subscription Agreement, dated January 6, 2011, between Adecoagro S.A. and Al Gharrafa Investment Company, previously filed as exhibit 10.41 to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.40 |  | English translation of Promise to Sell, dated December 21, 2010, between Kelizer S.C.A. and Las Mesetas S.A., previously filed as exhibit 4.40 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20- for fiscal year-end 2010 and incorporated by reference herein.
4.41 |  | English translation of Stock Purchase Agreement, dated August 18, 2011, between Kadesh Hispania, S.L., Leterton España, S.L. and Compañía Agroforestal de Servicios y Mandatos S.A., previously filed as Exhibit 4.41 to the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference.
4.42 |  | English translation of Stock Purchase Agreement, dated August 19, 2011, between Kadesh Hispania, S.L., Leterton España, S.L. and Simoneta S.A., previously filed as Exhibit 4.42 to the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference.
4.43 |  | English Summary Translation of Finance Agreement dated December 27, 2012 by and among Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema Ltda., as borrower, Adecoagro Brasil Participações S.A., as participant, and Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social – BNDES, as lender.
4.44 |  | English Summary Translation of Credit Agreement dated December 27, 2012 by and among Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema Ltda., as borrower, and Adecoagro Brasil Participações S.A. as participant, and Banco do Brasil S.A., Banco Itaú BBA S.A., as lenders, and Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social – (BNDES), as guarantor.
8.1 |  | Subsidiaries of Adecoagro S.A. as of March 31, 2013.
12.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
12.2 |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
13.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
13.2 |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
15.1 |  | Consent of Cushman & Wakefield Argentina S.A.
15.2 |  | Consent of Price Waterhouse & Co. S.R.L.

173

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

Adecoagro S.A.
By |  | /s/ Mariano Bosch
Name: |  | Mariano Bosch
Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 29, 2013

174

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

F - 1

##### Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders of

Adecoagro S.A.

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statement of financial position and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’s equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Adecoagro S.A. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” appearing under Item 15. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audit (which was an integrated audit in 2012). We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

F - 2

##### Table of Contents

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Buenos Aires, Argentina

April 29, 2013

PRICE WATERHOUSE & CO. S.R.L.
by |  | /s/ Marcelo de Nicola |  | (Partner)
Marcelo de Nicola

F - 3

##### Table of Contents

Legal information

Denomination: Adecoagro S.A.

Legal address: 13-15 Avenue de la Liberté, L-1931, Luxembourg

Company activity: Agricultural and agro-industrial

Date of registration: June 11, 2010

Expiration of company charter: No term defined

Number of register (RCS Luxembourg): B153.681

Capital stock: 122,220,606 common shares (of which 3,860 are treasury shares)

Majority shareholder: Quantum Partners LP

Legal address: 1300 Thames St. 5 th FL, Baltimore MD 21231-3495, United States of America

Parent company activity: Investing

Capital stock: 25,910,004 common shares

F - 4

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position

as of December 31, 2012 and 2011

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

|  | Note |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Non-Current Assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Property, plant and equipment, net |  | 6 |  |  | 880,897 |  |  |  | 759,696 |
Investment property |  | 7 |  |  | 15,542 |  |  |  | 27,883 |
Intangible assets, net |  | 8 |  |  | 32,880 |  |  |  | 36,755 |
Biological assets |  | 9 |  |  | 224,966 |  |  |  | 187,973 |
Investments in joint ventures |  | 10 |  |  | 2,613 |  |  |  | 4,299 |
Financial assets |  | 11 |  |  | 11,878 |  |  |  | — |
Deferred income tax assets |  | 22 |  |  | 35,391 |  |  |  | 37,081 |
Trade and other receivables, net |  | 13 |  |  | 44,030 |  |  |  | 15,746 |
Other assets |  |  |  |  | 1,398 |  |  |  | 1,408 |
Total Non-Current Assets |  |  |  |  | 1,249,595 |  |  |  | 1,070,841 |
Current Assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Biological assets |  | 9 |  |  | 73,170 |  |  |  | 51,627 |
Inventories |  | 14 |  |  | 95,321 |  |  |  | 96,147 |
Trade and other receivables, net |  | 13 |  |  | 135,848 |  |  |  | 141,181 |
Derivative financial instruments |  | 12 |  |  | 5,212 |  |  |  | 10,353 |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | 15 |  |  | 218,809 |  |  |  | 330,546 |
Total Current Assets |  |  |  |  | 528,360 |  |  |  | 629,854 |
TOTAL ASSETS |  |  |  |  | 1,777,955 |  |  |  | 1,700,695 |
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Capital and reserves attributable to equity holders of the parent |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Share capital |  | 17 |  |  | 183,331 |  |  |  | 180,800 |
Share premium |  | 17 |  |  | 940,332 |  |  |  | 926,005 |
Cumulative translation adjustment |  |  |  |  | (182,929 | ) |  |  | (99,202 | )
Equity-settled compensation |  |  |  |  | 17,952 |  |  |  | 15,306 |
Other reserves |  |  |  |  | (349 | ) |  |  | (526 | )
Treasury shares |  |  |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  | (4 | )
Retained earnings |  |  |  |  | 67,647 |  |  |  | 57,497 |
Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent |  |  |  |  | 1,025,978 |  |  |  | 1,079,876 |
Non controlling interest |  | 17 |  |  | 65 |  |  |  | 14,993 |
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |  |  |  |  | 1,026,043 |  |  |  | 1,094,869 |
LIABILITIES |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Non-Current Liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Trade and other payables |  | 20 |  |  | 4,575 |  |  |  | 8,418 |
Borrowings |  | 21 |  |  | 354,249 |  |  |  | 203,409 |
Deferred income tax liabilities |  | 22 |  |  | 75,389 |  |  |  | 92,989 |
Payroll and social liabilities |  | 23 |  |  | 1,512 |  |  |  | 1,431 |
Provisions for other liabilities |  | 24 |  |  | 1,892 |  |  |  | 3,358 |
Total Non-Current Liabilities |  |  |  |  | 437,617 |  |  |  | 309,605 |
Current Liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Trade and other payables |  | 20 |  |  | 99,685 |  |  |  | 114,020 |
Current income tax liabilities |  |  |  |  | 187 |  |  |  | 872 |
Payroll and social liabilities |  | 23 |  |  | 22,948 |  |  |  | 17,010 |
Borrowings |  | 21 |  |  | 184,884 |  |  |  | 157,296 |
Derivative financial instruments |  | 12 |  |  | 5,751 |  |  |  | 6,054 |
Provisions for other liabilities |  | 24 |  |  | 840 |  |  |  | 969 |
Total Current Liabilities |  |  |  |  | 314,295 |  |  |  | 296,221 |
TOTAL LIABILITIES |  |  |  |  | 751,912 |  |  |  | 605,826 |
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND LIABILITIES |  |  |  |  | 1,777,955 |  |  |  | 1,700,695 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 5

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Consolidated Statements of Income

for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

|  | Note |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Sales of manufactured products and services rendered |  |  | 25 |  |  |  | 379,526 |  |  |  | 365,857 |  |  |  | 294,529 |
Cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered |  |  | 26 |  |  |  | (263,978 | ) |  |  | (237,404 | ) |  |  | (219,201 | )
Gross Profit from Manufacturing Activities |  |  |  |  |  |  | 115,548 |  |  |  | 128,453 |  |  |  | 75,328 |
Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets |  |  | 25 |  |  |  | 225,174 |  |  |  | 182,227 |  |  |  | 131,738 |
Cost of agricultural produce sold and direct agricultural selling expenses |  |  | 26 |  |  |  | (225,174 | ) |  |  | (182,227 | ) |  |  | (131,738 | )
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16,643 |  |  |  | 86,811 |  |  |  | (30,528 | )
Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16,004 |  |  |  | 10,523 |  |  |  | 7,999 |
Gross Profit / (Loss) from Agricultural Activities |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32,647 |  |  |  | 97,334 |  |  |  | (22,529 | )
Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses |  |  |  |  |  |  | 148,195 |  |  |  | 225,787 |  |  |  | 52,799 |
General and administrative expenses |  |  | 26 |  |  |  | (57,691 | ) |  |  | (65,142 | ) |  |  | (56,562 | )
Selling expenses |  |  | 26 |  |  |  | (58,602 | ) |  |  | (59,404 | ) |  |  | (52,528 | )
Other operating income, net |  |  | 28 |  |  |  | 29,818 |  |  |  | 24,581 |  |  |  | 18,224 |
Share of loss of joint venture |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | (2,761 | ) |  |  | (1,034 | ) |  |  | (50 | )
Profit / (Loss) from Operations Before Financing and Taxation |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58,959 |  |  |  | 124,788 |  |  |  | (38,117 | )
Finance income |  |  | 29 |  |  |  | 11,538 |  |  |  | 9,132 |  |  |  | 16,559 |
Finance costs |  |  | 29 |  |  |  | (66,654 | ) |  |  | (62,341 | ) |  |  | (39,496 | )
Financial results, net |  |  | 29 |  |  |  | (55,116 | ) |  |  | (53,209 | ) |  |  | (22,937 | )
Profit / (Loss) Before Income Tax |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,843 |  |  |  | 71,579 |  |  |  | (61,054 | )
Income tax benefit / (expense) |  |  | 22 |  |  |  | 5,436 |  |  |  | (14,662 | ) |  |  | 16,263 |
Profit/ (Loss) for the Year |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9,279 |  |  |  | 56,917 |  |  |  | (44,791 | )
Attributable to: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Equity holders of the parent |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9,397 |  |  |  | 56,018 |  |  |  | (43,904 | )
Non controlling interest |  |  |  |  |  |  | (118 | ) |  |  | 899 |  |  |  | (887 | )
Earnings / (loss) per share attributable to the equity holders of the parent during the year: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  |  | 30 |  |  |  | 0.077 |  |  |  | 0.479 |  |  |  | (0.549 | )
Diluted |  |  | 30 |  |  |  | 0.077 |  |  |  | 0.475 |  |  |  | (0.549 | )

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 6

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Profit/ (loss) for the year |  |  | 9,279 |  |  |  | 56,917 |  |  |  | (44,791 | )
Other comprehensive income: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Exchange differences on translating foreign operations |  |  | (80,755 | ) |  |  | (112,071 | ) |  |  | 8,956 |
Other comprehensive (loss)/ income for the year |  |  | (80,755 | ) |  |  | (112,071 | ) |  |  | 8,956 |
Total comprehensive (loss) for the year |  |  | (71,476 | ) |  |  | (55,154 | ) |  |  | (35,835 | )
Attributable to: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Equity holders of the parent |  |  | (70,792 | ) |  |  | (54,592 | ) |  |  | (35,147 | )
Non controlling interest |  |  | (684 | ) |  |  | (562 | ) |  |  | (688 | )

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 7

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

|  | Attributable to equity holders of the parent |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Share Capital (Note 17) |  |  | Share Premium (Note 17) |  |  | Cumulative Translation Adjustment |  |  | Equity-settled Compensation |  |  | Other reserves |  |  | Treasury shares (Note 18) |  |  | Retained Earnings |  |  | Subtotal |  |  | Non Controlling Interest |  |  | Total Shareholders’ Equity |
Balance at January 1, 2010 |  |  | 120,000 |  |  |  | 563,343 |  |  |  | 2,516 |  |  |  | 11,914 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 44,161 |  |  |  | 741,934 |  |  |  | 15,222 |  |  |  | 757,156 |
Loss for the year |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (43,904 | ) |  |  | (43,904 | ) |  |  | (887 | ) |  |  | (44,791 | )
Other comprehensive income for the year |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 8,757 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 8,757 |  |  |  | 199 |  |  |  | 8,956 |
Total comprehensive income for the year |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 8,757 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (43,904 | ) |  |  | (35,147 | ) |  |  | (688 | ) |  |  | (35,835 | )
Employee share options granted (Note 18) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,745 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,745 |  |  |  | 36 |  |  |  | 1,781 |
Balance at December 31, 2010 |  |  | 120,000 |  |  |  | 563,343 |  |  |  | 11,273 |  |  |  | 13,659 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 257 |  |  |  | 708,532 |  |  |  | 14,570 |  |  |  | 723,102 |
Loss for the year |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 56,018 |  |  |  | 56,018 |  |  |  | 899 |  |  |  | 56,917 |
Other comprehensive income for the year |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (110,610 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (110,610 | ) |  |  | (1,461 | ) |  |  | (112,071 | )
Total comprehensive loss for the year |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (110,610 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 56,018 |  |  |  | (54,592 | ) |  |  | (562 | ) |  |  | (55,154 | )
Net proceeds from IPO and Private placement (Note 17) |  |  | 60,104 |  |  |  | 362,926 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 423,030 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 423,030 |
Employee share options (Note 18): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
- Value of employee services |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 874 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 874 |  |  |  | 14 |  |  |  | 888 |
- Exercised |  |  | 55 |  |  |  | 271 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (110 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 216 |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | 214 |
- Forfeited |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,122 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,122 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Restricted shares (Note 18): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
- Issued |  |  | 641 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (632 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 9 |  |  |  | (9 | ) |  |  | — |
- Value of employee services |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,751 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,751 |  |  |  | 38 |  |  |  | 2,789 |
- Vested |  |  | — |  |  |  | 746 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (838 | ) |  |  | 102 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | (10 | ) |  |  | — |
- Forfeited |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Acquisition of non controlling interest (Note 17) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,281 | ) |  |  | 135 |  |  |  | 92 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 100 |  |  |  | (954 | ) |  |  | 954 |  |  |  | — |
Balance at December 31, 2011 |  |  | 180,800 |  |  |  | 926,005 |  |  |  | (99,202 | ) |  |  | 15,306 |  |  |  | (526 | ) |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  | 57,497 |  |  |  | 1,079,876 |  |  |  | 14,993 |  |  |  | 1,094,869 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 8

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

|  | Attributable to equity holders of the parent |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Share Capital (Note 17) |  |  | Share Premium (Note 17) |  |  | Cumulative Translation Adjustment |  |  | Equity-settled Compensation |  |  | Other reserves |  |  | Treasury shares (Note 18) |  |  | Retained Earnings |  |  | Subtotal |  |  | Non Controlling Interest |  |  | Total Shareholders’ Equity |
Balance at December 31, 2011 |  |  | 180,800 |  |  |  | 926,005 |  |  |  | (99,202 | ) |  |  | 15,306 |  |  |  | (526 | ) |  |  | (4 | ) |  |  | 57,497 |  |  |  | 1,079,876 |  |  |  | 14,993 |  |  |  | 1,094,869 |
Profit for the year |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 9,397 |  |  |  | 9,397 |  |  |  | (118 | ) |  |  | 9,279 |
Other comprehensive loss for the year |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (80,189 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (80,189 | ) |  |  | (566 | ) |  |  | (80,755 | )
Total comprehensive loss for the year |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (80,189 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 9,397 |  |  |  | (70,792 | ) |  |  | (684 | ) |  |  | (71,476 | )
Employee share options (Note 18): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
- Value of employee services |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 265 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 265 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 267 |
- Exercised |  |  | 49 |  |  |  | 263 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | (93 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 219 |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | 217 |
- Forfeited |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | (82 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 82 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Restricted shares (Note 18): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
- Value of employee services |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 3,847 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 3,847 |  |  |  | 24 |  |  |  | 3,871 |
- Vested |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,347 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,516 | ) |  |  | 181 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 12 |  |  |  | (12 | ) |  |  | — |
- Forfeited |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Acquisition of non controlling interest (Note 17) |  |  | 2,482 |  |  |  | 12,717 |  |  |  | (1,845 | ) |  |  | 225 |  |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 671 |  |  |  | 14,244 |  |  |  | (14,244 | ) |  |  | — |
Disposal of subsidiary (Nota 16) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,693 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,693 | ) |  |  | (12 | ) |  |  | (1,705 | )
Balance at December 31, 2012 |  |  | 183,331 |  |  |  | 940,332 |  |  |  | (182,929 | ) |  |  | 17,952 |  |  |  | (349 | ) |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  | 67,647 |  |  |  | 1,025,978 |  |  |  | 65 |  |  |  | 1,026,043 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 9

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

|  | Note |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Cash flows from operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Profit / (loss) for the year |  |  |  |  | 9,279 |  |  |  | 56,917 |  |  |  | (44,791 | )
Adjustments for: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income tax (benefit) / expense |  | 22 |  |  | (5,436 | ) |  |  | 14,662 |  |  |  | (16,263 | )
Depreciation |  | 6 |  |  | 54,117 |  |  |  | 33,847 |  |  |  | 37,217 |
Amortization |  | 8 |  |  | 351 |  |  |  | 337 |  |  |  | 346 |
Gain from the disposal of other property items |  | 28 |  |  | (882 | ) |  |  | (394 | ) |  |  | (847 | )
Gain from disposal of farmlands |  | 28 |  |  | — |  |  |  | (8,832 | ) |  |  | (20,837 | )
Gain from the sale of subsidiaries |  | 28 |  |  | (27,513 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Equity settled share-based compensation granted |  | 27 |  |  | 4,138 |  |  |  | 3,677 |  |  |  | 1,781 |
Loss / gain from derivative financial instruments and forwards |  | 28,29 |  |  | 6,304 |  |  |  | (12,084 | ) |  |  | (1,189 | )
Interest expense, net |  | 29 |  |  | 18,948 |  |  |  | 33,006 |  |  |  | 33,028 |
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of non harvested biological assets (unrealized) |  | 5 |  |  | 13,335 |  |  |  | (17,136 | ) |  |  | 72,374 |
Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (unrealized) |  | 5 |  |  | (2,024 | ) |  |  | (1,816 | ) |  |  | (1,527 | )
Provision and allowances |  |  |  |  | (2,020 | ) |  |  | (3,147 | ) |  |  | 4,980 |
Share of loss from joint venture |  | 10 |  |  | 2,761 |  |  |  | 1,034 |  |  |  | 50 |
Foreign exchange losses / (gains), net |  | 29 |  |  | 26,080 |  |  |  | 12,683 |  |  |  | (7,324 | )
Subtotal |  |  |  |  | 97,438 |  |  |  | 112,754 |  |  |  | 56,998 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(Increase) / decrease in trade and other receivables |  |  |  |  | (39,163 | ) |  |  | (15,850 | ) |  |  | 3,584 |
(Increase) / decrease in inventories |  |  |  |  | (3,794 | ) |  |  | (49,776 | ) |  |  | 2,259 |
(Increase) / decrease in biological assets |  |  |  |  | (5,830 | ) |  |  | 6,745 |  |  |  | 7,171 |
(Decrease) / increase in other assets |  |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | (1,382 | ) |  |  | 8 |
Decrease in derivative financial instruments |  |  |  |  | (1,467 | ) |  |  | (248 | ) |  |  | (3,554 | )
Increase/ (decrease) in trade and other payables |  |  |  |  | 15,309 |  |  |  | 19,855 |  |  |  | (4,221 | )
Increase in payroll and social security liabilities |  |  |  |  | 5,784 |  |  |  | 1,785 |  |  |  | 5,470 |
Increase/ (decrease) in provisions for other liabilities |  |  |  |  | 132 |  |  |  | (641 | ) |  |  | 319 |
Net cash generated from operating activities before interest and taxes paid |  |  |  |  | 68,419 |  |  |  | 73,242 |  |  |  | 68,034 |
Income tax paid |  |  |  |  | (596 | ) |  |  | (16,656 | ) |  |  | (7,813 | )
Net cash generated from operating activities |  |  |  |  | 67,823 |  |  |  | 56,586 |  |  |  | 60,221 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 10

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)

for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

|  | Note |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Cash flows from investing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired |  | 32 |  |  | — |  |  |  | (11,617 | ) |  |  | (7,872 | )
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |  | 6 |  |  | (218,770 | ) |  |  | (90,422 | ) |  |  | (87,679 | )
Purchases of intangible assets |  | 8 |  |  | (359 | ) |  |  | (195 | ) |  |  | (33 | )
Purchase of cattle and planting cost of non current biological assets |  |  |  |  | (82,612 | ) |  |  | (63,074 | ) |  |  | (35,060 | )
Interest received |  | 29 |  |  | 11,249 |  |  |  | 8,019 |  |  |  | 1,341 |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |  |  |  |  | 851 |  |  |  | 2,611 |  |  |  | 2,103 |
Proceeds from sale of farmlands |  | 16 |  |  | 15,703 |  |  |  | 20,532 |  |  |  | 10,000 |
Proceeds from disposal of subsidiaries |  | 16 |  |  | 10,208 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 5,475 |
Investment in joint ventures |  | 16 |  |  | (3,000 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Payment of seller financing arising on subsidiaries acquired |  |  |  |  | (33,485 | ) |  |  | (6,347 | ) |  |  | — |
Net cash used in investing activities |  |  |  |  | (300,215 | ) |  |  | (140,493 | ) |  |  | (111,725 | )
Cash flows from financing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net proceeds from IPO and Private placement |  | 17 |  |  | — |  |  |  | 421,778 |  |  |  | — |
Proceeds from equity settled shared-based compensation exercised |  |  |  |  | 218 |  |  |  | 214 |  |  |  | — |
Proceeds from long-term borrowings |  | 21 |  |  | 230,601 |  |  |  | 34,980 |  |  |  | 98,581 |
Payments of long-term borrowings |  | 21 |  |  | (79,781 | ) |  |  | (82,244 | ) |  |  | (31,202 | )
Interest paid |  |  |  |  | (34,587 | ) |  |  | (33,481 | ) |  |  | (33,283 | )
Net increase in short-term borrowings |  | 21 |  |  | 17,057 |  |  |  | 19,545 |  |  |  | 12,449 |
Net cash generated from financing activities |  |  |  |  | 133,508 |  |  |  | 360,792 |  |  |  | 46,545 |
Net (decrease) / increase in cash and cash equivalents |  |  |  |  | (98,884 | ) |  |  | 276,885 |  |  |  | (4,960 | )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |  |  |  |  | 330,546 |  |  |  | 70,269 |  |  |  | 74,806 |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |  |  |  |  | (12,853 | ) |  |  | (16,608 | ) |  |  | 423 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |  |  |  |  | 218,809 |  |  |  | 330,546 |  |  |  | 70,269 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 11

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

1. | General information

Adecoagro S.A. (the “Company” or “Adecoagro”) is the Group’s ultimate parent company and is a société anonyme (stock corporation) organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Adecoagro is a holding company primarily engaged through its operating subsidiaries in agricultural and agro-industrial activities. The Company and its operating subsidiaries are collectively referred to hereinafter as the “Group”. These activities are carried out through three major lines of business, namely, Farming; Sugar, Ethanol and Energy and Land Transformation. Farming is further comprised of five reportable segments, which are described in detail in Note 5 to these consolidated financial statements.

Adecoagro is a Public Company listed in the New York Stock Exchange as a foreign registered company under the symbol of AGRO.

These consolidated financial statements have been approved for issue by the Board of Directors on March 19, 2013.

2. | Summary of significant accounting policies

The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.

2.1. | Basis of preparation and presentation

The consolidated financial statements of the Group have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the Interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC). All IFRS issued by the IASB, effective at the time of preparing these consolidated financial statements have been applied.

The financial year corresponds to the calendar year. The consolidated statements of income, of changes in shareholders´ equity, of comprehensive income and of cash flows include two comparative years.

Presentation in the consolidated statement of financial position differentiates between current and non-current assets and liabilities. Assets and liabilities are regarded as current if they mature within one year or are held for sale. The consolidated financial statements are presented in United States Dollars.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention as modified by financial assets and financial liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value through profit or loss and biological assets and agricultural produce at the point of harvest measured at fair value.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgment in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. The areas involving a higher degree of judgment or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements are disclosed in Note 4.

There were no new standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards effective for the first time for the year ended December 31, 2012 that were either applicable or material to the Group.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 12

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

2.1. | Basis of preparation and presentation (continued)

Below is a description of the standards, amendments and interpretations issued by the IASB to existing standards that have been issued and are mandatory for the Group’s fiscal periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 or later and which have not been early adopted by the Group:

In November 2009 and October 2010, the IASB issued IFRS 9 “Financial instruments”, which addresses the classification, measurement and recognition of financial assets and financial liabilities. It replaces the parts of IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement” that relate to the classification and measurement of financial instruments. IFRS 9 requires financial assets to be classified into two measurement categories: those measured as at fair value and those measured at amortized cost. The determination is made at initial recognition. The classification depends on the entity’s business model for managing its financial instruments and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the instrument. For financial liabilities, the standard retains most of the IAS 39 requirements. The main change is that, in cases where the fair value option is taken for financial liabilities, the part of a fair value change due to an entity’s own credit risk is recorded in other comprehensive income rather than the income statement, unless this creates an accounting mismatch. The remaining phases of the project, dealing with impairment of financial instruments and hedge accounting, have not yet been finalized. IFRS 9 shall be applied retrospectively for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. The Group is currently analyzing the resulting effects on the presentation of the Group’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In May 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 10 “Consolidated Financial Statements”. It replaces the consolidation requirements in SIC 12 “Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities” and IAS 27 “Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements” and is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Earlier application is permitted. IFRS 10 builds on existing principles by identifying the concept of control as the determining factor in whether an entity should be included within the consolidated financial statements of the parent company. The standard provides additional guidance to assist in the determination of control where this is difficult to assess. The standard is not expected to have a material impact on the presentation of the Group’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In May 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 11 “Joint Arrangements” which provides for a more realistic reflection of joint arrangements by focusing on the rights and obligations of the arrangement, rather than its legal form (as is currently the case). The standard addresses inconsistencies in the reporting of joint arrangements by requiring a single method to account for interests in jointly controlled entities. IFRS 11 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Earlier application is permitted. The standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Group given that its joint arrangement would be classified as a joint venture under IFRS 11 and continue to be measured applying equity accounting.

In May 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 12 “Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities”. IFRS 12 is a new and comprehensive standard on disclosure requirements for all forms of interests in other entities, including subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and unconsolidated structured entities. IFRS 12 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Earlier application is permitted. The standard is expected to increase the amount of disclosures required about subsidiaries, associates and joint arrangements.

In June 2012, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 11 and IFRS 12. The amendments explain that the ‘date of initial application’ in IFRS 10 means ‘the beginning of the annual reporting period in which IFRS 10 is applied for the first time’. Consequently, an entity is not required to make adjustments to the previous accounting for its involvement with entities if the consolidation conclusion reached at the date of initial application is the same when applying IAS 27 and SIC 12 and when applying IFRS 10. The IASB has also amended IFRS 11 and IFRS 12 to provide similar relief from the presentation or adjustment of comparative information for periods prior to the immediately preceding period. The amendments shall be applied for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, with earlier application permitted. The amendments are not expected to have a material impact on the Group’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 13

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

2.1. | Basis of preparation and presentation (continued)

In May 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 13 “Fair Value Measurement” which replaces the fair value measurement guidance currently dispersed across different IFRS standards with a single definition of fair value and extensive application guidance. IFRS 13 provides guidance on how to measure fair value and does not introduce new requirements for when fair value is required or permitted. It also establishes disclosure requirements to provide users of financial statements with more information about fair value measurements. It is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Earlier application is permitted. Even though not yet quantified, the standard is expected to have an impact on the measurement of biological assets at fair value and to increase the disclosures required about fair value measurements.

In June 2011, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 1 “Presentation of financial statements”. The amendment improves the consistency and clarity of the presentation of items of other comprehensive income (“OCI”). The main change is a requirement for entities to group items presented in OCI on the basis of whether they are potentially recyclable to profit or loss subsequently (reclassification adjustments). The amendment to IAS 1 shall be applied for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2012, with earlier application permitted. The amendment will impact the format of the Group’s consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

In May 2012, the IASB issued Improvements to IFRSs – a collection of amendments to five IFRSs – as part of its program of annual improvements to its standards. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, although entities are permitted to adopt them earlier. These amendments relate to IFRS 1 “First Time Adoption of IFRS”, IAS 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements”, IAS 16 “Property, Plant and Equipment”, IAS 32 “Financial instruments: Presentation” and IAS 34 “Interim Financial Reporting”. The Group is in the process of analyzing the resulting effects on the presentation of the Group’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In November 2012, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 27 “Separate Financial Statements”. The amendments define an investment entity and introduce an exception to consolidating particular subsidiaries for investment entities. These amendments require an investment entity to measure those subsidiaries at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with IFRS 9 in its consolidated and separate financial statements. They also introduce new disclosure requirements for investment entities. The amendments shall be applied for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014, with earlier application permitted. These amendments will not have an impact on the Group’s presentation of the its financial position, results of operations or earnings per share

2.2. | Scope of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the results of the Company and all of its subsidiaries from the date that control commences to the date that control ceases. They also include the Group’s share of the after-tax results of its jointly-controlled entities on an equity-accounted basis from the point at which joint control commences, to the date that it ceases.

(a) Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are all entities over which the Group has the power to govern the financial and operating policies generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one half of the voting rights. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether the Group controls another entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. They are de-consolidated from the date that control ceases.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 14

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

2.2. | Scope of consolidation (continued)

The Group accounts for acquisitions using the purchase method of accounting as prescribed by IFRS 3R. Consideration is measured as the fair value of the assets given, equity instruments issued and liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of exchange. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date, irrespective of the extent of any non-controlling interest. The excess of consideration over the fair value of the Group’s share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.

Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealized gains on transactions between Group companies are eliminated. Unrealized losses are also eliminated but considered an impairment indicator of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.

(b) Disposal of subsidiaries

When the group ceases to have control any retained interest in the entity is remeasured to its fair value at the date when control is lost, with the change in carrying amount recognized in profit or loss. The fair value is the initial carrying amount for the purposes of subsequently accounting for the retained interest as an associate, joint venture or financial asset. In addition, any amounts previously recognized in other comprehensive income in respect of that entity are accounted for as if the group had directly disposed of the related assets or liabilities. This may mean that amounts previously recognized in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss.

(c) Transactions and non controlling interest

Non controlling interest is shown as a component of equity in the statement of financial position and the share of profit attributable to non controlling interest is shown as a component of profit or loss for the year in the consolidated statement of income.

The Group treats transactions with non-controlling interests as transactions with equity owners of the Group. For purchases from non-controlling interests, the difference between any consideration paid and the relevant share acquired of the carrying value of net assets of the subsidiary is recorded in equity. Gains or losses on disposals to non-controlling interests are also recorded in equity.

(d) Joint ventures

An entity is regarded as a joint venture if the Group has joint control over its operating and financial policies. Joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method where the Group’s statement of income includes its share of their profits and losses and the Group’s statement of financial position includes its share of their net assets.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 15

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

2.3. | Segment reporting

According to IFRS 8, operating segments are identified based on the ‘management approach’. This approach stipulates external segment reporting based on the Group’s internal organizational and management structure and on internal financial reporting to the chief operating decision maker. The Management Committee of the Group is responsible for measuring and steering the business success of the segments and is considered the chief operating decision maker within the meaning of IFRS 8.

2.4. | Foreign currency translation

(a) Functional and presentation currency

Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (‘the functional currency’). The consolidated financial statements are presented in US dollars, which is the Group’s presentation currency.

(b) Transactions and balances

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions or valuation where items are remeasured. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the statement of income.

Foreign exchange gains and losses are presented in the statement of income within “Finance income” or “Finance cost”, as appropriate.

(c) Group companies

The results and financial position of all the Group entities (none of which has the currency of a hyper-inflationary economy) that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows:

| • |  | assets and liabilities for each statement of financial position presented are translated at the closing rate at the date of that statement of financial position;

| • |  | income and expenses for each statement of income are translated at average exchange rates (unless this average is not a reasonable approximation of the cumulative effect of the rates prevailing on the transaction dates, in which case income and expenses are translated at the rate on the dates of the transactions); and

| • |  | all resulting exchange differences are recognized as a separate component of equity.

When a foreign operation is partially disposed of or sold, exchange differences that were recorded in equity are recognized in the statement of income as part of the gain or loss on sale.

Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the closing rate.

2.5. | Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, if any. Historical cost comprises the purchase price and any costs directly attributable to the acquisition.

Where individual components of an item of property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items, which are depreciated separately.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 16

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

2.5. | Property, plant and equipment (continued)

Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognized as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part is derecognized. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the statement of income during the period in which they are incurred.

Farmland is not depreciated. Depreciation on other assets is calculated using the straight-line method, to allocate their cost to their residual values over their estimated useful lives, as follows:

Farmland improvements |  |  | 5-25 years |
Buildings and facilities |  |  | 20 years |
Furniture and fittings |  |  | 10 years |
Computer equipment |  |  | 3-5 years |
Machinery and equipment |  |  | 4-10 years |
Vehicles |  |  | 4-5 years |

The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each statement of financial position date. An asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount (see Note 2.10).

Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing the proceeds with the carrying amount and are recognized within “Other operating income, net” in the statement of income.

2.6. | Investment property

Investment property consists of farmland held to earn rentals or for capital appreciation and not used in production or for administrative purposes or for sale in the ordinary course of business. Investment property is measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment losses. Rental income from investment property “lease act under an operating lease” is recognized in the income statement on a straight line basis over the lease term.

If an investment property becomes owner-occupied, it is reclassified as property, plant and equipment at the commencement of owner occupation. An item of owner-occupied property is reclassified to investment property when its use has changed and owner-occupation ceases.

Transfers in and out of the respective categories as described above do not change the carrying amount of the properties transferred, and they do not change the cost of the properties for measurement or disclosure purposes.

2.7. | Leases

The Group classifies its leases at the inception as finance or operating leases. Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessee. All other leases are classified as operating leases and charged to the statements of income in a straight-line basis over the period of the lease. Finance leases are capitalized at the lease’s inception at the lower of the fair value of the leased property and the present value of the minimum lease payments. Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and finance charges so as to achieve a constant rate on the finance balance outstanding. The corresponding rental obligations, net of finance charges, are included as “Borrowings” in the statement of financial position. The interest element of the finance cost is charged to the statement of income over the lease period so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period. The property, plant and equipment acquired under finance leases is depreciated over the shorter of the asset’s useful life and the lease term.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 17

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

2.8. | Goodwill

Goodwill represents future economic benefits arising from assets that are not capable of being individually identified and separately recognized by the Group on an acquisition. Goodwill is computed as the excess of the consideration over the fair value of the Group’s share of net assets of the acquired subsidiary undertaking at the acquisition date and is allocated to those cash generating units expected to benefit from the acquisition for the purpose of impairment testing. Goodwill arising on the acquisition of subsidiaries is included within “Intangible assets” on the statement of financial position, whilst goodwill arising on the acquisition on joint ventures forms part of the carrying amount of the investments and tested for impairment as part of the overall balance.

Goodwill arising on the acquisition of foreign entities is treated as an asset of the foreign entity denominated in the local currency and translated at the closing rate.

Goodwill is not amortized but tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if there is an indication of impairment. Gains and losses on the disposal of a Group entity include any goodwill relating to the entity sold (see Note 2.10).

2.9. | Other intangible assets

Other intangible assets that are acquired by the Group, which have finite useful lives, are measured at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses, if any. These intangible assets comprise trademarks and computer software and are amortized in the statement of income on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives estimated to be 10 to 20 years and 3 to 5 years, respectively.

2.10. | Impairment of assets

Goodwill

For the purpose of impairment testing, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows, known as cash-generating units. If the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is less than the carrying amount of the unit, the impairment loss is allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the unit and then to the other assets of the unit pro-rata on the basis of the carrying amount of each asset in the unit. Impairment losses recognized for goodwill cannot be reversed in a subsequent period. Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted (see Note 4 (b) for details).

Property, plant and equipment and finite lived intangible assets

At each statement of financial position date, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its property, plant and equipment and finite lived intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent, if any, of the impairment loss. Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from other assets, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.

If the recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset or cash-generating unit is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognized immediately in the statement of income.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 18

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

2.10. | Impairment of assets (continued)

Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset or cash-generating unit is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, not to exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset or cash-generating unit in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognized immediately in the statement of income.

2.11. | Biological assets

Biological assets comprise growing crops (mainly corn, wheat, soybeans, sunflower and rice), sugarcane and coffee and livestock (growing herd and cattle for dairy production).

The Group distinguishes between consumable and bearer biological assets, and between mature and immature biological assets. “Consumable” biological assets are those assets that may be harvested as agriculture produce or sold as biological assets, for example livestock intended for dairy production. “Bearer” biological assets are those assets capable of producing more than one harvest, for example sugarcane or livestock from which raw milk is produced. “Mature” biological assets are those that have attained harvestable specifications (for consumable biological assets) or are able to sustain regular harvests (for bearer biological assets). “Immature” biological assets are those assets other than mature biological assets.

The Group presents long-term biological assets (sugarcane and coffee plantations) as non-current assets based on their nature, as capable of sustaining regular harvests in the long-term.

Costs are capitalized as biological assets if, and only if, (a) it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the entity, and (b) the cost can be measured reliably. The Group capitalizes costs such as: planting, harvesting, weeding, seedlings, irrigation, agrochemicals, fertilizers and a systematic allocation of fixed and variable production overheads that are directly attributable to the management of biological assets, among others. Costs that are expensed as incurred include administration and other general overhead and unallocated production overhead, among others.

Biological assets, both at initial recognition and at each subsequent reporting date, are measured at fair value less costs to sell, except where fair value cannot be reliably measured. Cost approximates fair value when little biological transformation has taken place since the costs were originally incurred or the impact of biological transformation on price is not expected to be material.

Gains and losses that arise on measuring biological assets at fair value less costs to sell and measuring agricultural produce at the point of harvest at fair value less costs to sell are recognized in the statement of income in the period in which they arise in the line item “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce”.

Where there is an active market for a biological asset or agricultural produce, quoted market prices in the most relevant market are used as a basis to determine the fair value. Otherwise, when there is no active market or market-determined prices are not available, fair value of biological assets is determined through the use of valuation techniques.

Therefore, the fair value of biological assets is generally derived from the expected discounted cash flows of the related agricultural produce. The fair value of our agricultural produce at the point of harvest is generally derived from market determined prices. A general description of the determination of fair values based on the Company’s business segments follow:

| • |  | Growing crops:

Growing crops, for which biological transformation is not significant, are measured at cost, which approximates fair value. Expenditure on growing crops includes land preparation expenses and other direct expenses incurred during the sowing period including labor, seedlings, agrochemicals and fertilizers among others.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 19

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

2.11. | Biological assets (continued)

Otherwise, biological assets are measured at fair value less estimated point-of-sale costs at initial recognition and at any subsequent period. Point-of-sale costs include all costs that would be necessary to sell the assets. Gains and losses arising from such measurements are included in the statement of income in the period in which they arise under the line item “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce”.

The fair value of growing crops excluding sugarcane and coffee is measured based on a formula, which takes into consideration the estimated crop yields, estimated market prices and costs, and discount rates. Yields are determined based on several factors including location of farmland, environmental conditions and other restrictions and growth at the time of measurement. Yields are multiplied by sown hectares to determine the estimated tons of crops to be obtained. The tons are then multiplied by a net cash flow determined at the future crop prices less the direct costs to be incurred. This amount is discounted at a discount rate, which reflects current market assessments of the assets involved and the time value of money.

| • |  | Growing herd and cattle:

Livestock are measured at fair value less estimated point-of-sale costs, with any changes therein recognized in the statement of income, on initial recognition as well as subsequently at each reporting period. Gains and losses arising from animal growth and changes in livestock numbers are included in the statement of income in the period in which they arise, under the line item “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce”. The fair value of livestock is determined based on the actual selling prices less estimated point-of-sale costs in the markets where the Group operates.

| • |  | Coffee:

The coffee trees are accounted for as plantations and are generally felled after their optimum economic age for use has expired, generally 18 years.

Coffee trees, for which biological growth is not significant, are valued at cost, which approximates fair value. Expenditure on coffee trees planting includes land preparation expenses and other direct expenses incurred during the sowing period including labor, seedlings, agrochemicals and fertilizers among others.

Coffee trees, which have attained significant biological growth are valued at fair value through a discounted cash flow model. Revenues are based on estimated yearly coffee production volumes and the price is calculated as the average of daily prices for coffee future contracts (Coffee ICE-NY contracts) for a six months period. Projected costs include maintenance, pruning, land leasing, harvesting and coffee treatment. These estimates are discounted at an appropriate discount rate.

| • |  | Sugarcane:

The fair value of sugarcane depends on the variety, location and maturity of the plantation. The sugarcanes are accounted for as plantations and are felled after their optimum economic age for use has expired, generally five years.

Sugarcane, for which biological growth is not significant, is valued at cost, which approximates fair value. Expenditure on sugarcane consists mainly of land preparation expenses and other direct expenses incurred during the sowing period including labor, seedlings, agrochemicals and fertilizers among others. When it has attained significant biological growth, it is measured at fair value through a discounted cash flow model. Revenues are based on estimated yearly production volume (which will be destined to sugar, ethanol, energy and raw cane production) and the price is calculated as the average of daily prices for sugar future contracts (Sugar #11 ICE-NY contracts) for a six months period. Projected costs include maintenance, land leasing, harvesting and transportation. These estimates are discounted at an appropriate discount rate

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 20

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

2.12. | Inventories

Inventories comprise of raw materials, finished goods (including harvested agricultural produce and manufactured goods) and others.

Harvested agricultural produce (except for rice and milk) are perpetually measured at net realizable value until the point of sale because there is an active market in the produce, there is a negligible risk that the produce will not be sold and there is a well-established practice in the industry carrying the inventories at net realizable value. Changes in net realizable value are recognized in the statement of income in the period in which they arise under the line item “Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest”.

All other inventories (including rice and milk) are measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined using the weighted average method.

2.13. | Financial assets

Financial assets are classified in the following categories: at fair value through profit or loss and loans and receivables. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial assets were acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial assets at initial recognition.

(a) Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are financial assets held for trading. A financial asset is classified in this category if acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short-term. Derivatives are also categorized as held for trading unless they are designated as hedges. Financial assets are classified as current if realization within 12 months is expected. Otherwise, they are classified as non-current. For all years presented, the Group’s financial assets at fair value through profit or loss comprise mainly derivative financial instruments.

(b) Loans and receivables

Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets, except for maturities greater than 12 months after the date of the statement of financial position. Loans and receivables comprise “trade and other receivables” and “cash and cash equivalents” in the statement of financial position.

(c) Recognition and measurement

Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized on the trade-date – the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset. Financial assets not carried at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs. Financial assets carried at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognized at fair value and transaction costs are expensed in the statement of income. Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been transferred and the Group has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are subsequently carried at fair value. Loans and receivables are subsequently carried at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of the “financial assets at fair value through profit or loss” category are presented in the statement of income within “Other operating income, net” in the period in which they arise. Dividend income from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss is recognized in the statement of income as part of “Other operating income, net” when the Group’s right to receive payments is established.

If the market for a financial asset is not active (and for unlisted securities), the Group establishes fair value by using valuation techniques. These include the use of recent arm’s length transactions, reference to other instruments that are substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis, and option pricing models, making maximum use of market inputs and relying as little as possible on entity-specific inputs.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 21

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

2.13. | Financial assets (continued)

The Group assesses at each statement of financial position date whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. Impairment testing of trade receivables is described in Note 2.15.

(d) Offsetting financial instruments

Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount reported in the statement of financial position when there is a legally enforceable right to offset the recognized amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, or realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

2.14. | Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities

Derivatives are initially recognized at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured at their fair value. Commodity future contract fair values are computed with reference to quoted market prices on future exchanges markets. The fair values of commodity options are calculated using year-end market rates together with common option pricing models. The fair value of interest rate swaps has been calculated using a discounted cash flow analysis.

The Group manages exposures to financial and commodity risks using hedging instruments that provide the appropriate economic outcome. The principal hedging instruments used may include commodity future contracts, put and call options, foreign exchange forward contracts and interest rate swaps. The Group does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

The Group’s policy is to apply hedge accounting to hedging relationships where it is both permissible under IAS 39, practical to do so and its application reduces volatility, but transactions that may be effective hedges in economic terms may not always qualify for hedge accounting under IAS 39. Any derivatives that the Group holds to hedge these exposures are classified as “held for trading” and are shown in a separate line on the face of the statement of financial position. Gains and losses on commodity derivatives are classified within “Other operating income, net”. Gains and losses on interest rate and foreign exchange rate derivatives are classified within ‘Financial results, net’.

2.15. | Trade receivables

Trade receivables are recognized initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less allowance for trade receivables. An allowance for trade receivables is established when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of the receivables. Significant financial difficulties of the debtor, probability that the debtor will enter bankruptcy or financial reorganization, and default or delinquency in payments are considered indicators that the trade receivable is impaired. The amount of the provision is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through the use of an allowance account, and the amount of the loss is recognized in the statement of income within selling expense. When a trade receivable is uncollectible, it is written off against the allowance account for trade receivables. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against selling expenses in the statement of income.

2.16. | Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents includes cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks and other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. In the statements of cash flows, interest paid is presented within financing cash flows and interest received is presented within investing activities.

2.17. | Trade payables

Trade payables are initially recognized at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 22

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

2.18. | Borrowings

Borrowings are initially recognized at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the date of the statement of financial position. Borrowing costs are capitalized during the period of time that is required to complete and prepare the asset for its intended use.

2.19. | Provisions

Provisions are recognized when (i) the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events; (ii) it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation; and (iii) a reliable estimate of the amount of the obligation can be made. Provisions are measured at the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation using a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the obligation.

2.20. | Onerous contracts

The Group enters into contracts, which require the Group to sell commodities in accordance with the Group’s expected sales. These contracts do not qualify as derivatives. These contracts are not recognized until at least one of the parties has performed under the agreement. However, when the contracts are onerous, the Group recognizes the present obligation under the contracts as a provision included within “Provision and other liabilities” in the statement of financial position. Losses under these onerous contracts are recognized within “Other operating income, net” in the statement of income.

2.21. | Current and deferred income tax

The Group’s tax benefit or expense for each year comprises the charge for current tax payable and deferred taxation attributable to the Group’s operating subsidiaries. Tax is recognized in the statement of income, except to the extent that it relates to items recognized directly in equity. In this case, the tax is also recognized in equity.

The current income tax charge is calculated on the basis of the tax laws enacted or substantively enacted at the date of the statement of financial position in the countries where the Group’s subsidiaries operate and generate taxable income. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulation is subject to interpretation. It establishes provisions where appropriate on the basis of amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities.

Deferred income tax is recognized, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. However, the deferred income tax is not accounted for if it arises from initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction other than a business combination that at the time of the transaction affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the date of the statement of financial position and are expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realized or the deferred income tax liability is settled.

Deferred income tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilized.

Deferred income tax is provided on temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the Group and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

The Group is able to control the timing of dividends from its subsidiaries and hence does not expect to remit overseas earnings in the foreseeable future in a way that would result in a charge to taxable profit. Hence deferred tax is recognized in respect of the retained earnings of overseas subsidiaries only to the extent that, at the date of the statement of financial position, dividends have been accrued as receivable or a binding agreement to distribute past earnings in future has been entered into by the subsidiary.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 23

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

2.22. | Revenue recognition

The Group’s primary activities comprise agricultural and agro-industrial activities.

The Group’s agricultural activities comprise growing and selling agricultural produce. In accordance with IAS 41 “Agriculture”, cattle are measured at fair value with changes therein recognized in the statement of income as they arise. Agricultural produce is measured at net realizable value with changes therein recognized in the statement of income as they arise. Therefore, sales of agricultural produce and cattle generally do not generate any separate gains or losses in the statement of income. See Notes 2.11 and 2.12 for additional details.

The Group’s agro-industrial activities comprise the selling of manufactured products (i.e. industrialized rice, milk-related products, coffee, ethanol, sugar, energy, among others). Sales of manufacturing products are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, net of returns and allowances, trade and other discounts, net of sales taxes, as applicable. Revenue is recognized when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer, recovery of the consideration is probable, the associated costs and possible return of goods can be estimated reliably, and there is no continuing management involvement with the goods. Transfers of risks and rewards vary depending on the individual terms of the contract of sale. For export shipments, transfer occurs upon loading of the goods onto the relevant carrier.

The Group also provides certain agricultural-related services such as grain warehousing/conditioning and other services, e.g. handling and drying services. Revenue from services is recognized as services are provided.

The Group leases owned farmland property to third parties under operating lease agreements. The leased assets are included within investment property on the Group’s statement of financial position. Rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.

The Group is a party to a 10-year power agreement for the sale of electricity. The delivery period starts in May and ends in November of each year. The Group is also a party to a 15-year power agreement which delivery period starts in April and ends in November of each year. Prices under both agreements are adjusted annually for inflation. Revenue related to the sale of electricity under these two agreements is recorded based upon output delivered.

2.23. | Farmlands sales

The Group’s strategy is to profit from land appreciation value generated through the transformation of its productive capabilities. Therefore, the Group may seek to realize value from the sale of farmland assets and businesses.

Farmland sales are not recognized until (i) the sale is completed, (ii) the Group has determined that it is probable the buyer will pay, (iii) the amount of revenue can be measured reliably, and (iv) the Group has transferred to the buyer the risk of ownership, and does not have a continuing involvement. Gains from “farmland sales” are included in the statement of income under the line item “Other operating income, net”.

2.24. | Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the net income for the period attributable to equity holders of the parent by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year. Diluted net earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income for the period by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding, and when dilutive, adjusted for the effect of all potentially dilutive shares, including share options, on an as-if converted basis.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 24

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

2.25. | Equity-settled share-based payments

The Group issues equity settled share-based payments to certain directors, senior management and employees. Options under the awards are measured at fair value at the date of grant. Management measures the fair value using the valuation technique that they consider to be the most appropriate to value each class of award. Methods used may include Black-Scholes calculations or other models as appropriate. The valuations take into account factors such as non-transferability, exercise restrictions and behavioral considerations. An expense is recognized to spread the fair value of each award over the vesting period on a straight-line basis, after allowing for an estimate of the awards that will eventually vest. The estimate of the level of vesting is reviewed at least annually, with any impact on the cumulative charge being recognized immediately.

2.26. | Research and development

Research phase expenditure is expensed as incurred. Development expenditure is capitalized as an internally generated intangible asset only if it meets strict criteria, relating in particular to technical feasibility and generation of future economic benefits. Research expenses have been immaterial to date. The Group has not capitalized any development expenses to date.

3. | Financial risk management

Risk management principles and processes

The Group’s activities are exposed to a variety of financial risks. The Group’s overall risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimize the Group’s capital costs by using suitable means of financing and to manage and control the Group’s financial risks effectively. The Group uses financial instruments to hedge certain risk exposures.

The Group’s approach to the identification, assessment and mitigation of risk is carried out by a Risk and Commercial Committee, which focuses on timely and appropriate management of risk. This Risk and Commercial Committee has overall accountability for the identification and management of risk across the Group.

The principal financial risks arising from financial instruments are raw material price risk, end-product price risk, exchange rate risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk and credit risk. This section provides a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s strategy, performance, results of operations and financial condition. The principal risks and uncertainties facing the business, set out below, do not appear in any particular order of potential materiality or probability of occurrence.

| • |  | Exchange rate risk

The Group’s cash flows, statement of income and statement of financial position are presented in US dollars and may be affected by fluctuations in exchange rates. Currency risks as defined by IFRS 7 arise on account of monetary assets and liabilities being denominated in a currency that is not the functional currency.

A significant majority of the Group’s business activities is conducted in the respective functional currencies of the subsidiaries (primarily the Brazilian Reais and the Argentine Peso). However, it transacts in currencies other than the respective functional currencies of the subsidiaries. To date, transactions denominated in currencies other than the respective functional currencies are denominated in US dollars. There are monetary balances held by the Group companies at each year-end that are denominated in US dollars (non-functional currency).

The Group’s net financial position exposure to the US dollar is managed on a case-by-case basis, partly by hedging certain expected cash flows with foreign exchange derivative contracts.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 25

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

3. | Financial risk management (continued)

The following tables show the Group’s net monetary position broken down by various currencies for each functional currency in which the Group operates for all the years presented. All amounts are shown in US dollars.

|  | 2012 |
|  | Functional currency |
Net monetary position (Liability)/ Asset |  | Argentine Peso |  |  | Brazilian Reais |  |  | Uruguayan Peso |  |  | US Dollar |  |  | Total |
Argentine Peso |  |  | (38,035 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (38,035 | )
Brazilian Reais |  |  | — |  |  |  | (256,484 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (256,484 | )
US Dollar |  |  | (131,754 | ) |  |  | (85,902 | ) |  |  | 18,031 |  |  |  | 157,479 |  |  |  | (42,146 | )
Uruguayan Peso |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (287 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (287 | )
Total |  |  | (169,789 | ) |  |  | (342,386 | ) |  |  | 17,744 |  |  |  | 157,479 |  |  |  | (336,952 | )
|  | 2011 |
|  | Functional currency |
Net monetary position (Liability)/ Asset |  | Argentine Peso |  |  | Brazilian Reais |  |  | Uruguayan Peso |  |  | US Dollar |  |  | Total |
Argentine Peso |  |  | (17,090 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (17,090 | )
Brazilian Reais |  |  | — |  |  |  | (56,147 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (56,147 | )
US Dollar |  |  | (98,674 | ) |  |  | (55,038 | ) |  |  | 21,964 |  |  |  | 138,107 |  |  |  | 6,359 |
Uruguayan Peso |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,780 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,780 | )
Total |  |  | (115,764 | ) |  |  | (111,185 | ) |  |  | 20,184 |  |  |  | 138,107 |  |  |  | (68,658 | )

The Group’s analysis shown on the tables below is carried out based on the exposure of each functional currency subsidiary against the US dollar. The Group estimated that, other factors being constant, a 10% appreciation of the US dollar against the respective functional currencies for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 would have (decreased) the Group’s Profit Before Income Tax for the year. A 10% depreciation of the US dollar against the functional currencies would have an equal and opposite effect on the income statement.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Group estimated that, other factors being constant, a 10% appreciation of the US dollar against the respective functional currencies would have (increased) the Group’s Loss Before Income Tax for the year. A 10% depreciation of the US dollar against the functional currencies would have an equal and opposite effect on the income statement.

|  | 2012 |
|  | Functional currency |
Net monetary position |  | Argentine Peso |  |  | Brazilian Reais |  |  | Uruguayan Peso |  |  | US Dollar |  |  | Total |
Argentine Peso |  |  | n/a |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Brazilian Reais |  |  | — |  |  |  | n/a |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
US Dollar |  |  | (13,175 | ) |  |  | (8,590 | ) |  |  | 1,803 |  |  |  | n/a |  |  |  | (19,962 | )
Uruguayan Peso |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
(Decrease) Increase in Profit Before Income Tax |  |  | (13,175 | ) |  |  | (8,590 | ) |  |  | 1,803 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (19,962 | )

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 26

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

3. | Financial risk management (continued)

|  | 2011 |
|  | Functional currency |
Net monetary position |  | Argentine Peso |  |  | Brazilian Reais |  |  | Uruguayan Peso |  |  | US Dollar |  |  | Total |
Argentine Peso |  |  | n/a |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Brazilian Reais |  |  | — |  |  |  | n/a |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
US Dollar |  |  | (9,867 | ) |  |  | (5,504 | ) |  |  | 2,196 |  |  |  | n/a |  |  |  | (13,175 | )
Uruguayan Peso |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
(Decrease) Increase in Profit Before Income Tax |  |  | (9,867 | ) |  |  | (5,504 | ) |  |  | 2,196 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (13,175 | )
|  | 2010 |
|  | Functional currency |
Net monetary position |  | Argentine Peso |  |  | Brazilian Reais |  |  | Uruguayan Peso |  |  | US Dollar |  |  | Total |
Argentine Peso |  |  | n/a |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Brazilian Reais |  |  | — |  |  |  | n/a |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
US Dollar |  |  | (7,344 | ) |  |  | (3,710 | ) |  |  | 1,741 |  |  |  | n/a |  |  |  | (9,313 | )
Uruguayan Peso |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | n/a |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
(Increase) or decrease in (Loss) Before Income Tax |  |  | (7,344 | ) |  |  | (3,710 | ) |  |  | 1,741 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (9,313 | )

| • |  | Raw material price risk

Inflation in the costs of raw materials and goods and services from industry suppliers and manufacturers presents risks to project economics. A significant portion of the Group’s cost structure includes the cost of raw materials primarily seeds, fertilizers and agrochemicals, among others. Prices for these raw materials may vary significantly.

| • |  | End-product price risk

Prices for commodities products have historically been cyclical, reflecting overall economic conditions and changes in capacity within the industry, which affect the profitability of entities engaged in the agribusiness industry. The Group’s commercial team combines different actions to minimize price risk. A percentage of crops are to be sold during and post harvest period. The Group manages minimum and maximum prices for each commodity as well as gross margin per each crop as to decide when and how to sell. End-product price risks are hedged if economically viable and possible by entering into forward contracts with major trading houses or by using derivative financial instruments, consisting mainly of crops, sugar and coffee future contracts, but also includes occasionally put and call options. A movement in end-product futures prices would result in a change in the fair value of the end product hedging contracts. These fair value changes, after taxes, are recorded in the statement of income.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 27

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

3. | Financial risk management (continued)

Contract positions are designed to ensure that the Group would receive a defined minimum price for certain quantities of its production. The counterparties to these instruments generally are major financial institutions. In entering into these contracts, the Group has assumed the risk that might arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. The Group does not expect any material losses as a result of counterparty defaults. The Group is also obliged to pay margin deposits and premiums for these instruments. These estimates represent only the sensitivity of the financial instruments to market risk and not the Group exposure to end product price risks as a whole, since the crops and cattle products sales are not financial instruments within the scope of IFRS 7 disclosure requirements.

The Group estimated that, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, other factors being constant, a 5% increase in the prices for the Group’s main products would have increased the Group’s Profit Before Income Tax for the year by approximately US$ 2,825 and US$ 1,675, respectively. A 5% decrease in prices would have an equal and opposite effect on the income statement.

The Group estimated that, for the year ended December 31, 2010, other factors being constant, a 5% increase in the prices for the Group’s main products would have decreased the Group’s Loss Before Income Tax for the year by approximately US$ 1,280. A 5% decrease in prices would have an equal and opposite effect on the income statement.

| • |  | Liquidity risk

The Group is exposed to liquidity risks, including risks associated with refinancing borrowings as they mature, the risk that borrowing facilities are not available to meet cash requirements and the risk that financial assets cannot readily be converted to cash without loss of value. Failure to manage financing risks could have a material impact on the Group’s cash flow and statement of financial position.

Prudent liquidity risk management includes managing the profile of debt maturities and funding sources close oversight of cash flows projections, maintaining sufficient cash, and ensuring the availability of funding from an adequate amount of committed credit facilities and the ability to close out market positions. The Group’s ability to fund its existing and prospective debt requirements is managed by maintaining diversified funding sources with adequate available funding lines from high quality lenders; and reaching to have long-term financial facilities.

As of December 31, 2012, cash and cash equivalent of the Group totaled U$S 218.8 million, which could be used for managing liquidity risk.

The tables below analyzes the Group’s non-derivative financial liabilities and derivative financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period at the statement of financial position to the contractual maturity date. The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows and as a result they do not reconcile to the amounts disclosed on the statement of financial position except for short-term payables when discounting is not applied.

At 31 December 2012 |  | Less than 1 year |  |  | Between 1 and 2 years |  |  | Between 2 and 5 years |  |  | Over 5 Years |  |  | Total |
Trade and other payables |  |  | 67,119 |  |  |  | 1,757 |  |  |  | 26,814 |  |  |  | 1,280 |  |  |  | 96,970 |
Borrowings (excluding finance lease liabilities) |  |  | 208,590 |  |  |  | 118,623 |  |  |  | 227,861 |  |  |  | 53,861 |  |  |  | 608,935 |
Finance leases |  |  | 517 |  |  |  | 432 |  |  |  | 341 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,290 |
Derivative financial instruments |  |  | 5,751 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 5,751 |
Total |  |  | 281,977 |  |  |  | 120,812 |  |  |  | 255,016 |  |  |  | 55,141 |  |  |  | 712,946 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 28

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

3. | Financial risk management (continued)

At 31 December 2011 |  | Less than 1 year |  |  | Between 1 and 2 years |  |  | Between 2 and 5 years |  |  | Over 5 Years |  |  | Total |
Trade and other payables |  |  | 106,991 |  |  |  | 3,780 |  |  |  | 1,598 |  |  |  | 1,812 |  |  |  | 114,181 |
Borrowings (excluding finance lease liabilities) |  |  | 166,708 |  |  |  | 104,760 |  |  |  | 118,541 |  |  |  | 26,366 |  |  |  | 416,375 |
Finance leases |  |  | 119 |  |  |  | 79 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 198 |
Derivative financial instruments |  |  | 6,054 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 6,054 |
Total |  |  | 279,872 |  |  |  | 108,619 |  |  |  | 120,139 |  |  |  | 28,178 |  |  |  | 536,808 |

| • |  | Interest rate risk

The Group’s financing costs may be significantly affected by interest rate volatility. Borrowings under the Group’s interest rate management policy may be fixed or floating rate. The Group maintains adequate committed borrowing facilities and holds most of its financial assets primarily in short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash.

The Group’s interest rate risk arises from long-term borrowings. Borrowings issued at floating rates expose the Group to cash flow interest rate risk. Borrowings issued at fixed rates expose the Group to fair value interest rate risk. The interest rate profile of the Group’s borrowings is set out in Note 21.

The Group occasionally manages its cash flow interest rate risk exposure by using floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps. Such interest rate swaps have the economic effect of converting borrowings from floating rates to fixed rates.

The following tables show a breakdown of the Group’s fixed-rate and floating-rate borrowings per currency denomination and functional currency of the subsidiary issuing the loans (excluding finance leases). These analyses are performed after giving effect to interest rate swaps.

The analysis for the year ended December 31, 2012 is as follows (all amounts are shown in US dollars):

|  | 2012 |
|  | Functional currency |
Rate per currency denomination |  | Argentine Peso |  |  | Brazilian Reais |  |  | Uruguayan Peso |  |  | Total |
Fixed rate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Argentine Peso |  |  | 18,039 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 18,039 |
Brazilian Reais |  |  | — |  |  |  | 119,340 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 119,339 |
US Dollar |  |  | 70,221 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 501 |  |  |  | 70,722 |
Uruguayan Peso |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 44 |  |  |  | 44 |
Subtotal Fixed-rate borrowings |  |  | 88,260 |  |  |  | 119,340 |  |  |  | 545 |  |  |  | 208,145 |
Variable rate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Brazilian Reais |  |  | — |  |  |  | 197,171 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 197,171 |
US Dollar |  |  | 52,112 |  |  |  | 80,584 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 132,696 |
Subtotal Variable-rate borrowings |  |  | 52,112 |  |  |  | 277,755 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 329,867 |
Total borrowings as per analysis |  |  | 140,372 |  |  |  | 397,095 |  |  |  | 545 |  |  |  | 538,012 |
Finance leases |  |  | 1,046 |  |  |  | 75 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,121 |
Total borrowings as per statement of financial position |  |  | 141,418 |  |  |  | 397,170 |  |  |  | 545 |  |  |  | 539,133 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 29

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

3. | Financial risk management (continued)

The analysis for the year ended December 31, 2011 is as follows (all amounts are shown in US dollars):

|  | 2011 |
|  | Functional currency |
Rate per currency denomination |  | Argentine Peso |  |  | Brazilian Reais |  |  | Uruguayan Peso |  |  | Total |
Fixed rate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Argentine Peso |  |  | 6,739 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 6,739 |
Brazilian Reais |  |  | — |  |  |  | 66,497 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 66,497 |
US Dollar |  |  | 72,136 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,934 |  |  |  | 74,070 |
Subtotal Fixed-rate borrowings |  |  | 78,875 |  |  |  | 66,497 |  |  |  | 1,934 |  |  |  | 147,306 |
Variable rate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Brazilian Reais |  |  | — |  |  |  | 87,614 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 87,614 |
US Dollar |  |  | 59,977 |  |  |  | 65,610 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 125,587 |
Subtotal Variable-rate borrowings |  |  | 59,977 |  |  |  | 153,224 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 213,201 |
Total borrowings as per analysis |  |  | 138,852 |  |  |  | 219,721 |  |  |  | 1,934 |  |  |  | 360,507 |
Finance leases |  |  | 66 |  |  |  | 132 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 198 |
Total borrowings as per statement of financial position |  |  | 138,918 |  |  |  | 219,853 |  |  |  | 1,934 |  |  |  | 360,705 |

For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, if interest rates on floating-rate borrowings had been 1% higher with all other variables held constant, the Group’s Profit Before Income Tax for the year would have decreased as shown below. A 1% decrease in interest rates would have an equal and opposite effect on the income statement.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, if interest rates on floating-rate borrowings had been 1% higher with all other variables held constant, the Group’s Loss Before Income Tax for the year would have increased as shown below. A 1% decrease in interest rates would have an equal and opposite effect on the income.

|  | 2012 |
|  | Functional currency |
Rate per currency denomination |  | Argentine Peso |  |  | Brazilian Reais |  |  | Uruguayan Peso |  |  | Total |
Variable rate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Brazilian Reais |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,972 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,972 | )
US Dollar |  |  | (521 | ) |  |  | (806 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,327 | )
Total effects on Profit Before Income Tax |  |  | (521 | ) |  |  | (2,778 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (3,299 | )
|  | 2011 |
|  | Functional currency |
Rate per currency denomination |  | Argentine Peso |  |  | Brazilian Reais |  |  | Uruguayan Peso |  |  | Total |
Variable rate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Brazilian Reais |  |  | — |  |  |  | (876 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (876 | )
US Dollar |  |  | (600 | ) |  |  | (656 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,256 | )
Total effects on Profit Before Income Tax |  |  | (600 | ) |  |  | (1,532 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (2,132 | )

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 30

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

3. | Financial risk management (continued)

|  | 2010 |
|  | Functional currency |
Rate per currency denomination |  | Argentine Peso |  |  | Brazilian Reais |  |  | Uruguayan Peso |  |  | Total |
Variable rate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Brazilian Reais |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,134 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,134 | )
US Dollar |  |  | (641 | ) |  |  | (932 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,573 | )
Total effects on (Loss) Before Income Tax |  |  | (641 | ) |  |  | (2,066 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (2,707 | )

The sensitivity analysis has been determined assuming that the change in interest rates had occurred at the date of the statement of financial position and had been applied to the exposure to interest rate risk for financial instruments in existence at that date. The 100 basis point increase or decrease represents management’s assessment of a reasonable possible change in those interest rates, which have the most impact on the Group, specifically the United States and Brazilian rates over the period until the next annual statement of financial position date.

| • |  | Credit risk

The Group’s exposures to credit risk takes the form of a loss that would be recognized if counterparties failed to, or were unable to, meet their payment obligations. These risks may arise in certain agreements in relation to amounts owed for physical product sales, the use of derivative instruments, and the investment of surplus cash balances. The Group is also exposed to political and economic risk events, which may cause non-payment of foreign currency obligations to the Group. The current credit crisis could also lead to the failure of companies in the sector, potentially including customers, partners, contractors and suppliers.

The Group is subject to credit risk arising from outstanding receivables, cash and cash equivalents and deposits with banks and financial institutions, and from the use of derivative financial instruments. The Group’s policy is to manage credit exposure to trading counterparties within defined trading limits. All of the Group’s significant counterparties are assigned internal credit limits.

The Group sells manufactured products, agricultural products and offers services to a large base of customers. Type and class of customers may differ depending on the Group’s business segments. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, more than 55% and 67% of the Group’s sales of crops were sold to 11 and 10 well-known customers (both multinational or local) with good credit history with the Group. In the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy segment, sales of ethanol were concentrated in 10 and 9 customers, which represented 89% and 61% of total sales of ethanol for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Approximately 79% and 70% of the Group’s sales of sugar were concentrated in 5 and 3 well-known traders for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The remaining 21% and 30%, which mainly relates to “crystal sugar”, were dispersed among several customers. In 2012 and 2011, energy sales are 100% and 91% concentrated in 3 major customers. In the dairy segment, 43% and 86% of the sales were completed with the Group’s joint venture La Lacteo (see Note 10).

No credit limits were exceeded during the reporting periods and management does not expect any losses from non-performance by these counterparties. If any of the Group’s customers are independently rated, these ratings are used. Otherwise, if there is no independent rating, the Group assesses the credit quality of the customer taking into account its financial position, past experience and other factors (see Note 13 for details). The Group may seek cash collateral, letter of credit or parent company guarantees, as considered appropriate. Sales to customers are primarily made by credit with customary payment terms. The maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by the carrying amount of each financial asset in the statement of financial position after deducting any impairment allowance. The Group’s exposure of credit risk arising from trade receivables is set out in Note 13.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 31

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

3. | Financial risk management (continued)

The Group is exposed to counterparty credit risk on cash and cash equivalent balances. The Group holds cash on deposit with a number of financial institutions. The Group manages its credit risk exposure by limiting individual deposits to clearly defined limits. The Group only deposits with high quality banks and financial institutions. The maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by the carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents in the statement of financial position. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the total amount of cash and cash equivalents mainly comprise cash in banks and short-term bank deposits. The Group is authorized to transact with banks rated “BBB+” or higher. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, 8 and 2 banks (primarily HSBC, Rabobank, Banco do Brasil, Votorantim, BTG Pactual, Itau, Citibank and Bradesco) accounted for more than 95% of the total cash deposited. The remaining amount of cash and cash equivalents relates to cash in hand. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2012, the Group invested in fixed-term bank deposits with mainly four banks (Banco do Brasil, Itau, Votorantim and BTG Pactual) and also entered into derivative contracts (currency forward). The Group does not have investment in securities or other financial instruments for which risk may have increased due to the financial credit crisis. The Group’s exposure of credit risk arising from cash and cash equivalents is set out in Note 15.

The Group’s primary objective for holding derivative financial instruments is to manage currency exchange rate risk, interest rate risk and commodity price risk. The Group generally enters into derivative transactions with high-credit-quality counterparties and, by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure to any one counterparty based on an analysis of that counterparty’s relative credit standing. The amounts subject to credit risk related to derivative instruments are generally limited to the amounts, if any, by which counterparty’s obligations exceed the obligations with that counterparty.

Similarly, transactions involving derivative financial instruments are with counterparties with high credit ratings (see Note 12 for details). The Group arranged interest rate swaps with HSBC, BTG Pactual, Rabobank, Deutsche Bank and Votorantim in Brazil and Rabobank in Argentina. The Group also entered into crop commodity futures traded in the established trading markets of Argentina and Brazil through well-rated brokers. Management does not expect any counterparty to fail to meet its obligations.

| • |  | Capital risk management

The Group’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of capital. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, it may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or sell assets to reduce debt. Consistent with others in the industry, the Group monitors capital on the basis of the gearing ratio. This ratio is calculated as total debt (including current and non-current borrowings as shown in the consolidated statement of financial position, if applicable) divided by total capital. Total capital is calculated as equity, as shown in the consolidated statement of financial position, plus total debt. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the strategy, which was unchanged from 2011, was to maintain the gearing ratio within 0.18 to 0.40, as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Total Debt |  |  | 539,133 |  |  |  | 360,705 |
Total Equity |  |  | 1,026,043 |  |  |  | 1,094,869 |
Total Capital |  |  | 1,565,176 |  |  |  | 1,455,574 |
Gearing Ratio |  |  | 0.34 |  |  |  | 0.25 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 32

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

3. | Financial risk management (continued)

| • |  | Derivative financial instruments

As part of its business operations, the Group uses a variety of derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to the financial risks discussed above. The primary objective for holding derivative financial instruments is to manage currency exchange rate risk, interest rate risk and commodity price risk. As part of this strategy, the Group may enter into (i) interest rate derivatives to manage the composition of floating and fixed rate debt; (ii) currency derivatives to manage the currency composition of its cash and cash equivalents; and (iii) crop future contracts and put and call options to manage its exposure to price volatility stemming from its integrated crop production activities. The Group’s policy is not to use derivatives for speculative purposes.

Derivative financial instruments involve, to a varying degree, elements of market and credit risk not recognized in the financial statements. The market risk associated with these instruments resulting from price movements is expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions, assets and liabilities, being hedged. The counterparties to the agreements relating to the Group’s contracts generally are large institutions with credit ratings equal to or higher than BBB+. The Group continually monitors the credit rating of such counterparties and seeks to limit its financial exposure to any one financial institution. While the contract or notional amounts of derivative financial instruments provide one measure of the volume of these transactions, they do not represent the amount of the Group’s exposure to credit risk. The amounts potentially subject to credit risk (arising from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts) are generally limited to the amounts, if any, by which the counterparties’ obligations under the contracts exceed the Group’s obligations to the counterparties.

The following tables show the outstanding positions for each type of derivative contract as of the date of each statement of financial position:

| • |  | Futures/ options

As of December 31, 2012:

|  | 2012 |
Type of derivative contract |  | Quantities (thousands) (**) |  |  | Notional amount |  |  | Fair Value Asset/ (Liability) |  |  | (Loss)/Gain (*) |
Futures: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Sale |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Corn |  |  | 99 |  |  |  | 24,472 |  |  |  | 1,082 |  |  |  | 1,082 |
Soybean |  |  | 30 |  |  |  | 10,161 |  |  |  | 363 |  |  |  | 363 |
Wheat |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 484 |  |  |  | (153 | ) |  |  | (153 | )
Sugar |  |  | 197 |  |  |  | 89,281 |  |  |  | 2,423 |  |  |  | 2,266 |
Ethanol (thousands m 3) |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 4,723 |  |  |  | (40 | ) |  |  | (40 | )
Coffee |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 764 |  |  |  | 63 |  |  |  | 63 |
OTC: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Sugar |  |  | 24 |  |  |  | 7,671 |  |  |  | 1,151 |  |  |  | 1,028 |
Options: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Buy put |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Sugar |  |  | 24 |  |  |  | 1,476 |  |  |  | 725 |  |  |  | (43 | )
Sell call |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Corn |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | (30 | ) |  |  | (13 | )
Sugar |  |  | 21 |  |  |  | 1,393 |  |  |  | (916 | ) |  |  | (317 | )
Total |  |  | 409 |  |  |  | 140,442 |  |  |  | 4,668 |  |  |  | 4,236 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 33

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

3. | Financial risk management (continued)

As of December 31, 2011:

|  | 2011 |
Type of derivative contract |  | Quantities (thousands) (**) |  |  | Notional amount |  |  | Fair Value Asset/ (Liability) |  |  | (Loss)/ Gain (*) |
Futures: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Sale |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Ethanol (thousands m 3) |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 2,719 |  |  |  | 44 |  |  |  | 44 |
Soybean |  |  | 63 |  |  |  | 19 |  |  |  | 256 |  |  |  | 256 |
Sugar |  |  | 160 |  |  |  | 7,551 |  |  |  | 6,751 |  |  |  | 6,751 |
Coffee |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 10,533 |  |  |  | 238 |  |  |  | 256 |
Wheat |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 7 |  |  |  | 7 |
Options: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Buy put |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Corn |  |  | 189 |  |  |  | 2,172 |  |  |  | 1,256 |  |  |  | (620 | )
Soybean |  |  | 20 |  |  |  | 127 |  |  |  | 293 |  |  |  | 164 |
Wheat |  |  | 27 |  |  |  | 596 |  |  |  | 457 |  |  |  | (143 | )
Sugar |  |  | 39 |  |  |  | 109,600 |  |  |  | 845 |  |  |  | 845 |
OTC |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Sugar |  |  | 20 |  |  |  | 79,831 |  |  |  | 1,658 |  |  |  | 1,658 |
Sell call |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Soybean |  |  | 21 |  |  |  | 130 |  |  |  | 137 |  |  |  | 7 |
Sugar |  |  | 44 |  |  |  | 98,000 |  |  |  | (1,519 | ) |  |  | (1,519 | )
Wheat |  |  | 27 |  |  |  | (566 | ) |  |  | (763 | ) |  |  | (193 | )
Total |  |  | 615 |  |  |  | 310,710 |  |  |  | 9,660 |  |  |  | 7,513 |

(*) | Included in the line item “Gain from commodity derivative financial instruments” of Note 28.

(**) | All quantities expressed in tons except otherwise indicated.

Commodity future contract fair values are computed with reference to quoted market prices on future exchanges.

| • |  | Floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps

In January 2009, the Group´s subsidiaries in Argentina, Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. and Pilagá S.A., entered into a floating-to-fixed interest rate swap to hedge against the variability of the cash flows of the Tranche B facility entered into with the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). Tranche B of the IDB Facility comprised a five-year US$ 49 million loan bearing interest at 180-day LIBOR plus 4.75% per annum (see Note 21 for additional details). The Group’s exposure to interest rate changes through the Tranche B loan was fully hedged through the use of an interest rate swap. This hedging arrangement fully offsets any additional interest rate expense incurred as a result of increases in interest rates. The swap’s notional amount was US$ 49 million and cancelled in December 2011.

The Group cancelled the original swap agreement when the terms of the IDB Facility were redefined and additional funds received. The Group then entered into a US$ 60 million new floating-to-fixed interest rate forward swap commencing in May 2012 and expiring November 15, 2016 expecting to hedge against the variability of the cash flows of the new Tranche B facility. The redefined facility comprises a five-year US$ 60 million loan bearing interest at 180-day LIBOR plus 4.45% per annum (fixed interest rate: 5.70%).

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 34

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

3. | Financial risk management (continued)

The Group did not apply hedge accounting to any of these agreements. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Group recorded a liability of US$ 0.6 million and US$ nil million, respectively, the estimated fair value of the outstanding swaps at those dates.

| • |  | Foreign currency fixed-to-floating interest rate swap

In August and September 2012 the Group’s subsidiary in Brazil, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema entered into a interest rate swap operation with Deutsche Bank in an aggregate amount of US$ 30 million (US$ 15 million per month). In those operations Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema receives exchange variation plus 4,37% per year, and pays CDI (a interbank floating interest rate in Reais) plus 2% per year, and at the same time convert the currency interest payment into Reais at a fixed exchange rate The swap expires in May and June 2013. The Group did not apply hedge accounting to this instrument. As of December 31, 2012, the Group recorded a liability of US$ 0.3 million representing the estimated fair value of the swap as of that date.

The Group evaluated the impact on interest expense, of all agreements mentioned above, for the year considering an immediate 100 basis point change in interest rates. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, a 100 basis point increase/decrease in interest rates would result in an increase/decrease in interest expense of US$ 0.35 million, US$ 0.1 million and US$ 0.7, respectively.

The Group evaluated the impact on the interest rate swaps’ fair value, of all agreements mentioned above, considering an immediate 100 basis point change in interest rates. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, a 100 basis point increase/decrease in interest rates would result in an approximate US$ 0.19 million and US$ nil million increase/decrease in the fair value of interest rate swap, respectively. The fair value of the swaps has been calculated using a discounted cash flow analysis.

| • |  | Foreign currency floating-to-fixed interest rate swap

In June 2012 the Group’s subsidiary in Brazil, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema entered into a Reais 230 million syndicated loan with Rabobank International Brasil, BGT Pactual, HSBC and Votorantim. The loan bears interest at a variable rate of CDI plus 3.60% per annum. At same moment and with same banks, the Company entered into a swap operation, which intention is to effectively convert the principal amount and interest rate denominated in Reais, to a principal amount an interest rate denominated in USD, plus a fixed rate of 7.70% per annum. The swap expires according to the due dates of the loan, until December 2015. The Group did not apply hedge accounting to this instrument. As of December 31, 2012, the Group recorded a liability of US$ 0.3 million representing the estimated fair value of the swap as of that date.

| • |  | Currency forward

During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Group entered into several currency forward contracts with Brazilian banks in order to hedge the fluctuation of the Brazilian Reais against the US Dollar for a total aggregate amount of US$ 56 million and US$ 74.0 million, respectively. The currency forward contracts entered in 2012 had maturity dates between May 2013 and December 2013, while those entered in 2011 had maturity dates ranging between February and December 2012. The outstanding contracts resulted in a recognition of a gain of US$ 1.9 million in 2012 and of a loss of US$ 9.1 million in 2011. Gains and losses on currency forward contracts are included within “Financial results, net” in the statement of income. During 2010 the Company did not enter in any currency forward.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 35

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

4. | Critical accounting estimates and judgments

Critical accounting policies are those that are most important to the portrayal of the Group’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments and estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that it believes are reasonable. The Group’s critical accounting policies are discussed below.

Actual results could differ from estimates used in employing the critical accounting policies and these could have a material impact on the Group’s results of operations. The Group also has other policies that are considered key accounting policies, such as the policy for revenue recognition. However, these other policies, which are discussed in the notes to the Group’s financial statements, do not meet the definition of critical accounting estimates, because they do not generally require estimates to be made or judgments that are difficult or subjective.

| (a) | Business combinations - purchase price allocation

Accounting for business combinations requires the allocation of the Group’s purchase price to the various assets and liabilities of the acquired business at their respective fair values. The Group uses all available information to make these fair value determinations, and for major acquisitions, may hire an independent appraisal firm to assist in making fair value estimates. In some instances, assumptions with respect to the timing and amount of future revenues and expenses associated with an asset might have to be used in determining its fair value. Actual timing and amount of net cash flows from revenues and expenses related to that asset over time may differ materially from those initial estimates, and if the timing is delayed significantly or if the net cash flows decline significantly, the asset could become impaired.

| (b) | Impairment testing

At the date of each statement of financial position, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its property, plant and equipment and finite lived intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent, if any, of the impairment loss. Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from other assets, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. The Group’s property, plant and equipment items generally do not generate independent cash flows.

Goodwill on acquisition is initially measured at cost being the excess of the cost of the business combination over the Group’s interest in the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities. As of the acquisition date, any goodwill acquired is allocated to the cash-generating unit (‘CGU’) expected to benefit from the business combination.

Following initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually as of September of each year, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired. The impairment review requires management to undertake certain judgments, including estimating the recoverable value of the CGU to which the goodwill relates, based on either fair value less costs-to-sell or the value-in-use, as appropriate, in order to reach a conclusion on whether it deems the goodwill is impaired or not.

For purposes of the impairment testing, each CGU represents the smallest identifiable group of assets that generate cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or group of assets.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 36

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

4. | Critical accounting estimates and judgments (continued)

Farmland businesses may be used for different activities that may generate independent cash flows. When farmland businesses are used for single activities (i.e. crops), these are considered as one CGU. Generally, each separate farmland business within Argentina and Uruguay are treated as single CGUs. Otherwise, when farmland businesses are used for more than one segment activity (i.e. crops and cattle or rental income), the farmland is further subdivided into two or more CGUs, as appropriate, for purposes of impairment testing. For its properties in Brazil, management identified a farmland together with its related mill as separate CGUs.

Management reviewed the carrying amounts of its property, plant and equipment and finite lived intangible assets as of December 31, 2012 to determine whether there was any indication of potential impairment. Management concluded that no impairment testing for property, plant and equipment and finite lived intangible assets was necessary as of year-end. As regards the mandatory impairment testing of goodwill, management tested all CGUs with allocated goodwill in Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil as of September 30, 2012 and determined that none of the CGUs were impaired as of that date. There were no events or changes in circumstances, which would warrant an impairment testing of goodwill as of December 31, 2012.

However, for the year ended December 31, 2011, due to the volatility in international markets, management tested all CGUs as of September 30, 2011 regardless of which CGUs have allocated any goodwill. None of the CGUs with or without any allocated goodwill were impaired as of September 30, 2011. There were no events or changes in circumstances, which would have warranted an impairment testing either of goodwill or other assets as of December 31, 2011.

CGUs tested based on a fair-value-less-costs-to-sell model at September 30, 2012 and 2011:

Based on the criteria described above, management identified a total amount of forty-three CGUs as of September 30, 2012 and forty-four CGUs as of September 30, 2011 for purposes of the impairment testing.

As of September 30, 2012, the Group identified 10 CGUs in Argentina and Uruguay to be tested based on this model (all CGUs with allocated goodwill). As of September 30, 2011, the Group identified 35 CGUs in Argentina and Uruguay and 2 CGUs in Brazil to be tested based in this model (regardless of any goodwill allocated to them). Estimating the fair value less costs-to-sell is based on the best information available, and refers to the amount at which the CGU could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties. In calculating the fair value less costs-to-sell, management may be assisted by the work of external advisors. When using this model, the Group applies the “sales comparison approach” as its method of valuing most properties. This method relies on results of sales of similar agricultural properties to estimate the value of the CGU. This approach is based on the theory that the fair value of a property is directly related to the selling prices of similar properties.

Fair values are determined by extensive analysis, which includes current and potential soil productivity of the land (the ability to produce crops and maintain livestock) projected margins derived from soil use, rental value obtained for soil use, if applicable, and other factors such as climate and location. Farmland ratings are established by considering such factors as soil texture and quality, yields, topography, drainage and rain levels. Farmland may contain farm outbuildings. A farm outbuilding is any improvement or structure that is used for farming operations. Outbuildings are valued based on their size, age and design.

Based on the factors described above, each farm property is assigned different soil classifications for the purposes of establishing a value. Soil classifications quantify the factors that contribute to the agricultural capability of the soil. Soil classifications range from the most productive to the least productive.

The first step to establishing an assessment for a farm property is a sales investigation that identifies the valid farm sales in the area where the farm is located.

A price per hectare is assigned for each soil class within each farm property. This price per hectare is determined based on the quantitative and qualitative analysis mainly described above.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 37

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

4. | Critical accounting estimates and judgments (continued)

The results are then tested against actual sales, if any, and current market conditions to ensure the values produced are accurate, consistent and fair.

The following table shows only the 10 CGUs (2011: 11 CGUs) where goodwill was allocated at each period end and the corresponding amount of goodwill allocated to each one:

CGU / Operating segment / Country |  | September 30, 2012 |  |  | September 30, 2011 |
La Carolina / Crops / Argentina |  |  | 149 |  |  |  | 166 |
La Carolina / Cattle / Argentina |  |  | 24 |  |  |  | 27 |
El Orden / Crops / Argentina |  |  | 182 |  |  |  | 203 |
El Orden / Cattle / Argentina |  |  | 30 |  |  |  | 33 |
La Guarida / Crops / Argentina |  |  | 2,179 |  |  |  | 2,434 |
La Guarida / Cattle / Argentina |  |  | 216 |  |  |  | 241 |
Los Guayacanes / Crops / Argentina |  |  | 1,664 |  |  |  | 1,859 |
Doña Marina / Rice / Argentina |  |  | 5,877 |  |  |  | 6,565 |
Huelen / Crops / Argentina |  |  | 6,585 |  |  |  | 7,403 |
El Colorado / Crops / Argentina |  |  | 3,323 |  |  |  | 2,802 |
El Colorado / Cattle / Argentina |  |  | — |  |  |  | 934 |
Closing net book value of goodwill allocated to CGUs tested (Note 8) |  |  | 20,229 |  |  |  | 22,667 |
Closing net book value of PPE items and other assets allocated to CGUs tested |  |  | 99,413 |  |  |  | 89,079 |
Total assets allocated to CGUs tested |  |  | 119,642 |  |  |  | 111,746 |

Based on the testing above, the Group determined that none of the CGUs, with allocated goodwill, were impaired at September 30, 2012.

As of September 30, 2011, property, plant and equipment, investment property, and finite-life intangible assets allocated to the remaining 28 CGUs without allocated goodwill tested had an aggregated net book value of US$ 252,252. None of the CGUs with or without allocated goodwill were impaired at September 30, 2011.

CGUs tested based on a value-in-use model at September 30, 2012 and 2011:

Based on the criteria described above, management identified a total amount of forty-three CGUs as of September 30, 2012 and forty-four CGUs as of September 30, 2011 for purposes of the impairment testing.

As of September 30, 2012, the Group identified 3 CGUs in Brazil to be tested base on this model (all CGUs with allocated goodwill). As of September 30, 2011, the Group identified 3 CGUs in Argentina and 4 CGUs in Brazil to be tested based on this model (regardless of any goodwill allocated to them). In performing the value-in-use calculation, the Group applied pre-tax rates to discount the future pre-tax cash flows. In each case, these key assumptions have been made by management reflecting past experience and are consistent with relevant external sources of information, such as appropriate market data. In calculating value-in-use, management may be assisted by the work of external advisors.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 38

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

4. | Critical accounting estimates and judgments (continued)

The key assumptions used by management in the value-in-use calculations which are considered to be most sensitive to the calculation are:

Key Assumptions |  | September 30, 2012 |  | September 30, 2011
Financial projections |  | Covers 4 years for UMA |  | Covers 4 years for
|  | Covers 8 years for AVI |  | Angelica and UMA
Yield average growth rates |  | 0-3% |  | 0-3%
Future pricing increases |  | 3% per annum |  | Between 3% and 5%
Future cost increases |  | 3% per annum |  | Expected USD Inflation
Discount rates |  | 9.16% |  | 8.91%
Perpetuity growth rate |  | 4.5% |  | 4.5%

Discount rates are based on the risk-free rate for U.S. government bonds, adjusted for a risk premium to reflect the increased risk of investing in South America and Brazil in particular. The risk premium adjustment is assessed for factors specific to the respective CGUs and reflects the countries that the CGUs operate in.

The following table shows only the 3 CGUs where goodwill was allocated at each period end and the corresponding amount of goodwill allocated to each one:

CGU/ Operating segment |  | September 30, 2012 |  |  | September 30, 2011 |
AVI / Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | 7,820 |  |  |  | 8,741 |
UMA / Sugar, Ethanol and Energy |  |  | 2,933 |  |  |  | 3,212 |
UMA (f.k.a. Alfenas Café Ltda) / Coffee |  |  | 1,099 |  |  |  | 1,002 |
Closing net book value of goodwill allocated to CGUs tested (Note 8) |  |  | 11,852 |  |  |  | 12,955 |
Closing net book value of PPE items and other assets allocated to CGUs tested |  |  | 517,052 |  |  |  | 90,278 |
Total assets allocated to 3 CGUs tested |  |  | 528,904 |  |  |  | 103,233 |

Based on the testing above, the Group determined that none of the CGUs, with allocated goodwill, were impaired at September 30, 2012.

As of September 30, 2011, property, plant and equipment and finite-life intangible assets allocated to the remaining 4 CGUs without allocated goodwill tested had an aggregated net book value of US$ 329,317. None of the CGUs with or without allocated goodwill were impaired at September 30, 2011.

Management views these assumptions as conservative and does not believe that any reasonable change in the assumptions would cause the carrying value of these CGU’s to exceed the recoverable amount.

(c) Biological assets

The nature of the Group’s biological assets and the basis of determination of their fair value are explained under Note 2.12. The discounted cash flow model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions including observable and unobservable data. Generally the estimation of the fair value of biological assets is based on models or inputs that are not observable in the market and the use of unobservable inputs is significant to the overall valuation of the assets. Unobservable inputs are determined based on the best information available, for example by reference to historical information of past practices and results, statistical and agronomical information, and other analytical techniques. Key assumptions include future market prices, estimated yields at the point of harvest, estimated production cycle, future cash flows, future costs of harvesting and other costs, and estimated discount rate.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 39

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

4. | Critical accounting estimates and judgments (continued)

Market prices are generally determined by reference to observable data in the principal market for the agricultural produce. Harvesting costs and other costs are estimated based on historical and statistical data. Yields are estimated based on several factors including the location of the farmland and soil type, environmental conditions, infrastructure and other restrictions and growth at the time of measurement. Yields are subject to a high degree of uncertainty and may be affected by several factors out of the Group’s control including but not limited to extreme or unusual weather conditions, plagues and other crop diseases, among other factors.

The key assumptions discussed above are highly sensitive. Reasonable shifts in assumptions including but not limited to increases or decreases in prices, costs and discount factors used would result in a significant increase or decrease to the fair value of biological assets. In addition, cash flows are projected over a number of years and based on estimated production. Estimates of production in themselves are dependent on various assumptions, in addition to those described above, including but not limited to several factors such as location, environmental conditions and other restrictions. Changes in these estimates could materially impact on estimated production, and could therefore affect estimates of future cash flows used in the assessment of fair value.

(d) Fair value of derivatives and other financial instruments

Fair values of derivative financial instruments are computed with reference to quoted market prices on trade exchanges, when available. The fair values of commodity options are calculated using year-end market rates together with common option pricing models. The fair value of interest rate swaps has been calculated using a discounted cash flow analysis.

(e) Income taxes

The Group is subject to income taxes in numerous jurisdictions. Significant judgement is required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes. There are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Group recognizes liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities in the period in which such determination is made.

Deferred tax assets are reviewed each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable income will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be settled. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are not discounted. In assessing the recoverability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is probable that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. (see Note 22 for details).

(f) Allowance for trade receivables

Management maintains an allowance for trade receivables to account for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make required payments. When evaluating the adequacy of an allowance for trade receivables, management bases its estimates on the aging of accounts receivable balances and historical write-off experience, customer credit worthiness and changes in customer payment terms. If the financial condition of customers were to deteriorate, actual write-offs might be higher than expected.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 40

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

5. | Segment information

IFRS 8 “Operating Segments” requires an entity to report financial and descriptive information about its reportable segments, which are operating segments or aggregations of operating segments that meet specified criteria. Operating segments are components of an entity about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The CODM evaluates the business based on the differences in the nature of its operations, products and services. The amount reported for each segment item is the measure reported to the CODM for these purposes.

The Group operates in three major lines of business, namely, Farming; Sugar, Ethanol and Energy; and Land Transformation.

| • |  | The Group’s ‘Farming’ is further comprised of five reportable segments:

| • |  | The Group’s ‘Crops’ Segment consists of planting, harvesting and sale of grains, oilseeds and fibers (including wheat, corn, soybeans, cotton and sunflowers, among others), and to a lesser extent the provision of grain warehousing/conditioning and handling and drying services to third parties. Each underlying crop in the Crops segment does not represent a separate operating segment. Management seeks to maximize the use of the land through the cultivation of one or more type of crops. Types and surface amount of crops cultivated may vary from harvest year to harvest year depending on several factors, some of them out of the Group´s control. Management is focused on the long-term performance of the productive land, and to that extent, the performance is assessed considering the aggregated combination, if any, of crops planted in the land. A single manager is responsible for the management of operating activity of all crops rather than for each individual crop.

| • |  | The Group’s ‘Rice’ Segment consists of planting, harvesting, processing and marketing of rice;

| • |  | The Group’s ‘Dairy’ Segment consists of the production and sale of raw milk, as well as an equity interest in La Lacteo, a dairy processing Joint Venture;

| • |  | The Group’s ‘Coffee’ Segment consists of cultivating coffee beans and marketing own and third party’s coffee production;

| • |  | The Group’s ‘Cattle’ Segment consists mainly in the lease of cattle grazing land (not suitable for crop production) to an international meat processor;

| • |  | The Group’s ‘Sugar, Ethanol and Energy’ Segment consists of cultivating sugarcane which is processed in owned sugar mills, transformed into ethanol, sugar and electricity and marketed;

| • |  | The Group’s ‘Land Transformation’ Segment comprises the (i) identification and acquisition of underdeveloped and undermanaged farmland businesses; and (ii) realization of value through the strategic disposition of assets (generating profits).

The measurement principles for the Group’s segment reporting structure are based on the IFRS principles adopted in the consolidated financial statements. Revenue generated and goods and services exchanged between segments are calculated on the basis of market prices.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 41

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

5. | Segment information (continued)

The following table presents information with respect to the Group’s reportable segments. Certain other activities of a holding function nature not allocable to the segments are disclosed in the column ‘Corporate’.

Segment analysis for the year ended December 31, 2012

|  | Farming |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol |  |  | Land Transformation |  |  | Corporate |  |  | Total |
|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Farming subtotal |  |  | and Energy |  |  |  |
Sales of manufactured products and services rendered |  |  | 589 |  |  |  | 92,438 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 4,390 |  |  |  | 97,417 |  |  |  | 282,109 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 379,526 |
Cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered |  |  | — |  |  |  | (78,617 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (230 | ) |  |  | (78,847 | ) |  |  | (185,131 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (263,978 | )
Gross Profit from Manufacturing Activities |  |  | 589 |  |  |  | 13,821 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 4,160 |  |  |  | 18,570 |  |  |  | 96,978 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 115,548 |
Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets |  |  | 195,617 |  |  |  | 1,466 |  |  |  | 18,868 |  |  |  | 8,363 |  |  |  | 637 |  |  |  | 224,951 |  |  |  | 223 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 225,174 |
Cost of agricultural produce sold and direct agricultural selling expenses |  |  | (195,617 | ) |  |  | (1,466 | ) |  |  | (18,868 | ) |  |  | (8,363 | ) |  |  | (637 | ) |  |  | (224,951 | ) |  |  | (223 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (225,174 | )
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce |  |  | 35,471 |  |  |  | 6,463 |  |  |  | 2,060 |  |  |  | (4,196 | ) |  |  | (131 | ) |  |  | 39,667 |  |  |  | (23,024 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 16,643 |
Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest |  |  | 15,850 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 154 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 16,004 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 16,004 |
Gross Profit / loss from Agricultural Activities |  |  | 51,321 |  |  |  | 6,463 |  |  |  | 2,060 |  |  |  | (4,042 | ) |  |  | (131 | ) |  |  | 55,671 |  |  |  | (23,024 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 32,647 |
Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses |  |  | 51,910 |  |  |  | 20,284 |  |  |  | 2,060 |  |  |  | (4,042 | ) |  |  | 4,029 |  |  |  | 74,241 |  |  |  | 73,954 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 148,195 |
General and administrative expenses |  |  | (4,436 | ) |  |  | (4,072 | ) |  |  | (906 | ) |  |  | (1,082 | ) |  |  | (23 | ) |  |  | (10,519 | ) |  |  | (22,239 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (24,933 | ) |  |  | (57,691 | )
Selling expenses |  |  | (5,904 | ) |  |  | (16,157 | ) |  |  | (319 | ) |  |  | (304 | ) |  |  | (60 | ) |  |  | (22,744 | ) |  |  | (35,690 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (168 | ) |  |  | (58,602 | )
Other operating income, net |  |  | (9,330 | ) |  |  | 1,065 |  |  |  | (1,257 | ) |  |  | 2,387 |  |  |  | (16 | ) |  |  | (7,151 | ) |  |  | 9,797 |  |  |  | 27,513 |  |  |  | (341 | ) |  |  | 29,818 |
Share of loss of joint ventures |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (2,761 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (2,761 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (2,761 | )
Profit / (loss) from Operations Before Financing and Taxation |  |  | 32,240 |  |  |  | 1,120 |  |  |  | (3,183 | ) |  |  | (3,041 | ) |  |  | 3,930 |  |  |  | 31,066 |  |  |  | 25,822 |  |  |  | 27,513 |  |  |  | (25,442 | ) |  |  | 58,959 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | (2,073 | ) |  |  | (3,823 | ) |  |  | (896 | ) |  |  | (587 | ) |  |  | (189 | ) |  |  | (7,568 | ) |  |  | (46,900 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (54,468 | )
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets (unrealized) |  |  | 6,169 |  |  |  | 4,352 |  |  |  | 115 |  |  |  | (2,615 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 8,021 |  |  |  | (24,783 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (16,762 | )
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of agricultural produce (unrealized) |  |  | 4,803 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,581 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 3,222 |  |  |  | 205 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 3,427 |
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce (realized) |  |  | 24,499 |  |  |  | 2,111 |  |  |  | 1,945 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (131 | ) |  |  | 28,424 |  |  |  | 1,554 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 29,978 |
Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (unrealized) |  |  | 877 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,147 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,024 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,024 |
Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (realized) |  |  | 14,973 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (993 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 13,980 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 13,980 |
Property, plant and equipment, net |  |  | 200,223 |  |  |  | 68,527 |  |  |  | 22,047 |  |  |  | 21,081 |  |  |  | 11,065 |  |  |  | 322,943 |  |  |  | 557,954 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 880,897 |
Investment property |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 15,542 |  |  |  | 15,542 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 15,542 |
Goodwill |  |  | 13,201 |  |  |  | 5,613 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,093 |  |  |  | 516 |  |  |  | 20,423 |  |  |  | 10,677 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 31,100 |
Biological assets |  |  | 42,091 |  |  |  | 30,836 |  |  |  | 12,149 |  |  |  | 16,211 |  |  |  | 979 |  |  |  | 102,266 |  |  |  | 195,870 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 298,136 |
Investment in joint ventures |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,613 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,613 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,613 |
Financial assets |  |  | 11,878 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 11,878 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 11,878 |
Inventories |  |  | 29,731 |  |  |  | 12,411 |  |  |  | 2,376 |  |  |  | 2,562 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 47,080 |  |  |  | 48,241 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 95,321 |
Total segment assets |  |  | 297,124 |  |  |  | 117,387 |  |  |  | 39,185 |  |  |  | 40,947 |  |  |  | 28,102 |  |  |  | 522,745 |  |  |  | 812,742 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,335,487 |
Borrowings |  |  | 79,820 |  |  |  | 56,567 |  |  |  | 14,142 |  |  |  | 8,686 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 159,215 |  |  |  | 379,918 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 539,133 |
Total segment liabilities |  |  | 79,820 |  |  |  | 56,567 |  |  |  | 14,142 |  |  |  | 8,686 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 159,215 |  |  |  | 379,918 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 539,133 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 42

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

5. | Segment information (continued)

Segment analysis for the year ended December 31, 2011

|  | Farming |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol |  |  | Land Transformation |  |  | Corporate |  |  | Total |
|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Farming subtotal |  |  | and Energy |  |  |  |
Sales of manufactured products and services rendered |  |  | 557 |  |  |  | 82,523 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 713 |  |  |  | 4,746 |  |  |  | 88,539 |  |  |  | 277,318 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 365,857 |
Cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered |  |  | — |  |  |  | (68,721 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (629 | ) |  |  | (408 | ) |  |  | (69,758 | ) |  |  | (167,646 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (237,404 | )
Gross Profit from Manufacturing Activities |  |  | 557 |  |  |  | 13,802 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 84 |  |  |  | 4,338 |  |  |  | 18,781 |  |  |  | 109,672 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 128,453 |
Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets |  |  | 147,389 |  |  |  | 721 |  |  |  | 19,697 |  |  |  | 13,457 |  |  |  | 963 |  |  |  | 182,227 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 182,227 |
Cost of agricultural produce sold and direct agricultural selling expenses |  |  | (147,389 | ) |  |  | (721 | ) |  |  | (19,697 | ) |  |  | (13,457 | ) |  |  | (963 | ) |  |  | (182,227 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (182,227 | )
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce |  |  | 38,014 |  |  |  | 10,139 |  |  |  | 6,939 |  |  |  | (697 | ) |  |  | 468 |  |  |  | 54,863 |  |  |  | 31,948 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 86,811 |
Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest |  |  | 10,953 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (430 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 10,523 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 10,523 |
Gross Profit / (loss) from Agricultural Activities |  |  | 48,967 |  |  |  | 10,139 |  |  |  | 6,939 |  |  |  | (1,127 | ) |  |  | 468 |  |  |  | 65,386 |  |  |  | 31,948 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 97,334 |
Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses |  |  | 49,524 |  |  |  | 23,941 |  |  |  | 6,939 |  |  |  | (1,043 | ) |  |  | 4,806 |  |  |  | 84,167 |  |  |  | 141,620 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 225,787 |
General and administrative expenses |  |  | (8,003 | ) |  |  | (6,278 | ) |  |  | (1,173 | ) |  |  | (1,153 | ) |  |  | (269 | ) |  |  | (16,876 | ) |  |  | (21,082 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (27,184 | ) |  |  | (65,142 | )
Selling expenses |  |  | (2,270 | ) |  |  | (14,488 | ) |  |  | (401 | ) |  |  | (463 | ) |  |  | (74 | ) |  |  | (17,696 | ) |  |  | (41,708 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (59,404 | )
Other operating income, net |  |  | 1,843 |  |  |  | 372 |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | 2,020 |  |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | 4,230 |  |  |  | 11,220 |  |  |  | 8,832 |  |  |  | 299 |  |  |  | 24,581 |
Share of loss of joint ventures |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,034 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,034 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,034 | )
Profit / (loss) from Operations Before Financing and Taxation |  |  | 41,094 |  |  |  | 3,547 |  |  |  | 4,329 |  |  |  | (639 | ) |  |  | 4,460 |  |  |  | 52,791 |  |  |  | 90,050 |  |  |  | 8,832 |  |  |  | (26,885 | ) |  |  | 124,788 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | (1,469 | ) |  |  | (3,105 | ) |  |  | (600 | ) |  |  | (530 | ) |  |  | (226 | ) |  |  | (5,930 | ) |  |  | (28,254 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (34,184 | )
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets (unrealized) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,503 |  |  |  | (1,394 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 109 |  |  |  | 8,797 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 8,906 |
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of agricultural produce (unrealized) |  |  | 1,474 |  |  |  | 2,234 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 697 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 4,405 |  |  |  | 3,825 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 8,230 |
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce (realized) |  |  | 36,540 |  |  |  | 7,905 |  |  |  | 5,436 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 468 |  |  |  | 50,349 |  |  |  | 19,326 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 69,675 |
Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (unrealized) |  |  | 1,944 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (128 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,816 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,816 |
Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (realized) |  |  | 9,009 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (302 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 8,707 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 8,707 |
Property, plant and equipment, net |  |  | 236,031 |  |  |  | 45,134 |  |  |  | 9,437 |  |  |  | 22,558 |  |  |  | 21,030 |  |  |  | 334,190 |  |  |  | 425,506 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 759,696 |
Investment property |  |  | 9,828 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 18,055 |  |  |  | 27,883 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 27,883 |
Goodwill |  |  | 14,656 |  |  |  | 6,414 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 990 |  |  |  | 1,193 |  |  |  | 23,253 |  |  |  | 11,633 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 34,886 |
Biological assets |  |  | 28,300 |  |  |  | 23,167 |  |  |  | 9,338 |  |  |  | 18,369 |  |  |  | 1,501 |  |  |  | 80,675 |  |  |  | 158,925 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 239,600 |
Investment in joint ventures |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 4,299 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 4,299 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 4,299 |
Inventories |  |  | 37,343 |  |  |  | 12,667 |  |  |  | 1,070 |  |  |  | 2,509 |  |  |  | 45 |  |  |  | 53,634 |  |  |  | 42,513 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 96,147 |
Total segment assets |  |  | 326,158 |  |  |  | 87,382 |  |  |  | 24,144 |  |  |  | 44,426 |  |  |  | 41,824 |  |  |  | 523,934 |  |  |  | 638,577 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,162,511 |
Borrowings |  |  | 83,019 |  |  |  | 55,567 |  |  |  | 13,892 |  |  |  | 11,937 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 164,415 |  |  |  | 196,290 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 360,705 |
Total segment liabilities |  |  | 83,019 |  |  |  | 55,567 |  |  |  | 13,892 |  |  |  | 11,937 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 164,415 |  |  |  | 196,290 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 360,705 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 43

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

5. | Segment information (continued)

Segment analysis for the year ended December 31, 2010

|  | Farming |  |  | Sugar, Ethanol |  |  | Land Transformation |  |  | Corporate |  |  | Total |
|  | Crops |  |  | Rice |  |  | Dairy |  |  | Coffee |  |  | Cattle |  |  | Farming subtotal |  |  | and Energy |  |  |  |
Sales of manufactured products and services rendered |  |  | 344 |  |  |  | 59,280 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,709 |  |  |  | 3,718 |  |  |  | 66,051 |  |  |  | 228,478 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 294,529 |
Cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered |  |  | — |  |  |  | (52,017 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (2,546 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (54,563 | ) |  |  | (164,638 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (219,201 | )
Gross Profit / (loss) from Manufacturing Activities |  |  | 344 |  |  |  | 7,263 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 163 |  |  |  | 3,718 |  |  |  | 11,488 |  |  |  | 63,840 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 75,328 |
Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets |  |  | 107,818 |  |  |  | 2,305 |  |  |  | 14,297 |  |  |  | 4,863 |  |  |  | 2,407 |  |  |  | 131,690 |  |  |  | 48 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 131,738 |
Cost of agricultural produce sold and direct agricultural selling expenses |  |  | (107,818 | ) |  |  | (2,305 | ) |  |  | (14,297 | ) |  |  | (4,863 | ) |  |  | (2,407 | ) |  |  | (131,690 | ) |  |  | (48 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (131,738 | )
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce |  |  | 38,879 |  |  |  | 9,360 |  |  |  | 9,129 |  |  |  | (2,630 | ) |  |  | 737 |  |  |  | 55,475 |  |  |  | (86,003 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (30,528 | )
Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest |  |  | 7,482 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 517 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 7,999 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 7,999 |
Gross Profit / (loss) from Agricultural Activities |  |  | 46,361 |  |  |  | 9,360 |  |  |  | 9,129 |  |  |  | (2,113 | ) |  |  | 737 |  |  |  | 63,474 |  |  |  | (86,003 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (22,529 | )
Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses |  |  | 46,705 |  |  |  | 16,623 |  |  |  | 9,129 |  |  |  | (1,950 | ) |  |  | 4,455 |  |  |  | 74,962 |  |  |  | (22,163 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 52,799 |
General and administrative expenses |  |  | (7,087 | ) |  |  | (3,773 | ) |  |  | (2,910 | ) |  |  | (983 | ) |  |  | (350 | ) |  |  | (15,103 | ) |  |  | (19,080 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (22,379 | ) |  |  | (56,562 | )
Selling expenses |  |  | (1,522 | ) |  |  | (8,154 | ) |  |  | (333 | ) |  |  | (655 | ) |  |  | (175 | ) |  |  | (10,839 | ) |  |  | (41,689 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (52,528 | )
Other operating income, net |  |  | (6,194 | ) |  |  | 345 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (2,165 | ) |  |  | 70 |  |  |  | (7,944 | ) |  |  | 5,305 |  |  |  | 20,837 |  |  |  | 26 |  |  |  | 18,224 |
Share of loss of joint ventures |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (50 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (50 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (50 | )
Profit / (loss) from Operations Before Financing and Taxation |  |  | 31,902 |  |  |  | 5,041 |  |  |  | 5,836 |  |  |  | (5,753 | ) |  |  | 4,000 |  |  |  | 41,026 |  |  |  | (77,627 | ) |  |  | 20,837 |  |  |  | (22,353 | ) |  |  | (38,117 | )
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | (1,711 | ) |  |  | (2,080 | ) |  |  | (423 | ) |  |  | (449 | ) |  |  | (333 | ) |  |  | (4,996 | ) |  |  | (32,567 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (37,563 | )
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets (unrealized) |  |  | 8,719 |  |  |  | 6,273 |  |  |  | 3,610 |  |  |  | (2,450 | ) |  |  | (36 | ) |  |  | 16,116 |  |  |  | (96,795 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (80,679 | )
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of agricultural produce (unrealized) |  |  | 7,229 |  |  |  | 742 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (71 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 7,900 |  |  |  | 405 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 8,305 |
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce (realized) |  |  | 22,931 |  |  |  | 2,345 |  |  |  | 5,519 |  |  |  | (109 | ) |  |  | 773 |  |  |  | 31,459 |  |  |  | 10,387 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 41,846 |
Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (unrealized) |  |  | 2,050 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (523 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,527 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,527 |
Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest (realized) |  |  | 5,432 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,040 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 6,472 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 6,472 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 44

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

5. | Segment information (continued)

Total segment assets are measured in a manner consistent with that of the consolidated financial statements. These assets are allocated based on the operations of the segment and the physical location of the asset. The Group’s investment in the joint venture Grupo La Lácteo is allocated to the ‘Dairy’ segment. Therefore, the Group’s share of profit or loss after income taxes and its carrying amount are reported in this segment.

Total reportable segments’ assets are reconciled to total assets as per the statement of financial position as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Total reportable assets as per Segment Information |  |  | 1,335,487 |  |  |  | 1,162,511 |
Intangible assets (excluding goodwill) |  |  | 1,780 |  |  |  | 1,869 |
Deferred income tax assets |  |  | 35,391 |  |  |  | 37,081 |
Trade and other receivables |  |  | 179,878 |  |  |  | 156,927 |
Other assets |  |  | 1,398 |  |  |  | 1,408 |
Derivative financial instruments |  |  | 5,212 |  |  |  | 10,353 |
Cash and cash equivalents |  |  | 218,809 |  |  |  | 330,546 |
Total assets as per the Statement of Financial Position |  |  | 1,777,955 |  |  |  | 1,700,695 |

Total segment liabilities are measured in a manner consistent with that of the consolidated financial statements. These liabilities are allocated based on the operations of the segment.

Total reportable segments’ liabilities are reconciled to total liabilities as per the statement of financial position as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Total reportable liabilities as per Segment Information |  |  | 539,133 |  |  |  | 360,705 |
Trade and other payables |  |  | 104,260 |  |  |  | 122,438 |
Deferred income tax liabilities |  |  | 75,389 |  |  |  | 92,989 |
Payroll and social liabilities |  |  | 24,460 |  |  |  | 18,441 |
Provisions for other liabilities |  |  | 2,732 |  |  |  | 4,327 |
Current income tax liabilities |  |  | 187 |  |  |  | 872 |
Derivative financial instruments |  |  | 5,751 |  |  |  | 6,054 |
Total liabilities as per the Statement of Financial Position |  |  | 751,912 |  |  |  | 605,826 |

Non-current assets and net revenue and fair value gains and losses are shown by geographic region. These are the regions in which the Group is active: Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay. Non-current assets are allocated to the regions according to the location of the assets in question. Non-current assets encompass intangible assets; property, plant and equipment; investments accounted for using the equity method as well as other non-current assets. Net revenue and fair value gains and losses are allocated according to the location of the respective operations.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 45

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

5. | Segment information (continued)

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2012:

|  | Argentina |  |  | Brazil |  |  | Uruguay |  |  | Total |
Property, plant and equipment |  |  | 272,730 |  |  |  | 597,284 |  |  |  | 10,883 |  |  |  | 880,897 |
Investment property |  |  | 15,542 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 15,542 |
Intangible assets |  |  | 1,187 |  |  |  | 593 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,780 |
Goodwill |  |  | 19,329 |  |  |  | 11,771 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 31,100 |
Investment in joint ventures |  |  | 2,613 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,613 |
Non-current portion of biological assets |  |  | 12,885 |  |  |  | 212,081 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 224,966 |
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce |  |  | 39,475 |  |  |  | (25,002 | ) |  |  | 2,170 |  |  |  | 16,643 |
(Loss) Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest |  |  | 16,190 |  |  |  | (31 | ) |  |  | (155 | ) |  |  | 16,004 |
Sales of manufactured products sold and services rendered |  |  | 96,945 |  |  |  | 282,536 |  |  |  | 45 |  |  |  | 379,526 |
Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets |  |  | 178,990 |  |  |  | 31,956 |  |  |  | 14,228 |  |  |  | 225,174 |

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2011:

|  | Argentina |  |  | Brazil |  |  | Uruguay |  |  | Total |
Property, plant and equipment |  |  | 281,696 |  |  |  | 467,509 |  |  |  | 10,491 |  |  |  | 759,696 |
Investment property |  |  | 27,883 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 27,883 |
Intangible assets |  |  | 1,129 |  |  |  | 740 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,869 |
Goodwill |  |  | 22,263 |  |  |  | 12,623 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 34,886 |
Investment in joint ventures |  |  | 4,299 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 4,299 |
Non-current portion of biological assets |  |  | 10,679 |  |  |  | 177,294 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 187,973 |
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce |  |  | 47,196 |  |  |  | 37,617 |  |  |  | 1,998 |  |  |  | 86,811 |
Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest |  |  | 10,539 |  |  |  | 651 |  |  |  | (667 | ) |  |  | 10,523 |
Sales of manufactured products sold and services rendered |  |  | 86,606 |  |  |  | 279,251 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 365,857 |
Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets |  |  | 143,505 |  |  |  | 29,864 |  |  |  | 8,858 |  |  |  | 182,227 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 46

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

5. | Segment information (continued)

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2010:

|  | Argentina |  |  | Brazil |  |  | Uruguay |  |  | Total |
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce |  |  | 54,226 |  |  |  | (86,557 | ) |  |  | 1,803 |  |  |  | (30,528 | )
Gain from changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest |  |  | 8,157 |  |  |  | (123 | ) |  |  | (35 | ) |  |  | 7,999 |
Sales of manufactured products sold and services rendered |  |  | 62,455 |  |  |  | 232,074 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 294,529 |
Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets |  |  | 109,387 |  |  |  | 17,158 |  |  |  | 5,193 |  |  |  | 131,738 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 47

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

6. | Property, plant and equipment

Changes in the Group’s property, plant and equipment in 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

|  | Farmlands |  |  | Farmland improvements |  |  | Buildings and facilities |  |  | Machinery, equipment, furniture and fittings |  |  | Computer equipment |  |  | Vehicles |  |  | Work in progress |  |  | Total |
At January 1, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost |  |  | 305,412 |  |  |  | 3,069 |  |  |  | 193,358 |  |  |  | 330,647 |  |  |  | 2,874 |  |  |  | 2,862 |  |  |  | 38,472 |  |  |  | 876,694 |
Accumulated depreciation |  |  | — |  |  |  | (2,824 | ) |  |  | (28,110 | ) |  |  | (90,737 | ) |  |  | (1,272 | ) |  |  | (1,759 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (124,702 | )
Net book amount |  |  | 305,412 |  |  |  | 245 |  |  |  | 165,248 |  |  |  | 239,910 |  |  |  | 1,602 |  |  |  | 1,103 |  |  |  | 38,472 |  |  |  | 751,992 |
Year ended December 31, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Opening net book amount |  |  | 305,412 |  |  |  | 245 |  |  |  | 165,248 |  |  |  | 239,910 |  |  |  | 1,602 |  |  |  | 1,103 |  |  |  | 38,472 |  |  |  | 751,992 |
Exchange differences |  |  | (26,619 | ) |  |  | (24 | ) |  |  | (16,958 | ) |  |  | (24,265 | ) |  |  | (130 | ) |  |  | (60 | ) |  |  | (3,344 | ) |  |  | (71,400 | )
Additions |  |  | 7,272 |  |  |  | 145 |  |  |  | 1,522 |  |  |  | 10,599 |  |  |  | 510 |  |  |  | 304 |  |  |  | 70,591 |  |  |  | 90,943 |
Acquisition of subsidiary (Note 32) |  |  | 30,863 |  |  |  | 241 |  |  |  | 76 |  |  |  | 161 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 56 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 31,397 |
Transfers |  |  | — |  |  |  | 639 |  |  |  | 14,336 |  |  |  | 6,074 |  |  |  | 114 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (21,163 | ) |  |  | — |
Transfers from investment property (Note 7) |  |  | 1,145 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1.145 |
Disposals |  |  | (4,388 | ) |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | (1,630 | ) |  |  | (534 | ) |  |  | (13 | ) |  |  | (40 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (6,607 | )
Reclassification to non-income tax credits (*) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (3,021 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (3,021 | )
Depreciation (Note 26) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (314 | ) |  |  | (8,977 | ) |  |  | (24,483 | ) |  |  | (609 | ) |  |  | (370 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (34,753 | )
Closing net book amount |  |  | 313,685 |  |  |  | 930 |  |  |  | 153,617 |  |  |  | 204,441 |  |  |  | 1,474 |  |  |  | 993 |  |  |  | 84,556 |  |  |  | 759,696 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 48

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

6. | Property, plant and equipment (continued)

|  | Farmlands |  |  | Farmland improvements |  |  | Buildings and facilities |  |  | Machinery, equipment, furniture and fittings |  |  | Computer equipment |  |  | Vehicles |  |  | Work in progress |  |  | Total |
At December 31, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost |  |  | 313,685 |  |  |  | 4,068 |  |  |  | 190,704 |  |  |  | 319,661 |  |  |  | 3,355 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 84,556 |  |  |  | 919,151 |
Accumulated depreciation |  |  | — |  |  |  | (3,138 | ) |  |  | (37,087 | ) |  |  | (115,220 | ) |  |  | (1,881 | ) |  |  | (2,129 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (159,455 | )
Net book amount |  |  | 313,685 |  |  |  | 930 |  |  |  | 153,617 |  |  |  | 204,441 |  |  |  | 1,474 |  |  |  | 993 |  |  |  | 84,556 |  |  |  | 759,696 |
Year ended December 31, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Opening net book amount |  |  | 313,685 |  |  |  | 930 |  |  |  | 153,617 |  |  |  | 204,441 |  |  |  | 1,474 |  |  |  | 993 |  |  |  | 84,556 |  |  |  | 759,696 |
Exchange differences |  |  | (34,911 | ) |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | (13,800 | ) |  |  | (17,418 | ) |  |  | (123 | ) |  |  | (254 | ) |  |  | (9,348 | ) |  |  | (75,852 | )
Additions |  |  | — |  |  |  | 29 |  |  |  | 756 |  |  |  | 35,840 |  |  |  | 862 |  |  |  | 1,585 |  |  |  | 208,507 |  |  |  | 247,579 |
Acquisition of subsidiary (Note 32) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Transfers from investment property (Note 7) |  |  | 9,625 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 9,625 |
Transfers |  |  | — |  |  |  | 9,287 |  |  |  | 24,528 |  |  |  | 26,634 |  |  |  | 27 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (60,476 | ) |  |  | — |
Disposals |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (85 | ) |  |  | (806 | ) |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  | (26 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (923 | )
Disposals of subsidiaries |  |  | (4,118 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (30 | ) |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (4,149 | )
Reclassification to non-income tax credits (*) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (188 | ) |  |  | (774 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (962 | )
Depreciation (Note 26) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,731 | ) |  |  | (15,912 | ) |  |  | (35,275 | ) |  |  | (641 | ) |  |  | (558 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (54,117 | )
Closing net book amount |  |  | 284,281 |  |  |  | 8,517 |  |  |  | 148,886 |  |  |  | 212,641 |  |  |  | 1,593 |  |  |  | 1,740 |  |  |  | 223,239 |  |  |  | 880,897 |
At December 31, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost |  |  | 284,281 |  |  |  | 13,386 |  |  |  | 201,885 |  |  |  | 363,136 |  |  |  | 4,115 |  |  |  | 4,427 |  |  |  | 223,239 |  |  |  | 1,094,469 |
Accumulated depreciation |  |  | — |  |  |  | (4,869 | ) |  |  | (52,999 | ) |  |  | (150,495 | ) |  |  | (2,522 | ) |  |  | (2,687 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (213,572 | )
Net book amount |  |  | 284,281 |  |  |  | 8,517 |  |  |  | 148,886 |  |  |  | 212,641 |  |  |  | 1,593 |  |  |  | 1,740 |  |  |  | 223,239 |  |  |  | 880,897 |

(*) | Brazilian federal tax law allows entities to take a percentage of the total cost of the assets purchased as a tax credit. As of December 31, 2012, ICMS tax credits were reclassified to trade and other receivables.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 49

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

6. | Property, plant and equipment (continued)

An amount of US$ 47,935; US$ 28,407 and US$ 29,603 of depreciation charges are included in “Cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered” for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. An amount of US$ 5,557; US$ 4,424 and US$ 7,614 of depreciation charges are included in “General and administrative expenses” for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. An amount of US$ 625, US$ 1,016 and US$ nil of depreciation charges are included in “Selling expenses” for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. An amount of US$ nil, US$ 906 and US$ nil of depreciation charges were not charged to the statement of income and were capitalized in “Inventories” for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, borrowing costs of US$ 17,506 (2011: US$ 1,918) were capitalized as components of the cost of acquisition or construction for qualifying assets.

Certain of the Group’s assets have been pledged as collateral to secure the Group’s borrowings and other payables. The net book value of the pledged assets amounts to US$ 305,032 as of December 31, 2012 (2011: US$ 319,392).

Where assets are financed by leasing agreements and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are substantially transferred to the Group (“finance leases”) the assets are treated as if they had been purchased outright and the corresponding liability to the leasing company is included as an obligation under finance leases. Depreciation on assets held under finance leases is charged to the income statement on the same basis as owned assets. Leasing payments are treated as consisting of capital and interest elements and the interest is charged to the statement of income as a financing charge. Assets under finance leases comprise vehicles, machinery and equipment. All other leases are treated as operating leases and the relevant annual rentals are charged to the statement of income as incurred (see Note 31).

7. | Investment property

Changes in the Group’s investment property in 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Beginning of the year |  |  | 27,883 |  |  |  | 21,417 |
Acquisition of subsidiary (Note 32) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 9,670 |
Transfers (i) |  |  | (9,625 | ) |  |  | (1,145 | )
Exchange difference |  |  | (2,716 | ) |  |  | (2,059 | )
End of the year |  |  | 15,542 |  |  |  | 27,883 |
Cost |  |  | 15,542 |  |  |  | 27,883 |
Accumulated depreciation |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Net book amount |  |  | 15,542 |  |  |  | 27,883 |

The following amounts have been recognized in the statement of income in the line “Sales of manufactured products and services rendered”:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Rental income |  |  | 4,735 |  |  |  | 4,980 |  |  |  | 3,718 |

(i) | Transferred to property, plant and equipment in 2012 and 2011. Relates to finalization of contracts with third parties.

As of December 31, 2012, the fair value of investment property was US$ 67 million (2011: US$ 86.6 million).

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 50

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

8. | Intangible assets

Changes in the Group’s intangible assets in 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

|  | Goodwill |  |  | Trademarks |  |  | Software |  |  | Others |  |  | Total |
At January 1, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost |  |  | 26,494 |  |  |  | 2,773 |  |  |  | 667 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 29.934 |
Accumulated amortization |  |  | — |  |  |  | (889 | ) |  |  | (392 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,281 | )
Net book amount |  |  | 26,494 |  |  |  | 1,884 |  |  |  | 275 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 28,653 |
Year ended December 31, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Opening net book amount |  |  | 26,494 |  |  |  | 1,884 |  |  |  | 275 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 28,653 |
Exchange differences |  |  | (2,747 | ) |  |  | (105 | ) |  |  | (43 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (2,895 | )
Additions |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 195 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 195 |
Acquisition of subsidiary (Note 32) |  |  | 11,139 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 11,139 |
Amortization charge (i) (Note 26) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (187 | ) |  |  | (150 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (337 | )
Closing net book amount |  |  | 34,886 |  |  |  | 1,592 |  |  |  | 277 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 36,755 |
At December 31, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost |  |  | 34,886 |  |  |  | 2,667 |  |  |  | 818 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 38,371 |
Accumulated amortization |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,075 | ) |  |  | (541 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,616 | )
Net book amount |  |  | 34,886 |  |  |  | 1,592 |  |  |  | 277 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 36,755 |
Year ended December 31, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Opening net book amount |  |  | 34,886 |  |  |  | 1,592 |  |  |  | 277 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 36,755 |
Exchange differences |  |  | (3,786 | ) |  |  | (65 | ) |  |  | (32 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (3,883 | )
Additions |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 276 |  |  |  | 83 |  |  |  | 359 |
Acquisition of subsidiaries (Note 32) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Amortization charge (i) (Note 26) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (171 | ) |  |  | (180 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (351 | )
Closing net book amount |  |  | 31,100 |  |  |  | 1,356 |  |  |  | 341 |  |  |  | 83 |  |  |  | 32,880 |
At December 31, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost |  |  | 31,100 |  |  |  | 2,602 |  |  |  | 1,062 |  |  |  | 83 |  |  |  | 34,847 |
Accumulated amortization |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,246 | ) |  |  | (721 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,966 | )
Net book amount |  |  | 31,100 |  |  |  | 1,356 |  |  |  | 341 |  |  |  | 83 |  |  |  | 32,880 |

(i) | An amount of US$ 180 and US$ 149 of amortization charges are included in “General and administrative expenses” for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. An amount of US$ 171 and US$ 186 of amortization charges are included in “Selling expenses” for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. There were no impairment charges for any of the years presented (see Note 4 (b)).

9. | Biological assets

Changes in the Group’s biological assets in 2012, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Beginning of the year |  |  | 239,600 |  |  |  | 186,757 |
Increase due to purchases |  |  | 1,678 |  |  |  | 1,683 |
Disposal of subsidiary (Note 16) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Acquisition of subsidiary (Note 32) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,495 |
Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets (i) |  |  | 16,643 |  |  |  | 86,811 |
Decrease due to harvest |  |  | (317,645 | ) |  |  | (331,278 | )
Decrease due to sales |  |  | (2,309 | ) |  |  | (2,842 | )
Costs incurred during the year |  |  | 376,740 |  |  |  | 319,089 |
Exchange differences |  |  | (16,571 | ) |  |  | (22,115 | )
End of the year year |  |  | 298,136 |  |  |  | 239,600 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 51

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

9. | Biological assets (continued)

(i) | Biological asset with a production cycle of more than one year (that is, sugarcane, coffee, dairy and cattle) generated “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets” amounting to US$ (25,291) for the year ended December 31, 2012 (2011: US$ 38,658; 2010: US$ (78,767)). In 2012, an amount of US$ (21,984) (2011: US$ 101,671; 2010: US$ (60,146)) was attributable to price changes, and an amount of US$ (3,307) (2011: US$ (63,013); 2010: US$ (18,621)) was attributable to physical changes.

Biological assets in 2012, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Non-current |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cattle for dairy production (i) |  |  | 12,149 |  |  |  | 9,338 |
Other cattle (ii) |  |  | 736 |  |  |  | 1,341 |
Sown land - coffee (iii) |  |  | 16,211 |  |  |  | 18,369 |
Sown land - sugarcane (iii) |  |  | 195,870 |  |  |  | 158,925 |
|  |  | 224,966 |  |  |  | 187,973 |
Current |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Other cattle (iv) |  |  | 243 |  |  |  | 160 |
Sown land - crops (ii) |  |  | 42,091 |  |  |  | 28,300 |
Sown land - rice (ii) |  |  | 30,836 |  |  |  | 23,167 |
|  |  | 73,170 |  |  |  | 51,627 |
Total biological assets |  |  | 298,136 |  |  |  | 239,600 |

(i) | Classified as bearer and mature biological assets.

(ii) | Classified as consumable and immature biological assets.

(iii) | Classified as bearer and immature biological assets.

(iv) | As of December 31, 2012, and amount of US$ 243 (2011: 124) was classified as consumable and mature biological assets, and an amount of US$ nil (2011: 36) was classified as consumable and immature biological assets.

The fair value less estimated point of sale costs of agricultural produce at the point of harvest amounted to US$ 304,221 for the year ended December 31, 2012 (2011: US$ 325,843; 2010: US$ 241,762).

A drought occurred during December 2011 affecting some of farms in Argentina and Uruguay. As a result, the expected yield consider in the Biological Asset model was reduced generating a negative impact in “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” of US$ 4.5 million as of December 31, 2011.

10. | Investments in joint ventures

The investment in joint ventures represents the Group’s share of 50% in Grupo La Lacteo.

The Milk Supply Offer Agreement signed between Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. (a group subsidiary) with La Lacteo establishes that Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. is committed to sell to La Lacteo and La Lacteo is obligated to purchase certain amount of the daily milk production subject to certain conditions. However, Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. is not obligated to sell to La Lacteo and La Lacteo is not obligated to purchase more than 50% of its milk requirements for a four-month period subject to certain conditions.

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
At the beginning of the year |  |  | 4,299 |  |  |  | 6,271 |
Share of loss |  |  | (2,761 | ) |  |  | (1,034 | )
Exchange differences |  |  | (646 | ) |  |  | (938 | )
Capital contribution |  |  | 3,000 |  |  |  | — |
Impairment charge (*) |  |  | (1,279 | ) |  |  | — |
At the end of the year |  |  | 2,613 |  |  |  | 4,299 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 52

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

10. | Investments in joint ventures (continued)

(*) | Impairment loss recognized due to the continuous operating losses in La Lacteo.

The following amounts represent the Group’s 50% share of the assets (including goodwill) and liabilities, and income and expenses of the joint venture:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Non-current assets |  |  | 4,185 |  |  |  | 5,633 |
Current assets |  |  | 5,672 |  |  |  | 5,883 |
|  |  | 9,857 |  |  |  | 11,516 |
Liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Non-current liabilities |  |  | 659 |  |  |  | 1,138 |
Current liabilities |  |  | 6,585 |  |  |  | 6,079 |
|  |  | 7,244 |  |  |  | 7,217 |
Net assets of joint venture |  |  | 2,613 |  |  |  | 4,299 |

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Income |  |  | 1,616 |  |  |  | 2,040 |  |  |  | 1,989 |
Expenses |  |  | (4,377 | ) |  |  | (3,074 | ) |  |  | (2,039 | )
Loss after income tax |  |  | (2,761 | ) |  |  | (1,034 | ) |  |  | (50 | )

There are no contingent liabilities relating to the group’s interest in the joint venture, and no contingent liabilities of the venture itself.

11. | Financial assets

In December 2012, the Group disposed of a 51% interest out of the 100% interest held in Santa Regina Agropecuaria S.A. at a consideration of US$ 12.4 million. The Group granted an option to the buyer to acquire the remaining 49% interest at any time on or before June 2014 at a fixed price US$ 13.1 million. The Group evaluated the effect of potential voting rights arising from the option and concluded that the interest retained in Santa Regina corresponds to a financial asset to be accounted for under IAS 39. This financial asset has been classified as an available for sale asset. See Note 16 for additional details.

12. | Financial instruments by category

The following tables show the carrying amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities by category of financial instrument and reconciliation to the corresponding line item in the statements of financial position, as appropriate. Since the line items “Trade and other receivables, net” and “Trade and other payables” contain both financial instruments and non-financial assets or liabilities (such as other tax receivables or advance payments for services to be received in the future), the reconciliation is shown in the columns headed “Non-financial assets” and “Non-financial liabilities.”

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 53

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

12. | Financial instruments by category (continued)

|  | Loans and receivables |  |  | Assets at fair value through profit and loss |  |  | Available for sale assets |  |  | Subtotal financial assets |  |  | Non-financial assets |  |  | Total |
December 31, 2012 Assets as per statement of financial position |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Trade and other receivables |  |  | 68,833 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 68,833 |  |  |  | 111,045 |  |  |  | 179,878 |
Equity investment in Santa Regina |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 11,878 |  |  |  | 11,878 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 11,878 |
Derivative financial instruments |  |  | — |  |  |  | 5,212 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 5,212 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 5,212 |
Cash and cash equivalents |  |  | 218,809 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 218,809 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 218,809 |
Total |  |  | 287,642 |  |  |  | 5,212 |  |  |  | 11,878 |  |  |  | 304,732 |  |  |  | 111,045 |  |  |  | 415,777 |

|  | Liabilities at fair value through profit and loss |  |  | Other financial liabilities at amortized cost |  |  | Subtotal financial liabilities |  |  | Non-financial liabilities |  |  | Total |
Liabilities as per statement of financial position |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Trade and other payables |  |  | — |  |  |  | 96,800 |  |  |  | 96,800 |  |  |  | 7,460 |  |  |  | 104,260 |
Borrowings (excluding finance lease liabilities) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 538,012 |  |  |  | 538,012 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 538,012 |
Finance leases |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,121 |  |  |  | 1,121 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,121 |
Derivative financial instruments |  |  | 5,751 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 5,751 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 5,751 |
Total |  |  | 5,751 |  |  |  | 635,933 |  |  |  | 641,684 |  |  |  | 7,460 |  |  |  | 649,144 |

|  | Loans and receivables |  |  | Assets at fair value through profit and loss |  |  | Subtotal financial assets |  |  | Non-financial assets |  |  | Total |
December 31, 2011 Assets as per statement of financial position |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Trade and other receivables |  |  | 71,383 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 71,383 |  |  |  | 85,544 |  |  |  | 156,927 |
Derivative financial instruments |  |  | — |  |  |  | 10,353 |  |  |  | 10,353 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 10,353 |
Cash and cash equivalents |  |  | 330,546 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 330,546 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 330,546 |
Total |  |  | 401,929 |  |  |  | 10,353 |  |  |  | 412,282 |  |  |  | 85,544 |  |  |  | 497,826 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 54

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

12. | Financial instruments by category (continued)

|  | Liabilities at fair value through profit and loss |  |  | Other financial liabilities at amortized cost |  |  | Subtotal financial liabilities |  |  | Non-financial liabilities |  |  | Total |
Liabilities as per statement of financial position |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Trade and other payables |  |  | — |  |  |  | 114,181 |  |  |  | 114,181 |  |  |  | 8,257 |  |  |  | 122,438 |
Borrowings (excluding finance lease liabilities) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 360,507 |  |  |  | 360,507 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 360,507 |
Finance leases |  |  | — |  |  |  | 198 |  |  |  | 198 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 198 |
Derivative financial instruments |  |  | 6,054 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 6,054 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 6,054 |
Total |  |  | 6,054 |  |  |  | 474,886 |  |  |  | 480,940 |  |  |  | 8,257 |  |  |  | 489,197 |

Liabilities carried at amortized cost also included liabilities under finance leases where the Group is the lessee and which therefore have to be measured in accordance with IAS 17. The categories disclosed are determined by reference to IAS 39. Finance leases are excluded from the scope of IFRS 7. Therefore, finance leases have been shown separately.

Because of the short maturities of most trade accounts receivable and payable, other receivables and liabilities, and cash and cash equivalents, their carrying amounts at the closing date do not differ significantly from their respective fair values. The fair value of long-term borrowings is disclosed in Note 21.

Income, expense, gains and losses on financial instruments can be assigned to the following categories:

|  | Loans and receivables |  |  | Assets/ liabilities at fair value through profit and loss |  |  | Other financial liabilities at amortized cost |  |  | Total |
December 31, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest income (i) |  |  | 11,249 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 11,249 |
Interest expense (i) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (27,672 | ) |  |  | (27,672 | )
Foreign exchange gains/ (losses) (ii) |  |  | (15,915 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (10,165 | ) |  |  | (26,080 | )
Gain from derivative financial instruments(iii) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (4,002 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (4,002 | )
Net result |  |  | (4,666 | ) |  |  | (4,002 | ) |  |  | (37,837 | ) |  |  | (46,505 | )

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 55

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

12. | Financial instruments by category (continued)

|  | Loans and receivables |  |  | Assets/ liabilities at fair value through profit and loss |  |  | Other financial liabilities at amortized cost |  |  | Total |
December 31, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest income (i) |  |  | 8,019 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 8,019 |
Interest expense (i) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (34,017 | ) |  |  | (34,017 | )
Foreign exchange gains/ (losses) (ii) |  |  | 9,899 |  |  |  | 1,405 |  |  |  | (23,987 | ) |  |  | (12,683 | )
Gain from derivative financial instruments(iii) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 17,417 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 17,417 |
Net result |  |  | 17,918 |  |  |  | 18,822 |  |  |  | (58,004 | ) |  |  | (21,264 | )

|  | Loans and receivables |  |  | Assets/ liabilities at fair value through profit and loss |  |  | Other financial liabilities at amortized cost |  |  | Total |
December 31, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest income (i) |  |  | 1,341 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,341 |
Interest expense (i) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (34,369 | ) |  |  | (34,369 | )
Foreign exchange gains/ (losses) (ii) |  |  | 372 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (11,029 | ) |  |  | (10,657 | )
Loss from derivative financial instruments(iii) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 5,124 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 5,124 |
Net result |  |  | 1,713 |  |  |  | 5,124 |  |  |  | (45,398 | ) |  |  | (38,561 | )

(i) | Included in “Financial results, net” in the statement of income.

(ii) | Included in “Financial results, net” in the statement of income.

(iii) | Included in “Other operating income, net” and “Financial results, net” in the statement of income.

Determining fair values

IAS 39 defines the fair value of a financial instrument as the amount for which a financial asset could be exchanged, or a financial liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s length transaction. All financial instruments recognized at fair value are allocated to one of the valuation hierarchy levels of IFRS 7. This valuation hierarchy provides for three levels. The initial basis for the allocation is the “economic investment class”. Only if this does not result in an appropriate allocation the Group deviates from such an approach in individual cases. The allocation reflects which of the fair values derive from transactions in the market and where valuation is based on models because market transactions are lacking.

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the financial instruments recognized at fair value on the statement of financial position comprise derivative financial instruments.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 56

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

12. | Financial instruments by category (continued)

In the case of Level 1, valuation is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical financial assets that the Group can refer to at the date of the statement of financial position. A market is deemed active if transactions take place with sufficient frequency and in sufficient quantity for price information to be available on an ongoing basis. Since a quoted price in an active market is the most reliable indicator of fair value, this should always be used if available. The financial instruments the Group has allocated to this level mainly comprise crop futures and options traded on the stock market. In the case of securities, the Group allocates them to this level when either a stock market price is available or prices are provided by a price quotation on the basis of actual market transactions.

Derivatives not traded on the stock market allocated to Level 2 are valued using models based on observable market data. For this, the Group uses inputs directly or indirectly observable in the market, other than quoted prices. If the financial instrument concerned has a fixed contract period, the inputs used for valuation must be observable for the whole of this period. The financial instruments the Group has allocated to this level mainly comprise interest-rate swaps and foreign-currency interest-rate swaps.

In the case of Level 3, the Group uses valuation techniques not based on inputs observable in the market. This is only permissible insofar as no observable market data are available. The inputs used reflect the Group’s assumptions regarding the factors, which market players would consider in their pricing. The Group uses the best available information for this, including internal company data. The Group does not have financial instruments allocated to this level for any of the years presented.

The following tables present the Group’s financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and their allocation to the fair value hierarchy:

|  | 2012 |
|  | Level 1 |  |  | Level 2 |  |  | Level 3 |  |  | Total |
Assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Derivative financial instruments |  |  | 5,212 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 5,212 |
Equity investment in Santa Regina |  |  | — |  |  |  | 11,878 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 11,878 |
Total assets |  |  | 5,212 |  |  |  | 11,878 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 17,090 |
Liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Derivative financial instruments |  |  | (361 | ) |  |  | (5,390 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (5,751 | )
Total liabilities |  |  | (361 | ) |  |  | (5,390 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (5,751 | )

|  | 2011 |
|  | Level 1 |  |  | Level 2 |  |  | Level 3 |  |  | Total |
Assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Derivative financial instruments |  |  | 10,353 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 10,353 |
Total assets |  |  | 10,353 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 10,353 |
Liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Derivative financial instruments |  |  | 671 |  |  |  | 5,383 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 6,054 |
Total liabilities |  |  | 671 |  |  |  | 5,383 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 6,054 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 57

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

12. | Financial instruments by category (continued)

When no quoted prices in an active market are available, fair values (particularly with derivatives) are based on recognized valuation methods. The Group uses a range of valuation models for this purpose, details of which may be obtained from the following table:

Concept |  | Pricing Method |  | Parameters |  | Pricing Model
Futures |  | Quoted price |  | - |  | -
Options |  | Quoted price |  | - |  | -
Options/ OTC |  | Quoted price |  | - |  | Montecarlo
Foreign-currency interest-rate swaps |  | Theoretical price |  | Swap curve; Money market interest-rate curve; Foreign-exchange curve. |  | Present value method
Interest-rate swaps |  | Theoretical price |  | Swap curve; Money market interest-rate curve |  | Present value method

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 58

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

13. | Trade and other receivables, net

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Non current |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Receivables from related parties (Note 34) |  |  | 2,253 |  |  |  | 63 |
Trade receivables - net |  |  | 2,253 |  |  |  | 63 |
Advances to suppliers |  |  | 12,850 |  |  |  | 2,719 |
Income tax credits |  |  | 4,594 |  |  |  | 3,682 |
Non-income tax credits (i) |  |  | 16,528 |  |  |  | 6,988 |
Receivable from disposal of subsidiary (Note 16) |  |  | 2,094 |  |  |  | — |
Cash collateral |  |  | 2,049 |  |  |  | 1,469 |
Other receivables |  |  | 3,662 |  |  |  | 824 |
Non current portion |  |  | 44,030 |  |  |  | 15,746 |
Current |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Trade receivables |  |  | 41,067 |  |  |  | 38,178 |
Receivables from related parties (Note 34) |  |  | 144 |  |  |  | 4,846 |
Less: Allowance for trade receivables |  |  | (588 | ) |  |  | (1,622 | )
Trade receivables - net |  |  | 40,623 |  |  |  | 41,402 |
Prepaid expenses |  |  | 12,766 |  |  |  | 12,102 |
Advances to suppliers |  |  | 11,213 |  |  |  | 11,872 |
Income tax credits |  |  | 4,256 |  |  |  | 2,522 |
Non-income tax credits (i) |  |  | 48,838 |  |  |  | 45,659 |
Cash collateral |  |  | 296 |  |  |  | 1,792 |
Receivable from disposal of farmland (Note 16) |  |  | 3,018 |  |  |  | 18,090 |
Receivable from disposal of subsidiaries (Note 16) |  |  | 9,395 |  |  |  | — |
Other receivables |  |  | 5,443 |  |  |  | 7,743 |
Subtotal |  |  | 95,225 |  |  |  | 99,779 |
Current portion |  |  | 135,848 |  |  |  | 141,181 |
Total trade and other receivables, net |  |  | 179,878 |  |  |  | 156,927 |

(i) | Includes US$ 962 reclassified from property, plant and equipment.

The fair values of current trade and other receivables approximate their respective carrying amounts due to their short-term nature. The fair values of non-current trade and other receivables approximate their carrying amount, as the impact of discounting is not significant.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 59

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

13. | Trade and other receivables, net (continued)

The carrying amounts of the Group’s trade and other receivables are denominated in the following currencies (expressed in US dollars):

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Currency |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
US Dollar |  |  | 50,184 |  |  |  | 51,338 |
Argentine Peso |  |  | 50,422 |  |  |  | 42,163 |
Uruguayan Peso |  |  | 565 |  |  |  | 803 |
Brazilian Reais |  |  | 78,707 |  |  |  | 62,622 |
|  |  | 179,878 |  |  |  | 156,927 |

As of December 31, 2012 trade receivables of US$ 2,662 (2011: US$ 18,938) were past due but not impaired. The ageing analysis of these receivables is as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Up to 3 months |  |  | 2,408 |  |  |  | 17,996 |
3 to 6 months |  |  | 46 |  |  |  | 914 |
Over 6 months |  |  | 208 |  |  |  | 28 |
|  |  | 2,662 |  |  |  | 18,938 |

The Group recognizes an allowance for trade receivables when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of the receivables.

Delinquency in payments is an indicator that a receivable may be impaired. However, management considers all available evidence in determining when a receivable is impaired. Generally, trade receivables, which are more than 180 days past due are fully provided for. However, certain receivables 180+ days overdue are not provided for based on a case-by-case analysis of credit quality analysis. Furthermore, receivables, which are not 180+ days overdue, may be provided for if specific analysis indicates a potential impairment.

Movements on the Group’s allowance for trade receivables are as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
At January 1 |  |  | 1,622 |  |  |  | 1,323 |
Charge of the year |  |  | 272 |  |  |  | 740 |
Unused amounts reversed |  |  | (21 | ) |  |  | (385 | )
Used during the year |  |  | (1,086 | ) |  |  | — |
Exchange differences |  |  | (199 | ) |  |  | (64 | )
At December 31 |  |  | 588 |  |  |  | 1,622 |

The creation and release of allowance for trade receivables have been included in “Selling expenses” in the statement of income. Amounts charged to the allowance account are generally written off, when there is no expectation of recovering additional cash.

The other classes within other receivables do not contain impaired assets.

The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying value of each class of receivable mentioned above. The Group holds mortgages as collateral for the sale of La Macarena and Agrícola Ganadera San José S.R.L. The shares of Santa Regina S.A. are also pledged in favor of the Group as collateral for the receivable of the 51% of the company (see Note 16).

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 60

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

13. | Trade and other receivables, net (continued)

As of December 31, 2012, approximately 81 % (2011: 36%) of the outstanding unimpaired trade receivables (neither past due nor impaired) relate to sales to 10 well-known multinational companies with good credit quality standing, including but not limited to Compersucar Trading A.V.V., Bunge, Camara de Comercializacao de Energia Electrica CCEE, Establecimiento Las Marias, or its affiliates, among others. Most of these entities or their parent companies are externally credit-rated. The Group reviews these external ratings from credit agencies.

The remaining percentage as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 of the outstanding unimpaired trade receivables (neither past due nor impaired) relate to sales to a dispersed large quantity of customers for which external credit ratings may not be available. However, the total base of customers without an external credit rating is relatively stable.

New customers with less than six months of history with the Group are closely monitored. The Group has not experienced credit problems with these new customers to date. The majority of the customers for which an external credit rating is not available are existing customers with more than six months of history with the Group and with no defaults in the past. A minor percentage of customers may have experienced some non-significant defaults in the past but fully recovered.

14. | Inventories

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Raw materials |  |  | 36,607 |  |  |  | 31,539 |
Finished goods. |  |  | 56,508 |  |  |  | 60,067 |
Stocks held by third parties |  |  | 2,195 |  |  |  | 4,528 |
Others |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 13 |
|  |  | 95,321 |  |  |  | 96,147 |

The cost of inventories recognized as expense and included in “Cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered” amounted to US$ 263,978 for the year ended December 31, 2012 (2011: US$ 226,413 and 2010: US$ 208,485). The cost of inventories recognized as expense and included in “Cost of agricultural produce sold and direct agricultural selling expenses” amounted to US$ 174,602 for the year ended December 31, 2012 (2011: US$ 148,177 and 2010: US$ 101,288).

15. | Cash and cash equivalents

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Cash at bank and on hand |  |  | 137,980 |  |  |  | 238,902 |
Short-term bank deposits |  |  | 80,829 |  |  |  | 91,644 |
|  |  | 218,809 |  |  |  | 330,546 |

16. | Disposals

Year ended December 31, 2012

On June 29, 2012, the Group sold its 100% interest in Agricola Ganadera San Jose S.A., a subsidiary whose main assets comprised of farmland, at a consideration of US$ 9.3 million. The sale price was collected US$ 5 million in cash and the remaining amount will be collected in two equal installments plus interest in June 2013 and 2014. This transaction resulted in a gain of US$ 8 million recorded in other operating income in the statement of income.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 61

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

16. | Disposals (continued)

On December 27, 2012, the Group disposed of a 51% interest out of the 100% interest held in Santa Regina Agropecuaria S.A. at a consideration of US$ 12.4 million. The main asset of the subsidiary is the Santa Regina farm located in General Villegas, Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina. The Group granted an option to the buyer to acquire the remaining 49% interest on or before June 2014 at US$ 13.1 million. The Group entered into a lease contract with the buyer to use the land for the next two crop years as from May 2013. The sale price was collected US$ 5.2 million in cash and the remaining amount will be collected in two installments plus interest, US$ 1 million in June 2013 and US$ 6.2 million in December 2013. As discussed in Note 11, the Group evaluated the effect of potential voting rights arising from the option and concluded that the interest retained in Santa Regina represents an available for sale financial asset under IAS 39.

The transaction generated a gain for the sale of US$ 9 million. In addition, since the Group ceased to have control over the subsidiary, the retained 49% interest was remeasured to its fair value and a gain of US$ 10.4 million was recognized in the statement of income under “Other operating income, net”.

Year ended December 31, 2011

On November 30, 2011 the Group completed the sale of “La Alegría”, a 2,438 hectare farm located in General Villegas, province of Buenos Aires, Argentina, for a total consideration of US$13.7 million. This transaction resulted in a gain of US$ 8.8 million included within “Other operating income, net”. As of December 31, 2012, the Group collected all the credit.

Year ended December 31, 2010

On December 21, 2010 the Group completed the sale of La Macarena, a farm located in Río Negro, Uruguay for cash consideration of US$ 34 million. This transaction resulted in a gain of US$ 20.8 million included within “Other operating income, net” in the statement of income as of December 31, 2010. The Group collected US$ 31 million in cash during the year ended December 31, 2012. The remaining amount will be collected in 2013 (see Note 13).

17. | Shareholders’ contributions

The share capital of the Group is represented by common shares with a nominal value of US$ 1.5 per share and one vote each.

|  | Number of shares |  |  | Share capital and share premium |
At 1 January 2010 |  |  | 120,000 |  |  |  | 683,343 |
Contributed capital |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
At 31 December 2010 |  |  | 120,000 |  |  |  | 683,343 |
At January 24, 2011, after reverse stock split (1) |  |  | 80,000 |  |  |  | 683,343 |
Issue of shares on January 28, 2011 (2) |  |  | 40,069 |  |  |  | 423,030 |
Employee share options exercised (Note 18) |  |  | 37 |  |  |  | 326 |
Restricted shares issued (Note 18) |  |  | 427 |  |  |  | 641 |
Restricted shares exercised (Note 18) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 746 |
Non controlling interest acquired (3) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,281 | )
At 31 December 2011 |  |  | 120,533 |  |  |  | 1,106,805 |
Employee share options exercised (Note 18) |  |  | 32 |  |  |  | 312 |
Restricted shares vested (Note 18) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,347 |
Non controlling interest acquired through exchange of Shares (4) |  |  | 1,655 |  |  |  | 15,199 |
At 31 December 2012 |  |  | 122,220 |  |  |  | 1,123,663 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 62

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

17. | Shareholders’ contributions (continued)

(1) | The Extraordinary General Meeting of Adecoagro’s shareholders held on January 24, 2011 approved a reverse stock split of Adecoagro’s common shares, changing the nominal value of Adecoagro’s common shares from US$ 1 to US$ 1,5. Therefore, Adecoagro reduced total shares outstanding as of that date from 119,999,997 shares to 79,999,985 shares.

(2) | On January 28, 2011 the Company successfully completed an initial public offering (IPO) of its shares in the New York Stock Exchange. The Company issued 28,405,925 shares, at a price of US$ 11 per share. In addition, on February 11, 2011, the Company issued 4,285,714 shares, at a price of US$ 11 per share, as a consequence of the over-alloment option exercised by the underwriters of the initial public offering, raising an overall amount of approximately US$ 359 million.

On January 28, 2011, Adecoagro’s also issued and sold to Al Gharrafa Investment Company 7,377,598 common shares at a purchase price per share of US$ 10.65, which is equal to the price per common share paid by the underwriters acting in the initial public offering of the Company. This transaction was conditioned upon, and closed immediately after, the closing of the initial public offering of the Company. Consequently the Company raised US$ 79 million.

The Company used these funds to finance part of the construction costs of Ivinhema (sugar and ethanol mill in Brazil) and for potential investments in the acquisition of farmland and capital expenditures required in the expansion of the farming business.

Related transaction costs totaling US$ 15 million net of tax have been netted off with the deemed proceeds, on the Share premium issued.

During 2011, the Company agreed to contribute the full proceed from the IPO to International Farmland Holdings LP, increasing its interest to 98.64%.

(3) | As a consequence of new contributions made in International Farmland Holdings LP fully attributable to the Group, non controlling interest was reduced from 2% to 1.36%.

(4) | During 2012, the Company issued 1,654,752 shares to certain limited partners of International Farmland Holdings LP (“IFH”) in exchange for their residual interest, totaling 1.36% interest in IFH. After this exchange, the Company holds 100% of IFH interest.

18. | Equity-settled share-based payments

The Group has set a “2004 Incentive Option Plan” and a “2007/2008 Equity Incentive Plan” (collectively referred to as “Option Schemes”) under which the Group grants equity-settled options to senior managers and selected employees of the Group’s subsidiaries. Additionally, in 2010 the Group has set a “Adecoagro Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan” (referred to as “Restricted Share Plan”) under which the Group grants restricted shares to senior and medium management and key employees of the Group’s subsidiaries.

| (a) | Option Schemes

The Group recognized aggregate compensation expense of US$ 0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 (2011: US$ 0.9 million; 2010: US$ 1.7 million) related to the options granted under the Option Schemes.

The fair value of the options under the Option Schemes was measured at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation technique. This valuation model takes into account factors such as non transferability, expected volatility, exercise restrictions and behavioral considerations.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 63

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

18. | Equity-settled unit-based payments (continued)

Key grant-date fair value and other assumptions under the Option Schemes are detailed below:

Grant Date |  | Jan 2009 |  |  | Nov 2009 |  |  | Jan 2010 |  |  | Jan 2010 |  |  | Jun 2010 |  |  | Sep 2010 |  |  | Sep 2010 |
Expected volatility |  |  | 21 | % |  |  | 22 | % |  |  | 22 | % |  |  | 22 | % |  |  | 22 | % |  |  | 22 | % |  |  | 22 | %
Expected life |  |  | 6.50 |  |  |  | 6.50 |  |  |  | 6.5 |  |  |  | 6.5 |  |  |  | 6.5 |  |  |  | 6.5 |  |  |  | 6.5 |
Risk free rate |  |  | 1,85 | % |  |  | 2,31 | % |  |  | 2.34 | % |  |  | 2.34 | % |  |  | 1.79 | % |  |  | 1.41 | % |  |  | 1.41 | %
Expected dividend yield |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | 0 | %
Fair value per option |  | $ | 3.52 |  |  | $ | 3.78 |  |  | $ | 3.62 |  |  | $ | 3.38 |  |  | $ | 3.17 |  |  | $ | 3.05 |  |  | $ | 3.28 |
Possibility of ceasing employment before vesting |  |  | 0.02 | % |  |  | 0.21 | % |  |  | 0.21 | % |  |  | 0.21 | % |  |  | 0.38 | % |  |  | 0.43 | % |  |  | 0.43 | %
Exercise price |  | $ | 13.40 |  |  | $ | 13.40 |  |  | $ | 12.82 |  |  | $ | 13.40 |  |  | $ | 13.40 |  |  | $ | 13.40 |  |  | $ | 12.82 |

Since the Group’s shares were not publicly traded at the time the options were granted, expected volatility was determined by calculating the historical volatility of share prices of comparable entities in representative stock markets. The expected life used in the model was adjusted, based on management’s best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions and behavioral considerations. On January 28, 2011 the Company completed its initial public offering in the New York Stock Exchange (see Note 16).

Details of each plan are as follow:

The Adecoagro/ IFH 2004 Stock Incentive Option Plan

This scheme was effectively established in 2004 and is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company. Options under the Adecoagro/ IFH 2004 Stock Incentive Option Plan vest over a 3-year period from the date of grant at 33% on each anniversary of the grant date. Options are exercisable over a ten-year period. The exercise price of the options is determined by the Compensation Committee but under no circumstances the price may be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant. For this scheme, there are no performance requirements for the exercising of options, except that a participant’s employment with the Group must not have been terminate prior to the date of exercise of the relevant option. If the participant ceases to be employee for cause any unvested option shall automatically expired and shall not be exercisable. In addition, if the participant ceases to be an employee for reason of death, any portion of the share option held by he or she that has vested on that date may be exercised by his or her legal representative for the period of one year. Finally if the participant ceases to be an employee for any reason other than cause or death any portion of any vested option held may be exercisable for a period of three months.

Movements in the number of equity-settled options outstanding and their related weighted average exercise prices under the Adecoagro/ IFH 2004 Stock Incentive Option Plan are as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
|  | Average exercise price per share |  |  | Options (thousands) |  |  | Average exercise price per share |  |  | Options (thousands) |  |  | Average exercise price per share |  |  | Options (thousands) |
At January 1 |  |  | 6.68 |  |  |  | 2,134 |  |  |  | 6.74 |  |  |  | 2,401 |  |  |  | 6.74 |  |  |  | 2,401 |
Forfeited |  |  | 8.62 |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | 7.31 |  |  |  | (230 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Exercised |  |  | 6.71 |  |  |  | (32 | ) |  |  | 5.83 |  |  |  | (37 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
At December 31 |  |  | 6.68 |  |  |  | 2,100 |  |  |  | 6.68 |  |  |  | 2,134 |  |  |  | 6.74 |  |  |  | 2,401 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 64

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

18. | Equity-settled unit-based payments (continued)

Options outstanding at year end under the Adecoagro/ IFH 2004 Incentive Option Plan have the following expiry date and exercise prices:

|  | Exercise price per share |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Shares (in thousands) |
Expiry date: |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
May 1, 2014 |  |  | 5.83 |  |  |  | 674 |  |  |  | 674 |  |  |  | 674 |
May 1, 2015 |  |  | 5.83 |  |  |  | 553 |  |  |  | 556 |  |  |  | 572 |
May 1, 2016 |  |  | 5.83 |  |  |  | 173 |  |  |  | 192 |  |  |  | 320 |
February 16, 2016 |  |  | 7.11 |  |  |  | 110 |  |  |  | 110 |  |  |  | 110 |
October 1, 2016 |  |  | 8,62 |  |  |  | 590 |  |  |  | 602 |  |  |  | 725 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,100 |  |  |  | 2,134 |  |  |  | 2,401 |

The Adecoagro/ IFH 2007/ 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

This scheme was effectively established in late 2007 and is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company. Options under the Adecoagro/ IFH 2007/2008 Equity Incentive Plan vest over a 4-year period from the date of grant at 25% on each anniversary of the grant date. Options are exercisable over a ten-year period. The exercise price of the options is determined by the Compensation Committee but under no circumstances the price may be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant. For this scheme, there are no performance requirements for the exercising of options, except that a participant’s employment with the Group must not have been terminated prior to the date of exercise of the relevant option. If the participant ceases to be employee for cause any unvested option shall automatically expired and shall not be exercisable. In addition, if the participant ceases to be an employee for reason of death, any portion of the share option held by he or she that has vested on that date may be exercised by his or her legal representative for the period of one year. Finally if the participant ceases to be an employee for any reason other than cause or death any portion of any vested option held may be exercisable for a period of three months.

Movements in the number of equity-settled options outstanding and their related weighted average exercise prices under the Adecoagro/ IFH 2007/2008 Equity Incentive Plan are as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
|  | Average exercise price per share |  |  | Options (thousands) |  |  | Average exercise price per share |  |  | Options (thousands) |  |  | Average exercise price per share |  |  | Options (thousands) |
At January 1 |  |  | 13.06 |  |  |  | 2,038 |  |  |  | 13.06 |  |  |  | 2,228 |  |  |  | 13.02 |  |  |  | 2,030 |
Granted |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 13.25 |  |  |  | 198 |
Forfeited |  |  | 13.06 |  |  |  | (24 | ) |  |  | 12.89 |  |  |  | (190 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
At December 31 |  |  | 13.06 |  |  |  | 2,013 |  |  |  | 13.06 |  |  |  | 2,038 |  |  |  | 13.06 |  |  |  | 2,228 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 65

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

18. | Equity-settled unit-based payments (continued)

Options outstanding at year-end under the Adecoagro/ IFH 2007/2008 Equity Incentive Plan have the following expiry date and exercise prices:

|  | Exercise price per share |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  | Shares (in thousands) |
Expiry date: |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Dec 1, 2017 |  |  | 12.82 |  |  |  | 1,138 |  |  |  | 1,149 |  |  |  | 1,313 |
Jan 30, 2019 |  |  | 13.40 |  |  |  | 687 |  |  |  | 687 |  |  |  | 700 |
Nov 1, 2019 |  |  | 13.40 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 18 |
Jan 30, 2020 |  |  | 12.82 |  |  |  | 28 |  |  |  | 32 |  |  |  | 35 |
Jan 30, 2020 |  |  | 13.40 |  |  |  | 71 |  |  |  | 71 |  |  |  | 81 |
Jun 30, 2020 |  |  | 13.40 |  |  |  | 22 |  |  |  | 22 |  |  |  | 22 |
Sep 1, 2020 |  |  | 13.40 |  |  |  | 44 |  |  |  | 44 |  |  |  | 44 |
Sep 1, 2020 |  |  | 12.82 |  |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 15 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,013 |  |  |  | 2,038 |  |  |  | 2,228 |

The following table shows the exercisable shares at year end under both the Adecoagro/ IFH 2004 Incentive Option Plan and the Adecoagro/ IFH 2007/ 2008 Equity Incentive Plan:

|  | Exercisable shares in thousands |
2012 |  |  | 3,849 |
2011 |  |  | 3,681 |
2010 |  |  | 3,318 |

During 2012, 32,439 options were exercised under the 2004 Incentive Option Plan. Accordingly, the Group issued and registered these shares with a nominal value of US$ 1.5.

| (b) | Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan

The Restricted Share and Restricted Stock Unit Plan was effectively established in 2010 and amended in November 2011 is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company. Restricted shares under the Restricted Share or Restricted Stock Units Plan vest over a 3-year period from the date of grant at 33% on each anniversary of the grant date. Participants are entitled to receive one common share of the Company for each restricted share or restricted unit issued. For the Restricted Share Plan there are no performance requirements for the delivery of common shares, except that a participant’s employment with the Group must not have been terminated prior to the relevant vesting date. If the participant ceases to be an employee for any reason, any unvested restricted share shall not be converted into common shares and the participant shall cease for all purposes to be a shareholder with respect to such shares.

On July 18, 2011, the Group issued and registered 427,293 restricted shares with a nominal value of US$ 1.5, which were granted under the Restricted Share Plan. While the restricted shares are not vested, they are recognized in “Other reserves”. Once they are vested, the reserve is reversed and a share premium is recognized.

During 2012, 120,811 (2011: 68,718) restricted shares were vested.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 66

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

18. | Equity-settled unit-based payments (continued)

At December 31, 2012, the Group recognized compensation expense US$ 3.8 million related to the restricted shares granted under the Restricted Share Plan (2011: US$ 2.8 million).

The restricted shares under the Restricted Share Plan were measured at fair value at the date of grant.

Key grant-date fair value and other assumptions under the Restricted Share Plan are detailed below:

Grant Date |  | Apr 1, 2011 |  |  | Apr 1, 2011 |  |  | May 13, 2011 |  |  | Apr 1, 2012 |  |  | May 15, 2012 |
Fair value |  |  | 12.69 |  |  |  | 12.69 |  |  |  | 12.36 |  |  |  | 9.81 |  |  |  | 9.33 |
Possibility of ceasing employment before vesting |  |  | 5 | % |  |  | 10 | % |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | 5 | % |  |  | 0 | %

Movements in the number of restricted shares outstanding under the Restricted Share Plan are as follows:

|  | Restricted shares (thousands) |  |  | Restricted stock units (thousands) |
|  | 2012 |  |  | 2012 |
At January 1 |  |  | 356 |  |  |  | — |
Granted (1) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 515 |
Forfeited |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | — |
Vested |  |  | (121 | ) |  |  | — |
At December 31 |  |  | 234 |  |  |  | 515 |

(1) | Approved by the Board of Directors of March 27, 2012 and the Shareholders Meeting of April 18, 2012.

During 2012, 1,557 restricted shares became forfeited and were returned to the Group. These restricted shares are held by the Group as treasury shares and presented within “Treasury shares” in the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity.

19. | Legal and other reserves

According to the laws of certain of the countries in which the Group operates, a portion of the profit of the year (5%) is separated to constitute legal reserves until they reach legal capped amounts. These legal reserves are not available for dividend distribution and can only be released to absorb losses. The legal limit of these reserves has not been met.

In addition, from time to time, the subsidiaries of the Group may separate portions of their profits of the year to constitute voluntary reserves according to company law and practice. These voluntary reserves may be released for dividend distribution.

Legal and other reserves amount to US$ 37,654 as of December 31, 2012 (2011: US$ 14,592; 2010: US$ 6,536) and are included within the balance of retained earnings in the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 67

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

19. | Legal and other reserves (continued)

The Company may make distributions in the form of dividends or otherwise to the extent that it has distributable retained earnings or available distributable reserves (including share premium) that result from the Stand Alone Financial Statements prepared in accordance with Luxembourg GAAP. No distributable retained earning result from the Stand Alone Financial Statements of the Company as of December 31, 2012, but the Company has distributable reserves in excess of US$ 918,646.

20. | Trade and other payables

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Non-current |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Payable from acquisition of property, plant and equipment (i) |  |  | 3,126 |  |  |  | 3,646 |
Taxes payable |  |  | 37 |  |  |  | 1,547 |
Other payables |  |  | 432 |  |  |  | 885 |
Escrows arising on business combinations (Note 32) |  |  | 980 |  |  |  | 2,340 |
|  |  | 4,575 |  |  |  | 8,418 |
Current |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Trade payables |  |  | 88,123 |  |  |  | 68,672 |
Payable from acquisition of subsidiary (Note 32) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 35,730 |
Advances from customers |  |  | 4,529 |  |  |  | 1,721 |
Amounts due to related parties (Note 34) |  |  | 562 |  |  |  | 318 |
Taxes payable |  |  | 2,894 |  |  |  | 4,989 |
Escrows arising on business combinations (Note 32) |  |  | 1,508 |  |  |  | — |
Other payables |  |  | 2,069 |  |  |  | 2,590 |
|  |  | 99,685 |  |  |  | 114,020 |
Total trade and other payables |  |  | 104,260 |  |  |  | 122,438 |

(i) | These trades payable are mainly collateralized by property, plant and equipment of the Group.

The fair values of current trade and other payables approximate their respective carrying amounts due to their short-term nature. The fair values of non-current trade and other payables approximate their carrying amounts, as the impact of discounting is not significant.

21. | Borrowings

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Non-current |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Bank borrowings |  |  | 353,540 |  |  |  | 203,330 |
Obligations under finance leases |  |  | 709 |  |  |  | 79 |
|  |  | 354,249 |  |  |  | 203,409 |
Current |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Bank overdrafts |  |  | 111 |  |  |  | 6,735 |
Bank borrowings |  |  | 184,361 |  |  |  | 150,442 |
Obligations under finance leases |  |  | 412 |  |  |  | 119 |
|  |  | 184,884 |  |  |  | 157,296 |
Total borrowings |  |  | 539,133 |  |  |  | 360,705 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 68

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

21. | Borrowings (continued)

As of December 31, 2012, total bank borrowings include collateralized liabilities of US$ 346,469 (2011: US$ 297,472). These loans are mainly collateralized by property, plant and equipment, sugarcane plantations, sugar export contracts and shares of certain subsidiaries of the Group.

The maturity of the Group’s borrowings (excluding obligations under finance leases) and the Group’s exposure to fixed and variable interest rates is as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Fixed rate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Less than 1 year |  |  | 60,049 |  |  |  | 70,007 |
Between 1 and 2 years |  |  | 19,066 |  |  |  | 25,554 |
Between 2 and 3 years |  |  | 24,364 |  |  |  | 12,426 |
Between 3 and 4 years |  |  | 21,760 |  |  |  | 8,902 |
Between 4 and 5 years |  |  | 20,870 |  |  |  | 7,551 |
More than 5 years |  |  | 62,036 |  |  |  | 22,866 |
|  |  | 208,145 |  |  |  | 147,306 |
Variable rate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Less than 1 year |  |  | 124,423 |  |  |  | 87,170 |
Between 1 and 2 years |  |  | 71,978 |  |  |  | 40,353 |
Between 2 and 3 years |  |  | 73,684 |  |  |  | 24,756 |
Between 3 and 4 years |  |  | 45,969 |  |  |  | 23,507 |
Between 4 and 5 years |  |  | 11,100 |  |  |  | 23,369 |
More than 5 years |  |  | 2,713 |  |  |  | 14,046 |
|  |  | 329,867 |  |  |  | 213,201 |
|  |  | 538,012 |  |  |  | 360,507 |

Borrowings incurred by the Group’s subsidiaries in Brazil are repayable at various dates between January 2013 and November 2022 and bear either fixed interest rates ranging from 2.45% to 10% per annum or variable rates based on LIBOR or other specific base-rates plus spreads ranging from 4.05% to 7% per annum. At December 31, 2012 LIBOR (six months) was 0.51% (2011: 0. 81%).

Borrowings incurred by the Group’s subsidiaries in Argentina are repayable at various dates between January 2013 and November 2019 and bear either fixed interest rates ranging from 5.00% and 7.00% per annum and variable rates based on LIBOR + 4.45% per annum.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 69

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

21. | Borrowings (continued)

Brazilian Subsidiaries

The main loans of the Group’s Brazilian Subsidiaries are:

| • |  | BNDES Loan Facility

As of December 31, 2012, the BNDES Loan Facility is divided in two tranches outstanding for an amount of Reais 9.5 million for Tranche “A” and Reais 90.3 million for Tranche “B” (equivalent to US$ 4.6 million and US$ 44.3 million, respectively). As of December 31, 2012, tranches “A” bears an interest at a Brazilian-specific variable rate “Taxa de Juros Resolução 635/87”, 3.56%, plus 4.05% per annum, and Tranches “B” bears an interest variable rate “TJLP rate”, 5.5%, plus 4.05% per annum. The BNDES Loan Facility contains certain customary financial covenants, events of default and restrictions which require the Group to meet pre-defined financial ratios, among other restrictions. These financial covenants are measured on an annual basis as of the end of each fiscal year. Certain covenants are measured on a combined basis aggregating the borrowing subsidiaries and others are measured on an individual basis. The obligations under the BNDES Loan Facility are secured by (i) a first degree mortgage of the Takuare farm; (ii) a pledge on the capital stock (“quotas”) of Adecoagro Brasil Participações S/A; and (iii) liens over the Angélica mill and equipment, all of which are property of Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema.

The financial covenants are defined as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 to 2018 |
Financial ratios: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net Bank Debt / EBITDA |  |  | [£] 4 |  |  |  | [£] 4.5 |  |  |  | [£] 4.5 |
Solvency Ratio |  |  | [³] 40 | % |  |  | [³] 40 | % |  |  | [³] 40 | %
Interest Coverage Ratio |  |  | [³] 2 |  |  |  | [³] 2 |  |  |  | [³] 2 |

| • |  | BNDES Loan 2012

On December 27, 2012, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema entered into a new loan with BNDES in an amount equal to Reais-denominated 488.6 million for a term of 10 years bearing interest at an average rate of 4.65% per year. The proceeds from the loan will be drawn during the next 24 months and will be used to finance the expansion of the construction of the Ivinhema Mill, which is expected to reach a crushing capacity of 6.3 million tons per year by 2017.

| • |  | BDB Facility 2010

In July 2010, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema entered into a Reais-denominated 70.0 million loan (equivalent to US$ 34.3 million as of December 31, 2012) with Banco do Brasil S.A. As of December 31, 2012, the remaining amount was Reais-denominated 66.9 million (equivalent to US$ 32.7 million). The BDB Facility bears a fixed interest rate of 10% per annum with a bonus performance of 15% and is repayable on a monthly basis starting in August 2012 and ending in July 2020. Under this facility, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema is required to meet the following financial ratio:

Financial Ratio |  | 2012 to 2020 |
Debt Service Coverage Ratio |  |  | [³] 1,2 |

| • |  | BDB Loan 2012

In October 2012, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema entered into a Reais-denominated 130.0 million loan (equivalent to US$ 63.6 million as of December 31, 2012) with Banco do Brasil S.A. due 2022. As of December 31, 2012, the remaining amount was Reais-denominated 130.8 million (equivalent to US$ 64 million). This loan bears a fixed interest rate of 2.94% per annum with a bonus performance of 15%. The obligations under this loan are secured by (i) a second degree mortgage of the Sapalio farm and (ii) liens over the Ivinhema mill and equipment, all of which are property of Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema. Under this loan, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema is required to meet the following financial ratio:

Financial Ratio |  | 2012 to 2022 |
Debt Service Coverage Ratio |  |  | [³] 1,2 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 70

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

21. | Borrowings (continued)

| • |  | Itau BBAFacility

In December 2012, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema entered into a Reais-denominated 16.5 million loan (equivalent to US$ 8.1 million as of December 31, 2012) with Banco ITAU BBA due 2022. As of December 31, 2012, the remaining amount was Reais-denominated 16.6 million (equivalent to US$ 8.1 million. This loan bears a fixed interest rate of 2.5% per annum. Under this loan, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema is required to meet the following financial ratio:

Financial Ratios |  | 2012 |  |  | 2013 to 2022 |
Net Bank Debt |  |  | [£] 4 |  |  |  | [£] 4,5 |

| • |  | Working capital funding

Brazilian subsidiaries entered in several borrowings to fund its working capital needs.

Working Capital - BTG Pactual - HSBC - Votorantim - Rabobank

In July 2012, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema entered into a Reais-denominated 230.0 million loan with a syndicate of banks, led by Rabobank International Brasil S/A, due 2015. As of December 31, 2012, the remaining amount was Reais-denominated 233.8 (equivalent to US$ 114.4 million). This syndicate loan bears a variable interest rate of CDI plus 3.6% per annum. The Group entered into a currency swap which fixed the loan in USD 113 million at a fixed rate of 7.7%.

The loan is collateralized by (i) a first-degree mortgage of the Conquista, Alto Alegre, Dom Fabrício, Nossa Senhora Aparecida, Água Branca e Lagoa D’Oeste farms, (ii) pledge of sugarcane and (iii) sugar export contracts. Under this loan, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema is required to meet the following financial ratios:

Financial Ratios |  | 2012 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 to 2015 |
Interest Coverage Ratio |  |  | [³] 2 |  |  |  | [³] 2 |  |  |  | [³] 2 |
Net Bank Debt / EBITDA |  |  | [£] 4 |  |  |  | [£] 5 |  |  |  | [£] 6 |
Solvency / EBITDA |  |  | [³] 40 | % |  |  | [³] 40 | % |  |  | [³] 40 | %

Working Capital - Bradesco

In May 2012, Usina Monte Alegre Ltda. entered into a US Dollar-denominated 11.7 million loan (equivalent to Reais-denominated 23.9 million as of December 31, 2012) with Banco Bradesco S.A. due 2016. This loan bears a fixed interest rate of 7.2% per annum. Under this loan, Usina Monte Alegre Ltda. is required to meet the following financial ratios:

Financial Ratios |  | 2012 to 2016 |
Net debt / milled sugarcane tons |  |  | [£] 80 |
Net debt / Equity |  |  | [£] 80 | %

Working Capital - ING Bank - Banco of China - Deutsche Bank

In August 2012, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema Ltda. entered into a US Dollar-denominated 60.0 million loan (equivalent to Reais-denominated 122.6 million as of December 31, 2012) with a syndicate of banks led by ING Bank, due in 2013. This loan bears a fixed interest rate of 4.34% per annum. Under this loan, Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema Ltda. is required to meet the following financial ratios:

Financial Ratios |  | 2012 |
Net debt / EBITDA |  |  | [£] 4 |
Solvency / EBITDA |  |  | [³] 40 | %
Interest Coverage Ratio |  |  | [³] 2 |

During 2012 and 2011 the Group was in compliance with all financial covenants.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 71

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

21. | Borrowings (continued)

Argentinian Subsidiaries

| • |  | IDB Facility

The amended IDB Facility is divided into a seven-year US$ 18.462 million tranche (“Tranche A”) and a five-year US$ 53.333 million tranche (“Tranche B”). Tranche A bore interest at fixed rate of 6.11% per annum. Tranche B bears interest at 180-day LIBOR plus 4.45% per annum. The Group entered into a floating to fix interest rate forward swap, fixing LIBOR at 1.25%, effective May 2012.

Payment of principal plus interest of both tranches are made on a bi-annual basis. The proceeds of this loan were used to make capital investments and refinance short-term debt. The IDB Facility is collateralized by property, plant and equipment with a net book value of US$ 36.357 million, by a mortgage over (i) Carmen and La Rosa farms which are property of Adeco Agropecuaria S.A.; and (ii) El Meridiano farm which is the property of Pilagá S.A.

Defaults by either Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. or Pilagá S.A. on any indebtedness with an aggregate principal amount over US$ 3.0 million can result in acceleration of the full outstanding loan amount due to the IDB. The IDB Facility also contains certain customary financial covenants and restrictions which require us to meet pre-defined financial ratios, among other restrictions, as well as restrictions on the payment of dividends. The financial covenants are measured in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Argentina. Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. and Pilagá S.A. are required to meet the following financial ratios (measured on a combined basis):

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |  |  | 2016 |  |  | 2017 |  |  | 2018 |
Total Debt (>; in million) (i) |  |  | 155,000 |  |  |  | 160,000 |  |  |  | 160,000 |  |  |  | 160,000 |  |  |  | 160,000 |  |  |  | 160,000 |  |  |  | 160,000 |
Current Ratio (>) (ii) |  |  | 1.10x |  |  |  | 1.15x |  |  |  | 1.20x |  |  |  | 1.20x |  |  |  | 1.20x |  |  |  | 1.20x |  |  |  | 1.20x |
Interest Coverage Ratio (>) (ii) |  |  | 2.15x |  |  |  | 2.20x |  |  |  | 2.25x |  |  |  | 2.30x |  |  |  | 2.40x |  |  |  | 2.50x |  |  |  | 2.60x |
Liabilities to Equity (<) (ii) |  |  | 1.40x |  |  |  | 1.40x |  |  |  | 1.40x |  |  |  | 1.40x |  |  |  | 1.40x |  |  |  | 1.40x |  |  |  | 1.40x |

(i) | Measured on a quarterly basis.

(ii) | Measured on yearly basis

In addition, the IDB Facility contains a change of control provision requiring acceleration of amounts due under the facility.

During 2012 and 2011 the Group was in compliance with all financial covenants.

The carrying amounts of the Group’s borrowings are denominated in the following currencies (expressed in US dollars):

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Currency |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Argentine Peso |  |  | 18,622 |  |  |  | 6,739 |
US Dollar |  |  | 203,881 |  |  |  | 199,657 |
Uruguayan Peso |  |  | 44 |  |  |  | — |
Brazilian Reais |  |  | 316,586 |  |  |  | 154,309 |
|  |  | 539,133 |  |  |  | 360,705 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 72

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

21. | Borrowings (continued)

Obligations under finance leases

Lease liabilities are effectively secured as the rights to the leased asset revert to the lessor in the event of default.

Gross finance lease liabilities - minimum lease payments:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Not later than one year |  |  | 417 |  |  |  | 119 |
Later than one year and not later than five years |  |  | 713 |  |  |  | 96 |
|  |  | 1,130 |  |  |  | 215 |
Future finance charges on finance leases |  |  | (9 | ) |  |  | (17 | )
Present value of finance lease liabilities |  |  | 1,121 |  |  |  | 198 |

The present value of finance lease liabilities is as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Not later than one year |  |  | 412 |  |  |  | 119 |
Later than one year and not later than five years |  |  | 709 |  |  |  | 79 |
|  |  | 1,121 |  |  |  | 198 |

Under the terms of the lease agreements, no contingent rents are payable. The interest rate inherent in these finance leases is fixed at the contract date for all of the lease term. The average interest rate on finance lease payables at December 31, 2012 was 9,86% (2011: 8.52%).

22. | Taxation

Adecoagro is subject to the applicable general tax regulations in Luxembourg.

The Group’s income tax has been calculated on the estimated assessable taxable profit for the year at the rates prevailing in the respective foreign tax jurisdictions. The subsidiaries of the Group in the jurisdictions where the Group operates are required to calculate their income taxes on a separate basis; thus, they are not permitted to compensate subsidiaries’ losses against subsidiaries income. The details of the provision for the Group’s consolidated income tax are as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Current income tax |  |  | (1,377 | ) |  |  | (13,520 | ) |  |  | (3,956 | )
Deferred income tax |  |  | 6,813 |  |  |  | (1,142 | ) |  |  | 20,219 |
Income tax benefit (expense) |  |  | 5,436 |  |  |  | (14,662 | ) |  |  | 16,263 |

The statutory tax rate in the countries where the Group operates for all of the years presented are:

Tax Jurisdiction |  | Income Tax Rate |
Argentina |  |  | 35 | %
Brazil |  |  | 34 | %
Uruguay |  |  | 25 | %

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 73

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

22. | Taxation (continued)

Deferred tax assets and liabilities of the Group as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, without taking into consideration the offsetting of balances within the same tax jurisdiction, will be recovered or settled as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Deferred income tax asset to be recovered after more than 12 months |  |  | 11,463 |  |  |  | 55,951 |
Deferred income tax asset to be recovered within 12 months |  |  | 65,095 |  |  |  | 2,161 |
Deferred income tax assets |  |  | 76,558 |  |  |  | 58,112 |
Deferred income tax liability to be settled after more than 12 months |  |  | 79,896 |  |  |  | 110,752 |
Deferred income tax liability to be settled within 12 months |  |  | 36,659 |  |  |  | 3,268 |
Deferred income tax liability |  |  | 116,555 |  |  |  | 114,020 |
Deferred income tax liabilities, net |  |  | 39,997 |  |  |  | 55,908 |

The gross movement on the deferred income tax account is as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Beginning of year |  |  | 55,908 |  |  |  | 44,032 |  |  |  | 61,932 |
Exchange differences |  |  | (8,741 | ) |  |  | (4,282 | ) |  |  | (4,961 | )
Acquisition of subsidiary |  |  | — |  |  |  | 15,016 |  |  |  | 7,280 |
Disposal of subsidiary (Note 16) |  |  | (357 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Income tax (expense) / benefit |  |  | (6,813 | ) |  |  | 1,142 |  |  |  | (20,219 | )
End of year |  |  | 39,997 |  |  |  | 55,908 |  |  |  | 44,032 |

The movement in the deferred income tax assets and liabilities during the year, without taking into consideration the offsetting of balances within the same tax jurisdiction, is as follows:

Deferred income tax liabilities |  | Property, plant and equipment |  |  | Biological assets |  |  | Others |  |  | Total |
At January 1, 2010 |  |  | 78,852 |  |  |  | 27,004 |  |  |  | 1,189 |  |  |  | 107,045 |
(Credited)/charged to the statement of income |  |  | (1,992 | ) |  |  | 2,051 |  |  |  | (376 | ) |  |  | (317 | )
Acquisition of subsidiary |  |  | 7,280 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 7,280 |
Exchange differences |  |  | (2,546 | ) |  |  | (263 | ) |  |  | 296 |  |  |  | (2,513 | )
At December 31, 2010 |  |  | 81,594 |  |  |  | 28,792 |  |  |  | 1,109 |  |  |  | 111,495 |
Charged/(credited) to the statement of income |  |  | 6,943 |  |  |  | (8,189 | ) |  |  | (764 | ) |  |  | (2,010 | )
Acquisition of subsidiary |  |  | 15,016 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 15,016 |
Exchange differences |  |  | (7,502 | ) |  |  | (4,117 | ) |  |  | 1,138 |  |  |  | (10,481 | )
At December 31, 2011 |  |  | 96,051 |  |  |  | 16,486 |  |  |  | 1,483 |  |  |  | 114,020 |
(Credited)/charged to the statement of income |  |  | (601 | ) |  |  | 3,951 |  |  |  | 13,277 |  |  |  | 16, 627 |
Disposal of subsidiary |  |  | (357 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (357 | )
Exchange differences |  |  | (11,684 | ) |  |  | (1,644 | ) |  |  | (407 | ) |  |  | (13,735 | )
At December 31, 2012 |  |  | 83,409 |  |  |  | 18,793 |  |  |  | 14,353 |  |  |  | 116,555 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 74

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

22. | Taxation (continued)

Deferred income tax assets |  | Provisions |  |  | Tax loss carryforwards |  |  | Equity-settled share-based compensation |  |  | Biological Assets |  |  | Others |  |  | Total |
At January 1, 2010 |  |  | 1,265 |  |  |  | 36,405 |  |  |  | 4,225 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 3,218 |  |  |  | 45,113 |
Charged/(credited) to the statement of income |  |  | 1,980 |  |  |  | (2,655 | ) |  |  | 617 |  |  |  | 19,525 |  |  |  | 435 |  |  |  | 19,902 |
Exchange differences |  |  | 63 |  |  |  | 2,961 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,632 | ) |  |  | 1,056 |  |  |  | 2,448 |
At December 31, 2010 |  |  | 3,308 |  |  |  | 36,711 |  |  |  | 4,842 |  |  |  | 17,893 |  |  |  | 4,709 |  |  |  | 67,463 |
Charged/(credited) to the statement of income |  |  | 2,364 |  |  |  | 7,455 |  |  |  | 1,117 |  |  |  | (15,357 | ) |  |  | 1,269 |  |  |  | (3,152 | )
Exchange differences |  |  | (604 | ) |  |  | (3,521 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 503 |  |  |  | (2,577 | ) |  |  | (6,199 | )
At December 31, 2011 |  |  | 5,068 |  |  |  | 40,645 |  |  |  | 5,959 |  |  |  | 3,039 |  |  |  | 3,401 |  |  |  | 58,112 |
Charged/(credited) to the statement of income |  |  | 1,033 |  |  |  | 21,652 |  |  |  | 757 |  |  |  | (302 | ) |  |  | (300 | ) |  |  | 23,440 |
Exchange differences |  |  | (530 | ) |  |  | (3,880 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (236 | ) |  |  | (348 | ) |  |  | (4,994 | )
At December 31, 2012 |  |  | 5,571 |  |  |  | 58,417 |  |  |  | 6,716 |  |  |  | 2,501 |  |  |  | (3,353 | ) |  |  | 76,558 |

Tax loss carry forwards in Argentina and Uruguay generally expire within 5 years. Tax loss carry forwards in Brazil do not expire. However, in Brazil, the taxable profit for each year can only be reduced by tax losses up to a maximum of 30%.

In order to fully realize the deferred tax asset, the Group will need to generate future taxable income in the countries where the tax loss carry forward were incurred. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes that as at December 31, 2012, it is probable that the Group will realize all of the deferred tax assets in Argentina and some portion of the deferred tax assets in Brazil.

As of December 31, 2012, the Group’s tax loss carry forwards and the jurisdictions in, which they were generated are as follows:

Jurisdiction |  | Tax loss carry forward |  |  | Expiration Period |
Argentina |  |  | 28,623 |  |  |  | 5 years |
Uruguay |  |  | 5,674 |  |  |  | 5 years |
Brazil |  |  | 133,205 |  |  |  | No expiration date |

Deferred income tax assets are recognized for tax loss carry-forwards to the extent that the realization of the related tax benefit through future taxable profits is probable. The Group recognized deferred income tax assets at December 31, 2012 in respect of all losses future taxable income.

The tax on the Group’s profit before tax differs from the theoretical amount that would arise using the weighted average tax rate applicable to profits of the consolidated entities as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Tax calculated at the tax rates applicable to profits in the respective countries |  |  | 959 |  |  |  | 30,947 |  |  |  | (23,004 | )
Non-deductible items |  |  | 1,978 |  |  |  | 2,075 |  |  |  | 3,210 |
Unused tax losses, net |  |  | (2,845 | ) |  |  | (14,617 | ) |  |  | 7,642 |
Non-taxable income |  |  | (5,744 | ) |  |  | (4,056 | ) |  |  | (4,234 | )
Others |  |  | 216 |  |  |  | 313 |  |  |  | 123 |
Income tax (benefit) / expense |  |  | (5,436 | ) |  |  | 14,662 |  |  |  | (16,263 | )

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 75

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

23. | Payroll and social security liabilities

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Non-current |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Social security payable |  |  | 1,512 |  |  |  | 1,431 |
|  |  | 1,512 |  |  |  | 1,431 |
Current |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Salaries payable |  |  | 4,816 |  |  |  | 3,174 |
Social security payable |  |  | 3,063 |  |  |  | 2,758 |
Provision for vacations |  |  | 9,745 |  |  |  | 7,100 |
Provision for bonuses |  |  | 5,324 |  |  |  | 3,978 |
|  |  | 22,948 |  |  |  | 17,010 |
Total payroll and social security liabilities |  |  | 24,460 |  |  |  | 18,441 |

24. | Provisions for other liabilities

The Group is subject to several laws, regulations and business practices of the countries where it operates. In the ordinary course of business, the Group is subject to certain contingent liabilities with respect to existing or potential claims, lawsuits and other proceedings, including those involving tax, labor and social security, administrative and civil and other matters. The Group accrues liabilities when it is probable that future costs will be incurred and it can reasonably estimate them. The Group bases its accruals on up-to-date developments, estimates of the outcomes of the matters and legal counsel experience in contesting, litigating and settling matters. As the scope of the liabilities becomes better defined or more information is available, the Group may be required to change its estimates of future costs, which could have a material effect on its results of operations and financial condition or liquidity.

The table below shows the movements in the Group’s provisions for other liabilities categorized by type of provision:

|  | Labor, legal and other claims |  |  | Tax and social security |  |  | Onerous contracts |  |  | Total |
At January 1, 2011 |  |  | 3,734 |  |  |  | 1,526 |  |  |  | 3,947 |  |  |  | 9,207 |
Additions |  |  | 1,274 |  |  |  | 430 |  |  |  | 222 |  |  |  | 1,926 |
Acquisition of subsidiaries |  |  | 155 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 155 |
Used during year |  |  | (2,447 | ) |  |  | (79 | ) |  |  | (3,947 | ) |  |  | (6,473 | )
Exchange differences |  |  | (256 | ) |  |  | (208 | ) |  |  | (24 | ) |  |  | (488 | )
At December 31, 2011 |  |  | 2,460 |  |  |  | 1,669 |  |  |  | 198 |  |  |  | 4,327 |
Additions |  |  | 2,422 |  |  |  | 1,911 |  |  |  | 5,257 |  |  |  | 9,590 |
Used during year |  |  | (2,001 | ) |  |  | (3,457 | ) |  |  | (5,402 | ) |  |  | (10,860 | )
Exchange differences |  |  | (247 | ) |  |  | (69 | ) |  |  | (9 | ) |  |  | (325 | )
At December 31, 2012 |  |  | 2,634 |  |  |  | 54 |  |  |  | 44 |  |  |  | 2,732 |

Analysis of total provisions:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Non current |  |  | 1,892 |  |  |  | 3,358 |
Current |  |  | 840 |  |  |  | 969 |
|  |  | 2,732 |  |  |  | 4,327 |

The Group is engaged in several legal proceedings, including tax, labor, civil, administrative and other proceedings in Brazil, which qualified as contingent liabilities for an aggregate amount of US$ 11.1 million and US$ 5.2 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectability.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 76

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

25. | Sales

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Sales of manufactured products and services rendered: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Rice |  |  | 89,062 |  |  |  | 82,079 |  |  |  | 58,876 |
Ethanol |  |  | 121,544 |  |  |  | 116,599 |  |  |  | 114,793 |
Sugar |  |  | 134,766 |  |  |  | 130,348 |  |  |  | 98,385 |
Soybean oil and meal |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Energy |  |  | 25,649 |  |  |  | 24,393 |  |  |  | 15,040 |
Coffee |  |  | — |  |  |  | 713 |  |  |  | 2,709 |
Services |  |  | 3,575 |  |  |  | 767 |  |  |  | 749 |
Rental income |  |  | 4,780 |  |  |  | 4,980 |  |  |  | 3,717 |
Powder milk |  |  |  |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Others |  |  | 150 |  |  |  | 5,978 |  |  |  | 260 |
|  |  | 379,526 |  |  |  | 365,857 |  |  |  | 294,529 |
Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Soybean |  |  | 66,721 |  |  |  | 61,385 |  |  |  | 64,890 |
Cattle for dairy |  |  | 1,634 |  |  |  | 1,896 |  |  |  | 2,096 |
Other cattle |  |  | 623 |  |  |  | 957 |  |  |  | 882 |
Corn |  |  | 67,915 |  |  |  | 42,959 |  |  |  | 23,968 |
Cotton |  |  | 16,489 |  |  |  | 9,101 |  |  |  | 2,395 |
Milk |  |  | 17,234 |  |  |  | 17,801 |  |  |  | 13,415 |
Wheat |  |  | 30,611 |  |  |  | 24,232 |  |  |  | 7,939 |
Coffee |  |  | 8,363 |  |  |  | 13,457 |  |  |  | 4,862 |
Sunflower |  |  | 7,887 |  |  |  | 7,413 |  |  |  | 4,880 |
Sorghum |  |  | 875 |  |  |  | 1,237 |  |  |  | — |
Barley |  |  | 4,220 |  |  |  | 828 |  |  |  | 1,171 |
Seeds |  |  | 2,294 |  |  |  | 784 |  |  |  | 2,537 |
Others |  |  | 308 |  |  |  | 177 |  |  |  | 2,703 |
|  |  | 225,174 |  |  |  | 182,227 |  |  |  | 131,738 |
Total sales |  |  | 604,700 |  |  |  | 548,084 |  |  |  | 426,267 |

Commitments to sell commodities at a future date

The Group entered into contracts to sell non-financial instruments, mainly, sugar, soybean and corn through sales forward contracts. Those contracts are held for purposes of delivery the non-financial instrument in accordance with the Group’s expected sales. Accordingly, as the own use exception criteria are met, those contracts are not recorded as derivatives.

The notional amount of these contracts is US$ 75 million as of December 31, 2012 (2011: US$ 65.9 million; 2010: US$ 77.2 million) comprised primarily of 36,112 tons of sugar (US$ 15.1 million), 82,835 tons of soybean (U$S 19.1 million) and 113,462 tons of corn (US$ 24.1 million), which expire between January 2013 and August 2013.

26. | Expenses by nature

The Group presented the statement of income under the function of expense method. Under this method, expenses are classified according to their function as part of the line items “cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered”, “cost of agricultural produce sold and direct agricultural selling expenses”, “general and administrative expenses” and “selling expenses”.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 77

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

26. | Expenses by nature (continued)

The following table provides the additional disclosure required on the nature of expenses and their relationship to the function within the Group:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Cost of agricultural produce and biological assets sold |  |  | 194,107 |  |  |  | 168,837 |  |  |  | 117,992 |
Raw materials and consumables used in manufacturing activities |  |  | 159,968 |  |  |  | 147,339 |  |  |  | 136,208 |
Services |  |  | 18,670 |  |  |  | 20,437 |  |  |  | 14,727 |
Salaries and social security expenses (Note 27) |  |  | 63,089 |  |  |  | 57,259 |  |  |  | 52,728 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 54,468 |  |  |  | 34,184 |  |  |  | 37,563 |
Taxes (*) |  |  | 2,102 |  |  |  | 2,159 |  |  |  | 3,462 |
Maintenance and repairs |  |  | 10,815 |  |  |  | 16,032 |  |  |  | 14,299 |
Freights |  |  | 35,470 |  |  |  | 31,956 |  |  |  | 24,198 |
Export taxes / selling taxes |  |  | 32,683 |  |  |  | 31,006 |  |  |  | 30,205 |
Fuel and lubricants |  |  | 7,625 |  |  |  | 8,522 |  |  |  | 9,336 |
Lease expense and similar arrangements (**) |  |  | 3,200 |  |  |  | 2,592 |  |  |  | 3,262 |
Others |  |  | 23,248 |  |  |  | 23,854 |  |  |  | 16,049 |
Total expenses by nature |  |  | 605,445 |  |  |  | 544,177 |  |  |  | 460,029 |

(*) | Excludes export taxes and selling taxes.

(**) | Relates to various cancellable operating lease agreements for office and machinery equipment.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, an amount of US$ 263,978 is included as “cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered” (2011: US$ 237,404; 2010: US$ 219,201); an amount of US$ 225,174 is included as “cost of agricultural produce sold and direct agricultural selling expenses” (2011: US$ 182,227; 2010: US$ 131,738); an amount of US$ 57,691 is included in “general and administrative expenses” (2011: US$ 65,142; 2010: US$ 56,562); and an amount of US$ 58,602 is included in “selling expenses” as described above (2011: US$ 59,404; 2010: US$ 52,528).

27. | Salaries and social security expenses

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Wages and salaries |  |  | 43,519 |  |  |  | 40,596 |  |  |  | 40,090 |
Social security costs |  |  | 15,432 |  |  |  | 12,986 |  |  |  | 10,857 |
Equity-settled share-based compensation |  |  | 4,138 |  |  |  | 3,677 |  |  |  | 1,781 |
|  |  | 63,089 |  |  |  | 57,259 |  |  |  | 52,728 |
Number of employees |  |  | 7,051 |  |  |  | 5,560 |  |  |  | 5,263 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 78

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

28. | Other operating income, net

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Gain from the sale of subsidiaries (Note 16) |  |  | 27,513 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Gain from disposal of farmland (Note 16) |  |  | — |  |  |  | 8,832 |  |  |  | 20,837 |
Gain from commodity derivative financial instruments |  |  | 1,821 |  |  |  | 19,664 |  |  |  | 106 |
Loss from onerous contracts - forwards |  |  | (2,302 | ) |  |  | (5,333 | ) |  |  | (3,935 | )
Gain from disposal of other property items |  |  | 882 |  |  |  | 394 |  |  |  | 847 |
Impairment charge (Note 10) |  |  | 1,279 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Others |  |  | 625 |  |  |  | 1,024 |  |  |  | 369 |
|  |  | 29,818 |  |  |  | 24,581 |  |  |  | 18,224 |

29. | Financial results, net

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Finance income: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
- Interest income |  |  | 11,249 |  |  |  | 8,019 |  |  |  | 1,341 |
- Foreign exchange gains, net |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 7,324 |
- Gain from interest rate/foreign exchange rate derivative financial instruments |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 5,018 |
- Other income |  |  | 289 |  |  |  | 1,113 |  |  |  | 2,876 |
Finance income |  |  | 11,538 |  |  |  | 9,132 |  |  |  | 16,559 |
Finance costs: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
- Interest expense |  |  | (27,672 | ) |  |  | (34,017 | ) |  |  | (34,369 | )
- Foreign exchange losses, net |  |  | (26,080 | ) |  |  | (12,683 | ) |  |  | — |
- Taxes |  |  | (4,265 | ) |  |  | (5,273 | ) |  |  | (2,104 | )
- Loss from interest rate/foreign exchange rate derivative financial instruments |  |  | (5,823 | ) |  |  | (2,247 | ) |  |  | — |
- Other expenses |  |  | (2,814 | ) |  |  | (8,121 | ) |  |  | (3,023 | )
Finance costs |  |  | (66,654 | ) |  |  | (62,341 | ) |  |  | (39,496 | )
Total financial results, net |  |  | (55,116 | ) |  |  | (53,209 | ) |  |  | (22,937 | )

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 79

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

30. | Earnings per share

(a) Basic

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to equity holders of the Group by the weighted average number of shares in issue during the period excluding ordinary shares held as treasury shares (Note 16).

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Earnings/(losses) attributable to equity holders of the Group |  |  | 9,397 |  |  |  | 56,018 |  |  |  | (43,904 | )
Weighted average number of shares in issue (thousands) |  |  | 121,365 |  |  |  | 117,028 |  |  |  | 80,000 |
Basic earnings/(losses) per share |  |  | 0.077 |  |  |  | 0.479 |  |  |  | (0.549 | )

(b) Diluted

Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of shares outstanding to assume conversion of all dilutive potential shares. The Group has one category of dilutive potential shares: equity-settled share options. For these instruments, a calculation is done to determine the number of shares that could have been acquired at fair value, based on the monetary value of the subscription rights attached to outstanding share options. The number of shares calculated as above is compared with the number of shares that would have been issued assuming the exercise of the equity-settled share options. As of December 31, 2012, there were 2,528 thousands (2011: 2,038 thousands; 2010: 4,629 thousands) share options outstanding that could potentially have a dilutive impact in the future but were antidilutive for the periods presented.

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Earnings/(losses) attributable to equity holders of the Group |  |  | 9,397 |  |  |  | 56,018 |  |  |  | (43,904 | )
Weighted average number of shares in issue (thousands) |  |  | 121,365 |  |  |  | 117,028 |  |  |  | 80,000 |
Adjustments for: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
- Employee share options and restricted units (thousands) |  |  | 1,104 |  |  |  | 822 |  |  |  | ( | *)
Weighted average number of shares for diluted earnings per share (thousands) |  |  | 122,469 |  |  |  | 117,850 |  |  |  | 80,000 |
Diluted earnings/(losses) per share |  |  | 0.077 |  |  |  | 0.475 |  |  |  | (0.549 | )

(*) | The effects of anti-dilutive potential shares are ignored in the earnings per share calculation at December 31, 2010. All shares are anti-dilutive in a loss period because they would decrease a loss per share.

As explained in Note 17, on January 24, 2011 the Extraordinary General Meeting of Adecoagro’s shareholders held on January 24, 2011 approved the reverse split of Adecoagro’s common shares, changing the nominal value of Adecoagro’s common shares from US$ 1 to US$ 1.5. Accordingly, the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for all periods presented had been adjusted retrospectively.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 80

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

31. | Disclosure of leases and similar arrangements

The Group as lessee

Operating leases:

The Group leases various offices and machinery under cancellable operating lease agreements. An amount of US$ 1.50 million of lease expense was included in “General and administrative expenses” in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2012 (2011: US$ 0.99 million; 2010: US$ 0.63 million). An amount of US$ 1.46 million of lease expense was included in “Cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered” in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2012 (2011: US$ 3.61 million; 2010: US$ 3.54). An amount of US$ 0.20 million of lease expense was included in “Selling expenses” in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2012 (2011: US$ 0.18 million; 2010: US$ 0.25)

The Group leases land for crop cultivation in Argentina. The leases have an average term of a crop year and are renewable at the option of the lessee for additional periods. Under the lease agreements, rent accrues generally at the time of harvest. Rent is payable at several times during the crop year. Lease expense was US$ 17.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 (2011: US$ 10.52 million; 2010: US$ 8.01 million). Lease expense is capitalized as part of biological assets, affecting the periodically re-measurement of the biological assets at fair value. Based on this accounting policy, the line item ‘Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce’ in the consolidated income statement is directly affected by the lease expense that has been capitalized.

The future aggregate minimum lease payments under cancellable operating leases are as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
No later than 1 year |  |  | 8,941 |  |  |  | 6,910 |
Later than 1 year and no later than 5 years |  |  | 6,411 |  |  |  | 3,256 |
Thereafter |  |  | — |  |  |  | 467 |
|  |  | 15,352 |  |  |  | 10,634 |

Agriculture “partnerships” (parceria by its exact term in Portuguese):

The Group enters into contracts with landowners to cultivate sugarcane on their land. These contracts have an average term of 5 years.

Under these contracts, the Group makes payments based on the market value of sugarcane per hectare (in tons) used by the Group in each harvest, with the market value based on the price of sugarcane published by CONSECANA and a fixed amount of total recoverable sugar per ton. Lease expense was US$ 30.35 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 (2011: US$ 17.1 million; 2010: US$ 15.8 million). Lease expense is included in “Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” in the statement of income.

Finance leases:

Most of the leased assets carried in the consolidated statement of financial position as part of a finance lease relate to long-term rental and lease agreements for vehicles, machinery and equipment. The net book value of assets under finance leases amounts to US$ 1,531 and US$ 275 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Information on the breakdown of the present value of finance leases and its components is disclosed in Note 21.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 81

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

31. | Disclosure of leases and similar arrangements (continued)

The Group as lessor

Operating leases:

The Group acts as a lessor in connection with an operating lease related to leased farmland. The lease payments received are recognized in profit or loss. The lease has a term of ten years.

The following amounts have been recognized in the statement of income in the line “Sales of manufactured products and services rendered”:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |
Rental income |  |  | 4,735 |  |  |  | 4,980 |  |  |  | 3,718 |

The future minimum rental payments receivable under cancellable leases are as follows:

|  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
No later than 1 year |  |  | 3,801 |  |  |  | 4,397 |
Later than 1 year and no later than 5 years |  |  | 15,205 |  |  |  | 17,437 |
Thereafter |  |  | 7,286 |  |  |  | 12,714 |
|  |  | 26,292 |  |  |  | 34,548 |

Finance leases:

The Group does not act as a lessor in connection with finance leases.

32. | Business combinations

Acquisitions completed during the year ended December 31, 2011

Acquisition of Compañía Agroforestal Sociedad Anónima (Agroforestal)

On August 18, 2011, the Group acquired 100% of the issued share capital of Agroforestal, an Argentine-based company mainly involved in agricultural and beef cattle industry, for a total consideration of US$ 18.0 million. The acquisition involved an escrow in an amount of US$ 1.5 million, which was retained in escrow by the Group to secure certain obligations of the seller. The escrowed amount is to be released within a three-year period as from the date of acquisition.

In the period from acquisition to December 31, 2011, Agroforestal contributed revenues of US$ 0.5 million and net loss of US$ 0.1 million to the Group’s consolidated results. If Agroforestal had been acquired on January 1, 2011, combined revenues of the Group would have been US$ 4.2 million (unaudited) and Profit Before Income Tax would have been US$ 1.4 million (unaudited) for the year ended December 31, 2011. For purposes of this note the term revenues comprises the line items “sales of manufactured products and services rendered”, “sales of agricultural produce and biological assets”, “initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” and “changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest”. These amounts have been calculated using the Group’s accounting policies and by adjusting the results of the subsidiary to reflect the additional depreciation and amortization, as appropriate, that would have been charged assuming the fair value adjustments to net assets acquired had been applied from January 1, 2011, together with its consequential tax effects.

Results, assets and liabilities of Agroforestal as from the acquisition date are included within the ‘Crops’ and ‘Cattle’ segments.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 82

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

32. | Business combinations (continued)

Details of the net assets acquired and goodwill are as follows:

Purchase consideration: |  |  |  |
Cash paid |  |  | 1,350 |
Present value of seller financing (*) |  |  | 15,056 |
Escrow (*) |  |  | 1,379 |
Total purchase consideration |  |  | 17,785 |
Fair value of net assets acquired |  |  | 14,049 |
Goodwill |  |  | 3,736 |

(*) | Discounted at present value as of the date of acquisition.

The goodwill generated on the acquisition was attributable mainly to the Group’s expected benefits from diversification and expansion into high-yield potential farmland properties.

The assets and liabilities at the date of acquisition are as follows:

|  | Fair value |
Cash and cash equivalents |  |  | 76 |
Property, plant and equipment |  |  | 15,291 |
Investment property |  |  | 3,709 |
Biological assets |  |  | 1,495 |
Deferred tax liabilities |  |  | (6,858 | )
Provisions for other liabilities |  |  | (39 | )
Other current assets |  |  | 1,219 |
Other current liabilities |  |  | (844 | )
Net assets acquired |  |  | 14,049 |

The outflow of cash and cash equivalents on the acquisition can be calculated as follows:

Cash paid |  |  | 1,350 |
Cash and cash equivalents in subsidiary acquired |  |  | (76 | )
Cash outflow on acquisition |  |  | 1,274 |

Acquisition of Simoneta Sociedad Anónima (Simoneta)

On August 19, 2011, the Group acquired 100% of the issued share capital of Simoneta, an Argentine-based company mainly involved in agricultural industry, for a total consideration of US$ 26.4 million. The acquisition also involved contingent consideration to the seller in an amount of US$ 1.0 million, which was retained in escrow by the Group to secure certain obligations of the seller. The escrowed amount is to be released within a three-year period as from the date of acquisition.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 83

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

32. | Business combinations (continued)

In the period from acquisition to December 31, 2011, Simoneta contributed revenues of US$ 1 million and net loss of US$ 0.1 million to the Group’s consolidated results. If Simoneta had been acquired on January 1, 2011, combined revenues of the Group would have been US$ 6 million (unaudited) and Profit Before Income Tax would have been US$ 3 million (unaudited) for the year ended December 31, 2011. For purposes of this note the term revenues comprises the line items “sales of manufactured products and services rendered”, “sales of agricultural produce and biological assets”, “initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce” and “changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest”. These amounts have been calculated using the Group’s accounting policies and by adjusting the results of the subsidiary to reflect the additional depreciation and amortization, as appropriate, that would have been charged assuming the fair value adjustments to net assets acquired had been applied from January 1, 2011, together with its consequential tax effects. Results, assets and liabilities of Simoneta as from the acquisition date are included within the ‘Crops’ segment.

Details of the net assets acquired and goodwill are as follows:

Purchase consideration: |  |  |  |
Cash paid |  |  | 11,000 |
Present value of seller financing (*) |  |  | 14,124 |
Escrow (*) |  |  | 923 |
Total purchase consideration |  |  | 26,047 |
Fair value of net assets acquired |  |  | 18,644 |
Goodwill |  |  | 7,403 |

(*) | Discounted at present value as of the date of acquisition.

The goodwill generated on the acquisition was attributable mainly to the Group’s expected benefits from diversification and expansion into high-yield potential farmland properties.

The assets and liabilities at the date of acquisition are as follows:

|  | Fair value |
Cash and cash equivalents |  |  | 657 |
Property, plant and equipment |  |  | 15,701 |
Investment property |  |  | 5,961 |
Deferred tax liabilities |  |  | (7,705 | )
Provisions for other liabilities |  |  | (116 | )
Other current and non current assets |  |  | 5,385 |
Other current liabilities |  |  | (1,239 | )
Net assets acquired |  |  | 18,644 |

The outflow of cash and cash equivalents on the acquisition can be calculated as follows:

Cash paid |  |  | 11,000 |
Cash and cash equivalents in subsidiary acquired |  |  | (657 | )
Cash outflow on acquisition |  |  | 10,343 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 84

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

33. | Group companies

The following table details the companies making up the Group as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

|  |  |  |  |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
|  | Activities |  |  | Country of incorporation and operation |  | Ownership percentage held if not 100% |  |  | Ownership percentage held if not 100% |
Details of principal subsidiary undertakings: Operating companies (unless otherwise stated): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Adeco Agropecuaria S.A. |  |  |  | (a) |  | Argentina |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Pilagá S.A. |  |  |  | (a) |  | Argentina |  |  | 99.84 | % |  |  | 99.84 | %
Cavok S.A. |  |  |  | (a) |  | Argentina |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Establecimientos El Orden S.A. |  |  |  | (a) |  | Argentina |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Bañado del Salado S.A. |  |  |  | (a) |  | Argentina |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Agrícola Ganadera San José S.A. |  |  |  | (a) |  | Argentina |  |  |  | (v) |  |  |  | (v)
Agro Invest S.A. |  |  |  | (a) |  | Argentina |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Forsalta S.A. |  |  |  | (a) |  | Argentina |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Dinaluca S.A. |  |  |  | (a) |  | Argentina |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Simoneta S.A. |  |  |  | (a) |  | Argentina |  |  |  | (iii) |  |  |  | (ii)
Compañía Agroforestal S.A. |  |  |  | (a) |  | Argentina |  |  |  | (iii) |  |  |  | (ii)
Adeco Agropecuaria Brazil S.A. |  |  |  | (b) |  | Brazil |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Adecoagro Comercio Exportação e importação Ltda (f.k.a. Alfenas Café Ltda). |  |  |  | (c) |  | Brazil |  |  |  | (ii) |  |  |  | (i)
Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema Ltda. |  |  |  | (b) |  | Brazil |  |  |  | (iv) |  |  |  | (iv)
Angélica Agroenergia Ltda. |  |  |  | (b) |  | Brazil |  |  |  | (iv) |  |  |  | (iii)
Usina Monte Alegre Ltda. |  |  |  | (b) |  | Brazil |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Fazenda Mimoso Ltda. |  |  |  | (c) |  | Brazil |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Ivinhema Agronergia S.A. (f.k.a. Amandina Agroenergía Ltda.) |  |  |  | (b) |  | Brazil |  |  |  | (iv) |  |  |  | (iii)
Kelizer S.A. |  |  |  | (a) |  | Uruguay |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Adecoagro Uruguay S.A. |  |  |  | (a) |  | Uruguay |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Holdings companies: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Adeco Brazil Participacoes S.A. |  |  | — |  |  | Brazil |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
International Farmland Holdings LP |  |  | — |  |  | United States |  |  | 99.99 | % |  |  | 98.64 | %
Adecoagro LP |  |  | — |  |  | United States |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Ladelux S.C.A. |  |  | — |  |  | Uruguay |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Kadesh Hispania S.L. |  |  | — |  |  | Spain |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Leterton España S.L. |  |  | — |  |  | Spain |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Ona Ltd. |  |  | — |  |  | Malta |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Toba Ltd. |  |  | — |  |  | Malta |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Details of principal associates: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Santa Regina Agropecuaria S.A. |  |  |  | (a) |  | Argentina |  |  | 49.00 | % |  |  |  | (iv)
Details of principal joint venture undertakings: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Grupo La Lácteo |  |  |  | (d) |  | Canada |  |  | 50.00 | % |  |  | 50.00 | %

(a) | Mainly crops, rice, cattle and others

(b) | Mainly sugarcane, ethanol and energy

(c) | Mainly coffee

(d) | Mainly dairy

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 85

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

33. | Group companies (continued)

(i) | Merged with Usina Monte Alegre Ltda

(ii) | Acquired in August 2011 (Note 32)

(iii) | Angélica Agroenergia Ltda. merged with Ivinhema Agronergia S.A. (f.k.a. Amandina Agroenergía Ltda.). Its new name is Adecoagro Vale do Ivinhema Ltda.

(iv) | On December 27, 2012, the Group completed the sale of 51% of the its wholly owned subsidiary Santa Regina Agropecuaria S.A (see Note 16). Until that day the Group owed 100% of this Company

(v) | In June 2012, the Group completed the sale of Agricula Ganadera San José, (see Note 16.)

The percentage voting right for each principal subsidiary is the same as the percentage of capital stock held. Issued share capital represents only ordinary shares/ quotas, units or their equivalent. There are no preference shares or units issued in any subsidiary undertaking.

34. | Related-party transactions

The following is a summary of the balances and transactions with related parties:

Related party |  | Relationship |  |  | Description of transaction |  | Income (loss) included in the statement of income |  |  | Balance receivable (payable)/(equity) |
|  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Grupo La Lácteo |  |  | Joint venture |  |  | Sales of goods |  |  | 8,231 |  |  |  | 16,459 |  |  |  | 13,397 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
|  |  |  |  |  | Purchases of goods |  |  | 53 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
|  |  |  |  |  | Receivables from related parties (Note 13) |  |  |  |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 2,253 |  |  |  | 4,909 |
|  |  |  |  |  | Interest income |  |  | 377 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Santa Regina Agropecuaria S.A. |  |  | Investment |  |  | Receivables from related parties |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 144 |  |  |  | — |
Mario Jorge de Lemos Vieira/ Cia Agropecuaria Monte Alegre/ Alfenas Agricola Ltda/ Marcelo Weyland Barbosa Vieira/ Paulo Albert Weyland Vieira |  |  |  | (i) |  | Cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered (ii) |  |  | (4,215 | ) |  |  | (3,136 | ) |  |  | (3,334 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
|  |  |  |  | Receivables from related parties (Note 13) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
|  |  |  |  | Payables (Note 20) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (562 | ) |  |  | (318 | )
UMA members |  |  |  | (i) |  | Tax charge |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 4,138 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Ospraie |  |  |  | (i) |  | Consent fee (iii) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (3,000 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Directors and senior management |  |  | Employment |  |  | Compensation selected employess |  |  | (7,367 | ) |  |  | (6,594 | ) |  |  | (6,593 | ) |  |  | (18,072 | ) |  |  | (15,408 | )

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 86

##### Table of Contents

Adecoagro S.A.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(All amounts in US$ thousands, except shares and per share data and as otherwise indicated)

34. | Related-party transactions (continued)

(i) | Shareholders of the Company.

(ii) | Relates to agriculture partnership agreements (“parceria”).

(iii) | One-time cost related to the agreement entered into with Ospraie to waive certain rights following the completion of initial public offering.

Ospraie Consent Agreement

On December 14, 2010, the Group entered into a consent agreement with Ospraie Special Opportunities Master Holdings Ltd, or Ospraie, one of the Groups shareholders, pursuant to which the Company should pay to Ospraie an aggregate amount of US$ 3 million, subject to certain conditions, promptly following the completion of the initial public offering in consideration for their agreement to waive certain of their rights under the Groups’ shareholders agreement, which terminates upon the initial public offering. The payment was made in February 2011.

35. | Subsequent events

On February 26, 2013, Adecoagro formed CHS AGRO, a joint venture together with CHS Inc., a leading farmer-owned energy, grains and foods company based in the United States. CHS AGRO will build a sunflower processing facility located in the county of Pehuajo, Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

In February 2013, Adecoagro completed an underwritten secondary offering of approximately 15.9 million common shares at a price per share of US$ 8.00. HBK Master Fund LP was the sole selling shareholder. The shares were acquired by a combination of new institutional investors and existing shareholders. Adecoagro did not issue any further shares and/or receive any proceeds as a consequence of this transaction.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 87