6-K 1 t1601273_6k.htm FORM 6-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 6-K

Report of Foreign Private Issuer

Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16

under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the month of May, 2016

Commission File Number 001-35052

Adecoagro S.A.

(Translation of registrant’s name into English)

Vertigo Naos Building 6,
Rue Eugene Ruppert,
L-2453, Luxembourg
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
(Address of principal executive office)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F x Form 40-F ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes ¨ No x

If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-

ANNOUNCEMENT OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2016

On May 12, 2016, the registrant issued a press release pertaining to its results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2016 (the “Release”). Registrant hereby furnishes the attached copy of the Release to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial and operational information contained in the Release is based on audited consolidated financial statements presented in U.S. dollars and prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards.

The attachment contains forward-looking statements. The registrant desires to qualify for the “safe-harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and consequently is hereby including cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause the registrant’s actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the attachment.

The registrant’s forward-looking statements are based on the registrant’s current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about the registrant and its industry. These forward-looking statements can be identified by words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “is/are likely to,” “may,” “plan,” “should,” “would,” or other similar expressions.

The forward-looking statements included in the attached relate to, among others: (i) the registrant’s business prospects and future results of operations; (ii) weather and other natural phenomena; (iii) developments in, or changes to, the laws, regulations and governmental policies governing the registrant’s business, including limitations on ownership of farmland by foreign entities in certain jurisdictions in which the registrant operate, environmental laws and regulations; (iv) the implementation of the registrant’s business strategy, including its development of the Ivinhema mill and other current projects; (v) the registrant’s plans relating to acquisitions, joint ventures, strategic alliances or divestitures; (vi) the implementation of the registrant’s financing strategy and capital expenditure plan; (vii) the maintenance of the registrant’s relationships with customers; (viii) the competitive nature of the industries in which the registrant operates; (ix) the cost and availability of financing; (x) future demand for the commodities the registrant produces; (xi) international prices for commodities; (xii) the condition of the registrant’s land holdings; (xiii) the development of the logistics and infrastructure for transportation of the registrant’s products in the countries where it operates; (xiv) the performance of the South American and world economies; and (xv) the relative value of the Brazilian Real, the Argentine Peso, and the Uruguayan Peso compared to other currencies; as well as other risks included in the registrant’s other filings and submissions with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

These forward-looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties. Although the registrant believes that its expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, its expectations may turn out to be incorrect. The registrant’s actual results could be materially different from its expectations. In light of the risks and uncertainties described above, the estimates and forward-looking statements discussed in the attached might not occur, and the registrant’s future results and its performance may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements due to, inclusive, but not limited to, the factors mentioned above. Because of these uncertainties, you should not make any investment decision based on these estimates and forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements made in the attached relate only to events or information as of the date on which the statements are made in the attached. The registrant undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

| 2 |

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

| Adecoagro S.A.
| By | /s/ Carlos A. Boero Hughes
| Name: | Carlos A. Boero Hughes
| Title: | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
Date: May 12, 2016 |  |

1Q16 1Q16 Earnings Release Conference Call English Conference Call May 13, 2016 9 a.m. (US EST) 10 a.m. Buenos Aires time 10 a.m. São Paulo time 3 p.m. Luxembourg time Tel: +1 (844) 836-8746 Participants calling from the US Tel: +1 (412) 317-2501 Participants calling from other countries Access Code: Adecoagro Investor Relations Charlie Boero Hughes CFO Hernan Walker IR Manager Email ir@adecoagro.com Website www.adecoagro.com Adecoagro recorded 1Q16 Adjusted EBITDA of $43.2 million, 113% higher year-over-year, and EBITDA margin of 37% Luxembourg, May 12, 2016 –Adecoagro S.A. (NYSE: AGRO, Bloomberg: AGRO US, Reuters: AGRO.K), one of the leading agricultural companies in South America, announced today its results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2016. The financial and operational information contained in this press release is based on the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements presented in US dollars and prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Highlights Financial & Operating Performance (1) $ thousands 1Q16 1Q15 (1) Chg % Gross Sales 121,484 114,218 6.4% Net Sales (2) 117,229 109,385 7.2% Adjusted EBITDA (3) Farming & Land Transformation 26,204 23,091 13.5% Sugar, Ethanol & Energy 22,088 2,392 823.4% Corporate Expenses (5,079) (5,197) (2.3%) Total Adjusted EBITDA 43,213 20,286 113.0% Adjusted EBITDA Margin (3) 36.9% 18.5% 98.8% Net Income 2,752 (5,574) n.a Farming Planted Area (Hectares) 210,788 224,362 (6.0%) Sugarcane Plantation Area (Hectares) 130,637 126,866 3.0% Adecoagro recorded Adjusted EBITDA(3) of $43.2 million in 1Q16, representing a 113.0% increase compared to 1Q15. Adjusted EBITDA margin(3) during 1Q16 reached 36.9% in 1Q16, compared to 18.5% in 1Q15. Net income for 1Q16 stands at $2.8 million, $8.3 million higher than 1Q15. (1) We have reclassified our long term biological assets (bearer plants) to Property, Plant and Equipment, pursuant to our adoption of amended IAS 41 and have revised comparative figures for 2015 accordingly. Please see “Changes to Biological Asset Accounting” (2) Net Sales are equal to Gross Sales minus sales taxes related to sugar, ethanol and energy. (3) Please see “Reconciliation-IFRSmeasures”ofpageNonstarting24forreconciliationof Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT to Profit/Loss. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as consolidated profit from operations before financing and taxation, depreciation, and amortization plus the gains or losses from disposals of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries. Adjusted EBIT is defined as consolidated profit from operations before financing and taxation plus the gains or losses from disposals of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries. Adjusted EBITDA margin and Adjusted EBIT margin are calculated as a percentage of net sales.

1Q16 Financial & Operational Performance Highlights Adjusted EBITDA in our Farming and Land Transformation businesses’ in 1Q16 was $26.2 million 13.5% higher than 1Q15. This increase is primarily explained by: (i) a $9.9 million increase in margins from our Crops segment as a result of higher corn and wheat prices in the local market. Local prices were driven by the elimination of export taxes and export quotas; coupled with lower costs in dollars resulting from the devaluation of the Argentine peso and lower input prices for seeds, fertilizers and agrochemicals; (ii) a 44.5% increase in margins in the Rice segment as a result of higher rice yields and lower costs in dollar terms due to operational efficiencies and peso devaluation. Results were partially offset by: (iii) lower soybean, white rice and dairy prices; and (iv) a $9.9 million lower gain from our commodity hedge position. In our Sugar, Ethanol & Energy business, Adjusted EBITDA in 1Q16 reached $22.1 million, $19.7 million higher than 1Q15. Adjusted EBITDA margin grew from 4.7% in 1Q15 to 31.9% in the current quarter. Results were driven by strong operational and financial performance, including: (i) the implementation and execution of a “continuous harvest” p company to harvest and crush sugarcane year-round (see Strategy Execution in page 3). As a result, during 1Q16 we crushed 1.5 million tons, 226.9% higher year-over-year, and produced 166.4 thousand tons of sugar and ethanol measured in TRS equivalent, 223.2% higher than 1Q15; (ii) strong production volumes coupled with higher ethanol prices in both BRL and USD have resulted in a 36.7% growth in net sales; and (iii) a 15.7% reduction in unit costs as a result of fixed cost dilution due to volume growth, coupled with the devaluation of the Brazilian Real. These positive effects were partially offset by an $11.5 million decrease in hedging results (a $0.5 million gain in 1Q16 compared to a $12.2 million gain in 1Q15). Net Income in 1Q16 was $2.8 million, $8.3 million higher than in 1Q15. Net income during the quarter was enhanced by Adjusted EBITDA in both the Farming and Sugar, Ethanol & Energy businesses; and was partially offset by a $7.2 million increase in depreciation expenses resulting from the capital expenditures deployed during 2015 for the completion of the construction of the Ivinhema mill. Market Overview Grain prices during most of 1Q16 showed very low volatility amidst a gradual decline in prices. However, since early April grain prices have rallied over potential downside risks to South America’s forecasts. The rally was further enhanced by macro drivers including the weakening of the US dollar, increasing crude oil prices and growth of the Chinese economy. Soybean and corn prices have increased 22% and 16% since early April, respectively. Sugar prices began the year at around 15.0 cents/lb, decreased to 12.50 cents/lb by mid-February and then rebounded to above 16.50 cents/lb by the end of March, the highest price level since October 2014. Despite an early start of the crop and ideal weather for cane crushing in Brazil, crops in other producing areas like India and Thailand were damaged by last year’s severe drought. Consequently, the supply & demand deficit is expected to be larger than forecasted. As a result, funds have begun to build up large long positions once again pushing prices to the highest level in over 18-months. Ethanol prices during 1Q16 reached their highest levels of the 2015/16 crop, driven by a tight supply and demand balance in Brazil and the imminent end of the harvest season. As reported by UNICA, from April 2015 to March 2016 ethanol sales grew by 16%, while production only increased by 8%. As a result, ethanol prices continued to rally during 1Q16. According to the “Escola Superior de A Queiroz”(Esalq) price index, hydrous and anhydrous prices increased respectively by 15% and 11% quarter-over-quarter and by 43% and 44% year-over-year, in BRL.

1Q16 Strategy Execution Implementation of a “Continuous Harvest” in our The first three months of the year in the Sugar, Ethanol & Energy business in Brazil are commonly known as the inter-harvest season. Warm and humid weather during January through March stimulate sugarcane plant growth causing energy to be used by the plant rather than being stored in the form of sugar (TRS). As a result, mills in the traditional sugarcane regions such as Sao Paulo suspend their harvesting and crushing activities until the end of the wet season, at which point sugarcane plants stop growing and begin to concentrate sugar (TRS). Harvesting and milling volumes peak during the dry season, when sugar content (TRS) reaches its highest level. Mills generally utilize the first quarter to perform maintenance of equipment and machinery in preparation for the upcoming harvest year. In Mato Grosso do Sul, where our cluster is located, the weather pattern is less seasonal than in Sao Paulo. Our wet season is dryer and our dry season is more humid than traditional sugarcane regions. As a consequence of this weather pattern, the sugar content (TRS) gap between the beginning and the end of the year compared to the peak of the harvest is much smaller than in Sao Paulo. This allows us to grow and harvest sugarcane year round with a minimal impact on sugar content (TRS). Since the beginning of the 2016/17 harvest year we implemented a “non-stop” or “continuous harvest This means that we will harvest and crush sugarcane year-round, without stopping during the traditional off-season. This new strategy will allow us to increase annual sugarcane milling and sugar, ethanol and energy production by approximately 10%. Another benefit of the system is that we will be producing ethanol in the off-season, when market prices usually have a high premium to prices at harvest. In addition, cogeneration efficiency is related to harvested volumes and unrelated to TRS, enabling us to utilize our cogeneration potential during the whole year. Considering that approximately 85% of total costs are fixed, this model will result not only in higher revenues but also in the dilution of our fixed costs. The investments required for implementing the “continuous harvest”and o land leasing expenses for expanding our plantation. These costs in Mato Grosso do Sul are highly competitive due to low competition for land from other mills. No investments in industrial assets or machinery were required. Maintenance of our industrial equipment and agricultural machinery will be performed throughout the year during rainy days, when milling is forced to stop due to unfeasibility of harvesting. The “continuouspartof ourharvest”strategyofincreasingis our overall productivity and enhancing our return on invested capital. We believe this model will allow us to remain one of the lowest-cost producers of sugar, ethanol and energy in Brazil. The implementation and execution of this model was only possible after reaching high operating efficiency standards and strong coordination between our agricultural and industrial teams. Changes to Biological Asset Accounting –Bearer Plants In June 2014, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) amended IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment and IAS 41 Agriculture, distinguishing bearer plants from other biological assets. Bearer plants are solely used to grow produce over several periods and are considered to be similar to an item of machinery. The IASB has determined that bearer plants should be accounted for in the same way as property, plant and equipment. They will therefore now be accounted for under IAS 16. The produce growing on bearer plants will continue to be measured at fair value less cost to sell (IAS 41). Under this new standard, Adecoagro’s sugarcane plantations agricultural produce in the following way: (i) the sugarcane roots, which will grow produce over multiple

1Q16 harvests and will be classified as property, plant and equipment and measured at amortized cost and depreciated over their useful lives; (ii) the sugarcane currently growing on the field, which will be cut during the next harvest, will be treated as agricultural produce and will be measured at fair value less selling costs. We are reporting 1Q16 financials statements under the new standard and have revised comparable 1Q15 figures accordingly. We have also adjusted the definition of our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT by no longer removing the impact of unrealized changes in the fair value of long term biological assets on earnings, which following the adoption of the new amended IAS 41 includes only the fair value of the sugarcane growing on the field which will be harvested over the next twelve months. Farming & Land Transformation Business Operational Performance 2015/16 Harvest Year Farming Production Data Planting & Production Planted Area (hectares) 2015/16 Harvested Area Yields (Tons per hectare) (3) 2015/16 2014/15 Chg % Hectares % Harvested Production 2015/16 2014/15 Chg % Soybean 59,460 63,944 (7.0%) 8,340 14.0% 25,256 3.0 3.2 (5.8%) Soybean 2nd Crop 28,950 32,532 (11.0%) 512 1.8% 1,093 2.1 2.5 (13.6%) Corn (1) 38,874 32,461 20% 6,016 15.5% 33,906 5.6 6.3 (9.8%) Corn 2nd Crop 3,994 7,583 (47.3%) - - - - 3.9 - Wheat (2) 32,396 37,020 (12.5%) 32,396 100.0% 82,167 2.5 2.3 11.0% Sunflower 9,549 12,314 (22.5%) 8,907 93.3% 14,023 1.6 1.8 (10.9%) Cotton - 3,160 n.a - - - - 0.7 - Total Crops 173,223 189,014 (8.4%) 56,171 32.4% 156,445 Rice 37,565 35,328 6.3% 37,322 99.4% 221,369 5.9 5.1 16.3% Total Farming 210,788 224,343 (6.0%) 93,492 44.4% 377,814 Owned Croppable Area 120,195 124,172 (3.2%) 76,752 63.9% Leased Area 57,650 60,056 (4.0%) 16,228 28.2% Second Crop Area 32,944 40,115 (17.9%) 512 1.6% Total Farming Area 210,788 224,343 (6.0%) 93,492 44.4% - Milking Cows (Average Heads) Milk Production (MM liters)(1) Productivity (Liters per cow per day) Dairy 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Milk Production 6,746 6,544 3.1% 21.5 20.3 5.9% 35.0 34.0 2.7% As of January 31, 2015, Adecoagro’s planting2015/16 activitiesharvestyearwerecompletedfor. Ourthe total planted area reached 210,788 hectares, 6.0% below the previous harvest year. Adec croppable area, which is the area that provides the highest EBITDA contribution, has decreased by 3.2% as a result of the farms sold in 2015. Leased area, which is an opportunistic business driven by return on invested capital, has decreased by 4.0%. Double crop area, (wheat followed by a soy 2nd crop) decreased by 17.9%, as a result of a combination of crop rotation and abundant rainfalls in certain regions that did not allow us to plant a soybean 2nd crop.

1Q16 As of the end of April 2016, harvest operations for most of our crops are well underway, with 44.4% of total planted area already harvested. However, since mid-April, the harvest of soybean in the northern parts of Argentina has been delayed by excess rains, with a high risk for crop damage and losses. Soybean: As of the end of April 2016, we harvested 14.0% of the soybean crop. In the Humid Pampas region, the crop development evolved above average as a result of abundant rains during the season. The crop is now being harvested and achieving good yields. In the northern parts of Argentina, despite good crop growth, abundant and consistent rains have generated significant delays in the pace of harvest. Grain quality is also suffering damage from high humidity and high temperatures. We have recommenced harvest activities during the last week of April. It is still early to assess the magnitude of the losses in the north as well as how much will be compensated by the large crop being harvested in the south. Soybean 2nd crop: The harvest of second crop soybean started during mid-April 2016 with some delays in the north of Argentina, but the bulk of the harvest is scheduled for mid-May. Corn: As of the end of April 2016, the harvested area for early corn totaled 6,016 hectares or 15.5% of the total planted area. Seeking to diversify our crop risk and manage water requirements, approximately 24% of the corn was planted early in September and 76% was planted late during the end of November and December 2015. During the 2015/16 harvest year, different from last harvest year, we planted early corn both in the south and in the north of Argentina. As of date of this report, the bulk of the harvested early corn came from the fields in the north of Argentina, where yields are usually lower. This explains the 9.8% decrease in yields. We expect yields to increase as we continue to harvest the more productive farms in the south. The late corn areas have received an adequate amount of rainfall allowing the crop to develop above expectations. In aggregate, we expect corn yields to be above the previous harvest year, which shows the benefits of the early-late balance in our corn planting strategy. Wheat: As of December 31, 2015, the harvest of wheat was completed with 32,396 hectares harvested. Average yield for the wheat crop was 2.5 tons per hectare, 11.0% higher than the previous harvest year. Planting for the 2016/17 harvest year will begin in May 2016 favored by abundant rainfalls from January to April 2015, which have filled the water table. Sunflower: The harvest of the sunflower crop began in late December 2015. As of the end of April 2016, 93.3% of sunflower had been harvested yielding an average of 1.6 per hectare, in line with the 2014/15 season. Rice: As of the end of March 2016, the rice harvest was essentially complete, reaching 99.4% of total planted area. Harvested yields reached 5.9 tons per hectare, 16.3% above the previous harvest year. Supply of water in dams and rivers was sufficient to flood the rice fields throughout the crop's cycle. We expect yields to improve in the upcoming harvest years as we continue with the transformation process and zero-leveling of our rice farms—precise leveling of the land based on GPS and Laser technology, resulting in reduced water irrigation requirements, and lower costs of labor and energy.

1Q16 Farming & Land Transformation Financial Performance Farming & Land transformation business - Financial highlights $ thousands 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Gross Sales Farming 47,933 58,687 (18.3%) Total Sales 47,933 58,687 (18.3%) Adjusted EBITDA (1) Farming 26,204 23,091 13.5% Land Transformation - - - Total Adjusted EBITDA (1) 26,204 23,091 13.5% Adjusted EBIT (1) Farming 25,030 21,345 17.3% Land Transformation - - - Total Adjusted EBIT (2) 25,030 21,345 17.3% Adjusted EBIT Margin 52.2% 36.4% Adjusted EBIT(2) for the Farming and Land Transformation businesses was $25.0 million in 1Q16, $3.7 million higher compared to 1Q16. This 17.3% increase is primarily the result of (i) a $9.9 million higher margin in the Crops segment mainly explained by higher corn prices due to the elimination of export taxes and export quotas in Argentina, and lower production and SG&A costs in dollars resulting from the devaluation of the Argentine peso and lower input prices (seeds, fertilizers and agrochemicals); (ii) a 44% increase in margins in the Rice segment as a result of higher yields and cost dilution. Results were partially offset by: (iii) a $1.1 million lower margin in our Dairy segment mainly explained by lower selling prices; (iv) a $9.9 million lower gain from commodity hedges; and (v) lower realized soybean, wheat, milk and rice international prices. (1) Please see “Reconciliation-IFRSmeasures”ofpageNonstarting24forreconciliationonof Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT to Profit/Loss. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as consolidated profit from operations before financing and taxation, depreciation and amortization plus the gains or losses from disposals of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries. Adjusted EBIT is defined as consolidated profit from operations before financing and taxation plus the gains or losses from disposals of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries. Adjusted EBITDA margin and Adjusted EBIT margin are calculated as a percentage of net sales. (2) Adecoagro uses the Adjusted EBIT performance measure rather than Adjusted EBITDA to compare its different farming business. We note that different farming businesses or production models may have more or less depreciation or amortization based on the ownership of fixed assets employed in production. Consequently similar types of costs may be expensed or capitalized. For example, Adecoagro’s farming whereinbusinessAdecoagro hiresin planting,Argentinaharvestingand is ba spraying services from specialized third party machine operators. This model minimizes the ownership of fixed assets, thus, reducing depreciation and amortization. On the other hand, operating fees are expensed increasing production costs. The Adjusted EBIT performance measure controls for such differences in business models and we believe is a more appropriate metric to compare the performance of the company relative to its peers.

1Q16 Crops Segment Crops - Highlights metric 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Gross Sales $ thousands 21,949 21,829 0.5% thousand tons 104.5 86.7 20.6% $ per ton 210.0 251.8 (16.6%) Adjusted EBITDA $ thousands 16,975 15,291 11.0% Adjusted EBIT $ thousands 16,652 14,798 12.5% Planted Area (1) hectares 140,279 148,915 (5.8%) (1) Does not include second crop planted area. Adjusted EBIT in our Crops segment increased to $16.7 million in 1Q16 from $14.8 million in 1Q15. The 12.5% increase is primarily explained by (i) a $18.7 million gain in Changes in Fair Value of Biological Assets and Agricultural Produce, which reflects the margins recognized throughout the biological growth cycle and harvest of our crops related to the 2015/16 harvest year, contrasted to a $8.8 million gain during 1Q15 related to the 2014/15 harvest. This 111.5% increase in margins is mainly explained by (i) lower production and SG&A costs due to the devaluation of the Argentine peso as well as lower prices for agrochemicals, seeds and fertilizers; and (ii) higher corn prices resulting from the elimination of export taxes and export quotas. These effects were partially offset by (iii) lower soybean, wheat and sunflower prices; and (iv) lower results generated from our commodity hedge position (a $9.4 million gain in 1Q15 compared to a $0.5 million loss in 1Q16 generated by our commodity hedge position as of March 31, 2016. Crops - Changes in Fair Value Breakdown 1Q16 metric Soy Soy 2nd Corn Corn 2nd Wheat Sunflower Total Crop Crop 2015/16 Harvest Year Total planted Area Plan Hectares 59,526 30,275 37,853 3,992 31,543 9,548 172,737 Planted area in initial growing stages Hectares - - - - - - Planted area with significant biological growth Hectares 51,692 29,641 31,833 3,992 - 642 117,800 Changes in Fair Value in 1Q16 from planted area $ thousands 3,415 2,725 6,176 468 - 12,784 2015/2016 with significant biological growth (i) Area harvested in previous period Hectares - - - - 27,773 3,626 31,399 Area harvested in current periods Hectares 7,834 634 6,020 - 3,770 5,280 23,538 Changes in Fair Value in 1Q16 from harvested area $ thousands 591 301 1,023 108 131 1,102 3,256 2015/16 (ii) Total Changes in Fair Value in 1Q16 (i+ii) $ thousands 4,006 3,026 7,199 576 131 1,102 16,040 The table above shows the gains or losses from crop production generated during 1Q16. A total of 172,737 hectares were planted in the 2015/16 crop. As of March 31, 2016, 117,800 hectares had attained significant biological growth generating Changes in Fair Value of biological assets of $12.8 million, as opposed to $6.1 million during 1Q15. As explained above, the main explanation for higher margins is lower costs driven by the devaluation of the Argentine peso and higher corn prices in the local market driven by the elimination of export taxes and quotas. Harvesting operations for our 2015/16 crops are well underway favored by above average weather conditions. As we complete the harvest we expect to see improvement in yields in most of our crops. A total of 23,538 hectares of soybean, corn, wheat and sunflower were harvested during 1Q16, generating Changes in Fair Value of agricultural produce of $3.3 million compared to $2.9 million in 1Q15, explained by the same reasons above.

1Q16 As a result of these two effects, Total Changes in Fair Value in 1Q16 reached $16.0 million, compared to $9.0 million in 1Q15. Crops - Gross Sales Breakdown Amount ($ '000) Volume $ per unit Crop 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Soybean 6,208 5,217 19.0% 25,739 17,488 47.2% 241 298 (19.1%) Corn (1) 7,217 3,885 85.8% 42,086 27,477 53.2% 171 141 21.3% Wheat (2) 3,990 6,861 (41.8%) 25,969 30,629 (15.2%) 154 224 (31.4%) Sunflower 3,104 4,637 (33.1%) 10,005 10,514 (4.8%) 310 441 (29.7%) Cotton Lint 835 713 17.1% 715 588 21.5% 1,168 1,212 (3.6%) Others 595 252 136.2% - - - - - - Total 21,949 21,829 0.5% 104,515 86,697 20.6% (1) Includes sorghum (2) Includes barley Note: Prices per unit are a result of the averaging of different local market prices such as FAS Rosario (Arg), FOB Nueva Palmira (Uru) and FOT Luis Eduardo Magalhaes (BR) Sales in 1Q16 were relatively in line with 1Q15 primarily driven by higher physical sales volumes of soybean, wheat, sunflower and cotton and offset by lower corn volumes, and lower prices for all grains except corn. Higher sales volumes are primarily explained by higher soybean and corn inventories at beginning of the year and a faster selling pace for the new crop. Rice Segment Rice - Highlights metric 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Gross Sales $ thousands 20,549 28,488 (27.9%) $ thousands 19,329 26,317 (26.6%) Gross Sales of White Rice thousand tons (1) 74.1 76.2 (2.7%) $ per ton 261 345 (24.5%) Gross Sales of By-products $ thousands 1,220 2,171 (43.8%) Adjusted EBITDA $ thousands 8,578 5,935 44.5% Adjusted EBIT $ thousands 8,023 5,140 56.1% Area under production (2) hectares 39,600 37,565 Rice Mills Total Rice Produced thousand tons (1) 39.9 52.6 (24.1%) Ending stock thousand tons (1) 232.9 135.0 72.6% (1) Of rough rice equivalent. Financial performance of our Rice segment during 1Q16 is primarily explained by the harvest of the 2015/16 rice crop and to a lesser extent by the sales of processed rice and by-products. In our farm operations we successfully harvested 35,328 hectares of rice with an average yield of 5.9 tons/ha, 16.3% higher compared to the 2014/15 harvest. The rice harvest resulted in Changes in Fair Value of $8.5 million compared to $4.7 million last season. The 80% increase in rice farming margins is explained

1Q16 by the increase in productivity coupled with lower costs in dollar terms, resulting from the devaluation of the Argentine peso and the investment made over the last three in transforming our rice plots to zero-level. In terms of sales of processed rice, we sold 74.1 thousand tons of white rice in 1Q16, 2.7% lower year-over-year. Overall, gross sales reached $20.5 million, 27.9% lower than 1Q15, primarily as a result of the 24.5% decrease in selling prices, measured in USD. Dairy Segment Dairy - Highlights metric 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Gross Sales $ thousands (1) 5,169 8,060 (35.9%) million liters (2) 21.5 19.7 9.5% $ per liter (3) 0.21 0.37 (44.5%) Adjusted EBITDA $ thousands 367 1,687 (78.2%) Adjusted EBIT $ thousands 124 1,307 (90.5%) Milking Cows Average Heads 6,746 6,544 3.1% Cow Productivity Liter/Cow/Day 35.0 34.0 2.7% Total Milk Produced million liters 21.5 20.3 5.9% (1) includes sales of powdered milk, and sales of culled cows and fattened male cows (2) includes liters of milk destined towards powdered milk production (3) Sales price reflects the sale of fluid milk Milk production reached 21.5 million liters in 1Q16, 5.9% higher than 1Q15. This increase is attributable to a 3.1% increase in our dairy cow herd driven by enhanced reproduction efficiencies at our two free-stall dairy facilities, and heightened by a 2.7% increase in cow productivity. Average productivity grew from 34.0 liters per cow per day in 1Q15 to 35.0 liters in 1Q16. Despite higher productivity and volumes, Adjusted EBIT in the quarter was $0.1 million, 90.5% lower year-over-year. Profitability year-over-year was negatively affected by a 6.4% reduction in milk prices in local currency, which coupled with the devaluation of the Argentine Peso, resulted in 44.5% decrease in prices measured in dollar terms.

1Q16 All Other Segments All Other Segments - Highlights metric 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Gross Sales $ thousands 266 310 (14.2%) Adjusted EBITDA $ thousands 285 177 61.0% Adjusted EBIT $ thousands 232 99 134.3% All Other Segments encompasses our cattle and coffee operations. Our cattle segment consists of over 63 thousand hectares of pasture land that is not suitable for crop production due to soil quality and as a result is leased to third parties for cattle grazing activities. Adjusted EBIT for All Other Segment during 1Q16 was $0.2 million, 132.0% higher compared to 1Q15. Land transformation business Land transformation - Highlights metric 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Adjusted EBITDA $ thousands - - - % Adjusted EBIT $ thousands - - - % Land sold Hectares - - - % There were no farm sales during 1Q16 and 1Q15. Land transformation is an ongoing process in our farms, which consists of transforming undervalued and undermanaged land into its highest production capabilities. Adecoagro is currently engaged in the transformation of several farms, especially in the northeastern region of Argentina, where farms formerly used for cattle grazing are being successfully transformed into high yielding crop and rice farms. The company is continuously seeking to recycle its capital by disposing of a portion of its developed farms. This allows the company to monetize the capital gains generated by its transformed farms and allocate its capital to other farms or projects with higher risk-adjusted returns, thereby enhancing return on invested capital.

1Q16 Sugar, Ethanol & Energy Business Operational Performance Sugar, Ethanol & Energy - Selected Information metric 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Milling Sugarcane Milled tons 1,504,053 460,124 226.9% Own Cane tons 1,449,457 452,516 220.3% Third Party Cane tons 54,596 7,608 617.6% Production Sugar tons 61,337 22,468 173% Ethanol M3 60,211 16,596 263% Hydrous Ethanol M3 41,592 14,097 195% Anhydrous Ethanol M3 18,619 2,499 645% TRS Equivalent Produced tons 166,396 51,485 223.2% Sugar mix in production 38% 46% (16%) Ethanol mix in production 62% 54% 13% Engery Exported (sold to grid) MWh 67,987 17,890 280.0% Cogen efficiency (KWh sold per ton crushed) KWh/ton 45.2 38.9 16.3% Agricultural Metrics Harvested own sugarcane thousand tons 1,449,483 452,516 220.3% Harvested area Hectares 14,146 5,160 174.2% Yield tons/hectare 102.3 90.7 12.9% TRS content kg/ton 107.2 116.0 (7.6%) TRS per hectare kg/hectare 10,965 10,512 4.3% Mechanized harvest % 99.7% 100.0% (0.3%) Area Sugarcane Plantation hectares 130,637 126,866 3.0% Expansion & Renewal Area hectares 3,673 3,975 (7.6%) While 1Q16 is the off-season for traditional mills in Brazil, as explained in page 3, we have begun operating our sugarcane operation under a “continuousaresult of sugarcathisnew strategy, during 1Q16 we were able to harvest and crush 1.5 million tons of sugarcane, 227% higher year-over-year. Sugar, ethanol, and energy production increased by 173%, 263% and 280% compared to 1Q15, respectively. Total production measured in TRS equivalent increased by 223%. The product mix was slanted 62% towards ethanol production as a result of the seasonally high market prices coupled with the tax benefits we obtain in Mato Grosso do Sul. Our cogeneration efficiency ratio reached 45.2 KWh/ton, 16.3% above 1Q15, but below our average for last year of 66 KWh/ton. This is primarily explained by the following reasons: (i) we performed maintenance of the boilers during the quarter, so one of the four boilers was always off; and (ii) we burned minimal bagasse volumes to avoid selling energy at low seasonal prices. During the rest of the year, the boilers are expected to operate at full capacity, reaching similar annual efficiency ratios as achieved during 2015.

1Q16 In terms of agricultural productivity, roughly half of the sugarcane harvested corresponds to left-over sugarcane from the previous season and the half to sugarcane that was planted more than 18 months ago as we planned for the. Sugarcane“continuousyieldsreached 102harvest”.3tons/ha,12.9% higher than 1Q15. TRS produced per hectare reached 10.9 tons/ha. The improvement of agricultural metrics is explained by our focus on improving our agricultural operations. Examples include: (i) effective implementation of pest controls, (ii) utilization of best cane varieties for the region, (iii) harvesting the cane at its optimum growth cycle; and (iv) the renewal of the sugarcane plantation. Sugarcane productivity was also positively affected by favorable weather conditions during the growth season. As of March 31, 2016, our sugarcane plantation consisted of 130,637 hectares, representing a 3.0% growth year-over-year. Sugarcane planting continues to be a key strategy to supply our mills with quality raw material at low cost. During 1Q16 we planted a total of 3,673 hectares of sugarcane. Of this total area, 1,338 hectares correspond to expansion areas planted to supply the additional sugarcane needed in 2017 to operate at full capacity under;and 2,335thehectares“continuouscorrespondtoareas har planted to renew old plantations with newer and high-yielding sugarcane, thus allowing us to maintain the productivity of our plantation. Financial Performance Sugar, Ethanol & Energy - Highlights $ thousands 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Net Sales (1) 69,296 50,698 36.7% Gross Profit Manufacturing Activities 19,932 11,480 73.6% Adjusted EBITDA 22,088 2,392 823.4% Adjusted EBITDA Margin 31.9% 4.7% 575.6% (1) Net Sales are calculated as Gross Sales net of sales taxes . Net sales in 1Q16 reached $69.3 million, 36.7% above 1Q15. Gross Profit from Manufacturing Activities increased 73.6%, from $11.5 million in 1Q15 to $19.9 million in 1Q15. The increase in net sales and gross profit was primarily driven by: (i) the early start of the harvest which resulted in significant growth in sugarcane crushing, production and sales volumes during the quarter; and (ii) the ethanol carry commenced during mid 2015 with the strategy of building inventories to sell at higher prices during the off-season. Adjusted EBITDA during 1Q16 reached $22.1 million, $19.7 million or 823.4% higher than 1Q15. Adjusted EBITDA margin grew from 4.7% in 1Q15 to 31.9% in the current quarter. These results are primarily explained by (i) the increase in crushing, production and sales explained above; (ii) a 4.3% increase in TRS per hectare; (iii) a 15.7% reduction in unitary costs; and (iv) partially offset by lower realized sugar prices and a $11.5 million decrease in hedging results. (a $0.5 million gain in 1Q16 compared to a $12.2 million gain in 1Q15). In 1Q16, we engaged in the commercialization of roughly 40,638 tons of sugar from third parties. Although these transactions contribute positively to our overall profitability, EBITDA margins for this type of transactions are considerably lower than the margins from core production. Adjusted EBITDA margin net of the commercialization transactions would have reached 39.4%, 749 bps above reported margin. The table below reflects the breakdown of net sales for the Sugar, Ethanol & Energy business.

1Q16 Sugar, Ethanol & Energy - Net Sales Breakdown (1) $ thousands Units ($/unit) 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Sugar (tons) 28,179 13,963 101.8% 100,751 34,991 187.9% 280 399 (29.9%) Ethanol (cubic meters) 38,783 35,062 10.6% 83,947 79,424 5.7% 462 441 4.7% Energy (Mwh) 2,335 1,672 39.6% 66,386 17,184 286.3% 35 97 (63.9%) TOTAL 69,296 50,698 36.7% 1) Net Sales are calculated as Gross Sales net of ICMS, PIS, CONFINS, INSS and IPI taxes. Sugar sales volumes grew 187.9% year-over-year, mainly driven by the increase in production due to the early commencement of the harvest season. Our average realized sugar price during the quarter was $280 per ton, 29.9% lower than 1Q15, which resulted in a 101.8% increase in net sales Ethanol sales volumes increased 5.7% in 1Q16 compared to 1Q15. Average selling prices in USD in 1Q16 were 4.7% higher than 1Q15, resulting in a 10.6% increase in net sales. Ethanol prices in BRL continued to rally during 1Q16 driven by growing consumption and tight supply. According to the Esalq price index, hydrous and anhydrous prices increased respectively by 15% and 11% quarter-over-quarter and by 43% and 44% year-over-year. In the case of energy, sales volumes grew 286.3% year-over-year, positively affected by the early start of the crushing season. However, energy prices were negatively affected by the rainy summer and ongoing economic recession in Brazil, supporting cheap hydro-power production. As a result, our realized energy prices, compared to 1Q15, decreased by 63.9% in dollar terms. Overall, the increase in selling volumes more than offset the decrease in prices, resulting in a 39.6% increase in net sales. Sugar, Ethanol & Energy - Cost of Goods Sold $ thousands 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Total Production Costs 31,995 14,201 125.3% Sugar Purchases (for commercialization) 10,357 4,371 Tax recovery and others (7,042) (6,791) 3.7% Harvested cane margin 3,891 (872) n.a Inventories variation 13,485 39,182 (65.6%) Exchange difference 933 (6,039) n.a Cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered 53,619 44,051 21.7% COGS per ton of TRS Sold 215 255 (15.7%) Our costs of goods sold increased in absolute terms by 21.7% driven by higher production costs incurred as a result of the expansion in our industrial and agricultural operation given the ramp up of the cluster and the implementation of the “continuous harvest”. Nonethe 15.7%, from $255/ton to $215/ton. Considering that over 85% of our costs are fixed, every marginal ton that we are able to crush and sell, has a significant impact on cost dilution and margin expansion.

1Q16 Sugar, Ethanol & Energy - Total Production Costs $ thousands 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Industrial costs 8,536 2,683 218.1% Agricultrual costs 23,459 11,518 103.7% Harvest costs 15,587 5,552 180.7% Cane from 3rd parties 1,096 115 851.1% Leasing costs 4,137 4,032 2.6% Maintenance costs 2,639 1,819 45.1% Total Production Costs 31,995 14,201 125.3% Total producton costs per ton of sugarcane crushed 21 31 (31.1%) Total production costs per ton of TRS produced 192 276 (30.3%) The table above shows the breakdown of our production costs incurred in 1Q16 compared to 1Q15. Costs in absolute terms have increased 125.3% year-over-year as a result of the 226.9% growth in sugarcane milling and the 174.2% growth in area harvested. Nonetheless, unitary costs measured either per ton of sugarcane crushed or ton of TRS produced have been diluted by 31.1% and 30.3%, respectively. Sugar, Ethanol & Energy - Changes in Fair Value $ thousands 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Changes in FV Harvested Sugarcane (Agricultural Produce) 3,891 (872) n.a Changes in FV Unharvested Sugarcane = [(a+b)-(c +d+e] (3,077) (13,105) (76.5%) Sugarcane Valuation Model as of March 2016 (a) 74,127 45,223 63.9% Capitalized crop maintenance costs LTM (b) (46,425) (32,314) 43.7% Sugarcane Valuation Model as of December 2015 (c ) 59,077 60,667 (2.6%) Capitalized crop maintenance costs LTM (d) (34,250) (27,391) 25.0% Exchange rate difference (e) 5,951 (7,261) n.a Total Changes in Fair Value 814 (13,978) (105.8%) Regarding sugarcane Biological Assets, according to the recent changes in IAS 41 accounting standards we must assess the fair value of the sugarcane growing on the fields (unharvested) which will be cut during the next harvest (twelve months). Total changes in fair value is composed by the fair value of the unharvested sugarcane in the current quarter net of sugarcane maintenance costs capitalized over the last twelve months minus the fair value of the unharvested sugarcane booked in the previous quarter, plus the fair value of sugarcane harvested in the period. Changes in fair value of Unharvested sugarcane in 1Q16 presented a loss of $3.1 million. This is explained by two main effects: (i) a $9.1 million increase in the valuation of our sugarcane plantation as of March 31, 2016, compared to December 31, 2015, mainly as a result of the increase in sugar prices; and (ii) a $12.2 million increase in capitalized costs over the last twelve months, offsetting the increase in the cane valuation. The increase in capitalized costs is a result of higher crop maintenance costs and leasing costs during 1Q16 as a result of the 272% increase in sugarcane harvested during the period. Changes in FV of Harvestedturalsugarcaneproduce” orreached“agricul$3.9 higher than 1Q15. The increase is explained primarily by a 37.7% decrease in agricultural production costs per ton of sugarcane harvested and transferred to the mill (leasing, crop maintenance, and harvest) as explained in the table above.

1Q16 Corporate Expenses Corporate Expenses $ thousands 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Corporate Expenses (5,079) (5,197) 2.3% Adecoagro’sxpensesCorporateincludeitems that have not been allocated to a specific business segment, such as executive officers and headquarters staff, certain professional fees, travel expenses, and office lease expenses, among others. As shown on the tables above corporate expenses for 1Q16 were $5.1 million, 2.3% below 1Q15. Other Operating Income Other Operating Income $ thousands 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Gain / (Loss) from commodity derivative financial instruments (170) 21,119 - % (Loss) from forward contracts (63) (29) 117.2% Gain from disposal of other property items 134 393 (65.9%) (Loss) from disposal of biological assets - (9) - % Other 157 151 4.0% Total 58 21,625 (99.7%) Other Operating Income in 1Q16 was essentially nil, compared to a $21.6 million gain in 1Q15. This difference is explained by the gains or losses resulting from the mark-to-market of our commodity hedge positions. During 1Q15, our soybean, corn and sugar derivative hedges generated a $21.1 million unrealized gain as market prices plummeted during the quarter. Despite the higher prices which negatively affected existing hedge positions, the quarters hedging activity resulted in no loss in the statement of income.

1Q16 Financial Results Financial Results $ thousands 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Interest Expenses, net (7,530) (10,147) 25.8% Cash Flow Hedge - Transfer from Equity (4,975) 464 1,172.2% FX (Losses), net (9,862) (13,694) 28.0% Gain from derivative financial Instruments 1,155 226 411.1% Taxes (513) (705) 27.2% Other Expenses, net (2,843) (636) (347.0%) Total Financial Results (24,568) (24,492) (0.3%) Our net financial results in 1Q16 show a loss of $24.6 million, compared to a loss of $24.5 million in 1Q15. The financial results loss is primarily composed by: (i) Interest expense: our net interest expense in 1Q16 was $7.5 million, 25.8% or $2.6 million lower year-over-year mainly explained by the 37% devaluation of the Brazilian Real coupled with a higher proportion of dollar denominated debt (ii) Foreign exchange losses (composed of “Cash Flow–TransferHedgefrom Equity”(1)and“Fx Gain line items) which reflect the impact of foreign exchange variations on our dollar denominated assets and liabilities. Foreign exchange losses stood at $14.8 million in 1Q16 compared to $13.2 million in 1Q15, explained in both cases by the accumulated devaluation of the Brazilian Real and Argentine Peso. (iii) Gains/Losses from derivative financial instruments: from time to time, the company enters into short-term forward contracts in Brazil to balance its short-term dollar inflows related to sugar revenues with its dollar outflows related to debt payments. The $1.2 million gain in 1Q16 was a result of the appreciation of the BRL during the quarter. (1) Effective July 1, 2014, Adecoagro formally documented and designated cash flow hedging relationships to hedge the foreign exchange rate risk of a portion of its highly probable future sales in US dollars using a portion of its borrowings denominated in US dollars and foreign currency forward contracts. Cash flow hedge accounting permits that gains and losses arising from the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on derivative and non-derivative hedging instruments not be immediately recognized in profit or loss, but be reclassified from equity to profit or loss in the same periods during which the future sales occur, thus allowing for a more appropriate presentation of the results for the period reflecting Adecoagro's Risk Management Policy.

1Q16 Commodity Hedging Adecoagro’sfinancialperformance is affected by the volatile price environment inherent to agricultural commodities. The company uses forward and derivative markets to mitigate swings in commodity prices by locking-in margins and stabilizing cash flow. The table below shows the average hedged price, considering both the physical sales and derivatives positions. Commodity Hedge Position Consolidated Hedge Position Farming Avg. FAS Price CBOT FOB Volume (1) USD/Ton USD/Bu 2015/2016 Harvest season Soybeans 241,456 251.3 981.8 Corn 234,666 154.0 382.4 2016/2017 Harvest season Soybeans 105,051 227.9 894.7 Corn 171,623 154.7 406.6 Consolidated Hedge Position Sugar, Ethanol & Energy Avg. FOB Price ICE FOB Volume (1) USD/Unit Cents/Lb 2016/2017 Harvest season Sugar (tons) 420,980 310.1 14.1 Ethanol (m3) 49,123 448.1 n.a Energy (MW/h) (2) 528,423 61.3 n.a 2017/2018 Harvest season Sugar (tons) 41,000 343.3 15.6 Ethanol (m3) 49,123 448.1 n.a Energy (MW/h) (2) 265,263 72.0 n.a (1) Includes volumes delivered/invoiced, forward contracts and derivatives (futures and options). (2) Energy prices were converted to USD @ an Fx of R/USD 3.59

1Q16 Indebtedness Net Debt Breakdown $ thousands 1Q16 4Q15 Chg % 1Q15 Chg % Farming 116,993 85,843 36.3% 108,106 8.2% Short term Debt 101,538 70,078 44.9% 68,824 47.5% Long term Debt 15,455 15,765 (2.0%) 39,282 (60.7%) Sugar, Ethanol & Energy 677,891 637,495 6.3% 669,731 1.2% Short term Debt 181,642 169,608 7.1% 124,317 46.1% Long term Debt 496,250 467,887 6.1% 545,414 (9.0%) Total Short term Debt 283,179 239,686 18.1% 193,141 46.6% Total Long term Debt 511,705 483,652 5.8% 584,696 (12.5%) Gross Debt 794,884 723,338 9.9% 777,837 2.2% Cash & Equivalents 223,688 198,894 12.5% 198,279 12.8% Net Debt 571,196 524,444 8.9% 579,558 (1.4%) EOP Net Debt / Adj. EBITDA LTM 2.38x 2.41x (1.5%) 2.88x (17.5%) Adecoagro’snetdebt as of 1Q16 was $571.2 million, 1.4% below March 31, 2015 and 8.9% above December 31, 2015. As of March 31 2016, outstanding debt related to our Farming business was at $117.0 million, increasing 36.3% or $31.2 million quarter-over-quarter. From a seasonality point of view, the first quarter is the one that requires the highest working capital, since all of our crops are planted and most costs incurred, but only a small amount of the crops are harvested and sold. As we continue harvesting throughout the second and third quarter we expect to reduce working capital invested and debt. On a year-over-year basis, debt increased by 8.2% or $8.9 million. As of March 31 2016, in the Sugar and Ethanol business, debt increased by 6.3% or $40.4 million quarter-over-quarter. This increase is related to the working capital cycle, since during the first quarter we are usually incurring crop maintenance and capex related to sugarcane planting and maintenance of industrial equipment and machinery. Cash and equivalents as of March 31, 2016, stood at $223.7 million, 12.5% higher than 4Q15. Year-over-year cash and cash equivalents increased by 12.8%. The charts depicted below show, on a consolidated basis our debt maturity profile, which currently stands at 64.4% in the long term and 35.6% in the short term. Our debt currency breakdown stands 25.8% in Brazilian Reals, 73.6% in US dollars and 0.7% in Argentine pesos. BRL ARS 36% 26% USD Short Term 1% 64% Long Term 73%

1Q16 Capital Expenditures & Investments Capital Expenditures & Investments $ thousands 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Farming & Land Transformation 2,093 3,236 (35.3%) Land Acquisitions - - - Land Transformation 1,524 1,801 (15.4%) Rice Mill 143 239 (40.0%) Dairy Free Stall Unit 87 136 (36.0%) Others 339 1,060 (68.0%) Sugar, Ethanol & Energy 31,795 56,653 (43.9%) Sugar & Ethanol Mills 20,115 46,711 (56.9%) Sugarcane Planting 11,680 9,942 17.5% Total 33,888 137,756 (75.4%) Adecoagro’scapitalexpenditures during 1Q16 totaled $33.9 million, 75.4% lower than 1Q15. The decrease is mainly explained by the reduction in capex related to the completion of our Sugar, Ethanol & Energy business, coupled with 37% depreciation of the Brazilian Real. In the Sugar, Ethanol and Energy business, capex deployed in 1Q16 consisted purely in agricultural and industrial maintenance. We spent $11.7 million to plant 3,673 hectares of sugarcane for the renewal of our plantation and the $20.1 million in the industrial maintenance of the mill and agricultural machinery. Regarding the Farming and Land Transformation businesses, total capital expenditures during 1Q16 decreased by $1.1 million to $2.1 million, mainly driven by expenditures related to land transformation projects. The most relevant project is the construction of a reservoir for rice irrigation in our Ita Caabo farm and transformation of cattle land, located in the north east of Argentina, which will allow us to expand our rice production area by 6,000 hectares. Inventories End of Period Inventories Volume thousand $ Product Metric 1Q16 1Q15 % Chg 1Q16 1Q15 % Chg Soybean tons 24,746 17,333 42.8% 5,386 3,904 38.0% Corn (1) tons 19,534 52,375 (62.7%) 2,474 6,235 (60.3%) Wheat (2) tons 53,454 61,873 (13.6%) 6,751 5,177 30.4% Sunflower tons 4,095 11,761 (65.2%) 1,110 4,441 (75.0%) Cotton lint tons 691 1,021 - % 646 1,256 - % Rough Rice(3) tons 232,948 134,964 72.6% 41,319 31,951 29.3% Sugar tons 16,009 25,634 (37.5%) 3,231 6,599 (51.0%) Ethanol m3 20,340 30,326 (32.9%) 13,857 13,283 4.3% Total 74,775 72,846 2.6% (1) Includes sorghum. (2) Includes barley. (3) Expressed in rough rice equivalent Variations in inventory levels between 1Q16 and 1Q15 are attributable to (i) changes in production volumes resulting from changes in planted area, in production mix between different crops and in yields obtained, (ii)

1Q16 different percentage of area harvested during the period, and (iii) changes in commercial strategy or sales for each product. Forward-looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements that are based on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about us and our industry. These forward-looking statements can be identified by words or phrases such as “anticipate “intend,”likely“is/areto,” “may,” “plan,” “should,” “would, The forward-looking statements included in this press release relate to, among others: (i) our business prospects and future results of operations; (ii) weather and other natural phenomena; (iii) developments in, or changes to, the laws, regulations and governmental policies governing our business, including limitations on ownership of farmland by foreign entities in certain jurisdictions in which we operate, environmental laws and regulations; (iv) the implementation of our business strategy, including our development of the Ivinhema mill and other current projects; (v) our plans relating to acquisitions, joint ventures, strategic alliances or divestitures; (vi) the implementation of our financing strategy and capital expenditure plan; (vii) the maintenance of our relationships with customers; (viii) the competitive nature of the industries in which we operate; (ix) the cost and availability of financing; (x) future demand for the commodities we produce; (xi) international prices for commodities; (xii) the condition of our land holdings; (xiii) the development of the logistics and infrastructure for transportation of our products in the countries where we operate; (xiv) the performance of the South American and world economies; and (xv) the relative value of the Brazilian Reais, the Argentine Peso, and the Uruguayan Peso compared to other currencies; as well as other risks included in the registrant’s otherthefilingsUnitedStatesSecuritiesand andsubmissionsExchangeCommission. wi These forward-looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties. Although we believe that our expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, our expectations may turn out to be incorrect. Our actual results could be materially different from our expectations. In light of the risks and uncertainties described above, the estimates and forward-looking statements discussed in this press release might not occur, and our future results and our performance may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements due to, inclusive, but not limited to, the factors mentioned above. Because of these uncertainties, you should not make any investment decision based on these estimates and forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements made in this press release related only to events or information as of the date on which the statements are made in this press release. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

1Q16 Appendix Market Overview Soft Commodity Prices 110 (30-06-2014=100) 100 90 80 70 60 50 Soybean Corn Wheat Cotton Sugar Source: Thomson Reuters Farming Buisiness: Corn: The closing price of corn nearby futures traded on the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) averaged US$/bu 3.63 in 1Q16, 2.7% lower than 4Q15, when the closing price averaged US$/bu 3.73. 1Q15 prices averaged USD/bu 3.85, 6.1% higher than 1Q16. Corn prices traded in a 30-cents range in the last five-months but South American production concerns and harvest delays provided volatility and prices finally rebounded from their lows. Brazilian safrinha corn areas have faced adverse weather conditions, affecting final production. In addition, Argentina´s harvest is well behind last year and average, resulting in very limited FOB offers. According to USDA´s March 2016 report, planting intentions as of March 1st for soybeans were at 93.6 million acres, 6.4% above March 2015 planting intentions of 88 million acres. March 1st stocks in all positions were reported at 7.808 billion bushels, when last year were at 7.750 billion bushels. According to April´s USDA report, Brazilian corn production was 84 million metric tons, 1 million below last year´s production. Argentina production was estimated at 28 million metric tons, 1.5 million above last year. Turning to the world

1Q16 numbers, stocks were estimated at 208.9 million metric tons, slightly above last year´s ending stocks of 207.6 million. Soybean: The closing price of soybean nearby futures traded on the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) averaged US$/bu 8.81 in 1Q16, as compared to the 4Q15 the closing price, which averaged US$/bu 8.80. 1Q15 prices averaged USD/bu 9.90, 11.0% higher than 1Q16. Soybean prices traded in a 50-cents range in the last seven-month but heavy rains reduced South America´s production and demand switched to U.S. production, as prices rebounded from their lows. Adverse weather affected Argentina´s production and harvest is well behind last year, with possible quality issues. In addition, strong demand provided more uncertainty into final ending stocks as March imports were at 6.1 million tons, 36% up year-on-year. According to USDA´s March report, planting intentions as of March 1st for soybeans were at 82.24 million acres, almost in line with last year´s intentions of 82.65 million acres. March 1st stocks in all positions were reported at 1.531 billion bushels, when last year were at 1.327 billion bushels. According to April´s USDA report, Brazilian soybean production would be at 100 million metric tons, 3.8 million above last year´s production. Argentina production was estimated at 59 million metric tons, 2.4 million below last year. Turning to the world numbers, stocks were estimated at 79 million metric tons, 1.7% above last year´s ending stocks of 77.7 million. Wheat: The closing price of wheat nearby futures traded on the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) averaged US$/bu 4.66 in 1Q16, 5.3% lower than 4Q15, when the closing price averaged US$/bu 4.92. 1Q15 prices averaged USD/bu 5.23, 12.2% higher than 1Q16. According to USDA´s March report, planting intentions as of March 1st for wheat were at 49.56 million acres, 9.3% below last year´s intentions of 54.64 million acres. March 1st stocks in all positions were reported at 1.372 billion bushels, when last year were at 1.140 billion bushels. According to April´s USDA report, world ending stocks were estimated at 239.30 million metric tons, almost in line with last year´s ending stocks of 237.59 million. Rice: In Thailand, rice prices rose again from 1% to 2% according to their categories, because of a reduction in export availabilities. Public stocks fell 50% over the previous year, reaching the lowest level since 2009. In March, foreign sales were less active in relation to the first two months of the year, but they continue to set an advance of 25% compared to the same period of last year. Business prospects remain optimistic based on more competitive prices and a recovery in Asian demand. In total Thai exports could reach 10Mt in 2016. In March, the average price of Thai 100% B was at $ 385/ton Fob. In Vietnam, export prices significantly rose by 6% in a month. The external sales in March registered a strong activity due to new Asian demand. Exports would be 60% higher than they were in the same period of the previous year. However, exports could slow down during the second quarter of the year if the announcement of Indonesia and the Philippines to limit further imports from now on was confirmed. Indonesia could even

1Q16 export some 100,000 tons in 2016. This would be a strong shock to Vietnam, since these countries represent, along with China, its main markets. In March, the Viet 5% was at $ 380/ton. In India, export prices rose 3%. Domestic prices also continue to rise for the fifth consecutive month. This firmness of the Indian prices is largely due to the sharp reduction in export availabilities and the contraction of production, affected by the weather phenomenon El Niño. In 2016, export forecasts indicate a remarkable fall to 9Mt against 11.5Mt in 2015. In March, the Indian 5% rice rose to $ 375/ton. In Pakistan, external prices rose by 2%. Exports tend to grow in relation to previous months, especially in the market for basmati rice, due to more competitive prices when compared to the Indian ones. This movement allows the country to recover from the slowdown observed earlier this year. Pakistani sales are now 10% higher than last year at the same time. In March, the Pak 25% was at $ 320/ton. In the United States, once again, export prices registered opposite trends in relation to Asian markets. Prices have decreased almost 3%, and they seem more competitive at the same time. The differential in comparison to Asian prices would now be at $ 75/ton against $ 100 earlier. In March, exports jumped to 290,000 tons against 200,000 tons in February. Despite this strong activity, US sales still are 8% lower than they were at the same time of the last year. The indicative price for Long Grain 2/4 marked $ 450/ton. In South America, the FOB average price for high-quality milled rice was $420 per ton during 1Q16, compared to an average of $540 in 1Q15 and $460 in 4Q15. Sugar and Ethanol: Sugar: The sugar market was very volatile in Q1 2016. Sugar prices were around 15.00 c/lb in the beginning of the year, decreased to 12.50 c/lb in mid-February and then recovered all the way to above 16.50 c/lb by the end of March, the highest level since October 2014. Sugar prices were in average 14.38 c/lb, 2% lower than Q4 2015 and 2% higher than the same period last year. Supported by strong fundamentals, the speculative community started the year with a large long position which supported prices. However the turbulent global market scenario weighted heavily in the commodity markets and funds exit from most of their long positions by mid-February. With a more stable macro environment, fundamentals returned to influence the sugar market again. Despite an early start of the crop and ideal weather for cane crushing in Brazil, crops in other producing areas like India and Thailand were damaged due to last year severe draught. Consequently, the S&D deficit now is expected to be larger than previously. As a result, funds build up a large long position once again pushing prices to the highest level is over a year and half. Ethanol: During 1Q16 ethanol reached the highest prices of the 15/16 crop, driven by a tight S&D situation in Brazil and the imminent end of the harvest season. As reported by UNICA, from April 2015 to March 2016 ethanol sales rose by 16%, while total production only increased by 8%. As a result, both hydrous and anhydrous prices substantially increased compared to 1Q15, 43% and 44% respectively –according to the Esalq price index. Compared to the previous quarter, ethanol prices also presented a significant increase, with hydrous increasing by 15% and anhydrous 11%. Energy:

1Q16 Energy price presented low volatility in 1Q16, the fluctuation were between 30BRL/MWh and 37BRL/MWh, 87% lower than last year. During January, energy price were 35,66BRL/MWh and dropped to the bottom level at 30,42BRL/MWh on February and 37,73BRL/Mwh. In April price were 49BRL/MWh, and the market expectations are higher prices on the following months. The reservoir of Southeast are at 57% Reconciliation of Non-IFRS measures (Adjusted EBITDA & Adjusted EBIT) to Profit / (Loss) We define Adjusted EBITDA for each of our operating profit from operations before financing and taxation for the year or period, as applicable, before depreciation and amortization and adjusted by profit or loss from discontinued operations and by gains or losses from disposals of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries whose main underlying asset is farmland, which are reflected in our Shareholders Equity under the line item “Reserve from the s interests in. subsidiaries” We define Adjusted EBIT for each of our operating s from operations before financing and taxation for the year or period, as applicable, and adjusted by profit from discontinued operations and by gains or losses from disposals of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries whose main underlying asset is farmland, which are reflected in our Shareholders Equity under “Reserve salefrom oftheminority interests. in subsidiaries” We believe that Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT are for the Company and each operating segment, respectively important measures of operating performance because they allow investors and others to evaluate and compare our consolidated operating results and to evaluate and compare the operating performance of our segments, respectively, including our return on capital and operating efficiencies, from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure (interest expense from our outstanding debt), asset base (depreciation and amortization), tax consequences (income taxes), foreign exchange gains or losses and other financial expenses. In addition, by including the gains or losses from disposals of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries whose main underlying asset is farmland, investors can evaluate the full value and returns generated by our land transformation activities. Other companies may calculate Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT differently, and therefore Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT are not a measures of financial performance under IFRS, and should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to consolidated net profit (loss), cash flows from operating activities, profit from operations before financing and taxation and other measures determined in accordance with IFRS.

1Q16 Adjusted EBITDA & Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation to Profit/Loss - 1Q16 Sugar, Land Ethanol & Transformati $ thousands Crops Rice Dairy Others Farming Energy on Corporate Total Sales of manufactured products and services rendered 595 20,547 162 266 21,570 73,551 - - 95,121 Cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered (451) (18,412) (146) (32) (19,041) (53,619) - - (72,660) Gross Profit from Manufacturing Activities 144 2,135 16 234 2,529 19,932 - - 22,461 Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets 21,354 2 5,007 - 26,363 - - - 26,363 Cost of agricultural produce and biological assets (21,354) (2) (5,007) - (26,363) - - - (26,363) Initial recog. and changes in FV of BA and agricultural produce 16,040 8,479 434 66 25,019 814 - - 25,833 Gain from changes in NRV of agricultural produce after harvest 2,659 - - - 2,659 - - - 2,659 Gross Profit from Agricultural Activities 18,699 8,479 434 66 27,678 814 - - 28,492 Gross Margin Before Operating Expenses 18,843 10,614 450 300 30,207 20,746 - - 50,953 General and administrative expenses (575) (626) (256) (58) (1,515) (3,666) - (5,123) (10,304) Selling expenses (793) (2,164) (101) (11) (3,069) (7,942) - (25) (11,036) Other operating income, net (823) 198 31 1 (593) 582 - 69 58 Share of gain/(loss) of joint ventures - - - - - - - - - Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation 16,652 8,022 124 232 25,030 9,720 - (5,079) 29,671 (-) Depreciation and Amortization 323 555 243 53 1,174 12,368 - - 13,542 Adjusted EBITDA 16,975 8,577 367 285 26,204 22,088 - (5,079) 43,213 Reconciliation to Profit/(Loss) Adjusted EBITDA 43,213 (+) Depreciation (13,542) (+) Financial result, net (24,568) (+) Income Tax (Charge)/Benefit (2,351) Profit/(Loss) for the Period 2,752 Adjusted EBITDA & Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation to Profit/Loss - 1Q15 Sugar, Land Ethanol & Transformat $ thousands Crops Rice Dairy Others Farming Energy ion Corporate Total Sales of manufactured products and services rendered 77 28,479 83 310 28,949 55,531 - - 84,480 Cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered (0) (23,156) (168) (186) (23,510) (44,051) - - (67,561) Gross Profit from Manufacturing Activities 77 5,323 (85) 124 5,439 11,480 - - 16,919 Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets 21,752 9 7,977 - 29,738 - - - 29,738 Cost of agricultural produce and biological assets (21,752) (9) (7,977) - (29,738) - - - (29,738) Initial recog. and changes in FV of BA and agricultural produce 9,004 4,717 1,955 (1) 15,675 (13,978) - - 1,697 Gain from changes in NRV of agricultural produce after harvest (162) - - - (162) - - - (162) Gross Profit from Agricultural Activities 8,842 4,717 1,955 (1) 15,513 (13,978) - - 1,535 Margin Before Operating Expenses 8,919 10,040 1,870 123 20,952 (2,498) - - 18,454 General and administrative expenses (1,403) (1,087) (370) (19) (2,879) (4,421) - (4,718) (12,018) Selling expenses (802) (4,291) (165) (7) (5,265) (7,506) - (484) (13,255) Other operating income, net 8,962 479 (28) 2 9,415 12,205 - 5 21,625 Share of gain/(loss) of joint ventures (878) - - - (878) - - - (878) Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation 14,798 5,141 1,307 99 21,345 (2,220) - (5,197) 13,928 (-) Depreciation and Amortization 493 795 380 78 1,746 4,612 - - 6,358 Adjusted EBITDA 15,291 5,936 1,687 177 23,091 2,392 - (5,197) 20,286 Reconciliation to Profit/(Loss) Adjusted EBITDA 20,286 (+) Depreciation (6,358) (+) Financial result, net (24,492) (+) Income Tax (Charge)/Benefit 4,990 Profit/(Loss) for the Period (5,574)

1Q16 Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements Condensed Consolidated Interim Statement of Income Statement of Income $ thousands 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Sales of manufactured products and services rendered 95,121 84,480 12.6% Cost of manufactured products sold and services rendered (72,660) (67,561) 7.5% Gross Profit from Manufacturing Activities 22,461 16,919 32.8% Sales of agricultural produce and biological assets 26,363 29,738 (11.3%) Cost of agricultural produce sold and direct agricultural selling expenses (26,363) (29,738) (11.3%) Initial recognition and changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce 25,833 1,697 1,422.3% Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest 2,659 (162) n.a Gross Profit/(Loss) from Agricultural Activities 28,492 1,535 1,756.2% Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses 50,953 18,454 176.1% General and administrative expenses (10,304) (12,018) (14.3%) Selling expenses (11,036) (13,255) (16.7%) Other operating income, net 58 21,625 (99.7%) Share of loss of joint ventures - (878) n.a Profit from Operations Before Financing and Taxation 29,671 13,928 113.0% Finance income 4,145 3,291 25.9% Finance costs (28,713) (27,783) 3.3% Financial results, net (24,568) (24,492) 0.3% Loss Before Income Tax 5,103 (10,564) (148.3%) Income tax expenses (2,351) 4,990 (147.1%) Profit for the Period from Continuing Operations 2,752 (5,574) (149.4%) Profit/(Loss) for the Period from discontinued operations - - n.a Profit for the Period 2,752 (5,574) (149.4%)

1Q16 Condensed Consolidated Interim Statement of Cash Flow Statement of Cash Flows $ thousands 1Q16 1Q15 Chg % Cash flows from operating activities: Profit for the period 2,752 13,761 (80.0%) Adjustments for : Income tax benefit 2,351 4,971 (52.7%) Depreciation 13,429 4,742 183.2% Amortization 113 135 (16.3%) Gain from of disposal of other property items (134) (393) (65.9%) Equity settled share-based compensation granted 1,195 919 30.0% Loss/(Gain) from derivative financial instruments and forwards (922) (21,316) (95.7%) Interest and other expense, net 8,787 10,783 (18.5%) Initial recognition and changes in fair value of non harvested biological (20,174) (20,065) assets (unrealized) 0.5% Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest 704 157 (unrealized) 348.4% Provision and allowances 1,722 458 276.0% Share of loss from joint venture - 878 - Foreign exchange gains, net 9,862 13,694 (28.0%) Cash flow hedge – transfer from equity 4,975 (464) n.a Discontinued operations - - - Subtotal 24,660 8,260 198.5% Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Decrease in trade and other receivables (28,654) 24,435 n.a (Increase) in inventories (15,072) (891) 1,591.6% Investment in other companies - - Decrease in biological assets 17,742 11,296 57.1% Decrease in other assets (51) 6 n.a (Increase) in derivative financial instruments (4,426) 11,309 n.a Increase/(Decrease) in trade and other payables 9,437 (13,027) (172.4%) (Decrease)/Increase in payroll and social security liabilities 2,303 486 373.9% Increase/(Decrease) in provisions for other liabilities 514 19 2,605.3% Net cash generated in operating activities before interest and taxes paid 6,453 41,893 (84.6%) Income tax paid (66) (90) - Net cash generated from operating activities 6,387 41,803 (84.7%) Cash flows from investing activities: Continuing operations: Purchases of property, plant and equipment (29,922) (51,284) (41.7%) Purchases of intangible assets (664) (195) 240.5% Purchase of cattle and non current biological assets planting cost - (11,268) (100.0%) Interest received 2,796 2,568 8.9% Investments in joint ventures - - - Proceeds from sale of farmland and other assets - 127 (100.0%) Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment 153 - n.a Proceeds from disposal of subsidiaries - - - Loans to subsidiaries - (561) Net cash used in investing activities (27,637) (60,613) (54.4%) Cash flows from financing activities: Net proceeds from the sale of minority interest in subsidiaries - Proceeds from equity settled share-based compensation exercised 152 634 - Proceeds from long-term borrowings 40,167 160,746 (75.0%) Payments of long-term borrowings (27,200) (11,189) 143.1% Net increase in short-term borrowings 38,985 (14,594) n.a Interest paid (8,765) (9,718) (9.8%) Purchase of own shares - - Net cash generated from financing activities 43,339 125,879 (65.6%) Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 22,089 107,069 (79.4%) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 198,894 113,795 74.8% Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 2,705 (22,585) n.a Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 223,688 198,279 12.8%

1Q16 Condensed Consolidated Interim Balance Sheet Statement of Financial Position $ thousands March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 Chg % ASSETS Non-Current Assets Property, plant and equipment 761,283 696,889 9.2% Investment property 4,255 4,796 (11.3%) Intangible assets 17,082 16,661 2.5% Biological assets 6,512 6,476 0.6% Investments in joint ventures - - n.a Financial Assets - - n.a Deferred income tax assets 75,151 68,744 9.3% Trade and other receivables 18,613 21,795 (14.6%) Other assets 691 651 6.1% Total Non-Current Assets 883,587 816,012 8.3% Current Assets Biological assets 108,885 105,342 3.4% Inventories 97,611 85,286 14.5% Trade and other receivables 177,033 145,011 22.1% Derivative financial instruments 9,798 4,849 102.1% Cash and cash equivalents 223,688 198,894 12.5% Total Current Assets 617,015 539,382 14.4% TOTAL ASSETS 1,500,602 1,355,394 10.7% SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY Capital and reserves attributable to equity holders of the parent Share capital 183,573 183,573 - Share premium 937,855 937,674 0.0% Cumulative translation adjustment (552,914) (568,316) (2.7%) Equity-settled compensation 17,768 16,631 6.8% Cash flow hedge (112,057) (137,911) (18.7%) Other reserves - - n.a Treasury shares (1,907) (1,936) (1.5%) Reserve from the sale of minority interests in subsidiaries 41,574 41,574 n.a Retained earnings 50,396 48,795 3.3% Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent 564,288 520,084 8.5% Non controlling interest 7,640 7,335 4.2% TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY 571,928 527,419 8.4% LIABILITIES Non-Current Liabilities Trade and other payables 1,951 1,911 2.1% Borrowings 511,705 483,651 5.8% Deferred income tax liabilities 19,836 15,636 26.9% Payroll and social security liabilities 1,306 1,236 5.7% Derivatives financial instruments - 119 Provisions for other liabilities 1,643 1,653 (0.6%) Total Non-Current Liabilities 536,441 504,206 6.4% Current Liabilities Trade and other payables 64,146 53,731 19.4% Current income tax liabilities 12,284 962 1,176.9% Payroll and social security liabilities 24,917 22,153 12.5% Borrowings 283,180 239,688 18.1% Derivative financial instruments 7,081 6,575 7.7% Provisions for other liabilities 625 660 (5.3%) Total Current Liabilities 392,233 323,769 21.1% TOTAL LIABILITIES 928,674 827,975 12.2% TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 1,500,602 1,355,394 10.7%