DEF 14A 1 ny20001846x1_def14a.htm FORM DEF 14A

TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:

☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement

☐ | Definitive Additional Materials

☐ | Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ | ​ | ​ | No fee required.
☐ | ​ | ​ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
| ​ | ​ | (1) | ​ | ​ | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |
| ​ | ​ | (2) | ​ | ​ | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |
| ​ | ​ | (3) | ​ | ​ | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |
| ​ | ​ | (4) | ​ | ​ | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |
| ​ | ​ | (5) | ​ | ​ | Total fee paid:
| ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |
☐ | ​ | ​ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
☐ | ​ | ​ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
| ​ | ​ | (1) | ​ | ​ | Amount Previously Paid:
| ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |
| ​ | ​ | (2) | ​ | ​ | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |
| ​ | ​ | (3) | ​ | ​ | Filing Party:
| ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |
| ​ | ​ | (4) | ​ | ​ | Date Filed:
| ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2022 Proxy Statement
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Tuesday, May 10, 2022
9:00 A.M., Central Time
Renaissance Nashville Hotel
611 Commerce Street
Nashville, Tennessee 37203

TABLE OF CONTENTS

March 30, 2022
Dear Stockholders of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.:
On behalf of the Board of Directors of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc., I cordially invite you to attend the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders of the Company, which will be held at 9:00 A.M., Central Time, on Tuesday, May 10, 2022 at the Renaissance Nashville Hotel, 611 Commerce Street, Nashville, Tennessee 37203.
At year-end, our hotel portfolio consisted of 100 hotels containing 22,313 total rooms across 26 states and Washington, D.C. While our focus is investing in predominantly upper upscale full-service hotels, we also own upscale properties. We believe our geographical diversity is a competitive advantage given that no single market represents greater than 9.7% of our hotel EBITDA. The importance of this competitive advantage has undoubtedly been highlighted by the recent pandemic.
While 2020 will always be remembered as the year when our industry was decimated by COVID-19, the year 2021 will be remembered as the beginning of the post-pandemic industry recovery. We have made significant progress improving our company, including deleveraging by over $1.1 billion over the past 18 months, materially improving our cash flow, and building up a sizable cash balance. Our best-in-class asset management team continues to be focused on pursuing initiatives to enhance our operating performance, including working closely with our property managers on aggressive cost control initiatives, driving ancillary revenue, and increasing operating margins. In addition, we are looking for opportunities to go on the offense to grow our portfolio and take advantage of what we believe are strong industry tailwinds.
Our business is managed with the oversight and direction of our Board of Directors, which regularly considers the optimal strategy for the strategic advancement and growth of the Company and the long-term interests of our stockholders. When making decisions, our Board of Directors considers the views of our stockholders. To understand our stockholders’ perspectives about the Company, our management team conducts outreach and engagement with our stockholders throughout the year and regularly provides our Board of Directors with management’s summaries of such feedback.
We encourage you to review the proxy statement and to return your proxy card as soon as possible so that your shares will be represented at the meeting.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Monty J. Bennett
Founder and Chairman of the Board

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.

​ | Meeting Date: | ​ | ​ | Tuesday, May 10, 2022 | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | Meeting Time: | ​ | ​ | 9:00 A.M., Central Time | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | Meeting Location | ​ | ​ | Renaissance Nashville Hotel 611 Commerce Street Nashville, Tennessee 37203 | ​

Meeting Agenda

1. | Election of eight directors;

2. | Advisory approval of our executive compensation;

3. | Ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our independent auditor for 2022;

4. | Approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan; and

5. | Transaction of any other business that may properly come before the annual meeting.

Record Date
You may vote at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders the shares of common stock of which you were the holder of record at the close of business on March 11, 2022.
Review your proxy statement and vote in one of the four ways:

• | In person: Attend the Annual Meeting and vote by ballot.

• | By telephone: Call the telephone number and follow the instructions on your proxy card.

• | Via the internet: Go to the website address shown on your proxy card and follow the instructions on the website.

• | By mail: Mark, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the postage paid envelopes.

By order of the Board of Directors,
Deric S. Eubanks,
Chief Financial Officer
14185 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1200
Dallas, Texas 75254
March 30, 2022

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

| ​ | ​ | Page
SUMMARY | ​ | ​ | 1
Annual Meeting of Stockholders | ​ | ​ | 2
Voting Matters | ​ | ​ | 2
Board Nominees | ​ | ​ | 2
Summary of Director Diversity and Experience | ​ | ​ | 3
Corporate Governance Highlights | ​ | ​ | 3
PROPOSAL NUMBER ONE-ELECTION OF DIRECTORS | ​ | ​ | 5
Nominees for Election as Directors | ​ | ​ | 6
Summary of Director Qualifications, Skills, Attributes and Experience | ​ | ​ | 12
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | ​ | ​ | 13
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics | ​ | ​ | 13
Board Leadership Structure | ​ | ​ | 13
Board Role | ​ | ​ | 14
Board Observers | ​ | ​ | 15
Board Refreshment | ​ | ​ | 15
Director Nomination Procedures by the Company | ​ | ​ | 15
Stockholder Nominations | ​ | ​ | 16
Stockholder and Interested Party Communication with our Board of Directors | ​ | ​ | 16
Director Orientation and Continuing Education | ​ | ​ | 16
Director Retirement Policy | ​ | ​ | 16
Hedging and Pledging Policies | ​ | ​ | 17
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES | ​ | ​ | 18
Board Member Independence | ​ | ​ | 18
Board Committees and Meetings | ​ | ​ | 19
Current Committee Membership | ​ | ​ | 19
Director Compensation | ​ | ​ | 23
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation | ​ | ​ | 24
Attendance at Annual Meeting of Stockholders | ​ | ​ | 24
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND COMPENSATION | ​ | ​ | 25
Executive Officers | ​ | ​ | 25
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | ​ | ​ | 28
Compensation Discussion and Analysis | ​ | ​ | 28
Summary Compensation Table | ​ | ​ | 36
2021 Grants of Plan-Based Awards | ​ | ​ | 37
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2021 Fiscal Year-End | ​ | ​ | 38
Equity Awards Vested in Fiscal Year 2021 | ​ | ​ | 39
Pension Benefits | ​ | ​ | 39
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation | ​ | ​ | 39
Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change of Control | ​ | ​ | 39
Pay Ratio Disclosure | ​ | ​ | 41
PROPOSAL NUMBER TWO-ADVISORY APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | ​ | ​ | 42
PROPOSAL NUMBER THREE-RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF BDO USA, LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITORS | ​ | ​ | 43
Audit Committee Report | ​ | ​ | 43
Auditor Fees | ​ | ​ | 44
PROPOSAL NUMBER FOUR-APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. 2021 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN | ​ | ​ | 46
General | ​ | ​ | 46
Summary of the 2021 Plan, as Amended by the Plan Amendment | ​ | ​ | 46
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS | ​ | ​ | 53

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   i | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

| ​ | ​ | Page
Security Ownership of Management and Directors | ​ | ​ | 53
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners | ​ | ​ | 54
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS | ​ | ​ | 55
Conflict of Interest Policies | ​ | ​ | 55
Our Relationship and Agreements with Ashford Inc. and its Subsidiaries | ​ | ​ | 56
Our Relationship and Agreements with Braemar | ​ | ​ | 62
OTHER PROPOSALS | ​ | ​ | 64
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT VOTING | ​ | ​ | 65
Solicitation of Proxies | ​ | ​ | 65
Electronic Availability of Proxy Materials | ​ | ​ | 65
Voting Securities | ​ | ​ | 65
Voting | ​ | ​ | 65
Counting of Votes | ​ | ​ | 65
Right to Revoke Proxy | ​ | ​ | 66
Multiple Stockholders Sharing the Same Address | ​ | ​ | 66
Annual Report | ​ | ​ | 67
Other Matters | ​ | ​ | 67
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | ​ | ​ | 68
ANNEX A—INFORMATION REGARDING NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE | ​ | ​ | A-1
2021 Adjusted EBITDAre | ​ | ​ | A-1

​ | IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 10, 2022. | ​
​ |  | ​
​ | The Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2022 annual Meeting of Stockholders and the Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, are available at www.ahtreit.com by clicking the “Investor” tab, then the “SEC Filings” tab and then the “Annual Meeting Material” link. | ​

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | ii | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information contained in this proxy statement, but it does not contain all the information you should consider in determining how to vote your shares of our common stock at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders of the Company. We urge you to read the entire proxy statement before you vote. This proxy statement was first mailed to stockholders on or about March 30, 2022.
We are providing these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. of proxies to be voted at our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders.
In this proxy statement:

• | “we,” “our,” “us,” “Ashford Trust,” and the “Company” each refers to Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation and real estate investment trust (“REIT”), shares of the common stock of which are listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “AHT”;

• | “Annual Meeting” refers to the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders of the Company;

• | “Ashford LLC” refers to Ashford Hospitality Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a subsidiary of Ashford Inc.;

• | “Board” or “Board of Directors” refers to the Board of Directors of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.;

• | “Braemar” refers to Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. (NYSE: BHR), a Maryland corporation and REIT;

• | “Premier” refers to Premier Project Management LLC, a Maryland limited liability company and a subsidiary of Ashford LLC. On August 8, 2018, Ashford Inc. completed its acquisition of Premier, formerly owned by Remington Lodging (as defined below). As a result, Ashford Inc. (through its indirect subsidiary, Premier) provides us with project management services, including construction management, interior design, architectural services, and the purchasing, expediting, warehousing coordination, freight management and supervision of installation of fixtures, furniture, furnishings and equipment, and related services; and

• | “Remington Lodging” refers to Remington Lodging & Hospitality, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and hotel management company that was owned by Mr. Monty J. Bennett, our Chairman of the Board, and his father, Mr. Archie Bennett, Jr., our Chairman Emeritus, before its acquisition by Ashford Inc. on November 6, 2019. “Remington Hotels” refers to the same entity after the acquisition was completed, resulting in Remington Lodging becoming a subsidiary of Ashford Inc.

Ashford Inc. and Ashford LLC together serve as our external advisor. In this proxy statement, we refer to Ashford Inc. and Ashford LLC collectively as our “advisor.”

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   1 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

​ | Time and Date | ​ | ​ | Record Date | ​
​ | 9:00 A.M., Central Time, May 10, 2022 | ​ | ​ | March 11, 2022 | ​

​ | Place | ​ | ​ | Number of Common Shares Eligible to Vote at the Annual Meeting as of March 11, 2022 | ​
​ | Renaissance Nashville Hotel 611 Commerce Street Nashville, Tennessee 37203 | ​ | ​ | 34,491,907 | ​

We intend to hold the Annual Meeting in person. However, we are sensitive to concerns related to public health and travel in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, we may impose additional procedures or limitations on meeting attendees (beyond those described herein) or may decide to hold the meeting in a different location or solely by means of remote communication (i.e., a virtual-only meeting). In the event we determine it is necessary or appropriate to take additional steps regarding how we conduct the Annual Meeting, we will announce this decision in advance, and details will be posted on our website and filed with the SEC.
Voting Matters

​ | Matter | ​ | ​ | Board Recommendation | ​ | ​ | Page Reference (for more detail) | ​
​ | Election of Directors | ​ | ​ | ✔ For each director nominee | ​ | ​ | 5 | ​
​ | Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation | ​ | ​ | ✔ For | ​ | ​ | 42 | ​
​ | Ratification of Appointment of BDO USA, LLP | ​ | ​ | ✔ For | ​ | ​ | 43 | ​
​ | Approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan | ​ | ​ | ✔ For | ​ | ​ | 46 | ​

Board Nominees
The following table provides summary information about each director nominee. All directors of the Company are elected annually and, in an uncontested election, by a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting.

​ | Name, Age | ​ | ​ | Director Since | ​ | ​ | Principal Occupation | ​ | ​ | Committee Memberships* | ​ | ​ | Other U.S. Public Company Boards | ​
​ | A | ​ | ​ | NCG | ​ | ​ | CC | ​ | ​ | RC | ​ | ​ | AC | ​
​ | Monty J. Bennett, 56 | ​ | ​ | 2003 | ​ | ​ | Chairman of Ashford Trust; Chairman and CEO of Ashford Inc.; Chairman of Braemar | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ | ✔ (C) | ​ | ​ | Ashford Inc.; Braemar | ​
​ | Benjamin J. Ansell, M.D., 54 | ​ | ​ | 2009 | ​ | ​ | Chairman and founder of UCLA Executive Health Program; Founder and Director of UCLA Medical Hospitality | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ | ✔ | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ | ✔ | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | Amish Gupta, 42(L) | ​ | ​ | 2014 | ​ | ​ | Managing Partner of RETC, Limited Partnership | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ | ✔ (C) | ​ | ​ | ✔ | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | J. Robison Hays, III, 44 | ​ | ​ | 2020 | ​ | ​ | CEO and President of Ashford Trust; Senior Managing Director of Ashford Inc. | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | Kamal Jafarnia, 55 | ​ | ​ | 2013 | ​ | ​ | General Counsel, Executive Vice President and Secretary of Lonsdale Investment Technology, Inc. | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ | ✔ (C) | ​ | ​ | ✔ | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ | Bluerock Residential Growth REIT | ​
​ | Frederick J. Kleisner, 77 (F) | ​ | ​ | 2016 | ​ | ​ | Retired CEO of Morgans Hotel Group Co. | ​ | ​ | ✔ | ​ | ​ | ✔ | ​ | ​ | ✔ | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | Sheri L. Pantermuehl, 65 (F) | ​ | ​ | 2018 | ​ | ​ | Chief Financial Officer of Alan Ritchey Inc. | ​ | ​ | ✔ (C) | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ | ✔ | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | Alan L. Tallis, 75 (F) | ​ | ​ | 2013 | ​ | ​ | Principal of Alan L. Tallis & Associates | ​ | ​ | ✔ | ​ | ​ | ✔ (C) | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ | ✔ | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​

* | Reflects current committee membership of current directors standing for re-election only and is not intended to imply any future committee membership after the election of our directors at the Annual Meeting. Our Board, in consultation with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, will determine the appropriate committee membership for the forthcoming year after the completion of the Annual Meeting.

A: Audit Committee
NCG: Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
CC: Compensation Committee
RC: Related Party Transactions Committee
AC: Acquisitions Committee
(L): Lead Director
(F): Audit Committee financial expert

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 2 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(C): Chair
Summary of Director Diversity and Experience
Our Board embodies a broad and diverse set of experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills. Below is a brief summary of some of the attributes, skills and experience of our director nominees. For a more complete description of each director nominee’s qualifications, please see their biographies starting on page 6.
Corporate Governance Highlights
We are committed to the values of effective corporate governance and high ethical standards. Our Board believes that these values are conducive to the strong performance of the Company and creating long-term stockholder value. Our governance framework gives our independent directors the structure necessary to provide oversight, direction, advice and counsel to the management of the Company. This framework is described in more detail in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and codes of conduct, which can be found on our website at www.ahtreit.com by clicking the “Investor” tab, then the “Corporate Governance” tab and then the “Governance Documents” link.
Set forth below is a summary of our corporate governance framework.

​ | Board Independence | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | All directors except our Chairman and Mr. Hays are independent | ​

​ | Board Committees | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | We have five standing Board committees: | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | Audit Committee | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | Compensation Committee | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | Related Party Transactions Committee | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | Acquisitions Committee | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | All committees, except the Acquisitions Committee, are composed entirely of independent directors | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | All three Audit Committee members are “financial experts” | ​

​ | Leadership Structure | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | Chairman of the Board separate from CEO | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | Independent and empowered Lead Director with broadly-defined authority and responsibilities | ​

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   3 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​ | Risk Oversight | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | Regular Board review of enterprise risk management and related policies, processes and controls | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | Board committees exercise oversight of risk for matters within their purview | ​

​ | Open Communication | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | We encourage open communication and strong working relationships among the Lead Director, Chairman, CEO and other directors and officers | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | Our directors have direct access to our officers and management and employees of our advisor | ​

​ | Stock Ownership | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | Stock ownership and equity award retention guidelines for directors and executives | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | Our directors should own shares of our common stock in excess of 3x the annual board retainer fee | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | Our CEO should own shares of our common stock in excess of 3x his annual base salary | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | Our other executive officers should own shares of our common stock in excess of 1.5x his or her annual base salary | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | Our directors and executive officers may not sell any stock granted to them for service to the Company until the required ownership levels described above are met | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | Comprehensive insider trading policy | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | Prohibitions on hedging and pledging transactions | ​

​ | Accountability to Stockholders | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | Directors elected by majority vote in uncontested director elections | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | We have a non-classified Board and elect every director annually | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | We do not have a stockholder rights plan | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | We have opted out of the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act (which provides certain takeover defenses) | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | We have not elected to be subject to the provisions of the Maryland Unsolicited Takeover Act, which would permit our Board to classify itself without a stockholder vote | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | Stockholders holding a stated percentage of our outstanding voting shares may call special meetings of stockholders | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | Board receives regular updates from management regarding interaction with stockholders and prospective investors | ​

​ | Board Practices | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | Robust annual Board and committee self-evaluation process | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | Mandatory director retirement at age 70 unless waived by the Board | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | Balanced and diverse Board composition | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | Limits on outside public company board service | ​

​ | Conflicts of Interest | ​
​ | • | ​ | ​ | Matters relating to our advisor or any other related party are subject to the approval of our independent directors or Related Party Transactions Committee | ​

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 4 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER ONE-ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
All of our directors are elected annually by our stockholders. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has recommended, and our Board has nominated, Monty J. Bennett, Benjamin J. Ansell, M.D., Amish Gupta, J. Robison Hays, III, Kamal Jafarnia, Frederick J. Kleisner, Sheri L. Pantermuehl and Alan L. Tallis for election as our directors.
Each of the persons nominated as director who receives a majority vote at the Annual Meeting will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. Under the terms of our bylaws, in uncontested elections of directors of our Company, a nominee is elected as a director by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in the election for that nominee (with abstentions and broker non-votes not counted as a vote cast either for or against that director’s election), at the meeting of stockholders at which such election occurs. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, if an incumbent director who is a nominee for reelection does not receive the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock so voted for such nominee, such incumbent director must promptly tender his or her resignation as a director for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board and ultimate decision by the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will promptly consider any such tendered resignation and will make a recommendation to our Board as to whether such tendered resignation should be accepted or rejected, or whether other action should be taken with respect to such offer to resign. Any incumbent director whose tendered resignation is under consideration may not participate in any deliberation or vote of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or our Board regarding such tendered resignation. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our Board may consider any factors they deem relevant in deciding whether to accept, reject or take other action with respect to any such tendered resignation. Within 90 days after the date on which certification of the stockholder vote on the election of directors is made, our Board will publicly disclose its decision and rationale regarding whether to accept, reject or take other action with respect to the tendered resignation. If any incumbent director’s tendered resignation is not accepted by our Board, such director will continue to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor is elected and qualified or his or her earlier death or resignation.
Set forth below are the names, principal occupations, committee memberships, ages, directorships held with other companies, if any, and other biographical data for each of the eight nominees for director, as well as the month and year each nominee first began his or her service on our Board. For a discussion of such person’s beneficial ownership of our common stock, see the “Security Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial Owners” section of this proxy statement.
If any nominee becomes unable to stand for election as a director, an event that our Board does not presently expect, our Board reserves the right to nominate substitute nominees prior to the meeting. In such a case, the Company will file an amended proxy statement that will identify each substitute nominee, disclose whether such nominee has consented to being named in such revised proxy statement and to serve, if elected, and include such other disclosure relating to such nominee as may be required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

​ | Our Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR all nominees. | ​

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   5 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Nominees for Election as Directors

​ | MONTY J. BENNETT | ​
​ | Age: 56 Director since 2003 Committees: • Acquisitions (chair) | ​ | ​ | Mr. Monty J. Bennett was first elected to our Board in May 2003 and has served as a director of the Company since that time and served as our Chief Executive Officer from that time until February 2017. Effective in January 2013, Mr. Bennett was appointed as the Chairman of our Board. Prior to January 2009, Mr. Bennett also served as our President. Mr. Bennett currently serves as the chair of our Acquisitions Committee. Mr. Bennett also currently serves as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors of Ashford Inc., where he has served in such capacities since November 2014, and as Chairman of the Board of Braemar, where he has served in such capacity since April 2013. Mr. Bennett also served as Chief Executive Officer of Braemar from April 2013 until November 2016. Mr. Bennett joined Remington Lodging in 1992 and has served in several key positions, such as President, Executive Vice President, Director of Information Systems, General Manager and Operations Director. Mr. Bennett holds a Master’s degree in Business Administration from the S.C. Johnson Graduate School of Management at Cornell University and a Bachelor of Science degree with distinction from the Cornell School of Hotel Administration. He is a life member of the Cornell Hotel Society. He has over 30 years of experience in the hotel industry and has experience in virtually all aspects of the hospitality industry, including hotel ownership, finance, operations, development, asset management and project management. He is a member of the American Hotel & Lodging Association’s Industry Real Estate Finance Advisory Council (IREFAC) and formerly was a member of Marriott’s Owner Advisory Council and Hilton’s Embassy Suites Franchise Advisory Council. Mr. Bennett is a frequent speaker and panelist for various hotel development and industry conferences, including the NYU International Hospitality Industry Investment Conference and the Americas Lodging Investment Summit conferences. Mr. Bennett’s extensive industry experience as well as the strong and consistent leadership qualities he has displayed in his prior role as the Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company and his experience with, and knowledge of, the Company and its operations gained in those roles and in his role as Chief Executive Officer and director of Ashford Inc. since its inception, are vital qualifications and skills that make him uniquely qualified to serve as a director of the Company and as the Chairman of our Board. | ​

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 6 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​ | BENJAMIN J. ANSELL, M.D. | ​
​ | Age: 54 Director since 2009 Independent Committees: •  Nominating and Corporate Governance • Acquisitions | ​ | ​ | Dr. Ansell was first elected to our Board in May 2009 and currently serves as a member of our Acquisitions Committee and as a member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Dr. Ansell is the founder of and current director and Chairman of the board of the UCLA Executive Health Program, where he has been responsible for marketing and selling executive health program services to more than 20 Fortune 500 companies and 4,000 individual customers. Dr. Ansell also founded and serves as the director of UCLA Medical Hospitality, which coordinates health services, concierge and some hospitality functions within the UCLA Health System. Dr. Ansell is also a senior practice physician within the UCLA Health System, specializing in cardiovascular disease prevention and early detection strategies. Over the past two decades, Dr. Ansell has acted as senior advisor to the pharmaceutical industry and financial community with respect to U.S. marketing, sales and branding strategies for cardiovascular medication. Dr. Ansell received a dual undergraduate degree with distinction in Biology and as a College Scholar in Music from Cornell University, followed by his Doctor of Medicine from the UCLA School of Medicine. Dr. Ansell successfully completed the director certification program at the UCLA Anderson Graduate School of Management in 2009. Dr. Ansell has significant entrepreneurial and management experience including brand development and positioning, sales and marketing, finance and establishing strategic relationships with both corporate and individual clients and customers that are beneficial in his service on the Board. With a 25-year career in academic and clinical internal medicine, Dr. Ansell is also able to advise the Board regarding the implications of and response to emerging bio-threats to the hospitality industry such as COVID-19. In addition, Dr. Ansell brings his experience with, and knowledge of, the Company and its operations gained as a director of the Company since May 2009 to his role as a director of the Company. | ​

​ | AMISH GUPTA | ​
​ | Age: 42 Director since 2014 Independent Lead Director Committees: • Related Party Transactions (chair) • Acquisitions | ​ | ​ | Mr. Gupta was first elected to our Board in May 2014 and currently serves as our lead independent director (“Lead Director”). Mr. Gupta currently serves as the Managing Partner of RETC, Limited Partnership, a property tax advisory firm that has represented over $30 billion in asset value nationally. He has led RETC since 2010, where he is responsible for overall operations and strategy. Additionally, Mr. Gupta founded Montfort Capital Partners (“MCP”), an asset management firm specializing in value-add real estate investments throughout the southern United States, where he serves as the Managing Partner. During this time, MCP has acquired $75 million in assets and secured a programmatic partnership with a national private equity firm. Prior to joining RETC, Mr. Gupta served as a real estate associate at the Carlyle Group, a private equity firm headquartered in Washington D.C. with more than $189 billion in assets under management, for three years. Mr. Gupta received his MBA from the Kellogg School of Management and his B.A. from Emory University. Mr. Gupta’s extensive real estate knowledge, stemming from his experiences with RETC, MCP, and the Carlyle Group, combined with his business acumen, will generate valuable insights into the economic environment of the real estate industry for the Board. | ​

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   7 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​ | J. ROBISON HAYS, III | ​
​ | Chief Executive Officer and President Age: 44 Director since 2020 | ​ | ​ | Mr. Hays was appointed to our Board effective June 2020. He has served as our Chief Executive Officer and President since May 2020 and prior to that served as our Chief Strategy Officer since 2015 and our Senior Vice President-Corporate Finance and Strategy since 2010. He has been with our Company since 2005. Mr. Hays also currently serves as Senior Managing Director at Ashford Inc. and served on its board of directors until June 2020. Mr. Hays also previously served as Chief Strategy Officer for Braemar until May 2020. Prior to 2013, in addition to his other responsibilities, Mr. Hays was in charge of our investor relations group. Mr. Hays is a frequent speaker at industry and Wall Street investor conferences. Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Hays worked in the Corporate Development office of Dresser, Inc., a Dallas-based oil field service and manufacturing company, where he focused on mergers, acquisitions and strategic direction. Before working at Dresser, Mr. Hays was a member of the Merrill Lynch Global Power & Energy Investment Banking Group based in Texas. Mr. Hays has been a frequent speaker at various lodging, real estate and alternative investment conferences around the globe. He earned his A.B. degree in Politics with a certificate in Political Economy from Princeton University and later studied philosophy at the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross in Rome, Italy. Mr. Hays’ extensive industry experience as well as the strong and consistent leadership qualities he has displayed as Chief Executive Officer and President and as a director of the Company and his experience with, and knowledge of, the Company and its operations gained in such roles are vital qualifications and skills that make him uniquely qualified to serve as a director of the Company. | ​

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 8 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​ | KAMAL JAFARNIA | ​
​ | Age: 55 Director since 2013 Independent Committees: • Nominating and Corporate Governance • Compensation | ​ | ​ | Mr. Jafarnia was appointed to our Board effective January 2013 and currently serves as chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and as a member of our Compensation Committee. Professionally, Mr. Jafarnia currently serves as General Counsel, Executive Vice President and Secretary of Lonsdale Investment Technology, Inc. In addition, effective May 2021, the Board of Trustees of Bluerock Total Income + Real Estate Fund appointed Mr. Jafarnia to serve as an Independent Trustee, and, since June 2019, he has served as a non-executive independent director of Bluerock Residential Growth REIT (NYSE American: BRG), a publicly listed REIT that focuses on the acquisition of multi-family apartment properties. Previously, Mr. Jafarnia served as General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer at Artivest Holdings, Inc., which position he held from October 2018 until February 2021, and as Chief Compliance Officer of Altegris Advisers, LLC which was the adviser to the Altegris KKR Commitments Fund. Prior to that, Mr. Jafarnia served as Managing Director for Legal and Business Development at Provasi Capital Partners LP. Prior to that, from October 2014 to December 2017, he served as Senior Vice President of W.P. Carey Inc. (NYSE: WPC), as well as Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Carey Credit Advisors, Inc. and as Chief Compliance Officer and General Counsel of Carey Financial, LLC. Prior to joining W. P. Carey Inc., Mr. Jafarnia served as Counsel to two American Lawyer Global 100 law firms in New York. From March 2014 to October 2014, Mr. Jafarnia served as Counsel in the REIT practice group at the law firm of Greenberg Traurig, LLP. From August 2012 to March 2014, Mr. Jafarnia served as Counsel in the Financial Services & Products Group and was a member of the REIT practice group of Alston & Bird, LLP. Between 2006 and 2012, Mr. Jafarnia served as a senior executive, in-house counsel, and Chief Compliance Officer for several alternative investment program sponsors, including, among others, American Realty Capital, a real estate investment program sponsor, and its affiliated broker- dealer, Realty Capital Securities, LLC. Mr. Jafarnia received his J.D. from Temple University School of Law and LL.M. from Georgetown University. Mr. Jafarnia is a licensed attorney admitted to practice law in four states and the District of Columbia and has spent a majority of his career specifically as a regulatory compliance officer. Mr. Jafarnia has over 22 years of experience in the real estate and financial services industry as an attorney, owner, principal, compliance officer and executive. His experience in these multiple roles provides unique perspectives and benefits to the Board, including specifically with respect to regulatory compliance. Mr. Jafarnia also has and maintains numerous relationships in the real estate industry that may be beneficial to his service on the Board. In addition, Mr. Jafarnia brings his experience with, and knowledge of, the Company and its operations gained as a director of the Company since January 2013 to his role as a director of the Company. | ​

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   9 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​ | FREDERICK J. KLEISNER | ​
​ | Age: 77 Director since 2016 Independent Committees: • Compensation •  Audit • Nominating and Corporate Governance Audit Committee Financial Expert | ​ | ​ | Mr. Kleisner was appointed to our Board in September 2016. Mr. Kleisner held a long illustrious career in the industry, serving as President and a director of Hard Rock Hotel Holdings, LLC, a destination casino and resort company, from October 2007 until March 2011. He also served as Chief Executive Officer of Morgans Hotel Group Co. (NASDAQ: MHGC), a hospitality company, from December 2007 until March 2011, as President and Chief Executive Officer (including interim President and Chief Executive Officer) from September 2007 until March 2009, and as a director from February 2006 to March 2011. Prior to his time at Morgans, Mr. Kleisner was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Rex Advisors, LLC, a hotel advisory firm, from January 2006 to September 2007. From August 1999 to December 2005, Mr. Kleisner served as President, Chief Operating Officer and, from March 2000 to August 2005, Chief Executive Officer of Wyndham International, Inc., a global hotel company. Mr. Kleisner also has served as Chairman of Wyndham International’s board from October 2000 to August 2005. He served as President and Chief Operating Officer of The Americas for Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. Hotel Group from January 1998 to August 1999. He has held senior positions with Westin Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, where he served as President and Chief Operating Officer from 1995 to 1998; Interstate Hotels Company, where he served as Executive Vice President and Group President of Operations from 1990 to 1995; the ITT Sheraton Corporation, where he served as Senior Vice President, Director of Operations, North America Division-East from 1985 to 1990; and Hilton Hotels Corp., where for 16 years he served as General Manager of several landmark hotels. Mr. Kleisner served as a director of Caesars Entertainment Corporation (NASDAQ: CZR) from 2013 to October 2017, Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (NYSE: KND) from 2009 to July 2018, and Apollo Residential Mortgage, Inc. (formerly NYSE: AMTG), a real estate investment trust, from July 2011 to August 2016. From November 2007 to August 2010, Mr. Kleisner served as a director of Innkeepers USA Trust, a subsidiary of Apollo Investment Corporation (NASDAQ: AINV). He is currently a director of Athora Holdings, Ltd., a specialist solutions provider for the European insurance and reinsurance market; European Gtd. Life Co; Playtime, LLC, a manufacturer of antibacterial and antimicrobial playground equipment and play systems; and Aimbridge Hospitality, Inc., a hotel investment and management firm. Mr. Kleisner graduated from Michigan State University with a B.A. in Hotel Management, and currently serves as a Real Estate Investment Management Advisory Board member of Michigan State University’s Eli Broad College of Business, School of Hospitality Business. He also completed advanced studies at the University of Virginia, Darden School of Business and attended the Catholic University of America. Mr. Kleisner’s extensive, impressive experience in the management and operation of companies in the hospitality industry enables him to provide the Board with a wealth of knowledge regarding operational issues facing companies in the hospitality industry and a business acumen essential to guiding the Company’s strategy. | ​

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 10 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​ | SHERI L. PANTERMUEHL | ​
​ | Age: 6 5 Director since 2016 Independent Committees: • Audit (chair) • Related Party Transactions Audit Committee Financial Expert | ​ | ​ | Ms. Pantermuehl was first elected to our Board in May 2018 and currently serves as the chair of our Audit Committee and as a member of our Related Party Transactions Committee. Ms. Pantermuehl has served as the Chief Financial Officer of Alan Ritchey, Inc. since May 2015, which has operations in the transportation and agriculture segments. From February 2011 to April 2015, Ms. Pantermuehl performed back office functions and acted as the Chief Financial Officer for a number of small to medium size firms, including a software development/document imaging firm and a bio-technology firm. From April 2007 to January 2011, Ms. Pantermuehl served as Controller and Chief Financial Officer of Riptide Worldwide, Inc. Prior to that, Ms. Pantermuehl served as the Chief Financial Officer of Intrametrics Corporation and Vertical Computer Systems, Inc., and as Director of Finance of Blockbuster, Inc. Ms. Pantermuehl is a former Treasurer and member of the board of directors of the Arthritis Foundation. Ms. Pantermuehl received a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration with an emphasis in Accounting and Finance from Texas A&M University and graduated magna cum laude. As a financial executive with over 26 years of experience as chief financial officer/controller of different companies and an innovative leader with significant successes in reducing operational costs and implementing effective strategies for business growth, Ms. Pantermuehl brings a valuable perspective on financial and related matters to the Board | ​

​ | ALAN L. TALLIS | ​
​ | Age: 75 Director since 2013 Independent Committees: • Compensation (chair) • Audit • Related Party Transactions Audit Committee Financial Expert | ​ | ​ | Mr. Tallis has served on our Board since his appointment in January 2013. Mr. Tallis currently serves as the chair of our Compensation Committee and as a member of our Audit Committee and Related Party Transactions Committee. Mr. Tallis is currently principal of Alan L. Tallis & Associates, a consulting firm principally engaged in serving the lodging industry, and an advisor at Hospitality Advisory Associates, a lodging industry advisory firm. Mr. Tallis was appointed to on the Advisory Board of Stonehill Strategic Hotel Credit Opportunity Fund II in 2008 and currently serves on a number of Advisory Boards for ownership and debt funds sponsored by or through Peachtree Hotel Group. From March 2008 through February 2011, Mr. Tallis served as Executive Vice President, Asset Management for our Company, and from February 2011 through January 2012, Mr. Tallis served as a consultant to our Company. From June 2006 to May 2007, Mr. Tallis served as a senior advisor to Blackstone Real Estate Advisors following its acquisition of La Quinta Corporation. From July 2000 until May 2006, Mr. Tallis served in various positions with La Quinta Corporation, most recently serving as President and Chief Development Officer of LQ Management LLC and President of La Quinta Franchising LLC. Prior to joining La Quinta Corporation, Mr. Tallis held various positions with Red Roof Inns, including serving as Executive Vice President-Development and General Counsel from 1994 to 1999. Mr. Tallis received an MBA from the Red McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas at Austin and a J.D. from the University of Miami. Mr. Tallis has over 42 years of experience in the lodging industry, including his responsibility for the growth of both of La Quinta Inns and Red Roof Inns. His diverse experience has included extensive transaction work, brand management and brand relations. In addition to his extensive experience in the lodging industry, Mr. Tallis’ service with our Company, first as our Executive Vice President, Asset Management and then as a consultant and as a director of the Company, allows him to bring a valuable perspective to the Board. | ​

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   11 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Summary of Director Qualifications, Skills, Attributes and Experience
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the full Board believe a complementary mix of diverse qualifications, skills, attributes, and experiences will best serve the Company and its stockholders. The summary of our directors’ qualifications, skills, attributes, and experiences that appears below, and the related narrative for each director nominee appearing in the directors’ biographies above, notes some of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills for each director that our Board considers important in determining that each nominee should serve on the Board in light of the Company’s business, structure, and strategic direction. The absence of a checkmark for a particular skill does not mean the director in question is unable to contribute to the decision-making process in that area.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 12 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Our Board is committed to corporate governance practices that promote the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Board regularly reviews developments in corporate governance and updates the Company’s corporate governance framework, including its corporate governance policies and guidelines, as it deems necessary and appropriate. Our policies and practices reflect corporate governance initiatives that comply with the listing requirements of the NYSE and the corporate governance requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We maintain a corporate governance section on our website, which includes key information about our corporate governance initiatives including our Corporate Governance Guidelines, charters for the committees of our Board, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and our Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer. The corporate governance section can be found on our website at www.ahtreit.com by clicking the “Investor” tab, then the “Corporate Governance” tab, and then the “Governance Documents” link.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to each of our directors and officers (including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Operating Officer, and Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary (or their respective successors)) and employees. The term “officers and employees” includes individuals who (i) are employed directly by us, if any (we do not currently employ any employees) or (ii) are employed by Ashford Inc., our advisor or their subsidiaries and (a) have been named one of our officers by our Board or (b) have been designated as subject to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by the legal department of our advisor. Among other matters, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

• | honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest;

• | full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in our reports filed with the SEC and our other public communications;

• | compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

• | prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to appropriate persons identified in the code;

• | protection of Company assets, including corporate opportunities and confidential information; and

• | accountability for compliance to the code.

Any waiver of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for our executive officers or directors may be made only by our Board or one of our Board committees and will be promptly disclosed if and to the extent required by law or stock exchange regulations.
Board Leadership Structure
Our Board regularly considers the optimal leadership structure for the Company and its stockholders. In making decisions related to our leadership structure, the Board considers many factors, including the specific needs of the Company in light of its current strategic initiatives and the best interests of stockholders.
To further minimize the potential for future conflicts of interest, our bylaws and our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as the NYSE rules applicable to its listed companies, require that the Board must maintain a majority of independent directors at all times, and our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that if the Chairman of the Board is not an independent director, at least two-thirds of the directors must be independent. Currently, all of our directors other than Mr. Monty J. Bennett and Mr. Hays are independent directors. Our Board must also comply with each of our conflict of interest policies discussed in “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions-Conflict of Interest Policies.” Our bylaw provisions, governance policies and conflicts of interest policies are designed to provide a strong and independent board and ensure independent director input and control over matters involving potential conflicts of interest.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   13 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In 2019 and 2020, our Board appointed Amish V. Gupta to serve as the Lead Director for a one-year term. In 2021, our Board re-appointed Mr. Gupta to serve as the Lead Director for an additional one-year term. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Lead Director has the following duties and responsibilities:

• | preside at all executive sessions of the independent or non-employee directors of the Company;

• | advise Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of decisions reached and suggestions made at meetings of independent directors or non-employee directors;

• | serve as liaison between the Chairman of the Board and the independent directors;

• | approve information sent to the Board;

• | approve meeting agendas for the Board;

• | approve meeting schedules to assure that there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items;

• | authorize the calling of meetings of the independent directors; and

• | if requested by major stockholders, be available for consultation and direct communication.

Our Board believes that our leadership structure provides a very well-functioning and effective balance between strong company leadership and appropriate safeguards and oversight by independent directors.
Board Role
Subject to the advisory agreement entered into by the Company, Ashford Inc., Ashford Hospitality Limited Partnership (“AHLP”), Ashford TRS Corporation and Ashford LLC, as amended from time to time (the “advisory agreement”), the business and affairs of the Company are managed by or under the direction of our Board in accordance with Maryland law. Our Board provides direction to, and oversight of, management of the Company. In addition, our Board establishes the strategic direction of the Company and oversees the performance of the Company’s business, management and the employees of our advisor who provide services to the Company. Subject to our Board’s supervision, our advisor is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Company and is required to make available sufficient experience and appropriate personnel to serve as executive officers of the Company. The management of the Company is responsible for presenting business objectives, opportunities and/or strategic plans to our Board for review and approval and for implementing the Company’s strategic direction and the Board’s directives.
Strategy
Our Board recognizes the importance of ensuring that our overall business strategy is designed to create long-term value for our stockholders and maintains an active oversight role in formulating, planning and implementing the Company’s strategy. Our Board regularly considers the progress of, and challenges to, the Company’s strategy and related risks throughout the year. At each regularly-scheduled Board meeting, the management and the Board discuss strategic and other significant business developments since the last meeting and the Board considers, recommends and approves changes, if any, in strategies for the Company.
Risk Oversight
Our full Board has ultimate responsibility for risk oversight, but the committees of our Board help oversee risk in areas over which they have responsibility. The Board does not view risk in isolation. Risks are considered in virtually every business decision and as part of the Company’s business strategy. Our Board and the Board committees receive regular updates related to various risks for both our Company and our industry. Our Board has received regular updates from the management team on the evolving COVID-19 pandemic and is involved in strategy decisions related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business. The Audit Committee regularly receives and discusses reports from members of management who are involved in the risk assessment and risk management functions of our Company. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the overall structure of our equity compensation programs to ensure that those programs do not encourage executives to take unnecessary or excessive risks.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 14 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Succession Planning
Our Board, acting through the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has reviewed and concurred in a management succession plan, developed by our advisor in consultation with the Chairman, to ensure continuity in senior management. This plan, on which the Chief Executive Officer is to report to the Board from time to time, addresses:

• | emergency Chief Executive Officer succession;

• | Chief Executive Officer succession in the ordinary course of business; and

• | succession for the other members of senior management.

The plan also includes an assessment of senior management experience, performance, skills and planned career paths.
Board Observers
On January 15, 2021, the Company entered into a credit agreement with certain funds and accounts managed by Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. (“Oaktree”). In connection with the transactions contemplated by the credit agreement, on January 15, 2021, Ashford Trust entered into an Investor Agreement (the “Investor Agreement”) with Oaktree. The Investor Agreement, among other things, provides Oaktree the right to appoint two observers to the Board, until such time, and subject to certain limitations, as more fully described in the Investor Agreement.
Board Refreshment
In addition to ensuring the Board reflects an appropriate mix of experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also focuses on director succession and tenure. For example, our bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that individuals who would be 70 years of age at the time of their election may not serve on our Board unless the Board waives such limitation. That limitation has been waived for both Mr. Kleisner and Mr. Tallis in connection with their election as directors at the Annual Meeting and their service as directors until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2023. Upon attaining age 70 while serving as a director of the Company and annually thereafter, an individual must tender a letter of proposed retirement from our Board effective at the expiration of such individual’s current term, and our Board may accept the retirement of the director or request such director to continue to serve as a director.
Director Nomination Procedures by the Company
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends qualified candidates for Board membership based on the following criteria:

• | integrity, experience, achievements, judgment, intelligence, competence, personal character, expertise, skills, knowledge useful to the oversight of the Company’s business, ability to make independent analytical inquiries, willingness to devote adequate time to board duties and likelihood of a sustained period of service on the Board;

• | business or other relevant experience; and

• | the extent to which the interplay of the candidate’s expertise, skills, knowledge and experience with that of other board members will build a board that is effective, collegial and responsive to the needs of the Company.

In connection with the merit-based selection of nominees for director, the Board has regard for the need to consider director candidates from different and diverse backgrounds, including sex, race, color, ethnicity, age, and geography. Consideration will also be given to the Board’s desire for an overall balance of professional diversity, including background, experience, perspective, viewpoint, education, and skills. In early 2018, our Board approved specific amendments to the “Selection of Directors” section of the Corporate Governance Guidelines to more specifically include diversity of sex, race, color, ethnicity, age, and geography when considering director candidates. The Board, taking into consideration the recommendations of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, is

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   15 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

responsible for selecting the director nominees for election by the stockholders and for appointing directors to the Board between annual meetings to fill vacancies, with primary emphasis on the criteria set forth above. The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assess the effectiveness of the Board’s diversity efforts as part of the annual board evaluation process.
Stockholder Nominations
Our bylaws permit stockholders to nominate candidates for election as directors of the Company at an annual meeting of stockholders. Stockholders wishing to nominate director candidates can do so by providing a written notice to the Corporate Secretary, Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc., 14185 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75254. Stockholder nomination notices and the accompanying certificate, as described below, must be received by the Corporate Secretary not earlier than November 30, 2022 and not later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern time, on December 30, 2022 for the nominated individuals to be considered for candidacy at the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders. Such nomination notices must include all information regarding the proposed nominee that would be required to be disclosed in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the election of the proposed nominee as a director in an election contest pursuant to the SEC’s proxy rules under the Exchange Act, as well as certain other information regarding the proposed nominee, the stockholder nominating such proposed nominee and certain persons associated with such stockholder, and must be accompanied by a certificate of the nominating stockholder as to certain matters, all as prescribed in the Company’s bylaws. A detailed description of the information required to be included in such notice and the accompanying certificate is included in the Company’s bylaws. You may contact the Corporate Secretary at the address above to obtain a copy of the relevant bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder nominations. Failure of the notice and certificate to comply fully with the requirements of the Company’s bylaws in such regard will result in the stockholder nomination being invalid and the election of the proposed nominee as a director of the Company not being voted on at the pertinent annual meeting of stockholders.
Stockholder and Interested Party Communication with our Board of Directors
Stockholders and other interested parties who wish to contact any of our directors either individually or as a group may do so by writing to them c/o the Corporate Secretary, Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc., 14185 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75254. Stockholders’ and other interested parties’ letters are reviewed by Company personnel based on criteria established and maintained by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which includes filtering out improper or irrelevant topics such as solicitations.
Director Orientation and Continuing Education
Our Board and senior management conduct a comprehensive orientation process for new directors to become familiar with our vision, strategic direction, core values including ethics, financial matters, corporate governance policies and practices and other key policies and practices through a review of background material and meetings with senior management. Our Board also recognizes the importance of continuing education for directors and is committed to providing education opportunities in order to improve both our Board’s and its committees’ performance. Senior management will assist in identifying and advising our directors about opportunities for continuing education, including conferences provided by independent third parties.
Director Retirement Policy
Upon attaining the age of 70 and annually thereafter, as well as when a director’s principal occupation or business association changes substantially from the position he or she held when originally invited to join the Board, a director will tender a letter of proposed retirement or resignation, as applicable, from our Board to the chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will review the director’s continuation on our Board and recommend to the Board whether, in light of all the circumstances, our Board should accept such proposed resignation or request that the director continue to serve.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 16 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Hedging and Pledging Policies
We maintain a policy that prohibits our directors and executive officers from holding Company securities in a margin account or pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan. Our policy also prohibits our directors and executive officers from engaging in speculation with respect to Company securities, and specifically prohibits our executives from engaging in any short-term, speculative securities transactions involving Company securities and engaging in hedging transactions.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   17 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES
Our business is managed through the oversight and direction of our Board. Members of our Board are kept informed of our business through discussions with the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Lead Director and other officers, by reviewing materials provided to them and by participating in meetings of our Board and its committees.
The Board has retained Ashford Inc. and Ashford LLC to manage our operations and our portfolio of hotel assets, subject to the Board’s oversight and supervision and the terms and conditions of the advisory agreement. Because of the conflicts of interest created by the relationships among us, Ashford Inc., Braemar, and any other related party, and each of their respective affiliates, many of the responsibilities of the Board have been delegated to our independent directors, as discussed below and under “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions- Conflict of Interest Policies.”
During the year ended December 31, 2021, our Board held nine regular meetings and our non-employee directors, each of whom is an independent director, held two meetings and/or executive sessions. Our Board must hold at least two regularly scheduled meetings per year of the non-employee directors without management present. All of our incumbent directors standing for re-election attended, in person or by telephone, at least 75% of all meetings of our Board and committees on which such director served, held during the period for which such person was a director or was a member of such committees, as applicable.
Board Member Independence
Our Board determines the independence of our directors in accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Section 303A.02(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, which requires an affirmative determination by our Board that the director has no material relationship with us that would impair independence. In addition, Section 303A.02(b) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual sets forth certain tests that, if any of them is met by a director automatically disqualifies that director from being independent from management of our Company. Moreover, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that if any director receives, during any 12-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 per year in direct compensation from the Company, exclusive of director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation, he or she will not be considered independent. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide that at all times that the Chairman of the Board is not an independent director, at least two-thirds of the members of the Board should consist of independent directors. The full text of our Board’s Corporate Governance Guidelines can be found on our website at www.ahtreit.com by clicking the “Investor” tab, then the “Corporate Governance” tab and then the “Governance Documents” link.
Following deliberations, our Board has affirmatively determined that, with the exception of Mr. Monty J. Bennett, our Chairman, and Mr. J. Robison Hays, III, our Chief Executive Officer and President, each nominee for election as a director of the Company is independent of Ashford Trust and its management and has been such during his or her term as a director commencing with the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company, held on May 12, 2021, under the standards set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE Listed Company Manual, and our Board has been since such date and is comprised of a majority of independent directors, as required by Section 303A.01 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. Any reference to an independent director herein means such director satisfies both the standards set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE independence tests.
In addition, each current member of our Audit Committee and our Compensation Committee has been determined by our Board to be independent and to have been independent at all pertinent times under the heightened independence standards applicable to members of audit committees of board of directors and to members of compensation committees of board of directors of companies with equity securities listed for trading on the NYSE and under the rules of the SEC under the Exchange Act and that each nominee for election as a director of the Company at the Annual Meeting is independent under those standards.
In making the independence determinations with respect to our current directors, our Board examined all relationships between each of our directors or their affiliates and Ashford Trust or its affiliates. Our Board determined that none of these transactions impaired the independence of the directors involved.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 18 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Board Committees and Meetings
Historically, the standing committees of our Board have been the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Related Party Transactions Committee and the Acquisitions Committee. Each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is governed by a written charter that has been approved by our Board. A copy of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charters can be found on our website at www.ahtreit.com by clicking the “Investor” tab, then the “Corporate Governance” tab and then the “Governance Documents” link. The committee members of each active committee and a description of the principal responsibilities of each such committee follows:
Current Committee Membership

​ |  | ​ | ​ | Audit | ​ | ​ | Compensation | ​ | ​ | Nominating and Corporate Governance | ​ | ​ | Related Party Transactions Committee | ​ | ​ | Acquisitions | ​
​ | Monty J. Bennett | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | Benjamin J. Ansell, M.D. | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | Amish Gupta | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | Kamal Jafarnia | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | Frederick J. Kleisner | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | Sheri L. Pantermuehl | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | Alan L. Tallis | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​

(C): Chair

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   19 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​ | Audit Committee | ​
​ | Current Members: | ​ | ​ | Sheri L. Pantermuehl (chair), Frederick J. Kleisner and Alan L. Tallis | ​
​ | Independence | ​ | ​ | All of the members of the Audit Committee have been determined by our Board to be independent at all pertinent times, including under the heightened independence standards for members of audit committees of boards of directors. | ​
​ | Number of Meetings in 2021: | ​ | ​ | Five | ​
​ | Key Responsibilities | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | Evaluate the performance, qualifications and independence of the independent auditors; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | review with the independent auditors and the Chief Financial Officer and controller the audit scope and plan; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | approve in advance all audit and non-audit engagement fees; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | if necessary, to appoint or replace our independent auditors; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | meet to review with management and the independent auditors the annual audited and quarterly financial statements; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | recommend to our Board whether the Company’s financial statements should be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | prepare the audit committee report that the SEC rules and regulations require to be included in the Company’s annual proxy statement; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | discuss with management the Company’s major financial risk exposures and management’s policies on financial risk assessment and risk management, including steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | annually review the effectiveness of the internal audit function; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | review with management the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, and review the effectiveness of the Company’s system for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations, including the Company’s code of conduct and cybersecurity; and | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | evaluate its own performance and deliver a report to the Board setting forth the results of such evaluation. | ​

Each current Audit Committee member qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the applicable rules and regulations of the Exchange Act. All of the members of our Audit Committee on and after January 1, 2021 are “financially literate” under the NYSE listing standards.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 20 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​ | Compensation Committee | ​
​ | Current Members: | ​ | ​ | Alan L. Tallis (chair), Kamal Jafarnia and Frederick J. Kleisner | ​
​ | Independence | ​ | ​ | All of the members of the Compensation Committee have been determined by our Board to be independent at all pertinent times, including under the heightened standards for members of the compensation committees of boards of directors. | ​
​ | Number of Meetings in 2021: | ​ | ​ | Four | ​
​ | Key Responsibilities | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | Review the Company’s equity compensation programs to ensure the alignment of the interests of key leadership with the long term interests of stockholders; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | either as a committee or together with the other independent directors (as directed by our Board), determine and approve the Chief Executive Officer’s and Chairman of our Board’s equity compensation; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | make recommendations to our Board with respect to the equity compensation of other executive officers; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | review the performance of our officers; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | review and approve the officer compensation plans, policies and programs; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | annually review the compensation paid to non-employee directors for service on our Board and make recommendations to our Board regarding any proposed adjustments to such compensation; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | prepare an annual report on executive compensation for the Company’s annual proxy statement; and | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | administer the Company’s equity incentive plan. | ​

The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain and terminate any compensation consultant to assist it in the evaluation of officer compensation, or to delegate its duties and responsibilities to one or more subcommittees as it deems appropriate. In 2021, the Compensation Committee retained Gressle & McGinley LLC (“Gressle & McGinley”) as its independent compensation consultant. Gressle & McGinley provided competitive market data to support the Compensation Committee’s decisions on the value of equity to be awarded to our named executive officers. Gressle & McGinley has not performed any other services for the Company and performed its services only on behalf of, and at the direction of, the Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee reviewed the independence of Gressle & McGinley in light of SEC rules and NYSE listing standards regarding compensation consultant independence and has affirmatively concluded that Gressle & McGinley is independent from management of the Company and has no conflicts of interest relating to its engagement by our Compensation Committee.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   21 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​ | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | ​
​ | Current Members: | ​ | ​ | Kamal Jafarnia (chair), Benjamin J. Ansell, M.D. and Frederick J. Kleisner | ​
​ | Independence | ​ | ​ | All of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee have been determined by our Board to be independent at all pertinent times. | ​
​ | Number of Meetings in 2021: | ​ | ​ | One | ​
​ | Key Responsibilities | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | Assess, develop and communicate with our Board for our Board’s approval the appropriate criteria for nominating and appointing directors; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | recommend to our Board the director nominees for election at the next annual meeting of stockholders; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | identify and recommend candidates to fill vacancies on our Board occurring between annual stockholder meetings; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | when requested by our Board, recommend to our Board director nominees for each committee of our Board; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | develop and recommend to our Board our Corporate Governance Guidelines and periodically review and update such Corporate Governance Guidelines as well as make recommendations concerning changes to the charters of each committee of our Board; | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | perform a leadership role in shaping our environmental, social and corporate governance policies and procedures; and | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | oversee a self-evaluation of our Board. | ​

​ | Related Party Transactions Committee | ​
​ | Members: | ​ | ​ | Amish Gupta (chair), Sheri L. Pantermuehl and Alan L. Tallis | ​
​ | Number of Meetings in 2021: | ​ | ​ | Five | ​
​ | Key Responsibilities | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | Review any transaction in which our officers, directors, Ashford Inc. or Braemar or their officers, directors or respective affiliates have an interest, including any other related party and their respective affiliates, before recommending approval by a majority of our independent directors. The Related Party Transactions Committee can deny a new proposed transaction or recommend for approval to the independent directors. Also, the Related Party Transactions Committee periodically reviews and reports to our independent directors on past approved related party transactions. | ​

​ | Acquisitions Committee | ​
​ | Members: | ​ | ​ | Monty J. Bennett (chair), Benjamin J. Ansell, M.D. and Amish Gupta | ​
​ | Number of Meetings in 2021: | ​ | ​ | None. | ​
​ | Key Responsibilities | ​ | ​ | • | ​ | ​ | Review and approve any acquisition or disposition (and any related property level financing) by the Company, or its affiliates of assets valued at under $100 million. | ​

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 22 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Director Compensation
Each of our non-employee directors (other than our Chairman, Mr. Monty J. Bennett) is paid an annual base cash retainer of $90,000 (which was increased to $140,000 effective as of February 22, 2022). Non-employee directors serving in the following capacities also receive the additional annual cash retainers set forth below:

​ | Capacity | ​ | ​ | Additional Annual Retainer ($) | ​
​ | Lead Director | ​ | ​ | 50,000 | ​
​ | Audit Committee Chair | ​ | ​ | 25,000 | ​
​ | Compensation Committee Chair | ​ | ​ | 15,000 | ​
​ | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair | ​ | ​ | 15,000 | ​
​ | Related Party Transactions Committee Chair | ​ | ​ | 10,000 | ​
​ | Committee Member (Non-Chair) | ​ | ​ | 5,000 | ​

Each non-employee director (other than our Chairman, Mr. Monty J. Bennett) also receives an annual grant of immediately vested equity shares having a value of $90,000, in the form of shares of our common stock or long-term incentive partnership units (“LTIP units”) in our operating partnership, at the election of each director, and additional cash retainers from time to time for their service on special committees. Our Chairman, Mr. Monty J. Bennett, instead receives an annual incentive compensation grant (for 2021, entirely in the form of an equity-based award) with a value and vesting schedule that is determined by the Board after review of the Company’s prior fiscal year performance, considering the same factors as the Board takes into account in making annual incentive compensation grants to our named executive officers (as further described below under “Executive Compensation”). Approximately one-half of Mr. Monty J. Bennett’s equity award granted in fiscal 2021 is eligible to vest over a three-year period based on the Company’s absolute and relative total shareholder return (as further described below under “Executive Compensation”) and the other half is eligible to vest based on continued service in three equal installments on each anniversary of the grant date. Mr. Monty J. Bennett’s annual equity award is not granted in respect of his service on the Board, but instead in recognition of the extraordinary service that he provides to the Company indirectly through his employment with our advisor. The Board believes that the size of, and vesting schedule applicable to, Mr. Monty J. Bennett’s annual equity grant is appropriate because it reflects the scale of his historical and ongoing contributions to the Company, the depth of his expertise and knowledge of both the Company and our industry generally, and his continuous leadership as a founder of the Company and our advisor.
We do not pay Board meeting fees to any of our directors (although per meeting fees for service on special committees may be paid). We have historically reimbursed and will continue to reimburse all directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their services on the Board. Officers receive no additional compensation for serving on the Board.
To encourage retention of our non-employee directors, we also provide a special, one-time cash or equity award to qualifying retiring directors. Pursuant to this arrangement, an eligible director who has completed at least five years of service on the Board will be provided a one-time award upon his or her separation of service with a total value of (x) $10,000 multiplied by (y) each year of service completed on the Board, payable either in cash or in fully vested shares of our common stock, or any combination thereof, in the Board’s discretion. An eligible director will also be entitled to continuing participation in the Company’s prevailing discounted/complimentary hotel room program for a period of years equal to the number of years of Board service completed.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide a stock ownership requirement for our directors. Under our guidelines, each director should hold common stock with a value in excess of three times his or her annual Board retainer fee (excluding any portion of the retainer fee representing additional compensation for being a committee chairman or committee member). New directors are expected to achieve compliance with this requirement within four years from the date of election or appointment. Once a director has met his or her guideline, he or she will not be considered to be out of compliance with the guideline as a result of stock price volatility. The Company calculates the minimum number of shares necessary to meet compliance with the guidelines, and that number of shares will be the number required to be held through the remaining term of a director’s tenure. Although a director may not sell any

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   23 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

common stock granted to them in connection with their service to the Company until the director is in compliance with the guidelines, no director is required to acquire shares on the open market (or is prohibited from selling shares acquired on the open market) in order to meet compliance with the guidelines. As of December 31, 2021, each of our directors had stock ownership that met the guidelines.
The following table summarizes the compensation paid by us to our non-employee directors for their services as director for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021:

​ | Name | ​ | ​ | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | ​ | ​ | Stock Awards/LTIP(1) | ​ | ​ | All Other Compensation | ​ | ​ | Total | ​
​ | Benjamin J. Ansell, M.D. | ​ | ​ | $87,083 | ​ | ​ | $95,912 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $182,995 | ​
​ | Monty J. Bennett | ​ | ​ | $0 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $4,883,551(2) | ​ | ​ | $4,883,551 | ​
​ | Amish Gupta | ​ | ​ | $137,500 | ​ | ​ | $99,333 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $236,833 | ​
​ | Kamal Jafarnia | ​ | ​ | $100,833 | ​ | ​ | $96,845 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $197,678 | ​
​ | Frederick J. Kleisner | ​ | ​ | $96,250 | ​ | ​ | $96,223 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $192,473 | ​
​ | Sheri L. Pantermuehl | ​ | ​ | $110,000 | ​ | ​ | $97,467 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $207,467 | ​
​ | Alan L. Tallis | ​ | ​ | $105,417 | ​ | ​ | $97,156 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $202,573 | ​

(1) | Based on the fair market value of the stock awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 on the date of the grant. See Notes 2, 13, and 15 to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 for a discussion of the assumptions used in the valuation of stock-based awards. Each director (other than Dr. Ansell and, in respect of a portion of his awards, Mr. Tallis) elected to receive his or her fiscal 2021 stock awards as LTIP units. This column includes both each applicable director’s annual equity retainer award, as well as the portion of each director’s cash retainers that were paid in equity, as further described above.

(2) | As described above, Mr. Monty J. Bennett’s annual equity award is not granted in respect of his service on the Board, but instead in recognition of the extraordinary service that he provides to the Company indirectly through his employment with our advisor, and is therefore disclosed in the “All Other Compensation” column. Mr. Monty J. Bennett elected to receive the performance-based portion of his award in the form of performance-based LTIP units and the time-based portion of his award in the form of time-based LTIP units. See Notes 2, 13, and 15 to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 for a discussion of the assumptions used in the valuation of stock-based awards. As of December 31, 2021, Mr. Monty J. Bennett held 2,292 shares of restricted stock, 58,011 service-based LTIP units, 122,419 performance-based LTIP units, assuming that the applicable performance metrics are achieved at the maximum level, and 2,250 performance stock units, assuming that the applicable performance metrics are achieved at the target level.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2021, Messrs. Tallis, Kleisner and Jafarnia served on our Compensation Committee. Messrs. Tallis, Kleisner and Jafarnia were and are independent directors throughout the period for which they served or have served on our Compensation Committee during 2021 and thereafter. Neither Mr. Kleisner nor Mr. Jafarnia were, are or have ever been an officer or employee of our Company. None of Mr. Tallis, Mr. Kleisner and Mr. Jafarnia serve, or during 2021 served, as (i) a member of a Compensation Committee (or board committee performing equivalent functions) of any entity, one of whose executive officers served as a director of the Company or as a member of our Compensation Committee, or (ii) a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served or serves on our Compensation Committee. No member of our Compensation Committee has, or had during 2021, any relationship with the Company requiring disclosure as a related person transaction in the section “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” of this proxy statement.
Attendance at Annual Meeting of Stockholders
In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, directors of the Company are expected to attend the annual meeting of stockholders in person, by telephone or video conference. All persons who were directors at our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders attended our 2021 annual meeting.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 24 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND COMPENSATION
Executive Officers
The following table shows the names and ages of our current executive officers and the positions held by each individual. A description of the business experience of each for the past five years follows the table.

​ | Name | ​ | ​ | Age | ​ | ​ | Title | ​
​ | J. Robison Hays, III | ​ | ​ | 44 | ​ | ​ | Chief Executive Officer and President | ​
​ | Alex Rose | ​ | ​ | 36 | ​ | ​ | Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary | ​
​ | Deric S. Eubanks | ​ | ​ | 46 | ​ | ​ | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | ​
​ | Jeremy J. Welter | ​ | ​ | 45 | ​ | ​ | Chief Operating Officer | ​
​ | Mark L. Nunneley | ​ | ​ | 64 | ​ | ​ | Chief Accounting Officer | ​

​ | J. ROBISON HAYS, III | ​
​ | Chief Executive Officer and President Age: 44 Director since 2020 | ​ | ​ | Mr. Hays has served as our Chief Executive Officer and President since May 2020 and prior to that served as our Chief Strategy Officer since 2015 and our Senior Vice President-Corporate Finance and Strategy since 2010. He has been with our Company since 2005. Mr. Hays also currently serves as Senior Managing Director at Ashford Inc. and served on its board of directors until June 2020. Mr. Hays also previously served as Chief Strategy Officer for Braemar until May 2020. Prior to 2013, in addition to his other responsibilities, Mr. Hays was in charge of our investor relations group. Mr. Hays is a frequent speaker at industry and Wall Street investor conferences. Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Hays worked in the Corporate Development office of Dresser, Inc., a Dallas-based oil field service and manufacturing company, where he focused on mergers, acquisitions and strategic direction. Before working at Dresser, Mr. Hays was a member of the Merrill Lynch Global Power & Energy Investment Banking Group based in Texas. Mr. Hays has been a frequent speaker at various lodging, real estate and alternative investment conferences around the globe. He earned his A.B. degree in Politics with a certificate in Political Economy from Princeton University and later studied philosophy at the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross in Rome, Italy. | ​

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   25 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​ | ALEX ROSE | ​
​ | Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Age: 36 Executive since 2021 | ​ | ​ | Alex Rose has served as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since July 2021 and has served in that capacity for Ashford Inc. and Braemar since July 2021. Mr. Rose brings a broad range of legal experience and corporate governance expertise to our Company. Prior to joining our Company in 2021, he was a Partner at Kirkland & Ellis LLP from July 2018 to June 2021, where he worked with public and private companies, as well as private equity funds and their portfolio companies, in connection with complex transactions such as mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, divestitures, private financings, recapitalizations, debt and equity security investments, and other general corporate matters. Previously, Mr. Rose was an attorney at Jones Day and Vinson & Elkins LLP. Mr. Rose holds a J.D. from Columbia University School of Law and a B.S. from the University of Kansas and is admitted to practice law in the States of Texas and New York. | ​

​ | DERIC S. EUBANKS | ​
​ | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Age: 46 Executive since 2011 | ​ | ​ | Mr. Eubanks has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since June 2014 and has served in that capacity for Ashford Inc. and Braemar since June 2014. Prior to serving as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, Mr. Eubanks served as our Senior Vice President of Finance from September 2011 to June 2014 and in that capacity for Braemar from April 2013 to June 2014. In his role as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, Mr. Eubanks is responsible for assisting our Chief Executive Officer with all corporate finance and financial reporting initiatives and capital market activities including equity raises, debt financings and loan modifications. He also oversees Investor Relations and is responsible for overseeing and executing our hedging strategies. Prior to his role as Senior Vice President of Finance, Mr. Eubanks was Vice President of Investments and was responsible for sourcing and underwriting hotel investments including direct equity investments, joint venture equity, preferred equity, mezzanine loans, first mortgages, B-notes, construction loans and other debt securities. Mr. Eubanks has been with us since our initial public offering in August of 2003. Mr. Eubanks has written several articles for industry publications and is a frequent speaker at industry conferences and industry round tables. Before joining our Company, Mr. Eubanks was a Manager of Financial Analysis for ClubCorp, where he assisted in underwriting and analyzing investment opportunities in the golf and resort industries. Mr. Eubanks earned a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the Cox School of Business at Southern Methodist University and is a CFA charter holder. He is a member of the CFA Institute and the CFA Society of Dallas-Fort Worth. | ​

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 26 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​ | JEREMY J. WELTER | ​
​ | Chief Operating Officer Age: 45 Executive since 2011 | ​ | ​ | Jeremy J. Welter has served as our Chief Operating Officer since March 2018 and has also served in that capacity for Ashford Inc. and Braemar since March 2018. Mr. Welter has also served as President of Ashford Inc. since March 2018. He served as our Executive Vice President, Asset Management from March 2011 to March 2018. He also served in that capacity for Ashford Inc. from November 2014 to March 2018 and for Braemar from April 2013 to March 2018. From August 2005 until December 2010, Mr. Welter was employed by Remington Lodging in various capacities, most recently serving as its Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Welter oversees the asset management, capital management and acquisition underwriting functions for Ashford Trust and Braemar as well as the operations of Ashford Inc., including both its asset management advisory business and its hospitality products and services business. Mr. Welter is a current member of Marriott’s Owner Advisor Council and serves as a Board Member for the American Hotel and Lodging Association. Mr. Welter is a frequent speaker and panelist for various lodging investment and development conferences, including the NYU International Hospitality Industry Investment Conference. Mr. Welter earned his Bachelor of Science in Economics from Oklahoma State University, where he served as student body president and graduated summa cum laude | ​

​ | MARK L. NUNNELEY | ​
​ | Chief Accounting Officer Age: 64 Executive since 2003 | ​ | ​ | Mr. Nunneley has served as our Chief Accounting Officer since May 2003 and has served in that capacity for Ashford Inc. since April 2014 and for Braemar since April 2013. From 1992 until 2003, Mr. Nunneley served as Chief Financial Officer of Remington Lodging. He previously served as a tax consultant at Arthur Andersen & Company and as a tax manager at Deloitte & Touche. Mr. Nunneley is a certified public accountant (CPA) in the State of Texas and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Texas Society of CPAs and Dallas Chapter of CPAs. Mr. Nunneley earned his Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Pepperdine University and his Master of Science in Accounting from the University of Houston. | ​

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   27 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The following is a discussion of the compensation program adopted for our named executive officers, which include J. Robison Hays, III, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Deric S. Eubanks, our Chief Financial Officer, Jeremy J. Welter, our Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Mark Nunneley, our Chief Accounting Officer, and Robert G. Haiman, our former Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Mr. Rose did not receive any compensation from us during 2021 in respect of his service as an executive officer. Also included below is a discussion of the incentive compensation awarded to our named executive officers in 2022 with respect to 2021 performance. This discussion should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures set forth elsewhere in this proxy statement.
Because we no longer qualify as an “emerging growth company” or “smaller reporting company,” we are no longer eligible to provide our executive compensation disclosure pursuant to the scaled disclosure rules available to such companies. Accordingly, though our 2021 compensation practices generally did not change dramatically from those in place for 2020 (subject to differences noted below among others), the nature of the disclosure below has changed as a result.
Compensation of Our Executive Officers
We are externally advised by Ashford Inc. pursuant to an advisory agreement. Ashford Inc., through its operating company Ashford LLC, is responsible for implementing our investment strategies and managing our operations. Our advisor manages the day-to-day operations of our Company and our affiliates in exchange for an advisory fee, the terms of which are described under “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions-Our Relationship and Agreements with Ashford Inc. and its Subsidiaries.” As a consequence of this management arrangement and although the Company has executive officers, it does not have any employees. Each of the Company’s executive officers is, however, an employee of our advisor and is compensated by our advisor in his capacity as such. During all of 2019, 2020 and 2021, the cash compensation received by our executive officers was paid to those persons by Ashford Inc. in their capacity as employees of our advisor. However, our executive officers (as well as other employees of our advisor) continue to be eligible to receive equity-based (and, starting in 2022, certain cash) awards under our 2021 Stock Incentive Plan as described below. We do not, however, provide any other compensation or employee benefit plans for our executive officers.
Compensation Objectives & Philosophy
The objectives of our equity compensation program are to: (i) motivate our executive officers to achieve the Company’s business and strategic objectives; (ii) align the interests of key leadership with the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders; and (iii) provide rewards and incentives, without excessive risk taking, in order to attract, retain, and motivate our executive officers to perform in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
Role of the Compensation Committee
The compensation we pay to our executive officers is administered under the direction of our Compensation Committee. In its role as the administrator of our compensation program, our Compensation Committee recommends the compensation to be paid to our named executive officers with respect to a year to the Board, taking into consideration the recommendations of our Chairman and our independent compensation consultant, with the members of the Board ultimately approving all executive compensation decisions. A full description of the Compensation Committee’s roles and responsibilities can be found in its charter which is posted to our website at www.ahtreit.com under the “Investor” tab, by navigating to the “Corporate Governance” link, then to the “Governance Documents” link.
Our Compensation Committee has the authority to retain independent advisors to assist the committee in fulfilling its responsibilities. In July 2015, the committee initially retained Gressle & McGinley as its independent compensation consultant, and has continued to do so. Gressle & McGinley has not performed any services other than executive and director compensation services for the Company, and has performed its services only on behalf of, and at the direction of, the Compensation Committee (although Gressle & McGinley is also the independent compensation

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 28 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

consultant to the compensation committees of the boards of directors of our advisor, Ashford Inc., and Braemar). Our Compensation Committee has reviewed the independence of Gressle & McGinley in light of SEC rules and NYSE listing standards regarding compensation consultant independence and has affirmatively concluded that Gressle & McGinley is independent from the Company and has no conflicts of interest relating to its engagement by our Compensation Committee.
Interaction with Management
Our Compensation Committee regularly meets in executive sessions without management or other directors present. Executives generally are not present during Compensation Committee meetings. However, our Chairman and certain of our executive officers and employees of our advisor do attend all or part of certain Compensation Committee meetings. Our Chairman, considering certain performance factors as set by the Board each year, annually reviews the compensation for each named executive officer and our advisor’s (and its subsidiaries’) employees as a group and makes recommendations to our Compensation Committee regarding the compensation we should grant to our named executive officers and our advisor’s (and its subsidiaries’) employees as a group. Final compensation decisions for our executive officers are ultimately made in the sole discretion of, and with the approval of, the members of the Board based on the recommendations of the Compensation Committee.
Corporate Governance
Our Compensation Committee believes that the integrity of corporate governance is reinforced by linking our executive officers’ long-term interests to the interests of our stockholders through our compensation program. We believe that our compensation program provides appropriate performance-based incentives to attract and retain leadership talent, to align officer and stockholder interests, and to continue to drive our long-term track record of superior returns to stockholders.
The following policies support our position:

​ | What We Do | ​ | ​ | What We Don’t Do | ​
​ | Pay for Performance. A substantial portion of our equity grants are tied to rigorous incentive compensation performance goals. | ​ | ​ | No Hedging/Pledging. We do not allow hedging or pledging of Company securities. | ​
​ | Equity Ownership Guidelines. We impose robust stock ownership guidelines on our executive officers. | ​ | ​ | Equity Ownership Guidelines. We do not count performance shares toward our stock ownership guidelines. | ​
​ | Clawback Policy. We can recover performance-based incentive compensation in various circumstances. | ​ | ​ | No Dividends on Unvested Performance Shares. We do not pay dividends on unvested performance shares unless the shares actually vest. | ​
​ | Independent Compensation Consultant. Our Compensation Committee uses the consulting firm of Gressle & McGinley, which is independent and provides no other services to the Company. | ​ | ​ | No Stock Options. We do not grant stock options. | ​
​ | Compensation Risk Assessment. We conduct an annual compensation risk assessment. | ​ | ​ | No Evergreen Provision. We have no evergreen provisions in our stock incentive plan. | ​
​ | External Advisor Compensation. We provide detailed disclosure of compensation paid by our advisor to our named executive officers. | ​ | ​ | No Perquisites. We do not provide our executive officers with any perquisites or retirement programs. | ​

Consideration of Say-on-Pay Vote
At our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, we provided our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, our executive compensation. More than 74% of the votes cast at our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders voted to approve our executive compensation as described in our proxy statement for the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders. The Compensation Committee reviewed the results of this advisory “say-on-pay” vote and considered it in determining specific award amounts granted to our named executive officers for 2021. The Compensation Committee will also carefully consider future stockholder votes on this matter, along with other expressions of stockholder views it receives on specific policies and desirable actions.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   29 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Advisory Fee and Compensation Paid by the Advisor
Pursuant to our advisory agreement, we pay Ashford Inc. an advisory fee. In turn, Ashford Inc. uses a portion of the proceeds of such advisory fee to pay the cash compensation it pays its personnel. We do not specifically reimburse Ashford Inc. for any executive officer compensation or benefits costs. The following is a summary of the advisory fees we paid to Ashford Inc. in 2021 and the total 2021 compensation paid to our named executive officers, including the equity compensation we paid to our named executive officers in 2021:

• | Under the terms of our advisory agreement, for 2021 our advisory services fee totaled approximately $52.3 million, comprised of a base fee of approximately $36.2 million, reimbursable overhead, internal audit, risk management advisory, and asset management services of approximately $6.9 million and equity-based compensation of approximately $9.1 million associated with equity grants of our common stock and long-term incentive partnership units, or LTIP units, awarded to our executive officers and employees of Ashford Inc. and its subsidiaries.

• | No specific portion of our advisory fee is allocated to the compensation paid by Ashford Inc. to its employees who are also our executive officers. Our advisor makes all decisions relating to compensation paid by Ashford Inc. to our executive officers who are its employees based on such factors as the terms of their employment agreements with Ashford Inc. and an evaluation of the performance of such employees on behalf of Ashford Inc. and its advisees during the year.

• | For 2021, our named executive officers earned total cash compensation of approximately $6.2 million from Ashford Inc. based on amounts determined through the date hereof. This amount was comprised of an aggregate of approximately $2.6 million in salaries and an aggregate of approximately $3.0 million in cash bonuses, plus approximately $605,000 in cash payments to our former Chief Executive Officer paid in accordance with the non-competition covenants contained in his former employment agreement with Ashford Inc. In addition, Ashford Inc. granted 92,500 restricted shares of common stock of Ashford Inc. with an aggregate grant date fair value of approximately $838,000, to our named executive officers. We have not agreed to or otherwise undertaken to pay Ashford Inc. any amount or otherwise reimburse Ashford Inc. for any expense it incurs in connection with the grant of any equity awards with respect to Ashford Inc. common stock to its employees who are our named executive officers.

• | Not all of the compensation received by our named executive officers from Ashford Inc. was attributable to services performed as executive officers of our Company. Based on a review of the proportion of our Company to the total operations managed using various measures of size (revenue, assets, and total enterprise value), we estimate that approximately 70% of the compensation paid by Ashford Inc. is attributable to services provided by our named executive officers to our Company.

• | The 2021 annual bonus program at Ashford Inc. took into account a variety of financial performance factors, including the level of attainment of budgeted revenue, budgeted adjusted EBITDA and liquidity levels, as well as non-financial strategic goals related to loan terms and third-party business growth in selected operational segments.

2021 and 2022 Incentive Compensation Grant Decisions
The Compensation Committee believes that our named executive officers should have an ongoing stake in the long-term success of our business, and our incentive compensation program is intended to align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders, as well as to reward our executive officers for their performance on the Company’s behalf. Under our incentive compensation program, the Compensation Committee determines the size of potential awards by officer based on a review of market pay levels, taking into consideration the size of our Company against our peers, as well as multiple other factors including, but not limited to, the Company’s and each named executive officer’s individual performance, competitive award opportunities provided to similarly situated executives, and our named executive officers’ roles and responsibilities.
The SEC’s rules require disclosure in the tables that follow this Compensation Discussion and Analysis of the equity awards that were granted to our named executive officers in 2021. However, this “2021 and 2022 Incentive Compensation Grant Decisions” section describes incentive compensation grants made to our named executive

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 30 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

officers in March 2022 because the Company’s long-term incentive compensation awards are granted to named executive officers in respect of their performance during the preceding year. For a discussion of awards made in 2021 (in respect of 2020 service), please refer to the “Executive Compensation” discussion contained in our 2021 proxy statement, filed with the SEC on March 30, 2021.
For our March 2022 awards based on 2021 performance, the size of the potential awards for our named executive officers was determined based on 2020 performance, historical compensation levels in the hospitality REIT sector (please refer to “—Review of Market Data for Peer Companies” below for further discussion of this analysis) and the recommendations of the Chairman in setting the awards for each individual named executive officer. 2021 performance was evaluated based on seven business objectives established by the Board of Directors. The Board believes these objectives reflected the cyclicality of the industry in which we operate and evolving changes in market conditions and were appropriate to further align the interests of the named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders. The following table summarizes the seven business objectives set by the Board of Directors for 2021, along with the actual results:
2021 Business Objectives

​ | Business Objective | ​ | ​ | Performance Target | ​ | ​ | 2021 Performance | ​
​ | Target | ​ | ​ | Actual | ​ | ​ | Achieved? | ​
​ | Revenue | ​ | ​ | Budget | ​ | ​ | $687.2M | ​ | ​ | $805.4M | ​ | ​ | Yes | ​
​ | Adjusted EBITDAre* | ​ | ​ | Budget | ​ | ​ | $48.8M | ​ | ​ | $113.6M | ​ | ​ | Yes | ​
​ | EBITDA Flows* | ​ | ​ | Target | ​ | ​ | 35.0% | ​ | ​ | 56.7% | ​ | ​ | Yes | ​
​ | Maintain Corporate Liquidity | ​ | ​ | At Least $50M | ​ | ​ | $50M | ​ | ​ | $974.1M | ​ | ​ | Yes(1) | ​
​ | Investor/Analyst Interactions | ​ | ​ | At Least 200 | ​ | ​ | 200 | ​ | ​ | 10,250 | ​ | ​ | Yes(2) | ​
​ | Refinance Marriott Gateway | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ | Done 11/1/21 | ​ | ​ | Yes | ​
​ | Finalize Forbearance Agreements | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ | Yes | ​

* | For a reconciliation of EBITDA, EBITDAre, Adjusted EBITDAre and EBITDA Flows (the change in Adjusted EBITDAre divided by the change in revenue) to a measure under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States, see Annex A.

(1) | Actual includes cash, securities, due from related/third parties and available credit facility.

(2) | Total includes online media interviews, industry-related conference calls, investor conferences, as well as individual investor meetings and calls.

Based on its review of 2021 performance, the Compensation Committee determined that the Company achieved all seven of the business objectives resulting in the equity awards to our named executive officers described below.
Approximately one-half of the value of the annual awards was granted in an equity-based form (for the 2022 award, settled in either equity or cash as determined by the Compensation Committee) that is eligible to vest based on performance metrics established by the Compensation Committee. For 2021, the other half of the award was an equity-based award eligible to vest based on continued service in three equal installments on each anniversary of the grant date. For 2022, the other half of the award was made in the form of deferred cash payments payable quarterly over three years generally subject to continued service. Named executive officers may elect to receive their performance-based equity awards in the form of performance stock units (“PSUs”) or performance LTIP units (“Performance LTIPs”), as described in further detail below. Upon vesting and reaching economic parity with the common units, LTIP units are convertible into common units at the option of the recipient. Common units are redeemable for cash or, at our option, convertible into shares of our common stock at a 1:1 conversion ratio.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   31 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

One-half of the fiscal 2022 PSUs and Performance LTIPs will be eligible to vest (from 0% to 200% of target) based on achievement of a Hotel Net Operating Income metric (with adjustments for certain asset sales), while the remaining one-half will be eligible to vest (from 0% to 200% of target) based on a Net Debt / Gross Investment Property Ratio, in each case in respect of 2024 as set forth in the table below (with linear interpolation between the threshold and target, and target and maximum, performance levels):

​ | Metric | ​ | ​ | Threshold Performance (50%) | ​ | ​ | Target Performance (100%) | ​ | ​ | Maximum Performance (200%) | ​
​ | Hotel Net Operating Income(1) | ​ | ​ | $150M | ​ | ​ | $250M | ​ | ​ | $350M | ​
​ | Net Debt / Gross Investment Property Ratio(2) | ​ | ​ | 67.5% | ​ | ​ | 62.5% | ​ | ​ | 57.5% | ​

(1) | Hotel Net Operating Income is defined as the Company’s Hotel EBITDA (as reported by the Company in its earnings release for the respective fiscal year), reduced by the Company’s FF&E Reserve (as calculated by the Compenstion Committee). However, the threshold performance level will be reduced by 40%, the target performance level will be reduced by 65%, and the maximum performance level will be reduced by 95%, respectively, of the 2019 Hotel Net Operating Income related to any hotel assets disposed of during the three-year performance period.

(2) | Equal to the quotient of Net Debt (as defined below) divided by “investments in hotel properties, net plus accumulated depreciation,” as reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements reported on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024. “Net Debt” is defined as “indebtedness” less (w) “cash and cash equivalents,” (x) “restricted cash,” (y) financial assets “due from third-party hotel managers,” and (z) “marketable securities,” each as reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements reported on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024.

Use of Net Debt / Gross Investment Property Ratio takes the place of the (Net Debt + Preferred Equity) / Total Enterprise Value metric that is in place for awards granted in 2021. The Compensation Committee believes this measure (which has also historically been used by Braemar) strengthens the incentive for our executive officers to focus on operating metrics that are critical to the Company’s success.
Once performance based on the two metrics above is determined, the calculated amount (which may between 0% and 200% of the target award) will be further subject to an absolute total shareholder return (“TSR”) modifier, which may range from 75% to 125% of the otherwise-earned award based on the annualized TSR over the three-year performance period as set forth in the table below (with linear interpolation between the threshold and target, and target and maximum, modifier levels):

​ | Threshold Absolute TSR Modifier (75%) | ​ | ​ | Target Absolute TSR Modifier (100%) | ​ | ​ | Maximum Absolute TSR Modifier (125%) | ​
​ | 5% or less | ​ | ​ | 7% | ​ | ​ | 9% or more | ​

This structure will provide each grantee with an opportunity to vest from 0% to 250% of the fiscal 2022 target PSU and performance LTIP awards. The awards will be settled in equity or cash as ultimately determined by the Compensation Committee.
A summary of the components of the March 2022 incentive compensation awards to our named executive officers is as follows. Mr. Haiman is omitted because he was no longer serving as an executive officer at the time of grant, and Mr. Welter is omitted because his awards, if any, have not yet been determined.

​ | Executive | ​ | ​ | Target Performance-Based Shares/LTIPs Awarded (#) | ​ | ​ | Deferred Cash Amount ($) | ​
​ | J. Robison Hays, III | ​ | ​ | 151,075 | ​ | ​ | 1,403,491 | ​
​ | Deric S. Eubanks | ​ | ​ | 85,215 | ​ | ​ | 791,645 | ​
​ | Mark L. Nunneley | ​ | ​ | 49,479 | ​ | ​ | 459,663 | ​

LTIP Units
The LTIP units are a special class of partnership units in our operating partnership called “long-term incentive partnership units.” Grants of LTIP units are designed to offer executives the same long-term incentive as restricted stock, while allowing them more favorable income tax treatment. Each LTIP unit awarded is deemed equivalent to an award of one share of common stock reserved under our stock incentive plan, reducing availability for other equity

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 32 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

awards, because LTIP units are convertible into common units of our operating partnership, which may themselves be converted into shares of our common stock based on a conversion ratio of 1:1. As a result, an LTIP unit granted may result in an issuance of one share of our common stock. LTIP units, whether vested or not, receive the same quarterly per unit distributions as common units of our operating partnership, which typically equal per share dividends on our common stock, if any. This treatment with respect to quarterly distributions is analogous to the typical treatment of time-vested restricted stock. (Note that distributions on Performance LTIPs accrue on unvested units and are paid in the form of additional common units of our operating partnership on the actual number of LTIP units that vest.) The key difference between LTIP units and restricted stock is that at the time of award, LTIP units do not have full economic parity with common units but can achieve such parity over time. Upon the occurrence of certain corporate events, which are not performance-related events, the capital accounts of our operating partnership may be adjusted, allowing for the LTIP units to achieve parity with the common units over time. If such parity is reached, vested LTIP units become convertible into an equal number of common units. Until and unless such parity is reached, the value that an executive will realize for a given number of vested LTIP units is less than the value of an equal number of shares of our common stock.
Subject to satisfaction of the applicable performance- or service-vesting requirements for the LTIP units or Performance LTIPs, the LTIP units will achieve parity with the common units upon the sale or deemed sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the partnership at a time when the Company’s stock is trading at some level in excess of the price it was trading at on the date of the LTIP issuance. More specifically, LTIP units will achieve full economic parity with common units in connection with (i) the actual sale of all or substantially all of the assets of our operating partnership or (ii) the hypothetical sale of such assets, which results from a capital account revaluation, as defined in the partnership agreement, for the operating partnership. A capital account revaluation generally occurs whenever there is an issuance of additional partnership interests or the redemption of a partnership interest. If a sale, or deemed sale as a result of a capital account revaluation, occurs at a time when the operating partnership’s assets have sufficiently appreciated, the LTIP units will achieve full economic parity with the common units. However, in the absence of sufficient appreciation in the value of the assets of the operating partnership at the time a sale or deemed sale occurs, full economic parity would not be reached. Until and unless such economic parity is reached, the value that an executive will realize for vested LTIP units will be less than the value of an equal number of shares of our common stock.
Review of Market Data for Peer Companies
Incentive compensation grants for our named executive officers are determined based on a number of factors, including a periodic review of the compensation levels in the marketplace for similar positions. In 2019, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of Gressle & McGinley, our independent compensation consultant, undertook such a review of competitive compensation compared to market, with a particular emphasis on market level of equity compensation.
Competitive pay data is used for reference only to gauge the marketplace for executive compensation in our industry. The Compensation Committee does not establish a specific target percentile of market for our executives and generally seeks to provide the compensation levels needed to retain our exceptional executive team and reward appropriately for performance.
The specific peers used to assess competitive pay include other hospitality REITs with similar assets. The hospitality REITs included in our assessment of competitive pay include: Chatham Lodging Trust, DiamondRock Hospitality Company, Hersha Hospitality Trust, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., Park Hotels and Resorts, Inc., Pebblebrook Hotel Trust, RLJ Lodging Trust, Summit Hotel Properties, Inc., Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
The Compensation Committee also assessed the pay practices of these hospitality REITs in evaluating 2021 incentive compensation grant decisions for 2020 performance and 2022 incentive compensation grant decisions for 2021 performance.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide ownership guidelines for our executive officers. The guidelines state that the Chief Executive Officer should hold an amount of our common stock or other equity equivalent having a market value in excess of three times his annual base salary paid by our advisor and each other executive officer

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   33 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

should hold common stock or other equity equivalent having a market value in excess of one-and-one half times his annual base salary paid by our advisor. The guidelines provide that ownership of common units or LTIP units in our operating partnership constitute “common stock” for purposes of compliance with the guideline based on a conversion ratio of 1:1. Executive officers are expected to achieve compliance within four years of being appointed. Once an executive officer has met his or her guideline, he or she will not be considered to be out of compliance with the guideline as a result of stock price volatility. The Company calculates the minimum number of shares necessary to meet compliance with the guidelines, and that number of shares will be the number required to be held through the remaining term of an executive’s tenure. Although an executive officer may not sell any common stock granted to them in connection with their service to the Company until the executive officer is in compliance with the guidelines, no executive officer is required to acquire shares on the open market (or is prohibited from selling shares acquired on the open market) in order to meet compliance with the guidelines. As of December 31, 2021, each of our named executive officers had stock ownership that met the guidelines.
Hedging and Pledging Policies
We maintain a policy that prohibits our directors and executive officers from holding Company securities in a margin account or pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan. Our policy also prohibits our directors and executive officers from engaging in speculation with respect to Company securities, and specifically prohibits our executives from engaging in any short-term, speculative securities transactions involving Company securities and engaging in hedging transactions.
Adjustment or Recovery of Awards
Under the Company’s clawback policy, if the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirements, then the Compensation Committee, or, in the discretion of the Board, any other committee or body of the Board consisting only of independent directors, may require any Section 16 reporting officer, as well as any other officer holding the title of senior vice president or a more senior title whose job description includes the function of accounting or financial reporting (each, a “covered officer”), during the three-year period preceding the publication of the restated financial statement to reimburse the Company for any annual cash bonus and long-term incentive compensation earned during the prior three-year period in such amounts that the independent director committee determines to be in excess of the amount that such covered officer would have received had such compensation been calculated based on the financial results reported in the restated financial statement.
The independent director committee may take into account any factors it deems reasonable, necessary, and in the best interests of the Company to remedy any misconduct and prevent its recurrence. In determining whether to seek recoupment of any previously paid excess compensation and how much to recoup from each covered officer, the independent director committee must consider the accountability of the applicable covered officer, any conclusion by the independent director committee whether a covered officer engaged in wrongdoing, committed grossly negligent acts, omissions or engaged in willful misconduct, as well as any failure of the covered officer to report another person’s grossly negligent acts, omissions, or willful misconduct. In addition, if a covered officer engaged in intentional misconduct or violation of Company policy that contributed to the award or payment of any annual cash bonus or long-term incentive compensation to him or her that is greater than would have been paid or awarded in the absence of the misconduct or violation, the independent director committee may take other remedial and recovery action permitted by applicable law, as determined by such committee.
Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC has proposed additional rules regarding the clawback of equity awards in certain circumstances. If the proposed rules or other rules are finally adopted by the SEC, the Company intends to modify its recoupment policies accordingly.
Tax and Accounting Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, generally precludes a publicly held corporation from a federal income tax deduction for a taxable year for compensation in excess of $1 million paid to its “covered employees,” which generally include its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, its next three most highly compensated executive officers, and any individual who is (or was) a “covered employee” for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2016.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 34 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our Company is structured such that compensation is not paid and deducted by the corporation, but at the Ashford Hospitality Trust OP level. Section 162(m)’s deduction limitation may apply to our distributive share of Ashford Hospitality Trust OP’s deduction for compensation paid to covered employees. The deductibility of compensation is only one of a multitude of factors that we consider in establishing compensation, and we and our Compensation Committee believe that it is important to retain flexibility to award compensation to our employees that appropriately incentivizes their retention, encourages performance, and aligns with our stockholders’ interests, even if the deductibility of that compensation is limited (whether under Section 162(m) or otherwise). We also consider the accounting impact of all compensation paid to our executives, and equity awards are given special consideration pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718.
Compensation Risk Assessment
The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for overseeing the risks relating to our compensation policies and practices. The Compensation Committee uses its independent compensation consultant, Gressle & McGinley, to independently consider and analyze the extent, if any, to which our compensation policies and practices might create risks for the Company, as well as policies and practices that could mitigate any such risks. After conducting this review in 2021, the Compensation Committee has determined that none of our compensation policies and practices create any risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis disclosure with the Company’s management, and based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

​ |  | ​ | ​ | COMPENSATION COMMITTEE | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | Alan L. Tallis, Chairman Frederick J. Kleisner Kamal Jafarnia | ​

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   35 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the fiscal 2021, 2020 and as applicable 2019 compensation paid to or earned by the Company’s named executive officers. Compensation information for Mr. Haiman is included only for 2021 and 2020, as Mr. Haiman first became a named executive officer in 2020.

​ | Name and Principal Position | ​ | ​ | Year | ​ | ​ | Salary(1) | ​ | ​ | Stock Awards/ LTIPs(2) | ​ | ​ | Total | ​
​ | J. Robison Hays, III | ​ | ​ | 2021 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $3,763,996 | ​ | ​ | $3,763,996 | ​
​ | President and Chief Executive Officer | ​ | ​ | 2020 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $195,187 | ​ | ​ | $195,187 | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2019 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $1,395,317 | ​ | ​ | $1,395,317 | ​
​ | Deric S. Eubanks | ​ | ​ | 2021 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $1,285,748 | ​ | ​ | $1,285,748 | ​
​ | Chief Financial Officer | ​ | ​ | 2020 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $195,187 | ​ | ​ | $195,187 | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2019 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $1,406,058 | ​ | ​ | $1,406,058 | ​
​ | Jeremy J. Welter | ​ | ​ | 2021 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $1,827,117 | ​ | ​ | $1,827,117 | ​
​ | Chief Operating Officer | ​ | ​ | 2020 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $247,640 | ​ | ​ | $247,640 | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2019 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $1,400,688 | ​ | ​ | $1,400,688 | ​
​ | Mark L. Nunneley | ​ | ​ | 2021 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $676,711 | ​ | ​ | $676,711 | ​
​ | Chief Accounting Officer | ​ | ​ | 2020 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $97,607 | ​ | ​ | $97,607 | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2019 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $746,523 | ​ | ​ | $746,523 | ​
​ | Robert G. Haiman | ​ | ​ | 2021 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $1,285,748 | ​ | ​ | $1,285,748 | ​
​ | Former Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary | ​ | ​ | 2020 | ​ | ​ | ​$0 | ​ | ​ | $165,093 | ​ | ​ | $165,093 | ​

(1) | We do not pay salary or bonus compensation to our executive officers, including our named executive officers. However, we grant our executives and the executives and employees of our advisor and its subsidiaries equity-based (and, starting in 2022, certain cash-based incentive compensation) awards, if and to the extent determined appropriate by our Compensation Committee. No allocation of the total compensation paid and benefits provided by Ashford Inc. to its officers and employees who are our named executive officers is made for the time spent by such persons on behalf of either our Company or Braemar. As a result, we have not included any amount of the compensation paid and benefits provided to such persons by Ashford Inc. in the foregoing summary compensation table.

(2) | Represents the total grant date fair value of restricted stock awards, LTIP unit awards, PSUs, and Performance LTIPs made in the fiscal year indicated (with respect to prior year performance), computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 without regard to the effects of forfeiture. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are described in Notes 2, 13, and 15 to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. With respect to the PSUs and Performance LTIPs, the amount reflected in the Summary Compensation Table assumes that the required performance goals will be achieved at target levels. The following table provides the grant date fair values of the Performance LTIPs and the PSUs, issued to the named executive officers in 2021, assuming maximum performance is achieved.

​ | Name | ​ | ​ | At Maximum | ​
​ | J. Robison Hays, III | ​ | ​ | $3,174,366 | ​
​ | Deric S. Eubanks | ​ | ​ | $1,723,224 | ​
​ | Jeremy J. Welter | ​ | ​ | $2,448,795 | ​
​ | Mark L. Nunneley | ​ | ​ | $906,964 | ​
​ | Robert G. Haiman | ​ | ​ | $1,723,224 | ​

(3) | Mr. Haiman ceased to serve as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary on June 30, 2021, in connection with his retirement.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 36 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2021 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

​ |  | ​ | ​ | Grant Date | ​ | ​ | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) (#) | ​ | ​ | All Other Equity Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or LTIPs(2) | ​ | ​ | Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Awards(3) | ​
​ | Name | ​ | ​ | Threshold | ​ | ​ | Target | ​ | ​ | Maximum | ​
​ | J. Robison Hays, III | ​ | ​ | 5/12/2021 | ​ | ​ | 16,032 | ​ | ​ | 42,752 | ​ | ​ | 106,881 | ​ | ​ | 97,053 | ​ | ​ | $3,763,996 | ​
​ | Deric S. Eubanks | ​ | ​ | 5/12/2021 | ​ | ​ | 8,703 | ​ | ​ | 23,208 | ​ | ​ | 58,021 | ​ | ​ | 23,209 | ​ | ​ | $1,285,748 | ​
​ | Jeremy J. Welter | ​ | ​ | 5/12/2021 | ​ | ​ | 12,368 | ​ | ​ | 32,980 | ​ | ​ | 82,451 | ​ | ​ | 32,981 | ​ | ​ | $1,827,117 | ​
​ | Mark L. Nunneley | ​ | ​ | 5/12/2021 | ​ | ​ | 4,581 | ​ | ​ | 12,215 | ​ | ​ | 30,538 | ​ | ​ | 12,215 | ​ | ​ | $676,711 | ​
​ | Robert G. Haiman | ​ | ​ | 5/12/2021 | ​ | ​ | 8,703 | ​ | ​ | 23,208 | ​ | ​ | 58,021 | ​ | ​ | 23,209 | ​ | ​ | $1,285,748 | ​

(1) | Amounts represent the threshold, target, and maximum number of PSUs or performance LTIPs, at the election of the recipient, pursuant to the March 2021 equity awards for 2020 performance. Subject to forfeiture and the achievement of the applicable performance-based vesting criteria, these awards will vest on December 31, 2023.

(2) | Represents LTIP units or restricted common stock, at the election of the recipient, that vest in three substantially equal installments on the first three anniversaries following the date of grant, with vesting generally conditioned on the award recipient continuing to be an executive officer of the Company on each such vesting date.

(3) | Computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of forfeitures and assuming the target level of achievement.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   37 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2021 Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth information concerning outstanding equity awards for each of our named executive officers as of December 31, 2021. All unit/share counts are shown as adjusted following the Company’s 1:10 reverse stock split completed on July 16, 2021.

​ | Name | ​ | ​ | Number of Service- Based Equity Awards That Had Not Vested at December 31, 2021 | ​ | ​ | Market Value of Service- Based Equity Awards That Had Not Vested at December 31, 2021(7) | ​ | ​ | Number of Equity Incentive Plan Awards (PSUs and Performance LTIPs) That Were Unearned or Not Vested at December 31, 2021 | ​ | ​ | Market Value of Equity Incentive Plan Awards (PSUs and Performance LTIPs) That Were Unearned or Not Vested at December 31, 2021(7) | ​
​ | J. Robison Hays, III | ​ | ​ | 358(1) | ​ | ​ | $3,437 | ​ | ​ | 500(5) | ​ | ​ | $4,800 | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 667(2) | ​ | ​ | $6,403 | ​ | ​ | 16,032(6) | ​ | ​ | $153,907 | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 42,752(3) | ​ | ​ | $410,419 | ​ | ​ | — | ​ | ​ | — | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 36,200(4) | ​ | ​ | $347,520 | ​ | ​ | — | ​ | ​ | — | ​
​ | Deric S. Eubanks | ​ | ​ | 358(1) | ​ | ​ | $3,437 | ​ | ​ | 500(5) | ​ | ​ | $4,800 | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 667(2) | ​ | ​ | $6,403 | ​ | ​ | 8,703(6) | ​ | ​ | $83,549 | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 23,208(3) | ​ | ​ | $222,797 | ​ | ​ | — | ​ | ​ | — | ​
​ | Jeremy J. Welter | ​ | ​ | 358(1) | ​ | ​ | $3,437 | ​ | ​ | 1,500(5) | ​ | ​ | $14,400 | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 1,000(2) | ​ | ​ | $9,600 | ​ | ​ | 12,368(6) | ​ | ​ | $118,728 | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 32,980(3) | ​ | ​ | $316,608 | ​ | ​ | — | ​ | ​ | — | ​
​ | Mark L. Nunneley | ​ | ​ | 190(1) | ​ | ​ | $1,824 | ​ | ​ | 250(5) | ​ | ​ | $2,400 | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 333(2) | ​ | ​ | $3,197 | ​ | ​ | 4,581(6) | ​ | ​ | $43,974 | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 12,215(3) | ​ | ​ | $117,264 | ​ | ​ | — | ​ | ​ | — | ​
​ | Robert G. Haiman | ​ | ​ | 207(1) | ​ | ​ | $1,987 | ​ | ​ | 1,000(5) | ​ | ​ | $9,600 | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 667(2) | ​ | ​ | $6,403 | ​ | ​ | 8,703(6) | ​ | ​ | $83,549 | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 23,208(3) | ​ | ​ | $222,797 | ​ | ​ | — | ​ | ​ | — | ​

(1) | These equity awards were granted on February 28, 2019, with an initial vesting term of three years. One-third of the awards initially granted vested on February 28, 2020; one-third vested on February 28, 2021; and the remaining one-third vested on February 28, 2022.

(2) | These equity awards were granted on March 11, 2020, with an initial vesting term of three years. One-third of the awards initially granted vested on March 11, 2021; one-third vested on March 11, 2022; and the remaining one-third will vest on March 11, 2023.

(3) | These equity awards were granted on May 12, 2021, with an initial vesting term of three years. One-third of the awards initially granted vested on March 15, 2021; one-third vested on March 15, 2022; and the remaining one-third will vest on March 15, 2023.

(4) | These equity awards were granted on May 12, 2021, with an initial vesting term of three years. One-third of the awards initially granted vested on May 14, 2021; one-third will vest on May 14, 2022; and the remaining one-third will vest on May 14, 2023.

(5) | These equity awards were granted on March 11, 2020, and assuming continued service and achievement of the specified performance-based vesting criteria, will vest on December 31, 2022. One-third of the initially granted award was eligible to vest based on performance over the first year of the three-year performance period, but since performance at the time was below the threshold level, no portion of the award vested after the first year of the performance period. Amount reflects the threshold payout level, which is 50% of the target payout; however, the actual number that will vest could range from 0% to 200% of the target number.

(6) | These equity awards were granted on May 12, 2021, and assuming continued service and achievement of the specified performance-based vesting criteria, will vest on December 31, 2023. Amount reflects the threshold payout level, which is 37.5% of the target payout; however, the actual number that will vest could range from 0% to 250% of the target number.

(7) | Market value of unvested service-based and performance-based awards is based on the closing share price of our common stock on December 31, 2021 of $9.60.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 38 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Equity Awards Vested in Fiscal Year 2021
The following table provides information concerning equity awards granted by us that vested during 2021. None of the named executive officers hold any stock option awards.

​ | Name | ​ | ​ | Stock Awards: Number of Equity Awards Acquired on Vesting | ​ | ​ | Value Realized on Vesting | ​
​ | J. Robison Hays, III | ​ | ​ | 19,093 | ​ | ​ | $484,531 | ​
​ | Deric S. Eubanks | ​ | ​ | 993 | ​ | ​ | $32,031 | ​
​ | Jeremy J. Welter | ​ | ​ | 1,160 | ​ | ​ | $37,275 | ​
​ | Mark L. Nunneley | ​ | ​ | 517 | ​ | ​ | $16,692 | ​
​ | Robert G. Haiman | ​ | ​ | 539 | ​ | ​ | $17,522 | ​

Pension Benefits
We do not provide pension or retirement benefits to our named executive officers.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Our named executive officers have not received any nonqualified deferred compensation.
Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change of Control
We are not a party to any employment agreements with our executive officers. As a result, all payments we would need to make to any named executive officer upon termination of employment or following a change of control are pursuant to awards granted under our equity incentive plan and the award agreements issued thereunder (which, for our executive officers, incorporate by reference certain acceleration of vesting provisions contained in the employment agreements that each executive officer has entered into with our advisor).
Generally, our equity awards (other than performance awards) will fully vest upon (i) the death or disability of the named executive officer; (ii) the termination or removal of the named executive officer as an employee or consultant of the Company or an affiliate without “cause” (as defined therein) or by the named executive officer for “good reason” (as defined therein); or (iii) the termination without “cause” or resignation for any reason of the named executive officer as an employee or consultant of the Company or an affiliate within one year from the effective date of a change of control of the Company.
The PSUs and Performance LTIPs granted to the named executive officers will be eligible for accelerated vesting upon (i) the termination or removal of the named executive officer as an employee of the Company by the Company without “cause” (including a termination of the advisory agreement with our advisor) or by the named executive officer for “good reason,” (ii) the death or disability of the named executive officer, (iii) a change of control of the Company, (iv) a change of control of our advisor, if such change of control results in the vesting of the award under the terms of any employment agreement that the named executive officer has with our advisor, and (v) an involuntary termination of employment or the nonrenewal of the employment agreement to the extent such event causes vesting of the award under the employment agreement the named executive officer has with our advisor. (Our advisor is an affiliate under our equity incentive plan.) The number of PSUs or Performance LTIPs that vests is generally calculated based on performance at the greater of target or actual performance (based on a truncated performance period), except that in the case of clauses (iii) and (iv), the number is based solely on actual performance (based on a truncated performance period).

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   39 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

For the purposes of the plan, the following definitions apply:
“Cause” has, with respect to a named executive officer, the same definition as in any employment agreement that such named executive officer has with the Company, Ashford Inc., or any of their respective affiliates. In the employment agreements that our named executive officers have with our advisor, “cause” generally means the named executive officer’s:

(i) | conviction of, or entry of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony (exclusive of a conviction, plea of guilty, or plea of nolo contendere arising under a statutory provision imposing criminal liability on a per se basis due to any offices held by the named executive officer pursuant to the employment agreement, so long as any act or omission of the named executive officer with respect to such matter was not taken or omitted in contravention of any applicable policy or directive of our advisor’s board of directors);

(ii) | willful breach of duty of loyalty which is materially detrimental to our advisor or any entity that it advises, which is not cured within 30 days following written notice thereof;

(iii) | willful failure to perform or adhere to explicitly stated duties or guidelines of employment or to follow the lawful directives of our advisor, which is not cured within 30 days following written notice thereof;

(iv) | gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of duties which is not cured within 30 days following written notice thereof;

(v) | willful commission of an act of dishonesty resulting in material economic or financial injury to our advisor or any entity that it advises, or willful commission of fraud; or

(vi) | chronic absence from work for reasons other than illness which is not cured within 30 days following written notice thereof.

A “change of control” of the Company is deemed to have occurred when:

(i) | any person other than (A) the Company or any of its subsidiaries, (B) any employee benefit plan of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, (C) Ashford Inc. or an affiliate, (D) a company owned, directly or indirectly, by stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the Company, or (E) an underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities, becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 30% or more of the shares of voting stock of the Company then outstanding;

(ii) | the consummation of any merger, organization, business combination, or consolidation of the Company or one of its subsidiaries with or into any other company, other than a merger, reorganization, business combination, or consolidation which would result in the holders of the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto holding securities which represent immediately after such merger, reorganization, business combination, or consolidation more than 50% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or the surviving company or the parent of such surviving company;

(iii) | the consummation of a sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, other than a sale or disposition if the holders of the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto hold securities immediately thereafter which represent more than 50% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the acquiror, or parent of the acquiror, of such assets, or the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company; or

(iv) | individuals who constitute our Board cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of our Board; provided, however, that any individual becoming a director whose election by our Board was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Board is considered as though such individual were a member of the initial Board, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of an election contest with respect to the election or removal of directors or other solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a person other than our Board.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 40 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

“Good reason” has, with respect to a named executive officer, the same definition as in any employment agreement that such named executive officer has with the Company, Ashford Inc., or any of their respective affiliates. In the employment agreements that our named executive officers have with our advisor, “good reason” generally means:

(i) | the assignment to the named executive officer of any duties, responsibilities, or reporting requirements (or, in the case of Mr. Hays or Mr. Welter, any title or directives) inconsistent with his or her position, or any material diminishment of the named executive officer’s duties, responsibilities, or status;

(ii) | a reduction by our advisor in the named executive officer’s base salary or target bonus;

(iii) | the requirement that the principal place of business at which the named executive officer performs his or her duties be changed to a location outside the greater Dallas metropolitan area; or

(iv) | any material breach by the advisor of the employment agreement.

The following table sets forth the value of the equity held by the Company’s named executive officers as of December 31, 2021 whose vesting would accelerate in the circumstances described above, assuming a common stock value of $9.60 per share, the closing share price of the common stock as of December 31, 2021, and, as applicable, that the outstanding performance-based awards are paid out at the target level, other than the performance LTIPs, which assume the maximum level. In connection with his retirement on June 30, 2021, Mr. Haiman entered into a Consulting and Cooperation Agreement with our Advisor pursuant to which, for purposes of his equity awards from the Company, Mr. Haiman will be treated as in continuous service with the Company subject to his provision of continued services under such agreement. The actual amount paid out to an executive upon an actual termination or change of control can only be determined at the time of such event.

​ | Name | ​ | ​ | Value | ​
​ | J. Robison Hays, III | ​ | ​ | $788,400 | ​
​ | Deric S. Eubanks | ​ | ​ | $465,034 | ​
​ | Jeremy J. Welter | ​ | ​ | $675,053 | ​
​ | Mark L. Nunneley | ​ | ​ | $244,349 | ​
​ | Robert G. Haiman | ​ | ​ | $473,184 | ​

Pay Ratio Disclosure
In August 2015, the SEC issued final rules implementing the provision of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that require U.S. publicly-traded companies to disclose the ratio of their Chief Executive Officer’s compensation to that of their median employee. Disclosure pursuant to such rules is not included herein because we do not have any employees.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   41 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER TWO-ADVISORY APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
We are providing stockholders an opportunity to cast a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation (sometimes referred to as “say on pay”). This proposal allows the Company to obtain the views of stockholders on the design and effectiveness of our executive compensation program. Your advisory vote will serve as an additional tool to guide the Compensation Committee and our Board in continuing to improve the alignment of our executive compensation programs with the interests of the Company and our stockholders.
Section 14A of the Exchange Act and related SEC rules require that we provide our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with SEC rules. We must provide this opportunity to our stockholders at least once every three years; however, following the recommendation of our stockholders, our Board has chosen to hold this vote every year.
In deciding how to vote on this proposal, the Board encourages you to read the Executive Compensation section beginning on page 28 of this proxy statement. The Board recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” approval of the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders hereby approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. as disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, in accordance with the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules.”
Because your vote is advisory in nature, it will not have any effect on compensation already paid or awarded to any of our executive officers and will not be binding on our Board. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of this advisory vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.
The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR approval of Proposal Number Two, advisory approval of our executive compensation.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 42 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER THREE-RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF BDO USA, LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We are asking our stockholders to ratify our Audit Committee’s appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. BDO USA, LLP has served as the Company’s auditor since 2015. Stockholder ratification of the selection of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is not required by our bylaws or otherwise. However, our Board is submitting the selection of BDO USA, LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance practice. If our stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of us and our stockholders.
Our Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, retaining, setting the compensation of, and overseeing the work of our independent registered public accounting firm. Our Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and non-audit services provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is subject to a specific budget. The Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to its chairperson when expedition of services is necessary. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the full Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee approved all fees paid to BDO USA, LLP since their appointment with no reliance placed on the de minimis exception established by the SEC for approving such services.
Audit Committee Report
Our Audit Committee is governed by a written charter adopted by our Board and is composed of three independent directors, each of whom has been determined by our Board to be independent in accordance with the rules of the NYSE.
The following is our Audit Committee’s report in its role as the overseer of the integrity of our financial statements, the financial reporting process, our independent auditor’s performance, including their qualification and independence, and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. In carrying out its oversight responsibilities, our Audit Committee is not providing any expert or special assurance as to our financial statements or any professional certification as to the outside auditor’s work. This report shall not be deemed to be soliciting material or to be filed with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act or incorporated by reference in any document so filed.
The Audit Committee schedules its meetings with a view to ensuring that it devotes appropriate attention to all of its tasks. The Audit Committee meetings include, whenever appropriate, executive sessions with the independent auditors and with the Company’s internal auditors, in each case without the presence of management.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021 with management of the Company and BDO USA, LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s consolidated financial statements; accounting and financial reporting principles; establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)); establishing and maintaining internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)); evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures; evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and evaluating any change in internal controls over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting. BDO USA, LLP is responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, as well as expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management, with the involvement of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has completed an evaluation of the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting as of the December 31, 2021 in response to the

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   43 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

requirements set forth in Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related regulations. Upon completion of that evaluation, management provided the Audit Committee with, and the Audit Committee reviewed, a written report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting provided by management. The Audit Committee also reviewed the report of management contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 filed with the SEC, as well as BDO USA, LLP’s Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 related to its audit of (i) the consolidated financial statements and (ii) the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee continues to oversee our efforts related to its internal control over financial reporting and management’s preparation for the evaluation in fiscal year 2021.
The Audit Committee has discussed with BDO USA, LLP the matters required to be discussed with the independent auditors pursuant to Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 1301 (Communication with the Audit Committees), including the quality of our accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and letter from BDO USA, LLP to the Audit Committee required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding BDO USA, LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with BDO USA, LLP its independence.
Taking all of these reviews and discussions into account, the undersigned Audit Committee members recommended to the Board that the Board approve the inclusion of our audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, for filing with the SEC.

​ |  | ​ | ​ | AUDIT COMMITTEE | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | Sheri L. Pantermuehl, Chair | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | Frederick J. Kleisner | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | Alan L. Tallis | ​

Auditor Fees
Services provided by BDO USA, LLP included the audits of the annual consolidated financial statements of the Company and our subsidiaries. Services also included the review of unaudited quarterly consolidated financial information in accordance with PCAOB standards, review and consultation regarding filings with the SEC and the Internal Revenue Service, and consultation on financial and tax accounting and reporting matters. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, aggregate fees incurred related to our principal accountants, BDO USA, LLP consisted of the following:

​ |  | ​ | ​ | Year Ended December 31, | ​ | ​ | Year Ended December 31, | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2021 | ​ | ​ | 2020 | ​
​ | Audit Fees | ​ | ​ | $1,084,925 | ​ | ​ | $1,040,538 | ​
​ | Audit-Related Fees | ​ | ​ | — | ​ | ​ | — | ​
​ | Tax Fees | ​ | ​ | — | ​ | ​ | — | ​
​ | All Other Fees | ​ | ​ | — | ​ | ​ | — | ​
​ | Total | ​ | ​ | $1,084,925 | ​ | ​ | $1,04 0,538 | ​

“Audit Fees” include fees and related expenses for professional services rendered in connection with audits of our annual financial statements and the financial statements of certain of our subsidiaries, reviews of our unaudited quarterly financial information, reporting on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and reviews and consultation regarding financial accounting and reporting matters. This category also includes fees for services that generally only the auditor reasonably can provide, such as statutory audits, comfort letters, consents, and assistance with review of our filings with the SEC.
“Audit-Related Fees” include fees and related expenses for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements that are not Audit Fees.
“Tax Fees” include fees and related expenses billed for tax compliance services and federal and state tax advice and planning.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 44 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

“All Other Fees” include fees and related expenses for products and services that are not Audit Fees, Audit- Related Fees or Tax Fees.
Representatives of BDO USA, LLP will be present at the annual meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR approval of Proposal Number Three, the ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   45 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NUMBER FOUR-APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. 2021 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
GENERAL
The Board proposes and recommends that stockholders approve Amendment No. 1 (the “Plan Amendment”) to our 2021 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”).
The 2021 Plan is our primary retention tool, the purpose of which is to encourage those who provide services to the Company (including, without limitation, our executive officers, non-employee directors, employees of our advisor, and others providing advisory or consulting services to the Company) to acquire or increase their equity interests in our Company to give an added incentive to work toward its growth and success.
As of March 4, 2022, there were (i) 42,638 shares of the Company’s common stock available for issuance under the 2021 Plan, (ii) 467,611 shares subject to outstanding “full-value” awards under the 2021 Plan (e.g., restricted stock, performance stock units, and time- and performance-based LTIPs, which figure includes 183,223 performance awards at the “target” level, and which may ultimately vest between 0% and 250% of target), and (iii) 0 shares subject to outstanding options and stock appreciation rights under the 2021 Plan.
The purpose of the Plan Amendment is to increase the aggregate number of shares of our common stock available for issuance under the 2021 Plan from 5,300,000 shares to 5,950,000 shares (an increase of 650,000 shares).
The Board believes that increasing the reserved shares of the Company’s common stock available for issuance under the 2021 Plan by 650,000 shares would provide sufficient shares for the Company’s equity-based compensation needs for approximately one to two years following stockholder approval of the Plan Amendment. This estimate is based on our historical equity plan usage. The reserve may be sufficient for a longer or shorter period of time, depending on our future equity grant needs, which are related to factors such as our participant population, future award forfeitures and cancellations, the Company’s acquisition activity, the Company’s stock price, and our retentive needs in a competitive compensation environment.
As described in detail in the “Executive Compensation” section of this proxy statement, equity compensation is integral to our operations. Our executive officers, as with the other employees of our advisor, are eligible to receive equity awards from us, which provide them with long-term exposure to our performance and aligns their interests with those of our stockholders. If our stockholders do not approve the Plan Amendment, our future ability to issue appropriate equity compensation to hire and retain talent will be severely limited, which could have an adverse impact on our ability to retain our workforce and, ultimately, on our business.
We are asking stockholders to approve the Plan Amendment. A summary of the material terms of the 2021 Plan, as amended by the Plan Amendment, is set forth below. Our summaries of the Plan Amendment and the 2021 Plan (as amended by the Plan Amendment) are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text and provisions of the 2021 Plan (as amended by the Plan Amendment).
The potential dilution resulting from issuing all of the 650,000 additional shares of the Company’s common stock available for issuance under the 2021 Plan as amended by the Plan Amendment, if approved, would be 1.9%, based on our common stock outstanding as of March 11, 2022 (approximately 34,491,907 shares, exclusive of 396,999 outstanding units in our operating partnership). The Company’s burn rate over 2019-2021 under the 2021 Plan was 3.28%, 3.39% and 2.21%, respectively, for a three-year average burn rate of 2.96%.
SUMMARY OF THE 2021 PLAN, AS AMENDED BY THE PLAN AMENDMENT
Eligibility
Under the 2021 Plan, we may grant awards to employees, consultants and non-employee directors of the Company or its affiliates (including, without limitation, the Company’s advisor, Ashford Inc., and its subsidiaries). While we may grant incentive stock options only to employees of the Company or certain of its affiliates, we may grant nonqualified stock options and other types of awards to any eligible participant. As of March 15, 2022, we had seven non-employee directors and we and our affiliates had a total of approximately 406 employees and 11 consultants who are reasonably expected to be eligible for receipt of an award under the 2021 Plan.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 46 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Types of Awards
The 2021 Plan authorizes the Company to grant:

• | nonqualified stock options;

• | incentive stock options;

• | unrestricted (or “bonus”) stock;

• | restricted stock;

• | phantom stock;

• | stock appreciation rights; and

• | other stock-based awards, including long-term incentive partnership units in our operating partnership (“LTIP units”) and cash denominated awards.

In addition, the 2021 Plan permits the Company to sell shares of common stock to a participant (for no more than their fair market value at the time of purchase).
Shares Subject to the 2021 Plan
If the Plan Amendment is approved by our stockholders, the aggregate number of shares of our common stock available for issuance under the 2021 Plan would increase from 5,300,000 shares to 5,950,000 shares (the “Share Limit”), an increase of 650,000 shares. As of March 25, 2022, the closing per share trading value of our common stock was $9.40.
These shares may be shares of original issuance, treasury shares, shares acquired in the open market or a combination of the foregoing. Shares of our common stock issued under any plan assumed by the Company in any corporate transaction will not count against the Share Limit, nor will any awards granted in substitution for outstanding awards previously granted by an entity directly or indirectly acquired by the Company or with which the Company combines. Any shares subject to an award under the 2021 Plan that is forfeited or expires or is settled for cash shall, to the extent of such forfeiture, expiration or cash settlement, again become available for awards under the 2021 Plan, except that the following shares shall not again become available for awards under the 2021 Plan: (i) shares tendered by a participant or withheld by the Company in payment of the purchase price of an option issued under the 2021 Plan, (ii) shares tendered by a participant or withheld by the Company to satisfy any tax withholding obligation with respect to an award under the 2021 Plan, (iii) shares repurchased by the Company with proceeds received from the exercise of an option issued under the 2021 Plan, and (iv) shares subject to a stock appreciation right issued under the 2021 Plan that are not issued in connection with the stock settlement of that stock appreciation right upon its exercise.
Administration
The 2021 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of our Board (the “Compensation Committee”). The authority of the Compensation Committee includes, among other things, selecting award recipients, establishing award terms and conditions, granting awards, construing any ambiguous provision of the 2021 Plan or in any award agreement issued thereunder, and adopting modifications and amendments to the 2021 Plan or any award agreement, subject to the terms of the 2021 Plan. The Board may also exercise the full power to administer the 2021 Plan in its discretion.
Types of Awards
Stock Options. Stock options entitle the participant to purchase shares of our common stock at a price not less than the fair market value per share on the grant date. Stock options may be incentive stock options intended to qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), or nonqualified stock options. All of the shares available for issuance under the 2021 Plan, including those subject to the Plan Amendment if approved, may be granted in the form of incentive stock options. The Compensation Committee may establish procedures through which the exercise price is payable in cash or by check, by a cashless broker-assisted exercise, by the transfer to the Company of shares of our common stock owned by the participant, by the Company withholding shares of our common stock otherwise deliverable to the participant upon the exercise of the stock option, or by a

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   47 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

combination of these payment methods. No stock option will be exercisable more than 10 years after the grant date. Except as otherwise provided in an applicable award agreement, outstanding unvested options will vest if we terminate a participant’s service without “cause,” a participant terminates his or her service with us for “good reason,” or a participant’s employment ends due to death or disability. Stock options are generally not transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a domestic relations order.
Restricted Stock. A grant of restricted stock constitutes an immediate transfer to the participant of the ownership of shares of our common stock. Restricted stock generally entitles the holder to voting and dividend rights. While restricted stock remains unvested, the transferability of the restricted stock may be prohibited or restricted in the manner and to the extent prescribed by the Compensation Committee on the grant date. Except as otherwise provided in an applicable award agreement, outstanding unvested shares of restricted stock will vest if we terminate a participant’s service without “cause,” a participant terminates his or her service with us for “good reason,” or a participant’s employment ends due to death or disability.
Bonus Stock. Bonus stock is a share of common stock not subject to any vesting or forfeiture restrictions.
Phantom Stock. Phantom stock is a right, subject to satisfaction of terms and conditions as imposed by the Compensation Committee, to receive, upon vesting, cash, common stock, other securities, or other property equal to the value of a stated number of shares of common stock. The right to receive payment of an award of phantom stock may be conditioned upon continued employment or achievement of performance goals.
Stock Appreciation Rights. A stock appreciation right is a right to receive from the Company an amount equal to the fair market value of the underlying share on the date of exercise less the grant price (or strike price) of the stock appreciation right. The amount payable by the Company upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right may be paid in cash, shares of our common stock, other property or any combination thereof.
Stock appreciation rights can be tandem (i.e., granted with stock options to provide an alternative to the exercise of the option rights) or freestanding. Tandem appreciation rights may only be exercised at a time when the related option right is exercisable, and require that the related stock option be surrendered for cancellation. No stock appreciation right will be exercisable more than 10 years after the grant date.
Other Stock-Based Awards. Consistent with the terms of the 2021 Plan, the Compensation Committee will establish the terms of awards of other stock-based awards, including restricted stock units or LTIP units, and such other awards may also be denominated and/or payable in cash. These awards may also be subject to vesting requirements as determined by the Compensation Committee, which may include completion of a period of service or attainment of performance objectives.
The LTIP units are a special class of partnership units in our operating partnership. Grants of LTIP units are designed to offer participants the same long-term incentive as restricted stock, while allowing them more favorable income tax treatment. Each LTIP unit awarded is deemed equivalent to an award of one share of common stock reserved under the 2021 Plan, reducing availability for other equity awards, because LTIP units are convertible into common units of our operating partnership, which may themselves be converted into shares of our common stock based on a conversion ratio of 1:1. As a result, an LTIP unit granted may result in an issuance of one share of our common stock. LTIP units, whether vested or not, receive the same quarterly per unit distributions as common units of our operating partnership, which typically equal per share dividends on our common stock, if any. This treatment with respect to quarterly distributions is analogous to the treatment of time-vested restricted stock. (Note that distributions on LTIPs that vest subject to achievement of performance goals accrue on unvested units and are paid in the form of additional common units of our operating partnership on the actual number of LTIP units that vest.) The key difference between LTIP units and restricted stock is that at the time of award, LTIP units do not have full economic parity with common units but can achieve such parity over time. Upon the occurrence of certain corporate events, which are not performance-related events, the capital accounts of our operating partnership may be adjusted, allowing for the LTIP units to achieve parity with the common units over time. If such parity is reached, vested LTIP units become convertible into an equal number of common units. Until and unless such parity is reached, the value that a participant will realize for a given number of vested LTIP units is less than the value of an equal number of shares of our common stock.
Subject to satisfaction of the applicable performance- or service-vesting requirements for the LTIP units, the LTIP units will achieve parity with the common units upon the sale or deemed sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the partnership at a time when the Company’s stock is trading at some level in excess of the price it was trading

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 48 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

at on the date of the LTIP issuance. More specifically, LTIP units will achieve full economic parity with common units in connection with (i) the actual sale of all or substantially all of the assets of our operating partnership or (ii) the hypothetical sale of such assets, which results from a capital account revaluation, as defined in the partnership agreement, for the operating partnership. A capital account revaluation generally occurs whenever there is an issuance of additional partnership interests or the redemption of a partnership interest. If a sale, or deemed sale as a result of a capital account revaluation, occurs at a time when the operating partnership’s assets have sufficiently appreciated, the LTIP units will achieve full economic parity with the common units. However, in the absence of sufficient appreciation in the value of the assets of the operating partnership at the time a sale or deemed sale occurs, full economic parity would not be reached.
Adjustments
In the event of (i) any dividend (other than regular cash dividends) or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, shares of common stock, other securities or other property), recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, split-off, spin-off, combination, repurchase or exchange of shares of common stock or other securities of the Company, issuance of warrants or other rights to acquire shares of common stock or other securities of the Company or other similar corporate transaction or event that affects the shares of common stock, or (ii) unusual or nonrecurring events affecting the Company, including changes in applicable rules, rulings, regulations or other requirements, that the Compensation Committee determines, in its sole discretion, could result in dilution or enlargement of the rights intended to be granted to, or available for, participants (any event in (i) or (ii), an “Adjustment Event”), the Compensation Committee shall, in respect of any such Adjustment Event, make such proportionate substitution or adjustment, if any, as it deems equitable, to any or all of: (A) the Share Limit, or any other limit applicable under the 2021 Plan with respect to the number of awards which may be granted thereunder; (B) the number of shares of common stock or other securities of the Company (or number and kind of other securities or other property) which may be issued in respect of awards or with respect to which awards may be granted under the 2021 Plan; and (C) the terms of any outstanding award, including, without limitation, (I) the number of shares of common stock or other securities of the Company (or number and kind of other securities or other property) subject to outstanding awards or to which outstanding awards relate; (II) the exercise price or strike price with respect to any award; or (III) any applicable performance measures; provided, that in the case of any “equity restructuring” (within the meaning of the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (or any successor pronouncement thereto)), the Compensation Committee shall make an equitable or proportionate adjustment to outstanding awards to reflect such equity restructuring. Any adjustment may provide for the elimination of any fractional share that might otherwise become subject to an award. Any adjustment by the Compensation Committee shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes.
Dividends and Dividend Equivalents
The Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, provide a participant as part of an award with dividends, dividend equivalents, or similar payments in respect of awards, payable in cash, shares of common stock, other securities, other awards or other property, on a current or deferred basis, on such terms and conditions as may be determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion.
Clawback
All awards under the 2021 Plan shall be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture or recoupment to the extent necessary to comply with (i) any clawback, forfeiture or other similar policy adopted by the Board or the Compensation Committee and as in effect from time to time; and (ii) applicable law. Further, unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, to the extent that the participant receives any amount in excess of the amount that the participant should otherwise have received under the terms of the award for any reason (including, without limitation, by reason of a financial restatement, mistake in calculations, or other administrative error), the participant may be required by the Compensation Committee to repay any such excess amount to the Company.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   49 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Transferability
Awards under the 2021 Plan are generally not transferable. However, the Compensation Committee may approve transfers to certain family members of a participant, a trust solely for the benefit of a participant and the participant’s family members, a partnership or limited liability company whose only partners or stockholders are the participant and the participant’s family members, or a beneficiary to whom donations are eligible to be treated as “charitable contributions.”
Prohibition on Repricing
The Compensation Committee does not have the right, without stockholder approval, to (i) grant to holders of outstanding options or stock appreciation rights, in exchange for the surrender and cancellation of such options or stock appreciation rights, (x) new options or stock appreciation rights having exercise or grant prices lower than the exercise or grant price provided in the options or stock appreciation rights so surrendered and canceled, or (y) another award or cash payment with a value that is greater than the intrinsic value (if any) of the canceled option or stock appreciation right, or (ii) take any other action which is considered a “repricing” for purposes of the stockholder approval rules of any securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation system on which the securities of the Company are listed or quoted.
Amendment; Duration; Termination
The Board may amend or terminate the 2021 Plan at any time, but an amendment will not become effective without the approval of our stockholders if it increases the number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the plan (other than changes permitted in connection with an Adjustment Event) or otherwise “materially revises” the terms of the 2021 Plan (within the meaning of the applicable NYSE rules). No amendment or termination of the 2021 Plan will adversely affect a participant’s rights under outstanding awards in any material respect without the participant’s consent. If not sooner terminated as described above, the 2021 Plan will terminate on May 12, 2031, and no new awards may be granted under the 2021 Plan after the termination date. Awards made before the 2021 Plan’s termination will continue in accordance with their terms.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences Related to Awards Granted under the 2021 Plan
The following is a brief summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences related to awards under the 2021 Plan. This summary is not intended to be complete and does not purport to cover federal employment tax or other federal tax consequences, or any state, local, or non-U.S. taxes.
Tax Consequences to Participants
Incentive Stock Options. No income generally will be recognized by a participant upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option. The exercise of an incentive stock option, however, may result in alternative minimum tax liability. If shares of our common stock are issued to the participant pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option, and if no disqualifying disposition of such shares is made by such participant within two years after the date of grant or within one year after the transfer of such shares to the participant, then upon sale of such shares, any amount realized in excess of the exercise price will be taxed to the participant as a long-term capital gain and any loss sustained will be a long-term capital loss.
If shares of our common stock acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option are disposed of prior to the expiration of either holding period described above, the participant generally will recognize ordinary income in the year of disposition in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the market value of such shares at the time of exercise (or, if less, the amount realized on the disposition of such shares if a sale or exchange) over the exercise price. Any further gain (or loss) realized by the participant generally will be taxed as short-term or long-term capital gain (or loss) depending on the holding period.
Nonqualified Stock Options. In general, no income will be recognized by a participant at the time a nonqualified stock option is granted. Upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option, ordinary income will be recognized by the participant in an amount equal to the difference between the exercise price and the market value of the shares, if unrestricted, on the date of exercise. At the time of sale of shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of a nonqualified stock option, appreciation (or depreciation) in value of the shares after the date of exercise will be treated as either short-term or long-term capital gain (or loss) depending on how long the shares have been held.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 50 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Stock Appreciation Rights. No income will be recognized by a participant in connection with the grant of a stock appreciation right. When the stock appreciation right is exercised, the participant generally will be required to include as taxable ordinary income in the year of exercise an amount equal to the amount of cash received and the market value of any unrestricted shares of our common stock (or other securities or property) received on the exercise.
Restricted Stock. The recipient of restricted stock generally will be subject to tax at ordinary income rates on the market value of the restricted stock (reduced by any amount paid by the participant for such restricted stock) at such time as the shares are no longer subject to forfeiture or restrictions on transfer for purposes of Section 83 of the Code. However, a recipient who so elects under Section 83(b) of the Code within 30 days of the date of grant of the shares will have taxable ordinary income on the date of grant of the shares equal to the excess of the market value of such shares (determined without regard to any such restrictions) over the purchase price, if any, of such restricted stock.
Other Stock-Based Awards. The tax consequences of another stock-based award will depend on the structure and terms of such award. Generally, LTIP units are intended to be treated as “profits interests” for purposes of the Code, meaning that a participant will generally not recognize income on the date of grant or vesting of an LTIP unit, and may benefit from taxation at long-term capital gains rates upon disposition of the LTIP unit if applicable holding period requirements are satisfied.
Tax Consequences to the Company
To the extent that a participant recognizes ordinary income in the circumstances described above, the Company will generally be entitled to a corresponding deduction, subject to applicable limitations under the Code (including Section 162(m) of the Code). The Company is not entitled to a corresponding deduction where a participant recognizes capital gain (or loss) in the circumstances described above.
Section 409A of the Code
Certain types of awards under the 2021 Plan may constitute, or provide for, a deferral of compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code. Unless certain requirements set forth in Section 409A of the Code are complied with, holders of such awards may be taxed earlier than would otherwise be the case (e.g., at the time of vesting instead of the time of payment) and may be subject to an additional 20% penalty tax (and, potentially, certain interest, penalties and additional state taxes). To the extent applicable, the 2021 Plan and awards granted under the 2021 Plan are intended to be structured and interpreted in a manner intended to either comply with or be exempt from Section 409A of the Code and the Department of Treasury regulations and other interpretive guidance that may be issued under Section 409A of the Code. To the extent determined necessary or appropriate by the Compensation Committee, the 2021 Plan and applicable award agreements may be amended to further comply with Section 409A of the Code or to exempt the applicable awards from Section 409A of the Code.
New Plan Benefits
Because benefits under the 2021 Plan are at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, it is not possible to determine the value of benefits that will be received by participants in the 2021 Plan with respect to any awards made in the future.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   51 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to securities authorized and available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2021:

​ |  | ​ | ​ | Number of Securities to be issues Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(1) (a) | ​ | ​ | Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and Rights(2) (b) | ​ | ​ | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance (c) | ​
​ | Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | ​ | ​ | 335,908 | ​ | ​ | N/A | ​ | ​ | 42,638(3) | ​
​ | Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | ​ | ​ | None | ​ | ​ | N/A | ​ | ​ | None | ​
​ | Total | ​ | ​ | 335,908 | ​ | ​ | N/A | ​ | ​ | 42,638 | ​

(1) | Consists of rights to acquire our common stock, or securities convertible into our common stock, subject to the satisfaction of service and or performance vesting conditions (with the amount shown assuming the maximum level of performance).

(2) | None of the rights disclosed in column (a) are subject to an exercise price.

(3) | As of December 31, 2021, approximately 42,638 shares of our common stock, or securities convertible into approximately 42,638 shares of our common stock, remained available for issuance under our 2021 Stock Incentive Plan.

Vote Required for Approval
Approval of the Plan Amendment requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast. In accordance with NYSE rules, abstentions will be treated as a vote against approval of the Plan Amendment. Assuming a valid quorum is otherwise established, broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of any vote on the proposal to approve the Plan Amendment.
Recommendation of the Board
The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the approval of the Plan Amendment. The Board believes it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to enable the Company to implement equity incentive compensation arrangements that are able to appropriately incentivize and retain our executive officers and non-employee directors, employees of our advisor, and others providing advisory or consulting services to the Company, and align the interests of participants with the interests of our stockholders. If our stockholders do not approve the Plan Amendment, our future ability to issue appropriate equity compensation to hire and retain talent will be severely limited, which could have an adverse impact on our ability to retain our workforce and, ultimately, on our business.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL NUMBER FOUR, APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. 2021 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 52 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The following table sets forth information as of March 11, 2022 regarding the ownership of our equity securities by (i) each person known to us who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, more than five percent of our outstanding shares of voting stock, (ii) each of our directors and our named executive officers and (iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. In accordance with SEC rules, each listed person’s beneficial ownership includes: (i) all shares the person owns beneficially; (ii) all shares over which the person has or shares voting or dispositive control; and (iii) all shares the person has the right to acquire within 60 days. Unless otherwise indicated, each person or entity named below has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our voting stock shown to be beneficially owned by such person or entity. As of March 11, 2022, we had an aggregate of 34,491,907 shares of voting stock outstanding, consisting of 34,491,907 shares of our common stock. Except as indicated in the footnotes to the table below, the address of each person listed below is the address of our principal executive office, 14185 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75254.
Security Ownership of Management and Directors

​ | Name of Beneficial Owner | ​ | ​ | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1) | ​ | ​ | Percent of Class(2) | ​
​ | Monty J. Bennett | ​ | ​ | 76,227 (3) | ​ | ​ | * | ​
​ | Benjamin J. Ansell, M.D. | ​ | ​ | 37,487 | ​ | ​ | * | ​
​ | Amish Gupta | ​ | ​ | 8,695 | ​ | ​ | * | ​
​ | Kamal Jafarnia | ​ | ​ | 7,887 | ​ | ​ | * | ​
​ | Frederick J. Kleisner | ​ | ​ | 7,362 | ​ | ​ | * | ​
​ | Sheri L. Pantermuehl | ​ | ​ | 7,553 | ​ | ​ | * | ​
​ | Alan L. Tallis | ​ | ​ | 12,455 | ​ | ​ | * | ​
​ | Deric S. Eubanks | ​ | ​ | 29,158 | ​ | ​ | * | ​
​ | Mark L. Nunneley | ​ | ​ | 17,350 | ​ | ​ | * | ​
​ | J. Robison Hays, III | ​ | ​ | 114,642 | ​ | ​ | * | ​
​ | Jeremy J. Welter | ​ | ​ | 40,277 | ​ | ​ | * | ​
​ | Robert G. Haiman | ​ | ​ | 443 | ​ | ​ | * | ​
​ | Alex Rose | ​ | ​ | 0 | ​ | ​ | * | ​
​ | All executive officers and directors as a group (13 persons) | ​ | ​ | 359,535 | ​ | ​ | 1.0 % | ​

* | Denotes less than 1.0%.

(1) | Assumes that all common units of our operating partnership held by such person or group of persons are redeemed for common stock based on the applicable exchange ratio as of March 11, 2022, which was one share of our common stock per common unit, and includes all restricted stock grants made since our initial public offering through March 11, 2022. All such stock grants typically vest over a period of time generally commencing on the date of their issuance. The number includes LTIP units in our operating partnership that have achieved economic parity with the common units as of March 11, 2022 but excludes any LTIP units (including Performance LTIPs) issued subsequent to March 11, 2022 or that have not yet achieved economic parity or PSUs, LTIP units or Performance LTIPs that have not yet vested. All LTIP units that have achieved economic parity with the common units are, subject to certain time-based and/or performance-based vesting requirements, convertible into common units, which may be redeemed for either cash or, at our sole discretion, up to one share of our common stock.

(2) | As of March 11, 2022, there were outstanding and entitled to vote 34,491,907 shares of common stock. The total number of shares outstanding used in calculating the percentage for each person assumes that operating partnership common units held by such person and LTIP units held by such person that have achieved economic parity with the common units are redeemed for common stock, using the conversion ratio effective as of the record date, but none of the operating partnership units held by other persons are redeemed for common stock.

(3) | Includes 9,431 common units held directly by Ashford Financial Corporation, 50% of which is owned by Mr. Monty J. Bennett. Mr. Monty J. Bennett disclaims beneficial ownership in excess of his pecuniary interest in such common units.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   53 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
The following table sets forth information as of March 11, 2022 regarding the ownership of our equity securities by the persons known to Ashford Trust to be the beneficial owners of five percent or more of our common stock (our only voting securities), by virtue of the filing of a Schedule 13D or Schedule 13G with the SEC. To our knowledge, other than as set forth in the table below, there are no persons owning more than five percent of any class of Ashford Trust’s common stock. Unless otherwise indicated, all shares are owned directly and the indicated person has sole voting and investment power.

​ | Title of Securities | ​ | ​ | Name of Stockholder | ​ | ​ | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | ​ | ​ | Percent of Class(1) | ​
​ | Common Stock | ​ | ​ | Brookfield Asset Management Inc. | ​ | ​ | 1,810,890(2) | ​ | ​ | 5.3% | ​
​ | Common Stock | ​ | ​ | BlackRock, Inc. | ​ | ​ | 1,703,833(3) | ​ | ​ | 5.0% | ​
​ | Common Stock | ​ | ​ | Värde Partners, L.P. | ​ | ​ | 2,434,064(4) | ​ | ​ | 7.19% | ​

(1) | As of March 11, 2022, there were outstanding and entitled to vote 34,491,907 shares of common stock.

(2) | Based on information provided by Brookfield Asset Management Inc. in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2022. Per such Schedule 13G, Brookfield Asset Management Inc. has sole voting power over all of such shares and sole dispositive power of all of such shares. The principal business address of Brookfield Asset Management Inc. is 333 S. Grand Avenue, 28th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071.

(3) | Based on information provided by BlackRock, Inc. in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 4, 2022. Per such Schedule 13G, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power over 1,607,606 shares and sole dispositive power of all of such shares. The principal business address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055.

(4) | Based on information provided by Värde Partners, L.P. in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2022. Per such Schedule 13G, Värde Partners, L.P. has shared voting power over all of such shares and shared dispositive power of all of such shares. The principal business address of Värde Partners, L.P. is 901 Marquette Ave S, Suite 3300, Minneapolis, MN 55402.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 54 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
This section of the proxy statement describes certain relationships and related person transactions we have that could give rise to conflicts of interest. A “related transaction” is any transaction, arrangement or relationship, or series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, since the beginning of our last fiscal year or currently proposed, in which: (i) our Company was or is to be a participant, (ii) the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and (iii) any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
A “related person” means: (i) any director, director nominee or executive officer of the Company, (ii) any person known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of its outstanding voting stock at the time of the transaction, (iii) any immediate family member of either of the foregoing, or (iv) a firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing is a partner or principal or in a similar position or in which such person has at least a 10% equity interest.
Conflict of Interest Policies
We take conflicts of interest seriously and aim to ensure that transactions involving conflicts or potential conflicts are thoroughly examined and only approved by independent Board members.
Because we could be subject to various conflicts of interest arising from our relationships with Braemar and Ashford Inc., including its subsidiaries, their respective affiliates and other parties, to mitigate any potential conflicts of interest, we have adopted a number of policies governing conflicts of interest. As described further in “Board of Directors and Committees-Board Member Independence” above, our bylaws require that, at all times, a majority of our Board be independent directors, and our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that two-thirds of our Board be independent directors at all times that we do not have an independent chairman.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that, in order to mitigate potential conflicts of interest, any waiver, consent, approval, modification, enforcement, or elections which the Company may make pursuant to any agreement between the Company, on the one hand, and any of the following entities, on the other hand, shall be within the exclusive discretion and control of a majority of the independent directors: (a) Braemar or any of its subsidiaries; (b) Ashford Inc. or any of its subsidiaries; (c) any entity controlled by Mr. Monty J. Bennett and/or Mr. Archie Bennett, Jr.; and (d) any other entity advised by Ashford Inc. or its subsidiaries.
Additionally, our Board has adopted our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which includes a policy for review of any transactions in which an individual’s private interests may interfere or conflict in any way with the interests of the Company. Pursuant to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, employees must report any actual or potential conflict of interest involving themselves or others to our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Directors must make such report to our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary or the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Officers must make such report to the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Our Related Party Transactions Committee is a committee composed of three independent directors and is tasked with reviewing any transaction in which our officers, directors, Ashford Inc. or Braemar or their officers, directors or respective affiliates have an interest, including our advisor or any other related party and their respective affiliates, before recommending approval by a majority of our independent directors. The Related Party Transactions Committee can deny a new proposed transaction or recommend for approval to the independent directors. Also, the Related Party Transactions Committee periodically reviews and reports to our independent directors on past approved related party transactions. Finally, our directors also are subject to provisions of Maryland law that address transactions between Maryland corporations and our directors or other entities in which our directors have a material financial interest. Such transactions may be voidable under Maryland law, unless certain safe harbors are met. Our charter contains a requirement, consistent with one such safe harbor, that any transaction or agreement involving us, any of our wholly owned subsidiaries or our operating partnership and a director or officer or an affiliate or associate of any director or officer requires the approval of a majority of disinterested directors.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   55 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our Relationship and Agreements with Ashford Inc. and its Subsidiaries
On November 12, 2014, we completed a spin-off of our asset management and advisory business from our hospitality investment business into Ashford Inc. In connection with that spin-off, we entered into an advisory agreement with Ashford Inc., pursuant to which Ashford Inc. (through its operating company, Ashford LLC) serves as our advisor and is responsible for implementing our investment strategies and decisions and managing our day-to-day operations, in each case subject to the supervision and oversight of our Board. Ashford Inc. may also perform similar services for new or existing platforms created by us, Ashford Inc. or Braemar. In addition, we have entered into other agreements with Ashford Inc. and its subsidiaries, which are described below.
Our Chairman, Mr. Monty J. Bennett, also serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ashford Inc. As of March 11, 2022, Mr. Monty J. Bennett may be deemed to beneficially own approximately 2,922,982 shares of Ashford Inc.’s common stock (consisting of common stock, vested options to purchase common stock, and common units in Ashford Inc.’s operating company which are redeemable for cash or, at the option of Ashford Inc., for shares of Ashford Inc.’s common stock on a one-for-one basis, and inclusive of approximately 1,974,319 shares of Ashford Inc.’s common stock issuable in the aggregate upon conversion of 9,279,300 shares of Ashford Inc.’s Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series D Convertible Preferred Stock”) beneficially owned by Mr. Monty J. Bennett as of such date, each of which shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of Ashford Inc. common stock at a conversion ratio equal to the liquidation price of a share of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (which is $25) divided by $117.50). In accordance with SEC rules, Mr. Monty J. Bennett may be deemed to beneficially own approximately 53.6% of Ashford Inc.’s common stock.
As of March 11, 2022, Mr. Monty J. Bennett’s father, Mr. Archie Bennett, Jr., our Chairman Emeritus, is deemed to beneficially own approximately 2,142,370 shares of Ashford Inc.’s common stock (consisting of common stock and common units in Ashford Inc.’s operating company redeemable for cash or, at the option of Ashford Inc., into shares of Ashford Inc.’s common stock on a one-for-one basis, inclusive of approximately 2,016,872 shares of Ashford Inc.’s common stock issuable in the aggregate upon conversion of 9,479,300 shares of Ashford Inc.’s Series D Convertible Preferred Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Archie Bennett, Jr. as of such date). In accordance with SEC rules, Mr. Archie Bennett, Jr. may be deemed to beneficially own approximately 42.6% of Ashford Inc.’s common stock.
All of our executive officers are executive officers or employees of Ashford Inc. and we have one common director with Ashford Inc., Mr. Monty J. Bennett, Chairman of our Board and Chairman of Ashford Inc. As of March 11, 2022, our directors and executive officers and their immediate family members (other than Mr. Monty J. Bennett, who is our Chairman, and Mr. Archie Bennett, Jr., who is our Chairman Emeritus and Mr. Monty J. Bennett’s father, each of whose beneficial ownership in Ashford Inc. is disclosed above) collectively may be deemed to beneficially own 1,079,362 shares of Ashford Inc.’s common stock inclusive of 6,893 shares of Ashford Inc.’s common stock issuable in the aggregate upon conversion of 32,400 shares of Ashford Inc.’s Series D Convertible Preferred Stock. In accordance with SEC rules, our directors and executive officers and their immediate family members (other than Mr. Monty J. Bennett and Mr. Archie Bennett, Jr.) may be deemed to beneficially own approximately 29.7% of Ashford Inc.’s common stock.1
The fees due to Ashford Inc. and its subsidiaries pursuant to the agreements described below are paid by us to Ashford Inc. or its subsidiaries, and Mr. Monty J. Bennett, Mr. Archie Bennett, Jr., our directors and executive officers and their immediate family members will benefit, as stockholders of Ashford Inc., from the payment by us of such fees to Ashford Inc. or its subsidiaries.
Our Board of Directors has the authority to make annual equity awards to Ashford Inc. or directly to its employees, officers, consultants and non-employee directors, based on our achievement of certain financial and other hurdles established by our Board of Directors. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we awarded equity grants of our common stock, LTIP units, performance stock units, and Performance LTIPs to Ashford Inc.’s executive officers valued at approximately $11.5 million (based on the target level) and equity grants of our common stock or LTIP units to Ashford Inc.’s non-executive employees valued at approximately $1.2 million. In March 2022, we awarded equity grants of our performance stock units, and Performance LTIPs to certain of Ashford Inc.’s executive officers valued at approximately $4.8 million.

1 | The total number of shares outstanding used in calculating the percentage for each person assumes that the common units and vested options held by such person are redeemed for common stock and the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock beneficially owned by any such person are converted into common stock at the stated conversion ratio, but none of the common units or vested options held by other persons are redeemed for common stock or, in the case of the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, are converted into common stock.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 56 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Advisory Agreement
On January 14, 2021, the Company entered into the Second Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement, by and between Ashford Trust, Ashford Hospitality Limited Partnership, Ashford TRS Corporation, Ashford Inc. and Ashford LLC. The Second Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement amends and restates the terms of the Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2015, as amended by the Enhanced Return Funding Program Agreement and Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement, dated as of June 26, 2018 (the “ERFP Agreement”). Our advisory agreement with Ashford Inc. has an initial ten-year term, which expires on January 14, 2031 and is subject to an extension by Ashford Inc. for up to seven successive additional ten-year renewal terms thereafter. Ashford Inc. is entitled to receive from us, on a monthly basis, an annual base fee, in an amount equal to 1/12th of (i) 0.70% or less of our total market capitalization plus (ii) a net asset fee adjustment (as described below), subject to a minimum monthly fee. The net asset fee adjustment is an amount equal to (i) the product of the Sold Non-ERFP Asset Amount (as more particularly defined in the advisory agreement, but generally equal to the net sales prices of real property (other than any hotel assets purchased pursuant to the enhanced return funding program described below) sold or disposed of after the date of the ERFP Agreement, commencing with and including the first such sale) and 0.70% plus (ii) the product of the Sold ERFP Asset Amount (as more particularly defined in the advisory agreement, but generally equal to the net sales prices of hotel assets purchased pursuant to the enhanced return funding program described below and then sold or disposed of by us after the date of the ERFP Agreement, commencing with and including the first such sale) and 1.07%. As a result of these provisions, in the event that we dispose of hotel properties in the future, we will continue to pay advisory fees to Ashford Inc. in respect of hotel properties that we have sold. Ashford Inc. may also be entitled to receive an incentive fee from us based on our performance, as measured by our total annual stockholder return compared to a defined peer group. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we paid Ashford Inc. a base fee of approximately $36.2 million.
In addition, Ashford Inc. is entitled to receive directly or to be reimbursed, on a monthly basis, for all expenses paid or incurred by Ashford Inc. or its affiliates on our behalf or in connection with the services provided by Ashford Inc. pursuant to the advisory agreement, which includes our pro rata share of Ashford Inc.’s office overhead and administrative expenses incurred in providing its duties under the advisory agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we reimbursed Ashford Inc. for expenses paid or incurred on our behalf totaling approximately $6.9 million.
Our Board has the authority to make annual equity awards to Ashford Inc. or directly to its employees, officers, consultants and non-employee directors, based on our achievement of certain financial and other hurdles established by our Board. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we incurred equity-based compensation expense of $9.1 million related to grants of equity awards to employees and officers of Ashford Inc., some of whom were also our executive officers.
Ashford Inc. is also entitled to receive a termination fee from us under certain circumstances upon the termination of our advisory agreement, and upon certain events that would if consummated result in a change of control of us, to escrow funds that belong to us to secure our obligation to pay the termination fee. In the event the termination fee is payable under our advisory agreement, we will be required to pay Ashford Inc. or its subsidiaries a termination fee equal to: (a) 1.1 multiplied by the greater of (i) 12 times the net earnings of Ashford Inc. for the 12-month period preceding the termination date of the advisory agreement; (ii) the earnings multiple (calculated as Ashford Inc.’s total enterprise value on the trading day immediately preceding the day the termination notice is given to Ashford Inc. divided by Ashford Inc.’s most recently reported adjusted EBITDA) for Ashford Inc.’s common stock for the 12-month period preceding the termination date of the advisory agreement multiplied by the net earnings of Ashford Inc. for the 12-month period preceding the termination date of the advisory agreement; or (iii) the simple average of the earnings multiples for each of the three fiscal years preceding the termination of the advisory agreement (calculated as Ashford Inc.’s total enterprise value on the last trading day of each of the three preceding fiscal years divided by, in each case, Ashford Inc.’s adjusted EBITDA for the same periods), multiplied by the net earnings of Ashford Inc. for the 12-month period preceding the termination date of the advisory agreement; plus (b) an additional amount such that the total net amount received by Ashford Inc. after the reduction by state and federal income taxes at an assumed combined rate of 40% on the sum of the amounts described in (a) and (b) shall equal the amount described in (a).
In accordance with our advisory agreement, our advisor, or entities in which our advisor has an interest, have a right to provide products or services to our hotels at market rates, provided such transactions are evaluated and approved

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   57 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

by our independent directors. We believe that this arrangement gives us a competitive advantage, as our advisor’s relationships with such product and service providers often results in preferred pricing, premium service, and other benefits for our hotels. We also anticipate that this arrangement will facilitate better long-term quality control and accountability.
If our advisor is requested, by our independent directors, to perform services outside the scope of the advisory agreement, we are obligated to pay separately for such services.
Enhanced Return Funding Program Agreement
On June 26, 2018, we entered into the ERFP Agreement with our advisor. The independent members of our Board and the independent directors of the board of directors of Ashford Inc., with the assistance of separate and independent legal counsel, engaged to negotiate the ERFP Agreement on our behalf and Ashford Inc.’s behalf, respectively. Under the ERFP Agreement, Ashford Inc. agreed to provide $50 million to us in connection with our acquisition of hotels recommended by Ashford Inc., with the option to increase the funding commitment to up to 100 million upon mutual agreement by the parties. Ashford Inc. is obligated to provide us 10% of the acquired hotel’s purchase price in exchange for furniture, fixtures and equipment (“FF&E”), which is subsequently leased to us rent-free. In connection with our acquisition of the Embassy Suites New York Midtown Manhattan on January 23, 2019, Ashford LLC became obligated to provide us with approximately $19.5 million in exchange for FF&E at our properties. As of March 13, 2020 we had received $8.1 million of cash with respect to certain acquisitions in exchange for FF&E that was subsequently leased back to us rent-free under the ERFP Agreement. Pursuant to an Extension Agreement, dated March 13, 2020, the original obligation to provide the remaining $11.4 million in funding by January 22, 2021 was extended to December 31, 2022. On November 25, 2020, the independent members of our Board granted Ashford Inc., in its sole and absolute discretion, the right to set-off against the Embassy Suites New York Manhattan Times Square remaining ERFP balance, the fees pursuant to our advisory agreement and the Lismore Agreement (as defined below) that have been or may be deferred by Ashford Inc.
On April 20, 2021, the Company delivered written notice of its intention not to renew the ERFP Agreement. As a result, the ERFP Agreement terminated in accordance with its terms on June 26, 2021.
Lismore Agreement
On March 20, 2020, Lismore Capital II LLC (“Lismore”), a subsidiary of Ashford Inc., entered into an agreement with the Company to seek modifications, forbearances or refinancings of the Company’s loans (the “Lismore Agreement”). Pursuant to the Lismore Agreement, Lismore was obligated, during the agreement term, (which commenced on March 20, 2020 and terminated on March 20, 2021) to negotiate the refinancing, modification or forbearance of the existing mortgage debt on the Company’s hotels. For the purposes of the Lismore Agreement, financing shall include, without limitation, senior or subordinate loan financing, provided in any single transaction or a combination of transactions, including, mortgage loan financing, mezzanine loan financing, or subordinate loan financing encumbering the applicable hotel or unsecured loan financing.
On July 1, 2020, the Company amended and restated the Lismore Agreement with an effective date of April 6, 2020 (the “Amended and Restated Lismore Agreement”). Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Lismore Agreement, the term of the Lismore Agreement was extended to 24 months following the commencement date. In connection with the services provided by Lismore under Amended and Restated Lismore Agreement, Lismore was entitled to receive a fee of approximately $2.6 million in three equal installments of approximately $857,000 per month beginning July 20, 2020, and ending on September 20, 2020. Lismore is also entitled to receive a fee that is calculated and payable as follows: (i) a fee equal to 25 basis points (0.25%) of the amount of a loan, payable upon the acceptance by the applicable lender of any forbearance or extension of such loan, or in the case where a third-party agent or contractor engaged by the Company has secured an extension of the maturity date equal to or greater than 12 months of any such loan, then the amount payable to Lismore shall be reduced to 10 basis points (0.10%); (ii) a fee equal to 75 basis points (0.75%) of the amount of any principal reduction of a loan upon the acceptance by any lender of any principal reduction of such loan; and (iii) a fee equal to 150 basis points (1.50%) of the implied conversion value (but in any case, no less than 50% percent of the face value of such loan or loans) of a loan upon the acceptance by any lender of any debt to equity conversion of such loan.
At the time of the Amended and Restated Lismore Agreement, the Company had paid Lismore approximately $8.3 million, in the aggregate, pursuant to the Lismore Agreement. Under the Amended and Restated Lismore

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 58 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Agreement, the Company was still entitled, in the event that the Company did not complete, for any reason, extensions or forbearances during the term of the agreement equal to or greater than approximately $4.1 billion, to offset, against any fees the Company or its affiliates owe pursuant to the advisory agreement, a portion of the fee previously paid by the Company to Lismore equal to the product of (x) approximately $4.1 billion minus the amount of extensions or forbearances completed during the term of the agreement multiplied by (y) 0.125%. Upon entering into the Amended and Restated Lismore Agreement, the Company made a payment of $5.1 million. No amounts under this payment can be clawed back. As of December 31, 2021, the Company has also paid $5.1 million related to periodic installments of which approximately $5.0 million has been expensed in accordance with the agreement. Additionally, the independent members of the board of directors of Ashford Inc. accelerated approximately $506,000 in claw back credit due to Ashford Trust which, absent a waiver, would occur after the expiration of the Lismore Agreement. Such claw back credit was due to Ashford Trust in connection with certain properties Ashford Trust no longer owns. This amount was offset against base advisory fees. Approximately $149,000 may be offset against future fees under the agreement that are eligible for claw back under the Amended and Restated Lismore Agreement. As of December 31, 2021 approximately $792,000 of the payments are included in “other assets.” Further, the Company has incurred $8.7 million in success fees under the agreement in connection with each signed forbearance or other agreement, of which no amounts are available for claw back. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had a payable of $13,000 for such fees.
From October 16, 2020 through January 11, 2021, the independent members of the board of directors of Ashford Inc. provided Ashford Trust deferrals of the base advisory fees and any Lismore success fees for the months of October 2020, November 2020, December 2020 and January 2021 that were previously deferred such that all such fees would be due and payable on the earlier of (x) January 18, 2021 and (y) immediately prior to the closing of the senior secured credit facility by and among Ashford Trust and certain of its affiliates and certain affiliates of Oaktree. Additionally, the independent members of the board of directors of Ashford Inc. waived any claim against Ashford Trust and Ashford Trust’s affiliates and each of their officers and directors for breach of the advisory agreement and the Amended and Restated Lismore Agreement or any damages that may have arisen in absence of such fee deferral.
In accordance with the terms of such deferrals, we paid Ashford Inc. approximately $14.4 million immediately prior to the closing of the senior secured credit facility with lending entities managed by Oaktree.
On May 26, 2021, the Company entered into an agreement with Real Estate Advisory Holdings LLC (“REA Holdings”) to negotiate, on the Company’s behalf, a refinancing of the existing mortgage loan on the Company’s Hilton Boston Back Bay in Boston, Massachusetts. The amount of the refinanced mortgage loan was approximately $97 million. Upon closing of the refinancing on August 25, 2021, the Company paid REA Holdings a fee of $784,000. Ashford Inc. indirectly owns a 30% non-controlling equity interest in REA Holdings.
Project Management Agreement
In connection with Ashford Inc.’s August 8, 2018 acquisition of Premier, we entered into a project management agreement with Premier, pursuant to which Premier provides project management services to our hotels, including construction management, interior design, architectural services, and the purchasing, freight management, and supervision of installation of furniture, fixtures and equipment, and related services. During 2020, pursuant to the project management agreement, we paid Premier: (a) project management fees of up to 4% of project costs; (b) construction management fees of up to 10% of construction costs; (c) interior design and architectural services fees of up to 6.5% of construction costs; and (d) FF&E purchasing, expediting/freight management, warehousing, installation and supervision fees of between 6% - 8% of the cost of FF&E. The amount of project management and market service fees incurred by us to Premier for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 was approximately $5.2 million. Additionally, there were other reimbursed expenses of approximately $748,000. In March 2022, we awarded deferred cash grants to Premier’s employees valued at approximately $632,000.
Project Management Mutual Exclusivity Agreement
Also, in connection with Ashford Inc.’s August 8, 2018 acquisition of Premier, we and our operating partnership entered into a mutual exclusivity agreement with Premier, pursuant to which we have a first right of refusal to purchase lodging investments identified by Premier and any of its affiliates that meet our investment criteria. We also agreed to hire Premier or its affiliates for the development and construction, capital improvement, refurbishment, and/or project management or other services in connection with any acquisition or investment by us in a hotel, unless

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   59 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

our independent directors either (i) unanimously vote not to engage Premier, or (ii) based on special circumstances or past performance, by a majority vote elect not to engage Premier because they have determined, in their reasonable business judgment, that it would be in our best interest not to engage Premier or that another manager or developer could perform the duties materially better.
Hotel Management Agreement
Our operating partnership previously entered into a master hotel management agreement with Remington Lodging, pursuant to which Remington Lodging provided us with hotel management services and project management services with respect to hotels owned or leased by us. In connection with Ashford Inc.’s August 8, 2018 acquisition of Premier, our operating partnership and Remington Lodging entered into an amended and restated hotel management agreement, pursuant to which Remington Lodging provides hotel management services to a significant number of our hotels, including hotel operations, sales and marketing, revenue management, budget oversight, guest service, asset maintenance (not involving capital expenditures) and related services. In connection with Ashford Inc.’s November 6, 2019 acquisition of Remington Lodging, Remington Hotels became a subsidiary of Ashford Inc., and the master hotel management agreement between our operating partnership and Remington Hotels, from and after November 6, 2019 a subsidiary of Ashford Inc., remains in effect. From and after November 6, 2019, pursuant to the hotel management agreement, we paid Remington Hotels hotel management fees and other fees. The amount of hotel management fees incurred by us to Remington Hotels for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 was approximately $21.9 million which includes approximately $17.8 million of base management fees and approximately $4.2 million of incentive fees. Additionally, there were other reimbursed expenses of approximately $13.6 million. In March 2022, we awarded deferred cash grants to Remington Hotels’ employees valued at approximately $946,000.
Hotel Management Mutual Exclusivity Agreement
We and our operating partnership have an amended and restated mutual exclusivity agreement with Remington Hotels and Remington Holdings, L.P. (“Remington Holdings”) and our Chairman, Mr. Monty J. Bennett, and his father, our Chairman Emeritus, Mr. Archie Bennett, Jr., pursuant to which we have a first right of refusal to purchase lodging investments identified by Remington Hotels that do not meet the investment criteria of Braemar. We also agreed to hire Remington Hotels or its affiliates for the management of any hotel which is part of an investment we elect to pursue, unless our independent directors either (i) unanimously vote not to engage Remington Hotels, or (ii) based on special circumstances or past performance, by a majority vote elect not to engage Remington Hotels because they have determined, in their reasonable business judgment, that it would be in our best interest not to engage Remington Hotels or that another manager or developer could perform the duties materially better. In connection with Ashford Inc.’s November 6, 2019 acquisition of Remington Hotels, Remington Hotels became a subsidiary of Ashford Inc., and the master hotel management agreement between our operating partnership and Remington Hotels remains in effect.
Agreement with Ashford Investment Management, LLC
Effective January 19, 2017, we entered into an agreement with Ashford Investment Management, LLC (“AIM”), an indirect subsidiary of Ashford Inc., pursuant to which AIM manages all or a portion of our excess available cash. This cash management strategy allows us to potentially realize a higher return on otherwise idle accounts while maintaining the flexibility to access cash when we need it. Effective December 31, 2020, the Investment Management Agreement with AIM was terminated.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 60 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Ashford Inc. Interest in Certain Entities
The table below sets forth the entities in which Ashford Inc. had an interest as of December 31, 2021 with which we or our hotel properties contracted for products and services (other than advisory services pursuant to the Advisory Agreement), the approximate amounts paid or retained by us for those services, Ashford Inc.’s interests in such entities (excluding the impact of the 0.2% minority interest in Ashford Hospitality Holdings LLC, a subsidiary of Ashford Inc., not held by Ashford Inc.), and the number of board seats Ashford Inc. has on such companies’ boards, such board seats being filled by directors or officers of us and/or directors, officers or employees of Ashford Inc.

​ | Company | ​ | ​ | Product or Service | ​ | ​ | Amounts Paid by/(Retained by) Us for Products or Services in 2021 | ​ | ​ | Ashford Inc. Interest | ​ | ​ | Ashford Inc. Board Seats/ Board Seats Available | ​
​ | OpenKey(1) | ​ | ​ | Mobile key app | ​ | ​ | $​121,000 | ​ | ​ | 75% | ​ | ​ | 1/3 | ​
​ | Pure Wellness(2) | ​ | ​ | Hypoallergenic premium rooms | ​ | ​ | $​1,366,000 | ​ | ​ | 70% | ​ | ​ | 2/3 | ​
​ | Lismore Capital(3) | ​ | ​ | Debt placement and related services | ​ | ​ | ​$​7,220,000 | ​ | ​ | 100% | ​ | ​ | N/A | ​
​ | INSPIRE(4) | ​ | ​ | Audio visual services | ​ | ​ | ​($2,993,000) | ​ | ​ | 100% | ​ | ​ | N/A | ​
​ | Ashford LLC | ​ | ​ | Insurance claims services | ​ | ​ | $74,000 | ​ | ​ | 100% | ​ | ​ | N/A | ​
​ | Premier (5) | ​ | ​ | Project management services | ​ | ​ | ​$5,940,000 | ​ | ​ | 100% | ​ | ​ | N/A | ​
​ | Remington Hotels(6) | ​ | ​ | Hotel management services | ​ | ​ | ​$35,526,000 | ​ | ​ | 100% | ​ | ​ | N/A | ​
​ | Real Estate Advisory Holdings LLC(7) | ​ | ​ | Debt placement/real estate brokerage | ​ | ​ | $​955,000 | ​ | ​ | 30% | ​ | ​ | 1/3 | ​
​ | Ashford Securities LLC(8) | ​ | ​ | Broker-dealer and dealer manager services | ​ | ​ | $​19,000 | ​ | ​ | 100% | ​ | ​ | 2/2 | ​

(1) | As of December 31, 2021, Ashford Trust held a 16.7% noncontrolling interest in OpenKey, Inc. (“OpenKey”), and Braemar held a 7.8% noncontrolling interest in OpenKey. Ashford Inc., Ashford Trust, and Braemar invested $5.7 million, $500,000 and $233,000, respectively, in OpenKey during the year ended December 31, 2021. In addition, Mr. Welter, our Chief Operating Officer, has been issued 75,000 options outstanding pursuant to OpenKey’s 2015 stock plan, equating to an approximate 0.3% ownership in OpenKey. Pursuant to the Voting Agreement, dated as of March 8, 2016, Ashford Lending Corporation or its affiliates may designate one member of the board of directors of OpenKey, and the holders of a majority of OpenKey’s Voting Series A Preferred Stock not held by any affiliate of Ashford Inc. may appoint an additional director. On March 9, 2021, Ashford Inc. acquired all of the redeemable noncontrolling interest’s shares in OpenKey for a purchase price of approximately $1.9 million. As a result of the acquisition, Ashford Inc.’s ownership in OpenKey increased to 75.4% with the remainder held by noncontrolling interest holders, including 16.7% and 7.8% owned by Ashford Trust and Braemar, respectively.

(2) | On April 6, 2017, a subsidiary of Ashford Inc. acquired substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of PRE Opco, LLC (“Pure Wellness”), a New York limited liability company that provides hypoallergenic premium room services to hotels and other venues, including hotels owned by us and our affiliates.

(3) | On November 1, 2019, Lismore Capital II LLC (formerly known as Lismore Capital LLC (“Lismore Capital”)), a wholly-owned subsidiary of our advisor, was formed in order to offer debt placement services to our affiliates of Ashford Trust, Braemar and third parties. On March 20, 2020, Lismore Capital entered into the Ashford Trust Agreement and Braemar Agreement, respectively, to provide modification, forbearance and refinancing services to Ashford Trust and Braemar,respectively. On July 1, 2020, Lismore and Ashford Trust amended and restated the Ashford Trust Agreement with an effective date of April 6, 2020.

(4) | On November 1, 2017, a subsidiary of Ashford Inc. acquired an 85% controlling interest in a privately held company that conducts the business of Inspire Event Technologies Holdings, LLC (f/k/a Presentation Technologies LLC; “INSPIRE”) in the United States, Mexico, and the Dominican Republic. On March 1, 2019, INSPIRE acquired a privately-held company that conducts the business of BAV Services in the United States (“BAV”) for approximately $9.0 million excluding contingent consideration and transaction costs. BAV is an audio visual rental, staging, and production company, focused on meeting and special event services. As a result of the acquisition, Ashford Inc.’s ownership interest in INSPIRE increased from 85% to approximately 88%. On December 31, 2020, Ashford Inc. acquired all of the redeemable noncontrolling interests in INSPIRE for $150,000. As a result of the acquisition, Ashford Inc.’s ownership in INSPIRE increased to 100%. INSPIRE provides integrated suites of audio visual services including show and event services, creative services and design and integration services to its customers in various venues including hotels and convention centers in the United States, Mexico, and the Dominican Republic. INSPIRE primarily contracts directly with third-party customers to whom it provides audio visual services. The gross revenue from these customers is generally collected by the hotels and the hotels retain an agreed commission and then remit the balance to INSPIRE. The amount above reflects the commission “retained by” Ashford Trust and Braemar hotels.

(5) | On August 8, 2018, Ashford Inc. completed the acquisition of Premier, the project management business formerly conducted by certain affiliates of Remington, for a total transaction value of $203 million. The purchase price was paid by issuing 8,120,000 shares of Ashford Inc.’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock to the sellers of Premier, primarily MJB Investments, LP (which is wholly-owned by Mr. Monty J. Bennett, our Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Ashford Inc.), and his father Mr. Archie Bennett, Jr., our Chairman Emeritus. The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock had a conversion price of $140 per share and would convert into 1,450,000 shares of Ashford Inc.’s common stock. The $5.9 million amount disclosed above includes approximately $748,000 of reimbursed expenses related to fixed asset accounting services in addition to the approximate $5.2 million of project management and market service fees.

(6) | On November 6, 2019, Ashford Inc. completed the acquisition of the hotel management business of Remington Lodging, for a total transaction value of $275 million. The purchase price was paid by exchanging $203 million of Ashford Inc.’s Series B Convertible Preferred

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   61 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Stock for $478 million of Ashford Inc.’s Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (such that, after the transactions, $478 million of Ashford Inc.’s Series D Convertible Preferred Stock and no Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, are outstanding). Each share of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible at any time and from time to time, in full or partially, into Ashford Inc.’s common stock at a conversion ratio equal to the liquidation preference of a share of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (which is $25), divided by $117.50. The $35.5 million amount disclosed above includes approximately $13.6 million of reimbursed expenses and $4.1 million of hotel incentive management fees in addition to the approximate $17.8 million of hotel management fees.

(7) | On January 1, 2019, Ashford Inc. acquired a 30% equity interest in Real Estate Advisory Holdings LLC (“REA Holdings”). REA Holdings, through its operating subsidiary, provides real estate advisory, debt placement and brokerage services to Ashford Trust, Braemar and third-party clients.

(8) | On September 25, 2019, Ashford Inc. announced the formation of Ashford Securities, LLC (“Ashford Securities”) to raise retail capital in order to grow its existing and future advised platforms. In conjunction with the formation of Ashford Securities, Ashford Trust has entered into a contribution agreement with Ashford Inc. pursuant to which Ashford Trust has agreed to contribute, with Braemar, up to $15 million to fund the operations of Ashford Securities. On December 31, 2020, an Amended and Restated Contribution Agreement was entered into by Ashford Inc., Ashford Trust and Braemar with respect to expenses to be reimbursed by Ashford Securities. The initial True-Up Date (as defined below) did not occur and beginning on the effective date of the Amended and Restated Contribution Agreement, costs will be allocated based upon an allocation percentage of 50% to Ashford Inc., 50% to Braemar and 0% to Ashford Trust. Upon reaching the earlier of $400 million in aggregate non-listed preferred equity offerings raised, or June 10, 2023, there will be an Amended and Restated true up (the “Amended and Restated True-up Date”) among Ashford Inc., Ashford Trust and Braemar whereby the actual expense reimbursement paid by each company will be based on the actual amount of capital raised by Ashford Inc., Ashford Trust and Braemar, respectively. After the Amended and Restated True-Up Date, the expense reimbursements will be allocated among Ashford Inc., Ashford Trust and Braemar quarterly based on the actual capital raised through Ashford Securities. On January 27, 2022 Ashford Trust, Braemar and Ashford Inc. entered into a Second Amended and Restated Contribution Agreement which provided for an additional $18 million in expenses to be reimbursed (with all expenses allocated 45% to the Company, 45% to Braemar and 10% to Ashford Inc.). As of December 31, 2021, we have funded approximately $3.5 million.

Contribution Agreement with Ashford Inc. and Braemar to Fund Ashford Securities
On September 25, 2019, Ashford Inc. announced the formation of Ashford Securities LLC (“Ashford Securities”) to raise capital in order to grow its existing and future advised platforms. In conjunction with the formation of Ashford Securities, we entered into a contribution agreement with Ashford Inc. and Braemar pursuant to which we had agreed to contribute, with Braemar, up to $15 million to fund the operations of Ashford Securities. Costs for all operating expenses of Ashford Securities that are contributed by us and Braemar were expensed as incurred. These costs were allocated initially to us and Braemar based on an allocation percentage of 75% to us and 25% to Braemar. Promptly after the True-up Date, which ends upon the earlier of $400 million in aggregate non-listed preferred equity offerings raised or June 10, 2023, there was a true up (the “True-up Date”) between us and Braemar whereby the actual capital contributions contributed by each company will be based on the actual amount of capital raised by us and Braemar, respectively. After the True-up Date, the capital contributions were allocated between us and Braemar quarterly based on the actual capital raised through Ashford Securities.
On December 31, 2020, an Amended and Restated Contribution Agreement was entered into by Ashford Inc., Ashford Trust and Braemar with respect to expenses to be reimbursed by Ashford Securities. The initial True-Up Date did not occur and beginning on the effective date of the Amended and Restated Contribution Agreement, costs will be allocated based upon an allocation percentage of 50% to Ashford Inc., 50% to Braemar and 0% to Ashford Trust. Upon reaching the Amended and Restated True-up Date, there will be an amended and restated true up among Ashford Inc., Ashford Trust and Braemar whereby the actual expense reimbursement paid by each company will be based on the actual amount of capital raised by Ashford Inc., Ashford Trust and Braemar, respectively. After the Amended and Restated True-Up Date, the expense reimbursements will be allocated among Ashford Inc., Ashford Trust and Braemar quarterly based on the actual capital raised through Ashford Securities. On January 27, 2022 Ashford Trust, Braemar and Ashford Inc. entered into a Second Amended and Restated Contribution Agreement which provided for an additional $18 million in expenses to be reimbursed (of which 45% is allocated to the Company, 45% is allocated to Braemar and 10% is allocated to Ashford Inc.). As of December 31, 2021, we have funded approximately $3.5 million.
Our Relationship and Agreements with Braemar
In November 2013, we completed a taxable pro-rata distribution of our subsidiary, Braemar, to our stockholders. Until July 2015, our operating subsidiary owned approximately 15% of the outstanding common units of the Braemar operating partnership, which were redeemable for shares of common stock of Braemar on a one-for-one basis. In July 2015, our operating subsidiary completed a distribution of these common units to its limited partners, including us, we sought redemption of the common units to shares of common stock of Braemar, and completed a pro rata, taxable dividend of the common stock of Braemar to our stockholders. Following this transaction, we no longer own any securities of Braemar.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 62 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

All of our executive officers are executive officers of Braemar (with the exception of our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. J. Robison Hays, III, who is not an executive officer of Braemar) and we have one common director with Braemar, Mr. Monty J. Bennett, Chairman of our Board and Chairman of Braemar. As of March 11, 2022, our directors and executive officers and their immediate family members (including Mr. Monty J. Bennett, who is our Chairman, and Mr. Archie Bennett, Jr., who is our Chairman Emeritus and Mr. Monty J. Bennett’s father) collectively may be deemed to beneficially own 4,508,511 shares of Braemar’s common stock (consisting of (1) common stock, (2) restricted stock, (3) common units in Braemar’s operating partnership which are redeemable for common stock based on the exchange ratio of one share of Braemar common stock per common unit and (4) LTIP units in Braemar’s operating partnership that have vested and that have achieved economic parity with the common units (but excluding LTIP units (including Performance LTIPs) issued subsequent to March 11, 2022, or that have not yet achieved economic parity or PSUs, LTIPs or Performance LTIPs that have not yet vested)). In accordance with SEC rules, our directors and executive officers and their immediate family members may be deemed to own approximately 6.2% of Braemar common stock.
Our directors and executive officers and their immediate family members will benefit, as stockholders of Braemar, to the extent we make payments or give other benefits to Braemar or its subsidiaries pursuant to the arrangements described below.
Advisory Agreement
Pursuant to the terms of Braemar’s advisory agreement with Ashford Inc., Braemar is obligated to indemnify and hold us harmless to the full extent lawful, from and against any and all losses, claims, damages or liabilities of any nature whatsoever with respect to or arising from any of our acts or omissions (including ordinary negligence) in our capacity as Braemar’s advisor for the period prior to the Ashford Inc. spin-off during which we served as advisor to Braemar, except with respect to losses, claims, damages or liabilities with respect to or arising out of our gross negligence, bad faith or willful misconduct, or reckless disregard of our duties under the advisory agreement (for which we are obligated to indemnify Braemar).
Separation and Distribution Agreement
Pursuant to the terms of the separation and distribution agreement governing our separation from Braemar, Braemar is obligated to indemnify us against losses arising from:

• | any Braemar liabilities, including the failure by Braemar or its subsidiaries to pay, perform or otherwise promptly discharge any of their liabilities in accordance with their respective terms;

• | any breach by Braemar or its subsidiaries of any provision of the separation and distribution agreement or any ancillary agreement, subject to certain limitations; and

• | our continuing guaranty of (i) any debt secured by any of the initial hotel properties conveyed to Braemar in connection with the separation and distribution or (ii) any management agreement or franchise matters related to any of such initial hotel properties.

We have agreed to indemnify Braemar and its subsidiaries against losses arising from:

• | any of our liabilities, including the failure by us or our subsidiaries to pay, perform or otherwise promptly discharge any of our liabilities in accordance with their respective terms;

• | any breach by us or our subsidiaries of any provision of the separation and distribution agreement or any ancillary agreement, subject to certain limitations; and

• | certain taxes of the entities that directly or indirectly, wholly or jointly, own the initial Braemar hotel properties and the related taxable REIT subsidiaries for tax periods prior to the effective date of the separation and distribution.

Right of First Offer Agreement
Pursuant to a right of first offer agreement, we have granted Braemar a first right to acquire certain subject hotels, to the extent our Board determines to market and sell the hotel, subject to any prior rights of the managers of the hotel or other third parties and limitations associated with certain of our hotels held in a joint venture. Likewise, Braemar has agreed to give us a right of first offer with respect to any properties that Braemar acquires in a portfolio transaction, to the extent its Board determines it is appropriate to market and sell such assets and Braemar controls the disposition, provided such assets satisfy our investment guidelines. Any such right of first offer granted to us will be subject to certain prior rights, if any, granted to the managers of the related properties or other third parties.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   63 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OTHER PROPOSALS
Stockholder proposals intended to be presented at our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, must be received by us no later than November 30, 2022. Such proposals also must comply with SEC regulations Rule 14a-8 regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in Company-sponsored proxy materials. Proposals should be addressed to the attention of Investor Relations at 14185 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75254.
Any proposal that a stockholder intends to present at the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders other than by inclusion in our proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 must be received by us no earlier than November 30, 2022 and no later than December 30, 2022. Stockholders are advised to review our bylaws, which contain additional requirements with respect to advance notice of stockholder proposals and director nominations, copies of which are available without charge upon request to the Corporate Secretary, Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc., 14185 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75254.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 64 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT VOTING
Solicitation of Proxies
The enclosed proxy is solicited by and on behalf of our Board. Our directors, officers and employees of our advisor may solicit the return of proxies by personal interview, mail, telephone, e-mail or facsimile. We will not pay additional compensation to our directors, officers or the employees of our advisor for their solicitation efforts, but we will reimburse them for any out-of-pocket expenses they incur in their solicitation efforts. We also intend to request persons holding shares of our common stock in their name or custody, or in the name of a nominee, to send proxy materials to their principals and request authority for the execution of the proxies, and we will reimburse such persons for their expense in doing so. We will bear the expense of soliciting proxies for the annual meeting of stockholders, including the cost of mailing.
We have retained Morrow Sodali to aid in the solicitation of proxies and to verify records relating to the solicitation. Morrow Sodali will receive a fee of up to $10,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses.
Electronic Availability of Proxy Materials
Most stockholders can elect to view future proxy statements electronically instead of receiving paper copies in the mail. This will save us the cost of producing and mailing these documents.
If you are a stockholder of record, you may choose electronic delivery by following the instructions provided when you vote over the internet. If you hold our common stock through a broker, bank, trust or other holder of record, you will receive information from that entity regarding the availability of electronic delivery. If you choose to view future proxy statements and annual reports over the Internet, you will receive an e-mail message next year containing the Internet address to access our proxy statement. Your choice will remain in effect until you cancel your election. You do not have to elect Internet access each year.
Voting Securities
Our only outstanding voting equity securities are shares of our common stock. Each share of common stock entitles the holder to one vote. As of March 11, 2022, there were 34,491,907 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 11, 2022 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting of stockholders and any postponement or adjournment of the annual meeting.
Voting
If you hold your common stock in your own name as a holder of record, you may instruct the proxies to vote your common stock by signing, dating and mailing the proxy card in the postage paid envelope provided. You may also vote your common stock in person at the annual meeting of stockholders, by telephone or electronically. Each stockholder may appoint only one proxy holder or representative to attend the meeting on his or her behalf.
If your common stock is held on your behalf by a broker, bank or other nominee, you will receive instructions from them that you must follow to have your common stock voted at the annual meeting of stockholders.
Counting of Votes
A quorum will be present at the annual meeting if the stockholders entitled to cast at least one third of all the votes entitled to be cast at the annual meeting on any matter are present in person or by proxy. If you have returned valid proxy instructions or if you hold your shares in your own name as a holder of record and attend the annual meeting of stockholders in person, your shares will be counted for the purpose of determining whether there is a quorum. If a quorum is not present, the annual meeting of stockholders may be adjourned by the chair of the meeting until a quorum has been obtained.
In an uncontested election, a nominee for director shall be elected if the votes cast for such nominee’s election exceed the votes cast against such nominee’s election (with abstentions and broker non-votes not counted as a vote cast either for or against that director’s election) (Proposal 1). Each share may be voted for as many individuals as there are directors to be elected and for whose election the share is entitled to be voted. Cumulative voting is not permitted.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   65 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The affirmative vote of a majority of all of the votes cast at the annual meeting will be required for approval, on an advisory basis, of the Company’s executive compensation (Proposal 2), to ratify the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2022 (Proposal 3), for approval of Amendment No. 1 to the 2021 Stock Incentive Plan (Proposal 4) and for any other matter that may properly come before the stockholders at the meeting.
If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in the name of a broker, trustee or other nominee and do not provide that broker, trustee or other nominee with voting instructions, your shares may constitute “broker non-votes.” The election of directors (Proposal 1), the advisory compensation proposal (Proposal 2) and approval of the amendment to the 2021 Stock Incentive Plan (Proposal 4) are non-routine items under the rules of the NYSE and shares may not be voted on this matter by brokers, banks or other nominees who have not received specific voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. It is therefore important that you provide instructions to your broker so that your shares will be voted for purposes of Proposals 1, 2 and 4. The ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our independent auditors (Proposal 3) is a routine item, and as such, banks, brokers, and other nominees that do not receive voting instructions from beneficial owners may vote on this proposal in their discretion.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will be included in determining whether a quorum is present at the annual meeting, as they are considered present and entitled to cast a vote on a matter at the meeting (even if, in the case of broker non-votes, they are only entitled to vote on Proposal 3). Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be considered “votes cast,” will not be included in vote totals on Proposals 1 and 2 and will not affect the outcome of the votes, on Proposals 1 and 2. Abstentions will not be considered “votes cast” and therefore will not be included in vote totals and will not affect the outcome of the vote for Proposal 3. Abstentions will be treated as “votes cast” and therefore will be included in vote totals and will affect the outcome of the vote for Proposal 4. Abstentions will be treated as a vote against approval of the amendment to the 2021 Stock Incentive Plan (Proposal 4).
If you sign and return your proxy card without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted consistent with the Board’s recommendations.
Right to Revoke Proxy
If you hold shares of voting stock in your own name as a holder of record, you may revoke your proxy instructions through any of the following methods:

• | notify our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in writing before your shares of voting stock have been voted at the annual meeting of stockholders;

• | sign, date and mail a new proxy card to Broadridge; or

• | attend the annual meeting of stockholders and vote your shares of voting stock in person.

You must meet the same deadline when revoking your proxy as when voting by proxy. See the “Voting” section of this proxy statement for more information.
If shares of voting stock are held on your behalf by a broker, bank or other nominee, you must contact them to receive instructions as to how you may revoke your proxy instructions.
Multiple Stockholders Sharing the Same Address
The SEC rules allow for the delivery of a single copy of an annual report and proxy statement to two or more stockholders who share an address, unless we have received contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders. We will deliver promptly upon written or oral request separate copies of our annual report and proxy statement to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy was delivered. Requests for additional copies of the proxy materials, and requests that in the future separate proxy materials be sent to stockholders who share an address, should be directed to Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 14185 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75254 or by calling (972) 490-9600. In addition, stockholders who share a single address but receive multiple copies of the proxy materials may request that in the future they receive a single copy by contacting us at the address and phone number set forth in the previous sentence. Depending upon the practices of your broker, bank or other nominee, you may need to contact them directly to continue duplicate mailings to your household. If you wish to revoke your consent to householding, you must contact your broker, bank or other nominee. If you hold shares of voting stock in your own name as a holder of record, householding will not apply to your shares.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 66 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If you wish to request extra copies free of charge of any annual report, proxy statement or information statement, please send your request to Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 14185 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75254 or call (972) 490-9600. You can also obtain copies from our web site at www.ahtreit.com.
Annual Report
Stockholders may request a free copy of our 2021 Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes our 2021 Form 10-K, by writing to the Corporate Secretary, Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc., 14185 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75254. Alternatively, stockholders may access our 2020 Annual Report to Stockholders on our website at www.ahtreit.com. We will also furnish any exhibit to our 2021 Form 10-K if specifically requested.
Other Matters
We know of no other matters to be submitted to the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters properly come before the stockholders at the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named on the proxy to vote the shares represented thereby on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   67 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549-1090. Our SEC filings are available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and on the website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov. We make available on our website at www.ahtreit.com, free of charge, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, press releases, charters for the committees of our Board, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Code of Ethics for our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer and other Company information, including amendments to such documents as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed or furnished to the SEC or otherwise publicly released. Such information will also be furnished upon written request to Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 14185 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75254 or by calling (972) 490-9600.
The SEC allows us to “incorporate by reference” information into this proxy statement. That means we can disclose important information to you by referring you to another document filed separately with the SEC. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this proxy statement, except to the extent that the information is superseded by information in this proxy statement.
This proxy statement incorporates by reference the information contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. We also incorporate by reference the information contained in all other documents we file with the SEC after the date of this proxy statement and prior to the annual meeting of stockholders. The information contained in any of these documents will be considered part of this proxy statement from the date these documents are filed.
Any statement contained in this proxy statement or in a document incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference herein will be deemed to be modified or superseded for purposes of this proxy statement to the extent that a statement contained herein or in any other subsequently filed document which also is or is deemed to be incorporated by reference herein modifies or supersedes such statement. Any statement so modified or superseded will not be deemed, except as so modified or superseded, to constitute a part of this proxy statement.
You should rely only on the information contained in (or incorporated by reference into) this proxy statement to vote on each of the proposals submitted for stockholder vote. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from what is contained in (or incorporated by reference into) this proxy statement. This proxy statement is dated March 30, 2022. You should not assume that the information contained in this proxy statement is accurate as of any later date.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | 68 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ANNEX A—INFORMATION REGARDING NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE
In the section of this proxy statement captioned “Executive Compensation” we disclose our Adjusted EBITDAre for the year ended December 31, 2021 (our “2021 Adjusted EBITDAre”). This financial measure is considered a non-GAAP financial measure under the SEC’s rules because it is calculated by excluding or including amounts that are included or excluded in the calculation of comparable measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.
Below, we tell you briefly how we calculate the non-GAAP financial measure (the “Non-GAAP Financial Measure”), disclose the financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP or using only measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP that we believe is most directly comparable to the Non-GAAP Measure (the “Comparable GAAP Measure”), disclose the reasons why we think the Non-GAAP Measure provides our stockholders with useful information about our financial condition and results of operations and provide a reconciliation of the Non-GAAP Measure with its Comparable GAAP Measure.
When we refer below to a financial measure as being a “reported” financial measure, we are referring to a GAAP financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP that was presented in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Our net income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2021 (which we refer to as our “2021 Net Loss”) and our net income (loss) per share for the year ended December 31, 2021 are each calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP and appear or are derived from our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021.
2021 Adjusted EBITDAre
Non-GAAP Measure: EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) before interest expense and amortization of discounts and loan costs, net, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, as adjusted to reflect only the Company’s portion of EBITDA of unconsolidated entities. In addition, we exclude impairment charges on real estate, and gain/loss on disposition of assets and hotel properties and gain/loss of unconsolidated entities to calculate EBITDAre, as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”).
We then further adjust EBITDAre to exclude certain additional items such as write-off of premiums, loan costs and exit fees, other income/expense, net, transaction and conversion costs, legal, advisory and settlement costs, dead deal costs, uninsured remediation costs, and non-cash items such as amortization of unfavorable contract liabilities, gain/loss on extinguishment of debt, non-cash stock/unit-based compensation, unrealized gains/losses on derivative instruments, as well as our portion of adjustments to EBITDAre of unconsolidated entities.
We exclude items from Adjusted EBITDAre that are either non-cash or are not part of our core operations in order to provide a period-over-period comparison of our operations. EBITDA, EBITDAre and Adjusted EBITDAre as calculated by us may not be comparable to EBITDA, EBITDAre and Adjusted EBITDAre reported by other companies that do not define EBITDA, EBITDAre and Adjusted EBITDAre exactly as we define the terms. EBITDA, EBITDAre and Adjusted EBITDAre do not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to (i) GAAP net income or loss as an indication of our financial performance or (ii) GAAP cash flows from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity.
Comparable GAAP Measure: Our 2021 Net Loss as reported.
Why the Non-GAAP Measure is Useful Information to Investors: We present EBITDA, EBITDAre and Adjusted EBITDAre because we believe these measurements (i) more accurately reflect the ongoing performance of our hotel assets and other investments, (ii) provide more useful information to investors as indicators of our ability to meet our future debt payment and working capital requirements and (iii) provide an overall evaluation of our financial condition.

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ |  | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement   A-1 | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reconciliation: The following table reconciles net income (loss) to EBITDA, EBITDAre and Adjusted EBITDAre
(in thousands) (unaudited):

​ | Net income (loss) | ​ | ​ | $(271,048) | ​
​ | Interest expense and amortization of discounts and loan costs | ​ | ​ | 156,119 | ​
​ | Depreciation and amortization | ​ | ​ | 218,851 | ​
​ | Income tax expense (benefit) | ​ | ​ | 5,948 | ​
​ | Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities | ​ | ​ | 558 | ​
​ | Company’s portion of EBITDA of unconsolidated entities | ​ | ​ | (554) | ​
​ | EBITDA | ​ | ​ | 109,874 | ​
​ | (Gain) loss on disposition of assets and hotel properties | ​ | ​ | (449) | ​
​ | EBITDAre | ​ | ​ | 109,425 | ​
​ | Amortization of unfavorable contract liabilities | ​ | ​ | 211 | ​
​ | Write-off of premiums, loan costs and exit fees | ​ | ​ | 10,612 | ​
​ | (Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt | ​ | ​ | (11,896) | ​
​ | Other (income) expense, net | ​ | ​ | (1,760) | ​
​ | Transaction and conversion costs | ​ | ​ | 3,033 | ​
​ | Legal, advisory and settlement costs | ​ | ​ | 7,371 | ​
​ | Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives | ​ | ​ | (14,493) | ​
​ | Dead deal costs | ​ | ​ | 689 | ​
​ | Uninsured remediation costs | ​ | ​ | 341 | ​
​ | Non-cash stock/unit-based compensation | ​ | ​ | 10,095 | ​
​ | Company’s portion of adjustments to EBITDAre of unconsolidated entities | ​ | ​ | 16 | ​
​ | Adjusted EBITDAre | ​ | ​ | $113,644 | ​

​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​ | ​ |  | ​
​ | A-2 | ​ | ​ | 2022 Proxy Statement | ​ | ​ |  | ​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS