XML 22 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.4.0.3
Principles of Consolidation
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2016
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Principles of Consolidation
Principles of Consolidation
GAAP requires us to consider whether securitizations we sponsor and other transfers of financial assets should be treated as sales or financings, as well as whether any VIEs that we hold variable interests in – for example, certain legal entities often used in securitization and other structured finance transactions – should be included in our consolidated financial statements. The GAAP principles we apply require us to reassess our requirement to consolidate VIEs each quarter and therefore our determination may change based upon new facts and circumstances pertaining to each VIE. This could result in a material impact to our consolidated financial statements during subsequent reporting periods.
Analysis of Consolidated VIEs
As of March 31, 2016, the VIEs we are required to consolidate include certain Sequoia securitization entities and the Commercial Securitization entity. In addition, we consolidated the Residential Resecuritization from its creation in 2011 through the fourth quarter of 2015, when the VIE was dissolved. Each of these entities is independent of Redwood and of each other and the assets and liabilities of these entities are not owned by and are not legal obligations of ours. Our exposure to these entities is primarily through the financial interests we have retained, although we are exposed to certain financial risks associated with our role as a sponsor, manager, or depositor of these entities or as a result of our having sold assets directly or indirectly to these entities. The following table presents a summary of the assets and liabilities of these VIEs. Intercompany balances have been eliminated for purposes of this presentation.
Table 4.1 – Assets and Liabilities of Consolidated VIEs
March 31, 2016
 
Sequoia
Entities
 
Commercial Securitization
 
Total
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
 
 
Residential loans, held-for-investment
 
$
930,027

 
$

 
$
930,027

Commercial loans, held-for-investment
 

 
164,626

 
164,626

Restricted cash
 
147

 
136

 
283

Accrued interest receivable
 
1,038

 
1,290

 
2,328

Other assets
 
4,884

 
47

 
4,931

Total Assets
 
$
936,096

 
$
166,099

 
$
1,102,195

Accrued interest payable
 
$
519

 
$
242

 
$
761

Asset-backed securities issued
 
907,023

 
51,680

 
958,703

Total Liabilities
 
$
907,542

 
$
51,922

 
$
959,464

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of VIEs
 
20

 
1

 
21


December 31, 2015
 
Sequoia
Entities
 
Commercial Securitization
 
Total
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
 
 
Residential loans, held-for-investment
 
$
1,021,870

 
$

 
$
1,021,870

Commercial loans, held-for-investment
 

 
166,016

 
166,016

Real estate securities
 

 

 

Restricted cash
 
228

 
137

 
365

Accrued interest receivable
 
1,131

 
1,297

 
2,428

Other assets
 
4,895

 

 
4,895

Total Assets
 
$
1,028,124

 
$
167,450

 
$
1,195,574

Accrued interest payable
 
$
555

 
$
249

 
$
804

Accrued expenses and other liabilities
 
100

 

 
100

Asset-backed securities issued, net
 
996,820

 
53,137

 
1,049,957

Total Liabilities
 
$
997,475

 
$
53,386

 
$
1,050,861

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of VIEs
 
21

 
1

 
22


Analysis of Unconsolidated VIEs with Continuing Involvement
Since 2012, we have transferred residential loans to 26 Sequoia securitization entities sponsored by us and accounted for these transfers as sales for financial reporting purposes, in accordance with ASC 860. We also determined we were not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs as we lacked the power to direct the activities that will have the most significant economic impact on the entities. For the transferred loans where we held the servicing rights prior to the transfer and continue to hold the servicing rights, we recorded MSRs on our consolidated balance sheets, and classified those MSRs as Level 3 assets. We also retained senior and subordinate securities in these securitizations that we classified as Level 3 assets. Our continuing involvement in these securitizations is limited to customary servicing obligations associated with retaining residential MSRs (which we retain a third-party sub-servicer to perform) and the receipt of interest income associated with the securities we retained.
The following table presents information related to securitization transactions that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.
Table 4.2 – Securitization Activity Related to Unconsolidated VIEs Sponsored by Redwood
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)
 
2016
 
2015
Principal balance of loans transferred
 
$

 
$
338,796

Trading securities retained, at fair value
 

 
3,423

AFS securities retained, at fair value
 

 
2,859

MSRs recognized
 

 
1,872


The following table summarizes the cash flows during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 between us and the unconsolidated VIEs sponsored by us.
Table 4.3 – Cash Flows Related to Unconsolidated VIEs Sponsored by Redwood
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)
 
2016
 
2015
Proceeds from new transfers
 
$

 
$
341,716

MSR fees received
 
3,523

 
3,770

Funding of compensating interest
 
(79
)
 
(90
)
Cash flows received on retained securities
 
11,191

 
12,645


The following table presents the key weighted-average assumptions used to measure MSRs and securities retained at the date of securitization.
Table 4.4 – Assumptions Related to Assets Retained from Unconsolidated VIEs Sponsored by Redwood

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
At Date of Securitization
 
MSRs
 
Subordinate Securities
 
MSRs
 
Subordinate Securities
Prepayment rate
 

 
N/A
 
N/A
 
5
%
-
19
%
 
8
%
Discount rates
 
 
 
N/A
 
N/A
 
 
 
11
%
 
6
%
Credit loss assumptions
 
 
 
N/A
 
N/A
 
 
 
N/A

 
0.25
%



The following table presents additional information at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, related to unconsolidated VIEs sponsored by Redwood and accounted for as sales since 2012.
Table 4.5 – Unconsolidated VIEs Sponsored by Redwood
(In Thousands)
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
On-balance sheet assets, at fair value:
 
 
 
 
Interest-only, senior and subordinate securities, classified as trading
 
$
32,434

 
$
258,697

Senior and subordinate securities, classified as AFS
 
274,380

 
272,715

Mortgage servicing rights
 
39,220

 
56,984

Maximum loss exposure (1)
 
$
346,034

 
$
588,396

Assets transferred:
 
 
 
 
Principal balance of loans outstanding
 
$
7,055,574

 
$
7,318,167

Principal balance of delinquent loans 30+ days delinquent
 
15,235

 
18,300

(1)
Maximum loss exposure from our involvement with unconsolidated VIEs pertains to the carrying value of our securities and MSRs retained from these VIEs and represents estimated losses that would be incurred under severe, hypothetical circumstances, such as if the value of our interests and any associated collateral declines to zero. This does not include, for example, any potential exposure to representation and warranty claims associated with our initial transfer of loans into a securitization.
The following table presents key economic assumptions for assets retained from unconsolidated VIEs and the sensitivity of their fair values to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
Table 4.6 – Key Assumptions and Sensitivity Analysis for Assets Retained from Unconsolidated VIEs Sponsored by Redwood
March 31, 2016
 
MSRs
 
Senior
Securities (1)
 
Subordinate Securities
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
 
 
Fair value at March 31, 2016
 
$
39,220

 
$
22,177

 
$
284,637

Expected life (in years) (2)
 
4

 
4

 
11

Prepayment speed assumption (annual CPR) (2)
 
21
%
 
14
%
 
13
%
Decrease in fair value from:
 
 
 
 
 
 
10% adverse change
 
$
2,423

 
$
1,297

 
$
969

25% adverse change
 
5,800

 
3,039

 
2,459

Discount rate assumption (2)
 
11
%
 
11
%
 
6
%
Decrease in fair value from:
 
 
 
 
 
 
100 basis point increase
 
$
1,024

 
$
650

 
$
21,432

200 basis point increase
 
2,012

 
1,264

 
40,189

Credit loss assumption (2)
 
N/A

 
0.25
%
 
0.25
%
Decrease in fair value from:
 
 
 
 
 
 
10% higher losses
 
N/A

 
$
15

 
$
1,213

25% higher losses
 
N/A

 
38

 
3,042

December 31, 2015
 
MSRs
 
Senior
Securities (1)
 
Subordinate Securities
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
 
 
Fair value at December 31, 2015
 
$
56,984

 
$
248,570

 
$
282,842

Expected life (in years) (2)
 
7

 
5

 
12

Prepayment speed assumption (annual CPR) (2)
 
11
%
 
10
%
 
12
%
Decrease in fair value from:
 
 
 
 
 
 
10% adverse change
 
$
2,868

 
$
2,042

 
$
901

25% adverse change
 
6,119

 
4,810

 
2,278

Discount rate assumption (2)
 
11
%
 
5
%
 
6
%
Decrease in fair value from:
 
 
 
 
 
 
100 basis point increase
 
$
2,711

 
$
10,029

 
$
21,981

200 basis point increase
 
4,745

 
19,365

 
41,156

Credit loss assumption (2)
 
N/A

 
0.25
%
 
0.25
%
Decrease in fair value from:
 
 
 
 
 
 
10% higher losses
 
N/A

 
$
35

 
$
1,244

25% higher losses
 
N/A

 
86

 
3,129


(1)
Senior securities included $22 million and $31 million of interest only securities as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
(2)
Expected life, prepayment speed assumption, discount rate assumption, and credit loss assumption presented in the tables above represent weighted averages.
Analysis of Third-Party VIEs
Third-party VIEs are securitization entities in which we maintain an economic interest, but do not sponsor. Our economic interest may include several securities from the same third-party VIE, and in those cases, the analysis is performed in consideration of all of our interests. The following table presents a summary of our interests in third-party VIEs at March 31, 2016, grouped by security type.
Table 4.7 – Third-Party Sponsored VIE Summary
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
March 31, 2016
Mortgage Backed Securities
 
 
Senior
 
$
146,030

Re-REMIC
 
162,970

Subordinate
 
304,113

Total Investments in Third-Party Sponsored VIEs
 
$
613,113


We determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of any third-party VIEs, as we do not have the required power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of these entities. Specifically, we do not service or manage these entities or otherwise solely hold decision making powers that are significant. As a result of this assessment, we do not consolidate any of the underlying assets and liabilities of these third-party VIEs – we only account for our specific interests in them.
Our assessments of whether we are required to consolidate a VIE may change in subsequent reporting periods based upon changing facts and circumstances pertaining to each VIE. Any related accounting changes could result in a material impact to our financial statements.