Revenue Recognition (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Mar. 28, 2019

Revenue from Contract with Customer [Abstract]

Revenue Recognition

On June 29, 2018 we adopted ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“Topic 606”) using the full retrospective method. See Note 13 – “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” for additional information. For each customer contract a five-step process is now followed in which we identify the contract, identify performance obligations, determine the transaction price, allocate the contract transaction price to the performance obligations, and recognize the revenue when (or as) the performance obligation is transferred to the customer. As a result of adopting Topic 606 we have updated our accounting policy for revenue recognition as follows:

Nature of Products

We manufacture and sell the following:

•

branded products under our own proprietary brands to retailers on a national basis;

•

private label products to retailers, such as supermarkets, mass merchandisers, and specialty retailers, for resale under the retailers’ own or controlled labels;

•

private label and branded products to the foodservice industry, including foodservice distributors and national restaurant operators;

•

branded products under co-pack agreements to other major branded companies for their distribution; and

•

products to our industrial customer base for repackaging in portion control packages and for use as ingredients by other food manufacturers.

When Performance Obligations Are Satisfied

A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer and is the unit of account for revenue recognition. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. The Company’s performance obligations are primarily for the delivery of raw and processed recipe and snack nuts, nut butters and trail mixes.

Our customer contracts do not include more than one performance obligation. If a contract were to contain more than one performance obligation, we are required to allocate the contract’s transaction price to each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price. The standalone selling price for each distinct good is generally determined by directly observable data.

Revenue recognition is generally completed at a point in time when product control is transferred to the customer. For approximately 99% of our revenues, control transfers to the customer when the product is shipped or delivered to the customer based upon applicable shipping terms, as the customer can then direct the use and obtain substantially all of the remaining benefits from the asset at that point in time. Therefore, for 99% of our revenues, the timing of revenue recognition requires minimal judgment and does not change compared to previous revenue recognition guidance. However, certain transactions within our contract packaging sales channel include contracts to develop, manufacture and deliver customized or proprietary products, which have no alternative use for the Company in the event the customer cancels the contract. In addition, for certain of these transactions the Company has the right to payment for performance completed to date. As a result, the revenue for products that are considered assets with no alternative use is now recognized over time. The value of these assets with no alternative use at period-end (an output method) is used as the basis to recognize revenue, which faithfully depicts our performance towards complete satisfaction of the performance obligation. This generally results in revenue recognition approximately one month earlier compared to previous revenue recognition guidance. The amount of contract revenue recognized over time is generally immaterial to total revenue recognized for any given period.

The performance obligations in our contracts are satisfied within one year, and typically much less. As such, we have not disclosed the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations for any periods presented.

Significant Payment Terms

Our customer contracts identify the product, quantity, price, payment and final delivery terms. Payment terms usually include early pay discounts. We grant payment terms consistent with industry standards. On a limited basis some payment terms may be extended, however, no payment terms beyond six months are granted at contract inception. The average customer payment is received within approximately 35 days of the invoice date. As a result, we do not adjust the promised amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component because the period between our transfer of a promised good or service to a customer and the customer’s payment for that good or service will be six months or less.

Shipping

All shipping and handling costs associated with outbound freight are accounted for as fulfillment costs and are included in selling expense.

Variable Consideration

Some of our products are sold through specific incentive programs consisting of promotional allowances, volume and customer rebates, in-store display incentives and marketing allowances, among others, to consumer and some commercial ingredient customers. The ultimate cost of these programs is dependent on certain factors such as actual purchase volumes or customer activities and is dependent on significant management estimate and judgment. The Company accounts for these programs as variable consideration and recognizes a reduction in revenue (and a corresponding reduction in the transaction price) in the same period as the underlying program based upon the terms of the specific arrangements.

Trade promotions, consisting primarily of customer pricing allowances, merchandising funds and consumer coupons, are also offered through various programs to customers and consumers. A provision for estimated trade promotions is recorded as a reduction of revenue (and a reduction in the transaction price) in the same period when the sale is recognized. Revenues are also recorded net of expected customer deductions which are provided for based upon past experiences. Evaluating these estimates requires management judgment.

We generally use the most likely amount method to determine the variable consideration. We believe there will not be significant changes to our estimates of variable consideration when any related uncertainties are resolved with our customers. The Company reviews and updates its estimates and related accruals of variable consideration and trade promotions at least quarterly based on the terms of the agreements and historical experience. Any uncertainties in the ultimate resolution of variable consideration due to factors outside of the Company’s influence are typically resolved within a short timeframe, therefore, no additional constraint on the variable consideration is required.

Product Returns

While customers generally have the right to return defective or non-conforming products, past experience has demonstrated that product returns have generally been immaterial. Customer remedies may include either a cash refund or an exchange of the returned product. As a result, the right of return and related refund liability for non-conforming or defective goods is estimated and recorded as a reduction in revenue, if necessary.

Contract Balances

Contract assets or liabilities result from transactions with revenue recorded over time. If the measure of remaining rights exceeds the measure of the remaining performance obligations, the Company records a contract asset. Conversely, if the measure of the remaining performance obligations exceeds the measure of the remaining rights, the Company records a contract liability. Contract asset balances at March 28, 2019, June 28, 2018 and March 29, 2018 were $358, $336, and $165, respectively, and are recorded in the caption “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company generally does not have material deferred revenue or contract liability balances arising from transactions with customers.

Contract Costs

The Company does not incur significant fulfillment costs requiring capitalization.

Disaggregation of Revenue

Revenue disaggregated by sales channel is as follows:


	For the Quarter Ended				For the Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
Distribution Channel	March 28, 2019		March 29, 2018		March 28, 2019		March 29, 2018
Consumer	$	142,011	$	134,994	$	477,381	$	452,495
Commercial Ingredients		32,219		38,943		100,427		110,930
Contract Packaging		27,604		28,849		81,631		113,830

Total	$	201,834	$	202,786	$	659,439	$	677,255

Impact of Adoption

The Company adopted Topic 606 using the full retrospective basis on June 29, 2018. The prior period comparative information has been recast to reflect the requirements of Topic 606. The impact of Topic 606 on the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the quarter and thirty-nine weeks ended March 29, 2018 were as follows:


	Quarter-Ended March 29, 2018 as previously reported		Impact of Adoption			As Adjusted
Net sales	$	203,181	$	(395	)	$	202,786
Gross profit		33,186		(79	)		33,107
Income from operations		14,103		(79	)		14,024
Net income	$	8,631	$	(79	)	$	8,552
Earnings per share-basic	$	0.76	$	(0.01	)	$	0.75
Earnings per share-diluted	$	0.75	$	—		$	0.75


	Thirty-Nine Weeks ended March 29, 2018 as previously reported		Impact of Adoption		As Adjusted
Net sales	$	677,090	$	165	$	677,255
Gross profit		105,906		53		105,959
Income from operations		45,688		53		45,741
Net income	$	26,819	$	53	$	26,872
Earnings per share-basic	$	2.36	$	—	$	2.36
Earnings per share-diluted	$	2.34	$	0.01	$	2.35

The impact of Topic 606 on the comparative Consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows was not material.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Note 13 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The following recent accounting pronouncements have been adopted in the current fiscal year:

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” and created a new ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and added ASC Subtopic 340-40, Other Assets and Deferred Costs — Contracts with Customers. The guidance in this Update supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the industry topics of the codification. Under the new guidance, an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. On June 29, 2018 we adopted Topic 606 using the full retrospective method. Under the full retrospective method, all periods presented are now presented under Topic 606. A cumulative effect of initially applying the new revenue standard for the earliest balance sheet period presented has been accounted for and was immaterial. See Note 2 – “Revenue Recognition” above for additional details.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15 “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”. This Update addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the perceived diversity in practice. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments in this Update were applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. ASU No. 2016-15 was adopted in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and did not have an impact on our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09 “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting”. The amendments in this Update provide guidance about which changes to terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. ASU No. 2017-09 should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. ASU No. 2017-09 was adopted in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and did not have an impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Release No. 33-10532 that amends and clarifies certain financial reporting requirements. The principal change to our financial reporting is the inclusion of the annual disclosure of changes in stockholders’ equity in Rule 3-04 of Regulation S-X to interim periods. We adopted the provisions of this new rule beginning with our fiscal 2019 financial reporting. We now include our Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity with each quarterly filing on Form 10-Q and have removed the dividends per share disclosure from the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

The following recent accounting pronouncements have not yet been adopted:

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15 “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract”. The amendments in this Update align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal use software license). The accounting for the service element of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract is not affected by the amendments in this Update. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the amendments in this Update is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for all entities. The amendments in this Update should be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. This Update will be effective for the Company in fiscal 2021. We do not expect this accounting Update to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-14 “Compensation – Retirement Benefits – Defined Benefit Plans – General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans”. The amendments in this Update modify the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. The amendments in this Update remove disclosures that no longer are considered cost beneficial, clarify the specific requirements of disclosures, and add disclosure requirements identified as relevant. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted for all entities. An entity should apply the amendments in this Update on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. This Update will be effective for the Company in fiscal 2021. We do not expect this accounting Update to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13 “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement”. The amendments in this Update modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. Certain disclosure requirements will be removed from Topic 820 with this Update to include: the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the policy for timing of transfers between levels and the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. The amendments also clarify that the measurement uncertainty disclosure is to communicate information about the uncertainty in measurement as of the reporting date. This Update will add the requirement to disclose the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted upon issuance of this Update. An entity is permitted to early adopt any removed or modified disclosures upon issuance of this Update and delay adoption of the additional disclosures until their effective date. This Update will be effective for the Company in fiscal 2021. We do not expect this accounting Update to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842)”. The primary goal of this Update is to require the lessee to recognize all lease commitments, both operating and finance, by initially recording a lease asset and liability on the balance sheet at the lease commencement date. Additionally, enhanced qualitative and quantitative disclosures will be required. ASU No. 2016-02 is effective for public business entities for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. This new guidance will be effective for the Company beginning in fiscal year 2020 and we do not expect to early adopt. Under ASU No. 2016-02 the guidance was to be adopted using a modified retrospective approach, with elective reliefs, with application of the new guidance for all periods presented. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-11 “Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements” which provides for another transition method by allowing entities to initially apply the new leases standard at the adoption date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. The amendments in this Update also provide lessors with a practical expedient, by class of underlying asset, to not separate non-lease components from the associated lease component, similar to the expedient provided for lessees. In July 2018, the FASB also issued ASU No. 2018-10 “Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases” which affects narrow aspects of the guidance issued in ASU No. 2016-02. In December 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-20 “Leases (Topic 842) – Narrow Scope Improvements for Lessors” which provides specific guidance for lessors on the issues of sales taxes and other similar taxes collected from lessees, certain lessor costs, and recognition of variable payments for contracts with lease and non-lease components. In March 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-01 “Leases (Topic 842) – Codification Improvements” which clarifies transition disclosure requirements for annual and interim periods after the date of adoption of ASU No. 2016-02. We are implementing processes and information technology tools to assist in our ongoing lease data analysis and updating our accounting policies and internal controls that would be impacted by the new guidance, to ensure readiness for adoption in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. Based on our current portfolio of leases, the Company expects the impact of these new standards to significantly increase total assets and total liabilities, and lead to increased financial statement disclosures.