10-Q 1 bzh-123114xq1document.htm 10-Q
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
_____________________________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
_____________________________________________________________

x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2014
or

¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 001-12822
_____________________________________________________________
BEAZER HOMES USA, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
_____________________________________________________________

DELAWARE |  | 58-2086934
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. employer Identification no.)

1000 Abernathy Road, Suite 260, Atlanta, Georgia |  | 30328
(Address of principal executive offices) |  | (Zip Code)

(770) 829-3700
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
_____________________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check One):

Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | x
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | Smaller reporting company | ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ¨ NO x

Class |  | Outstanding at January 29, 2015
Common Stock, $0.001 par value |  | 27,448,293

Table of Contents
References to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Beazer”, “Beazer Homes” and the “Company” in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q refer to Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements represent our expectations or beliefs concerning future events, and it is possible that the results described in this quarterly report will not be achieved. These forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the use of statements that include words such as “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “foresee,” “likely,” “will,” “goal,” “target” or other similar words or phrases. All forward-looking statements are based upon information available to us on the date of this quarterly report.
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of our control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements, including, among other things, the matters discussed in this quarterly report in the section captioned “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Additional information about factors that could lead to material changes in performance is contained in Part I, Item 1A— Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. These factors are not intended to be an all-encompassing list of risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance, development and results of our business, but instead are the risks that we currently perceive as potentially being material. Such factors may include:

• | the availability and cost of land and the risks associated with the future value of our inventory such as additional asset impairment charges or writedowns;

• | economic changes nationally or in local markets, including changes in consumer confidence, declines in employment levels, inflation and increases in the quantity and decreases in the price of new homes and resale homes in the market;

• | the cyclical nature of the homebuilding industry and a potential deterioration in homebuilding industry conditions;

• | estimates related to homes to be delivered in the future (backlog) are imprecise as they are subject to various cancellation risks which cannot be fully controlled;

• | shortages of or increased prices for labor, land or raw materials used in housing production;

• | our cost of and ability to access capital and otherwise meet our ongoing liquidity needs including the impact of any downgrades of our credit ratings or reductions in our tangible net worth or liquidity levels;

• | our ability to comply with covenants in our debt agreements or satisfy such obligations through repayment or refinancing;

• | a substantial increase in mortgage interest rates, increased disruption in the availability of mortgage financing, a change in tax laws regarding the deductibility of mortgage interest, or an increased number of foreclosures;

• | increased competition or delays in reacting to changing consumer preference in home design;

• | factors affecting margins such as decreased land values underlying land option agreements, increased land development costs on communities under development or delays or difficulties in implementing initiatives to reduce production and overhead cost structure;

• | estimates related to the potential recoverability of our deferred tax assets;

• | potential delays or increased costs in obtaining necessary permits as a result of changes to, or complying with, laws, regulations, or governmental policies and possible penalties for failure to comply with such laws, regulations and governmental policies;

• | the results of litigation or government proceedings and fulfillment of the obligations in the consent orders with governmental authorities and other settlement agreements;

• | the impact of construction defect and home warranty claims, including water intrusion issues in Florida and New Jersey;

• | the cost and availability of insurance and surety bonds;

• | the performance of our unconsolidated entities and our unconsolidated entity partners;

• | delays in land development or home construction resulting from adverse weather conditions;

• | the impact of information technology failures or data security breaches;

• | effects of changes in accounting policies, standards, guidelines or principles; or

• | terrorist acts, acts of war and other factors over which the Company has little or no control.

Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such factors.
2

Table of Contents
BEAZER HOMES USA, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | 4
Item 1. Financial Statements | 4
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014 | 4
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss), Three Months Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 | 5
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Three Months Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 | 6
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | 7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 28
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 36
Item 4. Controls and Procedures | 36
PART II. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | 37
Item 1. Legal Proceedings | 37
Item 6. Exhibits | 37
SIGNATURES | 38

3

Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
BEAZER HOMES USA, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

| December 31, 2014 |  | September 30, 2014
ASSETS |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 138,680 |  |  | $ | 324,154 |
Restricted cash | 64,092 |  |  | 62,941 |
Accounts receivable (net of allowance of $1,267 and $1,245, respectively) | 32,316 |  |  | 34,429 |
Income tax receivable | 46 |  |  | 46 |
Inventory |  |  |
Owned inventory | 1,677,611 |  |  | 1,557,496 |
Land not owned under option agreements | 1,443 |  |  | 3,857 |
Total inventory | 1,679,054 |  |  | 1,561,353 |
Investments in marketable securities and unconsolidated entities | 34,735 |  |  | 38,341 |
Deferred tax assets, net | 46 |  |  | 2,823 |
Property, plant and equipment, net | 19,315 |  |  | 18,673 |
Other assets | 21,102 |  |  | 23,460 |
Total assets | $ | 1,989,386 |  |  | $ | 2,066,220 |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |  |  |
Trade accounts payable | $ | 65,845 |  |  | $ | 106,237 |
Other liabilities | 127,542 |  |  | 142,516 |
Obligations related to land not owned under option agreements | 1,248 |  |  | 2,916 |
Total debt (net of discounts of $4,209 and $4,399 respectively) | 1,536,591 |  |  | 1,535,433 |
Total liabilities | 1,731,226 |  |  | 1,787,102 |
Stockholders’ equity: |  |  |
Preferred stock (par value $.01 per share, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued) | — |  |  | — |
Common stock (par value $0.001 per share, 63,000,000 shares authorized, 27,448,293 and 27,173,421 issued and outstanding, respectively) | 27 |  |  | 27 |
Paid-in capital | 852,800 |  |  | 851,624 |
Accumulated deficit | (593,597 | ) |  | (571,257 | )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,070 | ) |  | (1,276 | )
Total stockholders’ equity | 258,160 |  |  | 279,118 |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 1,989,386 |  |  | $ | 2,066,220 |

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4

Table of Contents
BEAZER HOMES USA, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands, except per share data)

| Three Months Ended
| December 31,
| 2014 |  | 2013
Total revenue | $ | 265,764 |  |  | $ | 293,170 |
Home construction and land sales expenses | 230,546 |  |  | 238,469 |
Inventory impairments and option contract abandonments | — |  |  | 31 |
Gross profit | 35,218 |  |  | 54,670 |
Commissions | 10,926 |  |  | 11,821 |
General and administrative expenses | 31,441 |  |  | 28,410 |
Depreciation and amortization | 2,341 |  |  | 2,907 |
Operating (loss) income | (9,490 | ) |  | 11,532 |
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities | 142 |  |  | 319 |
Other expense, net | (9,434 | ) |  | (15,757 | )
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes | (18,782 | ) |  | (3,906 | )
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes | (696 | ) |  | 42 |
Loss from continuing operations | (18,086 | ) |  | (3,948 | )
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | (4,254 | ) |  | (1,190 | )
Net loss | $ | (22,340 | ) |  | $ | (5,138 | )
Weighted average number of shares: |  |  |
Basic and Diluted | 26,457 |  |  | 25,009 |
Basic and Diluted loss per share: |  |  |
Continuing Operations | $ | (0.68 | ) |  | $ | (0.16 | )
Discontinued Operations | $ | (0.16 | ) |  | $ | (0.05 | )
Total | $ | (0.84 | ) |  | $ | (0.21 | )
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Net loss | $ | (22,340 | ) |  | $ | (5,138 | )
Other comprehensive loss, net of income tax: |  |  |
Unrealized gain related to available-for-sale securities | 206 |  |  | — |
Comprehensive loss | $ | (22,134 | ) |  | $ | (5,138 | )

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5

Table of Contents
BEAZER HOMES USA, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)

| Three Months Ended
| December 31,
| 2014 |  | 2013
Cash flows from operating activities: |  |  |
Net loss | $ | (22,340 | ) |  | $ | (5,138 | )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization | 2,341 |  |  | 2,907 |
Stock-based compensation expense | 1,375 |  |  | 609 |
Inventory impairments and option contract abandonments | — |  |  | 31 |
Deferred and other income tax benefit | (765 | ) |  | (19 | )
Changes in allowance for doubtful accounts | 22 |  |  | (156 | )
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities | (142 | ) |  | (319 | )
Cash distributions of income from unconsolidated entities | 34 |  |  | 56 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |  |  |
Decrease in accounts receivable | 2,091 |  |  | 1,424 |
Increase in inventory | (104,434 | ) |  | (63,062 | )
Decrease in other assets | 1,159 |  |  | 1,594 |
Decrease in trade accounts payable | (40,392 | ) |  | (23,295 | )
Decrease in other liabilities | (11,432 | ) |  | (28,366 | )
Other changes | (49 | ) |  | (144 | )
Net cash used in operating activities | (172,532 | ) |  | (113,878 | )
Cash flows from investing activities: |  |  |
Capital expenditures | (2,934 | ) |  | (3,200 | )
Investments in unconsolidated entities | (1,144 | ) |  | (2,164 | )
Increases in restricted cash | (1,445 | ) |  | (728 | )
Decreases in restricted cash | 294 |  |  | 551 |
Net cash used in investing activities | (5,229 | ) |  | (5,541 | )
Cash flows from financing activities: |  |  |
Repayment of debt | (7,388 | ) |  | (2,035 | )
Debt issuance costs | (126 | ) |  | (32 | )
Payments for other financing activities | (199 | ) |  | (413 | )
Net cash provided by financing activities | (7,713 | ) |  | (2,480 | )
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (185,474 | ) |  | (121,899 | )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 324,154 |  |  | 504,459 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 138,680 |  |  | $ | 382,560 |

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6

Table of Contents
BEAZER HOMES USA, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Beazer Homes USA, Inc. (Beazer Homes, Beazer or the Company) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Such financial statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation have been included in the accompanying financial statements. The results of our consolidated operations presented herein for the three months ended December 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year due to seasonal variations in operations and other items. For further information and a discussion of our significant accounting policies other than as discussed below, refer to our audited consolidated financial statements appearing in Beazer Homes’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 (the 2014 Annual Report).
Over the past few years, we have discontinued homebuilding operations in certain of our markets. Results from our title services business and our exit markets are reported as discontinued operations in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented (see Note 14 for further discussion of our Discontinued Operations). We evaluated events that occurred after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued for accounting treatment and disclosure.
Inventory Valuation. We assess our inventory assets no less than quarterly for recoverability in accordance with the policies as described in Notes 1 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements in our 2014 Annual Report. Our homebuilding inventories that are accounted for as held for development include land and home construction assets grouped together as communities. Homebuilding inventories held for development are stated at cost (including direct construction costs, capitalized indirect costs, capitalized interest and real estate taxes) unless facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. For those communities for which construction and development activities are expected to occur in the future or have been idled (land held for future development), all applicable interest and real estate taxes are expensed as incurred and the inventory is stated at cost unless facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. We record assets held for sale at the lower of the carrying value or fair value less costs to sell.
Other Liabilities. Other liabilities include the following:

(In thousands) | December 31, 2014 |  | September 30, 2014
Income tax liabilities | $ | 2,154 |  |  | $ | 5,576 |
Accrued warranty expenses | 27,227 |  |  | 16,084 |
Accrued interest | 20,187 |  |  | 34,645 |
Accrued and deferred compensation | 10,477 |  |  | 24,270 |
Customer deposits | 14,868 |  |  | 11,977 |
Other | 52,629 |  |  | 49,964 |
Total | $ | 127,542 |  |  | $ | 142,516 |

7

Table of Contents
(2) Supplemental Cash Flow Information

| Three Months Ended
| December 31,
(In thousands) | 2014 |  | 2013
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity: |  |  |
Decrease in obligations related to land not owned under option agreements | $ | (1,668 | ) |  | $ | (1,486 | )
Non-cash land acquisitions (a) | 12,904 |  |  | 5,400 |
Supplemental disclosure of cash activity: |  |  |
Interest payments | 42,709 |  |  | 43,778 |
Income tax payments | 62 |  |  | 1 |
Tax refunds received | — |  |  | — |

(a) For the three months ended December 31, 2014, non-cash land acquisitions are comprised of $7.8 million related to non-cash seller financing and $5.1 million in lot takedowns from one of our unconsolidated land development joint ventures.
(3) Investments in Marketable Securities and Unconsolidated Entities
Marketable Securities
The shares of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) represent marketable equity securities with a readily available fair value. Based on the Company's intent to sell the shares in one or more future transactions but not actively trade in the shares, these securities were classified as available-for-sale securities. Upon receipt of the shares during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, in exchange for the Company's interest in a real estate investment trust (REIT), the fair value was recorded at $26.0 million. During the three months ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded an unrealized gain of $0.2 million which is reflected in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). The cumulative loss through December 31, 2014 was $1.1 million and the fair value of the shares as of December 31, 2014 was $25.0 million.
Unconsolidated Entities
As of December 31, 2014, we participated in certain land development joint ventures and other unconsolidated entities in which Beazer Homes had less than a controlling interest. The following table presents our investment in our unconsolidated entities, the total equity and outstanding borrowings of these unconsolidated entities as of December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014:

(In thousands) | December 31, 2014 |  | September 30, 2014
Beazer’s investment in unconsolidated entities | $ | 9,765 |  |  | $ | 13,576 |
Total equity of unconsolidated entities | 47,090 |  |  | 59,336 |
Total outstanding borrowings of unconsolidated entities | 10,424 |  |  | 11,254 |

For the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, there were no impairments related to our unconsolidated entity investments. Our income from unconsolidated entity activities and the overall equity in income of unconsolidated entities is as follows:

| Three Months Ended
| December 31,
(In thousands) | 2014 |  | 2013
Continuing operations: |  |  |
Income from unconsolidated entity activity | $ | 142 |  |  | $ | 319 |
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities - continuing operations | $ | 142 |  |  | $ | 319 |

8

Table of Contents
South Edge/Inspirada
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, we and the other members of Inspirada received land in exchange for our investments in Inspirada. The change in total equity of unconsolidated entities above reflects these distributions. Also during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, we paid $1.0 million to the joint venture related to infrastructure and development costs. We continue to have an obligation for our portion of future infrastructure and other development costs which are estimated at approximately $5.7 million.
Guarantees
Historically, Beazer and our land development joint venture partners provide varying levels of guarantees of debt and other debt-related obligations for these unconsolidated entities. As of December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014, we had no outstanding guarantees or other debt-related obligations related to our unconsolidated entities.
We and our joint venture partners generally provide unsecured environmental indemnities to land development joint venture project lenders. In each case, we have performed due diligence on potential environmental risks. These indemnities obligate us to reimburse the project lenders for claims related to environmental matters for which they are held responsible. During the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, we were not required to make any payments related to environmental indemnities.
In assessing the need to record a liability for the contingent aspect of these guarantees, we consider our historical experience in being required to perform under the guarantees, the fair value of the collateral underlying these guarantees and the financial condition of the applicable unconsolidated entities. In addition, we monitor the fair value of the collateral of these unconsolidated entities to ensure that the related borrowings do not exceed the specified percentage of the value of the property securing the borrowings. We have not recorded a liability for the contingent aspects of any guarantees that we determined were reasonably possible but not probable.
(4) Inventory

(In thousands) | December 31, 2014 |  | September 30, 2014
Homes under construction | $ | 325,074 |  |  | $ | 282,095 |
Development projects in progress | 811,021 |  |  | 786,768 |
Land held for future development | 312,148 |  |  | 301,048 |
Land held for sale | 68,358 |  |  | 51,672 |
Capitalized interest | 99,868 |  |  | 87,619 |
Model homes | 61,142 |  |  | 48,294 |
Total owned inventory | $ | 1,677,611 |  |  | $ | 1,557,496 |

Homes under construction includes homes substantially finished and ready for delivery and homes in various stages of construction. We had 169 ($42.3 million) and 205 ($48.0 million) substantially completed homes that were not subject to a sales contract (spec homes) at December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014, respectively. Development projects in progress consist principally of land and land improvement costs. Certain of the fully developed lots in this category are reserved by a deposit or sales contract. Land held for future development consists of communities for which construction and development activities are expected to occur in the future or have been idled and are stated at cost unless facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. During the current quarter, there was a reclassification of a land parcel in Las Vegas from development projects in progress to land held for future development while certain financial issues involving this parcel are resolved. All applicable interest and real estate taxes on land held for future development are expensed as incurred. Land held for sale in Unallocated and Other as of December 31, 2014 includes land held for sale in the markets we have decided to exit including Charlotte, North Carolina and Detroit, Michigan. Total owned inventory, by reportable segment, is set forth in the table below:
9

Table of Contents

(In thousands) | Projects in Progress |  | Held for Future Development |  | Land Held for Sale |  | Total Owned Inventory
December 31, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
West Segment | $ | 479,550 |  |  | $ | 272,009 |  |  | $ | 12,446 |  |  | $ | 764,005 |
East Segment | 379,191 |  |  | 29,215 |  |  | 36,958 |  |  | 445,364 |
Southeast Segment | 283,014 |  |  | 10,924 |  |  | 16,658 |  |  | 310,596 |
Unallocated and Other | 155,350 |  |  | — |  |  | 2,296 |  |  | 157,646 |
Total | $ | 1,297,105 |  |  | $ | 312,148 |  |  | $ | 68,358 |  |  | $ | 1,677,611 |
September 30, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
West Segment | $ | 462,508 |  |  | $ | 260,898 |  |  | $ | 10,026 |  |  | $ | 733,432 |
East Segment | 353,859 |  |  | 29,239 |  |  | 34,530 |  |  | 417,628 |
Southeast Segment | 264,843 |  |  | 10,911 |  |  | 4,821 |  |  | 280,575 |
Unallocated and Other | 123,566 |  |  | — |  |  | 2,295 |  |  | 125,861 |
Total | $ | 1,204,776 |  |  | $ | 301,048 |  |  | $ | 51,672 |  |  | $ | 1,557,496 |

Inventory Impairments. When conducting our community level review for the recoverability of our homebuilding held for development inventories, we establish a quarterly “watch list” of communities with generally more than 10 homes remaining that carry profit margins in backlog and in our forecast that are below a minimum threshold of profitability. Assets on the quarterly watch list are subject to substantial additional financial and operational analyses and review that consider the competitive environment and other factors contributing to profit margins below our watch list threshold. Our assumptions about future home sales prices and absorption rates require significant judgment because the residential homebuilding industry is cyclical and is highly sensitive to changes in economic conditions. For certain communities, we determined that it was prudent to reduce sales prices or further increase sales incentives in response to factors, including competitive market conditions in those specific submarkets for the product and locations of these communities. For communities where the current competitive and market dynamics indicate that these factors may be other than temporary, which may call into question the recoverability of our investment, a formal impairment analysis is performed. The formal impairment analysis consists of both qualitative competitive market analyses and a quantitative analysis reflecting market and asset specific information.
Our assumptions about future home sales prices and absorption rates require significant judgment because the residential home building industry is cyclical and is highly sensitive to changes in economic conditions. Market deterioration that exceeds our estimates may lead us to incur impairment charges on previously impaired homebuilding assets in addition to homebuilding assets not currently impaired but for which indicators of impairment may arise if markets deteriorate.
As of December 31, 2014, two communities in our West segment were on our quarterly watch list as compared to one community in our West segment as of December 31, 2013. After additional financial and operational review, we determined that the factors contributing to profit margins below our threshold were temporary in nature and therefore the communities were not subjected to further analysis. Accordingly, there were no impairments recorded during the three months ended December 31, 2014 or 2013 related to our analyses.

Impairments on land held for sale generally represent further write downs of these properties to net realizable value, less estimated costs to sell and are based on current market conditions and our review of recent comparable transactions at the applicable period end. Our assumptions about land sales prices require significant judgment because the current market is highly sensitive to changes in economic conditions. We calculated the estimated fair values of land held for sale based on current market conditions and assumptions made by management, which may differ materially from actual results and may result in additional impairments if market conditions deteriorate.
Also, from time to time, we determine the proper course of action with respect to a community is to not exercise an option and to write-off the deposit securing an option takedown and pre-acquisition costs, as applicable. In determining whether to abandon lots or lot option contracts, our evaluation is primarily based upon the expected cash flows from the property. If we intend to abandon or walk-away from the property, we record a charge to earnings in the period such decision is made for the deposit amount and any related capitalized costs. Abandonment charges generally relate to our decision to abandon lots or not exercise certain option contracts that are not projected to produce adequate results or no longer fit in our long-term strategic plan. Lot option abandonment charges recorded for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were $0 and $31,000, respectively.

Lot Option Agreements and Variable Interest Entities (VIEs). As previously discussed, we also have access to land inventory through lot option contracts, which generally enable us to defer acquiring portions of properties owned by third parties and
10

Table of Contents
unconsolidated entities until we have determined whether to exercise our lot option. A majority of our lot option contracts require a non-refundable cash deposit or irrevocable letter of credit based on a percentage of the purchase price of the land for the right to acquire lots during a specified period of time at a certain price. Under lot option contracts, purchase of the properties is contingent upon satisfaction of certain requirements by us and the sellers. Our liability under option contracts is generally limited to forfeiture of the non-refundable deposits, letters of credit and other non-refundable amounts incurred. We expect to exercise, subject to market conditions and seller satisfaction of contract terms, most of our remaining option contracts. Various factors, some of which are beyond our control, such as market conditions, weather conditions and the timing of the completion of development activities, will have a significant impact on the timing of option exercises or whether lot options will be exercised.
For the VIEs in which we are the primary beneficiary, we have consolidated the VIE and reflected such assets and liabilities as land not owned under option agreements in our balance sheets. For VIEs we were required to consolidate, we recorded the remaining contractual purchase price under the applicable lot option agreement to land not owned under option agreements with an offsetting increase to obligations related to land not owned under option agreements. Also, to reflect the purchase price of this inventory consolidated, we present the related option deposits as land not owned under option agreement in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. Consolidation of these VIEs has no impact on the Company’s results of operations or cash flows.
The following provides a summary of our interests in lot option agreements as of December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014:

(In thousands) | Deposits & Non-refundable Preacquisition Costs Incurred |  | Remaining Obligation |  | Land Not Owned Under Option Agreements
As of December 31, 2014 |  |  |  |  |
Consolidated VIEs | $ | 195 |  |  | $ | 1,248 |  |  | $ | 1,443 |
Unconsolidated lot option agreements | 44,538 |  |  | 379,482 |  |  | — |
Total lot option agreements | $ | 44,733 |  |  | $ | 380,730 |  |  | $ | 1,443 |
As of September 30, 2014 |  |  |  |  |
Consolidated VIEs | $ | 941 |  |  | $ | 2,916 |  |  | $ | 3,857 |
Unconsolidated lot option agreements | 42,588 |  |  | 417,618 |  |  | — |
Total lot option agreements | $ | 43,529 |  |  | $ | 420,534 |  |  | $ | 3,857 |

(5) Interest
Our ability to capitalize all interest incurred during the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 has been limited by our inventory eligible for capitalization. The following table sets forth certain information regarding interest:

| Three Months Ended December 31,
(In thousands) | 2014 |  | 2013
Capitalized interest in inventory, beginning of period | $ | 87,619 |  |  | $ | 52,562 |
Interest incurred | 30,283 |  |  | 32,441 |
Interest expense not qualified for capitalization and included as other expense | (9,747 | ) |  | (16,032 | )
Capitalized interest amortized to house construction and land sales expenses | (8,287 | ) |  | (7,135 | )
Capitalized interest in inventory, end of period | $ | 99,868 |  |  | $ | 61,836 |

(6) Earnings Per Share
In computing diluted loss per share for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, all common stock equivalents were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share as a result of their anti-dilutive effect. For the quarter ended December 31, 2014, these excluded common stock equivalents included options/stock-settled appreciation rights (SSARs) to purchase 0.7 million shares of common stock, 1.0 million shares of nonvested restricted stock and 5.2 million shares issuable upon the conversion of our Tangible Equity Unit (TEU) prepaid stock purchase contracts (PSPs).
As of December 31, 2014, there were approximately 3.7 million TEUs outstanding (including $5.1 million of amortizing notes). The PSPs related to the TEUs are scheduled to be settled in Beazer Homes' common stock on July 15, 2015. If on that date, our common stock price is (1) at or below $14.50 per share, the PSPs will convert to 1.72414 shares per unit, (2) at or above $17.75
11

Table of Contents
per share, the PSPs will convert to 1.40746 shares per unit or (3) between $14.50 and $17.75 per share, the PSPs will convert to a number of shares of our common stock equal to $25.00 divided by the applicable market value of our common stock. If the remaining TEU PSPs were converted at the settlement factor under their agreement based on our current stock price, we would be required to issue approximately 5.2 million shares of common stock to the instrument holders upon conversion.
(7) Borrowings
At December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014 we had the following long-term debt, net of discounts:

(In thousands) | Maturity Date |  | December 31, 2014 |  | September 30, 2014
8 1/8% Senior Notes | June 2016 |  | $ | 172,879 |  |  | $ | 172,879 |
6 5/8% Senior Secured Notes | April 2018 |  | 300,000 |  |  | 300,000 |
9 1/8% Senior Notes | May 2019 |  | 235,000 |  |  | 235,000 |
5 3/4% Senior Notes | June 2019 |  | 325,000 |  |  | 325,000 |
7 1/2% Senior Notes | September 2021 |  | 200,000 |  |  | 200,000 |
7 1/4% Senior Notes | February 2023 |  | 200,000 |  |  | 200,000 |
TEU Senior Amortizing Notes | July 2015 |  | 5,065 |  |  | 6,703 |
Unamortized debt discounts |  |  | (4,209 | ) |  | (4,399 | )
Total Senior Notes, net |  |  | $ | 1,433,735 |  |  | $ | 1,435,183 |
Junior Subordinated Notes | July 2036 |  | 56,253 |  |  | 55,737 |
Cash Secured Loans | November 2017 |  | 22,368 |  |  | 22,368 |
Other secured notes payable | Various Dates |  | 24,235 |  |  | 22,145 |
Total debt, net |  |  | $ | 1,536,591 |  |  | $ | 1,535,433 |

Secured Revolving Credit Facility —The $150 million Secured Revolving Credit Facility provides for future working capital and letter of credit capacity. On November 10, 2014, we executed an amendment with three of the four lenders which included extending the maturity of the facility one additional year. With this amendment, $130 million of the $150 million facility will now mature in September 2016. One lender with a $20 million commitment chose not to extend their obligation, which is scheduled to mature in September 2015. Subject to our option to cash collateralize our obligations under the Secured Revolving Credit Facility upon certain conditions, our obligations under the Secured Revolving Credit Facility are secured by liens on substantially all of our personal property and a significant portion of our owned real properties. The Secured Revolving Credit Facility contains certain covenants, including negative covenants and financial maintenance covenants, with which we are required to comply. As of December 31, 2014, we were in compliance with all such covenants and had $150 million of available borrowings under the Secured Revolving Credit Facility. We have elected to cash collateralize all letters of credit; however, as of December 31, 2014, we have also pledged approximately $1 billion of inventory assets to our Secured Revolving Credit Facility to collateralize potential future borrowings or letters of credit. There were no borrowings under the Secured Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2014 or September 30, 2014.
Letter of Credit Facilities — We have entered into stand-alone, cash-secured letter of credit agreements with banks to maintain our pre-existing letters of credit and to provide for the issuance of new letters of credit. The letter of credit arrangements combined with our Secured Revolving Credit Facility provide a total letter of credit capacity of approximately $150.0 million. As of December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014, we have letters of credit outstanding of $38.6 million and $39.1 million, respectively, which are secured by cash collateral in restricted accounts. The Company may enter into additional arrangements to provide additional letter of credit capacity.
Senior Notes — The majority of our Senior Notes are unsecured or secured obligations ranking pari passu with all other existing and future senior indebtedness. Substantially all of our significant subsidiaries are full and unconditional guarantors of the Senior Notes and are jointly and severally liable for obligations under the Senior Notes and the Secured Revolving Credit Facility. Each guarantor subsidiary is a 100% owned subsidiary of Beazer Homes.
The Company's Senior Notes are issued under indentures that contain certain restrictive covenants which, among other things, restrict our ability to pay dividends, repurchase our common stock, incur additional indebtedness and to make certain investments. Specifically, all of our Senior Notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness unless it is refinancing indebtedness or non-recourse indebtedness. The incurrence of refinancing indebtedness and non-recourse indebtedness, as defined in the applicable indentures, are exempted from the covenant test. As of December 31, 2014, we were not able to incur additional
12

Table of Contents
indebtedness under certain of our senior debt instruments, except refinancing or non-recourse indebtedness. Compliance with our Senior Note covenants does not significantly impact our operations. We were in compliance with the covenants contained in all of our Senior Notes as of December 31, 2014.
Our Senior Notes due 2016 (the 2016 Notes) contain the most restrictive covenants, including the consolidated tangible net worth covenant, which states that should consolidated tangible net worth fall below $85 million for two consecutive quarters, the Company is required to make an offer to purchase 10% of the 2016 Notes at par. If triggered and fully subscribed, this could result in our having to purchase $27.5 million of the 2016 Notes, which may be reduced by certain 2016 Note repurchases (potentially at less than par) made in the open market after the triggering date. As of December 31, 2014 our consolidated tangible net worth was $235.6 million, well in excess of the minimum covenant requirement.
In April 2014, we issued and sold $325 million aggregate principal amount of 5.75% Senior Notes due June 2019 (the June 2019 Notes) at par (before underwriting and other issuance costs) through a private placement to qualified institutional buyers. Interest on the June 2019 Notes is payable semi-annually in cash in arrears, beginning on December 15, 2014. The June 2019 Notes will mature on June 15, 2019. Prior to maturity, we may, at our option redeem the June 2019 Notes at any time, in whole or in part, at specified redemption prices, which also include a customary make-whole premium provision through March 15, 2019. In July 2014, we exchanged 100% of the June 2019 Notes for notes that are freely transferable and registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
The June 2019 Notes were issued under an indenture (June 2019 Indenture), issued April 8, 2014 that contains covenants which, subject to certain exceptions, limit the ability of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries (as defined in the June 2019 Indenture) to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, including secured indebtedness, and make certain types of restricted payments. The June 2019 Indenture contains customary events of default. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, payments on the June 2019 Notes may be accelerated and become immediately due and payable. Upon a change of control (as defined in the June 2019 Indenture), the June 2019 Indenture requires us to make an offer to repurchase the June 2019 Notes at 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
We may redeem the June 2019 Notes at any time prior to March 15, 2019, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus a customary make-whole premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date. In addition, at any time on or prior to June 15, 2017, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of June 2019 Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 105.750% of the principal amount of the June 2019 Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the date fixed for redemption; provided, that at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the June 2019 Notes originally issued under the June 2019 Indenture remain outstanding after such redemption. On or after March 15, 2019, we may redeem some or all of the June 2019 Notes at 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date.
The proceeds from the June 2019 Notes were used to redeem all of our outstanding Senior Notes due June 2018 (the 2018 Notes), including the applicable $17.2 million make-whole premium. We recognized a loss on debt extinguishment of the 2018 Notes of $19.8 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2014 related to the premiums paid and the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs. The 2018 Notes redeemed by the Company were canceled.
In September 2013, we issued and sold $200 million aggregate principal amount of 7.500% Senior Notes due 2021 (the 2021 Notes) at a price of 98.541% (before underwriting and other issuance costs) through a private placement to qualified institutional buyers. Interest on the 2021 Notes is payable semi-annually in cash in arrears, beginning on March 15, 2014. The 2021 Notes will mature on September 15, 2021. Prior to maturity, we may, at our option, redeem the 2021 Notes at any time, in whole or in part, at specified redemption prices, which also include a customary make-whole premium provision through September 15, 2016. In January 2014, we exchanged 100% of the 2021 Notes for notes that are freely transferable and registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
The 2021 Notes were issued under an indenture (2021 Indenture), issued September 30, 2013 that contains covenants which, subject to certain exceptions, limit the ability of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries (as defined in the 2021 Indenture) to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, including secured indebtedness, and make certain types of restricted payments. The 2021 Indenture contains customary events of default. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, payments on the 2021 Notes may be accelerated and become immediately due and payable. Upon a change of control (as defined in the 2021 Indenture), the 2021 Indenture requires us to make an offer to repurchase the 2021 Notes at 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
We may redeem the 2021 Notes at any time prior to September 15, 2016, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus a customary make-whole premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. In addition, at any time on or prior to September 15, 2016, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of 2021 Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 107.500% of the principal amount of the 2021
13

Table of Contents
Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date fixed for redemption; provided, that at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2021 Notes originally issued under the 2021 Indenture remain outstanding after such redemption. On or after September 15, 2016, we may redeem some or all of the 2021 Notes at redemption prices set forth in the Indenture. These percentages range from 100.000% to 105.625%.
In February 2013, we issued and sold $200 million aggregate principal amount of 7.25% Senior Notes due 2023 (the 2023 Notes) at par (before underwriting and other issuance costs) through a private placement to qualified institutional buyers. Interest on the 2023 Notes is payable semi-annually in cash in arrears, beginning August 1, 2013. The 2023 Notes will mature on February 1, 2023. Prior to maturity, we may, at our option, redeem the 2023 Notes at any time, in whole or in part, at specified redemption prices, which also include a customary make-whole premium prior to February 1, 2018.
The 2023 Notes were issued under an indenture, dated as February 1, 2013 (the 2023 Indenture) that contains covenants which, subject to certain exceptions, limit the ability of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries (as defined in the 2023 Indenture) to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, including secured indebtedness, and make certain types of restricted payments. The 2023 Indenture contains customary events of default. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, payments on the 2023 Notes may be accelerated and become immediately due and payable. Upon a change of control (as defined in the Indenture), the 2023 Indenture requires us to make an offer to repurchase the 2023 Notes at 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
We may redeem the 2023 Notes at any time prior to February 1, 2018, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus a customary make-whole premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. In addition, at any time on or prior to February 1, 2016, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of 2023 Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 107.250% of the principal amount of the 2023 Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date fixed for redemption; provided, that at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2023 Notes originally issued under the 2023 Indenture remain outstanding after such redemption. On or after February 1, 2018, we may redeem some or all of the 2023 Notes at redemption prices set forth in the 2023 Indenture. These percentages range from 100.000% to 103.625%. In August 2013, we exchanged 100% of the 2023 Notes for notes that are freely transferable and registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
All unsecured Senior Notes rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future senior unsecured obligations, senior to all of the Company's existing and future subordinated indebtedness and effectively subordinated to the Company's existing and future secured indebtedness, including indebtedness under our Secured Revolving Credit Facility and our 6.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2018, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. The unsecured Senior Notes and related guarantees are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other liabilities of all of the Company's subsidiaries that do not guarantee these notes. The unsecured Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed jointly and severally on a senior basis by the Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries party to each applicable Indenture.
Senior Notes: Tangible Equity Units — In July 2012, we issued 4.6 million 7.5% TEUs (the 2012 TEUs), which were comprised of prepaid stock purchase contracts (PSPs) and senior amortizing notes. As the two components of the TEUs are legally separate and detachable, we have accounted for the two components as separate items for financial reporting purposes and valued them based on their relative fair value at the date of issuance. The amortizing notes are unsecured senior obligations and rank equally with all of our other unsecured indebtedness. Outstanding notes pay quarterly installments of principal and interest through maturity. The PSPs were originally accounted for as equity (additional paid in capital) at the initial fair value of these contracts based on the relative fair value method. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, we exchanged 890,000 TEUs, including approximately $2.4 million of amortizing notes, for Beazer Homes' common stock. The PSPs related to the remaining 2012 TEUs are scheduled to be settled in Beazer Homes' common stock on July 15, 2015. See Note 6 for more information related to this exchange and the future PSP settlement.
Junior Subordinated Notes — $103.1 million of unsecured junior subordinated notes (Junior Subordinated Notes) mature on July 30, 2036. The Junior Subordinated Notes are redeemable at par and pay a fixed rate of 7.987% for the first ten years ending July 30, 2016. Thereafter, the securities have a floating interest rate as defined in the Junior Subordinated Notes Indenture. The obligations relating to these notes and the related securities are subordinated to our Secured Revolving Credit Facility and Senior Notes. In January 2010, we modified the terms of $75 million of these notes and recorded these notes at their estimated fair value. Over the remaining life of the notes, we will increase their carrying value until this carrying value equals the face value of the notes. As of December 31, 2014, the unamortized accretion was $44.5 million and will be amortized over the remaining life of the notes.
As of December 31, 2014, we were in compliance with all covenants under our Junior Subordinated Notes.
Cash Secured Loans — We have two separate loan facilities, totaling $22.4 million outstanding as of December 31, 2014. Borrowing under the cash secured loan facilities will replenish cash used to repay or repurchase the Company’s debt and would
14

Table of Contents
be considered “refinancing indebtedness” under certain of the Company’s existing indentures and debt covenants. However, because the loans are fully collateralized by cash equal to the loan amount, the loans do not provide liquidity to the Company.
The loans mature in November 2017, however, the lenders of these facilities may put the outstanding loan balances to the Company at the two or four year anniversaries of the loans. Borrowings under the facilities are fully secured by cash held by the lender or its affiliates. This secured cash is reflected as restricted cash on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014. The cash secured loans have a maximum interest rate equivalent to LIBOR plus 0.4% per annum which is paid every three months following the effective date of each borrowing.
Other Secured Notes Payable — We periodically acquire land through the issuance of notes payable. As of December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014, we had outstanding notes payable of $24.2 million and $22.1 million respectively, primarily related to land acquisitions. These notes payable have varying expiration dates between 2016 and 2019 and have a weighted average fixed rate of 4.67% at December 31, 2014. These notes are secured by the real estate to which they relate.
The agreements governing these secured notes payable contain various affirmative and negative covenants. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain any future waivers or amendments that may become necessary without significant additional cost or at all. In each instance, however, a covenant default can be cured by repayment of the indebtedness.
(8) Income Taxes
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists, to provide guidance on the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits. ASU 2013-11 requires an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward with certain limited exceptions. ASU 2013-11 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods with earlier adoption permitted. The Company adopted this guidance in the quarter ended December 31, 2014 with no significant impact to the financial statements.
In the normal course of business, we are subject to audits by federal and state tax authorities regarding various tax liabilities. Our federal income tax returns for fiscal years 2011 through 2012 were agreed to with the IRS Appeals Office and approved by the Joint Committee on Taxation in the first quarter of fiscal year 2015. Certain state income tax returns for various fiscal years are under routine examination. The statute of limitations for our major tax jurisdictions remains open for examination for fiscal years 2007 and subsequent years. As of December 31, 2014, it is reasonably possible that up to $2.8 million of the total uncertain tax positions will reverse within the next twelve months, primarily due to the expiration of statutes of limitation in various jurisdictions.
As of both December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014, we had $0.4 million of accrued interest and penalties related to our unrecognized tax benefits.
We experienced an “ownership change” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 382) as of January 12, 2010. Section 382 contains rules that limit the ability of a company that undergoes an “ownership change” to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs) and certain built-in losses or deductions recognized during the five-year period after the ownership change to offset future taxable income. Therefore, our ability to utilize our pre-ownership change net operating loss carryforwards and recognize certain built-in losses or deductions is limited by Section 382 to an estimated maximum amount of approximately $11.4 million ($4 million tax-effected) annually. Certain deferred tax assets are not subject to any limitation imposed. Due to the Section 382 limitation and the maximum carryforward period of our NOLs, we will be unable to fully recognize certain deferred tax assets. As future economic conditions unfold, we will be able to confirm that certain deferred tax assets will not provide any future tax benefit. At such time, we will accordingly remove any deferred tax asset and corresponding valuation allowance.
Accordingly, a portion of our $500.4 million of total gross deferred tax assets related to accrued losses on our inventory may be unavailable due to the limitation imposed by Section 382. As of December 31, 2014, we estimate that between $7.9 million and $40.9 million may be unavailable due to our Section 382 limitation. As a result, upon the resumption of sustained profitability and reversal of our valuation allowance, between $416 million and $449 million of our net deferred tax assets may be available to us for the reduction of future cash taxes. The actual realization of our deferred tax assets is difficult to predict and will be dependent on future events.
15

Table of Contents
Considering the limitation imposed by Section 382, the table below depicts the classifications of our deferred tax assets:

(In thousands) | December 31, 2014
Deferred tax assets: |
Subject to annual limitation | $ | 102,207 |
Generally not subject to annual limitation | 357,289 |
Certain components likely to be subject to annual limitation | 40,905 |
Total deferred tax assets | 500,401 |
Deferred tax liabilities | (43,496 | )
Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance | 456,905 |
Valuation allowance | (456,859 | )
Net deferred tax assets | $ | 46 |

Based upon an evaluation of all available evidence, we established a valuation allowance for substantially all of our deferred tax assets during fiscal 2008. As of December 31, 2014, we continued our evaluation of whether the valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets was still required. We considered positive evidence including evidence of recovery in the housing markets where we operate, the prospects of continued profitability and growth, a strong backlog and sufficient balance sheet liquidity to sustain and grow operations. Although the Company’s performance and current positioning is bringing it closer to a conclusion that a valuation allowance is no longer needed, further evidence of sustained profitability is needed to reverse our valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Therefore, based upon all available positive and negative evidence, we concluded a valuation allowance is still needed for substantially all of our gross deferred tax assets at December 31, 2014. The Company's deferred tax asset valuation allowance was $456.9 million and $445.2 million as of December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014, respectively. In future periods, we expect to reduce all or a portion of our valuation allowance, generating a non-cash tax benefit, if sufficient positive evidence is present indicating that more likely than not a portion or all of our deferred tax assets will be realized. Changes in existing tax laws could also affect actual tax results and the valuation of deferred tax assets over time.
(9) Contingencies
Beazer Homes and certain of its subsidiaries have been and continue to be named as defendants in various construction defect claims, complaints and other legal actions. The Company is subject to the possibility of loss contingencies arising in its business. In determining loss contingencies, we consider the likelihood of loss as well as the ability to reasonably estimate the amount of such loss or liability. An estimated loss is recorded when it is considered probable that a liability has been incurred and when the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.
Warranty Reserves. We currently provide a limited warranty (ranging from one to two years) covering workmanship and materials per our defined performance quality standards. In addition, we provide a limited warranty (generally ranging from a minimum of five years up to the period covered by the applicable statute of repose) covering only certain defined construction defects. We also provide a defined structural element warranty with single-family homes and townhomes in certain states.
Our homebuilding work is performed by subcontractors that typically must agree to indemnify us with regard to their work and provide us with certificates of insurance demonstrating that they have met our insurance requirements and that we are named as an additional insured under their policies. Therefore, many claims relating to workmanship and materials that result in warranty spending are the primary responsibility of the subcontractors. In addition, we maintain insurance coverage relating to our construction efforts that can result in recoveries of warranty and construction defect costs above certain specified limits.
Warranty reserves are included in other liabilities and the provision for warranty accruals is included in home construction expenses in the consolidated financial statements. We record reserves covering anticipated warranty expense for each home closed. Management reviews the adequacy of warranty reserves each reporting period based on historical experience and management’s estimate of the costs to remediate the claims and adjusts these provisions accordingly. Our review includes a quarterly analysis of the historical data and trends in warranty expense by operating segment. An analysis by operating segment allows us to consider market specific factors such as our warranty experience, the number of home closings, the prices of homes, product mix and other data in estimating our warranty reserves. In addition, our analysis also contemplates the existence of any non-recurring or community-specific warranty related matters that might not be contemplated in our historical data and trends. While we adjust our estimated warranty liabilities each reporting period to the extent required as a result of our quarterly analyses, historical data and trends may not accurately predict actual warranty costs which could lead to a significant change in the reserve.
16

Table of Contents
Changes in our warranty reserves are as follows:

| Three Months Ended
| December 31,
(In thousands) | 2014 |  | 2013
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 16,084 |  |  | $ | 11,663 |
Accruals for warranties issued (a) | 1,525 |  |  | 1,123 |
Changes in liability related to warranties existing in prior periods (b) | 14,230 |  |  | 1,743 |
Payments made | (4,612 | ) |  | (2,618 | )
Balance at end of period | $ | 27,227 |  |  | $ | 11,911 |

(a) Accruals for warranties issued is a function of the number of home closings in the period, the average selling prices of the homes and the rates of accrual per home estimated as a percentage of the selling price of the home; the increase in the amount of accrual in the current period compared to the comparable prior-year period is due to an increase in the average selling prices of homes closed in the respective periods as well as increases in certain divisions' accrual rates.
(b) Changes in liability related to warranties existing in prior periods increased in the current year period primarily due to charges associated related to water intrusion issues in certain of our communities located in Florida.
Florida and New Jersey Water Intrusion Issues
In the latter portion of fiscal 2014, we experienced an increase in calls from homeowners reporting certain stucco and water intrusion issues in certain of our communities in Florida and New Jersey. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we recorded $4.9 million in charges related to these water intrusion issues, of which $4.3 million related to Florida and $0.6 million related to New Jersey.
Florida
The issues in Florida related to stucco installation in several communities. Through September 30, 2014, we had identified a total of 135 homes that we believed were likely to require more than minor repairs, of which we had resolved repairs on 11 of those homes. We consider warranty-related repairs for homes to be resolved when all repairs are complete and all repair costs are fully paid. As of September 30, 2014, our warranty liability included $4.0 million for the amount of estimated repair costs for the remaining 124 homes as well as an estimate of repair costs for homes that were likely to be identified in the future. At that time, we believed the issues were isolated to a limited number of specific house plans in several specific communities.
During the first quarter of 2015, with many homeowners seeing an increased level of warranty-related activities occurring in their communities, the number of stucco and water-related warranty calls in Florida increased significantly. This led us to expand the scope of our inspections, including to homes and communities from which no warranty calls had been received. This enhanced review, together with our growing experience repairing homes previously identified, resulted in us determining that more homes and communities in Florida were likely to be adversely affected. Based on all of these activities and our resulting analysis, we recorded an additional $13.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 related to these issues.
Through December 31, 2014, we had identified a total of 387 homes, with an average age of more than 8 years, in Florida with stucco installation issues that we believe are likely to require more than minor repairs, of which 42 were already fully repaired and numerous others were in various stages of repair. During the first quarter of fiscal 2015, we paid $1.4 million to repair such homes, and had cumulatively paid $2.3 million of repair costs associated with these homes. As of December 31, 2014, our overall warranty liability included $16.2 million for completing repairs on the remaining 345 homes as well as an estimated amount to cover repair costs for additional homes that we believe are likely to be identified in the future.
As of December 31, 2014, based on our assessment of the water intrusion issues, we believe it is likely that we will recover a portion of our repair costs associated with affected homes from various sources, including our direct insurers, the subcontractors involved with the construction of these homes and their insurers. However, as of December 31, 2014, we have not yet been able to estimate an amount that we believe is probable that we will recover, and thus, in accordance with accounting rules, we have neither recorded a receivable for estimated recoveries nor included an estimated amount of recoveries in determining our overall warranty liability. Our assessment of the water intrusion issues, including the process of determining potentially responsible parties and our efforts to obtain recoveries, is ongoing, and as a result, we anticipate that our assessment as to the ultimate value of our liability and the probability and magnitude of any recoveries may change as additional information is obtained.
17

Table of Contents
New Jersey
The water intrusion issues in New Jersey related to flashing and stone installation in one specific community. These homes had an average age of 8 years. No new homes were identified in New Jersey during the first quarter of fiscal 2015. As of December 31, 2014, we believe the remaining warranty liability for New Jersey encompasses the probable cost of the repair effort remaining to resolve the issues in that community and is not material.
Litigation
As disclosed in prior SEC filings, we operated Beazer Mortgage Corporation (BMC) from 1998 through February 2008 to offer mortgage financing to buyers of our homes. BMC entered into various agreements with mortgage investors, pursuant to which BMC originated certain mortgage loans and ultimately sold these loans to investors. In general, underwriting decisions were not made by BMC but by the investors themselves or third-party service providers. From time to time we have received claims from institutions which have acquired certain of these mortgages demanding damages or indemnity arising from BMC's activities or that we repurchase such mortgages. We have been able to resolve these claims for amounts that are not material to our consolidated financial position or results of operation. We currently have no such claims outstanding. However, we cannot rule out the potential for additional mortgage loan repurchase or indemnity claims in the future from other investors, although, at this time, we do not believe that the exposure related to any such claims would be material to our consolidated financial position or results of operations. As of December 31, 2014, no liability has been recorded for any such additional claims as such exposure is not both probable and reasonably estimable.
In the normal course of business, we are subject to various lawsuits. We cannot predict or determine the timing or final outcome of these lawsuits or the effect that any adverse findings or determinations in pending lawsuits may have on us. In addition, an estimate of possible loss or range of loss, if any, cannot presently be made with respect to certain of these pending matters. An unfavorable determination in any of the pending lawsuits could result in the payment by us of substantial monetary damages which may not be fully covered by insurance. Further, the legal costs associated with the lawsuits and the amount of time required to be spent by management and the Board of Directors on these matters, even if we are ultimately successful, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Other Matters
On July 1, 2009, we entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement and associated Bill of Information (the “DPA”) with the United States Attorney for the Western District of North Carolina and a separate but related agreement with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (the HUD Agreement) and the Civil Division of the United States Department of Justice. We have satisfied our obligations under the DPA and in July 2014 the United States District Court for the Western Division of North Carolina dismissed the Bill of Information. However, under these agreements, we are obligated to make payments equal to 4% of “adjusted EBITDA” as defined in the Agreements until the first to occur of (a) September 30, 2016 or (b) the date that a cumulative $48.0 million has been paid pursuant to the DPA and the HUD Agreement. As of December 31, 2014, we have paid a cumulative $22.7 million and an additional $2.7 million has been recorded as a liability at December 31, 2014 (of which $2.1 million was paid to HUD in January 2015).
We and certain of our subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various claims, complaints and other legal actions, most relating to construction defects, moisture intrusion and product liability. Certain of the liabilities resulting from these actions are covered in whole or part by insurance. In our opinion, based on our current assessment, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
We have accrued $15.6 million and $13.4 million in other liabilities related to litigation and other matters, excluding warranty, as of December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014, respectively.
We had outstanding letters of credit and performance bonds of approximately $38.6 million and $219.2 million, respectively, at December 31, 2014 related principally to our obligations to local governments to construct roads and other improvements in various developments. We have no outstanding letters of credit relating to our land option contracts as of December 31, 2014.
(10) Fair Value Measurements
As of December 31, 2014, we had assets in our consolidated balance sheets that were required to be measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis. We use a fair value hierarchy that requires us to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value as follows: Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable either directly or indirectly through corroboration with market data; Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that reflect our own estimates about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
18

Table of Contents
Certain of our assets are required to be recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value of our available-for-sale marketable equity securities are based on readily available share prices. The fair value of our deferred compensation plan assets are based on market-corroborated inputs.
Certain of our assets are required to be recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis when events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recovered. We review our long-lived assets, including inventory for recoverability when factors that indicate an impairment may exist, but no less than quarterly. Fair value is based on estimated cash flows discounted for market risks associated with the long-lived assets. The fair values of our investments in unconsolidated entities are determined primarily using a discounted cash flow model to value the underlying net assets of the respective entities.
See Notes 1, 3 and 4 for additional information related to the fair value accounting for the assets listed below. Determining which hierarchical level an asset or liability falls within requires significant judgment. We evaluate our hierarchy disclosures each quarter.
The following table presents our assets measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis for each hierarchy level and represents only those assets whose carrying values were adjusted to fair value during the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:

(In thousands) | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total
Three Months Ended December 31, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Available-for-sale marketable equity securities (a) | $ | 24,970 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 24,970 |
Deferred compensation plan assets (a) | — |  |  | 775 |  |  | — |  |  | 775 |
Three Months Ended December 31, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Deferred compensation plan assets (a) | $ | — |  |  | $ | 805 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 805 |
Land held for sale (b) | — |  |  | — |  |  | 3,536 |  |  | 3,536 |

(a) Measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
(b) Measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
The fair value of our cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, trade accounts payable, other liabilities, cash secured loans and other secured notes payable approximate their carrying amounts due to the short maturity of these assets and liabilities.
As of December 31, 2014, our investment in marketable equity securities, consisting solely of the shares held in AMH, was in a cumulative unrealized loss position of $1.1 million which is in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, a component of Stockholders' Equity.
Obligations related to land not owned under option agreements approximate fair value. The carrying values and estimated fair values of other financial assets and liabilities were as follows:

(In thousands) | As of December 31, 2014 |  | As of September 30, 2014
| Carrying Amount |  | Fair Value |  | Carrying Amount |  | Fair Value
Senior Notes | $ | 1,428,670 |  |  | $ | 1,438,627 |  |  | $ | 1,435,183 |  |  | $ | 1,462,899 |
Junior Subordinated Notes | 56,253 |  |  | 56,253 |  |  | 55,736 |  |  | 55,736 |
| $ | 1,484,923 |  |  | $ | 1,494,880 |  |  | $ | 1,490,919 |  |  | $ | 1,518,635 |

The estimated fair value shown above for our publicly-held Senior Notes has been determined using quoted market rates (Level 2). Since there is no trading market for our Junior Subordinated Notes, the fair value of these notes is estimated by discounting scheduled cash flows through maturity (Level 3). The discount rate is estimated using market rates currently being offered on loans with similar terms and credit quality. Judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop these estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that we could realize in a current market exchange.
(11) Stock-based Compensation
For the three months ended December 31, 2014, our total stock-based compensation included in general and administrative expenses (G&A), was approximately $1.4 million ($1.1 million net of tax). The fair value of each option/stock-based stock appreciation right (SSAR) grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model (Black-Scholes Model). The
19

Table of Contents
fair value of each performance-based, nonvested stock grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Monte Carlo valuation method. The cash-settled component of any awards granted to employees are accounted for as a liability award and the liability is adjusted to fair value each reporting period until vested. Non-performance based, nonvested stock is valued based on the market price of the common stock on the date of the grant.
During the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, employees surrendered 9,807 and 21,693 shares, respectively, to us in payment of minimum tax obligations upon the vesting of stock awards under our stock incentive plans. We valued the stock at the market price on the date of surrender, for an aggregate value of approximately $184,000 and $413,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Stock Options:

The intrinsic value of a stock option/SSAR is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option/SSAR. At December 31, 2014, our SSAR/stock options outstanding had an intrinsic value of $1.9 million. The intrinsic value of SSARs/stock options vested and expected to vest in the future was $1.9 million. The SSARS/stock options vested and expected to vest in the future had a weighted average expected life of 2.5 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable SSARs/stock options as of December 31, 2014 was $1.5 million.
The following table summarizes stock options and SSARs outstanding as of December 31, 2014 (there were no grants or activity related to stock options or SSARs during the three months ended December 31, 2014):

| Three Months Ended
| December 31, 2014
| Shares |  | Weighted- Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at end of period | 650,223 |  |  | $ | 18.12 |
Exercisable at end of period | 493,398 |  |  | $ | 18.39 |
Vested or expected to vest in the future | 649,954 |  |  | $ | 18.12 |

Nonvested Stock Awards: Compensation cost arising from nonvested stock awards granted to employees is recognized as an expense using the straight-line method over the vesting period. As of December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014, there was $15.9 million and $10.0 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock awards included in paid-in capital. The cost remaining at December 31, 2014 is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.7 years.
During the three months ended December 31, 2014, we issued 194,341 shares of performance-based restricted stock (Performance Shares) to our executive officers and certain other corporate employees. The first type of Performance Shares granted requires a total shareholder return (TSR) that compares favorably against an 11-member peer group measured at the end of a three-year performance period. The number of TSR Performance Shares that actually vest will range from 0% to 150% of the target number, based on the Company’s TSR ranking relative to its peer group during the three-year performance period. TSR calculations for the Company and the peer group companies will be based on the average closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE for the 20 trading days immediately preceding (i) the start of the performance period (October 1, 2014) and (ii) the end of the performance period (September 30, 2017). The grants of the TSR performance-based, nonvested stock were valued using the Monte Carlo valuation method and had an estimated fair value of $19.90 per share.
A Monte Carlo simulation model requires the following inputs: (1) expected dividend yield on the underlying stock, (2) expected price volatility of the underlying stock, (3) risk-free interest rate for the period corresponding with the expected term of the award and (4) fair value of the underlying stock. For the Company and each member of the peer group, the following inputs were used, as applicable, in the Monte Carlo simulation model to determine the fair value as of the grant date for the TSR Performance Shares: 0% dividend yield for the Company, expected price volatility ranging from 29.0% to 185.8% and a risk-free interest rate of 0.94%. The methodology used to determine these assumptions is similar to the Black-Scholes Model; however the expected term is determined by the model in the Monte Carlo simulation.
The second type of Performance Shares granted are structured to require absolute performance measured by the Company’s fiscal year 2017 pre-tax income (PTI), defined as the Company’s income from continuing operations, before taxes and excluding impairments and abandonments, bond losses and such other non-recurring items as the Compensation Committee may approve. The PTI Performance Shares will vest in 2017, subject to determination of the Company’s actual pre-tax income performance. The PTI Performance Shares will be fully earned at a target pre-tax income level, with a 50% payout at the threshold level of pre-
20

Table of Contents
tax income and a 200% payout at the maximum level of pre-tax income. Once the threshold 2017 pre-tax income performance level is achieved, to the extent the actual 2017 pre-tax income performance is between the threshold and target performance levels, or between the target and maximum performance levels, linear interpolation between the award opportunity percentages will be applied to determine the actual payout.
Performance Shares in excess of the target number (194,341) may be settled in cash or additional shares at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Any portion of the Performance Shares that do not vest at the end of the period will be forfeited.
Activity relating to nonvested stock awards, including the Performance Shares, for the three months ended December 31, 2014 is as follows:

| Three Months Ended
| December 31, 2014
| Shares |  | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Beginning of period | 746,567 |  |  | $ | 15.76 |
Granted | 390,870 |  |  | 19.07 |
Vested | (62,807 | ) |  | 15.89 |
Forfeited | (106,191 | ) |  | 4.65 |
End of period | 968,439 |  |  | $ | 18.31 |

(12) Segment Information
We have three homebuilding segments operating in 16 states. Revenues in our homebuilding segments are derived from the sale of homes which we construct and from land and lot sales. Our reportable segments have been determined on a basis that is used internally by management for evaluating segment performance and resource allocations. The reportable homebuilding segments and all other homebuilding operations, not required to be reported separately under the aggregation of ASC 280, include operations conducting business in the following states:
West: Arizona, California, Nevada and Texas
East: Delaware, Indiana, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee (Nashville) and Virginia
Southeast: Florida, Georgia, North Carolina (Raleigh) and South Carolina
Management’s evaluation of segment performance is based on segment operating income. Operating income for our homebuilding segments is defined as homebuilding, land sale and other revenues less home construction, land development and land sales expense, commission expense, depreciation and amortization and certain general and administrative expenses which are incurred by or allocated to our homebuilding segments. The accounting policies of our segments are those described in Note 1 above and Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements in our 2014 Annual Report.

| Three Months Ended
| December 31,
(In thousands) | 2014 |  | 2013
Revenue |  |  |
West | $ | 87,465 |  |  | $ | 122,576 |
East | 104,813 |  |  | 107,589 |
Southeast | 73,486 |  |  | 63,005 |
Total revenue | $ | 265,764 |  |  | $ | 293,170 |

21

Table of Contents

| Three Months Ended
| December 31,
(In thousands) | 2014 |  | 2013
Operating (loss) income |  |  |
West | $ | 6,783 |  |  | $ | 15,762 |
East | 7,369 |  |  | 8,235 |
Southeast | (6,233 | ) |  | 5,628 |
Segment total | 7,919 |  |  | 29,625 |
Corporate and unallocated (a) | (17,409 | ) |  | (18,093 | )
Total operating (loss) income | $ | (9,490 | ) |  | $ | 11,532 |

| Three Months Ended
| December 31,
(In thousands) | 2014 |  | 2013
Depreciation and amortization |  |  |
West | $ | 767 |  |  | $ | 1,382 |
East | 668 |  |  | 692 |
Southeast | 485 |  |  | 391 |
Segment total | 1,920 |  |  | 2,465 |
Corporate and unallocated (a) | 421 |  |  | 442 |
Depreciation and amortization - continuing operations | $ | 2,341 |  |  | $ | 2,907 |

| Three Months Ended
| December 31,
(In thousands) | 2014 |  | 2013
Capital Expenditures |  |  |
West | $ | 1,070 |  |  | $ | 1,102 |
East | 799 |  |  | 1,367 |
Southeast | 862 |  |  | 446 |
Corporate and unallocated | 203 |  |  | 285 |
Consolidated total | $ | 2,934 |  |  | $ | 3,200 |

(In thousands) | December 31, 2014 |  | September 30, 2014
Assets |  |  |
West | $ | 784,654 |  |  | $ | 756,575 |
East | 457,112 |  |  | 433,032 |
Southeast | 317,571 |  |  | 299,215 |
Corporate and unallocated (b) | 430,049 |  |  | 577,398 |
Consolidated total | $ | 1,989,386 |  |  | $ | 2,066,220 |

(a) | Corporate and unallocated includes amortization of capitalized interest and numerous shared services functions that benefit all segments, the costs of which are not allocated to the operating segments reported above including information technology, treasury, corporate finance, legal, branding and other national marketing costs.

(b) | Primarily consists of cash and cash equivalents, consolidated inventory not owned, deferred taxes, capitalized interest and other items that are not allocated to the segments.

22

Table of Contents
(13) Supplemental Guarantor Information
As discussed in Note 7, our obligations to pay principal, premium, if any, and interest under certain debt are guaranteed on a joint and several basis by substantially all of our subsidiaries. Certain of our immaterial subsidiaries do not guarantee our Senior Notes or our Secured Revolving Credit Facility. The guarantees are full and unconditional and the guarantor subsidiaries are 100% owned by Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
Unaudited Consolidating Balance Sheet Information
December 31, 2014
(In thousands)

| Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |  | Guarantor Subsidiaries |  | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |  | Consolidating Adjustments |  | Consolidated Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 147,840 |  |  | $ | (18 | ) |  | $ | 1,530 |  |  | $ | (10,672 | ) |  | $ | 138,680 |
Restricted cash | 62,905 |  |  | 1,187 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 64,092 |
Accounts receivable (net of allowance of $1,267) | — |  |  | 32,314 |  |  | 2 |  |  | — |  |  | 32,316 |
Income tax receivable | 46 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 46 |
Owned inventory | — |  |  | 1,677,611 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1,677,611 |
Consolidated inventory not owned | — |  |  | 1,443 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1,443 |
Investments in marketable securities and unconsolidated entities | 773 |  |  | 33,962 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 34,735 |
Deferred tax assets, net | 46 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 46 |
Property, plant and equipment, net | — |  |  | 19,315 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 19,315 |
Investments in subsidiaries | 242,515 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (242,515 | ) |  | — |
Intercompany | 1,323,583 |  |  | — |  |  | 2,402 |  |  | (1,325,985 | ) |  | — |
Other assets | 16,026 |  |  | 4,986 |  |  | 90 |  |  | — |  |  | 21,102 |
Total assets | $ | 1,793,734 |  |  | $ | 1,770,800 |  |  | $ | 4,024 |  |  | $ | (1,579,172 | ) |  | $ | 1,989,386 |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Trade accounts payable | $ | — |  |  | $ | 65,845 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 65,845 |
Other liabilities | 20,816 |  |  | 106,043 |  |  | 683 |  |  | — |  |  | 127,542 |
Intercompany | 2,402 |  |  | 1,334,255 |  |  | — |  |  | (1,336,657 | ) |  | — |
Obligations related to land not owned under option agreements | — |  |  | 1,248 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1,248 |
Total debt (net of discounts of $4,209) | 1,512,356 |  |  | 24,235 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1,536,591 |
Total liabilities | 1,535,574 |  |  | 1,531,626 |  |  | 683 |  |  | (1,336,657 | ) |  | 1,731,226 |
Stockholders’ equity | 258,160 |  |  | 239,174 |  |  | 3,341 |  |  | (242,515 | ) |  | 258,160 |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 1,793,734 |  |  | $ | 1,770,800 |  |  | $ | 4,024 |  |  | $ | (1,579,172 | ) |  | $ | 1,989,386 |

23

Table of Contents
Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
Unaudited Consolidating Balance Sheet Information
September 30, 2014
(In thousands)

| Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |  | Guarantor Subsidiaries |  | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |  | Consolidating Adjustments |  | Consolidated Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 301,980 |  |  | $ | 22,034 |  |  | $ | 1,614 |  |  | $ | (1,474 | ) |  | $ | 324,154 |
Restricted cash | 61,945 |  |  | 996 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 62,941 |
Accounts receivable (net of allowance of $1,245) | — |  |  | 34,428 |  |  | 1 |  |  | — |  |  | 34,429 |
Income tax receivable | 46 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 46 |
Owned inventory | — |  |  | 1,557,496 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1,557,496 |
Consolidated inventory not owned | — |  |  | 3,857 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 3,857 |
Investments in marketable securities and unconsolidated entities | 773 |  |  | 37,568 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 38,341 |
Deferred tax assets, net | 2,823 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 2,823 |
Property, plant and equipment, net | — |  |  | 18,673 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 18,673 |
Investments in subsidiaries | 253,540 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (253,540 | ) |  | — |
Intercompany | 1,195,349 |  |  | — |  |  | 2,405 |  |  | (1,197,754 | ) |  | — |
Other assets | 17,226 |  |  | 6,144 |  |  | 90 |  |  | — |  |  | 23,460 |
Total assets | $ | 1,833,682 |  |  | $ | 1,681,196 |  |  | $ | 4,110 |  |  | $ | (1,452,768 | ) |  | $ | 2,066,220 |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Trade accounts payable | $ | — |  |  | $ | 106,237 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 106,237 |
Other liabilities | 38,871 |  |  | 102,833 |  |  | 812 |  |  | — |  |  | 142,516 |
Intercompany | 2,405 |  |  | 1,196,823 |  |  | — |  |  | (1,199,228 | ) |  | — |
Obligations related to land not owned under option agreements | — |  |  | 2,916 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 2,916 |
Total debt (net of discounts of $4,399) | 1,513,288 |  |  | 22,145 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1,535,433 |
Total liabilities | 1,554,564 |  |  | 1,430,954 |  |  | 812 |  |  | (1,199,228 | ) |  | 1,787,102 |
Stockholders’ equity | 279,118 |  |  | 250,242 |  |  | 3,298 |  |  | (253,540 | ) |  | 279,118 |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 1,833,682 |  |  | $ | 1,681,196 |  |  | $ | 4,110 |  |  | $ | (1,452,768 | ) |  | $ | 2,066,220 |

24

Table of Contents
Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
Unaudited Consolidating Statement of Operations Information and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(In thousands)

| Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |  | Guarantor Subsidiaries |  | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |  | Consolidating Adjustments |  | Consolidated Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
Three Months Ended December 31, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total revenue | $ | — |  |  | $ | 265,764 |  |  | $ | 98 |  |  | $ | (98 | ) |  | $ | 265,764 |
Home construction and land sales expenses | 8,194 |  |  | 222,450 |  |  | — |  |  | (98 | ) |  | 230,546 |
Inventory impairments and option contract abandonments | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Gross (loss) profit | (8,194 | ) |  | 43,314 |  |  | 98 |  |  | — |  |  | 35,218 |
Commissions | — |  |  | 10,926 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 10,926 |
General and administrative expenses | — |  |  | 31,414 |  |  | 27 |  |  | — |  |  | 31,441 |
Depreciation and amortization | — |  |  | 2,341 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 2,341 |
Operating (loss) income | (8,194 | ) |  | (1,367 | ) |  | 71 |  |  | — |  |  | (9,490 | )
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities | — |  |  | 142 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 142 |
Other (expense) income, net | (9,747 | ) |  | 314 |  |  | (1 | ) |  | — |  |  | (9,434 | )
(Loss) income before income taxes | (17,941 | ) |  | (911 | ) |  | 70 |  |  | — |  |  | (18,782 | )
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes | (6,627 | ) |  | 5,906 |  |  | 25 |  |  | — |  |  | (696 | )
Equity in loss of subsidiaries | (6,772 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 6,772 |  |  | — |
(Loss) income from continuing operations | (18,086 | ) |  | (6,817 | ) |  | 45 |  |  | 6,772 |  |  | (18,086 | )
Loss from discontinued operations | — |  |  | (4,251 | ) |  | (3 | ) |  | — |  |  | (4,254 | )
Equity in loss of subsidiaries | (4,254 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 4,254 |  |  | — |
Net (loss) income | $ | (22,340 | ) |  | $ | (11,068 | ) |  | $ | 42 |  |  | $ | 11,026 |  |  | $ | (22,340 | )
Unrealized gain related to available-for-sale securities | 206 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 206 |
Comprehensive (loss) income | $ | (22,134 | ) |  | $ | (11,068 | ) |  | $ | 42 |  |  | $ | 11,026 |  |  | $ | (22,134 | )
| Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |  | Guarantor Subsidiaries |  | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |  | Consolidating Adjustments |  | Consolidated Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
Three Months Ended December 31, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total revenue | $ | — |  |  | $ | 293,170 |  |  | $ | 80 |  |  | $ | (80 | ) |  | $ | 293,170 |
Home construction and land sales expenses | 7,135 |  |  | 231,414 |  |  | — |  |  | (80 | ) |  | 238,469 |
Inventory impairments and option contract abandonments | — |  |  | 31 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 31 |
Gross (loss) profit | (7,135 | ) |  | 61,725 |  |  | 80 |  |  | — |  |  | 54,670 |
Commissions | — |  |  | 11,821 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 11,821 |
General and administrative expenses | — |  |  | 28,383 |  |  | 27 |  |  | — |  |  | 28,410 |
Depreciation and amortization | — |  |  | 2,907 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 2,907 |
Operating (loss) income | (7,135 | ) |  | 18,614 |  |  | 53 |  |  | — |  |  | 11,532 |
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities | — |  |  | 319 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 319 |
Other (expense) income, net | (16,032 | ) |  | 278 |  |  | (3 | ) |  | — |  |  | (15,757 | )
(Loss) income before income taxes | (23,167 | ) |  | 19,211 |  |  | 50 |  |  | — |  |  | (3,906 | )
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | 141 |  |  | (117 | ) |  | 18 |  |  | — |  |  | 42 |
Equity in income of subsidiaries | 19,360 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (19,360 | ) |  | — |
(Loss) income from continuing operations | (3,948 | ) |  | 19,328 |  |  | 32 |  |  | (19,360 | ) |  | (3,948 | )
Loss from discontinued operations | — |  |  | (1,187 | ) |  | (3 | ) |  | — |  |  | (1,190 | )
Equity in loss of subsidiaries | (1,190 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1,190 |  |  | — |
Net (loss) income | $ | (5,138 | ) |  | $ | 18,141 |  |  | $ | 29 |  |  | $ | (18,170 | ) |  | $ | (5,138 | )

25

Table of Contents
Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
Unaudited Consolidating Statements of Cash Flow Information
(In thousands)

| Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |  | Guarantor Subsidiaries |  | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |  | Consolidating Adjustments |  | Consolidated Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
Three Months Ended December 31, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net cash used in operating activities | $ | (30,841 | ) |  | $ | (141,603 | ) |  | $ | (88 | ) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | (172,532 | )
Cash flows from investing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Capital expenditures | — |  |  | (2,934 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (2,934 | )
Investments in unconsolidated entities | — |  |  | (1,144 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (1,144 | )
Increases in restricted cash | (959 | ) |  | (486 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (1,445 | )
Decreases in restricted cash | — |  |  | 294 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 294 |
Advances to/from subsidiaries | (114,977 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 114,977 |  |  | — |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (115,936 | ) |  | (4,270 | ) |  | — |  |  | 114,977 |  |  | (5,229 | )
Cash flows from financing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Repayment of debt | (7,038 | ) |  | (350 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (7,388 | )
Debt issuance costs | (126 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (126 | )
Advances to/from subsidiaries | — |  |  | 124,171 |  |  | 4 |  |  | (124,175 | ) |  | — |
Payments for other financing activities | (199 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (199 | )
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (7,363 | ) |  | 123,821 |  |  | 4 |  |  | (124,175 | ) |  | (7,713 | )
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (154,140 | ) |  | (22,052 | ) |  | (84 | ) |  | (9,198 | ) |  | (185,474 | )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 301,980 |  |  | 22,034 |  |  | 1,614 |  |  | (1,474 | ) |  | 324,154 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 147,840 |  |  | $ | (18 | ) |  | $ | 1,530 |  |  | $ | (10,672 | ) |  | $ | 138,680 |
| Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |  | Guarantor Subsidiaries |  | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |  | Consolidating Adjustments |  | Consolidated Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
Three Months Ended December 31, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net cash used in operating activities | $ | (37,161 | ) |  | $ | (76,683 | ) |  | $ | (34 | ) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | (113,878 | )
Cash flows from investing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Capital expenditures | — |  |  | (3,200 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (3,200 | )
Investments in unconsolidated entities | — |  |  | (2,164 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (2,164 | )
Increases in restricted cash | (433 | ) |  | (295 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (728 | )
Decreases in restricted cash | 39 |  |  | 512 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 551 |
Net cash used in investing activities | (394 | ) |  | (5,147 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (5,541 | )
Cash flows from financing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Repayment of debt | (1,913 | ) |  | (122 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (2,035 | )
Debt issuance costs | (32 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (32 | )
Advances to/from subsidiaries | (70,833 | ) |  | 75,697 |  |  | (69 | ) |  | (4,795 | ) |  | — |
Payments for other financing activities | (413 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (413 | )
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (73,191 | ) |  | 75,575 |  |  | (69 | ) |  | (4,795 | ) |  | (2,480 | )
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (110,746 | ) |  | (6,255 | ) |  | (103 | ) |  | (4,795 | ) |  | (121,899 | )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 499,341 |  |  | 6,324 |  |  | 1,637 |  |  | (2,843 | ) |  | 504,459 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 388,595 |  |  | $ | 69 |  |  | $ | 1,534 |  |  | $ | (7,638 | ) |  | $ | 382,560 |

26

Table of Contents
(14) Discontinued Operations
We continually review each of our markets in order to refine our overall investment strategy and to optimize capital and resource allocations in an effort to enhance our financial position and to increase shareholder value. This review entails an evaluation of both external market factors and our position in each market and over time has resulted in the decision to discontinue certain of our homebuilding operations.
We have classified the results of operations of our discontinued operations in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. There were no material assets or liabilities related to our discontinued operations as of December 31, 2014 or September 30, 2014. Discontinued operations were not segregated in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. Therefore, amounts for certain captions in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows will not agree with the respective data in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. The results of our discontinued operations in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

| Three Months Ended
| December 31,
(In thousands) | 2014 |  | 2013
Total revenue | $ | — |  |  | $ | 464 |
Home construction and land sales expenses (a) | 3,951 |  |  | 1,455 |
Gross loss | (3,951 | ) |  | (991 | )
General and administrative expenses | 304 |  |  | 189 |
Operating loss | (4,255 | ) |  | (1,180 | )
Other (expense) income, net | — |  |  | — |
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes | (4,255 | ) |  | (1,180 | )
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes | (1 | ) |  | 10 |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | $ | (4,254 | ) |  | $ | (1,190 | )

(a) The three months ended December 31, 2014 includes a $4.0 million accrual related to the probable liability of a case regarding alleged past construction defects in our discontinued operation in Denver, Colorado.
27

Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Executive Overview and Outlook
Executive Overview and Outlook:
Market Conditions
We believe that the housing recovery continues to move forward and that it is likely to last for at least several more years. The fundamentals including favorable demographic trends, excellent affordability and employment growth all point to a stronger and more stable level of demand for new homes than the uneven levels the industry experienced during fiscal 2014. The overall shape of the recovery has been flatter than many predicted, in large part, due to continuing mortgage constraints, employment insecurity and lack of wage growth. As a result of these issues, and combined with general economic and geopolitical uncertainties, we anticipate a slower recovery than the fundamentals would otherwise suggest.
Overview of Results for Our Fiscal First Quarter
For the quarter ended December 31, 2014, we recorded a net loss from continuing operations of $18.1 million, which included a $13.6 million warranty charge recorded in our cost of sales related to Florida stucco installation problems that resulted in water intrusion issues on homes which were, on average, more than 8 years old. Excluding this warranty charge, our net loss from continuing operations would have been $4.5 million.
The warranty charge for Florida stucco installation problems resulted from an expansion in scope and severity of the issues disclosed in our 2014 Annual Report and related Form 10-K. While we initially believed these issues were isolated to certain house plans in several specific communities, the number of warranty calls in Florida increased significantly in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. As a result, we expanded our efforts to identify and repair homes that may have been impacted by the poor stucco installation and related water intrusion issues. See Note 9 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of this matter.
Beyond the warranty issue, we were pleased with many of our operational achievements during the first quarter. We reached our sales objectives, growing new home orders by 7.9% over last year. We also increased our average active community count, which grew by 11.6%, and our average selling prices which increased 5.8% to $295.6 thousand. On the profitability side, our homebuilding gross margins of 21.8%, excluding impairments, abandonments, interest and the warranty charges noted above, exceeded margins recorded for the first quarter of fiscal 2014 by 60 basis points. Finally, we ended December with 1,771 units in backlog with an average selling price of $316.5 thousand, providing evidence of additional increases in our average selling prices in the quarters ahead
Reaching “2B-10”
In November 2013, we introduced a multi-year “2B-10” plan, which provided a roadmap of revenue and margin metrics to achieve $2 billion in revenue with a 10% Adjusted EBITDA margin. Taken together, reaching 2B-10 would result in Adjusted EBITDA of at least $200 million. In November of 2014, we refined the specific metrics we expected would lead us to the 2B-10 objectives, and identified the end of Fiscal 2016 as the target achievement date. Reaching the revenue component of 2B-10 depends primarily on our ability to improve our sales per community per month, increase our average selling prices and grow our active community count, while reaching the Adjusted EBITDA margin component requires us to maintain recent levels of homebuilding gross margins and achieve additional selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) cost leverage as our revenue grows.
Since introducing our “2B-10” plan, we have made significant strides toward achieving its objectives, with meaningful improvements in all key metrics. While our initial improvements were primarily related to better absorption rates and higher margins, more recently, we have improved average selling prices and our community count. For the trailing 12 months ended December 31, 2014, our revenues are $1.436 billion, up 8% year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA has increased $5.2 million or 5% to $105.4 million for the same time period. Excluding the warranty charge discussed above and a $4 million accrual in discontinued operations, Adjusted EBITDA increased $27.7 million or 28%. These improvements are due to the intense focus we have placed on the operational drivers of this plan, and, in part, to improved market conditions. Here’s where we currently stand on each of the five key metrics in relation to our current 2B-10 roadmap:

• | Our sales per community per month was 2.8 for the trailing 12 months ended December 31, 2014 versus 2.9 a year ago and 3.0 in our 2B-10 plan. We believe we are currently among the industry leaders in sales absorption rates, so our operational efforts have been focused on improvements in other 2B-10 metrics in recent quarters.

28

Table of Contents

• | Our ASP for the trailing 12 months ended December 31, 2014 was $288,000, up 9.9% year-over-year, and our ASP in backlog at December 31, 2014 had risen 10.8% to $317,000, versus the prior year. Our 2B-10 ASP metric is $325,000.

• | We ended December with 156 active communities, up 13% over last year. In order to sustain and further increase our active community count, we invested $145.4 million in land and land development during the quarter. This investment brings our total spending for the trailing 12 month period to $572.7 million, up over 12% versus a year ago. Our 2B-10 metric is to reach 170 communities.

• | Homebuilding gross margins, excluding impairments, abandonments and interest for the trailing 12 months ended December 31, 2014 was 21.0%. Excluding the current quarter warranty charge discussed above and the related warranty charge of $4.9 million recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, homebuilding gross margins would have been 22.3%, an increase of 170 basis points over the prior year. Our 2B-10 metric is 22%.

• | SG&A for the trailing 12 months ended December 31, 2014 was 13.7% of total revenue, which is somewhat higher than we expected and above our 2B-10 target of 12%. As we grow revenue from our larger base of communities and higher ASPs, we expect to demonstrate improved SG&A cost leverage.

We expect to continue our focus on our “2B-10” metrics during fiscal 2015 with particular emphasis on continuing to grow our active community count.
Critical Accounting Policies: Some of our critical accounting policies require the use of judgment in their application or require estimates of inherently uncertain matters. Although our accounting policies are in compliance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), a change in the facts and circumstances of the underlying transactions could significantly change the application of the accounting policies and the resulting financial statement impact. As disclosed in our 2014 Annual Report, our most critical accounting policies relate to inventory valuation (inventory held for development and land held for sale), homebuilding revenues and costs, warranty reserves, investments in unconsolidated entities and income tax valuation allowances. Since September 30, 2014, there have been no significant changes to those critical accounting policies.
Seasonal and Quarterly Variability: Our homebuilding operating cycle generally reflects escalating new order activity in the second and third fiscal quarters and increased closings in the third and fourth fiscal quarters.
29

Table of Contents
RESULTS OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS:

| Three Months Ended
| December 31,
($ in thousands) | 2014 |  | 2013
Revenues: |  |  |
Homebuilding | $ | 261,582 |  |  | $ | 289,958 |
Land sales and other | 4,182 |  |  | 3,212 |
Total | $ | 265,764 |  |  | $ | 293,170 |
Gross profit (loss): |  |  |
Homebuilding | $ | 35,277 |  |  | $ | 54,450 |
Land sales and other | (59 | ) |  | 220 |
Total | $ | 35,218 |  |  | $ | 54,670 |
Gross margin: |  |  |
Homebuilding | 13.5 | % |  | 18.8 | %
Land sales and other | (1.4 | )% |  | 6.8 | %
Total | 13.3 | % |  | 18.6 | %
Commissions | $ | 10,926 |  |  | $ | 11,821 |
General and administrative expenses (G&A) | $ | 31,441 |  |  | $ | 28,410 |
SG&A (commissions plus G&A) as a percentage of total revenue | 15.9 | % |  | 13.7 | %
G&A as a percentage of total revenue | 11.8 | % |  | 9.7 | %
Depreciation and amortization | $ | 2,341 |  |  | $ | 2,907 |
Operating (loss) income | $ | (9,490 | ) |  | $ | 11,532 |
Operating (loss) income as a percentage of total revenue | (3.6 | )% |  | 3.9 | %
Effective Tax Rate | 3.7 | % |  | (1.1 | )%
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities | $ | 142 |  |  | $ | 319 |

Homebuilding Operations Data

| Three Months Ended December 31,
| New Orders, net |  | Cancellation Rates
| 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 14 v 13 |  | 2014 |  | 2013
West | 405 |  |  | 351 |  |  | 15.4 | % |  | 20.0 | % |  | 21.1 | %
East | 286 |  |  | 308 |  |  | (7.1 | )% |  | 22.5 | % |  | 22.2 | %
Southeast | 275 |  |  | 236 |  |  | 16.5 | % |  | 22.3 | % |  | 22.4 | %
Total | 966 |  |  | 895 |  |  | 7.9 | % |  | 21.4 | % |  | 21.8 | %

Sales per active community per month declined slightly to 2.1 for the quarter ended December 31, 2014 from 2.2 for the quarter ended December 31, 2013. However, average active communities increased 11.6% year-over-year to 154 at December 31, 2014, contributing to the 7.9% increase in net new orders. The decrease in new orders in the East segment was primarily due to the close out of several communities in advance of several new community openings.
30

Table of Contents

| As of December 31,
| 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 14 v 13
Backlog Units: |  |  |  |  |
West | 646 |  |  | 654 |  |  | (1.2 | )%
East | 581 |  |  | 631 |  |  | (7.9 | )%
Southeast | 544 |  |  | 465 |  |  | 17.0 | %
Total | 1,771 |  |  | 1,750 |  |  | 1.2 | %
Aggregate dollar value of homes in backlog (in millions) | $ | 560.5 |  |  | $ | 500.0 |  |  | 12.1 | %
ASP in backlog (in thousands) | $ | 316.5 |  |  | $ | 285.7 |  |  | 10.8 | %

Backlog above reflects the number of homes for which the Company has entered into a sales contract with a customer but has not yet delivered the home. Backlog at December 31, 2014 increased slightly by 1.2%, primarily driven by the increase in net new orders year-over-year. We expect new orders and backlog to increase over time as our active community count continues to grow and the sales pace in recently opened communities improves.
Homebuilding Revenues and Average Selling Price
The table below summarizes homebuilding revenues, the average selling prices (ASP) of our homes and closings by reportable segment:

| Three Months Ended December 31,
| Homebuilding Revenues |  | Average Selling Price |  | Closings
($ in thousands) | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 14 v 13 |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 14 v 13 |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 14 v 13
West | $ | 86,318 |  |  | $ | 120,212 |  |  | (28.2 | )% |  | $ | 273.2 |  |  | $ | 276.3 |  |  | (1.1 | )% |  | 316 |  |  | 435 |  |  | (27.4 | )%
East | 101,832 |  |  | 106,879 |  |  | (4.7 | )% |  | 333.9 |  |  | 316.2 |  |  | 5.6 | % |  | 305 |  |  | 338 |  |  | (9.8 | )%
Southeast | 73,432 |  |  | 62,867 |  |  | 16.8 | % |  | 278.2 |  |  | 237.2 |  |  | 17.3 | % |  | 264 |  |  | 265 |  |  | (0.4 | )%
Total | $ | 261,582 |  |  | $ | 289,958 |  |  | (9.8 | )% |  | $ | 295.6 |  |  | $ | 279.3 |  |  | 5.8 | % |  | 885 |  |  | 1,038 |  |  | (14.7 | )%

Generally, improved operational strategies, product mix and market conditions in certain of our markets enhanced our ability to generate higher ASP over the past year. Despite an increase in ASP, homebuilding revenues declined 9.8% year-over-year, as a result of the 14.7% decrease in closings due primarily to a lower beginning backlog as compared to the prior year. The change in ASP for the three months ended December 31, 2014 was impacted by a change in mix in closings between products and among communities and markets as compared to the prior year.
We anticipate that our average ASP will likely continue to increase in future quarters as indicated by our increase in ASP for homes in backlog. We also anticipate that our closings in future quarters will increase as we begin to close homes in several recently opened communities.
31

Table of Contents
Homebuilding Gross Profit
The following table sets forth our homebuilding gross profit and gross margin by reportable segment and total homebuilding gross profit and gross margin, and such amounts excluding inventory impairments and abandonments and interest amortized to cost of sales for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. Homebuilding gross profit is defined as homebuilding revenues less home cost of sales (which includes land and land development costs, home construction costs, capitalized interest, indirect costs of construction, estimated warranty costs, closing costs and inventory impairment and lot option abandonment charges).

($ in thousands) | Three Months Ended December 31, 2014
| HB Gross Profit (Loss) |  | HB Gross Margin |  | Impairments & Abandonments (I&A) |  | HB Gross Profit w/o I&A |  | HB Gross Margin w/o I&A |  | Interest Amortized to COS |  | HB Gross Profit w/o I&A and Interest |  | HB Gross Margin w/o I&A and Interest
West | $ | 17,498 |  |  | 20.3 | % |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 17,498 |  |  | 20.3 | % |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 17,498 |  |  | 20.3 | %
East | 18,565 |  |  | 18.2 | % |  | — |  |  | 18,565 |  |  | 18.2 | % |  | — |  |  | 18,565 |  |  | 18.2 | %
Southeast | 2,080 |  |  | 2.8 | % |  | — |  |  | 2,080 |  |  | 2.8 | % |  | — |  |  | 2,080 |  |  | 2.8 | %
Corporate & unallocated | (2,866 | ) |  |  |  | — |  |  | (2,866 | ) |  |  |  | 8,194 |  |  | 5,328 |  |  |
Total homebuilding | $ | 35,277 |  |  | 13.5 | % |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 35,277 |  |  | 13.5 | % |  | $ | 8,194 |  |  | $ | 43,471 |  |  | 16.6 | %
($ in thousands) | Three Months Ended December 31, 2013
| HB Gross Profit (Loss) |  | HB Gross Margin |  | Impairments & Abandonments (I&A) |  | HB Gross Profit w/o I&A |  | HB Gross Margin w/o I&A |  | Interest Amortized to COS |  | HB Gross Profit w/o I&A and Interest |  | HB Gross Margin w/o I&A and Interest
West | $ | 27,798 |  |  | 23.1 | % |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 27,798 |  |  | 23.1 | % |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 27,798 |  |  | 23.1 | %
East | 19,416 |  |  | 18.2 | % |  | 31 |  |  | 19,447 |  |  | 18.2 | % |  | — |  |  | 19,447 |  |  | 18.2 | %
Southeast | 12,533 |  |  | 19.9 | % |  | — |  |  | 12,533 |  |  | 19.9 | % |  | — |  |  | 12,533 |  |  | 19.9 | %
Corporate & unallocated | (5,297 | ) |  |  |  | — |  |  | (5,297 | ) |  |  |  | 7,135 |  |  | 1,838 |  |  |
Total homebuilding | $ | 54,450 |  |  | 18.8 | % |  | $ | 31 |  |  | $ | 54,481 |  |  | 18.8 | % |  | $ | 7,135 |  |  | $ | 61,616 |  |  | 21.2 | %

Our overall homebuilding gross profit decreased to $35.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2014 from $54.5 million in the prior year. This decrease in homebuilding gross profit was due to the decline in closings and associated homebuilding revenues from the prior year and the $13.6 million warranty charge recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 related to Florida water intrusion issues, offset somewhat by the increase in ASP this quarter.
Total homebuilding gross profit and gross margin excluding inventory impairments and abandonments and interest amortized to cost of sales are not GAAP financial measures. These measures should not be considered alternatives to homebuilding gross profit determined in accordance with GAAP as an indicator of operating performance. The magnitude and volatility of non-cash inventory impairment and abandonment charges for the Company, and for other home builders, have been significant in recent periods and, as such, have made financial analysis of our industry more difficult. Homebuilding metrics excluding these charges, and other similar presentations by analysts and other companies, is frequently used to assist investors in understanding and comparing the operating characteristics of home building activities by eliminating many of the differences in companies' respective level of impairments and levels of debt. Management believes these non-GAAP measures enable holders of our securities to better understand the cash implications of our operating performance and our ability to service our debt obligations as they currently exist and as additional indebtedness is incurred in the future. These measures are also useful internally, helping management compare operating results and as a measure of the level of cash which may be available for discretionary spending.
In a given quarter, our reported gross margins arise from both communities previously impaired and communities not previously impaired. In addition as indicated above, certain gross margin amounts arise from recoveries of prior period costs, including warranty items that are not directly tied to communities generating revenue in the period. Home closings from communities previously impaired would, in most instances, generate very low or negative gross margins prior to the impact of the previously recognized impairment. Gross margins at each home closing are higher for a particular community after an impairment because the carrying value of the underlying land was previously reduced to the present value of future cash flows as a result of the impairment, leading to lower cost of sales at the home closing. This improvement in gross margin resulting from one or more prior impairments is frequently referred to in the aggregate as the “impairment turn” or “flow-back” of impairments within the reporting period. The amount of this impairment turn may exceed the gross margin for an individual impaired asset if the gross margin for that asset prior to the impairment would have been negative. The extent to which this impairment turn is greater than the reported gross margin for the individual asset is related to the specific historical cost basis of that individual asset.
32

Table of Contents
The asset valuations which result from our impairment calculations are based on discounted cash flow analyses and are not derived by simply applying prospective gross margins to individual communities. As such, impaired communities may have gross margins that are somewhat higher or lower than the gross margin for unimpaired communities. The mix of home closings in any particular quarter varies to such an extent that comparisons between previously impaired and never impaired communities would not be a reliable way to ascertain profitability trends or to assess the accuracy of previous valuation estimates. In addition, since any amount of impairment turn is tied to individual lots in specific communities it will vary considerably from period to period. As a result of these factors, we review the impairment turn impact on gross margins on a trailing 12-month basis rather than a quarterly basis as a way of considering whether our impairment calculations are resulting in gross margins for impaired communities that are comparable to our unimpaired communities. For the trailing 12-month period, the homebuilding gross margin from our continuing operations was 17.5% and excluding interest and inventory impairments, it was 21.0%. For the same trailing 12-month period, homebuilding gross margins were as follows in those communities that have previously been impaired and which represented 14.2% of total closings during this period:

Homebuilding Gross Margin from previously impaired communities: |
Pre-impairment turn gross margin | (3.1 | )%
Impact of interest amortized to COS related to these communities | 4.0 | %
Pre-impairment turn gross margin, excluding interest amortization | 0.9 | %
Impact of impairment turns | 18.5 | %
Gross margin (post impairment turns), excluding interest amortization | 19.4 | %

Land Sales and Other Revenues and Gross Profit (Loss). Land sales relate to land and lots sold that did not fit within our homebuilding programs and strategic plans in these markets. Other revenues include net fees we received for general contractor services we performed on behalf of a third party and broker fees. N/M in the table below indicates the percentage "not meaningful."

| Land Sales & Other Revenues |  | Land Sales and Other Gross Profit (Loss)
| Three Months Ended December 31, |  | Three Months Ended December 31,
(In thousands) | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 14 v 13 |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 14 v 13
West | $ | 1,147 |  |  | $ | 2,364 |  |  | (51.5 | )% |  | $ | (10 | ) |  | $ | 75 |  |  | (113.3 | )%
East | 2,981 |  |  | 710 |  |  | 319.9 | % |  | 27 |  |  | 7 |  |  | 285.7 | %
Southeast | 54 |  |  | 138 |  |  | (60.9 | )% |  | 49 |  |  | 138 |  |  | (64.5 | )%
Corporate and unallocated (a) | — |  |  | — |  |  | n/a |  |  | (125 | ) |  | — |  |  | n/a |
Total | $ | 4,182 |  |  | $ | 3,212 |  |  | 30.2 | % |  | $ | (59 | ) |  | $ | 220 |  |  | (126.8 | )%

(a) Corporate and unallocated includes interest and indirects amortized to land sales.
As anticipated, we closed on a number of land sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 in the East segment, leading to the increase from fiscal 2014. These land sales related to land and lots sold that did not fit within our homebuilding programs and strategic plans in these markets.
Operating (Loss) Income. The table below summarizes operating (loss) income by reportable segment for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:

(In thousands) | Three Months Ended December 31,
| 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 14 v 13
West | $ | 6,783 |  |  | $ | 15,762 |  |  | $ | (8,979 | )
East | 7,369 |  |  | 8,235 |  |  | (866 | )
Southeast | (6,233 | ) |  | 5,628 |  |  | (11,861 | )
Corporate and Unallocated | (17,409 | ) |  | (18,093 | ) |  | 684 |
Operating (loss) income | $ | (9,490 | ) |  | $ | 11,532 |  |  | $ | (21,022 | )

Our operating income decreased by $21.0 million to a loss of $9.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2014, compared to income of $11.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2013. The decrease is primarily due to the $13.6 million warranty charge recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 related to Florida water intrusion issues and decreased revenues and homebuilding gross profits as a result of a decline in closings. As a percentage of revenue, our operating loss was 3.6% for the
33

Table of Contents
three months ended December 31, 2014 compared to operating income of 3.9% for the three months ended December 31, 2013. Excluding the aforementioned warranty charge, results for the first quarter of fiscal 2015 would have been operating income as a percentage of revenue of 1.5%.
Our first quarter SG&A (a component of operating (loss) income) as a percentage of total revenue was higher than last year as our selling, general and administrative expenses included costs incurred in anticipation of new community openings to promote sales and support operations in these communities before any revenues were generated. As a result, our SG&A as a percentage of total revenue was 15.9% this quarter compared to 13.7% last year.
Income taxes. Our income tax assets and liabilities and related effective tax rate are affected by various factors, the most significant of which is the valuation allowance recorded against substantially all of our deferred tax assets. Due to the effect of our valuation allowance adjustments beginning in fiscal 2008, a comparison of our annual effective tax rates must consider the changes in our valuation allowance.
Our overall effective tax rates from continuing operations were 3.7% for the three months ended December 31, 2014, compared to -1.1% for the three months ended December 31, 2013. Due to the effects of our deferred tax asset valuation allowances and changes in our unrecognized tax benefits, our effective tax rates are not meaningful items as our income tax provisions and benefits are currently not directly correlated to the amount of pretax income or loss for the periods.
Three months ended December 31, 2014 as compared to 2013
West Segment: Homebuilding revenues decreased 28.2% for the three months ended December 31, 2014, compared to the prior year, primarily due to a 27.4% decline in closings. The decrease in the number of closings was primarily driven by a 25% lower beginning backlog. As compared to the prior year, our homebuilding gross profit decreased $10.3 million and homebuilding gross margins decreased from 23.1% to 20.3%. These decreases were primarily due to increases in labor costs in anticipation of new community openings, as well as a slight decrease in ASP. The $9.0 million decrease in operating income resulted from the aforementioned decrease in homebuilding gross margins as well as increased SG&A costs in anticipation of community openings.
East Segment: Homebuilding revenues decreased 4.7% for the three months ended December 31, 2014, compared to the prior year, primarily due to a 9.8% decline in closings, offset by a 5.6% increase in ASP. As compared to the prior year, our homebuilding gross profit decreased $0.9 million related to the aforementioned decrease in homebuilding revenues. Homebuilding gross margins remained steady year-over-year at 18.2%. The $0.9 million decrease in operating income resulted from the aforementioned decrease in homebuilding revenues.
Southeast Segment: As compared to the prior year, our homebuilding gross profit in the Southeast segment decreased $10.5 million driven primarily by the warranty charge of $13.6 million in Florida relating to water intrusion issues, partially offset by a 16.8% increase in homebuilding revenue. Including the warranty charge, homebuilding gross margins decreased from 19.9% to 2.8%. Excluding the warranty charge, homebuilding gross margins without impairments, abandonments and interest increased 140 bps from 19.9% last year to 21.3% this quarter. Our fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 land sales and other revenue and gross profit in our Southeast segment include net fees received for general contractor services we performed on behalf of a third party. The decrease in operating income resulted from the warranty charge, offset by an increase in homebuilding revenues. Excluding the warranty charge, operating income would have been $7.3 million this quarter compared to $5.6 million last year.
Corporate and Unallocated: Corporate and unallocated includes amortization of capitalized interest and numerous shared services functions that benefit all segments, including information technology, treasury, corporate finance, legal and other national marketing costs. The costs of these shared services are not allocated to the operating segments. For the three months ended December 31, 2014, corporate and unallocated expense decreased $0.7 million primarily due to an increase in the amount of capitalized indirect spending relative to the increase in inventory, mostly offset by increases in interest amortized to cost of sales and personnel related expenses to grow the business.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. We are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates. From time to time, we enter into derivative agreements to manage interest costs and hedge against risks associated with fluctuating interest rates. As of December 31, 2014, we were not a party to any such derivative agreements. We do not enter into or hold derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources. Our sources of liquidity include, but are not limited to, cash from operations, proceeds from Senior Notes, our Secured Revolving Credit Facility, and other bank borrowings, the issuance of equity and equity-linked securities and other external sources of funds. Our short-term and long-term liquidity depends primarily upon our level of net income, working capital management (cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other liabilities) and available credit facilities.
34

Table of Contents
As of December 31, 2014, our liquidity position consisted of $138.7 million in cash and cash equivalents, $150 million of capacity under our Secured Revolving Credit Facility, plus $64.1 million of restricted cash, $22.4 million of which related to our cash secured term loans. We expect to be able to meet our liquidity needs in the remainder of fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016 and to maintain a significant liquidity position, subject to changes in market conditions that would alter our expectations for land and land development expenditures or capital market transactions which could increase or decrease our cash balance on a quarterly basis.
We currently also hold an equity investment in American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) resulting from the sale of our interest in Pre-Owned Homes. We account for this investment as a marketable equity security classified as available-for-sale securities based on our intent to sell the shares in the future.
We incurred $145.4 million on land and land development activities during the three months ended December 31, 2014 as we continue to strive to replace closed out communities and position the Company to increase our active community count. We spent $123.8 million on land and land development for the three months ended December 31, 2013. This level of land and land development had a significant impact on our net cash used in operating activities in both years bringing net cash used in operating activities to $172.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and $113.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2013. Also significantly impacting cash used in operations in both years was the payment of accounts payables, which is a seasonal trend, and decreases in other liabilities which is primarily related to semi-annual payments of interest obligations and annual bonus payments.
Net cash used in investing activities was $5.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2014 primarily related to capital expenditures for model homes, additional investments in unconsolidated entities and a net increase in restricted cash collateralizing our outstanding letters of credit. Net cash used in investing activities was $5.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2013 primarily related to capital expenditures for model homes and additional investments in unconsolidated entities.
Net cash used in financing activities was $7.7 million and $2.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, primarily related to principal payments on the 2015 TEU notes and one Other Secured Note Payable.
In September 2014, Fitch reaffirmed the Company's long-term debt rating of B-. In April 2014, Moody's reaffirmed the Company's issuer default debt rating of Caa1 and increased our rating outlook from stable to positive and S&P reaffirmed the Company's corporate credit rating for the Company of B-. These ratings and our current credit condition affect, among other things, our ability to access new capital. Negative changes to these ratings may result in more stringent covenants and higher interest rates under the terms of any new debt. Our credit ratings could be lowered or rating agencies could issue adverse commentaries in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. In particular, a weakening of our financial condition, including any further increase in our leverage or decrease in our profitability or cash flows, could adversely affect our ability to obtain necessary funds, could result in a credit rating downgrade or change in outlook, or could otherwise increase our cost of borrowing.
We generally fulfill our short-term cash requirements with cash generated from our operations and available borrowings. While we believe we possess sufficient liquidity to participate in a housing recovery, we are mindful of potential short-term, or seasonal, requirements for enhanced liquidity that may arise, especially as we increase our land and land development spending to grow our business. To facilitate this objective, we maintain our undrawn Secured Revolving Credit Facility at $150 million for fiscal 2015.
We have also entered into a number of stand-alone, cash secured letter of credit agreements with banks. These combined facilities will provide for letter of credit needs collateralized by either cash or assets of the Company. We currently have $38.6 million of outstanding letters of credit under these facilities, secured with cash collateral which is maintained in restricted accounts totaling $40.5 million.
In the future, we may from time to time seek to continue to retire or purchase our outstanding debt through cash repurchases or in exchange for other debt securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. In an effort to accelerate our path to profitability, we may seek to expand our business through acquisition, which may be funded through cash, additional debt or equity. In addition, any material variance from our projected operating results could require us to obtain additional equity or debt financing. There can be no assurance that we will be able to complete any of these transactions in the future on favorable terms or at all.
Stock Repurchases and Dividends Paid. The Company did not repurchase any shares in the open market during the three months ended December 31, 2014 or 2013. Any future stock repurchases, as allowed by our debt covenants, must be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors or its Finance Committee.
35

Table of Contents
The indentures under which our Senior Notes were issued contain certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on the payment of dividends. At December 31, 2014, under the most restrictive covenants of each indenture, none of our retained earnings was available for cash dividends. Hence, there were no dividends paid during the three months ended December 31, 2014 or 2013.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Commitments. At December 31, 2014, we controlled 27,908 lots. We owned 80.0%, or 22,317 lots, and 5,591 lots, or 20.0%, were under option contracts which generally require the payment of cash or the posting of a letter of credit for the right to acquire lots during a specified period of time at a certain price. We historically have attempted to control a portion of our land supply through options. As a result of the flexibility that these options provide us, upon a change in market conditions we may renegotiate the terms of the options prior to exercise or terminate the agreement. Under option contracts, purchase of the properties is contingent upon satisfaction of certain requirements by us and the sellers and our liability is generally limited to forfeiture of the non-refundable deposits and other non-refundable amounts incurred, which aggregated approximately $44.7 million at December 31, 2014. The total remaining purchase price, net of cash deposits, committed under all options was $380.7 million as of December 31, 2014.
We expect to exercise, subject to market conditions and seller satisfaction of contract terms, most of our option contracts. Various factors, some of which are beyond our control, such as market conditions, weather conditions and the timing of the completion of development activities, will have a significant impact on the timing of option exercises or whether lot options will be exercised.
We have historically funded the exercise of lot options with operating cash flows. We expect these sources to continue to be adequate to fund anticipated future option exercises. Therefore, we do not anticipate that the exercise of our lot options will have a material adverse effect on our liquidity.
We also participate in a number of joint ventures and other investments in which we have less than a controlling interest. We enter into the majority of these investments with land developers, other homebuilders and financial partners to acquire attractive land positions, to manage our risk profile and to leverage our capital base. The land positions are developed into finished lots for sale to the unconsolidated entity’s members or other third parties. We account for our interest in unconsolidated entities under the equity method.
Our unconsolidated entities periodically obtain secured acquisition and development financing. At December 31, 2014, our unconsolidated entities had borrowings outstanding totaling $10.4 million. Historically, we and our partners have provided varying levels of guarantees of debt or other obligations of our unconsolidated entities. At December 31, 2014, we have no repayment guarantees outstanding related to the debt of our unconsolidated entities. See Note 3 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further information.
We had outstanding performance bonds of approximately $219.2 million at December 31, 2014 related principally to our obligations to local governments to construct roads and other improvements in various developments.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to a number of market risks in the ordinary course of business. Our primary market risk exposure relates to fluctuations in interest rates. We do not believe that our exposure in this area is material to cash flows or earnings. As of December 31, 2014, we had variable rate debt outstanding totaling approximately $22.4 million. A one percent change in the interest rate would not be material to our financial statements. The estimated fair value of our fixed rate debt at December 31, 2014 was $1.52 billion, compared to a carrying value of $1.51 billion. In addition, the effect of a hypothetical one-percentage point decrease in our estimated discount rates would increase the estimated fair value of the fixed rate debt instruments from $1.52 billion to $1.58 billion at December 31, 2014.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act). Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2014, at a reasonable assurance level.
Attached as exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are certifications of our CEO and CFO, which are required by Rule 13a-14 of the Act. This Disclosure Controls and Procedures section includes information concerning management’s evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures referred to in those certifications and, as such, should be read in conjunction with the certifications of the CEO and CFO.
36

Table of Contents
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Litigation
As disclosed in prior SEC filings, we operated Beazer Mortgage Corporation (BMC) from 1998 through February 2008 to offer mortgage financing to buyers of our homes. BMC entered into various agreements with mortgage investors, pursuant to which BMC originated certain mortgage loans and ultimately sold these loans to investors. In general, underwriting decisions were not made by BMC but by the investors themselves or third-party service providers. From time to time we have received claims from institutions which have acquired certain of these mortgages demanding damages or indemnity arising from BMC's activities or that we repurchase such mortgages. We have been able to resolve these claims for amounts that are not material to our consolidated financial position or results of operation. We currently have no such claims outstanding. However, we cannot rule out the potential for additional mortgage loan repurchase or indemnity claims in the future from other investors, although, at this time, we do not believe that the exposure related to any such claims would be material to our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In the normal course of business, we are subject to various lawsuits. We cannot predict or determine the timing or final outcome of these lawsuits or the effect that any adverse findings or determinations in pending lawsuits may have on us. In addition, an estimate of possible loss or range of loss, if any, cannot presently be made with respect to certain of these pending matters. An unfavorable determination in any of the pending lawsuits could result in the payment by us of substantial monetary damages which may not be fully covered by insurance. Further, the legal costs associated with the lawsuits and the amount of time required to be spent by management and the Board of Directors on these matters, even if we are ultimately successful, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Other Matters
On July 1, 2009, we entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement and associated Bill of Information (the “DPA”) with the United States Attorney for the Western District of North Carolina and a separate but related agreement with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (the HUD Agreement) and the Civil Division of the United States Department of Justice. We have satisfied our obligations under the DPA and in July 2014 the United States District Court for the Western Division of North Carolina dismissed the Bill of Information. However, under these agreements, we are obligated to make payments equal to 4% of “adjusted EBITDA” as defined in the Agreements until the first to occur of (a) September 30, 2016 or (b) the date that a cumulative $48.0 million has been paid pursuant to the DPA and the HUD Agreement. As of December 31, 2014, we have paid a cumulative $22.7 million towards these obligations and an additional $2.7 million has been recorded as a liability at December 31, 2014.
We and certain of our subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various claims, complaints and other legal actions, most relating to construction defects, moisture intrusion and product liability. Certain of the liabilities resulting from these actions are covered in whole or part by insurance. In our opinion, based on our current assessment, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 6. Exhibits

31.1 | Certification pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14 promulgated under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 | Certification pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14 promulgated under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101 | The following financial statements from Beazer Homes USA, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2014, filed on January 30, 2015, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (iv) Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

37

Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: | January 30, 2015 | Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
|  | By: |  | /s/ Robert L. Salomon
|  |  | Name: | Robert L. Salomon
|  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

38