|
Fair Value Measurements - Additional Information (Detail)
|
3 Months Ended |
|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2014
|
|
| Business Combination Contingent Consideration Arrangements [Abstract] | |
| Acquisition of ownership interest in PRISM | Aug. 01, 2012 |
| Description of contingent consideration arrangements | Contingent consideration, based on management's best estimate of fair value and future performance results on the acquisition date and is to be paid in 24 months following the acquisition date. |
| Contingent consideration payment period | 24 months |
| Business acquisition contingent consideration discount rate for payments | 4.75% |
| Description of sensitivity of fair value | A 1% increase or decrease in our discount rate would not result in a material change in fair value. |
| Sensitivity change to fair value by percentage | 1.00% |
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Business Acquisition Contingent Consideration Payment Period No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Sensitivity Change To Fair Value By Percent No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Date when the acquirer obtains control of the acquiree, in CCYY-MM-DD format. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
For contingent consideration arrangements recognized in connection with a business combination, this element represents a description of such arrangements. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Interest rate used to find the present value of an amount to be paid or received in the future as an input to measure fair value. For example, but not limited to, weighted average cost of capital (WACC), cost of capital, cost of equity and cost of debt. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Description of the sensitivity of the fair value measurements to changes in unobservable inputs and the inter-relationships between those inputs as well as how those inter-relationships might magnify or mitigate the effect of changes in the unobservable inputs on the fair value measurements. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|