2.	Significant Accounting Policies

The Company reported Significant Accounting Policies in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. The following are new or revised disclosures or disclosures required on a quarterly basis.

Concentrations of Credit Risk. The Company is exposed to concentrations of credit risk, consisting principally of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash equivalents, debt securities, premiums receivable, prepaid reinsurance premiums, reinsurance receivable and reinsurance recoverable.

The Company maintains depository relationships with SunTrust Bank, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., and State Street Bank and Trust Company and invests excess cash with custodial institutions that invest primarily in money market accounts consisting of or collateralized by short-term U.S. Treasury securities and other U.S. government guaranteed securities. These accounts are held primarily by SunTrust Bank, Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., and State Street Bank and Trust Company. The Company regularly evaluates the financial strength of the institutions with which it maintains depository relationships. SunTrust Bank has the following ratings from each of the rating agencies: BBB from Standard and Poor’s Rating Services and A3 from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. has the following ratings from each of the rating agencies: AA- from Standard and Poor’s Rating Services and Aa3 from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. has the following ratings from each of the rating agencies: A+ from Standard and Poor’s Rating Services and A2 from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. State Street Bank and Trust Company has the following ratings from each of the rating agencies: AA- from Standard and Poor’s Rating Services and Aa2 from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.

Restricted cash and cash equivalents are maintained in money market accounts consisting of U.S. Treasury and government agency securities.

The following table presents the amount of cash and cash equivalents as of the periods presented (in thousands):


	Cash and cash equivalents
	As of June 30, 2013									As of December 31, 2012
Institution	Cash		Money Market Funds		Total		% by institution			Cash		Money Market Funds		Total		% by institution
U. S. Bank IT&C	$	—	$	—	$	—		0.0	%	$	—	$	40,463	$	40,463		11.6	%
SunTrust Bank		3,093		5,099		8,192		4.5	%		773		1,055		1,828		0.5	%
SunTrust Bank Escrow Services		—		69,548		69,548		38.5	%		—		300,843		300,843		86.6	%
Wells Fargo Bank N.A.		3,088		—		3,088		1.7	%		1,991		3		1,994		0.6	%
Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.		—		37,692		37,692		20.8	%		1,796		468		2,264		0.7	%
State Street Bank and Trust Company		—		61,582		61,582		34.1	%		—		—		—		—
All Other Banking Institutions		755		—		755		0.4	%		—		—		—		—

Total	$	6,936	$	173,921	$	180,857		100.0	%	$	4,560	$	342,832	$	347,392		100.0	%

The following table presents the amount of restricted cash and cash equivalents as of the periods presented (in thousands):


	Restricted cash and cash equivalents
	As of June 30, 2013									As of December 31, 2012
Institution	Funds held in Trust		State Deposits		Total		% by institution			Funds held in Trust		State Deposits		Total		% by institution
U. S. Bank IT&C	$	—	$	800	$	800		30.2	%	$	—	$	800	$	800		2.4	%
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co.		53		—		53		2.0	%		—		—		—		—
Florida Department of Financial Services		—		1,800		1,800		67.8	%		—		32,209		32,209		97.6	%

Total	$	53	$	2,600	$	2,653		100.0	%	$	—	$	33,009	$	33,009		100.0	%

Concentrations of credit risk with respect to premiums receivable are limited due to the large number of individuals comprising the Company’s customer base. However, the majority of the Company’s revenues are currently derived from products and services offered to customers in Florida, which could be adversely affected by economic downturns, an increase in competition or other environmental changes.

In order to reduce credit risk for amounts due from reinsurers, the Insurance Entities seek to do business with financially sound reinsurance companies and regularly evaluate the financial strength of all reinsurers used.

The following table presents the unsecured amounts due from the Company’s reinsurers whose aggregate balance exceeded 3% of the Company’s stockholders’ equity as of the periods presented (in thousands):

Current Ratings

As of

Reinsurer

AM Best
Company

Standard and
Poor’s Rating
Services

Moody’s
Investors
Service, Inc.

June 30,
2013

December 31,
2012

Everest Reinsurance Company

A+

83,281

44,392

Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund

n/a

—

31,970

Odyssey Reinsurance Company

A-

159,643

192,096

Total (1)

242,924

268,458

(1)	Amounts represent prepaid reinsurance premiums, reinsurance receivables, and net recoverables for paid and unpaid losses, including incurred but not reported reserves, loss adjustment expenses, and offsetting reinsurance payables.

n/a—No rating available

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) updated its guidance to the Comprehensive Income Topic 220 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and in February 2013, the FASB further amended such topic. This February 2013 guidance requires disclosure about amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement of operations or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income, but only if the amount reclassified is required to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures that provide additional detail about those amounts. This guidance is to be applied prospectively to interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2013. The adoption of this guidance will result in additional disclosure but did not impact the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position. The updated guidance provided by the FASB in June 2011 increases the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income by eliminating the option of presenting components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The guidance requires that total comprehensive income (including both the net income components and other comprehensive income components) be reported in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income (the approach currently used in the Company’s financial statements), or two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance is to be applied retrospectively to fiscal years (and interim periods within those years) beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2012. The adoption did not have an impact on the presentation of the Company’s financial statements and notes herein, as the Company has presented amounts of other comprehensive income consistent with this updated guidance.

In May 2011, the FASB updated its guidance related to the Fair Value Measurement, Topic 820 of the ASC, to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements with International Financial Reporting Standards. The amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements under GAAP, to clarify the intent of application of existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements, and to change particular principles or requirements for measuring and disclosing fair value measurements. The amendments are to be applied prospectively to interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2012. The adoption of this guidance resulted in additional disclosure but did not impact the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

In September 2010, the FASB issued guidance related to accounting for costs associated with acquiring or renewing insurance contracts. This guidance defines allowable deferred policy acquisition costs as costs incurred by insurance entities for the successful acquisition of new and renewal contracts. Such costs result directly from and are essential to the contract transaction(s) and would not have been incurred by the insurance entity had the contract(s) not occurred. This guidance is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this guidance prospectively effective January 1, 2012. Under the new guidance, the Company’s net deferred policy acquisition costs were reduced from $13.0 million to $11.4 million, a difference of 13% at December 31, 2011. The resulting $1.6 million difference was charged directly to earnings during the three months ended March 31, 2012. This charge represents a charge-off of capitalized costs existing at December 31, 2011, which would have been amortized to earnings within a twelve-month period under the old guidance.