10-K 1 hov20131015_10k.htm FORM 10-K

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended OCTOBER 31, 2013

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 1-8551

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware | 22-1851059
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
110 West Front Street, P.O. Box 500, Red Bank, N.J. | 07701
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code)
732-747-7800
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share | New York Stock Exchange
7.25% Tangible Equity Units | New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights | New York Stock Exchange
Depositary Shares, each representing 1/1,000th of a share of 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock | NASDAQ Global Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Class B Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate “website”, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a nonaccelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer ☐ Accelerated Filer ☒ Nonaccelerated Filer ☐ Smaller Reporting Company ☐

(Do Not Check if a smaller reporting Company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the voting and nonvoting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity as of April 30, 2013 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $614,817,623.

As of the close of business on December 16, 2013, there were outstanding 124,546,460 shares of the Registrant’s Class A Common Stock and 14,654,867 shares of its Class B Common Stock.

1

HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES, INC.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Part III — Those portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with registrant’s annual meeting of stockholders to be held on March 11, 2014, which are responsive to those parts of Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 as identified herein.

2

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item |  | Page
| PART I | 4
1 | Business | 4
1A | Risk Factors | 11
1B | Unresolved Staff Comments | 20
2 | Properties | 20
3 | Legal Proceedings | 21
4 | Mine Safety Disclosures | 21
| Executive Officers of the Registrant | 22
| PART II | 22
5 | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 22
6 | Selected Financial Data | 22
7 | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 24
7A | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 52
8 | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 52
9 | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 52
9A | Controls and Procedures | 52
9B | Other Information | 55
| PART III | 55
10 | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | 55
11 | Executive Compensation | 56
12 | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 56
13 | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence | 56
14 | Principal Accountant Fees and Services | 56
| PART IV | 57
15 | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules | 57
| Signatures | 62

3

Part I

ITEM 1

BUSINESS

Business Overview

We design, construct, market, and sell single-family detached homes, attached townhomes and condominiums, urban infill, and active adult homes in planned residential developments and are one of the nation’s largest builders of residential homes. Founded in 1959 by Kevork Hovnanian, Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”) was incorporated in New Jersey in 1967 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1983. Since the incorporation of our predecessor company and including unconsolidated joint ventures, we have delivered in excess of 306,000 homes, including 5,930 homes in fiscal 2013. The Company consists of two distinct operations: homebuilding and financial services. Our homebuilding operations consist of six segments: Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Southeast, Southwest, and West. Our financial services operations provide mortgage loans and title services to the customers of our homebuilding operations.

We are currently, excluding unconsolidated joint ventures, offering homes for sale in 192 communities in 34 markets in 16 states throughout the United States. We market and build homes for first-time buyers, first-time and second-time move-up buyers, luxury buyers, active adult buyers, and empty nesters. We offer a variety of home styles at base prices ranging from $68,652 (low-income housing) to $1,524,990 with an average sales price, including options, of $339,000 nationwide in fiscal 2013.

Our operations span all significant aspects of the home-buying process – from design, construction, and sale, to mortgage origination and title services.

The following is a summary of our growth history:

1959 - Founded by Kevork Hovnanian as a New Jersey homebuilder.

1983 - Completed initial public offering.

1986 - Entered the North Carolina market through the investment in New Fortis Homes.

1992 - Entered the greater Washington, D.C. market.

1994 - Entered the Coastal Southern California market.

1998 - Expanded in the greater Washington, D.C. market through the acquisition of P.C. Homes.

1999 - Entered the Dallas, Texas market through our acquisition of Goodman Homes. Further diversified and strengthened our position as New Jersey’s largest homebuilder through the acquisition of Matzel & Mumford.

2001 - Continued expansion in the greater Washington D.C. and North Carolina markets through the acquisition of Washington Homes. This acquisition further strengthened our operations in each of these markets.

2002 - Entered the Central Valley market in Northern California and Inland Empire region of Southern California through the acquisition of Forecast Homes.

2003 - Expanded operations in Texas and entered the Houston market through the acquisition of Parkside Homes and Brighton Homes. Entered the greater Ohio market through our acquisition of Summit Homes and entered the greater metro Phoenix market through our acquisition of Great Western Homes.

2004 - Entered the greater Tampa, Florida market through the acquisition of Windward Homes and started operations in the Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota market.

2005 - Entered the Orlando, Florida market through our acquisition of Cambridge Homes and entered the greater Chicago, Illinois market and expanded our position in Florida and Minnesota through the acquisition of the operations of Town & Country Homes, which occurred concurrently with our entering into a joint venture with affiliates of Blackstone Real Estate Advisors to own and develop Town & Country Homes’ existing residential communities. We also entered the Fort Myers market through the acquisition of First Home Builders of Florida, and the Cleveland, Ohio market through the acquisition of Oster Homes.

4

2006 - Entered the coastal markets of South Carolina and Georgia through the acquisition of Craftbuilt Homes.

Geographic Breakdown of Markets by Segment

Hovnanian markets and builds homes that are constructed in 21 of the nation’s top 50 housing markets. We segregate our homebuilding operations geographically into the following six segments:

Northeast: New Jersey and Pennsylvania

Mid-Atlantic: Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Washington, D.C., and West Virginia

Midwest: Illinois, Minnesota, and Ohio

Southeast: Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina

Southwest: Arizona and Texas

West: California

For financial information about our segments, see Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Employees

We employed approximately 1,749 full-time employees (whom we refer to as associates) as of October 31, 2013.

Corporate Offices and Available Information

Our corporate offices are located at 110 West Front Street, P.O. Box 500, Red Bank, New Jersey 07701, our telephone number is 732-747-7800, and our Internet web site address is www.khov.com. Information available on or through our web site is not a part of this Form 10-K. We make available through our web site our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(d) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Copies of the Company’s Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports are available free of charge upon request. Any materials we file with the SEC may be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C., 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy, and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

Business Strategies

Although new home demand remains at historically low levels, during fiscal 2013 the overall homebuilding market improved. Improved conditions in our markets resulted in our higher revenues and gross margins, increased contracts and deliveries and profitability for the first time since fiscal 2006. From 2006 to 2012, the homebuilding industry had been in a prolonged downturn. During that time, our primary focus, while market conditions were extremely weak, had been to strengthen our financial condition by reducing inventories of homes and land, controlling and reducing construction and overhead costs, maximizing cash flows, reducing outstanding debt, and maintaining strong liquidity. In 2009, we began to see opportunities to purchase land at prices and terms that made economic sense in light of our sales prices and sales paces. As a result, since early 2009, we have been more active in purchasing or putting under option new properties that meet or exceed our internal rate of return investment requirements. Deliveries from these newly acquired communities helped us achieve profitability in fiscal 2013, and in order to continue to increase profitability in the future, we will need to continue purchasing new land that will generate good investment returns and drive greater operating efficiencies, as well as control expenses commensurate with our level of deliveries.

In addition to our current focus on maintaining strong liquidity and evaluating new investment opportunities, we intend to continue to focus on our historic key business strategies as enumerated below. We believe that these strategies separate us from our competitors in the residential homebuilding industry and the adoption, implementation, and adherence to these principles will continue to benefit our business.

5

Our goal is to become a significant builder in each of the selected markets in which we operate, which will enable us to achieve powers and economies of scale and differentiate ourselves from most of our competitors.

We offer a broad product array to provide housing to a wide range of customers. Our customers consist of first-time buyers, first-time and second-time move-up buyers, luxury buyers, active adult buyers, and empty nesters. Our diverse product array includes single-family detached homes, attached townhomes and condominiums, urban infill, and active adult homes.

We are committed to customer satisfaction and quality in the homes that we build. We recognize that our future success rests in the ability to deliver quality homes to satisfied customers. We seek to expand our commitment to customer service through a variety of quality initiatives. In addition, our focus remains on attracting and developing quality associates. We use several leadership development and mentoring programs to identify key individuals and prepare them for positions of greater responsibility within our Company.

We focus on achieving high return on invested capital. Each new community is evaluated based on its ability to meet or exceed internal rate of return requirements. Our belief is that the best way to create lasting value for our shareholders is through a strong focus on return on invested capital.

We prefer to use a risk-averse land strategy. We attempt to acquire land with a minimum cash investment and negotiate takedown options, thereby limiting the financial exposure to the amounts invested in property and predevelopment costs. This approach significantly reduces our risk and generally allows us to obtain necessary development approvals before acquisition of the land.

We enter into homebuilding and land development joint ventures from time to time as a means of controlling lot positions, expanding our market opportunities, establishing strategic alliances, reducing our risk profile, leveraging our capital base, and enhancing our returns on capital. Our homebuilding joint ventures are generally entered into with third-party investors to develop land and construct homes that are sold directly to home buyers. Our land development joint ventures include those with developers and other homebuilders, as well as financial investors to develop finished lots for sale to the joint venture’s members or other third parties.

We manage our financial services operations to better serve all of our home buyers. Our current mortgage financing and title service operations enhance our contact with customers and allow us to coordinate the home-buying experience from beginning to end.

Operating Policies and Procedures

We attempt to reduce the effect of certain risks inherent in the housing industry through the following policies and procedures:

Training - Our training is designed to provide our associates with the knowledge, attitudes, skills, and habits necessary to succeed in their jobs. Our training department regularly conducts online or webinar training in sales, construction, administration, and managerial skills.

Land Acquisition, Planning, and Development - Before entering into a contract to acquire land, we complete extensive comparative studies and analyses which assist us in evaluating the economic feasibility of such land acquisition. We generally follow a policy of acquiring options to purchase land for future community developments.

| ● | Where possible, we acquire land for future development through the use of land options, which need not be exercised before the completion of the regulatory approval process. We attempt to structure these options with flexible takedown schedules rather than with an obligation to take down the entire parcel upon receiving regulatory approval. If we are unable to negotiate flexible takedown schedules, we will buy parcels in a single bulk purchase. Additionally, we purchase improved lots in certain markets by acquiring a small number of improved lots with an option on additional lots. This allows us to minimize the economic costs and risks of carrying a large land inventory, while maintaining our ability to commence new developments during favorable market periods.

| ● | Our option and purchase agreements are typically subject to numerous conditions, including, but not limited to, our ability to obtain necessary governmental approvals for the proposed community. Generally, the deposit on the agreement will be returned to us if all approvals are not obtained, although predevelopment costs may not be recoverable. By paying an additional nonrefundable deposit, we have the right to extend a significant number of our options for varying periods of time. In most instances, we have the right to cancel any of our land option agreements by forfeiture of our deposit on the agreement. In fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, rather than purchase additional lots in underperforming communities, we took advantage of this right and walked away from 1,611 lots, 2,134 lots, and 6,983 lots, respectively, out of 17,134 total lots, 13,552 total lots, and 16,896 total lots, respectively, under option, resulting in pretax charges of $2.6 million, $2.7 million, and $24.3 million, respectively.

6

Design - Our residential communities are generally located in suburban areas easily accessible through public and personal transportation. Our communities are designed as neighborhoods that fit existing land characteristics. We strive to create diversity within the overall planned community by offering a mix of homes with differing architecture, textures, and colors. Recreational amenities, such as swimming pools, tennis courts, clubhouses, open areas, and tot lots, are frequently included.

Construction - We design and supervise the development and building of our communities. Our homes are constructed according to standardized prototypes, which are designed and engineered to provide innovative product design while attempting to minimize costs of construction. We generally employ subcontractors for the installation of site improvements and construction of homes. Agreements with subcontractors are generally short term and provide for a fixed price for labor and materials. We rigorously control costs through the use of computerized monitoring systems.

Because of the risks involved in speculative building, our general policy is to construct an attached condominium or townhouse building only after signing contracts for the sale of at least 50% of the homes in that building. A majority of our single family detached homes are constructed after the signing of a sales contract and mortgage approval has been obtained. This limits the buildup of inventory of unsold homes and the costs of maintaining and carrying that inventory.

Materials and Subcontractors - We attempt to maintain efficient operations by utilizing standardized materials available from a variety of sources. In addition, we generally contract with subcontractors to construct our homes. We have reduced construction and administrative costs by consolidating the number of vendors serving certain markets and by executing national purchasing contracts with select vendors. In recent years, we have experienced no significant construction delays due to shortage of materials or labor; however, we cannot predict the extent to which shortages in necessary materials or labor may occur in the future.

Marketing and Sales - Our residential communities are sold principally through on-site sales offices. In order to respond to our customers’ needs and trends in housing design, we rely upon our internal market research group to analyze information gathered from, among other sources, buyer profiles, and exit interviews at model sites, focus groups, and demographic databases. We make use of newspaper, radio, television, Internet, magazine, our web site, billboard, video and direct mail advertising, special and promotional events, illustrated brochures, and full-sized and scale model homes in our comprehensive marketing program. In addition, we have home design galleries in our Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, North Carolina, and Virginia markets, which offer a wide range of customer options to satisfy individual customer tastes.

Customer Service and Quality Control - In many of our markets, associates are responsible for customer service and preclosing quality control inspections as well as responding to postclosing customer needs. Prior to closing, each home is inspected and any necessary completion work is undertaken by us. Our homes are enrolled in a standard limited warranty program which, in general, provides a homebuyer with a one-year warranty for the home’s materials and workmanship, a two-year warranty for the home’s heating, cooling, ventilating, electrical, and plumbing systems, and a 10-year warranty for major structural defects. All of the warranties contain standard exceptions, including, but not limited to, damage caused by the customer.

Customer Financing - We sell our homes to customers who generally finance their purchases through mortgages. Our financial services segment provides our customers with competitive financing and coordinates and expedites the loan origination transaction through the steps of loan application, loan approval, and closing and title services. We originate loans in Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. We believe that our ability to offer financing to customers on competitive terms as a part of the sales process is an important factor in completing sales.

During the year ended October 31, 2013, for the markets in which our mortgage subsidiaries originated loans, 14.6% of our home buyers paid in cash and 71.5% of our noncash home buyers obtained mortgages from our mortgage banking subsidiary. The loans we originated in fiscal 2013 were 32.7% Federal Housing Administration/Veterans Affairs (“FHA/VA”), 65.7% prime, and 1.6% United States Department of Agriculture.

We customarily sell virtually all of the loans and loan-servicing rights that we originate within a short period of time. Loans are sold either individually or against forward commitments to institutional investors, including banks, mortgage banking firms, and savings and loan associations.

7

Residential Development Activities

Our residential development activities include site planning and engineering, obtaining environmental and other regulatory approvals and constructing roads, sewer, water, and drainage facilities, recreational facilities, and other amenities and marketing and selling homes. These activities are performed by our associates, together with independent architects, consultants, and contractors. Our associates also carry out long-term planning of communities. A residential development generally includes single-family detached homes and/or a number of residential buildings containing from two to 24 individual homes per building, together with amenities, such as club houses, swimming pools, tennis courts, tot lots, and open areas.

Current base prices for our homes in contract backlog at October 31, 2013, range from $68,652 (low-income housing) to $1,040,000 in the Northeast, from $159,900 to $1,524,990 in the Mid-Atlantic, from $99,490 to $701,808 in the Midwest, from $173,490 to $566,252 in the Southeast, from $90,450 to $878,990 in the Southwest, and from $142,760 to $1,130,000 in the West. Closings generally occur and are typically reflected in revenues within 12 months of when sales contracts are signed.

Information on homes delivered by segment for the year ended October 31, 2013, is set forth below:

(Housing revenue in thousands) |  | Housing Revenues |  |  | Homes Delivered |  |  | Average Price |
Northeast |  |  | $279,695 |  |  |  | 617 |  |  |  | $453,314 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 288,323 |  |  |  | 623 |  |  |  | 462,798 |
Midwest |  |  | 162,758 |  |  |  | 657 |  |  |  | 247,730 |
Southeast |  |  | 146,264 |  |  |  | 535 |  |  |  | 273,391 |
Southwest |  |  | 684,258 |  |  |  | 2,331 |  |  |  | 293,547 |
West |  |  | 223,029 |  |  |  | 503 |  |  |  | 443,398 |
Consolidated total |  |  | $1,784,327 |  |  |  | 5,266 |  |  |  | $338,839 |
Unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 306,174 |  |  |  | 664 |  |  |  | 461,105 |
Total including unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | $2,090,501 |  |  |  | 5,930 |  |  |  | $352,530 |

The value of our net sales contracts, excluding unconsolidated joint ventures, increased to $1.9 billion from $1.6 billion for the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The number of homes contracted increased to 5,544 in 2013 from 5,137 in 2012. The increase in the number of homes contracted occurred along with an increase in the number of open-for-sale communities from 172 to 192. We contracted an average of 30.7 homes per average active selling community in 2013 compared to 28.1 homes per active selling community in 2012, demonstrating an increase in sales pace as the homebuilding market has improved.

Information on the value of net sales contracts by segment for the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, is set forth below.

(Value of net sales contracts in thousands) |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | Percentage of Change |
Northeast |  |  | $269,284 |  |  |  | $225,168 |  |  |  | 19.6 | %
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 310,718 |  |  |  | 250,350 |  |  |  | 24.1 | %
Midwest |  |  | 217,759 |  |  |  | 157,385 |  |  |  | 38.4 | %
Southeast |  |  | 182,225 |  |  |  | 145,963 |  |  |  | 24.8 | %
Southwest |  |  | 739,784 |  |  |  | 590,208 |  |  |  | 25.3 | %
West |  |  | 194,678 |  |  |  | 228,624 |  |  |  | (14.8 | )%
Consolidated total |  |  | $1,914,448 |  |  |  | $1,597,698 |  |  |  | 19.8 | %
Unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 282,205 |  |  |  | 318,409 |  |  |  | (11.4 | )%
Total including unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | $2,196,653 |  |  |  | $1,916,107 |  |  |  | 14.6 | %

The following table summarizes our active selling communities under development as of October 31, 2013. The contracted not delivered and remaining homes available in our active selling communities are included in the consolidated total homesites under the total residential real estate chart in Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

8

Active Selling Communities

|  | Communities |  |  | Approved Homes |  |  | Homes Delivered |  |  | Contracted Not Delivered(1) |  |  | Remaining Homes Available(2) |
Northeast |  |  | 12 |  |  |  | 3,181 |  |  |  | 2,039 |  |  |  | 220 |  |  |  | 922 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 29 |  |  |  | 4,393 |  |  |  | 1,748 |  |  |  | 271 |  |  |  | 2,374 |
Midwest |  |  | 27 |  |  |  | 4,092 |  |  |  | 1,009 |  |  |  | 605 |  |  |  | 2,478 |
Southeast |  |  | 24 |  |  |  | 2,229 |  |  |  | 972 |  |  |  | 308 |  |  |  | 949 |
Southwest |  |  | 88 |  |  |  | 11,484 |  |  |  | 6,539 |  |  |  | 677 |  |  |  | 4,268 |
West |  |  | 12 |  |  |  | 2,371 |  |  |  | 961 |  |  |  | 86 |  |  |  | 1,324 |
Total |  |  | 192 |  |  |  | 27,750 |  |  |  | 13,268 |  |  |  | 2,167 |  |  |  | 12,315 |

(1) | Includes 274 home sites under option.

(2) | Of the total remaining homes available, 694 were under construction or completed (including 61 models and sales offices), and 6,490 were under option.

Backlog

At October 31, 2013 and 2012, including unconsolidated joint ventures, we had a backlog of signed contracts for 2,392 homes and 2,145 homes, respectively, with sales values aggregating $848.4 million and $742.2 million, respectively. The majority of our backlog at October 31, 2013, is expected to be completed and closed within the next 12 months. At November 30, 2013 and 2012, our backlog of signed contracts, including unconsolidated joint ventures, was 2,464 homes and 2,138 homes, respectively, with sales values aggregating $892.8 million and $745.8 million, respectively. For information on our backlog excluding unconsolidated joint ventures, see the table on page 42 under Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations -Homebuilding.”

Sales of our homes typically are made pursuant to a standard sales contract that provides the customer with a statutorily mandated right of rescission for a period ranging up to 15 days after execution. This contract requires a nominal customer deposit at the time of signing. In addition, in the Northeast, and some sections of the Mid-Atlantic and Midwest, we typically obtain an additional 5% to 10% down payment due within 30 to 60 days after signing. The contract may include a financing contingency, which permits customers to cancel their obligation in the event mortgage financing at prevailing interest rates (including financing arranged or provided by us) is unobtainable within the period specified in the contract. This contingency period typically is four to eight weeks following the date of execution of the contract. When housing values decline in certain markets, some customers cancel their contracts and forfeit their deposits. Cancellation rates are discussed further in Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Sales contracts are included in backlog once the sales contract is signed by the customer, which in some cases includes contracts that are in the rescission or cancellation periods. However, revenues from sales of homes are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations, when title to the home is conveyed to the buyer, adequate initial and continuing investments have been received, and there is no continued involvement.

9

Residential Land Inventory in Planning

It is our objective to control a supply of land, primarily through options, whenever possible, consistent with anticipated homebuilding requirements in each of our housing markets. Controlled land (land owned and under option) as of October 31, 2013, exclusive of communities under development described above under “Active Selling Communities” and excluding unconsolidated joint ventures, is summarized in the following table. The proposed developable home sites in communities in planning are included in the 32,097 consolidated total home sites under the total residential real estate table in Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” on page 36.

Communities in Planning

(Dollars in thousands) |  | Number of Proposed Communities |  |  | Proposed Developable Home Sites |  |  | Total Land Option Price |  |  | Book Value |
Northeast: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Under option(1) |  |  | 22 |  |  |  | 2,486 |  |  |  | $204,117 |  |  |  | $11,720 |
Owned |  |  | 14 |  |  |  | 1,140 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 108,120 |
Total |  |  | 36 |  |  |  | 3,626 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $119,840 |
Mid-Atlantic: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Under option(1) |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | 1,212 |  |  |  | $135,258 |  |  |  | $2,596 |
Owned |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 1,741 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29,412 |
Total |  |  | 28 |  |  |  | 2,953 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $32,008 |
Midwest: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Under option(1) |  |  | 22 |  |  |  | 1,241 |  |  |  | $50,081 |  |  |  | $2,722 |
Owned |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 468 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6,078 |
Total |  |  | 33 |  |  |  | 1,709 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $8,800 |
Southeast: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Under option(1) |  |  | 22 |  |  |  | 2,010 |  |  |  | $92,020 |  |  |  | $5,381 |
Owned |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 568 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5,484 |
Total |  |  | 37 |  |  |  | 2,578 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $10,865 |
Southwest: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Under option(1) |  |  | 31 |  |  |  | 1,746 |  |  |  | $126,818 |  |  |  | $11,538 |
Owned |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 305 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14,899 |
Total |  |  | 36 |  |  |  | 2,051 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $26,437 |
West: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Under option(1) |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Owned |  |  | 25 |  |  |  | 4,634 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $27,202 |
Total |  |  | 25 |  |  |  | 4,634 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $27,202 |
Totals: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Under option(1) |  |  | 110 |  |  |  | 8,695 |  |  |  | $608,294 |  |  |  | $33,957 |
Owned |  |  | 85 |  |  |  | 8,856 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 191,195 |
Combined total |  |  | 195 |  |  |  | 17,551 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $225,152 |

(1) | Properties under option also include costs incurred on properties not under option but which are under evaluation. For properties under option, as of October 31, 2013, option fees and deposits aggregated approximately $25.8 million. As of October 31, 2013, we spent an additional $15.2 million in nonrefundable predevelopment costs on such properties.

We either option or acquire improved or unimproved home sites from land developers or other sellers. Under a typical agreement with the land developer, we purchase a minimal number of home sites. The balance of the home sites to be purchased is covered under an option agreement or a nonrecourse purchase agreement. During the declining homebuilding market, we decided to mothball (or stop development on) certain communities where we determined that current market conditions did not justify further investment at that time. When we decide to mothball a community, the inventory is reclassified on our Consolidated Balance Sheet from Sold and unsold homes and lots under development to Land and land options held for future development or sale. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on mothballed communities. For additional financial information regarding our homebuilding segments, see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

10

Raw Materials

The homebuilding industry has from time to time experienced raw material and labor shortages. In particular, shortages and fluctuations in the price of lumber or in other important raw materials could result in delays in the start or completion of or increase the cost of developing one or more of our residential communities. We attempt to maintain efficient operations by utilizing standardized materials available from a variety of sources. In addition, we generally contract with subcontractors to construct our homes. We have reduced construction and administrative costs by consolidating the number of vendors serving certain markets and by executing national purchasing contracts with select vendors.

Seasonality

Our business is seasonal in nature and, historically, weather-related problems, typically in the fall, late winter and early spring, can delay starts or closings and increase costs.

Competition

Our homebuilding operations are highly competitive. We are among the top 10 homebuilders in the United States in both homebuilding revenues and home deliveries. We compete with numerous real estate developers in each of the geographic areas in which we operate. Our competition ranges from small local builders to larger regional builders to publicly owned builders and developers, some of which have greater sales and financial resources than we do. Previously owned homes and the availability of rental housing provide additional competition. We compete primarily on the basis of reputation, price, location, design, quality, service, and amenities.

Regulation and Environmental Matters

We are subject to various local, state, and federal statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations concerning zoning, building design, construction, and similar matters, including local regulations which impose restrictive zoning and density requirements in order to limit the number of homes that can eventually be built within the boundaries of a particular locality. In addition, we are subject to registration and filing requirements in connection with the construction, advertisement, and sale of our communities in certain states and localities in which we operate even if all necessary government approvals have been obtained. We may also be subject to periodic delays or may be precluded entirely from developing communities due to building moratoriums that could be implemented in the future in the states in which we operate. Generally, such moratoriums relate to insufficient water or sewerage facilities or inadequate road capacity.

In addition, some state and local governments in markets where we operate have approved, and others may approve, slow-growth, or no-growth initiatives that could negatively affect the availability of land and building opportunities within those areas. Approval of these initiatives could adversely affect our ability to build and sell homes in the affected markets and/or could require the satisfaction of additional administrative and regulatory requirements, which could result in slowing the progress or increasing the costs of our homebuilding operations in these markets. Any such delays or costs could have a negative effect on our future revenues and earnings.

We are also subject to a variety of local, state, federal, and foreign laws and regulations concerning protection of health and the environment (“environmental laws”). The particular environmental laws which apply to any given community vary greatly according to the community site, the site’s environmental conditions, and the present and former uses of the site. These environmental laws may result in delays; may cause us to incur substantial compliance, remediation, and/or other costs; and prohibit or severely restrict development and homebuilding activity. See Item 3 “Legal Proceedings” and Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Despite our past ability to obtain necessary permits and approvals for our communities, we anticipate that increasingly stringent requirements will be imposed on developers and homebuilders in the future. Although we cannot predict the effect of these requirements, they could result in time-consuming and expensive compliance programs and in substantial expenditures, which could cause delays and increase our cost of operations. In addition our ability to obtain or renew permits or approvals and the continued effectiveness of permits already granted or approvals already obtained is dependent upon many factors, some of which are beyond our control, such as changes in policies, rules, and regulations and their interpretation and application.

ITEM 1A

RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the following risks in addition to the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto.

11

The homebuilding industry is significantly affected by changes in general and local economic conditions, real estate markets, and weather and other environmental conditions, which could affect our ability to build homes at prices our customers are willing or able to pay, could reduce profits that may not be recaptured, could result in cancellation of sales contracts, and could affect our liquidity.

The homebuilding industry is cyclical, has from time to time experienced significant difficulties, and is significantly affected by changes in general and local economic conditions such as:

• Employment levels and job growth;

• Availability of financing for home buyers;

• Interest rates;

• Foreclosure rates;

• Inflation;

• Adverse changes in tax laws;

• Consumer confidence;

• Housing demand;

• Population growth; and

• Availability of water supply in locations in which we operate.

Turmoil in the financial markets could affect our liquidity. In addition, our cash balances are primarily invested in short-term government-backed instruments. The remaining cash balances are held at numerous financial institutions and may, at times, exceed insurable amounts. We seek to mitigate this risk by depositing our cash in major financial institutions and diversifying our investments. In addition, our homebuilding operations often require us to obtain letters of credit. We recently entered into a new $75 million unsecured revolving credit facility under which letters of credit may be issued. We also have certain stand-alone letter of credit facilities and agreements pursuant to which letters of credit are issued. However, we may need additional letters of credit above the amounts provided under these facilities and agreements. If we are unable to obtain such additional letters of credit as needed to operate our business, we may be adversely affected.

Weather conditions and man-made or natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, floods, droughts, fires, and other environmental conditions, can harm the local homebuilding business. For example, our business in Florida was adversely affected in late 2005 and into 2006 due to the effects of Hurricane Wilma on materials and labor availability and pricing. Conversely, Hurricane Ike, which hit Houston in September 2008, did not have an effect on materials and labor availability or pricing, but did affect the volume of home sales in subsequent weeks. In August 2011 and October 2012, Hurricane Irene and Hurricane Sandy, respectively, caused widespread flooding and disruptions on the Atlantic seaboard, which impacted our sales and construction activity in affected markets during those months.

The difficulties described above could cause us to take longer and incur more costs to build our homes. We may not be able to recapture increased costs by raising prices in many cases because we fix our prices up to 12 months in advance of delivery by signing home sales contracts. In addition, some home buyers may cancel or not honor their home sales contracts altogether.

The homebuilding industry has experienced a significant and sustained downturn which has, and could continue to, materially and adversely affect our business, liquidity, and results of operations.

The homebuilding industry experienced a significant and sustained downturn over the past several years. An industry-wide softening of demand for new homes resulted from a lack of consumer confidence, decreased availability of mortgage financing, and large supplies of resale and new home inventories, among other factors. In addition, an oversupply of alternatives to new homes, such as rental properties, resale homes, and foreclosures, depressed prices, and reduced margins for the sale of new homes. Industry conditions had a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations in fiscal years 2007 through 2011 and may continue to materially adversely affect our business and results of operations in future years. Further, we substantially increased our inventory through fiscal 2006, which required significant cash outlays and which increased our price and margin exposure as we worked through this inventory.

12

General economic conditions in the United States remain weak. Several challenges, such as persistently high unemployment levels, national and global economic weakness and uncertainty, the restrictive mortgage lending environment, and the potential for more foreclosures, continue to threaten the recovery in the housing market. In addition, both national new home sales and our home sales remain below historical levels. Until there is a more robust U.S. economic recovery, we expect national demand for new homes to remain at historically low levels, with uneven improvement across our operating markets. Looking forward, although we have begun to see improvements, given instability in the housing market, it may continue to be difficult to generate positive cash flow especially as we invest in land to fund future homebuilding. In addition, while our sales have increased, we saw lower sales in July through September 2013 in part due to increasing interest rates. Market volatility has been unprecedented and extraordinary in the last several years, and the resulting economic turmoil may continue to exacerbate industry conditions or have other unforeseen consequences, leading to uncertainty about future conditions in the homebuilding industry. Continuation or worsening of the downturn or general economic conditions would continue to have a material adverse effect on our business, liquidity, and results of operations.

In addition, an increase in the default rate on the mortgages we originate may adversely affect our ability to sell mortgages or the pricing we receive upon the sale of mortgages. Although substantially all of the mortgage loans we originate are sold in the secondary mortgage market on a servicing released, non-recourse basis, we remain liable for certain limited representations, such as fraud, and warranties related to loan sales. As default rates rise, this may increase our potential exposure regarding mortgage loan sales because investors may seek to have us buy back or make whole investors for mortgages we previously sold. To date, we have not made significant payments related to our mortgage loans, but because of the uncertainties inherent to these matters, actual future payments could differ significantly from our currently estimated amounts.

During the industry downturn, the housing market benefited from a number of government programs, including:

| • | Tax credits for home buyers provided by the federal government and certain state governments, including California; and

| • | Support of the mortgage market, including through purchases of mortgage-backed securities by The Federal Reserve Bank and the underwriting of a substantial amount of new mortgages by the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) and other governmental agencies.

These programs are expected to wind down over time; for example, the California tax credit ended in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and the federal tax credit expired in April 2010. In addition, in fiscal 2010, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) tightened FHA underwriting standards. The maximum size of mortgage loans that are treated as conforming by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was reduced on October 1, 2011, which could further weaken home sales in general as mortgages may become more expensive and, if conforming loan limits are further reduced (as currently expected to occur on January 1, 2014), it could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Housing markets may further decline as these programs are modified or terminated.

Our leverage places burdens on our ability to comply with the terms of our indebtedness, may restrict our ability to operate, may prevent us from fulfilling our obligations, and may adversely affect our financial condition.

We have a significant amount of debt.

| • | Our debt (excluding nonrecourse secured debt and debt of our financial subsidiaries), as of October 31, 2013, including the debt of the subsidiaries that guarantee our debt, was $1,544.2 million ($1,529.4 million net of discount); and

| • | Our debt service payments for the 12-month period ended October 31, 2013, were $121.2 million, substantially all of which represented interest incurred and the remainder of which represented payments on the principal of our amortizing notes, and do not include principal and interest on nonrecourse secured debt, debt of our financial subsidiaries and fees under our letter of credit and other credit facilities and agreements.

In addition, as of October 31, 2013, we had $30.9 million in aggregate outstanding face amount of letters of credit issued under various letter of credit and other credit facilities and agreements, certain of which were collateralized by $5.2 million of cash. Our fees for these letters of credit for the year ended October 31, 2013, which are based on both the used and unused portion of the facilities and agreements, were $0.7 million. We also had substantial contractual commitments and contingent obligations, including approximately $242.0 million of performance bonds as of October 31, 2013. See Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Contractual Obligations.”

13

Our significant amount of debt could have important consequences. For example, it could:

| • | Limit our ability to obtain future financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, or other requirements;

| • | Require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of our debt and reduce our ability to use our cash flow for other purposes;

| • | Limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business;

| • | Place us at a competitive disadvantage because we have more debt than some of our competitors; and

| • | Make us more vulnerable to downturns in our business and general economic conditions.

Our ability to meet our debt service and other obligations will depend upon our future performance. We are engaged in businesses that are substantially affected by changes in economic cycles. Our revenues and earnings vary with the level of general economic activity in the markets we serve. Our businesses are also affected by customer sentiment and financial, political, business, and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. The factors that affect our ability to generate cash can also affect our ability to raise additional funds for these purposes through the sale of equity securities, the refinancing of debt, or the sale of assets. Changes in prevailing interest rates may affect our ability to meet our debt service obligations to the extent we have any floating rate indebtedness. A higher interest rate on our debt service obligations could result in lower earnings or increased losses.

Our sources of liquidity are limited and may not be sufficient to meet our needs.

We are largely dependent on our current cash balance and future cash flows from operations (which may not be positive) to enable us to service our indebtedness, to cover our operating expenses, and/or to fund our other liquidity needs. Although we generated $9.3 million of cash in operating activities in the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, for the prior two years we generated negative cash flow, and currently expect to continue to generate slightly positive or negative cash flow, after taking into account land purchases. If the homebuilding industry does not experience improved conditions over the next several years, our cash flows could be insufficient to fund our obligations and support land purchases; if we cannot buy additional land we would ultimately be unable to generate future revenues from the sale of houses. In addition, we may need to further refinance all or a portion of our debt on or before maturity, which we may not be able to do on favorable terms or at all. If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations or we are unable to refinance our indebtedness, we may be forced to reduce or delay investments and capital expenditures, sell assets, seek additional capital, or restructure our indebtedness. These alternative measures may not be successful or, if successful, made on desirable terms and may not permit us to meet our debt service obligations. We have also entered into certain cash collateralized letters of credit agreements and facilities that require us to maintain specified amounts of cash in segregated accounts as collateral to support our letters of credit issued thereunder. If our available cash and capital resources are insufficient to meet our debt service and other obligations, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. We may not be able to consummate those dispositions or the proceeds from the dispositions may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due. For additional information about capital resources and liquidity, see Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Capital Resources and Liquidity.”

Restrictive covenants in our debt instruments may restrict our and certain of our subsidiaries’ ability to operate and if our financial performance worsens, we may not be able to undertake transactions within the restrictions of our debt instruments.

The indentures governing our outstanding debt securities and our revolving credit facility impose certain restrictions on our and certain of our subsidiaries’ operations and activities. The most significant restrictions relate to debt incurrence, creating liens, sales of assets, cash distributions, including paying dividends on common and preferred stock, capital stock and debt repurchases, and investments by us and certain of our subsidiaries. Because of these restrictions, we are currently prohibited from paying dividends on our common and preferred stock and anticipate that we will remain prohibited for the foreseeable future.

The restrictions in our debt instruments could prohibit or restrict our and certain of our subsidiaries’ activities, such as undertaking capital raising or restructuring activities or entering into other transactions. In such a situation, we may be unable to amend the instrument or obtain a waiver. In addition, if we fail to make timely payments on this debt and other material indebtedness, our debt under these debt instruments could become due and payable prior to maturity. In such a situation, there can be no assurance that we would be able to obtain alternative financing. Either situation could have a material adverse effect on the solvency of the Company.

14

The terms of our debt instruments allow us to incur additional indebtedness.

Under the terms of our indebtedness under our indentures and under our revolving credit facility, we have the ability, subject to our debt covenants, to incur additional amounts of debt. The incurrence of additional indebtedness could magnify the risks described above. In addition, certain obligations, such as standby letters of credit and performance bonds issued in the ordinary course of business, including those issued under our stand-alone letter of credit agreements and facilities, are not considered indebtedness under our debt instruments (and may be secured), and therefore, are not subject to limits in our debt covenants.

We could be adversely affected by a negative change in our credit rating.

Our ability to access capital on favorable terms is a key factor in our ability to service our indebtedness to cover our operating expenses and to fund our other liquidity needs. For example, during fiscal 2011 and thereafter, credit agencies took a series of negative actions, including downgrades, with respect to their credit ratings of us and our debt. Downgrades may make it more difficult and costly for us to access capital. Therefore, any further downgrade by any of the principal credit agencies may exacerbate these difficulties. Although certain of our credit ratings have recently been upgraded, there can be no assurances that our credit ratings will not be further downgraded in the future, whether as a result of deteriorating general economic conditions, a more protracted downturn in the housing industry, failure to successfully implement our operating strategy, the adverse impact on our results of operations or liquidity position of any of the above, or otherwise.

Our business is seasonal in nature and our quarterly operating results can fluctuate.

Our quarterly operating results generally fluctuate by season. The construction of a customer’s home typically begins after signing the agreement of sale and can take 12 months or more to complete. Weather-related problems, typically in the fall, winter and early spring, can delay starts or closings and increase costs and thus reduce profitability. In addition, delays in opening communities could have an adverse effect on our sales and revenues. Due to these factors, our quarterly operating results will likely continue to fluctuate.

Our success depends on the availability of suitable undeveloped land and improved lots at acceptable prices and our having sufficient liquidity to fund such investments.

Our success in developing land and in building and selling homes depends in part upon the continued availability of suitable undeveloped land and improved lots at acceptable prices. The availability of undeveloped land and improved lots for purchase at favorable prices depends on a number of factors outside of our control, including the risk of competitive over bidding on land and lots and restrictive governmental regulation. Should suitable land opportunities become less available, the number of homes we may be able to build and sell would be reduced, which would reduce revenue and profits. In addition, our ability to make land purchases will depend upon us having sufficient liquidity to fund such purchases. We may be at a disadvantage in competing for land due to our significant debt obligations, which require substantial cash resources.

Raw material and labor shortages and price fluctuations could delay or increase the cost of home construction and adversely affect our operating results.

The homebuilding industry has from time to time experienced raw material and labor shortages. In particular, shortages and fluctuations in the price of lumber or in other important raw materials could result in delays in the start or completion of, or increase the cost of, developing one or more of our residential communities. For example, manufacturers have increased the price of drywall in 2013 by approximately 20% as compared to the prior year, and there is a potential for significant future price increases. In addition, we contract with subcontractors to construct our homes. Therefore, the timing and quality of our construction depends on the availability, skill, and cost of our subcontractors. Delays or cost increases caused by shortages and price fluctuations could harm our operating results, the impact of which may be further affected depending on our ability to raise sales prices to offset increased costs. We have experienced some labor shortages and increased labor costs in recent months.

Changes in economic and market conditions could result in the sale of homes at a loss or holding land in inventory longer than planned, the cost of which can be significant.

Land inventory risk can be substantial for homebuilders. We must continuously seek and make acquisitions of land for expansion into new markets and for replacement and expansion of land inventory within our current markets. The market value of undeveloped land, buildable lots, and housing inventories can fluctuate significantly as a result of changing economic and market conditions. In the event of significant changes in economic or market conditions, we may have to sell homes at a loss or hold land in inventory longer than planned. In the case of land options, we could choose not to exercise them, in which case we would write off the value of these options. Inventory carrying costs can be significant and can result in losses in a poorly performing project or market. The assessment of communities for indication of impairment is performed quarterly. While we consider available information to determine what we believe to be our best estimates as of the reporting period, these estimates are subject to change in future reporting periods as facts and circumstances change. See Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation - Critical Accounting Policies.” For example, while in fiscal 2013 and 2012, we did not have significant land option write-offs or impairments, during fiscal 2011, 2010, and 2009, we decided not to exercise many option contracts and walked away from land option deposits and predevelopment costs, which resulted in land option write-offs of $24.3 million, $13.2 million, and $45.4 million, respectively. Also, in fiscal 2011, 2010, and 2009, as a result of the difficult market conditions, we recorded inventory impairment losses on owned property of $77.5 million, $122.5 million, and $614.1 million, respectively. If market conditions worsen, additional inventory impairment losses and land option write-offs will likely be necessary.

15

Home prices and sales activities in the Arizona, California, New Jersey, and Texas, markets have a large impact on our results of operations because we conduct a significant portion of our business in these markets.

We presently conduct a significant portion of our business in the Arizona, California, New Jersey, and Texas, markets. Home prices and sales activities in these markets and in most of the other markets in which we operate have declined from time to time, particularly as a result of slow economic growth. Furthermore, precarious economic and budget situations at the state government level may adversely affect the market for our homes in those affected areas. If home prices and sales activity decline in one or more of the markets in which we operate, our costs may not decline at all or at the same rate and may negatively impact our results of operations.

Because almost all of our customers require mortgage financing, increases in interest rates or the decreased availability of mortgage financing could impair the affordability of our homes, lower demand for our products, limit our marketing effectiveness, and limit our ability to fully realize our backlog.

Virtually all of our customers finance their acquisitions through lenders providing mortgage financing. Increases in interest rates (or the perception that interest rates will rise, including as a result of government actions) or decreases in availability of mortgage financing could lower demand for new homes because of the increased monthly mortgage costs to potential home buyers. Even if potential customers do not need financing, changes in interest rates and mortgage availability could make it harder for them to sell their existing homes to potential buyers who need financing. This could prevent or limit our ability to attract new customers as well as our ability to fully realize our backlog because our sales contracts generally include a financing contingency. Financing contingencies permit the customer to cancel its obligation in the event mortgage financing at prevailing interest rates, including financing arranged or provided by us, is unobtainable within the period specified in the contract. This contingency period is typically four to eight weeks following the date of execution of the sales contract.

Starting in 2007, many lenders have been significantly tightening their underwriting standards, and subprime and other alternative mortgage products are no longer being made available in the marketplace. If these trends continue and mortgage loans continue to be difficult to obtain, the ability and willingness of prospective buyers to finance home purchases or to sell their existing homes will be adversely affected, which will adversely affect our operating results. In addition, we believe that the availability of mortgage financing, including Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp, and FHA/VA financing, is an important factor in marketing many of our homes. The maximum size of mortgage loans that are treated as conforming by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was reduced on October 1, 2011, which could further weaken home sales in general as mortgages may become more expensive and, if conforming loan limits are further reduced (as currently expected to occur on January 1, 2014), it could have a material adverse effect on the Company. In addition, HUD continues to tighten FHA underwriting standards. Any limitations or restrictions on the availability of those types of financing could reduce our sales.

Increases in the after-tax costs of owning a home could prevent potential customers from buying our homes and adversely affect our business or financial results.

Significant expenses of owning a home, including mortgage interest expenses and real estate taxes, generally are deductible expenses for an individual’s federal, and in some cases state, income taxes, subject to limitations under current tax law and policy. If the federal government or a state government were to change its income tax laws to eliminate or substantially limit these income tax deductions, as has been discussed from time to time, the after-tax cost of owning a new home would increase for many of our potential customers. The loss or reduction of these homeowner tax deductions, if such tax law changes were enacted without any offsetting legislation, would adversely impact demand for and sales prices of new homes, including ours. In addition, increases in property tax rates or fees on developers by local governmental authorities, as experienced in response to reduced federal and state funding or to fund local initiatives, such as funding schools or road improvements, can adversely affect the ability of potential customers to obtain financing or their desire to purchase new homes, and can have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.

16

We conduct certain of our operations through unconsolidated joint ventures with independent third parties in which we do not have a controlling interest. These investments involve risks and are highly illiquid.

We currently operate through a number of unconsolidated homebuilding and land development joint ventures with independent third parties in which we do not have a controlling interest. At October 31, 2013, we had invested an aggregate of $51.4 million in these joint ventures, including advances to these joint ventures of approximately $4.6 million. In addition, as part of our strategy, we intend to continue to evaluate additional joint venture opportunities.

These investments involve risks and are highly illiquid. There are a limited number of sources willing to provide acquisition, development, and construction financing to land development and homebuilding joint ventures, and if market conditions become more challenging, it may be difficult or impossible to obtain financing for our joint ventures on commercially reasonable terms. Over the past few years, we have been unable to obtain financing for newly created joint ventures. In addition, we lack a controlling interest in these joint ventures and, therefore, are usually unable to require that our joint ventures sell assets or return invested capital, make additional capital contributions, or take any other action without the vote of at least one of our venture partners. Therefore, absent partner agreement, we will be unable to liquidate our joint venture investments to generate cash.

Homebuilders are subject to a number of federal, local, state, and foreign laws and regulations concerning the development of land, the homebuilding, sales, and customer financing processes and the protection of the environment, which can cause us to incur delays and costs associated with compliance and which can prohibit or restrict our activity in some regions or areas.

We are subject to extensive and complex laws and regulations that affect the development of land and homebuilding, sales and customer financing processes, including zoning, density, building standards and mortgage financing. These laws and regulations often provide broad discretion to the administering governmental authorities. This can delay or increase the cost of development or homebuilding. In light of recent developments in the home building industry and the financial markets, federal, state, or local governments may seek to adopt regulations that limit or prohibit homebuilders from providing mortgage financing to their customers. If adopted, any such regulations could adversely affect future revenues and earnings. In addition, some state and local governments in markets where we operate have approved, and others may approve, slow-growth or no-growth initiatives that could negatively impact the availability of land and building opportunities within those areas. Approval of these initiatives could adversely affect our ability to build and sell homes in the affected markets and/or could require the satisfaction of additional administrative and regulatory requirements, which could result in slowing the progress or increasing the costs of our homebuilding operations in these markets. Any such delays or costs could have a negative effect on our future revenues and earnings.

We also are subject to a variety of local, state, federal, and foreign laws and regulations concerning protection of health and the environment. The particular environmental laws and regulations that apply to any given community vary greatly according to the community site, the site’s environmental conditions, and the present and former uses of the site. These environmental laws and regulations may result in delays, may cause us to incur substantial compliance, remediation, and/or other costs, and can prohibit or severely restrict development and homebuilding activity.

For example, we engaged in discussions with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) regarding alleged violations of storm water discharge requirements. In resolution of this matter, in April 2010, we agreed to the terms of a consent decree with the EPA, DOJ and the states of Virginia, Maryland, West Virginia and the District of Columbia (collectively, the “States”). The consent decree was approved by the federal district court in August 2010. Under the terms of the consent decree, we paid a fine of $1.0 million collectively to the United States and the States named above and have agreed to perform under the terms of the consent decree for a minimum of three years, which includes implementing certain operational and training measures nationwide to facilitate ongoing compliance with storm water regulations. We received in October 2012 a notice from Region III of the EPA concerning stipulated penalties, totaling approximately $120,000, based on the extent to which we reportedly did not meet certain compliance performance specified in the previously reported consent decree entered into in August 2010; we have since paid the stipulated penalties as assessed, and more recently have paid approximately $8,000 in response to an EPA demand received in June 2013 for stipulated penalties based on information about our performance under the consent decree for 2012. The consent decree was terminated by court order without objection in December 2013.

In March 2013, we received a letter from the EPA requesting information about our involvement in a housing redevelopment project in Newark, New Jersey that a Company entity undertook during the 1990s. We understand that the development is in the vicinity of a former lead smelter and that recent tests on soil samples from properties within the development conducted by the EPA show elevated levels of lead. We also understand that the smelter operated before the City of Newark acquired properties, demolished structures existing on them, and sold the properties to the Company entity in connection with the redevelopment project. We responded to the EPA’s request. In August 2013, we were notified that the EPA considers us a potentially responsible party (or “PRP”) with respect to the site, that the EPA believes the site requires cleanup, and that the EPA is proposing that we address contamination at the site. We have begun preliminary discussions with the EPA concerning a possible resolution but do not know the scope or extent of the Company’s obligations, if any, that may arise from the site and, therefore cannot provide any assurance that this matter will not have a material impact on the Company.

17

We anticipate that increasingly stringent requirements will be imposed on developers and homebuilders in the future. Although we cannot predict the effect of these requirements, they could result in time-consuming and expensive compliance programs and in substantial expenditures, which could cause delays and increase our cost of operations. In addition our ability to obtain or renew permits or approvals and the continued effectiveness of permits already granted or approvals already obtained is dependent upon many factors, some of which are beyond our control, such as changes in policies, rules, and regulations and their interpretations and application.

Several other homebuilders have received inquiries from regulatory agencies regarding the potential for homebuilders using contractors to be deemed employers of the employees of their contractors under certain circumstances. Contractors are independent of the homebuilders that contract with them under normal management practices and the terms of trade contracts and subcontracts within the industry; however, if regulatory agencies reclassify the employees of contractors as employees of homebuilders, homebuilders using contractors could be responsible for wage, hour, and other employment-related liabilities of their contractors.

Product liability litigation and warranty claims that arise in the ordinary course of business may be costly.

As a homebuilder, we are subject to construction defect and home warranty claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Such claims are common in the homebuilding industry and can be costly. For example, in the past we have received construction defect and home warranty claims associated with, and we were involved in a multidistrict litigation concerning, allegedly defective drywall manufactured in China (“Chinese Drywall”) that may have been responsible for noxious smells and accelerated corrosion of certain metals in certain homes we have constructed. We remediated certain homes in response to such claims and settled the litigation. In addition, the amount and scope of coverage offered by insurance companies is currently limited, and this coverage may be further restricted and become more costly. If we are not able to obtain adequate insurance against such claims, if the costs associated with such claims significantly exceed the amount of our insurance coverage, or if our insurers do not pay on claims under our policies (whether because of dispute, inability, or otherwise), we may experience losses that could hurt our financial results. Our financial results could also be adversely affected if we were to experience an unusually high number of claims or unusually severe claims. Our insurance companies have the right to review our claims and claims history, and do so from time to time, and could decline to pay on such claims if such reviews determine the claims did not meet the terms for coverage. Additionally, we may need to significantly increase our construction defect and home warranty reserves as a result of insurance not being available for any of the reasons discussed above, such claims or the results of our annual actuarial study.

Mortgage investors could seek to have us buy back loans or compensate them for losses incurred on mortgages we have sold based on claims that we breached our limited representations or warranties.

Our financial services segment originates mortgages, primarily for our homebuilding customers. Substantially all of the mortgage loans originated are sold within a short period of time in the secondary mortgage market on a servicing released, nonrecourse basis, although we remain liable for certain limited representations, such as fraud, and warranties related to loan sales. Accordingly, mortgage investors have in the past and could in the future seek to have us buy back loans or compensate them for losses incurred on mortgages we have sold based on claims that we breached our limited representations or warranties. We believe there continues to be an industry-wide issue with the number of purchaser claims in which purchasers purport to have found inaccuracies related to sellers’ representations and warranties in particular loan sale agreements. We have established reserves for potential losses; however, there can be no assurance that we will not have significant liabilities in respect of such claims in the future, which could exceed our reserves, or that the impact of such claims on our results of operations will not be material.

We compete on several levels with homebuilders that may have greater sales and financial resources, which could hurt future earnings.

We compete not only for home buyers but also for desirable properties, financing, raw materials, and skilled labor often within larger subdivisions designed, planned, and developed by other homebuilders. Our competitors include other local, regional, and national homebuilders, some of which have greater sales and financial resources.

The competitive conditions in the homebuilding industry together with current market conditions have, and could continue to, result in:

• difficulty in acquiring suitable land at acceptable prices;

• increased selling incentives;

• lower sales; or

• delays in construction.

Any of these problems could increase costs and/or lower profit margins.

18

We may have difficulty in obtaining the additional financing required to operate and develop our business.

Our operations require significant amounts of cash, and we may be required to seek additional capital, whether from sales of debt or equity securities or borrowing additional money, for the future growth and development of our business. The terms or availability of additional capital is uncertain. Moreover, the agreements governing our outstanding debt instruments contain provisions that restrict the debt we may incur in the future and our ability to pay dividends on equity. If we are not successful in obtaining sufficient capital, it could reduce our sales and may hinder our future growth and results of operations. In addition, pledging substantially all of our assets to support our senior secured notes may make it more difficult to raise additional financing in the future.

Our future growth may include additional acquisitions of companies that may not be successfully integrated and may not achieve expected benefits.

Acquisitions of companies have contributed to our historical growth and may again be a component of our growth strategy in the future. In the future, we may acquire businesses, some of which may be significant. As a result of acquisitions of companies, we may need to seek additional financing and integrate product lines, dispersed operations, and distinct corporate cultures. These integration efforts may not succeed or may distract our management from operating our existing business. Additionally, we may not be able to enhance our earnings as a result of acquisitions. Our failure to successfully identify and manage future acquisitions could harm our operating results.

Our controlling stockholders are able to exercise significant influence over us.

Members of the Hovnanian family, including Ara K. Hovnanian, our chairman of the board, president, and chief executive officer, have voting control, through personal holdings, the limited partnership and the limited liability company established for members of Mr. Hovnanian’s family, family trusts and shares held by the estate of our former chairman, Kevork S. Hovnanian, of Class A and Class B common stock that enables them to cast approximately 56% of the votes that may be cast by the holders of our outstanding Class A and Class B common stock combined. Their combined stock ownership enables them to exert significant control over us, including power to control the election of the Board of Directors and to approve matters presented to our stockholders. This concentration of ownership may also make some transactions, including mergers or other changes in control, more difficult or impossible without their support. Also, because of their combined voting power, circumstances may occur in which their interests could be in conflict with the interests of other stakeholders.

Our net operating loss carryforwards could be substantially limited if we experience an ownership change as defined in the Internal Revenue Code.

Based on recent impairments and our current financial performance, we generated a federal net operating loss carryforward of $1.5 billion through the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, and we may generate net operating loss carryforwards in future years.

Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) contains rules that limit the ability of a company that undergoes an ownership change, which is generally any change in ownership of more than 50% of its stock over a three-year period, to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards and certain built-in losses recognized in years after the ownership change. These rules generally operate by focusing on ownership shifts among stockholders owning directly or indirectly 5% or more of the stock of a company and any change in ownership arising from a new issuance of stock by the company.

If we undergo an ownership change for purposes of Section 382 as a result of future transactions involving our stock, including purchases or sales of stock between 5% shareholders, our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and to recognize certain built-in losses would be subject to the limitations of Section 382. Depending on the resulting limitation, a significant portion of our net operating loss carryforwards could expire before we would be able to use them. A limitation imposed under Section 382 on our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards could have a negative impact on our financial position and results of operations.

19

In August 2008, we announced that the Board of Directors adopted a shareholder rights plan (the “Rights Plan”) designed to preserve shareholder value and the value of certain tax assets primarily associated with net loss carryforwards and built-in losses under Section 382 of the Code, and on December 5, 2008, our stockholders approved the Board’s decision to adopt the Rights Plan. The Rights Plan is intended to act as a deterrent to any person or group acquiring 4.9% or more of our outstanding Class A common stock (any such person an “Acquiring Person”), without the approval of the Company’s Board of Directors. Subject to the terms, provisions and conditions of the Rights Plan, if and when they become exercisable, each right would entitle its holder to purchase from the Company one ten-thousandth of a share of the Company’s Series B Junior Preferred Stock for a purchase price of $35.00 per share (the “purchase price”). The rights will not be exercisable until the earlier of (i) 10 business days after a public announcement by us that a person or group has become an Acquiring Person and (ii) 10 business days after the commencement of a tender or exchange offer by a person or group for 4.9% of the Class A common stock (the “distribution date”). If issued, each fractional share of Series B Junior Preferred Stock would give the stockholder approximately the same dividend, voting and liquidation rights as does one share of the Company’s Class A common stock. However, prior to exercise, a right does not give its holder any rights as a stockholder of the Company, including without limitation any dividend, voting, or liquidation rights. After the distribution date, each holder of a right, other than rights beneficially owned by the Acquiring Person (which will thereupon become void), will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise of a right and payment of the purchase price, that number of shares of Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock, as the case may be, having a market value of two times the purchase price. After the distribution date, our Board of Directors may exchange the rights (other than rights owned by an Acquiring Person which will have become void), in whole or in part, at an exchange ratio of one share of common stock, or a fractional share of Series B Junior Preferred Stock (or of a share of a similar class or series of Hovnanian’s preferred stock having similar rights, preferences, and privileges) of equivalent value, per right (subject to adjustment).

In addition, on December 5, 2008, our stockholders approved an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to restrict certain transfers of our common stock in order to preserve the tax treatment of our net operating loss carryforwards and built-in losses under Section 382 of the Code. Subject to certain exceptions pertaining to pre-existing 5% stockholders and Class B stockholders, the transfer restrictions in the amended Certificate of Incorporation generally restrict any direct or indirect transfer (such as transfers of the Company’s stock that result from the transfer of interests in other entities that own the Company’s stock) if the effect would be to: (i) increase the direct or indirect ownership of the Company’s stock by any person (or public group) from less than 5% to 5% or more of the Company’s stock; (ii) increase the percentage of the Company’s stock owned directly or indirectly by a person (or public group) owning or deemed to own 5% or more of the Company’s stock; or (iii) create a new “public group” (as defined in the applicable United States Treasury regulations).

Utility shortages and outages or rate fluctuations could have an adverse effect on our operations.

In prior years, the areas in which we operate in California have experienced power shortages, including periods without electrical power, as well as significant fluctuations in utility costs. We may incur additional costs and may not be able to complete construction on a timely basis if such power shortages and outages and utility rate fluctuations continue. Furthermore, power shortages and outages and rate fluctuations may adversely affect the regional economies in which we operate, which may reduce demand for our homes. Our operations may be adversely affected if further rate fluctuations and/or power shortages and outages occur in California, the Northeast, or in our other markets.

Geopolitical risks and market disruption could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

Geopolitical events, such as the aftermath of the war with Iraq and the continuing involvement in Afghanistan, may have a substantial impact on the economy and the housing market. The terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 had an impact on our business and the occurrence of similar events in the future cannot be ruled out. The war and the continuing involvement in Afghanistan, terrorism, and related geopolitical risks have created many economic and political uncertainties, some of which may have additional material adverse effects on the U.S. economy, our customers and, in turn, our results of operations and financial condition.

ITEM 1B

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2

PROPERTIES

We own a 69,000 square-foot office complex located in the Northeast that serves as our corporate headquarters. We own 215,000 square feet of office and warehouse space throughout the Midwest. We lease approximately 488,000 square feet of space for our segments located in the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Southeast, Southwest, and West. Included in this amount is 88,000 square feet of abandoned lease space.

20

ITEM 3

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, none of which is expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations, and we are subject to extensive and complex regulations that affect the development and home building, sales, and customer financing processes, including zoning, density, building standards, and mortgage financing. These regulations often provide broad discretion to the administering governmental authorities. This can delay or increase the cost of development or homebuilding.

We also are subject to a variety of local, state, federal, and foreign laws and regulations concerning protection of health and the environment. The particular environmental laws that apply to any given community vary greatly according to the community site, the site’s environmental conditions and the present and former uses of the site. These environmental laws may result in delays, may cause us to incur substantial compliance, remediation and/or other costs, and can prohibit or severely restrict development and homebuilding activity.

We received in October 2012 a notice from Region III of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) concerning stipulated penalties, totaling approximately $120,000, based on the extent to which we reportedly did not meet certain compliance performance specified in the previously reported consent decree entered into in August 2010; we have since paid the stipulated penalties as assessed, and more recently have paid approximately $8,000 in response to an EPA demand received in June 2013 for stipulated penalties based on information about our performance under the consent decree for 2012. The consent decree was terminated by court order without objection in December 2013.

In March 2013, we received a letter from the EPA requesting information about our involvement in a housing redevelopment project in Newark, New Jersey that a Company entity undertook during the 1990s. We understand that the development is in the vicinity of a former lead smelter and that recent tests on soil samples from properties within the development conducted by the EPA show elevated levels of lead. We also understand that the smelter operated before the City of Newark acquired properties, demolished structures existing on them, and sold the properties to the Company entity in connection with the redevelopment project. We responded to the EPA’s request. In August 2013, we were notified that the EPA considers us a potentially responsible party (or “PRP”) with respect to the site, that the EPA believes the site requires cleanup, and that the EPA is proposing that we address contamination at the site. We have begun preliminary discussions with the EPA concerning a possible resolution but do not know the scope or extent of the Company's obligations, if any, that may arise from the site and therefore cannot provide any assurance that this matter will not have a material impact on the Company.

We anticipate that increasingly stringent requirements will be imposed on developers and homebuilders in the future. Although we cannot predict the effect of these requirements, they could result in time-consuming and expensive compliance programs and in substantial expenditures, which could cause delays and increase our cost of operations. In addition our ability to obtain or renew permits or approvals and the continued effectiveness of permits already granted or approvals already obtained is dependent upon many factors, some of which are beyond our control, such as changes in policies, rules, and regulations and their interpretations and application.

The Company is also involved in the following litigation:

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and K. Hovnanian Venture I, L.L.C. (collectively, the “Company Defendants”) have been named as defendants in a class action suit. The action was filed by Mike D’Andrea and Tracy D’Andrea, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Gloucester County. The action was initially filed on May 8, 2006 alleging that the HVAC systems installed in certain of the Company’s homes are in violation of applicable New Jersey building codes and are a potential safety issue. On December 14, 2011, the Superior Court granted class certification; the potential class is 1,065 homes. The Company Defendants filed a request to take an interlocutory appeal regarding the class certification decision. The Appellate Division denied the request, and the Company Defendants filed a request for interlocutory review by the New Jersey Supreme Court, which remanded the case back to the Appellate Division for a review on the merits of the appeal on May 8, 2012. The Appellate Division, on remand, heard oral arguments on December 4, 2012, reviewing the Superior Court’s original finding of class certification. On June 18, 2013, the Appellate Division affirmed class certification. On July 3, 2013, the Company Defendants appealed the June 2013 Appellate Division’s decision to the New Jersey Supreme Court, which elected not to hear the appeal on October 22, 2013. Accordingly, the matter is proceeding in the Superior Court and discovery is ongoing. The Company Defendants have pending a motion to consolidate an indemnity action they filed against various manufacturer and sub-contractor defendants so that these parties will be required to participate directly in the class action. The plaintiff class seeks unspecified damages as well as treble damages pursuant to the NJ Consumer Fraud Act. The Company Defendants believe there is insurance coverage available for this action. It is not possible to estimate a loss or range of loss related to this matter at this time.

ITEM 4

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable

21

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Information on executive officers of the registrant is incorporated herein from Part III, Item 10.

Part II

ITEM 5

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our Class A Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “HOV” and was held by 503 stockholders of record at December 16, 2013. There is no established public trading market for our Class B Common Stock, which was held by 241 stockholders of record at December 16, 2013. In order to trade Class B Common Stock, the shares must be converted into Class A Common Stock on a one-for-one basis. The high and low closing sales prices for our Class A Common Stock were as follows for each fiscal quarter during the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012:

|  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |
Quarter |  | High |  |  | Low |  |  | High |  |  | Low |
First |  |  | $7.00 |  |  |  | $4.42 |  |  |  | $2.67 |  |  |  | $1.23 |
Second |  |  | $6.32 |  |  |  | $4.76 |  |  |  | $3.24 |  |  |  | $1.88 |
Third |  |  | $6.43 |  |  |  | $5.20 |  |  |  | $2.94 |  |  |  | $1.61 |
Fourth |  |  | $5.53 |  |  |  | $4.93 |  |  |  | $4.44 |  |  |  | $2.25 |

Certain debt instruments to which we are a party contain restrictions on the payment of cash dividends. As a result of the most restrictive of these provisions, we are not currently able to pay any cash dividends. We have never paid a cash dividend to common stockholders.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities

None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

No shares of our Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock were purchased by or on behalf of the Company or any affiliated purchaser during the fiscal fourth quarter of 2013. The maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the Company’s repurchase plans or programs is 0.5 million.

ITEM 6

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial data and should be read in conjunction with Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

22

|  | Year Ended |
Summary Consolidated Statements of Operations Data (In thousands, Except Per Share Data) |  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |  |  | October 31, 2011 |  |  | October 31, 2010 |  |  | October 31, 2009 |
Revenues |  |  | $1,851,253 |  |  |  | $1,485,353 |  |  |  | $1,134,907 |  |  |  | $1,371,842 |  |  |  | $1,596,290 |
Expenses excluding inventory impairment loss and land option write-offs |  |  | 1,835,633 |  |  |  | 1,550,406 |  |  |  | 1,323,316 |  |  |  | 1,557,428 |  |  |  | 1,972,978 |
Inventory impairment loss and land option write-offs |  |  | 4,965 |  |  |  | 12,530 |  |  |  | 101,749 |  |  |  | 135,699 |  |  |  | 659,475 |
Total Expenses |  |  | 1,840,598 |  |  |  | 1,562,936 |  |  |  | 1,425,065 |  |  |  | 1,693,127 |  |  |  | 2,632,453 |
(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt |  |  | (760 | ) |  |  | (29,066 | ) |  |  | 7,528 |  |  |  | 25,047 |  |  |  | 410,185 |
Income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 12,040 |  |  |  | 5,401 |  |  |  | (8,958 | ) |  |  | 956 |  |  |  | (46,041 | )
Income (loss) before income taxes |  |  | 21,935 |  |  |  | (101,248 | ) |  |  | (291,588 | ) |  |  | (295,282 | ) |  |  | (672,019 | )
State and federal income tax (benefit) provision |  |  | (9,360 | ) |  |  | (35,051 | ) |  |  | (5,501 | ) |  |  | (297,870 | ) |  |  | 44,693 |
Net income (loss) |  |  | $31,295 |  |  |  | $(66,197 | ) |  |  | $(286,087 | ) |  |  | $2,588 |  |  |  | $(716,712 | )
Per share data: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income (loss) per common share |  |  | $0.22 |  |  |  | $(0.52 | ) |  |  | $(2.85 | ) |  |  | $0.03 |  |  |  | $(9.16 | )
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |  |  | 145,087 |  |  |  | 126,350 |  |  |  | 100,444 |  |  |  | 78,691 |  |  |  | 78,238 |
Assuming dilution: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income (loss) per common share |  |  | $0.22 |  |  |  | $(0.52 | ) |  |  | $(2.85 | ) |  |  | $0.03 |  |  |  | $(9.16 | )
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |  |  | 162,329 |  |  |  | 126,350 |  |  |  | 100,444 |  |  |  | 79,683 |  |  |  | 78,238 |

Summary Consolidated Balance Sheet Data |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(In thousands) |  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |  |  | October 31, 2011 |  |  | October 31, 2010 |  |  | October 31, 2009 |
Total assets |  |  | $1,759,130 |  |  |  | $1,684,250 |  |  |  | $1,602,180 |  |  |  | $1,817,560 |  |  |  | $2,024,577 |
Mortgages and lines of credit |  |  | $172,299 |  |  |  | $164,562 |  |  |  | $95,598 |  |  |  | $98,613 |  |  |  | $77,364 |
Senior secured notes, senior notes, senior amortizing notes, senior exchangeable notes and TEU senior subordinated amortizing notes (net of discount) |  |  | $1,529,445 |  |  |  | $1,542,196 |  |  |  | $1,602,770 |  |  |  | $1,616,347 |  |  |  | $1,751,701 |
Total equity deficit |  |  | $(432,799 | ) |  |  | $(485,345 | ) |  |  | $(496,602 | ) |  |  | $(337,938 | ) |  |  | $(348,868 | )

Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends

For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges and the ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends, earnings consist of earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and income or loss from equity investees, plus fixed charges and distributed income of equity investees, less interest capitalized. Fixed charges consist of all interest incurred, plus that portion of operating lease rental expense (33%) deemed to be representative of interest, plus the amortization of debt issuance costs and bond discounts. Combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends consist of fixed charges and preferred stock dividends declared. Due to covenant restrictions, we have been prohibited from paying preferred stock dividends beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The following table sets forth the ratios of earnings to fixed charges and the ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends for each of the periods indicated:

|  | Years Ended October 31,
|  | 2013 |  | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |  |  | 1.2 |  | (a) | (a) | (a) | (a)
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends |  |  | 1.2 |  | (b) | (b) | (b) | (b)

(a) | Earnings for the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were insufficient to cover fixed charges for such period by $105.1 million, $272.9 million, $273.8 million, and $628.3 million, respectively.

(b) | Earnings for the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were insufficient to cover fixed charges and preferred stock dividends for such period by $105.1 million, $272.9 million, $273.8 million and $628.3 million, respectively. Due to restrictions in our indentures for our senior and senior secured notes, we are currently prohibited from paying dividends on our preferred stock and did not make any dividend payments in fiscal 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, and 2009.

23

ITEM 7

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

During fiscal 2013, the housing market continued to strengthen, and, as a result, we experienced further positive operating trends, including improvements in several metrics for the year ended October 31, 2013 compared to the year ended October 31, 2012, such as: net contract growth of 7.9%, an increase in gross margin percentage, before cost of sales interest expense and land charges, from 17.8% to 20.1% and a decrease in selling, general and administrative costs (including corporate general and administrative expenses) as a percentage of total revenue from 12.8% to 11.9%. In addition, our contract cancellation rate was 18% for fiscal 2013, which is below what we believe to be a normalized level of approximately 20%. Active selling communities were 192 and 172 at October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Net contracts per average active selling community increased to 30.7 for the year ended October 31, 2013, compared to 28.1 in the same period in the prior year. Net contracts for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 were 6.4% below the same period of the prior year as a result of the slowdown in the housing market due to the adverse impacts of higher mortgage rates, the sequester and the government shutdown. However, this negative trend reversed in October and November of 2013, where net contracts increased slightly over the same periods of the prior year.

Our gross margin percentage, before cost of sales interest expense and land charges, and selling, general and administrative costs (including corporate general and administrative expenses) as a percentage of total revenues also had favorable variances when comparing sequentially from the third quarter of fiscal 2013 to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. Gross margin percentage increased from 20.3% to 22.6% and selling, general and administrative costs (including corporate general and administrative expenses) as a percentage of revenues decreased from 11.8% to 10.6%, as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2013. Cost of sales and selling, general and administrative costs include some fixed costs that are not impacted by delivery volume. Therefore, as deliveries increased from the third quarter of fiscal 2013 to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, selling, general and administrative costs as a percentage of revenues improved. The increase in gross margin percentage partially resulted from the delivery volume increase, but also was the result of higher home prices that exceeded increased construction costs in certain markets and an increase in the percentage of deliveries from newly identified communities (which we define as communities that were controlled subsequent to January 31, 2009), which generally have higher gross margins than our older communities.

While we are encouraged by the positive operating trends that began in fiscal 2012 and continued into fiscal 2013, several challenges, such as persistently high unemployment levels, national and global economic weakness and uncertainty, the restrictive mortgage lending environment, higher mortgage interest rates and the potential for more foreclosures, continue to threaten a recovery in the housing market. Our recent operating results and other national data indicate that the overall demand for new homes has continued to improve. However, both national new home sales and our home sales remain below historical levels. Until there is a more robust U.S. economic recovery, we expect national demand for new homes to remain at below normal levels, with uneven improvement across our operating markets.

During the prolonged downturn of the housing market, we adjusted our approach to land acquisition and construction practices and shortened our land pipeline, reduced production volumes, and balanced home price and profitability with sales pace. We delayed and cancelled planned land purchases, renegotiated land prices, and significantly reduced our total number of controlled lots owned and under option. Additionally, we significantly reduced our total number of speculative homes put into production. Since January 2009, however, we began to see more opportunities to purchase land at prices that made economic sense in light of our then current sales prices and sales paces and plan to continue pursuing such land acquisitions. New land purchases at pricing that we believe will generate appropriate investment returns and drive greater operating efficiencies are needed to return to sustained profitability. During fiscal 2013, we opened for sale 91 new communities, purchased approximately 6,200 lots within 236 newly identified communities (which we define as communities that were controlled subsequent to January 31, 2009), and optioned approximately 12,100 lots in 230 newly identified communities. As we have experienced increased sales pace over the past year, causing communities to sell out more rapidly, we continue to consider and make new land acquisitions to replenish or grow our community count. As a result, our active community count increased by 20 communities from October 31, 2012 to 192 communities at October 31, 2013. We have also continued to closely evaluate and control selling, general and administrative expenses, including corporate general and administrative expenses. While homebuilding selling, general and administrative expenses increased $23.7 million from $142.1 million in fiscal 2012 to $165.8 million for fiscal 2013, in connection with our increased revenues, these expenses as a percentage of total homebuilding revenues decreased from 9.8% to 9.2% due to the revenue growth across our operating segments. Corporate general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenue decreased from 3.2% in fiscal 2012 to 2.9% in fiscal 2013. Given the persistence of difficult market conditions, improving the efficiency of our selling, general and administrative expenses will continue to be a significant area of focus.

24

Critical Accounting Policies

Management believes that the following critical accounting policies require its most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements:

Income Recognition from Home and Land Sales - We are primarily engaged in the development, construction, marketing and sale of residential single-family and multi-family homes where the planned construction cycle is less than 12 months. For these homes, in accordance with Accounting Standards Certification (ASC) 360-20, “Property, Plant and Equipment - Real Estate Sales” (“ASC 360-20”), revenue is recognized when title is conveyed to the buyer, adequate initial and continuing investments have been received, and there is no continued involvement. In situations where the buyer’s financing is originated by our mortgage subsidiary and the buyer has not made an adequate initial investment or continuing investment as prescribed by ASC 360-20, the profit on such sales is deferred until the sale of the related mortgage loan to a third-party investor has been completed.

Income Recognition from Mortgage Loans - Our Financial Services segment originates mortgages, primarily for our homebuilding customers. We use mandatory investor commitments and forward sales of mortgage-backed securities to hedge our mortgage-related interest rate exposure on agency and government loans.

We elected the fair value option for our mortgage loans held for sale in accordance with ASC 825, “Financial Instruments,” which permits us to measure our loans held for sale at fair value. Management believes that the election of the fair value option for loans held for sale improves financial reporting by mitigating volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring the fair value of the loans and the derivative instruments used to economically hedge them without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions.

Substantially all of the mortgage loans originated are sold within a short period of time in the secondary mortgage market on a servicing released, nonrecourse basis, although the Company remains liable for certain limited representations, such as fraud, and warranties related to loan sales. Mortgage investors could seek to have us buy back loans or compensate them for losses incurred on mortgages we have sold based on claims that we breached our limited representations and warranties. We believe there continues to be an industry-wide issue with the number of purchaser claims in which purchasers purport to have found inaccuracies related to the sellers’ representations and warranties in particular loan sale agreements. We have established reserves for probable losses.

Inventories - Inventories consist of land, land development, home construction costs, capitalized interest, and construction overhead and property taxes. Construction costs are accumulated during the period of construction and charged to cost of sales under specific identification methods. Land, land development, and common facility costs are allocated based on buildable acres to product types within each community, then charged to cost of sales equally based upon the number of homes to be constructed in each product type.

We record inventories in our consolidated balance sheets at cost unless the inventory is determined to be impaired, in which case the inventory is written down to its fair value. Our inventories consist of the following three components: (1) sold and unsold homes and lots under development, which includes all construction, land, capitalized interest, and land development costs related to started homes and land under development in our active communities; (2) land and land options held for future development or sale, which includes all costs related to land in our communities in planning or mothballed communities; and (3) consolidated inventory not owned, which includes all costs related to specific performance options, variable interest entities, and other options, which consists primarily of model homes financed with an investor and inventory related to land banking arrangements.

We decide to mothball (or stop development on) certain communities when we determine that current market conditions do not justify further investment at that time. When we decide to mothball a community, the inventory is reclassified on our consolidated balance sheets from "Sold and unsold homes and lots under development" to "Land and land options held for future development or sale." As of October 31, 2013, the net book value associated with our 50 mothballed communities was $115.9 million, net of impairment charges recorded in prior periods of $431.6 million. We regularly review communities to determine if mothballing is appropriate. During fiscal 2013, we mothballed one community, re-activated three previously mothballed communities, and sold one mothballed community.

25

From time to time we enter into option agreements that include specific performance requirements, whereby we are required to purchase a minimum number of lots. Because of our obligation to purchase these lots, for accounting purposes in accordance with ASC 360-20-40-38, we are required to record this inventory on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of October 31, 2013, we had $0.8 million of specific performance options recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets to “Consolidated inventory not owned – specific performance options,” with a corresponding amount recorded to “Liabilities from inventory not owned.”

“Consolidated inventory not owned – other options” consists of certain model sale leasebacks and land banking arrangements, and other options that were included on our balance sheet in accordance with GAAP. During fiscal 2013, we sold and leased back certain of our model homes with the right to participate in the potential profit when each home is sold to a third party at the end of the respective lease. As a result of our continued involvement, for accounting purposes in accordance with ASC 360-20-40-38, these sale and leaseback transactions are considered a financing rather than a sale. Therefore, for purposes of our Consolidated Balance Sheet, at October 31, 2013, inventory of $47.6 million was recorded to “Consolidated inventory not owned – other options”, with a corresponding amount of $45.7 million recorded to “Liabilities from inventory not owned.”

In addition, we entered into a land banking arrangement in fiscal 2012 with GSO Capital Partners LP ("GSO"), that continued in fiscal 2013, whereby we sold a portfolio of our land parcels to GSO, and GSO provided us an option to purchase back finished lots on a quarterly basis. Because of our option to repurchase these parcels, for accounting purposes, in accordance with ASC 360-20-40-38, this transaction is considered a financing rather than a sale. For purposes of our Consolidated Balance Sheet, at October 31, 2013, inventory of $52.4 million was recorded as “Consolidated inventory not owned – other options”, with a corresponding amount of $41.4 million recorded to “Liabilities from inventory not owned” for the amount of net cash received from the transactions.

The recoverability of inventories and other long-lived assets is assessed in accordance with the provisions of ASC 360-10, “Property, Plant and Equipment - Overall” (“ASC 360-10”). ASC 360-10 requires long-lived assets, including inventories, held for development to be evaluated for impairment based on undiscounted future cash flows of the assets at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows. As such, we evaluate inventories for impairment at the individual community level, the lowest level of discrete cash flows that we measure.

We evaluate inventories of communities under development and held for future development for impairment when indicators of potential impairment are present. Indicators of impairment include, but are not limited to, decreases in local housing market values, decreases in gross margins or sales absorption rates, decreases in net sales prices (base sales price net of sales incentives), or actual or projected operating or cash flow losses. The assessment of communities for indication of impairment is performed quarterly. As part of this process, we prepare detailed budgets for all of our communities at least semi-annually and identify those communities with a projected operating loss. For those communities with projected losses, we estimate the remaining undiscounted future cash flows and compare those to the carrying value of the community, to determine if the carrying value of the asset is recoverable.

The projected operating profits, losses, or cash flows of each community can be significantly impacted by our estimates of the following:

| ● | future base selling prices;

| ● | future home sales incentives;

| ● | future home construction and land development costs; and

| ● | future sales absorption pace and cancellation rates.

These estimates are dependent upon specific market conditions for each community. While we consider available information to determine what we believe to be our best estimates as of the end of a quarterly reporting period, these estimates are subject to change in future reporting periods as facts and circumstances change. Local market-specific conditions that may impact our estimates for a community include:

| ● | the intensity of competition within a market, including available home sales prices and home sales incentives offered by our competitors;

| ● | the current sales absorption pace for both our communities and competitor communities;

| ● | community specific attributes, such as location, availability of lots in the market, desirability and uniqueness of our community, and the size and style of homes currently being offered;

26

| ● | potential for alternative product offerings to respond to local market conditions;

| ● | changes by management in the sales strategy of the community;

| ● | current local market economic and demographic conditions and related trends of forecasts; and

| ● | existing home inventory supplies, including foreclosures and short sales.

These and other local market-specific conditions that may be present are considered by management in preparing projection assumptions for each community. The sales objectives can differ between our communities, even within a given market. For example, facts and circumstances in a given community may lead us to price our homes with the objective of yielding a higher sales absorption pace, while facts and circumstances in another community may lead us to price our homes to minimize deterioration in our gross margins, although it may result in a slower sales absorption pace. In addition, the key assumptions included in our estimate of future undiscounted cash flows may be interrelated. For example, a decrease in estimated base sales price or an increase in homes sales incentives may result in a corresponding increase in sales absorption pace. Additionally, a decrease in the average sales price of homes to be sold and closed in future reporting periods for one community that has not been generating what management believes to be an adequate sales absorption pace may impact the estimated cash flow assumptions of a nearby community. Changes in our key assumptions, including estimated construction and development costs, absorption pace and selling strategies, could materially impact future cash flow and fair-value estimates. Due to the number of possible scenarios that would result from various changes in these factors, we do not believe it is possible to develop a sensitivity analysis with a level of precision that would be meaningful.

If the undiscounted cash flows are more than the carrying value of the community, then the carrying amount is recoverable, and no impairment adjustment is required. However, if the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount, then the community is deemed impaired and is written-down to its fair value. We determine the estimated fair value of each community by determining the present value of its estimated future cash flows at a discount rate commensurate with the risk of the respective community, or in limited circumstances, prices for land in recent comparable sale transactions, market analysis studies, which include the estimated price a willing buyer would pay for the land (other than in a forced liquidation sale), and recent bona fide offers received from outside third parties. Our discount rates used for all impairments recorded from October 31, 2011 to October 31, 2013 ranged from 16.8% to 19.8%. The estimated future cash flow assumptions are virtually the same for both our recoverability and fair value assessments. Should the estimates or expectations used in determining estimated cash flows or fair value, including discount rates, decrease or differ from current estimates in the future, we may be required to recognize additional impairments related to current and future communities. The impairment of a community is allocated to each lot on a relative fair value basis.

From time to time, we write off deposits and approval, engineering and capitalized interest costs when we determine that it is no longer probable that we will exercise options to buy land in specific locations or when we redesign communities and/or abandon certain engineering costs. In deciding not to exercise a land option, we take into consideration changes in market conditions, the timing of required land takedowns, the willingness of land sellers to modify terms of the land option contract (including timing of land takedowns), and the availability and best use of our capital, among other factors. The write-off is recorded in the period it is deemed not probable that the optioned property will be acquired. In certain instances, we have been able to recover deposits and other pre-acquisition costs that were previously written off. These recoveries have not been significant in comparison to the total costs written off.

Inventories held for sale are land parcels ready for sale in their current condition, where we have decided not to build homes but are instead actively marketing for sale. These land parcels represented $2.7 million of our total inventories at October 31, 2013, and are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. In determining fair value for land held for sale, management considers, among other things, prices for land in recent comparable sale transactions, market analysis studies, which include the estimated price a willing buyer would pay for the land (other than in a forced liquidation sale) and recent bona fide offers received from outside third parties.

Insurance Deductible Reserves - For homes delivered in fiscal 2013 and 2012, our deductible under our general liability insurance is $20 million per occurrence for construction defect and warranty claims. For bodily injury claims, our deductible per occurrence in fiscal 2013 and 2012 is $0.25 million and $0.1 million, respectively, up to a $5 million limit. Our aggregate retention in 2013 and 2012 is $21 million for construction defect, warranty and bodily injury claims. We do not have a deductible on our worker's compensation insurance. Reserves for estimated losses for construction defects, warranty, bodily injury and workers’ compensation claims have been established using the assistance of a third-party actuary. We engage a third-party actuary that uses our historical warranty and construction defect data and worker's compensation data to assist our management in estimating our unpaid claims, claim adjustment expenses and incurred but not reported claims reserves for the risks that we are assuming under the general liability and worker's compensation programs. The estimates include provisions for inflation, claims handling and legal fees. These estimates are subject to a high degree of variability due to uncertainties such as trends in construction defect claims relative to our markets and the types of products we build, claim settlement patterns, insurance industry practices, and legal interpretations, among others. Because of the high degree of judgment required in determining these estimated liability amounts, actual future costs could differ significantly from our currently estimated amounts.

27

Land Options – Deposits on options to acquire improved or unimproved home sites and pre-development costs incurred on this land under option are capitalized. Such amounts are either included as part of the purchase price if the land is acquired or charged to operations if we determine we will not exercise the option. If the options are with variable interest entities and we are the primary beneficiary, we record the land under option on the Consolidated Balance Sheets under “Consolidated inventory not owned” with an offset under “Liabilities from inventory not owned.” The evaluation of whether or not we are the primary beneficiary can require significant judgment. Similarly, if the option obligation is to purchase under specific performance or has terms that require us to record it as financing, then we record the option on the Consolidated Balance Sheets under “Consolidated inventory not owned” with an offset under “Liabilities from inventory not owned.” We record costs associated with other options on the Consolidated Balance Sheets under “Land and land options held for future development or sale.”

Unconsolidated Homebuilding and Land Development Joint Ventures - Investments in unconsolidated homebuilding and land development joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, we recognize our proportionate share of earnings and losses earned by the joint venture upon the delivery of lots or homes to third parties. Our ownership interest in joint ventures varies but our voting interests are generally less than or equal to 50%. In determining whether or not we must consolidate joint ventures where we are the managing member of the joint venture, we assess whether the other partners have specific rights to overcome the presumption of control by us as the manager of the joint venture. In most cases, the presumption is overcome because the joint venture agreements require that both partners agree on establishing the significant operating and capital decisions of the partnership, including budgets, in the ordinary course of business. The evaluation of whether or not we control a venture can require significant judgment. In accordance with ASC 323-10, “Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures - Overall” (“ASC 323-10”), we assess our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures for recoverability, and if it is determined that a loss in value of the investment below its carrying amount is other than temporary, we write down the investment to its fair value. We evaluate our equity investments for impairment based on the joint venture’s projected cash flows. This process requires significant management judgment and estimates. During fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2013, there were no write-downs of our joint venture investments.

Post-Development Completion and Warranty Costs - In those instances where a development is substantially completed and sold and we have additional construction work to be incurred, an estimated liability is provided to cover the cost of such work. We accrue for warranty costs that are covered under our existing general liability and construction defect policy as part of our general liability insurance deductible. This accrual is expensed as selling, general, and administrative costs. For homes delivered in fiscal 2013 and 2012, our deductible under our general liability insurance is $20 million per occurrence for construction defect and warranty claims. For bodily injury claims, our deductible per occurrence in fiscal 2013 and 2012 is $0.25 million and $0.1 million, respectively, up to a $5 million limit. Our aggregate retention in fiscal 2013 and 2012 is $21 million for construction defect, warranty and bodily injury claims. In addition, we establish a warranty accrual for lower cost-related issues to cover home repairs, community amenities, and land development infrastructure that are not covered under our general liability and construction defect policy. We accrue an estimate for these warranty costs as part of cost of sales at the time each home is closed and title and possession have been transferred to the homebuyer. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the amount of warranty costs recognized in cost of goods sold and administrative expenses.

Income Taxes - Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between amounts recorded for financial reporting and for income tax purposes. If the combination of future years’ income (or loss) combined with the reversal of the timing differences results in a loss, such losses can be carried back to prior years or carried forward to future years to recover the deferred tax assets. In accordance with ASC 740-10, “Income Taxes - Overall” (“ASC 740-10”), we evaluate our deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are required. ASC 740-10 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more-likely-than-not” standard. See “Total Taxes” below under “Results of Operations” for further discussion of the valuation allowances.

In evaluating the exposures associated with our various tax filing positions, we recognize tax liabilities in accordance with ASC 740-10, for more likely than not exposures. We re-evaluate the exposures associated with our tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors such as changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, new audit activity, and effectively settled issues. Determining whether an uncertain tax position is effectively settled requires judgment. Such a change in recognition or measurement would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter for which we have established a liability is audited and fully resolved or clarified. We adjust our liability for unrecognized tax benefits and income tax provision in the period in which an uncertain tax position is effectively settled, or the statute of limitations expires for the relevant taxing authority to examine the tax position or when more information becomes available. Due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a liability that is materially different from our current estimate. Any such changes will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period in which they are determined.

28

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

There have been no accounting pronouncements that have been issued but not yet implemented that we believe will materially impact our financial statements.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Our operations consist primarily of residential housing development and sales in the Northeast (New Jersey, Pennsylvania), the Mid-Atlantic (Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Washington D.C., West Virginia), the Midwest (Illinois, Minnesota, Ohio), the Southeast (Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina), the Southwest (Arizona, Texas), and the West (California). In addition, we provide certain financial services to our homebuilding customers.

We have historically funded our homebuilding and financial services operations with cash flows from operating activities, borrowings under our bank credit facilities (when we have had such facilities for our homebuilding operations) and the issuance of new debt and equity securities. During the prolonged housing market downturn that began in late 2006, we had been operating with a primary focus to generate cash flows from operations through reductions in assets during fiscal 2007 through fiscal 2009. The generation of cash flow, together with debt repurchases and exchanges at prices below par, allowed us to reduce debt (notes payable, excluding accrued interest) during fiscal 2009 by approximately $754 million. Since the latter half of fiscal 2009, we have seen more opportunities to purchase land at prices that make economic sense given the then-current home sales prices and sales paces. As such, since that time, despite acquiring new land at higher levels than in the previous few years, we have been able to further reduce our debt by approximately $222 million.

Our homebuilding cash balance at October 31, 2013 increased by $60.8 million from October 31, 2012. The significant uses of cash during fiscal 2013 were primarily due to spending $503.0 million on land and land development. The remaining change in cash came from normal operations, as well a $31.4 million reduction of homebuilding restricted cash. Most of this restricted cash became unrestricted as the letters of credit the cash collateralized were released during fiscal 2013.

Our cash uses during fiscal 2013 and 2012 were for operating expenses, land purchases, land deposits, land development, construction spending, financing transactions, debt payments and repurchases, state income taxes, interest payments and investments in joint ventures. During these periods, we provided for our cash requirements from available cash on hand, financing transactions, debt and equity issuances, housing and land sales, model sale leasebacks, land banking deals, financial service revenues and other revenues. We believe that these sources of cash will be sufficient through fiscal 2014 to finance our working capital requirements and other needs. In June 2013, we enhanced our liquidity by entering into a $75 million unsecured revolving credit facility, discussed below.

Our net income (loss) historically does not approximate cash flow from operating activities. The difference between net income (loss) and cash flow from operating activities is primarily caused by changes in inventory levels together with changes in receivables, prepaid and other assets, mortgage loans held for sale, interest and other accrued liabilities, deferred income taxes, accounts payable and other liabilities, and noncash charges relating to depreciation, amortization of computer software costs, stock compensation awards and impairment losses for inventory. When we are expanding our operations, inventory levels, prepaids, and other assets increase causing cash flow from operating activities to decrease. Certain liabilities also increase as operations expand and partially offset the negative effect on cash flow from operations caused by the increase in inventory levels, prepaids and other assets. Similarly, as our mortgage operations expand, net income from these operations increases, but for cash flow purposes net income is offset by the net change in mortgage assets and liabilities. The opposite is true as our investment in new land purchases and development of new communities decrease, which is what happened during the last half of fiscal 2007 through fiscal 2009, allowing us to generate positive cash flow from operations during this period. Since the latter part of fiscal 2009 cumulative through the first three quarters of fiscal 2013, as a result of the new land purchases and land development we have used cash in operations as we add new communities. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we generated a positive cash flow from operations, which was the result of a high volume of home deliveries. Looking forward, given the unstable housing market, it will continue to be difficult to generate positive cash flow from operations until we return to sustained profitability. However, we will continue to make adjustments to our structure and our business plans in order to maximize our liquidity while also taking steps to return to sustained profitability, including through land acquisitions.

On July 3, 2001, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to purchase up to 4 million shares of Class A Common Stock. We did not repurchase any shares under this program during fiscal 2013 or 2011. During fiscal 2012, we repurchased 0.1 million shares under this program. As of October 31, 2013, the maximum number of shares of Class A Common Stock that may yet be purchased under this program is 0.5 million. (See Part II, Item 5 for information on equity purchases).

29

On July 12, 2005, we issued 5,600 shares of 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock, with a liquidation preference of $25,000 per share. Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock are not cumulative and are payable at an annual rate of 7.625%. The Series A Preferred Stock is not convertible into the Company’s common stock and is redeemable in whole or in part at our option at the liquidation preference of the shares. The Series A Preferred Stock is traded as depositary shares, with each depositary share representing 1/1000th of a share of Series A Preferred Stock. The depositary shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “HOVNP”. In fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, we did not make any dividend payments on the Series A Preferred Stock as a result of covenant restrictions in our debt instruments. We anticipate that we will continue to be restricted from paying dividends, which are not cumulative, for the foreseeable future.

On October 20, 2009, K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (“K. Hovnanian”) issued $785.0 million ($770.9 million net of discount) of 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due October 15, 2016. The notes were secured, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions, by a first-priority lien on substantially all of the assets owned by us, K. Hovnanian and the guarantors. The net proceeds from this issuance, together with cash on hand, were used to fund certain cash tender offers for our then outstanding 11.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2013 and 18.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2017 and certain series of our unsecured notes. In May 2011, we issued $12.0 million of additional 10.625% Senior Secured Notes as discussed below. The 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 were the subject of a tender offer in October 2012, and the notes that were not tendered in the tender offer were redeemed, as discussed below.

On February 9, 2011, we issued 13,512,500 shares of our Class A Common Stock, including 1,762,500 shares issued pursuant to the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters, at a price of $4.30 per share.

On February 9, 2011, we issued an aggregate of 3,000,000 7.25% Tangible Equity Units (the “TEUs”), and on February 14, 2011, we issued an additional 450,000 TEUs pursuant to the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters. Each TEU initially consists of (i) a prepaid stock purchase contract (each a “Purchase Contract”) and (ii) a senior subordinated amortizing note due February 15, 2014 (each, a “Senior Subordinated Amortizing Note”). As of October 31, 2013 and 2012, we had an aggregate principal amount of $2.2 million and $6.1 million, respectively, of Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes outstanding. On each February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15, K. Hovnanian will pay holders of Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes equal quarterly cash installments of $0.453125 per Senior Subordinated Amortizing Note, which cash payments in the aggregate will be equivalent to 7.25% per year with respect to each $25 stated amount of TEUs. Each installment constitutes a payment of interest (at a rate of 12.072% per annum) and a partial repayment of principal on the Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes, allocated as set forth in the amortization schedule provided in the indenture under which the Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes were issued. The Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes have a scheduled final installment payment date of February 15, 2014. If we elect to settle the Purchase Contracts early, holders of the Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes will have the right to require K. Hovnanian to repurchase such holders’ Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes, except in certain circumstances as described in the indenture governing Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes.

Unless settled earlier, on February 15, 2014 (subject to postponement under certain circumstances), each Purchase Contract will automatically settle and we will deliver a number of shares of Class A Common Stock based on the applicable market value, as defined in the purchase contract agreement, which will be between 4.7655 shares and 5.8140 shares per Purchase Contract (subject to adjustment). Each TEU may be separated into its constituent Purchase Contract and Senior Subordinated Amortizing Note after the initial issuance date of the TEUs, and the separate components may be combined to create a TEU. The Senior Subordinated Amortizing Note component of the TEUs is recorded as debt, and the Purchase Contract component of the TEUs is recorded in equity as additional paid in capital. We have recorded $68.1 million, the initial fair value of the Purchase Contracts, as additional paid in capital. As of October 31, 2013, 2.2 million Purchase Contracts have been converted into 10.4 million shares of our Class A Common Stock.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we exchanged pursuant to agreements with bondholders approximately $3.1 million aggregate principal amount of our Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes for shares of our Class A Common Stock, as discussed in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These transactions resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $0.2 million for the year ended October 31, 2012. The gain is included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as “Gain on extinguishment of debt.”

On February 14, 2011, K. Hovnanian issued $155.0 million aggregate principal amount of 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015. These notes were the subject of a November 2011 exchange offer discussed below. The net proceeds from the issuances of the 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015, Class A Common Stock described above, and Units were approximately $286.2 million, a portion of which were used to fund the purchase through tender offers, on February 14, 2011, of the following series of K. Hovnanian’s then outstanding senior and senior subordinated notes: approximately $24.6 million aggregate principal amount of 8.0% Senior Notes due 2012, $44.1 million aggregate principal amount of 8.875% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012 and $29.2 million aggregate principal amount of 7.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 (the “2013 Notes” and, together with the 2012 Senior Notes and the 2012 Senior Subordinated Notes, the “Tender Offer Notes”). On February 14, 2011, K. Hovnanian called for redemption on March 15, 2011 all Tender Offer Notes that were not tendered in the tender offers for an aggregate redemption price of approximately $60.1 million. Such redemptions were funded with proceeds from the offerings of the Class A Common Stock, the TEUs and the 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015.

30

On May 4, 2011, K. Hovnanian issued an aggregate principal amount of $12.0 million of additional 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 resulting in net proceeds of approximately $11.6 million. On June 3, 2011, we used these net proceeds together with cash on hand, to fund the redemption of the remaining outstanding principal amount ($0.5 million) of our 11.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2013 and the remaining outstanding principal amount ($11.7 million) of our 18.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2017. These transactions, along with the tender offers and redemptions in February 2011 and March 2011 discussed above, resulted in a loss of $3.1 million during the year ended October 31, 2011. The losses from the transactions are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as “(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt.”

On November 1, 2011, we issued $141.8 million aggregate principal amount of 5.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 (the “5.0% 2021 Notes”) and $53.2 million aggregate principal amount of 2.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 (the “2.0% 2021 Notes”, and together with the 5.0% 2021 Notes the “2021 Notes”) in exchange for $195.0 million of certain of our unsecured senior notes with maturities ranging from 2014 through 2017. Holders of the senior notes due 2014 and 2015 that were exchanged in the exchange offer also received an aggregate of approximately $14.2 million in cash payments and all holders of senior notes that were exchanged in the exchange offer received accrued and unpaid interest (in the aggregate amount of approximately $3.3 million). Costs associated with this transaction were $4.7 million. The 5.0% 2021 Notes and the 2.0% 2021 Notes were issued as separate series under an indenture, but have substantially the same terms other than with respect to interest rate and related redemption provisions, and vote together as a single class. Due to the then-existing financial condition of K. Hovnanian as determined in accordance with ASC 470-60, “Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructurings” and because the holders of the senior notes that exchanged such notes for 2021 Notes granted K. Hovnanian a concession in the form of extended maturities and reduced interest rates, the accounting for the debt exchange was treated as a troubled debt restructuring. Under this accounting, the Company did not recognize any gain or loss on extinguishment of debt and the costs associated with the debt exchange were expensed as incurred as shown in “Other operations” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

The guarantees by K. Hovnanian JV Holdings, L.L.C. and its subsidiaries, except for certain joint ventures and joint venture holding companies (collectively, the “Secured Group”) with respect to the 2021 Notes are secured, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions, by a first-priority lien on substantially all of the assets of the members of the Secured Group. As of October 31, 2013, the collateral securing the guarantees included (1) $72.9 million of cash and cash equivalents (subsequent to such date, cash uses include general business operations and real estate and other investments); (2) approximately $74.4 million aggregate book value of real property of the Secured Group, which does not include the impact of inventory investments, home deliveries, or impairments thereafter and which may differ from the value if it were appraised, and (3) equity interests in guarantors that are members of the Secured Group. Members of the Secured Group also own equity in joint ventures, either directly or indirectly through ownership of joint venture holding companies, with a book value of $44.1 million as of October 31, 2013; this equity is not pledged to secure, and is not collateral for, the 2021 Notes. Members of the Secured Group are “unrestricted subsidiaries” under K. Hovnanian's other senior notes, senior secured notes and senior subordinated amortizing notes, and thus have not guaranteed such indebtedness.

On October 2, 2012, K. Hovnanian issued $577.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.25% senior secured first lien notes due 2020 (the "First Lien Notes") and $220.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9.125% senior secured second lien notes due 2020 (the "Second Lien Notes" and, together with the First Lien Notes, the "2020 Secured Notes") in a private placement (the "2020 Secured Notes Offering"). The net proceeds from the 2020 Secured Notes Offering, together with the net proceeds of the Units offering discussed below, and cash on hand, were used to fund the tender offer and consent solicitation with respect to the Company’s then-outstanding 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 and the redemption of the remaining notes that were not purchased in the tender offer as described below.

The First Lien Notes are secured by a first-priority lien and the Second Lien Notes are secured by a second-priority lien, in each case, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions, on substantially all the assets owned by us, K. Hovnanian and the guarantors of such notes. At October 31, 2013, the aggregate book value of the real property that constituted collateral securing the 2020 Secured Notes was approximately $526.0 million, which does not include the impact of inventory investments, home deliveries, or impairments thereafter and which may differ from the value if it were appraised. In addition, cash collateral that secured the 2020 Secured Notes was $251.5 million as of October 31, 2013, which included $5.2 million of restricted cash collateralizing certain letters of credit. Subsequent to such date, cash uses include general business operations and real estate and other investments.

The First Lien Notes are redeemable in whole or in part, at our option at any time prior to October 15, 2015 at 100% of the principal amount plus an applicable “Make-Whole Amount.” We may also redeem some or all of the First Lien Notes at 105.438% of principal commencing October 15, 2015, at 103.625% of principal commencing October 15, 2016, at 101.813% of principal commencing October 15, 2017 and 100% of principal commencing October 15, 2018. In addition, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the First Lien Notes prior to October 15, 2015 with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at 107.25% of principal.

31

The Second Lien Notes are redeemable in whole, or in part, at our option at any time prior to November 15, 2015 at 100% of the principal amount plus an applicable “Make-Whole Amount.” We may also redeem some or all of the Second Lien Notes at 106.844% of principal commencing November 15, 2015, at 104.563% of principal commencing November 15, 2016, at 102.281% of principal commencing November 15, 2017 and 100% of principal commencing November 15, 2018. In addition, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Second Lien Notes prior to November 15, 2015 with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at 109.125% of principal.

Also on October 2, 2012, the Company and K. Hovnanian issued $100,000,000 aggregate stated amount of 6.0% Exchangeable Note Units (the “Units”) (equivalent to 100,000 Units). Each $1,000 stated amount of Units initially consists of (1) a zero coupon Senior Exchangeable note due December 1, 2017 (a “Senior Exchangeable Note”) issued by K. Hovnanian, which bears no cash interest and has an initial principal amount of $768.51 per Senior Exchangeable Note, and that will accrete to $1,000 at maturity and (2) a Senior Amortizing note due December 1, 2017 (a “Senior Amortizing Note”) issued by K. Hovnanian, which has an initial principal amount of $231.49 per Senior Amortizing Note, bears interest at a rate of 11.0% per annum, and has a final installment payment date on December 1, 2017. Each Unit may be separated into its constituent Senior Exchangeable Note and Senior Amortizing Note after the initial issuance date of the Units, and the separate components may be combined to create a Unit.

Each Senior Exchangeable Note had an initial principal amount of $768.51 (which will accrete to $1,000 over the term of the Exchangeable Note at an annual rate of 5.17% from the date of issuance, calculated on a semi-annual bond equivalent yield basis). Holders may exchange their Senior Exchangeable Notes at their option at any time prior to 5p.m., New York City time, on the business day immediately preceding December 1, 2017. Each Senior Exchangeable Note will be exchangeable for shares of Class A Common Stock at an initial exchange rate of 185.5288 shares of Class A Common Stock per Senior Exchangeable Note (equivalent to an initial exchange price, based on $1,000 principal amount at maturity, of approximately $5.39 per share of Class A Common Stock). The exchange rate will be subject to adjustment in certain events. If certain corporate events occur prior to the maturity date, the Company will increase the applicable exchange rate for any holder who elects to exchange its Senior Exchangeable Notes in connection with such corporate event. In addition, holders of Senior Exchangeable Notes will also have the right to require K. Hovnanian to repurchase such holders’ Senior Exchangeable Notes upon the occurrence of certain of these corporate events. As of October 31, 2013, 18,305 Senior Exchangeable Notes have been converted into 3.4 million shares of our Class A Common Stock, all of which were converted during the first quarter of fiscal 2013.

On each June 1 and December 1 (each, an “installment payment date”) K. Hovnanian will pay holders of Senior Amortizing Notes equal semi-annual cash installments of $30.00 per Senior Amortizing Note (except for the June 1, 2013 installment payment, which was $39.83 per Senior Amortizing Note), which cash payment in the aggregate will be equivalent to 6.0% per year with respect to each $1,000 stated amount of Units. Each installment will constitute a payment of interest (at a rate of 11.0% per annum) and a partial repayment of principal on the Senior Amortizing Note. Following certain corporate events that occur prior to the maturity date, holders of the Senior Amortizing Notes will have the right to require K. Hovnanian to repurchase such holders’ Senior Amortizing Notes.

The net proceeds of the Units offering, along with the net proceeds from the 2020 Secured Notes Offering previously discussed, and cash on hand, were used to fund the tender offer and consent solicitation with respect to the Company’s then outstanding 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 and redemption of the remaining notes that were not purchased in the tender offer as described below.

On October 2, 2012, pursuant to a cash tender offer and consent solicitation, we purchased in a fixed-price tender offer approximately $637.2 million aggregate principal amount of 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 for approximately $691.3 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Subsequently, all 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 that were not tendered in the tender offer (approximately $159.8 million) were redeemed for an aggregate redemption price of approximately $181.8 million. The tender offer and redemption resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $87.0 million, including the write-off of unamortized discounts and fees. The loss is included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as “(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt.”

During the year ended October 31, 2012, we repurchased for cash in the open market and privately negotiated transactions $21.0 million principal amount of our 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016, $61.1 million principal amount of our 7.5% Senior Notes due 2016, $37.4 million principal amount of our 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017, and $2.0 million principal amount of our 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015. The aggregate purchase price for these repurchases was $72.2 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest. These repurchases resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $48.4 million for the year ended October 31, 2012, net of the write-off of unamortized discounts and fees. The gain is included in the consolidated statement of operations as “(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt.” Certain of these repurchases were funded with the proceeds from our April 11, 2012 issuance of 25,000,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock (see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

32

In addition, during the year ended October 31, 2012, pursuant to agreements with bondholders we exchanged $7.8 million principal amount of our 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016, $4.0 million principal amount of our 7.5% Senior Notes due 2016 and $18.3 million of our outstanding 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017 for shares of our Class A Common Stock, as discussed in Notes 9 and 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These transactions were treated as a substantial modification of debt, resulting in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $9.3 million for the year ended October 31, 2012. The gain is included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as “(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt.”

On September 16, 2013, K. Hovnanian issued an aggregate principal amount of $41.6 million of its 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016. The Notes were issued as additional 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016 under the indenture dated as of August 8, 2005. The net proceeds from this offering were used to fund the redemption on October 15, 2013 of all of K. Hovnanian’s outstanding 6.5% Senior Notes due 2014 and 6.375% Senior Notes due 2014 and to pay related fees and expenses.

As of October 31, 2013, we had $992.0 million of outstanding senior secured notes ($978.6 million, net of discount), comprised of $577.0 million 7.25% Senior Secured First Lien Notes due 2020 (the “First Lien Notes”), $220.0 million 9.125% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2020 (the “Second Lien Notes” and, together with the First Lien Notes, the “2020 Secured Notes”), $53.2 million 2.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 (the “2.0% 2021 Notes”) and $141.8 million 5.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 (the “5.0% 2021 Notes” and together with the 2.0% 2021 Notes, the “2021 Notes”). As of October 31, 2013, we also had $462.6 million of outstanding senior notes ($461.2 million, net of discount), comprised of $21.4 million 6.25% Senior Notes due 2015, $172.7 million 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016, $86.5 million 7.5% Senior Notes due 2016, $121.0 million 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017 and $60.8 million 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015. In addition, as of October 31, 2013, we had outstanding $20.9 million 11.0% Senior Amortizing Notes due 2017 (issued as a component of our 6.0% Exchangeable Note Units), $66.6 million Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2017 (issued as a component of our 6.0% Exchangeable Note Units) and $2.2 million 7.25% Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes (issued as a component of our 7.25% Tangible Equity Units). Except for K. Hovnanian, the issuer of the notes, our home mortgage subsidiaries, joint ventures and subsidiaries holding interests in our joint ventures, certain of our title insurance subsidiaries and our foreign subsidiary, we and each of our subsidiaries are guarantors of the senior secured, senior, senior amortizing, senior exchangeable and senior subordinated amortizing notes outstanding at October 31, 2013 (see Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). In addition, the 2021 Notes are guaranteed by the Secured Group. Members of the Secured Group do not guarantee K. Hovnanian's other indebtedness.

The indentures governing the notes do not contain any financial maintenance covenants, but do contain restrictive covenants that limit, among other things, the Company’s ability and that of certain of its subsidiaries, including K. Hovnanian, to incur additional indebtedness (other than certain permitted indebtedness, refinancing indebtedness and non-recourse indebtedness), pay dividends and make distributions on common and preferred stock, repurchase subordinated indebtedness with (respect to certain of the senior secured notes), make other restricted payments, make investments, sell certain assets, incur liens, consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all assets and enter into certain transactions with affiliates. The indentures also contain events of default which would permit the holders of the notes to declare the notes to be immediately due and payable if not cured within applicable grace periods, including the failure to make timely payments on the notes or other material indebtedness, the failure to comply with agreements and covenants and specified events of bankruptcy, and insolvency and, with respect to the indentures governing the senior secured notes, the failure of the documents granting security for the senior secured notes to be in full force and effect and the failure of the liens on any material portion of the collateral securing the senior secured notes to be valid and perfected. As of October 31, 2013, we believe we were in compliance with the covenants of the indentures governing our outstanding notes.

Under the terms of the indentures, we have the right to make certain redemptions and, depending on market conditions and covenant restrictions, may do so from time to time. We also continue to evaluate our capital structure and may also continue to make debt purchases and/or exchanges for debt or equity from time to time through tender offers, open market purchases, private transactions, or otherwise, or seek to raise additional debt or equity capital, depending on market conditions and covenant restrictions.

If our consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined in the indentures governing our senior secured and senior notes (other than the senior exchangeable notes) is less than 2.0 to 1.0, we are restricted from making certain payments, including dividends, and from incurring indebtedness other than certain permitted indebtedness, refinancing indebtedness, and non-recourse indebtedness. As a result of this restriction, we are currently restricted from paying dividends, which are not cumulative, on our 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock. We anticipate we will continue to be restricted from paying dividends for the foreseeable future. Our inability to pay dividends is in accordance with covenant restrictions and will not result in a default under our debt instruments or otherwise affect compliance with any of the covenants contained in the debt instruments.

33

In June 2013, K. Hovnanian, as borrower, and we and certain of our subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into a five-year $75 million unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and Citibank, N.A., as a lender. The Credit Facility is available for both letters of credit and general corporate purposes. The Credit Facility does not contain any financial maintenance covenants, but does contain certain restrictive covenants that track those contained in our indenture governing the First Lien Notes, which are described above. The Credit Facility also contains certain customary events of default which would permit the administrative agent at the request of the required lenders to, among other things, declare all loans then outstanding to be immediately due and payable if not cured within applicable grace periods, including the failure to make timely payments of amounts payable under the Credit Facility or other material indebtedness or the acceleration of other material indebtedness, the failure to comply with agreements and covenants or for representations or warranties to be correct in all material respects when made, specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency, and the entry of a material judgment against a loan party. Outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility accrue interest at an annual rate equal to either, as selected by K. Hovnanian, (i) the alternate base rate plus the applicable spread determined on the date of such borrowing or (ii) an adjusted LIBOR rate plus the applicable spread determined as of the date two business days prior to the first day of the interest period for such borrowing. As of October 31, 2013, there were no borrowings and $25.8 million of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility and as of such date, we believe we were in compliance with the covenants under the Credit Facility.

In addition to the Credit Facility, we have certain stand alone cash collateralized letter of credit agreements and facilities under which there were a total of $5.1 million and $29.5 million of letters of credit outstanding as of October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These agreements and facilities require us to maintain specified amounts of cash as collateral in segregated accounts to support the letters of credit issued thereunder, which will affect the amount of cash we have available for other uses. As of October 31, 2013 and 2012, the amount of cash collateral in these segregated accounts was $5.2 million and $30.7 million, respectively, which is reflected in “Restricted cash and cash equivalents” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Our wholly owned mortgage banking subsidiary, K. Hovnanian American Mortgage, LLC (“K. Hovnanian Mortgage”), originates mortgage loans primarily from the sale of our homes. Such mortgage loans and related servicing rights are sold in the secondary mortgage market within a short period of time. In certain instances, we retain the servicing rights for a small amount of loans. Our secured Master Repurchase Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase Master Repurchase Agreement”), which was amended on June 28, 2013 to extend the maturity date to June 27, 2014, is a short-term borrowing facility that provides up to $50.0 million through maturity. The loan is secured by the mortgages held for sale and is repaid when we sell the underlying mortgage loans to permanent investors. Interest is payable monthly on outstanding advances at an adjusted LIBOR rate, which was 0.168% at October 31, 2013, subject to a floor of 1%, plus the applicable margin of 2.5%. Therefore, at October 31, 2013, the interest rate was 3.5%. As of October 31, 2013, the aggregate principal amount of all borrowings outstanding under the Chase Master Repurchase Agreement was $33.6 million.

K. Hovnanian Mortgage has another secured Master Repurchase Agreement with Customers Bank (“Customers Master Repurchase Agreement”), which was amended on May 28, 2013 to extend the maturity date to May 27, 2014, that is a short-term borrowing facility that provides up to $37.5 million through maturity. The loan is secured by the mortgages held for sale and is repaid when we sell the underlying mortgage loans to permanent investors. Interest is payable daily or as loans are sold to permanent investors on outstanding advances at the current LIBOR subject to a floor of 0.5% plus the applicable margin ranging from 3.0% to 5.5% based on the takeout investor and type of loan. As of October 31, 2013, the aggregate principal amount of all borrowings outstanding under the Customers Master Repurchase Agreement was $30.7 million.

K. Hovnanian Mortgage has a third secured Master Repurchase Agreement with Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC (“Credit Suisse Master Repurchase Agreement”), which was amended on January 2, 2013, that is a short-term borrowing facility that provides up to $50.0 million through June 20, 2014. The loan is secured by the mortgages held for sale and is repaid when we sell the underlying mortgage loans to permanent investors. Interest is payable monthly on outstanding advances at the Credit Suisse Cost of Funds, which was 0.48% at October 31, 2013, plus the applicable margin ranging from 3.75% to 4.0% based on the takeout investor and type of loan. As of October 31, 2013, the aggregate principal amount of all borrowings outstanding under the Credit Suisse Master Repurchase Agreement was $27.4 million.

The Chase Master Repurchase Agreement, Customers Master Repurchase Agreement and Credit Suisse Master Repurchase Agreement (together, the “Master Repurchase Agreements”) require K. Hovnanian Mortgage to satisfy and maintain specified financial ratios and other financial condition tests. Because of the extremely short period of time mortgages are held by K. Hovnanian Mortgage before the mortgages are sold to investors (generally a period of a few weeks), the immateriality to us on a consolidated basis of the size of the Master Repurchase Agreements, the levels required by these financial covenants, our ability based on our immediately available resources to contribute sufficient capital to cure any default, were such conditions to occur, and our right to cure any conditions of default based on the terms of the agreement, we do not consider any of these covenants to be substantive or material. As of October 31, 2013, we believe we were in compliance with the covenants under the Master Repurchase Agreements.

34

Total inventory, excluding consolidated inventory not owned, increased $87.1 million during the year ended October 31, 2013. Total inventory, excluding consolidated inventory not owned, increased in the Mid-Atlantic by $39.4 million, in the Midwest $25.0 million, in the Southeast by $12.6 million and in the Southwest by $59.2 million. This increase was partially offset by decreases in the Northeast of $46.4 million and in the West of $2.7 million. The increases were primarily attributable to new land purchases and land development during fiscal 2013, offset by home deliveries. The decreases in the Northeast and West during fiscal 2013 were due to delivering homes at a faster pace than purchasing new land to replenish our inventory. During fiscal 2013, we incurred $2.4 million in impairments, primarily in the Northeast. In addition, we wrote-off costs in the amount of $2.6 million during fiscal 2013 related to land options that expired or that we terminated, as the communities’ forecasted profitability was not projected to produce adequate returns on investment commensurate with the risk. In the last few years, we have been able to acquire new land parcels at prices that we believe will generate reasonable returns under current homebuilding market conditions. There can be no assurances that this trend will continue in the near term. Substantially all homes under construction or completed and included in inventory at October 31, 2013 are expected to be closed during the next 12 months.

The total inventory increase discussed above excluded the increase in consolidated inventory not owned of $10.2 million. Consolidated inventory not owned consists of specific performance options and other options that were added to our balance sheet in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The increase from October 31, 2012 to October 31, 2013, was primarily due to sale and leaseback of certain model homes and land banking transactions during fiscal 2013. During fiscal 2012 and 2013, we sold and leased back certain of our model homes with the right to participate in the potential profit when each home is sold to a third party at the end of the respective lease. As a result of our continued involvement for accounting purposes in accordance with ASC 360-20-40-38, these sale and leaseback transactions are considered a financing rather than a sale for accounting purposes. Therefore, for purposes of our Consolidated Balance Sheet, at October 31, 2013, inventory of $47.6 million was recorded to “Consolidated inventory not owned - other options”, with a corresponding amount of $45.7 million recorded to “Liabilities from inventory not owned”. In addition, we entered into a land banking arrangement in fiscal 2012 with GSO Capital Partners LP (“GSO”) that continued in fiscal 2013 whereby we sold a portfolio of our land parcels to GSO, and GSO provided us an option to purchase back finished lots on a quarterly basis. Because of our option to repurchase these parcels, for accounting purposes in accordance with ASC 360-20-40-38, this transaction is considered a financing rather than a sale. For purposes of our Consolidated Balance Sheet, at October 31, 2013, inventory of $52.4 million was recorded to “Consolidated inventory not owned - other options”, with a corresponding amount of $41.4 million recorded to “Liabilities from inventory not owned” for the amount of net cash received from the transactions. From time to time we enter into option agreements that include specific performance requirements, whereby we are required to purchase a minimum number of lots. Because of our obligation to purchase these lots, for accounting purposes in accordance with ASC 360-20-40-38, we are required to record this inventory on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of October 31, 2013, we had $0.8 million of specific performance options recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets to “Consolidated inventory not owned - specific performance options”, with a corresponding amount recorded to “Liabilities from inventory not owned”.

When possible, we option property for development prior to acquisition. By optioning property, we are only subject to the loss of the cost of the option and predevelopment costs if we choose not to exercise the option (other than with respect to specific performance options discussed above). As a result, our commitment for major land acquisitions is reduced. The costs associated with optioned properties are included in “Land and land options held for future development or sale inventory”. Also included in "Land and land options held for future development or sale inventory" are amounts associated with inventory in mothballed communities. We mothball (or stop development on) certain communities when we determine the current performance does not justify further investment at the time. That is, we believe we will generate higher returns if we decide against spending money to improve land today and save the raw land until such times as the markets improve or we determine to sell the property. As of October 31, 2013, we have mothballed land in 50 communities. The book value associated with these communities at October 31, 2013 was $115.9 million, net of impairment charges recorded in prior periods of $431.6 million. We continually review communities to determine if mothballing is appropriate. During fiscal 2013, we mothballed one community, re-activated three previously mothballed communities and sold one mothballed community. Our inventory representing “Land and land options held for future development or sale” at October 31, 2013, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, increased by $6.2 million compared to October 31, 2012. The increase was primarily due to the acquisition of new land in all segments during fiscal 2013, offset by the movement of certain of our communities from held for future development to sold and unsold homes and lots under development during the period, combined with land sales in the Northeast and Southwest.

Inventories held for sale, which are land parcels where we have decided not to build homes, represented $2.7 million of our total inventories at October 31, 2013, and are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. In determining fair value for land held for sale, management considers, among other things, prices for land in recent comparable sale transactions, market analysis studies, which include the estimated price a willing buyer would pay for the land (other than in a forced liquidation sale) and recent bona fide offers received from outside third parties.

35

The following tables summarize home sites included in our total residential real estate. The increase in total home sites available at October 31, 2013 compared to October 31, 2012 is attributable to signing new land option agreements and acquiring new land parcels, offset by terminating certain option agreements and delivering homes.

|  | Total Home Sites |  |  | Contracted Not Delivered |  |  | Remaining Home Sites Available |
October 31, 2013: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Northeast |  |  | 4,768 |  |  |  | 220 |  |  |  | 4,548 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 5,598 |  |  |  | 271 |  |  |  | 5,327 |
Midwest |  |  | 4,792 |  |  |  | 605 |  |  |  | 4,187 |
Southeast |  |  | 3,835 |  |  |  | 308 |  |  |  | 3,527 |
Southwest |  |  | 7,060 |  |  |  | 677 |  |  |  | 6,383 |
West |  |  | 6,044 |  |  |  | 86 |  |  |  | 5,958 |
Consolidated total |  |  | 32,097 |  |  |  | 2,167 |  |  |  | 29,930 |
Unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 2,613 |  |  |  | 225 |  |  |  | 2,388 |
Total including unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 34,710 |  |  |  | 2,392 |  |  |  | 32,318 |
Owned |  |  | 16,326 |  |  |  | 1,645 |  |  |  | 14,681 |
Optioned |  |  | 15,523 |  |  |  | 274 |  |  |  | 15,249 |
Construction to permanent financing lots |  |  | 248 |  |  |  | 248 |  |  |  | - |
Consolidated total |  |  | 32,097 |  |  |  | 2,167 |  |  |  | 29,930 |
Lots controlled by unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 2,613 |  |  |  | 225 |  |  |  | 2,388 |
Total including unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 34,710 |  |  |  | 2,392 |  |  |  | 32,318 |
October 31, 2012: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Northeast |  |  | 4,363 |  |  |  | 264 |  |  |  | 4,099 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 5,878 |  |  |  | 266 |  |  |  | 5,612 |
Midwest |  |  | 3,204 |  |  |  | 427 |  |  |  | 2,777 |
Southeast |  |  | 2,179 |  |  |  | 235 |  |  |  | 1,944 |
Southwest |  |  | 5,753 |  |  |  | 506 |  |  |  | 5,247 |
West |  |  | 6,642 |  |  |  | 191 |  |  |  | 6,451 |
Consolidated total |  |  | 28,019 |  |  |  | 1,889 |  |  |  | 26,130 |
Unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 1,774 |  |  |  | 256 |  |  |  | 1,518 |
Total including unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 29,793 |  |  |  | 2,145 |  |  |  | 27,648 |
Owned |  |  | 16,427 |  |  |  | 1,499 |  |  |  | 14,928 |
Optioned |  |  | 11,418 |  |  |  | 216 |  |  |  | 11,202 |
Construction to permanent financing lots |  |  | 174 |  |  |  | 174 |  |  |  | - |
Consolidated total |  |  | 28,019 |  |  |  | 1,889 |  |  |  | 26,130 |
Lots controlled by unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 1,774 |  |  |  | 256 |  |  |  | 1,518 |
Total including unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 29,793 |  |  |  | 2,145 |  |  |  | 27,648 |

The following table summarizes our started or completed unsold homes and models, excluding unconsolidated joint ventures, in active and substantially completed communities. Started or completed unsold homes decreased in total, and on a per active selling community basis, from October 31, 2012 to October 31, 2013, primarily due to increased sales pace in many of our homebuilding markets. Model homes decreased in total from October 31, 2012 to October 31, 2013, primarily due to model homes that were sold to a third party in sales lease-back transactions during fiscal 2013.

36

|  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |
|  | Unsold Homes |  |  | Models |  |  | Total |  |  | Unsold Homes |  |  | Models |  |  | Total |
Northeast |  |  | 95 |  |  |  | 14 |  |  |  | 109 |  |  |  | 116 |  |  |  | 9 |  |  |  | 125 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 78 |  |  |  | 9 |  |  |  | 87 |  |  |  | 65 |  |  |  | 7 |  |  |  | 72 |
Midwest |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 25 |  |  |  | 19 |  |  |  | 22 |  |  |  | 41 |
Southeast |  |  | 57 |  |  |  | 9 |  |  |  | 66 |  |  |  | 55 |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 65 |
Southwest |  |  | 346 |  |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | 359 |  |  |  | 355 |  |  |  | 19 |  |  |  | 374 |
West |  |  | 40 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 48 |  |  |  | 39 |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 45 |
Total |  |  | 633 |  |  |  | 61 |  |  |  | 694 |  |  |  | 649 |  |  |  | 73 |  |  |  | 722 |
Started or completed unsold homes and models per active selling communities(1) |  |  | 3.3 |  |  |  | 0.3 |  |  |  | 3.6 |  |  |  | 3.8 |  |  |  | 0.4 |  |  |  | 4.2 |

(1) | Active selling communities (which are communities that are open for sale with 10 or more home sites available) were 192 and 172 at October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Ratio does not include substantially completed communities, which are communities with less than 10 home sites available. |

Homebuilding restricted cash and cash equivalents decreased $31.4 million to $10.3 million at October 31, 2013 compared to October 31, 2012. The decrease was primarily related to the release of cash securitizing letters of credit as we transitioned from having letters of credit issued under our letter of credit agreements and facilities that required cash collateral to having letters of credit issued under our new Credit Facility that does not require any cash collateral. Also contributing to the decrease was a reduction in our surety bond escrow cash requirements during fiscal 2013.

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures decreased $9.6 million during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013. The decrease was primarily due to reduced advances at October 31, 2013 as compared to October 31, 2012. Partially offsetting this decrease was an increase related to the investment in two new homebuilding joint ventures during fiscal 2013. As of October 31, 2013, we had investments in seven homebuilding joint ventures and one land development joint venture. We have no guarantees associated with our unconsolidated joint ventures, other than guarantees limited only to performance and completion of development, environmental indemnification and standard warranty and representation against fraud misrepresentation and similar actions, including a voluntary bankruptcy.

Receivables, deposits and notes decreased $16.7 million from October 31, 2012 to $45.1 million at October 31, 2013. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in receivables for home closings as a result of cash in transit from various title companies at the end of the respective periods. In addition, although we received reimbursements from our insurance carriers for certain warranty claims, we also increased our allowance for doubtful accounts related to certain other of our insurance receivables and other note receivables.

Property, plant and equipment decreased $2.3 million during the year ended October 31, 2013 primarily due to depreciation and a small amount of disposals, which were offset by minor additions for leasehold improvements during the period.

Prepaid expenses and other assets were as follows as of:

(In thousands) |  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |  |  | Dollar Change |
Prepaid insurance |  |  | $3,213 |  |  |  | $1,729 |  |  |  | $1,484 |
Prepaid project costs |  |  | 23,841 |  |  |  | 24,008 |  |  |  | (167 | )
Net rental properties |  |  | 1,975 |  |  |  | 5,430 |  |  |  | (3,455 | )
Other prepaids |  |  | 30,055 |  |  |  | 26,086 |  |  |  | 3,969 |
Other assets |  |  | 267 |  |  |  | 9,441 |  |  |  | (9,174 | )
Total |  |  | $59,351 |  |  |  | $66,694 |  |  |  | $(7,343 | )

37

Prepaid insurance increased due to premium payments made on certain liability insurance policies during fiscal 2013. These costs are amortized over the life of the associated insurance policy, which can be one to three years. Prepaid project costs consist of community specific expenditures that are used over the life of the community. Such prepaids are expensed as homes are delivered. Net rental properties decreased primarily due to the sale of our last senior residential rental property during the second quarter of fiscal 2013. The remaining balance of net rental properties represents leasehold improvements for an office building that we fully sub-lease. Other prepaids increased primarily as a result of fees paid in connection with our new Credit Facility entered into during the third quarter of fiscal 2013, along with prepaid payroll taxes related to the timing of the Company’s payroll at October 31, 2013. Other assets decreased mainly due to the sale of Company-owned life insurance policies to a third party during fiscal 2013 for approximately book value.

Financial Services - Mortgage loans held for sale consist primarily of residential mortgages receivable held for sale, of which $109.7 million and $115.0 million at October 31, 2013 and October 31, 2012, respectively, were being temporarily warehoused and are awaiting sale in the secondary mortgage market. The decrease in mortgage loans held for sale from October 31, 2012 was primarily related to the timing of loans closed during fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.

Financial Services – Other assets decreased $6.0 million to $4.3 million at October 31, 2013 compared to October 31, 2012. The decrease is related to the closing of mortgages in the first quarter of fiscal 2013, which were funded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, in anticipation of home closings on the last days of October 2012 that did not occur until early November, due to weather-related delays from Hurricane Sandy.

Nonrecourse mortgages were $62.9 million at October 31, 2013 and $38.3 million at October 31, 2012. The increase was primarily due to new mortgages for communities in the Northeast, the Mid-Atlantic, the Midwest, the Southwest and the West obtained during fiscal 2013, along with increased borrowings on certain of our existing non-recourse mortgages. Offsetting the increase was a decrease related to a property in the Mid-Atlantic, which we had previously acquired when our partner in a land development joint venture transferred its interest in the venture to us, that was foreclosed on in fiscal 2013. As a result, the non-recourse liability of $9.5 million and corresponding inventory balance were taken off our balance sheet for the second quarter of fiscal 2013. Also offsetting the increase during the period were principal payments made on certain of our existing non-recourse mortgages.

Accounts payable and other liabilities are as follows as of:

(In thousands) |  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |  |  | Dollar Change |
Accounts payable |  |  | $98,585 |  |  |  | $89,310 |  |  |  | $9,275 |
Reserves |  |  | 136,029 |  |  |  | 129,025 |  |  |  | 7,004 |
Accrued expenses |  |  | 26,454 |  |  |  | 29,969 |  |  |  | (3,515 | )
Accrued compensation |  |  | 39,704 |  |  |  | 26,625 |  |  |  | 13,079 |
Other liabilities |  |  | 6,992 |  |  |  | 21,581 |  |  |  | (14,589 | )
Total |  |  | $307,764 |  |  |  | $296,510 |  |  |  | $11,254 |

The increase in accounts payable was primarily due to the higher volume of deliveries in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, along with a change in the scheduled timing of certain of our monthly payments. Reserves increased during the period as new accruals for general liability insurance exceeded payments for warranty related claims. The decrease in accrued expenses is primarily due to decreases in property tax accruals and amortization of abandoned lease space accruals. The increase in accrued compensation is primarily due to increased bonus accruals as profitability increased in many of our markets, as well as for the consolidated Company, in fiscal 2013. Other liabilities decreased primarily due to installment payments made to a former joint venture partner for the buy-out of their share of the joint venture during fiscal 2012.

Customer deposits increased to $30.1 million at October 31, 2013 from $23.8 million at October 31, 2012. This increase is primarily attributable to the increase in backlog as of October 31, 2013.

Liabilities from inventory not owned increased $10.1 million to $87.9 million at October 31, 2013 from $77.8 million at October 31, 2012. The increase is primarily due to the model home and land banking programs described above with the change in inventory not owned discussion.

Financial Services - Accounts payable and other liabilities decreased $4.7 million to $32.9 million at October 31, 2013. The decrease primarily related to the decrease in restricted cash in our title company during the period, due to a decrease in the volume and timing of home closings during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.

Financial Services - Mortgage warehouse lines of credit decreased $15.8 million from $107.5 million at October 31, 2012, to $91.7 million at October 31, 2013. The decrease correlates to the decrease in the volume of mortgage loans held for sale during the period, along with the decrease in financial services other assets, discussed above.

38

Accrued interest increased $8.1 million to $28.3 million at October 31, 2013 as compared to October 31, 2012. This increase is due to the timing of semi-annual interest payments on our bonds.

Income taxes payable of $6.9 million at October 31, 2012 decreased $3.6 million during the year ended October 31, 2013 to $3.3 million primarily due to the release of reserves for a federal tax position that was settled with the Internal Revenue Service during the first quarter of fiscal 2013, offset by state tax expense.

Results of Operations

Total Revenues

Compared to the prior period, revenues increased (decreased) as follows:

|  | Year Ended |
(Dollars in thousands) |  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |  |  | October 31, 2011 |
Homebuilding: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Sale of homes |  |  | $378,747 |  |  |  | $333,106 |  |  |  | $(255,025 | )
Land sales |  |  | (14,077 | ) |  |  | 5,043 |  |  |  | 19,925 |
Other revenues |  |  | (7,762 | ) |  |  | 3,043 |  |  |  | 657 |
Financial services |  |  | 8,992 |  |  |  | 9,254 |  |  |  | (2,492 | )
Total change |  |  | $365,900 |  |  |  | $350,446 |  |  |  | $(236,935 | )
Total revenues percent change |  |  | 24.6 | % |  |  | 30.9 | % |  |  | (17.3 | )%

Homebuilding

Sale of homes revenues increased $378.7 million, or 26.9%, for the year ended October 31, 2013, increased $333.1 million, or 31.1%, for the year ended October 31, 2012 and decreased $255.0 million, or 19.2%, for the year ended October 31, 2011. The increased revenues in fiscal 2013 were primarily due to the number of home deliveries increasing 12.6% and the average price per home increasing to $338,839 from $300,595 in fiscal 2012. The increased revenues in fiscal 2012 were primarily due to the number of home deliveries increasing 22.0% and the average price per home increasing to $300,595 from $279,873 in 2011. The decreased revenues in fiscal 2011 were primarily due to the number of home deliveries declining 19.0% and the decrease in average price per home. The fluctuations in average prices were a result of the geographic and community mix of our deliveries, as well as price increases in certain of our individual communities. During fiscal 2013 and 2012, we were able to raise prices in a number of our communities. For information on land sales, see the section titled “Land Sales and Other Revenues” below.

39

Information on homes delivered by segment is set forth below:

|  | Year Ended |
(Housing Revenue in thousands) |  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |  |  | October 31, 2011 |
Northeast: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Housing revenues |  |  | $279,695 |  |  |  | $218,396 |  |  |  | $179,866 |
Homes delivered |  |  | 617 |  |  |  | 505 |  |  |  | 399 |
Average price |  |  | $453,314 |  |  |  | $432,467 |  |  |  | $450,792 |
Mid-Atlantic: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Housing revenues |  |  | $288,323 |  |  |  | $268,880 |  |  |  | $199,061 |
Homes delivered |  |  | 623 |  |  |  | 649 |  |  |  | 524 |
Average price |  |  | $462,798 |  |  |  | $414,299 |  |  |  | $379,887 |
Midwest: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Housing revenues |  |  | $162,758 |  |  |  | $106,539 |  |  |  | $70,465 |
Homes delivered |  |  | 657 |  |  |  | 477 |  |  |  | 360 |
Average price |  |  | $247,730 |  |  |  | $223,352 |  |  |  | $195,736 |
Southeast: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Housing revenues |  |  | $146,264 |  |  |  | $113,347 |  |  |  | $79,146 |
Homes delivered |  |  | 535 |  |  |  | 482 |  |  |  | 339 |
Average price |  |  | $273,391 |  |  |  | $235,160 |  |  |  | $233,469 |
Southwest: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Housing revenues |  |  | $684,258 |  |  |  | $515,757 |  |  |  | $418,631 |
Homes delivered |  |  | 2,331 |  |  |  | 2,003 |  |  |  | 1,726 |
Average price |  |  | $293,547 |  |  |  | $257,492 |  |  |  | $242,544 |
West: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Housing revenues |  |  | $223,029 |  |  |  | $182,661 |  |  |  | $125,305 |
Homes delivered |  |  | 503 |  |  |  | 560 |  |  |  | 484 |
Average price |  |  | $443,398 |  |  |  | $326,180 |  |  |  | $258,895 |
Consolidated total: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Housing revenues |  |  | $1,784,327 |  |  |  | $1,405,580 |  |  |  | $1,072,474 |
Homes delivered |  |  | 5,266 |  |  |  | 4,676 |  |  |  | 3,832 |
Average price |  |  | $338,839 |  |  |  | $300,595 |  |  |  | $279,873 |
Unconsolidated joint ventures: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Housing revenues |  |  | $306,174 |  |  |  | $320,657 |  |  |  | $172,343 |
Homes delivered |  |  | 664 |  |  |  | 680 |  |  |  | 384 |
Average price |  |  | $461,105 |  |  |  | $471,554 |  |  |  | $448,810 |
Total including unconsolidated joint ventures: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Housing revenues |  |  | $2,090,501 |  |  |  | $1,726,237 |  |  |  | $1,244,817 |
Homes delivered |  |  | 5,930 |  |  |  | 5,356 |  |  |  | 4,216 |
Average price |  |  | $352,530 |  |  |  | $322,300 |  |  |  | $295,260 |

The increase in housing revenues and deliveries during year ended October 31, 2013, as compared to year ended October 31, 2012, was primarily attributed to market improvements demonstrated by an increase in sales pace per community from 28.1 to 30.7 for fiscal 2012 and 2013, respectively. Housing revenues and average sales prices in 2013 increased in all of our homebuilding segments combined by 26.9% and 12.7%, respectively. In our homebuilding segments, homes delivered increased in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012 by 22.2%, 37.7%, 11.0%, and 16.4%, in the Northeast, Midwest, Southeast, and Southwest, respectively, and decreased by 4.0% and 10.2% in the Mid-Atlantic and West, respectively.

The increase in housing revenues and deliveries during the year ended October 31, 2012, as compared to year ended October 31, 2011, was primarily attributed to market improvements demonstrated by an increase in sales pace per community from 21.3 to 28.1 for fiscal 2011 and 2012, respectively. Housing revenues and average sales prices in 2012 increased in all of our homebuilding segments combined by 31.1% and 7.4%, respectively. In our homebuilding segments, homes delivered increased in fiscal 2012 as compared to fiscal 2011 by 26.6%, 23.9%, 32.5%, 42.2%, 16.0% and 15.7% in the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Southeast, Southwest and West, respectively.

40

Quarterly housing revenues and net sales contracts by segment, excluding unconsolidated joint ventures, for the years ending October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are set forth below:

|  | Quarter Ended |
(In thousands) |  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | July 31, 2013 |  |  | April 30, 2013 |  |  | January 31, 2013 |
Housing revenues: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Northeast |  |  | $105,914 |  |  |  | $66,447 |  |  |  | $53,099 |  |  |  | $54,234 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 89,048 |  |  |  | 89,123 |  |  |  | 57,706 |  |  |  | 52,447 |
Midwest |  |  | 53,313 |  |  |  | 37,918 |  |  |  | 39,356 |  |  |  | 32,172 |
Southeast |  |  | 45,276 |  |  |  | 35,265 |  |  |  | 37,119 |  |  |  | 28,605 |
Southwest |  |  | 220,948 |  |  |  | 181,593 |  |  |  | 160,988 |  |  |  | 120,728 |
West |  |  | 63,595 |  |  |  | 52,030 |  |  |  | 61,308 |  |  |  | 46,095 |
Consolidated total |  |  | $578,094 |  |  |  | $462,376 |  |  |  | $409,576 |  |  |  | $334,281 |
Sales contracts (net of cancellations): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Northeast |  |  | $68,499 |  |  |  | $69,118 |  |  |  | $86,311 |  |  |  | $45,356 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 71,797 |  |  |  | 79,104 |  |  |  | 89,896 |  |  |  | 69,922 |
Midwest |  |  | 59,808 |  |  |  | 57,066 |  |  |  | 60,898 |  |  |  | 39,988 |
Southeast |  |  | 42,901 |  |  |  | 54,581 |  |  |  | 51,479 |  |  |  | 33,263 |
Southwest |  |  | 149,594 |  |  |  | 195,403 |  |  |  | 235,517 |  |  |  | 159,269 |
West |  |  | 50,747 |  |  |  | 39,322 |  |  |  | 55,461 |  |  |  | 49,148 |
Consolidated total |  |  | $443,346 |  |  |  | $494,594 |  |  |  | $579,562 |  |  |  | $396,946 |

|  | Quarter Ended |
(In thousands) |  | October 31, 2012 |  |  | July 31, 2012 |  |  | April 30, 2012 |  |  | January 31, 2012 |
Housing revenues: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Northeast |  |  | $71,675 |  |  |  | $63,811 |  |  |  | $49,834 |  |  |  | $33,077 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 76,259 |  |  |  | 75,075 |  |  |  | 64,432 |  |  |  | 53,113 |
Midwest |  |  | 36,579 |  |  |  | 28,213 |  |  |  | 23,590 |  |  |  | 18,157 |
Southeast |  |  | 47,328 |  |  |  | 24,432 |  |  |  | 21,462 |  |  |  | 20,125 |
Southwest |  |  | 170,913 |  |  |  | 139,407 |  |  |  | 114,284 |  |  |  | 91,153 |
West |  |  | 66,521 |  |  |  | 40,543 |  |  |  | 38,892 |  |  |  | 36,705 |
Consolidated total |  |  | $469,275 |  |  |  | $371,481 |  |  |  | $312,494 |  |  |  | $252,330 |
Sales contracts (net of cancellations): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Northeast |  |  | $68,779 |  |  |  | $54,575 |  |  |  | $54,887 |  |  |  | $28,198 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 63,208 |  |  |  | 55,399 |  |  |  | 82,121 |  |  |  | 49,622 |
Midwest |  |  | 40,446 |  |  |  | 43,100 |  |  |  | 45,431 |  |  |  | 28,408 |
Southeast |  |  | 43,624 |  |  |  | 38,562 |  |  |  | 39,305 |  |  |  | 24,471 |
Southwest |  |  | 153,700 |  |  |  | 166,120 |  |  |  | 166,529 |  |  |  | 103,860 |
West |  |  | 71,108 |  |  |  | 65,640 |  |  |  | 61,670 |  |  |  | 30,206 |
Consolidated total |  |  | $440,865 |  |  |  | $423,396 |  |  |  | $449,943 |  |  |  | $264,765 |

|  | Quarter Ended |
(In thousands) |  | October 31, 2011 |  |  | July 31, 2011 |  |  | April 30, 2011 |  |  | January 31, 2011 |
Housing revenues: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Northeast |  |  | $57,014 |  |  |  | $43,443 |  |  |  | $36,126 |  |  |  | $43,284 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 49,050 |  |  |  | 57,104 |  |  |  | 46,643 |  |  |  | 46,263 |
Midwest |  |  | 21,249 |  |  |  | 17,716 |  |  |  | 17,466 |  |  |  | 14,034 |
Southeast |  |  | 29,064 |  |  |  | 17,894 |  |  |  | 16,684 |  |  |  | 15,504 |
Southwest |  |  | 126,204 |  |  |  | 107,861 |  |  |  | 97,339 |  |  |  | 87,227 |
West |  |  | 30,555 |  |  |  | 32,461 |  |  |  | 32,716 |  |  |  | 29,573 |
Consolidated total |  |  | $313,136 |  |  |  | $276,479 |  |  |  | $246,974 |  |  |  | $235,885 |
Sales contracts (net of cancellations): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Northeast |  |  | $40,014 |  |  |  | $56,427 |  |  |  | $57,394 |  |  |  | $37,435 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 56,269 |  |  |  | 73,986 |  |  |  | 55,874 |  |  |  | 52,013 |
Midwest |  |  | 20,863 |  |  |  | 21,273 |  |  |  | 20,521 |  |  |  | 12,331 |
Southeast |  |  | 20,775 |  |  |  | 28,301 |  |  |  | 23,345 |  |  |  | 15,640 |
Southwest |  |  | 101,549 |  |  |  | 113,370 |  |  |  | 104,010 |  |  |  | 85,787 |
West |  |  | 38,953 |  |  |  | 38,950 |  |  |  | 32,423 |  |  |  | 22,282 |
Consolidated total |  |  | $278,423 |  |  |  | $332,307 |  |  |  | $293,567 |  |  |  | $225,488 |

41

Contracts per average active selling community in fiscal 2013 were 30.7 compared to fiscal 2012 of 28.1. Our reported level of sales contracts (net of cancellations) has been impacted by the increase in the pace of sales in all of the Company’s segments, due to improved market conditions and lower interest rates on mortgages during fiscal 2013. Cancellation rates represent the number of cancelled contracts in the quarter divided by the number of gross sales contracts executed in the quarter. For comparison, the following are historical cancellation rates, excluding unconsolidated joint ventures.

Quarter |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |
First |  |  | 16 | % |  |  | 21 | % |  |  | 22 | % |  |  | 21 | % |  |  | 31 | %
Second |  |  | 15 | % |  |  | 16 | % |  |  | 20 | % |  |  | 17 | % |  |  | 24 | %
Third |  |  | 17 | % |  |  | 20 | % |  |  | 18 | % |  |  | 23 | % |  |  | 23 | %
Fourth |  |  | 23 | % |  |  | 23 | % |  |  | 21 | % |  |  | 24 | % |  |  | 24 | %

Another common and meaningful way to analyze our cancellation trends is to compare the number of contract cancellations as a percentage of the beginning backlog. The following table provides this historical comparison, excluding unconsolidated joint ventures.

Quarter |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |  |  | 2010 |  |  | 2009 |
First |  |  | 12 | % |  |  | 18 | % |  |  | 18 | % |  |  | 13 | % |  |  | 22 | %
Second |  |  | 15 | % |  |  | 21 | % |  |  | 22 | % |  |  | 17 | % |  |  | 31 | %
Third |  |  | 12 | % |  |  | 18 | % |  |  | 20 | % |  |  | 15 | % |  |  | 23 | %
Fourth |  |  | 14 | % |  |  | 18 | % |  |  | 18 | % |  |  | 25 | % |  |  | 20 | %

Historically, most cancellations occur within the legal rescission period, which varies by state but is generally less than two weeks after the signing of the contract. Cancellations also occur as a result of a buyer's failure to qualify for a mortgage, which generally occurs during the first few weeks after signing. However, beginning in fiscal 2007 and continuing through fiscal 2009, we started experiencing higher than normal numbers of cancellations later in the construction process. These cancellations were related primarily to falling prices, sometimes due to new discounts offered by us and other builders, leading the buyer to lose confidence in their contract price and due to tighter mortgage underwriting criteria leading to some customers’ inability to be approved for a mortgage loan. In some cases, the buyer will walk away from a significant nonrefundable deposit that we recognize as other revenues. Our cancellations as a percentage of beginning backlog for fiscal 2013 were lower than what we believe to be normalized levels for the fourth quarter of 2013. Our cancellation rate based on gross sales contracts for fiscal 2013 was more typical of what we believe to be more normalized levels, except for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, which increased in conjunction with the slowdown in sales during August and September 2013. However, in October and November 2013, sales returned to prior year levels. It is difficult to predict what cancellation rates will be in the future.

An important indicator of our future results is recently signed contracts and our home contract backlog for future deliveries. Our consolidated contract backlog, excluding unconsolidated joint ventures, by segment is set forth below:

(Dollars In thousands) |  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |  |  | October 31, 2011 |
Northeast: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total contract backlog |  |  | $105,006 |  |  |  | $115,416 |  |  |  | $108,645 |
Number of homes |  |  | 220 |  |  |  | 264 |  |  |  | 265 |
Mid-Atlantic: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total contract backlog |  |  | $141,168 |  |  |  | $118,773 |  |  |  | $137,303 |
Number of homes |  |  | 271 |  |  |  | 266 |  |  |  | 325 |
Midwest: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total contract backlog |  |  | $150,716 |  |  |  | $95,716 |  |  |  | $44,870 |
Number of homes |  |  | 605 |  |  |  | 427 |  |  |  | 226 |
Southeast: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total contract backlog |  |  | $98,656 |  |  |  | $62,696 |  |  |  | $30,080 |
Number of homes |  |  | 308 |  |  |  | 235 |  |  |  | 124 |
Southwest: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total contract backlog |  |  | $216,367 |  |  |  | $160,840 |  |  |  | $86,388 |
Number of homes |  |  | 677 |  |  |  | 506 |  |  |  | 331 |
West: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total contract backlog |  |  | $50,526 |  |  |  | $78,877 |  |  |  | $32,914 |
Number of homes |  |  | 86 |  |  |  | 191 |  |  |  | 116 |
Totals: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total consolidated contract backlog |  |  | $762,439 |  |  |  | $632,318 |  |  |  | $440,200 |
Number of homes |  |  | 2,167 |  |  |  | 1,889 |  |  |  | 1,387 |

42

Our net contracts for the full years of fiscal 2013 and 2012, excluding unconsolidated joint ventures, increased 7.9% and increased 27.7%, respectively, as compared to the prior fiscal year. In the month of November 2013, excluding unconsolidated joint ventures, we signed an additional 345 net contracts amounting to $133.5 million in contract value.

Total cost of sales on our Consolidated Statements of Operations includes expenses for consolidated housing and land and lot sales, including inventory impairment loss and land option write-offs (defined as “land charges” in the tables below). A breakout of such expenses for housing sales and housing gross margin is set forth below:

|  | Year Ended |
(Dollars In thousands) |  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |  |  | October 31, 2011 |
Sale of homes |  |  | $1,784,327 |  |  |  | $1,405,580 |  |  |  | $1,072,474 |
Cost of sales, net of impairment reversals and excluding interest expense |  |  | 1,426,032 |  |  |  | 1,155,643 |  |  |  | 905,253 |
Homebuilding gross margin, before cost of sales interest expense and land charges |  |  | 358,295 |  |  |  | 249,937 |  |  |  | 167,221 |
Cost of sales interest expense, excluding land sales interest expense |  |  | 51,939 |  |  |  | 48,843 |  |  |  | 57,016 |
Homebuilding gross margin, after cost of sales interest expense, before land charges |  |  | 306,356 |  |  |  | 201,094 |  |  |  | 110,205 |
Land charges |  |  | 4,965 |  |  |  | 12,530 |  |  |  | 101,749 |
Homebuilding gross margin, after cost of sales interest expense and land charges |  |  | $301,391 |  |  |  | $188,564 |  |  |  | $8,456 |
Gross margin percentage, before cost of sales interest expense and land charges |  |  | 20.1 | % |  |  | 17.8 | % |  |  | 15.6 | %
Gross margin percentage, after cost of sales interest expense, before land charges |  |  | 17.2 | % |  |  | 14.3 | % |  |  | 10.3 | %
Gross margin percentage after cost of sales interest expense and land charges |  |  | 16.9 | % |  |  | 13.4 | % |  |  | 0.8 | %

Cost of sales expenses as a percentage of consolidated home sales revenues are presented below:

|  | Year Ended |
|  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |  |  | October 31, 2011 |
Sale of homes |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | %
Cost of sales, net of impairment reversals and excluding interest: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Housing, land and development costs |  |  | 70.0 | % |  |  | 71.1 | % |  |  | 71.9 | %
Commissions |  |  | 3.3 | % |  |  | 3.4 | % |  |  | 3.5 | %
Financing concessions |  |  | 1.4 | % |  |  | 1.7 | % |  |  | 2.0 | %
Overheads |  |  | 5.2 | % |  |  | 6.0 | % |  |  | 7.0 | %
Total cost of sales, before interest expense and land charges |  |  | 79.9 | % |  |  | 82.2 | % |  |  | 84.4 | %
Gross margin percentage, before cost of sales interest expense and land charges |  |  | 20.1 | % |  |  | 17.8 | % |  |  | 15.6 | %
Cost of sales interest |  |  | 2.9 | % |  |  | 3.5 | % |  |  | 5.3 | %
Gross margin percentage, after cost of sales interest expense and before land charges |  |  | 17.2 | % |  |  | 14.3 | % |  |  | 10.3 | %

We sell a variety of home types in various communities, each yielding a different gross margin. As a result, depending on the mix of communities delivering homes, consolidated gross margin may fluctuate up or down. Total homebuilding gross margin percentage, before interest expense and land impairment and option write off charges, increased to 20.1% for the year ended October 31, 2013, compared to 17.8% for the same period last year. The increase in gross margin percentage was primarily due to the mix of higher margin homes delivered during the year ended October 31, 2013 compared to the prior year. This mix change is a result of delivering more homes in communities where we acquired the land more recently at lower costs than land acquired before the housing downturn. In addition, during fiscal 2013 and 2012 we saw an increase in the pace of sales in some of our markets and, as a result, in a majority of communities we were able to increase base prices and increase lot premiums. For the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, gross margin was favorably impacted by the reversal of prior period inventory impairments of $60.5 million, $75.7 million and $91.8 million, respectively, which represented 3.4%, 5.4% and 8.6%, respectively, of “Sale of homes” revenue. During fiscal 2011, there was a declining pace of sales in our markets which led to intense competition in many of our specific community locations. In order to attempt to maintain a reasonable pace of absorption, we increased incentives, reduced lot location premiums, and lowered some base prices, all of which significantly impacted our margins and resulted in significant inventory impairments.

43

Reflected as inventory impairment loss and land option write-offs in cost of sales (“land charges”), we have written-off or written-down certain inventories totaling $5.0 million, $12.5 million, and $101.7 million during the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively, to their estimated fair value. See “Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for an additional discussion. During the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, we wrote-off residential land options and approval and engineering costs totaling $2.6 million, $2.7 million, and $24.3 million, respectively, which are included in the total land charges mentioned above. When a community is redesigned or abandoned, engineering costs are written-off. Option, approval and engineering costs are written-off when a community’s pro forma profitability is not projected to produce adequate returns on the investment commensurate with the risk and when we believe it is probable we will cancel the option. Such write-offs were located in all of our segments in fiscal 2011 and 2012 and all segments except the West in 2013. The inventory impairments amounted to $2.4 million, $9.8 million, and $77.5 million for the years ending October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In fiscal 2013 and 2012, inventory impairments were lower than they had been in several years as we began to see some stabilization in the prices and sales pace in some of our segments as reflected by the overall improvement of the housing industry. In fiscal 2011, the majority of the impairments were in the Northeast and West segments. Impairments in the Northeast were primarily due to increased weakness in the market, primarily in Northern New Jersey and communities now classified as held for sale or sold and thus adjusted to fair value. In the West, where we had significant competition from foreclosures, we had reduced prices in order to maintain sales pace. This was especially true in some of the more fringe markets in our West segment. It is difficult to predict if this trend will continue, and should it become necessary to further lower prices, or should the estimates or expectations used in determining estimated cash flows or fair value decrease or differ from current estimates in the future, we may need to recognize additional impairments.

Below is a breakdown of our lot option walk-aways and impairments by segment for fiscal 2013. In 2013, we walked away from 9.4% of all the lots we controlled under option contracts. The remaining 90.6% of our option lots are in communities that we believe remain economically feasible.

The following table represents lot option walk-aways by segment for the year ended October 31, 2013:

(In millions) |  | Dollar Amount of Walk Away |  |  | Number of Walk-Away Lots |  |  | % of Walk-Away Lots |  |  | Total Option Lots(1) |  |  | Walk-Away Lots as a % of Total Option Lots |
Northeast |  |  | $0.7 |  |  |  | 642 |  |  |  | 39.8 | % |  |  | 3,319 |  |  |  | 19.3 | %
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 0.1 |  |  |  | 280 |  |  |  | 17.4 | % |  |  | 3,245 |  |  |  | 8.6 | %
Midwest |  |  | 0.2 |  |  |  | 161 |  |  |  | 10.0 | % |  |  | 2,109 |  |  |  | 7.6 | %
Southeast |  |  | 0.2 |  |  |  | 192 |  |  |  | 11.9 | % |  |  | 2,672 |  |  |  | 7.2 | %
Southwest |  |  | 1.4 |  |  |  | 336 |  |  |  | 20.9 | % |  |  | 5,059 |  |  |  | 6.6 | %
West |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | 730 |  |  |  | 0 | %
Total |  |  | $2.6 |  |  |  | 1,611 |  |  |  | 100.0 | % |  |  | 17,134 |  |  |  | 9.4 | %

(1) | Includes lots optioned at October 31, 2013 and lots optioned that the Company walked away from in the year ended October 31, 2013.

We can incur costs while investigating land options, whereby we decided not to pursue the opportunity before we control the lots. These costs are expensed in the period we decided to no longer pursue the opportunity. For the year ended October 31, 2013, such costs were not significant and are therefore not shown in the tables above. In addition, we sometimes walk-away from a lot option when we have only incurred costs of less than $50,000, such costs are not shown in the tables above.

The following table represents impairments by segment for the year ended October 31, 2013:

(In millions) |  | Dollar Amount of Impairment |  |  | % of Impairments | (2) |  | Pre- Impairment Value(1) |  |  | % of Pre- Impairment Value |
Northeast |  |  | $2.4 |  |  |  | 100.0 | % |  |  | $7.7 |  |  |  | 31.2 | %
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | 0.1 |  |  |  | 0 | %
Midwest |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0 | %
Southeast |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | 0.4 |  |  |  | 0 | %
Southwest |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0 | %
West |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0 | %
Total |  |  | $2.4 |  |  |  | 100.0 | % |  |  | $8.2 |  |  |  | 29.3 |

(1) | Represents carrying value, net of prior period impairments, if any, at the time of recording the applicable period’s impairments.

(2) | During the year ended October 31, 2013, the Mid-Atlantic had an impairment totaling $2 thousand and the Southeast had an impairment totaling $17 thousand.

44

Land Sales and Other Revenues

Land sales and other revenues consist primarily of land and lot sales. A breakout of land and lot sales is set forth below:

|  | Year Ended |
(In thousands) |  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |  |  | October 31, 2011 |
Land and lot sales |  |  | $17,711 |  |  |  | $31,788 |  |  |  | $26,745 |
Cost of sales, net of impairment reversals and excluding interest |  |  | 16,012 |  |  |  | 24,158 |  |  |  | 8,648 |
Land and lot sales gross margin, excluding interest |  |  | 1,699 |  |  |  | 7,630 |  |  |  | 18,097 |
Land sales interest expense |  |  | 291 |  |  |  | 5,695 |  |  |  | 17,660 |
Land and lot sales gross margin, including interest |  |  | $1,408 |  |  |  | $1,935 |  |  |  | $437 |

Land sales are ancillary to our residential homebuilding operations and are expected to continue in the future but may significantly fluctuate up or down. Although we budget land sales, they are often dependent upon receiving approvals and entitlements, the timing of which can be uncertain. As a result, projecting the amount and timing of land sales is difficult. There were 14 land sales in the year ended October 31, 2013, compared to 16 in the same period of the prior year, which resulted in a decrease of $14.1 million in land sales revenue. There were 11 land sales in the year ended October 31, 2011, which resulted in an increase of $5.0 million in land sales revenue in fiscal 2012.

Land sales and other revenues decreased $21.8 million and increased $8.1 million for the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012 compared to the same period in the prior year. Other revenues include income from contract cancellations where the deposit has been forfeited due to contract terminations, interest income, cash discounts, buyer walk-aways, and miscellaneous one-time receipts. The decrease for the year ended October 31, 2013, compared to the year ended October 31, 2012, was mainly due to the decrease in land sales discussed above, a $3.0 million decrease in interest income recognized from a note receivable, as well as minor fluctuations spread across the various components of other revenues. The primary reason for the increase in land sales and other revenues for fiscal 2012 was due to the increase in land sales mentioned above, along with a $1.0 million increase in interest income recognized from a note receivable. The remaining increase relates to minor fluctuations among the various components of other revenues.

Homebuilding Selling, General and Administrative

Homebuilding selling, general and administrative (“SGA”) expenses increased $23.7 million to $165.8 million for the year ended October 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended October 31, 2012. This increase was due to higher insurance costs and construction defect reserves and additional reserves for a receivable from an insurance provider and a receivable related to a prior year land sale. However, these expenses increased by less than the increase in revenues. Therefore, SGA expenses as a percentage of homebuilding revenues improved to 9.2% for the year ended October 31, 2013 compared to 9.8% for the year ended October 31, 2012. SGA decreased to $142.1 million for the year ended October 31, 2012 from $161.5 million for the year ended October 31, 2011. These decreases in SGA expenses were the result of reduced costs through administrative consolidation and other cost saving measures.

45

Homebuilding Operations by Segment

Financial information relating to the Company’s operations was as follows:

Segment Analysis (Dollars in thousands, except average sales price)

|  | Years Ended October 31, |
|  | 2013 |  |  | Variance 2013 Compared to 2012 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | Variance 2012 Compared to 2011 |  |  | 2011 |
Northeast |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding revenue |  |  | $282,855 |  |  |  | $49,529 |  |  |  | $233,326 |  |  |  | $31,342 |  |  |  | $201,984 |
Income (loss) before income taxes |  |  | $1,519 |  |  |  | $6,202 |  |  |  | $(4,683 | ) |  |  | $94,593 |  |  |  | $(99,276 | )
Homes delivered |  |  | 617 |  |  |  | 112 |  |  |  | 505 |  |  |  | 106 |  |  |  | 399 |
Average sales price |  |  | $453,314 |  |  |  | $20,847 |  |  |  | $432,467 |  |  |  | $(18,325 | ) |  |  | $450,792 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding revenue |  |  | $289,303 |  |  |  | $16,223 |  |  |  | $273,080 |  |  |  | $73,364 |  |  |  | $199,716 |
Income (loss) before income taxes |  |  | $24,388 |  |  |  | $7,126 |  |  |  | $17,262 |  |  |  | $34,548 |  |  |  | $(17,286 | )
Homes delivered |  |  | 623 |  |  |  | (26 | ) |  |  | 649 |  |  |  | 125 |  |  |  | 524 |
Average sales price |  |  | $462,798 |  |  |  | $48,499 |  |  |  | $414,299 |  |  |  | $34,412 |  |  |  | $379,887 |
Midwest |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding revenue |  |  | $163,485 |  |  |  | $56,766 |  |  |  | $106,719 |  |  |  | $36,152 |  |  |  | $70,567 |
Income (loss) before income taxes |  |  | $12,270 |  |  |  | $12,017 |  |  |  | $253 |  |  |  | $9,230 |  |  |  | $(8,977 | )
Homes delivered |  |  | 657 |  |  |  | 180 |  |  |  | 477 |  |  |  | 117 |  |  |  | 360 |
Average sales price |  |  | $247,730 |  |  |  | $24,378 |  |  |  | $223,352 |  |  |  | $27,616 |  |  |  | $195,736 |
Southeast |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding revenue |  |  | $147,570 |  |  |  | $18,886 |  |  |  | $128,684 |  |  |  | $49,231 |  |  |  | $79,453 |
Income (loss) before income taxes |  |  | $6,455 |  |  |  | $11,283 |  |  |  | $(4,828 | ) |  |  | $7,046 |  |  |  | $(11,874 | )
Homes delivered |  |  | 535 |  |  |  | 53 |  |  |  | 482 |  |  |  | 143 |  |  |  | 339 |
Average sales price |  |  | $273,391 |  |  |  | $38,231 |  |  |  | $235,160 |  |  |  | $1,691 |  |  |  | $233,469 |
Southwest |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding revenue |  |  | $697,358 |  |  |  | $178,427 |  |  |  | $518,931 |  |  |  | $93,779 |  |  |  | $425,152 |
Income before income taxes |  |  | $76,459 |  |  |  | $34,281 |  |  |  | $42,178 |  |  |  | $12,862 |  |  |  | $29,316 |
Homes delivered |  |  | 2,331 |  |  |  | 328 |  |  |  | 2,003 |  |  |  | 277 |  |  |  | 1,726 |
Average sales price |  |  | $293,547 |  |  |  | $36,055 |  |  |  | $257,492 |  |  |  | $14,948 |  |  |  | $242,544 |
West |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding revenue |  |  | $223,086 |  |  |  | $37,235 |  |  |  | $185,851 |  |  |  | $57,193 |  |  |  | $128,658 |
Income (loss) before income taxes |  |  | $14,398 |  |  |  | $17,575 |  |  |  | $(3,177 | ) |  |  | $37,422 |  |  |  | $(40,599 | )
Homes delivered |  |  | 503 |  |  |  | (57 | ) |  |  | 560 |  |  |  | 76 |  |  |  | 484 |
Average sales price |  |  | $443,398 |  |  |  | $117,218 |  |  |  | $326,180 |  |  |  | $67,285 |  |  |  | $258,895 |

Homebuilding Results by Segment

Northeast – Homebuilding revenues increased 21.2% in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to a 22.2% increase in homes delivered and a 4.8% increase in average selling price, offset by an $11.8 million decrease in land sales and other revenue. The increase in average sales prices was the result of the mix of communities delivering in fiscal 2013 compared to 2012. Income before income taxes increased $6.2 million, compared to a loss before income taxes in the prior year, to a profit of $1.5 million, which was mainly due to the increase in homebuilding revenues discussed above, a decrease of $0.4 million in inventory impairment and land option write-offs and an increase in gross margin percentage before interest expense for fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012.

Homebuilding revenues increased 15.5% in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to a 26.6% increase in homes delivered partially offset by a 4.1% decrease in average selling price. The decrease in average sales prices was the result of the mix of communities delivering in fiscal 2012 compared to 2011. Loss before income taxes decreased $94.6 million to a loss of $4.7 million, which was mainly due to a decrease of $64.8 million in inventory impairment and land option write-offs. In addition, selling, general and administrative costs decreased $7.1 million due to decreased salaries from headcount reductions and other overhead cost savings, as well as the increase in gross margin percentage before interest expense for fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011.

Mid-Atlantic – Homebuilding revenues increased 5.9% in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to an 11.7% increase in average selling price, offset by a 4.0% decrease in homes delivered. The increase in average sales price was due to the mix of communities that delivered in 2013 compared to 2012. Income before income taxes increased $7.1 million to $24.4 million, due mainly to a decrease of $0.9 million in inventory impairment and land option write-offs, an increase of $3.7 million from income from unconsolidated joint ventures and the increase in homebuilding revenues discussed above. Additionally, the gross margin percentage before interest expense was relatively flat for the fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012.

46

Homebuilding revenues increased 36.7% in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to a 23.9% increase in homes delivered, a 9.1% increase in average selling price and a $3.5 million increase in land sales and other revenue. The increase in average sales price is due to the mix of communities that delivered in 2012 compared to 2011. Loss before income taxes decreased $34.6 million to a profit of $17.3 million, due mainly to a decrease of $8.5 million in inventory impairment and land option write-offs and a $5.4 million decrease in selling, general and administrative costs. Additionally, the gross margin percentage before interest expense was relatively flat for the fiscal year 2012 compared to fiscal year 2011.

Midwest – Homebuilding revenues increased 53.2% in 2013 compared to 2012. The increase was primarily due to a 37.7% increase in homes delivered and a 10.9% increase in average sales price. Income before income taxes increased $12.0 million to $12.3 million. The increase in income was primarily due to the increase in homebuilding revenues discussed above, a decrease of $1.6 million in inventory impairment and land option write-offs, and an increase in gross margin percentage before interest expense.

Homebuilding revenues increased 51.2% in 2012 compared to 2011. The increase was primarily due to a 32.5% increase in homes delivered and a 14.1% increase in average sales price. Loss before income taxes decreased $9.2 million to a profit of $0.3 million. The decrease in the loss was primarily due to the increase in homebuilding revenues discussed above and an increase in gross margin percentage before interest expense.

Southeast – Homebuilding revenues increased 14.7% in 2013 compared to 2012. The increase was primarily due to an 11.0% increase in homes delivered and a 16.3% increase in average sales price. Loss before income taxes decreased by $11.3 million to a profit of $6.5 million due to the increase in homebuilding revenues discussed above, a decrease of $3.3 million in inventory impairment and land option write-offs, a $2.5 million decrease in selling, general and administrative costs and an increase in gross margin percentage before interest expense.

Homebuilding revenues increased 62.0% in 2012 compared to 2011. The increase was primarily due to a 42.2% increase in homes delivered, a 0.7% increase in average sales price and a $15.0 million increase in land sales and other revenue. Loss before income taxes decreased $7.1 million to a loss of $4.8 million due to the increase in homebuilding revenues discussed above and an increase in gross margin percentage before interest expense.

Southwest – Homebuilding revenues increased 34.4% in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to a 16.4% increase in homes delivered, 14.0% increase in average sales price and a $9.9 million increase in land sales and other revenue. The increase in average sales price was due to the mix of communities that delivered in 2013 compared to 2012. Income before income taxes increased $34.3 million to $76.5 million in 2013 mainly due to the increase in homebuilding revenues discussed above. Additionally, the gross margin percentage before interest expense for fiscal year 2013 increased compared to fiscal year 2012.

Homebuilding revenues increased 22.1% in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to a 16.0% increase in homes delivered and a 6.2% increase in average sales price. The increase in average sales price is due to the mix of communities that delivered in 2012 compared to 2011. Income before income taxes increased $12.9 million to $42.2 million in 2012 mainly due to the increase in revenues previously mentioned. Gross margin percentage before interest expense for fiscal year 2012 was relatively flat compared to fiscal year 2011.

West – Homebuilding revenues increased 20.0% in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to a 35.9% increase in average sales price, partially offset by a 10.2% decrease in homes delivered, which was due to the different mix of communities delivered in fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012. Loss before income taxes decreased $17.6 million to a profit of $14.4 million in 2013 due mainly to a $2.3 million decrease in inventory impairment and land option write offs, and the increase in homebuilding revenues discussed above. In addition, there was a significant increase in gross margin percentage before interest expense.

Homebuilding revenues increased 44.5% in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to a 15.7% increase in homes delivered and a 26.0% increase in average sales price, due to the different mix of communities delivered in fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011. Loss before income taxes decreased $37.4 million to a loss of $3.2 million in 2012 due mainly to a $17.3 million decrease in inventory impairment and land option write offs, additional gross margin dollars from the increased revenues and a $6.3 million decrease in selling, general and administrative costs. In addition, there was an increase in gross margin percentage before interest expense.

47

Financial Services

Financial services consist primarily of originating mortgages from our home buyers, selling such mortgages in the secondary market, and title insurance activities. We use mandatory investor commitments and forward sales of mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) to hedge our mortgage-related interest rate exposure on agency and government loans. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk. Credit risk associated with MBS forward commitments and loan sales transactions is managed by limiting our counterparties to investment banks, federally regulated bank affiliates and other investors meeting our credit standards. Our risk, in the event of default by the purchaser, is the difference between the contract price and fair value of the MBS forward commitments. For the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, Federal Housing Administration and Veterans Administration (“FHA/VA”) loans represented 32.7%, 41.7%, and 47.2%, respectively, of our total loans. While the origination of FHA/VA loans have decreased over the last three fiscal years, our conforming conventional loan originations as a percentage of our total loans increased from 47.1% for fiscal 2011 to 53.7% for fiscal 2012 and to 62.7% for fiscal 2013. Profits and losses relating to the sale of mortgage loans are recognized when legal control passes to the buyer of the mortgage and the sales price is collected.

During the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, financial services provided an $18.7 million, $15.1 million and $8.1 million pretax profit, respectively. In fiscal 2013, financial services revenues increased $9.0 million to $47.7 million compared to fiscal 2012 due to increases in the number of mortgage settlements and the average price of the loans settled. In fiscal 2012, financial services revenue increased $9.3 million to $38.7 million compared to fiscal 2011 due to increases in the number of mortgage settlements and the average price of loans settled. In the market areas served by our wholly owned mortgage banking subsidiaries, approximately 71%, 76%, and 77% of our noncash home buyers obtained mortgages originated by these subsidiaries during the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Servicing rights on new mortgages originated by us are sold with the loans.

Corporate General and Administrative

Corporate general and administrative expenses include the operations at our headquarters in Red Bank, New Jersey. These expenses include payroll, stock compensation, facility and other costs associated with our executive offices, information services, human resources, corporate accounting, training, treasury, process redesign, internal audit, construction services, and administration of insurance, quality, and safety. Corporate general and administrative expenses increased $6.1 million for the year ended October 31, 2013 compared to the year ended October 31, 2012, and declined $1.7 million for the year ended October 31, 2012 compared to the year ended October 31, 2011. The increase in expenses for fiscal 2013 was due to increased total compensation as a result of a slight increase in headcount, additional amounts accrued for bonuses as a result of improved operating performance, including achieving profitability for fiscal 2013, and additional professional services for various corporate operations. The decrease in expenses in fiscal 2012 was due to the decrease in depreciation expense from capitalized software costs becoming fully depreciated coupled with no new significant additions of depreciable assets, and a continued effort to tighten variable spending.

Other Interest

Other interest decreased $6.6 million to $91.3 million for the year ended October 31, 2013 compared to October 31, 2012. For fiscal 2012, other interest increased $0.7 million to $97.9 million compared to October 31, 2011. Our assets that qualify for interest capitalization (inventory under development) are less than our debt, and therefore a portion of interest not covered by qualifying assets must be directly expensed. In fiscal 2013, our interest incurred decreased compared to the prior year due to the lower effective interest rates on our outstanding debt and lower overall balance of our outstanding debt, which resulted in less interest that was required to be directly expensed. For the 2012 and 2011 fiscal years, other interest was relatively flat.

Other Operations

Other operations consist primarily of miscellaneous residential housing operations expenses, senior rental residential property operations, rent expense for commercial office space, amortization of prepaid bond fees, minority interest relating to consolidated joint ventures, and corporate owned life insurance. Compared to the previous year, other operations decreased $3.4 million to $0.8 million for the year ended October 31, 2013, and decreased $0.6 million to $4.2 million for the year ended October 31, 2012. The decrease in expenses from October 31, 2013 compared to October 31, 2012 was due mainly to the $4.7 million of costs incurred from the debt exchange completed in fiscal 2012 discussed above under “Capital Resources and Liquidity” and also the gain recognized from the sale of one of our senior rental residential properties in 2013, partially offset by the loss of related rental income in fiscal 2013. Due to the then existing financial condition of K. Hovnanian as determined in accordance with ASC 470-60 and because the holders of the senior notes that exchanged such notes for 2021 Notes granted K. Hovnanian a concession in the form of extended maturities and reduced interest rates, this debt exchange was accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring, which required any costs incurred associated with the exchange to be expensed as incurred. The decrease in other operations from October 31, 2011 to October 31, 2012 was primarily due to the gain recognized from the sale of one of our senior residential properties partially offset by the cost incurred from the debt exchange on November 1, 2011 previously discussed.

48

(Loss) Gain on Extinguishment of Debt

During the year ended October 31, 2013, our loss on extinguishment of debt decreased $28.3 million to $0.8 million. In the fourth quarter of 2013, K. Hovnanian issued an aggregate principal amount of $41.6 million of its 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016. The Notes were issued as additional 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016 under the indenture dated as of August 8, 2005. The net proceeds from this offering were used to fund the redemption on October 15, 2013 of all of K. Hovnanian’s outstanding 6.5% Senior Notes due 2014 and 6.375% Senior Notes due 2014 and to pay related fees and expenses. These transactions resulted in a write-off of prepaid fees and a make whole true-up, totaling $0.8 million. During the year ended October 31, 2012, our loss on extinguishment of debt was $29.1 million. During 2012, we repurchased for cash in the open market and privately negotiated transactions a total of $121.4 million principal amount of various issues of our unsecured notes for an aggregate purchase price of $72.2 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest. We recognized a gain of $48.4 million net of the write-off of unamortized discounts and fees related to these purchases, which represents the difference between the aggregate principal amounts of the notes purchased and the total purchase price. In addition, we exchanged a total of $33.2 million aggregate principal amount of various issuances of our outstanding senior notes senior and our 12.072% senior subordinated amortizing notes for Class A Common Stock. These transactions resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $9.5 million. W e also repurchased in a tender offer our 10.625% senior secured notes due 2016 and satisfied and discharged the indenture under which such notes were issued (calling the remaining notes for redemption). We paid a premium, incurred fees and wrote off discounts and prepaid costs that were amortizing over the terms of the 10.625% senior secured notes, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $87.0 million.

During the year ended October 31, 2011, our gain on extinguishment of debt was $7.5 million. In February of 2011, we purchased a portion of our subordinated notes ($97.9 million face for $98.6 million cash in a tender offer), and redeemed early the remainder of those notes ($57.8 million in debt for $58.1 million cash). In both transactions, we paid a premium, incurred fees, and wrote off discounts and prepaid costs that we were amortizing over the term of the notes. On June 3, 2011, we redeemed early the remainder of certain of our senior secured notes. These transactions resulted in a loss of $3.1 million during the year ended October 31, 2011. Offsetting this loss was a gain of $10.6 million on open market repurchases during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we repurchased in the open market a total of $25.6 million principal amount of various issues of our unsecured senior notes due 2014 through 2015 for an aggregate purchase price of $14.0 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The net gain of $7.5 million for the year ended October 31, 2011, is net of the write-offs of unamortized discounts and fees, related to these purchases, which represents the difference between the aggregate principal amounts of the notes purchased and the total purchase price.

Income (Loss) From Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

Income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures consists of our share of the earnings or losses of the joint ventures. Income from unconsolidated joint ventures increased $6.6 million for the year ended October 31, 2013. Income was $12.0 million for the year ended October 31, 2013, compared $5.4 million for the year ended October 31, 2012. The increase in income was due to certain of our homebuilding joint ventures delivering more homes and reporting increased profits in fiscal 2013. In addition, we recognized a higher profit from one of our land development joint ventures during fiscal 2013, which had a larger land sale in the current fiscal year compared to the prior fiscal year. Income from unconsolidated joint ventures increased $14.4 million to $5.4 million for the year ended October 31, 2012 compared to a loss of $9.0 million for the year ended October 31, 2011. The decrease in loss to income was due to five of our homebuilding joint ventures, which reported losses in fiscal 2011, delivering more homes and reporting profits or a decreased loss in fiscal 2012. In addition, we recognized profit from one of our land development joint ventures during fiscal 2012, which did not have any activity in the prior year.

Total Taxes

The total income tax benefit of $9.4 million recognized for the year ended October 31, 2013 was primarily due to the release of reserves for a federal tax position that was settled with the Internal Revenue Service and a favorable state tax audit settlement, partially offset by state tax expenses and state tax reserves for uncertain state tax positions. The total income tax benefit was $35.1 million for the year ended October 31, 2012 primarily due to the elimination of reserves for uncertain state tax positions consistent with past practices and precedents of the relevant taxing authorities in their dealings with the Company, offset slightly by state tax expenses. The total income tax benefit was $5.5 million for the year ended October 31, 2011 primarily due to a decrease in tax reserves for uncertain tax positions.

49

Deferred federal and state income tax assets primarily represent the deferred tax benefits arising from temporary differences between book and tax income which will be recognized in future years as an offset against future taxable income. If the combination of future years’ income (or loss) and the reversal of the timing differences results in a loss, such losses can be carried forward to future years. In accordance with ASC 740, we evaluate our deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. Because of the downturn in the homebuilding industry, resulting in significant inventory and intangible impairments in prior years, we are in a three-year cumulative loss position as of October 31, 2013. According to ASC 740, a three-year cumulative loss is significant negative evidence in considering whether deferred tax assets are realizable. Our valuation allowance for deferred taxes amounted to $927.1 million and $937.9 million at October 31, 2013 and October 31, 2012, respectively. The valuation allowance decreased during the year ended October 31, 2013 primarily due to a decrease in deferred tax assets as a result of generating a profit before income taxes for fiscal 2013.

Off-Balance Sheet Financing

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into land and lot option purchase contracts in order to procure land or lots for the construction of homes. Lot option contracts enable us to control significant lot positions with a minimal capital investment and substantially reduce the risks associated with land ownership and development. At October 31, 2013, we had $79.3 million in option deposits in cash and letters of credit to purchase land and lots with a total purchase price of $1.1 billion. Our liability is generally limited to forfeiture of the nonrefundable deposits, letters of credit and other nonrefundable amounts incurred. We have no material third-party guarantees.

Contractual Obligations

The following summarizes our aggregate contractual commitments at October 31, 2013. There were no specific performance option contracts as of October 31, 2013.

|  | Payments Due by Period (1) |
(In thousands) |  | Total |  |  | Less than 1 year |  |  | 1-3 years |  |  | 3-5 years |  |  | More than 5 years |
Long term debt(2)(3) |  |  | $2,171,814 |  |  |  | $116,916 |  |  |  | $549,377 |  |  |  | $362,060 |  |  |  | $1,143,461 |
Operating leases |  |  | 33,036 |  |  |  | 10,631 |  |  |  | 16,862 |  |  |  | 4,105 |  |  |  | 1,438 |
Total |  |  | $2,204,850 |  |  |  | $127,547 |  |  |  | $566,239 |  |  |  | $366,165 |  |  |  | $1,144,899 |

(1) | Total contractual obligations exclude our accrual for uncertain tax positions of $2.3 million recorded for financial reporting purposes as of October 31, 2013 because we were unable to make reasonable estimates as to the period of cash settlement with the respective taxing authorities.

(2) | Represents our senior secured, senior, senior amortizing, senior exchangeable and senior subordinated amortizing notes, and other notes payable and related interest payments for the life of such debt of $609.9 million.

(3) | Does not include the mortgage warehouse lines of credit made under our Master Repurchase Agreements. See“- Capital Resources and Liquidity”. Also does not include our $75.0 million revolving Credit Facility because there were no borrowings outstanding (there were issued $25.8 million of letters of credit) under such facility as of October 31, 2013.

We had outstanding letters of credit and performance bonds of approximately $30.9 million and $242.0 million, respectively, at October 31, 2013, related principally to our obligations to local governments to construct roads and other improvements in various developments. We do not believe that any such letters of credit or bonds are likely to be drawn upon.

Inflation

Inflation has a long-term effect, because increasing costs of land, materials, and labor result in increasing sale prices of our homes. In general, these price increases have been commensurate with the general rate of inflation in our housing markets and have not had a significant adverse effect on the sale of our homes. A significant risk faced by the housing industry generally is that rising house construction costs, including land and interest costs, will substantially outpace increases in the income of potential purchasers.

Inflation has a lesser short-term effect, because we generally negotiate fixed price contracts with many, but not all, of our subcontractors and material suppliers for the construction of our homes. These prices usually are applicable for a specified number of residential buildings or for a time period of between three to twelve months. Construction costs for residential buildings represent approximately 56.8% of our homebuilding cost of sales.

50

Safe Harbor Statement

All statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not historical facts should be considered as “Forward- Looking Statements” within the meaning of the "Safe Harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in, or suggested by, such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such plans, intentions, or expectations will be achieved. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to:

| ● | Changes in general and local economic, industry and business conditions and impacts of the sustained homebuilding downturn;
| ● | Adverse weather and other environmental conditions and natural disasters;
| ● | Changes in market conditions and seasonality of the Company’s business;
| ● | Changes in home prices and sales activity in the markets where the Company builds homes;

| ● | Government regulation, including regulations concerning development of land, the home building, sales and customer financing processes, tax laws, and the environment;
| ● | Fluctuations in interest rates and the availability of mortgage financing;
| ● | Shortages in, and price fluctuations of, raw materials and labor;
| ● | The availability and cost of suitable land and improved lots;
| ● | Levels of competition;
| ● | Availability of financing to the Company;
| ● | Utility shortages and outages or rate fluctuations;
| ● | Levels of indebtedness and restrictions on the Company’s operations and activities imposed by the agreements governing the Company’s outstanding indebtedness;
| ● | The Company's sources of liquidity;
| ● | Changes in credit ratings;
| ● | Availability of net operating loss carryforwards;
| ● | Operations through joint ventures with third parties;
| ● | Product liability litigation, warranty claims and claims made by mortgage investors;
| ● | Successful identification and integration of acquisitions;
| ● | Changes in tax laws affecting the after-tax costs of owning a home;
| ● | Significant influence of the Company’s controlling stockholders; and
| ● | Geopolitical risks, terrorist acts and other acts of war.

Certain risks, uncertainties, and other factors are described in detail in Part I, Item 1 “Business” and Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as otherwise required by applicable securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

51

ITEM 7A

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

A primary market risk facing us is interest rate risk on our long term debt, including debt instruments at variable interest rates. In connection with our mortgage operations, mortgage loans held for sale, and the associated mortgage warehouse lines of credit under our Master Repurchase Agreements are subject to interest rate risk; however, such obligations reprice frequently and are short-term in duration. In addition, we hedge the interest rate risk on mortgage loans by obtaining forward commitments from private investors. Accordingly, the interest rate risk from mortgage loans is not material. We do not use financial instruments to hedge interest rate risk except with respect to mortgage loans. We are also subject to foreign currency risk but we do not believe this risk is material. The following tables set forth as of October 31, 2013 and 2012, our long-term debt obligations, principal cash flows by scheduled maturity, weighted average interest rates and estimated fair value (“FV”).

Long-Term Debt Tables

|  | Long-Term Debt as of October 31, 2013 by Fiscal Year of Debt Maturity |
(Dollars in thousands) |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |  |  | 2016 |  |  | 2017 |  |  | 2018 |  |  | Thereafter |  |  | Total |  |  | FV at 10/31/13 |
Long term debt(1): |  |  | $69,978 |  |  |  | $87,685 |  |  |  | $265,272 |  |  |  | $127,662 |  |  |  | $4,311 |  |  |  | $1,069,925 |  |  |  | $1,624,833 |  |  |  | $1,693,318 |
Fixed rate |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Weighted average interest rate |  |  | 6.19 | % |  |  | 10.39 | % |  |  | 6.75 | % |  |  | 8.70 | % |  |  | 9.62 | % |  |  | 7.00 | % |  |  | 7.24 | % |  |  |  |

| (1) Does not include the mortgage warehouse lines of credit made under our Master Repurchase Agreements. Also does not include our $75 million revolving Credit Facility under which there were no borrowings outstanding and $25.8 million of letters of credit issued as of October 31, 2013.

|  | Long-Term Debt as of October 31, 2012 by Fiscal Year of Debt Maturity |
(Dollars in thousands) |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |  |  | 2016 |  |  | 2017 |  |  | Thereafter |  |  | Total |  |  | FV at 10/31/12 |
Long term debt(1): |  |  | $43,283 |  |  |  | $39,916 |  |  |  | $86,462 |  |  |  | $218,974 |  |  |  | $122,412 |  |  |  | $1,104,778 |  |  |  | $1,615,825 |  |  |  | $1,615,840 |
Fixed rate |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Weighted average interest rate |  |  | 6.95 | % |  |  | 6.55 | % |  |  | 10.22 | % |  |  | 6.75 | % |  |  | 8.61 | % |  |  | 7.07 | % |  |  | 7.30 | % |  |  |  |

| (1) Does not include the mortgage warehouse lines of credit made under our Master Repurchase Agreements.

ITEM 8

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Financial statements of Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries are set forth herein beginning on page 63.

ITEM 9

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of October 31, 2013. Based upon that evaluation and subject to the foregoing, the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to accomplish their objectives.

52

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended October 31, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f).

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of October 31, 2013.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2013 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report below.

53

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of October 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended October 31, 2013 of the Company and our report dated December 20, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New York, NY

December 20, 2013

54

ITEM 9B

OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information called for by Item 10, except as set forth in this Item 10, is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with our annual meeting of shareholders to be held on March 11, 2014, which will involve the election of directors.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Our executive officers are listed below and brief summaries of their business experience and certain other information with respect to them are set forth following the table. Each executive officer holds such office for a one-year term.

Name | Age | Position | Year Started With Company
Ara K. Hovnanian | 56 |  | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director of the Company | 1979
Thomas J. Pellerito | 66 |  | Chief Operating Officer | 2001
J. Larry Sorsby | 58 |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company | 1988
Brad G. O’Connor | 43 |  | Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller | 2004
David G. Valiaveedan | 46 |  | Vice President Finance and Treasurer | 2005

Mr. Hovnanian has been Chief Executive Officer since July 1997 after being appointed President in 1988 and Executive Vice President in 1983. Mr. Hovnanian joined the Company in 1979 and has been a Director of the Company since 1981 and was Vice Chairman from 1998 through November 2009. In November 2009, he was elected Chairman of the Board following the death of Kevork S. Hovnanian, the chairman and founder of the Company and the father of Mr. Hovnanian.

Mr. Pellerito was appointed Chief Operating Officer of the Company in January 2010. Since joining the Company in connection with the Company's acquisition of Washington Homes, Inc. in 2001, Mr. Pellerito has served as a Group President overseeing homebuilding operations in certain of the Company's Mid-Atlantic and Southeast segments (excluding Florida). Before joining the Company, Mr. Pellerito was the President of homebuilding operations and Chief Operating Officer of Washington Homes, Inc.

Mr. Sorsby has been Chief Financial Officer of Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. since 1996, and Executive Vice President since November 2000. Mr. Sorsby was also Senior Vice President from March 1991 to November 2000 and was elected as a Director of the Company in 1997. He is Chairman of the Board of Visitors for Urology at The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (“CHOP”) and also serves on the Institutional Advancement Committee at CHOP.

Mr. O’Connor joined the Company in April 2004 as Vice President and Associate Corporate Controller. In December 2007, he was promoted to Vice President, Corporate Controller and then in May 2011, he also became Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. O’Connor was the Corporate Controller for Amershem Biosciences, and prior to that a Senior Manager in the audit practice of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

Mr. Valiaveedan joined the Company as Vice President - Finance in September 2005. In August 2008, he was named as an executive officer of the Company and, in December 2009, he was also named Treasurer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Valiaveedan served as Vice President - Finance for AIG Global Real Estate Investment Corp.

55

Code of Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines

In more than 50 years of doing business, we have been committed to enhancing our shareholders’ investment through conduct that is in accordance with the highest levels of integrity. Our Code of Ethics is a set of guidelines and policies that govern broad principles of ethical conduct and integrity embraced by our Company. Our Code of Ethics applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, chief accounting officer, and all other associates of our Company, including our directors and other officers.

We also remain committed to fostering sound corporate governance principles. The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines” assist the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) in fulfilling its responsibilities related to corporate governance conduct. These guidelines serve as a framework, addressing the function, structure, and operations of the Board, for purposes of promoting consistency of the Board’s role in overseeing the work of management.

We have posted our Code of Ethics on our web site at www.khov.com under “Investor Relations/Corporate Governance”. We have also posted our Corporate Governance Guidelines on our web site at www.khov.com under “Investor Relations/Corporate Governance”. A printed copy of the Code of Ethics and Guidelines is also available to the public at no charge by writing to: Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Attn: Human Resources Department, 110 West Front Street, P.O. Box 500, Red Bank, N.J. 07701 or calling corporate headquarters at 732-747-7800. We will post amendments to or waivers from our Code of Ethics that are required to be disclosed by the rules of either the SEC or the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) on our web site at www.khov.com under “Investor Relations/Corporate Governance.”

Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charters

We have adopted charters that apply to the Company’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. We have posted the text of these charters on our web site at www.khov.com under “Investor Relations/Corporate Governance.” A printed copy of each charter is available at no charge to any shareholder who requests it by writing to: Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Attn: Human Resources Department, 110 West Front Street, P.O. Box 500, Red Bank, N.J. 07701 or calling corporate headquarters at 732-747-7800.

ITEM 11

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information called for by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with our annual meeting of shareholders to be held on March 11, 2014.

ITEM 12
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information called for by Item 12, is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with our annual meeting of shareholders to be held on March 11, 2014.

ITEM 13

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information called for by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with our annual meeting of shareholders to be held on March 11, 2014.

ITEM 14

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information called for by Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with our annual meeting of shareholders to be held on March 11, 2014.

56

PART IV

ITEM 15

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

| Page
Financial Statements: |
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements | 63
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 64
Consolidated Balance Sheets at October 31, 2013 and 2012 | 65
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 | 67
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 | 68
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 | 69
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 71

No schedules have been prepared because the required information of such schedules is not present, is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the required information is included in the financial statements and notes thereto.

Exhibits:

3(a) | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant.(5)
3(b) | Restated Bylaws of the Registrant.(24)
4(a) | Specimen Class A Common Stock Certificate.(13)
4(b) | Specimen Class B Common Stock Certificate.(13)
4(c) | Certificate of Designations, Powers, Preferences and Rights of the 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock of Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., dated July 12, 2005.(11)
4(d) | Certificate of Designations of the Series B Junior Preferred Stock of Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., dated August 14, 2008.(1)
4(e) | Rights Agreement, dated as of August 14, 2008, between Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and National City Bank, as Rights Agent, which includes the Form of Certificate of Designation as Exhibit A, Form of Right Certificate as Exhibit B and the Summary of Rights as Exhibit C.(22)
4(f) | Indenture dated as of November 3, 2003, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company (as successor trustee), as Trustee.(2)
4(g) | Eleventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 16, 2013, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., and the other guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee, including form of 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016. (15)
4(h) | Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 18, 2004, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., the other Guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company (as successor trustee), as Trustee.(18)
4(i) | Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 15, 2004, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., the other Guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company (as successor trustee), as Trustee.(18)
4(j) | Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 19, 2005, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., the other Guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company (as successor trustee), as Trustee.(18)
4(k) | Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 6, 2005, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., the other Guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company (as successor trustee), as Trustee.(18)
4(l) | Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 27, 2006, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., the other Guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company (as successor trustee), as Trustee (including form of 7.5% Senior Notes due 2016).(19)
4(m) | Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 12, 2006, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., the other Guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company (as successor trustee), as Trustee (including form of 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017).(20)
4(n) | Indenture dated as of November 30, 2004, relating to 6.25% Senior Notes, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., the Guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company (as successor trustee), as Trustee, including form of 6.25% Senior Notes due 2015.(6)

57

4(o) | Indenture dated as of August 8, 2005, relating to 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., the Guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company (as successor trustee), as Trustee including form of 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016.(7)
4(p) | Indenture dated as of October 2, 2012, relating to the 7.25% Senior Secured First Lien Notes due 2020, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., the other guarantors named therein and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee and Collateral Agent, including the form of 7.25% Senior Secured First Lien Note due 2020.(14)
4(q) | Indenture, dated as of February 14, 2011, relating to Senior Debt Securities, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee.(12)
4(r) | Senior Notes Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 14, 2011, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and the other guarantors named therein with Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, including form of Senior Note.(10)
4(s) | Indenture, dated as of February 9, 2011, relating to Senior Subordinated Debt Securities, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee.(12)
4(t) | Amortizing Notes Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 9, 2011, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and the other guarantors named therein and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, including form of Amortizing Note.(10)
4(u) | Purchase Contract Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2011, among Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee under the Amortizing Notes Indenture, as Purchase Contract Agent and as attorney-in-fact for the holders of the Purchase Contracts from time to time, including form of Unit and form of Purchase Contract.(10)
4(v) | Indenture dated as of October 2, 2012, relating to the 9.125% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2020, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., the other guarantors named therein and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee and Collateral Agent, including the form of 9.125% Senior Secured Second Lien Note due 2020.(14)
4(w) | Eighth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 21, 2011, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and the other guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (as successor trustee), as trustee, relating to 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017.(9)
4(x) | Secured Notes Indenture dated as of November 1, 2011 relating to the 5.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 and 2.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., the other guarantors named therein and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee and Collateral Agent, including the forms of 5.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 and 2.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021.(4)
4(y) | Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 1, 2011, relating to the 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., as guarantor, the other guarantors named therein and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee.(4)
4(z) | Units Agreement, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, as Units Agent, including form of Unit, component amortizing notes and component exchangeable notes.(14)
4(aa) | Amortizing Notes Indenture, dated as of October 2, 2012, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and the other guarantors named therein and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, including the form of Amortizing Note. (14)
4(bb) | Exchangeable Notes Indenture, dated as of October 2, 2012, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and the other guarantors named therein and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, including the form of Exchangeable Note.(14)
10(a) | First Lien Pledge Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2012, relating to the 7.25% Senior Secured First Lien Notes due 2020.(14)
10(b) | Second Lien Pledge Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2012, relating to the 9.125% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2020.(14)
10(c) | First Lien Security Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2012, relating to the 7.25% Senior Secured First Lien Notes due 2020.(14)
10(d) | Second Lien Security Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2012, relating to the 9.125% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2020.(14)
10(e) | Form of First Lien Intellectual Property Security Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2012, relating to the 7.25% Senior Secured First Lien Notes due 2020.(14)
10(f) | Form of Second Lien Intellectual Property Security Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2012, relating to the 9.125% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2020.(14)

58

10(g) | Intercreditor Agreement, dated October 2, 2012, among Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., the other guarantors party thereto, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee and collateral agent under the Senior Noteholder Documents as defined therein, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as collateral agent for the Mortgage Tax Collateral as defined therein, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee and collateral agent under the Junior Noteholder Documents as defined therein.(14)
10(h) | First Lien Pledge Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2011, relating to the 5.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 and the 2.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021.(4)
10(i) | First Lien Security Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2011, relating to the 5.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 and the 2.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021.(4)
10(j)* | Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (2012) for Ara K. Hovnanian. (32)
10(k)* | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (Class A shares).(25)
10(l)* | Amended and Restated 2008 Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan.(16)
10(m)* | 1983 Stock Option Plan (as amended and restated).(17)
10(n) | Management Agreement dated August 12, 1983, for the management of properties by K. Hovnanian Investment Properties, Inc.(3)
10(o) | Management Agreement dated December 15, 1985, for the management of properties by K. Hovnanian Investment Properties, Inc.(21)
10(p)* | Executive Deferred Compensation Plan as amended and restated on May 24, 2012. (32)
10(q)* | Amended and Restated Senior Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan.(26)
10(r)* | Death and Disability Agreement between the Registrant and Ara K. Hovnanian, dated February 2, 2006. (28)
10(s)* | Form of Hovnanian Deferred Share Policy for Senior Executives.(8)
10(t)* | Form of Hovnanian Deferred Share Policy.(8)
10(u)* | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (Class B shares).(8)
10(v)* | Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement.(8)
10(w)* | Form of Stock Option Agreement for Directors.(8)
10(x)* | Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement.(8)
10(y)* | Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement.(27)
10(z)* | Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement.(27)
10(aa)* | Form of Performance Vesting Incentive Stock Option Agreement.(27)
10(bb)* | Form of Performance Vesting Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement.(27)
10(cc)* | Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement for Directors.(25)
10(dd)* | Form of Long Term Incentive Program Award Agreement (Class A Shares).(23)
10(ee)* | Form of Long Term Incentive Program Award Agreement (Class B Shares).(23)
10(ff)* | Form of Change in Control Severance Protection Agreement entered into with each of Brad G. O’Connor and David G. Valiaveedan.(29)
10(gg)* | 2012 Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan. (30)
10(hh)* | Form of Amendment to Outstanding Stock Option Grants.(31)
10(ii)* | Form of Amendment to 2011 Restricted Share Unit Agreement for Ara K. Hovnanian and J. Larry Sorsby. (31)
10(jj)* | Form of Amendment to 2011 Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Ara K. Hovnanian.(31)
10(kk)* | Form of Amendment to 2011 Incentive Stock Option Agreement for J. Larry Sorsby.(31)
10(ll)* | Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (2012).(32)
10(mm)* | Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement (2012).(32)
10(nn)* | Form of Stock Option Agreement (2012) for Directors.(32)
10(oo)* | Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement (2012) for Directors.(32)
10(pp)* | Form of 2013 Long-Term Incentive Program Award. (33)
10(qq)* | Form of 2013 Incentive Stock Option Agreement – Performance Option Grant (Class A shares). (34)
10(rr)* | Form of 2013 Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement – Performance Option Grant (Class B shares).(34)
12 | Statements re Computation of Ratios.
21 | Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23 | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
31(a) | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31(b) | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32(a) | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
32(b) | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
101 | The following financial information from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2013, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at October 31, 2013 and October 31, 2012, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Equity for years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
* | Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.

59

(1) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2008 (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant.

(2) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report of the Registrant on Form 8-K (No. 001-08551) filed on November 7, 2003.

(3) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Registration Statement (No. 2-85198) on Form S-1 of the Registrant.

(4) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant filed on November 7, 2011.

(5) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report of the Registrant on Form 8-K (No. 001-08551) filed on March 15, 2013.

(6) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2004 (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant.

(7) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Registration Statement (No. 333-127806) on Form S-4 of the Registrant.

(8) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2008 (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant.

(9) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant filed on May 5, 2011.

(10) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report on Form 8-K of the Registrant (No. 001-08551) filed February 15, 2011.

(11) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant filed on July 13, 2005.

(12) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011 (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant.

(13) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009 (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant.

(14) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant filed on October 2, 2012.

(15) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant filed on September 16, 2013.

(16) | Incorporated by reference to definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A of the Registrant filed on February 1, 2010.

(17) | Incorporated by reference to Appendix C of the definitive Proxy Statement of the Registration on Schedule 14A filed on February 19, 2008.

(18) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Registration Statement (No. 333-131982) on Form S-3 of the Registrant.

(19) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report of the Registrant on Form 8-K (No. 001-08551) filed on February 27, 2006.

(20) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report on Form 8-K of the Registrant (No. 001-08551) filed on June 15, 2006.

(21) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2003 (No. 001-08551), of the Registrant.

(22) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the Registration Statement (No. 001-08551) on Form 8-A of the Registrant filed August 14, 2008

60

(23) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 (No. 001-08551), of the Registrant.
(24) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report on Form 8-K of the Registrant (No. 001-08551), filed December 21, 2009.
(25) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2009 (No. 001-08551), of the Registrant.
(26) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant filed on March 22, 2010.
(27) | Incorporated by reference to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2009 (No. 001-08551), of the Registrant.
(28) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2006 (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant.
(29) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2012 (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant.
(30) | Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A of the Registrant filed on February 14, 2012.
(31) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2012 (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant.
(32) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2012 (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant.
(33) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2013 (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant.
(34) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2013 (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant.

61

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

| HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. |
| By: | /s/ ARA K. HOVNANIAN |
|  | Ara K. Hovnanian |
|  | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and President |
|  | December 20, 2013 |

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant on December 20, 2013, and in the capacities indicated.

/s/ ARA K. HOVNANIAN |  | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
Ara K. Hovnanian |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ BRAD G. O'CONNOR |  | Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller
Brad G. O’Connor |  | (Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ EDWARD A. KANGAS |  | Chairman of Audit Committee and Director
Edward A. Kangas |  |
/s/ J. LARRY SORSBY |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
J. Larry Sorsby |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ STEPHEN D. WEINROTH |  | Chairman of Compensation Committee and Director
Stephen D. Weinroth |  |

62

HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial Statements: | Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 64
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 2013 and 2012 | 65
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 | 67
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 | 68
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 | 69
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 71

No schedules have been prepared because the required information of such schedules is not present, is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the required information is included in the financial statements and notes thereto.

63

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of October 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries as of October 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated December 20, 2013, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New York, NY

December 20, 2013

64

HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands) |  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash |  |  | $319,142 |  |  |  | $258,323 |
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |  |  | 10,286 |  |  |  | 41,732 |
Inventories: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Sold and unsold homes and lots under development |  |  | 752,749 |  |  |  | 671,851 |
Land and land options held for future development or sale |  |  | 225,152 |  |  |  | 218,996 |
Consolidated inventory not owned: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Specific performance options |  |  | 792 |  |  |  | - |
Other options |  |  | 100,071 |  |  |  | 90,619 |
Total consolidated inventory not owned |  |  | 100,863 |  |  |  | 90,619 |
Total inventories |  |  | 1,078,764 |  |  |  | 981,466 |
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 51,438 |  |  |  | 61,083 |
Receivables, deposits, and notes - net |  |  | 45,085 |  |  |  | 61,794 |
Property, plant, and equipment - net |  |  | 46,211 |  |  |  | 48,524 |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |  |  | 59,351 |  |  |  | 66,694 |
Total homebuilding |  |  | 1,610,277 |  |  |  | 1,519,616 |
Financial services: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash |  |  | 10,062 |  |  |  | 14,909 |
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |  |  | 21,557 |  |  |  | 22,470 |
Mortgage loans held for sale at fair value |  |  | 112,953 |  |  |  | 117,024 |
Other assets |  |  | 4,281 |  |  |  | 10,231 |
Total financial services |  |  | 148,853 |  |  |  | 164,634 |
Total assets |  |  | $1,759,130 |  |  |  | $1,684,250 |

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

65

HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share amounts) |  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Nonrecourse mortgages |  |  | $62,903 |  |  |  | $38,302 |
Accounts payable and other liabilities |  |  | 307,764 |  |  |  | 296,510 |
Customers’ deposits |  |  | 30,119 |  |  |  | 23,846 |
Nonrecourse mortgages secured by operating properties |  |  | 17,733 |  |  |  | 18,775 |
Liabilities from inventory not owned |  |  | 87,866 |  |  |  | 77,791 |
Total homebuilding |  |  | 506,385 |  |  |  | 455,224 |
Financial services: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable and other liabilities |  |  | 32,874 |  |  |  | 37,609 |
Mortgage warehouse lines of credit |  |  | 91,663 |  |  |  | 107,485 |
Total financial services |  |  | 124,537 |  |  |  | 145,094 |
Notes payable: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Senior secured notes |  |  | 978,611 |  |  |  | 977,369 |
Senior notes |  |  | 461,210 |  |  |  | 458,736 |
Senior amortizing notes |  |  | 20,857 |  |  |  | 23,149 |
Senior exchangeable notes |  |  | 66,615 |  |  |  | 76,851 |
TEU senior subordinated amortizing notes |  |  | 2,152 |  |  |  | 6,091 |
Accrued interest |  |  | 28,261 |  |  |  | 20,199 |
Total notes payable |  |  | 1,557,706 |  |  |  | 1,562,395 |
Income taxes payable |  |  | 3,301 |  |  |  | 6,882 |
Total liabilities |  |  | 2,191,929 |  |  |  | 2,169,595 |
Equity: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. stockholders' equity deficit: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Preferred stock, $.01 par value - authorized 100,000 shares; issued and outstanding 5,600 shares with a liquidation preference of $140,000 at October 31, 2013 and 2012 |  |  | 135,299 |  |  |  | 135,299 |
Common stock, Class A, $.01 par value - authorized 400,000,000 shares; issued 136,306,223 shares at October 31, 2013 and 130,055,304 shares at October 31, 2012 (including 11,760,763 shares at October 31, 2013 and 2012, held in Treasury) |  |  | 1,363 |  |  |  | 1,300 |
Common stock, Class B, $.01 par value (convertible to Class A at time of sale) - authorized 60,000,000 shares; issued 15,347,615 shares at October 31, 2013 and 15,350,101 shares at October 31, 2012 (including 691,748 shares at October 31, 2013 and 2012 held in Treasury) |  |  | 153 |  |  |  | 154 |
Paid in capital - common stock |  |  | 689,727 |  |  |  | 668,735 |
Accumulated deficit |  |  | (1,144,408 | ) |  |  | (1,175,703 | )
Treasury stock - at cost |  |  | (115,360 | ) |  |  | (115,360 | )
Total Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. stockholders' equity deficit |  |  | (433,226 | ) |  |  | (485,575 | )
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures |  |  | 427 |  |  |  | 230 |
Total equity deficit |  |  | (432,799 | ) |  |  | (485,345 | )
Total liabilities and equity |  |  | $1,759,130 |  |  |  | $1,684,250 |

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

66

HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

|  | Year Ended |
(In thousands except per share data) |  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |  |  | October 31, 2011 |
Revenues: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Sale of homes |  |  | $1,784,327 |  |  |  | $1,405,580 |  |  |  | $1,072,474 |
Land sales and other revenues |  |  | 19,199 |  |  |  | 41,038 |  |  |  | 32,952 |
Total homebuilding |  |  | 1,803,526 |  |  |  | 1,446,618 |  |  |  | 1,105,426 |
Financial services |  |  | 47,727 |  |  |  | 38,735 |  |  |  | 29,481 |
Total revenues |  |  | 1,851,253 |  |  |  | 1,485,353 |  |  |  | 1,134,907 |
Expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost of sales, excluding interest |  |  | 1,442,044 |  |  |  | 1,179,801 |  |  |  | 913,901 |
Cost of sales interest |  |  | 52,230 |  |  |  | 54,538 |  |  |  | 74,676 |
Inventory impairment loss and land option write-offs |  |  | 4,965 |  |  |  | 12,530 |  |  |  | 101,749 |
Total cost of sales |  |  | 1,499,239 |  |  |  | 1,246,869 |  |  |  | 1,090,326 |
Selling, general and administrative |  |  | 165,809 |  |  |  | 142,087 |  |  |  | 161,456 |
Total homebuilding expenses |  |  | 1,665,048 |  |  |  | 1,388,956 |  |  |  | 1,251,782 |
Financial services |  |  | 29,059 |  |  |  | 23,648 |  |  |  | 21,371 |
Corporate general and administrative |  |  | 54,357 |  |  |  | 48,232 |  |  |  | 49,938 |
Other interest |  |  | 91,344 |  |  |  | 97,895 |  |  |  | 97,169 |
Other operations |  |  | 790 |  |  |  | 4,205 |  |  |  | 4,805 |
Total expenses |  |  | 1,840,598 |  |  |  | 1,562,936 |  |  |  | 1,425,065 |
(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt |  |  | (760 | ) |  |  | (29,066 | ) |  |  | 7,528 |
Income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 12,040 |  |  |  | 5,401 |  |  |  | (8,958 | )
Income (loss) before income taxes |  |  | 21,935 |  |  |  | (101,248 | ) |  |  | (291,588 | )
State and federal income tax (benefit) provision: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
State |  |  | 518 |  |  |  | (35,328 | ) |  |  | (3,924 | )
Federal |  |  | (9,878 | ) |  |  | 277 |  |  |  | (1,577 | )
Total income taxes |  |  | (9,360 | ) |  |  | (35,051 | ) |  |  | (5,501 | )
Net income (loss) |  |  | $31,295 |  |  |  | $(66,197 | ) |  |  | $(286,087 | )
Per share data: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income (loss) per common share |  |  | $0.22 |  |  |  | $(0.52 | ) |  |  | $(2.85 | )
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |  |  | 145,087 |  |  |  | 126,350 |  |  |  | 100,444 |
Assuming dilution: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income (loss) per common share |  |  | $0.22 |  |  |  | $(0.52 | ) |  |  | $(2.85 | )
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |  |  | 162,329 |  |  |  | 126,350 |  |  |  | 100,444 |

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

67

HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

|  | A Common Stock |  |  | B Common Stock |  |  | Preferred Stock |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(Dollars In thousands) |  | Shares Issued and Outstanding |  |  | Amount |  |  | Shares Issued and Outstanding |  |  | Amount |  |  | Shares Issued and Outstanding |  |  | Amount |  |  | Paid-In Capital |  |  | Accumulated Deficit |  |  | Treasury Stock |  |  | Non Controlling Interest |  |  | Total |
Balance, October 31, 2010 |  |  | 63,114,963 |  |  |  | $748 |  |  |  | 14,564,795 |  |  |  | $153 |  |  |  | 5,600 |  |  |  | $135,299 |  |  |  | $463,908 |  |  |  | $(823,419 | ) |  |  | $(115,257 | ) |  |  | $630 |  |  |  | $(337,938 | )
Stock options, amortization and issuances |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4,377 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4,377 |
Restricted stock amortization, issuances and forfeitures |  |  | 414,320 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 589 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 593 |
Stock Issuance |  |  | 13,512,500 |  |  |  | 135 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54,764 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54,899 |
Issuance of prepaid common stock purchase contracts |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 68,092 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 68,092 |
Settlement of prepaid common stock purchase contracts |  |  | 3,400,658 |  |  |  | 34 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (34 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | - |
Conversion of Class B to Class A common stock |  |  | 4,331 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (4,331 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | - |
Changes in noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (538 | ) |  |  | (538 | )
Net loss |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (286,087 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (286,087 | )
Balance, October 31, 2011 |  |  | 80,446,772 |  |  |  | 921 |  |  |  | 14,560,464 |  |  |  | 153 |  |  |  | 5,600 |  |  |  | 135,299 |  |  |  | 591,696 |  |  |  | (1,109,506 | ) |  |  | (115,257 | ) |  |  | 92 |  |  |  | (496,602 | )
Stock options, amortization and issuances |  |  | 6,250 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4,078 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4,078 |
Restricted stock amortization, issuances and forfeitures |  |  | 172,941 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 117,399 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,763 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,766 |
Stock issuance |  |  | 25,000,000 |  |  |  | 250 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 47,074 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 47,324 |
Issuance of shares for debt |  |  | 8,443,713 |  |  |  | 84 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23,167 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23,251 |
Settlement of prepaid common stock purchase contracts |  |  | 4,271,398 |  |  |  | 43 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (43 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | - |
Conversion of Class B to Class A common stock |  |  | 19,510 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (19,510 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | - |
Changes in noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 138 |  |  |  | 138 |
Treasury stock purchases |  |  | (66,043 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (103 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (103 | )
Net loss |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (66,197 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (66,197 | )
Balance, October 31, 2012 |  |  | 118,294,541 |  |  |  | 1,300 |  |  |  | 14,658,353 |  |  |  | 154 |  |  |  | 5,600 |  |  |  | 135,299 |  |  |  | 668,735 |  |  |  | (1,175,703 | ) |  |  | (115,360 | ) |  |  | 230 |  |  |  | (485,345 | )
Stock options, amortization and issuances |  |  | 44,812 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4,169 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4,169 |
Restricted stock amortization, issuances and forfeitures |  |  | 123,840 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,608 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,609 |
Settlement of prepaid Class A Common Stock purchase contracts |  |  | 2,683,679 |  |  |  | 27 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (27 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | - |
Exchange of senior exchangeable notes for Class A Common Stock |  |  | 3,396,102 |  |  |  | 34 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14,242 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14,276 |
Conversion of Class B to Class A common stock |  |  | 2,486 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | (2,486 | ) |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | - |
Changes in noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 197 |  |  |  | 197 |
Net income |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31,295 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31,295 |
Balance, October 31, 2013 |  |  | 124,545,460 |  |  |  | $1,363 |  |  |  | 14,655,867 |  |  |  | $153 |  |  |  | 5,600 |  |  |  | $135,299 |  |  |  | $689,727 |  |  |  | $(1,144,408 | ) |  |  | $(115,360 | ) |  |  | $427 |  |  |  | $(432,799 | )

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

68

HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

|  | Year Ended |
(In thousands) |  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |  |  | October 31, 2011 |
Cash flows from operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income (loss) |  |  | $31,295 |  |  |  | $(66,197 | ) |  |  | $(286,087 | )
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Depreciation |  |  | 4,712 |  |  |  | 6,223 |  |  |  | 9,340 |
Compensation from stock options and awards |  |  | 6,842 |  |  |  | 6,453 |  |  |  | 6,219 |
Amortization of bond discounts and deferred financing costs |  |  | 7,843 |  |  |  | 7,436 |  |  |  | 6,047 |
Gain on sale and retirement of property and assets |  |  | (4,696 | ) |  |  | (230 | ) |  |  | (266 | )
(Income) loss from unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | (12,040 | ) |  |  | (5,401 | ) |  |  | 8,958 |
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 2,340 |  |  |  | 1,790 |  |  |  | 1,583 |
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt |  |  | 760 |  |  |  | 29,066 |  |  |  | (7,528 | )
Expenses related to the debt for debt exchange |  |  | - |  |  |  | 4,694 |  |  |  | - |
Inventory impairment and land option write-offs |  |  | 4,965 |  |  |  | 12,530 |  |  |  | 101,749 |
Decrease (increase) in assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Mortgage notes receivable |  |  | 4,071 |  |  |  | (44,852 | ) |  |  | 14,154 |
Restricted cash, receivables, prepaids, deposits, and other assets |  |  | 52,940 |  |  |  | 3,680 |  |  |  | 59,686 |
Inventories |  |  | (111,770 | ) |  |  | 8,430 |  |  |  | (88,385 | )
(Decrease) increase in liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
State and federal income tax liabilities |  |  | (3,581 | ) |  |  | (34,947 | ) |  |  | 23,919 |
Customers’ deposits |  |  | 6,273 |  |  |  | 5,903 |  |  |  | 7,150 |
Accounts payable, accrued interest and other accrued liabilities |  |  | 19,314 |  |  |  | (1,576 | ) |  |  | (63,954 | )
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |  |  | 9,268 |  |  |  | (66,998 | ) |  |  | (207,415 | )
Cash flows from investing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Proceeds from sale of property and assets |  |  | 7,369 |  |  |  | 3,206 |  |  |  | 1,341 |
Purchase of property, equipment, and other fixed assets and acquisitions |  |  | (1,558 | ) |  |  | (5,059 | ) |  |  | (826 | )
Increase in restricted cash related to mortgage company |  |  | 4,575 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | (4,907 | ) |  |  | (4,743 | ) |  |  | (4,071 | )
Distributions of capital from unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 24,806 |  |  |  | 5,096 |  |  |  | 4,751 |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |  |  | 30,285 |  |  |  | (1,500 | ) |  |  | 1,195 |
Cash flows from financing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Proceeds from mortgages and notes |  |  | 109,209 |  |  |  | 16,240 |  |  |  | 16,614 |
Payments related to mortgages and notes |  |  | (76,142 | ) |  |  | (25,605 | ) |  |  | (14,247 | )
Proceeds from model sale leaseback financing programs |  |  | 21,948 |  |  |  | 34,389 |  |  |  | - |
Payments related to model sale leaseback financing programs |  |  | (9,193 | ) |  |  | (1,444 | ) |  |  | - |
Proceeds from land bank financing program |  |  | 36,233 |  |  |  | 50,927 |  |  |  | - |
Payments related to land bank financing program |  |  | (39,669 | ) |  |  | (6,081 | ) |  |  | - |
Net proceeds from senior secured notes |  |  | - |  |  |  | 797,000 |  |  |  | 12,660 |
Proceeds from senior notes |  |  | 41,581 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 151,220 |
Payments from senior notes |  |  | (40,424 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Net proceeds from exchangeable notes units |  |  | - |  |  |  | 100,000 |  |  |  | - |
Net proceeds from tangible equity units |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 83,707 |
Net proceeds from Class A Common Stock |  |  | - |  |  |  | 47,324 |  |  |  | 54,899 |
Net (payments) proceeds related to mortgage warehouse lines of credit |  |  | (15,822 | ) |  |  | 57,756 |  |  |  | (23,914 | )
Deferred financing cost from land banking financing program and note issuances |  |  | (5,071 | ) |  |  | (19,381 | ) |  |  | (5,396 | )
Principal payments and debt repurchases |  |  | (6,231 | ) |  |  | (941,158 | ) |  |  | (185,763 | )
Payments related to the debt for debt exchange |  |  | - |  |  |  | (18,874 | ) |  |  | - |
Purchase of treasury stock |  |  | - |  |  |  | (103 | ) |  |  | - |
Net cash provided by financing activities |  |  | 16,419 |  |  |  | 90,990 |  |  |  | 89,780 |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |  |  | 55,972 |  |  |  | 22,492 |  |  |  | (116,440 | )
Cash and cash equivalents balance, beginning of year |  |  | 273,232 |  |  |  | 250,740 |  |  |  | 367,180 |
Cash and cash equivalents balance, end of year |  |  | $329,204 |  |  |  | $273,232 |  |  |  | $250,740 |
Supplemental disclosures of cash flows: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash received during the year for income taxes |  |  | $5,780 |  |  |  | $103 |  |  |  | $28,008 |

69

Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing activities:

In fiscal 2013, a property that we previously acquired when our partner in a land development joint venture transferred its interest in the venture to us, was foreclosed on by the note holder. As a result, the inventory with a book value of $9.5 million and corresponding non-recourse liability of equal amount were taken off of our balance sheet.

In fiscal 2013, 18,305 of our senior exchangeable notes were exchanged for 3,396,102 shares of Class A Common Stock.

In fiscal 2013, we entered into a new unconsolidated homebuilding joint venture which resulted in the transfer of an existing receivable from our joint venture partners of $0.6 million at October 31, 2012, to an investment in the joint venture at January 31, 2013.

During fiscal 2012, we purchased our partners’ interest in one of our unconsolidated homebuilding joint ventures. The consolidation of this entity resulted in increases in inventory, other assets, non-recourse land mortgages and accounts payables and other liabilities of $34.3 million, $5.0 million, $20.6 million and $15.8 million, respectively.

In fiscal 2012, we completed several debt for equity exchanges and a debt for debt exchange. See Notes 9 and 10 for further information.

In fiscal 2011, our partner in a land development joint venture transferred its interest in the venture to us. The consolidation resulted in increases in inventory and non-recourse land mortgages of $9.5 million and $18.5 million, respectively, and a decrease in other liabilities of $9.0 million.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

70

HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation - The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and include our accounts and those of all wholly-owned subsidiaries, and variable interest entities in which we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary, after elimination of all significant intercompany balances and transactions. Our fiscal year ends October 31.

2. Business

Our operations consist of homebuilding, financial services, and corporate. Our homebuilding operations are made up of six reportable segments defined as Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Southeast, Southwest, and West. Homebuilding operations comprise the substantial part of our business, with approximately 97% of consolidated revenues for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011. We are a Delaware corporation, building and selling homes at October 31, 2013 in 192 consolidated new home communities in Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, Washington, D.C., and West Virginia. We offer a wide variety of homes that are designed to appeal to first-time buyers, first and second-time move-up buyers, luxury buyers, active adult buyers, and empty nesters. Our financial services operations, which are a reportable segment, provide mortgage banking and title services to the homebuilding operations’ customers. We do not typically retain or service the mortgages that we originate but rather sell the mortgages and related servicing rights to investors. Corporate primarily includes the operations of our corporate office whose primary purpose is to provide executive services, accounting, information services, human resources, management reporting, training, cash management, internal audit, risk management, and administration of process redesign, quality, and safety.

See Note 11 “Operating and Reporting Segments” for further disclosure of our reportable segments.

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and these differences could have a significant impact on the financial statements.

Income Recognition from Home and Land Sales - We are primarily engaged in the development, construction, marketing and sale of residential single-family and multi-family homes where the planned construction cycle is less than 12 months. For these homes, in accordance with ASC 360-20, “Property, Plant and Equipment - Real Estate Sales”, revenue is recognized when title is conveyed to the buyer, adequate initial and continuing investments have been received and there is no continued involvement. In situations where the buyer’s financing is originated by our mortgage subsidiary and the buyer has not made an adequate initial investment or continuing investment as prescribed by ASC 360-20, the profit on such sales is deferred until the sale of the related mortgage loan to a third-party investor has been completed.

Income Recognition from Mortgage Loans - Our Financial Services segment originates mortgages, primarily for our homebuilding customers. We use mandatory investor commitments and forward sales of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) to hedge our mortgage-related interest rate exposure on agency and government loans.

We elected the fair value option for our mortgage loans held for sale in accordance with ASC 825, “Financial Instruments”, which permits us to measure our loans held for sale at fair value. Management believes that the election of the fair value option for loans held for sale improves financial reporting by mitigating volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring the fair value of the loans and the derivative instruments used to economically hedge them without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions.

71

Substantially all of the mortgage loans originated are sold within a short period of time in the secondary mortgage market on a servicing released, nonrecourse basis, although the Company remains liable for certain limited representations, such as fraud, and warranties related to loan sales. Mortgage investors could seek to have us buy back loans or compensate them from losses incurred on mortgages we have sold based on claims that we breached our limited representations and warranties. We believe there continues to be an industry-wide issue with the number of purchaser claims in which purchasers purport to have found inaccuracies related to the sellers’ representations and warranties in particular loan sale agreements. We have established reserves for probable losses.

Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash represents cash deposited in checking accounts. Cash equivalents include certificates of deposit, Treasury Bills and government money market funds with maturities of 90 days or less when purchased. Our cash balances are held at a few financial institutions and may, at times, exceed insurable amounts. We believe we mitigate this risk by depositing our cash in major financial institutions. At both October 31, 2013 and 2012, we had no cash equivalents in “Homebuilding: Cash” or “Financial services: Cash” as the full balance of cash and cash equivalents was held as cash. However, “Homebuilding: Restricted cash and cash equivalents” and “Financial services: Restricted cash and cash equivalents” both included cash equivalents at October 31, 2013 and 2012.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The fair value of financial instruments is determined by reference to various market data and other valuation techniques as appropriate. Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, deposits and notes, accounts payable and other liabilities, customer deposits, mortgage loans held for sale, nonrecourse and operating properties mortgages, mortgage warehouse lines of credit, accrued interest, and the senior secured notes, senior notes, senior amortizing notes, senior exchangeable notes and senior subordinated amortizing notes payable. The fair value of the senior secured notes, senior notes, senior amortizing notes, senior exchangeable notes and senior subordinated amortizing notes payable is estimated based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered to us for debt of the same remaining maturities.

Inventories - Inventories consist of land, land development, home construction costs, capitalized interest, construction overhead and property taxes. Construction costs are accumulated during the period of construction and charged to cost of sales under specific identification methods. Land, land development, and common facility costs are allocated based on buildable acres to product types within each community, then charged to cost of sales equally based upon the number of homes to be constructed in each product type.

We record inventories in our consolidated balance sheets at cost unless the inventory is determined to be impaired, in which case the inventory is written down to its fair value. Our inventories consist of the following three components: (1) sold and unsold homes and lots under development, which includes all construction, land, capitalized interest, and land development costs related to started homes and land under development in our active communities; (2) land and land options held for future development or sale, which includes all costs related to land in our communities in planning or mothballed communities; and (3) consolidated inventory not owned, which includes all costs related to specific performance options, variable interest entities, and other options, which consists primarily of model homes financed with an investor and inventory related to land banking arrangements.

We have decided to mothball (or stop development on) certain communities; we do so when we determine that current performance does not justify further investment at that time. When we decide to mothball a community, the inventory is reclassified from "Sold and unsold homes and lots under development" to "Land and land options held for future development or sale". We regularly review communities to determine if mothballing is appropriate. During fiscal 2013, we mothballed one community, re-activated three previously mothballed communities and sold one mothballed community. As of October 31, 2013, the net book value of our 50 total mothballed communities was $115.9 million, which was net of impairment charges recorded in prior periods of $431.6 million.

From time to time we enter into option agreements that include specific performance requirements, whereby we are required to purchase a minimum number of lots. Because of our obligation to purchase these lots, for accounting purposes in accordance with ASC 360-20-40-38, we are required to record this inventory on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of October 31, 2013, we had $0.8 million of specific performance options recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets to “Consolidated inventory not owned – specific performance options”, with a corresponding amount recorded to “Liabilities from inventory not owned”.

72

“Consolidated inventory not owned – other options” consists of certain model sale leasebacks and land banking arrangements that were included on our balance sheet in accordance with GAAP. During fiscal 2013, we sold and leased back certain of our model homes with the right to participate in the potential profit when each home is sold to a third party at the end of the respective lease. As a result of our continued involvement, for accounting purposes in accordance with ASC 360-20-40-38, these sale and leaseback transactions are considered a financing rather than a sale. Therefore, for purposes of our Consolidated Balance Sheet, at October 31, 2013, inventory of $47.6 million was recorded to “Consolidated inventory not owned – other options”, with a corresponding amount of $45.7 million recorded to “Liabilities from inventory not owned”.

In addition, we entered into a land banking arrangement in fiscal 2012 with GSO Capital Partners LP ("GSO"), that continued in fiscal 2013, whereby we sold a portfolio of our land parcels to GSO, and GSO provided us an option to purchase back finished lots on a quarterly basis. Because of our option to repurchase these parcels, for accounting purposes, in accordance with ASC 360-20-40-38, this transaction is considered a financing rather than a sale. For purposes of our Consolidated Balance Sheet, at October 31, 2013, inventory of $52.4 million was recorded as “Consolidated inventory not owned – other options”, with a corresponding amount of $41.4 million recorded to “Liabilities from inventory not owned” for the amount of net cash received from the transactions.

The recoverability of inventories and other long-lived assets is assessed in accordance with the provisions of ASC 360-10, “Property, Plant and Equipment - Overall”. ASC 360-10 requires long-lived assets, including inventories, held for development to be evaluated for impairment based on undiscounted future cash flows of the assets at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows. As such, we evaluate inventories for impairment at the individual community level, the lowest level of discrete cash flows that we measure.

We evaluate inventories of communities under development and held for future development for impairment when indicators of potential impairment are present. Indicators of impairment include, but are not limited to, decreases in local housing market values, decreases in gross margins or sales absorption rates, decreases in net sales prices (base sales price net of sales incentives), or actual or projected operating or cash flow losses. The assessment of communities for indication of impairment is performed quarterly, primarily by completing detailed budgets for all of our communities and identifying those communities with a projected operating loss for any projected fiscal year or for the entire projected community life. For those communities with projected losses, we estimate the remaining undiscounted future cash flows and compare those to the carrying value of the community, to determine if the carrying value of the asset is recoverable.

The projected operating profits, losses, or cash flows of each community can be significantly impacted by our estimates of the following:

| ● | future base selling prices;

| ● | future home sales incentives;

| ● | future home construction and land development costs; and

| ● | future sales absorption pace and cancellation rates.

These estimates are dependent upon specific market conditions for each community. While we consider available information to determine what we believe to be our best estimates as of the end of a quarterly reporting period, these estimates are subject to change in future reporting periods as facts and circumstances change. Local market-specific conditions that may impact our estimates for a community include:

| ● | the intensity of competition within a market, including available home sales prices and home sales incentives offered by our competitors, including foreclosed homes where they have an impact on our ability to sell homes;

| ● | the current sales absorption pace for both our communities and competitor communities;

| ● | community-specific attributes, such as location, availability of lots in the market, desirability and uniqueness of our community, and the size and style of homes currently being offered;

| ● | potential for alternative product offerings to respond to local market conditions;

| ● | changes by management in the sales strategy of the community;

| ● | current local market economic and demographic conditions and related trends and forecasts; and
| ● | existing home inventory supplies, including foreclosures and short sales.

73

These and other local market-specific conditions that may be present are considered by management in preparing projection assumptions for each community. The sales objectives can differ between our communities, even within a given market. For example, facts and circumstances in a given community may lead us to price our homes with the objective of yielding a higher sales absorption pace, while facts and circumstances in another community may lead us to price our homes to minimize deterioration in our gross margins, although it may result in a slower sales absorption pace. In addition, the key assumptions included in our estimate of future undiscounted cash flows may be interrelated. For example, a decrease in estimated base sales price or an increase in homes sales incentives may result in a corresponding increase in sales absorption pace. Additionally, a decrease in the average sales price of homes to be sold and closed in future reporting periods for one community that has not been generating what management believes to be an adequate sales absorption pace may impact the estimated cash flow assumptions of a nearby community. Changes in our key assumptions, including estimated construction and development costs, absorption pace and selling strategies, could materially impact future cash flow and fair value estimates. Due to the number of possible scenarios that would result from various changes in these factors, we do not believe it is possible to develop a sensitivity analysis with a level of precision that would be meaningful to an investor.

If the undiscounted cash flows are more than the carrying amount of the community, then the carrying amount is recoverable, and no impairment adjustment is required. However, if the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount, then the community is deemed impaired and is written-down to its fair value. We determine the estimated fair value of each community by determining the present value of its estimated future cash flows at a discount rate commensurate with the risk of the respective community, or in limited circumstances, prices for land in recent comparable sale transactions, market analysis studies, which include the estimated price a willing buyer would pay for the land (other than in a forced liquidation sale), and recent bona fide offers received from outside third parties. Our discount rates used for all impairments recorded from October 31, 2011 to October 31, 2013 range from 16.8% to 19.8%. The estimated future cash flow assumptions are virtually the same for both our recoverability and fair value assessments. Should the estimates or expectations used in determining estimated cash flows or fair value, including discount rates, decrease or differ from current estimates in the future, we may be required to recognize additional impairments related to current and future communities. The impairment of a community is allocated to each lot on a relative fair value basis.

From time to time, we write off deposits and approval, engineering and capitalized interest costs when we determine that it is no longer probable that we will exercise options to buy land in specific locations or when we redesign communities and/or abandon certain engineering costs. In deciding not to exercise a land option, we take into consideration changes in market conditions, the timing of required land takedowns, the willingness of land sellers to modify terms of the land option contract (including timing of land takedowns), and the availability and best use of our capital, among other factors. The write-off is recorded in the period that it is not deemed probable that the optioned property will be acquired. In certain instances, we have been able to recover deposits and other pre-acquisition costs that were previously written off. These recoveries have not been significant in comparison to the total costs written off.

Land and land options held for sale includes land parcels on which we have decided not to build homes and are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. In determining the fair value of land held for sale, management considers, among other things, prices for land in recent comparable sale transactions, market analysis studies, which include the estimated price a willing buyer would pay for the land (other than in a forced liquidation sale) and recent bona fide offers received from outside third parties. At October 31, 2013, land and land options held for sale had a carrying value of $2.7 million.

Insurance Deductible Reserves - For homes delivered in fiscal 2013 and 2012, our deductible under our general liability insurance is $20 million per occurrence for construction defect and warranty claims. For bodily injury claims, our deductible per occurrence in fiscal 2013 and 2012 is $0.25 million and $0.1 million, respectively, up to a $5 million limit. Our aggregate retention in fiscal 2013 and 2012 is $21 million for construction defect, warranty and bodily injury claims. We do not have a deductible on our worker's compensation insurance. Reserves for estimated losses for construction defects, warranty, bodily injury and worker’s compensation claims have been established using the assistance of a third-party actuary. We engage a third-party actuary that uses our historical warranty and construction defect data and worker's compensation data to assist our management in estimating our unpaid claims, claim adjustment expenses and incurred but not reported claims reserves for the risks that we are assuming under the general liability and worker's compensation programs. The estimates include provisions for inflation, claims handling and legal fees. These estimates are subject to a high degree of variability due to uncertainties such as trends in construction defect claims relative to our markets and the types of products we build, claim settlement patterns, insurance industry practices, and legal interpretations, among others. Because of the high degree of judgment required in determining these estimated liability amounts, actual future costs could differ significantly from our currently estimated amounts.

Interest - Interest attributable to properties under development during the land development and home construction period is capitalized and expensed along with the associated cost of sales as the related inventories are sold. Interest incurred in excess of interest capitalized, which occurs when assets qualifying for interest capitalization are less than our outstanding debt balances, is expensed as incurred in “Other interest.”

74

Interest costs incurred, expensed and capitalized were:

|  | Year Ended |
(Dollars in thousands) |  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |  |  | October 31, 2011 |
Interest capitalized at beginning of year |  |  | $116,056 |  |  |  | $121,441 |  |  |  | $136,288 |
Plus interest incurred(1) |  |  | 132,611 |  |  |  | 147,048 |  |  |  | 156,998 |
Less cost of sales interest expensed |  |  | 52,230 |  |  |  | 54,538 |  |  |  | 74,676 |
Less other interest expensed(2)(3) |  |  | 91,344 |  |  |  | 97,895 |  |  |  | 97,169 |
Interest capitalized at end of year(4) |  |  | $105,093 |  |  |  | $116,056 |  |  |  | $121,441 |

(1) | Data does not include interest incurred by our mortgage and finance subsidiaries.
(2) | Other interest expensed is comprised of interest that does not qualify for capitalization because our assets that qualify for interest capitalization (inventory under development) do not exceed our debt. Interest on completed homes and land in planning which does not qualify for capitalization is expensed.
(3) | Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest is the sum of other interest expensed, as defined above, and interest paid by our mortgage and finance subsidiaries adjusted for the change in accrued interest, which is calculated as follows:

|  | Year Ended |
(Dollars in thousands) |  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |  |  | October 31, 2011 |
Other interest expensed |  |  | $91,344 |  |  |  | $97,895 |  |  |  | $97,169 |
Interest paid by our mortgage and finance subsidiaries |  |  | 2,975 |  |  |  | 2,433 |  |  |  | 1,959 |
(Increase)/decrease in accrued interest |  |  | (8,062 | ) |  |  | 1,132 |  |  |  | 2,637 |
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest |  |  | $86,257 |  |  |  | $101,460 |  |  |  | $101,765 |

(4) | Capitalized interest amounts are shown gross before allocating any portion of inventory impairments to capitalized interest.

Land Options - Costs incurred to obtain options to acquire improved or unimproved home sites are capitalized. Such amounts are either included as part of the purchase price if the land is acquired or charged to “Inventory impairments loss and land option write-offs” if we determine we will not exercise the option. If the options are with variable interest entities and we are the primary beneficiary, we record the land under option on the Consolidated Balance Sheets under “Consolidated inventory not owned” with an offset under “Liabilities from inventory not owned.” If the option obligation is to purchase under specific performance or has terms that require us to record it as financing, then we record the option on the Consolidated Balance Sheets under “Consolidated inventory not owned” with an offset under “Liabilities from inventory not owned”. In accordance with ASC 810-10 “Consolidation - Overall”, we record costs associated with other options on the Consolidated Balance Sheets under “Land and land options held for future development or sale.”

Unconsolidated Homebuilding and Land Development Joint Ventures - Investments in unconsolidated homebuilding and land development joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, we recognize our proportionate share of earnings and losses earned by the joint venture upon the delivery of lots or homes to third parties. Our ownership interests in the joint ventures vary but our voting interests are generally 50% or less. In determining whether or not we must consolidate joint ventures where we are the managing member of the joint venture, we assess whether the other partners have specific rights to overcome the presumption of control by us as the manager of the joint venture. In most cases, the presumption is overcome because the joint venture agreements require that both partners agree on establishing the significant operating and capital decisions of the partnership, including budgets, in the ordinary course of business. The evaluation of whether or not we control a venture can require significant judgment. In accordance with ASC 323-10, “Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures - Overall”, we assess our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures for recoverability, and if it is determined that a loss in value of the investment below its carrying amount is other than temporary, we write down the investment to its fair value. We evaluate our equity investments for impairment based on the joint venture’s projected cash flows. This process requires significant management judgment and estimates. There were no write-downs in fiscal 2011, 2012 or 2013.

Deferred Bond Issuance Costs - Costs associated with the issuance of our senior secured, senior, senior amortizing, senior exchangeable and senior subordinated amortizing notes are capitalized and amortized over the term of each note’s issuance.

75

Debt Issued At a Discount - Debt issued at a discount to the face amount is accreted up to its face amount utilizing the effective interest method over the term of the note and recorded as a component of interest on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Post Development Completion and Warranty Costs - In those instances where a development is substantially completed and sold and we have additional construction work to be incurred, an estimated liability is provided to cover the cost of such work. We accrue for warranty costs that are covered under our existing general liability and construction defect policy as part of our general liability insurance deductible. This accrual is expensed as selling, general, and administrative costs. For homes delivered in fiscal 2013 and 2012, our deductible under our general liability insurance is $20 million per occurrence for construction defect and warranty claims. For bodily injury claims, our deductible per occurrence in fiscal 2013 and 2012 is $0.25 million and $0.1 million, respectively, up to a $5 million limit. Our aggregate retention in fiscal 2013 and 2012 is $21 million for construction defect, warranty and bodily injury claims. In addition, we establish a warranty accrual for lower cost-related issues to cover home repairs, community amenities, and land development infrastructure that are not covered under our general liability and construction defect policy. We accrue an estimate for these warranty costs as part of cost of sales at the time each home is closed and title and possession have been transferred to the homebuyer. See Note 17 for additional information on the amount of warranty costs recognized in cost of goods sold and administrative expenses.

Advertising Costs - Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. During the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, advertising costs expensed totaled to $17.2 million, $18.2 million and $20.3 million, respectively.

Deferred Income Taxes - Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between amounts recorded for financial reporting and for income tax purposes. If the combination of future years’ income (or loss) combined with the reversal of the timing differences results in a loss, such losses can be carried back to prior years or carried forward to future years to recover the deferred tax assets. In accordance with ASC 740-10, “Income Taxes - Overall”, we evaluate our deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are required. ASC 740-10 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more-likely-than-not” standard.

In evaluating the exposures associated with our various tax filing positions, we recognize tax liabilities in accordance with ASC 740-10, for more likely than not exposures. We re-evaluate the exposures associated with our tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors such as changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, new audit activity, and effectively settled issues. Determining whether an uncertain tax position is effectively settled requires judgment. Such a change in recognition or measurement would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter for which we have established a liability is audited and fully resolved or clarified. We adjust our liability for unrecognized tax benefits and income tax provision in the period in which an uncertain tax position is effectively settled, or the statute of limitations expires for the relevant taxing authority to examine the tax position or when more information becomes available. Due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a liability that is materially different from our current estimate. Any such changes will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period in which they are determined.

Depreciation - Property, plant and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the assets ranging from 3 to 40 years.

Prepaid Expenses - Prepaid expenses which relate to specific housing communities (model setup, architectural fees, homeowner warranty program fees, etc.) are amortized to cost of sales as the applicable inventories are sold. All other prepaid expenses are amortized over a specific time period or as used and charged to overhead expense.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts – We regularly review our receivable balances, which are included in Receivables, deposits and notes on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, for collectability and record an allowance against a receivable when it is deemed that collectability is uncertain. These receivables include receivables from our insurance carriers, receivables from municipalities related to the development of utilities or other infrastructure, and other miscellaneous receivables. At October 31, 2013 and 2012, the balance for allowance for doubtful accounts was $14.7 million and $8.2 million, respectively. The balance at October 31, 2013 primarily related to the allowance for receivables from our insurance carriers for certain warranty claims which may not be fully recoverable, allowances for receivables from municipalities, an allowance for a receivable for a prior year land sale and an allowance for a receivable related to a legal settlement. The balance at October 31, 2012 primarily related to the allowance for receivables from municipalities. During fiscal 2013 and 2012, we recorded $7.4 million and $7.7 million, respectively, of additional reserves and $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, in write-offs. In 2013, we also had $0.8 million in recoveries.

Stock Options - We account for our stock options under ASC 718-10, “Compensation - Stock Compensation - Overall”, which requires the fair-value based method of accounting for stock awards granted to employees and measures and records the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award.

76

Compensation cost arising from non-vested stock granted to employees and from nonemployee stock awards is recognized as expense using the straight-line method over the vesting period.

Per Share Calculations - Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) (the “numerator”) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, adjusted for non-vested shares of restricted stock (the “denominator”) for the period. The basic weighted-average number of shares for the twelve months ended October 31, 2013 includes 6.1 million shares related to Purchase Contracts (issued as part of our 7.25% Tangible Equity Units) which are issuable in the future with no additional cash required to be paid by the holders thereof. This number of shares represents the minimum number of shares that will, under all circumstances, be issuable upon settlement of the Purchase Contracts. As discussed in Note 10, the actual number of shares of Class A Common stock we may issue upon settlement of the Purchase Contracts will be between 4.7655 shares (which is the minimum settlement rate) and 5.8140 shares (which is the maximum settlement rate) per Purchase Contract (in each case, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments) based on the applicable market value, as defined in the purchase contract agreement governing the Purchase Contracts, of our Class A Common Stock. Computing diluted earnings per share is similar to computing basic earnings per share, except that the denominator is increased to include the dilutive effects of options and non-vested shares of restricted stock, as well as common shares that would be issuable upon exchange of our Senior Exchangeable Notes issued as part of our 6.0% Exchangeable Note Units. Any options that have an exercise price greater than the average market price are considered to be anti-dilutive and are excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation.

All outstanding non-vested shares that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents that participate in undistributed earnings with common stock are considered participating securities and are included in computing earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating securities according to dividends or dividend equivalents and participation rights in undistributed earnings. The Company’s restricted common stock (“nonvested shares”) are considered participating securities.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements – As of October 31, 2013, there were no pending accounting pronouncements applicable to the Company.

4. Leases

We lease certain property under non-cancelable leases. Office leases are generally for terms of three to five years and generally provide renewal options. Model home leases are generally for shorter terms of approximately one to three years with renewal options on a month-to-month basis. In most cases, we expect that in the normal course of business, leases that will expire will be renewed or replaced by other leases. The future lease payments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable terms in excess of one year are as follows:

Years Ending October 31, |  |  | (In Thousands) |
2014 |  |  |  | $10,631 |
2015 |  |  |  | 9,105 |
2016 |  |  |  | 7,757 |
2017 |  |  |  | 3,310 |
2018 |  |  |  | 795 |
After 2019 |  |  |  | 1,438 |
Total |  |  |  | $33,036 |

Net rental expense for the three years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, was $10.8 million, $12.4 million and $15.3 million, respectively. These amounts include rent expense for various month-to-month leases on model homes, furniture, and equipment. These amounts also include abandoned lease cost accruals, as well as the amortization of those accruals over the lease term, for leased space that we have abandoned due to our reduction in size and consolidation of certain locations. Certain leases contain renewal or purchase options and generally provide that the Company shall pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance.

5. Property, Plant and Equipment

Homebuilding property, plant, and equipment consists of land, land improvements, buildings, building improvements, furniture, and equipment used to conduct day-to-day business and are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation.

77

Property, plant, and equipment balances as of October 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

|  | October 31, |
(In thousands) |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |
Land |  |  | $2,398 |  |  |  | $2,398 |
Buildings |  |  | 66,859 |  |  |  | 66,843 |
Building improvements |  |  | 8,869 |  |  |  | 9,475 |
Furniture |  |  | 6,262 |  |  |  | 6,272 |
Equipment |  |  | 36,998 |  |  |  | 39,222 |
Total |  |  | 121,386 |  |  |  | 124,210 |
Less accumulated depreciation |  |  | 75,175 |  |  |  | 75,686 |
Total |  |  | $46,211 |  |  |  | $48,524 |

6. Restricted Cash and Deposits

Restricted cash and cash equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheets totaled to $31.9 million and $64.2 million as of October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which included cash collateralizing our letter of credit agreements and facilities and is discussed in Note 8. Also included in this balance were homebuilding and financial services customers’ deposits of $5.1 million and $21.6 million at October 31, 2013, respectively, and $4.8 million and $22.5 million as of October 31, 2012, respectively, which are restricted from use by us. In addition, we previously collateralized our surety bonds with cash, but as of April 30, 2013 were no longer required to do so. The balance of this surety bond collateral was $6.2 million at October 31, 2012, which was in cash equivalents, the book value of which approximates fair value.

Total Homebuilding Customers’ deposits are shown as a liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These liabilities are significantly more than the applicable periods’ escrow cash balances because, in some states, the deposits are not restricted from use and, in other states, we are able to release the majority of this escrow cash by pledging letters of credit and surety bonds.

7. Mortgage Loans Held for Sale

Our mortgage banking subsidiary originates mortgage loans, primarily from the sale of our homes. Such mortgage loans are sold in the secondary mortgage market within a short period of time of origination. Mortgage loans held for sale consist primarily of single-family residential loans collateralized by the underlying property. We have elected the fair value option to record loans held for sale and therefore these loans are recorded at fair value with the changes in the value recognized in the Statements of Operations in “Revenues: Financial services.” We currently use forward sales of mortgage-backed securities, interest rate commitments from borrowers and mandatory and/or best efforts forward commitments to sell loans to investors to protect us from interest rate fluctuations. These short-term instruments, which do not require any payments to be made to the counterparty or investor in connection with the execution of the commitments, are recorded at fair value. Gains and losses on changes in the fair value are recognized in the Statements of Operations in “Revenues: Financial services.”

At October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, $94.1 million and $104.6 million of mortgages held for sale were pledged against our mortgage warehouse lines of credit (see Note 8). We may incur losses with respect to mortgages that were previously sold that are delinquent and which had underwriting defects, but only to the extent the losses are not covered by mortgage insurance or resale value of the home. The reserves for these estimated losses are included in the "Financial services – Accounts payable and other liabilities" balance on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. We received 58 and 66 repurchase or make-whole inquiries during the year ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

78

The activity in our loan origination reserves in fiscal 2013 and 2012 was as follows:

|  | Year Ended October 31, |
(In thousands) |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |
Loan origination reserves, beginning of period |  |  | $9,334 |  |  |  | $5,063 |
Provisions for losses during the period |  |  | 3,138 |  |  |  | 4,060 |
Adjustments to pre-existing provisions for losses from changes in estimates |  |  | (786 | ) |  |  | 1,802 |
Payments/settlements |  |  | (650 | ) |  |  | (1,591 | )
Loan origination reserves, end of period |  |  | $11,036 |  |  |  | $9,334 |

8. Mortgages and Notes Payable

We have nonrecourse mortgages for a small number of our communities totaling $62.9 million, as well as our Corporate Headquarters totaling $17.7 million, at October 31, 2013, which are secured by the related real property and any improvements. These loans have installment obligations with annual principal maturities in the years ending October 31 of approximately: $63.9 million in 2014, $1.2 million in 2015, $1.3 million in 2016, $1.4 million in 2017, $1.5 million in 2018 and $11.3 million after 2018. The interest rates on these obligations range from 4.0% to 8.8% at October 31, 2013.

In June 2013, K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (“K. Hovnanian”), as borrower, and we and certain of our subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into a five-year $75 million unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and Citibank, N.A., as a lender. The Credit Facility is available for both letters of credit and general corporate purposes. The Credit Facility does not contain any financial maintenance covenants, but does contain certain restrictive covenants that track those contained in our indenture governing the First Lien Notes (as defined below in Note 9), which are described in Note 9. The Credit Facility also contains certain customary events of default which would permit the administrative agent at the request of the required lenders to, among other things, declare all loans then outstanding to be immediately due and payable if not cured within applicable grace periods, including the failure to make timely payments of amounts payable under the Credit Facility or other material indebtedness or the acceleration of other material indebtedness, the failure to comply with agreements and covenants or for representations or warranties to be correct in all material respects when made, specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency, and the entry of a material judgment against a loan party. Outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility accrue interest at an annual rate equal to either, as selected by K. Hovnanian, (i) the alternate base rate plus the applicable spread determined on the date of such borrowing or (ii) an adjusted LIBOR rate plus the applicable spread determined as of the date two business days prior to the first day of the interest period for such borrowing. As of October 31, 2013, there were no borrowings and $25.8 million of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility and as of such date, we believe we were in compliance with the covenants under the Credit Facility.

In addition to the Credit Facility, we have certain stand alone cash collateralized letter of credit agreements and facilities under which there were a total of $5.1 million and $29.5 million of letters of credit outstanding as of October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These agreements and facilities require us to maintain specified amounts of cash as collateral in segregated accounts to support the letters of credit issued thereunder, which will affect the amount of cash we have available for other uses. As of October 31, 2013 and 2012, the amount of cash collateral in these segregated accounts was $5.2 million and $30.7 million, respectively, which is reflected in “Restricted cash and cash equivalents” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Our wholly owned mortgage banking subsidiary, K. Hovnanian American Mortgage, LLC (“K. Hovnanian Mortgage”), originates mortgage loans primarily from the sale of our homes. Such mortgage loans and related servicing rights are sold in the secondary mortgage market within a short period of time. In certain instances, we retain the servicing rights for a small amount of loans. Our secured Master Repurchase Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase Master Repurchase Agreement”), which was amended on June 28, 2013 to extend the maturity date to June 27, 2014, is a short-term borrowing facility that provides up to $50.0 million through maturity. The loan is secured by the mortgages held for sale and is repaid when we sell the underlying mortgage loans to permanent investors. Interest is payable monthly on outstanding advances at an adjusted LIBOR rate, which was 0.168% at October 31, 2013, subject to a floor of 1%, plus the applicable margin of 2.5%. Therefore, at October 31, 2013, the interest rate was 3.5%. As of October 31, 2013 and 2012, the aggregate principal amount of all borrowings outstanding under the Chase Master Repurchase Agreement was $33.6 million and $58.8 million, respectively.

79

K. Hovnanian Mortgage has another secured Master Repurchase Agreement with Customers Bank (“Customers Master Repurchase Agreement”), which was amended on May 28, 2013 to extend the maturity date to May 27, 2014, that is a short-term borrowing facility that provides up to $37.5 million through maturity. The loan is secured by the mortgages held for sale and is repaid when we sell the underlying mortgage loans to permanent investors. Interest is payable daily or as loans are sold to permanent investors on outstanding advances at the current LIBOR subject to a floor of 0.5% plus the applicable margin ranging from 3.0% to 5.5% based on the takeout investor and type of loan. As of October 31, 2013 and 2012, the aggregate principal amount of all borrowings outstanding under the Customers Master Repurchase Agreement was $30.7 million and $22.9 million, respectively.

K. Hovnanian Mortgage has a third secured Master Repurchase Agreement with Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC (“Credit Suisse Master Repurchase Agreement”), which was amended on January 2, 2013, that is a short-term borrowing facility that provides up to $50.0 million through June 20, 2014. The loan is secured by the mortgages held for sale and is repaid when we sell the underlying mortgage loans to permanent investors. Interest is payable monthly on outstanding advances at the Credit Suisse Cost of Funds, which was 0.48% at October 31, 2013, plus the applicable margin ranging from 3.75% to 4.0% based on the takeout investor and type of loan. As of October 31, 2013 and 2012, the aggregate principal amount of all borrowings outstanding under the Credit Suisse Master Repurchase Agreement was $27.4 million and $25.8 million, respectively.

The Chase Master Repurchase Agreement, Customers Master Repurchase Agreement and Credit Suisse Master Repurchase Agreement (together, the “Master Repurchase Agreements”) require K. Hovnanian Mortgage to satisfy and maintain specified financial ratios and other financial condition tests. Because of the extremely short period of time mortgages are held by K. Hovnanian Mortgage before the mortgages are sold to investors (generally a period of a few weeks), the immateriality to us on a consolidated basis of the size of the Master Repurchase Agreements, the levels required by these financial covenants, our ability based on our immediately available resources to contribute sufficient capital to cure any default, were such conditions to occur, and our right to cure any conditions of default based on the terms of the agreement, we do not consider any of these covenants to be substantive or material. As of October 31, 2013, we believe we were in compliance with the covenants under the Master Repurchase Agreements.

9. Senior Secured, Senior, Senior Amortizing, Senior Exchangeable and Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes

Senior Secured, Senior, Senior Amortizing, Senior Exchangeable and Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes balances as of October 31, 2013 and 2012, were as follows:

|  | Year Ended |
(In thousands) |  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | October 31, 2012 |
Senior Secured Notes: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
7.25% Senior Secured First Lien Notes due October 15, 2020 |  |  | $577,000 |  |  |  | $577,000 |
9.125% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due November 15, 2020 |  |  | 220,000 |  |  |  | 220,000 |
2.0% Senior Secured Notes due November 1, 2021 (net of discount) |  |  | 53,119 |  |  |  | 53,109 |
5.0% Senior Secured Notes due November 1, 2021 (net of discount) |  |  | 128,492 |  |  |  | 127,260 |
Total Senior Secured Notes |  |  | $978,611 |  |  |  | $977,369 |
Senior Notes: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
6.5% Senior Notes due January 15, 2014 |  |  | $- |  |  |  | $36,649 |
6.375% Senior Notes due December 15, 2014 |  |  | - |  |  |  | 3,015 |
6.25% Senior Notes due January 15, 2015 |  |  | 21,438 |  |  |  | 21,438 |
11.875% Senior Notes due October 15, 2015 (net of discount) |  |  | 60,044 |  |  |  | 59,716 |
6.25% Senior Notes due January 15, 2016 (net of discount) |  |  | 172,153 |  |  |  | 130,343 |
7.5% Senior Notes due May 15, 2016 |  |  | 86,532 |  |  |  | 86,532 |
8.625% Senior Notes due January 15, 2017 |  |  | 121,043 |  |  |  | 121,043 |
Total Senior Notes |  |  | $461,210 |  |  |  | $458,736 |
11.0% Senior Amortizing Notes due December 1, 2017 |  |  | $20,857 |  |  |  | $23,149 |
Senior Exchangeable Notes due December 1, 2017 |  |  | $66,615 |  |  |  | $76,851 |
7.25% Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes due February 15, 2014 |  |  | $2,152 |  |  |  | $6,091 |

80

As of October 31, 2013, future maturities of our borrowings (assuming no exchange of our senior exchangeable notes), were as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal Year Ended October 31, |  | 2013 |
2014 |  |  | $5,960 |
2015 |  |  | 86,491 |
2016 |  |  | 263,994 |
2017 |  |  | 126,293 |
2018 |  |  | 69,459 |
Thereafter |  |  | 992,000 |
Total |  |  | $1,544,197 |

Except for K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (“K. Hovnanian”), the issuer of the notes, our home mortgage subsidiaries, joint ventures and subsidiaries holding interests in our joint ventures, certain of our title insurance subsidiaries and our foreign subsidiary, we and each of our subsidiaries are guarantors of the senior secured, senior, senior amortizing, senior exchangeable and senior subordinated amortizing notes outstanding at October 31, 2013 (see Note 23). In addition, the 5.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 and the 2.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 are guaranteed by K. Hovnanian JV Holdings, L.L.C. and its subsidiaries except for certain joint ventures and joint venture holding companies (collectively, the “Secured Group”). Members of the Secured Group do not guarantee K. Hovnanian's other indebtedness.

The indentures governing the notes do not contain any financial maintenance covenants, but do contain restrictive covenants that limit, among other things, the Company’s ability and that of certain of its subsidiaries, including K. Hovnanian, to incur additional indebtedness (other than certain permitted indebtedness, refinancing indebtedness and non-recourse indebtedness), pay dividends and make distributions on common and preferred stock, repurchase subordinated indebtedness (with respect to certain of the senior secured notes), make other restricted payments, make investments, sell certain assets, incur liens, consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all assets and enter into certain transactions with affiliates. The indentures also contain events of default which would permit the holders of the notes to declare the notes to be immediately due and payable if not cured within applicable grace periods, including the failure to make timely payments on the notes or other material indebtedness, the failure to comply with agreements and covenants and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency and, with respect to the indentures governing the senior secured notes, the failure of the documents granting security for the senior secured notes to be in full force and effect and the failure of the liens on any material portion of the collateral securing the senior secured notes to be valid and perfected. As of October 31, 2013, we believe we were in compliance with the covenants of the indentures governing our outstanding notes.

Under the terms of the indentures, we have the right to make certain redemptions and, depending on market conditions and covenant restrictions, may do so from time to time. We also continue to evaluate our capital structure and may also continue to make debt purchases and/or exchanges for debt or equity from time to time through tender offers, open market purchases, private transactions, or otherwise, or seek to raise additional debt or equity capital, depending on market conditions and covenant restrictions.

If our consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined in the indentures governing our senior secured and senior notes (other than the senior exchangeable notes), is less than 2.0 to 1.0, we are restricted from making certain payments, including dividends, and from incurring indebtedness other than certain permitted indebtedness, refinancing indebtedness, and non-recourse indebtedness. As a result of this restriction, we are currently restricted from paying dividends, which are not cumulative, on our 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock. We anticipate we will continue to be restricted from paying dividends for the foreseeable future. Our inability to pay dividends is in accordance with covenant restrictions and will not result in a default under our bond indentures or otherwise affect compliance with any of the covenants contained in the bond indentures.

On November 3, 2003, K. Hovnanian issued $215.0 million 6.5% Senior Notes due 2014. The net proceeds of the issuance were used for general corporate purposes. These notes were the subject of a November 2011 exchange offer discussed below, and pursuant to the terms of the indenture, were subsequently redeemed in full as discussed below.

On March 18, 2004, K. Hovnanian issued $150.0 million 6.375% Senior Notes due 2014. The net proceeds of the issuance were used to redeem all of our $150.0 million outstanding 9.125% Senior Notes due 2009, which occurred on May 3, 2004, and for general corporate purposes. These notes were the subject of a November 2011 exchange offer discussed below, and pursuant to the terms of the indenture, were subsequently redeemed in full, as discussed below.

On November 30, 2004, K. Hovnanian issued $200.0 million 6.25% Senior Notes due 2015. The notes are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at 100% of their principal amount upon payment of a make-whole price. The net proceeds of the issuance were used to repay the outstanding balance on our then existing revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes. These notes were the subject of a November 2011 exchange offer discussed below.

81

On August 8, 2005, K. Hovnanian issued $300.0 million 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016. The 6.25% Senior Notes were issued at a discount to yield 6.46% and have been reflected net of the unamortized discount in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The notes are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at 100% of their principal amount plus the payment of a make-whole amount. The net proceeds of the issuance were used to repay the outstanding balance under our then existing revolving credit facility as of August 8, 2005, and for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions. These notes were the subject of a November 2011 exchange offer discussed below. On September 16, 2013, K. Hovnanian issued $41.6 million of additional 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016 at a price equal to 100% of their principal amount as discussed below.

On February 27, 2006, K. Hovnanian issued $300.0 million of 7.5% Senior Notes due 2016. The notes are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at 100% of their principal amount plus the payment of a make-whole amount. The net proceeds of the issuance were used to repay a portion of the outstanding balance under our then existing revolving credit facility as of February 27, 2006. These notes were the subject of a November 2011 exchange offer discussed below.

On June 12, 2006, K. Hovnanian issued $250.0 million of 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017. The notes are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at 100% of their principal amount plus the payment of a make-whole amount. The net proceeds of the issuance were used to repay a portion of the outstanding balance under our then existing revolving credit facility as of June 12, 2006. These notes were the subject of a November 2011 exchange offer discussed below.

On May 27, 2008, K. Hovnanian issued $600.0 million ($594.4 million net of discount) of 11.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2013. The notes were secured, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions, by a second-priority lien on substantially all of the assets owned by us, K. Hovnanian and the guarantors to the extent such assets secured obligations under the then existing 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016. A portion of the net proceeds of the issuance were used to repay the outstanding balance under the then existing amended credit facility. These second lien notes were the subject of tender offers, and notes that remained outstanding following such tender offers were subsequently redeemed, as discussed below.

On December 3, 2008, K. Hovnanian issued $29.3 million of 18.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2017 in exchange for $71.4 million of various series of our unsecured senior notes. This exchange resulted in a recognized gain on extinguishment of debt of $41.3 million, net of the write-off of unamortized discounts and fees. The notes were secured, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions, by a third-priority lien on substantially all of the assets owned by us, K. Hovnanian, and the guarantors to the extent such assets secured obligations under our then existing 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 and 11.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2013. These third lien notes were the subject of tender offers, and notes that remained outstanding following such tender offers were subsequently redeemed, as discussed below.

On October 20, 2009, K. Hovnanian issued $785.0 million ($770.9 million net of discount) of 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due October 15, 2016. The notes were secured, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions, by a first-priority lien on substantially all of the assets owned by us, K. Hovnanian and the guarantors. The net proceeds from this issuance, together with cash on hand, were used to fund certain cash tender offers for our then outstanding 11.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2013 and 18.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2017 and certain series of our unsecured notes. In May 2011, we issued $12.0 million of additional 10.625% Senior Secured Notes as discussed below. The 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 were the subject of a tender offer in October 2012, and the notes that were not tendered in the tender offer were redeemed, as discussed below.

On February 14, 2011, K. Hovnanian issued $155.0 million aggregate principal amount of 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015. The notes are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at any time at 100% of their principal amount plus an applicable “Make-Whole Amount.” In addition, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 11.875% Senior Notes prior to April 15, 2014 with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at 111.875% of principal. These notes were the subject of a November 2011 exchange offer discussed below.

The net proceeds from the issuances of the 11.875% Senior Notes due in 2015, Class A Common Stock (see Note 15) and 7.25% Tangible Equity Units (see Note 10) were approximately $286.2 million, a portion of which were used to fund the purchase through tender offers, on February 14, 2011, of the following series of K. Hovnanian’s then outstanding senior and senior subordinated notes: approximately $24.6 million aggregate principal amount of 8.0% Senior Notes due 2012, $44.1 million aggregate principal amount of 8.875% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012 and $29.2 million aggregate principal amount of 7.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 (the “2013 Notes” and, together with the 2012 Senior Notes and the 2012 Senior Subordinated Notes, the “Tender Offer Notes”). On February 14, 2011, K. Hovnanian called for redemption on March 15, 2011 all Tender Offer Notes that were not tendered in the tender offers for an aggregate redemption price of approximately $60.1 million. Such redemptions were funded with proceeds from the offerings of the Class A Common Stock, the Tangible Equity Units and the 11.875% Senior Notes.

82

On May 4, 2011, K. Hovnanian issued an aggregate principal amount of $12.0 million of additional 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 resulting in net proceeds of approximately $11.6 million. On June 3, 2011 we used these net proceeds together with cash on hand, to fund the redemption of the remaining outstanding principal amount ($0.5 million) of our 11.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2013 and the remaining outstanding principal amount ($11.7 million) of our 18.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2017. These transactions, along with the tender offers and redemptions in February and March 2011 discussed above, resulted in a loss of $3.1 million during the year ended October 31, 2011. The losses from the transactions are included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as “(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt.”

During the three months ended October 31, 2011 we completed a number of open market repurchases. These included $24.6 million principal amount of 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015 and $1.0 million principal amount of 6.5% Senior Notes due 2014. The aggregate purchase price for these repurchases was $14.0 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest. These repurchases resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $10.6 million, net of the write-off of unamortized discounts and fees. The gains from the repurchases are included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as “(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt”.

On November 1, 2011, K. Hovnanian issued $141.8 million aggregate principal amount of 5.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 (the “5.0% 2021 Notes”) and $53.2 million aggregate principal amount of 2.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 (the “2.0% 2021 Notes” and, together with the 5.0% 2021 Notes, the “2021 Notes”) in exchange for $195.0 million of K. Hovnanian's unsecured senior notes with maturities ranging from 2014 through 2017. Holders of the senior notes due 2014 and 2015 that were exchanged in the exchange offer also received an aggregate of approximately $14.2 million in cash payments and all holders of senior notes that were exchanged in the exchange offer received accrued and unpaid interest (in the aggregate amount of approximately $3.3 million). Costs associated with this transaction were $4.7 million. The 5.0% 2021 Notes and the 2.0% 2021 Notes were issued as separate series under an indenture, but have substantially the same terms other than with respect to interest rate and related redemption provisions, and vote together as a single class. The 2021 Notes are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at any time, at 100.0% of the principal amount plus the greater of 1% of the principal amount and an applicable “Make-Whole Amount.” In addition, we may redeem up to 35.0% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes before November 1, 2014 with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at 105.0% (in the case of the 5.0% Secured Notes) and 102.0% (in the case of the 2.0% Secured Notes) of principal. Due to the then existing financial condition of K. Hovnanian as determined in accordance with ASC 470-60 “Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructurings” and, because the holders of the senior notes that exchanged such notes for 2021 Notes granted K. Hovnanian a concession in the form of extended maturities and reduced interest rates, the accounting for the debt exchange was treated as a troubled debt restructuring. Under this accounting, the Company did not recognize any gain or loss on extinguishment of debt and the costs associated with the debt exchange were expensed as incurred in “Other operations” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The guarantees with respect to the 2021 Notes of the Secured Group are secured, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions, by a first-priority lien on substantially all of the assets of the members of the Secured Group. As of October 31, 2013, the collateral securing the guarantees included (1) $72.9 million of cash and cash equivalents (subsequent to such date, cash uses include general business operations and real estate and other investments); (2) approximately $74.4 million aggregate book value of real property of the Secured Group, which does not include the impact of inventory investments, home deliveries, or impairments thereafter and which may differ from the value if it were appraised, and (3) equity interests in guarantors that are members of the Secured Group. Members of the Secured Group also own equity in joint ventures, either directly or indirectly through ownership of joint venture holding companies, with a book value of $44.1 million as of October 31, 2013; this equity is not pledged to secure, and is not collateral for, the 2021 Notes. Members of the Secured Group are “unrestricted subsidiaries” under K. Hovnanian's other senior notes, senior secured notes and senior subordinated amortizing notes, and thus have not guaranteed such indebtedness.

In addition, on November 1, 2011, K. Hovnanian entered into a Second Supplemental Indenture (the “11.875% Notes Supplemental Indenture”), among K. Hovnanian, the Company, as guarantor, the other guarantors party thereto and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee, amending and supplementing the Indenture dated February 14, 2011 (the “Base Indenture”) by and among K. Hovnanian, the Company, as guarantor, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee, as amended by the First Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 14, 2011 (the “First Supplemental Indenture”), by and among K. Hovnanian, the Company, as guarantor, the other guarantors party thereto and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (the Base Indenture as amended by the First Supplemental Indenture, the “Existing Indenture”). The 11.875% Notes Supplemental Indenture was executed and delivered following the receipt by K. Hovnanian of consents from a majority of the holders of K. Hovnanian’s 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015. The 11.875% Notes Supplemental Indenture provides for the elimination of substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain of the default provisions contained in the Existing Indenture and the 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015.

On October 2, 2012, K. Hovnanian issued $577.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.25% senior secured first lien notes due 2020 (the "First Lien Notes") and $220.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9.125% senior secured second lien notes due 2020 (the "Second Lien Notes" and, together with the First Lien Notes, the "2020 Secured Notes") in a private placement (the "2020 Secured Notes Offering"). The net proceeds from the 2020 Secured Notes Offering, together with the net proceeds of the Units offering discussed below, and cash on hand, were used to fund the tender offer and consent solicitation with respect to the Company’s then outstanding 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 and the redemption of the remaining notes that were not purchased in the tender offer as described below.

83

The First Lien Notes are secured by a first-priority lien and the Second Lien Notes are secured by a second-priority lien, in each case, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions, on substantially all the assets owned by us, K. Hovnanian and the guarantors of such notes. At October 31, 2013, the aggregate book value of the real property that constituted collateral securing the 2020 Secured Notes was approximately $526.0 million, which does not include the impact of inventory investments, home deliveries, or impairments thereafter and which may differ from the value if it were appraised. In addition, cash collateral that secured the 2020 Secured Notes was $251.5 million as of October 31, 2013, which included $5.2 million of restricted cash collateralizing certain letters of credit. Subsequent to such date, cash uses include general business operations and real estate and other investments.

The First Lien Notes are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at any time prior to October 15, 2015 at 100% of the principal amount plus an applicable “Make-Whole Amount.” We may also redeem some or all of the First Lien Notes at 105.438% of principal commencing October 15, 2015, at 103.625% of principal commencing October 15, 2016, at 101.813% of principal commencing October 15, 2017 and 100% of principal commencing October 15, 2018. In addition, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the First Lien Notes prior to October 15, 2015 with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at 107.25% of principal.

The Second Lien Notes are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at any time prior to November 15, 2015 at 100% of the principal amount plus an applicable “Make-Whole Amount.” We may also redeem some or all of all of the Second Lien Notes at 106.844% of principal commencing November 15, 2015, at 104.563% of principal commencing November 15, 2016, at 102.281% of principal commencing November 15, 2017 and 100% of principal commencing November 15, 2018. In addition, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Second Lien Notes prior to November 15, 2015 with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at 109.125% of principal.

Also on October 2, 2012, the Company and K. Hovnanian issued $100,000,000 aggregate stated amount of 6.0% Exchangeable Note Units (the “Units”) (equivalent to 100,000 Units). Each $1,000 stated amount of Units initially consists of (1) a zero coupon senior exchangeable note due December 1, 2017 (a “Senior Exchangeable Note”) issued by K. Hovnanian, which bears no cash interest and has an initial principal amount of $768.51 per Senior Exchangeable Note, and that will accrete to $1,000 at maturity and (2) a senior amortizing note due December 1, 2017 (a “Senior Amortizing Note”) issued by K. Hovnanian, which has an initial principal amount of $231.49 per Senior Amortizing Note, bears interest at a rate of 11.0% per annum, and has a final installment payment date of December 1, 2017. Each Unit may be separated into its constituent Senior Exchangeable Note and Senior Amortizing Note after the initial issuance date of the Units, and the separate components may be combined to create a Unit.

Each Senior Exchangeable Note had an initial principal amount of $768.51 (which will accrete to $1,000 over the term of the Senior Exchangeable Note at an annual rate of 5.17% from the date of issuance, calculated on a semi-annual bond equivalent yield basis). Holders may exchange their Senior Exchangeable Notes at their option at any time prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the business day immediately preceding December 1, 2017. Each Senior Exchangeable Note will be exchangeable for shares of Class A Common Stock at an initial exchange rate of 185.5288 shares of Class A Common Stock per Senior Exchangeable Note (equivalent to an initial exchange price, based on $1,000 principal amount at maturity, of approximately $5.39 per share of Class A Common Stock). The exchange rate will be subject to adjustment in certain events. Following certain corporate events that occur prior to the maturity date, the Company will increase the applicable exchange rate for any holder who elects to exchange its Senior Exchangeable Notes in connection with such corporate event. In addition, holders of Senior Exchangeable Notes will also have the right to require K. Hovnanian to repurchase such holders’ Senior Exchangeable Notes upon the occurrence of certain of these corporate events. As of October 31, 2013, 18,305 Senior Exchangeable Notes have been converted into 3.4 million shares of our Class A Common Stock, all of which were converted during the first quarter of fiscal 2013.

On each June 1 and December 1 (each, an “installment payment date”), K. Hovnanian will pay holders of Senior Amortizing Notes equal semi-annual cash installments of $30.00 per Senior Amortizing Note (except for the June 1, 2013 installment payment, which was $39.83 per Senior Amortizing Note), which cash payment in the aggregate will be equivalent to 6.0% per year with respect to each $1,000 stated amount of Units. Each installment will constitute a payment of interest (at a rate of 11.0% per annum) and a partial repayment of principal on the Senior Amortizing Note. Following certain corporate events that occur prior to the maturity date, holders of the Senior Amortizing Notes will have the right to require K. Hovnanian to repurchase such holders’ Senior Amortizing Notes.

The net proceeds of the Units Offering, along with the net proceeds from the 2020 Secured Notes Offering previously discussed, and cash on hand, were used to fund the tender offer and consent solicitation with respect to the Company’s then outstanding 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 and redemption of the remaining notes that were not purchased in the tender offer as described below.

84

On October 2, 2012, pursuant to a cash tender offer and consent solicitation, we purchased in a fixed-price tender offer approximately $637.2 million aggregate principal amount of 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 for approximately $691.3 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Subsequently, all 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 that were not tendered in the tender offer (approximately $159.8 million) were redeemed for an aggregate redemption price of approximately $181.8 million. The tender offer and redemption resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $87.0 million, including the write-off of unamortized discounts and fees. The loss is included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as “(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt.”

During the year ended October 31, 2012, we repurchased for cash in the open market and privately negotiated transactions $21.0 million principal amount of our 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016, $61.1 million principal amount of our 7.5% Senior Notes due 2016, $37.4 million principal amount of our 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017 and $2.0 million principal amount of our 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015. The aggregate purchase price for these repurchases was $72.2 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest. These repurchases resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $48.4 million for the year ended October 31, 2012, net of the write-off of unamortized discounts and fees. The gain is included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as “(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt.” Certain of these repurchases were funded with the proceeds from our April 11, 2012 issuance of 25,000,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock (see Note 15).

In addition, during the year ended October 31, 2012, pursuant to agreements with bondholders we exchanged $7.8 million principal amount of our 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016, $4.0 million principal amount of our 7.5% Senior Notes due 2016 and $18.3 million of our outstanding 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017 for shares of our Class A Common Stock, as discussed in Note 15. These transactions were treated as a substantial modification of debt, resulting in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $9.3 million for the year ended October 31, 2012. The gain is included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as “(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt.”

On September 16, 2013, K. Hovnanian issued an aggregate principal amount of $41.6 million of its 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016. The Notes were issued as additional 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016 under the indenture dated as of August 8, 2005. The net proceeds from this offering were used to fund the redemption on October 15, 2013 of all of K. Hovnanian’s outstanding 6.5% Senior Notes due 2014 and 6.375% Senior Notes due 2014 and to pay related fees and expenses.

10. Tangible Equity Units

On February 9, 2011, we issued an aggregate of 3,000,000 7.25% Tangible Equity Units (the “TEUs”), and on February 14, 2011, we issued an additional 450,000 TEUs pursuant to the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters. Each TEU initially consists of (i) a prepaid stock purchase contract (each a “Purchase Contract”) and (ii) a senior subordinated amortizing note due February 15, 2014 (each, a “Senior Subordinated Amortizing Note”). As of October 31, 2013 and 2012, we had an aggregate principal amount of $2.2 million and $6.1 million, respectively, of Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes outstanding. On each February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15, K. Hovnanian will pay holders of Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes equal quarterly cash installments of $0.453125 per Senior Subordinated Amortizing Note, which cash payments in the aggregate will be equivalent to 7.25% per year with respect to each $25 stated amount of TEUs. Each installment constitutes a payment of interest (at a rate of 12.072% per annum) and a partial repayment of principal on the Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes, allocated as set forth in the amortization schedule provided in the indenture under which the Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes were issued. The Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes have a scheduled final installment payment date of February 15, 2014. If we elect to settle the Purchase Contracts early, holders of the Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes will have the right to require K. Hovnanian to repurchase such holders’ Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes, except in certain circumstances as described in the indenture governing Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes.

Unless settled earlier, on February 15, 2014 (subject to postponement under certain circumstances), each Purchase Contract will automatically settle and we will deliver a number of shares of Class A Common Stock based on the applicable market value, as defined in the purchase contract agreement, which will be between 4.7655 shares and 5.8140 shares per Purchase Contract (subject to adjustment). Each TEU may be separated into its constituent Purchase Contract and Senior Subordinated Amortizing Note after the initial issuance date of the TEUs, and the separate components may be combined to create a TEU. The Senior Subordinated Amortizing Note component of the TEUs is recorded as debt, and the Purchase Contract component of the TEUs is recorded in equity as additional paid in capital. We have recorded $68.1 million, the initial fair value of the Purchase Contracts, as additional paid in capital. As of October 31, 2013, 2.2 million Purchase Contracts have been converted into 10.4 million shares of our Class A Common Stock.

85

During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we purchased pursuant to agreements with bondholders $3.1 million aggregate principal amount of our Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes in exchange for Class A Common Stock, as discussed in Note 15. These transactions resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $0.2 million for the year ended October 31, 2012. The gain is included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as “Gain on extinguishment of debt.”

11. Operating and Reporting Segments

Our operating segments are components of our business for which discrete financial information is available and reviewed regularly by the chief operating decision maker, our Chief Executive Officer, to evaluate performance and make operating decisions. Based on this criteria, each of our communities qualifies as an operating segment, and therefore, it is impractical to provide segment disclosures for this many segments. As such, we have aggregated the homebuilding operating segments into six reportable segments.

Our homebuilding operating segments are aggregated into reportable segments based primarily upon geographic proximity, similar regulatory environments, land acquisition characteristics and similar methods used to construct and sell homes. Our reportable segments consist of the following six homebuilding segments and a financial services segment:

Homebuilding:

(1) Northeast (New Jersey and Pennsylvania)

(2) Mid-Atlantic (Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Washington D.C. , and West Virginia)

(3) Midwest (Illinois, Minnesota, and Ohio)

(4) Southeast (Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina)

(5) Southwest (Arizona and Texas)

(6) West (California)

Financial Services

Operations of the Company’s Homebuilding segments primarily include the sale and construction of single-family attached and detached homes, attached townhomes and condominiums, urban infill and active adult homes in planned residential developments. In addition, from time to time, operations of the homebuilding segments include sales of land. Operations of the Company’s Financial Services segment include mortgage banking and title services provided to the homebuilding operations’ customers. We do not typically retain or service mortgages that we originate but rather sell the mortgages and related servicing rights to investors.

Corporate and unallocated primarily represents operations at our headquarters in Red Bank, New Jersey. This includes our executive offices, information services, human resources, corporate accounting, training, treasury, process redesign, internal audit, construction services, and administration of insurance, quality, and safety. It also includes interest income and interest expense resulting from interest incurred that cannot be capitalized in inventory in the Homebuilding segments, as well as the gains or losses on extinguishment of debt from debt repurchases or exchanges.

Evaluation of segment performance is based primarily on operating earnings from continuing operations before provision for income taxes (“Income (loss) before income taxes”). Income (loss) before income taxes for the Homebuilding segments consist of revenues generated from the sales of homes and land, income (loss) from unconsolidated entities, management fees and other income, less the cost of homes and land sold, selling, general and administrative expenses, interest expense and non-controlling interest expense. Income before income taxes for the Financial Services segment consist of revenues generated from mortgage financing, title insurance and closing services, less the cost of such services and certain selling, general and administrative expenses incurred by the Financial Services segment.

Operational results of each segment are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred had the segment been an independent stand-alone entity during the periods presented.

86

Financial information relating to operations of our segments was as follows:

|  | Year Ended October 31, |
(In thousands) |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Revenues: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Northeast |  |  | $282,855 |  |  |  | $233,326 |  |  |  | $201,984 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 289,303 |  |  |  | 273,080 |  |  |  | 199,716 |
Midwest |  |  | 163,485 |  |  |  | 106,719 |  |  |  | 70,567 |
Southeast |  |  | 147,570 |  |  |  | 128,684 |  |  |  | 79,453 |
Southwest |  |  | 697,358 |  |  |  | 518,931 |  |  |  | 425,152 |
West |  |  | 223,086 |  |  |  | 185,851 |  |  |  | 128,658 |
Total homebuilding |  |  | 1,803,657 |  |  |  | 1,446,591 |  |  |  | 1,105,530 |
Financial services |  |  | 47,727 |  |  |  | 38,735 |  |  |  | 29,481 |
Corporate and unallocated |  |  | (131 | ) |  |  | 27 |  |  |  | (104 | )
Total revenues |  |  | $1,851,253 |  |  |  | $1,485,353 |  |  |  | $1,134,907 |
Income (loss) before income taxes: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Northeast |  |  | $1,519 |  |  |  | $(4,683 | ) |  |  | $(99,276 | )
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 24,388 |  |  |  | 17,262 |  |  |  | (17,286 | )
Midwest |  |  | 12,270 |  |  |  | 253 |  |  |  | (8,977 | )
Southeast |  |  | 6,455 |  |  |  | (4,828 | ) |  |  | (11,874 | )
Southwest |  |  | 76,459 |  |  |  | 42,178 |  |  |  | 29,316 |
West |  |  | 14,398 |  |  |  | (3,177 | ) |  |  | (40,599 | )
Total homebuilding |  |  | 135,489 |  |  |  | 47,005 |  |  |  | (148,696 | )
Financial services |  |  | 18,668 |  |  |  | 15,087 |  |  |  | 8,109 |
Corporate and unallocated |  |  | (132,222 | ) |  |  | (163,340 | ) |  |  | (151,001 | )
Income (loss) before income taxes |  |  | $21,935 |  |  |  | $(101,248 | ) |  |  | $(291,588 | )

|  | October 31, |
(In thousands) |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Northeast |  |  | $323,152 |  |  |  | $396,073 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 240,486 |  |  |  | 200,969 |
Midwest |  |  | 104,596 |  |  |  | 73,305 |
Southeast |  |  | 101,410 |  |  |  | 90,132 |
Southwest |  |  | 305,878 |  |  |  | 235,367 |
West |  |  | 130,545 |  |  |  | 143,851 |
Total homebuilding |  |  | 1,206,067 |  |  |  | 1,139,697 |
Financial services |  |  | 148,853 |  |  |  | 164,634 |
Corporate and unallocated |  |  | 404,210 |  |  |  | 379,919 |
Total assets |  |  | $1,759,130 |  |  |  | $1,684,250 |

|  | October 31, |
(In thousands) |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Northeast |  |  | $8,828 |  |  |  | $18,954 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 33,052 |  |  |  | 32,014 |
Midwest |  |  | 1,661 |  |  |  | 2,190 |
Southeast |  |  | 3,412 |  |  |  | 4,636 |
Southwest |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
West |  |  | 3,921 |  |  |  | 2,490 |
Total homebuilding |  |  | 50,874 |  |  |  | 60,284 |
Corporate and unallocated |  |  | 564 |  |  |  | 799 |
Total investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | $51,438 |  |  |  | $61,083 |

87

|  | Year Ended October 31, |
(In thousands) |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Homebuilding interest expense: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Northeast |  |  | $26,163 |  |  |  | $25,507 |  |  |  | $33,833 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 10,037 |  |  |  | 9,988 |  |  |  | 10,180 |
Midwest |  |  | 3,737 |  |  |  | 2,994 |  |  |  | 2,441 |
Southeast |  |  | 5,861 |  |  |  | 5,310 |  |  |  | 4,036 |
Southwest |  |  | 16,071 |  |  |  | 15,880 |  |  |  | 14,552 |
West |  |  | 12,960 |  |  |  | 14,416 |  |  |  | 10,264 |
Total homebuilding |  |  | 74,829 |  |  |  | 74,095 |  |  |  | 75,306 |
Corporate and unallocated |  |  | 68,745 |  |  |  | 78,338 |  |  |  | 96,539 |
Financial services interest expense (1) |  |  | 499 |  |  |  | 553 |  |  |  | 350 |
Total interest expense, net |  |  | $144,073 |  |  |  | $152,986 |  |  |  | $172,195 |

| (1) | Financial services interest expenses are included in the Financial services lines on the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the respective revenues and expenses sections.

|  | Year Ended October 31, |
(In thousands) |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Depreciation: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Northeast |  |  | $245 |  |  |  | $316 |  |  |  | $677 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 283 |  |  |  | 370 |  |  |  | 437 |
Midwest |  |  | 528 |  |  |  | 517 |  |  |  | 1,825 |
Southeast |  |  | 31 |  |  |  | 47 |  |  |  | 132 |
Southwest |  |  | 163 |  |  |  | 217 |  |  |  | 292 |
West |  |  | 148 |  |  |  | 302 |  |  |  | 409 |
Total homebuilding |  |  | 1,398 |  |  |  | 1,769 |  |  |  | 3,772 |
Financial services |  |  | 285 |  |  |  | 328 |  |  |  | 391 |
Corporate and unallocated |  |  | 3,029 |  |  |  | 4,126 |  |  |  | 5,177 |
Total depreciation |  |  | $4,712 |  |  |  | $6,223 |  |  |  | $9,340 |

|  | Year Ended October 31, |
(In thousands) |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Net additions to operating properties and equipment: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Northeast |  |  | $388 |  |  |  | $2,944 |  |  |  | $191 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 35 |  |  |  | 55 |  |  |  | 19 |
Midwest |  |  | 279 |  |  |  | 218 |  |  |  | 66 |
Southeast |  |  | 7 |  |  |  | 30 |  |  |  | 34 |
Southwest |  |  | 44 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 28 |
West |  |  | 19 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 118 |
Total homebuilding |  |  | 772 |  |  |  | 3,247 |  |  |  | 456 |
Financial services |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 21 |  |  |  | 74 |
Corporate and unallocated |  |  | 780 |  |  |  | 1,791 |  |  |  | 296 |
Total net additions to operating properties and equipment |  |  | $1,558 |  |  |  | $5,059 |  |  |  | $826 |

|  | Year Ended October 31, |
(In thousands) |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Equity in earnings (losses) from unconsolidated joint ventures: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Northeast |  |  | $3,738 |  |  |  | $3,202 |  |  | $ | (4,474 | )
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 5,631 |  |  |  | 155 |  |  |  | (4,340 | )
Midwest |  |  | 1,045 |  |  |  | 598 |  |  |  | 672 |
Southeast |  |  | 1,287 |  |  |  | 1,503 |  |  |  | 676 |
Southwest |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 83 |
West |  |  | 339 |  |  |  | (57 | ) |  |  | (1,575 | )
Total equity in earnings (losses) from unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | $12,040 |  |  |  | $5,401 |  |  |  | $(8,958 | )

88

12. Income Taxes

Income taxes payable consists of the following:

|  | Year Ended October 31, |
(In thousands) |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |
State income taxes: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current |  |  | $3,301 |  |  |  | $940 |
Deferred |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Federal income taxes: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current |  |  | - |  |  |  | 5,942 |
Deferred |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Total |  |  | $3,301 |  |  |  | $6,882 |

The provision for income taxes is composed of the following charges (benefits):

|  | Year Ended October 31, |
(In thousands) |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Current income tax (benefit) expense: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Federal |  |  | $(9,878 | ) |  |  | $277 |  |  |  | $(1,577 | )
State (1) |  |  | 518 |  |  |  | (35,328 | ) |  |  | (3,924 | )
Total current income tax (benefit): |  |  | (9,360 | ) |  |  | (35,051 | ) |  |  | (5,501 | )
Total deferred income tax (benefit): |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Total |  |  | $(9,360 | ) |  |  | $(35,051 | ) |  |  | $(5,501 | )

(1) | The current state income tax expense (benefit) is net of the use of state net operating losses totaling $23.1 million, $3.4 million, and $0.5 million for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.

The total income tax benefit of $9.4 million recognized for the twelve months ended October 31, 2013 was primarily due to the release of reserves for a federal tax position that was settled with the Internal Revenue Service and a favorable state tax audit settlement, partially offset by state tax expenses and state tax reserves for uncertain state tax positions. The total income tax benefit was $35.1 million for the twelve months ended October 31, 2012 primarily due to the elimination of reserves for uncertain state tax positions consistent with past practices and precedents of the relevant taxing authorities in their dealings with the Company, offset slightly by state tax expenses. The total income tax benefit was $5.5 million for the year ended October 31, 2011 primarily due to a decrease in tax reserves for uncertain tax positions.

In accordance with ASC 740, we evaluate our deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. Because of the downturn in the homebuilding industry, resulting in significant inventory and intangible impairments in prior years, we are in a three-year cumulative loss position as of October 31, 2013. According to ASC 740, a three-year cumulative loss is significant negative evidence in considering whether deferred tax assets are realizable, and in this circumstance, the Company does not rely on projections of future income to support the recovery of deferred tax assets. Therefore, we have valuation allowances for the full amount of our deferred tax assets as of October 31, 2013 and 2012.

During 2013, the valuation allowance decreased by $10.8 million against our deferred tax assets. Our valuation allowance decreased to $927.1 million at October 31, 2013 from $937.9 million at October 31, 2012 primarily due to a decrease in deferred tax assets offset by additional valuation allowance recorded for the federal and state tax benefits related to the tax losses incurred during this period. Our state net operating losses of approximately $2.3 billion expire between 2014 and 2033. Our federal net operating losses of $1.5 billion expire between 2028 and 2033.

89

The deferred tax assets and liabilities have been recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:

|  | Year Ended October 31, |
(In thousands) |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |
Deferred tax assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Depreciation |  |  | $2,345 |  |  |  | $1,870 |
Inventory impairment loss |  |  | 230,553 |  |  |  | 255,996 |
Uniform capitalization of overhead |  |  | 6,208 |  |  |  | 6,046 |
Warranty and legal reserves |  |  | 15,571 |  |  |  | 16,320 |
Deferred income |  |  | 551 |  |  |  | 1,173 |
Acquisition intangibles |  |  | 22,523 |  |  |  | 27,598 |
Restricted stock bonus |  |  | 5,781 |  |  |  | 5,830 |
Rent on abandoned space |  |  | 3,591 |  |  |  | 5,318 |
Stock options |  |  | 6,994 |  |  |  | 5,831 |
Provision for losses |  |  | 38,923 |  |  |  | 32,647 |
Joint venture loss |  |  | 5,360 |  |  |  | 12,496 |
Federal net operating losses |  |  | 542,409 |  |  |  | 528,117 |
State net operating losses |  |  | 182,940 |  |  |  | 180,184 |
Other |  |  | 16,350 |  |  |  | 11,362 |
Total deferred tax assets |  |  | 1,080,099 |  |  |  | 1,090,788 |
Deferred tax liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Acquisition intangibles |  |  | 351 |  |  |  | 296 |
Debt repurchase income |  |  | 152,450 |  |  |  | 152,414 |
Other |  |  | 164 |  |  |  | 197 |
Total deferred tax liabilities |  |  | 152,965 |  |  |  | 152,907 |
Valuation allowance |  |  | (927,134 | ) |  |  | (937,881 | )
Net deferred income taxes |  |  | $- |  |  |  | $- |

The effective tax rate varied from the statutory federal income tax rate. The effective tax rate is affected by a number of factors, the most significant of which is the valuation allowance recorded against our deferred tax assets. The sources of these factors were as follows:

|  | Year Ended October 31, |
|  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Computed “expected” tax rate |  |  | 35.0 | % |  |  | 35.0 | % |  |  | 35.0 | %
State income taxes, net of Federal income tax benefit |  |  | 14.0 |  |  |  | (2.6 | ) |  |  | (0.1 | )
Permanent differences, net |  |  | 11.3 |  |  |  | (0.3 | ) |  |  | (1.2 | )
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance impact |  |  | (66.2 | ) |  |  | (32.3 | ) |  |  | (25.8 | )
Tax contingencies |  |  | (36.8 | ) |  |  | 34.8 |  |  |  | (3.2 | )
Adjustments to prior years’ tax accruals |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (2.8 | )
Effective tax rate |  |  | (42.7 | )% |  |  | 34.6 | % |  |  | 1.9 | %

ASC 740-10 provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits.

Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized upon the adoption of ASC 740-10 and in subsequent periods. This interpretation also provides guidance on measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.

We recognize tax liabilities in accordance with ASC 740-10 and we adjust these liabilities when our judgment changes as a result of the evaluation of new information not previously available. Due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a liability that is materially different from our current estimate of the tax liabilities. These differences will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period in which they are determined.

We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the income tax expense line in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. Accrued interest and penalties are included within the related tax liability line in the consolidated balance sheet.

90

The following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the year (in millions) excluding interest and penalties:

|  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |
Unrecognized tax benefit—November 1, |  |  | $9.9 |  |  |  | $26.8 |
Gross increases—tax positions in current period |  |  | 1.2 |  |  |  | 0.6 |
Decrease related to tax positions taken during a prior period |  |  | (9.3 | ) |  |  | (16.2 | )
Lapse of statute of limitations |  |  | - |  |  |  | (1.3 | )
Unrecognized tax benefit—October 31, |  |  | $1.8 |  |  |  | $9.9 |

Related to the unrecognized tax benefits noted above, as of October 31, 2013 and 2012, we have recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively. For the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we recognized $0.1 million, $(18.3) million and $(2.0) million, respectively, of interest and penalties in income tax benefit.

It is likely that, within the next twelve months, the amount of the Company's unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by approximately $0.3 million, excluding penalties and interest. This reduction is expected primarily due to the expiration of the statutes of limitation. The portion of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective tax rate (excluding any related impact to the valuation allowance) is $1.2 million and $9.9 million as of October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The recognition of unrecognized tax benefits could have an impact on the Company’s deferred tax assets and the valuation allowance.

There is an open federal audit for the year ended October 31, 2012. We are also subject to various income tax examinations in the states in which we do business. The outcome for a particular audit cannot be determined with certainty prior to the conclusion of the audit, appeal, and in some cases, litigation process. As each audit is concluded, adjustments, if any, are appropriately recorded in the period determined. To provide for potential exposures, tax reserves are recorded, if applicable, based on reasonable estimates of potential audit results. However, if the reserves are insufficient upon completion of an audit, there could be an adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations. The statute of limitations for our major tax jurisdictions remains open for examination for tax years 2009 – 2012.

13. Reduction of Inventory to Fair Value

We record impairment losses on inventories related to communities under development and held for future development when events and circumstances indicate that they may be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than their related carrying amounts. If the expected undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount, then the community is written down to its fair value. We estimate the fair value of each impaired community by determining the present value of the estimated future cash flows at a discount rate commensurate with the risk of the respective community. For the year ended October 31, 2013, our discount rates used for the impairments recorded ranged from 18.0% to 19.3%. Should the estimates or expectations used in determining cash flows or fair value decrease or differ from current estimates in the future, we may need to recognize additional impairments.

During the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, we evaluated inventories of all 388 and 331 communities under development and held for future development, respectively, for impairment indicators through preparation and review of detailed budgets or other market indicators of impairment. We performed detailed impairment calculations during the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012 for 33 and 54 of those communities (i.e., those with a projected operating loss or other impairment indicators), respectively, with an aggregate carrying value of $85.0 million and $77.7 million, respectively, (8 and 31 were in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively, with an aggregate carrying value of $21.8 million and $47.4 million, respectively). As impairment indicators are assessed on a quarterly basis, some of the communities evaluated during the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012 were evaluated in more than one quarterly period. Of those communities tested for impairment during the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, four and 17 communities, respectively, with an aggregate carrying value of $4.5 million and $31.6 million, respectively, had undiscounted future cash flows that only exceeded the carrying amount by less than 20%. As a result of our impairment analysis, we recorded impairment losses, which are included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and deducted from inventory, of $2.4 million, $9.8 million, and $77.5 million for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.

91

The following table represents impairments by segment for fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011:

(Dollars in millions) |  | Year Ended October 31, 2013 |
|  | Number of Communities |  |  | Dollar Amount of Impairment | (2) |  | Pre- Impairment Value (1) |
Northeast |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | $2.4 |  |  |  | $7.7 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0.1 |
Midwest |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Southeast |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0.4 |
Southwest |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
West |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Total |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | $2.4 |  |  |  | $8.2 |

(Dollars in millions) |  | Year Ended October 31, 2012 |
|  | Number of Communities |  |  | Dollar Amount of Impairment |  |  | Pre- Impairment Value (1) |
Northeast |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | $2.8 |  |  |  | $19.6 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 0.4 |  |  |  | 0.8 |
Midwest |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 1.6 |  |  |  | 4.5 |
Southeast |  |  | 12 |  |  |  | 2.8 |  |  |  | 8.3 |
Southwest |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
West |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 2.2 |  |  |  | 4.9 |
Total |  |  | 32 |  |  |  | $9.8 |  |  |  | $38.1 |

(Dollars in millions) |  | Year Ended October 31, 2011 |
|  | Number of Communities |  |  | Dollar Amount of Impairment |  |  | Pre- Impairment Value (1) |
Northeast |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | $54.9 |  |  |  | $179.9 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 3.4 |  |  |  | 17.3 |
Midwest |  |  | 7 |  |  |  | 1.1 |  |  |  | 4.2 |
Southeast |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 1.5 |  |  |  | 5.1 |
Southwest |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 0.1 |  |  |  | 0.3 |
West |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 16.5 |  |  |  | 45.2 |
Total |  |  | 41 |  |  |  | $77.5 |  |  |  | $252.0 |

(1) | Represents carrying value, net of prior period impairments, if any, at the time of recording the applicable period’s impairments.
(2) | During year ended October 31, 2013, the Mid-Atlantic had an impairment totaling $2 thousand and the Southeast had an impairment totaling $17 thousand.

The Consolidated Statements of Operations line entitled “Homebuilding-Inventory impairment loss and land option write-offs” also includes write-offs of options and approval, engineering and capitalized interest costs that we record when we redesign communities and/or abandon certain engineering costs and we do not exercise options in various locations because the communities’ pro forma profitability is not projected to produce adequate returns on investment commensurate with the risk. The total aggregate write-offs were $2.6 million, $2.7 million, and $24.3 million for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Occasionally, these write-offs are offset by recovered deposits (sometimes through legal action) that had been written off in a prior period as walk-away costs. Historically, these recoveries have not been significant in comparison to the total costs written off.

92

The following table represents write-offs of such costs by segment for fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011:

|  | Year Ended October 31, |
(In millions) |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Northeast |  |  | $0.7 |  |  |  | $0.7 |  |  |  | $13.4 |
Mid-Atlantic |  |  | 0.1 |  |  |  | 0.6 |  |  |  | 6.1 |
Midwest |  |  | 0.2 |  |  |  | 0.2 |  |  |  | 0.5 |
Southeast |  |  | 0.2 |  |  |  | 0.7 |  |  |  | 0.8 |
Southwest |  |  | 1.4 |  |  |  | 0.4 |  |  |  | 0.4 |
West |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0.1 |  |  |  | 3.1 |
Total |  |  | $2.6 |  |  |  | $2.7 |  |  |  | $24.3 |

14. Per Share Calculations

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) (the “numerator”) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, adjusted for non-vested shares of restricted stock (the “denominator”) for the period. The basic weighted-average number of shares for the twelve months ended October 31, 2013 includes 6.1 million shares related to Purchase Contracts (issued as part of our 7.25% Tangible Equity Units) which are issuable in the future with no additional cash required to be paid by the holders thereof. This number of shares represents the minimum number of shares that will, under all circumstances, be issuable upon settlement of the Purchase Contracts. As discussed in Note 10, the actual number of shares of Class A Common stock we may issue upon settlement of the Purchase Contracts will be between 4.7655 shares (which is the minimum settlement rate) and 5.8140 shares (which is the maximum settlement rate) per Purchase Contract (in each case, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments) based on the applicable market value, as defined in the purchase contract agreement governing the Purchase Contracts, of our Class A Common Stock. Computing diluted earnings per share is similar to computing basic earnings per share, except that the denominator is increased to include the dilutive effects of options and non-vested shares of restricted stock, as well as common shares issuable upon exchange of our Senior Exchangeable Notes issued as part of our 6.0% Exchangeable Note Units. Any options that have an exercise price greater than the average market price are considered to be anti-dilutive and are excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation.

All outstanding non-vested shares that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents that participate in undistributed earnings with common stock are considered participating securities and are included in computing earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating securities according to dividends or dividend equivalents and participation rights in undistributed earnings. The Company’s restricted common stock (“nonvested shares”) are considered participating securities.

Basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods presented below were calculated as follows:

|  | Year Ended October 31, |
(In thousands, except per share data) |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2011 |
Numerator: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Hovnanian |  |  | $31,295 |  |  |  | $(66,197 | ) |  |  | $(286,087 | )
Less: undistributed earnings allocated to nonvested shares |  |  | (58 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Numerator for basic earnings per share |  |  | $31,237 |  |  |  | $(66,197 | ) |  |  | $(286,087 | )
Plus: undistributed earnings allocated to nonvested shares |  |  | 58 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Less: undistributed earnings reallocated to nonvested shares |  |  | (59 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Plus: interest on senior exchangeable notes |  |  | 3,720 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Numerator for diluted earnings per share |  |  | $34,956 |  |  |  | $(66,197 | ) |  |  | $(286,087 | )
Denominator: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Denominator for basic earnings per share |  |  | 145,087 |  |  |  | 126,350 |  |  |  | 100,444 |
Effect of dilutive securities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Share based payments |  |  | 1,396 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Senior exchangeable notes |  |  | 15,846 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Denominator for diluted earnings per share – weighted average shares outstanding |  |  | 162,329 |  |  |  | 126,350 |  |  |  | 100,444 |
Basic earnings (loss) per share |  |  | $0.22 |  |  |  | $(0.52 | ) |  |  | $(2.85 | )
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |  |  | $0.22 |  |  |  | $(0.52 | ) |  |  | $(2.85 | )

93

Incremental shares attributed to non-vested stock and outstanding options to purchase common stock of 0.2 million and 0.3 million for the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because we had a net loss for the period, and any incremental shares would not be dilutive. Also, for the year ended October 31, 2012, 18.6 million shares of common stock issuable upon the exchange of our senior exchangeable notes (which were issued in fiscal 2012) were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because we had a net loss for the period.

In addition, shares related to out-of-the money stock options that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share were 2.2 million, 2.5 million and 5.1 million for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented.

15. Capital Stock

Common Stock - Each share of Class A Common Stock entitles its holder to one vote per share, and each share of Class B Common Stock generally entitles its holder to ten votes per share. The amount of any regular cash dividend payable on a share of Class A Common Stock will be an amount equal to 110% of the corresponding regular cash dividend payable on a share of Class B Common Stock. If a shareholder desires to sell shares of Class B Common Stock, such stock must be converted into shares of Class A Common Stock.

On March 12, 2013, the Company held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders at which the Company’s shareholders approved an increase in the Company’s authorized common stock from 200,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Class A Common Stock”), to 400,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, and from 30,000,000 shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Class B Common Stock”), to 60,000,000 shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share.

On April 11, 2012, we issued 25,000,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock at a price of $2.00 per share, resulting in net proceeds of $47.3 million. The net proceeds of the issuance, along with cash on hand, were used to purchase $75.4 million principal amount of our senior notes, as discussed in Note 9.

Pursuant to agreements with bondholders, during the year ended October 31, 2012, we issued an aggregate of 8,443,713 shares of our Class A Common Stock in exchange for an aggregate of $33.2 million of our outstanding indebtedness, consisting of $7.8 million principal amount of our 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016, $4.0 million principal amount of our 7.5% Senior Notes due 2016, $18.3 million of our outstanding 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017 and approximately $3.1 million aggregate principal amount of our 12.072% senior subordinated amortizing notes (the “exchanges”). The exchanges were effected with existing bondholders, without any underwriters, and no commission or other remuneration was paid or given directly or indirectly for soliciting such exchanges. The exchanges resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $9.5 million for the year ended October 31, 2012.

On February 9, 2011, we issued 13,512,500 shares of our Class A Common Stock, including 1,762,500 shares issued pursuant to the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters, at a price of $4.30 per share. A portion of the net proceeds of the issuance, together with the net proceeds from the issuances of the 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015 and the 7.25% Tangible Equity Units were used to fund certain tender offers and subsequent redemptions as described in Note 9.

On August 4, 2008, our Board of Directors adopted a shareholder rights plan (the “Rights Plan”) designed to preserve shareholder value and the value of certain tax assets primarily associated with net operating loss carryforwards (NOL) and built-in losses under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Our ability to use NOLs and built-in losses would be limited if there was an “ownership change” under Section 382. This would occur if shareholders owning (or deemed under Section 382 to own) 5% or more of our stock increase their collective ownership of the aggregate amount of our outstanding shares by more than 50 percentage points over a defined period of time. The Rights Plan was adopted to reduce the likelihood of an “ownership change” occurring as defined by Section 382. Under the Rights Plan, one right was distributed for each share of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business on August 15, 2008. Effective August 15, 2008, if any person or group acquires 4.9% or more of the outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock without the approval of the Board of Directors, there would be a triggering event causing significant dilution in the voting power of such person or group. However, existing stockholders who owned, at the time of the Rights Plan’s adoption, 4.9% or more of the outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock will trigger a dilutive event only if they acquire additional shares. The approval of the Board of Directors’ decision to adopt the Rights Plan may be terminated by the Board at any time, prior to the Rights being triggered. The Rights Plan will continue in effect until August 15, 2018, unless it expires earlier in accordance with its terms. The approval of the Board of Directors’ decision to adopt the Rights Plan was submitted to a stockholder vote and approved at a special meeting of stockholders held on December 5, 2008. Also at the Special Meeting on December 5, 2008, our stockholders approved an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to restrict certain transfers of Class A Common Stock in order to preserve the tax treatment of our NOLs and built-in losses under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Subject to certain exceptions pertaining to pre-existing 5% stockholders and Class B stockholders, the transfer restrictions in the amended Certificate of Incorporation generally restrict any direct or indirect transfer (such as transfers of our stock that result from the transfer of interests in other entities that own our stock) if the effect would be to (i) increase the direct or indirect ownership of our stock by any person (or public group) from less than 5% to 5% or more of our common stock; (ii) increase the percentage of our common stock owned directly or indirectly by a person (or public group) owning or deemed to own 5% or more of our common stock; or (iii) create a new public group. Transfers included under the transfer restrictions include sales to persons (or public groups) whose resulting percentage ownership (direct or indirect) of common stock would exceed the 5% thresholds discussed above, or to persons whose direct or indirect ownership of common stock would by attribution cause another person (or public group) to exceed such threshold.

94

On July 3, 2001, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to purchase up to 4 million shares of Class A Common Stock. There were no shares purchased during the year ended October 31, 2013. As of October 31, 2013, the maximum number of shares of Class A Common Stock that may yet be purchased under this program is 0.5 million.

Preferred Stock - On July 12, 2005, we issued 5,600 shares of 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock, with a liquidation preference of $25,000 per share. Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock are not cumulative and are paid at an annual rate of 7.625%. The Series A Preferred Stock is not convertible into the Company’s common stock and is redeemable in whole or in part at our option at the liquidation preference of the shares. The Series A Preferred Stock is traded as depositary shares, with each depositary share representing 1/1000th of a share of Series A Preferred Stock. The depositary shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “HOVNP.” In fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, we did not pay any dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock due to covenant restrictions in our debt instruments.

Retirement Plan - In December 1982, we established a tax-qualified, defined contribution savings and investment retirement plan (a 401(k) plan). All associates are eligible to participate in the retirement plan, and employer contributions are based on a percentage of associate contributions and our operating results. There were no plan costs charged to operations in fiscal years 2012 and 2011, as forfeited unvested contributions were used to cover such costs. In fiscal 2009, we suspended the employer match portion of the program. In fiscal 2013, the employer match portion of the program was reinstated. Plan costs charged to operations were $0.6 million for the year ended October 31, 2013.

16. Stock Plans

The fair value of option awards is established at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for October 31, 2013, October 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011: risk free interest rate of 2.14%, 1.65% and 2.99%, respectively; dividend yield of zero; historical volatility factor of the expected market price of our common stock of 0.96 for year ended 2013, 0.97 for the year ended 2012, and 0.94 for the year ended 2011; a weighted-average expected life of the option of 7.30 years for 2013, 7.37 years for 2012 and 7.25 years for 2011; and an estimated forfeiture rate of 18.17% for 2013, 15.99% for fiscal 2012 and 14.93% for fiscal 2011. The benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost are reported as both a financing cash inflow and an operating cash outflow.

For the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, total stock-based compensation expense was $6.8 million (pre and post tax), $6.5 million (pre and post tax) and $6.2 million (pre and post tax), respectively. Included in this total stock-based compensation expense was incremental expense for stock options of $4.0 million, $4.1 million and $4.4 million for the years ended October 31, 2013, October 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011, respectively.

We have a stock incentive plan pursuant to which stock options and other equity-based awards may be granted to employees and directors. Options are granted by a committee appointed by the Board of Directors or its delegee in accordance with the stock incentive plan. The exercise price of all stock options must be at least equal to the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of the grant. Options granted before June 8, 2007 generally vest in four equal installments on the third, fourth, fifth and sixth anniversaries of the date of the grant. Options granted on or after June 8, 2007 generally vest in four equal installments on the second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of the grant. All options expire 10 years after the date of the grant. During the year ended October 31, 2013, each of the five non-employee directors of the Company were given the choice to receive stock options or a reduced number of shares of restricted stock units. All five selected to receive restricted stock units. Non-employee directors’ options vest in three equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of the grant. Stock option transactions are summarized as follows:

95

|  |  |  |  |  | Weighted -Average |  |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted- Average |  |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted- Average |
|  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | Exercise Price |  |  | October 31, 2012 |  |  | Exercise Price |  |  | October 31, 2011 |  |  | Exercise Price |
Options outstanding at beginning of period |  |  | 6,019,070 |  |  |  | $5.97 |  |  |  | 5,094,367 |  |  |  | $7.05 |  |  |  | 6,316,860 |  |  |  | $8.72 |
Granted |  |  | 887,500 |  |  |  | $6.28 |  |  |  | 1,334,828 |  |  |  | $2.59 |  |  |  | 674,100 |  |  |  | $1.93 |
Exercised |  |  | 44,812 |  |  |  | $2.67 |  |  |  | 6,250 |  |  |  | $2.55 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Forfeited |  |  | 76,500 |  |  |  | $3.06 |  |  |  | 94,808 |  |  |  | $4.77 |  |  |  | 238,499 |  |  |  | $7.33 |
Cancellations |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,200,000 |  |  |  | $11.19 |
Expired |  |  | 194,204 |  |  |  | $16.92 |  |  |  | 309,067 |  |  |  | $9.61 |  |  |  | 458,094 |  |  |  | $11.57 |
Options outstanding at end of period |  |  | 6,591,054 |  |  |  | $5.74 |  |  |  | 6,019,070 |  |  |  | $5.97 |  |  |  | 5,094,367 |  |  |  | $7.05 |
Options exercisable at end of period |  |  | 3,161,952 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,467,170 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,764,338 |  |  |  |  |

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during fiscal 2013 and 2012 was $167 thousand and $8 thousand, respectively. The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option. There were no options exercised in fiscal 2011.

At October 31, 2013, 1.9 million options outstanding and exercisable had an intrinsic value of $3.6 million. Exercise prices for options outstanding at October 31, 2013 ranged from $1.93 to $60.36.

The weighted-average fair value of grants made in fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011 was $5.14, $1.74, and $1.57 per share, respectively. Based on the fair value at the time they were granted, the weighted-average fair value of options vested in fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011 was $2.72, $3.61, and $3.92 per share, respectively.

The following table summarizes the exercise price range and related number of options outstanding at October 31, 2013:

Range of Exercise Prices |  | Number Outstanding |  |  | Weighted- Average Exercise Price |  |  | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
$1.93 | – | $5.00 |  |  | 4,405,679 |  |  |  | $2.95 |  |  |  | 7.07 |
$5.01 | – | $10.00 |  |  | 1,701,500 |  |  |  | $6.37 |  |  |  | 7.27 |
$10.01 | – | $20.00 |  |  | - |  |  |  | $- |  |  |  | - |
$20.01 | – | $30.00 |  |  | 241,500 |  |  |  | $21.70 |  |  |  | 3.66 |
$30.01 | – | $40.00 |  |  | 197,375 |  |  |  | $32.53 |  |  |  | 1.77 |
$40.01 | – | $50.00 |  |  | 10,000 |  |  |  | $41.45 |  |  |  | 0.25 |
$50.01 | – | $60.00 |  |  | 30,000 |  |  |  | $54.70 |  |  |  | 1.42 |
$60.01 | – | $70.00 |  |  | 5,000 |  |  |  | $60.36 |  |  |  | 1.67 |
|  |  |  |  | 6,591,054 |  |  |  | $5.74 |  |  |  | 6.80 |

96

The following table summarizes the exercise price range and related number of exercisable options at October 31, 2013:

Range of Exercise Prices |  | Number Exercisable |  |  | Weighted- Average Exercise Price |  |  | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
$1.93 | – | $5.00 |  |  | 1,864,077 |  |  |  | $3.14 |  |  |  | 6.18 |
$5.01 | – | $10.00 |  |  | 814,000 |  |  |  | $6.46 |  |  |  | 4.67 |
$10.01 | – | $20.00 |  |  | - |  |  |  | $- |  |  |  | - |
$20.01 | – | $30.00 |  |  | 241,500 |  |  |  | $21.70 |  |  |  | 3.66 |
$30.01 | – | $40.00 |  |  | 197,375 |  |  |  | $32.53 |  |  |  | 1.77 |
$40.01 | – | $50.00 |  |  | 10,000 |  |  |  | $41.45 |  |  |  | 0.25 |
$50.01 | – | $60.00 |  |  | 30,000 |  |  |  | $54.70 |  |  |  | 1.42 |
$60.01 | – | $70.00 |  |  | 5,000 |  |  |  | $60.36 |  |  |  | 4.83 |
|  |  |  |  | 3,161,952 |  |  |  | $7.95 |  |  |  | 5.26 |

Officers and key employees who are eligible to receive equity grants may elect to receive either a stated number of stock options, or a reduced number of shares of restricted stock units, or a combination thereof. Shares underlying restricted stock units vest 25% each year beginning on the 2nd anniversary of the grant date. Participants age 60 years or older, or age 58 with 15 years of service are eligible to vest in their equity awards on an accelerated basis on their retirement (which in the case of the restricted stock units only applies to a retirement that is at least one year after the date of grant). During the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, we granted 104,944 (including 63,694 shares to certain of our non-employee directors) and 133,855 (including 104,167 shares to certain of our non-employee directors) shares of restricted stock, respectively, and also issued 46,393 and 32,112 shares, relating to awards granted in prior fiscal years, respectively. During the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, 500 and 9,845 shares of restricted stock were forfeited, respectively.

For certain associates in certain years, a portion of their bonus is paid by issuing a deferred right to receive our common stock. The number of shares is calculated for each bonus year by dividing the portion of the bonus subject to the deferred right award by our average stock price for the year or the stock price at year-end, whichever is lower. Twenty-five percent of the deferred right award will vest and shares will be issued one year after the year end and then 25% a year for the next three years. Participants with 20 years of service or over 58 years of age vest immediately. During the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, we issued 68,390 and 258,228 shares relating to awards granted in prior fiscal years. No shares were forfeited during the year ended October 31, 2013, but during the year ended October 31, 2012, 8,701 shares were forfeited. For the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, no rights in lieu of bonus payments were awarded.

For the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 total compensation cost recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the annual restricted stock grants, and the stock portion of the long term incentive plan was $2.7 million, $2.4 million and $1.7 million, respectively. In addition to nonvested share awards summarized in the following table, there were 534,143 at both October 31, 2013 and 2012 and 692,668 at October 31, 2011 shares of vested restricted stock which were deferred at the associates' election.

A summary of the Company’s nonvested share awards as of and for the year ended October 31, 2013, is as follows:

|  | Shares |  |  | Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Nonvested at beginning of period |  |  | 2,128,005 |  |  |  | $4.49 |
Granted |  |  | 1,377,120 |  |  |  | $5.63 |
Vested |  |  | (979,462 | ) |  |  | $4.58 |
Forfeited |  |  | (62,016 | ) |  |  | $4.61 |
Nonvested at end of period |  |  | 2,463,647 |  |  |  | $5.10 |

Included in the above table are restricted stock unit awards for a long term incentive plan for certain associates, which is a performance based plan. The awards included above for this plan are based on our current best estimate of the outcome for the performance criteria. The change in this estimate resulted in an increase of 0.4 million shares, which is reflected in the granted row on the above table.

97

As of October 31, 2013, we had 0.3 million shares authorized for future issuance under our equity compensation plans. In addition, as of October 31, 2013, there were $16.5 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested share based compensation arrangements. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2 years.

During fiscal 2011, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer consented to a cancellation of certain of their options (with the full understanding that the Company made no commitment to provide them with any other form of consideration in respect of the cancelled options) in order to reduce a portion of the equity reserve “overhang” under the Company’s equity compensation plans represented by the number of shares of the Company’s common stock remaining available for future issuance under such plans (including shares that may be issued upon the exercise or vesting of outstanding options and other rights). No compensation expense was recorded related to the cancellation of stock options in fiscal 2011, as the options canceled were fully vested and expensed prior to fiscal 2011.

17. Warranty Costs

Over the past several years, general liability insurance for homebuilding companies and their suppliers and subcontractors has become very difficult to obtain. The availability of general liability insurance has been limited due to a decreased number of insurance companies willing to underwrite for the industry. In addition, those few insurers willing to underwrite liability insurance have significantly increased the premium costs. We have been able to obtain general liability insurance but at higher premium costs with higher deductibles. We have been advised that a significant number of our subcontractors and suppliers have also had difficulty obtaining insurance that also provides us coverage. As a result, we introduced an owner controlled insurance program for certain of our subcontractors, whereby the subcontractors pay us an insurance premium (through a reduction of amounts we would otherwise owe such subcontractors for their work on our homes) based on the value of their services. We absorb the liability associated with their work on our homes as part of our overall general liability insurance at no additional cost to us because our existing general liability and construction defect insurance policy and related reserves for amounts under our deductible covers construction defects regardless of whether we or our subcontractors are responsible for the defect. For the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, we received $2.2 million and $2.1 million, respectively, from subcontractors related to the owner controlled insurance program, which we accounted for as a reduction to inventory.

We accrue for warranty costs that are covered under our existing general liability and construction defect policy as part of our general liability insurance deductible. This accrual is expensed as selling, general, and administrative costs. For homes delivered in fiscal 2013 and 2012, our deductible under our general liability insurance is $20 million per occurrence for construction defect and warranty claims. For bodily injury claims, our deductible per occurrence in fiscal 2013 and 2012 is $0.25 million and $0.1 million, respectively, up to a $5 million limit. Our aggregate retention in fiscal 2013 and 2012 is $21 million for construction defect, warranty and bodily injury claims. In addition, we establish a warranty accrual for lower cost-related issues to cover home repairs, community amenities, and land development infrastructure that are not covered under our general liability and construction defect policy. We accrue an estimate for these warranty costs as part of cost of sales at the time each home is closed and title and possession have been transferred to the homebuyer. Additions and charges in the warranty reserve and general liability reserve for the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

|  | Year Ended October 31, |
(In thousands) |  | 2013 |  |  | 2012 |
Balance, beginning of period |  |  | $121,149 |  |  |  | $123,865 |
Additions – Selling, general and administrative |  |  | 18,676 |  |  |  | 13,438 |
Additions – Cost of sales |  |  | 13,529 |  |  |  | 17,509 |
Charges incurred during the period |  |  | (22,511 | ) |  |  | (33,663 | )
Changes to pre-existing reserves |  |  | 185 |  |  |  | - |
Balance, end of period |  |  | $131,028 |  |  |  | $121,149 |

Warranty accruals are based upon historical experience. We engage a third-party actuary that uses our historical warranty and construction defect data, worker’s compensation data, and other industry data to assist us in estimating our reserves for unpaid claims, claim adjustment expenses and incurred but not reported claims reserves for the risks that we are assuming under the general liability and workers compensation programs. The estimates include provisions for inflation, claims handling, and legal fees.

98

Insurance claims paid by our insurance carriers, excluding insurance deductibles paid, were $9.7 million and $18.1 million for the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for prior year deliveries. In the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we settled two construction defect claims, one claim relating to the Northeast segment and one claim relating to the West segment, which made up the majority of the payments.

18. Transactions with Related Parties

During the year ended October 31, 2003, we entered into an agreement (as subsequently amended) to purchase land in California for approximately $31.4 million from an entity that is owned by Hirair Hovnanian, a family relative of our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. As of October 31, 2013, we had an option deposit of $3.0 million related to this land acquisition agreement. In accordance with ASC 810-10 we no longer have any balances consolidated under “Consolidated inventory not owned” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Neither the Company nor the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer has a financial interest in the relative’s company from whom the land was purchased.

During the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, an engineering firm owned by Tavit Najarian, a relative of our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, provided services to the Company totaling $0.8 million, $0.9 million, and $1.0 million, respectively. Neither the Company nor the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer has a financial interest in the relative’s company from whom the services were provided.

During the year ended October 31, 2011, a real estate development firm owned by Mazin Kalian, a relative of our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, provided consulting services to the Company totaling less than $0.1 million, including significant travel related expenses. The consulting services consisted primarily of negotiations, community design and cost analysis on a potential joint venture. During the fiscal years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no consulting services provided. Neither the Company nor the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer has or had a financial interest in the relative’s company from whom the services were provided.

In December 2005, we entered into an agreement to purchase land in New Jersey from an entity that is owned by Hirair Hovnanian, a family relative of our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer at a base price of $25 million. The land was to be acquired in four phases over a period of three years from the date of acquisition of the first phase and the land seller was obligated to obtain all government approvals. The purchase prices for all phases were subject to an increase in the purchase price of the phase per annum from February 1, 2008. On June 11, 2008, the parties amended the purchase agreement and closed title to 43 of the 86 building lots in phase one. The purchase of the balance of phase one was deferred to no later than the scheduled closing of phase four. On November 12, 2009, the parties closed title to 83 building lots located in phase two. On June 22, 2010, the parties closed title to 84 building lots located in phase three. On June 13, 2011, the parties closed title to the 137 building lots, which included the building lots contained within phase four and the deferred balance of building lots from phase one. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, all of the property under the purchase agreement had been purchased by the Company for a total purchase price of approximately $29.2 million. Neither the Company nor the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer has or had a financial interest in the relatives' company from whom the land was purchased.

In November 2012, one of our joint ventures in which the Company has a 50% interest sold an option to acquire a parcel of land for approximately $5.5 million. The total cost to the buyer was approximately $11.1 million and on which the commission was paid. The son of Mr. Pellerito, one of the Company’s executive officers, was employed by the brokerage firm that handled the transaction and received $145,710 as a commission in connection with the transaction. Mr. Pellerito did not have a financial interest in the brokerage firm involved in the transaction nor did he receive any portion of the commission paid to his son.

Ms. Jovana Pellerito, the daughter-in-law of Mr. Pellerito, one of our executive officers, is employed by the Company and, in fiscal 2013, her total compensation, including salary, commissions and other benefits, totaled approximately $172,000. Her compensation is commensurate with that of similarly situated employees in her position.

The Company has a significant interest in the amount of estate tax liabilities and any necessary sales by the Estate of Kevork S. Hovnanian, deceased, and other members of the Hovnanian family of their assets (which includes a significant amount of shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock) to pay such liabilities because the benefit of federal net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) to the Company would be significantly reduced or eliminated if we were to experience an “ownership change” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Based on recent impairments and current financial performance, the Company has generated NOLs of approximately $1.5 billion through the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, and may generate NOLs in future years. During fiscal 2013, an outside law firm was retained to advise the Executors of the Estate and other members of the Hovnanian family in connection with estate tax planning. The fees and other charges of such legal services during fiscal 2013 totaled $249,653, of which (1) the Company and (2) the Estate and Hovnanian family each paid half. Kevork S. Hovnanian was the founder and former Chairman of our Company. Our current Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and other members of his immediate family are Executors and among the beneficiaries of the will of Kevork S. Hovnanian.

99

19. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

We are involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, none of which is expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations, and we are subject to extensive and complex regulations that affect the development and home building, sales and customer financing processes, including zoning, density, building standards and mortgage financing. These regulations often provide broad discretion to the administering governmental authorities. This can delay or increase the cost of development or homebuilding.

We also are subject to a variety of local, state, federal and foreign laws and regulations concerning protection of health and the environment. The particular environmental laws that apply to any given community vary greatly according to the community site, the site’s environmental conditions and the present and former uses of the site. These environmental laws may result in delays, may cause us to incur substantial compliance, remediation and/or other costs, and can prohibit or severely restrict development and homebuilding activity.

We received in October 2012 a notice from Region III of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) concerning stipulated penalties, totaling approximately $120,000, based on the extent to which we reportedly did not meet certain compliance performance specified in the previously reported consent decree entered into in August 2010; we have since paid the stipulated penalties as assessed, and more recently have paid approximately $8,000 in response to an EPA demand received in June 2013 for stipulated penalties based on information about our performance under the consent decree for 2012. The consent decree was terminated by court order without objection in December 2013.

In March 2013, we received a letter from the EPA requesting information about our involvement in a housing redevelopment project in Newark, New Jersey that a Company entity undertook during the 1990s. We understand that the development is in the vicinity of a former lead smelter and that recent tests on soil samples from properties within the development conducted by the EPA show elevated levels of lead. We also understand that the smelter operated before the City of Newark acquired properties, demolished structures existing on them, and sold the properties to the Company entity in connection with the redevelopment project. We responded to the EPA’s request. In August 2013, we were notified that the EPA considers us a potentially responsible party (or “PRP”) with respect to the site, that the EPA believes the site requires cleanup, and that the EPA is proposing that we address contamination at the site. We have begun preliminary discussions with the EPA concerning a possible resolution but do not know the scope or extent of the Company's obligations, if any, that may arise from the site and therefore cannot provide any assurance that this matter will not have a material impact on the Company.

We anticipate that increasingly stringent requirements will be imposed on developers and homebuilders in the future. Although we cannot predict the effect of these requirements, they could result in time-consuming and expensive compliance programs and in substantial expenditures, which could cause delays and increase our cost of operations. In addition our ability to obtain or renew permits or approvals and the continued effectiveness of permits already granted or approvals already obtained is dependent upon many factors, some of which are beyond our control, such as changes in policies, rules, and regulations and their interpretations and application.

The Company is also involved in the following litigation:

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and K. Hovnanian Venture I, L.L.C. (collectively, the “Company Defendants”) have been named as defendants in a class action suit. The action was filed by Mike D’Andrea and Tracy D’Andrea, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Gloucester County. The action was initially filed on May 8, 2006 alleging that the HVAC systems installed in certain of the Company’s homes are in violation of applicable New Jersey building codes and are a potential safety issue. On December 14, 2011, the Superior Court granted class certification; the potential class is 1,065 homes. The Company Defendants filed a request to take an interlocutory appeal regarding the class certification decision. The Appellate Division denied the request, and the Company Defendants filed a request for interlocutory review by the New Jersey Supreme Court, which remanded the case back to the Appellate Division for a review on the merits of the appeal on May 8, 2012. The Appellate Division, on remand, heard oral arguments on December 4, 2012, reviewing the Superior Court’s original finding of class certification. On June 18, 2013, the Appellate Division affirmed class certification. On July 3, 2013, the Company Defendants appealed the June 2013 Appellate Division’s decision to the New Jersey Supreme Court, which elected not to hear the appeal on October 22, 2013. Accordingly, the matter is proceeding in the Superior Court and discovery is ongoing. The Company Defendants have pending a motion to consolidate an indemnity action they filed against various manufacturer and sub-contractor defendants so that these parties will be required to participate directly in the class action. The plaintiff class seeks unspecified damages as well as treble damages pursuant to the NJ Consumer Fraud Act. The Company Defendants believe there is insurance coverage available for this action. It is not possible to estimate a loss or range of loss related to this matter at this time.

100

20. Variable Interest Entities

The Company enters into land and lot option purchase contracts to procure land or lots for the construction of homes. Under these contracts, the Company will fund a stated deposit in consideration for the right, but not the obligation, to purchase land or lots at a future point in time with predetermined terms. Under the terms of the option purchase contracts, many of the option deposits are not refundable at the Company's discretion. Under the requirements of ASC 810, certain option purchase contracts may result in the creation of a variable interest in the entity (“VIE”) that owns the land parcel under option.

In compliance with ASC 810, the Company analyzes its option purchase contracts to determine whether the corresponding land sellers are VIEs and, if so, whether the Company is the primary beneficiary. Although the Company does not have legal title to the underlying land, ASC 810 requires the Company to consolidate a VIE if the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary. In determining whether it is the primary beneficiary, the Company considers, among other things, whether it has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance. Such activities would include, among other things, determining or limiting the scope or purpose of the VIE, selling or transferring property owned or controlled by the VIE, or arranging financing for the VIE. The Company also considers whether it has the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE. As a result of its analyses, the Company determined that, as of October 31, 2013 and 2012, it was not the primary beneficiary of any VIEs from which it is purchasing land under option purchase contracts.

We will continue to secure land and lots using options, some of which are with VIEs. Including deposits on our unconsolidated VIEs, at October 31, 2013, we had total cash and letters of credit deposits amounting to approximately $79.3 million to purchase land and lots with a total purchase price of $1.1 billion. The maximum exposure to loss with respect to our land and lot options is limited to the deposits plus any pre-development costs invested in the property, although some deposits are refundable at our request or refundable if certain conditions are not met.

21. Investments in Unconsolidated Homebuilding and Land Development Joint Ventures

We enter into homebuilding and land development joint ventures from time to time as a means of accessing lot positions, expanding our market opportunities, establishing strategic alliances, managing our risk profile, leveraging our capital base and enhancing returns on capital. Our homebuilding joint ventures are generally entered into with third-party investors to develop land and construct homes that are sold directly to third-party home buyers. Our land development joint ventures include those entered into with developers and other homebuilders as well as financial investors to develop finished lots for sale to the joint venture’s members or other third parties.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we purchased our partners’ interest in one of our unconsolidated homebuilding joint ventures. The consolidation of this entity resulted in increases in inventory, other assets, non-recourse land mortgages and accounts payables and other liabilities of $34.3 million, $5.0 million, $20.6 million and $15.8 million, respectively.

The tables set forth below summarize the combined financial information related to our unconsolidated homebuilding and land development joint ventures that are accounted for under the equity method.

101

|  | October 31, 2013 |
(Dollars In Thousands) |  | Homebuilding |  |  | Land Development |  |  | Total |
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  |  | $30,102 |  |  |  | $639 |  |  |  | $30,741 |
Inventories |  |  | 101,735 |  |  |  | 11,080 |  |  |  | 112,815 |
Other assets |  |  | 6,868 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 6,868 |
Total assets |  |  | $138,705 |  |  |  | $11,719 |  |  |  | $150,424 |
Liabilities and equity: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  |  | $28,016 |  |  |  | $4,047 |  |  |  | $32,063 |
Notes payable |  |  | 23,904 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 23,904 |
Total liabilities |  |  | 51,920 |  |  |  | 4,047 |  |  |  | 55,967 |
Equity of: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. |  |  | 44,141 |  |  |  | 2,703 |  |  |  | 46,844 |
Others |  |  | 42,644 |  |  |  | 4,969 |  |  |  | 47,613 |
Total equity |  |  | 86,785 |  |  |  | 7,672 |  |  |  | 94,457 |
Total liabilities and equity |  |  | $138,705 |  |  |  | $11,719 |  |  |  | $150,424 |
Debt to capitalization ratio |  |  | 22 | % |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | 20 | %

|  | October 31, 2012 |
(Dollars In Thousands) |  | Homebuilding |  |  | Land Development |  |  | Total |
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  |  | $29,657 |  |  |  | $1,686 |  |  |  | $31,343 |
Inventories |  |  | 177,170 |  |  |  | 14,853 |  |  |  | 192,023 |
Other assets |  |  | 12,886 |  |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 12,891 |
Total assets |  |  | $219,713 |  |  |  | $16,544 |  |  |  | $236,257 |
Liabilities and equity: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  |  | $24,651 |  |  |  | $12,233 |  |  |  | $36,884 |
Notes payable |  |  | 79,675 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 79,675 |
Total liabilities |  |  | 104,326 |  |  |  | 12,233 |  |  |  | 116,559 |
Equity of: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. |  |  | 45,285 |  |  |  | 794 |  |  |  | 46,079 |
Others |  |  | 70,102 |  |  |  | 3,517 |  |  |  | 73,619 |
Total equity |  |  | 115,387 |  |  |  | 4,311 |  |  |  | 119,698 |
Total liabilities and equity |  |  | $219,713 |  |  |  | $16,544 |  |  |  | $236,257 |
Debt to capitalization ratio |  |  | 41 | % |  |  | 0 | % |  |  | 40 | %

As of October 31, 2013 and 2012, we had advances outstanding of approximately $4.6 million and $15.0 million, respectively, to these unconsolidated joint ventures, which were included in the “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” balances in the tables above. On our Consolidated Balance Sheets, our “Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures” amounted to $51.4 million and $61.1 million at October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In some cases, our net investment in these joint ventures is less than our proportionate share of the equity reflected in the tables above because of the differences between asset impairments recorded against our joint venture investments and any impairments recorded in the applicable joint venture. Impairments of our joint venture equity investments are recorded when we deem a decline in fair value to be other than temporary while impairments recorded in the joint ventures are recorded when undiscounted cash flows of the community indicate that the carrying amount is not recoverable. During fiscal 2011, 2012 and 2013, we did not write down any joint venture investments based on our determination that none of the investments in our joint ventures sustained an other than temporary impairment during those periods.

102

|  | For The Twelve Months Ended October 31, 2013 |
(Dollars In Thousands) |  | Homebuilding |  |  | Land Development |  |  | Total |
Revenues |  |  | $307,993 |  |  |  | $14,659 |  |  |  | $322,652 |
Cost of sales and expenses |  |  | (276,795 | ) |  |  | (9,396 | ) |  |  | (286,191 | )
Joint venture net income |  |  | $31,198 |  |  |  | $5,263 |  |  |  | $36,461 |
Our share of net income |  |  | $9,581 |  |  |  | $2,631 |  |  |  | $12,212 |

|  | For The Twelve Months Ended October 31, 2012 |
(Dollars In Thousands) |  | Homebuilding |  |  | Land Development |  |  | Total |
Revenues |  |  | $323,177 |  |  |  | $11,531 |  |  |  | $334,708 |
Cost of sales and expenses |  |  | (300,892 | ) |  |  | (9,318 | ) |  |  | (310,210 | )
Joint venture net income |  |  | $22,285 |  |  |  | $2,213 |  |  |  | $24,498 |
Our share of net income |  |  | $4,763 |  |  |  | $1,108 |  |  |  | $5,871 |

|  | For The Twelve Months Ended October 31, 2011 |
(Dollars In Thousands) |  | Homebuilding |  |  | Land Development |  |  | Total |
Revenues |  |  | $177,301 |  |  |  | $12,226 |  |  |  | $189,527 |
Cost of sales and expenses |  |  | (181,651 | ) |  |  | (11,114 | ) |  |  | (192,765 | )
Joint venture net (loss) income |  |  | $(4,350 | ) |  |  | $1,112 |  |  |  | $(3,238 | )
Our share of net (loss) income |  |  | $(8,395 | ) |  |  | $647 |  |  |  | $(7,748 | )

“Income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations reflects our proportionate share of the loss or income of these unconsolidated homebuilding and land development joint ventures. The difference between our share of the loss or income from these unconsolidated joint ventures in the tables above compared to the Consolidated Statements of Operations is due primarily to the reclassification of the intercompany portion of management fee income from certain joint ventures and the deferral of income for lots purchased by us from certain joint ventures. To compensate us for the administrative services we provide as the manager of certain joint ventures we receive a management fee based on a percentage of the applicable joint venture’s revenues. These management fees, which totaled $13.2 million, $15.2 million and $7.6 million for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, are recorded in homebuilding selling, general and administrative on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

In determining whether or not we must consolidate joint ventures that we manage, we assess whether the other partners have specific rights to overcome the presumption of control by us as the manager of the joint venture. In most cases, the presumption is overcome because the joint venture agreements require that both partners agree on establishing the operations and capital decisions of the partnership, including budgets in the ordinary course of business.

Typically, our unconsolidated joint ventures obtain separate project specific mortgage financing. The amount of financing is generally targeted to be no more than 50% of the joint venture’s total assets. For our more recent joint ventures, obtaining financing has become challenging, therefore, some of our joint ventures are capitalized only with equity. Including the impact of impairments recorded by the joint ventures, the average debt to capitalization ratio of all our joint ventures is currently 20%. Any joint venture financing is on a nonrecourse basis, with guarantees from us limited only to performance and completion of development, environmental warranties and indemnification, standard indemnification for fraud, misrepresentation and other similar actions, including a voluntary bankruptcy filing. In some instances, the joint venture entity is considered a VIE under ASC 810-10 “Consolidation – Overall” due to the returns being capped to the equity holders; however, in these instances, we have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary, and therefore we do not consolidate these entities.

22. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures", provides a framework for measuring fair value, expands disclosures about fair-value measurements and establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value summarized as follows:

Level 1: Fair value determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.

103

Level 2: Fair value determined using significant other observable inputs.

Level 3: Fair value determined using significant unobservable inputs.

Our financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

(In thousands) | Fair Value Hierarchy |  | Fair Value at October 31, 2013 |  |  | Fair Value at October 31, 2012 |
Mortgage loans held for sale (1) | Level 2 |  |  | $113,739 |  |  |  | $116,912 |
Interest rate lock commitments | Level 2 |  |  | 369 |  |  |  | (8 | )
Forward contracts | Level 2 |  |  | (1,155 | ) |  |  | 120 |
Total |  |  | $112,953 |  |  |  | $117,024 |

(1) The aggregate unpaid principal balance is $107.7 million and $113.8 million at October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

We elected the fair value option for our loans held for sale for mortgage loans originated subsequent to October 31, 2008 in accordance with ASC 825, “Financial Instruments,” which permits us to measure financial instruments at fair value on a contract-by-contract basis. Management believes that the election of the fair value option for loans held for sale improves financial reporting by mitigating volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring the fair value of the loans and the derivative instruments used to economically hedge them without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. In addition, the fair value of servicing rights is included in the Company’s loans held for sale as of October 31, 2013. Fair value of the servicing rights is determined based on values in the Company’s servicing sales contracts. Fair value of loans held for sale is based on independent quoted market prices, where available, or the prices for other mortgage whole loans with similar characteristics.

The Financial Services segment had a pipeline of loan applications in process of $371.4 million at October 31, 2013. Loans in process for which interest rates were committed to the borrowers totaled approximately $55.4 million as of October 31, 2013. Substantially all of these commitments were for periods of 60 days or less. Since a portion of these commitments is expected to expire without being exercised by the borrowers, the total commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

The Financial Services segment uses investor commitments and forward sales of mandatory mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) to hedge its mortgage-related interest rate exposure. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk. Credit risk is managed by entering into MBS forward commitments, option contracts with investment banks, federally regulated bank affiliates and loan sales transactions with permanent investors meeting the segment’s credit standards. The segment’s risk, in the event of default by the purchaser, is the difference between the contract price and fair value of the MBS forward commitments and option contracts. At October 31, 2013, the segment had open commitments amounting to $25.0 million to sell MBS with varying settlement dates through December 11, 2013.

104

The assets accounted for using the fair value option are initially measured at fair value. Gains and losses from initial measurement and subsequent changes in fair value are recognized in the Financial Services segment’s income. The changes in fair values that are included in income (loss) are shown, by financial instrument and financial statement line item, below:

|  | Year Ended October 31, 2013 |
(In thousands) |  | Loans Held For Sale |  |  | Mortgage Loan Commitments |  |  | Forward Contracts |
Changes in fair value included in net income (loss), all reflected in financial services revenues |  |  | $1,604 |  |  |  | $378 |  |  |  | $(1,276 | )

|  | Year Ended October 31, 2012 |
(In thousands) |  | Loans Held For Sale |  |  | Mortgage Loan Commitments |  |  | Forward Contracts |
Changes in fair value included in net income (loss), all reflected in financial services revenues |  |  | $(572 | ) |  |  | $(151 | ) |  |  | $1,216 |

|  | Year Ended October 31, 2011 |
(In thousands) |  | Loans Held For Sale |  |  | Mortgage Loan Commitments |  |  | Forward Contracts |
Changes in fair value included in net income (loss), all reflected in financial services revenues |  |  | $362 |  |  |  | $63 |  |  |  | $(842 | )

The Company's assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are those assets for which the Company has recorded valuation adjustments and write-offs during the fiscal years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012. The assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are all within the Company's Homebuilding operations and are summarized below:

Nonfinancial Assets

| Year Ended October 31, 2013 |
(In thousands) | Fair Value Hierarchy |  | Pre- Impairment Amount |  |  | Total Losses |  |  | Fair Value |
Sold and unsold homes and lots under development | Level 3 |  |  | $7,302 |  |  |  | $(2,249 | ) |  |  | $5,053 |
Land and land options held for future development or sale | Level 3 |  |  | $924 |  |  |  | $(136 | ) |  |  | $788 |

105

Nonfinancial Assets

| Year Ended October 31, 2012 |
(In thousands) | Fair Value Hierarchy |  | Pre- Impairment Amount |  |  | Total Losses |  |  | Fair Value |
Sold and unsold homes and lots under development | Level 3 |  |  | $11,065 |  |  |  | $(3,234 | ) |  |  | $7,831 |
Land and land options held for future development or sale | Level 3 |  |  | $26,998 |  |  |  | $(6,589 | ) |  |  | $20,409 |

We record impairment losses on inventories related to communities under development and held for future development when events and circumstances indicate that they may be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than their related carrying amounts. If the expected undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount, then the community is written down to its fair value. We estimate the fair value of each impaired community by determining the present value of its estimated future cash flows at a discount rate commensurate with the risk of the respective community. Should the estimates or expectations used in determining cash flows or fair value decrease or differ from current estimates in the future, we may be required to recognize additional impairments. We recorded inventory impairments, which are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as “Inventory impairment loss and land option write-offs” and deducted from Inventory of $2.4 million, $9.8 million and $77.5 million for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. See Note 13 for a further discussion of communities evaluated for impairment.

The fair value of our cash equivalents and restricted cash approximates their carrying amount, based on Level 1 inputs.

The fair value of each series of the senior unsecured notes (other than the senior exchangeable notes and senior amortizing notes) and senior subordinated amortizing notes is estimated based on recent trades or quoted market prices for the same issues or based on recent trades or quoted market prices for our debt of similar security and maturity to achieve comparable yields, which are Level 2 measurements. The fair value of the senior unsecured notes (all series in the aggregate), other than the senior exchangeable notes and senior amortizing notes, and senior subordinated amortizing notes, was estimated at $493.4 million and $2.2 million, respectively, as of October 31, 2013. As of October 31, 2012 the fair value of the senior unsecured notes (all series in the aggregate), other than the senior exchangeable notes and the senior amortizing notes, and senior subordinated amortizing notes was estimated at $448.7 million and $5.5 million, respectively.

The fair value of each of the senior secured notes (all series in the aggregate), senior amortizing notes and senior exchangeable notes is estimated based on third party broker quotes, a Level 3 measurement. The fair value of the senior secured notes (all series in the aggregate), senior amortizing notes and senior exchangeable notes was estimated at $1.0 billion, $20.9 million and $86.8 million, respectively, as of October 31, 2013. As of October 31, 2012, the fair value of the senior secured notes (all series in the aggregate), senior amortizing notes and senior exchangeable notes was estimated at $994.2 million, $23.1 million and $87.2 million, respectively.

23. Financial Information of Subsidiary Issuer and Subsidiary Guarantors

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., the parent company (the “Parent”), is the issuer of publicly traded common stock, preferred stock, which is represented by depository shares, and 7.25% Tangible Equity Units. One of its wholly owned subsidiaries, K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (the “Subsidiary Issuer”), acts as a finance entity that, as of October 31, 2013, had issued and outstanding approximately $992.0 million of senior secured notes ($978.6 million, net of discount), $462.6 million senior notes ($461.2 million, net of discount), $20.9 million senior amortizing notes and $66.6 million senior exchangeable notes (issued as components of our 6.0% Exchangeable Note Units), and $2.2 million senior subordinated amortizing notes (issued as a component of our 7.25% Tangible Equity Units). The senior secured notes, senior notes, senior amortizing notes, senior exchangeable notes and senior subordinated amortizing notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Parent.

In addition to the Parent, each of the wholly owned subsidiaries of the Parent other than the Subsidiary Issuer (collectively, “Guarantor Subsidiaries”), with the exception of our home mortgage subsidiaries, certain of our title insurance subsidiaries, joint ventures, subsidiaries holding interests in our joint ventures and our foreign subsidiary (collectively, the “Nonguarantor Subsidiaries”), have guaranteed fully and unconditionally, on a joint and several basis, the obligations of the Subsidiary Issuer to pay principal and interest under the senior secured notes (other than the 2021 Notes), senior notes, senior exchangeable notes, senior amortizing notes and senior subordinated amortizing notes. The Guarantor Subsidiaries are directly or indirectly 100% owned subsidiaries of the Parent. The 2021 Notes are guaranteed by the Guarantor Subsidiaries and the members of the Secured Group (see Note 9).

106

The senior unsecured notes, senior amortizing notes, senior exchangeable notes and senior subordinated amortizing notes have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The 2020 Secured Notes and the 2021 Notes (see Note 9) are not, pursuant to the indentures under which such notes were issued, required to be registered. The Consolidating Financial Statements presented below are in respect of our registered notes only and not the 2020 Secured Notes or the 2021 Notes (however, the Guarantor Subsidiaries for the 2020 Secured Notes are the same as those represented by the accompanying Consolidating Financial Statements). In lieu of providing separate financial statements for the Guarantor Subsidiaries of our registered notes, we have included the accompanying Consolidating Financial Statements. Therefore, separate financial statements and other disclosures concerning such Guarantor Subsidiaries are not presented.

The following Consolidating Condensed Financial Statements present the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of (i) the Parent, (ii) the Subsidiary Issuer, (iii) the Guarantor Subsidiaries, (iv) the Nonguarantor Subsidiaries and (v) the eliminations to arrive at the information for Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. on a consolidated basis. Investments in consolidated subsidiaries, Stockholders’(deficit)equity and Intercompany in the Consolidating Condensed Balance Sheet as of October 31, 2012, Equity in (loss)income from subsidiaries in the Consolidating Condensed Statement of Operations for the Years Ended October 31, 2012 and 2011 and Net (loss)income and Adjustments to reconcile net (loss)income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities in the Consolidating Condensed Statement of Cash Flows for the Years Ended October 31, 2012 and 2011 have been reclassified to conform to the fiscal 2013 presentation.

107

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET

OCTOBER 31, 2013

(In thousands) |  | Parent |  |  | Subsidiary Issuer |  |  | Guarantor Subsidiaries |  |  | Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |  |  | Eliminations |  |  | Consolidated |
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding |  |  | $- |  |  |  | $277,800 |  |  |  | $1,020,435 |  |  |  | $312,042 |  |  | $ |  |  |  |  | $1,610,277 |
Financial services |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14,570 |  |  |  | 134,283 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 148,853 |
Intercompany receivable |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,093,906 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14,489 |  |  |  | (1,108,395 | ) |  |  | - |
Investments in and amounts due to and from consolidated subsidiaries |  |  | (62,298 | ) |  |  | 2,275 |  |  |  | 286,216 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (226,193 | ) |  |  | - |
Total assets |  |  | $(62,298 | ) |  |  | $1,373,981 |  |  |  | $1,321,221 |  |  |  | $460,814 |  |  |  | $(1,334,588 | ) |  |  | $1,759,130 |
Liabilities and equity: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding |  |  | $3,798 |  |  |  | $491 |  |  |  | $437,767 |  |  |  | $64,329 |  |  | $ |  |  |  |  | $506,385 |
Financial services |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14,789 |  |  |  | 109,748 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 124,537 |
Notes payable |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,555,336 |  |  |  | 2,276 |  |  |  | 94 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,557,706 |
Intercompany payable |  |  | 326,262 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 805,774 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1,132,036 | ) |  |  | - |
Income taxes payable (receivable) |  |  | 40,868 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (37,567 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,301 |
Stockholders’ (deficit) equity |  |  | (433,226 | ) |  |  | (181,846 | ) |  |  | 98,182 |  |  |  | 286,216 |  |  |  | (202,552 | ) |  |  | (433,226 | )
Non-controlling interest in consolidated joint ventures |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 427 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 427 |
Total liabilities and equity |  |  | $(62,298 | ) |  |  | $1,373,981 |  |  |  | $1,321,221 |  |  |  | $460,814 |  |  |  | $(1,334,588 | ) |  |  | $1,759,130 |

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET

OCTOBER 31, 2012

(In thousands) |  | Parent |  |  | Subsidiary Issuer |  |  | Guarantor Subsidiaries |  |  | Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |  |  | Eliminations |  |  | Consolidated |
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding |  |  | $6,155 |  |  |  | $259,339 |  |  |  | $976,836 |  |  |  | $277,286 |  |  | $ |  |  |  |  | $1,519,616 |
Financial services |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23,669 |  |  |  | 140,965 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 164,634 |
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries |  |  | (80,674 | ) |  |  | 13,790 |  |  |  | 246,467 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (179,583 | ) |  |  | - |
Total assets |  |  | $(74,519 | ) |  |  | $273,129 |  |  |  | $1,246,972 |  |  |  | $418,251 |  |  |  | $(179,583 | ) |  |  | $1,684,250 |
Liabilities and equity: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding |  |  | $1,671 |  |  |  | $125 |  |  |  | $391,628 |  |  |  | $61,800 |  |  | $ |  |  |  |  | $455,224 |
Financial services |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23,070 |  |  |  | 122,024 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 145,094 |
Notes payable |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,561,635 |  |  |  | 271 |  |  |  | 489 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,562,395 |
Income taxes payable (receivable) |  |  | 40,551 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (33,669 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6,882 |
Intercompany |  |  | 368,834 |  |  |  | (1,930,998 | ) |  |  | 1,589,502 |  |  |  | (12,759 | ) |  |  | (14,579 | ) |  |  | - |
Stockholders’ (deficit) equity |  |  | (485,575 | ) |  |  | 642,367 |  |  |  | (723,830 | ) |  |  | 246,467 |  |  |  | (165,004 | ) |  |  | (485,575 | )
Non-controlling interest in consolidated joint ventures |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 230 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 230 |
Total liabilities and equity |  |  | $(74,519 | ) |  |  | $273,129 |  |  |  | $1,246,972 |  |  |  | $418,251 |  |  |  | $(179,583 | ) |  |  | $1,684,250 |

108

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2013

(In thousands) |  | Parent |  |  | Subsidiary Issuer |  |  | Guarantor Subsidiaries |  |  | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries |  |  | Eliminations |  |  | Consolidated |
Revenues: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding |  |  | $3 |  |  |  | $(235 | ) |  |  | $1,497,016 |  |  |  | $311,730 |  |  |  | $(4,988 | ) |  |  | $1,803,526 |
Financial services |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9,386 |  |  |  | 38,341 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 47,727 |
Intercompany charges |  |  |  |  |  |  | 81,816 |  |  |  | (104,212 | ) |  |  | (2,325 | ) |  |  | 24,721 |  |  |  | - |
Total revenues |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 81,581 |  |  |  | 1,402,190 |  |  |  | 347,746 |  |  |  | 19,733 |  |  |  | 1,851,253 |
Expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding |  |  | 8,608 |  |  |  | 123,511 |  |  |  | 1,373,360 |  |  |  | 295,390 |  |  |  | 10,670 |  |  |  | 1,811,539 |
Financial services |  |  | 17 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6,721 |  |  |  | 22,321 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29,059 |
Total expenses |  |  | 8,625 |  |  |  | 123,511 |  |  |  | 1,380,081 |  |  |  | 317,711 |  |  |  | 10,670 |  |  |  | 1,840,598 |
(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt |  |  |  |  |  |  | (770,769 | ) |  |  | 770,009 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (760 | )
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,327 |  |  |  | 9,713 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12,040 |
(Loss) income before income taxes |  |  | (8,622 | ) |  |  | (812,699 | ) |  |  | 794,445 |  |  |  | 39,748 |  |  |  | 9,063 |  |  |  | 21,935 |
State and federal income tax (benefit) provision |  |  | (21,541 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12,181 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (9,360 | )
Equity in income (loss) from subsidiaries |  |  | 18,376 |  |  |  | (11,514 | ) |  |  | 39,748 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (46,610 | ) |  |  | - |
Net income (loss) |  |  | $31,295 |  |  |  | $(824,213 | ) |  |  | $822,012 |  |  |  | $39,748 |  |  |  | $(37,547 | ) |  |  | $31,295 |

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2012

(In thousands) |  | Parent |  |  | Subsidiary Issuer |  |  | Guarantor Subsidiaries |  |  | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries |  |  | Eliminations |  |  | Consolidated |
Revenues: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding |  |  | $9 |  |  |  | $(270 | ) |  |  | $1,364,733 |  |  |  | $87,124 |  |  |  | $(4,978 | ) |  |  | $1,446,618 |
Financial services |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8,082 |  |  |  | 30,653 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 38,735 |
Intercompany charges |  |  |  |  |  |  | 98,805 |  |  |  | (120,094 | ) |  |  | (3,590 | ) |  |  | 24,879 |  |  |  | - |
Total revenues |  |  | 9 |  |  |  | 98,535 |  |  |  | 1,252,721 |  |  |  | 114,187 |  |  |  | 19,901 |  |  |  | 1,485,353 |
Expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding |  |  | 3,030 |  |  |  | 150,297 |  |  |  | 1,300,728 |  |  |  | 79,899 |  |  |  | 5,334 |  |  |  | 1,539,288 |
Financial services |  |  | (28 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5,737 |  |  |  | 17,951 |  |  |  | (12 | ) |  |  | 23,648 |
Total expenses |  |  | 3,002 |  |  |  | 150,297 |  |  |  | 1,306,465 |  |  |  | 97,850 |  |  |  | 5,322 |  |  |  | 1,562,936 |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |  |  |  |  |  |  | (29,066 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (29,066 | )
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 561 |  |  |  | 4,840 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5,401 |
(Loss) income before income taxes |  |  | (2,993 | ) |  |  | (80,828 | ) |  |  | (53,183 | ) |  |  | 21,177 |  |  |  | 14,579 |  |  |  | (101,248 | )
State and federal income tax (benefit) provision |  |  | (17,495 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (17,580 | ) |  |  | 24 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (35,051 | )
Equity in (loss) income from subsidiaries |  |  | (80,699 | ) |  |  | (1,521 | ) |  |  | 21,153 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61,067 |  |  |  | - |
Net (loss) income |  |  | $(66,197 | ) |  |  | $(82,349 | ) |  |  | $(14,450 | ) |  |  | $21,153 |  |  |  | $75,646 |  |  |  | $(66,197 | )

109

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2011

(In thousands) |  | Parent |  |  | Subsidiary Issuer |  |  | Guarantor Subsidiaries |  |  | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries |  |  | Eliminations |  |  | Consolidated |
Revenues: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding |  |  | $21 |  |  |  | $(245 | ) |  |  | $1,103,249 |  |  |  | $7,360 |  |  |  | $(4,959 | ) |  |  | $1,105,426 |
Financial services |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5,523 |  |  |  | 23,958 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29,481 |
Intercompany charges |  |  |  |  |  |  | 114,592 |  |  |  | (152,042 | ) |  |  | (655 | ) |  |  | 38,105 |  |  |  | - |
Total revenues |  |  | 21 |  |  |  | 114,347 |  |  |  | 956,730 |  |  |  | 30,663 |  |  |  | 33,146 |  |  |  | 1,134,907 |
Expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Homebuilding |  |  | 5,704 |  |  |  | 164,947 |  |  |  | 1,218,886 |  |  |  | 1,073 |  |  |  | 13,084 |  |  |  | 1,403,694 |
Financial services |  |  | 307 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4,809 |  |  |  | 16,263 |  |  |  | (8 | ) |  |  | 21,371 |
Total expenses |  |  | 6,011 |  |  |  | 164,947 |  |  |  | 1,223,695 |  |  |  | 17,336 |  |  |  | 13,076 |  |  |  | 1,425,065 |
Gain on extinguishment of debt |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7,528 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7,528 |
Loss from unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (712 | ) |  |  | (8,246 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (8,958 | )
(Loss) income before income taxes |  |  | (5,990 | ) |  |  | (43,072 | ) |  |  | (267,677 | ) |  |  | 5,081 |  |  |  | 20,070 |  |  |  | (291,588 | )
State and federal income tax (benefit) provision |  |  | (20,084 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14,583 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (5,501 | )
Equity in (loss) income from subsidiaries |  |  | (300,181 | ) |  |  | 8,018 |  |  |  | 5,081 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 287,082 |  |  |  | - |
Net (loss) income |  |  | $(286,087 | ) |  |  | $(35,054 | ) |  |  | $(277,179 | ) |  |  | $5,081 |  |  |  | $307,152 |  |  |  | $(286,087 | )

110

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2013

(In thousands) |  | Parent |  |  | Subsidiary Issuer |  |  | Guarantor Subsidiaries |  |  | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries |  |  | Eliminations |  |  | Consolidated |
Cash flows from operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income (loss) |  |  | $31,295 |  |  |  | $(824,213 | ) |  |  | $822,012 |  |  |  | $39,748 |  |  |  | $(37,547 | ) |  |  | $31,295 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |  |  | 29,653 |  |  |  | 797,892 |  |  |  | (875,287 | ) |  |  | (11,832 | ) |  |  | 37,547 |  |  |  | (22,027 | )
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |  |  | 60,948 |  |  |  | (26,321 | ) |  |  | (53,275 | ) |  |  | 27,916 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 9,268 |
Net cash provided by investing activities |  |  |  |  |  |  | 235 |  |  |  | 11,819 |  |  |  | 18,231 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 30,285 |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |  |  |  |  |  |  | (6,139 | ) |  |  | 52,914 |  |  |  | (30,356 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | 16,419 |
Intercompany financing activities - net |  |  | (60,948 | ) |  |  | 78,598 |  |  |  | (15,920 | ) |  |  | (1,730 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Net increase (decrease) in cash |  |  | - |  |  |  | 46,373 |  |  |  | (4,462 | ) |  |  | 14,061 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 55,972 |
Cash and cash equivalents balance, beginning of period |  |  | - |  |  |  | 197,097 |  |  |  | (2,017 | ) |  |  | 78,152 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 273,232 |
Cash and cash equivalents balance, end of period |  |  | $- |  |  |  | $243,470 |  |  |  | $(6,479 | ) |  |  | $92,213 |  |  |  | $- |  |  |  | $329,204 |

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2012

(In thousands) |  | Parent |  |  | Subsidiary Issuer |  |  | Guarantor Subsidiaries |  |  | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries |  |  | Eliminations |  |  | Consolidated |
Cash flows from operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net (loss) income |  |  | $(66,197 | ) |  |  | $(82,349 | ) |  |  | $(14,450 | ) |  |  | $21,153 |  |  |  | $75,646 |  |  |  | $(66,197 | )
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |  |  | 37,030 |  |  |  | 53,114 |  |  |  | 124,875 |  |  |  | (140,174 | ) |  |  | (75,646 | ) |  |  | (801 | )
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |  |  | (29,167 | ) |  |  | (29,235 | ) |  |  | 110,425 |  |  |  | (119,021 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | (66,998 | )
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |  |  | - |  |  |  | 146 |  |  |  | (3,260 | ) |  |  | 1,614 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (1,500 | )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |  |  | 47,221 |  |  |  | (79,976 | ) |  |  | 49,670 |  |  |  | 74,075 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 90,990 |
Intercompany financing activities - net |  |  | (18,054 | ) |  |  | 194,040 |  |  |  | (153,863 | ) |  |  | (22,123 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Net increase (decrease) in cash |  |  | - |  |  |  | 84,975 |  |  |  | 2,972 |  |  |  | (65,455 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | 22,492 |
Cash and cash equivalents balance, beginning of period |  |  | - |  |  |  | 112,122 |  |  |  | (4,989 | ) |  |  | 143,607 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 250,740 |
Cash and cash equivalents balance, end of period |  |  | $- |  |  |  | $197,097 |  |  |  | $(2,017 | ) |  |  | $78,152 |  |  |  | $- |  |  |  | $273,232 |

111

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2011

(In thousands) |  | Parent |  |  | Subsidiary Issuer |  |  | Guarantor Subsidiaries |  |  | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries |  |  | Eliminations |  |  | Consolidated |
Cash flows from operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net (loss) income |  |  | $(286,087 | ) |  |  | $(35,054 | ) |  |  | $(277,179 | ) |  |  | $5,081 |  |  |  | $307,152 |  |  |  | $(286,087 | )
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |  |  | 93,926 |  |  |  | (42,459 | ) |  |  | 352,320 |  |  |  | (17,963 | ) |  |  | (307,152 | ) |  |  | 78,672 |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |  |  | (192,161 | ) |  |  | (77,513 | ) |  |  | 75,141 |  |  |  | (12,882 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | (207,415 | )
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (223 | ) |  |  | 1,418 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 1,195 |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |  |  | 54,899 |  |  |  | 56,428 |  |  |  | 2,367 |  |  |  | (23,914 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | 89,780 |
Intercompany financing activities - net |  |  | 137,252 |  |  |  | (79,163 | ) |  |  | (69,462 | ) |  |  | 11,373 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Net (decrease) increase in cash |  |  | (10 | ) |  |  | (100,248 | ) |  |  | 7,823 |  |  |  | (24,005 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | (116,440 | )
Cash and cash equivalents balance, beginning of period |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 212,370 |  |  |  | (12,812 | ) |  |  | 167,612 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 367,180 |
Cash and cash equivalents balance, end of period |  |  | $- |  |  |  | $112,122 |  |  |  | $(4,989 | ) |  |  | $143,607 |  |  |  | $- |  |  |  | $250,740 |

24. Unaudited Summarized Consolidated Quarterly Information

Summarized quarterly financial information for the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

|  | Three Months Ended |
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data) |  | October 31, 2013 |  |  | July 31, 2013 |  |  | April 30, 2013 |  |  | January 31, 2013 |
Revenues |  |  | $591,687 |  |  |  | $478,357 |  |  |  | $422,998 |  |  |  | $358,211 |
Expenses |  |  | 561,061 |  |  |  | 471,036 |  |  |  | 422,899 |  |  |  | 380,637 |
Inventory impairment loss and land option write-offs |  |  | 1,486 |  |  |  | 623 |  |  |  | 2,191 |  |  |  | 665 |
(Loss) on extinguishment of debt |  |  | (760 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 5,234 |  |  |  | 3,690 |  |  |  | 827 |  |  |  | 2,289 |
Income (loss) before income taxes |  |  | 33,614 |  |  |  | 10,388 |  |  |  | (1,265 | ) |  |  | (20,802 | )
State and federal income tax provision (benefit) |  |  | 795 |  |  |  | 1,922 |  |  |  | (2,583 | ) |  |  | (9,494 | )
Net income (loss) |  |  | $32,819 |  |  |  | $8,466 |  |  |  | $1,318 |  |  |  | $(11,308 | )
Per share data: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income (loss) per common share |  |  | $0.22 |  |  |  | $0.06 |  |  |  | $0.01 |  |  |  | $(0.08 | )
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |  |  | 145,821 |  |  |  | 146,056 |  |  |  | 145,948 |  |  |  | 141,725 |
Assuming dilution: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income (loss) per common share |  |  | $0.21 |  |  |  | $0.06 |  |  |  | $0.01 |  |  |  | $(0.08 | )
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |  |  | 162,100 |  |  |  | 162,823 |  |  |  | 147,231 |  |  |  | 141,725 |

112

|  | Three Months Ended |
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data) |  | October 31, 2012 |  |  | July 31, 2012 |  |  | April 30, 2012 |  |  | January 31, 2012 |
Revenues |  |  | $487,045 |  |  |  | $387,011 |  |  |  | $341,698 |  |  |  | $269,599 |
Expenses |  |  | 481,996 |  |  |  | 395,221 |  |  |  | 364,678 |  |  |  | 308,511 |
Inventory impairment loss and land option write-offs |  |  | 5,300 |  |  |  | 689 |  |  |  | 3,216 |  |  |  | 3,325 |
(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt |  |  | (87,033 | ) |  |  | 6,230 |  |  |  | 27,039 |  |  |  | 24,698 |
Income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures |  |  | 3,077 |  |  |  | 852 |  |  |  | 1,495 |  |  |  | (23 | )
(Loss) income before income taxes |  |  | (84,207 | ) |  |  | (1,817 | ) |  |  | 2,338 |  |  |  | (17,562 | )
State and federal income tax provision (benefit) |  |  | 203 |  |  |  | (36,493 | ) |  |  | 536 |  |  |  | 703 |
Net (loss) income |  |  | $(84,410 | ) |  |  | $34,676 |  |  |  | $1,802 |  |  |  | $(18,265 | )
Per share data: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(Loss) income per common share |  |  | $(0.59 | ) |  |  | $0.25 |  |  |  | $0.02 |  |  |  | $(0.17 | )
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |  |  | 142,249 |  |  |  | 138,472 |  |  |  | 116,021 |  |  |  | 108,735 |
Assuming dilution: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(Loss) income per common share |  |  | $(0.59 | ) |  |  | $0.25 |  |  |  | $0.02 |  |  |  | $(0.17 | )
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |  |  | 142,249 |  |  |  | 138,552 |  |  |  | 116,117 |  |  |  | 108,735 |

113