XML 37 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Note 11 - Income Taxes
12 Months Ended
Oct. 31, 2017
Notes to Financial Statements  
Income Tax Disclosure [Text Block]
11.
Income Taxes
 
Income taxes payable (receivable), including deferred benefits, consists of the following:
 
   
Year Ended October 31,
 
(In thousands)
 
2017
   
2016
 
State income taxes:
               
Current
  $
2,227
    $
1,945
 
Deferred
   
-
     
(9,890
)
Federal income taxes:
               
Current
   
-
     
-
 
Deferred
   
-
     
(275,688
)
Total
  $
2,227
    $
(283,633
)
 
 
The provision for income taxes is composed of the following charges (benefits):
 
   
Year Ended October 31,
 
(In thousands)
 
2017
   
2016
   
2015
 
Current income tax expense
(benefit):
                       
Federal (1)
  $
-
    $
(2,796
)
  $
(1,497
)
State (2)
   
1,371
     
1,200
     
523
 
Total current income tax expense
(benefit):
   
1,371
     
(1,596
)
   
(974
)
Federal
   
275,688
     
5,594
     
(8,461
)
State
   
9,890
     
1,257
     
3,770
 
Total deferred income tax expense (benefit):
   
285,578
     
6,851
     
(4,691
)
Total
  $
286,949
    $
5,255
    $
(5,665
)
 
 
(
1
)
The current federal income tax did
not
include the use of federal net operating losses for the year ended
October 31, 2017.
The current federal income tax
benefit 
is net of the use of federal net operating losses totaling
$4.4
million and
$3.7
million for the years ended
October 
31,
 
2016
and
2015,
respectively.
 
(
2
)
The current state income tax expense
(benefit)
is net of the use of state net operating losses totaling
$18.2
million,
$16.4
million and
$12.3
million for the years ended
October 
31,
2017,
2016
and
2015,
respectively.
 
The total income tax expense of
$286.9
million for the period ended
October 31, 2017
was primarily due to increasing our valuation allowance to fully reserve against our deferred tax assets (“DTAs”). In addition, the same periods were also impacted by state tax expense from income generated in some states, which was
not
offset by tax benefits in other states that had losses for which we fully reserve the net operating losses. The total income tax expense of
$5.3
million for the period ended
October 31, 2016
was primarily due to current state taxes and permanent differences related to stock compensation, partially offset by a federal tax benefit related to receiving a specified liability loss refund of taxes paid in fiscal year
2002.
The total income tax benefit of
$5.7
million recognized for the
 year ended
October 31, 2015
was primarily due to deferred taxes resulting from the loss before income taxes plus the reversal of state tax reserves for uncertain state tax positions, partially offset by state tax expenses.
 
The permanent difference in fiscal
2016
related to stock compensation arose because for tax purposes, the amount of stock compensation the Company expenses is the amount reported on an associate
’s W-
2
when the equity award is exercised or received, whereas for accounting purposes, the amount the Company expenses is based on the fair value of the equity award on the date of grant. Therefore, the permanent difference due to stock compensation was because of this different treatment, which does
not
arise until the time the equity award is exercised or received by the associate and therefore reported on an associate’s W-
2.
The amount was significant because of the issuance in fiscal
2016
of stock to Company executives in respect of awards that had been granted over
ten
years ago at significantly higher stock prices and thus significantly higher fair values as compared to the time of issuance to the executive. As a result, at the time the stock awards were issued in fiscal
2016,
a significant permanent difference between book and tax was created impacting the effective tax rate for
2016.
 
The federal specified liability loss refund of taxes in fiscal year
2002
was due to an amendment of a prior year
’s tax return. The Internal Revenue Service issued the refund following the Company’s application therefor during the year ended
October 31, 2016.
The refund related to the portion of the fiscal year
2012
NOL attributable to a specified liability loss which, pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section
172
(b)(
1
)(C), can be carried back
ten
years to
October 31, 2002.
A specified liability is any amount allowable as a deduction attributable to a product liability or expense incurred in investigation or settlement of claims because of a product liability. The refund was received in
February 2016
and therefore the tax credit was recorded in the
second
quarter of fiscal
2016.
 
Our federal net operating losses of
$1.6
billion expire between
2028
and
2037.
Our state NOLs of
$2.3
billion expire between
2018
and
2037.
Of the total state amount,
$247.1
million will expire between
2018
through
2022;
$463.1
million will expire between
2023
through
2027;
$1.2
billion will expire between
2028
through
2032;
and
$348.6
million will expire between
2033
through
2037.
 
Deferred federal and state income tax assets primarily represent the deferred tax benefits arising from net operating loss carryforwards and temporary differences between book and tax income which will be recognized in future years as an offset against future taxable income. If the combination of future years
’ income (or loss) and the reversal of the timing differences results in a loss, such losses can be carried forward to future years. In accordance with ASC
740,
we evaluate our deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are required. ASC
740
requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than
not”
standard.  
 
As of
October 31, 2017,
we considered all available positive and negative evidence to determine whether, based on the weight of that evidence, an additional valuation allowance for our DTAs was necessary in accordance with ASC
740.
Listed below, in order of the weighting of each factor, is the available positive and negative evidence that we considered in determining that it is more likely than
not
that all of our DTAs will
not
be realized. In analyzing these factors, overall the negative evidence, both objective and subjective, outweighed the positive evidence. Based on this analysis, we increased the valuation allowance against our DTAs such that we have a full valuation allowance and determined that the current valuation allowance for deferred taxes of
$918.2
 million as of
October 31, 2017
is appropriate.
 
 
1.
Fiscal
2017
financial results, especially the
$50.2
million pre-tax loss in the
third
quarter of
2017
primarily from the
$42.3
million loss on extinguishment of debt during the quarter, that put us in a cumulative
three
-year loss position as of
July 31, 2017,
and we are still in a cumulative
three
-year loss position as of
October 31, 2017.
Per ASC
740,
cumulative losses are
one
of the most objectively verifiable forms of negative evidence. (Negative Objective Evidence)
 
2.
In the
third
quarter of fiscal
2017,
we completed a debt refinancing/restructuring transaction which, by extending our debt maturities, will enable us to allocate cash to invest in new communities and grow our community count to get back to sustained profitability. (Positive Objective Evidence)
 
3.
Recent financial results of
$12.3
 pre-tax income in the
fourth
quarter of
2017.
(Positive Objective Evidence)
 
4.
The refinancing discussed above will increase our interest incurred in fiscal
2018
 and future years (based on our longer term modeling) by
$23.4
million per year. (Negative Objective Evidence)
 
5.
We incurred pre-tax losses during the housing market decline and the slower than expected housing market recovery. (Negative Objective Evidence)
 
6.
We exited
two
geographic markets and are winding down operations in
two
other markets that have historically had losses. By exiting these underperforming markets, the Company will be able to redeploy capital to better performing markets, which over time should improve our profitability. (Positive Subjective Evidence)
 
7.
Evidence of a sustained recovery in the housing markets in which we operate, supported by economic data showing housing starts, homebuilding volume and prices all increasing and forecasted to continue to increase. (Positive Subjective Evidence)
 
8.
The historical cyclicality of the U.S. housing market, a more restrictive mortgage lending environment compared to before the housing downturn, the uncertainty of the overall US economy and government policies and consumer confidence, all or any of which could continue to hamper a faster, stronger recovery of the housing market. (Negative Subjective Evidence)
 
 
The deferred tax assets and liabilities have been recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:
 
   
Year Ended October 31,
 
(In thousands)
 
2017
   
2016
 
Deferred tax assets:
               
Depreciation
  $
246
    $
1,729
 
Inventory impairment loss
   
122,584
     
174,489
 
Uniform capitalization of overhead
   
5,766
     
6,802
 
Warranty and legal reserves
   
8,763
     
13,238
 
Deferred income
   
2,341
     
5,061
 
Acquisition intangibles
   
4,420
     
8,829
 
Restricted stock bonus
   
4,202
     
4,526
 
Rent on abandoned space
   
101
     
1,006
 
Stock options
   
6,539
     
7,073
 
Provision for losses
   
38,831
     
34,505
 
Joint venture loss
   
12,028
     
4,171
 
Federal net operating losses
   
549,862
     
520,117
 
State net operating losses
   
172,307
     
170,014
 
Other
   
20,678
     
22,862
 
Total deferred tax assets
   
948,668
     
974,422
 
Deferred tax liabilities:
               
Debt repurchase income
   
30,465
     
60,901
 
Total deferred tax liabilities
   
30,465
     
60,901
 
Valuation allowance
   
(918,203
)    
(627,943
)
Net deferred income taxes
  $
-
    $
285,578
 
 
The effective tax rate varied from the statutory federal income tax rate. The effective tax rate is affected by a number of factors, the most significant of which has been the valuation allowance related to our deferred tax assets.
 Due to the effects of these factors, our effective tax rates for
2017,
2016
and
2015
are
not
correlated to the amount of our income or loss before income taxes. The sources of these factors were as follows:
 
   
Year Ended October 31,
 
   
2017
   
2016
   
2015
 
Computed “expected” tax rate
   
35.0
%
   
35.0
%
   
35.0
%
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
   
1.0
     
65.4
     
(15.6
)
Permanent differences, net
   
(2.4
)    
222.2
     
(0.4
)
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance impact
   
(667.8
)    
-
     
-
 
Tax contingencies
   
-
     
0.3
     
3.2
 
Adjustments to prior years
’ tax accruals(1)
   
-
     
(107.2
)    
3.8
 
Effective tax rate
   
(634.2
)%
   
215.7
%
   
26.0
%
 
(
1
)
The adjustments to prior years
’ tax accruals includes the impact of a federal specified liability loss refund of taxes paid in fiscal year
2002
of (
114.8%
) for the year ended
October 
31,
 
2016.
 
 
ASC
740
-
10
provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position
may
be recognized when it is more likely than
not
that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits.
 
Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-
not
recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized upon the adoption of ASC
740
-
10
and in subsequent periods. This interpretation also provides guidance on measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.
 
We recognize tax liabilities in accordance with ASC
740
-
10
and we adjust these liabilities when our judgment changes as a result of the evaluation of new information
not
previously available. Due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution
may
result in a liability that is materially different from our current estimate of the tax liabilities. These differences will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period in which they are determined.
 
 
We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the income tax expense line in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
 Accrued interest and penalties are included within the related tax liability line in the consolidated balance sheet. 
 
The following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the year (in millions) excluding interest and penalties:
 
 
Year Ended October 31,
 
     
2017
   
2016
 
Unrecognized tax benefit
—November 1,
  $
1.1
    $
1.1
 
Gross increases
—tax positions in current period
   
0.2
     
0.2
 
Decrease related to tax positions taken during a prior period
   
-
     
-
 
Lapse of statute of limitations
   
(0.2
)
   
(0.2
)
Unrecognized tax benefit
—October 31,
  $
1.1
    $
1.1
 
 
 
Related to the unrecognized tax benefits noted above, as of
October 
31,
2017
and
2016,
we have recognized a liability for interest and penalties of
$0.3
million and
$0.3
million, respectively. For the years ended
October 
31,
2017,
2016
and
2015,
we recognized $(
45
) thousand, $(
2
) thousand and $(
91
) thousand respectively, of interest and penalties in income tax benefit.
 
It is likely that, within the next
year, the amount of the Company's unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by
$0.2
million, excluding penalties and interest. This reduction is expected primarily due to the expiration of the statutes of limitation. The portion of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective tax rate (excluding any related impact to the valuation allowance) is
$1.1
million as of both
October 31, 2017
and
2016.
 The recognition of unrecognized tax benefits could have an impact on the Company’s deferred tax assets and the valuation allowance.
 
The consolidated federal tax returns have been audited through
October 31, 2016
and these years are closed. We are also subject to various income tax examinations in the states in which we do business. The outcome for a particular audit cannot be determined with certainty prior to the conclusion of the audit, appeal, and in some cases, litigation process. As each audit is concluded, adjustments, if any, are appropriately recorded in the period determined.
 To provide for potential exposures, tax reserves are recorded, if applicable, based on reasonable estimates of potential audit results. However, if the reserves are insufficient upon completion of an audit, there could be an adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations. The statute of limitations for our major tax jurisdictions remains open for examination for tax years
2013
-
2016.