XML 44 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3
LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2019
Receivables [Abstract]  
LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The Company’s loan portfolio is grouped into classes to allow management to monitor the performance by the borrower and to monitor the yield on the portfolio. Consistent with ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Loan Losses, the segments are further broken down into classes to allow for differing risk characteristics within a segment.
The risks associated with lending activities differ among the various loan classes and are subject to the impact of changes in interest rates, market conditions of collateral securing the loans, and general economic conditions. All of these factors may adversely impact both the borrower’s ability to repay its loans and associated collateral.
The Company has various types of commercial real estate loans, which have differing levels of credit risk. Owner occupied commercial real estate loans are generally dependent upon the successful operation of the borrower’s business, with the cash flows generated from the business being the primary source of repayment of the loan. If the business suffers a downturn in sales or profitability, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan could be in jeopardy.
Non-owner occupied and multi-family commercial real estate loans and non-owner occupied residential loans present a different credit risk to the Company than owner occupied commercial real estate loans, as the repayment of the loan is dependent upon the borrower’s ability to generate a sufficient level of occupancy to produce rental income that exceeds debt service requirements and operating expenses. Lower occupancy or lease rates may result in a reduction in cash flows, which hinders the ability of the borrower to meet debt service requirements, and may result in lower collateral values. The Company generally recognizes that greater risk is inherent in these credit relationships as compared to owner occupied loans mentioned above.
Acquisition and development loans consist of 1-4 family residential construction and commercial and land development loans. The risk of loss on these loans is largely dependent on the Company’s ability to assess the property’s value at the completion of the project, which should exceed the property’s construction costs. During the construction phase, a number of factors could potentially negatively impact the collateral value, including cost overruns, delays in completing the project, competition, and real estate market conditions which may change based on the supply of similar properties in the area. In the event the collateral value at the completion of the project is not sufficient to cover the outstanding loan balance, the Company must rely upon other repayment sources, including, if any, the guarantors of the project or other collateral securing the loan.
Commercial and industrial loans include advances to local and regional businesses for general commercial purposes and include permanent and short-term working capital, machinery and equipment financing, and may be either in the form of lines of credit or term loans. Although commercial and industrial loans may be unsecured to our highest-rated borrowers, the majority of these loans are secured by the borrower’s accounts receivable, inventory and machinery and equipment. In a significant number of these loans, the collateral also includes the business real estate or the business owner’s personal real estate or assets. Commercial and industrial loans present credit exposure to the Company, as they are more susceptible to risk of loss during a downturn in the economy as borrowers may have greater difficulty in meeting their debt service requirements and the value of the collateral may decline. The Company attempts to mitigate this risk through its underwriting standards, including evaluating the creditworthiness of the borrower and, to the extent available, credit ratings on the business. Additionally, monitoring of the loans through annual renewals and meetings with the borrowers are typical. However, these procedures cannot eliminate the risk of loss associated with commercial and industrial lending.
Municipal loans consist of extensions of credit to municipalities and school districts within the Company’s market area. These loans generally present a lower risk than commercial and industrial loans, as they are generally secured by the municipality’s full taxing authority, by revenue obligations, or by its ability to raise assessments on its customers for a specific utility.
The Company originates loans to its retail customers, including fixed-rate and adjustable first lien mortgage loans with the underlying 1-4 family owner occupied residential property securing the loan. The Company’s risk exposure is minimized in these types of loans through the evaluation of the creditworthiness of the borrower, including credit scores and debt-to-income ratios, and underwriting standards which limit the loan-to-value ratio to generally no more than 80% upon loan origination, unless the borrower obtains private mortgage insurance.
Home equity loans, including term loans and lines of credit, present a slightly higher risk to the Company than 1-4 family first liens, as these loans can be first or second liens on 1-4 family owner occupied residential property, but can have loan-to-value ratios of no greater than 90% of the value of the real estate taken as collateral. The creditworthiness of the borrower is considered including credit scores and debt-to-income ratios.
Installment and other loans’ credit risk are mitigated through prudent underwriting standards, including evaluation of the creditworthiness of the borrower through credit scores and debt-to-income ratios and, if secured, the collateral value of the assets. These loans can be unsecured or secured by assets the value of which may depreciate quickly or may fluctuate, and may present a greater risk to the Company than 1-4 family residential loans.
The following table presents the loan portfolio by segment and class, excluding residential LHFS, at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
(Dollars in thousands)September 30, 2019December 31, 2018
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied$171,327  $129,650  
Non-owner occupied310,334  252,794  
Multi-family108,751  78,933  
Non-owner occupied residential120,395  100,367  
Acquisition and development:
1-4 family residential construction12,257  7,385  
Commercial and land development38,494  42,051  
Commercial and industrial215,734  160,964  
Municipal47,920  50,982  
Residential mortgage:
First lien353,811  235,296  
Home equity - term15,175  12,208  
Home equity - lines of credit159,930  143,616  
Installment and other loans38,977  33,411  
Total Loans (1)
$1,593,105  $1,247,657  
(1) Includes $425,940,000 and $135,009,000 of acquired loans at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

In order to monitor ongoing risk associated with its loan portfolio and specific loans within the segments, management uses an internal grading system. The first several rating categories, representing the lowest risk to the Bank, are combined and given a “Pass” rating. Management generally follows regulatory definitions in assigning criticized ratings to loans, including "Special Mention," "Substandard," "Doubtful" or "Loss." The Special Mention category includes loans that have potential weaknesses that may, if not monitored or corrected, weaken the asset or inadequately protect the Bank's position at some future date. These assets pose elevated risk, but their weakness does not yet justify a more severe, or classified rating. Substandard loans are classified as they have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses that jeopardize liquidation of the debt. These loans are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Substandard loans include loans that management has determined not to be impaired, as well as loans considered to be impaired. A Doubtful loan has a high probability of total or substantial loss, but because of specific pending events that may strengthen the asset, its classification as Loss is deferred. Loss loans are considered uncollectible, as the borrowers are often in bankruptcy, have suspended debt repayments, or have ceased business operations. Once a loan is classified as Loss, there is little prospect of collecting the loan’s principal or interest and it is charged-off.
The Company has a loan review policy and program which is designed to identify and monitor risk in the lending function. The ERM Committee, comprised of executive officers and loan department personnel, is charged with the oversight of overall credit quality and risk exposure of the Company's loan portfolio. This includes the monitoring of the lending activities of all Company personnel with respect to underwriting and processing new loans and the timely follow-up and corrective action for loans showing signs of deterioration in quality. A loan review program provides the Company with an independent review
of the commercial loan portfolio on an ongoing basis. Generally, consumer and residential mortgage loans are included in the Pass categories unless a specific action, such as extended delinquencies, bankruptcy, repossession or death of the borrower occurs, which heightens awareness as to a possible credit event.
Internal loan reviews are completed annually on all commercial relationships with a committed loan balance in excess of $500,000, which includes confirmation of risk rating by an independent credit officer. Credit Administration also reviews loans in excess of $1,000,000. In addition, all commercial relationships greater than $250,000 rated Substandard, Doubtful or Loss are reviewed quarterly and corresponding risk ratings are reaffirmed by the Company's Problem Loan Committee, with subsequent reporting to the ERM Committee.
The following table summarizes the Company’s loan portfolio ratings based on its internal risk rating system at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
(Dollars in thousands)PassSpecial MentionNon-Impaired SubstandardImpaired - SubstandardDoubtfulPCI LoansTotal
September 30, 2019
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied$153,327  $5,750  $2,664  $3,324  $ $6,262  $171,327  
Non-owner occupied298,268  10,685     1,381  310,334  
Multi-family101,479  5,537  940  105   690  108,751  
Non-owner occupied residential113,248  3,139  1,246  137   2,625  120,395  
Acquisition and development:
1-4 family residential construction12,004  253      12,257  
Commercial and land development37,582  348  564     38,494  
Commercial and industrial198,348  2,316  10,101  1,089   3,880  215,734  
Municipal47,920       47,920  
Residential mortgage:
First lien340,619  713   2,547   9,932  353,811  
Home equity - term15,068  76   11   20  15,175  
Home equity - lines of credit159,063  75  39  753    159,930  
Installment and other loans38,715      255  38,977  
$1,515,641  $28,892  $15,554  $7,973  $ $25,045  $1,593,105  
December 31, 2018
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied$121,903  $3,024  $987  $1,880  $ $1,856  $129,650  
Non-owner occupied242,136  10,008     650  252,794  
Multi-family71,482  5,886  717  131   717  78,933  
Non-owner occupied residential97,590  736  1,197  309   535  100,367  
Acquisition and development:
1-4 family residential construction7,385       7,385  
Commercial and land development41,251  25  583    192  42,051  
Commercial and industrial150,286  2,278  2,940  286   5,174  160,964  
Municipal50,982       50,982  
Residential mortgage:
First lien229,971    2,877   2,448  235,296  
Home equity - term12,170    16   22  12,208  
Home equity - lines of credit142,638  165  15  798    143,616  
Installment and other loans33,229  15     166  33,411  
$1,201,023  $22,137  $6,440  $6,297  $ $11,760  $1,247,657  

For commercial real estate, acquisition and development and commercial and industrial loans, a loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by
management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Generally, loans that are more than 90 days past due are deemed impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed to determine if the loan should be placed on nonaccrual status. Nonaccrual loans in the commercial and commercial real estate portfolios and any TDRs are, by definition, deemed to be impaired. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial, construction and restructured loans by either the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. A loan is collateral dependent if the repayment of the loan is expected to be provided solely by the underlying collateral. For loans that are deemed to be impaired for extended periods of time, periodic updates on fair values are obtained, which may include updated appraisals. Updated fair values are incorporated into the impairment analysis in the next reporting period.
Loan charge-offs, which may include partial charge-offs, are taken on an impaired loan that is collateral dependent if the loan’s carrying balance exceeds its collateral’s appraised value, the loan has been identified as uncollectible, and it is deemed to be a confirmed loss. Typically, impaired loans with a charge-off or partial charge-off will continue to be considered impaired, unless the note is split into two, and management expects the performing note to continue to perform and is adequately secured. The second, or non-performing note, would be charged-off. Generally, an impaired loan with a partial charge-off may continue to have an impairment reserve on it after the partial charge-off, if factors warrant.
At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, nearly all of the Company’s impaired loans’ extent of impairment were measured based on the estimated fair value of the collateral securing the loan, except for TDRs. By definition, TDRs are considered impaired. All restructured loans’ impairment was determined based on discounted cash flows for those loans classified as TDRs and still accruing interest. For real estate loans, collateral generally consists of commercial real estate, but in the case of commercial and industrial loans, it could also consist of accounts receivable, inventory, equipment or other business assets. Commercial and industrial loans may also have real estate collateral.
Updated appraisals are generally required every 18 months for classified commercial loans in excess of $250,000. The “as is" value provided in the appraisal is often used as the fair value of the collateral in determining impairment, unless circumstances, such as subsequent improvements, approvals, or other circumstances, dictate that another value than that provided by the appraiser is more appropriate.
Generally, impaired commercial loans secured by real estate, other than performing TDRs, are measured at fair value using certified real estate appraisals that had been completed within the last 18 months. Appraised values are discounted for estimated costs to sell the property and other selling considerations to arrive at the property’s fair value. In those situations in which it is determined an updated appraisal is not required for loans individually evaluated for impairment, fair values are based on one or a combination of approaches. In those situations in which a combination of approaches is considered, the factor that carries the most consideration will be the one management believes is warranted. The approaches are: 
Original appraisal – if the original appraisal provides a strong loan-to-value ratio (generally 70% or lower) and, after consideration of market conditions and knowledge of the property and area, it is determined by the Credit Administration staff that there has not been a significant deterioration in the collateral value, the original certified appraised value may be used. Discounts as deemed appropriate for selling costs are factored into the appraised value in arriving at fair value.
Discounted cash flows – in limited cases, discounted cash flows may be used on projects in which the collateral is liquidated to reduce the borrowings outstanding, and is used to validate collateral values derived from other approaches.
Collateral on certain impaired loans is not limited to real estate, and may consist of accounts receivable, inventory, equipment or other business assets. Estimated fair values are determined based on borrowers’ financial statements, inventory ledgers, accounts receivable agings or appraisals from individuals with knowledge in the business. Stated balances are generally discounted for the age of the financial information or the quality of the assets. In determining fair value, liquidation discounts are applied to this collateral based on existing loan evaluation policies.
The Company distinguishes Substandard loans on both an impaired and nonimpaired basis, as it places less emphasis on a loan’s classification, and increased reliance on whether the loan was performing in accordance with the contractual terms. A Substandard classification does not automatically meet the definition of impaired. Loss potential, while existing in the aggregate amount of Substandard loans, does not have to exist in individual extensions of credit classified Substandard. As a result, the Company’s methodology includes an evaluation of certain accruing commercial real estate, acquisition and
development and commercial and industrial loans rated Substandard to be collectively, as opposed to individually, evaluated for impairment. Although the Company believes these loans meet the definition of Substandard, they are generally performing and management has concluded that it is likely we will be able to collect the scheduled payments of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
Larger groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Generally, the Company does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement due to financial difficulties of the borrower.
The following table, which excludes PCI loans, summarizes impaired loans by segment and class, segregated by those for which a specific allowance was required and those for which a specific allowance was not required at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The recorded investment in loans excludes accrued interest receivable due to insignificance. Related allowances established generally pertain to those loans in which loan forbearance agreements were in the process of being negotiated or updated appraisals were pending, and any partial charge-off will be recorded when final information is received.
 
Impaired Loans with a Specific AllowanceImpaired Loans with No Specific Allowance
(Dollars in thousands)Recorded
Investment
(Book Balance)
Unpaid Principal
Balance
(Legal Balance)
Related
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
(Book Balance)
Unpaid Principal
Balance
(Legal Balance)
September 30, 2019
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied$ $ $ $3,324  $5,490  
Multi-family   105  325  
Non-owner occupied residential26  48   111  319  
Commercial and industrial   1,089  2,769  
Residential mortgage:
First lien498  498  36  2,049  3,098  
Home equity - term   11  19  
Home equity - lines of credit   753  1,081  
Installment and other loans    17  
$524  $546  $36  $7,449  $13,118  
December 31, 2018
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied$ $ $ $1,880  $2,576  
Multi-family   131  336  
Non-owner occupied residential   309  632  
Commercial and industrial   286  457  
Residential mortgage:
First lien743  743  38  2,134  2,727  
Home equity - term   16  23  
Home equity - lines of credit   798  1,081  
$743  $743  $38  $5,554  $7,832  
The following table, which excludes PCI loans, summarizes the average recorded investment in impaired loans and related recognized interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.
20192018
(Dollars in thousands)Average
Impaired
Balance
Interest
Income
Recognized
Average
Impaired
Balance
Interest
Income
Recognized
Three Months Ended September 30,
Commercial real estate:
Owner-occupied$2,126  $ $1,569  $ 
Non-owner occupied150     
Multi-family110   144   
Non-owner occupied residential173   336   
Acquisition and development:
1-4 family residential construction  201   
Commercial and industrial765   316   
Residential mortgage:
First lien2,392  12  2,900  15  
Home equity – term12   18   
Home equity - lines of credit768   692   
Installment and other loans    
$6,504  $12  $6,177  $16  
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied$1,950  $ $1,372  $ 
Non-owner occupied60   2,395   
Multi-family118   152   
Non-owner occupied residential246   355   
Acquisition and development:
1-4 family residential construction  235   
Commercial and industrial469   330   
Residential mortgage:
First lien2,574  41  3,312  44  
Home equity - term13   20   
Home equity - lines of credit752   621   
Installment and other loans    
$6,190  $43  $8,798  $47  
The following table presents impaired loans that are TDRs, with the recorded investment at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

September 30, 2019December 31, 2018
(Dollars in thousands)Number of
Contracts
Recorded
Investment
Number of
Contracts
Recorded
Investment
Accruing:
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied $30   $39  
Residential mortgage:
First lien10  992  11  1,069  
Home equity - lines of credit 20   24  
12  1,042  13  1,132  
Nonaccruing:
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied 1,898   37  
Residential mortgage:
First lien 368   658  
 2,266   695  
21  $3,308  22  $1,827  

There were three new commercial real estate owner occupied TDR's, totaling $1,867,000, for the quarter ended September 30, 2019. There were no modified restructured loans in 2018. No additional commitments have been made to borrowers whose loans are considered TDRs.
Management further monitors the performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio by analyzing the length of time a portfolio is past due, by aggregating loans based on its delinquencies. The following table presents the classes of loan portfolio summarized by aging categories of performing loans and nonaccrual loans at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
Days Past Due
(Dollars in thousands)Current30-5960-8990+
(still accruing)
Total
Past Due
Non-
Accrual
Total
Loans
September 30, 2019
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied$161,771  $ $ $ $ $3,294  $165,065  
Non-owner occupied308,823    130  130   308,953  
Multi-family107,707    249  249  105  108,061  
Non-owner occupied residential117,301  225  69  38  332  137  117,770  
Acquisition and development:
1-4 family residential construction12,257       12,257  
Commercial and land development38,358    136  136   38,494  
Commercial and industrial210,112  320  333   653  1,089  211,854  
Municipal47,920       47,920  
Residential mortgage:
First lien339,460  1,101  1696  67  2,864  1,555  343,879  
Home equity - term15,122  17    22  11  15,155  
Home equity - lines of credit158,601  475  121   596  733  159,930  
Installment and other loans38,556  122  37   159   38,722  
Subtotal1,555,988  2,260  2,256  625  5,141  6,931  1,568,060  
Loans acquired with credit deterioration:
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied6,089  131   42  173   6,262  
Non-owner occupied585    796  796   1,381  
Multi-family690       690  
Non-owner occupied residential2,025   188  412  600   2,625  
Commercial and industrial3,863    17  17   3,880  
Residential mortgage:
First lien8,459  74  357  1,042  1,473   9,932  
Home equity - term16       20  
Installment and other loans190  17   48  65   255  
Subtotal21,917  226  545  2,357  3,128   25,045  
$1,577,905  $2,486  $2,801  $2,982  $8,269  $6,931  $1,593,105  
Days Past Due
(Dollars in thousands)Current30-5960-8990+
(still accruing)
Total
Past Due
Non-
Accrual
Total
Loans
December 31, 2018
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied$125,887  $66  $ $ $66  $1,841  $127,794  
Non-owner occupied252,144       252,144  
Multi-family78,085      131  78,216  
Non-owner occupied residential99,268  226  29   255  309  99,832  
Acquisition and development:
1-4 family residential construction7,385       7,385  
Commercial and land development41,822  37    37   41,859  
Commercial and industrial154,988  411  105   516  286  155,790  
Municipal50,982       50,982  
Residential mortgage:
First lien228,714  1,592  734   2,326  1,808  232,848  
Home equity - term11,487  678    683  16  12,186  
Home equity - lines of credit142,394  420  28   448  774  143,616  
Installment and other loans33,135  66  44   110   33,245  
Subtotal1,226,291  3,496  945   4,441  5,165  1,235,897  
Loans acquired with credit deterioration:
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied1,784   72   72   1,856  
Non-owner occupied650       650  
Multi-family717       717  
Non-owner occupied residential535       535  
Acquisition and development:
Commercial and land development192       192  
Commercial and industrial4,943  231    231   5,174  
Residential mortgage:
First lien1,971  382  42  53  477   2,448  
Home equity - term17       22  
Installment and other loans149  13    17   166  
Subtotal10,958  631  114  57  802   11,760  
$1,237,249  $4,127  $1,059  $57  $5,243  $5,165  $1,247,657  
The Company maintains its ALL at a level management believes adequate for probable incurred credit losses. The ALL is established and maintained through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Quarterly, management assesses the adequacy of the ALL utilizing a defined methodology which considers specific credit evaluation of impaired loans as discussed above, past loan loss historical experience, and qualitative factors. Management believes its approach properly addresses relevant accounting guidance for loans individually identified as impaired and for loans collectively evaluated for impairment, and other bank regulatory guidance.
In connection with its quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the ALL, management reviews its methodology to determine if it properly addresses the current risk in the loan portfolio. For each loan class, general allowances based on quantitative factors, principally historical loss trends, are provided for loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment. An adjustment to historical loss factors may be incorporated for delinquency and other potential risk not elsewhere defined within the ALL methodology.
In addition to this quantitative analysis, adjustments to the ALL requirements are allocated on loans collectively evaluated for impairment based on additional qualitative factors, including:
Nature and Volume of Loans – including loan growth in the current and subsequent quarters based on the Company’s targeted growth and strategic plan, coupled with the types of loans booked based on risk management and credit culture; the number of exceptions to loan policy; and supervisory loan to value exceptions.
Concentrations of Credit and Changes within Credit Concentrations – including the composition of the Company’s overall portfolio makeup and management's evaluation related to concentration risk management and the inherent risk associated with the concentrations identified.
Underwriting Standards and Recovery Practices – including changes to underwriting standards and perceived impact on anticipated losses; trends in the number of exceptions to loan policy; supervisory loan to value exceptions; and administration of loan recovery practices.
Delinquency Trends – including delinquency percentages noted in the portfolio relative to economic conditions; severity of the delinquencies; and whether the ratios are trending upwards or downwards.
Classified Loans Trends – including internal loan ratings of the portfolio; severity of the ratings; whether the loan segment’s ratings show a more favorable or less favorable trend; and underlying market conditions and impact on the collateral values securing the loans.
Experience, Ability and Depth of Management/Lending staff – including the years’ experience of senior and middle management and the lending staff; turnover of the staff; and instances of repeat criticisms of ratings.
Quality of Loan Review – including the years of experience of the loan review staff; in-house versus outsourced provider of review; turnover of staff and the perceived quality of their work in relation to other external information.
National and Local Economic Conditions – including trends in the consumer price index, unemployment rates, the housing price index, housing statistics compared to the prior year, bankruptcy rates, regulatory and legal environment risks and competition.
The following table presents the activity in the ALL for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.
CommercialConsumer
(Dollars in thousands)Commercial
Real Estate
Acquisition
and
Development
Commercial
and
Industrial
MunicipalTotalResidential
Mortgage
Installment
and Other
TotalUnallocatedTotal
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2019
Balance, beginning of period$6,847  $1,008  $2,120  $94  $10,069  $3,734  $209  $3,943  $448  $14,460  
Provision for loan losses465  (188) 269  (1) 545  27  50  77  (322) 300  
Charge-offs  (50)  (50) (24) (49) (73)  (123) 
Recoveries111   33   144   23  28   172  
Balance, end of period$7,423  $820  $2,372  $93  $10,708  $3,742  $233  $3,975  $126  $14,809  
September 30, 2018
Balance, beginning of period$6,680  $720  $1,598  $80  $9,078  $3,544  $230  $3,774  $585  $13,437  
Provision for loan losses194  19  (38) (1) 174  (45) 146  101  (75) 200  
Charge-offs(17)    (17) (62) (80) (142)  (159) 
Recoveries200     201  102  31  133   334  
Balance, end of period$7,057  $739  $1,561  $79  $9,436  $3,539  $327  $3,866  $510  $13,812  
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2019
Balance, beginning of period$6,876  $817  $1,656  $98  $9,447  $3,753  $244  $3,997  $570  $14,014  
Provision for loan losses347   753  (5) 1,096  184  64  248  (444) 900  
Charge-offs(25)  (140)  (165) (295) (121) (416)  (581) 
Recoveries225   103   330  100  46  146   476  
Balance, end of period$7,423  $820  $2,372  $93  $10,708  $3,742  $233  $3,975  $126  $14,809  
September 30, 2018
Balance, beginning of period$6,763  $417  $1,446  $84  $8,710  $3,400  $211  $3,611  $475  $12,796  
Provision for loan losses(217) 319  114  (5) 211  157  197  354  35  600  
Charge-offs(17)    (17) (148) (198) (346)  (363) 
Recoveries528     532  130  117  247   779  
Balance, end of period$7,057  $739  $1,561  $79  $9,436  $3,539  $327  $3,866  $510  $13,812  
The following table summarizes the ending loan balance individually evaluated for impairment based upon loan segment, as well as the related ALL loss allocation for each at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, including PCI loans.
 CommercialConsumer  
(Dollars in thousands)Commercial
Real Estate
Acquisition
and
Development
Commercial
and
Industrial
MunicipalTotalResidential
Mortgage
Installment
and Other
TotalUnallocatedTotal
September 30, 2019
Loans allocated by:
Individually evaluated for impairment
$3,566  $ $1,089  $ $4,655  $3,311  $ $3,318  $ $7,973  
Collectively evaluated for impairment
707,241  50,751  214,645  47,920  1,020,557  525,605  38,970  564,575   1,585,132  
$710,807  $50,751  $215,734  $47,920  $1,025,212  $528,916  $38,977  $567,893  $ $1,593,105  
ALL allocated by:
Individually evaluated for impairment
$ $ $ $ $ $36  $ $36  $ $36  
Collectively evaluated for impairment
7,423  820  2,372  93  10,708  3,706  233  3,939  126  14,773  
$7,423  $820  $2,372  $93  $10,708  $3,742  $233  $3,975  $126  $14,809  
December 31, 2018
Loans allocated by:
Individually evaluated for impairment
$2,320  $ $286  $ $2,606  $3,691  $ $3,691  $ $6,297  
Collectively evaluated for impairment
559,424  49,436  160,678  50,982  820,520  387,429  33,411  420,840   1,241,360  
$561,744  $49,436  $160,964  $50,982  $823,126  $391,120  $33,411  $424,531  $ $1,247,657  
ALL allocated by:
Individually evaluated for impairment
$ $ $ $ $ $38  $ $38  $ $38  
Collectively evaluated for impairment
6,876  817  1,656  98  9,447  3,715  244  3,959  570  13,976  
$6,876  $817  $1,656  $98  $9,447  $3,753  $244  $3,997  $570  $14,014  

The following table provides activity for the accretable yield of purchased credit impaired loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019.
Three Months EndedNine Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)September 30, 2019September 30, 2019
Accretable yield, beginning of period$4,988  $2,065  
New loans purchased 3,497  
Accretion of income(422) (1,814) 
Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference due to improvement in expected cash flows825  1,441  
Other changes, net319  521  
Accretable yield, end of period$5,710  $5,710