XML 59 R39.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.26.1

Impairment of long-lived assets | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2025
Notes and other explanatory information [abstract] |
Impairment of long-lived assets |
31 | Impairment of long-lived assets
Accounting policy Impairment of goodwill As part of the impairment testing procedures, the goodwill arising from a business combination is allocated to a CGU or groups of CGUs that are expected to benefit from the related business combination and is tested at the lowest level that goodwill is monitored by management. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment, regardless of whether there has been an impairment indicator or, more frequently, if circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recovered. Impairment of long-lived assets The Company assesses at each reporting date, whether there are indicators that the carrying amount of an asset or CGU, including goodwill balance, may not be recovered. If any indicator exists, such as a change in forecasted commodity prices, a significant increase in operational costs, a significant decrease in production volumes, a reduction in LOM, the cancelation or significant reduction in the scope of a project, foreign exchange rate, market conditions or unusual events that can affect the business, the Company estimates the recoverable amount of the assets or CGUs. The recoverable amount is estimated by reference to the higher of an assets or CGUs fair value less cost of disposal (“FVLCD”) and its value in use (“VIU”). The recoverable amount is determined for an individual asset unless the asset does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets or groups of assets, in which case, the asset is tested as part of a larger CGU to which it belongs. If the carrying amount of an asset or CGU exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset or CGU is considered impaired and is reduced to its recoverable amount. Non-financial assets other than goodwill that were adjusted due to impairment are subsequently reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date. Generally, the opposite of indicators that gave rise to an impairment loss would be considered indicators that impairment losses might have to be reversed. If the underlying reasons for the original impairment have been removed or the service potential of the asset or CGU has increased, an assessment of impairment reversals is performed by the Company. Reversals of impairment losses that arise simply from the passage of time or related with prior goodwill impairments are not recognized. For individual assets, if there is any indicator that an asset become unusable by damage or a decision that would lead the asset to not contribute economically to the Company, it is impaired. In addition, greenfield projects for which the Company decides to quit exploration and there is no expectation that in the future will bring cash inflows are also impaired. Impairment of exploration and evaluation costs and development projects costs Exploration assets (greenfields) representing mineral rights acquired in business combinations, mineral rights, and other capitalized exploration and evaluation costs, as well as development projects costs capitalized included in Property, plant and equipment are tested for impairment individually or allocated in aggregation with CGU or groups of CGUs that include producing assets, when applicable, through FVLCD when there are indicators that capitalized costs might not be recoverable. The allocation of exploration and evaluation costs, and development project costs to CGUs or group of CGUs is based on 1) expected synergies or share of producing assets infrastructure, assets and/or processing facilities 2) legal entity level, and 3) country level. When testing a CGU or a group of CGUs that include exploration and evaluation costs and development project costs, the Company performs the impairment test in two steps. In the first step, producing assets or group of producing assets, and exploration and evaluation costs and development projects costs that are not expected to share infrastructure assets are tested for impairment on an individual basis. In the second step, exploration and evaluation costs and development project costs that shared infrastructure assets and/or processing facilities are allocated to a CGU or a group of CGUs and tested for impairment on a combined basis. Valuation methods and assumptions for recoverable amount based on FVLCD FVLCD FVLCD is an estimate of the price that the Company would receive to sell an asset, CGU or group of CGUs in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, less the cost of disposal. FVLCD is not an entity-specific measurement but is focused on market participants’ assumptions for a particular asset when pricing the asset. FVLCD is estimated by the Company using discounted cash flows techniques (using a post-tax discount rate) and market past transaction multiples (amount paid per ton of minerals for projects in similar stages) for greenfield projects for which resources allocation is under review, although the Company considers observable inputs, a substantial portion of the assumptions used in the calculations are unobservable. These cash flows are classified as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. No CGUs are currently assessed for impairment by reference to a recoverable amount based on FVLCD classified as level 1 or level 2. VIU VIU is determined as the present value of the estimated future cash flows expected to arise from the continued use of the asset in its current condition and its residual value. VIU is determined by applying assumptions specific to the Company’s continued use and does not consider enhancements or future developments. These assumptions are different from those used in calculating FVLCD and consequently the VIU calculation is likely to give a different result (usually lower) than a FVLCD calculation. Additionally, it is applied to the estimated future cash flows a pre-tax discount rate. Forecast assumptions The cash flow forecasts are based on management’s best estimates of expected future revenues and costs, including the future cash costs of production, capital expenditure, and closure, restoration, and environmental costs. The resulting estimates are based on detailed LOM and long-term production plans. When calculating FVLCD, these forecasts include capital and operating expenditures related to expansions and restructurings of both brownfield and greenfield projects that a market participant would consider in seeking to obtain the highest and best use of the asset, considering their evaluation, eventual changes in their scope or feasibility, and their development stage. The cash flow forecasts may include net cash flows expected to be realized from the extraction, processing and sale of material that does not currently qualify for inclusion in ore reserves. Such non-reserve material is only included if the Company has a high level of confidence that it will be converted to reserves. This expectation is usually based on preliminary drilling and sampling of areas of mineralization that are contiguous with existing ore reserves, as well as on the historical internal conversion ratio. Typically, the additional evaluation required for conversion to reserves of such material has not yet been done because this would involve incurring evaluation costs earlier than is required for the efficient planning and operation of the producing mine. For purposes of determining FVLCD from a market participant’s perspective, the cash flows incorporate management’s internal price forecasts that also reflects the view of market participants. The internal price forecasts are developed using a robust model that incorporates market-based supply, demand and cost data. The internal price forecasts used for ore reserve estimation testing and the Company’s strategic planning are generally consistent with those used for the impairment testing. Cost levels incorporated in the cash flow forecasts are based on the current LOM plan and long-term production plan for the CGU, which are based on detailed research, analysis and iterative modeling to optimize the level of return from investment, output and sequence of extraction. The mine plan considers all relevant characteristics of the orebody, including waste-to-ore ratios, ore grades, haul distances, chemical and metallurgical properties of the ore, process recoveries and capacities of processing equipment that can be used. The LOM plan and long-term production plans are, therefore, the basis for forecasting production output and production costs in each future year. The discount rates applied to the future cash flow forecasts represent the Company’s estimate of the rate that a market participant would apply to the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the future cash flow estimates have not been adjusted. The Company’s weighted average cost of capital is generally used for determining the discount rates, with appropriate adjustments for the risk profile of the countries in which the individual CGUs operate. With respect to the estimated future cash flows of capitalized exploration assets and development projects, for some assets the Company applies a price to net assets value ratio discount in order to reflect the inherent risk of such projects and that are neither adjusted in the discount rate nor in the future cash flows. The discount is based on the stage of the project and the type of metal. Critical accounting estimates, assumptions and judgments - Impairment of long-lived assets Impairment is assessed at the CGU level. A CGU is the smallest identifiable asset or group of assets that generates independent cash inflows. Judgment is applied to identify the Company’s CGUs, particularly when assets belong to integrated operations, and changes in CGUs could impact impairment charges and reversals. External and internal factors are quarterly monitored for impairment indicators. Judgment is required to determine, for example, whether the impact of adverse spot commodity price movements is significant and structural in nature. Also, the Company’s assessment of whether internal factors, such as an increase in production costs and delays in projects, result in impairment indicators requires significant judgment. Among others, the long-term zinc price, foreign exchange rate considering Brazilian real (BRL) per US dollar (USD) for Brazilian operations, and the discount rate may have a significant impact on the Company’s’ impairment estimations. The process of estimating the recoverable amount involves the use of assumptions, judgment and projections for future cash flows. These calculations use cash flow projections based on financial and operational budgets for a five-year period. After the five-year period, the cash flows are extended until the end of the useful LOM or indefinitely for the smelters. The smelters cash flows do not use growth rates in the cash flow projections of the terminal value. Management’s assumptions and estimates of future cash flows used for the Company’s impairment testing of goodwill and long-lived assets are subject to risk and uncertainties, including metal prices and macroeconomic conditions, which are particularly volatile and partially or totally outside the Company’s control. Future changes in these variables may differ from management’s expectations and may materially change the recoverable amounts of the CGUs. Impairment test analysis Throughout 2025, the Company, at each reporting date, assessed whether there were indicators that the carrying amount of an asset, goodwill, or cash generation unit (CGU) might not be recoverable, or if a previously recorded impairment needed to be reversed for its entire CGU located in Brazil and Peru. Goodwill assessment During 2025 Nexa conducted its annual impairment test for the CGUs to which goodwill has been previously allocated including Mining Peru group of CGUs (composed of Cerro Pasco and Cerro Lindo CGUs), Cajamarquilla and Juiz de Fora in accordance with the assumptions and projections outlined in the Company’s strategic planning process. As a result, no impairment was identified. Cerro Pasco CGU The Company identified indicators of reversal, primarily driven by the increase of short-term and long-term metal prices. As a result, an impairment reversal of USD 108,005 was recognized at the CGU Cerro Pasco against the income statement. Impairment test summary In summary, for the year 2025, Nexa recognized the following impairment loss/reversal:
Schedule of impairment (losses) reversals |  |  |
Impairment (losses) reversals | 2025 | 2024 | 2023
Magistral Project | - | (58,435) | -
Cerro Pasco CGU | 108,005 | 22,206 | (42,660)
Morro Agudo | - | 10,291 | (59,002)
Pukaqaqa Project | - | 3,978 | -
Other individual assets | (16,299) | (10,910) | (12,976)
Total | 91,706 | (32,870) | (114,643)
(a) | Key assumptions used in impairment tests
The recoverable amounts for each CGU were determined based on the FVLCD method, which were higher than those determined based on the VIU method. The Company identified long-term metal prices, discount rate, exchange rate considering Brazilian real (BRL), and LOM as key assumptions in determining the recoverable amounts, due to the material impact such assumptions may have on the recoverable value. Part of these assumptions are summarized below:
Schedule of key assumptions used in impairment test |  |  |  |
| 2025 | 2024 |  | 2023
Long-term zinc price (USD/t) | 3,120 | 2,930 |  | 2,800
Discount rate (Peru) | 7.08% | 7.08% |  | 7.22%
Discount rate (Brazil) | 7.63% | 7.64% |  | 8.02%
Exchange rate (BRL x USD) | 5.43 | 5.66 |  | 4.84
Brownfield projects - LOM (years) | From 3 to 25 | From 3 to 25 |  | From 4 to 21
(i) Although LOM is a key assumption, based on current facts and circumstances, including recent historical information, management does not consider a change in this assumption to be reasonably possible. Historically, LOM has remained stable or increased by one to two years, and given the current stage of mining operations, a significant reduction in LOM is not expected.
(b) | Impairment reversal – Cerro Pasco CGU
As mentioned above, the impairment reversal was identified at the CGU level, not being directly related to a single asset. Then, the impairment reversal was allocated on a pro-rata basis to the following assets:
Schedule of impairment reversal cerro pasco CGU |  |  |
| Carrying amount prior to impairment reversal | Impairment reversal | Carrying amount after impairment reversal
Property, plant and equipment | 292,466 | 17,448 | 309,914
Intangible assets | 155,528 | 90,558 | 246,086
Other net liabilities | (53,772) | - | (53,772)
| 394,222 | 108,005 | 502,228
The Company performed a stress test on the key assumptions used in the calculation of the recoverable amount of the CGU Cerro Pasco as follows:
Schedule of key assumptions used recoverable amount |  |  |  |
Scenario | Impairment Reversal | Excess over recoverable amount | Current Long-term zinc price (USD/t) | Current Discount rate (Peru)
Base case | 108,005 | 33,502 | 3,120 | 7.08%
Schedule of after stress test scenario |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Assumption | Stress test Scenario | Stress on Assumption |  | After Stress test scenario
| Impairment Reversal | Impact |  | Excess over recoverable amount | Impact
Long-term zinc price (USD/t) | 5% Decrease | 2,964 |  | 75,328 | (32,677) |  | - | (33,502)
Discount rate (Peru) | 5% Increase | 7.43% |  | 108,005 | - |  | 18,643 | (14,859)
(c) | Sensitivity analysis –Tested CGUs and Cajamarquilla Goodwill
The Company estimated the amount by which the value assigned to the key assumptions must change in order for the assessed CGU recoverable amount, which was not impaired, to be equal to its carrying amount:
Schedule of sensitivity analysis |  |  |  |  |  |  |
CGU | Excess over recoverable amount | Decrease in Long term Zinc (USD/t) | Increase in WACC | Appreciation of BRL over USD(i)
Change | Price | Change | Rate | Change | Price
Três Marias System | 458,634 | (14.41%) | 2,670 | 111.02% | 14.94% | (13.46%) | 4.70
Juiz de Fora | 51,351 | (8.04%) | 2,869 | 24.96% | 8.85% | (3.77%) | 5.23
Aripuaña | 633,312 | (30.26%) | 2,176 | 113.29% | 15.10% | (22.70%) | 4.20
Cerro Pasco | 33,502 | (2.53%) | 3,041 | 11.54% | 8.51% | - | -
Cerro Lindo | 431,471 | (36.33%) | 1,987 | 133.08% | 17.78% | - | -
Mining Peru | 258,550 | (11.24%) | 2,769 | 43.88% | 10.98% | - | -
Cajamarquilla | 730,640 | (51.36%) | 1,518 | 94.11% | 14.81% | - | -
(i) These analyses are only applicable to Três Marias System, Juiz de Fora and Aripuanã CGUs, as these are in Brazil and their functional currency is BRL. Therefore, the appreciation of BRL over USD impacts the operational cost and expense, reducing the recoverable amount of these CGUs in USD, for consolidated purposes.

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for the impairment of assets. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Name IAS -Number 36 -IssueDate 2024-01-01 -Section Disclosure -URI https://taxonomy.ifrs.org/xifrs-link?type=IAS&num=36&code=ifrs-tx-2024-en-r&doctype=Standard&dita_xref=IAS36_g126-137_TI -URIDate 2024-03-27 + Details
Name: | ifrs-full_DisclosureOfImpairmentOfAssetsExplanatory
Namespace Prefix: | ifrs-full_
Data Type: | dtr-2022:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | ifrs-full_NotesAndOtherExplanatoryInformationAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | ifrs-full_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration