XML 30 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.22.2.2

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS | 3 Months Ended
--- | ---
Mar. 31, 2022
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS |
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS | 14. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS Derivative Financial Instruments On February 2, 2012, the Company entered into a master interest rate swap agreement. The Company elected not to designate the interest rate swap agreements as cash flow hedges and, therefore, gains or losses on the agreements as well as the other offsetting gains or losses on the hedged items attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in current earnings. ASC 815-10, Derivatives and Hedging, requires derivative instruments to be measured at fair value and recorded in the statements of financial position as either assets or liabilities. The Company entered into interest rate swap agreement with Capital One Bank on June 12, 2017 to fix the variable rate portion for $8,000 of the line of credit. This interest rate swap agreement matured on May 11, 2020. Fair Value Measurements The Company accounts for its investments and derivative instruments in accordance with ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurement, which among other things provides the framework for measuring fair value. That framework provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level I measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level III measurements). The three levels of fair value hierarchy under ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurement, are as follows: Level I Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level II Significant observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for which inputs to the valuation methodology include: (1) Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; (2) Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets; (3) Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable; (4) Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, the Level II input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. Level III Significant unobservable inputs that reflect an entity’s own assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities. The asset or liability fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company has used derivatives to manage risks related to interest rate movements. The Company does not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes. Interest rate swap contracts are recognized as assets or liabilities on the balance sheets and are measured at fair value. The fair value was calculated and provided by the lender, a Level II valuation technique. Management reviewed the fair values for the instruments as provided by the lender and determined the related asset and liability to be an accurate estimate of future gains and losses to the Company. The Company is not a party to any interest rate swaps as of March 31, 2022. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, consumer loans, MHP Notes, other note receivables, accounts payable, lines of credit, notes payable, and dealer portion of consumer loans. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate their respective fair values because of the short-term maturities or expected settlement dates of these instruments. This is considered a Level I valuation technique. The lines of credit, notes payable, part of the MHP Notes and part of the other note receivables have variable interest rates that reflect market rates and their fair value approximates their carrying value. This is considered a Level II valuation technique. The Company also assessed the fair value of the consumer loans receivable, the fixed rate MHP Notes and the portion of other note receivables with fixed rates based on the discounted value of the remaining principal and interest cash flows. The Company determined that the fair value of the consumer loan portfolio was approximately $127,600 compared to the book value of $127,259 as of March 31, 2022, and a fair value of approximately $125,600 compared to the book value of $125,623 as of December 31, 2021. The Company determined that the fair value of the fixed rate MHP Notes was approximately $92,000 compared to the book value of $97,782 as of March 31, 2022, and a fair value of approximately $83,000 compared to the book value of $83,773 as of December 31, 2021. The Company determined that the fair value of the other notes was approximately $33,300 compared to the book value of $38,748 as of March 31, 2022, and a fair value of approximately $38,500 compared to the book value of $38,886 as of December 31, 2021. This is a Level III valuation technique. ​

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | legh_DerivativeFinancialInstrumentsAndFairValueMeasurementsAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | legh_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure of information relating to derivative financial instruments and fair value measurements. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | legh_DerivativeFinancialInstrumentsAndFairValueMeasurementsDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | legh_
Data Type: | dtr-types:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration