10-Q 1 mndl-10q_20140930.htm 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014

or

¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 001-35958

MANDALAY DIGITAL GROUP, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware |  | 22-2267658
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2811 Cahuenga Boulevard West Los Angeles, CA |  | 90068
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |  | (Zip Code)

(323) 472-5461

(Issuer’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of a “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One)

Large Accelerated Filer | ¨ |  |  | Accelerated Filer |  | ¨
Non-accelerated Filer | ¨ | (do not check if smaller reporting company) |  | Smaller Reporting Company |  | x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of November 12, 2014, the Company had 37,797,221 shares of its common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, outstanding.

MANDALAY DIGITAL GROUP, INC.

FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2014

Table of Contents

|  |  |  | Page
|  | PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION |  |
Item 1. |  | Consolidated Financial Statements |  | 1
|  | Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2014 (Unaudited) and March 31, 2014 |  | 1
|  | Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited) For the Six Month Period Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 |  | 2
|  | Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited) for the Six Month Period Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 |  | 3
|  | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) For the Six Month Period Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 |  | 4
|  | Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements |  | 5
Item 2. |  | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |  | 24
Item 3. |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |  | 33
Item 4 |  | Controls and Procedures |  | 33
|  | PART II – OTHER INFORMATION |  |
Item 1. |  | Legal Proceedings |  | 35
Item 2. |  | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |  | 35
Item 3. |  | Defaults |  | 35
Item 4. |  | Mine Safety Disclosures |  | 35
Item 5. |  | Other Information |  | 35
Item 6. |  | Exhibits |  | 36
Signatures |  | 37

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Mandalay Digital Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

| (unaudited) |  |  |  |  |
| September 30, |  |  | March 31, |
| 2014 |  |  | 2014 |
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 16,715 |  |  | $ | 21,805 |
Restricted cash |  | 200 |  |  |  | 200 |
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $0 and $0, respectively |  | 4,337 |  |  |  | 5,102 |
Deposits |  | 86 |  |  |  | 24 |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |  | 349 |  |  |  | 350 |
Total current assets |  | 21,687 |  |  |  | 27,481 |
Property and equipment, net |  | 422 |  |  |  | 465 |
Deferred tax assets |  | 541 |  |  |  | 3,238 |
Intangible assets, net |  | 6,913 |  |  |  | 9,074 |
Goodwill |  | 6,309 |  |  |  | 4,837 |
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 35,872 |  |  | $ | 45,095 |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable | $ | 3,817 |  |  | $ | 2,943 |
Accrued license fees |  | 2,373 |  |  |  | 3,395 |
Accrued compensation |  | 2,122 |  |  |  | 1,681 |
Deferred tax liabilities |  | 1,024 |  |  |  | 2,987 |
Other current liabilities |  | 708 |  |  |  | 900 |
Total current liabilities |  | 10,044 |  |  |  | 11,906 |
Long term contingent liability, less discount of $0 and $762, respectively |  | - |  |  |  | 238 |
Total liabilities | $ | 10,044 |  |  | $ | 12,144 |
Stockholders' equity |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Preferred stock |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series A convertible preferred stock at $0.0001 par value; 200,000 shares authorized, 100,000 issued and outstanding (liquidation preference of $1,000,000) |  | 100 |  |  |  | 100 |
Common stock, $0.0001 par value: 200,000,000 shares authorized; 38,538,403 issued and 37,783,804 outstanding at September 30, 2014; 38,143,028 issued and 37,388,429 outstanding at March 31, 2014; |  | 7 |  |  |  | 7 |
Additional paid-in capital |  | 196,040 |  |  |  | 193,422 |
Treasury Stock (754,600 shares at September 30, 2014 and March 31, 2014) |  | (71 | ) |  |  | (71 | )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |  | (129 | ) |  |  | (199 | )
Accumulated deficit |  | (170,119 | ) |  |  | (160,308 | )
Total stockholders' equity |  | 25,828 |  |  |  | 32,951 |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | $ | 35,872 |  |  | $ | 45,095 |

1

Mandalay Digital Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

|  | 3 Months Ended |  |  | 3 Months Ended |  |  | 6 Months Ended |  |  | 6 Months Ended |
|  | September 30, |  |  | September 30, |  |  | September 30, |  |  | September 30, |
|  | 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2013 |
Net revenues |  | $ | 5,462 |  |  | $ | 6,759 |  |  | $ | 11,016 |  |  | $ | 11,543 |
Cost of revenues |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
License fees |  |  | 3,316 |  |  |  | 3,919 |  |  |  | 7,112 |  |  |  | 6,633 |
Other direct cost of revenues |  |  | 345 |  |  |  | 456 |  |  |  | 689 |  |  |  | 859 |
Total cost of revenues |  |  | 3,661 |  |  |  | 4,375 |  |  |  | 7,801 |  |  |  | 7,492 |
Gross profit |  |  | 1,801 |  |  |  | 2,384 |  |  |  | 3,215 |  |  |  | 4,051 |
Operating expenses |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Product development |  |  | 2,155 |  |  |  | 2,407 |  |  |  | 4,114 |  |  |  | 3,995 |
Sales and marketing |  |  | 743 |  |  |  | 536 |  |  |  | 1,504 |  |  |  | 909 |
General and administrative |  |  | 3,548 |  |  |  | 3,293 |  |  |  | 6,922 |  |  |  | 7,092 |
Total operating expenses |  |  | 6,446 |  |  |  | 6,236 |  |  |  | 12,540 |  |  |  | 11,996 |
Loss from operations |  |  | (4,645 | ) |  |  | (3,852 | ) |  |  | (9,325 | ) |  |  | (7,945 | )
Interest and other income / (expense) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest income / (expense) |  |  | (131 | ) |  |  | (194 | ) |  |  | (128 | ) |  |  | (1,633 | )
Foreign exchange transaction gain / (loss) |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  | 27 |  |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  | 56 |
Change in fair value of warrant derivative liabilities gain / (loss) |  |  | - |  |  |  | (811 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | (811 | )
Loss on extinguishment of debt |  |  | - |  |  |  | (442 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | (442 | )
Gain / (loss) on settlement of debt |  |  | - |  |  |  | 33 |  |  |  | (10 | ) |  |  | 33 |
Gain/ (loss) on disposal of fixed assets |  |  | - |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 2 |
Gain on change on valuation of long term contingent liability |  |  | - |  |  |  | 603 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 603 |
Other income |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 12 |  |  |  | - |
Interest and other expense |  |  | (129 | ) |  |  | (780 | ) |  |  | (131 | ) |  |  | (2,192 | )
Loss from operations before income taxes |  |  | (4,774 | ) |  |  | (4,632 | ) |  |  | (9,456 | ) |  |  | (10,137 | )
Income tax provision / (benefit) |  |  | 427 |  |  |  | 85 |  |  |  | 355 |  |  |  | 2 |
Net loss from continuing operations, net of taxes |  |  | (5,201 | ) |  |  | (4,717 | ) |  |  | (9,811 | ) |  |  | (10,139 | )
Loss from operations of discontinued component |  |  | - |  |  |  | (1,505 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | (1,769 | )
Net (loss)/profit |  | $ | (5,201 | ) |  | $ | (6,222 | ) |  | $ | (9,811 | ) |  | $ | (11,908 | )
Other comprehensive income: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |  | $ | 32 |  |  | $ | 333 |  |  | $ | 70 |  |  | $ | 438 |
Comprehensive loss: |  | $ | (5,169 | ) |  | $ | (5,889 | ) |  | $ | (9,741 | ) |  | $ | (11,470 | )
Basic and diluted net loss per common share |  | $ | (0.14 | ) |  | $ | (0.25 | ) |  | $ | (0.26 | ) |  | $ | (0.53 | )
Continuing operations |  | $ | (0.14 | ) |  | $ | (0.19 | ) |  | $ | (0.26 | ) |  | $ | (0.45 | )
Discontinued operations |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | (0.06 | ) |  | $ | - |  |  | $ | (0.08 | )
Net loss |  | $ | (0.14 | ) |  | $ | (0.25 | ) |  | $ | (0.26 | ) |  | $ | (0.53 | )
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted |  |  | 37,504 |  |  |  | 25,232 |  |  |  | 37,464 |  |  |  | 22,636 |

2

Mandalay Digital Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share amounts)

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accumulated |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Additional |  |  | Other |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Common Stock |  |  |  |  |  |  | Preferred Stock |  |  |  |  |  |  | Treasury Stock |  |  |  |  |  |  | Paid-In |  |  | Comprehensive |  |  | Accumulated |  |  |  |  |
| Shares |  |  | Amount |  |  | Shares |  |  | Amount |  |  | Shares |  |  | Amount |  |  | Capital |  |  | Income/(Loss) |  |  | Deficit |  |  | Total |
Balance at March 31, 2014 |  | 37,388,429 |  |  |  | 7 |  |  |  | 100,000 |  |  |  | 100 |  |  |  | 754,600 |  |  |  | (71 | ) |  |  | 193,422 |  |  |  | (199 | ) |  |  | (160,308 | ) |  |  | 32,951 |
Net loss |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (4,610 | ) |  |  | (4,610 | )
Foreign currency translation |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 38 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 38 |
Vesting of shares issued to employee |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 100 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 100 |
Vesting of options issued to employees |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 718 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 718 |
Vesting of restricted stock for services |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 76 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 76 |
Shares issued as settlement of debt |  | 50,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 188 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 188 |
Balance at June 30, 2014 |  | 37,438,429 |  |  |  | 7 |  |  |  | 100,000 |  |  |  | 100 |  |  |  | 754,600 |  |  |  | (71 | ) |  |  | 194,504 |  |  |  | (161 | ) |  |  | (164,918 | ) |  |  | 29,461 |
Net loss |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (5,201 | ) |  |  | (5,201 | )
Foreign currency translation |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 32 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 32 |
Vesting of shares issued to employee |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 100 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 100 |
Vesting of options issued to employees |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 889 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 889 |
Vesting of restricted stock for services |  | 45,375 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 172 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 172 |
Warrant exercised |  | 300,000 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 375 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 375 |
Vesting of shares issued |  | 37,783,804 |  |  |  | 7 |  |  |  | 100,000 |  |  |  | 100 |  |  |  | 754,600 |  |  |  | (71 | ) |  |  | 196,040 |  |  |  | (129 | ) |  |  | (170,119 | ) |  |  | 25,828 |

3

Mandalay Digital Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)

(In thousands)

| 6 Months Ended |  |  | 6 Months Ended |
| September 30, |  |  | September 30, |
| 2014 |  |  | 2013 |
Cash flows from operating activities |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net (loss)/income | $ | (9,811 | ) |  | $ | (11,908 | )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of taxes |  | - |  |  |  | 1,653 |
Depreciation and amortization |  | 737 |  |  |  | 1,037 |
Amortization of debt discount |  | - |  |  |  | 186 |
Interest and PIK interest accrued |  | - |  |  |  | 36 |
Finance costs |  | - |  |  |  | 1,869 |
Stock and Stock option compensation |  | 1,807 |  |  |  | 410 |
Stock issued for services |  | 248 |  |  |  | 1,803 |
Warrants issued for services |  | - |  |  |  | 406 |
Revaluation of contingent liability |  | - |  |  |  | (603 | )
Increase / (decrease) in fair value of derivative liabilities |  | - |  |  |  | 811 |
(Increase) / decrease in assets, net of effect of disposal of subsidiary: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts receivable |  | 764 |  |  |  | (1,011 | )
Deposits |  | (62 | ) |  |  | 515 |
Deferred tax assets |  | 2,697 |  |  |  | - |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |  | 1 |  |  |  | 142 |
Increase / (decrease) in liabilities, net of effect of disposal of subsidiary: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable |  | 875 |  |  |  | 418 |
Accrued license fees |  | (1,022 | ) |  |  | 2,607 |
Accrued compensation |  | 442 |  |  |  | 151 |
Other liabilities and other items |  | (2,155 | ) |  |  | (2,415 | )
Net cash used in operating activities |  | (5,479 | ) |  |  | (3,893 | )
Cash flows from investing activities |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Purchase of property and equipment |  | (6 | ) |  |  | (31 | )
Settlement of contingent liability |  | 11 |  |  |  | - |
Cash used in acquisition of subsidiary |  | - |  |  |  | (1,287 | )
Cash acquired with acquisition of subsidiary |  | - |  |  |  | 513 |
Net cash used in investing activities |  | 5 |  |  |  | (805 | )
Cash flows from financing activities |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Repayment of debt obligations |  | - |  |  |  | (3,657 | )
Issuance of shares for cash |  | - |  |  |  | 14,924 |
Warrant exercised |  | 375 |  |  |  | - |
Net cash provided by financing activities |  | 375 |  |  |  | 11,267 |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |  | 9 |  |  |  | 88 |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |  | (5,090 | ) |  |  | 6,657 |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |  | 21,805 |  |  |  | 1,149 |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 16,715 |  |  | $ | 7,806 |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Taxes paid | $ | - |  |  | $ | - |
Noncash investing and financing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Contingency earn out on acquisition of subsidiary, net of discount | $ | - |  |  | $ | 238 |
Common stock of the Company issued for acquisition of subsidiary | $ | - |  |  | $ | 4,449 |

4

Mandalay Digital Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(all numbers in thousands except share and per share amounts)

1. Organization

Mandalay Digital Group, Inc. (“we”, “us”, “our”, the “Company” or “Mandalay Digital”), formerly NeuMedia, Inc. (“NeuMedia”), formerly Mandalay Media, Inc. (“Mandalay Media”) and formerly Mediavest, Inc. (“Mediavest”), through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Digital Turbine USA, Inc. (“DT USA”), provides end to end mobile content solutions for wireless carriers and OEMs globally to enable them to better monetize their subscribers. The Company’s products include mobile application management through DT Ignite, user experience and discovery through DT IQ, application stores and content through DT Content and mobile payments through DT Pay. With global headquarters in Los Angeles, and offices throughout the U.S., Asia Pacific and EMEA, Mandalay Digital’s solutions are available worldwide.

The Company was originally incorporated in the State of Delaware on November 6, 1998 under the name eB2B Commerce, Inc. On April 27, 2000, it merged into DynamicWeb Enterprises Inc., a New Jersey corporation. On April 13, 2005, the Company changed its name to Mediavest, Inc. Through January 26, 2005, the Company and its former subsidiaries were engaged in providing business-to-business transaction management services designed to simplify trading between buyers and suppliers. The Company was inactive from January 26, 2005 until its merger with Twistbox Entertainment, Inc., on February 12, 2008. On September 14, 2007, Mediavest was re-incorporated in the State of Delaware. On November 7, 2007 the Company changed its name to Mandalay Media, Inc. On May 11, 2010, the Company merged with a wholly-owned, newly formed subsidiary, changing its name to NeuMedia, Inc. On February 6, 2012, the Company merged with a wholly-owned, newly formed subsidiary, changing its name to Mandalay Digital Group, Inc.

On October 23, 2008, the Company completed an acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding share capital of AMV Holding Limited, a United Kingdom private limited company (“AMV”), and 80% of the issued and outstanding share capital of Fierce Media Ltd (“Fierce”).

On May 10, 2010, an administrator was appointed over AMV in the UK, at the request of the Company’s senior debt holder. As from that date, AMV and its subsidiaries were considered to be a discontinued operation. AMV and its subsidiaries were subsequently disposed.

On May 11, 2010, Mandalay Media merged into NeuMedia, with NeuMedia as the surviving corporation.

On December 28, 2011 the Company entered into a Share Purchase Agreement to acquire the assets of Digital Turbine LLC through its newly formed wholly owned subsidiary, Digital Turbine, Inc. The Company purchased the Digital Turbine LLC assets with 10,000 shares of common stock of the Company, with a fair value of $30,500 on the date of grant. On September 19, 2014, the Company changed the name of Digital Turbine, Inc. to Digital Turbine USA, Inc.

On July 27, 2012, the Company formed a wholly-owned Israeli acquisition/holding company, Digital Turbine (EMEA) Ltd. (“DT EMEA”) (formerly M.D.G. Logia Holdings LTD).

On August 15, 2012, the Company amended its charter with the state of Delaware to increase the total number of shares of common stock of the Company to 200,000,000 and the total number of shares of preferred stock of the Company to 2,000,000.

On September 13, 2012, the Company completed an acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding share capital of three operating subsidiaries of Logia Group Ltd (“Sellers”) (Logia Content Development and Management Ltd. (“Logia Content”), Volas Entertainment Ltd. (“Volas”) and Mail Bit Logia (2008) Ltd. (“Mail Bit”), (collectively, the “Targets”). In addition, the Company, by assignment to the acquisition entity, Digital Turbine (EMEA) Ltd (“DT EMEA”) acquired the assets of LogiaDeck Ltd (an affiliate of the Seller, “LogiaDeck”), comprised of the “LogiaDeck” software, which the Company has rebranded “DT Ignite”, and certain operator and other contracts related to the business of the Targets that were originally entered into by the Sellers. Pursuant to the Logia purchase agreement, the Company purchased 23% of the outstanding shares of the Targets and DT EMEA purchased 77% of such shares. On November 7, 2012, the Company contributed all of its shares of the Targets to DT EMEA pursuant to a Contribution Agreement among the Company, DT USA and DT EMEA. The acquired business of the Targets and DT Ignite are collectively referred to as “DT EMEA” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

5

On March 28, 2013 and April 9, 2013, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment and Certificate of Correction of Certificate of Amendment of its Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Amendment”), with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, to effect a 1-for-5 reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”). The Certificate of Amendment, as corrected, became effective as of April 12, 2013.

As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, every five (5) shares of our pre-Reverse Stock Split common stock were combined and reclassified into one (1) share of our common stock. Our post-Reverse Stock Split common stock began trading on April 15, 2013 with a new CUSIP number of 562562-207. The Reverse Stock Split did not change the authorized number of shares or the par value of our common stock.

On April 12, 2013, the Company, through its indirect, wholly owned subsidiary organized under the laws of Australia, Digital Turbine Group Pty Ltd (“DT APAC”), acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of Mirror Image International Holdings Pty Ltd (“MIAH”). MIAH owns direct or indirect subsidiaries Mirror Image Access (Australia) Pty Ltd (MIA), MIA Technology Australia Pty Ltd (MIATA) and MIA Technology IP Pty Ltd (together with the MIAH, the “MIA Group”). The acquired business of the MIA Group is referred to as “DT APAC” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

On February 13, 2014, the Company sold 100% of the issued and outstanding share capital of Twistbox.

On March 17, 2014, the Company created a new entity in Singapore named Digital Turbine Singapore Pte. Ltd. (“DT Singapore”).

On October 8, 2014, the Company created a new entity in Luxembourg named Digital Turbine Luxembourg S.a r.l. (“DT Luxembourg”). On October 9, 2014, DT Luxembourg, acquired certain intellectual property assets of Xyologic Mobile Analysis, GmbH, registered with the district court for Berlin Charlottenberg, Germany ("XYO"), related to mobile application (“app”) recommendation, search and discovery. In addition, DT Luxembourg acquired certain other assets of XYO related to its relationships with carriers. The aggregate purchase price was US $2,500,000, paid in cash, subject to a twelve (12) month holdback of US $375,000, which acts as partial security for indemnities related to certain representations and warranties made by XYO and the Founders to DT Luxembourg in the Asset Purchase Agreement.

On October 13, 2014, the Company created a new entity in Germany named Digital Turbine Germany GmbH. (“DT Germany”).

2. Liquidity

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern.

Our primary sources of liquidity have historically been issuance of common and preferred stock and convertible debt. In fiscal year 2014, the Company raised $33.3 million, through equity financings. Our current cash resources appear to be sufficient to fund our planned operations for at least the next twelve months.

Until we become cash flow positive, we anticipate that our primary sources of liquidity will be cash on hand. In addition, we may make acquisitions or license products and technologies complementary to our business and may need to raise additional capital through future debt or equity financing to provide for greater flexibility to fund any such acquisitions and licensing activities. Additional financing may not be available on acceptable terms or at all. If we issue additional equity securities to raise funds, the ownership percentage of our existing stockholders would be reduced. New investors may demand rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of common stock.

In view of the matters described in the preceding paragraph, recoverability of a major portion of the recorded asset amounts shown in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet is dependent upon continued operations of the Company, which, in turn, is dependent upon the Company’s ability to generate positive cash flows from operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue its existence.

6

3. Acquisitions

DT APAC

On April 12, 2013, Mandalay Digital, through its indirect wholly owned subsidiary DT APAC, acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of Mirror Image Australia Holdings, which directly or indirectly owns subsidiaries Mirror Image Access (Australia) Pty Ltd, MIA Technology Australia Pty Ltd and MIA Technology IP Pty Ltd.

The purpose of the DT APAC acquisition was an effort not only to build on the Company’s current distribution network, but to enhance its mobile content infrastructure with the IP acquired in the purchase.

The acquisition of DT APAC was capitalized through a combination of intercompany debt and the issuance of equity.

The purchase consideration for the transaction was comprised of cash, a note, and common stock of the Company, as follows:

(1) | At closing AUD 1,220 in cash, translated to $1,287 for U.S. GAAP reporting purposes;

(2) | Convertible Note payable of AUD 2,280, translated to $2,404;

(3) | Shares of common stock of the Company (the “Closing Shares”) equivalent to AUD 3,500, translated to $3,691 and under the agreement, converted to shares at $3.65 per share, or 1,011,164 shares of the common stock of the Company. The closing price of the stock on that day was $4.40 per share, for a total value of $4,449.

The Closing Shares are subject to a Registration Rights Agreement that provides for piggyback rights for 3 years and inclusion on the Company’s Form S-3 filed August 30, 2013, and subsequently made effective on October 31, 2013.

The following table summarizes the final fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition.

| Unaudited |
Cash | $ | 513 |
Accounts receivable |  | 2,809 |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |  | 896 |
Property, plant and equipment |  | 300 |
Customer relationships |  | 1,600 |
Developed technology |  | 3,400 |
Trade names / trademarks |  | 54 |
Library |  | 300 |
Goodwill |  | 2,654 |
Accounts payable |  | (1,151 | )
Accrued liabilities |  | (2,890 | )
Accrued compensation |  | (345 | )
Purchase price | $ | 8,140 |

In addition to the value assigned to the acquired workforce, the Company recorded the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the assets acquired as an increase in goodwill. This goodwill arises because the purchase price reflects the strategic fit and resulting synergies that the acquired business brings to the Company’s existing operations. In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $54 to write down trade names pursuant to its decision to rename and rebrand DT APAC. In the period ended June 30, 2014, the Company finalized the purchase price allocation of DT APAC, which resulted in an adjustment from intangibles to goodwill of $1,472.

7

The amortization period for the intangible assets acquired in the DT APAC transaction is as follows:

| Remaining
| Useful Life
Customer relationships | 14 years
Developed technology | 5 years
Trade names / Trademarks | 5 years
Library | 5 years
Goodwill | Indefinite

4. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for quarterly and annual financial statements. The financial statements, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations, financial position and cash flows for each period presented.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenues are derived primarily from transactions with the carriers’ customers (end users). The Company shares revenue’s from the end user with the carrier. The end user transactions are processed by the Company’s software services which are as follows: processing of content purchases through the use of our billing software (“DT Pay”), use or hosting of application management services (“DT Ignite”), managed services (“DT Content”), and cross-platform content management, recommendation, and search functionality (“DT IQ”). The Company’s products are sold mainly to wireless carriers. The licensed software enables the wireless carriers to market and deliver content and mobile applications to end users. The Company bills the wireless carrier based on monthly transactional reporting and other fees earned upon delivery of the product to the wireless carrier.

The Company utilizes its reporting system to capture and recognize revenue to carriers. Determination of the appropriate amount of revenue recognized is based on the Company’s reporting system, but it is possible that actual results may differ from the Company’s estimates once the reports are reconciled with the customer. When the Company receives the final carrier reports, to the extent not received within a reasonable time frame following the end of each month, the Company records any differences between estimated revenues and actual revenues in the reporting period when the Company determines the actual amounts. Revenues earned from certain carriers may not be reasonably estimated. To monitor the reliability of the Company’s estimates, management, where possible, reviews the revenues by country, by carrier and by product line on a regular basis to identify unusual trends such the introduction of new handsets. If the Company deems a carrier not to be creditworthy, the Company defers all revenues from the arrangement until the Company receives payment and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

In accordance with FASB ASC 605-45, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal Versus Net as an Agent, the Company recognizes as revenues the amount the carrier reports as payable upon the sale of the Company’s products, images or games. The Company has evaluated its carrier agreements and has determined that it is the principal when selling its products, images or games through carriers. Key indicators that it evaluated to reach this determination include:

· | end users subscribe directly with the carriers, but the Company is responsible for providing the service and first level customer support including all interaction with regard to content delivery issues and are generally viewed as the primary obligor of the content by the subscribers;

· | carriers generally have control over the types of content that they offer to their subscribers, but the Company has the supplier relationships, manages all services offered and determines the actual offerings;

· | the Company has the credit risk, while carriers are directly responsible for billing and collecting fees from their subscribers. Customer refunds, bad debt allowances for uncollectible fees, and customer service fees are directly charged back to the Company;

8

· | the Company has compliance risks, as it is required to be compliant with the carrier’s guidelines, policies and codes of conduct and the regulation applicable to mobile services. This includes requirements related to the supply of mobile premium services, such as the collection, storage and handling of personal information.

In addition to its share of revenues from end users, the Company may receive fees from the carriers relating to the initial set-up of the arrangements with the carriers. Set-up activities may include customization and future updates of the Ignite application. The Company has determined that certain set-up activities are within the scope of FASB ASC 985-605, Software Revenue Recognition and, accordingly, the Company applies the provisions of ASC 985-605 to the software components. As a result, the Company typically defers recognition of the set-up fee until all elements of the arrangement have been delivered. In those instances where the set-up fee covers ongoing support and maintenance, the fee is deferred and amortized over the term of the carrier agreement.

Net Loss per Common Share

Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period plus dilutive common stock equivalents, using the treasury stock method. Potentially dilutive shares from stock options and warrants and the conversion of the Series A preferred stock that were excluded from the shares used to calculate diluted earnings per share, as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive, were as follows:

| Three Months Ended |  |  | Six Months Ended |
| September 30, |  |  | September 30, |
| 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2013 |
Potentially dilutive shares |  | 1,676,071 |  |  |  | 1,717,450 |  |  |  | 1,277,470 |  |  |  | 1,847,304 |

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss consists of two components, net loss and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income refers to gains and losses that under generally accepted accounting principles are recorded as an element of stockholders’ equity, but are excluded from net income. The Company’s other comprehensive income currently includes only foreign currency translation adjustments.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid short-term investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

The Company maintains a restricted deposit account with its financial institution to secure its credit card program.

Accounts Receivable

The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses on accounts receivable. Management reviews the composition of accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns to evaluate the adequacy of these reserves.

Deposits

As of September 30, 2014, the Company has deposits of $86 comprised of facility and equipment lease deposits, as compared to $24 as of March 31, 2014.

Content Provider Licenses

Content Provider License Fees

The Company’s royalty expenses consist of fees that it pays to content owners for the use of their intellectual property in the distribution of music, games and other content services, and other expenses directly incurred in earning revenue. Royalty-based obligations are either accrued as incurred and subsequently paid, or, in the case of content acquisitions, paid in advance and

9

capitalized on our balance sheet as prepaid license fees. These royalty-based obligations are expensed to cost of revenues either at the applicable contractual rate related to that revenue or over the estimated life of the content acquired. Minimum guarantee license payments that are not recoupable against future royalties are capitalized and amortized over the lesser of the estimated life of the branded title or the term of the license agreement.

Carrier Revenue Share

Revenues generated from advertising via direct Cost-Per-Install or CPI arrangements with application developers, or indirect arrangements through advertising aggregators (ad networks) are shared with the carrier and the shared revenue is recorded as a cost of goods sold. In each case the revenue share with the carrier varies depending on the agreement with the carrier, and, in some cases, is based upon revenue tiers.

Content Acquired

Amounts paid to third party content providers as part of an agreement to make content available to the Company for a term or in perpetuity, without a revenue share, have been capitalized and are included in the balance sheet as prepaid expenses. These balances will be expensed over the estimated life of the content acquired.

Software Development Costs

The Company applies the principles of FASB ASC 985-20, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed (“ASC 985-20”). ASC 985-20 requires that software development costs incurred in conjunction with product development be charged to research and development expense until technological feasibility is established. Thereafter, until the product is released for sale, software development costs must be capitalized and reported at the lower of unamortized cost or net realizable value of the related product.

The Company has adopted the “tested working model” approach to establishing technological feasibility for its products. Under this approach, the Company does not consider a product in development to have passed the technological feasibility milestone until the Company has completed a model of the product that contains essentially all the functionality and features of the final product and has tested the model to ensure that it works as expected. To date, the Company has not incurred significant costs between the establishment of technological feasibility and the release of a product for sale; thus, the Company has expensed all software development costs as incurred. The Company considers the following factors in determining whether costs can be capitalized: the emerging nature of the mobile market; the gradual evolution of the wireless carrier platforms and mobile phones for which it develops products; the lack of pre-orders or sales history for its products; the uncertainty regarding a product’s revenue-generating potential; its lack of control over the carrier distribution channel resulting in uncertainty as to when, if ever, a product will be available for sale; and its historical practice of canceling products at any stage of the development process.

Product Development Costs

The Company charges costs related to research, design and development of products to product development expense as incurred. The types of costs included in product development expenses include salaries, contractor fees and allocated facilities costs.

Advertising Expenses

The Company expenses the costs of advertising the first time the advertising takes place. Advertising expense for continuing operations was $248 and $77 in the six months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Advertising expense for discontinued operations was $0 and $4 for the six months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Presentation

In order to facilitate the comparison of financial information, certain amounts reported in the prior year have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

As of September 30, 2014 and March 31, 2014, the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable, accrued license fees, accrued compensation and other current liabilities approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of such instruments.

10

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company uses the United States dollar for financial reporting purposes. Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated using current rates of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet date. Equity accounts have been translated at their historical exchange rates when the capital transaction occurred. Statement of Operations amounts are translated at average rates in effect for the reporting period. The foreign currency translation adjustment gains of $70 and $438 in the six months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, have been reported as a component of comprehensive loss in the consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments which potentially subject us to concentration of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, and accounts receivable. We have placed cash and cash equivalents at high credit-quality institutions. Most of our sales are made directly to large national mobile phone carriers in the countries that we operate. We have a significant level of business and resulting significant accounts receivable balance with one operator and therefore have a high concentration of credit risk with that operator. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and maintain an allowance for potential credit losses. As of September 30, 2014, three major customers represented approximately 41.3%, 12.7% and 11.5% of our gross accounts receivable outstanding, and 49.1%, 13.4% and 7.3% of our gross accounts receivable outstanding as of March 31, 2014, respectively. These three customers accounted for 58.5%, 14.9% and 3.5% of our gross revenues during the six month period ended September 30, 2014 and 38.5%, 25.5% and 3.9% of our gross revenues during the six month period ended September 30, 2013.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Estimated useful lives are the lesser of 8 to 10 years or the term of the lease for leasehold improvements and 3 or 5 years for other assets.

Goodwill and Indefinite Life Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of net assets of businesses acquired. In accordance with FASB ASC 350-20 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the value assigned to goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets is not amortized to expense, but rather they are evaluated at least on an annual basis to determine if there are potential impairments. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill is less than the carrying value. If the fair value of an indefinite lived intangible is less than its carrying amount, an impairment loss is recorded. Fair value is determined based on discounted cash flows, market multiples or appraised values, as appropriate. Discounted cash flow analysis requires assumptions about the timing and amount of future cash inflows and outflows, risk, the cost of capital, and terminal values. Each of these factors can significantly affect the value of the intangible asset. The estimates of future cash flows, based on reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections, require management’s judgment. Any changes in key assumptions about the Company’s businesses and their prospects, or changes in market conditions, could result in an impairment charge. Some of the more significant estimates and assumptions inherent in the intangible asset valuation process include: the timing and amount of projected future cash flows; the discount rate selected to measure the risks inherent in the future cash flows; and the assessment of the asset’s life cycle and the competitive trends impacting the asset, including consideration of any technical, legal or regulatory trends.

In the year ended March 31, 2014, the Company determined that there was no impairment of goodwill. In performing the related valuation analysis, the Company used various valuation methodologies including probability weighted discounted cash flows, comparable transaction analysis, and market capitalization and comparable company multiple comparison. There were no indications of impairment present during the period ended September 30, 2014.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Finite Life Intangibles

Long-lived assets, including, intangible assets subject to amortization primarily consist of customer lists, license agreements and software that have been acquired are amortized using the straight-line method over their useful life ranging from five to eight years and are reviewed for impairment in accordance with FASB ASC 360-10, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

11

In the year ended March 31, 2014, the Company determined that there was an impairment of intangible assets of $154 related to the change in trade names as the Company has rebranded its acquisitions, DT EMEA and DT APAC, under the Digital Turbine name. In performing the related valuation analysis the Company used various valuation methodologies including probability weighted discounted cash flows, comparable transaction analysis, and market capitalization and comparable company multiple comparison. There were no indications of impairment present during the period ended September 30, 2014,

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC 740-10, Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASC 740-10”), which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in its financial statements or tax returns. Under ASC 740-10, the Company determines deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities along with net operating losses, if it is more likely than not the tax benefits will be realized using the enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which it expects the differences to reverse. To the extent a deferred tax asset cannot be recognized, a valuation allowance is established if necessary.

ASC 740-10 prescribes that a company should use a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold based on the technical merits of the tax position taken. Tax positions that meet the “more-likely-than-not” recognition threshold should be measured as the largest amount of the tax benefits, determined on a cumulative probability basis, which is more likely than not to be realized upon ultimate settlement in the financial statements. We recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of the provision for income taxes. We do not currently anticipate that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change within the next 12 months.

Stock-based Compensation

We have applied FASB ASC 718 Share-Based Payment (“ASC 718”) and accordingly, we record stock-based compensation expense for all of our stock-based awards.

Under ASC 718, we estimate the fair value of stock options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value for awards that are expected to vest is then amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the option vesting term. The amount of expense recognized represents the expense associated with the stock options we expect to ultimately vest based upon an estimated rate of forfeitures; this rate of forfeitures is updated as necessary and any adjustments needed to recognize the fair value of options that actually vest or are forfeited are recorded.

The Black-Scholes option pricing model, used to estimate the fair value of an award, requires the input of subjective assumptions, including the expected volatility of our common stock, interest rates, dividend rates and an option’s expected life. As a result, the financial statements include amounts that are based upon our best estimates and judgments relating to the expenses recognized for stock-based compensation.

In the past the Company granted restricted stock subject to market or performance conditions that vest based on the satisfaction of the conditions of the award. Unvested restricted stock entitles the grantees to dividends, if any, with voting rights determined in each agreement. The fair market values of market condition-based awards are determined using the Monte Carlo simulation method. The Monte Carlo simulation method is subject to variability as several factors utilized must be estimated, including the derived service period, which is estimated based on the Company’s judgment of likely future performance and the Company’s stock price volatility. The fair value of performance-based awards is determined using the market closing price on the grant date. Derived service periods and the periods charged with compensation expense for performance-based awards are estimated based on the Company’s judgment of likely future performance and may be adjusted in future periods depending on actual performance.

Preferred Stock

The Company applies the guidance enumerated in FASB ASC 480-10, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity (“ASC 480-10”) when determining the classification and measurement of preferred stock. Preferred shares subject to mandatory redemption (if any) are classified as liability instruments and are measured at fair value in accordance with ASC 480-10. All other issuances of preferred stock are subject to the classification and measurement principles of ASC 480-10. Accordingly, the Company classifies conditionally redeemable preferred shares (if any), which includes preferred shares that feature redemption rights that are either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within the Company’s control, as temporary equity. At all other times, the Company classifies its preferred shares in stockholders’ equity.

12

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent asset and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The most significant estimates relate to revenues for periods not yet reported by carriers, accounts receivable allowances, and stock-based compensation expense.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The new standard is effective as of the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016, and will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP. Early application is not permitted. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We have not yet selected a transition method or determined the effect of the standard on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or presentation thereof.

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements and Property, Plant, and Equipment: Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. ASU 2014-08 limits the requirement to report discontinued operations to disposals of components of an entity that represent strategic shifts that have (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. The amendments also require expanded disclosures concerning discontinued operations and disclosures of certain financial results attributable to a disposal of a significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations reporting. These amendments are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or presentation thereof.

Other authoritative guidance issued by the FASB (including technical corrections to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the SEC did not, or are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

5. Fair Value Measurements

The Company applies the provisions of ASC 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” ASC 820-10 defines fair value, and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement that enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for receivables and current liabilities each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest. The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:

· | Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

· | Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

· | Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

The Company analyzes all financial instruments with features of both liabilities and equity under ASC 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities From Equity” and ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” Derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in results of operations as adjustments to fair value of derivatives. The effects of interactions between embedded derivatives are calculated and accounted for in arriving at the overall fair value of the financial instruments. In addition, the fair values of freestanding derivative instruments such as warrant and option derivatives are valued using the Black-Scholes model.

The Company identified the following liabilities that are required to be presented on the balance sheet at fair value:

Contingent liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(in thousands) | Total |  |  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |
September 30, 2014 | — |  |  | — |  | — |  | — |
March 31, 2014 | $ | 238 |  |  | — |  | — |  | $ | 238 |

13

Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

In September 2012, the Company recorded a contingent liability in connection with the acquisition of Logia. The liability was determined by using a valuation model that measured the probability of the liability to occur and the present value of the consideration at the time it would be paid. The value of the contingent liability as of March 31, 2014 was determined to be $238. The contingent liability was settled in the period ended June 30, 2014, as reflected in Note 11 below.

The Company did not identify any recurring assets and liabilities that are required to be presented in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value in accordance with ASC 825.

6. Accounts Receivable

| September 30, |  |  | March 31, |
| 2014 |  |  | 2014 |
Billed | $ | 3,072 |  |  | $ | 3,629 |
Unbilled |  | 1,265 |  |  |  | 1,473 |
Net accounts receivable of continuing operations | $ | 4,337 |  |  | $ | 5,102 |
Net accounts receivable of discontinued operations | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |

The Company had no significant write-offs or recoveries during the six months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

7. Property and Equipment

| September 30, |  |  | March 31, |
| 2014 |  |  | 2014 |
Equipment | $ | 525 |  |  | $ | 561 |
Furniture & fixtures |  | 39 |  |  |  | 39 |
Leasehold improvements |  | 18 |  |  |  | 27 |
|  | 582 |  |  |  | 627 |
Accumulated depreciation |  | (160 | ) |  |  | (162 | )
Net Property and Equipment of continuing operations | $ | 422 |  |  | 465 |
Net Property and Equipment of discontinued operations | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |

Depreciation expense for continuing operations was $48 and $39 in the six months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Depreciation expense for discontinued operations was $0 and $24 in the six months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

8. Description of Stock Plans

On May 26, 2011, our board of directors adopted the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan of NeuMedia, Inc. and on April 27, 2012, our board of directors amended and restated the plan and the related plan documents to change references to the name of our company from “NeuMedia, Inc.” to “Mandalay Digital Group, Inc.” and further directed that they be submitted to our stockholders for their consideration and approval. On May 23, 2012, our stockholders approved and adopted by written consent the Amended and Restated 2011 Equity Incentive Plan of Mandalay Digital Group, Inc. (the “2011 Plan”), the Mandalay Digital Group, Inc. Amended and Restated 2011 Equity Incentive Plan Notice of Grant and Restricted Stock Agreement and the Mandalay Digital Group, Inc. Amended and Restated 2011 Equity Incentive Plan Notice of Grant and Stock Option Agreement (collectively, the “Related Documents”).

The 2011 Plan provides for grants of stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock and restricted stock units (sometimes referred to individually or collectively as “Awards”) to our and our subsidiaries’ officers, employees, non-employee directors and consultants.

14

On September 10, 2012, the Company increased the 2011 Plan shares available for issuance from 4,000,000 to 20,000,000.

Stock options may be either “incentive stock options” (“ISOs”), as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), or non-qualified stock options (“NQSOs”). The 2011 Plan reserves 20,000,000 shares for issuance, of which 15,973,185 remain available for issuance as of September 30, 2014. The 20,000,000 shares reserved for issuance will serve as the underlying value for all equity awards under the Plan.

The following table summarizes options granted under the 2011 Plan for the periods or as of the dates indicated:

Options

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted Average |  |  |  |  |
| Number of |  |  | Weighted Average |  |  | Remaining Contractual |  |  | Aggregate Intrinsic |
| Shares |  |  | Exercise Price |  |  | Life (in years) |  |  | Value |
Outstanding, March 31, 2013 |  | 60,000 |  |  | $ | 4.65 |  |  |  | 9.99 |  |  | — |
Granted |  | 2,840,000 |  |  | $ | 3.33 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  |  |
Forfeited/Canceled |  | (151,860 | ) |  | $ | 3.96 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  |  |
Exercised |  | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  |  |
Outstanding, March 31, 2014 |  | 2,748,140 |  |  | $ | 3.32 |  |  |  | 9.46 |  |  | $ | 2,080 |
Granted |  | 1,119,200 |  |  | $ | 4.13 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  |  |
Forfeited/Canceled |  | (478,587 | ) |  | $ | 3.10 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  |  |
Exercised |  | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  |  |
Outstanding, September 30, 2014 |  | 3,388,753 |  |  | $ | 3.62 |  |  |  | 9.22 |  |  | $ | 3,309 |
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2014 |  | 2,436,599 |  |  | $ | 3.65 |  |  |  | 9.18 |  |  | $ | 2,310 |
Exercisable, September 30, 2014 |  | 489,448 |  |  | $ | 3.80 |  |  |  | 8.83 |  |  | $ | 385 |

| Options Outstanding |  |  | Options Exercisable |
|  |  |  |  | Weighted |  |  | Weighted |  |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted |  |  | Weighted |
|  |  |  |  | Average |  |  | Average |  |  |  |  |  |  | Average |  |  | Average |
| Number of |  |  | Exercise |  |  | Remaining |  |  | Number of |  |  | Exercise |  |  | Remaining |
Exercise Price | Shares |  |  | Price |  |  | Life (Years) |  |  | Shares |  |  | Price |  |  | Life (Years) |
$2.50 - 2.75 |  | 911,000 |  |  | $ | 2.61 |  |  |  | 9.07 |  |  |  | 110,167 |  |  | $ | 2.65 |  |  |  | 9.08 |
$2.76 - 2.85 |  | 372,836 |  |  | $ | 2.83 |  |  |  | 9.01 |  |  |  | 33,180 |  |  | $ | 2.83 |  |  |  | 9.01 |
$3.85 |  | 112,302 |  |  | $ | 3.85 |  |  |  | 8.84 |  |  |  | 44,146 |  |  | $ | 3.85 |  |  |  | 8.84 |
$4.00 |  | 714,554 |  |  | $ | 4.00 |  |  |  | 9.52 |  |  |  | 85,173 |  |  | $ | 4.00 |  |  |  | 8.75 |
$4.05 - 4.11 |  | 589,061 |  |  | $ | 4.10 |  |  |  | 9.64 |  |  |  | 34,449 |  |  | $ | 4.06 |  |  |  | 8.75 |
$4.23 - 4.5 |  | 579,000 |  |  | $ | 4.43 |  |  |  | 8.88 |  |  |  | 152,333 |  |  | $ | 4.48 |  |  |  | 8.75 |
$4.65 - $5.89 |  | 110,000 |  |  | $ | 5.21 |  |  |  | 9.16 |  |  |  | 30,000 |  |  | $ | 4.65 |  |  |  | 8.49 |
|  | 3,388,753 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 489,448 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

On September 27, 2007, the stockholders of the Company adopted the 2007 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan (“2007 Plan”). Under the 2007 Plan, the Company may grant up to 3,000,000 shares or equivalents of common stock of the Company as incentive stock options (“ISO’s”), non-qualified options (“NQO’s”), stock grants or stock-based awards to employees, directors or consultants, except that ISO’s shall only be issued to employees. Generally, ISO’s and NQO’s shall be issued at prices not less than fair market value at the date of issuance, as defined, and for terms ranging up to ten years, as defined. All other terms of grants shall be determined by the board of directors of the Company, subject to the 2007 Plan.

On February 12, 2008, the Company amended the 2007 Plan to increase the number of shares of our common stock that may be issued under the 2007 Plan to 7,000,000 shares and on March 7, 2008, amended the 2007 Plan to increase the maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock with respect to which stock rights may be granted in any fiscal year to 1,100,000 shares. All other terms of the 2007 Plan remain in full force and effect.

15

The following table summarizes options granted under the 2007 Plan for the periods or as of the dates indicated:

|  |  |  |  | Weighted Average |
| Number of |  |  | Grant Date |
| Shares |  |  | Fair Value |
Outstanding at March 31, 2013 |  | 959,670 |  |  | $ | 9.00 |
Granted | — |  |  | — |
Vested | — |  |  | — |
Exercised |  | (240,000 | ) |  | $ | 9.59 |
Outstanding at March 31, 2014 |  | 719,670 |  |  | $ | 11.58 |
Granted | — |  |  | — |
Vested | — |  |  | — |
Exercised | — |  |  | — |
Outstanding at September 30, 2014 |  | 719,670 |  |  | $ | 11.58 |

The Company’s 2007 Plan did not contain nonvested options as of September 30, 2014 and March 31, 2014.

Total stock compensation expense for the Company’s 2007 Plan and 2011 Plan, which includes both stock options and restricted stock is included in the following statements of operations components. Please see Note 13 regarding restricted stock:

| Six Months Ended |  |  | Six Months Ended |
| September 30, 2014 |  |  | September 30, 2013 |
Product development | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |
Sales and marketing |  | — |  |  |  | — |
General and administrative |  | 2,038 |  |  |  | 926 |
| $ | 2,038 |  |  | $ | 926 |

9. Goodwill

Goodwill

A reconciliation of the changes to the Company’s carrying amount of goodwill for the periods or as of the dates indicated:

Balance at March 31, 2013 | $ | 3,588 |
Acquisition |  | 1,182 |
Goodwill attributable to discontinued operations |  | 142 |
Adjustment to goodwill for tax |  | 209 |
Balance at March 31, 2014 | $ | 4,837 |
Adjustment to goodwill for purchase price allocation |  | 1,472 |
Balance at June 30, 2014 | $ | 6,309 |
No activity |  | - |
Balance at September 30, 2014 | $ | 6,309 |

Fair value is defined under ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures as, “The price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date”. The Company considered the income and market approaches to derive an opinion of value. Under the income approach, the Company utilized the discounted cash flow method, and under the market approach, consideration was given to the guideline public company method, the merger and acquisition method, and the market capitalization method.

We complete our annual impairment tests in the fourth quarter of each year unless events or circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired. In the period ended June 30, 2014, we finalized the purchase price allocation of DT APAC, which resulted in an adjustment to goodwill of $1,472. There were no changes to goodwill in the three month period ended September 30, 2014.

16

10. Intangible Assets

Intangibles

We complete our annual impairment tests in the fourth quarter of each year unless events or circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired. The Company recorded an intangible asset impairment charge for the year ended March 31, 2014 of $154 to write down trade names pursuant to its decision to rename and rebrand the subsidiaries under DT USA to DT EMEA and DT APAC. There were no other indications of impairment present during the periods ended June 30, 2014 and March 31, 2014. In the period ended June 30, 2014, we finalized the purchase price allocation of DT APAC, which resulted in an adjustment to intangibles of $1,472.

The components of intangible assets as at September 30, 2014 and March 31, 2014 were as follows:

| As of September 30, 2014 |
|  |  |  |  | Accumulated |  |  |  |  |
| Cost |  |  | Amortization |  |  | Net |
Software | $ | 4,217 |  |  | $ | (1,791 | ) |  | $ | 2,426 |
Customer list |  | 5,055 |  |  |  | (807 | ) |  |  | 4,248 |
License agreements |  | 354 |  |  |  | (115 | ) |  |  | 239 |
| $ | 9,626 |  |  | $ | (2,713 | ) |  | $ | 6,913 |

| As of March 31, 2014 |
|  |  |  |  | Accumulated |  |  |  |  |
| Cost |  |  | Amortization |  |  | Net |
Software | $ | 6,637 |  |  | $ | (1,369 | ) |  | $ | 5,268 |
Customer list |  | 4,107 |  |  |  | (577 | ) |  |  | 3,530 |
License agreements |  | 354 |  |  |  | (78 | ) |  |  | 276 |
| $ | 11,098 |  |  | $ | (2,024 | ) |  | $ | 9,074 |
Discontinued operations | $ | 3,278 |  |  | $ | (3,050 | ) |  | $ | 228 |

The Company has included amortization of acquired intangible assets directly attributable to revenue-generating activities in cost of revenues. The Company has included amortization of acquired intangible assets not directly attributable to revenue-generating activities in operating expenses.

During the six month period ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded amortization expense in the amount of $689 and $859, respectively, in cost of revenues for continuing operations and $0 and $116 for discontinued operations, respectively.

Based on the amortizable intangible assets as of September 30, 2014, we estimate amortization expense for the next five years to be as follows:

| Amortization |
Year Ending September 30, | Expense |
| (in thousands) |
2015 | $ | 1,377 |
2016 |  | 1,376 |
2017 |  | 1,363 |
2018 |  | 860 |
2019 |  | 460 |
Future |  | 1,477 |
| $ | 6,913 |

17

Below is a summary of intangible assets for the period March 31, 2013 through September 30, 2014:

| Intangible |
| Assets |
Balance as of March 31, 2013 | $ | 4,757 |
Acquisition |  | 6,826 |
Impairment |  | (154 | )
Disposal of subsidiary |  | (586 | )
Amortization of intangibles |  | (1,769 | )
Balance as of March 31, 2014 | $ | 9,074 |
Amortization of intangibles |  | (345 | )
Purchase price allocation adjustment |  | (1,472 | )
Balance as of June 30, 2014 | $ | 7,257 |
Amortization of intangibles |  | (344 | )
Balance as of September 30, 2014 | $ | 6,913 |

11. Debt

Contingent Liabilities

| September 30, |  |  | March 31, |
| 2014 |  |  | 2014 |
Contingent Liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Contingent liability, net of discount of $0 and $762, respectively | $ | — |  |  | $ | 238 |

The Stock Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) to acquire DT EMEA and DT Ignite from Logia Group, Ltd. (“Sellers”) entitled the Sellers to receive certain contingent purchase consideration (“Contingent Consideration”) upon achieving certain milestones. Should all milestones have been achieved, the Contingent Consideration would have been $1,000 payable in cash and shares of stock of the Company. As of March 31, 2014, the Company had recorded the fair value of the Contingent Consideration in Long Term Debt of $1,000, net of a discount of $762. On April 28, 2014, the Company and the Sellers entered into an agreement (“Logia Settlement Agreement”) to settle and resolve certain disputes surrounding the Contingent Consideration, among other claims related to the SPA. The Logia Settlement Agreement absolves or relieves the Company of any and all Contingent Consideration under the SPA. In consideration for the release of all claims the Company deposited 50,000 shares of common stock of the Company into escrow along with the other common stock that was issued under the SPA, and will release all common stock from escrow on periodic, pre-arranged dates through February 1, 2016. Additionally, the Company has accrued an additional $60 payable to the Sellers at the Company’s election either in cash or shares valued by both parties at $4.00 per share.

12. Capital Stock Transactions

Preferred Stock

There are 200,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A”) authorized and 100,000 shares, issued and outstanding. The Series A has a par value of $0.0001 per share. The Series A holders are entitled to: (1) vote on an equal per share basis as common stock, (2) dividends paid to the common stock holders on an as if-converted basis and (3) a liquidation preference equal to the greater of $10 per share of Series A (subject to adjustment) or such amount that would have been paid to the common stock holders on an as if-converted basis.

Common Stock and Warrants

In April 2014, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock of the Company to the Sellers of DT EMEA as part of the settlement of its contingent liability to Sellers pursuant to the Logia Settlement Agreement referenced in Note 11. The fair value of the shares on the date of issuance was $188.

In July 2014, the Company issued 35,000 shares of common stock of the Company to two directors for services. The shares vest over one year. The fair value of the shares on the date of issuance was $135.

18

In July 2014, the Company issued 10,375 shares of common stock of the Company to directors holding committee positions within the board. The shares vest over one year. The fair value of the shares on the date of issuance was $42

In September 2014, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock of the Company to a service provider for the exercise of 300,000 warrants granted in January 2011.

Restricted Stock Agreements

From time to time, the Company enters into restricted stock agreements (“RSAs”) with certain employees and consultants. The RSAs have performance conditions, market conditions, time conditions or a combination. In many cases, once the stock vests, the individual is restricted from selling the shares of stock for a certain defined period from three months to two years depending on the terms of the RSA. As reported in our Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 12, 2014 and June 25, 2014 respectively, the Company adopted a Board Member Equity Ownership Policy that supersedes any post-vesting lock-up in RSAs that are applicable to people covered by the policy which includes the Company’s board of directors and Chief Executive Officer.

Performance and Market Condition RSAs

On December 28, 2011, the Company issued 3,170 restricted shares with vesting criteria based on both performance and market conditions.

On December 28, 2011, one third of the restricted shares vested. On July 3, 2013, the second one third of the restricted shares vested.

The Company expensed $5,784 through the period ended March 31, 2014 related to the 3,170 RSAs issued on December 28, 2011. These RSAs were fully expensed as of December 31, 2013.

Time and Performance Condition RSAs

On January 3, 2012, the Company issued 445 restricted shares with vesting criteria based on both time and performance conditions. At January 3, 2012, 175 restricted shares vested immediately and the remaining 270 shares were required to meet certain performance criteria. In September 2012, 85 shares vested in connection with a significant acquisition by the Company. In December 2012, 50 shares vested in connection with the termination of employment of an employee. In April 2013, 85 shares vested in connection with a significant acquisition by the Company. In October 2013, the remaining 50 shares vested in connection with performance criteria.

For accounting purposes, the Company determined the grant date fair value to be $3.25 per share which is the closing price of the Company’s stock price on January 3, 2012. The Company expensed $514 in the period ended March 31, 2014. These RSAs were fully expensed as of December 31, 2013.

Time Condition RSAs

On various dates during the years ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013, the Company issued 254 and 365 restricted shares with vesting criteria based on time conditions. During the years ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013, the Company expensed $1,561 and $2,144 related to time condition RSAs, respectively. During the six month period ended September 30, 2014, the Company expensed $448. As of September 30, 2014, 163 remain unvested.

19

The following table summarizes all RSA activity:

|  |  |  |  | Weighted |
|  |  |  |  | Average |
| Number of |  |  | Grant Date |
(thousands, except grant date fair value) | Shares |  |  | Fair Value |
Unvested at March 31, 2013 |  | 2,632 |  |  | $ | 3.27 |
Granted |  | 254 |  |  |  | 3.69 |
Canceled | — |  |  | — |
Vested |  | (1,521 | ) |  |  | 3.39 |
Unvested at March 31, 2014 |  | 1,365 |  |  | $ | 3.23 |
Granted | — |  |  | — |
Canceled | — |  |  | — |
Vested |  | (59 | ) |  |  | 2.73 |
Unvested at September 30, 2014 |  | 1,306 |  |  | $ | 3.21 |
Granted |  | 45 |  |  |  | 3.90 |
Canceled | — |  |  | — |
Vested |  | (49 | ) |  |  | 3.47 |
Unvested at September 30, 2014 |  | 1,302 |  |  | $ | 3.23 |

All restricted shares, vested and unvested, cancelable and uncancelled, have been included in the outstanding shares as of September 30, 2014.

13. Employee Benefit Plans

The Company has an employee 401(k) savings plan covering full-time eligible employees. These employees may contribute eligible compensation up to the annual IRS limit. The Company does not make matching contributions.

14. Income Taxes

In accordance with ASC 740 and based on all available evidence on a jurisdictional basis, the Company believes that, it is more likely than not that its deferred tax assets will not be utilized, and has recorded a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets in each jurisdiction.

As of September 30, 2014, the Company had net operating loss (NOL) carry-forwards to reduce future U.S. Federal, Australian and Israeli income taxes, expiring in various years ranging through 2031. Utilization of the NOLs may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to ownership change limitations that may have occurred or that could occur in the future, as required by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), as well as similar state limitations. These ownership changes may limit the amount of NOLs that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income and tax, respectively. In general, an “ownership change” as defined by Section 382 of the Code, results from a transaction of series of transactions over a three-year period resulting in an ownership change of more than 50 percentage points of the outstanding stock of a company by certain stockholders or public groups.

ASC 740 requires the consideration of a valuation allowance to reflect the likelihood of realization of deferred tax assets. Significant management judgment is required in determining any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. Management has evaluated and concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Company’s financial statements as of September 30, 2014.

The Company adopted the provisions of ASC 740 on January 1, 2008 and there was no difference between the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits recognized in the balance sheet prior to the adoption of ASC 740 and those after the adoption of ASC 740. ASC 740 provides guidance on the minimum threshold that an uncertain income tax position is required to meet before it can be

20

recognized in the financial statements and applies to all tax positions taken by a company. ASC 740 contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain income tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the income tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. If it is not more likely than not that the benefit will be sustained on its technical merits, no benefit will be recorded. Uncertain income tax positions that relate only to timing of when an item is included on a tax return are considered to have met the recognition threshold. We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain income tax positions in income tax expense on our consolidated statement of income. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate uncertain income tax positions and establish or release reserves as appropriate under GAAP. We are multinational. Foreign tax estimates may vary from actual.

The Company’s income is subject to taxation in both the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating the Company’s tax positions and determining its provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Company establishes reserves for tax-related uncertainties based on estimates of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. These reserves for tax contingencies are established when the Company believes that certain positions might be challenged despite the Company’s belief that its tax return positions are fully supportable. The Company adjusts these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the outcome of a tax audit or lapse of a statute of limitations. The provision for income taxes includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that are considered appropriate.

15. Segment and Geographic information

The Company operates in one reportable segment in which it provides end to end mobile content solutions for wireless carriers and OEMs. Revenues are attributed to geographic areas based on the country in which the carrier’s principal operations are located. The Company attributes its long-lived assets, which primarily consist of property and equipment, to a country primarily based on the physical location of the assets. Goodwill and intangibles are not included in this allocation. The following information sets forth geographic information on our sales for the six month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, and net property and equipment for the periods ended September 30, 2014 and March 31, 2014:

| North |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Other |  |  |  |
| America |  |  | EMEA |  |  | APAC |  |  | Regions |  | Consolidated |
Six Months ended September 30, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net sales to unaffiliated customers |  | 592 |  |  |  | 1,358 |  |  |  | 9,066 |  |  | — |  | $ | 11,016 |
Property and equipment, net at September 30, 2014 |  | 65 |  |  |  | 36 |  |  |  | 321 |  |  | — |  | $ | 422 |
Six Months ended September 30, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net sales to unaffiliated customers | — |  |  |  | 2,266 |  |  |  | 9,277 |  |  | — |  | $ | 11,543 |
Property and equipment, March 31, 2014 |  | 68 |  |  |  | 70 |  |  |  | 327 |  |  | — |  | $ | 465 |

21

16. Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Lease Obligations

The Company leases office facilities and equipment under noncancelable operating leases expiring in various years through 2022.

Following is a summary of future minimum payments under initial terms of leases as of:

Twelve month period ending September 30, |  |  |
2015 | $ | 297 |
2016 |  | 293 |
2017 |  | 270 |
2018 |  | 300 |
2019 |  | 300 |
Thereafter |  | 900 |
Total minimum lease payments | $ | 2,360 |

These amounts do not reflect future escalations for real estate taxes and building operating expenses. Rental expense for continuing operations amounted to $296 and $244, for the six months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Other Obligations

As of September 30, 2014, the Company was obligated for payments under various employment contracts with initial terms greater than one year at September 30, 2014. Annual payments relating to these commitments at September 30, 2014 are as follows:

Twelve month period Ending September 30, |  |  |
2015 | $ | 1,300 |
2016 |  | 750 |
Total minimum payments | $ | 2,050 |

Litigation

On May 30, 2013, a class action suit in the amount of NIS 19.2 million or $5.3 million was filed in the Tel-Aviv Jaffa District Court against Coral Tell Ltd. an Israeli company which owns and operates a website offering advertisements and Coral Tell Ltd is currently being sued in a class action lawsuit regarding phone call overages and has served a third party notice against Logia and two additional companies for our alleged involvement in facilitating the overages. The suit relates to a service offered by the Coral Tell website, enabling advertisers to display a virtual cellular number in the advertisement instead of their real cellular number. The plaintiff claims that calls were charged for the connection time between two segments of the call, instead of the second segment alone; that the caller was charged even if the advertiser did not answer the call (as the charge began upon initiation of the first segment); and that the caller was charged for text messages sent to the advertiser, although the service did not support delivery of text messages. We have no contractual relationship with this company. We believe the lawsuit is without merits and a finding of liability on our part remote. After conferring with advisors and counsel, management believes that the ultimate liability, if any, in the aggregate will not be material to the financial position or results or operations of the Company for any future period; and no liability has been accrued.

On November 25, 2013, the Israeli Supreme Court ordered the parties to submit their position as to whether the defendant (applicant) has a right to appeal the Israeli District’s Court decision or must request the Israeli Supreme Court to grant a right to appeal.

On December 25, 2013, after reviewing the parties’ positions, the Israeli Supreme Court ordered the respondents (Cellcom, Logia, Ethrix) to submit their response to defendant’s petition to grant the right to appeal, by January 26th, 2014. Appellant responded thereafter and the appeal is now under review and pending judgment. Usually, in petitions such as this the Israeli Supreme Court makes a judgment based on the parties’ written responses. Such judgment may take between several weeks to several months.

The Company is subject to various claims and legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Based on the opinion of the Company’s legal counsel, management believes that the ultimate liability, if any in the aggregate of other claims will not be material to the financial position or results of operations of the Company for any future period; and no liability has been accrued.

22

17. Subsequent Events

On October 9, 2014, the Company, through its indirect wholly owned subsidiary organized under the laws of Luxembourg, Digital Turbine Luxembourg SARL (“DT Luxembourg”), acquired certain intellectual property assets of Xyologic Mobile Analysis, GmbH, registered with the district court for Berlin Charlottenberg, Germany ("XYO"), related to mobile application (“app”) recommendation, search and discovery. In addition, DT Luxembourg acquired certain other assets of XYO related to its relationships with carriers.

The acquisition was effected pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated October 8, 2014 (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among DT Luxembourg, XYO, Salisbury Investments UG, Miau Capital Unternehmergesellschaft and Rudolfix Software Insights UG (each a “Founder” and together, the “Founders”).

The aggregate purchase price was US $2,500,000, paid in cash, subject to a twelve (12) month holdback of US $375,000, which acts as partial security for indemnities related to certain representations and warranties made by XYO and the Founders to DT Luxembourg in the Asset Purchase Agreement.

On November 13, 2014, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “ Merger Agreement”) with DTM Merger Sub, Inc., a newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub ”), Appia, Inc. (“ Appia ”), and Shareholder Representative Services LLC, as the stockholder representative, pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into Appia on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement (the “ Merger ”), with Appia surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mandalay Digital and its name being changed to Digital Turbine Media, Inc. The Merger is expected to close in the first quarter of calendar 2015, subject to satisfaction of conditions, including a stockholder vote. The aggregate number of shares to be issued in Merger is estimated to be approximately 19 million (subject to various adjustments), plus assumption of approximately $10 million of Appia indebtedness.

Management evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date of September 30, 2014 through the date these unaudited financial statements were issued and concluded that no other material subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the consolidated financial statements or disclosure in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

23

It em 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This report (the “Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and the provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1993, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This discussion contains certain forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect”, “will”, “seeks”, “should”, “could”, “would”, “may” and similar expressions, as they relate to our management or us, are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors including those set forth under “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended March 31, 2014. Historical operating results are not necessarily indicative of the trends in operating results for any future period.

We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements made in this Report. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward-looking statements, which are based on known results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.

Unless the context otherwise indicates, the use of the terms “we,” “our”, “us”, “Mandalay Digital” or the “Company” refer to the business and operations of Mandalay Digital Group, Inc. through its operating and wholly-owned subsidiaries, Digital Turbine USA, Inc. (“DT USA”), Digital Turbine (EMEA) Ltd. (formerly MDG Logia Holdings Ltd)(“DT EMEA”), Digital Turbine Australia Pty Ltd (“DT APAC”), and Digital Turbine Singapore Pte Ltd (“DT Singapore”), collectively “DT”, as well as its recently sold subsidiary, Twistbox Entertainment, Inc. (“Twistbox”).

Mandalay Digital Group, Inc., through DT, provides end to end mobile content solutions for wireless carriers and Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) globally to enable them to better monetize their subscribers. The Company’s product offerings include: mobile application management through DT Ignite, user experience and discovery through DT IQ, white labeled mobile storefront, and content management solutions through DT Content and mobile payments with direct operator billing through DT Pay. With global headquarters in Los Angeles, California and offices throughout the U.S., Asia Pacific and EMEA, Mandalay Digital’s solutions are available worldwide.

Historical Operations of Mandalay Digital Group, Inc.

Mandalay Digital was originally incorporated in the State of Delaware on November 6, 1998 under the name eB2B Commerce, Inc. On April 27, 2000, the Company merged into DynamicWeb Enterprises, Inc., a New Jersey corporation and changed its name to eB2B Commerce, Inc. On April 13, 2005, the Company changed its name to Mediavest, Inc. On November 7, 2007, the Company reincorporated in the State of Delaware under the name Mandalay Media, Inc. On May 11, 2010, the Company changed its name to NeuMedia, Inc.

On February 6, 2012, the Company merged with a wholly-owned, newly-formed subsidiary, changing its name to Mandalay Digital Group, Inc.

On October 27, 2004, and as amended on December 17, 2004, the Company filed a plan for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Plan of Reorganization”). The Plan of Reorganization was completed on January 26, 2005. Through January 26, 2005, the Company and its subsidiaries were engaged in providing business-to-business transaction management services designed to simplify trading between buyers and suppliers.

From 2005 to February 12, 2008, the Company was a public shell company with no operations, and controlled by its significant stockholder, Trinad Capital Master Fund, L.P.

From February 12, 2008 to October 23, 2008, our sole operations were those of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Twistbox Entertainment, Inc. In October 2008, we acquired AMV Holding Limited and its subsidiaries, a mobile media and marketing company. On June 21, 2010, we sold AMV Holding Limited and its subsidiaries. On February 13, 2014, we disposed of the Twistbox subsidiary, and as such it is no longer reflected as part of our continuing operations in this Report.

In December 2011, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary Digital Turbine, Inc., purchased the assets of Digital Turbine LLC. The Company subsequently re-branded the assets as “DT IQ”. On September 19, 2014, the Company changed the name of Digital Turbine, Inc. to Digital Turbine USA, Inc.

24

Since the acquisition of the DT IQ product into DT, and subsequent acquisitions of DT EMEA and DT APAC the Company has acquired, rebranded, enhanced and commercialized products which include DT Ignite, DT Pay, and DT Content.

SUMMARY OF THE TWISTBOX MERGER

The Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger on December 31, 2007, as subsequently amended with Twistbox Acquisition, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, Twistbox Entertainment, Inc. (“Twistbox”), and Adi McAbian and Spark Capital, L.P., as representatives of the stockholders of Twistbox, pursuant to which acquisition sub merged with and into Twistbox, with Twistbox as the surviving corporation (the “Merger”). The Merger was completed on February 12, 2008.

On February 13, 2014, we sold all of the operating subsidiaries comprising Twistbox.

SUMMARY OF THE AMV ACQUISITION

On October 23, 2008, the Company consummated the acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding share capital of AMV Holding Limited, a United Kingdom private limited company and 80% of the issued and outstanding share capital of Fierce Media Limited, United Kingdom private limited company.

On June 21, 2010, we sold all of the operating subsidiaries comprising AMV.

SUMMARY OF THE DIGITAL TURBINE (DT USA) ACQUISITION

On December 28, 2011, the Company entered into a Share Purchase Agreement to acquire the assets of Digital Turbine LLC through its newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary, Digital Turbine, Inc. The Company purchased Digital Turbine LLC assets with 10,000 shares of common stock of the Company, with a fair value of $30,500 on the date of grant. On September 19, 2014, the Company changed the name of Digital Turbine, Inc. to Digital Turbine USA, Inc.

SUMMARY OF THE LOGIA (DT EMEA) ACQUISITION

On September 13, 2012, the Company acquired subsidiaries and certain assets of Logia Group, Ltd. (“Logia”). As a part of the transaction, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Digital Turbine (EMEA) Ltd (“DT EMEA”), acquired all of the capital stock of three operating subsidiaries of Logia (Logia Content Development and Management Ltd. (“Logia Content”), Volas Entertainment Ltd. (“Volas”) and Mail Bit Logia (2008) Ltd. (“Mail Bit”), (collectively, the “Targets”)). In addition, the Company acquired the assets comprising the “LogiaDeck” software from LogiaDeck Ltd., which the Company has rebranded “DT Ignite”, and certain operator and other contracts related to the business of the Targets that were entered into by Logia and Volas.

The purpose of the DT EMEA acquisition was to build on the Company’s current distribution network, and to enhance its mobile content infrastructure with DT Ignite. DT Ignite is an application management platform that enables mobile operators and OEMs to control, manage and monetize the applications that are installed on mobile devices. In addition, DT Ignite allows mobile operators and OEMS to obtain a new advertising revenue stream from pre and post installations.

SUMMARY OF MIA (DT APAC) ACQUISITION

On April 12, 2013, the Company, through its indirect wholly owned subsidiary Digital Turbine Group Pty Ltd (“DT APAC”), acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of Mirror Image International Holdings Pty Ltd (“MIAH”). MIAH owns direct or indirect subsidiaries Mirror Image Access (Australia) Pty Ltd (MIA), MIA Technology Australia Pty Ltd (MIATA) and MIA Technology IP Pty Ltd (together “MIA”).

DT APAC is a leading mobile solutions provider based in Australia. DT APAC has extensive content licenses with major brands, as well as a proprietary content management and billing integration system (“Sphere”). DT APAC through an Application Programming Interface (API), enhances experiences on connected devices by enabling the delivery of content and applications to multiple devices, across any network, in any format, effectively integrating the infrastructure of mobile operators to content publishers to facilitate mobile commerce (“DT Content”). DT Content uses the Sphere platform toenable carriers, media companies and brands to work together.

SUMMARY OF THE XYO (DT GERMANY and DT LUXEMBOURG) ASSET ACQUISITION

On October 8, 2014, the Company formed a new entity, Digital Turbine Luxembourg S.a.r.l. (“DT Luxembourg”). On October 9, 2014, DT Luxembourg, acquired certain intellectual property assets of Xyologic Mobile Analysis, GmbH, registered with the

25

district court for Berlin Charlottenberg, Germany ("XYO"), related to mobile application (“app”) recommendation, search and discovery. In addition, DT Luxembourg acquired certain other assets of XYO related to its relationships with carriers. The aggregate purchase price was US $2,500,000, paid in cash, subject to a twelve (12) month holdback of US $375,000, which acts as partial security for indemnities related to certain representations and warranties made by XYO and the Founders to DT Luxembourg in the Asset Purchase Agreement.

On October 13, 2014, the Company formed a new entity, Digital Turbine Germany GmbH (“DT Germany”), as a subsidiary of DT Luxembourg. The entity will market and support the Company’s products.

Company Overview

Since the acquisition of the DT IQ product into DT, and the subsequent acquisitions of DT EMEA and DT APAC, the Company has acquired, rebranded, enhanced and commercialized products which include DT Ignite, DT Pay, and DT Content.

DT provides end to end mobile content solutions for wireless carriers and OEMs globally to enable them to better monetize their subscribers. The Company’s product offerings include: mobile application management through our product, DT Ignite, user experience and discovery through our product, DT IQ, white labeled mobile storefront, and content management solutions through our product, DT Content, and management and mobile payments with direct operator billing through our product, DT Pay.

We enable mobile content distribution and monetization serving mobile operators, OEMs, mobile device distributors, and end consumers. Our software is sold as both licensed software and software as a service (“SaaS”). Our software permits mobile carriers, advertising aggregation companies, application developers and third-party publishers to provide application installation, portal management, user interface, content development and billing technology that enables the ecosystem required for the global distribution of mobile applications and content. Our platforms provide our customers with the tools to implement an intuitive user experience and storefront, enabling the discovery, purchase and download of mobile applications and content. Our integrated solutions address the mobile ecosystem spanning mobile optimized websites, mobile applications, mobile merchandising and content management, mobile messaging, mobile advertising, mobile billing and predictive analytics. Our solutions empower our customers to better participate in the mobile advertising revenue cycle, drive loyalty, generate revenues and re-engineer business processes to capture the advantages of their mobile-enabled customer base. Our predictive analytics capabilities allow our customers to recommend applications and content to their end-customer based upon the consumers’ tastes and preferences.

DT Ignite is a mobile application management software that is pre-installed on devices to enable mobile operators and OEMs to control, manage and monetize the applications that are installed on mobile devices. DT Ignite allows mobile operators to customize the out-of-the-box experience for customers and monetize their homescreens via Cost-Per-Install or CPI arrangements with third party application developers. Applications can be installed silently or with notification, on first boot or later in the lifecycle of the device, allowing mobile operators and OEMs to participate in a new advertising revenue stream. The Company has launched DT Ignite with operators in North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and Israel.

IQ App Drawer organizes your applications for you by category, as well as providing more traditional alphabetical and search based methods. DT IQ Search is a User Experience and User Interface that enables customers to search and discover content from various sources including social media, search engines, and applications. IQ App Drawer and DT IQ Search monetize content through increased content sales and leveraging IQ’s recommendation engine to recommend the right applications to the right consumers through its cost-per-install or CPI commercial model.

DT Content is one of the Company’s primary revenue generating products. DT Content can be sold as an application storefront that manages the retailing of mobile content including features such as merchandising, product placements, reporting, pricing, promotions, and distribution of digital goods. DT Content also includes the distribution and licensing of content across multiple content categories including music, applications, wallpapers, eBooks, and games. DT Content is deployed with many operators across multiple countries including Australia, Israel, Turkey, Indonesia, Philippines, Italy, India and Germany.

DT Pay is an Application Programming Interface (API) that integrates billing infrastructure between mobile operators and content publishers to facilitate mobile commerce. Increasingly, mobile content publishers want to go directly to consumers to sell their content rather than sell through traditional distributors such as Google Play or Apple Application Store. DT Pay allows publishers and carriers to monetize those applications by allowing the content to be billed directly to the consumer via their carrier billing. DT Pay has been launched in Australia and Italy.

26

Mandalay Digital’s divestiture of Twistbox Entertainment in the fiscal 2014 fourth quarter is reflected as discontinued operations in this Report. All periods presented have been revised to reflect this presentation. Unless otherwise noted, all discussions in this Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations relate to continuing operations.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands)

| 3 Months Ended |  |  | 3 Months Ended |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6 Months Ended |  |  | 6 Months Ended |  |  |  |
| September 30, |  |  | September 30, |  |  | % of |  |  | September 30, |  |  | September 30, |  | % of |
| 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | Change |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  | Change |
| (in thousands) |  |  |  |
Revenues | $ | 5,462 |  |  | $ | 6,759 |  |  |  | -19.2 | % |  | $ | 11,016 |  |  | $ | 11,543 |  |  | -4.6 | %
Cost of revenues |  | 3,661 |  |  |  | 4,375 |  |  |  | -16.3 | % |  |  | 7,801 |  |  |  | 7,492 |  |  | 4.1 | %
Gross profit |  | 1,801 |  |  |  | 2,384 |  |  |  | -24.5 | % |  |  | 3,215 |  |  |  | 4,051 |  |  | -20.6 | %
SG&A |  | 6,446 |  |  |  | 6,236 |  |  |  | 3.4 | % |  |  | 12,540 |  |  |  | 11,996 |  |  | 4.5 | %
Operating loss |  | (4,645 | ) |  |  | (3,852 | ) |  |  | 20.6 | % |  |  | (9,325 | ) |  |  | (7,945 | ) |  | 17.4 | %
Interest expense, net |  | (131 | ) |  |  | (194 | ) |  |  | -32.5 | % |  |  | (128 | ) |  |  | (1,633 | ) |  | -92.2 | %
Foreign exchange transaction gain / (loss) |  | (1 | ) |  |  | 27 |  |  |  | -103.7 | % |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  | 56 |  |  | -112.5 | %
Change in fair value of warrant derivative liabilities gain / (loss) |  | - |  |  |  | (811 | ) |  |  | -100.0 | % |  |  | - |  |  |  | (811 | ) |  | -100.0 | %
Gain/ (loss) on disposal of fixed assets |  | - |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | -100.0 | % |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  | 0.0 | %
Loss on extinguishment of debt |  | - |  |  |  | (442 | ) |  |  | -100.0 | % |  |  | - |  |  |  | (442 | ) |  | -100.0 | %
Gain / (loss) on settlement of debt |  | - |  |  |  | 33 |  |  |  | -100.0 | % |  |  | (10 | ) |  |  | 33 |  |  | -130.3 | %
Other income |  | 3 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0.0 | % |  |  | 12 |  |  |  | - |  |  | 0.0 | %
Loss on change on valuation of long term contingent liability |  | - |  |  |  | 603 |  |  |  | -100.0 | % |  |  | - |  |  |  | 603 |  |  | -100.0 | %
Loss before income taxes |  | (4,774 | ) |  |  | (4,632 | ) |  |  | 3.1 | % |  |  | (9,456 | ) |  |  | (10,137 | ) |  | -6.7 | %
Income tax provision |  | 427 |  |  |  | 85 |  |  |  | 402.4 | % |  |  | 355 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  | 17650.0 | %
Loss from continuing operations |  | (5,201 | ) |  |  | (4,717 | ) |  |  | 10.3 | % |  |  | (9,811 | ) |  |  | (10,139 | ) |  | -3.2 | %
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.0 | %
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of taxes |  | - |  |  |  | (1,505 | ) |  |  | -100.0 | % |  |  | - |  |  |  | (1,769 | ) |  | -100.0 | %
Net (loss)/profit |  | (5,201 | ) |  |  | (6,222 | ) |  |  | -16.4 | % |  |  | (9,811 | ) |  |  | (11,908 | ) |  | -17.6 | %
Basic and Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |  | 37,504 |  |  |  | 25,232 |  |  |  | 48.6 | % |  |  | 37,464 |  |  |  | 22,636 |  |  | 65.5 | %

27

Comparison of the Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013

Revenues

| Three Months Ended September 30, |  |  | % of |  |  | Six Months Ended September 30, |  |  | % of |
| 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | Change |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | Change |
| (In thousands) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (In thousands) |  |  |  |  |
Revenues by type: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Content | $ | 2,548 |  |  | $ | 3,493 |  |  |  | -27.1 | % |  | $ | 5,232 |  |  | $ | 5,661 |  |  |  | -7.6 | %
Billing |  | 2,049 |  |  |  | 2,528 |  |  |  | -18.9 | % |  |  | 4,677 |  |  |  | 4,457 |  |  |  | 4.9 | %
Advertising |  | 641 |  |  |  | 204 |  |  |  | 214.2 | % |  |  | 682 |  |  |  | 451 |  |  |  | 51.2 | %
Services |  | 223 |  |  |  | 532 |  |  |  | -58.1 | % |  |  | 425 |  |  |  | 973 |  |  |  | -56.3 | %
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.0 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total | $ | 5,462 |  |  | $ | 6,759 |  |  |  | -19.2 | % |  | $ | 11,016 |  |  | $ | 11,543 |  |  |  | -4.6 | %

During the three and six months ending September 30, 2014, there was an overall decrease in revenue as compared to the three and six months ending September 30, 2013 , driven primarily by a reduction in Content revenues. Billing revenues increased for the six months ended September 30, 2014 as a result of the addition of new customers. Advertising revenues for the three and six month periods increased, which was comprised of one-time set up fees, as well as DT Ignite and DT IQ CPI revenue.

Cost of Revenues

| Three Months Ended September 30, |  |  | % of |  |  | Six Months Ended September 30, |  |  | % of |
| 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | Change |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | Change |
| (In thousands) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (In thousands) |  |  |  |  |
Cost of revenues: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
License fees and revenue share | $ | 3,316 |  |  | $ | 3,919 |  |  |  | -15.4 | % |  | $ | 7,112 |  |  | $ | 6,633 |  |  |  | 7.2 | %
Other direct cost of revenues |  | 345 |  |  |  | 456 |  |  |  | -24.3 | % |  |  | 689 |  |  |  | 859 |  |  |  | -19.8 | %
Total cost of revenues | $ | 3,660 |  |  | $ | 4,375 |  |  |  | -16.3 | % |  | $ | 7,801 |  |  | $ | 7,492 |  |  |  | 4.1 | %
Revenues | $ | 5,462 |  |  | $ | 6,759 |  |  |  | -19.2 | % |  | $ | 11,016 |  |  | $ | 11,543 |  |  |  | -4.6 | %
Gross margin |  | 32.99 | % |  |  | 35.27 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29.18 | % |  |  | 35.09 | % |  |  |  |

License fees mainly represent costs payable to content providers for use of their intellectual property in the products sold. Revenue share represents the portion of revenues generated from advertising via the DT Ignite and DT IQ products that is payable to the carriers. Cost of revenues decreased somewhat consistently with the decrease in revenues. However, due to the change in sales mix, primarily the increase in Billing revenues and decrease in Service revenues, gross margin has decreased from the previous year. Gross margin for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was favorable to the six month period due to the increase in Advertising revenue in the quarter

Operating Expenses

| Three Months Ended September 30, |  |  | % of |  |  | Six Months Ended September 30, |  |  | % of |
| 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | Change |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | Change |
| (In thousands) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (In thousands) |  |  |  |  |
Product development expenses | $ | 2,155 |  |  | $ | 2,407 |  |  |  | -10.5 | % |  | $ | 4,114 |  |  | $ | 3,995 |  |  |  | 3.0 | %
Sales and marketing expenses |  | 743 |  |  |  | 536 |  |  |  | 38.6 | % |  |  | 1,504 |  |  |  | 909 |  |  |  | 65.5 | %
General and administrative expenses |  | 3,548 |  |  |  | 3,293 |  |  |  | 10.9 | % |  |  | 6,922 |  |  |  | 7,092 |  |  |  | -2.4 | %

Product development expenses include campaign management, the development and maintenance of the DT IQ and DT Ignite products, as well as the costs to support DT Pay and DT Content through the optimization of content for consumption on a mobile phone. Expenses in this area are primarily a function of personnel.

28

Sales and marketing expenses represent the costs of sales and marketing personnel, and advertising and marketing campaigns.

Selling and production costs have decreased in conjunction with our decrease in revenues, and costs associated with bringing Digital Turbine products to market.

General and administrative expenses represent management, finance and support personnel costs in both the parent and subsidiary companies, which include professional and consulting costs, in addition to other costs such as rent, stock based compensation and depreciation expense. The increase in general and administrative expense was due primarily due to the increase in stock based compensation in the three months ended September 30, 2014.

Other Income and Expenses

| Three Months Ended September 30, |  |  | % of |  |  | Six Months Ended September 30, |  |  | % of |
| 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | Change |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | Change |
| (In thousands) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (In thousands) |  |  |  |  |
Interest and other (expense) |  | (131 | ) |  |  | (194 | ) |  |  | -32.5 | % |  |  | (128 | ) |  |  | (1,633 | ) |  |  | -92.2 | %
Foreign exchange transaction gain / (loss) |  | (1 | ) |  |  | 27 |  |  |  | -103.7 | % |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  | 56 |  |  |  | -112.5 | %
Change in fair value of accrued derivative liabilities loss |  | - |  |  |  | (811 | ) |  |  | -100.0 | % |  |  | - |  |  |  | (811 | ) |  |  | -100.0 | %
Loss on disposal of fixed assets |  | 0 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | -100.0 | % |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 0.0 | %
Other income |  | 3 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0.0 | % |  |  | 12 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0.0 | %
Loss on extinguishment of debt |  | - |  |  |  | (442 | ) |  |  | -100.0 | % |  |  | - |  |  |  | (442 | ) |  |  | -100.0 | %
Gain / (loss) on settlement of debt |  | - |  |  |  | 33 |  |  |  | -100.0 | % |  |  | (10 | ) |  |  | 33 |  |  |  | -130.3 | %
Loss on change on valuation of long term contingent liability |  | - |  |  |  | 603 |  |  |  | -100.0 | % |  |  | - |  |  |  | 603 |  |  |  | -100.0 | %

Interest and other expense includes interest income on invested funds, interest expense, and financing costs as incurred by the Company. These expenses were significantly higher in the six months ended September 2013 due to repayment of debt. Other expenses include foreign exchange transaction gains and losses.

Financial Condition

Assets

Our current assets totaled $21.7 million and $27.5 million at September 30, 2014 and March 31, 2014, respectively. Total assets were $36 million and $45.1 million at September 30, 2014 and March 31, 2014, respectively. The decrease in current assets is primarily due to the decrease in cash for operating expenses.

Liabilities and Working Capital

At September 30, 2014, our total liabilities were $10 million, compared to $12.1 million at March 31, 2014. The change in liabilities was mainly due to the decrease of deferred tax liabilities, accrued license fees, and other current liabilities of $3.2 million, offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued compensation of $1.3 million combined. The Company had positive working capital of $11.6 million and $15.6 million at September 30, 2014 and March 31, 2014, respectively, for a decrease of $3.9 million of working capital. This is mainly comprised of a decrease in cash, offset by a decrease in total current liabilities.

29

Liquidity and Capital Resources

| Three Months Ended September 30, |  |  | % of |  |  | Six Months Ended September 30, |  |  | % of |
| 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | Change |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | Change |
| (In thousands) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (In thousands) |  |  |  |  |
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Data: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Capital expenditures |  | (26 | ) |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | -300.0 | % |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 31 |  |  |  | -80.6 | %
Cash flows used in operating activities |  | 2,344 |  |  |  | 2,299 |  |  |  | 2.0 | % |  |  | 5,479 |  |  |  | 3,893 |  |  |  | 40.7 | %
Cash flows used in investing activities |  | 1 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0.0 | % |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | (0 | ) |  |  | -293.6 | %
Exercise of warrants |  | (375 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0.0 | % |  |  | (5,479 | ) |  |  | (8,324 | ) |  |  | -34.2 | %
Settlement of contingent liability |  | (1 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0.0 | % |  |  | (11 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0.0 | %
Cash acquired with acquisition of subsidiary |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0.0 | % |  |  | - |  |  |  | (513 | ) |  |  | -100.0 | %
Cash used in acquisition of subsidiary |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 0.0 | % |  |  | - |  |  |  | 1,287 |  |  |  | -100.0 | %
Repayment of debt obligations |  | - |  |  |  | 3,657 |  |  |  | -100.0 | % |  |  | - |  |  |  | 3,657 |  |  |  | -100.0 | %
Issuance of shares for cash |  | - |  |  |  | (12,224 | ) |  |  | -100.0 | % |  |  | - |  |  |  | (14,924 | ) |  |  | -100.0 | %
Loss on exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |  | 30 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 1400.0 | % |  |  | (9 | ) |  |  | (88 | ) |  |  | -89.8 | %

The Company’s primary sources of liquidity have historically been through the issuance of common and preferred stock and borrowings under credit facilities. In the fiscal year 2014, the Company raised $33.3 million, less financing costs, through the issuance of equity financings and public offerings. Until we become cash flow positive, we anticipate that our primary sources of liquidity will be our existing cash balances. Our current cash resources will be sufficient to fund our planned operations for at least the next twelve months.

Operating Activities

During the six months ended September 30, 2014, cash decreased $5.1 million. Net cash used in operating activities increased by $1.5 million during the same time period. The increase is comprised of a decrease in accrued license fees and other liabilities of $3.2 million, offset by an increase of $3.7 million in deferred tax assets, accounts receivable and prepaid expense and an increase in accounts payable and accrued compensation of $1.3 million. These changes are related to the loss for the period, but exclude depreciation and amortization of $0.74 million, as well as a $2.1 million expense for stock compensation, stock options and stock issued for services. The Company also received $0.4 million in cash for warrants exercised.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partners, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. In addition, we do not have any undisclosed borrowings or debt, and we have not entered into any synthetic leases. We believe, therefore, that we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.

Stock Sales, Warrants and Liquidity

In April 2014, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock of the Company to the Sellers of DT EMEA as part of the settlement of its contingent liability to Sellers pursuant to the Logia Settlement Agreement referenced in Note 11 of the Financial Statements included in this Report. The fair value of the shares on the date of issuance was $188.

In July 2014, the Company issued 35,000 shares of common stock of the Company to two directors for services. The shares vest quarterly over one year. The fair value of the shares on the date of issuance was $135.

30

In July 2014, the Company issued 10,375 shares of common stock of the Company to directors holding committee positions within the board. The shares vest quarterly over one year. The fair value of the shares on the date of issuance was $42.

In September 2014, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock of the Company to a service provider for the exercise of 300,000 warrants granted in January 2011.

Revenues

The discussion herein regarding our future operations pertain to the results and operations of DT, including its subsidiaries, DT USA, DT EMEA, DT APAC, DT Germany and DT Singapore.

DT APAC generates revenues from mobile phone carriers that market, distribute and/or bill for their content, through the use of our DT Content and DT Pay products. These carriers generally charge a one-time purchase fee or a monthly subscription fee on their subscribers’ phone bills when the subscribers download DT APAC content to their mobile phones. The carriers perform the billing and collection functions and generally remit to DT APAC a contractual percentage of their collected fee for each transaction. DT APAC recognizes as revenues the percentage of the fees due to them from the carrier. End users may also initiate the purchase of DT APAC content through other delivery mechanisms, with third parties being responsible for billing, collecting and remitting to DT APAC a portion of their fees.

DT EMEA generates revenues from services provided to mobile phone carriers. DT EMEA manages the mobile operators’ platform. DT EMEA recognizes based on revenues the percentage of the fees due to them from the carrier. These carriers generally charge a one-time purchase fee or a monthly subscription fee on their subscribers’ phone bills when the subscribers download content to their mobile phones. The carriers perform the billing and collection functions and generally remit to DT EMEA a contractual percentage of their collected fee for each transaction.

DT USA, DT APAC, DT EMEA, DT Germany and DT Singapore also generate revenues from the sale of advertising delivered via the DT Ignite and DT IQ products. The Company may also receive set up fees and per device license fees for DT Ignite and DT IQ. Once DT Ignite or DT IQ is launched on the mobile phone carrier’s platform, revenues can be generated from advertising via Cost-Per-Install (CPI) arrangements directly with application developers, or indirectly through advertising aggregators (ad networks). In addition, the Company’s carrier partners may source advertising via CPI arrangements, which would then generate a revenue share back to the Company. While the sales mix of the advertising via DT Ignite and DT IQ may change based on these three scenarios, the gross profit result to the Company remains the same.

To date, DT EMEA has generated revenues mainly in Israel and Europe. DT APAC has generated revenues mainly in Australia, Singapore and Indonesia. DT USA has generated revenues mainly in the U.S.that are generated mainly from DT Ignite and DT IQ.

We believe that the improved quality and greater availability of smartphones is encouraging consumer awareness and demand for high quality applications and content on their mobile devices. At the same time, carriers and branded content owners are focusing on a small group of enablers that have the ability to provide high-quality mobile content services consistently and cost-effectively and to enable mobile billing across a wide variety of handsets in countries around the world. Additionally, publishers and content owners are seeking enablers that have the ability to distribute content globally through relationships with most or all of the major carriers. We believe our Company has created the requisite development, distribution and billing technology and has achieved the scale to operate at a level that provides it with competitive advantages as an enabler. We also believe that leveraging existing carrier and publisher relationships will allow us to grow our revenues without corresponding percentage growth in our infrastructure and operating costs. Our revenue growth rate will depend significantly on revenues generated from the sale of content and applications, from advertising via Cost-Per-Install or CPI arrangements with third party application developers from continued growth in the mobile content market, from our ability to leverage our distribution and content relationships, and from our ability to expand billing for content in new regional markets. Because many new mobile handset models are released in the fourth calendar quarter to coincide with the holiday shopping season, and because many end users download our content soon after they purchase new handsets, we may experience seasonal sales increases based on this key holiday selling period. However, due to the time between handset purchases and content purchases, much of this holiday impact may occur in the March quarter end. For a variety of reasons, we may experience seasonal sales decreases during the summer, particularly in Europe, which is predominantly reflected in our September quarter end. In addition to these possible seasonal patterns, our revenues may be impacted by declines in users visiting carrier portals, new or changed carrier deals, or changes in the manner that our major carrier partners market our content on their platform. Initial spikes in revenues as a result of successful launches or campaigns may create further aberrations in our revenue patterns.

31

Cost of Revenues

Our Company’s cost of revenues has historically consisted primarily of royalties that we pay to content providers from which we license brands and other intellectual property. Our cost of revenues also include a share of revenues payable to wireless carriers for the installation of applications, which are generated through advertising via Cost-Per-Install or CPI arrangements. In addition, certain other direct costs such as platform, hosting and third party delivery charges are included in cost of revenues. Our cost of revenues also includes noncash expenses— such as amortization of certain acquired intangible assets, and any impairment of guarantees. We generally do not pay royalties advances to licensors. Where we acquire rights in perpetuity or for a specific time period without revenue share or additional fees, we record the payments made to content owners as prepaid royalties on our balance sheet at the time payment is made to the licensor. We recognize royalties in cost of revenues based upon the revenues derived from the relevant product sold multiplied by the applicable royalty rate. If applicable, we will record an impairment of prepaid royalties or accrue for future guaranteed royalties that are in excess of anticipated recoupment. At each balance sheet date, we perform a detailed review of prepaid royalties and guarantees that considers multiple factors, including forecasted demand, anticipated share for specific content providers, development and launch plans, and current and anticipated sales levels. We expense the costs for development of our content prior to technological feasibility incurred throughout the development process, and we include these costs in product development expenses.

Gross Margin

Our gross margin is determined principally by our product mix, including DT Ignite, DT IQ, DT Content and DT Pay, each of which have differing gross margins. Gross margins realized by the Company related to our DT Ignite and DT IQ products are mixed depending on whether advertising deals are done directly with application developers or through ad networks or via the Company’s carrier partners. When advertising deals are done directly between the Company and the application developer or directly with the ad network, the gross margin is determined by terms of the revenue share with the carrier. When the advertising deal is sourced via the carrier, the gross margin is 100%, as revenues are remitted net of carrier revenue share. Content that is sourced for distribution that is based on licensed intellectual property requires us to pay royalties to the licensor and these royalty rates can vary significantly. Our in-house developed content, which is based on the Company’s owned intellectual property, requires no royalty payments to third parties. Branded content requires royalty payment to the licensors of the content, generally on a revenue share basis. There are multiple internal and external factors that affect the mix of revenues derived from our products, including consumer trends. Changes in the mix of revenues can impact the Company’s gross margin. Our gross margin is also affected by changes in direct costs such as platform and third party delivery charges, and by changes in periodic charges for prepaid royalties and guarantees, particularly on a quarterly basis.

Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses primarily include product development expenses, sales and marketing expenses and general and administrative expenses. Our product development expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits for employees working on campaign management, creating, developing, editing, programming, performing quality assurance, obtaining carrier certification and deploying our products across various mobile phone carriers and on our internal platforms. Operating expenses also include payments to third parties for developing our product, and facilities costs. We devote substantial resources to the development, technology support, and quality assurance of our products.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses, consist primarily of salaries, benefits and incentive compensation for sales, business development, and marketing personnel, expenses for advertising, trade shows, public relations and other promotional and marketing activities, expenses for general business development activities, travel and entertainment expenses and allocated facilities costs. We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase in absolute terms with the growth of our business and as we further promote our content and expand our business.

General and Administrative

Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits for general and administrative personnel, consulting fees, legal, accounting and other professional fees, information technology costs and allocated facilities costs. We expect that general and administrative expenses will increase in absolute terms as we hire additional personnel and incur costs related to the anticipated growth of our business, capital raises and our operation as a public company.

32

Amortization of Intangible Assets

We will record amortization of acquired intangible assets that are directly related to revenue-generating activities as part of our cost of revenues and amortization of the remaining acquired intangible assets as part of our operating expenses. We will record intangible assets on our balance sheet based upon their fair value at the time they are acquired. We will determine the fair value of the intangible assets using a contribution approach. We will amortize the amortizable intangible assets using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of four to ten years.

Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Income Taxes

We provide for deferred income taxes using the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and the tax effect of net operating loss carry-forwards.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The new standard is effective as of the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016, and will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP. Early application is not permitted. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We have not yet selected a transition method or determined the effect of the standard on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or presentation thereof.

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements and Property, Plant, and Equipment: Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. ASU 2014-08 limits the requirement to report discontinued operations to disposals of components of an entity that represent strategic shifts that have (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. The amendments also require expanded disclosures concerning discontinued operations and disclosures of certain financial results attributable to a disposal of a significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations reporting. These amendments are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or presentation thereof.

Other authoritative guidance issued by the FASB (including technical corrections to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the SEC did not, or are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

It em 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.

It em 4. | Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information that we are required to file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

33

Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, have concluded that, based on such evaluation, our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of September 30, 2014 because of the material weaknesses described below.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal controls over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a more than remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

During management’s review of our internal control over financial reporting, we determined the following process contains material weaknesses as of September 30, 2014:

Financial Close and Reporting Process

The material weakness relates to inadequate systems and technical resources required to meet increasing accounting demands. The Company did not maintain sufficient personnel and system resources to ensure the financial reports of the consolidated entity were complete, accurate, and timely. Further, the lack of a single accounting platform for all entities resulted in significant manual procedures that were required to complete the close.

Management does not believe that any of our annual or interim financial statements issued to-date contain a material misstatement as a result of the aforementioned weaknesses in our internal controls. However, these material weaknesses related to the entity as a whole affect all of our significant accounts and could result in a material misstatement to our annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.

Our management has identified and is taking the steps necessary to address the material weaknesses existing as of September 30, 2014 described above, as follows:

1. | Implementing comprehensive ERP software across the business to consolidate financial reporting and to standardize internal and accounting controls;

2. | Realigning accounting responsibilities to provide additional technical resources to analyze the accounting for complex, non-routine transactions.

The Company expects certain remediation efforts to be completed during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2015.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

Other than the recent change of our Chief Financial Officer on July 8, 2014, as reported on our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 9, 2014, and the appointment of our Principal Accounting Officer on September 12, 2014, there were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(d) or 15d-15(d) that occurred during the fiscal period ended September 30, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

34

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

It em 1. | Legal Proceedings.

None.

Item 1 (A). | Risk Factors.

Registrant is not aware of any material risk factors since those set forth under “Risk Factors” in its Annual Report of the Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended March 31, 2014 other than as follows:

Our Revenues May Fluctuate Significantly Based on Mobile Device Sell-Through, Over Which We Have No Control

A significant portion of our revenue is impacted by the level of sell-through of mobile devices on which our software is installed. Demand for mobile devices sold by carriers varies materially by device, and if our software is installed on devices for which demand is lower than our expectations --a factor over which we have no control as we do not market mobile devices --our revenues will be impacted negatively, and this impact may be significant. As our software is deployed on a diversified universe of devices, this risk will be mitigated, as the relative performance of one device over another devise will have less impact on us, but until we achieve diversification in our device installations, we will continue to be subject to revenue fluctuations based on devise sell-through, and such fluctuations can be material. Further, it is difficult to predict the level of demand for a particular device, making our revenue projections correspondingly difficult. These issues can be ameliorated as we gain more significant carrier relationships and conversely these issues can be exacerbated with, as presently, a limited number of such relationships.

Ite m 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

In September 2014, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock of the Company to a service provider for the exercise of 300,000 warrants granted in January 2011.

We relied on Section 4(2) and/ or Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act, as providing an exemption from registering the sale of these shares of common stock under the Securities Act because, among other reasons, the offerees/issuees were accredited investors who were not subject to any general solicitation and/or the transactions met the requirements of Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act.

It em 3. | Defaults.

Not applicable.

It em 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

It em 5. | Other Information.

None.

35

It em 6. | Exhibits.

Exhibit No. | Description
10.1 | Employment Agreement effective September 9, 2014 between the Company and William Stone (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 15, 2014).†
31.1 | Certification of William Stone, Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
31.2 | Certification of Andrew Schleimer, Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
32.1 | Certification of William Stone, Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.*(1)
32.2 | Certification of Andrew Schleimer, Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.*(1)
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* | Filed herewith

† | Management Compensatory Plan or Arrangement

(1) | In accordance with SEC Commission Release No. 33-8212, these exhibits are being furnished, and are not being filed, as part of the Report on Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document, and are not being incorporated by reference into any Securities Act registration statement.

36

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

|  | Mandalay Digital Group, Inc.
Dated: November 14, 2014 |  | By: | /s/ William Stone
|  |  | William Stone
|  |  | Chief Executive Officer

37