XML 73 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v2.4.0.8

Note 16 - Commitments and Contingencies | 9 Months Ended
--- | ---
Sep. 28, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] |
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block] | 16. Commitments and Contingencies Operating Lease with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources Related to Rocky Gap In connection with the closing of the acquisition of Rocky Gap, Lakes entered into a 40-year operating ground lease (the “Lease Agreement”) with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources for approximately 268 acres in the Rocky Gap State Park on which Rocky Gap is situated. The Lease Agreement contains an option to renew for 20 years after the initial 40-year term. From August 3, 2012 and until the casino opened for public play on May 22, 2013, rent in the form of surcharges was due and payable with a minimum annual payment of $150,000. From May 22, 2013 through the remaining term of the Lease Agreement, rent payments are due and payable annually in the amount of $275,000 plus 0.9% of any gross operator share of gaming revenue (as defined in the Lease Agreement) in excess of $275,000, and $150,000 plus any surcharge revenue in excess of $150,000. Surcharge revenue consists of amounts billed to and collected from guests and are $3.00 per room per night and $1.00 per round of golf. Rent expense for the three and nine months ended September 28, 2014 and September 29, 2013 were as follows (in thousands):
|  | Three Months Ended |  |  | Nine Months Ended |
|  | September 28, 2014 |  |  | September 29, 2013 |  |  | September 28, 2014 |  |  | September 29, 2013 |
Rent expense |  | $ | 70 |  |  | $ | 74 |  |  | $ | 241 |  |  | $ | 258 |
Future minimum lease payments under the Lease Agreement at September 28, 2014 are as follows (in thousands):
|  | 201 5 |  |  | 201 6 |  |  | 201 7 |  |  | 201 8 |  |  | 201 9 |  |  | Thereafter |
Minimum lease payment |  | $ | 425 |  |  | $ | 425 |  |  | $ | 425 |  |  | $ | 425 |  |  | $ | 425 |  |  | $ | 13,600 |
Rock Ohio Ventures, LLC Lakes has a 10% ownership in Rock Ohio Ventures and as of September 28, 2014, Lakes has invested approximately $21.0 million as required. As of September 28, 2014, Lakes reduced the carrying value of the investment in Rock Ohio Ventures to its estimated fair value of zero due to the determination that the investment had experienced an other-than-temporary impairment (see note 7, Investment in Rock Ohio Ventures, LLC). Lakes may invest additional capital up to $4.1 million as needed to maintain its equity position in Rock Ohio Ventures. If Lakes chooses not to fund additional amounts of capital as needed to maintain its equity position in Rock Ohio Ventures, it will maintain an ownership position in Rock Ohio Ventures in a pro rata amount of what its $2.8 million initial payment is to the total amount of equity funded to develop casino operations, and all equity funded in excess of the initial $2.8 million is required to be repurchased at an amount equal to the price paid. Payment to Lakes in the event of such repurchase would be deferred and paid in accordance with the terms of the Rock Ohio Ventures First Amended and Restated Operating Agreement. Jerry Argovitz Litigation On March 12, 2014, Lakes received a demand for arbitration from Jerry Argovitz (“Argovitz”) relating to a Consent and Agreement to Buyout and Release by and between Argovitz and Lakes KAR Shingle Springs, LLC (“LKAR”), Lakes Entertainment, Inc., and Lakes Shingle Springs, Inc. dated January 30, 2003 (“Buyout Agreement”). The Buyout Agreement provided that LKAR was to make certain payments to Argovitz for so long as LKAR was managing the Red Hawk Casino for the Shingle Springs Tribe. Lakes made the payments required under the Buyout Agreement while it was managing the Red Hawk Casino, and discontinued the payments after its management contract to manage the Red Hawk Casino was terminated. Argovitz asserted claims for breach of the Buyout Agreement and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing relating to the payments he alleged he was entitled to receive after the management agreement was terminated. He sought damages of approximately $2.7 million, plus interest, costs, and attorney fees. On September 9, 2014, Argovitz was awarded approximately $2.4 million related to the arbitration action brought by Argovitz against Lakes. As a result, Lakes recognized charges related to arbitration award in its consolidated statement of operations of approximately $2.5 million during the third quarter of 2014, which included the $2.4 million award and $0.1 million of legal fees. The action is now closed and no further claims can be made by Argovitz related to this matter. Quest Media Group, LLC Litigation On May 17, 2012, Lakes received service of a breach of contract lawsuit filed in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County, Ohio by Quest Media Group, LLC (“Quest”) with respect to an agreement (the “Agreement”) entered into between Lakes Ohio Development, LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary of Lakes) (“Lakes Ohio Development”) and Quest on March 9, 2010. The Agreement relates to Quest assisting Lakes Ohio Development in partnering with Rock Ohio Ventures, LLC and Penn Ventures, LLC (“Penn Ventures”) with respect to funding the proposed citizen-initiated referendum in November 2009 to amend the Ohio constitution to permit one casino each in Cleveland, Cincinnati, Toledo and Columbus, Ohio. The lawsuit alleged, among other things, that Lakes breached the Agreement by selling Lakes Ohio Development’s interest in the Toledo and Columbus, Ohio casino projects to Penn Ventures, failing to pay the proper fee to Quest as a result of such sale, and incorrectly calculating the costs that are to be offset against Quest’s fee. The lawsuit sought unspecified compensatory damages in excess of $25,000, punitive damages, declaratory and injunctive relief. The lawsuit named as defendants Lakes Entertainment, Inc., Lakes Ohio Development, LLC and Lyle Berman, Chairman and CEO of Lakes. Lakes removed the case to federal court, answered the pleadings and filed a motion to dismiss the claims against all defendants. Prior to the judge’s ruling on the motion to dismiss, the parties settled all but one of Quest’s claims (including obtaining a dismissal of Lyle Berman from the lawsuit) at no out-of-pocket expense to Lakes. The judge granted Lakes’ motion to dismiss and dismissed the remaining claims against Lakes. Quest subsequently appealed the dismissal to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Lakes continues to believe that the suit is without merit and will continue to vigorously defend the matter. Miscellaneous Legal Matters Lakes and its subsidiaries are involved in various other inquiries, administrative proceedings, and litigation relating to contracts and other matters arising in the normal course of business. While any proceeding or litigation has an element of uncertainty, and although unable to estimate the minimum costs, if any, to be incurred in connection with these matters, management currently believes that the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is remote, and is not likely to have a material adverse effect upon Lakes’ unaudited consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, no provision has been made with regard to these matters.

X
- Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 210 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.5-02.25) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6877327&loc=d3e13212-122682 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6449706&loc=d3e16207-108621 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 460 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 8 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6398077&loc=d3e12565-110249 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=25496072&loc=d3e14435-108349 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6394976&loc=d3e25287-109308 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration