XML 52 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.2.0.727

Note 15 - Commitments and Contingencies | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 28, 2015
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] |
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block] | 1 5. Commitments and Contingencies Operating Lease with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources Related to Rocky Gap In connection with the closing of the acquisition of Rocky Gap, Lakes entered into a 40-year operating ground lease (the “Lease Agreement”) with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources for approximately 268 acres in the Rocky Gap State Park on which Rocky Gap is situated. The Lease Agreement contains an option to renew for 20 years after the initial 40-year term. From August 3, 2012 and until the casino opened for public play on May 22, 2013, rent in the form of surcharges was due and payable with a minimum annual payment of $150,000. From May 22, 2013 through the remaining term of the Lease Agreement, rent payments are due and payable annually in the amount of $275,000 plus 0.9% of any gross operator share of gaming revenue (as defined in the Lease Agreement) in excess of $275,000, and $150,000 plus any surcharge revenue in excess of $150,000. Surcharge revenue consists of amounts billed to and collected from guests and are $3.00 per room per night and $1.00 per round of golf. Rent expense associated with the Lease Agreement was $0.1 million, net of surcharge revenues, for each of the three months ended June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014, and $0.2 million, net of surcharge revenues, for each of the six months ended June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014. Future minimum lease payments under the Lease Agreement at June 28, 2015 are as follows (in thousands):
|  | 2016 |  |  | 2017 |  |  | 2018 |  |  | 2019 |  |  | 2020 |  |  | Thereafter |
Minimum lease payment |  | $ | 425 |  |  | $ | 425 |  |  | $ | 425 |  |  | $ | 425 |  |  | $ | 425 |  |  | $ | 13,175 |
Jerry Argovitz Litigation On March 12, 2014, Lakes received a demand for arbitration from Jerry Argovitz (“Argovitz”) relating to a Consent and Agreement to Buyout and Release by and between Argovitz and Lakes KAR Shingle Springs, LLC (“LKAR”), Lakes Entertainment, Inc., and Lakes Shingle Springs, Inc. dated January 30, 2003 (“Buyout Agreement”). The Buyout Agreement provided that LKAR was to make certain payments to Argovitz for so long as LKAR was managing the Red Hawk Casino for the Shingle Springs Tribe. Lakes made the payments required under the Buyout Agreement while it was managing the Red Hawk Casino, and discontinued the payments after its management contract to manage the Red Hawk Casino was terminated. Argovitz asserted claims for breach of the Buyout Agreement and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing relating to the payments he alleged he was entitled to receive after the management agreement was terminated. He sought damages of approximately $2.7 million, plus interest, costs, and attorney fees. On September 9, 2014, Argovitz was awarded approximately $2.4 million related to the arbitration action brought by Argovitz against Lakes. As a result, Lakes recognized charges related to arbitration award in its consolidated statement of operations of approximately $2.5 million during the third quarter of 2014, which included the $2.4 million award and $0.1 million of legal fees. The action is now closed and no further claims can be made by Argovitz related to this matter. Quest Media Group, LLC Litigation On May 17, 2012, Lakes received service of a breach of contract lawsuit filed in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County, Ohio by Quest Media Group, LLC (“Quest”) with respect to an agreement (the “Agreement”) entered into between Lakes Ohio Development, LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary of Lakes) (“Lakes Ohio Development”) and Quest on March 9, 2010. The Agreement related to Quest assisting Lakes Ohio Development in partnering with Rock Ohio Ventures, LLC and Penn Ventures, LLC (“Penn Ventures”) with respect to funding the proposed citizen-initiated referendum in November 2009 to amend the Ohio constitution to permit one casino each in Cleveland, Cincinnati, Toledo and Columbus, Ohio. The lawsuit alleged, among other things, that Lakes breached the Agreement by selling Lakes Ohio Development’s interest in the Toledo and Columbus, Ohio casino projects to Penn Ventures, failing to pay the proper fee to Quest as a result of such sale, and incorrectly calculating the costs that were to be offset against Quest’s fee. The lawsuit sought unspecified compensatory damages in excess of $25,000, punitive damages, declaratory and injunctive relief. The lawsuit named as defendants Lakes Entertainment, Inc., Lakes Ohio Development, LLC and Lyle Berman, Chairman and CEO of Lakes. Lakes removed the case to federal court, answered the pleadings and filed a motion to dismiss the claims against all defendants. Prior to the judge’s ruling on the motion to dismiss, the parties settled all but one of Quest’s claims (including obtaining a dismissal of Lyle Berman from the lawsuit) at no out-of-pocket expense to Lakes. The judge granted Lakes’ motion to dismiss and dismissed the remaining claims against Lakes. Quest subsequently appealed the dismissal to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. On June 17, 2015, Lakes settled the lawsuit by paying Quest $325,000. No further claims can be made by Quest related to this matter. Employment Agreements Lakes has entered into employment agreements with certain key employees of the Company. The agreements provide for certain benefits to the employee as well as severance if the employee is terminated without cause or due to a “constructive termination” as defined in the agreements. The severance amounts depend upon the term of the agreement and can be up to two years of base salary and two years of bonus calculated as the average bonus earned in the previous two years. If such termination occurs within three years of a change of control as defined in the agreements by the Company without cause or due to a constructive termination, the employee will receive a lump sum payment equal to two times the annual base salary and bonus/incentive compensation along with insurance costs, 401(k) matching contributions and certain other benefits. In the event the employee’s employment terminates for any reason, including death, disability, expiration of an initial term, non-renewal by the Company with or without cause, by the employee with notice, or due to constructive termination, all unvested stock options vest at the date of termination and remain exercisable for three years. The Company is expected to perform on these agreements if the pending Merger with Golden Gaming closes. The agreements provide for a base salary, bonus, stock options and other customary benefits. Retention Bonus and Severance Agreements On March 30, 2015, Lakes provided Retention Bonus and Severance Agreements (“Severance Agreements”) to 14 of its employees. These Severance Agreements are contingent upon closing of the Merger. Pursuant to these Severance Agreements, Lakes estimates that it will recognize an estimated charge of $2.8 million, representing cash payments and non-cash expenses related to stock vesting acceleration. All of the payments due under these agreements are anticipated to be paid within 30 days after closing of the Merger. Merger Costs Lakes expects to incur a total of approximately $10.0 million in costs associated with the proposed Merger, the majority of which are contingent upon the closing of the Merger. The $10.0 million includes the employment, retention bonus and severance agreements discussed above in addition to legal, financial advisor, accounting and consulting costs. Lakes has incurred approximately $1.8 million of the expected $10.0 million total transaction related costs as of June 28, 2015, of which approximately $1.3 million was incurred during the six months ended June 28, 2015. Shareholder Class Action Lawsuits On February 6, 2015, Lakes, the members of the Lakes’ Board of Directors, LG Acquisition Corporation, Sartini Gaming, Inc., and the Blake L. Sartini and Delise F. Sartini Family Trust were named as defendants in three complaints filed in the District Court of the State of Minnesota, Fourth Judicial District in Hennepin County. The cases are captioned James Orr, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, as Plaintiff, vs. Lakes Entertainment, Inc., LG Acquisition Corporation, Sartini Gaming, Inc., Lyle A. Berman, Timothy J. Cope, Larry C. Barenbaum, Neil I. Sell, Ray M. Moberg, and the Blake L. Sartini and Delise F. Sartini Family Trust, as Defendants; Anthony Dacquisito, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, as Plaintiff vs. Larry Barenbaum, Lyle Berman, Neil Sell, Ray Moberg, Timothy Cope, LG Acquisition Corporation, Sartini Gaming, Inc., and the Blake L. Sartini and Delise F. Sartini Family Trust, as Defendants; and David Lehr and Pamela Lehr, as Plaintiffs, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated vs. Larry Barenbaum, Lyle Berman, Neil Sell, Ray Moberg, Timothy Cope, LG Acquisition Corporation, Sartini Gaming, Inc., and the Blake L. Sartini and Delise F. Sartini Family Trust, as Defendants. These are purported shareholder class action lawsuits brought by certain of Lakes’ shareholders on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, alleging that in entering into the proposed transaction with Golden Gaming, the Defendants have breached their fiduciary duties of good faith, loyalty and due care, and/or have aided and abetted such breaches. The Plaintiffs seek, among other things, to enjoin the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and attorney’s fees. On April 20, 2015, the plaintiffs filed an Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint consolidating all pending actions arising out of the Merger. In response to the lawsuits, Lakes’ Board of Directors appointed a special litigation committee (the “SLC”) pursuant to Minnesota law to investigate the claims alleged by the plaintiffs. On June 8, 2015, the judge in the matter denied the plaintiffs’ request for expedited proceedings and stayed the lawsuit until the conclusion of the SLC investigation and the issuance of its determinations. An unfavorable outcome in this lawsuit could result in substantial costs to Lakes. It is also possible that other lawsuits may yet be filed and Lakes cannot estimate any possible loss from this or future litigation at this time. Miscellaneous Legal Matters Lakes and its subsidiaries are involved in various other inquiries, administrative proceedings, and litigation relating to contracts and other matters arising in the normal course of business. While any proceeding or litigation has an element of uncertainty, and although unable to estimate the minimum costs, if any, to be incurred in connection with these matters, management currently believes that the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is remote, and is not likely to have a material adverse effect upon Lakes’ unaudited consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, no provision has been made with regard to these matters.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6449706&loc=d3e16207-108621 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 460 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 8 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=51674963&loc=d3e12565-110249 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=25496072&loc=d3e14435-108349 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 210 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.5-02.25) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6877327&loc=d3e13212-122682 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6394976&loc=d3e25287-109308 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration