Commitments and Contingencies	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies Participation and Revenue Share Agreements In addition to the space agreements described above in Note 13, Leases, the Company also enters into slot placement contracts in the form of participation and revenue share agreements. Under participation agreements, the business location holds the applicable gaming license and retains a percentage of the gaming revenue that it generates from the Company’s slots. Under revenue share agreements, the Company pays the business location a percentage of the gaming revenue generated from the Company’s slots placed at the location, rather than a fixed monthly rental fee. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the aggregate contingent payments recognized by the Company as gaming expenses under participation and revenue share agreements were $158.6 million, $147.7 million and $143.3 million, respectively, including $0.9 million, $0.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively, under participation and revenue share agreements with related parties, as described in Note 15, Related Party Transactions. The Company also enters into amusement device and ATM placement contracts in the form of participation agreements. Under these agreements, the Company pays the business location a percentage of the non-gaming revenue generated from the Company’s amusement devices and ATMs placed at the location. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the total contingent payments recognized by the Company as operating expenses for amusement devices and ATMs under such agreements were $1.5 million, $1.4 million and $1.4 million, respectively. Collective Bargaining Agreements As of December 31, 2019 the Company had approximately 8,000 employees, of which approximately 2,000 were covered by various collective bargaining agreements. One collective bargaining agreement expired in 2018, and was successfully renegotiated in the first quarter of 2020. The Company’s other collective bargaining agreements expire between 2020 and 2024. The Company cannot ensure that, upon the expiration of existing collective bargaining agreements, new agreements will be reached without union action or that any such new agreements will be on terms satisfactory to the Company. Employment Agreements The Company has entered into at-will employment agreements with certain of the Company’s executive officers. Under each employment agreement, in addition to the executive’s annual base salary, the executive is entitled to participate in the Company’s incentive compensation programs applicable to executive officers of the Company. The executives are also eligible to participate in all health benefits, insurance programs, pension and retirement plans and other employee benefit and compensation arrangements. Each executive is also provided with other benefits as set forth in his employment agreement. In the event of a termination without “cause” or a “constructive termination” of the Company’s executive officers (as defined in their respective employment agreements), the Company could be liable for estimated severance payments of up to $5.7 million for Mr. Sartini, $3.1 million for Charles H. Protell, $2.5 million for Stephen A. Arcana, $1.6 million for Sean T. Higgins, and $0.9 million for Blake L. Sartini II (assuming each officer’s respective annual salary and health benefit costs as of December 31, 2019, subject to amounts in effect at the time of termination and excluding potential expense related to acceleration of stock options, RSUs and PSUs). Legal Matters From time to time, the Company is involved in a variety of lawsuits, claims, investigations and other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings concerning labor and employment matters, personal injury claims, breach of contract claims, commercial disputes, business practices, intellectual property, tax and other matters for which the Company records reserves. Although lawsuits, claims, investigations and other legal proceedings are inherently uncertain and their results cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes that the resolution of its currently pending matters should not have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Regardless of the outcome, legal proceedings can have an adverse impact on the Company because of defense costs, diversion of management resources and other factors. In addition, it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more such proceedings could in the future materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity in a particular period. On August 31, 2018, prior guests of The Strat filed a purported class action complaint against the Company in the District Court, Clark County, Nevada, on behalf of similarly situated individuals and entities that paid the Clark County Combined Transient Lodging Tax (“Tax”) on the portion of a resort fee that constitutes charges for Internet access, during the period of February 6, 2014 through the date the alleged conduct ceases. The lawsuit alleged that the Tax was charged in violation of the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act, which imposed a national moratorium on the taxation of Internet access by states and their political subdivisions, and sought, on behalf of the plaintiff and the putative class, damages equal to the amount of the Tax collected on the Internet access component of the resort fee, injunctive relief, disgorgement, interest, fees and costs. All defendants to this matter, including Golden Entertainment, Inc., filed a joint motion to dismiss this matter for lack of merit. The District Court granted this joint motion to dismiss on February 21, 2019. The plaintiffs filed an appeal to the Supreme Court of Nevada on April 10, 2019. The Company, and other defendants, filed an appellate response brief on October 19, 2019. While legal proceedings are inherently unpredictable and no assurance can be given as to the ultimate outcome of any of the above matters, based on management’s current understanding of the relevant facts and circumstances, the Company believes that these proceedings should not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Commitments and Contingencies

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2019

Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies

Participation and Revenue Share Agreements

In addition to the space agreements described above in Note 13, Leases, the Company also enters into slot placement contracts in the form of participation and revenue share agreements. Under participation agreements, the business location holds the applicable gaming license and retains a percentage of the gaming revenue that it generates from the Company’s slots. Under revenue share agreements, the Company pays the business location a percentage of the gaming revenue generated from the Company’s slots placed at the location, rather than a fixed monthly rental fee. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the aggregate contingent payments recognized by the Company as gaming expenses under participation and revenue share agreements were $158.6 million, $147.7 million and $143.3 million, respectively, including $0.9 million, $0.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively, under participation and revenue share agreements with related parties, as described in Note 15, Related Party Transactions.

The Company also enters into amusement device and ATM placement contracts in the form of participation agreements. Under these agreements, the Company pays the business location a percentage of the non-gaming revenue generated from the Company’s amusement devices and ATMs placed at the location. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the total contingent payments recognized by the Company as operating expenses for amusement devices and ATMs under such agreements were $1.5 million, $1.4 million and $1.4 million, respectively.

Collective Bargaining Agreements

As of December 31, 2019 the Company had approximately 8,000 employees, of which approximately 2,000 were covered by various collective bargaining agreements. One collective bargaining agreement expired in 2018, and was successfully renegotiated in the first quarter of 2020. The Company’s other collective bargaining agreements expire between 2020 and 2024. The Company cannot ensure that, upon the expiration of existing collective bargaining agreements, new agreements will be reached without union action or that any such new agreements will be on terms satisfactory to the Company.

Employment Agreements

The Company has entered into at-will employment agreements with certain of the Company’s executive officers. Under each employment agreement, in addition to the executive’s annual base salary, the executive is entitled to participate in the Company’s incentive compensation programs applicable to executive officers of the Company. The executives are also eligible to participate in all health benefits, insurance programs, pension and retirement plans and other employee benefit and compensation arrangements. Each executive is also provided with other benefits as set forth in his employment agreement. In the event of a termination without “cause” or a “constructive termination” of the Company’s executive officers (as defined in their respective employment agreements), the Company could be liable for estimated severance payments of up to $5.7 million for Mr. Sartini, $3.1 million for Charles H. Protell, $2.5 million for Stephen A. Arcana, $1.6 million for Sean T. Higgins, and $0.9 million for Blake L. Sartini II (assuming each officer’s respective annual salary and health benefit costs as of December 31, 2019, subject to amounts in effect at the time of termination and excluding potential expense related to acceleration of stock options, RSUs and PSUs).

Legal Matters

From time to time, the Company is involved in a variety of lawsuits, claims, investigations and other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings concerning labor and employment matters, personal injury claims, breach of contract claims, commercial disputes, business practices, intellectual property, tax and other matters for which the Company records reserves. Although lawsuits, claims, investigations and other legal proceedings are inherently uncertain and their results cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes that the resolution of its currently pending matters should not have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Regardless of the outcome, legal proceedings can have an adverse impact on the Company because of defense costs, diversion of management resources and other factors. In addition, it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more such proceedings could in the future materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity in a particular period.

On August 31, 2018, prior guests of The Strat filed a purported class action complaint against the Company in the District Court, Clark County, Nevada, on behalf of similarly situated individuals and entities that paid the Clark County Combined Transient Lodging Tax (“Tax”) on the portion of a resort fee that constitutes charges for Internet access, during the period of February 6, 2014 through the date the alleged conduct ceases. The lawsuit alleged that the Tax was charged in violation of the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act, which imposed a national moratorium on the taxation of Internet access by states and their political subdivisions, and sought, on behalf of the plaintiff and the putative class, damages equal to the amount of the Tax collected on the Internet access component of the resort fee, injunctive relief, disgorgement, interest, fees and costs. All defendants to this matter, including Golden Entertainment, Inc., filed a joint motion to dismiss this matter for lack of merit. The District Court granted this joint motion to dismiss on February 21, 2019. The plaintiffs filed an appeal to the Supreme Court of Nevada on April 10, 2019. The Company, and other defendants, filed an appellate response brief on October 19, 2019.

While legal proceedings are inherently unpredictable and no assurance can be given as to the ultimate outcome of any of the above matters, based on management’s current understanding of the relevant facts and circumstances, the Company believes that these proceedings should not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.