Legal Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Legal Contingencies	Jun. 30, 2021
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Legal Contingencies	Legal Contingencies There have been no material changes in the status of the legal proceedings previously disclosed in Part I, Item 3 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, except as follows. From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various legal proceedings incidental to their business in the ordinary course, including matters in which damages in various amounts are claimed. Based on information currently available, the Company does not believe that the liabilities (if any) resulting from such legal proceedings will have a material effect on the financial position of the Company. However, in light of the inherent uncertainties involved in such matters, ongoing legal expenses or an adverse outcome in one or more of these matters could materially and adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in any particular reporting period, as well as its reputation. On July 24, 2019, a putative class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “SDNY”) against the Company, its current and former President and Chief Executive Officer and its current and former Chief Financial Officer, on behalf of persons similarly situated, who purchased or otherwise acquired Company securities between March 2, 2015 and July 17, 2019. On November 7, 2019, the Court appointed a lead plaintiff and lead counsel in that matter, and on January 21, 2020, the lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint on behalf of the same class against the same defendants as well as the Company’s former General Counsel. The plaintiff alleges that certain of the Company’s 10-K reports and other public statements and disclosures contained materially false or misleading statements about, among other things, the effectiveness of its internal controls and related party loans, in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and Section 20(a) of that act, resulting in injury to the purported class members as a result of the decline in the value of the Company’s common stock following the disclosure of increased legal expenses associated with certain government investigations involving the Company. As previously disclosed by the Company, on December 24, 2020, by stipulation of the parties, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York stayed the putative class action lawsuit pending a non-binding mediation that had been scheduled for April 13, 2021. Immediately following the non-binding mediation, the parties continued a settlement dialogue and reached an agreement to settle the putative class action lawsuit, involving a total payment by the Company of $7.5 million in exchange for the release of all of the defendants from all alleged claims in the class action suit, without any admission or concession of wrongdoing by the Company or the other defendants. The Company expects that the full amount of a final settlement will be paid by the Company’s insurance carriers under applicable insurance policies. On June 28, 2021, the lead plaintiff filed the executed Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with the Court, along with an unopposed motion for preliminary approval of the proposed settlement. The Court has scheduled a preliminary approval hearing for August 12, 2021; the Company anticipates that a final approval hearing will be held later this year. There can be no assurance, however, that the agreement will receive court approval and/or meet all other conditions. As previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, on January 25, 2021, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with respect to a previously disclosed shareholder demand letter, covering substantially the same subject matters as the disclosed civil securities class action litigation pending in the SDNY. The letter demanded that the Board undertake an investigation into the Board’s and management’s alleged violations of law and alleged breaches of fiduciary duties, and take appropriate actions following such investigation. As required by DC Superior Court administrative procedures, shareholder’s counsel first filed a derivative action complaint against the individual directors and officers named in the demand letter, and the Company as nominal Defendant, before filing the executed Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement accompanied by the shareholder’s brief in support of its unopposed motion to approve the settlement. Court approval of the settlement remains pending. Although the Company believes the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement is in the best interests of the Company’s shareholders, there can be no assurance that it will be approved by the Court. The Company has received various document requests and subpoenas from the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), banking regulators and U.S. Attorney’s offices in connection with investigations, which the Company believes relate to the Company’s identification, classification and disclosure of related party transactions; the retirement of certain former officers and directors; and the relationship of the Company and certain of its former officers and directors with a local public official, among other things. The Company is cooperating with these investigations. There have been no regulatory restrictions placed on the Company’s ability to fully engage in its banking business as presently conducted as a result of these ongoing investigations. In connection with the Commission’s investigation, which we initially disclosed on Form 8-K on July 18, 2019, our current Chief Financial Officer recently received a Wells Notice from the Commission Staff that the Staff has made a preliminary determination to recommend to the Commission enforcement actions against him. Neither the Company nor any other current employee or director has received a Wells Notice. The Company and our Chief Financial Officer are continuing to cooperate with the Staff’s investigation, and we understand that our Chief Financial Officer has made a submission to the SEC in response to the Wells Notice. The Company has, in addition, initiated discussions with the Staff about a potential resolution or settlement of the Staff’s investigation with respect to the Company. The Company is hopeful that these discussions will lead to a resolution of the investigation in the next few months as it relates to the Company and any current employees and directors on a mutually agreeable basis, but there can be no assurance that will be the case. There also can be no assurance that this would result in resolution of any charges against former employees or directors, given the Staff’s ongoing review of the factual record. Any agreements reached by the Company with the Staff would be subject to approval by the Commission, and there can be no assurance that it would be approved. We are unable to predict the outcome of the investigation or these discussions or whether any potential resolution would have a material impact on the Company. The Company has also recently initiated discussions with the Staff of the Federal Reserve Board about a potential resolution or settlement of its investigation with respect to the Company. With respect to the other investigations described above, we are unable to predict their duration, scope or outcome. The amount of legal fees and expenditures for the year is net of expected insurance coverage where we believe we have a high likelihood of recovery pursuant to our D&O insurance policies, but does not include any offset for potential claims we may have in the future as to which recovery is impossible to predict at this time.