<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.77E LEGAL
<SEQUENCE>2
<FILENAME>nkx77e.txt
<TEXT>
Form N-SAR, Sub-Item 77E
Legal Proceedings



Nuveen Insured California Tax-Free Advantage Municipal Fund
333-100323
811-21212


During 2010, 33 Nuveen leveraged closed-end funds,
including the Nuveen Insured California Tax-Free
Advantage Municipal Fund (symbol  NKX ) (hereafter,
the  Registrant ), received a demand letter from a law
firm on behalf of purported holders of common shares of
each such fund, alleging that Nuveen Asset Management,
the funds investment adviser, and the funds officers and
Board of Directors/Trustees breached their fiduciary
duties related to the redemption at par of the funds
auction rate preferred securities (ARPS). In response, the
Board established an ad hoc Demand Committee
consisting of certain of its disinterested and independent
Board members to investigate the claims. The Demand
Committee retained independent counsel to assist it in
conducting an extensive investigation. Based upon its
investigation, the Demand Committee found that it was
not in the best interests of each fund or its shareholders to
take the actions suggested in the demand letters, and
recommended that the full Board reject the demands
made in the demand letters. After reviewing the findings
and recommendation of the Demand Committee, the full
Board of each fund unanimously adopted the Demand
Committees recommendation.  Subsequently, the
Registrant was named as a nominal defendant in a
purported shareholder derivative complaint filed in the
Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois on July 27, 2010.
The case is captioned  Safier et al. v. Nuveen Asset
Management et al., No. 10 CH 32166. The plaintiffs are
common shareholders of one or more of 20 Nuveen
funds, including the Registrant. The defendants in these
cases are Nuveen Asset Management, individual current
or former officers and an officer/director of the Nuveen
funds, Nuveen Investments, Inc. and its parent entity.
The complaint alleges that Nuveen Asset Management
and the individual defendants breached their fiduciary
duties to the common shareholders and to the funds when
they caused the funds to redeem ARPS and that such
conduct constituted corporate waste.  The plaintiffs
further allege that Nuveen Investments, Inc. and its parent
entity aided and abetted the breaches of fiduciary duty.
The complaint seeks a declaration that the defendants
have breached their fiduciary duties, an order directing
the defendants not to redeem any ARPS at their
liquidation value using fund assets, indeterminate
monetary damages in favor of the funds and an award of
plaintiffs costs and disbursements in pursuing the action.
Two related lawsuits have been subsequently filed by the
same law firm relating to additional Nuveen funds and
raising the same allegations. These cases do not involve
the Registrant.

The defendants believe the complaints are without merit
and intend to vigorously defend against the charges.
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
