<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.77E LEGAL
<SEQUENCE>2
<FILENAME>nkx77e.txt
<TEXT>
Form N-SAR, Sub-Item 77E
Legal Proceedings



Nuveen Insured California Tax-Free Advantage Municipal Fund
333-100323
811-21212


    Thirty-three Nuveen leveraged closed-end funds
(including the Nuveen California Dividend Advantage
Municipal Fund (symbol  NAC ) (hereafter, the  Fund ))
have each received a demand letter from a law firm on
behalf of purported holders of the funds common shares.
Each letter alleged that Nuveen Fund Advisors (the funds
investment adviser) and the funds officers and Board of
Directors or Trustees, as applicable (the  Board of
Trustees ) breached their fiduciary duties by favoring the
interests of holders of the funds auction rate preferred
shares ( ARPS ) over those of its common shareholders in
connection with each funds ARPS refinancing and/or
redemption activities, and demanded that the Board take
action to remedy those alleged breaches. In response to the
demand letters, each funds Board of Trustees established a
Demand Committee of certain of its disinterested and
independent members to investigate the claims. The
Demand Committee, for each fund, retained independent
counsel to assist it in conducting its investigation. Based
upon its investigation, the Demand Committee, for each
fund, found that it was not in the best interests of each fund
or its shareholders to take the actions suggested in the
demand letters, and recommended that the full Board reject
the demands made in the demand letters. After reviewing
the findings and recommendation of each Demand
Committee, the full Board of each fund unanimously
adopted the Demand Committees recommendation and
each of the thirty-three funds has since rejected the
demands made in the demand letters.


    Subsequently, all thirty-three funds that received
demand letters (including the Fund) and one fund that did
not receive a demand letter were named as nominal
defendants in four putative shareholder derivative action
complaints filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County,
Illinois, Chancery Division (the  Cook County Chancery
Court ). The four putative shareholder actions have since
been consolidated into one shareholder derivative action
complaint captioned Martin Safier, et al., v. Nuveen Asset
Management, et al., filed with the Cook County Chancery
Court on February 18, 2011 (the  Complaint ). The
Complaint was filed on behalf of purported holders of each
funds common shares and also names Nuveen Fund
Advisors as a defendant, together with current and former
officers and a trustee of each of the funds (together with the
nominal defendants, collectively, the  Defendants ). The
Complaint contains the same basic allegations contained in
the demand letters. The suit seeks a declaration that the
Defendants have breached their fiduciary duties, an order
directing the Defendants not to redeem any ARPS at their
liquidation value using fund assets, indeterminate monetary
damages in favor of the funds and an award of plaintiffs
costs and disbursements in pursuing the action. The
plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary injunction to stop
the funds subject to the lawsuits from redeeming additional
ARPS during the pendency of the lawsuits. The court
rejected that motion on November 23, 2010.   On April 29,
2011, each of the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the
Complaint, which remains pending before the court.


    Nuveen Fund Advisors believes that the Complaint is
without merit, and intends to defend vigorously against the
charges. Nuveen Fund Advisors also believes that the
Complaint will not have a material adverse effect on the
ability of Nuveen Fund Advisors to perform its obligations
under its investment advisory contract with any of the
Nuveen leveraged closed-end funds (including the Fund).



</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
