XML 31 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.25.3

Investment properties | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2025
Investment properties |
Investment properties | 9. Investment properties Changes in the Group’s investment properties according to the fair value hierarchy for the years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 were as follows:
|  | 06.30.2025 |  |  | 06.30.2024 |
|  | Level 2 |  |  | Level 3 |  |  | Level 2 |  |  | Level 3 |
Fair value at the beginning of year |  |  | 1,515,809 |  |  |  | 924,467 |  |  |  | 2,120,704 |  |  |  | 916,340 |
Additions |  |  | 26,944 |  |  |  | 47,567 |  |  |  | 6,217 |  |  |  | 12,400 |
Disposals |  |  | (9,089 | ) |  |  | (18 | ) |  |  | (55,236 | ) |  |  | - |
Transfers |  |  | (111,140 | ) |  |  | (3,824 | ) |  |  | (56,953 | ) |  |  | (9 | )
Net (loss) / gain from fair value adjustment |  |  | (438,333 | ) |  |  | 457,408 |  |  |  | (481,805 | ) |  |  | (4,316 | )
Additions of capitalized leasing costs |  |  | 65 |  |  |  | 117 |  |  |  | 22 |  |  |  | 298 |
Amortization of capitalized leasing costs (i) |  |  | (131 | ) |  |  | (250 | ) |  |  | (188 | ) |  |  | (246 | )
Currency translation adjustment |  |  | (5,477 | ) |  |  | - |  |  |  | (16,952 | ) |  |  | - |
Fair value at the end of the year |  |  | 978,648 |  |  |  | 1,425,467 |  |  |  | 1,515,809 |  |  |  | 924,467 |
(i) Amortization charges of capitalized leasing costs were included in “Costs” in the Consolidated Statement of Income and Other Comprehensive Income (Note 27). The following is the balance by type of investment property of the Group as of June 30, 2025 and 2024:
|  | 06.30.2025 |  |  | 06.30.2024 |
Leased out farmland |  |  | 74,005 |  |  |  | 89,955 |
Offices and other rental properties |  |  | 276,149 |  |  |  | 444,474 |
Shopping malls (i) |  |  | 1,439,736 |  |  |  | 956,400 |
Undeveloped parcels of land |  |  | 611,617 |  |  |  | 946,585 |
Properties under development |  |  | 2,608 |  |  |  | 2,862 |
Total |  |  | 2,404,115 |  |  |  | 2,440,276 |
(i) Includes parking spaces. Certain investment property assets of the Group have been mortgaged or restricted to secure some of the Group’s trade and other payables. The book value of those properties as of June 30, 2025 and 2024 is as follows:
|  | 06.30.2025 |  |  | 06.30.2024 |
Córdoba Shopping (i) |  |  | 19,494 |  |  |  | 27,179 |
Total |  |  | 19,494 |  |  |  | 27,179 |
(i) A portion of the Córdoba Shopping mall property is encumbered with an antichresis right as collateral for an advance rent received from NAI International II Inc. amounting to ARS 2,936 million and ARS 2,866 million, as of June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, (included in “Trade and other payables” in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position). The following amounts have been recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income and Other Comprehensive Income:
|  | 06.30.2025 |  |  | 06.30.2024 |  |  | 06.30.2023 |
Revenues |  |  | 406,348 |  |  |  | 379,325 |  |  |  | 381,024 |
Direct operating expenses |  |  | (131,642 | ) |  |  | (115,834 | ) |  |  | (123,692 | )
Development expenses |  |  | (14,865 | ) |  |  | (1,848 | ) |  |  | (1,359 | )
Net unrealized gain / (loss) from fair value adjustment of investment property (i) |  |  | 15,923 |  |  |  | (521,760 | ) |  |  | (330,388 | )
Net realized gain from fair value adjustment of investment property (ii) |  |  | 3,152 |  |  |  | 35,639 |  |  |  | 62,707 |
(i) It includes the result from changes in the fair value of those investment properties that are in the portfolio and have not yet been sold. It has been generated in accordance with what is described in the section called "valuation techniques", mainly affected by the macroeconomic effects of inflation and changes in the reference exchange rates mentioned therein. (ii) Corresponds to the result from changes in the fair value realized from sales that occurred during the fiscal year of properties considered as investment properties. See Note 5 (liquidity schedule) for detail of contractual commitments related to investment properties. Valuation processes The Group’s investment properties were valued at each reporting date by independent professionally qualified appraisers who hold a recognized relevant professional qualification and have experience in the locations and segments of the investment properties appraised. For all investment properties, their current use equates to the highest and best use. Each business (or operations center, as appropriate) has a team, which reviews the appraisals performed by the independent appraisers (the “review teams”). The review teams: i) verifies all major and important assumptions relevant to the appraisal in the valuation report from the independent appraisers; ii) assesses property valuation movements compared to the valuation report from the prior period; and iii) holds discussions with the independent appraisers. Changes in Level 2 and 3 fair values, if any, are analyzed at each reporting date during the valuation discussions between the review team and the independent appraisers. The Board of Directors ultimately approves the fair value calculation for recording into the Financial Statements. Valuation techniques used for the estimation of fair value of the investment property Agricultural business For all leases of agricultural land, the valuation was determined using comparable values. Sale prices of comparable properties are adjusted considering the specific aspects of each property, being the most relevant premise the price per hectare. Urban properties and investments business During the annual investment property valuation process carried out in previous years, the following circumstances were identified, among other aspects: i) entry into force of the modifications in the urban planning code of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA) with the new urban code law sanctioned in November 2020 and which entered into force in February 2021 modifying approximately one third of the current code, ii) new construction potential, iii) consolidation of new paradigms of the sector imposed by the pandemic, the general economic situation and the situation of the real estate sector that make technical, legal or economically viable buildable potentials or surpluses for alternative uses of the entire portfolio of properties. Additionally, the amendments introduced in the new Urban Planning Code of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA), which came into effect on January 1, 2025, were taken into consideration. In this sense, the shopping malls were the most affected by the aforementioned circumstances, taking into account the size of their plots and their unique and strategic locations, considering an alternative potential realization market. The impact of the pandemic and the long-term closure of shopping malls led to a reconsideration of the possibility of mixed uses in the buildable potentials of such shopping malls, seeking a new centrality and enhancing the attractiveness in replacement of anchor stores. On the other hand, the analysis of opening towards its surroundings and the generation of open spaces produced a new distribution of the value of the existing square meters, producing a change of focus on how to maximize said surplus square meters. This led to reevaluate the analysis of the value of surplus square meters that were potentially marketable, (being that historically they were the most profitable), to reconvert them to other complementary uses. The buildable potentials analyzed have unique, irreplaceable locations, with high potentials, feasible realization and very attractive from an economic point of view, this vision remains to this day. The identified buildable potentials, identified in previous years and that remain in the current year, are included in the value of the investment property based on the methodology established for other Level 2 properties: 1. Patio Bullrich, CABA 2. Alto Palermo, CABA 3. Córdoba Shopping, Córdoba 4. Beruti 3345/47, (Corner of Coronel Diaz), CABA. Valuation techniques used for the estimation of fair value of the investment property The Group has defined valuation techniques according to the characteristics of each property and the type of market in which these assets are located, for the purpose of considering the use of the most observable information available for the determination of fair value. For the Shopping Malls operated by the Group there is no liquid market for the sale of properties with these characteristics that can be taken as a reference of value. Likewise, the Shopping Malls, a business whose revenue is denominated in Argentine Pesos, are highly related to the fluctuation of macroeconomic variables in Argentina, the purchasing power of individuals, the economic cycle of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth, the evolution of inflation and consumption, among others. Consequently, the methodology adopted by the Group for the valuation of Shopping Malls is the discounted cash flow model (“DCF”), which allows the volatility of the Argentine economy to be taken into account and its correlation with the revenue streams of the Malls and the inherent risk of the Argentine macroeconomy. The DCF methodology contemplates the use of certain unobservable valuation assumptions, which are determined based on the information and internal sources available at the date of each measurement. These assumptions mainly include the following: • Future projected income flow based on the current locations, type and quality of the properties, supported by the rental contracts that the Company has signed with its tenants. Because the Company's income arises from the higher value between a Minimum Insured Fixed Value (“VMA”) and a percentage of the sales of the tenants in each Shopping Mall, estimates of the evolution of GDP and Inflation of the Argentine economy provided by external consultants to estimate the evolution of tenant sales, which present a high correlation with these macroeconomic variables. Said macroeconomic projections were contrasted with the projections prepared by the International Monetary Fund (“IMF”), the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (“OECD”) and with the Market Expectations Survey (“REM”), which consists of a survey prepared by the Central Bank of the Argentine Republic (“BCRA”) aimed at local and foreign specialized analysts in order to allow a systematic monitoring of the main macroeconomic forecasts in the short and medium term on the evolution of the Argentine economy.
| · | It was considered that the revenues from all the Shopping Malls would grow in line with the budget during the first fiscal year. Subsequently, they grow with the same elasticity in relation to the evolution of GDP and projected Inflation. The specific characteristics and risks of each Shopping Mall are captured through the use of the historical average EBITDA Margin of each of them. Eliminating from the average those years that, due to various factors, are not representative, such as the pandemic year.
| · | Cash flows from future investments, expansions or improvements in Shopping Mall were not contemplated.
| · | Terminal value: a perpetuity calculated from the cash flow from the 10th year of each Shopping Mall was considered.
| · | The cash flow for concessions was projected until the termination date of the concession stipulated in the current contract.
| · | Given the prevailing inflationary context and the volatility of certain macroeconomic variables, a reference long term interest rate in Argentine Pesos is not available to discount the projected cash flows from shopping malls. Consequently, the projected cash flows were dollarized through the future ARS / US$ exchange rate curve provided by an external consultant, which are contrasted to assess their reasonableness with those of the IMF, OECD, REM and the On-shore Exchange Rate Futures Market (ROFEX). Finally, dollarized cash flows were discounted with a long-term dollar rate, the weighted average capital cost rate (“WACC”), for each valuation date.
| · | The estimation of the WACC discount rate was determined according to the following components:
| a) | United State Governments Bonds risk-free rate;
| b) | Market risk premium in the United States.
| c) | Industry beta or volatility, considering comparable companies from the United States, Brazil, Chile and Mexico, in order to contemplate the Market Risk on the risk-free rate;
| d) | Argentine country risk considering the average yield spread of a representative set of corporate bonds issued by Argentine companies with a credit quality similar to the Company, and 10-year U.S. Treasuries.;
| e) | Cost of debt and capital structure, considering that information available from the Argentine corporate market (“blue chips”) was determined as a reference, since sovereign bonds have a history of defaults. Consequently, and because IRSA, based on its representativeness and market share represents the most important entity in the sector, we have taken its relevant indicators to determine the discount rate; and
| f) | local income tax rate.
Due to the debt restructuring carried out during previous fiscal periods, which affected the composition of the group's capital structure, the use of two different discount rates was introduced in the valuation of our shopping malls: one for the flows discount and another for perpetuity. Here is the difference between the two:
| · | Discounted cash flow rate: considers the company’s current capital structure.
| · | Discount perpetuity rate: considers a market capital structure, based on comparable companies.
The introduction of the normalized rate in perpetuity is due to the fact that we consider that the relationship between debt and capital would tend to normalize in the long term. For offices, other rental properties, plot of lands and buildable potentials the valuation was determined using transactions of comparable market assets, since the market for these assets in Argentina is liquid and has market transactions that can be taken as reference. These values are adjusted to reflect differences in key attributes such as location, property size and quality of interior fittings (incidence adjustments). The most significant input to the comparable market approach is the price per square meter that derives from the supply and demand in force in the market at each valuation date. Since September 2019, the real estate market has faced certain changes in terms of its operation as a consequence of the implementation of regulations applicable to the foreign exchange market. Since that date, strict exchange controls have been in effect in Argentina, which limit, among other things: buying foreign currency in order to form external assets, prepaying debts, the purchase of foreign currency to pay for imports, making remittances of profits and dividends abroad and transferring funds abroad. However, as of April 2025, such foreign exchange controls were almost entirely eliminated for individuals and reduced for the payment of imports, dividends generated from fiscal years beginning after January 1, 2025, and interest payments on financial debt with related parties As a consequence of these exchange regulations, it is observed that the purchase and sales transactions for office buildings, other rental properties, land reserves, and buildable potentials may be settled in Argentine Pesos or in dollars. In this way, the most probable scenario is that any sale of the aforementioned assets be settled in Argentine Pesos at an implicit foreign exchange rate higher than the official one. This is evidenced by the transactions consummated by the Group, both in the current fiscal year and in prior years. Therefore, and given that the previously described situation remains in effect as of the date of issuance of these Consolidated Financial Statements, the Group has valued its office buildings, land reserves and buildable potentials in Argentine Pesos at the end of the year considering the situation described above, considering an implicit exchange rate higher than the official one. In certain situations, it is complex to determine reliably the fair value of developing properties. In order to assess whether the fair value of a developing property can be determined reliably, management considers the following factors, among others:
| · | The provisions of the construction contract.
| · | The stage of completion.
| · | Whether the project / property is standard (typical for the market) or non-standard.
| · | The level of reliability of cash inflows after completion.
| · | The specific development risk of the property.
| · | Previous experience with similar constructions.
| · | Status of construction permits.
| · | The feasibility studies of infrastructure links.
There were no changes in the valuation techniques during the year. The following table presents information regarding the fair value measurements of investment properties using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
|  |  |  | 06.30.2025 (i) | 06.30.2024 (i) | 06.30.2023 (i)
Description | Valuation technique | Parameters | Fiscal year 2025 / 2024 / 2023 | Increase | Decrease | Increase | Decrease | Increase | Decrease
Shopping Malls (Level 3) | Discounted cash flows | Discount cash flows rate | 11.08% / 15.40% / 15.25% | (28,789) | 30,669 | (21,136) | 22,438 | (19,460) | 20,843
Discount perpetually rate | 10.63% / 14.11% / 14.20% | (112,417) | 149,290 | (42,692) | 53,024 | (45,832) | 56,414
Grouth perpetually rate | 2.4% / 2.4% / 2.4% | 92,603 | (72,527) | 29,104 | (24,523) | 34,757 | (29,328)
Inflation | (*) | 88,284 | (82,775) | 46,342 | (44,520) | 124,586 | (113,796)
Devaluation | (*) | (129,588) | 158,385 | (84,041) | 92,445 | (83,302) | 91,632
(*) Fiscal year 2025: For the next 5 years, an average ARS / USD exchange rate with an upward trend was considered, starting at ARS 1,308.33 (corresponding to the year ended June 30, 2026) and arriving at ARS 2,477.27 in 2030. In the long term, a nominal devaluation rate of 5.57% calculated based on the quotient between inflation in Argentina and the United States is assumed. The considered inflation shows a downward trend, which starts at 25.5% and stabilizes at 8.0% after 4 years. Fiscal year 2024: For the next 5 years, an average ARS / USD exchange rate with an upward trend was considered, starting at ARS 1,170.0 (corresponding to the year ended June 30, 2025) and arriving at ARS 3,024.05 in 2030. In the long term, a nominal devaluation rate of 5.57% calculated based on the quotient between inflation in Argentina and the United States is assumed. The considered inflation shows a downward trend, which starts at 85.6% (corresponding to the year ended June 30, 2025) and stabilizes at 8.0% after 5 years. Fiscal year 2023: For the next 5 years, an average ARS / USD exchange rate with an upward trend was considered, starting at ARS 479.40 (corresponding to the year ended June 30, 2024) and arriving at ARS 2,118.20 in 2029. In the long term, a nominal devaluation rate of 5.57% calculated based on the quotient between inflation in Argentina and the United States is assumed. The considered inflation shows a downward trend, which starts at 144.3% (corresponding to the year ended June 30, 2023) and stabilizes at 8.0% after 5 years. (i) Considering an increase or decrease of: 100 points for the discount and growth rate in Argentina, 10% for the incidence and inflation and 10% for the devaluation.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | cresud_DisclosureOfInvestmentPropertiesExplanatoryAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | cresud_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | cresud_InvestmentPropertiesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | cresud_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration