XML 35 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Income Taxes
12 Months Ended
Feb. 28, 2017
Income Taxes  
Income Taxes

Note 11 - Income Taxes

We reorganized the Company in Bermuda in 1994 and many of our foreign subsidiaries are not directly or indirectly owned by a U.S. parent. As such, a large portion of our foreign income is not subject to U.S. taxation on a permanent basis under current law. Additionally, our intellectual property is largely owned by foreign subsidiaries, resulting in proportionally higher earnings in jurisdictions with lower statutory tax rates, which decreases our overall effective tax rate. The taxable income earned in each jurisdiction, whether U.S. or foreign, is determined by the subsidiary's operating results, and transfer pricing and tax regulations in the related jurisdictions. We have indefinitely reinvested $62.1 million of undistributed earnings of our foreign operations outside of our U.S. tax jurisdiction as of February 28, 2017.  No deferred tax liability has been recognized for the remittance of such earnings to the U.S. since it is our intention to utilize these earnings in our foreign operations.

 

Our components of income before income tax expense are as follows:

 

COMPONENTS OF INCOME BEFORE TAXES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Years Ended the Last Day of February,

(in thousands)

   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

U.S.

 

$

15,051

 

$

30,874

 

$

34,876

Non-U.S.

 

 

134,838

 

 

88,944

 

 

112,338

Total

 

$

149,889

 

$

119,818

 

$

147,214

Our components of income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:

 

COMPONENTS OF INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Years Ended the Last Day of February,

(in thousands)

   

2017

   

2016

   

2015

U.S.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

16,744

 

$

12,824

 

$

18,525

Deferred

 

 

(10,230)

 

 

(1,239)

 

 

(3,014)

 

 

 

6,514

 

 

11,585

 

 

15,511

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-U.S.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

 

(290)

 

 

4,919

 

 

(645)

Deferred

 

 

2,976

 

 

2,086

 

 

1,184

 

 

 

2,686

 

 

7,005

 

 

539

Total

 

$

9,200

 

$

18,590

 

$

16,050

 

Our total income tax expense differs from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. statutory tax rate to income before income taxes. A summary of these differences are as follows:

 

INCOME TAX RATE RECONCILIATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Years Ended the Last Day of February,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

 

Effective income tax rate at the U.S. statutory rate

 

 

35.0

%  

 

35.0

%  

 

35.0

%  

    Impact of U.S. state income taxes

 

 

0.3

%  

 

0.5

%  

 

0.6

%  

Effect of zero tax rate in Macau

 

 

(20.9)

%  

 

(19.3)

%  

 

(12.4)

%  

Effect of statutory tax rate in Barbados

 

 

(7.6)

%  

 

(6.8)

%  

 

(11.7)

%  

Effect of statutory tax rate in Switzerland

 

 

(3.8)

%  

 

(5.7)

%  

 

(2.9)

%  

Effect of income from other non-U.S. operations subject to varying rates

 

 

2.2

%  

 

4.1

%  

 

0.9

%  

Effect of foreign exchange fluctuations

 

 

0.5

%  

 

3.3

%  

 

0.4

%  

Effect of asset impairment charges

 

 

0.4

%  

 

1.1

%  

 

1.6

%  

Other Items

 

 

0.0

%  

 

3.3

%  

 

(0.6)

%  

Effective income tax rate

 

 

6.1

%  

 

15.5

%  

 

10.9

%  

 

Our Macau subsidiary generates income from the sale of the goods that it has sourced and procured. This subsidiary is responsible for the sourcing and procurement of a large portion of the products that we sell. We have an indefinite tax holiday in Macau conditioned on the subsidiary meeting certain employment and investment thresholds.  We have not experienced any issues in meeting the required thresholds, and are unaware of any regulatory changes or impending circumstances that would restrict our right to continue to benefit from the tax holiday. Because our Macau subsidiary is not directly or indirectly owned by a U.S. parent, there is no U.S. tax liability associated with the income generated in Macau.

 

Each year there are significant transactions or events that are incidental to our core businesses and that by a combination of their nature and jurisdiction, can have a disproportionate impact on our reported effective tax rates. Without these transactions or events, the trend in our effective tax rates would follow a more normalized pattern.

 

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of the last day of February 2017 and 2016 are as follows:

 

COMPONENTS OF DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Last Day of February,

(in thousands)

    

2017

    

2016

Deferred tax assets, gross:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating loss carryforwards

 

$

16,799

 

$

15,419

Accounts receivable

 

 

7,375

 

 

6,332

Inventories

 

 

11,057

 

 

10,372

Accrued expenses and other

 

 

12,007

 

 

10,783

Total gross deferred tax assets

 

 

47,238

 

 

42,906

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

(17,600)

 

 

(16,223)

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(47,774)

 

 

(51,562)

Total deferred tax liabilities, net

 

$

(18,136)

 

$

(24,879)

 

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We consider the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, expected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in assessing the ultimate realization of deferred tax assets. If recovery is not likely, we must increase our provision for taxes by recording a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets that we estimate will not be recoverable. In fiscal 2017, the $1.4 million net increase in our valuation allowance was principally due to changes in estimates regarding the value of operating loss carryforwards to be used in the future.

 

As of February 28, 2017 and February 29, 2016, we had remaining tax-deductible goodwill of $113.0 million and $133.1 million, respectively, resulting from acquisitions. The amortization of this goodwill is deductible over various periods ranging up to 12 years. The tax deduction for goodwill in fiscal 2018 is expected to be approximately $20.2 million.

The composition of our operating loss carryforwards at the end of fiscal 2017 is as follows:

 

SUMMARY OF OPERATING LOSS CARRYFORWARDS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balances at February 28, 2017

 

 

Tax Year

 

Deferred

 

Operating

 

 

Expiration

 

Tax

 

Loss

(in thousands)

    

Date Range

    

Assets

    

Carryforward

U.S. state operating loss carryforward

 

2017 - 2036

 

$

458

 

$

11,121

Non-U.S. operating loss carryforwards with definite carryover periods

 

2017 - 2027

 

 

1,418

 

 

8,349

Non-U.S. operating loss carryforwards with indefinite carryover periods

 

Indefinite

 

 

14,923

 

 

50,514

Subtotals

 

 

 

 

16,799

 

$

69,984

Less portion of valuation allowance established for operating loss carryforwards

 

 

 

 

(15,954)

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

$

845

 

 

 

 

Any future amount of deferred tax asset considered realizable could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during any carryforward periods are reduced.

 

During fiscal 2017 and 2016, changes in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits were as follows:

 

UNRECOGNIZED TAX BENEFITS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Fiscal Years Ended

 

 

the Last Day of February,

(in thousands)

    

2017

    

2016

Total unrecognized tax benefits, beginning balance

 

$

8,737

 

$

10,295

Tax positions taken during the current period

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Resolution of tax dispute

 

 

(1,381)

 

 

 -

Changes in tax positions taken during a prior period

 

 

121

 

 

278

Lapse in statute of limitations

 

 

(218)

 

 

(1,375)

Impact of foreign currency re-measurement

 

 

(133)

 

 

(421)

Settlements

 

 

(515)

 

 

(40)

Total unrecognized tax benefits, ending balance

 

 

6,611

 

 

8,737

Less current unrecognized tax benefits

 

 

 -

 

 

(536)

Noncurrent unrecognized tax benefits

 

$

6,611

 

$

8,201

 

Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of fiscal 2017 were $6.6 million of tax benefits, which, if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate. We do not expect any significant changes to our existing unrecognized tax benefits during the next twelve months resulting from any issues currently pending with tax authorities.

 

We classify interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions as income tax expense. At the end of February 2017 and 2016, the liability for tax-related interest and penalties included in unrecognized tax benefits was $1.7 million and $2.3 million, respectively. Additionally, during fiscal 2017,  2016 and 2015 we recognized expense (benefit) of ($0.6),  $0.5 and $0.2 million, respectively, in the consolidated statements of income.

 

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in various states and foreign jurisdictions. We do not expect that any proposed adjustments from these tax jurisdictions will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

As of February 28, 2017, tax years under examination or still subject to examination by material tax jurisdictions are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jurisdiction

    

Tax Years Under Examination

    

Open Tax Years

United Kingdom

 

- None -

 

2016

-

2017

United States *

 

2003, 2007, 2008

 

2003, 2007, 2008, 2014 - 2017

Switzerland

 

- None -

 

2013

-

2017

Hong Kong

 

2014

 

2009

-

2017

Kaz, Inc. and its U.S. subsidiaries are under examination for the 2003, 2007 and 2008 tax years. In February 2016, the examination of Helen of Troy Texas Corporation and its subsidiaries for the 2011 and 2012 tax years was completed with no impact to tax expense.

During fiscal 2017 we received an initial notice from a state tax authority which questioned our determination of taxable income applicable to the particular state resulting from interpretations of certain state income tax provisions applicable to our legal structure. We believe we have accurately reported our taxable income and will be pursuing the matter through routine administrative processes with the state. We believe it is unlikely that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.