N-CSR 1 d138563dncsr.htm N-CSR - IIM

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED

MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number 811-06590

Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

1555 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 1800 Atlanta, Georgia 30309

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

Sheri Morris

1555 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 1800 Atlanta, Georgia 30309

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (713) 626-1919

Date of fiscal year end: 2/28

Date of reporting period: 2/28/21

ITEM 1. | Report to Stockholders.

Annual Report to Shareholders |  | February 28, 2021
Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust
NYSE: IIM |  |

Management’s Discussion of Trust Performance

|  | Performance summary For the year ended February 28, 2021, Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust (the Trust), at net asset value (NAV), outperformed its style-specific benchmark, the S&P Municipal Bond 5+ Year Investment Grade Index. The Trust’s return can be calculated based on either the market price or the NAV of its shares. NAV per share is determined by dividing the value of the Trust’s portfolio securities, cash and other assets, less all liabilities and preferred shares, by the total number of common shares outstanding. Market price reflects the supply and demand for Trust shares. As a result, the two returns can differ, as they did during the year. |
|  | Performance |  |  |  |
|  | Total returns, 2/29/20 to 2/28/21 |  |  |  |
|  | Trust at NAV |  |  | 1.11 | %
|  | Trust at Market Value |  |  | 5.45 |
|  | S&P Municipal Bond Indexq (Broad Market Index) |  |  | 1.22 |
|  | S&P Municipal Bond 5+ Year Investment Grade Indexq (Style-Specific Index) |  |  | 0.95 |
|  | Lipper Closed-End General and Insured Municipal Leveraged Debt Funds Index⬛ (Peer Group Index) |  |  | 0.51 |
|  | Market Price Discount to NAV as of 2/28/21 |  |  | -5.93 |
|  | Source(s): qRIMES Technologies Corp.; ⬛ Lipper Inc. |  |  |  |
|  | The performance data quoted represent past performance and cannot guarantee comparable future results; current performance may be lower or higher. Investment return, NAV and common share market price will fluctuate so that you may have a gain or loss when you sell shares. Please visit invesco.com/us for the most recent month-end performance. Performance figures reflect Trust expenses, the reinvestment of distributions (if any) and changes in NAV for performance based on NAV and changes in market price for performance based on market price. Since the Trust is a closed-end management investment company, shares of the Trust may trade at a discount or premium from the NAV. This characteristic is separate and distinct from the risk that NAV could decrease as a result of investment activities and may be a greater risk to investors expect ing to sell their shares after a short time. The Trust cannot predict whether shares will trade at, above or below NAV. The Trust should not be viewed as a vehicle for trading purposes. It is designed primarily for risk-tolerant long-term investors. |

Market conditions and your Trust

The broad municipal bond market experienced positive returns for the seventh consecutive year in 2020, even despite the unexpected twist of the coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic that pierced the markets and forced society to navigate unchartered waters in March 2020.

Investment-grade municipal bonds returned 1.06%, high-yield municipal bonds returned 1.27%, and taxable municipal bonds returned 0.43% during 2020.1

The year 2020 began with an unexpected major market shift as the global spread of COVID-19 ignited macroeconomic concerns. Significant equity market sell-offs incited a flight to quality that caused a strong municipal rally in February 2020. In March, however, a flight to cash caused extreme volatility and price declines across the municipal market.

Municipal funds averaged about $10 billion per week in outflows during March.2 Total fund outflows were $21 billion for the first quarter of 2020, with the majority in the high-yield segment.2 High-yield municipal funds generally hold anywhere from 30% to 60% of their portfolios in investment-grade securities. As a result, funds sold both high-yield and investment-grade securities into a distressed market to meet shareholder

redemptions. This led to price declines across the municipal universe.

Continued uncertainty regarding COVID-19 and its economic effects caused other major dislocations in the marketplace, including with respect to US Treasuries. Near the end of March, 10-year AAA-rated† municipals traded at yields that were roughly 370% of the yield on comparable maturity US Treasuries – well above the historical norm of approximately 90%.3

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), enacted at the end of March, gave the US Federal Reserve (the Fed) the ability to invest in programs or facilities established by the Fed which included the Municipal Liquidity Facility (MLF). The CARES Act also provided $150 billion for state and local governments and established the Disaster Relief Fund.

The Fed cut the federal funds rate twice in 2020 during unscheduled emergency meetings in March in response to COVID-19, consisting of a half of a percentage and a whole percentage point leaving the target range from 0.00% to 0.25%.4

Investors continued to sell municipal bonds in April amid disruption from the COVID-19 pandemic. However, May and June saw municipal bond performance improve despite ongoing market turmoil. As April began, many states maintained quarantines with

indeterminate timelines for closures of non-essential businesses.

Throughout the summer months, the municipal market began to rebound with gains that erased the earlier 2020 losses. The municipal market continued to benefit from federal support from the MLF which enabled two issuers per state, city, or county to use proceeds from the sale of notes to service their debt payments. While only two issuers accessed the MLF, the State of Illinois and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, we believe the availability of the program provided a psychological safety net for the market.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continued into fall and winter, most states saw cases rise amid colder weather and holiday gatherings, which led to renewed restrictions on non-essential businesses and had a negative effect on the economy. Attention moved to the US Presidential election and medical advancements toward a vaccine.

We believe the election of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, aligned with a Democrat-controlled Congress, could benefit municipal bonds given their stated support for numerous initiatives, including a larger stimulus bill and an infrastructure package, as well as health care and tax reform.

A highly demanded second stimulus package was signed at the end of 2020. The $900 billion Omnibus Spending and COVID Relief Deal included funding for small businesses, the unemployed, and health care workers.

In December, several pharmaceutical companies reported long-awaited breakthroughs and a vaccine with 95% effectiveness was approved for widespread distribution, significantly improving both investor and public sentiment.

New municipal issuance totaled $465 billion for the year, up 3% from the previous year’s $449 billion. Taxable municipals played a significant role in this increase in 2020, having 43% of new issuance.5 This uptick can be attributed to recent changes in tax laws. Municipalities are no longer able to refinance existing debt with new tax-exempt debt, thus causing an uptrend in taxable municipal issuance.

Municipal credits have a long history of low default rates as many provide essential services to all Americans. Most municipal issuers were in strong financial shape heading into the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite speculation, a flurry of downgrades has not yet occurred, mainly because most issuers have a rainy-day fund or cash on hand for difficult times. Though there could be small, isolated pockets of defaults in the future, we believe the vast majority of municipal bonds will stay current on principal and interest, as history has shown.

At the close of the year, the House passed the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. Subsequent to the year end, on

2 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

March 11, 2021, this bill was signed into law. The US Food and Drug Administration issued an emergency use authorization for a third vaccine. February also brought $34 billion in supply, higher than the average supply for the last 5 years for the month.

During the year, security selection in AA-rated and non-rated bonds contributed to the Trust’s performance relative to its style-specific benchmark. Security selection in intermediate and longer maturity bonds (6.00 years and greater) also contributed to the Trust’s relative performance compared to its style-specific index. At the sector level, security selection in industrial development revenue/pollution control revenue contributed to the Trust’s relative return. On a state level, security selection in Illinois issues benefited the Trust’s relative performance.

Conversely, security selection in B-rated bonds detracted from the Trust’s performance relative to its style-specific benchmark during the year. The Trust’s allocation to lower and intermediate coupon bonds (3.99% and less) also detracted from its relative performance. On a state level, security selection in Connecticut, Nevada, and Texas holdings detracted from the Trust’s relative performance, as well.

One important factor affecting the Trust’s performance relative to its style-specific benchmark was the use of leverage. The Trust uses leverage because we believe that, over time, leveraging can provide opportunities for additional income and total return for common shareholders. However, the use of leverage also can expose common shareholders to additional volatility. For example, if the prices of securities held by a trust decline, the negative effect of these valuation changes on common-share NAV and total return is magnified by the use of leverage. Conversely, leverage may enhance common-share returns during periods when the prices of securities held by a trust generally are rising.

Over the year, leverage contributed to the Trust’s performance relative to its style-specific benchmark. The Trust achieved a leveraged position through the use of inverse floating rate securities and variable rate muni term preferred (VMTP) shares. Inverse floating rate securities or tender option bonds are instruments that have an inverse relationship to a referenced interest rate. VMTPs are a variable rate form of preferred stock with a mandatory redemption date. Inverse floating rate securities and VMTPs can be an efficient way to manage duration, yield curve exposure and credit exposure, potentially enhancing yield. At the close of the year, leverage accounted for 37% of the Trust’s total assets and it contributed to returns. For more information about the Trust’s use of leverage, see the Notes to Financial Statements later in this report.

We wish to remind you that the Trust is subject to interest rate risk, meaning when interest rates rise, the value of fixed-income securities tends to fall. The risk may be greater in the current market environment because interest rates are near historic lows.

The degree to which the value of fixed-income securities may decline due to rising interest rates may vary depending on the speed and magnitude of the increase in interest rates, as well as individual security characteristics, such as price, maturity, duration and coupon and market forces, such as supply and demand for similar securities. We are monitoring interest rates, as well as the market, economic and geopolitical factors that may impact the direction, speed and magnitude of changes to interest rates across the maturity spectrum, including the potential impact of monetary policy changes by the Fed and certain foreign central banks. If interest rates rise or fall faster than expected, markets may experience increased volatility, which may affect the value and/or liquidity of certain of the Trust’s investments.

Thank you for investing in Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust and for sharing our long-term investment horizon.

1 Source: Bloomberg Barclays

2 Source: Strategic Insight

3 Source: US Department of the Treasury

4 Source: US Federal Reserve

5 Source: The Bond Buyer

† A credit rating is an assessment provided by a NRSRO of the creditworthiness of an issuer with respect to debt obligations, including specific securities, money market instruments or other debts. Ratings are measured on a scale that generally ranges from AAA (highest) to D (lowest); ratings are subject to change without notice. For more information on rating methodology, please visit www.standardandpoors.com and select “Understanding Ratings” under Rating Resources on the homepage; www.fitchratings.com and select “Understanding Credit Ratings” from the drop-down menu on the homepage; and www.moodys.com and select “Methodology,” then “Rating Methodologies” under Research Type on the left-hand side.

Portfolio manager(s):

Jack Connelly

Tim O’Reilly

Mark Paris

Jim Phillips

John Schorle

Julius Williams

On March 12, 2021, Josh Cooney and Rebecca Setcavage were added to the Trust’s portfolio management team.

The views and opinions expressed in management’s discussion of Trust performance are those of Invesco Advisers, Inc. These views and opinions are subject to change at any time based on factors such as market and economic conditions. These views and opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice or recommendations, or as an offer for a particular security. The information is not a complete analysis of every aspect of any market, country, industry, security or the Trust. Statements of fact are from sources considered reliable, but Invesco Advisers, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to their completeness or accuracy. Although historical performance is no guarantee of future results,

these insights may help you understand our investment management philosophy.

See important Trust and, if applicable, index disclosures later in this report.

3 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Your Trust’s Long-Term Performance

Results of a $10,000 Investment

Trust and index data from 2/28/11

1 Source: Lipper Inc.

2 Source: RIMES Technologies Corp.

Past performance cannot guarantee future results.

Performance shown in the chart does not reflect deduction of taxes a shareholder would pay on Trust distributions or sale of Trust shares.

4 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Average Annual Total Returns |
As of 2/28/21 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  | NAV |  |  |  | Market |
10 Years |  |  | 7.15% |  |  |  | 7.25% |
5 Years |  |  | 4.77 |  |  |  | 3.00 |
1 Year |  |  | 1.11 |  |  |  | 5.45 |

The performance data quoted represent past performance and cannot guarantee future results; current performance may be lower or higher. Please visit invesco.com/ performance for the most recent month-end performance.

Performance figures do not reflect deduction of taxes a shareholder would pay on Trust distributions or sale of Trust shares. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that you may have a gain or loss when you sell shares.

5 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Supplemental Information

∎ |  | Unless otherwise stated, information presented in this report is as of February 28, 2021, and is based on total net assets applicable to common shares.

∎ |  | Unless otherwise noted, all data provided by Invesco.

∎ |  | To access your Trust’s reports, visit invesco.com/fundreports.

About indexes used in this report

∎ |  | The S&P Municipal Bond Index is a broad, market value-weighted index that seeks to measure the performance of the US municipal bond market.

∎ |  | The S&P Municipal Bond 5+ Year Investment Grade Index seeks to measure the performance of investment grade US municipal bonds with maturities equal to or greater than five years.

∎ |  | The Lipper Closed-End General and Insured Municipal Leveraged Debt Funds Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of closed-end general and insured leveraged municipal debt funds tracked by Lipper.

∎ |  | The Trust is not managed to track the performance of any particular index, including the index(es) described here, and consequently, the performance of the Trust may deviate significantly from the performance of the index(es).

∎ |  | A direct investment cannot be made in an index. Unless otherwise indicated, index results include reinvested dividends, and they do not reflect sales charges. Performance of the peer group, if applicable, reflects fund expenses; performance of a market index does not.

Changes to the Trust’s Governing Documents

On August 13, 2020, the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”) approved changes to the Trust’s Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust (the “Declaration of Trust”) and the Trust’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”). The following is a summary of certain of these changes.

Declaration of Trust

The Trust’s Declaration of Trust was amended to provide as follows:

∎ |  | A Majority Trustee Vote is required on all Board actions, including amendments to the Declaration of Trust. “Majority Trustee Vote” means (a) with respect to a vote of the Board, a vote of the majority of the Trustees then in office, and a separate vote of a majority of the Continuing Trustees; and (b) with respect to a vote of a committee or sub-committee of the Board, a vote of the majority of the members of such committee or sub-committee, and a separate vote of a majority of the Continuing Trustees that are members of such committee or sub-committee. “Continuing Trustee” means a Trustee who either (a) has been a member of the Board for a period of at least thirty-six months (or since the commencement of the Trust’s operations, if less than thirty-six months) or (b) was nominated to serve as a member of the Board by a majority of the Continuing Trustees then members of the Board.

∎ |  | Any Trustee may only be removed for cause, including but not limited to (i) willful misconduct, dishonesty, or fraud on the part of the Trustee in the conduct of his or her office; (ii) failing to meet, on a continuous basis, the Trustee Qualifications (as defined below); or (iii) being indicted for, pleading guilty to or being convicted of a felony, in each case only by a written instrument signed by at least 75% of the number of Trustees prior to such removal (not including the Trustee(s) for which removal is being sought), specifying the date when such removal shall become effective.

∎ |  | In the event of a vacancy on the Board, the size of the Board is automatically reduced by the number of vacancies (but not to less than two) until the Board maintains or increases the size of the Board.

∎ |  | The following Trustee Qualifications are imposed on all nominees and current Trustees, whether or not nominated by a third party:

(a) An individual who is an Affiliated Person of any:

(1) Investment Adviser (other than the Trust’s Investment Adviser or any Investment Adviser affiliated with the Trust’s Investment Adviser);

(2) Pooled Vehicle (as defined below) (other than a Pooled Vehicle advised or managed by the Trust’s Investment Adviser or any Investment Adviser affiliated with the Trust’s Investment Adviser); or

6 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

(3) Entity Controlling, Controlled by, or under common Control with, any Investment Adviser (other than the Trust’s Investment Adviser or any Investment Adviser affiliated with the Trust’s Investment Adviser) or Pooled Vehicle (other than a Pooled Vehicle advised or managed by the Trust’s Investment Adviser or any Investment Adviser affiliated with the Trust’s Investment Adviser);

shall be disqualified from being nominated or serving as a Trustee, if the Board determines by Majority Trustee Vote (excluding the vote of any Trustee subject to such vote) that such relationship is reasonably likely to:

(1) Present undue conflicts of interest between (i) the Trust and its Shareholders, and (ii) such other Investment Adviser or Pooled Vehicle;

(2) Impede the ability of the individual to discharge the duties of a Trustee; and/or

(3) Impede the free flow of information (including proprietary, non-public or confidential information) between the Trust’s Investment Adviser and the Board.

(b) An individual who:

(1) Is a 12(d) Control Person (as defined below);

(2) Is an Affiliated Person of a 12(d) Holder (as defined below) or 12(d) Control Person; or

(3) Has accepted directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from any 12(d) Holder or 12(d) Control Person;

shall be disqualified from being nominated or serving as a Trustee.

(c) An individual who serves as a trustee or director of 5 or more issuers (including the Trust) having securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) (for these purposes, investment companies or individual series thereof having the same Investment Adviser as the Trust or any Investment Adviser affiliated with the Trust’s Investment Adviser shall be counted as a single issuer) shall be disqualified from being nominated or serving as a Trustee.

(d) An individual who has been subject to any censure, order, consent decree or adverse final action of any federal, state, or foreign governmental or regulatory authority barring or suspending such individual from participation in or association with any investment-related business or restricting such individual’s activities with respect to any investment-related business, been the subject of any investigation or proceeding that could reasonably be expected to result in an individual nominated or serving as a Trustee failing to satisfy the requirements of this paragraph, or is or has been engaged in any conduct which has resulted in, or could have reasonably been expected or would reasonably be expected to result in, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) censuring, placing limitations on the activities, functions, or operation of, suspending, or revoking the registration of any Investment Adviser under Section 203(e) or (f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 shall be disqualified from being nominated or serving as a Trustee.

(e) An individual who is or has been the subject of any of the ineligibility provisions contained in Section 9(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) that would permit, or could reasonably have been expected or would reasonably be expected to permit the SEC by order to prohibit, conditionally or unconditionally, either permanently or for a period of time, such individual from servicing or acting as an employee, officer, trustee, director, member of an advisory board, Investment Adviser or depositor of, or principal underwriter for, a registered investment company or Affiliated Person of such Investment Adviser, depositor, or principal underwriter shall be disqualified from being nominated or serving as a Trustee.

For purposes of the foregoing, the following definitions apply:

“12(d) Control Person” means any person who Controls, is Controlled by, or under common Control with, a 12(d) Holder (solely for purposes of this definition, an Investment Adviser shall be deemed to Control any investment company that it advises, including any collective investment vehicle that would be an investment company but for the exception provided by Section 3(c)(1) or (7) of the 1940 Act);

“12(d) Holder” is defined as an investment company (including, for purposes of (1) below, any collective investment vehicle that would be an investment company but for the exception provided by Section 3(c)(1) or (7) of the 1940 Act) that in the aggregate owns, directly or indirectly through any companies Controlled by the 12(d) Holder, of record or beneficially as defined in Rule 13d-3 and 13d-5 of the Securities Act of 1934:

(1) More than three percent (3%) of the outstanding voting Shares of the Trust;

(2) Securities issued by the Trust having an aggregate value in excess of five percent (5%) of the total assets of such investment company or of any company or companies Controlled by such investment company;

(3) Securities issued by the Trust and by all other investment companies having an aggregate value in excess of ten percent (10%) of the total assets of the investment company making such investment or any company or companies Controlled by the investment company making such investment;

(4) Together with other investment companies having the same Investment Adviser and companies Controlled by such investment companies, more than ten percent (10%) of the total outstanding Shares of the Trust; or

(5) For an investment company operating as a “fund of funds” pursuant to Section 12(d)(1)(F) of the 1940 Act, together with all Affiliated Persons of such investment company, more than three percent (3%) of the outstanding voting Shares of the Trust (solely for purposes of determining an “Affiliated Person” for purposes of this definition, an Investment Adviser shall be deemed to Control any investment company that it advises, including any collective investment vehicle that would be an investment company but for the exception provided by Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act).

“Pooled Vehicle” means (i) any issuer meeting the definition of an “investment company” in Section 3(a) of the 1940 Act, or (ii) any person that would meet the definition of an investment company but for the exceptions in Section 3(c) of the 1940 Act.

7 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Bylaws

The Trust’s Bylaws were amended to provide as follows:

∎ |  | At all meetings of the Board, one-half (50%) of the Trustees then in office, including one-half (50%) of the Continuing Trustees (but in no event fewer than two Trustees), shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. At all meetings of any committee or sub-committee, one-half (50%) of the committee members or sub-committee members, including one-half (50%) of the committee members or sub-committee members who are Continuing Trustees (but in no event fewer than two Trustees), shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Business transacted at any meeting of Shareholders shall be limited to (a) the purpose stated in the notice, (b) the adjournment of such meeting in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Bylaws, and (c) solely with respect to annual meetings, such other matters as are permitted to be presented at the meeting in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Bylaws.

∎ |  | A majority of the outstanding Shares entitled to vote at a Shareholders’ meeting, which are present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at the Shareholders’ meeting, except when a larger quorum is required by applicable law or the requirements of any securities exchange on which Shares are listed for trading, in which case such quorum shall comply with such requirements. Quorum shall be determined with respect to the meeting as a whole regardless of whether particular matters have achieved the requisite vote for approval, but the presence or absence of a quorum shall not prevent any adjournment at the meeting pursuant to the relevant provisions of the Bylaws.

∎ |  | When a quorum is present at any meeting, the vote of the shares as set forth in the Declaration of Trust shall decide any question brought before such meeting, unless a different vote is required by the express provision of applicable law, the Declaration of Trust, the Bylaws or other governing instrument of the Trust, in which case such express provision shall govern and control the decision of such question. Notwithstanding the foregoing, and whether or not a quorum is present, the vote of the holders of one-third (1/3) of the shares cast, or the chair of the meeting in his or her discretion, shall have the power to adjourn a meeting of the Shareholders with regard to a particular proposal scheduled to be voted on at such meeting or to adjourn such meeting entirely.

∎ |  | The matters to be considered and brought before any annual meeting of Shareholders of the Trust shall be limited to only such matters, including the nomination and election of Trustees, as shall be brought properly before such meeting in compliance with the procedures set forth in the Bylaws. For any matter to be properly brought before any annual meeting of Shareholders, the matter must be (among other requirements specified in the Bylaws), brought before the annual meeting in the manner specified in the Bylaws by a Record Owner at the time of the giving of notice, on the record date for such meeting and at the time of the meeting, or a Shareholder (a “Nominee Holder”) that holds voting securities entitled to vote at meetings of Shareholders through a nominee or “street name” holder of record and can demonstrate to the Trust such indirect ownership and such Nominee Holder’s entitlement to vote such securities, and is a Nominee Holder at the time of the giving of notice provided for in the Bylaws, on the record date for such meeting and at the time of the meeting, with proof of such ownership or holding reasonably satisfactory to the Trust to be provided by such Record Owner or Nominee Holder at each such aforementioned time.

∎ |  | Any Shareholder desiring to nominate any person(s) for election as a Trustee shall deliver, as part of such Shareholder Notice, a statement in writing with respect to the person(s) to be nominated, together with any persons to be designated as a proposed substitute nominee in the event that a proposed nominee is unwilling or unable to serve, including by reason of any disqualification (a “Proposed Nominee”) setting forth all information required by the Bylaws, including each Proposed Nominee’s written representation that he or she agrees to complete, execute, and return to the Trust within 5 business days of receipt the Trust’s form of trustee questionnaire and any supplemental information reasonably requested by the Trust.

∎ |  | Any Shareholder who gives a Shareholder Notice of any matter proposed to be brought before an annual meeting or to elect Proposed Nominees shall deliver, as part of such Shareholder Notice, all statements and representations required by the Bylaws, including: 1) a statement in writing with respect to the Shareholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is being made setting forth, among other requirements, the number and class of all Shares which the Shareholder has the right to acquire pursuant to any agreement or upon exercise of conversion rights or warrants, or otherwise (including any derivative or short positions, profit interests, options or similar rights, and borrowed or loaned shares); and 2) an agreement to return to the Trust within 5 business days of receipt such other information as the Board may reasonably request.

∎ |  | To be considered a qualified representative of the Shareholder, a Person must be a duly authorized officer, manager or partner of such Shareholder, as evidenced by an incumbency certificate executed by the corporate secretary (or other duly authorized officer) of the Shareholder, or must be authorized by a writing executed by such Shareholder delivered by such Shareholder to act for such Shareholder as proxy at the meeting of Shareholders, and such Person must deliver a copy of such incumbency certificate or writing to the secretary of the meeting.

∎ |  | Only such matters shall be conducted at a special meeting of Shareholders as shall have been brought before the meeting pursuant to the Trust’s notice of meeting. Nominations of individuals for election to the Board may be made at a special meeting of Shareholders at which Trustees are to be elected: 1) pursuant to the Trust’s notice of meeting; 2) by or at the direction of the Board; or 3) provided that the Board has determined that Trustees shall be elected at such special meeting, and such special meeting shall meet all of the requirements with respect to annual meetings as if such special meeting were an annual meeting.

∎ |  | Provisions in the Bylaws regarding advance notice of Shareholder Nominees for Trustee and other Shareholder proposals shall not apply to Shareholder proposals made pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act. Notwithstanding the forgoing, no Shareholder proposal may be brought before an annual meeting, whether submitted pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Bylaws or Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, unless Shareholders have power to vote on the Shareholder proposal, or the subject matter of the Shareholder proposal, pursuant to the Declaration of Trust, irrespective of whether such Shareholder proposal is submitted as a precatory recommendation to the Board.

∎ |  | No person shall be eligible for election as a Trustee of the Trust unless nominated in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Bylaws.

The Trust’s Declaration of Trust and Bylaws contain other provisions, including all requirements for the conduct of shareholder meetings, and are available in their entirety upon request to the Trust’s Secretary, c/o Invesco Advisers, Inc., 1555 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, GA 30309.

NOT FDIC INSURED | MAY LOSE VALUE | NO BANK GUARANTEE

8 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Dividend Reinvestment Plan

The dividend reinvestment plan (the Plan) offers you a prompt and simple way to reinvest your dividends and capital gains distributions (Distributions) into additional shares of your Invesco closed-end Trust (the Trust). Under the Plan, the money you earn from Distributions will be reinvested automatically in more shares of the Trust, allowing you to potentially increase your investment over time. All shareholders in the Trust are automatically enrolled in the Plan when shares are purchased.

Plan benefits

∎ |  | Add to your account:

You may increase your shares in your Trust easily and automatically with the Plan.

∎ |  | Low transaction costs:

Shareholders who participate in the Plan may be able to buy shares at below-market prices when the Trust is trading at a premium to its net asset value (NAV). In addition, transaction costs are low because when new shares are issued by the Trust, there is no brokerage fee, and when shares are bought in blocks on the open market, the per share fee is shared among all participants.

∎ |  | Convenience:

You will receive a detailed account statement from Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (the Agent), which administers the Plan. The statement shows your total Distributions, date of investment, shares acquired, and price per share, as well as the total number of shares in your reinvestment account. You can also access your account at invesco.com/closed-end.

∎ |  | Safekeeping:

The Agent will hold the shares it has acquired for you in safekeeping.

Who can participate in the Plan

If you own shares in your own name, your purchase will automatically enroll you in the Plan. If your shares are held in “street name” – in the name of your brokerage firm, bank, or other financial institution – you must instruct that entity to participate on your behalf. If they are unable to participate on your behalf, you may request that they reregister your shares in your own name so that you may enroll in the Plan.

How to enroll

If you haven’t participated in the Plan in the past or chose to opt out, you are still eligible to participate. Enroll by visiting invesco.com/closed-end, by calling toll-free 800 341 2929 or by notifying us in writing at Invesco Closed-End Funds, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 505000, Louisville, KY 40233-5000. If you are writing to us, please include the Trust name and account number and ensure that all shareholders listed on the account sign these written instructions. Your participation in the Plan will begin with the next Distribution payable after the Agent receives your authorization, as long as they receive it before the “record date,” which is generally 10 business days before the Distribution is paid. If your authorization arrives after such record date, your participation in the Plan will begin with the following Distribution.

How the Plan works

If you choose to participate in the Plan, your Distributions will be promptly reinvested for you, automatically increasing your shares. If the Trust is trading at a share price that is equal to its NAV, you’ll pay that amount for your reinvested shares. However, if the Trust is trading above or below NAV, the price is determined by one of two ways:

| 1. | Premium: If the Trust is trading at a premium – a market price that is higher than its NAV –you’ll pay either the NAV or 95 percent of

| the market price, whichever is greater. When the Trust trades at a premium, you may pay less for your reinvested shares than an investor purchasing shares on the stock exchange. Keep in mind, a portion of your price reduction may be taxable because you are receiving shares at less than market price.

| 2. | Discount: If the Trust is trading at a discount – a market price that is lower than its NAV – you’ll pay the market price for your reinvested shares.

Costs of the Plan

There is no direct charge to you for reinvesting Distributions because the Plan’s fees are paid by the Trust. If the Trust is trading at or above its NAV, your new shares are issued directly by the Trust and there are no brokerage charges or fees. However, if the Trust is trading at a discount, the shares are purchased on the open market, and you will pay your portion of any per share fees. These per share fees are typically less than the standard brokerage charges for individual transactions because shares are purchased for all participants in blocks, resulting in lower fees for each individual participant. Any service or per share fees are added to the purchase price. Per share fees include any applicable brokerage commissions the Agent is required to pay.

Tax implications

The automatic reinvestment of Distributions does not relieve you of any income tax that may be due on Distributions. You will receive tax information annually to help you prepare your federal income tax return.

Invesco does not offer tax advice. The tax information contained herein is general and is not exhaustive by nature. It was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer under US federal tax laws. Federal and state tax laws are complex and constantly changing. Shareholders should always consult a legal or tax adviser for information concerning their individual situation.

How to withdraw from the Plan

You may withdraw from the Plan at any time by calling 800 341 2929, by visiting invesco.com/ closed-end or by writing to Invesco Closed-End Funds, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 505000, Louisville, KY 40233-5000. Simply indicate that you would like to withdraw from the Plan, and be sure to include your Trust name and account number. Also, ensure that all shareholders listed on the account sign these written instructions. If you withdraw, you have three options with regard to the shares held in the Plan:

| 1. | If you opt to continue to hold your non-certificated whole shares (Investment Plan Book Shares), they will be held by the Agent electronically as Direct Registration Book-Shares (Book-Entry Shares) and fractional shares will be sold at the then-current market price. Proceeds will be sent via check to your address of record after deducting applicable fees, including per share fees such as any applicable brokerage commissions the Agent is required to pay.

| 2. | If you opt to sell your shares through the Agent, we will sell all full and fractional shares and send the proceeds via check to your address of record after deducting a $2.50 service fee and per share fees. Per share fees include any applicable brokerage commissions the Agent is required to pay.

| 3. | You may sell your shares through your financial adviser through the Direct Registration System (DRS). DRS is a service within the securities industry that allows Trust shares to be held in your name in electronic format. You retain full ownership of your shares, without having to hold a share certificate. You should contact your financial adviser to learn more about any restrictions or fees that may apply.

The Trust and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. may amend or terminate the Plan at any time. Participants will receive at least 30 days written notice before the effective date of any amendment. In the case of termination, Participants will receive at least 30 days written notice before the record date for the payment of any such Distributions by the Trust. In the case of amendment or termination necessary or appropriate to comply with applicable law or the rules and policies of the Securities and Exchange Commission or any other regulatory authority, such written notice will not be required.

To obtain a complete copy of the current Dividend Reinvestment Plan, please call our Client Services department at 800 341 2929 or visit invesco.com/closed-end.

9 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Fund Information

Portfolio Composition

By credit sector |  | % of total investments
Revenue Bonds |  | 76.9%
General Obligation Bonds |  | 11.5
Pre-Refunded Bonds |  | 11.3
Other |  | 0.3

Top Five Debt Holdings

|  |  |  | % of total net assets
1. |  | North Texas Tollway Authority, Series 2008 D, Ref. RB |  | 1.9%
2. |  | New Jersey (State of) Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Series 2006 C, RB |  | 1.7
3. |  | Illinois (State of) Toll Highway Authority, Series 2013 A, RB |  | 1.7
4. |  | New York (State of) Utility Debt Securitization Authority, Series 2013 TE, RB |  | 1.5
5. |  | New York (City of), NY Municipal Water Finance Authority, Series 2012 FF, RB |  | 1.5

The Trust’s holdings are subject to change, and there is no assurance that the Trust will continue to hold any particular security.

Data presented here are as of February 28, 2021.

10 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Schedule of Investments

February 28, 2021

|  | Interest Rate |  | Maturity Date |  |  | Principal Amount (000) |  |  | Value |
Municipal Obligations–157.76%(a) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Alabama–1.33% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Alabama (State of) Special Care Facilities Financing Authority (Ascension Health Senior Credit Group); Series 2016 B, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/15/2046 |  |  | $ | 4,500 |  |  | $ | 5,331,150 |
Birmingham (City of), AL Special Care Facilities Financing Authority (Methodist Home for the Aging); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2016, RB |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 06/01/2025 |  |  |  | 630 |  |  |  | 650,752 |
Series 2016, RB |  |  | 5.75 | % |  |  | 06/01/2045 |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  | 20,618 |
Lower Alabama Gas District (The); Series 2016 A, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 09/01/2046 |  |  |  | 2,400 |  |  |  | 3,373,248 |
Tuscaloosa (County of), AL Industrial Development Authority (Hunt Refining); Series 2019 A, Ref. IDR(c) |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 05/01/2044 |  |  |  | 860 |  |  |  | 979,119 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10,354,887 |
Alaska–0.59% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Alaska (State of) Industrial Development & Export Authority (Providence Health Services); Series 2011 A, RB(b) |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 10/01/2041 |  |  |  | 4,465 |  |  |  | 4,550,996 |
Arizona–4.16% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Arizona (State of) Health Facilities Authority (Catholic Healthcare West); Series 2011 B-2, RB(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 03/01/2021 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |
Arizona (State of) Health Facilities Authority (Phoenix Children’s Hospital); Series 2012, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 02/01/2042 |  |  |  | 4,450 |  |  |  | 4,585,102 |
Arizona (State of) Health Facilities Authority (Scottsdale Lincoln Hospital); Series 2014, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2042 |  |  |  | 1,905 |  |  |  | 2,142,249 |
Arizona (State of) Industrial Development Authority; Series 2020 A, RB(c) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/15/2050 |  |  |  | 405 |  |  |  | 444,621 |
Arizona (State of) Industrial Development Authority (Great Laked Senior Living Community); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2019 A, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2036 |  |  |  | 1,650 |  |  |  | 1,609,393 |
Series 2019 A, RB |  |  | 4.25 | % |  |  | 01/01/2039 |  |  |  | 100 |  |  |  | 86,829 |
Series 2019 B, RB |  |  | 5.13 | % |  |  | 01/01/2054 |  |  |  | 85 |  |  |  | 63,997 |
Arizona (State of) Industrial Development Authority (Leman Academy of Excellence); Series 2017 A, Ref. RB(c) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2037 |  |  |  | 680 |  |  |  | 701,230 |
City of Phoenix Civic Improvement Corp.; Series 2020-XM0924, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2044 |  |  |  | 2,005 |  |  |  | 2,546,129 |
Glendale (City of), AZ Industrial Development Authority (The Beatitudes Campus); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2017, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/15/2031 |  |  |  | 1,220 |  |  |  | 1,332,203 |
Series 2017, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/15/2045 |  |  |  | 980 |  |  |  | 1,047,199 |
La Paz (County of), AZ Industrial Development Authority (Charter School Solutions- Harmony Public Schools); Series 2018 A, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 02/15/2048 |  |  |  | 700 |  |  |  | 796,495 |
Maricopa (County of), AZ Industrial Development Authority (Legacy Traditional Schools); Series 2019, Ref. RB(c) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2054 |  |  |  | 550 |  |  |  | 615,466 |
Mesa (City of), AZ; Series 2013, RB(b)(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2022 |  |  |  | 7,600 |  |  |  | 8,085,564 |
Phoenix (City of), AZ Industrial Development Authority (Legacy Traditional Schools); Series 2014 A, RB(c) |  |  | 6.50 | % |  |  | 07/01/2034 |  |  |  | 435 |  |  |  | 503,391 |
Phoenix (City of), AZ Industrial Development Authority (Rowan University); Series 2012, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2042 |  |  |  | 2,665 |  |  |  | 2,757,929 |
Pima (County of), AZ Industrial Development Authority (American Leadership Academy); Series 2019, Ref. RB(c) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/15/2052 |  |  |  | 360 |  |  |  | 377,208 |
Pima (County of), AZ Industrial Development Authority (Grande Innovations Academy); Series 2018, RB(c) |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 07/01/2048 |  |  |  | 1,175 |  |  |  | 1,203,364 |
Yuma (City of), AZ Industrial Development Authority (Regional Medical Center); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2014 A, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2032 |  |  |  | 1,050 |  |  |  | 1,171,296 |
Series 2014 A, RB |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 08/01/2032 |  |  |  | 2,000 |  |  |  | 2,254,720 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32,324,385 |
California–21.14% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Alhambra Unified School District (Election of 2004); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2009 B, GO Bonds (INS - AGC)(f)(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2035 |  |  |  | 3,010 |  |  |  | 2,245,490 |
Series 2009 B, GO Bonds (INS - AGC)(f)(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2036 |  |  |  | 2,675 |  |  |  | 1,931,671 |
Bay Area Toll Authority (San Francisco Bay Area); Series 2017 F-1, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 04/01/2056 |  |  |  | 2,325 |  |  |  | 2,719,925 |
Beverly Hills Unified School District (Election of 2008); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2009, GO Bonds(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2026 |  |  |  | 2,720 |  |  |  | 2,592,894 |
Series 2009, GO Bonds(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2031 |  |  |  | 5,270 |  |  |  | 4,423,585 |
California (County of), CA Tobacco Securitization Agency; Series 2020 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2039 |  |  |  | 250 |  |  |  | 294,770 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

11 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

|  | Interest Rate |  | Maturity Date |  |  | Principal Amount (000) |  |  | Value |
California–(continued) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
California (State of); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2012, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 04/01/2035 |  |  | $ | 4,135 |  |  | $ | 4,351,591 |
Series 2013, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 04/01/2037 |  |  |  | 1,800 |  |  |  | 1,965,744 |
Series 2020-XM0909, GO Bonds(b) |  |  | 3.00 | % |  |  | 11/01/2050 |  |  |  | 2,350 |  |  |  | 2,461,437 |
California (State of) Community Housing Agency (Annadel Apartments); Series 2019 A, RB(c) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 04/01/2049 |  |  |  | 835 |  |  |  | 941,888 |
California (State of) Housing Finance Agency; Series 2019 A-2, RB |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 03/20/2033 |  |  |  | 496 |  |  |  | 557,081 |
California (State of) Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank; Series 2003 A, RB(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2028 |  |  |  | 4,500 |  |  |  | 5,708,835 |
California (State of) Municipal Finance Authority (Bella Mente Montessori Academy); Series 2018 A, RB(c) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2048 |  |  |  | 195 |  |  |  | 214,089 |
California (State of) Municipal Finance Authority (CHF-Davis I, LLC - West Village Student Housing); Series 2018, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 05/15/2035 |  |  |  | 1,245 |  |  |  | 1,488,771 |
California (State of) Municipal Finance Authority (Linxs APM); Series 2018 A, RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/31/2037 |  |  |  | 2,000 |  |  |  | 2,394,020 |
California (State of) Municipal Finance Authority (United Airlines, Inc.); Series 2019, Ref. RB(h) |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 07/15/2029 |  |  |  | 1,680 |  |  |  | 1,883,549 |
California (State of) Municipal Finance Authority (William Jessup University); Series 2019, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2039 |  |  |  | 250 |  |  |  | 273,875 |
California (State of) Pollution Control Finance Authority; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2012, RB(c)(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2027 |  |  |  | 1,135 |  |  |  | 1,216,448 |
Series 2012, RB(c)(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2030 |  |  |  | 1,400 |  |  |  | 1,497,860 |
Series 2012, RB(c)(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2037 |  |  |  | 3,075 |  |  |  | 3,264,635 |
California (State of) Statewide Communities Development Authority (Loma Linda University Medical Center); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2014, RB |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 12/01/2044 |  |  |  | 755 |  |  |  | 829,171 |
Series 2016 A, RB(c) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2041 |  |  |  | 1,275 |  |  |  | 1,428,854 |
Series 2016 A, RB(c) |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 12/01/2056 |  |  |  | 995 |  |  |  | 1,113,803 |
California (State of), CA Tobacco Securitization Agency (Alameda County Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.); Series 2006 C, RB(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2055 |  |  |  | 10,335 |  |  |  | 816,878 |
California (State of), CA Tobacco Securitization Agency (Los Angeles County Securitization Corp.); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2020 B-1, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2049 |  |  |  | 100 |  |  |  | 120,276 |
Series 2020 B-2, Ref. RB(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2055 |  |  |  | 1,680 |  |  |  | 321,233 |
California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2003 A, RB(b)(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2028 |  |  |  | 6,700 |  |  |  | 8,515,834 |
Series 2003 A, RB(b)(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2028 |  |  |  | 3,300 |  |  |  | 4,194,366 |
California State University; Series 2020-XM0923, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/01/2048 |  |  |  | 2,080 |  |  |  | 2,574,042 |
Clovis Unified School District (Election of 2004); Series 2004 A, GO Bonds (INS - NATL)(f)(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2029 |  |  |  | 1,360 |  |  |  | 1,179,759 |
CSCDA Community Improvement Authority; Series 2021, RB(c) |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2056 |  |  |  | 505 |  |  |  | 546,582 |
CSCDA Community Improvement Authority (Jefferson-Anaheim Social Bonds); Series 2021-A, RB(c) |  |  | 3.13 | % |  |  | 08/01/2056 |  |  |  | 840 |  |  |  | 772,800 |
Dry Creek Joint Elementary School District (Election of 2008-Measure E); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2009, GO Bonds(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2043 |  |  |  | 2,120 |  |  |  | 1,120,441 |
Series 2009, GO Bonds(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2044 |  |  |  | 1,090 |  |  |  | 553,884 |
Series 2009, GO Bonds(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2045 |  |  |  | 6,270 |  |  |  | 3,064,588 |
Series 2009, GO Bonds(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2048 |  |  |  | 4,610 |  |  |  | 2,027,017 |
El Segundo Unified School District (Election of 2008); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2009 A, GO Bonds(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2031 |  |  |  | 4,155 |  |  |  | 3,423,429 |
Series 2009 A, GO Bonds(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2032 |  |  |  | 3,165 |  |  |  | 2,531,937 |
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp.; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2013 A, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2030 |  |  |  | 3,200 |  |  |  | 3,462,944 |
Series 2018 A-1, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2035 |  |  |  | 1,375 |  |  |  | 1,664,341 |
Series 2018 A-1, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2047 |  |  |  | 1,595 |  |  |  | 1,649,996 |
Los Angeles (City of), CA Department of Water & Power; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2012 A, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2043 |  |  |  | 6,240 |  |  |  | 6,621,763 |
Series 2012 B, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2043 |  |  |  | 9,805 |  |  |  | 10,404,870 |
Menifee Union School District (Election of 2008); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2009 C, GO Bonds (INS - AGC)(f)(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2034 |  |  |  | 1,665 |  |  |  | 1,233,016 |
Series 2009 C, GO Bonds (INS - AGC)(f)(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2035 |  |  |  | 300 |  |  |  | 214,740 |
Moreland School District (Crossover Series 14); Series 2006 C, Ref. GO Bonds (INS - AMBAC)(f)(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2029 |  |  |  | 3,350 |  |  |  | 2,927,933 |
M-S-R Energy Authority; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2009 B, RB |  |  | 6.13 | % |  |  | 11/01/2029 |  |  |  | 990 |  |  |  | 1,236,748 |
Series 2009 B, RB |  |  | 7.00 | % |  |  | 11/01/2034 |  |  |  | 585 |  |  |  | 900,385 |
Mt. San Antonio Community College District (Election of 2008); Series 2013 A, GO Bonds(i) |  |  | 6.25 | % |  |  | 08/01/2043 |  |  |  | 1,985 |  |  |  | 2,161,447 |
Oak Grove School District (Election of 2008); Series 2009 A, GO Bonds(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2028 |  |  |  | 2,400 |  |  |  | 2,171,472 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

12 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

|  | Interest Rate |  | Maturity Date |  |  | Principal Amount (000) |  |  | Value |
California–(continued) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Patterson Joint Unified School District (Election of 2008); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2009 B, GO Bonds (INS - AGM)(f)(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2034 |  |  | $ | 3,825 |  |  | $ | 2,813,861 |
Series 2009 B, GO Bonds (INS - AGM)(f)(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2035 |  |  |  | 4,120 |  |  |  | 2,932,328 |
Series 2009 B, GO Bonds (INS - AGM)(f)(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2036 |  |  |  | 300 |  |  |  | 206,325 |
Series 2009 B, GO Bonds (INS - AGM)(f)(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2037 |  |  |  | 1,785 |  |  |  | 1,185,383 |
Poway Unified School District (Election of 2008 - School Facilities Improvement District No. 2007-1); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2009 A, GO Bonds(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2028 |  |  |  | 7,840 |  |  |  | 7,077,874 |
Series 2009 A, GO Bonds(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2031 |  |  |  | 8,475 |  |  |  | 7,011,706 |
Regents of the University of California; Series 2013 AI, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 05/15/2033 |  |  |  | 6,000 |  |  |  | 6,592,560 |
San Buenaventura (City of), CA (Community Memorial Health System); Series 2011, RB |  |  | 7.50 | % |  |  | 12/01/2041 |  |  |  | 2,180 |  |  |  | 2,271,582 |
San Francisco (City & County of), CA Airport Commission (San Francisco International Airport); Series 2019 A, Ref. RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 05/01/2036 |  |  |  | 1,165 |  |  |  | 1,436,818 |
San Jose Evergreen Community College District (Election of 2004); Series 2008 B, GO Bonds (INS - AGM)(f)(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 09/01/2030 |  |  |  | 1,600 |  |  |  | 1,365,584 |
Santa Margarita Water District (Community Facilities District No. 2013-1); Series 2013, RB |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 09/01/2032 |  |  |  | 570 |  |  |  | 622,155 |
Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority (Santa Clara); Series 2007 A, RB(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2041 |  |  |  | 3,445 |  |  |  | 1,108,842 |
Tustin Unified School District (Community Facilities District No. 97-1); Series 2015, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 09/01/2031 |  |  |  | 2,450 |  |  |  | 2,811,865 |
University of California; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2018 AZ, Ref. RB(b) |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 05/15/2048 |  |  |  | 2,385 |  |  |  | 2,715,990 |
Series 2020 BE, Ref. RB |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 05/15/2047 |  |  |  | 2,350 |  |  |  | 2,749,524 |
William S. Hart Union High School District (Election of 2008); Series 2009 A, GO Bonds(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2033 |  |  |  | 11,350 |  |  |  | 8,796,023 |
Yosemite Community College District (Election of 2004); Series 2008 C, GO Bonds (INS - AGM)(f)(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2022 |  |  |  | 525 |  |  |  | 522,034 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 164,433,161 |
Colorado–4.09% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Aurora Crossroads Metropolitan District No. 2; Series 2020 B, GO Bonds |  |  | 7.75 | % |  |  | 12/15/2050 |  |  |  | 500 |  |  |  | 524,565 |
Belford North Metropolitan District; Series 2020 A, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 12/01/2050 |  |  |  | 1,045 |  |  |  | 1,108,160 |
Colorado (State of) Health Facilities Authority (Adventist Health System/Sunbelt Obligated Group); Series 2018 A, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/15/2048 |  |  |  | 1,155 |  |  |  | 1,378,296 |
Colorado (State of) Health Facilities Authority (Commonspirit Health); Series 2019 A-2, Ref. RB |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2049 |  |  |  | 1,675 |  |  |  | 1,850,590 |
Colorado (State of) Health Facilities Authority (Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society (The)); Series 2017, Ref. RB(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2027 |  |  |  | 580 |  |  |  | 723,335 |
Colorado (State of) Health Facilities Authority (SCL Health System); Series 2013 A, RB(b) |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 01/01/2035 |  |  |  | 8,100 |  |  |  | 9,045,513 |
Colorado (State of) Science and Technology Park Metropolitan District No. 1; Series 2018, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2033 |  |  |  | 500 |  |  |  | 537,380 |
Colorado Crossing Metropolitan District No. 2; Series 2020 A-1, Ref. GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2047 |  |  |  | 500 |  |  |  | 520,815 |
Colorado Health Facilities Authority; Series 2020-XX1130, Ctfs.(b)(j) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2044 |  |  |  | 1,260 |  |  |  | 1,525,054 |
Denver (City & County of), CO; Series 2018 A, Ref. RB(b)(h) |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 12/01/2048 |  |  |  | 5,740 |  |  |  | 6,906,024 |
Denver City & County School District No. 1; Series 2021, GO Bonds |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2045 |  |  |  | 2,855 |  |  |  | 3,383,632 |
Great Western Metropolitan District; Series 2020, Ref. GO Bonds |  |  | 4.75 | % |  |  | 12/01/2050 |  |  |  | 460 |  |  |  | 476,891 |
Jefferson (County of), CO Center Metropolitan District No. 1; Series 2020 B, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.75 | % |  |  | 12/15/2050 |  |  |  | 740 |  |  |  | 783,690 |
Mirabelle Metropolitan District No. 2; Series 2020, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2049 |  |  |  | 645 |  |  |  | 684,435 |
Neu Towne Metropolitan District; Series 2018 A, Ref. GO Bonds |  |  | 5.38 | % |  |  | 12/01/2046 |  |  |  | 700 |  |  |  | 743,407 |
North Range Metropolitan District No. 3; Series 2020 A, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2040 |  |  |  | 500 |  |  |  | 539,610 |
Village Metropolitan District (The); Series 2020, Ref. GO Bonds |  |  | 4.15 | % |  |  | 12/01/2030 |  |  |  | 500 |  |  |  | 539,430 |
White Buffalo Metropolitan District No. 3; Series 2020, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 12/01/2050 |  |  |  | 500 |  |  |  | 538,195 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31,809,022 |
District of Columbia–2.88% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
District of Columbia; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2006 B-1, RB (INS - NATL)(f) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 02/01/2031 |  |  |  | 550 |  |  |  | 551,089 |
Series 2014 C, GO Bonds(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2035 |  |  |  | 6,060 |  |  |  | 6,878,827 |
District of Columbia (Provident Group - Howard Properties LLC); Series 2013, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2045 |  |  |  | 310 |  |  |  | 306,528 |
District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority; Series 2013 A, RB(b)(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2023 |  |  |  | 6,000 |  |  |  | 6,732,600 |
Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (Dulles Metrorail and Capital Improvement); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2014 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2053 |  |  |  | 5,905 |  |  |  | 6,105,357 |
Series 2019 B, Ref. RB |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2049 |  |  |  | 1,675 |  |  |  | 1,843,890 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22,418,291 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

13 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

|  | Interest Rate |  | Maturity Date |  | Principal Amount (000) |  |  | Value |
Florida–9.75% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Alachua (County of), FL Health Facilities Authority (Shands Teaching Hospital & Clinics); Series 2019, RB |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2049 |  |  | $ | 500 |  |  | $ | 558,200 |
Alachua (County of), FL Health Facilities Authority (Terraces at Bonita Springs); Series 2011 A, RB |  |  | 8.13 | % |  |  | 11/15/2041 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,001,120 |
Broward (County of), FL; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2015 A, RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2045 |  |  |  | 1,280 |  |  |  | 1,457,894 |
Series 2017, RB(b)(h)(j) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2047 |  |  |  | 3,615 |  |  |  | 4,214,512 |
Series 2019 B, RB(h) |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 09/01/2044 |  |  |  | 840 |  |  |  | 929,410 |
Cape Coral (City of), FL; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2011 A, Ref. RB(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2021 |  |  |  | 1,500 |  |  |  | 1,542,465 |
Series 2011, Ref. RB(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2021 |  |  |  | 4,130 |  |  |  | 4,245,681 |
Cape Coral (City of), FL Health Facilities Authority (Gulf Care, Inc.); Series 2015, Ref. RB(c) |  |  | 6.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2045 |  |  |  | 250 |  |  |  | 264,488 |
Capital Trust Agency (Sarasota-Manatee Jewish Housing Council, Inc.); Series 2017, Ref. RB(c) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2046 |  |  |  | 1,250 |  |  |  | 1,270,938 |
Central Florida Expressway Authority; Series 2020-XX1136, Ctfs.(b)(j) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2049 |  |  |  | 2,390 |  |  |  | 2,924,667 |
Citizens Property Insurance Corp.; Series 2012 A-1, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2021 |  |  |  | 4,890 |  |  |  | 4,948,093 |
Collier (County of), FL Industrial Development Authority (The Arlington of Naples); Series 2014 A, RB (Acquired 12/16/2013; Cost $2,198,211)(c)(k)(l) |  |  | 7.75 | % |  |  | 05/15/2035 |  |  |  | 2,250 |  |  |  | 1,740,937 |
Davie (Town of), FL (Nova Southeastern University); Series 2013 A, RB(d)(e) |  |  | 6.00 | % |  |  | 04/01/2023 |  |  |  | 1,250 |  |  |  | 1,397,387 |
Florida (State of) North Broward Hospital District; Series 2017 B, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2048 |  |  |  | 2,980 |  |  |  | 3,440,350 |
Florida Development Finance Corp. (Green Bonds); Series 2019 B, RB(c)(h) |  |  | 7.38 | % |  |  | 01/01/2049 |  |  |  | 2,015 |  |  |  | 1,955,960 |
Greater Orlando Aviation Authority; Series 2019 A, RB(h) |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2044 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,111,940 |
Hillsborough (County of), FL Aviation Authority (Tampa International Airport); Series 2018 E, RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2048 |  |  |  | 2,055 |  |  |  | 2,422,927 |
Lake (County of), FL (Lakeside at Waterman Village); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2020 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 08/15/2040 |  |  |  | 650 |  |  |  | 695,448 |
Series 2020 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.75 | % |  |  | 08/15/2050 |  |  |  | 285 |  |  |  | 303,813 |
Series 2020 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.75 | % |  |  | 08/15/2055 |  |  |  | 1,055 |  |  |  | 1,116,443 |
Series 2020 B-3, Ref. RB |  |  | 3.38 | % |  |  | 08/15/2026 |  |  |  | 420 |  |  |  | 422,407 |
Martin (County of), FL Health Facilities Authority (Martin Memorial Medical Center); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2012, RB(d)(e) |  |  | 5.13 | % |  |  | 11/15/2021 |  |  |  | 4,000 |  |  |  | 4,139,120 |
Series 2012, RB(d)(e) |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 11/15/2021 |  |  |  | 1,100 |  |  |  | 1,141,162 |
Miami Beach (City of), FL Health Facilities Authority (Mt. Sinai Medical Center); Series 2014, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/15/2044 |  |  |  | 820 |  |  |  | 892,800 |
Miami-Dade (County of), FL; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2012 A, Ref. RB(d)(e)(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2022 |  |  |  | 2,000 |  |  |  | 2,150,100 |
Series 2012 B, Ref. RB(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2022 |  |  |  | 2,575 |  |  |  | 2,772,502 |
Series 2016 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2041 |  |  |  | 1,195 |  |  |  | 1,390,884 |
Miami-Dade (County of), FL Educational Facilities Authority (University of Miami); Series 2018 A, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 04/01/2053 |  |  |  | 3,180 |  |  |  | 3,704,509 |
Miami-Dade (County of), FL Expressway Authority; Series 2010 A, Ref. RB (INS - AGM)(f) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2035 |  |  |  | 3,415 |  |  |  | 3,424,699 |
Orange (County of), FL; Series 2012 B, Ref. RB(b)(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2022 |  |  |  | 7,500 |  |  |  | 7,803,075 |
Orlando (City of), FL Greater Orlando Aviation Authority; Series 2017 A, RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2047 |  |  |  | 975 |  |  |  | 1,141,238 |
Osceola (County of), FL; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2020 A-2, Ref. RB(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2050 |  |  |  | 1,490 |  |  |  | 530,172 |
Series 2020 A-2, Ref. RB(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2052 |  |  |  | 455 |  |  |  | 149,408 |
Series 2020 A-2, Ref. RB(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2053 |  |  |  | 1,700 |  |  |  | 536,741 |
Series 2020 A-2, Ref. RB(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2054 |  |  |  | 390 |  |  |  | 118,369 |
Palm Beach (County of), FL Health Facilities Authority; Series 2020, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2055 |  |  |  | 505 |  |  |  | 534,512 |
Palm Beach (County of), FL Health Facilities Authority (Jupiter Medical Center, Inc.); Series 2013 A, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/01/2043 |  |  |  | 2,030 |  |  |  | 2,114,387 |
Palm Beach (County of), FL Solid Waste Authority; Series 2016, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2031 |  |  |  | 2,790 |  |  |  | 2,866,334 |
Putnam (County of), FL Development Authority (Seminole Electric Cooperative); Series 2018 B, Ref. PCR |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 03/15/2042 |  |  |  | 825 |  |  |  | 986,816 |
Tallahassee (City of), FL (Tallahassee Memorial Health Care, Inc.); Series 2016, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2055 |  |  |  | 1,335 |  |  |  | 1,476,857 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 75,838,765 |
Georgia–1.35% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Augusta (City of), GA Development Authority; Series 2018, RB |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2037 |  |  |  | 3,110 |  |  |  | 3,277,442 |
Brookhaven Development Authority; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2020, RB(b)(j) |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2044 |  |  |  | 1,180 |  |  |  | 1,354,510 |
Series 2020, RB(b)(j) |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2049 |  |  |  | 1,670 |  |  |  | 1,901,312 |
Fulton (County of), GA Development Authority (Georgia Tech Athletic Association); Series 2012, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2042 |  |  |  | 510 |  |  |  | 538,652 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

14 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

|  | Interest Rate |  | Maturity Date |  |  | Principal Amount (000) |  |  | Value |
Georgia-(continued) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Private Colleges & Universities Authority (Mercer University); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2012 A, RB |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 10/01/2027 |  |  | $ | 2,170 |  |  | $ | 2,220,062 |
Series 2012 A, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2032 |  |  |  | 1,220 |  |  |  | 1,242,033 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10,534,011 |
Hawaii-1.15% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Hawaii (State of); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2015 A, RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2045 |  |  |  | 1,575 |  |  |  | 1,787,672 |
Series 2018 A, RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2043 |  |  |  | 1,605 |  |  |  | 1,903,755 |
Hawaii (State of) Department of Budget & Finance (Hawaii Pacific Health Obligated Group); Series 2013 A, Ref. RB(d) |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 07/01/2043 |  |  |  | 3,000 |  |  |  | 3,318,780 |
Hawaii (State of) Department of Transportation (Airports Division); Series 2013, COP(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2028 |  |  |  | 1,775 |  |  |  | 1,951,506 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8,961,713 |
Idaho-0.23% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Idaho (State of) Health Facilities Authority (Valley Vista Care Corp.); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2017 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/15/2032 |  |  |  | 730 |  |  |  | 756,857 |
Series 2017 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 11/15/2037 |  |  |  | 1,020 |  |  |  | 1,049,498 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,806,355 |
Illinois-15.30% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Chicago (City of), IL; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2002 B, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 01/01/2037 |  |  |  | 630 |  |  |  | 697,782 |
Series 2005 D, Ref. GO Bonds |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 01/01/2040 |  |  |  | 395 |  |  |  | 437,103 |
Series 2007 E, Ref. GO Bonds |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 01/01/2042 |  |  |  | 315 |  |  |  | 348,173 |
Series 2008, Ref. RB (INS - AGM)(f) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/01/2027 |  |  |  | 280 |  |  |  | 280,924 |
Series 2012 A, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2033 |  |  |  | 830 |  |  |  | 849,820 |
Series 2014, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/01/2044 |  |  |  | 765 |  |  |  | 863,501 |
Series 2014, Ref. RB (INS - AGM)(f) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2030 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,081,250 |
Series 2015 A, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 01/01/2033 |  |  |  | 3,145 |  |  |  | 3,498,341 |
Series 2017 A, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2047 |  |  |  | 2,500 |  |  |  | 2,908,175 |
Chicago (City of), IL (Midway Airport); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2013 A, Ref. RB(h) |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 01/01/2031 |  |  |  | 2,280 |  |  |  | 2,474,256 |
Series 2013 B, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2025 |  |  |  | 1,550 |  |  |  | 1,678,681 |
Series 2014 A, Ref. RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2041 |  |  |  | 1,100 |  |  |  | 1,201,585 |
Chicago (City of), IL (O’Hare International Airport); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2015 C, RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2046 |  |  |  | 790 |  |  |  | 888,971 |
Series 2015 D, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2046 |  |  |  | 555 |  |  |  | 631,179 |
Series 2016 C, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2037 |  |  |  | 1,595 |  |  |  | 1,855,416 |
Series 2017 D, RB |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 01/01/2042 |  |  |  | 1,265 |  |  |  | 1,491,435 |
Series 2017 D, RB(b)(h)(j) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2052 |  |  |  | 5,000 |  |  |  | 5,701,550 |
Chicago (City of), IL Board of Education; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2017 H, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2046 |  |  |  | 955 |  |  |  | 1,087,735 |
Series 2018 A, Ref. GO Bonds (INS - AGM)(f) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2029 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,253,410 |
Series 2018 A, Ref. GO Bonds (INS - AGM)(f) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2031 |  |  |  | 625 |  |  |  | 767,888 |
Series 2018 C, Ref. GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2022 |  |  |  | 995 |  |  |  | 1,064,829 |
Series 2018 C, Ref. GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2023 |  |  |  | 500 |  |  |  | 552,055 |
Chicago (City of), IL Metropolitan Water Reclamation District (Green Bonds); Series 2016 E, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2045 |  |  |  | 1,650 |  |  |  | 1,965,199 |
Chicago (City of), IL Transit Authority; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2011, RB(b)(d)(e)(j) |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 12/01/2021 |  |  |  | 7,490 |  |  |  | 7,776,268 |
Series 2014, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2044 |  |  |  | 2,970 |  |  |  | 3,410,243 |
Cook (County of), IL Forest Preserve District; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2012 B, Ref. GO Bonds(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/15/2032 |  |  |  | 2,460 |  |  |  | 2,602,311 |
Series 2012 B, Ref. GO Bonds(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/15/2037 |  |  |  | 2,460 |  |  |  | 2,597,391 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

15 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

|  | Interest Rate |  | Maturity Date |  |  | Principal Amount (000) |  |  | Value |
Illinois–(continued) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Illinois (State of); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2012, Ref. GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2021 |  |  | $ | 1,035 |  |  | $ | 1,052,699 |
Series 2013, GO Bonds (INS - AGM)(f) |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 07/01/2029 |  |  |  | 1,880 |  |  |  | 2,026,414 |
Series 2014, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 02/01/2033 |  |  |  | 1,100 |  |  |  | 1,187,846 |
Series 2014, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 05/01/2035 |  |  |  | 285 |  |  |  | 306,498 |
Series 2014, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 05/01/2036 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,073,950 |
Series 2016, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/01/2036 |  |  |  | 715 |  |  |  | 797,025 |
Series 2016, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2041 |  |  |  | 1,750 |  |  |  | 1,910,737 |
Series 2017 A, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2036 |  |  |  | 750 |  |  |  | 850,815 |
Series 2017 D, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/01/2024 |  |  |  | 115 |  |  |  | 128,625 |
Series 2017 D, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/01/2026 |  |  |  | 1,840 |  |  |  | 2,115,227 |
Series 2018 A, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 05/01/2030 |  |  |  | 1,135 |  |  |  | 1,328,563 |
Series 2018 A, Ref. GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2021 |  |  |  | 830 |  |  |  | 849,804 |
Series 2018 A, Ref. GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2022 |  |  |  | 580 |  |  |  | 615,386 |
Series 2020, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 05/01/2039 |  |  |  | 1,040 |  |  |  | 1,263,662 |
Illinois (State of) Finance Authority (Centegra Health System); Series 2014 A, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 09/01/2039 |  |  |  | 1,250 |  |  |  | 1,383,763 |
Illinois (State of) Finance Authority (CITGO Petroleum Corp.); Series 2002, RB(h) |  |  | 8.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2032 |  |  |  | 360 |  |  |  | 360,389 |
Illinois (State of) Finance Authority (Navistar International Corp.); Series 2020, Ref. RB(c)(e) |  |  | 4.75 | % |  |  | 08/01/2030 |  |  |  | 840 |  |  |  | 897,128 |
Illinois (State of) Finance Authority (OSF Healthcare System); Series 2015 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/15/2045 |  |  |  | 2,205 |  |  |  | 2,470,085 |
Illinois (State of) Finance Authority (Peace Village); Series 2013, RB(d)(e) |  |  | 6.75 | % |  |  | 08/15/2023 |  |  |  | 1,430 |  |  |  | 1,635,491 |
Illinois (State of) Finance Authority (Rush University Medical Center); Series 2015 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/15/2038 |  |  |  | 1,940 |  |  |  | 2,196,778 |
Illinois (State of) Finance Authority (Three Crowns Park); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2017, Ref. RB |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 02/15/2027 |  |  |  | 280 |  |  |  | 273,468 |
Series 2017, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 02/15/2037 |  |  |  | 200 |  |  |  | 202,030 |
Series 2017, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 02/15/2047 |  |  |  | 835 |  |  |  | 823,335 |
Illinois (State of) Finance Authority (University of Chicago); Series 2013 A, RB(b) |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 10/01/2052 |  |  |  | 3,720 |  |  |  | 3,990,109 |
Illinois (State of) Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority; Series 2002, RB (INS - AGM)(f)(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 12/15/2029 |  |  |  | 2,500 |  |  |  | 2,096,175 |
Illinois (State of) Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority (McCormick PL); Series 2002 A, RB (INS - NATL)(f)(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 12/15/2029 |  |  |  | 3,520 |  |  |  | 2,880,451 |
Illinois (State of) Sports Facilities Authority (The); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2014, Ref. RB (INS - AGM)(f) |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 06/15/2031 |  |  |  | 1,060 |  |  |  | 1,182,515 |
Series 2014, Ref. RB (INS - AGM)(f) |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 06/15/2032 |  |  |  | 965 |  |  |  | 1,074,238 |
Illinois (State of) Toll Highway Authority; Series 2013 A, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2038 |  |  |  | 12,300 |  |  |  | 13,255,218 |
Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Authority; Series 2010, RB(d)(e) |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 06/01/2021 |  |  |  | 4,090 |  |  |  | 4,144,356 |
Regional Transportation Authority; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 1999, Ref. RB (INS - AGM)(f) |  |  | 5.75 | % |  |  | 06/01/2021 |  |  |  | 4,000 |  |  |  | 4,054,840 |
Series 2000, RB (INS - NATL)(f) |  |  | 6.50 | % |  |  | 07/01/2030 |  |  |  | 2,280 |  |  |  | 3,022,300 |
Series 2018 B, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2040 |  |  |  | 2,285 |  |  |  | 2,756,921 |
Sales Tax Securitization Corp.; Series 2018 A, Ref. RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2048 |  |  |  | 4,150 |  |  |  | 4,822,176 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 118,994,488 |
Indiana–2.57% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Indiana (State of) Finance Authority (KIPP Indianapolis, Inc.); Series 2020 A, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2055 |  |  |  | 460 |  |  |  | 506,437 |
Indiana (State of) Finance Authority (Ohio River Bridges East End Crossing); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2013 A, RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2035 |  |  |  | 500 |  |  |  | 538,740 |
Series 2013 A, RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2048 |  |  |  | 510 |  |  |  | 544,073 |
Series 2013, RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2040 |  |  |  | 3,365 |  |  |  | 3,608,390 |
Indiana (State of) Finance Authority (Ohio Valley Electrical Corp.); Series 2012 A, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2039 |  |  |  | 3,325 |  |  |  | 3,426,313 |
Indianapolis Local Public Improvement Bond Bank; Series 2013 F, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 02/01/2030 |  |  |  | 9,000 |  |  |  | 9,700,110 |
Valparaiso (City of), IN (Pratt Paper, LLC); Series 2013, RB(h) |  |  | 6.75 | % |  |  | 01/01/2034 |  |  |  | 1,500 |  |  |  | 1,694,190 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20,018,253 |
Iowa–1.28% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Iowa (State of) Finance Authority (Alcoa, Inc.); Series 2012, RB |  |  | 4.75 | % |  |  | 08/01/2042 |  |  |  | 420 |  |  |  | 435,120 |
Iowa (State of) Finance Authority (Iowa Fertilizer Co.); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2013, RB |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 12/01/2025 |  |  |  | 1,300 |  |  |  | 1,428,102 |
Series 2013, Ref. RB(e) |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 12/01/2037 |  |  |  | 1,190 |  |  |  | 1,319,710 |
Series 2019, Ref. RB |  |  | 3.13 | % |  |  | 12/01/2022 |  |  |  | 390 |  |  |  | 397,761 |
Iowa (State of) Finance Authority (Lifespace Communities, Inc.); Series 2016, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 05/15/2041 |  |  |  | 895 |  |  |  | 1,006,284 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

16 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

|  | Interest Rate |  | Maturity Date |  |  | Principal Amount (000) |  |  | Value |
Iowa–(continued) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Iowa (State of) Tobacco Settlement Authority; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2005 B, RB |  |  | 5.60 | % |  |  | 06/01/2034 |  |  | $ | 280 |  |  | $ | 283,956 |
Series 2005 C, RB |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 06/01/2042 |  |  |  | 1,945 |  |  |  | 1,972,483 |
Series 2005 C, RB |  |  | 5.63 | % |  |  | 06/01/2046 |  |  |  | 1,055 |  |  |  | 1,069,907 |
Series 2005 E, RB(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2046 |  |  |  | 12,020 |  |  |  | 2,053,737 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9,967,060 |
Kansas-0.34% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Wichita (City of), KS (Presbyterian Manors, Inc.); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2013 IV-A, RB |  |  | 6.38 | % |  |  | 05/15/2043 |  |  |  | 1,500 |  |  |  | 1,590,885 |
Series 2018 I, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 05/15/2047 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,015,030 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,605,915 |
Kentucky-2.67% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Kentucky (Commonwealth of) Economic Development Finance Authority (Catholic Health Initiatives); Series 2011 B, RB (SIFMA Municipal Swap Index + 1.40%)(e)(m) |  |  | 1.43 | % |  |  | 02/01/2025 |  |  |  | 700 |  |  |  | 704,844 |
Kentucky (Commonwealth of) Economic Development Finance Authority (Next Generation Kentucky Information Highway); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2015 A, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2040 |  |  |  | 2,770 |  |  |  | 3,073,149 |
Series 2015 A, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2045 |  |  |  | 390 |  |  |  | 429,718 |
Kentucky (Commonwealth of) Economic Development Finance Authority (Owensboro Health, Inc.); Series 2017 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2045 |  |  |  | 955 |  |  |  | 1,024,113 |
Kentucky (Commonwealth of) Municipal Power Agency (Prairie State); Series 2019 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 09/01/2037 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,199,210 |
Kentucky (Commonwealth of) Public Energy Authority; Series 2019 C, RB(e) |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 02/01/2028 |  |  |  | 1,480 |  |  |  | 1,731,215 |
Kentucky (Commonwealth of) Public Transportation Infrastructure Authority (Downtown Crossing); Series 2013 A, RB |  |  | 5.75 | % |  |  | 07/01/2049 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,096,710 |
Kentucky (Commonwealth of) Turnpike Authority (Revitalization); Series 2012 A, RB(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2022 |  |  |  | 3,140 |  |  |  | 3,341,023 |
Kentucky Bond Development Corp.; Series 2020, RB (INS - BAM)(b)(f)(j) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 09/01/2044 |  |  |  | 3,860 |  |  |  | 4,789,102 |
Louisville (City of) & Jefferson (County of), KY Metropolitan Government (Norton Healthcare, Inc.); Series 2013 A, RB |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 10/01/2033 |  |  |  | 3,000 |  |  |  | 3,359,100 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20,748,184 |
Louisiana-1.11% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Louisiana (State of) Local Government Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority (St. John the Baptist) (Green Bonds); Series 2019, RB(c) |  |  | 3.90 | % |  |  | 11/01/2044 |  |  |  | 975 |  |  |  | 990,756 |
Louisiana (State of) Public Facilities Authority (Tulane University of Louisiana); Series 2020, Ref. RB |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 04/01/2050 |  |  |  | 670 |  |  |  | 751,573 |
St. Tammany (Parish of), LA Public Trust Financing Authority (Christwood); Series 2015, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 11/15/2037 |  |  |  | 1,850 |  |  |  | 1,990,729 |
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp.; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2013 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 05/15/2030 |  |  |  | 590 |  |  |  | 591,551 |
Series 2013 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 05/15/2031 |  |  |  | 745 |  |  |  | 754,953 |
Series 2013 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 05/15/2032 |  |  |  | 1,410 |  |  |  | 1,480,754 |
Series 2013 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 05/15/2033 |  |  |  | 1,190 |  |  |  | 1,248,536 |
Series 2013 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 05/15/2035 |  |  |  | 750 |  |  |  | 814,628 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8,623,480 |
Maryland-1.48% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Howard (County of), MD (Downtown Columbia); Series 2017 A, RB(c) |  |  | 4.50 | % |  |  | 02/15/2047 |  |  |  | 1,500 |  |  |  | 1,558,650 |
Maryland (State of) Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority (LifeBridge Health); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2015, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2040 |  |  |  | 4,250 |  |  |  | 4,901,227 |
Series 2016, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2047 |  |  |  | 720 |  |  |  | 826,279 |
Maryland (State of) Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority (Peninsula Regional Medical Center); Series 2015, Ref. RB(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2024 |  |  |  | 1,465 |  |  |  | 1,687,197 |
Maryland (State of) Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority (Stevenson University); Series 2021, Ref. RB |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2051 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,096,880 |
Prince Georges (County of), MD (Collington Episcopal Life Care Community, Inc.); Series 2017, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 04/01/2028 |  |  |  | 690 |  |  |  | 730,330 |
Rockville (City of), MD (Ingleside at King Farm); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2017 B, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2024 |  |  |  | 550 |  |  |  | 568,849 |
Series 2017 B, RB |  |  | 4.25 | % |  |  | 11/01/2037 |  |  |  | 175 |  |  |  | 174,164 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11,543,576 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

17 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

|  | Interest Rate |  | Maturity Date |  |  | Principal Amount (000) |  |  | Value |
Massachusetts–1.33% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) Development Finance Agency (Emerson College); Series 2016 A, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2047 |  |  | $ | 3,125 |  |  | $ | 3,554,094 |
Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) Port Authority; Series 2019 A, Ref. RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2037 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,238,980 |
Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) Transportation Fund Revenue; Series 2016 B, RB |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2046 |  |  |  | 2,520 |  |  |  | 2,787,422 |
Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) Water Resources Authority; Series 2007 B, Ref. RB (INS - AGM)(f) |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 08/01/2031 |  |  |  | 2,000 |  |  |  | 2,779,260 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10,359,756 |
Michigan–2.98% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Academy of Warren; Series 2020 A, Ref. RB(c) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 05/01/2035 |  |  |  | 290 |  |  |  | 299,445 |
Detroit (City of), MI; Series 2018, GO Bonds |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 04/01/2035 |  |  |  | 250 |  |  |  | 291,440 |
Detroit (City of), MI Downtown Development Authority (Catalyst Development); Series 2018 A, Ref. RB (INS - AGM)(b)(f)(j) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2036 |  |  |  | 2,000 |  |  |  | 2,256,580 |
Grand Rapids Economic Development Corp. (Beacon Hill at Eastgate); Series 2017 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/01/2047 |  |  |  | 1,390 |  |  |  | 1,407,973 |
Michigan (State of) Building Authority (Facilities Program); Series 2016 I, Ref. RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 04/15/2041 |  |  |  | 2,715 |  |  |  | 3,223,465 |
Michigan (State of) Finance Authority; Series 2014 C-1, RB(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2022 |  |  |  | 1,095 |  |  |  | 1,165,868 |
Michigan (State of) Finance Authority (Beaumont Health Credit Group); Series 2016, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/01/2044 |  |  |  | 1,745 |  |  |  | 1,982,529 |
Michigan (State of) Finance Authority (Charter County of Wayne Criminal Justice Center); Series 2018, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/01/2038 |  |  |  | 750 |  |  |  | 931,418 |
Michigan (State of) Finance Authority (Detroit Water & Sewerage Department); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2014 C-6, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2033 |  |  |  | 550 |  |  |  | 626,571 |
Series 2014 D-4, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2029 |  |  |  | 550 |  |  |  | 627,550 |
Series 2015, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2035 |  |  |  | 1,190 |  |  |  | 1,390,777 |
Michigan (State of) Finance Authority (Landmark Academy); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2020, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2035 |  |  |  | 170 |  |  |  | 184,078 |
Series 2020, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2045 |  |  |  | 490 |  |  |  | 520,140 |
Michigan (State of) Finance Authority (MidMichigan Health Credit Group); Series 2014, Ref. RB(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2024 |  |  |  | 2,005 |  |  |  | 2,291,053 |
Michigan (State of) Finance Authority (Trinity Health Credit); Series 2017 MI, Ref. RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2046 |  |  |  | 3,655 |  |  |  | 4,308,587 |
Michigan (State of) Strategic Fund (Canterbury Health Care, Inc.); Series 2016, RB(c) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2026 |  |  |  | 715 |  |  |  | 725,067 |
Michigan (State of) Strategic Fund (I-85 Improvement Project); Series 2018, RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/31/2032 |  |  |  | 750 |  |  |  | 926,385 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23,158,926 |
Minnesota–0.31% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Bethel (City of), MN (Spectrum High School); Series 2017 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 4.25 | % |  |  | 07/01/2047 |  |  |  | 425 |  |  |  | 448,129 |
St. Cloud (City of), MN (CentraCare Health System); Series 2019, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 05/01/2048 |  |  |  | 1,235 |  |  |  | 1,490,410 |
St. Paul (City of), MN Housing & Redevelopment Authority (Hope Community Academy); Series 2020, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2055 |  |  |  | 430 |  |  |  | 447,131 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,385,670 |
Missouri–1.64% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Kansas City (City of), MO Industrial Development Authority (Downtown Redevelopment District); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2011 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 09/01/2024 |  |  |  | 825 |  |  |  | 846,260 |
Series 2011 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 09/01/2025 |  |  |  | 1,445 |  |  |  | 1,482,165 |
Series 2011 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 09/01/2027 |  |  |  | 980 |  |  |  | 1,005,147 |
Kansas City (City of), MO Industrial Development Authority (Kansas City International Airport); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2019 B, RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 03/01/2046 |  |  |  | 1,215 |  |  |  | 1,432,716 |
Series 2019 B, RB (INS - AGM)(f)(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 03/01/2049 |  |  |  | 1,005 |  |  |  | 1,200,724 |
Kirkwood (City of), MO Industrial Development Authority (Aberdeen Heights); Series 2017 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 05/15/2050 |  |  |  | 475 |  |  |  | 511,898 |
Missouri (State of) Health & Educational Facilities Authority (Lutheran Senior Services); Series 2019, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 02/01/2048 |  |  |  | 340 |  |  |  | 395,311 |
St. Louis (County of), MO Industrial Development Authority (Friendship Village of Sunset Hills); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2012, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 09/01/2042 |  |  |  | 2,000 |  |  |  | 2,056,960 |
Series 2013 A, RB |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 09/01/2033 |  |  |  | 1,375 |  |  |  | 1,483,969 |
St. Louis (County of), MO Industrial Development Authority (Friendship Village West County); Series 2018 A, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 09/01/2038 |  |  |  | 2,070 |  |  |  | 2,304,738 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12,719,888 |
Nebraska–1.28% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Central Plains Energy Project (No. 3); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2012, RB(n) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 09/01/2032 |  |  |  | 4,690 |  |  |  | 4,991,286 |
Series 2017 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 09/01/2042 |  |  |  | 920 |  |  |  | 1,295,636 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

18 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

|  | Interest Rate |  | Maturity Date |  |  | Principal Amount (000) |  |  | Value |
Nebraska–(continued) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Douglas (County of), NE Hospital Authority No. 2 (Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital); Series 2014, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 05/15/2044 |  |  | $ | 1,000 |  |  | $ | 1,088,590 |
Lincoln (County of), NE Hospital Authority No. 1 (Great Plains Regional Medical Center); Series 2012, Ref. RB(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/01/2021 |  |  |  | 2,500 |  |  |  | 2,577,525 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9,953,037 |
New Hampshire–0.34% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
New Hampshire (State of) Health and Education Facilities Authority; Series 2020 A, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2059 |  |  |  | 1,800 |  |  |  | 2,673,594 |
New Jersey–5.27% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Garden State Preservation Trust; Series 2005 A, RB (INS - AGM)(f) |  |  | 5.75 | % |  |  | 11/01/2028 |  |  |  | 920 |  |  |  | 1,139,512 |
New Jersey (State of) Economic Development Authority; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2005 N-1, Ref. RB (INS - NATL)(b)(f)(j) |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 09/01/2022 |  |  |  | 3,720 |  |  |  | 4,004,096 |
Series 2005, Ref. RB (INS - AMBAC)(f) |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 09/01/2024 |  |  |  | 3,390 |  |  |  | 3,929,552 |
Series 2017 DDD, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/15/2032 |  |  |  | 1,030 |  |  |  | 1,210,209 |
Series 2021, RB |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 06/15/2038 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,113,610 |
New Jersey (State of) Economic Development Authority (Continental Airlines, Inc.); Series 1999, RB(h) |  |  | 5.13 | % |  |  | 09/15/2023 |  |  |  | 680 |  |  |  | 722,276 |
New Jersey (State of) Economic Development Authority (Port Newark Container Terminal LLC); Series 2017, Ref. RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2037 |  |  |  | 945 |  |  |  | 1,070,345 |
New Jersey (State of) Economic Development Authority (The Goethals Bridge Replacement); Series 2013, RB(h) |  |  | 5.38 | % |  |  | 01/01/2043 |  |  |  | 2,000 |  |  |  | 2,203,980 |
New Jersey (State of) Higher Education Student Assistance Authority; Series 2018 B, Ref. RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/01/2024 |  |  |  | 1,100 |  |  |  | 1,267,002 |
New Jersey (State of) Transportation Trust Fund Authority; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2006 C, RB (INS - AGC)(f)(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 12/15/2026 |  |  |  | 14,305 |  |  |  | 13,463,008 |
Series 2018 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/15/2024 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,153,170 |
Series 2018 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/15/2035 |  |  |  | 880 |  |  |  | 1,051,538 |
Series 2018 A, Ref. RN(b)(j) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/15/2029 |  |  |  | 1,575 |  |  |  | 1,847,900 |
Series 2018 A, Ref. RN(b)(j) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/15/2030 |  |  |  | 535 |  |  |  | 623,264 |
Series 2018 A, Ref. RN |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/15/2031 |  |  |  | 995 |  |  |  | 1,155,961 |
Subseries 2016 A-1, RN |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/15/2028 |  |  |  | 960 |  |  |  | 1,136,045 |
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp.; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2018 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2046 |  |  |  | 2,480 |  |  |  | 2,892,126 |
Series 2018 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 06/01/2046 |  |  |  | 835 |  |  |  | 993,625 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40,977,219 |
New York–22.30% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Build NYC Resource Corp. (Pratt Paper, Inc.); Series 2014, Ref. RB(c)(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2035 |  |  |  | 1,600 |  |  |  | 1,768,624 |
Erie Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.; Series 2005 A, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2045 |  |  |  | 2,500 |  |  |  | 2,502,450 |
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp; Series 2020-XF2859, Ctfs. (INS - AGM)(b)(f) |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 02/15/2047 |  |  |  | 1,500 |  |  |  | 1,639,410 |
Long Island (City of), NY Power Authority; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2011 A, RB(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 05/01/2021 |  |  |  | 4,955 |  |  |  | 4,994,690 |
Series 2014 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 09/01/2044 |  |  |  | 2,870 |  |  |  | 3,223,498 |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2012 A, Ref. RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/15/2027 |  |  |  | 10,000 |  |  |  | 10,760,200 |
Series 2016 A, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 11/15/2032 |  |  |  | 630 |  |  |  | 764,959 |
Series 2019 A, RB (INS - AGM)(b)(f) |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 11/15/2046 |  |  |  | 2,685 |  |  |  | 2,991,412 |
Series 2020 A-2, RB |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 02/01/2022 |  |  |  | 1,175 |  |  |  | 1,209,157 |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Green Bonds); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2017 C-1, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/15/2023 |  |  |  | 605 |  |  |  | 670,909 |
Series 2020 C-1, RB |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 11/15/2055 |  |  |  | 1,340 |  |  |  | 1,609,474 |
Monroe County Industrial Development Corp. (University of Rochester); Series 2020 A, RB(b) |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2050 |  |  |  | 4,675 |  |  |  | 5,278,356 |
New York & New Jersey (States of) Port Authority; Two Hundred Seventh Series 2018, Ref. RB(b)(h)(j) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 09/15/2028 |  |  |  | 3,255 |  |  |  | 4,074,967 |
New York (City of), NY; Series 2020-XM0925, GO Bonds(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2043 |  |  |  | 2,335 |  |  |  | 2,893,649 |
New York (City of), NY Municipal Water Finance Authority; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2012 FF, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/15/2045 |  |  |  | 10,545 |  |  |  | 11,160,617 |
Subseries 2012 A-1, VRD RB(o) |  |  | 0.01 | % |  |  | 06/15/2044 |  |  |  | 990 |  |  |  | 990,000 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

19 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

|  | Interest Rate |  | Maturity Date |  |  | Principal Amount (000) |  |  | Value |
New York–(continued) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
New York (City of), NY Transitional Finance Authority; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2013 I, RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 05/01/2038 |  |  | $ | 1,465 |  |  | $ | 1,604,614 |
Subseries 2012 E-1, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 02/01/2037 |  |  |  | 6,845 |  |  |  | 7,129,341 |
Subseries 2013, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/01/2038 |  |  |  | 4,500 |  |  |  | 5,018,895 |
New York (City of), NY Water & Sewer System; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2019 EE-2, Ref. RB(b) |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 06/15/2040 |  |  |  | 2,790 |  |  |  | 3,206,352 |
Series 2020 GG-1, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/15/2048 |  |  |  | 4,395 |  |  |  | 5,453,360 |
New York (County of), NY Tobacco Trust V; Series 2005 S-2, RB(g) |  |  | 0.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2050 |  |  |  | 10,140 |  |  |  | 1,488,856 |
New York (County of), NY Tobacco Trust VI; Subseries 2016 A-1, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.75 | % |  |  | 06/01/2043 |  |  |  | 3,135 |  |  |  | 3,943,422 |
New York (State of) Dormitory Authority (City of New York); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2005 A, RB (INS - AMBAC)(f) |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 05/15/2028 |  |  |  | 2,900 |  |  |  | 3,739,550 |
Series 2005 A, RB (INS - AMBAC)(f) |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 05/15/2029 |  |  |  | 2,455 |  |  |  | 3,230,191 |
New York (State of) Dormitory Authority (General Purpose); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2013 A, RB(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 02/15/2023 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,093,710 |
Series 2014 C, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 03/15/2040 |  |  |  | 4,840 |  |  |  | 5,445,339 |
New York (State of) Dormitory Authority (New York University); Series 2001 1, RB (INS - BHAC)(f) |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 07/01/2031 |  |  |  | 1,040 |  |  |  | 1,354,496 |
New York (State of) Thruway Authority; Series 2011 A-1, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 04/01/2029 |  |  |  | 4,545 |  |  |  | 4,561,817 |
New York (State of) Utility Debt Securitization Authority; Series 2013 TE, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 12/15/2031 |  |  |  | 10,000 |  |  |  | 11,260,800 |
New York City (City of), NY Transitional Finance Authority; Series 2020-XF2864, Ctfs.(b) |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 11/01/2045 |  |  |  | 3,355 |  |  |  | 3,792,861 |
New York Liberty Development Corp. (3 World Trade Center); Series 2014, Class 1, Ref. RB(c) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 11/15/2044 |  |  |  | 6,095 |  |  |  | 6,630,446 |
New York Liberty Development Corp. (7 World Trade Center); Series 2012, Class 1, Ref. RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 09/15/2040 |  |  |  | 4,900 |  |  |  | 5,109,622 |
New York Power Authority; Series 2020-XF0956, Ctfs.(b) |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 11/15/2050 |  |  |  | 3,690 |  |  |  | 4,245,161 |
New York State Dormitory Authority; Series 2020-XL0149, Ctfs.(b) |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 03/15/2046 |  |  |  | 5,000 |  |  |  | 5,649,350 |
New York State Thruway Authority; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2020-XM0830, Ctfs.(b) |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2050 |  |  |  | 4,790 |  |  |  | 5,367,961 |
Series 2020-XX1127, Ctfs. (INS - AGM)(b)(f)(j) |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2050 |  |  |  | 2,625 |  |  |  | 2,977,380 |
New York Transportation Development Corp. (American Airlines, Inc. John F. Kennedy International Airport); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2016, Ref. RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2021 |  |  |  | 2,085 |  |  |  | 2,121,613 |
Series 2020, Ref. RB(h) |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 08/01/2031 |  |  |  | 660 |  |  |  | 792,950 |
Series 2020, Ref. RB(h) |  |  | 5.38 | % |  |  | 08/01/2036 |  |  |  | 960 |  |  |  | 1,140,557 |
New York Transportation Development Corp. (American Airlines, Inc.); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2016, Ref. RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2026 |  |  |  | 1,580 |  |  |  | 1,607,618 |
Series 2016, Ref. RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 08/01/2031 |  |  |  | 1,340 |  |  |  | 1,362,244 |
New York Transportation Development Corp. (Delta Air Lines, Inc. LaGuardia Airport Terminal C&D Redevelopment); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2018, RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2031 |  |  |  | 235 |  |  |  | 280,630 |
Series 2018, RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2033 |  |  |  | 2,075 |  |  |  | 2,457,941 |
Series 2018, RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2034 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,180,550 |
Series 2018, RB(h) |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 01/01/2036 |  |  |  | 1,495 |  |  |  | 1,646,279 |
New York Transportation Development Corp. (Delta Air Lines, Inc.-Laguardia); Series 2020, RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2040 |  |  |  | 2,015 |  |  |  | 2,449,414 |
New York Transportation Development Corp. (LaGuardia Airport Terminal B Redevelopment); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2016 A, RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2046 |  |  |  | 3,055 |  |  |  | 3,401,193 |
Series 2016 A, RB(h) |  |  | 5.25 | % |  |  | 01/01/2050 |  |  |  | 1,660 |  |  |  | 1,860,860 |
Rockland Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.; Series 2001, RB |  |  | 5.75 | % |  |  | 08/15/2043 |  |  |  | 1,500 |  |  |  | 1,513,740 |
TSASC, Inc.; Series 2016 B, Ref. RB |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2045 |  |  |  | 2,575 |  |  |  | 2,795,909 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 173,447,394 |
North Carolina–3.43% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Charlotte (City of), NC (Charlotte Airport); Series 2017 A, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2042 |  |  |  | 1,915 |  |  |  | 2,284,921 |
Charlotte (City of), NC (Charlotte Douglas International Airport); Series 2017 A, RB(b) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 07/01/2047 |  |  |  | 4,000 |  |  |  | 4,738,520 |
North Carolina (State of) Department of Transportation (I-77 HOT Lanes); Series 2015, RB(h) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/30/2054 |  |  |  | 1,135 |  |  |  | 1,239,897 |
North Carolina (State of) Medical Care Commission (Duke University Health System); Series 2012 A, RB(b)(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2022 |  |  |  | 4,890 |  |  |  | 5,186,041 |
North Carolina (State of) Medical Care Commission (Vidant Health); Series 2012 A, Ref. RB(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 06/01/2022 |  |  |  | 2,250 |  |  |  | 2,385,045 |
North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency; Series 2015 B, Ref. RB(b)(d)(e) |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 10/01/2025 |  |  |  | 9,050 |  |  |  | 10,873,665 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26,708,089 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

20 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

|  | Interest Rate |  | Maturity Date |  |  | Principal Amount (000) |  |  | Value |
North Dakota–0.58% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Ward (County of), ND (Trinity Obligated Group); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2017 C, RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 06/01/2043 |  |  | $ | 2,140 |  |  | $ | 2,385,822 |
Series 2017 C, RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 06/01/2048 |  |  |  | 1,900 |  |  |  | 2,104,345 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4,490,167 |
Ohio-6.98% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Akron, Bath & Copley Joint Township Hospital District (Summa Health Obligated Group); Series 2016, Ref. RB |  | 5.25% |  |  | 11/15/2046 |  |  |  | 790 |  |  |  | 912,719 |
Allen (County of), OH (Catholic Healthcare Partners); Series 2012 A, Ref. RB(d)(e) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 05/01/2022 |  |  |  | 3,300 |  |  |  | 3,486,846 |
American Municipal Power, Inc.; Series 2015 A, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 02/15/2039 |  |  |  | 1,230 |  |  |  | 1,369,347 |
American Municipal Power, Inc. (Greenup Hydroelectric); Series 2016 A, RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 02/15/2046 |  |  |  | 500 |  |  |  | 588,160 |
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2020 A-2, Ref. RB |  | 4.00% |  |  | 06/01/2039 |  |  |  | 475 |  |  |  | 545,376 |
Series 2020 A-2, Ref. RB |  | 4.00% |  |  | 06/01/2048 |  |  |  | 3,190 |  |  |  | 3,566,005 |
Series 2020 B-2, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 06/01/2055 |  |  |  | 8,660 |  |  |  | 9,751,073 |
Series 2020 B-3, Ref. RB(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 06/01/2057 |  |  |  | 8,650 |  |  |  | 1,296,981 |
Chillicothe (City of), OH (Adena Health System Obligated Group); Series 2017, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 12/01/2037 |  |  |  | 3,000 |  |  |  | 3,591,930 |
Cleveland (City of) & Cuyahoga (County of), OH Port Authority (Constellation Schools); Series 2014 A, Ref. RB |  | 6.50% |  |  | 01/01/2034 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,075,360 |
Cleveland (City of), OH; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2008 B-2, RB (INS - NATL)(f)(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 11/15/2026 |  |  |  | 3,545 |  |  |  | 3,299,721 |
Series 2008 B-2, RB (INS - NATL)(f)(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 11/15/2028 |  |  |  | 3,845 |  |  |  | 3,395,981 |
Series 2008 B-2, RB (INS - NATL)(f)(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 11/15/2038 |  |  |  | 2,800 |  |  |  | 1,721,944 |
Columbus-Franklin (County of), OH Finance Authority (Easton); Series 2020, RB(c) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 06/01/2028 |  |  |  | 840 |  |  |  | 886,738 |
Cuyahoga (County of), OH (Metrohealth System); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2017, Ref. RB |  | 5.25% |  |  | 02/15/2047 |  |  |  | 2,555 |  |  |  | 2,935,363 |
Series 2017, Ref. RB |  | 5.50% |  |  | 02/15/2052 |  |  |  | 1,590 |  |  |  | 1,844,940 |
Franklin (County of), OH (First Community Village Obligated Group); Series 2013, Ref. RB |  | 5.25% |  |  | 07/01/2033 |  |  |  | 2,000 |  |  |  | 1,981,960 |
Gallia (County of), OH (Holzer Health System Obligated Group); Series 2012, Ref. RB(d)(e) |  | 8.00% |  |  | 07/01/2022 |  |  |  | 1,005 |  |  |  | 1,099,651 |
Hamilton (County of), OH (Christ Hospital); Series 2012, RB(d)(e) |  | 5.50% |  |  | 06/01/2022 |  |  |  | 3,000 |  |  |  | 3,198,720 |
Hamilton (County of), OH (Life Enriching Communities); Series 2016, Ref.RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 01/01/2046 |  |  |  | 1,395 |  |  |  | 1,503,266 |
Lucas (County of), OH (ProMedica Healthcare System); Series 2018 A, Ref. RB |  | 5.25% |  |  | 11/15/2048 |  |  |  | 1,655 |  |  |  | 1,888,090 |
Montgomery (County of), OH (Trousdale Foundation Properties); Series 2018 A, RB(c) |  | 6.00% |  |  | 04/01/2038 |  |  |  | 1,490 |  |  |  | 702,490 |
Ohio (State of) (Portsmouth Bypass); Series 2015, RB (INS - AGM)(f)(h) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 12/31/2039 |  |  |  | 750 |  |  |  | 849,870 |
Ohio (State of) Air Quality Development Authority (Pratt Paper LLC); Series 2017, RB(c)(h) |  | 4.25% |  |  | 01/15/2038 |  |  |  | 575 |  |  |  | 636,226 |
Ohio (State of) Water Development Authority (Water Pollution Control Loan Fund); Series 2020 A, RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 12/01/2050 |  |  |  | 1,675 |  |  |  | 2,118,875 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54,247,632 |
Oklahoma–1.17% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Comanche (County of), OK Hospital Authority; Series 2015, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 07/01/2022 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,048,090 |
Oklahoma (State of) Development Finance Authority (OU Medicine); Series 2018 B, RB |  | 5.50% |  |  | 08/15/2057 |  |  |  | 5,005 |  |  |  | 5,901,846 |
Oklahoma (State of) Development Finance Authority (Provident Oklahoma Education Resources, Inc.-Cross Village Student Housing); Series 2017, RB (Acquired 12/24/2018; Cost $1,703,893)(k)(l) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 08/01/2052 |  |  |  | 1,825 |  |  |  | 757,375 |
Oklahoma (State of) Water Resources Board; Series 2018 C, RB |  | 4.00% |  |  | 10/01/2048 |  |  |  | 1,245 |  |  |  | 1,381,950 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9,089,261 |
Oregon–0.81% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Clackamas (County of), OR Hospital Facility Authority (Rose Villa); Series 2020 A, Ref. RB |  | 5.38% |  |  | 11/15/2055 |  |  |  | 505 |  |  |  | 541,557 |
Forest Grove (City of), OR (Pacific University); Series 2014 A, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 05/01/2040 |  |  |  | 1,570 |  |  |  | 1,612,704 |
University of Oregon; Series 2020, RB(b)(j) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 04/01/2050 |  |  |  | 3,360 |  |  |  | 4,163,813 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6,318,074 |
Pennsylvania–2.24% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Allegheny (County of), PA Hospital Development Authority (Allegheny Health Network Obligated Group Issue); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2018 A, Ref. RB |  | 4.00% |  |  | 04/01/2044 |  |  |  | 835 |  |  |  | 912,521 |
Series 2018 A, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 04/01/2047 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,166,220 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

21 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

|  | Interest Rate |  | Maturity Date |  |  | Principal Amount (000) |  |  | Value |
Pennsylvania–(continued) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Pennsylvania (Commonwealth of) Turnpike Commission; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2018 A-2, RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 12/01/2048 |  |  | $ | 1,180 |  |  | $ | 1,417,428 |
Series 2018 B, RB |  | 5.25% |  |  | 12/01/2048 |  |  |  | 1,160 |  |  |  | 1,420,478 |
Subseries 2014 A-2, RB(i) |  | 5.13% |  |  | 12/01/2039 |  |  |  | 1,500 |  |  |  | 1,536,360 |
Subseries 2017 B-1, RB |  | 5.25% |  |  | 06/01/2047 |  |  |  | 1,250 |  |  |  | 1,515,150 |
Pennsylvania (State of) Turnpike Commission; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2021 A, RB |  | 4.00% |  |  | 12/01/2043 |  |  |  | 460 |  |  |  | 529,391 |
Series 2021 A, RB |  | 4.00% |  |  | 12/01/2044 |  |  |  | 505 |  |  |  | 578,765 |
Philadelphia (City of), PA; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2017 A, RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 10/01/2052 |  |  |  | 1,035 |  |  |  | 1,231,640 |
Series 2017 B, Ref. RB(h) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 07/01/2042 |  |  |  | 4,920 |  |  |  | 5,710,398 |
Philadelphia (City of), PA Authority for Industrial Development (String Theory Charter School); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2020, Ref. RB(c) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 06/15/2040 |  |  |  | 150 |  |  |  | 172,888 |
Series 2020, Ref. RB(c) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 06/15/2050 |  |  |  | 285 |  |  |  | 323,877 |
Philadelphia (City of), PA Industrial Development Authority (Thomas Jefferson University); Series 2017 A, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 09/01/2047 |  |  |  | 795 |  |  |  | 930,047 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17,445,163 |
Puerto Rico–3.84% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Children’s Trust Fund; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2002, RB |  | 5.50% |  |  | 05/15/2039 |  |  |  | 3,420 |  |  |  | 3,503,927 |
Series 2002, RB |  | 5.63% |  |  | 05/15/2043 |  |  |  | 1,825 |  |  |  | 1,834,362 |
Series 2005 A, RB(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 05/15/2050 |  |  |  | 5,570 |  |  |  | 861,011 |
Series 2005 B, RB(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 05/15/2055 |  |  |  | 2,530 |  |  |  | 221,603 |
Series 2008 A, RB(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 05/15/2057 |  |  |  | 14,910 |  |  |  | 1,045,936 |
Puerto Rico (Commonwealth of); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2003 C-7, Ref. GO Bonds (INS - NATL)(f) |  | 6.00% |  |  | 07/01/2027 |  |  |  | 400 |  |  |  | 412,064 |
Series 2004 A, GO Bonds (INS - NATL)(f) |  | 5.25% |  |  | 07/01/2021 |  |  |  | 485 |  |  |  | 487,876 |
Puerto Rico (Commonwealth of) Aqueduct & Sewer Authority; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2012 A, RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 07/01/2033 |  |  |  | 180 |  |  |  | 188,896 |
Series 2012 A, RB |  | 5.13% |  |  | 07/01/2037 |  |  |  | 1,600 |  |  |  | 1,681,696 |
Puerto Rico (Commonwealth of) Electric Power Authority; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2003 NN, RB (INS - NATL)(f) |  | 4.75% |  |  | 07/01/2033 |  |  |  | 575 |  |  |  | 581,900 |
Series 2007 VV, Ref. RB (INS - NATL)(f) |  | 5.25% |  |  | 07/01/2029 |  |  |  | 1,900 |  |  |  | 2,094,864 |
Series 2007 VV, Ref. RB (INS - NATL)(f) |  | 5.25% |  |  | 07/01/2033 |  |  |  | 725 |  |  |  | 817,793 |
Series 2007 VV, Ref. RB (INS - NATL)(f) |  | 5.25% |  |  | 07/01/2035 |  |  |  | 640 |  |  |  | 727,808 |
Puerto Rico (Commonwealth of) Highway & Transportation Authority; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2004 J, RB (INS - NATL)(f) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 07/01/2029 |  |  |  | 370 |  |  |  | 375,383 |
Series 2007 N, Ref. RB (INS - AGM)(f) |  | 5.50% |  |  | 07/01/2029 |  |  |  | 600 |  |  |  | 731,520 |
Series 2007 N, Ref. RB (INS - NATL)(f) |  | 5.25% |  |  | 07/01/2032 |  |  |  | 760 |  |  |  | 853,708 |
Series 2007 N, Ref. RB (INS - AGC)(f) |  | 5.25% |  |  | 07/01/2034 |  |  |  | 1,195 |  |  |  | 1,469,336 |
Puerto Rico (Commonwealth of) Public Buildings Authority (Government Facilities); Series 2007 M-3, Ref. RB (INS - NATL)(f) |  | 6.00% |  |  | 07/01/2024 |  |  |  | 2,000 |  |  |  | 2,054,780 |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp.; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2018 A-1, RB(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 07/01/2029 |  |  |  | 1,405 |  |  |  | 1,162,427 |
Series 2018 A-1, RB(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 07/01/2033 |  |  |  | 2,116 |  |  |  | 1,504,539 |
Series 2018 A-1, RB(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 07/01/2051 |  |  |  | 6,470 |  |  |  | 1,424,500 |
Series 2018 A-1, RB |  | 4.75% |  |  | 07/01/2053 |  |  |  | 1,359 |  |  |  | 1,483,253 |
Series 2018 A-1, RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 07/01/2058 |  |  |  | 3,131 |  |  |  | 3,467,708 |
Series 2019 A-2, RB |  | 4.33% |  |  | 07/01/2040 |  |  |  | 820 |  |  |  | 882,033 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29,868,923 |
Rhode Island–0.10% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp.; Series 2015 A, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 06/01/2035 |  |  |  | 700 |  |  |  | 791,175 |
South Carolina–3.02% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Piedmont Municipal Power Agency; Series 2011 C, Ref. RB (INS - AGC)(f) |  | 5.75% |  |  | 01/01/2034 |  |  |  | 7,410 |  |  |  | 7,508,553 |
South Carolina (State of) Jobs-Economic Development Authority (Palmetto Health Alliance); Series 2013 A, Ref. RB(d)(e) |  | 5.25% |  |  | 08/01/2023 |  |  |  | 4,450 |  |  |  | 4,980,529 |
South Carolina (State of) Ports Authority; Series 2015, RB(d)(e)(h) |  | 5.25% |  |  | 07/01/2025 |  |  |  | 4,500 |  |  |  | 5,386,725 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

22 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

|  | Interest Rate |  | Maturity Date |  |  | Principal Amount (000) |  |  | Value |
South Carolina–(continued) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
South Carolina (State of) Public Service Authority; Series 2014, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 12/01/2046 |  |  | $ | 1,175 |  |  | $ | 1,327,233 |
South Carolina (State of) Public Service Authority (Santee Cooper); Series 2013 E, RB |  | 5.50% |  |  | 12/01/2053 |  |  |  | 3,830 |  |  |  | 4,263,211 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23,466,251 |
South Dakota–0.56% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
South Dakota (State of) Health & Educational Facilities Authority (Sanford Obligated Group); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2014 B, RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 11/01/2044 |  |  |  | 2,500 |  |  |  | 2,795,275 |
Series 2015, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 11/01/2045 |  |  |  | 1,345 |  |  |  | 1,530,368 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4,325,643 |
Tennessee–1.34% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Greeneville (Town of), TN Health & Educational Facilities Board (Ballad Health Obligated Group); Series 2018 A, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 07/01/2036 |  |  |  | 1,715 |  |  |  | 2,062,957 |
Johnson City (City of), TN Health & Educational Facilities Board (Mountain States Health Alliance); Series 2012, RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 08/15/2042 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,034,200 |
Memphis (City of), TN; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2020, RB |  | 4.00% |  |  | 12/01/2045 |  |  |  | 1,700 |  |  |  | 1,993,318 |
Series 2020, RB |  | 4.00% |  |  | 12/01/2050 |  |  |  | 1,700 |  |  |  | 1,980,670 |
Memphis Center City Revenue Finance Corp. (Pyramid & Pinch District Redevelopment); Series 2011 B, RB(d)(e) |  | 5.25% |  |  | 11/01/2021 |  |  |  | 2,475 |  |  |  | 2,559,224 |
Nashville (City of), TN Metropolitan Airport Authority; Series 2019 B, RB(h) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 07/01/2049 |  |  |  | 655 |  |  |  | 792,137 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10,422,506 |
Texas–15.68% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Alamo Community College District; Series 2012, Ref. GO Bonds(b) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 08/15/2034 |  |  |  | 4,895 |  |  |  | 5,225,706 |
Austin (City of), TX; Series 2012, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 11/15/2042 |  |  |  | 1,490 |  |  |  | 1,598,189 |
Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority; Series 2020 E, RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 01/01/2045 |  |  |  | 710 |  |  |  | 866,796 |
Clifton Higher Education Finance Corp. (International Leadership of Texas); Series 2018 D, RB |  | 5.75% |  |  | 08/15/2033 |  |  |  | 1,660 |  |  |  | 1,920,089 |
Harris (County of), TX Metropolitan Transit Authority; Series 2011 A, RB(b)(d)(e) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 11/01/2021 |  |  |  | 6,305 |  |  |  | 6,508,715 |
Houston (City of), TX (United Airlines, Inc.); Series 2018, RB(h) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 07/15/2028 |  |  |  | 500 |  |  |  | 577,250 |
Houston (City of), TX Airport System (United Airlines, Inc. Terminal E); Series 2014, Ref. RB(h) |  | 4.75% |  |  | 07/01/2024 |  |  |  | 925 |  |  |  | 969,659 |
Houston (City of), TX Convention & Entertainment Facilities Department; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2001 B, RB (INS - AGM)(f)(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 09/01/2026 |  |  |  | 3,975 |  |  |  | 3,676,318 |
Series 2001 B, RB (INS - AGM)(f)(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 09/01/2027 |  |  |  | 5,015 |  |  |  | 4,519,969 |
Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. (Cosmos Foundation, Inc.); Series 2012 A, RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 02/15/2042 |  |  |  | 2,700 |  |  |  | 2,765,718 |
La Vernia Higher Education Finance Corp. (Meridian World School); Series 2015 A, RB(c) |  | 5.50% |  |  | 08/15/2045 |  |  |  | 1,230 |  |  |  | 1,320,922 |
Love Field Airport Modernization Corp. (Southwest Airlines Co.); Series 2010, RB |  | 5.25% |  |  | 11/01/2040 |  |  |  | 500 |  |  |  | 507,590 |
Lower Colorado River Authority; Series 2019, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 05/15/2039 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,195,500 |
Mission Economic Development Corp. (Natgasoline); Series 2018, Ref. RB(c)(h) |  | 4.63% |  |  | 10/01/2031 |  |  |  | 2,100 |  |  |  | 2,236,836 |
New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Corp. (Presbyterian Village North); Series 2018, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 10/01/2026 |  |  |  | 1,550 |  |  |  | 1,667,707 |
New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (4-K Housing, Inc.-Stoney Brook); Series 2017 A-1, RB |  | 4.75% |  |  | 07/01/2052 |  |  |  | 750 |  |  |  | 623,700 |
New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Carillon Lifecare Community); Series 2016, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 07/01/2046 |  |  |  | 1,455 |  |  |  | 1,495,987 |
New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (CHF-Collegiate Housing College Station I, LLC - Texas A&M University); Series 2014 A, RB (INS - AGM)(f) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 04/01/2046 |  |  |  | 1,985 |  |  |  | 2,145,686 |
New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Forefront Living Plano); Series 2020 A, RB(c) |  | 10.00% |  |  | 12/01/2025 |  |  |  | 265 |  |  |  | 270,652 |
New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Morningside Ministries); Series 2013, RB |  | 6.50% |  |  | 01/01/2043 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,049,050 |
New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Presbyterian Village North); Series 2020, RB |  | 5.25% |  |  | 10/01/2055 |  |  |  | 2,520 |  |  |  | 2,623,849 |
North Texas Tollway Authority; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2008 D, Ref. RB (INS - AGC)(f)(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 01/01/2028 |  |  |  | 16,400 |  |  |  | 14,988,124 |
Series 2008 D, Ref. RB (INS - AGC)(f)(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 01/01/2029 |  |  |  | 2,725 |  |  |  | 2,425,332 |
Series 2008 D, Ref. RB (INS - AGC)(f)(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 01/01/2031 |  |  |  | 3,550 |  |  |  | 2,977,349 |
San Antonio (City of), TX; Series 2013, RB(d)(e) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 02/01/2023 |  |  |  | 2,405 |  |  |  | 2,622,965 |
San Jacinto River Authority (Groundwater Reduction Plan Division); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2011, RB (INS - AGM)(f) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 10/01/2032 |  |  |  | 2,265 |  |  |  | 2,272,407 |
Series 2011, RB (INS - AGM)(f) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 10/01/2037 |  |  |  | 2,475 |  |  |  | 2,483,465 |
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp.; Series 2016 A, Ref. RB(b) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 02/15/2047 |  |  |  | 3,415 |  |  |  | 3,974,479 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

23 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

|  | Interest Rate |  | Maturity Date |  |  | Principal Amount (000) |  |  | Value |
Texas–(continued) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Air Force Village Obligated Group); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2016, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 05/15/2037 |  |  | $ | 1,645 |  |  | $ | 1,762,914 |
Series 2016, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 05/15/2045 |  |  |  | 1,030 |  |  |  | 1,097,640 |
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (C.C. Young Memorial Home); Series 2017 A, RB (Acquired 12/15/2016; Cost $1,802,920)(l) |  | 6.38% |  |  | 02/15/2048 |  |  |  | 1,785 |  |  |  | 1,414,220 |
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (MRC Stevenson Oaks); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2020, Ref. RB |  | 6.63% |  |  | 11/15/2041 |  |  |  | 85 |  |  |  | 95,023 |
Series 2020, Ref. RB |  | 6.75% |  |  | 11/15/2051 |  |  |  | 85 |  |  |  | 94,637 |
Series 2020, Ref. RB |  | 6.88% |  |  | 11/15/2055 |  |  |  | 85 |  |  |  | 95,027 |
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Texas Health Resources System); Series 2016 A, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 02/15/2041 |  |  |  | 4,000 |  |  |  | 4,700,520 |
Temple (City of), TX; Series 2018 A, RB(c) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 08/01/2028 |  |  |  | 685 |  |  |  | 769,413 |
Texas (State of) Transportation Commission; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2016 A, GO Bonds |  | 5.00% |  |  | 04/01/2044 |  |  |  | 1,585 |  |  |  | 1,888,274 |
Series 2019, RB(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 08/01/2037 |  |  |  | 1,250 |  |  |  | 686,588 |
Series 2019, RB(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 08/01/2039 |  |  |  | 1,400 |  |  |  | 689,738 |
Texas (State of) Transportation Commission (Central Texas Turnpike System); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2012 A, Ref. RB(d)(e) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 08/15/2022 |  |  |  | 1,000 |  |  |  | 1,070,660 |
Series 2015 B, Ref. RB(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 08/15/2036 |  |  |  | 3,075 |  |  |  | 1,690,881 |
Series 2015 B, Ref. RB(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 08/15/2037 |  |  |  | 705 |  |  |  | 369,596 |
Series 2015 C, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 08/15/2033 |  |  |  | 5,000 |  |  |  | 5,619,700 |
Series 2015 C, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 08/15/2042 |  |  |  | 3,805 |  |  |  | 4,222,218 |
Texas (State of) Turnpike Authority (Central Texas Turnpike System); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2002 A, RB (INS - BHAC)(f)(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 08/15/2027 |  |  |  | 6,800 |  |  |  | 6,367,860 |
Series 2002, RB(d)(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 08/15/2027 |  |  |  | 200 |  |  |  | 186,812 |
Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp. I; Series 2008 D, RB |  | 6.25% |  |  | 12/15/2026 |  |  |  | 4,075 |  |  |  | 4,785,272 |
Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp. III; Series 2021, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 12/15/2031 |  |  |  | 2,175 |  |  |  | 2,840,876 |
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp. (Blueridge Transportation Group, LLC SH 288 Toll Lanes); Series 2016, RB(h) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 12/31/2055 |  |  |  | 1,070 |  |  |  | 1,194,291 |
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp. (NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 LLC Segments 3A and 3B Facility); Series 2013, RB(h) |  | 7.00% |  |  | 12/31/2038 |  |  |  | 1,250 |  |  |  | 1,429,838 |
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp. (Segment 3C); Series 2019, RB(h) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 06/30/2058 |  |  |  | 2,390 |  |  |  | 2,840,491 |
Travis County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Wayside Schools); Series 2012 A, RB |  | 5.25% |  |  | 08/15/2042 |  |  |  | 545 |  |  |  | 549,109 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 121,971,607 |
Utah–1.37% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Salt Lake (City of), UT; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2017 A, RB(b)(h) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 07/01/2047 |  |  |  | 2,540 |  |  |  | 2,939,974 |
Series 2018 A, RB(h) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 07/01/2048 |  |  |  | 1,275 |  |  |  | 1,495,766 |
Series 2018 A, RB(h) |  | 5.25% |  |  | 07/01/2048 |  |  |  | 1,710 |  |  |  | 2,040,988 |
Utah (County of), UT; Series 2016 B, RB(b) |  | 4.00% |  |  | 05/15/2047 |  |  |  | 2,025 |  |  |  | 2,151,239 |
Weber (County of), UT; Series 2000 C, VRD RB(o) |  | 0.01% |  |  | 02/15/2035 |  |  |  | 2,000 |  |  |  | 2,000,000 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10,627,967 |
Virgin Islands–0.19% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Virgin Islands (Government of) Public Finance Authority (Matching Fund Loan Note); Series 2010 A, RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 10/01/2029 |  |  |  | 1,485 |  |  |  | 1,488,460 |
Virginia–2.27% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Richmond (City of), VA Metropolitan Authority; Series 2002, Ref. RB (INS - NATL)(f) |  | 5.25% |  |  | 07/15/2022 |  |  |  | 1,295 |  |  |  | 1,344,055 |
Roanoke (City of), VA Economic Development Authority (Carilion Clinic Obligated Group); Series 2020, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 07/01/2047 |  |  |  | 1,255 |  |  |  | 1,895,125 |
Roanoke (City of), VA Economic Development Authority (Richfield Living); Series 2020, RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 09/01/2050 |  |  |  | 330 |  |  |  | 320,585 |
Virginia (Commonwealth of) Small Business Financing Authority (Elizabeth River Crossings Opco, LLC); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2012, RB(h) |  | 6.00% |  |  | 01/01/2037 |  |  |  | 785 |  |  |  | 832,202 |
Series 2012, RB(h) |  | 5.50% |  |  | 01/01/2042 |  |  |  | 3,355 |  |  |  | 3,501,446 |
Virginia (Commonwealth of) Small Business Financing Authority (Express Lanes, LLC); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2012, RB(h) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 07/01/2034 |  |  |  | 3,645 |  |  |  | 3,765,868 |
Series 2012, RB(h) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 01/01/2040 |  |  |  | 1,810 |  |  |  | 1,869,549 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

24 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

|  | Interest Rate |  | Maturity Date |  |  | Principal Amount (000) |  |  | Value |
Virginia–(continued) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Virginia (Commonwealth of) Small Business Financing Authority (Transform 66 P3); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2017, RB(h) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 12/31/2049 |  |  | $ | 1,155 |  |  | $ | 1,335,422 |
Series 2017, RB(h) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 12/31/2052 |  |  |  | 2,420 |  |  |  | 2,793,406 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17,657,658 |
Washington–3.13% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Kalispel Tribe of Indians; Series 2018 A, RB(c) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 01/01/2032 |  |  |  | 1,350 |  |  |  | 1,540,647 |
Seattle (Port of), WA; Series 2012 A, Ref. RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 08/01/2032 |  |  |  | 2,500 |  |  |  | 2,663,400 |
Washington (State of); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2004 F, GO Bonds (INS - AMBAC)(f)(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 12/01/2029 |  |  |  | 5,100 |  |  |  | 4,455,666 |
Series 2019 A, GO Bonds(b) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 08/01/2042 |  |  |  | 1,850 |  |  |  | 2,293,297 |
Washington (State of) Convention Center Public Facilities District; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2018, RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 07/01/2043 |  |  |  | 1,160 |  |  |  | 1,350,344 |
Series 2018, RB(b)(j) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 07/01/2048 |  |  |  | 4,140 |  |  |  | 4,784,598 |
Series 2018, RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 07/01/2048 |  |  |  | 830 |  |  |  | 956,841 |
Washington (State of) Health Care Facilities Authority; Series 2019 A-2, Ref. RB(b)(j) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 08/01/2044 |  |  |  | 3,635 |  |  |  | 4,399,659 |
Washington (State of) Housing Finance Commission (Bayview Manor Homes); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2016 A, Ref. RB(c) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 07/01/2046 |  |  |  | 435 |  |  |  | 458,977 |
Series 2016 A, Ref. RB(c) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 07/01/2051 |  |  |  | 360 |  |  |  | 379,264 |
Washington (State of) Tobacco Settlement Authority; Series 2013, Ref. RB |  | 5.25% |  |  | 06/01/2031 |  |  |  | 1,030 |  |  |  | 1,032,616 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24,315,309 |
West Virginia–0.12% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Monongalia (County of), WV Commission Special District (University Town Centre Economic Opportunity Development District); Series 2020, Ref. RB(c) |  | 7.50% |  |  | 06/01/2043 |  |  |  | 840 |  |  |  | 915,306 |
Wisconsin–3.75% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Public Finance Authority (American Dream at Meadowlands); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2017, RB(c) |  | 6.75% |  |  | 08/01/2031 |  |  |  | 900 |  |  |  | 1,004,121 |
Series 2017, RB(c) |  | 6.75% |  |  | 12/01/2042 |  |  |  | 2,100 |  |  |  | 2,303,028 |
Public Finance Authority (KU Campus Development Corp.); Series 2016, RB(b) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 03/01/2046 |  |  |  | 3,420 |  |  |  | 3,984,779 |
Public Finance Authority (Mallard Creek Stem Academy); Series 2019 A, RB(c) |  | 5.13% |  |  | 06/15/2039 |  |  |  | 650 |  |  |  | 700,862 |
Wisconsin (State of) Center District; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2020 D, RB (INS - AGM)(f)(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 12/15/2055 |  |  |  | 6,385 |  |  |  | 1,768,517 |
Series 2020 D, RB (INS - AGM)(f)(g) |  | 0.00% |  |  | 12/15/2060 |  |  |  | 24,670 |  |  |  | 5,416,052 |
Wisconsin (State of) Health & Educational Facilities Authority (Mercy Alliance); Series 2012, RB |  | 5.00% |  |  | 06/01/2039 |  |  |  | 5,000 |  |  |  | 5,158,000 |
Wisconsin (State of) Health & Educational Facilities Authority (Mile Bluff Medical Center, Inc.); Series 2014, RB |  | 5.50% |  |  | 05/01/2034 |  |  |  | 2,000 |  |  |  | 2,026,860 |
Wisconsin (State of) Public Finance Authority (Explore Academy); Series 2020 A, RB(c) |  | 6.13% |  |  | 02/01/2050 |  |  |  | 420 |  |  |  | 450,345 |
Wisconsin (State of) Public Finance Authority (Maryland Proton Treatment Center); Series 2018 A-1, RB(c) |  | 6.38% |  |  | 01/01/2048 |  |  |  | 640 |  |  |  | 519,533 |
Wisconsin (State of) Public Finance Authority (Prime Healthcare Foundation, Inc.); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2018 A, RB |  | 5.20% |  |  | 12/01/2037 |  |  |  | 1,655 |  |  |  | 1,854,047 |
Series 2018 A, RB |  | 5.35% |  |  | 12/01/2045 |  |  |  | 1,655 |  |  |  | 1,835,511 |
Wisconsin (State of) Public Finance Authority (Roseman University of Health Sciences); |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Series 2012, RB |  | 5.50% |  |  | 04/01/2032 |  |  |  | 1,155 |  |  |  | 1,201,396 |
Series 2015, Ref. RB |  | 5.75% |  |  | 04/01/2035 |  |  |  | 815 |  |  |  | 926,965 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29,150,016 |
Wyoming–0.31% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Wyoming (State of) Municipal Power Agency; Series 2017 A, Ref. RB (INS - BAM)(b)(f) |  | 5.00% |  |  | 01/01/2047 |  |  |  | 2,060 |  |  |  | 2,375,510 |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES(p)–157.76% (Cost $1,109,760,477) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,226,882,743 |
FLOATING RATE NOTE OBLIGATIONS–(29.45)% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Notes with interest and fee rates ranging from 0.55% to 0.85% at 02/28/2021 and contractual maturities of collateral ranging from 09/01/2022 to 04/01/2056 (See Note 1J)(q) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (229,030,000 | )
VARIABLE RATE MUNI TERM PREFERRED SHARES–(29.97)% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (233,084,903 | )
OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES–1.66% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12,927,149 |
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHARES–100.00% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 777,694,989 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

25 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Investment Abbreviations:
AGC |  | – Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM |  | – Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC |  | – American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp.
BAM |  | – Build America Mutual Assurance Co.
BHAC |  | – Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
COP |  | – Certificates of Participation
Ctfs. |  | – Certificates
GO |  | – General Obligation
IDR |  | – Industrial Development Revenue Bonds
INS |  | – Insurer
NATL |  | – National Public Finance Guarantee Corp.
PCR |  | – Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
RB |  | – Revenue Bonds
Ref. |  | – Refunding
RN |  | – Revenue Notes
SIFMA |  | – Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
VRD |  | – Variable Rate Demand

Notes to Schedule of Investments:

(a) | Calculated as a percentage of net assets. Amounts in excess of 100% are due to the Trust’s use of leverage.

(b) | Underlying security related to TOB Trusts entered into by the Trust. See Note 1J.

(c) | Security purchased or received in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”). The security may be resold pursuant to an exemption from registration under the 1933 Act, typically to qualified institutional buyers. The aggregate value of these securities at February 28, 2021 was $49,515,922, which represented 6.37% of the Trust’s Net Assets.

(d) | Advance refunded; secured by an escrow fund of U.S. Government obligations or other highly rated collateral.

(e) | Security has an irrevocable call by the issuer or mandatory put by the holder. Maturity date reflects such call or put.

(f) | Principal and/or interest payments are secured by the bond insurance company listed.

(g) | Zero coupon bond issued at a discount.

(h) | Security subject to the alternative minimum tax.

(i) | Convertible capital appreciation bond. The interest rate shown represents the coupon rate at which the bond will accrue at a specified future date.

(j) | Security is subject to a reimbursement agreement which may require the Trust to pay amounts to a counterparty in the event of a significant decline in the market value of the security underlying the TOB Trusts. In case of a shortfall, the maximum potential amount of payments the Trust could ultimately be required to make under the agreement is $35,366,000. However, such shortfall payment would be reduced by the proceeds from the sale of the security underlying the TOB Trusts.

(k) | Defaulted security. Currently, the issuer is in default with respect to principal and/or interest payments. The aggregate value of these securities at February 28, 2021 was $2,498,312, which represented less than 1% of the Trust’s Net Assets.

(l) | Restricted security. The aggregate value of these securities at February 28, 2021 was $3,912,532, which represented less than 1% of the Trust’s Net Assets.

(m) | Interest or dividend rate is redetermined periodically. Rate shown is the rate in effect on February 28, 2021.

(n) | Security subject to crossover refunding.

(o) | Demand security payable upon demand by the Trust at specified time intervals no greater than thirteen months. Interest rate is redetermined periodically by the issuer or agent based on current market conditions. Rate shown is the rate in effect on February 28, 2021.

(p) | This table provides a listing of those entities that have either issued, guaranteed, backed or otherwise enhanced the credit quality of more than 5% of the securities held in the portfolio. In instances where the entity has guaranteed, backed or otherwise enhanced the credit quality of a security, it is not primarily responsible for the issuer’s obligations but may be called upon to satisfy the issuer’s obligations.

Entity |  | Percent |
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. |  |  | 5.31% |

(q) | Floating rate note obligations related to securities held. The interest and fee rates shown reflect the rates in effect at February 28, 2021. At February 28, 2021, the Trust’s investments with a value of $366,613,554 are held by TOB Trusts and serve as collateral for the $229,030,000 in the floating rate note obligations outstanding at that date.

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

26 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

February 28, 2021

Assets: |  |  |  |
Investments in securities, at value (Cost $1,109,760,477) |  | $ | 1,226,882,743 |
Cash |  |  | 3,469,092 |
Receivable for: |  |  |  |
Interest |  |  | 11,498,024 |
Investment for trustee deferred compensation and retirement plans |  |  | 120,596 |
Total assets |  |  | 1,241,970,455 |
Liabilities: |  |  |  |
Floating rate note obligations |  |  | 229,030,000 |
Variable rate muni term preferred shares ($0.01 par value, 2,331 shares issued with liquidation preference of $100,000 per share) |  |  | 233,084,903 |
Payable for: |  |  |  |
Investments purchased |  |  | 1,271,062 |
Dividends |  |  | 47,134 |
Accrued fees to affiliates |  |  | 105,714 |
Accrued interest expense |  |  | 193,377 |
Accrued trustees’ and officers’ fees and benefits |  |  | 3,426 |
Accrued other operating expenses |  |  | 229,228 |
Trustee deferred compensation and retirement plans |  |  | 310,622 |
Total liabilities |  |  | 464,275,466 |
Net assets applicable to common shares |  | $ | 777,694,989 |

Net assets applicable to common shares consist of: |  |  |  |
Shares of beneficial interest – common shares |  | $ | 679,364,020 |
Distributable earnings |  |  | 98,330,969 |
|  | $ | 777,694,989 |
Common shares outstanding, no par value, with an unlimited number of common shares authorized: |  |  |  |
Common shares outstanding |  |  | 47,056,518 |
Net asset value per common share |  | $ | 16.53 |
Market value per common share |  | $ | 15.55 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

27 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Statement of Operations

For the year ended February 28, 2021

Investment income: |  |  |  |
Interest |  | $ | 48,311,410 |
Expenses: |  |  |  |
Advisory fees |  |  | 6,757,871 |
Administrative services fees |  |  | 112,947 |
Custodian fees |  |  | 9,260 |
Interest, facilities and maintenance fees |  |  | 5,904,492 |
Transfer agent fees |  |  | 23,592 |
Trustees’ and officers’ fees and benefits |  |  | 33,960 |
Registration and filing fees |  |  | 40,868 |
Reports to shareholders |  |  | 61,885 |
Professional services fees |  |  | 110,132 |
Other |  |  | (8,184 | )
Total expenses |  |  | 13,046,823 |
Net investment income |  |  | 35,264,587 |
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) from: |  |  |  |
Net realized gain (loss) from: |  |  |  |
Unaffiliated investment securities |  |  | (4,743,965 | )
Futures contracts |  |  | (263,437 | )
|  |  | (5,007,402 | )
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of unaffiliated investment securities |  |  | (25,817,381 | )
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |  |  | (30,824,783 | )
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations applicable to common shares |  | $ | 4,439,804 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

28 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

For the years ended February 28, 2021 and February 29, 2020

|  | 2021 |  |  | 2020 |
Operations: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net investment income |  | $ | 35,264,587 |  |  | $ | 31,583,441 |
Net realized gain (loss) |  |  | (5,007,402 | ) |  |  | 725,755 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |  |  | (25,817,381 | ) |  |  | 69,782,274 |
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations applicable to common shares |  |  | 4,439,804 |  |  |  | 102,091,470 |
Distributions to common shareholders from distributable earnings |  |  | (33,598,354 | ) |  |  | (31,692,606 | )
Return of capital applicable to common shares |  |  | – |  |  |  | (1,378,715 | )
Total distributions |  |  | (33,598,354 | ) |  |  | (33,071,321 | )
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to common shares |  |  | (29,158,550 | ) |  |  | 69,020,149 |
Net assets applicable to common shares: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Beginning of year |  |  | 806,853,539 |  |  |  | 737,833,390 |
End of year |  | $ | 777,694,989 |  |  | $ | 806,853,539 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

29 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Statement of Cash Flows

For the year ended February 28, 2021

Cash provided by operating activities: |  |  |  |
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations applicable to common shares |  | $ | 4,439,804 |
Adjustments to reconcile the change in net assets applicable to common shares from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |  |  |
Purchases of investments |  |  | (207,483,066 | )
Proceeds from sales of investments |  |  | 235,456,678 |
Purchases of short-term investments, net |  |  | (4,009,992 | )
Amortization of premium on investment securities |  |  | 7,221,836 |
Accretion of discount on investment securities |  |  | (6,039,803 | )
Increase in receivables and other assets |  |  | (84,226 | )
Decrease in accrued expenses and other payables |  |  | (124,302 | )
Net realized loss from investment securities |  |  | 4,743,965 |
Net change in unrealized depreciation on investment securities |  |  | 25,817,381 |
Net cash provided by operating activities |  |  | 59,938,275 |
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities: |  |  |  |
Dividends paid to common shareholders from distributable earnings |  |  | (33,590,808 | )
Proceeds of TOB Trusts |  |  | 33,897,500 |
Repayments of TOB Trusts |  |  | (57,262,500 | )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |  |  | (56,955,808 | )
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |  |  | 2,982,467 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |  |  | 486,625 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |  | $ | 3,469,092 |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |  |  |  |
Cash paid during the period for interest, facilities and maintenance fees |  | $ | 6,131,895 |

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

30 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Financial Highlights

The following schedule presents financial highlights for a share of the Trust outstanding throughout the periods indicated.

|  | Year Ended |  |  | Year Ended |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | February 28, |  |  | February 29, |  |  | Years ended February 28, |
|  | 2021 |  |  | 2020 |  |  | 2019 |  |  | 2018 |  |  | 2017 |
Net asset value per common share, beginning of period |  |  | $ 17.15 |  |  |  | $ 15.68 |  |  |  | $ 15.80 |  |  |  | $ 15.93 |  |  |  | $ 16.73 |
Net investment income(a) |  |  | 0.75 |  |  |  | 0.67 |  |  |  | 0.69 |  |  |  | 0.77 |  |  |  | 0.79 |
Net gains (losses) on securities (both realized and unrealized) |  |  | (0.66 | ) |  |  | 1.50 |  |  |  | (0.08 | ) |  |  | (0.16 | ) |  |  | (0.80 | )
Total from investment operations |  |  | 0.09 |  |  |  | 2.17 |  |  |  | 0.61 |  |  |  | 0.61 |  |  |  | (0.01 | )
Less: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Dividends paid to common shareholders from net investment income |  |  | (0.71 | ) |  |  | (0.67 | ) |  |  | (0.72 | ) |  |  | (0.74 | ) |  |  | (0.79 | )
Return of capital |  |  | – |  |  |  | (0.03 | ) |  |  | (0.01 | ) |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |
Total distributions |  |  | (0.71 | ) |  |  | (0.70 | ) |  |  | (0.73 | ) |  |  | (0.74 | ) |  |  | (0.79 | )
Net asset value per common share, end of period |  |  | $ 16.53 |  |  |  | $ 17.15 |  |  |  | $ 15.68 |  |  |  | $ 15.80 |  |  |  | $ 15.93 |
Market value per common share, end of period |  |  | $ 15.55 |  |  |  | $ 15.47 |  |  |  | $ 14.35 |  |  |  | $ 14.49 |  |  |  | $ 14.75 |
Total return at net asset value(b) |  |  | 1.11 | % |  |  | 14.53 | % |  |  | 4.50 | % |  |  | 4.27 | % |  |  | 0.02 | %
Total return at market value(c) |  |  | 5.45 | % |  |  | 12.88 | % |  |  | 4.29 | % |  |  | 3.27 | % |  |  | (9.55 | )%
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of period (000’s omitted) |  |  | $777,695 |  |  |  | $806,854 |  |  |  | $737,833 |  |  |  | $743,442 |  |  |  | $749,406 |
Portfolio turnover rate(d) |  |  | 16 | % |  |  | 6 | % |  |  | 15 | % |  |  | 7 | % |  |  | 14 | %
Ratios/supplemental data based on average net assets applicable to common shares outstanding: |
Ratio of expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
With fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements |  |  | 1.70 | %(e) |  |  | 2.40 | % |  |  | 2.48 | % |  |  | 2.05 | % |  |  | 1.65 | %
With fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements excluding interest, facilities and maintenance fees |  |  | 0.93 | %(e) |  |  | 0.95 | % |  |  | 0.99 | % |  |  | 0.95 | % |  |  | 0.90 | %
Without fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements |  |  | 1.70 | %(e) |  |  | 2.40 | % |  |  | 2.48 | % |  |  | 2.05 | % |  |  | 1.65 | %
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets |  |  | 4.59 | %(e) |  |  | 4.10 | % |  |  | 4.41 | % |  |  | 4.73 | % |  |  | 4.72 | %
Senior securities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total amount of preferred shares outstanding (000’s omitted) |  |  | $233,100 |  |  |  | $233,100 |  |  |  | $233,100 |  |  |  | $233,100 |  |  |  | $193,100 |
Asset coverage per preferred share(f) |  |  | $433,631 |  |  |  | $446,141 |  |  |  | $416,531 |  |  |  | $418,937 |  |  |  | $488,092 |
Liquidating preference per preferred share |  |  | $100,000 |  |  |  | $100,000 |  |  |  | $100,000 |  |  |  | $100,000 |  |  |  | $100,000 |

(a) | Calculated using average shares outstanding.

(b) | Includes adjustments in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and as such, the net asset value for financial reporting purposes and the returns based upon those net asset values may differ from the net asset value and returns for shareholder transactions. Does not include sales charges and is not annualized for periods less than one year, if applicable.

(c) | Total return assumes an investment at the common share market price at the beginning of the period indicated, reinvestment of all distributions for the period in accordance with the Trust’s dividend reinvestment plan, and sale of all shares at the closing common share market price at the end of the period indicated. Not annualized for periods less than one year, if applicable.

(d) | Portfolio turnover is not annualized for periods less than one year, if applicable.

(e) | Ratios are based on average daily net assets applicable to common shares (000’s omitted) of $767,557.

(f) | Calculated by subtracting the Trust’s total liabilities (not including preferred shares, at liquidation value) from the Trust’s total assets and dividing this by the total number of preferred shares outstanding.

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

31 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Notes to Financial Statements

February 28, 2021

NOTE 1–Significant Accounting Policies

Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust (the “Trust”) is a Delaware statutory trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as a diversified, closed-end management investment company.

The Trust’s investment objective is to provide common shareholders with current income which is exempt from federal income tax. Under normal market conditions, the Trust will invest at least 80% of its net assets in municipal securities rated investment grade at the time of investment.

The Trust is an investment company and accordingly follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies.

The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies followed by the Trust in the preparation of its financial statements.

A. | Security Valuations - Securities, including restricted securities, are valued according to the following policy.

Securities are fair valued using an evaluated quote provided by an independent pricing service approved by the Board of Trustees. Evaluated quotes provided by the pricing service may be determined without exclusive reliance on quoted prices, and may reflect appropriate factors such as institution-size trading in similar groups of securities, developments related to specific securities, dividend rate (for unlisted equities), yield (for debt obligations), quality, type of issue, coupon rate (for debt obligations), maturity (for debt obligations), individual trading characteristics and other market data. Pricing services generally value debt obligations assuming orderly transactions of institutional round lot size, but a trust may hold or transact in the same securities in smaller, odd lot sizes. Odd lots often trade at lower prices than institutional round lots. Debt obligations are subject to interest rate and credit risks. In addition, all debt obligations involve some risk of default with respect to interest and/or principal payments.

Securities for which market quotations either are not readily available or became unreliable are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by or under the supervision of the Trust’s officers following procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. Some of the factors which may be considered in determining fair value are fundamental analytical data relating to the investment; the nature and duration of any restrictions on transferability or disposition; trading in similar securities by the same issuer or comparable companies; relevant political, economic or issuer specific news; and other relevant factors under the circumstances.

The Trust may invest in securities that are subject to interest rate risk, meaning the risk that the prices will generally fall as interest rates rise and, conversely, the prices will generally rise as interest rates fall. Specific securities differ in their sensitivity to changes in interest rates depending on their individual characteristics. Changes in interest rates may result in increased market volatility, which may affect the value and/or liquidity of certain Trust investments.

Valuations change in response to many factors including the historical and prospective earnings of the issuer, the value of the issuer’s assets, general market conditions which are not specifically related to the particular issuer, such as real or perceived adverse economic conditions, changes in the general outlook for revenues or corporate earnings, changes in interest or currency rates, regional or global instability, natural or environmental disasters, widespread disease or other public health issues, war, acts of terrorism or adverse investor sentiment generally and market liquidity. Because of the inherent uncertainties of valuation, the values reflected in the financial statements may materially differ from the value received upon actual sale of those investments.

B. | Securities Transactions and Investment Income - Securities transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains or losses on sales are computed on the basis of specific identification of the securities sold. Interest income (net of withholding tax, if any) is recorded on an accrual basis from settlement date and includes coupon interest and amortization of premium and accretion of discount on debt securities as applicable. Pay-in-kind interest income and non-cash dividend income received in the form of securities in-lieu of cash are recorded at the fair value of the securities received. Dividend income (net of withholding tax, if any) is recorded on the ex-dividend date.

The Trust may periodically participate in litigation related to Trust investments. As such, the Trust may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received are included in the Statement of Operations as realized gain (loss) for investments no longer held and as unrealized gain (loss) for investments still held.

Brokerage commissions and mark ups are considered transaction costs and are recorded as an increase to the cost basis of securities purchased and/or a reduction of proceeds on a sale of securities. Such transaction costs are included in the determination of net realized and unrealized gain (loss) from investment securities reported in the Statement of Operations and the Statement of Changes in Net Assets and the net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on securities per share in the Financial Highlights. Transaction costs are included in the calculation of the Trust’s net asset value and, accordingly, they reduce the Trust’s total returns. These transaction costs are not considered operating expenses and are not reflected in net investment income reported in the Statement of Operations and the Statement of Changes in Net Assets, or the net investment income per share and the ratios of expenses and net investment income reported in the Financial Highlights, nor are they limited by any expense limitation arrangements between the Trust and the investment adviser.

C. | Country Determination - For the purposes of making investment selection decisions and presentation in the Schedule of Investments, the investment adviser may determine the country in which an issuer is located and/or credit risk exposure based on various factors. These factors include the laws of the country under which the issuer is organized, where the issuer maintains a principal office, the country in which the issuer derives 50% or more of its total revenues and the country that has the primary market for the issuer’s securities, as well as other criteria. Among the other criteria that may be evaluated for making this determination are the country in which the issuer maintains 50% or more of its assets, the type of security, financial guarantees and enhancements, the nature of the collateral and the sponsor organization. Country of issuer and/or credit risk exposure has been determined to be the United States of America, unless otherwise noted.

D. | Distributions - The Trust declares and pays monthly dividends from net investment income to common shareholders. Distributions from net realized capital gain, if any, are generally declared and paid annually and are distributed on a pro rata basis to common and preferred shareholders.

E. | Federal Income Taxes - The Trust intends to comply with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), necessary to qualify as a regulated investment company and to distribute substantially all of the Trust’s taxable earnings to shareholders. As such, the Trust will not be subject to federal income taxes on otherwise taxable income (including net realized capital gain) that is distributed to shareholders. Therefore, no provision for federal income taxes is recorded in the financial statements.

The Trust recognizes the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only when the position is more likely than not to be sustained. Management has analyzed the Trust’s uncertain tax positions and concluded that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be recorded related to uncertain tax positions. Management is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change materially in the next 12 months.

In addition, the Trust intends to invest in such municipal securities to allow it to qualify to pay shareholders “exempt dividends”, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code.

The Trust files tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction and certain other jurisdictions. Generally, the Trust is subject to examinations by such taxing authorities for up to three years after the filing of the return for the tax period.

F. | Interest, Facilities and Maintenance Fees - Interest, Facilities and Maintenance Fees include interest and related borrowing costs such as commitment fees, rating and bank agent fees and other expenses associated with lines of credit and Variable Rate Muni Term Preferred Shares (“VMTP Shares”), and interest and administrative expenses related to establishing and maintaining floating rate note obligations, if any.

G. | Accounting Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial

32 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period including estimates and assumptions related to taxation. Actual results could differ from those estimates by a significant amount. In addition, the Trust monitors for material events or transactions that may occur or become known after the period-end date and before the date the financial statements are released to print.

H. | Indemnifications - Under the Trust’s organizational documents, each Trustee, officer, employee or other agent of the Trust is indemnified against certain liabilities that may arise out of the performance of their duties to the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Trust enters into contracts, including the Trust’s servicing agreements, that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Trust’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Trust that have not yet occurred. The risk of material loss as a result of such indemnification claims is considered remote.

I. | Cash and Cash Equivalents - For the purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the Trust defines Cash and Cash Equivalents as cash (including foreign currency), money market funds and other investments held in lieu of cash and excludes investments made with cash collateral received.

J. | Floating Rate Note Obligations - The Trust invests in inverse floating rate securities, such as Tender Option Bonds (“TOBs”), for investment purposes and to enhance the yield of the Trust. Such securities may be purchased in the secondary market without first owning an underlying bond but generally are created through the sale of fixed rate bonds by the Trust to special purpose trusts established by a broker dealer or by the Trust (“TOB Trusts”) in exchange for cash and residual interests in the TOB Trusts’ assets and cash flows, which are in the form of inverse floating rate securities. The TOB Trusts finance the purchases of the fixed rate bonds by issuing floating rate notes to third parties and allowing the Trust to retain residual interests in the bonds. The floating rate notes issued by the TOB Trusts have interest rates that reset weekly and the floating rate note holders have the option to tender their notes to the TOB Trusts for redemption at par at each reset date. The residual interests held by the Trust (inverse floating rate securities) include the right of the Trust (1) to cause the holders of the floating rate notes to tender their notes at par at the next interest rate reset date, and (2) to transfer the municipal bond from the TOB Trust to the Trust, thereby collapsing the TOB Trust. Inverse floating rate securities tend to underperform the market for fixed rate bonds in a rising interest rate environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate bonds when interest rates decline or remain relatively stable.

The Trust generally invests in inverse floating rate securities that include embedded leverage, thus exposing the Trust to greater risks and increased costs. The primary risks associated with inverse floating rate securities are varying degrees of liquidity and decreases in the value of such securities in response to changes in interest rates to a greater extent than fixed rate securities having similar credit quality, redemption provisions and maturity, which may cause the Trust’s net asset value to be more volatile than if it had not invested in inverse floating rate securities. In certain instances, the short-term floating rate notes created by the TOB Trust may not be able to be sold to third parties or, in the case of holders tendering (or putting) such notes for repayment of principal, may not be able to be remarketed to third parties. In such cases, the TOB Trust holding the fixed rate bonds may be collapsed with the entity that contributed the fixed rate bonds to the TOB Trust. In the case where a TOB Trust is collapsed with the Trust, the Trust will be required to repay the principal amount of the tendered securities, which may require the Trust to sell other portfolio holdings to raise cash to meet that obligation. The Trust could therefore be required to sell other portfolio holdings at a disadvantageous time or price to raise cash to meet this obligation, which risk will be heightened during times of market volatility, illiquidity or uncertainty. The embedded leverage in the TOB Trust could cause the Trust to lose more money than the value of the asset it has contributed to the TOB Trust and greater levels of leverage create the potential for greater losses. In addition, a Trust may enter into reimbursement agreements with the liquidity provider of certain TOB transactions in connection with certain residuals held by the Trust. These agreements commit a Trust to reimburse the liquidity provider to the extent that the liquidity provider must provide cash to a TOB Trust, including following the termination of a TOB Trust resulting from a mandatory tender event (“liquidity shortfall”). The reimbursement agreement will effectively make the Trust liable for the amount of the negative difference, if any, between the liquidation value of the underlying security and the purchase price of the floating rate notes issued by the TOB Trust.

The Trust accounts for the transfer of fixed rate bonds to the TOB Trusts as secured borrowings, with the securities transferred remaining in the Trust’s investment assets, and the related floating rate notes reflected as Trust liabilities under the caption Floating rate note obligations on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The carrying amount of the Trust’s floating rate note obligations as reported on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities approximates its fair value. The Trust records the interest income from the fixed rate bonds under the caption Interest and records the expenses related to floating rate obligations and any administrative expenses of the TOB Trusts as a component of Interest, facilities and maintenance fees on the Statement of Operations.

Final rules implementing section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Volcker Rule”) prohibit banking entities from engaging in proprietary trading of certain instruments and limit such entities’ investments in, and relationships with, “covered funds”, as defined in the rules. These rules preclude banking entities and their affiliates from sponsoring and/or providing services for existing TOB Trusts. A new TOB structure is being utilized by the Trust wherein the Trust, as holder of the residuals, will perform certain duties previously performed by banking entities as “sponsors” of TOB Trusts. These duties may be performed by a third-party service provider. The Trust’s expanded role under the new TOB structure may increase its operational and regulatory risk. The new structure is substantially similar to the previous structure; however, pursuant to the Volcker Rule, the remarketing agent would not be able to repurchase tendered floaters for its own account upon a failed remarketing. In the event of a failed remarketing, a banking entity serving as liquidity provider may loan the necessary funds to the TOB Trust to purchase the tendered floaters. The TOB Trust, not the Trust, would be the borrower and the loan from the liquidity provider will be secured by the purchased floaters now held by the TOB Trust. However, as previously described, the Trust would bear the risk of loss with respect to any liquidity shortfall to the extent it entered into a reimbursement agreement with the liquidity provider.

Further, the SEC and various banking agencies have adopted rules implementing credit risk retention requirements for asset-backed securities (the “Risk Retention Rules”). The Risk Retention Rules require the sponsor of a TOB Trust to retain at least 5% of the credit risk of the underlying assets supporting the TOB Trust’s municipal bonds. The Trust has adopted policies intended to comply with the Risk Retention Rules. The Risk Retention Rules may adversely affect the Trust’s ability to engage in TOB Trust transactions or increase the costs of such transactions in certain circumstances.

There can be no assurances that the new TOB structure will continue to be a viable form of leverage. Further, there can be no assurances that alternative forms of leverage will be available to the Trust in order to maintain current levels of leverage. Any alternative forms of leverage may be less advantageous to the Trust, and may adversely affect the Trust’s net asset value, distribution rate and ability to achieve its investment objective.

TOBs are presently classified as private placement securities. Private placement securities are subject to restrictions on resale because they have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), or are otherwise not readily marketable. As a result of the absence of a public trading market for these securities, they may be less liquid than publicly traded securities. Although atypical, these securities may be resold in privately negotiated transactions, the prices realized from these sales could be less than those originally paid by the Trust or less than what may be considered the fair value of such securities.

K. | Futures Contracts - The Trust may enter into futures contracts to manage exposure to interest rate, equity and market price movements and/or currency risks. A futures contract is an agreement between two parties (“Counterparties”) to purchase or sell a specified underlying security, currency or commodity (or delivery of a cash settlement price, in the case of an index future) for a fixed price at a future date. The Trust currently invests only in exchange-traded futures and they are standardized as to maturity date and underlying financial instrument. Initial margin deposits required upon entering into futures contracts are satisfied by the segregation of specific securities or cash as collateral at the futures commission merchant (broker). During the period the futures contracts are open, changes in the value of the contracts are recognized as unrealized gains or losses by recalculating the value of the contracts on a daily basis. Subsequent or variation margin payments are received or made depending upon whether unrealized gains or losses are incurred. These amounts are reflected as receivables or payables on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. When the contracts are closed or expire, the Trust recognizes a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the proceeds from, or cost of, the closing transaction and the Trust’s basis in the contract. The net realized gain (loss) and the change in unrealized gain (loss) on futures contracts held during the period is included on the Statement of Operations. The primary risks associated with futures contracts are market risk

33 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

| and the absence of a liquid secondary market. If the Trust were unable to liquidate a futures contract and/or enter into an offsetting closing transaction, the Trust would continue to be subject to market risk with respect to the value of the contracts and continue to be required to maintain the margin deposits on the futures contracts. Futures contracts have minimal Counterparty risk since the exchange’s clearinghouse, as Counterparty to all exchange-traded futures, guarantees the futures against default. Risks may exceed amounts recognized in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

L. | Other Risks - The value of, payment of interest on, repayment of principal for and the ability to sell a municipal security may be affected by constitutional amendments, legislative enactments, executive orders, administrative regulations, voter initiatives and the economics of the regions in which the issuers are located. Since many municipal securities are issued to finance similar projects, especially those relating to education, health care, transportation and utilities, conditions in those sectors can affect the overall municipal securities market and the Trust’s investments in municipal securities. There is some risk that a portion or all of the interest received from certain tax-free municipal securities could become taxable as a result of determinations by the Internal Revenue Service.

The current low interest rate environment was created in part by the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) and certain foreign central banks keeping the federal funds and equivalent foreign rates near historical lows. Increases in the federal funds and equivalent foreign rates may expose fixed income markets to heightened volatility and reduced liquidity for certain fixed income investments, particularly those with longer maturities. In addition, decreases in fixed income dealer market-making capacity may also potentially lead to heightened volatility and reduced liquidity in the fixed income markets. As a result, the value of the Trust’s investments and share price may decline. Changes in central bank policies could also result in higher than normal shareholder redemptions, which could potentially increase portfolio turnover and the Trust’s transaction costs.

NOTE 2–Advisory Fees and Other Fees Paid to Affiliates

The Trust has entered into a master investment advisory agreement with Invesco Advisers, Inc. (the “Adviser” or “Invesco”). Under the terms of the investment advisory agreement, the Trust accrues daily and pays monthly an advisory fee to the Adviser based on the annual rate of 0.55% of the Trust’s average daily managed assets. Managed assets for this purpose means the Trust’s net assets, plus assets attributable to outstanding preferred shares and the amount of any borrowings incurred for the purpose of leverage (whether or not such borrowed amounts are reflected in the Trust’s financial statements for purposes of GAAP).

Under the terms of a master sub-advisory agreement between the Adviser and each of Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH, Invesco Asset Management Limited, Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited, Invesco Hong Kong Limited, Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. and Invesco Canada Ltd. (collectively, the “Affiliated Sub-Advisers”) the Adviser, not the Trust, will pay 40% of the fees paid to the Adviser to any such Affiliated Sub-Adviser(s) that provide(s) discretionary investment management services to the Trust based on the percentage of assets allocated to such Affiliated Sub-Adviser(s).

The Trust has entered into a master administrative services agreement with Invesco pursuant to which the Trust has agreed to pay Invesco for certain administrative costs incurred in providing accounting services to the Trust. For the year ended February 28, 2021, expenses incurred under this agreement are shown in the Statement of Operations as Administrative services fees. Invesco has entered into a sub-administration agreement whereby State Street Bank and Trust Company (“SSB”) serves as fund accountant and provides certain administrative services to the Trust. Pursuant to a custody agreement with the Trust, SSB also serves as the Trust’s custodian.

Certain officers and trustees of the Trust are officers and directors of Invesco.

NOTE 3–Additional Valuation Information

GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, under current market conditions. GAAP establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods, giving the highest priority to readily available unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical assets (Level 1) and the lowest priority to significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), generally when market prices are not readily available or are unreliable. Based on the valuation inputs, the securities or other investments are tiered into one of three levels. Changes in valuation methods may result in transfers in or out of an investment’s assigned level:

| Level 1 – | Prices are determined using quoted prices in an active market for identical assets.

| Level 2 – | Prices are determined using other significant observable inputs. Observable inputs are inputs that other market participants may use in pricing a security. These may include quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, loss severities, default rates, discount rates, volatilities and others.

| Level 3 – | Prices are determined using significant unobservable inputs. In situations where quoted prices or observable inputs are unavailable (for example, when there is little or no market activity for an investment at the end of the period), unobservable inputs may be used. Unobservable inputs reflect the Trust’s own assumptions about the factors market participants would use in determining fair value of the securities or instruments and would be based on the best available information.

As of February 28, 2021, all of the securities in this Trust were valued based on Level 2 inputs (see the Schedule of Investments for security categories). The level assigned to the securities valuations may not be an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with investing in those securities. Because of the inherent uncertainties of valuation, the values reflected in the financial statements may materially differ from the value received upon actual sale of those investments.

NOTE 4–Derivative Investments

The Trust may enter into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association Master Agreement (“ISDA Master Agreement”) under which a trust may trade OTC derivatives. An OTC transaction entered into under an ISDA Master Agreement typically involves a collateral posting arrangement, payment netting provisions and close-out netting provisions. These netting provisions allow for reduction of credit risk through netting of contractual obligations. The enforceability of the netting provisions of the ISDA Master Agreement depends on the governing law of the ISDA Master Agreement, among other factors.

For financial reporting purposes, the Trust does not offset OTC derivative assets or liabilities that are subject to ISDA Master Agreements in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

Effect of Derivative Investments for the year ended February 28, 2021

The table below summarizes the gains (losses) on derivative investments, detailed by primary risk exposure, recognized in earnings during the period:

|  | Location of Gain (Loss) on |
|  | Statement of Operations |
|  | Interest |
|  | Rate Risk |
Realized Gain (Loss): |  |  |  |
Futures contracts |  |  | $(263,437) |

34 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

The table below summarizes the average notional value of derivatives held during the period.

|  | Futures Contracts |
Average notional value |  | $ | 15,792,395 |

NOTE 5–Security Transactions with Affiliated Funds

The Trust is permitted to purchase or sell securities from or to certain other Invesco Funds under specified conditions outlined in procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Trust. The procedures have been designed to ensure that any purchase or sale of securities by the Trust from or to another fund or portfolio that is or could be considered an affiliate by virtue of having a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Trustees and/or common officers complies with Rule 17a-7 of the 1940 Act. Further, as defined under the procedures, each transaction is effected at the current market price. Pursuant to these procedures, for the year ended February 28, 2021, the Trust engaged in securities purchases of $9,500,109 and securities sales of $24,616,149, which did not result in any net realized gains (losses).

NOTE 6–Trustees’ and Officers’ Fees and Benefits

Trustees’ and Officers’ Fees and Benefits include amounts accrued by the Trust to pay remuneration to certain Trustees and Officers of the Trust. Trustees have the option to defer compensation payable by the Trust, and Trustees’ and Officers’ Fees and Benefits also include amounts accrued by the Trust to fund such deferred compensation amounts. Those Trustees who defer compensation have the option to select various Invesco Trusts in which their deferral accounts shall be deemed to be invested. Finally, certain current Trustees were eligible to participate in a retirement plan that provided for benefits to be paid upon retirement to Trustees over a period of time based on the number of years of service. The Trust may have certain former Trustees who also participate in a retirement plan and receive benefits under such plan. Trustees’ and Officers’ Fees and Benefits include amounts accrued by the Trust to fund such retirement benefits. Obligations under the deferred compensation and retirement plans represent unsecured claims against the general assets of the Trust.

NOTE 7–Cash Balances and Borrowings

The Trust is permitted to temporarily carry a negative or overdrawn balance in its account with SSB, the custodian bank. Such balances, if any at period-end, are shown in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities under the payable caption Amount due custodian. To compensate the custodian bank for such overdrafts, the overdrawn Trust may either (1) leave funds as a compensating balance in the account so the custodian bank can be compensated by earning the additional interest; or (2) compensate by paying the custodian bank at a rate agreed upon by the custodian bank and Invesco, not to exceed the contractually agreed upon rate.

Inverse floating rate obligations resulting from the transfer of bonds to TOB Trusts are accounted for as secured borrowings. The average floating rate notes outstanding and average annual interest and fee rate related to inverse floating rate note obligations during the year ended February 28, 2021 were $231,793,308 and 1.03%, respectively.

NOTE 8–Distributions to Shareholders and Tax Components of Net Assets

Tax Character of Distributions to Shareholders Paid During the Fiscal Years Ended February 28, 2021 and February 29, 2020:

|  | 2021 |  |  | 2020 |
Ordinary income-tax-exempt* |  | $ | 33,598,354 |  |  | $ | 31,692,606 |
Ordinary income-tax-exempt VMTP shares |  |  | 3,376,362 |  |  |  | 5,701,270 |
Return of capital |  |  | – |  |  |  | 1,378,715 |
Total distributions |  | $ | 36,974,716 |  |  | $ | 38,772,591 |

* | Includes short-term capital gain distributions, if any.

Tax Components of Net Assets at Period-End:

|  | 2021 |
Undistributed tax-exempt income |  | $ | 1,944,794 |
Net unrealized appreciation – investments |  |  | 116,846,131 |
Temporary book/tax differences |  |  | (267,678 | )
Capital loss carryforward |  |  | (20,192,278 | )
Shares of beneficial interest |  |  | 679,364,020 |
Total net assets |  | $ | 777,694,989 |

The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is due to differences in the timing of recognition of gains and losses on investments for tax and book purposes. The Trust’s net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) difference is attributable primarily to TOBs and book to tax accretion and amortization differences.

The temporary book/tax differences are a result of timing differences between book and tax recognition of income and/or expenses. The Trust’s temporary book/tax differences are the result of the trustee deferral of compensation and retirement plan benefits.

Capital loss carryforward is calculated and reported as of a specific date. Results of transactions and other activity after that date may affect the amount of capital loss carryforward actually available for the Trust to utilize. The ability to utilize capital loss carryforward in the future may be limited under the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations based on the results of future transactions.

35 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

The Trust has a capital loss carryforward as of February 28, 2021, as follows:

Capital Loss Carryforward*
Expiration |  |  |  | Short-Term |  | Long-Term |  | Total
Not subject to expiration |  |  |  | $18,446,471 |  | $1,745,807 |  | $20,192,278

* | Capital loss carryforward is reduced for limitations, if any, to the extent required by the Internal Revenue Code and may be further limited depending upon a variety of factors, including the realization of net unrealized gains or losses as of the date of any reorganization.

NOTE 9–Investment Transactions

The aggregate amount of investment securities (other than short-term securities, U.S. Treasury obligations and money market funds, if any) purchased and sold by the Trust during the year ended February 28, 2021 was $200,396,333 and $235,456,678, respectively. Cost of investments, including any derivatives, on a tax basis includes the adjustments for financial reporting purposes as of the most recently completed federal income tax reporting period-end.

Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) of Investments on a Tax Basis |
Aggregate unrealized appreciation of investments |  | $ | 124,094,347 |
Aggregate unrealized (depreciation) of investments |  |  | (7,248,216 | )
Net unrealized appreciation of investments |  | $ | 116,846,131 |

Cost of investments for tax purposes is $1,110,036,612.

NOTE 10–Reclassification of Permanent Differences

Primarily as a result of differing book/tax treatment of market discount and federal taxes paid by, on February 28, 2021, undistributed net investment income was increased by $20,822, undistributed net realized gain (loss) was decreased by $207,774 and shares of beneficial interest was increased by $186,952. This reclassification had no effect on the net assets of the Trust.

NOTE 11–Common Shares of Beneficial Interest

Transactions in common shares of beneficial interest were as follows:

|  | Year Ended February 28, |  |  | Year Ended February 29, |
|  | 2021 |  |  | 2020 |
Beginning shares |  |  | 47,056,518 |  |  |  | 47,056,518 |
Shares issued through dividend reinvestment |  |  | – |  |  |  | – |
Ending shares |  |  | 47,056,518 |  |  |  | 47,056,518 |

The Trust may, when appropriate, purchase shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions at a price not above market value or net asset value, whichever is lower at the time of purchase.

NOTE 12–Variable Rate Muni Term Preferred Shares

On May 9, 2012, the Trust issued 712 Series 2015/6-IIM VMTP Shares, with a liquidation preference of $100,000 per share, pursuant to an offering exempt from registration under the 1933 Act. Proceeds from the issuance of VMTP Shares on May 9, 2012 were used to redeem all of the Trust’s outstanding Auction Rate Preferred Shares (“ARPS”). In addition, the Trust issued 719 Series 2015/6-IIM VMTP Shares in connection with the reorganization of Invesco Value Municipal Bond Trust, Invesco Value Municipal Trust and Invesco Value Municipal Securities into the Trust with a liquidation preference of $100,000 per share. VMTP Shares are a floating-rate form of preferred shares with a mandatory redemption date. On December 5, 2014, the Trust extended the term of the VMTP Shares and was required to redeem all outstanding VMTP Shares on December 1, 2017, unless earlier redeemed, repurchased or extended. On February 2, 2015, the Trust issued 500 Series 2015/6-IIM VMTP Shares, with a liquidation preference of $100,000 per share. On June 1, 2017, the Trust issued an additional 400 Series 2015/6-IIM VMTP Shares, with a liquidation preference of $100,000 per share. In addition, on June 1, 2017, the Trust extended the term of the VMTP Shares and was required to redeem all outstanding VMTP Shares on December 1, 2019, unless earlier redeemed, repurchased or extended. On June 1, 2019, the Trust extended the term of the VMTP Shares and is required to redeem all outstanding VMTP Shares on December 1, 2021, unless earlier redeemed, repurchased or extended. VMTP Shares are subject to optional and mandatory redemption in certain circumstances. The redemption price per share is equal to the sum of the liquidation value per share plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends and a redemption premium, if any. On or prior to the redemption date, the Trust will be required to segregate assets having a value equal to 110% of the redemption amount.

The Trust incurred costs in connection with the issuance of the VMTP Shares. These costs were recorded as a deferred charge and were amortized over the original 3 year life of the VMTP Shares. In addition, the Trust incurred costs in connection with the extension of the VMTP Shares that are recorded as a deferred charge and are being amortized over the extended term. Amortization of these costs is included in Interest, facilities and maintenance fees on the Statement of Operations, and the unamortized balance is included in the value of Variable rate muni term preferred shares on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

Dividends paid on the VMTP Shares (which are treated as interest expense for financial reporting purposes) are declared daily and paid monthly. The initial rate for dividends was equal to the sum of 1.10% per annum plus the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association Municipal Swap Index (the “SIFMA” Index). As of February 28, 2021, the dividend rate is equal to the SIFMA Index plus a spread of 1.05%, which is based on the long term preferred share ratings assigned to the VMTP Shares by a ratings agency. The average aggregate liquidation preference outstanding and the average annualized dividend rate of the VMTP Shares during the year ended February 28, 2021 were $233,100,000 and 1.45%, respectively.

The Trust utilizes the VMTP Shares as leverage in order to enhance the yield of its common shareholders. The primary risk associated with VMTP Shares is exposing the net asset value of the common shares and total return to increased volatility if the value of the Trust decreases while the value of the VMTP Shares remains unchanged. Fluctuations in the dividend rates on the VMTP Shares can also impact the Trust’s yield or its distributions to common shareholders. The Trust is subject to certain restrictions relating to the VMTP Shares, such as maintaining certain asset coverage and leverage ratio requirements. Failure to comply with these restrictions could preclude the Trust from declaring any distributions to common shareholders or purchasing common shares and/or could trigger an increased rate which, if not cured, could cause the mandatory redemption of VMTP Shares at the liquidation preference plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends.

The liquidation preference of VMTP Shares, which approximates fair value, is recorded as a liability under the caption Variable rate muni term preferred shares on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The fair value of VMTP Shares is expected to be approximately their liquidation preference so long as the credit rating on the VMTP

36 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Shares, and therefore the “spread” on the VMTP Shares (determined in accordance with the VMTP Shares’ governing document) remains unchanged. At period-end, the Trust’s Adviser has determined that fair value of VMTP Shares is approximately their liquidation preference. Fair value could vary if market conditions change materially. Unpaid dividends on VMTP Shares are recognized as Accrued interest expense on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Dividends paid on VMTP Shares are recognized as a component of Interest, facilities and maintenance fees on the Statement of Operations.

NOTE 13–Dividends

The Trust declared the following dividends to common shareholders from net investment income subsequent to February 28, 2021:

Declaration Date |  | Amount per Share |  | Record Date |  |  | Payable Date |
March 1, 2021 |  | $0.0640 |  |  | March 15, 2021 |  |  |  | March 31, 2021 |
April 1, 2021 |  | $0.0640 |  |  | April 14, 2021 |  |  |  | April 30, 2021 |

NOTE 14–Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic

During the first quarter of 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 to be a public health emergency. COVID-19 has led to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on U.S. and world economies and markets in general. COVID-19 may adversely impact the Trust’s ability to achieve its investment objective. Because of the uncertainties on valuation, the global economy and business operations, values reflected in these financial statements may materially differ from the value received upon actual sales of those investments.

The extent of the impact on the performance of the Trust and its investments will depend on future developments, including the duration and spread of the COVID-19 outbreak, related restrictions and advisories, and the effects on the financial markets and economy overall, all of which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.

37 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, of Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust (the “Trust”) as of February 28, 2021,the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year ended February 28, 2021, the statement of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period ended February 28, 2021, including the related notes, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended February 28, 2021 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Trust as of February 28, 2021, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period ended February 28, 2021 and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended February 28, 2021 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Trust’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Trust’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Trust in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of February 28, 2021 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; when replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas

April 28, 2021

We have served as the auditor of one or more investment companies in the Invesco group of investment companies since at least 1995. We have not been able to determine the specific year we began serving as auditor.

38 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Tax Information

Form 1099-DIV, Form 1042-S and other year-end tax information provide shareholders with actual calendar year amounts that should be included in their tax returns. Shareholders should consult their tax advisers.

The following distribution information is being provided as required by the Internal Revenue Code or to meet a specific state’s requirement.

The Trust designates the following amounts or, if subsequently determined to be different, the maximum amount allowable for its fiscal year ended February 28, 2021:

| Federal and State Income Tax |  |  |  |
| Qualified Dividend Income* |  |  | 0.00 | %
| Corporate Dividends Received Deduction* |  |  | 0.00 | %
| U.S. Treasury Obligations* |  |  | 0.00 | %
| Tax-Exempt Interest Dividends* |  |  | 100.00 | %
| Qualified Business Income* |  |  | 0.00 | %
| Business Interest Income* |  |  | 0.00 | %

* The above percentages are based on ordinary income dividends paid to shareholders during the Trust’s fiscal year.

39 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Additional Information

Investment Objective, Policies and Principal Risks of the Trust

Recent Changes

During the Trust’s most recent fiscal year, there were no material changes in the Trust’s investment objectives or policies that have not been approved by shareholders or in the principal risk factors associated with investment in the Trust. This information may not reflect all of the changes that have occurred since you purchased the Trust.

Investment Objective

The investment objective of Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust (the “Trust”) is to provide current income which is exempt from federal income tax. The investment objective is fundamental and may not be changed without approval of a majority of the Trust’s outstanding voting securities, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).

Investment Policies of the Trust

Under normal circumstances, the Trust will invest at least 80% of its net assets in municipal obligations. The policy stated in the foregoing sentence is a fundamental policy of the Trust and may not be changed without approval of a majority of the Trust’s outstanding voting securities, as defined in the 1940 Act. Under normal market conditions, the Trust’s investment adviser, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (the “Adviser”) seeks to achieve the Trust’s investment objective by investing at least 80% of the Trust’s net assets in investment grade municipal securities. Investment grade securities are: (i) securities rated BBB- or higher by S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”) or Baa3 or higher by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or an equivalent rating by another nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”), (ii) securities with comparable short-term NRSRO ratings, or (iii) unrated municipal securities determined by the Adviser to be of comparable quality, each at the time of purchase. Under normal market conditions, the Trust may invest up to 20% of its net assets in municipal securities rated below investment grade or that are unrated but determined by the Adviser to be of comparable quality at the time of purchase. Lower-grade securities are commonly referred to as junk bonds and involve greater risks than investments in higher-grade securities. The Trust does not purchase securities that are in default or rated in categories lower than B- by S&P or B3 by Moody’s or unrated securities of comparable quality.1

The Trust may invest up to 20% of its net assets in taxable or tax-exempt fixed income securities rated at least investment grade by an NRSRO or, if not rated, determined by the Adviser to be of comparable quality, including obligations of the U.S. government, its respective agencies or instrumentalities, and other fixed income obligations, and, during periods in which the Adviser believes that changes in economic, financial or political conditions make it advisable to do so, to an unlimited extent in such investments for temporary defensive purposes.

The foregoing percentage and rating limitations apply at the time of acquisition of a security based on the last previous determination of the Trust’s net asset value. Any subsequent change in any rating by a rating service or change in percentages resulting from market fluctuations or other changes in the

Trust’s total assets will not require elimination of any security from the Trust’s portfolio.

The Trust may invest all or a substantial portion of its total assets in municipal securities that may subject certain investors to the federal alternative minimum tax and, therefore, a substantial portion of the income produced by the Trust may be taxable for such investors under the federal alternative minimum tax. Accordingly, the Trust may not be a suitable investment for investors who are already subject to the federal alternative minimum tax or could become subject to the federal alternative minimum tax as a result of an investment in the Trust.

The Adviser buys and sells securities for the Trust with a view towards seeking a high level of current income exempt from federal income taxes, subject to reasonable credit risk. As a result, the Trust will not necessarily invest in the highest yielding municipal securities permitted by its investment policies if the Adviser determines that market risks or credit risks associated with such investments would subject the Trust’s portfolio to undue risk. The potential realization of capital gains or losses resulting from possible changes in interest rates will not be a major consideration and frequency of portfolio turnover generally will not be a limiting factor if the Adviser considers it advantageous to purchase or sell securities.

The Trust may invest more than 25% of its total assets in a segment of the municipal securities market with similar characteristics if the Adviser determines that the yields available from obligations in a particular segment justify the additional risks of a larger investment in such segment. The Trust may not, however, invest more than 25% of its total assets in municipal securities issued for non-governmental entities that are in the same industry, such as many private activity bonds or industrial development revenue bonds. The Trust has no policy limiting its investments in municipal securities whose issuers are located in the same state. If the Trust were to invest a significant portion of its total assets in issuers located in the same state, it would be more susceptible to adverse economic, business or regulatory conditions in that state.

The Adviser actively manages the Trust’s portfolio and adjusts the average maturity of portfolio investments based upon its expectations regarding the direction of interest rates and other economic factors. The Adviser seeks to identify those securities that it believes entail reasonable credit risk considered in relation to the Trust’s investment policies. In selecting securities for investment, the Adviser uses its extensive research capabilities to assess potential investments and considers a number of factors, including general market and economic conditions and interest rate, credit and prepayment risks. Each security considered for investment is subjected to an in-depth credit analysis to evaluate the level of risk it presents. Finally, the Adviser employs leverage in an effort to enhance the Trust’s income and total return.

Decisions to purchase or sell securities are determined by the relative value considerations of the portfolio managers that factor in economic and credit-related fundamentals, market supply and

demand, market dislocations and situation-specific opportunities. The purchase or sale of securities may be related to a decision to alter the Trust’s macro risk exposure (such as duration, yield curve positioning and sector exposure), a need to limit or reduce the Trust’s exposure to a particular security or issuer, degradation of an issuer’s credit quality, or general liquidity needs of the Trust. The potential for realization of capital gains or losses resulting from possible changes in interest rates will not be a major consideration and frequency of portfolio turnover generally will not be a limiting factor if the Adviser considers it advantageous to purchase or sell securities.

Municipal Securities. Municipal securities are obligations issued by or on behalf of states, territories or possessions of the United States, the District of Columbia and their cities, counties, political subdivisions, agencies and instrumentalities, the interest on which, in the opinion of bond counsel or other counsel to the issuers of such securities, is, at the time of issuance, exempt from federal income tax. The Adviser does not conduct its own analysis of the tax status of the interest paid by municipal securities held by the Trust, but will rely on the opinion of counsel to the issuer of each such instrument.

The yields of municipal securities depend on, among other things, general money market conditions, general conditions of the municipal securities market, size of a particular offering, the maturity of the obligation and rating of the issue. There is no limitation as to the maturity of the municipal securities in which the Trust may invest. The ratings of S&P and Moody’s represent their opinions of the quality of the municipal securities they undertake to rate. These ratings are general and are not absolute standards of quality. Consequently, municipal securities with the same maturity, coupon and rating may have different yields while municipal securities of the same maturity and coupon with different ratings may have the same yield. The Adviser may adjust the average maturity of the Trust’s portfolio from time to time depending on its assessment of the relative yields available on securities of different maturities and its expectations of future changes in interest rates.

The principal types of municipal debt securities purchased by the Trust are revenue obligations and general obligations. Revenue obligations are usually payable only from the revenues derived from a particular facility or class of facilities or, in some cases, from the proceeds of a special excise tax or other specific revenue source, but not from the general taxing power. Revenue obligations may include industrial development, pollution control, public utility, housing, and health care issues. General obligation securities are secured by the issuer’s pledge of its faith, credit and taxing power for the payment of principal and interest.

Within these principal classifications of municipal securities, there are a variety of types of municipal securities, including but not limited to:

∎ Variable rate securities, which bear rates of interest that are adjusted periodically according to formulae intended to reflect market rates of interest.

40 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

∎ Municipal notes, including tax, revenue and bond anticipation notes of short maturity, generally less than three years, which are issued to obtain temporary funds for various public purposes.

∎ Variable rate demand notes, which are obligations that contain a floating or variable interest rate adjustment formula and which are subject to a right of demand for payment of the principal balance plus accrued interest either at any time or at specified intervals. The interest rate on a variable rate demand note may be based on a known lending rate, such as a bank’s prime rate, and may be adjusted when such rate changes, or the interest rate may be a market rate that is adjusted at specified intervals. The adjustment formula maintains the value of the variable rate demand note at approximately the par value of such note at the adjustment date.

∎ Municipal leases, which are obligations issued by state and local governments or authorities to finance the acquisition of equipment and facilities. Certain municipal lease obligations may include non-appropriation clauses which provide that the municipality has no obligation to make lease or installment purchase payments in future years unless money is appropriated for such purpose on a yearly basis.

∎ Private activity bonds, which are issued by, or on behalf of, public authorities to finance privately operated facilities.

∎ Participation certificates, which are obligations issued by state or local governments or authorities to finance the acquisition of equipment and facilities. They may represent participations in a lease, an installment purchase contract or a conditional sales contract.

∎ Municipal securities that may not be backed by the faith, credit and taxing power of the issuer.

∎ Municipal securities that are privately placed and that may have restrictions on the Trust’s ability to resell, such as timing restrictions or requirements that the securities only be sold to qualified institutional investors.

∎ Municipal securities that are insured by financial insurance companies.

Derivatives. The Trust may use derivative instruments, including futures, for a variety of purposes, including hedging, risk management, portfolio management or to earn income.

Inverse Floating Rate Obligations. The Trust may invest in inverse floating rate obligations for investment purposes and to enhance the yield of the Trust. Inverse floating rate obligations are variable rate debt instruments that pay interest at rates that move in the opposite direction of prevailing interest rates. Inverse floating rate obligations in which the Trust may invest include derivative instruments such as residual interest bonds, tender option bonds or municipal bond trust certificates. Such instruments are typically created by a special purpose trust (the TOB Trust) that holds long-term fixed rate bonds, which are contributed by the Trust (the underlying security), and sells two classes of beneficial interests: short-term floating rate interests, which are sold to or held by third party investors, and inverse floating residual interests, which are purchased by the Trust. Because the interest rate paid to holders of such obligations is generally determined by subtracting the available or floating rate from a predetermined amount, the interest rate paid to holders of such obligations will decrease as such variable or floating rate increases and increase as such variable or floating rate decrease. For

additional information regarding Inverse Floating Rate Obligations, see Note 1(J) in “Notes to Financial Statements.”

When-Issued and Delayed-Delivery Transactions. The Trust may purchase municipal securities on a “when-issued” basis and may purchase or sell such securities on a “delayed-delivery” basis, which means that a Trust buys or sells a security with payment and delivery taking place in the future. The payment obligation and the interest rate are fixed at the time a Trust enters into the commitment. No income accrues on such securities until the date a Trust actually takes delivery of the securities.

Restricted Securities. The Trust may invest in securities subject to contractual restrictions on resale.

Preferred Shares. The Trust may issue preferred shares as leverage. The Trust currently utilizes VMTP Shares as leverage in order to enhance the yield of its common shareholders. For additional information regarding the VMTP Shares, see Note 12 in “Notes to Financial Statements.”

Zero Coupon/Pay-in-Kind Securities. The Trust may invest in securities not producing immediate cash income, including zero coupon securities or pay-in-kind securities, when their effective yield over comparable instruments producing cash income makes these investments attractive. Zero coupon securities are debt securities that do not entitle the holder to any periodic payment of interest prior to maturity or a specified date when the securities begin paying current interest. Pay-in-kind securities are debt securities that pay interest through the issuance of additional securities.

Temporary Defensive Strategy. When market conditions dictate a more defensive investment strategy, the Trust may, on a temporary basis, hold cash or invest a portion or all of its assets in high-quality, short-term municipal securities. If such municipal securities are not available or, in the judgment of the Adviser, do not afford sufficient protection against adverse market conditions, the Trust may invest in taxable instruments. Such taxable securities may include securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities, other investment grade quality fixed income securities, prime commercial paper, certificates of deposit, bankers’ acceptances and other obligations of domestic banks, repurchase agreements and money market funds (including money market funds affiliated with the Adviser). In taking a defensive position, the Trust would temporarily not be pursuing its principal investment strategies and may not achieve its investment objective.

Principal Risks of Investing in the Trust

As with any fund investment, loss of money is a risk of investing. The risks associated with an investment in the Trust can increase during times of significant market volatility. The principal risks of investing in the Trust are:

Market Risk. The market values of the Trust’s investments, and therefore the value of the Trust’s shares, will go up and down, sometimes rapidly or unpredictably. Market risk may affect a single issuer, industry or section of the economy, or it may affect the market as a whole. The value of the Trust’s investments may go up or down due to general market conditions that are not specifically related to the particular issuer, such as real or perceived adverse economic conditions, changes in the general outlook for revenues or corporate earnings, changes

in interest or currency rates, regional or global instability, or adverse investor sentiment generally. The value of the Trust’s investments may also go up or down due to factors that affect an individual issuer or a particular industry or sector, such as changes in production costs and competitive conditions within an industry. In addition, natural or environmental disasters, widespread disease or other public health issues, war, acts of terrorism or other events may have a significant impact on the value of the Trust’s investments, as well as the financial markets and global economy generally. Such circumstances may also impact the ability of the Adviser to effectively implement the Trust’s investment strategy. During a general downturn in the financial markets, multiple asset classes may decline in value. When markets perform well, there can be no assurance that specific investments held by the Trust will rise in value.

COVID-19. The “COVID-19” strain of coronavirus has resulted in instances of market closures and dislocations, extreme volatility, liquidity constraints and increased trading costs. Efforts to contain its spread have resulted in travel restrictions, disruptions of healthcare systems, business operations and supply chains, layoffs, lower consumer demand, and defaults, among other significant economic impacts that have disrupted global economic activity across many industries. Such economic impacts may exacerbate other pre-existing political, social and economic risks locally or globally. The ongoing effects of COVID-19 are unpredictable and may result in significant and prolonged effects on the Trust’s performance.

Municipal Securities Risk. Under normal market conditions, longer-term municipal securities generally provide a higher yield than shorter-term municipal securities. The yields of municipal securities may move differently and adversely compared to the yields of the overall debt securities markets. The risk of a municipal obligation generally depends on the financial and credit status of the issuer. Constitutional amendments, legislative enactments, executive orders, administrative regulations, voter initiatives, and the issuer’s regional economic conditions may affect the municipal security’s value, interest payments, repayment of principal and the Trust’s ability to sell the security. Municipal obligations may be more susceptible to downgrades or defaults during recessions or similar periods of economic stress. Municipal securities structured as revenue bonds are generally not backed by the taxing power of the issuing municipality but rather the revenue from the particular project or entity for which the bonds were issued. If the Internal Revenue Service determines that an issuer of a municipal security has not complied with applicable tax requirements, interest from the security could be treated as taxable, which could result in a decline in the security’s value. In addition, there could be changes in applicable tax laws or tax treatments that reduce or eliminate the current federal income tax exemption on municipal securities or otherwise adversely affect the current federal or state tax status of municipal securities.

Changing Fixed Income Market Conditions Risk. The current low interest rate environment was created in part by the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) and certain foreign central banks keeping the federal funds and equivalent foreign rates near historical lows. Increases in the federal funds and equivalent foreign rates may expose fixed income markets to heightened volatility and reduced liquidity for certain fixed

41 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

income investments, particularly those with longer maturities. In addition, decreases in fixed income dealer market-making capacity may persist in the future, potentially leading to heightened volatility and reduced liquidity in the fixed income markets. As a result, the value of the Trust’s investments and share price may decline.

Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that rising interest rates, or an expectation of rising interest rates in the near future, will cause the values of the Trust’s investments to decline. The values of debt securities usually change when prevailing interest rates change. When interest rates rise, the values of outstanding debt securities generally fall, and those securities may sell at a discount from their face amount. When interest rates rise, the decrease in values of outstanding debt securities may not be offset by higher income from new investments. When interest rates fall, the values of already-issued debt securities generally rise. However, when interest rates fall, the Trust’s investments in new securities may be at lower yields and may reduce the Trust’s income. The values of longer-term debt securities usually change more than the values of shorter-term debt securities when interest rates change; thus, interest rate risk is usually greater for securities with longer maturities or durations. “Zero-coupon” or “stripped” securities may be particularly sensitive to interest rate changes. Risks associated with rising interest rates are heightened given that interest rates in the U.S. are near historic lows.

Market Discount from Net Asset Value Risk. Shares of closed-end investment companies like the Trust frequently trade at prices lower than their net asset value. Because the market price of the Trust’s common shares is determined by factors such as relative market supply and demand, general market and economic circumstances, and other factors beyond the control of the Trust, the Trust cannot predict whether its shares of common stock will trade at, below or above net asset value. This characteristic is a risk separate and distinct from the risk that the Trust’s net asset value could decrease as a result of investment activities. Common shareholders bear a risk of loss to the extent that the price at which they sell their shares is lower than at the time of purchase.

High Yield Debt Securities (Junk Bond) Risk. The Trust’s investments in high yield debt securities (commonly referred to as “junk bonds”) and other lower-rated securities will subject the Trust to substantial risk of loss. These securities are considered to be speculative with respect to the issuer’s ability to pay interest and principal when due and are more susceptible to default or decline in market value due to adverse economic, regulatory, political or company developments than higher rated or investment grade securities. Prices of high yield debt securities tend to be very volatile. These securities are less liquid than investment grade debt securities and may be difficult to sell at a desirable time or price, particularly in times of negative sentiment toward high yield securities.

Medium- and Lower-Grade Municipal Securities Risk. Securities that are in the medium- and lower-grade categories generally offer higher yields than are offered by higher-grade securities of similar maturity, but they also generally involve more volatility and greater risks, such as greater credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk and management risk. Furthermore, many issuers of medium- and lower-grade securities choose not to have a rating assigned to their obligations by any nationally

recognized statistical rating organization. As such, the Trust’s portfolio may consist of a higher portion of unrated securities as compared with an investment company that invests solely in higher-grade securities. Unrated securities may not be as attractive to as many buyers as are rated securities, a factor that may make unrated securities less able to be sold at a desirable time or price. These factors may limit the ability of the Trust to sell such securities at their fair value either to raise cash or in response to changes in the economy or the financial markets.

Unrated Securities Risk. Because the Trust purchases securities that are not rated by any nationally recognized statistical rating organization, the Adviser may internally assign ratings to those securities, after assessing their credit quality and other factors, in categories similar to those of nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. There can be no assurance, nor is it intended, that the Adviser’s credit analysis process is consistent or comparable with the credit analysis process used by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Unrated securities are considered “investment-grade” or “below-investment-grade” if judged by the Adviser to be comparable to rated investment-grade or below-investment-grade securities. The Adviser’s rating does not constitute a guarantee of the credit quality. In addition, some unrated securities may not have an active trading market or may trade less actively than rated securities, which means that the Trust might have difficulty selling them promptly at an acceptable price. In evaluating the credit quality of a particular security, whether rated or unrated, the Adviser will normally take into consideration a number of factors such as, if applicable, the financial resources of the issuer, the underlying source of funds for debt service on a security, the issuer’s sensitivity to economic conditions and trends, any operating history of the facility financed by the obligation, the degree of community support for the financed facility, the capabilities of the issuer’s management, and regulatory factors affecting the issuer or the particular facility. A reduction in the rating of a security after the Trust buys it will not require the Trust to dispose of the security. However, the Adviser will evaluate such downgraded securities to determine whether to keep them in the Trust’s portfolio.

Credit Risk. The issuers of instruments in which the Trust invests may be unable to meet interest and/or principal payments. This risk is increased to the extent the Trust invests in junk bonds, which may cause the Trust to incur higher expenses to protect its interests. The credit risks and market prices of lower-grade securities generally are more sensitive to negative issuer developments, such as reduced revenues or increased expenditures, or adverse economic conditions, such as a recession, than are higher-grade securities. An issuer’s securities may decrease in value if its financial strength weakens, which may reduce its credit rating and possibly its ability to meet its contractual obligations. In the event that an issuer of securities held by the Trust experiences difficulties in the timely payment of principal and interest and such issuer seeks to restructure the terms of its borrowings, the Trust may incur additional expenses and may determine to invest additional assets with respect to such issuer or the project or projects to which the Trust’s securities relate. Further, the Trust may incur additional expenses to the extent that it is required to seek

recovery upon a default in the payment of interest or the repayment of principal on its portfolio holdings and the Trust may be unable to obtain full recovery on such amounts.

Income Risk. The income you receive from the Trust is based primarily on prevailing interest rates, which can vary widely over the short and long term. If interest rates decrease, your income from the Trust may decrease as well.

Call Risk. If interest rates fall, it is possible that issuers of securities with high interest rates will prepay or call their securities before their maturity dates. In this event, the proceeds from the called securities would likely be reinvested by the Trust in securities bearing the new, lower interest rates, resulting in a possible decline in the Trust’s income and distributions to shareholders.

Municipal Issuer Focus Risk. The municipal issuers in which the Trust invests may be located in the same geographic area or may pay their interest obligations from revenue of similar projects, such as hospitals, airports, utility systems and housing finance agencies. This may make the Trust’s investments more susceptible to similar social, economic, political or regulatory occurrences, making the Trust more susceptible to experience a drop in its share price than if the Trust had been more diversified across issuers that did not have similar characteristics. From time to time, the Trust’s investments may include securities that alone or together with securities held by other funds or accounts managed by the Adviser, represents a major portion or all of an issue of municipal securities. Because there may be relatively few potential purchasers for such investments and, in some cases, there may be contractual restrictions on resales, the Trust may find it more difficult to sell such securities at a desirable time or price.

Insurance Risk. Financial insurance guarantees that interest payments on a bond will be made on time and that principal will be repaid when the bond matures. Insured municipal obligations would generally be assigned a lower rating if the rating was based primarily on the credit quality of the issuer without regard to the insurance feature. If the claims-paying ability of the insurer were downgraded, the ratings on the municipal obligations it insures may also be downgraded. Insurance does not protect the Trust against losses caused by declines in a bond’s value due to a change in market conditions.

Alternative Minimum Tax Risk. Although the interest received from municipal securities generally is exempt from federal income tax, the Trust may invest all or a substantial portion of its total assets in municipal securities subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. Accordingly, an investment in the Trust could cause shareholders to be subject to (or result in an increased liability under) the federal alternative minimum tax.

Taxability Risk. The Trust’s investments in municipal securities rely on the opinion of the issuer’s bond counsel that the interest paid on those securities will not be subject to federal income tax. Tax opinions are generally provided at the time the municipal security is initially issued. However, tax opinions are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or any court and after the Trust buys a security, the Internal Revenue Service or a court may determine that a bond issued as tax-exempt should in fact be taxable and the Trust’s dividends with respect to that bond might be subject to federal income tax. As a result, the treatment of dividends previously paid or to be paid by the Trust as “exempt-interest

42 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

dividends” could be adversely affected, subjecting the Trust’s shareholders to increased federal income tax liabilities. In addition, income from tax-exempt municipal securities could be declared taxable because of unfavorable changes in tax laws, adverse interpretations by the Internal Revenue Service or a court, or the non-compliant conduct of a bond issuer.

The value of the Trust’s investments and its net asset value may be adversely affected by changes in tax rates and policies. Because interest income from municipal securities is normally not subject to regular federal income taxation, the attractiveness of municipal securities in relation to other investment alternatives is affected by changes in federal income tax rates or changes in the tax-exempt status of interest income from municipal securities. Any proposed or actual changes in such rates or exempt status, therefore, can significantly affect the demand for and supply, liquidity and marketability of municipal securities. This could in turn affect the Trust’s net asset value and ability to acquire and dispose of municipal securities at desirable yield and price levels.

Inverse Floating Rate Obligations Risk. Inverse floating rate obligations (inverse floaters) represent interests in bonds with interest rates that vary inversely to changes in short-term rates. As short-term rates rise, inverse floaters produce less income, and as short-term rates decline, inverse floaters produce more income. As a result, the price of inverse floaters is expected to decline when interest rates rise, and generally will decline further than the price of a bond with a similar maturity. The price of inverse floaters is typically more volatile than the price of bonds with similar maturities. Interest rate risk and price volatility of inverse floaters can be particularly high if leverage is used in the formula that determines the interest payable by the inverse floater. Leverage may make the Trust’s returns more volatile and increase the risk of loss. The Trust generally invests in inverse floaters that include embedded leverage, thus exposing the Trust to greater risks and increased costs. The market value of a “leveraged” inverse floater will fluctuate in response to changes in market rates of interest to a greater extent than the value of an unleveraged investment, and the value of, and income earned on, an inverse floater that has a higher degree of leverage are more likely to be eliminated entirely under adverse market conditions. The use of short-term floating rate obligations may require the Trust to segregate or earmark cash or liquid assets to cover its obligations. Securities so segregated or earmarked will be unavailable for sale by the Trust (unless replaced by other securities qualifying for segregation requirements), which may limit the Trust’s flexibility and may require that the Trust sell other portfolio investments at a time when it may be disadvantageous to sell such assets. Upon the occurrence of certain adverse events, the special purpose trust that created the inverse floater may be collapsed and the underlying security liquidated, and the Trust could lose the entire amount of its investment in the inverse floater and may, in some cases, be contractually required to pay the negative difference, if any, between the liquidation value of the underlying security and the principal amount of the short-term floating rate interests. Regulatory changes have prompted changes to the structure of tender option bonds. The Trust’s enhanced role under the revised structure may increase the Trust’s operational and regulatory risk. For additional

information regarding the risks of Inverse Floating Rate Obligations, see Note 1(J) in “Notes to Financial Statements.”

Liquidity Risk. The Trust may be unable to sell illiquid investments at the time or price it desires and, as a result, could lose its entire investment in such investments. An investment may be illiquid due to a lack of trading volume in the investment or if the investment is privately placed and not traded in any public market or is otherwise restricted from trading. Consequently, the Trust may have to accept a lower price to sell an investment or continue to hold it or keep the position open, sell other investments to raise cash or abandon an investment opportunity, any of which could have a negative effect on the Trust’s performance. Liquid securities can become illiquid during periods of market stress.

Restricted Securities Risk. Limitations on the resale of restricted securities may have an adverse effect on their marketability, and may prevent the Trust from disposing of them promptly at reasonable prices. There can be no assurance that a trading market will exist at any time for any particular restricted security. Transaction costs may be higher for restricted securities. Also, restricted securities may be difficult to value because market quotations may not be readily available, and the securities may have significant volatility. In addition, the Trust may get only limited information about the issuer of a restricted security and therefore may be less able to predict a loss.

Preferred Shares. The primary risk associated with the Trust’s issuance of preferred shares, such as the VMTP Shares, is exposing the net asset value of the common shares and total return to increased volatility if the value of the Trust decreases while the value of the preferred shares remain unchanged. Fluctuations in the dividend rates on the VMTP Shares can also impact the Trust’s yield or its distributions to common shareholders. The Trust is subject to certain restrictions relating to the VMTP Shares, such as maintaining certain asset coverage and leverage ratio requirements. Failure to comply with these restrictions could preclude the Trust from declaring any distributions to common shareholders or purchasing common shares and/or could trigger an increased rate which, if not cured, could cause the mandatory redemption of VMTP Shares at the liquidation preference plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends. For additional information regarding the risks of VMTP Shares, see Note 12 in “Notes to Financial Statements.”

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Risks. When-issued and delayed delivery transactions are subject to market risk as the value or yield of a security at delivery may be more or less than the purchase price or the yield generally available on securities when delivery occurs. In addition, the Trust is subject to counterparty risk because it relies on the buyer or seller, as the case may be, to consummate the transaction, and failure by the counterparty to complete the transaction may result in the Trust missing the opportunity of obtaining a price or yield considered to be advantageous. These transactions have a leveraging effect on the Trust because the Trust commits to purchase securities that it does not have to pay for until a later date. These investments therefore increase the Trust’s overall investment exposure and, as a result, its volatility. Typically, no income accrues on securities the Trust has committed to purchase prior to the time delivery of the securities

is made, although the Trust may earn income on securities it has set aside to cover these positions.

Zero Coupon or Pay-In-Kind Securities Risk. Zero coupon and pay-in-kind securities may be subject to greater fluctuation in value and less liquidity in the event of adverse market conditions than comparably rated securities paying cash interest at regular interest payment periods. Prices on non-cash-paying instruments may be more sensitive to changes in the issuer’s financial condition, fluctuation in interest rates and market demand/supply imbalances than cash-paying securities with similar credit ratings, and thus may be more speculative. Investors may purchase zero coupon and pay-in-kind securities at a price below the amount payable at maturity. Because such securities do not entitle the holder to any periodic payments of interest prior to maturity, this prevents any reinvestment of interest payments at prevailing interest rates if prevailing interest rates rise. The higher yields and interest rates on pay-in-kind securities reflect the payment deferral and increased credit risk associated with such instruments and that such investments may represent a higher credit risk than coupon loans. Pay-in-kind securities may have a potential variability in valuations because their continuing accruals require continuing judgments about the collectability of the deferred payments and the value of any associated collateral. Special tax considerations are associated with investing in certain lower-grade securities, such as zero coupon or pay-in-kind securities.

Derivatives Risk. The value of a derivative instrument depends largely on (and is derived from) the value of an underlying security, currency, commodity, interest rate, index or other asset (each referred to as an underlying asset). In addition to risks relating to the underlying assets, the use of derivatives may include other, possibly greater, risks, including counterparty, leverage and liquidity risks. Counterparty risk is the risk that the counterparty to the derivative contract will default on its obligation to pay the Trust the amount owed or otherwise perform under the derivative contract. Derivatives create leverage risk because they do not require payment up front equal to the economic exposure created by holding a position in the derivative. As a result, an adverse change in the value of the underlying asset could result in the Trust sustaining a loss that is substantially greater than the amount invested in the derivative or the anticipated value of the underlying asset, which may make the Trust’s returns more volatile and increase the risk of loss. Derivative instruments may also be less liquid than more traditional investments and the Trust may be unable to sell or close out its derivative positions at a desirable time or price. This risk may be more acute under adverse market conditions, during which the Trust may be most in need of liquidating its derivative positions. Derivatives may also be harder to value, less tax efficient and subject to changing government regulation that could impact the Trust’s ability to use certain derivatives or their cost. Derivatives strategies may not always be successful. For example, derivatives used for hedging or to gain or limit exposure to a particular market segment may not provide the expected benefits, particularly during adverse market conditions.

Variable-Rate Demand Notes Risk. The absence of an active secondary market for certain variable and floating rate notes could make it difficult to dispose of these instruments, and a portfolio could suffer a

43 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

loss if the issuer defaults during periods in which a portfolio is not entitled to exercise its demand rights.

Repurchase Agreement Risk. If the seller of a repurchase agreement defaults or otherwise does not fulfill its obligations, the Trust may incur delays and losses arising from selling the underlying securities, enforcing its rights, or declining collateral value. These risks are magnified to the extent that a repurchase agreement is secured by securities other than cash or U.S. Government securities.

Management Risk. The Trust is actively managed and depends heavily on the Adviser’s judgment about markets, interest rates or the attractiveness, relative values, liquidity, or potential appreciation of particular investments made for the Trust’s portfolio. The Trust could experience losses if these judgments prove to be incorrect. There can be no guarantee that the Adviser’s investment techniques or investment decisions will produce the desired results. Additionally, legislative, regulatory, or tax developments may affect the investments or investment strategies available to the Adviser in connection with managing the Trust, which may also adversely affect the ability of the Trust to achieve its investment objective.

1 | A credit rating is an assessment provided by a NRSRO of the creditworthiness of an issuer with respect to debt obligations, including specific securities, money market instruments or other debts. Ratings are measured on a scale that generally ranges from AAA (highest) to D (lowest); ratings are subject to change without notice. For more information on rating methodology, please visit www.standardandpoors.com and select “Understanding Ratings” under Rating Resources on the homepage; www.fitchratings.com and select “Understanding Credit Ratings” from the drop-down menu on the homepage; and www.moodys.com and select “Methodology,” then “Rating Methodologies” under Research Type on the left-hand side.

44 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Trustees and Officers

The address of each trustee and officer is 1555 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Generally, each trustee serves for a three year term or until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified, and each officer serves for a one year term or until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified. Column two below includes length of time served with predecessor entities, if any.

Name, Year of Birth and Position(s) Held with the Trust |  | Trustee and/or Officer Since |  | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |  | Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee |  | Other Directorship(s) Held by Trustee During Past 5 Years
Interested Trustee |  |  |  |  |  |
Martin L. Flanagan1 – 1960 Trustee and Vice Chair |  | 2010 |  | Executive Director, Chief Executive Officer and President, Invesco Ltd. (ultimate parent of Invesco and a global investment management firm); Trustee and Vice Chair, The Invesco Funds; Vice Chair, Investment Company Institute; and Member of Executive Board, SMU Cox School of Business Formerly: Advisor to the Board, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.); Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (registered investment adviser); Director, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Invesco Holding Company (US), Inc. (formerly IVZ Inc.) (holding company), Invesco Group Services, Inc. (service provider) and Invesco North American Holdings, Inc. (holding company); Director, Chief Executive Officer and President, Invesco Holding Company Limited (parent of Invesco and a global investment management firm); Director, Invesco Ltd.; Chairman, Investment Company Institute and President, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Co-President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Franklin Resources, Inc. (global investment management organization) |  | 191 |  | None

1 | Mr. Flanagan is considered an interested person (within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act) of the Trust because he is an officer of the Adviser to the Trust, and an officer and a director of Invesco Ltd., ultimate parent of the Adviser.

T-1 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Trustees and Officers–(continued)

Name, Year of Birth and Position(s) Held with the Trust |  | Trustee and/or Officer Since |  | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |  | Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee |  | Other Directorship(s) Held by Trustee During Past 5 Years
Independent Trustees |  |  |  |  |  |
Christopher L. Wilson – 1957 Trustee and Chair |  | 2017 |  | Retired Formerly: Director, TD Asset Management USA Inc. (mutual fund complex) (22 portfolios); Managing Partner, CT2, LLC (investing and consulting firm); President/Chief Executive Officer, Columbia Funds, Bank of America Corporation; President/Chief Executive Officer, CDC IXIS Asset Management Services, Inc.; Principal & Director of Operations, Scudder Funds, Scudder, Stevens & Clark, Inc.; Assistant Vice President, Fidelity Investments |  | 191 |  | enaible, Inc. (artificial intelligence technology); Director, ISO New England, Inc. (non-profit organization managing regional electricity market)
Beth Ann Brown – 1968 Trustee |  | 2019 |  | Independent Consultant Formerly: Head of Intermediary Distribution, Managing Director, Strategic Relations, Managing Director, Head of National Accounts, Senior Vice President, National Account Manager and Senior Vice President, Key Account Manager, Columbia Management Investment Advisers LLC; Vice President, Key Account Manager, Liberty Funds Distributor, Inc.; and Trustee of certain Oppenheimer Funds |  | 191 |  | Director, Board of Directors of Caron Engineering Inc.; Advisor, Board of Advisors of Caron Engineering Inc.; President and Director, Acton Shapleigh Youth Conservation Corps (non - profit); and President and Director of Grahamtastic Connection (non-profit)
Jack M. Fields – 1952 Trustee |  | 2010 |  | Chief Executive Officer, Twenty First Century Group, Inc. (government affairs company); and Board Member, Impact(Ed) (non-profit) Formerly: Owner and Chief Executive Officer, Dos Angeles Ranch L.P. (cattle, hunting, corporate entertainment); Director, Insperity, Inc. (formerly known as Administaff) (human resources provider); Chief Executive Officer, Texana Timber LP (sustainable forestry company); Director of Cross Timbers Quail Research Ranch (non-profit); and member of the U.S. House of Representatives |  | 191 |  | Member, Board of Directors of Baylor College of Medicine
Cynthia Hostetler –1962 Trustee |  | 2017 |  | Non-Executive Director and Trustee of a number of public and private business corporations Formerly: Director, Aberdeen Investment Funds (4 portfolios); Director, Artio Global Investment LLC (mutual fund complex); Director, Edgen Group, Inc. (specialized energy and infrastructure products distributor); Head of Investment Funds and Private Equity, Overseas Private Investment Corporation; President, First Manhattan Bancorporation, Inc.; Attorney, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP |  | 191 |  | Resideo Technologies, Inc. (smart home technology); Vulcan Materials Company (construction materials company); Trilinc Global Impact Fund; Genesee & Wyoming, Inc. (railroads); Investment Company Institute (professional organization); Independent Directors Council (professional organization);Eisenhower Foundation (non-profit)
Eli Jones – 1961 Trustee |  | 2016 |  | Professor and Dean, Mays Business School - Texas A&M University Formerly: Professor and Dean, Walton College of Business, University of Arkansas and E.J. Ourso College of Business, Louisiana State University; Director, Arvest Bank |  | 191 |  | Insperity, Inc. (formerly known as Administaff) (human resources provider)

T-2 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Trustees and Officers–(continued)

Name, Year of Birth and Position(s) Held with the Trust |  | Trustee and/or Officer Since |  | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |  | Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee |  | Other Directorship(s) Held by Trustee During Past 5 Years
Independent Trustees–(continued) |  |  |  |
Elizabeth Krentzman – 1959 Trustee |  | 2019 |  | Formerly: Principal and Chief Regulatory Advisor for Asset Management Services and U.S. Mutual Fund Leader of Deloitte & Touche LLP; General Counsel of the Investment Company Institute (trade association); National Director of the Investment Management Regulatory Consulting Practice, Principal, Director and Senior Manager of Deloitte & Touche LLP; Assistant Director of the Division of Investment Management - Office of Disclosure and Investment Adviser Regulation of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and various positions with the Division of Investment Management – Office of Regulatory Policy of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Associate at Ropes & Gray LLP; Advisory Board Member of the Securities and Exchange Commission Historical Society; and Trustee of certain Oppenheimer Funds |  | 191 |  | Trustee of the University of Florida National Board Foundation and Audit Committee Member; Member of the Cartica Funds Board of Directors (private investment funds); Member of the University of Florida Law Center Association, Inc. Board of Trustees and Audit Committee Member
Anthony J. LaCava, Jr. – 1956 Trustee |  | 2019 |  | Formerly: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Blue Hills Bank (publicly traded financial institution) and Managing Partner, KPMG LLP |  | 191 |  | Blue Hills Bank; Chairman, Bentley University; Member, Business School Advisory Council; and Nominating Committee KPMG LLP
Prema Mathai-Davis – 1950 Trustee |  | 2010 |  | Retired Formerly: Co-Founder & Partner of Quantalytics Research, LLC, (a FinTech Investment Research Platform for the Self-Directed Investor); Trustee of YWCA Retirement Fund; CEO of YWCA of the USA; Board member of the NY Metropolitan Transportation Authority; Commissioner of the NYC Department of Aging; Board member of Johns Hopkins Bioethics Institute |  | 191 |  | None
Joel W. Motley – 1952 Trustee |  | 2019 |  | Director of Office of Finance, Federal Home Loan Bank System; Managing Director of Carmona Motley Inc. (privately held financial advisor); Member of the Council on Foreign Relations and its Finance and Budget Committee; Chairman Emeritus of Board of Human Rights Watch and Member of its Investment Committee; and Member of Investment Committee and Board of Historic Hudson Valley (non-profit cultural organization) Formerly: Managing Director of Public Capital Advisors, LLC (privately held financial advisor); Managing Director of Carmona Motley Hoffman, Inc. (privately held financial advisor); Trustee of certain Oppenheimer Funds; and Director of Columbia Equity Financial Corp. (privately held financial advisor); and Member of the Vestry of Trinity Church Wall Street |  | 191 |  | Member of Board of Greenwall Foundation (bioethics research foundation) and its Investment Committee; Member of Board of Friends of the LRC (non-profit legal advocacy); Board Member and Investment Committee Member of Pulizer Center for Crisis Reporting (non-profit journalism)
Teresa M. Ressel – 1962 Trustee |  | 2017 |  | Non-executive director and trustee of a number of public and private business corporations Formerly: Chief Executive Officer, UBS Securities LLC (investment banking); Chief Operating Officer, UBS AG Americas (investment banking); Sr. Management Team Olayan America, The Olayan Group (international investor/commercial/industrial); Assistant Secretary for Management & Budget and Designated Chief Financial Officer, U.S. Department of Treasury; Director, Atlantic Power Corporation (power generation company) and ON Semiconductor Corporation (semiconductor manufacturing) |  | 191 |  | Elucida Oncology (nanotechnology & medical particles company);

T-3 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Trustees and Officers–(continued)

Name, Year of Birth and Position(s) Held with the Trust |  | Trustee and/or Officer Since |  | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |  | Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee |  | Other Directorship(s) Held by Trustee During Past 5 Years
Independent Trustees–(continued) |  |  |  |
Ann Barnett Stern – 1957 Trustee |  | 2017 |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Board member of Houston Endowment, Inc. a private philanthropic institution Formerly: Executive Vice President, Texas Children’s Hospital; Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Compliance Officer, Texas Children’s Hospital; Attorney at Beck, Redden and Secrest and Andrews and Kurth |  | 191 |  | Director and Audit Committee member of Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas; Trustee and Board Chair of Good Reason Houston (nonprofit); Trustee, Vice Chair, Chair of Nomination/Governance Committee, Chair of Personnel Committee of Holdsworth Center (nonprofit); Trustee and Investment Committee member of University of Texas Law School Foundation (nonprofit); Board Member of Greater Houston Partnership
Robert C. Troccoli – 1949 Trustee |  | 2016 |  | Retired Formerly: Adjunct Professor, University of Denver – Daniels College of Business; and Managing Partner, KPMG LLP |  | 191 |  | None
Daniel S. Vandivort –1954 Trustee |  | 2019 |  | Trustee, Board of Trustees, Huntington Disease Foundation of America; and President, Flyway Advisory Services LLC (consulting and property management) Formerly: Trustee and Governance Chair, of certain Oppenheimer Funds; and Treasurer, Chairman of the Audit and Finance Committee, Huntington Disease Foundation of America |  | 191 |  | None
James D. Vaughn – 1945 Trustee |  | 2019 |  | Retired Formerly: Managing Partner, Deloitte & Touche LLP; Trustee and Chairman of the Audit Committee, Schroder Funds; Board Member, Mile High United Way, Boys and Girls Clubs, Boy Scouts, Colorado Business Committee for the Arts, Economic Club of Colorado and Metro Denver Network (economic development corporation); and Trustee of certain Oppenheimer Funds |  | 191 |  | Board member and Chairman of Audit Committee of AMG National Trust Bank; Trustee and Investment Committee member, University of South Dakota Foundation; Board member, Audit Committee Member and past Board Chair, Junior Achievement (non-profit)

T-4 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Trustees and Officers–(continued)

Name, Year of Birth and Position(s) Held with the Trust |  | Trustee and/or Officer Since |  | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |  | Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee |  | Other Directorship(s) Held by Trustee During Past 5 Years
Officers |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Sheri Morris – 1964 President and Principal Executive Officer |  | 2010 |  | Head of Global Fund Services, Invesco Ltd.; President and Principal Executive Officer, The Invesco Funds; Senior Vice President, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.) (registered investment adviser); and Vice President, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II, Invesco India Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Commodity Fund Trust and Invesco Exchange-Traded Self-Indexed Fund Trust; and Vice President, OppenheimerFunds, Inc. Formerly: Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer, The Invesco Funds; Vice President, Invesco AIM Advisers, Inc., Invesco AIM Capital Management, Inc. and Invesco AIM Private Asset Management, Inc.; Assistant Vice President and Assistant Treasurer, The Invesco Funds; Vice President and Assistant Vice President, Invesco Advisers, Inc.; Assistant Vice President, Invesco AIM Capital Management, Inc. and Invesco AIM Private Asset Management, Inc.; and Treasurer, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II, Invesco India Exchange-Traded Fund Trust and Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust |  | N/A |  | N/A
Russell C. Burk – 1958 Senior Vice President and Senior Officer |  | 2010 |  | Senior Vice President and Senior Officer, The Invesco Funds |  | N/A |  | N/A
Jeffrey H. Kupor – 1968 Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary |  | 2018 |  | Head of Legal of the Americas, Invesco Ltd.; Senior Vice President and Secretary, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.) (registered investment adviser); Senior Vice President and Secretary, Invesco Distributors, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM Distributors, Inc.); Vice President and Secretary, Invesco Investment Services, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM Investment Services, Inc.) Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, The Invesco Funds; Secretary and General Counsel, Invesco Investment Advisers LLC (formerly known as Van Kampen Asset Management); Secretary and General Counsel, Invesco Capital Markets, Inc. (formerly known as Van Kampen Funds Inc.) and Chief Legal Officer, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II, Invesco India Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Commodity Fund Trust and Invesco Exchange-Traded Self-Indexed Fund Trust; Secretary, Invesco Indexing LLC; Secretary, W.L. Ross & Co., LLC ; Secretary and Vice President, Harbourview Asset Management Corporation; Secretary and Vice President, OppenheimerFunds, Inc. and Invesco Managed Accounts, LLC; Secretary and Senior Vice President, OFI Global Institutional, Inc.; Secretary and Vice President, OFI SteelPath, Inc.; Secretary and Vice President, Oppenheimer Acquisition Corp.; Secretary and Vice President, Shareholder Services, Inc.; Secretary and Vice President, Trinity Investment Management Corporation Formerly: Secretary and Vice President, Jemstep, Inc.; Head of Legal, Worldwide Institutional, Invesco Ltd.; Secretary and General Counsel, INVESCO Private Capital Investments, Inc.; Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, Invesco Management Group, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM Management Group, Inc.); Assistant Secretary, INVESCO Asset Management (Bermuda) Ltd.; Secretary and General Counsel, Invesco Private Capital, Inc.; Assistant Secretary and General Counsel, INVESCO Realty, Inc.; Secretary and General Counsel, Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc.; and Secretary, Sovereign G./P. Holdings Inc. |  | N/A |  | N/A

T-5 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Trustees and Officers–(continued)

Name, Year of Birth and Position(s) Held with the Trust |  | Trustee and/or Officer Since |  | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |  | Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee |  | Other Directorship(s) Held by Trustee During Past 5 Years
Officers–(continued) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Andrew R. Schlossberg – 1974 Senior Vice President |  | 2019 |  | Head of the Americas and Senior Managing Director, Invesco Ltd.; Director and Senior Vice President, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.) (registered investment adviser); Director and Chairman, Invesco Investment Services, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM Investment Services, Inc.) (registered transfer agent); Senior Vice President, The Invesco Funds; Director, Invesco Investment Advisers LLC (formerly known as Van Kampen Asset Management); Director, President and Chairman, Invesco Insurance Agency, Inc. Formerly: Director, President and Chairman, Invesco Insurance Agency, Inc.; Director, Invesco UK Limited; Director and Chief Executive, Invesco Asset Management Limited and Invesco Fund Managers Limited; Assistant Vice President, The Invesco Funds; Senior Vice President, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.) (registered investment adviser); Director and Chief Executive, Invesco Administration Services Limited and Invesco Global Investment Funds Limited; Director, Invesco Distributors, Inc.; Head of EMEA, Invesco Ltd.; President, Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Commodity Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II and Invesco India Exchange-Traded Fund Trust; Managing Director and Principal Executive Officer, Invesco Capital Management LLC |  | N/A |  | N/A
John M. Zerr – 1962 Senior Vice President |  | 2010 |  | Chief Operating Officer of the Americas; Senior Vice President, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.) (registered investment adviser); Senior Vice President, Invesco Distributors, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM Distributors, Inc.); Director and Vice President, Invesco Investment Services, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM Investment Services, Inc.) Senior Vice President, The Invesco Funds; Managing Director, Invesco Capital Management LLC; Director, Invesco Investment Advisers LLC (formerly known as Van Kampen Asset Management); Senior Vice President, Invesco Capital Markets, Inc. (formerly known as Van Kampen Funds Inc.); Manager, Invesco Indexing LLC; Manager, Invesco Specialized Products, LLC; Member, Invesco Canada Funds Advisory Board; Director, President and Chief Executive Officer, Invesco Corporate Class Inc. (corporate mutual fund company); and Director, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Invesco Canada Ltd. (formerly known as Invesco Trimark Ltd./Invesco Trimark Ltèe) (registered investment adviser and registered transfer agent); President, Invesco, Inc.; President, Invesco Global Direct Real Estate Feeder GP Ltd.; President, Invesco IP Holdings(Canada) Ltd; President, Invesco Global Direct Real Estate GP Ltd.; President, Invesco Financial Services Ltd. / Services Financiers Invesco Ltée; and President, Trimark Investments Ltd./Placements Trimark Ltée Formerly: Director and Senior Vice President, Invesco Insurance Agency, Inc.; Director and Senior Vice President, Invesco Management Group, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM Management Group, Inc.); Secretary and General Counsel, Invesco Management Group, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM Management Group, Inc.); Secretary, Invesco Investment Services, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM Investment Services, Inc.); Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, The Invesco Funds; Secretary and General Counsel, Invesco Investment Advisers LLC (formerly known as Van Kampen Asset Management); Secretary and General Counsel, Invesco Capital Markets, Inc. (formerly known as Van Kampen Funds Inc.); Chief Legal Officer, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II, Invesco India Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Commodity Fund Trust and Invesco Exchange-Traded Self-Indexed Fund Trust; Secretary, Invesco Indexing LLC; Director, Secretary, General Counsel and Senior Vice President, Van Kampen Exchange Corp.; Director, Vice President and Secretary, IVZ Distributors, Inc. (formerly known as INVESCO Distributors, Inc.); Director and Vice President, INVESCO Funds Group, Inc.; Director and Vice President, Van Kampen Advisors Inc.; Director, Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, Van Kampen Investor Services Inc.; Director and Secretary, Invesco Distributors, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM Distributors, Inc.); Director, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Invesco AIM Advisers, Inc. and Van Kampen Investments Inc.; Director, Vice President and Secretary, Fund Management Company; Director, Senior Vice President, Secretary, General Counsel and Vice President, Invesco AIM Capital Management, Inc.; Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel, Liberty Ridge Capital, Inc. (an investment adviser) |  | N/A |  | N/A

T-6 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Trustees and Officers–(continued)

Name, Year of Birth and Position(s) Held with the Trust |  | Trustee and/or Officer Since |  | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |  | Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee |  | Other Directorship(s) Held by Trustee During Past 5 Years
Officers–(continued) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gregory G. McGreevey – 1962 Senior Vice President |  | 2012 |  | Senior Managing Director, Invesco Ltd.; Director, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.) (registered investment adviser); Director, Invesco Mortgage Capital, Inc. and Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc.; and Senior Vice President, The Invesco Funds; and President, SNW Asset Management Corporation and Invesco Managed Accounts, LLC; Chairman and Director, Invesco Private Capital, Inc.; Chairman and Director, INVESCO Private Capital Investments, Inc.; and Chairman and Director, INVESCO Realty, Inc. Formerly: Senior Vice President, Invesco Management Group, Inc. and Invesco Advisers, Inc.; Assistant Vice President, The Invesco Funds |  | N/A |  | N/A
Adrien Deberghes – 1967 Principal Financial Officer, Treasurer and Vice President |  | 2020 |  | Head of the Fund Office of the CFO and Fund Administration; Vice President, Invesco Advisers, Inc.; Principal Financial Officer, Treasurer and Vice President, The Invesco Funds; Vice President, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II, Invesco India Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Commodity Fund Trust and Invesco Exchange-Traded Self-Indexed Fund Trust Formerly: Senior Vice President and Treasurer, Fidelity Investments |  | N/A |  | N/A
Crissie M. Wisdom – 1969 Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer |  | 2013 |  | Anti-Money Laundering and OFAC Compliance Officer for Invesco U.S. entities including: Invesco Advisers, Inc. and its affiliates, Invesco Capital Markets, Inc., Invesco Distributors, Inc., Invesco Investment Services, Inc., The Invesco Funds, Invesco Capital Management, LLC, Invesco Trust Company; and Fraud Prevention Manager for Invesco Investment Services, Inc. |  | N/A |  | N/A
Todd F. Kuehl – 1969 Chief Compliance Officer and Senior Vice President |  | 2020 |  | Chief Compliance Officer, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (registered investment adviser); and Chief Compliance Officer, The Invesco Funds and Senior Vice President Formerly: Managing Director and Chief Compliance Officer, Legg Mason (Mutual Funds);Chief Compliance Officer, Legg Mason Private Portfolio Group (registered investment adviser) |  | N/A |  | N/A
Michael McMaster – 1962 Chief Tax Officer, Vice President and Assistant Treasurer |  | 2020 |  | Head of Global Fund Services Tax; Chief Tax Officer, Vice President and Assistant Treasurer, The Invesco Funds; Vice President, Invesco Advisers, Inc.; Assistant Treasurer, Invesco Capital Management LLC, Assistant Treasurer and Chief Tax Officer, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II, Invesco India Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Commodity Fund Trust and Invesco Exchange-Traded Self-Indexed Fund Trust; Assistant Treasurer, Invesco Specialized Products, LLC Formerly: Senior Vice President – Managing Director of Tax Services, U.S. Bank Global Fund Services (GFS) |  | N/A |  | N/A

Office of the Fund

1555 Peachtree Street, N.E.

Atlanta, GA 30309

Counsel to the Fund

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP

2005 Market Street, Suite 2600

Philadelphia, PA 19103-7018

Investment Adviser

Invesco Advisers, Inc.

1555 Peachtree Street, N.E.

Atlanta, GA 30309

Counsel to the Independent Trustees

Goodwin Procter LLP

901 New York Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20001

Auditors

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5800

Houston, TX 77002-5021

Transfer Agent

Computershare Trust Company, N.A

250 Royall Street

Canton, MA 02021

Custodian

State Street Bank and Trust Company

225 Franklin Street

Boston, MA 02110-2801

T-7 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

Correspondence information

Send general correspondence to Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 505000, Louisville, KY 40233-5000.

Trust holdings and proxy voting information

The Trust provides a complete list of its portfolio holdings four times each fiscal year, at the end of each fiscal quarter. For the second and fourth quarters, the list appears, respectively, in the Trust’s semiannual and annual reports to shareholders. For the first and third quarters, the Trust files the list with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as an exhibit to its reports on Form N-PORT. The most recent list of portfolio holdings is available at invesco.com/us. Shareholders can also look up the Trust’s Form N-PORT filings on the SEC website at sec.gov. The SEC file number for the Trust is shown below.

A description of the policies and procedures that the Trust uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, from our Client Services department at 800 341 2929 or at invesco.com/corporate/about-us/esg. The information is also available on the SEC website, sec.gov. Information regarding how the Trust voted proxies related to its portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available at invesco.com/proxysearch. The information is also available on the SEC website, sec.gov. |  |

SEC file number(s): 811-06590 |  | MS-CE-VMINC-AR-1

ITEM 2. | CODE OF ETHICS.

There were no amendments to the Code of Ethics (the “Code”) that applies to the Registrant’s Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) and Principal Financial Officer (“PFO”) during the period covered by the report. The Registrant did not grant any waivers, including implicit waivers, from any provisions of the Code to the PEO or PFO during the period covered by this report.

ITEM 3: | AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.

The Board of Trustees has determined that the Registrant has at least one audit committee financial expert serving on its Audit Committee. The Audit Committee financial experts are Cynthia Hostetler, Anthony J. LaCava, Jr., Dr. Eli Jones, Ann Barnett Stern, Robert C. Troccoli, James Vaughn, and Christopher L. Wilson. Cynthia Hostetler, Anthony J. LaCava, Jr., Dr. Eli Jones, Ann Barnett Stern, Robert C. Troccoli, James Vaughn and Christopher L. Wilson are “independent” within the meaning of that term as used in Form N-CSR.

ITEM 4. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

Pursuant to PCAOB Rule 3526, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC (“PwC”) advised the Registrant’s Audit Committee of the following matters identified between March 1, 2020 to April 28, 2021 that may be reasonably thought to bear on PwC’s independence. PwC advised the Audit Committee that one PwC Manager and one PwC Associate each held financial interests either directly or, in the case of the PwC Manager, indirectly through their spouse’s brokerage account, in investment companies within the Invesco Fund Complex that were inconsistent with the requirements of Rule 2-01(c)(1) of Regulation S-X. In reporting the matters to the Audit Committee, PwC noted, among other things, that the impermissible holdings were disposed of by the individuals, the individuals were not in the chain of command of the audit or the audit partners of the Funds, the individuals either did not provide any audit services (or in the case of the PwC Associate, the individual did not have decision-making responsibility for matters that materially affected the audit and their audit work was reviewed by team members at least two levels higher than the individual), or did not provide services of any kind to the Registrant or its affiliates, and the financial interests were not material to the net worth of each individual or their respective immediate family members and senior leadership of the Funds’ audit engagement team was unaware of the impermissible holdings until after the matters were confirmed to be independence exceptions or individuals ceased providing services. Based on the mitigating factors noted above, PwC advised the Audit Committee that it concluded that its objectivity and impartiality with respect to all issues encompassed within the audit engagement has not been impaired and it believes that a reasonable investor with knowledge of all relevant facts and circumstances for the violations would conclude PwC is capable of exercising objective and impartial judgment on all issues encompassed within the audits of the financial statements of the Funds in the Registrant for the impacted periods.

(a) to (d)

Fees Billed by PwC Related to the Registrant

PwC billed the Registrant aggregate fees for services rendered to the Registrant for the last two fiscal years as shown in the following table. The Audit Committee pre-approved all audit and non-audit services provided to the Registrant.

|  | Fees Billed for Services Rendered to the Registrant for fiscal year end 2021 |  |  | Fees Billed for Services Rendered to the Registrant for fiscal year end 2020 |
Audit Fees |  | $ | 47,625 |  |  | $ | 56,907 |
Audit-Related Fees |  | $ | 0 |  |  | $ | 0 |
Tax Fees(1) |  | $ | 14,398 |  |  | $ | 19,377 |
All Other Fees |  | $ | 0 |  |  | $ | 0 |
Total Fees |  | $ | 62,023 |  |  | $ | 76,284 |

(1) | Tax Fees for the fiscal years ended February 28, 2021 and February 29, 2020 includes fees billed for preparation of U.S. Tax Returns and Taxable Income calculations, including excise tax and year-to-date estimates for various book-to-tax differences.

Fees Billed by PwC Related to Invesco and Invesco Affiliates

PwC billed Invesco Advisers, Inc. (“Invesco”), the Registrant’s adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with Invesco that provides ongoing services to the Registrant (“Invesco Affiliates”) aggregate fees for pre-approved non-audit services rendered to Invesco and Invesco Affiliates for the last two fiscal years as shown in the following table. The Audit Committee pre-approved all non-audit services provided to Invesco and Invesco Affiliates that were required to be pre-approved.

|  | Fees Billed for Non- Audit Services Rendered to Invesco and Invesco Affiliates for fiscal year end 2021 That Were Required to be Pre-Approved by the Registrant’s Audit Committee |  |  | Fees Billed for Non-Audit Services Rendered to Invesco and Invesco Affiliates for fiscal year end 2020 That Were Required to be Pre-Approved by the Registrant’s Audit Committee |
Audit-Related Fees(1) |  | $ | 701,000 |  |  | $ | 690,000 |
Tax Fees |  | $ | 0 |  |  | $ | 0 |
All Other Fees |  | $ | 0 |  |  | $ | 0 |
Total Fees |  | $ | 701,000 |  |  | $ | 690,000 |

(1) | Audit-Related Fees for the fiscal years ended 2021 and 2020 include fees billed related to reviewing controls at a service organization.

(e)(1)

PRE-APPROVAL OF AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

As adopted by the Audit Committees

of the Invesco Funds (the “Funds”)

Last Amended March 29, 2017

| I. | Statement of Principles

The Audit Committees (the “Audit Committee”) of the Boards of Trustees of the Funds (the “Board”) have adopted these policies and procedures (the “Procedures”) with respect to the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services to be provided by the Funds’ independent auditor (the “Auditor”) to the Funds, and to the Funds’ investment adviser(s) and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser(s) that provides ongoing services to the Funds (collectively, “Service Affiliates”).

Under Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, all audit and non-audit services provided to the Funds by the Auditor must be preapproved by the Audit Committee. Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X requires that the Audit Committee also pre-approve a Service Affiliate’s engagement of the Auditor for non-audit services if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Funds (a “Service Affiliate’s Covered Engagement”).

These Procedures set forth the procedures and the conditions pursuant to which the Audit Committee may pre-approve audit and non-audit services for the Funds and a Service Affiliate’s Covered Engagement pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and other organizations and regulatory bodies applicable to the Funds (“Applicable Rules”).1 They address both general pre-approvals without consideration of specific case-by-case services (“general pre-approvals”) and pre-approvals on a case-by-case basis (“specific pre-approvals”). Any services requiring pre-approval that are not within the scope of general pre-approvals hereunder are subject to specific pre-approval. These Procedures also address the delegation by the Audit Committee of pre-approval authority to the Audit Committee Chair or Vice Chair.

| II. | Pre-Approval of Fund Audit Services

The annual Fund audit services engagement, including terms and fees, is subject to specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. Audit services include the annual financial statement audit and other procedures required to be performed by an independent auditor to be able to form an opinion on the Funds’ financial statements. The Audit Committee will receive, review and consider sufficient information concerning a proposed Fund audit engagement to make a reasonable evaluation of the Auditor’s qualifications and independence. The Audit Committee will oversee the Fund audit services engagement as necessary, including approving any changes in terms, audit scope, conditions and fees.

1 | Applicable Rules include, for example, New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules applicable to closed-end funds managed by Invesco and listed on NYSE.

In addition to approving the Fund audit services engagement at least annually and specifically approving any changes, the Audit Committee may generally or specifically pre-approve engagements for other audit services, which are those services that only an independent auditor reasonably can provide. Other audit services may include services associated with SEC registration statements, periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC.

| III. | General and Specific Pre-Approval of Non-Audit Fund Services

The Audit Committee will consider, at least annually, the list of General Pre-Approved Non-Audit Services which list may be terminated or modified at any time by the Audit Committee. To inform the Audit Committee’s review and approval of General Pre-Approved Non-Audit Services, the Funds’ Treasurer (or his or her designee) and Auditor shall provide such information regarding independence or other matters as the Audit Committee may request.

Any services or fee ranges that are not within the scope of General Pre-Approved Non-Audit Services have not received general pre-approval and require specific pre-approval. Each request for specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee for services to be provided by the Auditor to the Funds must be submitted to the Audit Committee by the Funds’ Treasurer (or his or her designee) and must include detailed information about the services to be provided, the fees or fee ranges to be charged, and other relevant information sufficient to allow the Audit Committee to consider whether to pre-approve such engagement, including evaluating whether the provision of such services will impair the independence of the Auditor and is otherwise consistent with Applicable Rules.

| IV. | Non-Audit Service Types

The Audit Committee may provide either general or specific pre-approval of audit-related, tax or other services, each as described in more detail below.

| a. | Audit-Related Services

“Audit-related services” are assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Fund’s financial statements or that are traditionally performed by an independent auditor. Audit-related services include, among others, accounting consultations related to accounting, financial reporting or disclosure matters not classified as “Audit services”; assistance with understanding and implementing new accounting and financial reporting guidance from rulemaking authorities; services related to mergers, acquisitions or dispositions; compliance with ratings agency requirements and interfund lending activities; and assistance with internal control reporting requirements.

| b. | Tax Services

“Tax services” include, but are not limited to, the review and signing of the Funds’ federal tax returns, the review of required distributions by the Funds and consultations regarding tax matters such as the tax treatment of new investments or the impact of new regulations. The Audit Committee will not approve proposed services of the Auditor which the Audit Committee believes are to be provided in connection with a service or transaction initially recommended by the Auditor, the sole business purpose of which may be tax avoidance and the tax treatment of which may not be supported in the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations. The Audit

Committee will consult with the Funds’ Treasurer (or his or her designee) and may consult with outside counsel or advisers as necessary to ensure the consistency of tax services rendered by the Auditor with the foregoing policy. The Auditor shall not represent any Fund or any Service Affiliate before a tax court, district court or federal court of claims.

Each request to provide tax services under either the general or specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee will include a description from the Auditor in writing of (i) the scope of the service, the fee structure for the engagement, and any side letter or other amendment to the engagement letter, or any other agreement (whether oral, written, or otherwise) between the Auditor and the Funds, relating to the service; and (ii) any compensation arrangement or other agreement, such as a referral agreement, a referral fee or fee-sharing arrangement, between the Auditor (or an affiliate of the Auditor) and any person (other than the Funds or Service Affiliates receiving the services) with respect to the promoting, marketing, or recommending of a transaction covered by the service. The Auditor will also discuss with the Audit Committee the potential effects of the services on the independence of the Auditor, and document the substance of its discussion with the Audit Committee.

| c. | Other Services

The Audit Committee may pre-approve other non-audit services so long as the Audit Committee believes that the service will not impair the independence of the Auditor. Appendix I includes a list of services that the Auditor is prohibited from performing by the SEC rules. Appendix I also includes a list of services that would impair the Auditor’s independence unless the Audit Committee reasonably concludes that the results of the services will not be subject to audit procedures during an audit of the Funds’ financial statements.

| V. | Pre-Approval of Service Affiliate’s Covered Engagements

Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X requires that the Audit Committee pre-approve a Service Affiliate’s engagement of the Auditor for non-audit services if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Funds, defined above as a “Service Affiliate’s Covered Engagement”.

The Audit Committee may provide either general or specific pre-approval of any Service Affiliate’s Covered Engagement, including for audit-related, tax or other services, as described above, if the Audit Committee believes that the provision of the services to a Service Affiliate will not impair the independence of the Auditor with respect to the Funds. Any Service Affiliate’s Covered Engagements that are not within the scope of General Pre-Approved Non-Audit Services have not received general pre-approval and require specific pre-approval.

Each request for specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee of a Service Affiliate’s Covered Engagement must be submitted to the Audit Committee by the Funds’ Treasurer (or his or her designee) and must include detailed information about the services to be provided, the fees or fee ranges to be charged, a description of the current status of the pre-approval process involving other audit committees in the Invesco investment company complex (as defined in Rule 2-201 of Regulation S-X) with respect to the proposed engagement, and other relevant information sufficient to allow the Audit Committee to consider whether the provision of such services will impair the independence of the Auditor from the Funds. Additionally, the Funds’ Treasurer (or his or her designee) and the Auditor will provide the Audit Committee with a statement that the

proposed engagement requires pre-approval by the Audit Committee, the proposed engagement, in their view, will not impair the independence of the Auditor and is consistent with Applicable Rules, and the description of the proposed engagement provided to the Audit Committee is consistent with that presented to or approved by the Invesco audit committee.

Information about all Service Affiliate engagements of the Auditor for non-audit services, whether or not subject to pre-approval by the Audit Committee, shall be provided to the Audit Committee at least quarterly, to allow the Audit Committee to consider whether the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining the Auditor’s independence from the Funds. The Funds’ Treasurer and Auditor shall provide the Audit Committee with sufficiently detailed information about the scope of services provided and the fees for such services, to ensure that the Audit Committee can adequately consider whether the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining the Auditor’s independence from the Funds.

| VI. | Pre-Approved Fee Levels or Established Amounts

Pre-approved fee levels or ranges for audit and non-audit services to be provided by the Auditor to the Funds, and for a Service Affiliate’s Covered Engagement, under general pre-approval or specific pre-approval will be set periodically by the Audit Committee. Any proposed fees exceeding 110% of the maximum pre-approved fee levels or ranges for such services or engagements will be promptly presented to the Audit Committee and will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee before payment of any additional fees is made.

| VII. | Delegation

The Audit Committee hereby delegates, subject to the dollar limitations set forth below, specific authority to its Chair, or in his or her absence, Vice Chair, to pre-approve audit and non-audit services proposed to be provided by the Auditor to the Funds and/or a Service Affiliate’s Covered Engagement, between Audit Committee meetings. Such delegation does not preclude the Chair or Vice Chair from declining, on a case by case basis, to exercise his or her delegated authority and instead convening the Audit Committee to consider and pre-approve any proposed services or engagements.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Audit Committee must pre-approve: (a) any non-audit services to be provided to the Funds for which the fees are estimated to exceed $500,000; (b) any Service Affiliate’s Covered Engagement for which the fees are estimated to exceed $500,000; or (c) any cost increase to any previously approved service or engagement that exceeds the greater of $250,000 or 50% of the previously approved fees up to a maximum increase of $500,000.

| VIII. | Compliance with Procedures

Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, failure to pre-approve any services or engagements that are not required to be pre-approved pursuant to the de minimis exception provided for in Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X shall not constitute a violation of these Procedures. The Audit Committee has designated the Funds’ Treasurer to ensure services and engagements are pre-approved in compliance with these Procedures. The Funds’ Treasurer will immediately report to the Chair of the Audit Committee, or the Vice Chair in his or her absence, any breach of these Procedures that comes to the attention of the Funds’ Treasurer or any

services or engagements that are not required to be pre-approved pursuant to the de minimis exception provided for in Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X.

On at least an annual basis, the Auditor will provide the Audit Committee with a summary of all non-audit services provided to any entity in the investment company complex (as defined in section 2-01(f)(14) of Regulation S-X, including the Funds and Service Affiliates) that were not pre-approved, including the nature of services provided and the associated fees.

| IX. | Amendments to Procedures

All material amendments to these Procedures must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee. Non-material amendments to these Procedures may be made by the Legal and Compliance Departments and will be reported to the Audit Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Audit Committee.

Appendix I

Non-Audit Services That May Impair the Auditor’s Independence

The Auditor is not independent if, at any point during the audit and professional engagement, the Auditor provides the following non-audit services:

| • |  | Management functions;

| • |  | Human resources;

| • |  | Broker-dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services ;

| • |  | Legal services;

| • |  | Expert services unrelated to the audit;

| • |  | Any service or product provided for a contingent fee or a commission;

| • |  | Services related to marketing, planning, or opining in favor of the tax treatment of confidential transactions or aggressive tax position transactions, a significant purpose of which is tax avoidance;

| • |  | Tax services for persons in financial reporting oversight roles at the Fund; and

| • |  | Any other service that the Public Company Oversight Board determines by regulation is impermissible.

An Auditor is not independent if, at any point during the audit and professional engagement, the Auditor provides the following non-audit services unless it is reasonable to conclude that the results of the services will not be subject to audit procedures during an audit of the Funds’ financial statements:

| • |  | Bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the audit client;

| • |  | Financial information systems design and implementation;

| • |  | Appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions, or contribution-in-kind reports;

| • |  | Actuarial services; and

| • |  | Internal audit outsourcing services.

(e)(2) There were no amounts that were pre-approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the de minimus exception under Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

(f) Not applicable.

(g) In addition to the amounts shown in the tables above, PwC billed Invesco and Invesco Affiliates aggregate fees of $6,219,000 for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2021 and $4,089,000 for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2020. In total, PwC billed the Registrant, Invesco and Invesco Affiliates aggregate non-audit fees of $6,934,398 for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2021 and $4,798,377 for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2020.

PwC provided audit services to the Investment Company complex of approximately $32 million.

(h) The Audit Committee also has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to Invesco and Invesco Affiliates that were not required to be pre-approved pursuant to SEC regulations, if any, is compatible with maintaining PwC’s independence.

ITEM 5. | AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 6. | SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.

Investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers is included as part of the reports to stockholders filed under Item 1 of this Form.

ITEM 7. | DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Invesco’s Policy Statement on Global Corporate Governance and Proxy Voting |  |

I. | Introduction

Invesco Ltd. and its affiliated investment advisers (collectively, “Invesco”, the “Company”, “our” or “we”) has adopted and implemented this Policy Statement on Global Corporate Governance and Proxy Voting (“Policy”) which it believes describes policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that proxies are voted in the best interests of its clients. This Policy is intended to help Invesco’s clients understand our commitment to responsible investing and proxy voting, as well as the good governance principles that inform our approach to engagement and voting at shareholder meetings.

| A. | Our Commitment to Environmental, Social and Governance Investment Stewardship and Proxy Voting

Our commitment to environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles is a core element of our ambition to be the most client centric asset manager. We aspire to incorporate ESG considerations into all of our investment capabilities in the context of financial materiality and in the best interest of our clients. Our Global ESG team functions as a center of excellence, providing specialist insights on research, engagement, voting, integration, tools, and client and product solutions with investment teams implementing ESG approaches appropriate to asset class and investment style. Much of our work is rooted in fundamental research and frequent dialogue with companies.

Invesco views proxy voting as an integral part of its investment management responsibilities. The proxy voting process at Invesco focuses on protecting clients’ rights and promoting governance structures and practices that reinforce the accountability of corporate management and boards of directors to shareholders. The voting decision lies with our portfolio managers and analysts with input and support from our Global ESG team and Proxy Operations functions. Our proprietary proxy voting platform (“PROXYintel”) facilitates implementation of voting decisions and rationales across global investment teams. Our good governance principles, governance structure and processes are designed to ensure that proxy votes are cast in accordance with clients’ best interests.

As a large active investor, Invesco is well placed to use our ESG expertise and beliefs to engage with portfolio companies in ways which drive corporate change that we believe will enhance shareholder value. We take our responsibility as active owners very seriously and see engagement as an opportunity to encourage continual improvement and ensure that our clients’ interests are represented and protected. Dialogue with portfolio companies is a core part of the investment process. Invesco may engage with investee companies to discuss environmental, social and governance issues throughout the year or on specific ballot items to be voted on.

Our passive strategies and certain other client accounts managed in accordance with fixed income, money market and index strategies (including exchange traded funds) will typically vote in line with the majority holder of the active-equity shares held by Invesco outside of those strategies. Invesco refers to this approach as “Majority Voting”. This process of Majority Voting ensures that our passive strategies benefit from the engagement and deep dialogue of our active investors, which Invesco believes benefits shareholders in passively-managed accounts. In the absence of overlap between the active and passive holders, the passive holders vote in line with our internally developed voting guidelines (as defined below). Portfolio managers and analysts for accounts employing Majority Voting retain full discretion to override Majority Voting and to vote the shares as they determine to be in the best interest of those accounts, absent certain types of conflicts of interest, which are discussed elsewhere in this Policy.

| B. | Applicability of Policy

Invesco may be granted by its clients the authority to vote the proxies of securities held in client portfolios. Invesco’s investment teams vote proxies on behalf of Invesco-sponsored funds and both fund and non-fund advisory clients that have explicitly granted Invesco authority in writing to vote proxies on their behalf. In the case of institutional or sub-advised clients, Invesco will vote the proxies in accordance with this Policy unless the client agreement specifies that the client retains the right to vote or has designated a named fiduciary to direct voting.

This Policy applies to all entities in Exhibit A. Due to regional or asset class specific considerations, there may be certain entities that have local proxy voting guidelines or policies

and procedures that differ from this Policy. In the event that local policies and the Global Policy differ, the local policy will apply. These entities are also listed in Exhibit A and include proxy voting guidelines specific to; Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited, Invesco Asset Management (India) Pvt. Ltd, Invesco Taiwan Ltd and Invesco Capital Markets, Inc. for Invesco Unit Investment Trusts. In Europe, we comply with the Shareholder Rights Directive and publish our disclosures and voting practices in this regard.

II. | Global Proxy Voting Operational Procedures

Invesco’s global proxy voting operational procedures are in place to implement the provisions of this Policy (the “Procedures”). At Invesco, proxy voting is conducted by our investment teams through PROXYintel. Our investment teams globally are supported by Invesco’s centralized team of ESG professionals and proxy voting specialists. Invesco’s Global ESG team oversees the proxy policy, operational procedures, inputs to analysis and research and leads the Global Invesco Proxy Advisory Committee (“Global IPAC”). Invesco’s global proxy administration team is responsible for operational implementation including vote execution oversight.

Invesco aims to vote all proxies where we have been granted voting authority in accordance with this Policy as implemented by the Procedures. Our portfolio managers and analysts review voting items based on their individual merits and retain full discretion on vote execution conducted through our proprietary proxy voting platform. Invesco may supplement its internal research with information from independent third-parties, such as proxy advisory firms.

| A. | Proprietary Proxy Voting Platform

Invesco’s proprietary proxy voting platform is supported by a dedicated team of internal proxy specialists. PROXYintel streamlines the proxy voting process by providing our investment teams globally with direct access to meeting information and proxies, external proxy research and ESG ratings, as well as related functions, such as management of conflicts of interest issues, significant votes, global reporting and record-keeping capabilities. Managing these processes internally, as opposed to relying on third parties, is designed to provide Invesco greater quality control, oversight and independence in the proxy administration process.

Historical proxy voting information is stored to build institutional knowledge across the Invesco complex with respect to individual companies and proxy issues. Certain investment teams also use PROXYintel to access third-party proxy research and ESG ratings.

Our proprietary systems facilitate internal control and oversight of the voting process. Invesco may choose to leverage this capability to automatically vote proxies based on its internally developed voting guidelines and in circumstances where Majority Voting applies.

| B. | Oversight of Voting Operations

Invesco’s Proxy Governance and Voting Manager provides oversight of the proxy voting verification processes facilitated by a dedicated proxy administration team which include; (i) the monthly global vote audit review of votes cast containing documented rationales of conflicts of interest votes, market and operational limitations; (ii) the quarterly sampling of proxy votes cast to determine that (a) Invesco is voting consistently with this Policy and (b) third-party proxy

advisory firms’ methodologies in formulating the vote recommendation are consistent with their publicly disclosed guidelines; and (iii) quarterly review of rationales with the Global IPAC of occasions where a portfolio manager may take a position that may not be in accordance with Invesco’s good governance principles and our internally developed voting guidelines.

To the extent material errors are identified in the proxy voting process, such errors are reviewed and reported to, as appropriate, the Global Head of ESG, Global Proxy Governance and Voting Manager, legal and compliance, the Global IPAC and relevant boards and clients, where applicable. Invesco’s Global Head of ESG and Proxy Governance and Voting Manager provide proxy voting updates and reporting to the Global IPAC, various boards and clients. Invesco’s proxy voting administration and operations are subject to periodic review by Internal Audit and Compliance groups.

| C. | Disclosures and Record Keeping

Unless otherwise required by local or regional requirements, Invesco maintains voting records in either electronic format or hard copy for at least 6 years. Invesco makes available its proxy voting records publicly in compliance with regulatory requirements and industry best practices in the regions below:

| • |  | In accordance with the US Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, Invesco will file a record of all proxy voting activity for the prior 12 months ending June 30th for each U.S. registered fund. That filing is made on or before August 31st of each year. Each year, the proxy voting records are made available on Invesco’s website here. Moreover, and to the extent applicable, the U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), including Department of Labor regulations and guidance thereunder, provide that the named fiduciary generally should be able to review not only the investment manager’s voting procedure with respect to plan-owned stock, but also to review the actions taken in individual proxy voting situations. In the case of institutional and sub-advised Clients, Clients may contact their client service representative to request information about how Invesco voted proxies on their behalf. Absent specific contractual guidelines, such requests may be made on a semi-annual basis.

| • |  | In the UK and Europe, Invesco publicly discloses our proxy votes monthly in compliance with the UK Stewardship Code and for the European Shareholder Rights Directive annually here.

| • |  | In Canada, Invesco publicly discloses our annual proxy votes each year here by August 31st, covering the 12-month period ending June 30th in compliance with the National Instrument 81-106 Investment Fund Continuous Disclosure.

| • |  | In Japan, Invesco publicly discloses our proxy votes annually in compliance with the Japan Stewardship Code.

| • |  | In India, Invesco publicly discloses our proxy votes quarterly in compliance with The Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) Circular on stewardship code for all mutual funds and all categories of Alternative Investment Funds in relation to their investment in listed equities. SEBI has implemented principles on voting for Mutual Funds through circulars dated March 15, 2010 and March 24, 2014, which prescribed detailed mandatory requirements for Mutual Funds in India to disclose their voting policies and actual voting by Mutual Funds on different resolutions of investee companies.

| • |  | In Hong Kong, Invesco Hong Kong Limited will provide proxy voting records upon request in compliance with the Securities and Futures Commission (“SFC”) Principles of Responsible Ownership.

| • |  | In Taiwan, Invesco publicly discloses our proxy voting policy and proxy votes annually in compliance with Taiwan’s Stewardship Principles for Institutional Investors.

| D. | Global Invesco Proxy Advisory Committee

Guided by its philosophy that investment teams should manage proxy voting, Invesco has created the Global IPAC. The Global IPAC is an investments-driven committee comprised of representatives from various investment management teams globally, Invesco’s Global Head of ESG and chaired by its Global Proxy Governance and Voting Manager. The Global IPAC provides a forum for investment teams to monitor, understand and discuss key proxy issues and voting trends within the Invesco complex, to assist Invesco in meeting regulatory obligations, to review votes not aligned with our good governance principles and to consider conflicts of interest in the proxy voting process, all in accordance with this Policy.

In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Global IPAC meets as necessary, but no less than semi-annually, and has the following responsibilities and functions: (i) acts as a key liaison between the Global ESG team and local proxy voting practices to ensure compliance with this Policy; (ii) provides insight on market trends as it relates to stewardship practices; (iii) monitors proxy votes that present potential conflicts of interest; (iv) the Conflict of Interest sub-committee will make voting decisions on submissions made by portfolio managers on conflict of interest issues to override the Policy; and (v) reviews and provides input, at least annually, on this Policy and related internal procedures and recommends any changes to the Policy based on, but not limited to, Invesco’s experience, evolving industry practices, or developments in applicable laws or regulations.

In addition to the Global IPAC, for some clients, third parties (e.g., U.S. fund boards) provide oversight of the proxy voting process.

| E. | Market and Operational Limitations

In the great majority of instances, Invesco will vote proxies. However, in certain circumstances, Invesco may refrain from voting where the economic or other opportunity costs of voting exceeds any benefit to clients. Moreover, ERISA fiduciaries, in voting proxies or exercising other shareholder rights, must not subordinate the economic interests of plan participants and beneficiaries to unrelated objectives. These matters are left to the discretion of the relevant portfolio manager. Such circumstances could include, for example:

| • |  | In some countries the exercise of voting rights imposes temporary transfer restrictions on the related securities (“share blocking”). Invesco generally refrains from voting proxies in share blocking countries unless Invesco determines that the benefit to the client(s) of voting a specific proxy outweighs the client’s temporary inability to sell the security.

| • |  | Some companies require a representative to attend meetings in person to vote a proxy, additional documentation or the disclosure of beneficial owner details to vote. Invesco may determine that the costs of sending a representative, signing a power-of-attorney or submitting additional disclosures outweigh the benefit of voting a particular proxy.

| • |  | Invesco may not receive proxy materials from the relevant fund or client custodian with sufficient time and information to make an informed independent voting decision.

| • |  | Invesco held shares on the record date but has sold them prior to the meeting date.

In some non-U.S. jurisdictions, although Invesco uses reasonable efforts to vote a proxy, proxies may not be accepted or rejected due to changes in the agenda for a shareholder meeting for which Invesco does not have sufficient notice, a proxy voting service may not be offered by the custodian in the local market or due to operational issues experienced by third-parties involved in the process or by the issuer or sub-custodian. In addition, despite the best efforts of Invesco and its proxy voting agent, there may be instances where our votes may not be received or properly tabulated by an issuer or the issuer’s agent.

| F. | Securities Lending

Invesco’s funds may occasionally participate in a securities lending program. In circumstances where shares are on loan, the voting rights of those shares are transferred to the borrower. If the security in question is on loan as part of a securities lending program, Invesco may determine that the benefit to the client of voting a particular proxy outweighs the benefits of securities lending. In those instances, Invesco may determine to recall securities that are on loan prior to the meeting record date, so that we will be entitled to vote those shares. There may be instances where Invesco may be unable to recall shares or may choose not to recall shares. The relevant portfolio manager will make these determinations.

| G. | Conflicts of Interest

There may be occasions where voting proxies may present a perceived or actual conflict of interest between Invesco, as investment manager, and one or more of Invesco’s clients or vendors.

Firm-Level Conflicts of interest

A conflict of interest may exist if Invesco has a material business relationship with either the company soliciting a proxy or a third party that has a material interest in the outcome of a proxy vote or that is actively lobbying for a particular outcome of a proxy vote. Such relationships may include, among others, a client relationship, serving as a vendor whose products / services are material or significant to Invesco, serving as a distributor of Invesco’s products, a significant research provider or broker to Invesco.

Invesco identifies potential conflicts of interest based on a variety of factors, including but not limited to the materiality of the relationship between the issuer or its affiliates to Invesco.

Invesco’s proxy administration team maintains a list of all such issuers for which a conflict of interest exists (“Global Conflicts List”). Material firm-level conflicts of interests are identified by individuals and groups within Invesco globally based on criteria established by the proxy administration team. The Global Conflicts List is updated periodically by the proxy administration team so as to seek to ensure an updated view is available when conducting conflicts checks. Operating procedures and associated governance are designed to seek to ensure conflicts of interest are appropriately considered ahead of voting proxies. The Global IPAC Conflict of Interest Sub-committee maintains oversight of the process. Companies on the Global Conflicts List will be voted in line with the principles below as implemented by Invesco’s internally developed voting guidelines. To the extent a portfolio manager disagrees with the Policy, our processes and procedures seek to ensure justification and rationales are fully documented and presented to the Global IPAC Sub-committee for a majority vote of its members.

As an additional safeguard, persons from Invesco’s marketing, distribution and other customer-facing functions may not serve on the Global IPAC. For the avoidance of doubt, Invesco may not consider Invesco Ltd.’s pecuniary interest when voting proxies on behalf of clients. To avoid any appearance of a conflict of interest, Invesco will not vote proxies issued by Invesco Ltd. that may be held in client accounts.

Personal Conflicts of Interest

A conflict also may exist where an Invesco employee has a known personal or business relationship with other proponents of proxy proposals, participants in proxy contests, corporate directors, or candidates for directorships. Under Invesco’s Global Code of Conduct, Invesco entities and individuals must act in the best interests of clients and must avoid any situation that gives rise to an actual or perceived conflict of interest.

All Invesco personnel with proxy voting responsibilities are required to report any known personal or business conflicts of interest regarding proxy issues with which they are involved. In such instances, the individual(s) with the conflict will be excluded from the decision-making process relating to such issues.

Voting Fund of Funds

There may be conflicts that can arise from Invesco voting on matters when shares of Invesco-sponsored funds are held by other Invesco funds or entities. The scenarios below set out how Invesco votes in these instances.

| • |  | In the United States, as required by law, proportional voting applies.

| • |  | Shares of an Invesco-sponsored fund held by other Invesco funds will be voted in the same proportion as the votes of external shareholders of the underlying fund, where required by law.

| • |  | Shares of an unaffiliated registered fund held by one or more Invesco funds will be voted in the same proportion as the votes of external shareholders of the underlying fund where the thresholds are met as required by federal securities law or any exemption therefrom.

| • |  | To the extent proportional voting is required by law, but not operationally possible, Invesco will not vote the shares.

| • |  | For US fund of funds where proportional voting is not required by law, Invesco will still apply proportional voting. In the event this is not operationally possible, Invesco will vote in line with our internally developed voting guidelines (as defined below).

| • |  | For non-US fund of funds Invesco will vote in line with our above-mentioned firm-level conflicts of interest process unless we have local policies in place as per Exhibit A.

| H. | Use of Third-Party Proxy Advisory Services

Invesco may supplement its internal research with information from independent third-parties, such as proxy advisory firms. Globally, Invesco leverages research from Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS”) and Glass Lewis (“GL”). Invesco generally retains full and independent discretion with respect to proxy voting decisions.

ISS and GL both provide research reports, including vote recommendations, to Invesco and its portfolio managers and analysts. Invesco retains ISS to provide recommendations based on Invesco’s internally developed custom guidelines. Updates to previously issued proxy research reports may be provided to incorporate newly available information or additional disclosure provided by the issuer regarding a matter to be voted on, or to correct factual errors which may result in the issuance of revised proxy vote recommendations. Invesco’s proxy administration team may periodically monitor for these research alerts issued by ISS and GL that are shared with our investment teams. There may be instances where these updates may not be provided in a timely manner ahead of the vote deadline.

Invesco also retains ISS to assist with services that include receipt of proxy ballots, vote execution through PROXYintel and vote disclosure in Canada, the UK and Europe to meet regulatory reporting obligations.

As part of its fiduciary obligation to clients, Invesco performs extensive initial and ongoing due diligence on the proxy advisory firms it engages globally. This includes reviews of information regarding the capabilities of their research staff, methodologies for formulating voting recommendations, the adequacy and quality of personnel and technology, as applicable, and internal controls, policies and procedures, including those relating to possible conflicts of interest.

The proxy advisory firms Invesco engages globally complete an annual due diligence questionnaire submitted by Invesco, and Invesco conducts annual due diligence meetings in part to discuss their responses to the questionnaire. In addition, Invesco monitors and communicates with these firms and monitors their compliance with Invesco’s performance and policy standards. ISS and GL disclose conflicts to Invesco through a review of their policies, procedures and practices regarding potential conflicts of interests (including inherent internal conflicts) as well as disclosure of the work ISS and GL perform for corporate issuers and the payments they receive from such issuers. Invesco conducts semi-annual roundtables with external proxy and governance experts and our Global IPAC to ensure transparency, dialogue and engagement

with the firms. These meetings provide Invesco with an opportunity to assess the firms’ capabilities, conflicts of interest and service levels, as well as provide investment professionals with direct insight into the advisory firms’ stances on key governance and proxy topics and their policy framework/methodologies.

Invesco’s compliance function completes a review of the System and Organizational Controls (“SOC”) Reports for each proxy advisory firm to ensure the related controls operated effectively to provide reasonable assurance.

In addition to ISS and GL, Invesco may use regional third-party research providers to access regionally specific research.

| I. | Review of Policy

The Global IPAC and Invesco’s Global ESG team, proxy administration team, compliance and legal teams annually communicate and review this Policy and our internally developed voting guidelines to seek to ensure that they remain consistent with clients’ best interests, regulatory requirements, governance trends and industry best practices. At least annually, this Policy and our internally developed voting guidelines are reviewed by various groups within Invesco to ensure that they remain consistent with Invesco’s views on best practice in corporate governance and long-term investment stewardship.

III. | Our Good Governance Principles

Invesco’s good governance principles outline our views on best practice in corporate governance and long-term investment stewardship. These principles have been developed by our global investment teams in collaboration with the Global ESG team. The broad philosophy and guiding principles in this section inform our approach to investment stewardship and proxy voting. These principles are not intended to be exhaustive or prescriptive.

Our portfolio managers and analysts retain full discretion on vote execution except where otherwise specified in this Policy. The final voting decisions may incorporate the unique circumstances affecting companies, regional best practices and any dialogue we have had with company management. To the extent a portfolio manager chooses to vote a proxy in a way that is not aligned with the principles below, such manager’s rationales are fully documented.

The following guiding principles apply to operating companies. We apply a separate approach to investment companies and unit investment trusts. Where appropriate, these guidelines are supplemented by additional internal guidance that considers regional variations in best practices, disclosure and region-specific voting items.

The following are high-level governance principles that Invesco endorses:

| A. | Transparency

Investors require accurate, timely and complete information in order to make informed investment decisions and effectively carry out their stewardship obligations. Invesco supports the highest standards in corporate transparency, including but not limited to the following areas:

Financial reporting: Company accounts and reporting must accurately reflect the underlying economic position of a company. Arrangements that may constitute an actual or perceived conflict with this objective should be avoided.

| • |  | We will generally vote against the incumbent audit committee chair, or nearest equivalent, where the non-audit fees paid to the independent auditor exceed audit fees for two consecutive years or other problematic accounting practices are identified such as fraud, misapplication of audit standards or persistent material weaknesses/deficiencies in internal controls over financial reporting.

| • |  | We will generally not support the ratification of the independent auditor and/or ratification of their fees payable if non-audit fees exceed audit and audit related fees or

| there are significant auditing controversies or questions regarding the independence of the external auditor. We will consider an auditor’s length of service as a company’s independent auditor in applying this policy.

| B. | Accountability

Robust shareholder rights and strong board oversight help ensure that management adhere to the highest standards of ethical conduct, are held to account for poor performance and responsibly deliver value creation for stakeholders over the long-term. We therefore encourage companies to adopt governance features that ensure board and management accountability. In particular, we consider the following as key mechanisms for enhancing accountability to investors:

One share one vote: Voting rights are an important tool for investors to hold boards and management teams accountable. Unequal voting rights may limit the ability of investors to exercise their stewardship obligations.

| • |  | We generally do not support proposals that establish or perpetuate dual classes of voting shares, double voting rights or other means of differentiated voting or disproportionate board nomination rights.

| • |  | We generally support proposals to decommission differentiated voting rights.

| • |  | Where unequal voting rights are established, we expect these to be accompanied by reasonable safeguards to protect minority shareholders’ interests.

Anti-takeover devices: Mechanisms designed to prevent or unduly delay takeover attempts may unduly limit the accountability of boards and management teams to shareholders.

| • |  | We generally will not support proposals to adopt antitakeover devices such as poison pills. Exceptions may be warranted at entities without significant operations and to preserve the value of net operating losses carried forward or where the applicability of the pill is limited in scope and duration.

| • |  | In addition, we will generally not support capital authorizations or amendments to corporate articles or bylaws at operating companies that may be utilized for antitakeover purposes, for example, the authorization of classes of shares of preferred stock with unspecified voting, dividend, conversion or other rights (“blank check” authorizations).

Shareholder rights: We support the rights of shareholders to hold boards and management teams accountable for company performance. We generally support best practice aligned proposals to enhance shareholder rights, including but not limited to the following:

| • |  | Adoption of proxy access rights

| • |  | Rights to call special meetings

| • |  | Rights to act by written consent

| • |  | Reduce supermajority vote requirements

| • |  | Remove antitakeover provisions

| • |  | Requirement that directors are elected by a majority vote

In addition, we oppose practices that limit shareholders’ ability to express their views at a general meeting such as bundling unrelated proposals or several significant article or bylaw amendments into a single voting item. We will generally vote against these proposals unless we are satisfied that all the underlying components are aligned with our views on best practice.

Director Indemnification: Invesco recognizes that individuals may be reluctant to serve as corporate directors if they are personally liable for all related lawsuits and legal costs. As a

result, reasonable limitations on directors’ liability can benefit a company and its shareholders by helping to attract and retain qualified directors while preserving recourse for shareholders in the event of misconduct by directors. Accordingly, unless there is insufficient information to make a decision about the nature of the proposal, Invesco will generally support proposals to limit directors’ liability and provide indemnification and/or exculpation, provided that the arrangements are reasonably limited in scope to directors acting in good faith and, in relation to criminal matters, limited in scope to directors having reasonable grounds for believing the conduct was lawful.

Responsiveness: Boards should respond to investor concerns in a timely fashion, including reasonable requests to engage with company representatives regarding such concerns, and address matters that receive significant voting dissent at general meetings of shareholders.

| • |  | We will generally vote against the lead independent director and/or the incumbent chair of the governance committee, or nearest equivalent, in cases where the board has not adequately responded to items receiving significant voting opposition from shareholders at an annual or extraordinary general meeting.

| • |  | We will generally vote against the lead independent director and/or incumbent chair of the governance committee, or nearest equivalent, where the board has not adequately responded to a shareholder proposal which has received significant support from shareholders.

| • |  | We will generally vote against the incumbent chair of the compensation committee if there are significant ongoing concerns with a company’s compensation practices that have not been addressed by the committee or egregious concerns with the company’s compensation practices for two years consecutively.

| • |  | In addition, we will generally vote against the incumbent compensation committee chair where there are ongoing concerns with a company’s compensation practices and there is no opportunity to express dissatisfaction by voting against an advisory vote on executive compensation, remuneration report (or policy) or nearest equivalent.

| C. | Board Composition

Annual director elections: Board members should generally stand for election annually and individually.

| • |  | We will generally support proposals requesting that directors stand for election annually.

| • |  | We will generally vote against the incumbent governance committee chair or lead independent director if a company has a declassified board structure that is not being phased out. This policy will not apply in regions where market practice is for directors to stand for election on a staggered basis or for boards that do not oversee significant commercial operations.

| • |  | When a board is presented for election as a slate (i.e., shareholders are unable to vote against individual nominees and must vote for or against the entire nominated slate of directors) and this approach is not aligned with local market practice, we will generally vote against the slate in cases where we otherwise would vote against an individual nominee.

| • |  | Where market practice is to elect directors as a slate we will generally support the nominated slate unless there are governance concerns with several of the individuals included on the slate or we have broad concerns with the composition of the board such as a lack independence.

Board size: We will generally defer to the board with respect to determining the optimal number of board members, provided that the proposed board size is sufficiently large to represent shareholder interests and sufficiently limited to remain effective.

Definition of independence: Invesco considers local market definitions of director

independence but applies a proprietary standard for assessing director independence considering a director’s status as a current or former employee of the business, any commercial or consulting relationships with the company, the level of shares beneficially owned or represented and familial relationships, among others.

Board and committee independence: The board of directors, board committees and regional equivalents should be sufficiently independent from management, substantial shareholders and conflicts of interest. We consider local market practices in this regard and in general we look for a balance across the board of directors. Above all, we like to see signs of robust challenge and discussion in the boardroom.

| • |  | We will generally vote against one or more non-independent directors when a board is less than majority independent, but we will take into account local market practice with regards to board independence in limited circumstances where this standard is not appropriate.

| • |  | We will generally vote against non-independent directors serving on the audit committee.

| • |  | We will generally vote against non-independent directors serving on the compensation committee.

| • |  | We will generally vote against non-independent directors serving on the nominating committee.

| • |  | In relation to the board, compensation committee and nominating committee we will consider the appropriateness of significant shareholder representation in applying this policy. This exception will generally not apply to the audit committee.

Separation of Chair and CEO roles: We believe that independent board leadership generally enhances management accountability to investors. Companies deviating from this best practice should provide a strong justification and establish safeguards to ensure that there is independent oversight of a board’s activities (e.g., by appointing a lead or senior independent director with clearly defined powers and responsibilities).

| • |  | We will generally vote against the incumbent nominating committee chair where the board chair is not independent unless a lead independent or senior director is appointed.

| • |  | We will generally support shareholder proposals requesting that the board chair be an independent director.

| • |  | We will generally not vote against a CEO or executive serving as board chair solely on the basis of this issue, however, we may do so in instances where we have significant concerns regarding a company’s corporate governance, capital allocation decisions and/or compensation practices.

Attendance and over boarding: Directors serving on the board should attend at least 75% of their board and committee meetings, where applicable. In addition, directors should not have excessive external board or managerial commitments that may interfere with their ability to execute the duties of a director.

| • |  | We will generally vote against directors who do not attend 75% of their meetings unless there are extenuating circumstances such as health matters or family emergencies.

| • |  | We will generally vote against directors who have more than four total mandates at public operating companies. We apply a lower threshold for directors with significant commitments such as executive positions and chairmanships.

Diversity: We encourage companies to continue to evolve diversity and inclusion practices. Boards should be comprised of directors with a variety of relevant skills and industry expertise together with a diverse profile of individuals of different genders, ethnicities, skills, tenures and backgrounds in order to provide robust challenge and debate. We consider diversity at the board level, within the executive management team and in the succession pipeline.

| • |  | We will generally vote against the incumbent nominating committee chair of a board where women constitute less than two board members or 25% of the board, whichever is lower, for two or more consecutive years, unless incremental improvements are being made to diversity practices.

| • |  | In addition, we will consider a company’s performance on broader types of diversity which may include diversity of skills, non-executive director tenure, ethnicity or other factors where appropriate and reasonably determinable. We will generally vote against the incumbent nominating committee chair if there are multiple concerns on diversity issues.

| • |  | We generally believe that an individual board’s nominating committee is best positioned to determine whether director term limits would be an appropriate measure to help achieve these goals and, if so, the nature of such limits. Invesco generally opposes proposals to limit the tenure of outside directors through mandatory retirement ages.

| D. | Long Term Stewardship of Capital

Capital allocation: Invesco expects companies to responsibly raise and deploy capital towards the long-term, sustainable success of the business. In addition, we expect capital allocation authorizations and decisions to be made with due regard to shareholder dilution, rights of shareholders to ratify significant corporate actions and pre-emptive rights, where applicable.

Share issuance and repurchase authorizations: We generally support authorizations to issue shares up to 20% of a company’s issued share capital for general corporate purposes. Shares should not be issued at a substantial discount to the market price or be repurchased at a substantial premium to the market price.

Stock splits: We generally support management proposals to implement a forward or reverse stock split, provided that a reverse stock split is not being used to take a company private. In addition, we will generally support requests to increase a company’s common stock authorization if requested in order to facilitate a stock split.

Increases in authorized share capital: We will generally support proposals to increase a company’s number of authorized common and/or preferred shares, provided we have not identified concerns regarding a company’s historical share issuance activity or the potential to use these authorizations for antitakeover purposes. We will consider the amount of the request in relation to the company’s current authorized share capital, any proposed corporate transactions contingent on approval of these requests and the cumulative impact on a company’s authorized share capital, for example, if a reverse stock split is concurrently submitted for shareholder consideration.

Mergers, acquisitions, proxy contests, disposals and other corporate transactions: Invesco’s investment teams will review proposed corporate transactions including mergers, acquisitions, reorganizations, proxy contests, private placements, dissolutions and divestitures based on a proposal’s individual investment merits. In addition, we broadly approach voting on other corporate transactions as follows:

| • |  | We will generally support proposals to approve different types of restructurings that provide the necessary financing to save the company from involuntary bankruptcy.

| • |  | We will generally support proposals to enact corporate name changes and other proposals related to corporate transactions that we believe are in shareholders’ best interests.

| • |  | We will generally support reincorporation proposals, provided that management have provided a compelling rationale for the change in legal jurisdiction and provided further that the proposal will not significantly adversely impact shareholders’ rights.

| • |  | With respect to contested director elections, we consider the following factors, among others, when evaluating the merits of each list of nominees: the long term performance of the company relative to its industry, management’s track record, any relevant

| background information related to the contest, the qualifications of the respective lists of director nominees, the strategic merits of the approaches proposed by both sides including the likelihood that the proposed goals can be met, positions of stock ownership in the company.

| E. | Environmental, Social and Governance Risk Oversight

Director responsibility for risk oversight: The board of directors are ultimately responsible for overseeing management and ensuring that proper governance, oversight and control mechanisms are in place at the companies they oversee. Invesco may take voting action against director nominees in response to material governance or risk oversight failures that adversely affect shareholder value.

Invesco considers the adequacy of a company’s response to material oversight failures when determining whether any voting action is warranted. In addition, Invesco will consider the responsibilities delegated to board subcommittees when determining if it is appropriate to hold certain director nominees accountable for these material failures.

Material governance or risk oversight failures at a company may include, without limitation:

| i. | significant bribery, corruption or ethics violations;

| ii. | events causing significant environmental degradation;

| iii. | significant health and safety incidents; or

| iv. | failure to ensure the protection of human rights.

Reporting of financially material ESG information: Companies should report on their environmental, social and governance opportunities and risks where material to their business operations.

| • |  | Where Invesco finds significant gaps in terms of management and disclosure of environmental, social and governance risk policies, we will generally vote against the annual reporting and accounts or an equivalent resolution.

Shareholder proposals addressing environmental and social risks: Invesco may support shareholder resolutions requesting that specific actions be taken to address environmental and social issues or mitigate exposure to material environmental and social risks, including reputational risk, related to these issues. When considering such proposals, we will consider a company’s track record managing these risks, the efficacy of the proposal’s request and whether the requested action is unduly burdensome.

| • |  | We generally do not support resolutions where insufficient information has been provided in advance of the vote or a lack of disclosure inhibits our ability to make fully informed voting decisions.

| • |  | We will generally support shareholder resolutions requesting that companies provide additional information on material environmental, social and governance risks facing their businesses, provided that such requests are not unduly burdensome or duplicative with a company’s existing reporting. These may include but are not limited to the following: gender pay gap reporting requests, political contributions and lobbying disclosure, information on data security, privacy, and internet practices, and reporting on climate change risks.

Ratification of board and/or management acts: We will generally support proposals to ratify the actions of the board of directors, supervisory board and/or executive decision-making bodies, provided there are no material oversight failures as described above. When such oversight concerns are identified, we will consider a company’s response to any issues raised and may vote against ratification proposals instead of, or in addition to, director nominees.

| F. | Executive Compensation and Alignment

Invesco supports compensation polices and equity incentive plans that promote alignment between management incentives and shareholders’ long-term interests. We pay close attention to local market practice and may apply stricter or modified criteria where appropriate.

Advisory votes on executive compensation, remuneration policy and remuneration reports: We will generally not support compensation related proposals where more than one of the following is present:

| i. | there is an unmitigated misalignment between executive pay and company performance for at least two consecutive years;

| ii. | there are problematic compensation practices which may include among others incentivizing excessive risk taking or circumventing alignment between management and shareholders’ interests via repricing of underwater options;

| iii. | vesting periods for long term incentive awards are less than three years;

| iv. | the company “front loads” equity awards;

| v. | there are inadequate risk mitigating features in the program such as clawback provisions;

| vi. | excessive, discretionary one-time equity grants are awarded to executives;

| vii. | less than half of variable pay is linked to performance targets, except where prohibited by law.

Invesco will consider company reporting on pay ratios as part of our evaluation of compensation proposals, where relevant.

Equity plans: Invesco generally supports equity compensation plans that promote the proper alignment of incentives with shareholders’ long-term interests, and generally votes against plans that are overly dilutive to existing shareholders, plans that contain objectionable structural features which may include provisions to reprice options without shareholder approval, plans that include evergreen provisions or plans that provide for automatic accelerated vesting upon a change in control.

Employee stock purchase plans: We generally support employee stock purchase plans that are reasonably designed to provide proper incentives to a broad base of employees, provided that the price at which employees may acquire stock represents a reasonable discount from the market price.

Severance Arrangements: Invesco considers proposed severance arrangements (sometimes known as “golden parachute” arrangements) on a case-by-case basis due to the wide variety among their terms. Invesco acknowledges that in some cases such arrangements, if reasonable, may be in shareholders’ best interests as a method of attracting and retaining high quality executive talent. We generally vote in favor of proposals requiring shareholder ratification of senior executives’ severance agreements where the proposed terms and disclosure align with good market practice.

Exhibit A

Invesco Advisers, Inc.

Invesco Asset Management (India) Pvt. Ltd*1

Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited*1

Invesco Asset Management (Schweiz) AG

Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH

Invesco Asset Management Limited1

Invesco Asset Management Singapore Ltd

Invesco Asset Management Spain

Invesco Australia Ltd

Invesco Canada Ltd.1

Invesco Capital Management LLC

Invesco Capital Markets, Inc.*1

Invesco Hong Kong Limited

Invesco Investment Advisers LLC

Invesco Investment Management (Shanghai) Limited

Invesco Investment Management Limited

Invesco Managed Accounts, LLC

Invesco Management S.A

Invesco Overseas Investment Fund Management (Shanghai) Limited

Invesco Pensions Limited

Invesco Private Capital, Inc.

Invesco Real Estate Management S.a.r.l1

Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc.

Invesco Taiwan Ltd*1

Invesco Trust Company

Oppenheimer Funds, Inc.

WL Ross & Co. LLC

* | Invesco entities with specific proxy voting guidelines

1 | Invesco entities with specific conflicts of interest policies

ITEM 8. | PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

As of February 28, 2021, the following individuals are jointly and primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Trust:

| • |  | Mark Paris, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Trust since 2015 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2010.

| • |  | John Connelly, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Trust since 2016 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2016.

| • |  | Joshua Cooney, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Trust since 2021 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 1999.

| • |  | Tim O’Reilly, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Trust since 2016 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2010.

| • |  | James Phillips, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Trust since 2015 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2010.

| • |  | John Schorle, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Trust since 2018 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2010.

| • |  | Rebecca Setcavage, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Trust since 2021 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2019. Ms. Setcavage was associated with OppenheimerFunds, a global asset management firm, since 2017. From 2004 to 2017, she was employed by T. Rowe Price where she last served as a Portfolio Investment Analyst.

| • |  | Julius Williams, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Trust since 2015 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2010.

Portfolio Manager Fund Holdings and Information on Other Managed Accounts

Invesco’s portfolio managers develop investment models which are used in connection with the management of certain Invesco Funds as well as other mutual funds for which Invesco or an affiliate acts as sub-adviser, other pooled investment vehicles that are not registered mutual funds, and other accounts managed for organizations and individuals. The ‘Investments’ chart reflects the portfolio managers’ investments in the Fund(s) that they manage and includes investments in the Fund’s shares beneficially owned by a portfolio manager, as determined in accordance with Rule 16a-1(a)(2) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (beneficial ownership includes ownership by a portfolio manager’s immediate family members sharing the same household). The ‘Assets Managed’ chart reflects information regarding accounts other than the Funds for which each portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities. Accounts are grouped into three categories: (i) other registered investment companies; (ii) other pooled investment vehicles; and (iii) other accounts. To the extent that any of these accounts pay advisory fees that are based on account performance (performance-based fees), information on those accounts is specifically noted. In addition, any assets denominated in foreign currencies have been converted into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates as of the applicable date.

Investments

The following information is as of February 28, 2021 (unless otherwise noted):

Portfolio Managers |  | Dollar Range of Investments in the Fund |
Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust |
Mark Paris |  |  | None |
John Connelly |  |  | None |
Joshua Cooney1 |  |  | None |
Tim O’Reilly |  |  | None |
James Phillips |  |  | None |
John Schorle |  |  | None |
Rebecca Setcavage1 |  |  | None |
Julius Williams |  |  | None |

Assets Managed

The following information is as of February 28, 2021 (unless otherwise noted):

Portfolio Manager |  | Other Registered Investment Companies Managed |  |  | Other Pooled Investment Vehicles Managed |  |  | Other Accounts Managed |
| Number of Accounts |  | Assets (in millions) |  |  | Number of Accounts |  |  | Assets (in millions) |  |  | Number of Accounts |  |  | Assets (in millions) |
Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust |
Mark Paris |  | 25 |  | $ | 52,836.9 |  |  |  | None |  |  |  | None |  |  |  | 3 | 2 |  | $ | 71.6 | 2
John Connelly |  | 14 |  | $ | 26,978.6 |  |  |  | None |  |  |  | None |  |  |  | 3 | 2 |  | $ | 71.6 | 2
Joshua Cooney1 |  | 6 |  | $ | 12,233.6 |  |  |  | None |  |  |  | None |  |  |  | None |  |  |  | None |
Tim O’Reilly |  | 24 |  | $ | 52,691.9 |  |  |  | None |  |  |  | None |  |  |  | 3 | 2 |  | $ | 71.6 | 2
James Phillips |  | 14 |  | $ | 26,978.6 |  |  |  | None |  |  |  | None |  |  |  | 3 | 2 |  | $ | 71.6 | 2
John Schorle |  | 14 |  | $ | 26,978.6 |  |  |  | None |  |  |  | None |  |  |  | 3 | 2 |  | $ | 71.6 | 2
Rebecca Setcavage1 |  | 3 |  | $ | 7,793.1 |  |  |  | None |  |  |  | None |  |  |  | None |  |  |  | None |
Julius Williams |  | 24 |  | $ | 52,691.9 |  |  |  | None |  |  |  | None |  |  |  | 3 | 2 |  | $ | 71.6 | 2

Potential Conflicts of Interest

Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one Fund or other account. More specifically, portfolio managers who manage multiple Funds and/or other accounts may be presented with one or more of the following potential conflicts:

| • |  | The management of multiple Funds and/or other accounts may result in a portfolio manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of each Fund and/or other account. The Adviser and each Sub-Adviser seek to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio

1 | The Portfolio Manager began serving on the Fund effective March 12, 2021.

2 | These are accounts of individual investors for which Invesco provides investment advice. Invesco offers separately managed accounts that are managed according to the investment models developed by its portfolio managers and used in connection with the management of certain Invesco Funds. These accounts may be invested in accordance with one or more of those investment models and investments held in those accounts are traded in accordance with the applicable models.

| managers by having portfolio managers focus on a particular investment discipline. Most other accounts managed by a portfolio manager are managed using the same investment models that are used in connection with the management of the Funds.

| • |  | If a portfolio manager identifies a limited investment opportunity which may be suitable for more than one Fund or other account, a Fund may not be able to take full advantage of that opportunity due to an allocation of filled purchase or sale orders across all eligible Funds and other accounts. To deal with these situations, the Adviser, each Sub-Adviser and the Funds have adopted procedures for allocating portfolio transactions across multiple accounts.

| • |  | The Adviser and each Sub-Adviser determine which broker to use to execute each order for securities transactions for the Funds, consistent with its duty to seek best execution of the transaction. However, for certain other accounts (such as mutual funds for which Invesco or an affiliate acts as sub-adviser, other pooled investment vehicles that are not registered mutual funds, and other accounts managed for organizations and individuals), the Adviser and each Sub-Adviser may be limited by the client with respect to the selection of brokers or may be instructed to direct trades through a particular broker. In these cases, trades for a Fund in a particular security may be placed separately from, rather than aggregated with, such other accounts. Having separate transactions with respect to a security may temporarily affect the market price of the security or the execution of the transaction, or both, to the possible detriment of the Fund or other account(s) involved.

| • |  | Finally, the appearance of a conflict of interest may arise where the Adviser or Sub-Adviser has an incentive, such as a performance-based management fee, which relates to the management of one Fund or account but not all Funds and accounts for which a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities. None of the Invesco Fund accounts managed have a performance fee.

The Adviser, each Sub-Adviser, and the Funds have adopted certain compliance procedures which are designed to address these types of conflicts. However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.

Description of Compensation Structure

For the Adviser and each Sub-Adviser

The Adviser and each Sub-Adviser seek to maintain a compensation program that is competitively positioned to attract and retain high-caliber investment professionals. Portfolio managers receive a base salary, an incentive cash bonus opportunity and a deferred compensation opportunity. Portfolio manager compensation is reviewed and may be modified each year as appropriate to reflect changes in the market, as well as to adjust the factors used to determine bonuses to promote competitive Fund performance. The Adviser and each Sub-Adviser evaluate competitive market compensation by reviewing compensation survey results conducted by an independent third party of investment industry compensation. Each portfolio manager’s compensation consists of the following three elements:

Base Salary. Each portfolio manager is paid a base salary. In setting the base salary, the Adviser and each Sub-Adviser’s intention is to be competitive in light of the particular portfolio manager’s experience and responsibilities.

Annual Bonus. The portfolio managers are eligible, along with other employees of the Adviser and each Sub-Adviser, to participate in a discretionary year-end bonus pool. The Compensation Committee of Invesco Ltd. reviews and approves the firm-wide bonus pool based upon progress against strategic objectives and annual operating plan, including investment performance and financial results. In addition, while having no direct impact on individual bonuses, assets under management are considered when determining the starting bonus funding levels. Each portfolio manager is eligible to receive an annual cash bonus which is based on quantitative (i.e. investment performance) and non-quantitative factors (which may include, but are not limited to, individual performance, risk management and teamwork).

Each portfolio manager’s compensation is linked to the pre-tax investment performance of the Funds/accounts managed by the portfolio manager as described in Table 1 below.

Table 1

Sub-Adviser |  | Performance time period3
Invesco 4 Invesco Deutschland Invesco Hong Kong4 Invesco Asset Management Invesco India Invesco Listed Real Assets Division4 |  | One-, Three- and Five-year performance against Fund peer group
Invesco Senior Secured4, 5 Invesco Capital4, 6 |  | Not applicable
Invesco Canada4 |  | One-year performance against Fund peer group Three- and Five-year performance against entire universe of Canadian funds
Invesco Japan |  | One-, Three- and Five-year performance

High investment performance (against applicable peer group and/or benchmarks) would deliver compensation generally associated with top pay in the industry (determined by reference to the third-party provided compensation survey information) and poor investment performance (versus applicable peer group) would result in low bonus compared to the applicable peer group or no bonus at all. These decisions are reviewed and approved collectively by senior leadership which has responsibility for executing the compensation approach across the organization.

With respect to Invesco Capital, there is no policy regarding, or agreement with, the Portfolio Managers or any other senior executive of the Adviser to receive bonuses or any other compensation in connection with the performance of any of the accounts managed by the Portfolio Managers.

Deferred / Long Term Compensation. Portfolio managers may be granted a deferred compensation award based on a firm-wide bonus pool approved by the Compensation Committee of Invesco Ltd. Deferred compensation awards may take the form of annual deferral awards or long-term equity awards. Annual deferral awards may be granted as an annual stock deferral award or an annual fund deferral award. Annual stock deferral awards are settled in Invesco Ltd. common shares. Annual fund deferral awards are notionally invested in certain Invesco Funds selected by the Portfolio Manager and are settled in cash. Long-term equity awards are settled in Invesco Ltd. common shares. Both annual deferral awards and long-term equity awards have a four-year ratable vesting schedule. The vesting period aligns the interests of the Portfolio Managers with the long-term interests of clients and shareholders and encourages retention.

Retirement and health and welfare arrangements. Portfolio managers are eligible to participate in retirement and health and welfare plans and programs that are available generally to all employees.

3 | Rolling time periods based on calendar year-end.

4 | Portfolio Managers may be granted an annual deferral award that vests on a pro-rata basis over a four-year period.

5 | Invesco Senior Secured’s bonus is based on annual measures of equity return and standard tests of collateralization performance.

6 | Portfolio Managers for Invesco Capital base their bonus on Invesco results as well as overall performance of Invesco Capital.

ITEM 9. | PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 10. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

None

ITEM 11. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

| (a) | As of April 19, 2021, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the officers of the Registrant, including the PEO and PFO, to assess the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures, as that term is defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”), as amended. Based on that evaluation, the Registrant’s officers, including the PEO and PFO, concluded that, as of April 19, 2021, the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were reasonably designed to ensure: (1) that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission; and (2) that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to the PEO and PFO as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

| (b) | There have been no changes in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 12. | DISCLOSURE OF SECURITIES LENDING ACTIVITIES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Not applicable.

ITEM 13. | EXHIBITS.

13(a) (1) |  | Code of Ethics.
13(a) (2) |  | Certifications of principal executive officer and principal financial officer as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
13(a) (3) |  | Not applicable.
13(a) (4) |  | Not applicable.
13(b) |  | Certifications of principal executive officer and principal financial officer as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Registrant: Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

By: |  | /s/ Sheri Morris
|  | Sheri Morris
|  | Principal Executive Officer

Date: May 7, 2021

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By: |  | /s/ Sheri Morris
|  | Sheri Morris
|  | Principal Executive Officer

Date: May 7, 2021

By: |  | /s/ Adrien Deberghes
|  | Adrien Deberghes
|  | Principal Financial Officer

Date: May 7, 2021