XML 38 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Employee Benefits
12 Months Ended
Jan. 02, 2016
Compensation and Retirement Disclosure [Abstract]  
Employee Benefits
Employee Benefits
Single-Employer Defined Benefit Pension Plan
Some of our hourly employees participate in a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan administered solely by us (the “pension plan”). Our funding policy for the pension plan is based on actuarial calculations and the applicable requirements of federal law. Benefits under the pension plan primarily are related to years of service.
The following tables set forth the change in projected benefit obligation and the change in plan assets for the pension plan:
 
January 2,
2016
 
January 3,
2015
 
(In thousands)
Change in projected benefit obligation:
 
 
 
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of period
$
121,955

 
$
104,924

Service cost
1,104

 
1,056

Interest cost
5,099

 
5,123

Actuarial (gain) loss
(8,460
)
 
15,797

Curtailment gain
(272
)
 

Benefits paid
(4,371
)
 
(4,945
)
Projected benefit obligation at end of period
115,055

 
121,955

Change in plan assets:
 

 
 

Fair value of assets at beginning of period
80,192

 
77,039

Actual return on plan assets
(2,820
)
 
3,422

Employer contributions
5,263

 
4,676

Benefits paid
(4,371
)
 
(4,945
)
Fair value of assets at end of period
78,264

 
80,192

Net (unfunded) status of plan
$
(36,791
)
 
$
(41,763
)

We recognize the unfunded status (i.e., the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligations) of our pension plan in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax. On January 2, 2016, we measured the fair value of our plan assets and benefit obligations. As of January 2, 2016, and January 3, 2015, the net unfunded status of our benefit plan was $36.8 million and $41.8 million, respectively.
Actuarial gains and losses occur when actual experience differs from the estimates used to determine the components of net periodic pension cost, and when certain assumptions used to determine the fair value of the plan assets or projected benefit obligation are updated; including but not limited to, changes in the discount rate, plan amendments, differences between actual and expected returns on plan assets, mortality assumptions, and plan remeasurement.
We amortize a portion of unrecognized actuarial gains and losses for the pension plan into our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The amount recognized in the current year’s operations is based on amortizing the unrecognized gains or losses for the pension plan that exceed the larger of 10% of the projected benefit obligation or the fair value of plan assets, also known as the corridor. In the current fiscal year, the amount representing the unrecognized gain or loss that exceeds the corridor is amortized over the estimated average remaining life expectancy of participants, as almost all the participants in the plan are inactive.
The net adjustment to other comprehensive loss for fiscal 2015, fiscal 2014, and fiscal 2013 was a $0.4 million gain, $17.7 million loss; and a $13.9 million gain ($22.8 million gain, net of tax of $8.9 million), primarily from the net recognized and unrecognized actuarial gain (loss) for those fiscal periods.
The decrease in the unfunded obligation for the period was approximately $5.0 million and was comprised of $8.5 million of actuarial gains, $2.8 million of asset losses, $5.3 million of pension contributions, and a charge of $6.1 million due to current year service and interest cost. The main driver of the decrease in the liability related to the actuarial gain was the change in the underlying discount rate assumption which increased to 4.52% in fiscal 2015 from 4.19% in fiscal 2014. The net periodic pension cost decreased to $0.7 million in fiscal 2015 from $0.9 million in fiscal 2014, driven primarily by higher asset values and higher discount rate at the mid-year fiscal 2015 curtailment.
In fiscal 2015, a freeze of certain unionized participants in the pension plan, due to renegotiation of union contracts, resulted in a reduction in future years of service for the remaining active participants in the plan, which triggered a curtailment. As a result, there was a curtailment gain from the event which resulted in a decrease to the projected benefit obligation of $0.3 million in fiscal 2015.
The unfunded status and the amounts recognized on our Consolidated Balance Sheets for the pension plan are set forth in the following table:
 
January 2,
2016
 
January 3,
2015
 
(In thousands)
Unfunded status                                                                                                                            
$
(36,791
)
 
$
(41,763
)
Unrecognized prior service cost
1

 
1

Unrecognized actuarial loss
31,871

 
32,309

Net amount recognized
$
(4,919
)
 
$
(9,453
)
Amounts recognized on the balance sheet consist of:
 

 
 

Accrued pension liability
$
(36,791
)
 
$
(41,763
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (pre-tax)
31,872

 
32,310

Net amount recognized
$
(4,919
)
 
$
(9,453
)

The portion of estimated net loss for the pension plan that is expected to be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic cost over the next fiscal year is approximately $0.9 million.
The accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plan was $114.0 million and $120.5 million at January 2, 2016, and January 3, 2015, respectively.
Net periodic pension cost for the pension plan included the following:
 
Fiscal Year Ended
January 2,
2016
 
Fiscal Year Ended
January 3,
2015
 
Fiscal Year Ended
January 4,
2014
 
(In thousands)
Service cost                                                                                              
$
1,104

 
$
1,056

 
$
2,193

Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
5,099

 
5,123

 
4,750

Expected return on plan assets
(6,172
)
 
(6,041
)
 
(5,225
)
Amortization of unrecognized loss
699

 
763

 
2,873

Net periodic pension cost
$
730

 
$
901

 
$
4,591


 
The following assumptions were used to determine the projected benefit obligation at the measurement date and the net periodic pension cost:
 
January 2, 2016
 
January 3, 2015
Projected benefit obligation:
 
 
 
Discount rate
4.52
%
 
4.19
%
Average rate of increase in future compensation levels
Graded 5.5-2.5%

 
Graded 5.5-2.5%

Net periodic pension cost:
 

 
 

Discount rate
4.19
%
 
5.00
%
Average rate of increase in future compensation levels
Graded 5.5-2.5%

 
Graded 5.5-2.5%

Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
7.54
%
 
7.85
%

Our estimates of the amount and timing of our future funding obligations for our defined benefit pension plan are based upon various assumptions specified above. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, the discount rate, projected return on plan assets, compensation increase rates, mortality rates, retirement patterns, and turnover rates.
Determination of expected long-term rate of return
In developing expected return assumptions for our pension plan, the most influential decision affecting long-term portfolio performance is the determination of overall asset allocation. An asset class is a group of securities that exhibit similar characteristics and behave similarly in the marketplace. The three main asset classes are equities, fixed income, and cash equivalents.
Upon calculation of the historical risk premium for each asset class, an expected rate of return can be established based on assumed 90-day Treasury bill rates. Based on the normal asset allocation structure of the portfolio (60% equities, 25% fixed income, and 15% other) with an assumed compound annualized risk free rate of 3.50%, the expected overall portfolio return is 8.57% offset by 0.75% expense estimate, resulting in a 7.82% net long term rate of return as of January 2, 2016, which is used to calculate 2016 pension expense.
Our percentage of fair value of total assets by asset category as of the applicable measurement dates are as follows:
Asset Category
January 2,
2016
 
January 3,
2015
Equity securities — domestic                                                                                                                            
59
%
 
57
%
Equity securities — international
14
%
 
15
%
Fixed income
24
%
 
24
%
Other
3
%
 
4
%
Total
100
%
 
100
%

The fair value of our plan assets by asset category as of the applicable measurement dates are as follows:
Asset Category
January 2,
2016
 
January 3,
2015
 
(In thousands)
Equity securities — domestic                                                                                                                                                 
$
46,087

 
$
45,950

Equity securities — international
10,912

 
11,924

Fixed income
18,792

 
19,161

Other
2,473

 
3,157

Total
$
78,264

 
$
80,192


 
Plan assets are valued using quoted market prices in active markets, and we consider the investments to be Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.  See Note 8 for a discussion of the levels of inputs to determine fair value.
Investment policy and strategy
 
Plan assets are managed as a balanced portfolio comprised of two major components: an equity portion and a fixed income portion. The expected role of plan equity investments is to maximize the long-term real growth of fund assets, while the role of fixed income investments is to generate current income, provide for more stable periodic returns, and provide some downside protection against the possibility of a prolonged decline in the market value of equity investments. We review this investment policy statement at least once per year. In addition, the portfolio is reviewed quarterly to determine the deviation from target weightings and is rebalanced as necessary. Target allocations for fiscal 2016 are 55% domestic and 10% international equity investments, 30% fixed income investments, and 5% cash. The expected long-term rate of return for the plan’s total assets is based on the expected return of each of the above categories, weighted based on the target allocation for each class.
 
Our estimated future benefit payments reflecting expected future service are as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal Year Ending
(In thousands)
January 2, 2016
$
5,612

December 31, 2016
5,922

December 30, 2017
6,188

December 29, 2018
6,430

December 28, 2019
6,673

Thereafter
$
36,100


We currently are required to make four quarterly cash contributions during fiscal 2016 and 2017 of approximately $1.0 million related to our 2016 minimum required contribution, which totals approximately $4.2 million.
Multiemployer Pension Plans
We participate in several multiemployer pension plans (“MEPPs”) administered by labor unions that provide retirement benefits to certain union employees in accordance with various collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”). Approximately 36% of our employees are covered by CBAs, of which approximately 16% are covered by CBAs that expire within one year. As one of many participating employers in these MEPPs, we are generally responsible with the other participating employers for any plan underfunding. Our contributions to a particular MEPP are established by the applicable CBAs; however, our required contributions may increase based on the funded status of an MEPP and legal requirements such as those of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (“Pension Act”), which requires substantially underfunded MEPPs to implement a funding improvement plan (“FIP”) or a rehabilitation plan (“RP”) to improve their funded status. Factors that could impact funded status of an MEPP include, without limitation, investment performance, changes in the participant demographics, decline in the number of contributing employers, changes in actuarial assumptions and the utilization of extended amortization provisions. A FIP or RP requires a particular MEPP to adopt measures to correct its underfunded status. These measures may include, but are not limited to: an increase in our contribution rate to the applicable CBA, a reallocation of the contributions already being made by participating employers for various benefits to individuals participating in the MEPP, and/or a reduction in the benefits to be paid to future and/or current retirees. In addition, the Pension Act requires that a 5% surcharge be levied on employer contributions for the first year commencing shortly after the date the employer receives notice that the MEPP is in critical status (also referred to as red status) and a 10% surcharge on each succeeding year until a CBA is in place with terms and conditions consistent with the RP. We have not been subject to any such surcharges, as the MEPP to which we are individually significant has not been considered in “critical” status.
We could also be obligated to make future payments to MEPPs if we either cease to have an obligation to contribute to the MEPP or significantly reduce our contributions to the MEPP because we reduce our number of employees who are covered by the relevant MEPP for various reasons, including, but not limited to, layoffs or closures, assuming the MEPP has unfunded vested benefits. The amount of such payments (known as a complete or partial withdrawal liability) generally would equal our proportionate share of the MEPPs' unfunded vested benefits. We believe that one of the MEPP's in which we participate has material unfunded vested benefits. Our share of the contributions in this plan exceeded 5% of total plan contributions for certain plan years. Due to uncertainty regarding future factors that could trigger a withdrawal liability, as well as the absence of specific information regarding matters such as the MEPP's current financial situation due in part to delays in reporting, the potential withdrawal or bankruptcy of other contributing employers, the impact of future plan performance or the success of current and future funding improvement or rehabilitation plans to restore solvency to the plan, we are unable to determine with certainty the amount and timing of any future withdrawal liability, changes in future funding obligations, or the impact of increased contributions, including those that could be triggered by a mass withdrawal of other employers from a MEPP. There can be no assurance that the impact of increased contributions, future funding obligations or future withdrawal liabilities will not be material to our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. We believe that the probability of a withdrawal is remote, and therefore, we have not recorded a liability for the material MEPP on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table lists our participation in our multiemployer plan that is individually significant, and other MEPP plans for the years ended, as follows:
 
 
 
 
Contributions (in thousands)
Pension Fund:
EIN/Pension Plan Number
Pension Act Zone Status
FIP Status
2015
 
2014
 
2013
Lumber Employees Local 786 Retirement Fund
516067407
Green
(2014 - 2015)
N/A
$0.4
 
$0.4
 
$0.4
Other
 
 
 
1.9
 
0.6
 
0.9
Total
 
 
 
$2.3
 
$1.0
 
$1.3

Contributions represent the amounts contributed to the plan during the fiscal years presented. Our contributions for fiscal year 2015 exceeded 5% of total plan contributions. Although the plan data for fiscal 2016 is not yet available, we expect to continue to exceed 5% of total plan contributions.
Defined Contribution Plans
Our employees also participate in two defined contribution plans: the “hourly savings plan” covering hourly employees, and the “salaried savings plan” covering salaried employees. Discretionary contributions to the plans are based on employee contributions and compensation; and, in certain cases, participants in the hourly savings plan also receive employer contributions based on union negotiated match amounts. Employer contributions to the hourly savings plan for fiscal years 2015, 2014, and 2013 totaled $0.1 million during each fiscal year. Employer contributions for the salaried savings plan for fiscal year 2015 have been deferred until the first quarter of 2016, and employer contributions to the salaried savings plan for fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013 totaled $0.9 million and $1.1 million, respectively.