XML 55 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v2.4.0.6

Summary of significant accounting policies | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2011
Summary of significant accounting policies |
Summary of significant accounting policies |
1. Summary of significant accounting policies (a) Basis of consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries and entities over which the Company has control. All intercompany accounts, transactions and profits are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. (b) Use of estimates in preparation of financial statements The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S.”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates including those related to resolution of U.S. government matters, contractual allowances, doubtful accounts, inventories, taxes, shared-based compensation and potential goodwill and intangible asset impairment. Actual results could differ from these estimates. (c) Foreign currency translation All foreign currency denominated balance sheet accounts, except shareholders’ equity, are translated at year end exchange rates and revenue and expense items are translated at weighted average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. Gains and losses resulting from the translation of foreign currency are recorded in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders’ equity. Transactional foreign currency gains and (losses), including those generated from intercompany operations, are included in other expense, net and were $1.6 million loss, $0.1 million loss and $0.5 million loss for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. (d) Reporting currency The reporting currency is the U.S. Dollar. (e) Cash and cash equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. (f) Restricted cash Restricted cash consists of cash held at certain subsidiaries, the distribution or transfer of which to Orthofix International N.V. (the “Parent”) or other subsidiaries that are not parties to the credit facility described in Note 8 is restricted. The senior secured credit facility restricts the Parent and subsidiaries that are not parties to the facilities from access to cash held by Orthofix Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All credit party subsidiaries have access to this cash for operational and debt repayment purposes. (g) Market risk In the ordinary course of business, the Company is exposed to the impact of changes in interest rates and foreign currency fluctuations. The Company’s objective is to limit the impact of such movements on earnings and cash flows. In order to achieve this objective the Company seeks to balance its non-dollar denominated income and expenditures. During 2008, the Company executed an interest rate swap agreement to manage the cash flow exposure generated from interest rate fluctuations. On June 29, 2010, the Company settled the interest rate swap. During 2011, 2010, and 2009, the Company made use of a foreign currency swap agreement to manage cash flow exposure generated from foreign currency fluctuations. See Note 9 for additional information. The Company generally does not require collateral on trade receivables. (h) Inventories Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value, after provision for excess or obsolete items. Cost is determined on a weighted-average basis, which approximates the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. The valuation of work-in-process, finished products, field inventory and consignment inventory includes the cost of materials, labor and production. Field inventory represents immediately saleable finished products inventory that is in the possession of the Company’s direct sales representatives. Consignment inventory represents immediately saleable finished products located at third party customers, such as distributors and hospitals. (i) Long-lived assets, including intangibles and goodwill Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Costs include all expenditures necessary to place the asset in service, including freight and sales and use taxes. Plant and equipment also includes instrumentation held by customers and used with the Company’s products. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the useful lives of the assets, except for land, which is not depreciated. Depreciation of leasehold improvements is computed over the shorter of the lease term or the useful life of the asset. The useful lives are as follows:
|  | Years |
Buildings |  | 25 to 33 |
Plant and equipment |  | 2 to 10 |
Furniture and fixtures |  | 4 to 8 |
Instrumentation |  | 3 to 4 |
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs and minor renewals and improvements, which do not extend the lives of the respective assets, are expensed. All other expenditures for renewals and improvements are capitalized. The assets and related accumulated depreciation are adjusted for property retirements and disposals, with the resulting gain or loss included in operations. Fully depreciated assets remain in the accounts until retired from service. Patents and other intangible assets are recorded at cost, or when acquired as a part of a business combination at estimated fair value. These assets primarily include patents and other technology agreements (“developed technologies”), trademarks and distribution networks. Identifiable intangible assets which are considered definite lived are amortized over their useful lives using a method of amortization that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefit of the intangible assets is consumed. The Company’s weighted average amortization period for developed technologies and distribution networks is 11 and 10 years, respectively. Intangible and long-lived assets with definite lives, such as Orthofix’s developed technologies and distribution network assets, are tested for impairment if any adverse conditions exist or change in circumstances have occurred that would indicate impairment or a change in the remaining useful life. If an impairment indicator exists, the Company tests the intangible asset for recoverability. For purposes of the recoverability test, the Company groups its intangible assets with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows if the intangible asset does not generate cash flows independent of other assets and liabilities. If the carrying value of the intangible asset (asset group) exceeds the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the intangible asset (asset group), the Company will write the carrying value down to the fair value in the period identified. The Company generally calculates fair value of intangible assets as the present value of estimated future cash flows. In determining the estimated future cash flows associated with intangible assets, the Company uses estimates and assumptions about future revenue contributions, cost structures and remaining useful lives of the asset (asset group). The use of alternative assumptions, including estimated cash flows, discount rates, and alternative estimated remaining useful lives could result in different calculations of impairment. The Company tests goodwill and certain indefinite lived trademarks at least annually for impairment. The Company tests more frequently if indicators are present or changes in circumstances suggest that impairment may exist. These indicators include, among others, declines in sales, earnings or cash flows, or the development of a material adverse change in the business climate. The Company assesses goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment, referred to as a component. The Company has identified three reporting units, which are consistent with the Company’s reporting segments; Spine, Orthopedics, and Sports Medicine (see Note 12 for additional information). During 2011 the Company elected to perform the optional “Step Zero” qualitative assessment to support the fair value of its spine reporting unit whereby if an entity concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, it would not be required to perform the two-step impairment test for that reporting unit. During 2011 the Company performed the “Step Zero” qualitative assessment for its spine reporting unit and noted no impairments were to be recorded. In performing the annual impairment test during 2011, 2010 and 2009, which is performed during the fourth quarter or more frequently when impairment indicators exist, the Company utilized the two-step approach prescribed for its orthopedics and sports medicine reporting units in 2011 and all reporting units in 2010 and 2009. The first step requires a comparison of each reporting unit’s carrying value to the fair value of the respective unit (see additional discussions below). If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, a second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. No impairments were recorded in 2010 and 2009. Carrying Value In order to calculate the respective carrying values, the Company initially recorded goodwill based on the purchase price allocation performed at the time of acquisition. Corporate assets and liabilities that directly relate to a reporting unit’s operations are ascribed directly to that reporting unit. Corporate assets and liabilities that are not directly related to a specific reporting unit, but from which the reporting unit benefits, are allocated based on the respective contribution measure of each reporting unit. Effective January 1, 2011 the Company re-aligned its reporting units and consequently reallocated the carrying value of goodwill from its previous reporting units to its new reporting units based on the relative fair value of each new reporting units to total enterprise value at January 1, 2011. Fair Value The fair value of each reporting unit was estimated, entirely or predominantly, using an income based approach based on the Company’s new reporting units as realigned effective January 1, 2011. This income approach utilizes a discounted cash flow (“DCF”), which estimates after-tax cash flows on a debt free basis, discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted discount rate. The Company believes the DCF generally provides the most meaningful fair value as it appropriately measures the Company’s income producing assets. The Company may consider using a cost approach but generally believes it is not appropriate, given the inability to replicate the value of the specific technology-based assets within the reporting units. In circumstances when the DCF indicator of fair value is not sufficiently conclusive to support the carrying value of a reporting unit, or when other measures provide a more appropriate indicator, the Company may use a market approach in its determination of the reporting unit’s fair value. In performing a DCF calculation, the Company is required to make assumptions about the amount and timing of future expected cash flows, terminal value growth rates and appropriate discount rates. In connection with these estimates, the Company considers the following: · The determination of expected cash flows is based on the Company’s strategic plans and long-range planning forecasts which, to the extent reasonably possible, reflect anticipated changes in the economy and the industry. Revenue growth rates represent estimates based on current and forecasted market conditions. The profit margin assumptions are projected by each reporting unit based on historical margins, the current cost structure and anticipated net cost reductions. · The terminal value growth rate is used to calculate the value of cash flows beyond the last projected period in the DCF. This rate reflects the Company’s estimates for stable, perpetual growth for each reporting unit. · The discount rates are based on the reporting unit’s risk-adjusted weighted average cost of capital, using assumptions consistent with publicly traded guideline companies operating within the medical device industry as well as Company specific risk factors for each reporting unit. · When a market approach is considered in the determination of a reporting unit’s fair value, the Company considers market participant multiples of earnings measures, primarily earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBIDTA) and other market based indicators of fair value. (j) Investments The Company had total investments held at cost of $0.3 million as of December 31, 2010 which represented its minority interest ownership in Biowave Corporation, a pain therapy company. In 2011, the Company assessed the cost investment and noted impairment in the carrying value and recorded a charge to write down its investment in Biowave to zero. (k) Derivative instruments The Company manages its exposure to fluctuating cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates and foreign exchange within the consolidated financial statements according to its hedging policy. Under the policy, the Company may engage in non-leveraged transactions involving various financial derivative instruments to manage exposed positions. The policy requires the Company to formally document the relationship between the hedging instrument and hedged item, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. For instruments designated as a cash flow hedge, the Company formally assesses (both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis) whether the derivative that is used in the hedging transaction has been effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item and whether such derivative may be expected to remain effective in future periods. If it is determined that a derivative is not (or has ceased to be) effective as a hedge, the Company will discontinue the related hedge accounting prospectively. Such a determination would be made when (1) the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item; (2) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised; or (3) management determines that designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate. Ineffective portions of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges are recognized in earnings. The Company records all derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet at their respective fair values. For a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the derivative’s change in fair value (i.e. gains or losses) is initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income, net of related taxes, and subsequently reclassified into net earnings when the hedged exposure is no longer effective. The Company utilizes a cross currency swap to manage its foreign currency exposure related to a portion of the Company’s intercompany receivable of a U.S. dollar functional currency subsidiary that is denominated in Euro. The cross currency swap has been accounted for as a cash flow hedge in accordance with ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC Topic 815”). See Note 9 for a description of the types of derivative instruments the Company utilizes. (l) Accumulated other comprehensive income Accumulated other comprehensive income is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments and the effective portion of the gain (loss) on the Company’s cross-currency swaps, which are designated and accounted for as a cash flow hedge (see Note 9). The components of and changes in accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows:
(US$ in thousands) |  | Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments |  | Fair Value of Cross- Currency Swaps |  | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Balance at December 31, 2009 |  | $ | 6,795 |  | $ | 395 |  | $ | 7,190 |
Unrealized loss on cross-currency swaps, net of tax of $(36) |  | — |  | (90 | ) | (90 | )
Foreign currency translation adjustment (1) |  | (1,710 | ) | — |  | (1,710 | )
Balance at December 31, 2010 |  | 5,085 |  | 305 |  | 5,390 |
Unrealized loss on cross-currency swaps, net of tax of $256 |  | — |  | (437 | ) | (437 | )
Foreign currency translation adjustment (1) |  | (3,192 | ) | — |  | (3,192 | )
Balance at December 31, 2011 |  | $ | 1,893 |  | $ | (132 | ) | $ | 1,761 |
(1) As the cash generally remains permanently invested in the non U.S. dollar denominated foreign subsidiaries, no deferred taxes are recognized on the related foreign currency translation adjustment. (m) Revenue recognition and accounts receivable Revenue is generally recognized as income in the period in which title passes, the products are delivered subject to a fixed or determinable fee and collectability is reasonably assured. To the extent these criteria are not met, the Company accounts for shipments as consigned inventory and recognizes revenue when all criteria are met. Revenues exclude any value added or other local taxes, intercompany sales and trade discounts. Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of sales. Royalty revenues are recognized when the royalty is earned. For stimulation and certain bracing products that are prescribed by a physician, the Company recognizes revenue when the product is placed on or implanted in and accepted by the patient. For domestic spinal implant and human cellular and tissue based products (“HCT/P products”), revenues are recognized when the product has been utilized and a confirming purchase order has been received from the hospital. For sales to commercial customers, including hospitals and distributors, revenues are recognized at the time of shipment unless contractual agreements specify that title passes on delivery. Revenues for inventory delivered on consignment are recognized as the product is used by the consignee. In 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with the Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation (“MTF”) to develop and commercialize Trinity ® Evolution ™ , a stem cell-based bone growth biologic matrix. With the development process completed in 2009, the Company and MTF operated under the terms of a separate commercialization agreement. Under the terms of the 10-year agreement, MTF sourced the tissue, processed it to create the bone growth matrix, packaged and delivered it to the customer in accordance with orders received from the Company. The Company has exclusive global marketing rights for Trinity ® Evolution ™ and receives a marketing fee from MTF based on total sales. This marketing fee is recorded on a net basis within net sales. On January 10, 2012, the Company announced that it had reached an agreement with MTF to both co-develop and commercialize a new technology for use in bone grafting applications and to expand MTF’s Trinity Evolution processing capacity. MTF and the Company also extended the initial term of their existing agreement for an additional five years. The Company derives a significant amount of revenues in the U.S. from third-party payors, including commercial insurance carriers, health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations and governmental payors such as Medicare. Amounts paid by these third-party payors are generally based on fixed or allowable reimbursement rates. These revenues are recorded at the expected or pre-authorized reimbursement rates, net of any contractual allowances or adjustments. Certain billings are subject to review by the third-party payors and may be subject to adjustment. The process for estimating the ultimate collection of accounts receivable involves significant assumptions and judgments. Historical collection and payor reimbursement experience is an integral part of the estimation process related to reserves for doubtful accounts and the establishment of contractual allowances. Accounts receivable are analyzed on a quarterly basis to assess the adequacy of both reserves for doubtful accounts and contractual allowances. Revisions in allowances for doubtful accounts estimates are recorded as an adjustment to bad debt expense within sales and marketing expenses. Revisions to contractual allowances are recorded as an adjustment to net sales. In the judgment of management, adequate allowances have been provided for doubtful accounts and contractual allowances. These estimates are periodically tested against actual collection experience. (n) Sale of accounts receivable The Company will generally sell receivables from certain Italian hospitals during the fourth quarter of each year. The estimate of related fee is provided throughout the year as interest expense. Trade accounts receivables sold without recourse are removed from the balance sheet at the time of sale. (o) Share-based compensation The Company recognizes share-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“ASC Topic 718”). The fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Such value is recognized as expense over the service period net of estimated forfeitures. The expected term of options granted is estimated based on a number of factors, including the vesting and expiration terms of the award, historical employee exercise behavior for both options that are currently outstanding and options that have been exercised or are expired, the expected volatility of the Company’s common stock and an employee’s average length of service. The risk-free interest rate is determined based upon a constant U.S. Treasury security rate with a contractual life that approximates the expected term of the option award. Management estimates expected volatility based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The compensation expense recognized for all equity-based awards is net of estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated based on an analysis of actual option forfeitures. (p) Advertising costs The Company expenses all advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $0.5 million, $0.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively. (q) Research and development costs Expenditures for research and development are expensed as incurred. Expenditures related to collaborative arrangements with MTF are expensed based on the terms of the related agreements. (r) Income taxes The Company is subject to income taxes in both the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, and uses estimates in determining the provision for income taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method for accounting and reporting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using statutory rates. This process requires that the Company project the current tax liability and estimate the deferred tax assets and liabilities, including net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, the Company has considered the recent operating results, future taxable income projections and all prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. The Company also recognizes a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position if it is “more likely than not” that the position is sustainable based solely on its technical merits. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had $1.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively, inclusive of interest and penalties, of unrecognized tax benefits. (s) Net income (loss) per common share Net income (loss) per common share—basic is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each of the respective years. Net income (loss) per common share—diluted is computed using the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during each of the respective years using the “treasury stock” method, if dilutive. Common equivalent shares represent the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of outstanding share options (see Note 18). The only differences between basic and diluted shares result from the assumed exercise of certain outstanding share options. (t) Recently Issued Accounting Standards In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The update was intended to increase the prominence of other comprehensive income in financial statements and help financial statement users better understand the cause of a company’s change in financial position and results of operations. Stakeholders, however, raised concerns that new presentation requirements about the reclassification of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income would be costly for preparers and add unnecessary complexity to financial statements. As a result of these concerns, the FASB decided to reconsider whether it was necessary to require companies to present reclassification adjustments by component in both the statement where net income is presented and the statement where other comprehensive income is presented for both interim and annual financial statements. The result was the issuance of the ASU 2011-12. In December 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-12, Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in ASU No. 2011-05. The update defers the effective date of the requirement to present separate line items on the income statement for reclassification adjustments of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The deferral is temporary until the FASB reconsiders the operational concerns and needs of financial statement users. The FASB has not yet established a timetable for its reconsideration. The disclosure requirements of this standard will not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position as the amendment impacts presentation only. In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment (the revised standard). The revised standard is intended to reduce the cost and complexity of the annual goodwill impairment test by providing both public and nonpublic entities with the option of performing a “qualitative” assessment to determine if it is more-likely-than-not that goodwill might be impaired and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test required under current accounting standards. The revised standard is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted for certain companies. The Company adopted the revised standard in 2011. The disclosure requirements of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

X
- Details
Name: | us-gaap_AccountingPoliciesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for all significant accounting policies of the reporting entity. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18743-107790 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 5 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18854-107790 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher AICPA -Name Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) -Number 22 -Paragraph 8 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 6 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18861-107790 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 3 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18780-107790 Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18726-107790 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_SignificantAccountingPoliciesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration