XML 22 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.4.0.3
Other Assets
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2016
Deferred Costs, Capitalized, Prepaid, and Other Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Other Assets Disclosure [Text Block]
Note 5 – Other Assets
 
The Company had the following other assets at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
Nonmarketable investment securities
 
$
1,650
 
$
1,621
 
Accrued interest receivable
 
 
2,602
 
 
2,458
 
Deferred income taxes
 
 
10,234
 
 
12,132
 
Prepaid expenses
 
 
1,605
 
 
1,039
 
Other assets
 
 
6,297
 
 
6,670
 
Total
 
$
22,388
 
$
23,920
 
 
The following table provides information on significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
March 31,
2016
 
December 31,
2015
 
Deferred tax assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for credit losses
 
$
3,318
 
$
3,316
 
Reserve for off-balance sheet commitments
 
 
121
 
 
121
 
Net operating loss carry forward
 
 
7,413
 
 
9,069
 
Write-downs of other real estate owned
 
 
303
 
 
308
 
Deferred income
 
 
1,220
 
 
1,155
 
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities
 
 
-
 
 
48
 
Accrued expenses
 
 
928
 
 
946
 
AMT carryover
 
 
395
 
 
-
 
Other
 
 
185
 
 
191
 
Total deferred tax assets
 
 
13,883
 
 
15,154
 
Deferred tax liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation
 
 
243
 
 
271
 
Amortization on loans FMV adjustment
 
 
192
 
 
140
 
Purchase accounting adjustments
 
 
2,036
 
 
1,988
 
Deferred capital gain on branch sale
 
 
409
 
 
411
 
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities
 
 
593
 
 
-
 
Other
 
 
176
 
 
212
 
Total deferred tax liabilities
 
 
3,649
 
 
3,022
 
Net deferred tax assets
 
$
10,234
 
$
12,132
 
 
The Company’s deferred tax assets consist of net operating loss carryovers that will be used to offset taxable income in future periods through their statutory period of 20 years for federal tax purposes. As of December 31, 2015 18 years of the statutory period remain available to offset future taxable income. No valuation allowance on these deferred tax assets was recorded at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 as management believes it is more likely than not that all deferred tax assets will be realized based on the following positive material factors: 1) The Company was profitable for all four quarters of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016 on a GAAP basis. The net operating loss was originally created in the third quarter of 2013 and was solely attributable to Talbot Bank’s sale of loans and other real estate owned (the “Asset Sale”), which is considered non-recurring. 2) The Company had pre-tax income of $4.0 million and $11.5 million for the quarter and year ended March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, providing further evidence that the Asset Sale was producing positive results and confirming the expectation of utilizing the deferred tax assets. 3) As a contingent opportunity, the Company has had discussions with certain investors about entering into a sales leaseback transaction for some of its branch locations which would generate a material taxable gain. The decision to act on this has been deferred; however, it would become a very viable option as a tax planning strategy if there was a risk that the net operating loss carryovers would expire before they were fully utilized. Alternatively, the Company has reviewed negative factors which would influence the conclusion of realizing the deferred tax assets. These factors include the following: 1) The Company could be subject to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”), which could further limit the realization of the net operating loss-related deferred tax asset (“NOL-DTA”). 2) Although the local economy of the market in which the Company operates has been showing continued signs of improvement over the past three years, if this trend flattens or reverses, there is a potential that this potential negative evidence could outweigh the prevailing positive factors.
 
Based on the aforementioned considerations, the Company has concluded that the predominance of observable positive evidence outweighs the future potential of negative evidence and therefore it is more likely than not that the Company will be able to realize in the future all of the net deferred tax assets.