XML 44 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.24.0.1
Liability for Unpaid Losses and Loss Adjustment Expense
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2023
Insurance [Abstract]  
Liability for Future Policy Benefits and Unpaid Claims Disclosure ABILITY FOR UNPAID LOSSES AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSE (LAE)
We generally use the term loss(es) to collectively refer to both loss and LAE. We establish reserves for both reported and unreported unpaid losses that have occurred at or before the balance sheet date for amounts we estimate we will be required to pay in the future. Our policy is to establish these loss reserves after considering all information known to us at each reporting period. At any given point in time, our loss reserve represents our best estimate of the ultimate settlement and administration cost of our insured claims incurred and unpaid. Since the process of estimating loss reserves requires significant judgment due to a number of variables, such as fluctuations in inflation, judicial decisions, legislative changes and changes in claims handling procedures, our ultimate liability will likely differ from these estimates. We revise our reserve for unpaid losses as additional information becomes available, and reflect adjustments, if any, in our earnings in the periods in which we determine the adjustments are necessary.
General Discussion of the Loss Reserving Process
Reserves for unpaid losses fall into two categories: case reserves and reserves for claims incurred but not reported.
Case reserves - When a claim is reported, we establish an automatic minimum case reserve for that claim type that represents our initial estimate of the losses that will ultimately be paid on the reported claim. Our initial estimate for each claim is based upon averages of loss payments for our prior closed claims made for that claim type. Then, our claims personnel perform an evaluation of the type of claim involved, the circumstances surrounding each claim and the policy provisions relating to the loss and adjust the reserve as necessary. As claims mature, we increase or decrease the reserve estimates as deemed necessary by our claims department based upon additional information we receive regarding the loss, the results of on-site reviews and any other information we gather while reviewing the claims.
Reserves for losses incurred but not reported (IBNR reserves) - Our IBNR reserves include true IBNR reserves plus “bulk” reserves. Bulk reserves represent additional amounts that cannot be allocated to particular claims, but which are necessary to estimate ultimate losses on reported and unreported claims. We estimate our IBNR reserves by projecting the ultimate losses using the methods discussed below and then deducting actual loss payments and case reserves from the projected ultimate losses. We review and adjust our IBNR reserves on a quarterly basis based on information available to us at the balance sheet date.

When we establish our reserves, we analyze various factors such as our historical loss experience and that of the insurance industry, claims frequency and severity, our business mix, our claims processing procedures, legislative enactments, judicial decisions and legal developments in imposition of damages, and general economic conditions, including inflation. A change in any of these factors from the assumptions implicit in our estimates will cause our ultimate loss experience to be better or worse than indicated by our reserves, and the difference could be material. Due to the interaction of the aforementioned factors, there
is no precise method for evaluating the impact of any one specific factor in isolation, and an element of judgment is ultimately required. Due to the uncertain nature of any projection of the future, the ultimate amount we will pay for losses will be different from the reserves we record. However, in our judgment, we employ techniques and assumptions that are appropriate, and the resulting reserve estimates are reasonable, given the information available at the balance sheet date.
To determine our ultimate losses, we first use multiple actuarial techniques to establish a range of reasonable estimates. These techniques are in line with actuarial standards of practice and actuarial literature. A brief overview of each of these techniques is provided below. We then make additional qualitative considerations for many of the previously mentioned factors and select a point within this range. These ultimate loss estimates include reserves for both reported and unreported claims.
Estimation of the Reserves for Unpaid Losses and Allocated LAE
We calculate our estimate of ultimate losses with the following actuarial methods. The methods are applied to paid and incurred loss data. Incurred losses are defined as paid losses plus case reserves. For our loss reserving process, the word “segment” refers to a subgrouping of our claims data, such as by geographic area and/or by particular line of business; it does not refer to operating segments.
Development Method - The development method is based upon the assumption that the relative change in a given year’s loss estimates from one evaluation point to the next is similar to the relative change in prior years’ reported loss estimates at similar evaluation points. In utilizing this method, actual annual historical loss data is evaluated. Loss development factors (LDFs) are calculated to measure the change in cumulative losses from one evaluation point to the next. These historical LDFs and comparable industry benchmark factors form the basis for selecting the LDFs used in projecting the current valuation of losses to an ultimate basis. When applied to incurred loss data, the implicit assumption is that the relative adequacy of case reserves has been consistent over time, and that there have been no material changes in the rate at which claims have been reported. Applying this method to paid losses avoids potential distortions in the data due to changes in case reserving methodology, but also loses any potentially useful information contained in the current case reserves. The paid development method’s implicit assumption is that the rate of payment of claims has been relatively consistent over time.

Expected Loss Method - Ultimate loss projections are based upon a prior measure of the anticipated losses, usually relative to a measure of exposure (such as earned house years). An expected loss cost is applied to each year’s measure of exposure to determine estimated ultimate losses for that year. Actual losses are not considered in this calculation. Because the ultimate loss estimates do not change unless the exposures or loss costs change, this method has the advantage of being stable over time. However, the advantage of this stability is offset by a lack of responsiveness since this method does not consider actual loss experience as it emerges. This method assumes that the loss cost per unit of exposure is a good indication of ultimate losses. It can be entirely dependent on pricing assumptions (e.g., historical experience adjusted for loss trend).

Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method - The Bornhuetter-Ferguson (B-F) method is a credibility weighting procedure that blends the responsiveness of the Development Method with the stability of the Expected Loss Method by setting ultimate losses equal to actual losses plus the expected unreported losses which are based on the Expected Loss Method. As an experience year matures, actual losses gradually move closer to their ultimate levels so reliance on the Expected Loss Method can be reduced.

Paid-to-Paid Development Method - In addition to the aforementioned methods, we also rely upon the Paid-to-Paid Development Method to project ultimate unallocated loss adjustment expense (ULAE). Ratios of paid ULAE to paid loss and allocated loss adjustment expense are compiled by calendar year and a paid-to-paid ratio selection is made. The selected ratio is applied to the estimated IBNR amounts and one half of this ratio is applied to case reserves. This method is derived from rule of thumb that half of ULAE is incurred when a claim is opened and the other half is incurred over the remaining life of the claim.

Reliance and Selection of Methods
Each of these methods has its own strengths and weaknesses that depend upon the circumstances of the segment and the age of the claims experience we analyze. The nature of our book of business allows us to place substantial, but not exclusive, reliance on the loss development methods, and the selected LDFs, represent the most critical aspect of our loss reserving process. We use the same set of LDFs in the methods during our loss reserving process that we also use to calculate the premium necessary to pay expected ultimate losses.
Reasonably-Likely Changes in Variables
As previously noted, we evaluate several factors when exercising our judgment in the selection of the LDFs that ultimately drive the determination of our loss reserves. The process of establishing our reserves is complex and necessarily imprecise, as it involves using judgment that is affected by many variables. We believe a reasonably-likely change in almost any of these aforementioned factors could have an impact on our reported results, financial condition and liquidity. However, we do not believe any reasonably likely changes in the frequency or severity of claims would have a material impact on us.
On an annual basis, our consulting actuary issues a statement of actuarial opinion that documents the actuary’s evaluation of the adequacy of our unpaid loss obligations under the terms of our policies. We review the analysis underlying the consulting actuary’s opinion and compare the projected ultimate losses to our own estimates to ensure that the reserve for unpaid losses recorded at each annual balance sheet date is based upon all internal and external factors related to known and unknown claims against us and to ensure our reserve is within guidelines promulgated by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC).
Our commercial lines claims are handled by Sedgwick Delegated Authority (“SDA”) pursuant to a servicing agreement with AmRisc, as AmCoastal’s exclusive managing general underwriter. We maintain a claims management team that focuses on statutory claim compliance and overall customer satisfaction on these claims. When AmRisc receives a claim, it sends notification to SDA and our claims team. SDA triages all incoming claims to determine whether they can be desk-adjusted or whether SDA will assign the fieldwork to third-party claims adjusting companies. The third-party claims adjusting companies conduct inspections of the damaged property and prepare initial estimates. SDA reviews the reports to determine whether there is a covered loss to be paid to the policyholder in accordance with the terms and conditions of the policy in effect. We have established an authority level with SDA to settle claims on our behalf. If a loss amount exceeds this authority, the approval elevates to AmRisc for review and ultimately to our team for final review if the loss exceeds AmRisc’s established authority level. Our claims team monitors all claims throughout the claims-handling process, regardless of the loss amount.
We maintain an internal and external claims staff that monitors and directs all aspects of our personal lines claims process. We assign the fieldwork to third-party claims adjusting companies, none of whom have the authority to settle or pay any claims on our behalf. The third-party claims adjusting companies conduct inspection of the damaged property and prepare initial estimates. We review the inspection reports and initial estimates to determine the amounts to be paid to the policyholder in accordance with the terms and conditions of the policy in effect at the time that the policyholder incurs the loss.
We maintain strategic relationships with multiple claims adjusting companies that we can engage should we need additional non-catastrophe claims servicing capacity. We believe the combination of our internal resources and relationships with external claims servicing companies provide an adequate level of claims servicing in the event catastrophes affect our policyholders.
The following is information about incurred claims development and paid claims development as of December 31, 2023, net of reinsurance, as well as cumulative claim frequency and the total of IBNR liability plus expected development on reported claims included within the net incurred claims amounts. Please note that a portion of our Commercial Lines Operating Segment is subject to a loss cap which may have been allocated to the incurred table below in a different period than the payment is reflected in the paid table. This may result in a decrease in incurred claims year-over-year. The incurred claims development and paid claims development data reflect the acquisitions of IIC, and AmCo in April 2016, and April 2017, respectively, on a retrospective basis (includes IIC and AmCo data for years prior to our acquisition of the insurance affiliates). The information about incurred claims development and paid claims development for the years ended December 31, 2014 to 2022 is presented as supplementary information.

Personal Lines Operating Segment
$ In thousands (except number of reported claims)
Incurred Claims and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses, Net of Reinsurance
As of December 31, 2023
Total of IBNR Liabilities Plus Expected Development on Reported ClaimsCumulative Number of Reported Claims
For the Years Ended December 31,
Audited
Accident Year2014201520162017201820192020202120222023
2014$48,290 $47,315 $47,721 $47,661 $47,797 $47,905 $48,249 $48,141 $48,389 $48,329 $— 1,881
2015— 27,812 26,948 25,772 26,272 26,325 26,428 26,693 26,714 26,920 — 2,316
2016— — 33,863 33,987 33,471 33,412 33,337 33,320 33,302 33,302 29 785
2017— — — 20,741 21,325 13,864 14,398 14,203 14,183 14,063 28 1,104
2018— — — — 20,421 18,838 19,138 19,669 20,056 20,307 279 1,373
2019— — — — — 14,511 10,084 9,704 9,812 9,562 218 721
2020— — — — — — 24,796 22,184 22,080 22,163 523 791
2021— — — — — — — 34,129 30,946 30,438 1,757 613
2022— — — — — — — — 48,641 49,444 4,653 614
2023— — — — — — — — — 15,474 3,332 639
Total$270,002 
Accident YearCumulative Paid Claims and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses, Net of Reinsurance
For the Years Ended December 31,
Audited
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023
2014$39,871 $44,482 $46,573 $47,296 $47,482 $47,703 $47,776 $48,089 $48,320 $48,329 
2015— 17,151 24,964 24,863 25,374 26,019 26,125 26,137 26,600 26,920 
2016— — 26,529 32,715 32,961 33,119 33,252 33,246 33,251 33,273 
2017— — — 13,359 19,445 13,374 13,758 13,970 13,835 14,028 
2018— — — — 15,758 17,305 17,780 18,563 19,262 19,325 
2019— — — — — 6,459 8,481 8,894 9,057 9,195 
2020— — — — — — 15,909 19,976 20,592 21,037 
2021— — — — — — — 22,143 26,795 27,207 
2022— — — — — — — — 32,008 39,759 
2023— — — — — — — — — 9,716 
Total$248,789 
All outstanding liabilities before 2014, net of reinsurance409 
Liabilities for claims and claim adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance$21,622 

The following is supplementary information about average historical claims duration as of December 31, 2023.
Average Annual Percentage Payout of Incurred Claims by Age, Net of Reinsurance
Years12345678910
73.8 %19.9 %0.7 %2.0 %1.6 %— %0.4 %0.8 %0.8 %— %

Commercial Lines Operating Segment
$ In thousands (except number of reported claims)
Incurred Claims and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses, Net of Reinsurance
As of December 31, 2023
Total of IBNR Liabilities Plus Expected Development on Reported ClaimsCumulative Number of Reported Claims
For the Years Ended December 31,
Audited
Accident Year2014201520162017201820192020202120222023
2014$15,845 $15,752 $16,311 $16,816 $16,070 $15,602 $15,604 $15,618 $15,611 $15,611 $— 680 
2015— 16,504 20,379 24,563 26,614 26,332 26,910 28,350 28,680 28,678 279 821 
2016— — 37,837 25,043 22,578 23,816 23,397 23,945 38,526 23,935 351 1,143 
2017— — — 70,650 72,135 78,970 83,286 87,833 91,545 80,536 16,647 4,242 
2018— — — — 61,778 64,964 69,203 68,384 84,727 67,238 (429)3,674 
2019— — — — — 76,515 70,515 68,900 41,424 70,611 1,899 5,006 
2020— — — — — — 67,573 68,165 66,177 75,369 3,408 4,664 
2021— — — — — — — 53,338 38,304 29,991 (4,413)1,802 
2022— — — — — — — — 65,255 68,194 18,688 1,515 
2023— — — — — — — — — 25,430 15,144 314 
Total$485,593 
Accident YearCumulative Paid Claims and Allocated Claim Adjustment Expenses, Net of Reinsurance
For the Years Ended December 31,
Audited
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023
2014$6,379 $9,452 $13,212 $14,420 $15,336 $15,460 $15,475 $15,606 $15,611 $15,611 
2015— 10,188 17,134 20,640 22,978 23,605 25,269 27,303 28,024 28,057 
2016— — 10,638 16,217 19,114 21,410 22,266 23,506 38,063 23,583 
2017— — — 40,467 62,353 64,329 73,683 80,460 84,933 54,143 
2018— — — — 27,852 54,551 61,885 66,848 82,443 67,193 
2019— — — — — 38,428 57,041 62,133 34,768 64,274 
2020— — — — — — 25,068 46,535 69,903 74,858 
2021— — — — — — — 19,754 28,506 32,033 
2022— — — — — — — — 7,742 42,845 
2023— — — — — — — — — 8,993 
Total$411,590 
All outstanding liabilities before 2014, net of reinsurance— 
Liabilities for claims and claim adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance$74,003 

The following is supplementary information about average historical claims duration as of December 31, 2023.
Average Annual Percentage Payout of Incurred Claims by Age, Net of Reinsurance
Years12345678910
34.7 %30.3 %15.1 %10.1 %5.1 %2.3 %1.6 %0.4 %0.4 %— %
The reconciliation of the net incurred and paid claims development tables to the liability for claims and claim adjustment expenses in the consolidated statement of financial position is as follows.
December 31,
20232022
Net outstanding liabilities
Personal Lines Operating Segment$21,622 $24,940 
Commercial Lines Operating Segment74,003 80,256 
Liabilities for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance95,625 105,196 
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid claims
Personal Lines Operating Segment226 674 
Commercial Lines Operating Segment271,722 731,667 
Total reinsurance recoverable on unpaid claims271,948 732,341 
Unallocated claims adjustment expenses2,648 5,421 
Total gross liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense$370,221 $842,958 

The table below shows the analysis of our reserve for unpaid losses for each of our last three fiscal years on a GAAP basis:
 202320222021
Balance at January 1$842,958 $250,642 $363,434 
Less: reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses732,341 176,183 265,723 
Net balance at January 1$110,617 $74,459 $97,711 
Incurred related to:
Current year75,155 145,675 95,183 
Prior years(12,294)(10,869)(6,132)
Total incurred$62,861 $134,806 $89,051 
Paid related to:
Current year51,133 66,070 64,444 
Prior years24,072 32,577 47,859 
Total paid$75,205 $98,647 $112,303 
Net balance at December 31$98,273 $110,617 $74,459 
Plus: reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses271,948 732,341 176,183 
Balance at December 31$370,221 $842,958 $250,642 
Composition of reserve for unpaid losses and LAE:
     Case reserves$120,103 $300,864 $114,652 
     IBNR reserves250,118 542,094 135,990 
Balance at December 31$370,221 $842,958 $250,642 
Based upon our internal analysis and our review of the statement of actuarial opinion provided by our actuarial consultants, we believe that the reserve for unpaid losses reasonably represents the amount necessary to pay all claims and related expenses which may arise from incidents that have occurred as of the balance sheet date.
As reflected in the table above, we had favorable development in all three years related to prior year losses. This favorable development came as a result of re-estimating ultimate losses in each year based on historical loss trends. The loss payments made by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2023, were lower than the loss payments made during the year ended December 31, 2022, due to the settling of prior year catastrophe claims, with no similar catastrophe activity occurring in 2023. IBNR reserves and reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses also decreased when compared to the prior period, as a result of Hurricane Ian.