20-F 1 form20f.htm FORM 20-F

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

[ ] REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

OR

[ ] SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report

Commission File Number: 001-35404

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION
(Formerly Eurasian Minerals Inc.)
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

British Columbia, Canada
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Suite 501, 543 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 1X8
(Address of principal executive offices)

Christina Cepeliauskas, Chief Financial Officer
Telephone No.: 604-688-6390
Facsimile No.: 604-688-1157
Suite 501, 543 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 1X8
(Name, Telephone, Email and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class | Name on each exchange on which registered
Common Shares, without par value | NYSE American LLC

Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the Company’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: 79,746,271

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned Company, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes [ ] No [X]

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety days.
Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,"accelerated filer,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [ ] | Accelerated filer [ ] | Non-accelerated filer [X]
|  | Emerging growth company [ ]

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]

The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAA P [ ] | International Financial Reporting Standards as issued | Other [ ]
| by the International Accounting Standards Board [X] |

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:
Item 17 [ ] Item 18 [ ]

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes [ ] No [X]

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

|  | Page
Glossary of Geological and Mining Terms | 2
Itroduction |  | 9
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements | 10
Cautionary Note to United States Investors Regarding Reserve and Resource Information | 12
PART I
Item 1. | Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors | 13
Item 2. | Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable | 13
Item 3. | Key Information | 13
Item 4. | Information on the Company | 20
Item 5. | Operating, Financial Review and Prospects | 55
Item 6. | Directors, Senior Management and Employees | 68
Item 7. | Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions | 82
Item 8. | Financial Information | 84
Item 9. | The Offer and Listing | 85
Item 10. | Additional Information | 85
Item 11. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 100
Item 12. | Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities | 100
PART II
Item 13. | Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies | 100
Item 14. | Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds | 100
Item 15. | Controls and Procedures | 101
Item 16A. | Audit Committee Financial Expert | 102
Item 16B. | Code of Ethics | 102
Item 16C. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services | 102
Item 16D. | Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees | 103
Item 16E. | Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers | 103
Item 16F. | Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant | 103
Item 16G. | Corporate Governance | 103
Item 16H. | Mine Safety Disclosure | 103
PART III
Item 17. | Financial Statements | 103
Item 18. | Financial Statements | 103
Item 19. | Exhibits | 104

Glossary of Geological and Mining Terms

Certain terms used in this Form 20-F are defined as follows:

Alunite: a hydrated aluminium potassium, sulfate mineral [(KAl3(SO4)2(OH)6].

Andesite: an extrusive igneous rock of intermediate composition with a fine grained to porphyritic texture.

Argillic Alteration: hydrothermal alteration of rock which introduces clay minerals including kaolinite, smectite and illite.

Assay: a quantitative chemical analysis of an ore, mineral or concentrate to determine the amount of specific elements.

Breccia: a coarse-grained clastic rock composed of broken rock fragments held together by a mineral cement or in a fine-grained matrix.

Carbonate: a sedimentary rock made mainly of calcium carbonate (CaCO3).

Dacite: an extrusive igneous rock with a fine grained to porphyritic texture and intermediate in composition between andesite and rhyolite.

Diorite: a grey to dark-grey intermediate intrusive igneous rock composed principally of plagioclase feldspar, biotite, hornblende, and/or pyroxene.

Dike: a tabular igneous intrusion that cuts across the country rock, generally vertical in nature.

Doré: a mixture of predominantly gold and silver produced by a mine, usually in a bar form, before separation and refining into gold and silver by a refinery.

Epithermal: said of a hydrothermal mineral deposit formed within about 1 kilometer of the Earth’s surface and in the temperature range of 50oC to 200oC.

Feasibility Study: is defined in the CIM Definition Standards (2014) as referenced by NI 43-101 as a comprehensive technical and economic study of the selected development option for a mineral project that includes appropriately detailed assessments of applicable Modifying Factors together with any other relevant operational factors and detailed financial analysis that are necessary to demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that extraction is reasonably justified (economically mineable). The results of the study may reasonably serve as the basis for a final decision by a proponent or financial institution to proceed with, or finance, the development of the project. The confidence level of the study will be higher than that of a Pre-Feasibility Study.

Foliation: repetitive layering in metamorphic rocks.

Footwall: the underlying side of a fault, ore body, or mine working; particularly the wall rock beneath an inclined vein or fault.

Formation: a persistent body of igneous, sedimentary, or metamorphic rock, having easily recognizable boundaries that can be traced in the field without recourse to detailed paleontologic or petrologic analysis, and large enough to be represented on a geologic map as a practical or convenient unit for mapping and description.

Gneiss: a type of rock formed by high-grade regional metamorphic processes from pre-existing formations of igneous or sedimentary rocks.

Granodiorite: a group of plutonic rocks intermediate in composition between quartz diorite and quartz monzonite.

Greenfields: conceptual exploration; relying on the predictive power of ore genesis models to search for mineralization in relatively unexplored ground.

2

Hanging wall: the overlying side of an ore body, fault, or mine working, especially the wall rock above an inclined vein or fault.

Hornfels: a fine-grained rock composed of a mosaic of equidimensional grains without preferred orientation and typically formed by contact metamorphism.

Hydrothermal: of or pertaining to hot water, to the action of hot water, or to the products of this action, such as a mineral deposit precipitated from a hot aqueous solution, with or without demonstrable association with igneous processes.

Igneous rock: rock that is magmatic in origin.

Indicated mineral resource: is defined in the CIM Definition Standards (2014) as referenced by NI 43-101 as that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics are estimated with sufficient confidence to allow the application of Modifying Factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from adequately detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing and is sufficient to assume geological and grade or quality continuity between points of observation. An Indicated Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to a Measured Mineral Resource and may only be converted to a Probable Mineral Reserve.

Inferred mineral resource: is defined in the CIM Definition Standards (2014) as referenced by NI 43-101 as that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. Geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify geological and grade or quality continuity. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.

Intercalated: said of layered material that exists or is introduced between layers of a different character; especially said of relatively thin strata of one kind of material that alternates with thicker strata of some other kind, such as beds of shale intercalated in a body of sandstone.

Jasperoid: a dense chert-like siliceous rock, in which chalcedony or cryptocrystalline quartz has replaced the carbonate materials of limestone or dolomite.

Kriging: a weighted, moving-average interpolation method in which the set of weights assigned to samples minimizes the estimation variance, which is computed as a function of the variogram model and locations of the samples relative to each other, and to the point or block being estimated.

Leach: to dissolve minerals or metals out of ore with chemicals.

Limestone: a sedimentary rock consisting predominantly of calcium carbonate.

Lithocap: the shallow part of porphyry copper systems typically above the main Cu-Au/-Mo zone; upper alteration zone.

Measured mineral resource: is defined in the CIM Definition Standards (2014) as referenced by NI 43-101 as that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape, and physical characteristics are estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the application of Modifying Factors to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing and is sufficient to confirm geological and grade or quality continuity between points of observation. A Measured Mineral Resource has a higher level of confidence than that applying to either an Indicated Mineral Resource or an Inferred Mineral Resource. It may be converted to a Proven Mineral Reserve or to a Probable Mineral Reserve.

Meta: a prefix that, when used with the name of a sedimentary or igneous rock, indicates that the rock has been metamorphosed.

Metamorphic rock: rock which has been changed from igneous or sedimentary rock through heat and pressure into a new form of rock.

Mineral Reserve: is defined in the CIM Definition Standards (2014) as referenced by NI 43-101 as the economically mineable part of a Measured and/or Indicated Mineral Resource. It includes diluting materials and allowances for losses, which may occur when the material is mined or extracted and is defined by studies at Pre-Feasibility or Feasibility level as appropriate that include application of Modifying Factors. Such studies demonstrate that, at the time of reporting, extraction could reasonably be justified. The reference point at which Mineral Reserves are defined, usually the point where the ore is delivered to the processing plant, must be stated. It is important that, in all situations where the reference point is different, such as for a saleable product, a clarifying statement is included to ensure that the reader is fully informed as to what is being reported. The public disclosure of a Mineral Reserve must be demonstrated by a Pre-Feasibility Study or Feasibility Study.

3

Mineral Resource: is defined in the CIM Definition Standards (2014) as referenced by NI 43-101 as a concentration or occurrence of solid material of economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust in such form, grade or quality and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade or quality, continuity and other geological characteristics of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge, including sampling.

Modifying factors: is defined in the CIM Definition Standards (2014) as the considerations used to convert Mineral Resources to Mineral Reserves. These include, but are not restricted to, mining, processing, metallurgical, infrastructure, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social and governmental factors.

Net smelter return royalty or NSR royalty: a type of royalty based on a percentage of the proceeds, net of smelting, refining and transportation costs and penalties, from the sale of metals extracted from concentrate and doré by the smelter or refinery.

NI 43-101: National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators.

Oxide: a compound of ore that has been subjected to weathering and alteration as a result of exposure to oxygen for a long period of time.

Pegmatite: a very coarse-grained igneous rock that has a grain size of 20 millimetres or more.

Phyllite: a regional metamorphic rock, intermediate in grade between slate and schist. Minute crystals of sericite and chlorite impart a silky sheen to the surfaces exposed by cleavage.

Plagioclase: a series of tectosilicate minerals within the feldspar family.

Plutonic: intrusive igneous rock that is crystallized from magma slowly cooling below the surface of the Earth.

Porphyry: igneous rock consisting of large-grained crystals dispersed in a fine-grained matrix or groundmass.

Pre-Feasibility Study: is defined in the CIM Definition Standards (2014) as referenced by NI 43-101 as a comprehensive study of a range of options for the technical and economic viability of a mineral project that has advanced to a stage where a preferred mining method, in the case of underground mining, or the pit configuration, in the case of an open pit, is established and an effective method of mineral processing is determined. It includes a financial analysis based on reasonable assumptions on the Modifying Factors and the evaluation of any other relevant factors which are sufficient for a Qualified Person, acting reasonably, to determine if all or part of the Mineral Resource may be converted to a Mineral Reserve at the time of reporting. A Pre-Feasibility Study is at a lower confidence level than a Feasibility Study.

Preliminary Economic Assessment: is defined in NI 43-101 and NI 43-101CP as a study, other than a pre-feasibility or feasibility study that includes an economic analysis of the potential viability of mineral resources. The term preliminary economic assessment can include a study commonly referred to as a scoping study. A preliminary economic assessment might be based on measured, indicated, or inferred mineral resources, or a combination of any of these. These types of economic analyses include disclosure of forecast mine production rates that might contain capital costs to develop and sustain the mining operation, operating costs, and projected cash flows.

Probable mineral reserve: is defined in the CIM Definition Standards (2014) as referenced by NI 43-101 as the economically mineable part of an Indicated, and in some circumstances, a Measured Mineral Resource. The confidence in the Modifying Factors applying to a Probable Mineral Reserve is lower than that applying to a Proven Mineral Reserve. The Qualified Person(s) may elect to convert Measured Mineral Resources to Probable Mineral Reserves if the confidence in the Modifying Factors is lower than that applied to a Proven Mineral Reserve.

Proven mineral reserve: is defined in the CIM Definition Standards (2014) as referenced by NI 43-101 as the economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource. A Proven Mineral Reserve implies a high degree of confidence in the Modifying Factors. Application of the Proven Mineral Reserve category implies that the Qualified Person has the highest degree of confidence in the estimate with the consequent expectation in the minds of the readers of the report. The term should be restricted to that part of the deposit where production planning is taking place and for which any variation in the estimate would not significantly affect the potential economic viability of the deposit. Proven Mineral Reserve estimates must be demonstrated to be economic, at the time of reporting, by at least a Pre-Feasibility Study.

4

Pyroclastic: pertaining to clastic rock material formed by volcanic explosion or aerial expulsion from a volcanic vent; also, pertaining to rock texture of explosive origin.

Qualified Person: is defined in NI 43-101 as an individual who (a) is an engineer or geoscientist with a university degree, or equivalent accreditation, in an area of geoscience, or engineering, relating to mineral exploration or mining; (b) has at least five years of experience in mineral exploration, mine development or operation or mineral project assessment, or any combination of these, that is relevant to his or her professional degree or area of practice; (c) has experience relevant to the subject matter of the mineral project and the technical report; (d) is in good standing with a professional association; and (e) in the case of a professional association in a foreign jurisdiction, has a membership designation that (i) requires attainment of a position of responsibility in their profession that requires the exercise of independent judgment; and (ii) requires A. a favourable confidential peer evaluation of the individual’s character, professional judgement, experience, and ethical fitness; or B. a recommendation for membership by at least two peers, and demonstrated prominence or expertise in the field of mineral exploration or mining;

Run-of-mine: ore in its natural state as it is removed from the mine that has not been subjected to additional size reduction.

Schist: a strongly foliated crystalline rock, which readily splits into sheets or slabs as a result of the planar alignment of the constituent crystals. The constituent minerals are commonly specified (e.g. “quartz-muscovite-chlorite schist”).

Shear zone: a tabular zone of rock that has been crushed and brecciated by parallel fractures due to “shearing” along a fault or zone of weakness. These can be mineralized with ore-forming solutions.

Silicification: the introduction of, or replacement by, silica, generally resulting in the formation of fine-grained quartz, chalcedony, or opal, which may fill pores and replace existing minerals.

Skarn: metamorphic zone developed in the contact area around igneous rock intrusions when carbonate sedimentary rocks are invaded by large amounts of silicon, aluminum, iron, and magnesium.

Spectrography: the process of using a spectrograph to map or photograph a spectrum.

Stockwork: a complex system of structurally controlled or randomly oriented veins.

Strata: layers of sedimentary rock with internally consistent characteristics that distinguish them from other layers.

Strike: the direction, or course or bearing of a vein or rock formation measured on a level surface.

Stratibound: confined to a particular stratigraphic layer or unit.

Stratiform: occurring as or arranged in strata.

Strip (or stripping) ratio: the tonnage or volume of waste material that must be removed to allow the mining of one tonne of ore in an open pit.

Sulfides or sulphides: compounds of sulfur (or sulphur) with other metallic elements.

Tailing: material rejected from a mill after the recoverable valuable minerals have been extracted.

Terrane: a rock formation or assemblage of rock formations that share a common geologic history.

Tuff: a general term for consolidated pyroclastic rocks.

Vein: sheet-like body of minerals formed by fracture filling or replacement of host rock.

Vuggy: containing small cavities in a rock or vein, often with a mineral lining of different composition from that of the surrounding rock.

5

Linear Measurements |  |
1 inch | = | 2.54 centimeters
1 foot | = | 0.3048 meter
1 yard | = | 0.9144 meter
1 mile | = | 1.609 kilometers

Area Measurements |  |
1 acre | = | 0.4047 hectare
1 hectare | = | 2.471 acres
1 square mile | = | 640 acres or 259 hectares or 2.59 square kilometers

Units of Weight |  |
1 short ton | = | 2000 pounds or 0.893 long ton
1 long ton | = | 2240 pounds or 1.12 short tons
1 metric tonne | = | 2204.62 pounds or 1.1023 short tons
1 pound (16 oz.) | = | 0.454 kilograms or 14.5833 troy ounces
1 troy oz. | = | 31.1035 grams
1 troy oz. per short ton | = | 34.2857 grams per metric tonne

Analytical | percent | grams per metric tonne | troy oz per short ton
1% | 1% | 10,000 | 291.667
1 gram/tonne | 0.0001% | 1 | 0.029167
1 troy oz./short ton | 0.003429% | 34.2857 | 1
10 ppb | nil | 0.01 | 0.00029
100 ppm | 0.01 | 100 | 2.917

Temperature Conversion Formulas |  |
Degrees Fahrenheit | = | (°C x 1.8) + 32
Degrees Celsius | = | (°F - 32) x 0.556

6

Frequently Used Abbreviations and Symbols

AA | atomic absorption spectrometry
Ag | silver
As | arsenic
Au | gold
°C | degrees Celsius (centigrade)
CIM | Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
cm | centimeter
C.P.G. | Certified Professional Geologist
CSAMT | Controlled source audio-frequency magnetotellurics
Cu | copper
ESIA | Environmental & Social Impact Assessment
F | fluorine
°F | degrees Fahrenheit
g | gram(s)
g/t | grams per tonne
Hg | mercury
HSE | high sulphidation epithermal
ICP AES | inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy
ICP MS | inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy
ICP MS/AAS | inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy/atomic absorption spectroscopy
IOCG | iron-oxide-copper-gold
IP | Induced polarization
JORC | Joint Ore Reserves Committee
JV | joint venture
kg | kilogram
km | kilometer
m | meter(s)
Ma | million years ago
Mn | manganese
Mo | molybdenum
n | number or count
oz | troy ounce
opt | ounce per short ton
oz/ton | ounce per short ton
oz/tonne | ounce per metric tonne
Pb | lead
PEA | Preliminary Economic Assessment
PGE | platinum group element
ppb | parts per billion
ppm | parts per million
QA | quality assurance
QC | quality control
QP | Qualified Person
sq | square

7

Frequently Used Abbreviations and Symbols

Sb | antimony
VMS | volcanogenic massive sulfide
Zn | zinc

8

INTRODUCTION

EMX Royalty Corporation (the “Company” or “EMX”) was incorporated under the laws of the Yukon Territory of Canada on August 21, 2001 as 33544 Yukon Inc. and, on October 10, 2001, changed its name to Southern European Exploration Ltd. On November 24, 2003, the Company completed the reverse take-over of Marchwell Capital Corp., a TSX Venture Exchange (“TSX-V”) listed company incorporated in Alberta on May 13, 1996 and which subsequently changed its name to Eurasian Minerals Inc. On September 21, 2004, EMX continued into British Columbia from Alberta under the Business Corporations Act. On July 19, 2017, EMX changed its name to EMX Royalty Corporation to better reflect the nature of its business.

EMX’s head office is located at Suite 501 – 543 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 1X8, Canada, and its registered and records office is located at Northwest Law Group, Suite 704 – 595 Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 2T5, Canada.

EMX is a reporting company under the securities legislation of British Columbia and Alberta and is listed on the TSX-V, as a Tier 1 Company, and the NYSE American LLC (“NYSE American”). EMX’s common shares without par value (“Common Shares”) are traded on the TSX-V and the NYSE American under the symbol “EMX”.

BUSINESS OF EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION

EMX is principally in the business of exploring for, and generating royalties from minerals properties, as well as identifying mineral property royalty opportunities for purchase. Under the royalty generation business model, the Company acquires and advances early-stage mineral exploration projects and then sells the projects to, and thereby forms relationships with, other parties in consideration of a retained royalty interest, as well as annual advance royalty and other pre-production cash or share payments and work commitments. Through its various agreements, EMX may also provide technical and commercial assistance to such companies as the projects advance. By selling interests in its projects to third parties for a royalty interest, EMX:

| (a) | reduces its exposure to the costs and risks associated with mineral exploration and project development,
| (b) | receives near term cash flow from scheduled pre-production and milestone based bonus payments,
| (c) | maintains the opportunity to participate in exploration upside, and
| (d) | develops a pipeline for potential production royalty payments and associated greenfields discoveries in the future.

This approach helps preserve the Company’s treasury, which can be utilized for further project acquisitions and other business initiatives.

Strategic investments are an important complement to the Company’s royalty acquisition and royalty generation initiatives. These investments are made in under-valued exploration companies identified by the Company. EMX helps to develop the value of these assets, with exit strategies that can include royalty positions or equity sales.

EMX started receiving royalty income as of August 17, 2012 when it acquired Bullion Monarch Mining, Inc. (“Bullion Monarch” or “BULM”). The Company’s royalty, exploration, and strategic investment portfolio mainly consists of properties in North America, Turkey, Europe, Haiti, Australia, New Zealand, the Russian Federation, and Chile.

FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

In this Annual Report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in Canadian Dollars (“C$” or “$”). References to “US$” are to United States dollars. The Government of Canada permits a floating exchange rate to determine the value of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The Company is a “foreign private issuer” as defined in Rule 3b-4 under the Exchange Act and Rule 405 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Equity securities of the Company are accordingly exempt from Sections 14(a), 14(b), 14(c), 14(f) and 16 of the Exchange Act pursuant to Rule 3a12-3 thereunder.

9

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report, including the documents incorporated by reference herein, may contain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may include statements regarding perceived merit of properties, exploration results and budgets, mineral reserves and resource estimates, work programs, capital expenditures, operating costs, cash flow estimates, production estimates and similar statements relating to the economic viability of a project, timelines, strategic plans, completion of transactions, market prices for metals or other statements that are not statements of fact. These statements relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute “forward-looking statements” to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered if the property is developed.

Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, identified by words or phrases such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “potential”, “possible” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are based on a number of material assumptions, including those listed below, which could prove to be significantly incorrect:

- the Company’s ability to achieve production at any of its mineral properties;
- estimated capital costs, operating costs, production and economic returns;
- estimated metal pricing, metallurgy, mineability, marketability and operating and capital costs, together with other assumptions underlying the Company’s resource and reserve estimates;
- the Company’s expected ability to develop adequate infrastructure at a reasonable cost;
- assumptions that all necessary permits and governmental approvals will be obtained;
- assumptions made in the interpretation of drill results, the geology, grade and continuity of the Company’s mineral deposits;
- the Company’s expectations regarding demand for equipment, skilled labor and services needed for exploration and development of mineral properties; and
- the Company’s activities will not be adversely disrupted or impeded by development, operating or regulatory risks.

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those reflected in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation:

- uncertainty of whether there will ever be production at the Company’s mineral exploration and development properties;
- uncertainty of estimates of capital costs, operating costs, production and economic returns;
- uncertainties relating to the assumptions underlying the Company’s resource and reserve estimates, such as metal pricing, metallurgy, mineability, marketability and operating and capital costs;
- risks related to the Company’s ability to commence production and generate material revenues or obtain adequate financing for its planned exploration and development activities;
- risks related to the Company’s ability to finance the development of its mineral properties through external financing, joint ventures or other strategic alliances, the sale of property interests or otherwise;
- risks related to the third parties on which the Company depends for its exploration and development activities;
- dependence on cooperation of joint venture partners in exploration and development of properties;
- credit, liquidity, interest rate and currency risks;
- risks related to market events and general economic conditions;
- uncertainty related to inferred mineral resources;
- risks and uncertainties relating to the interpretation of drill results, the geology, grade and continuity of the Company’s mineral deposits;
- risks related to lack of adequate infrastructure;
- mining and development risks, including risks related to infrastructure, accidents, equipment breakdowns, labor disputes or other unanticipated difficulties with or interruptions in development, construction or production;
- the risk that permits and governmental approvals necessary to develop and operate mines on the Company’s properties will not be available on a timely basis or at all;
- commodity price fluctuations;

10

- risks related to governmental regulation and permits, including environmental regulation;
- risks related to the need for reclamation activities on the Company’s properties and uncertainty of cost estimates related thereto;
- uncertainty related to title to the Company’s mineral properties;
- uncertainty as to the outcome of potential litigation;
- risks related to increases in demand for equipment, skilled labor and services needed for exploration and development of mineral properties, and related cost increases;
- increased competition in the mining industry;
- the Company’s need to attract and retain qualified management and technical personnel;
- risks related to hedging arrangements or the lack thereof;
- uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to acquire additional commercially mineable mineral rights;
- risks related to the integration of potential new acquisitions into the Company’s existing operations;
- risks related to unknown liabilities in connection with acquisitions;
- risks related to conflicts of interest of some of the directors of the Company;
- risks related to global climate change;
- risks related to adverse publicity from non-governmental organizations;
- risks related to political uncertainty or instability in countries where the Company’s mineral properties are located;
- uncertainty as to the Company’s passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) status;
- uncertainty as to the Company’s status as a “foreign private issuer” and “emerging growth company” in future years;
- uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to maintain the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting; and
- risks related to regulatory and legal compliance and increased costs relating thereto.

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements about the future and are inherently uncertain, and actual achievements of the Company or other future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including, without limitation, those referred to under the heading “Key Information” (as defined below), which is incorporated by reference herein.

The Company’s forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, expectations and opinions of management on the date of this Annual Report, and the Company does not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management’s beliefs, expectations or opinions should change, except as required by law. For the reasons set forth above, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

11

CAUTIONARY NOTE TO UNITED STATES INVESTORS REGARDING RESERVE AND RESOURCE INFORMATION

Unless otherwise indicated, all resource estimates, and any future reserve estimates, included or incorporated by reference in this annual report on Form 10-K have been, and will be, prepared in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (“CIM Definition Standards”). NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators which establishes standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects.

Canadian standards, including NI 43-101, differ significantly from the requirements of the SEC, and reserve and resource information contained or incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 20-F may not be comparable to similar information disclosed by U.S. companies. In particular, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the term “resource” does not equate to the term “reserves”. Under SEC Industry Guide 7, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. SEC Industry Guide 7 does not define and the SEC’s disclosure standards normally do not permit the inclusion of information concerning “measured mineral resources”, “indicated mineral resources” or “inferred mineral resources” or other descriptions of the amount of mineralization in mineral deposits that do not constitute “reserves” by U.S. standards in documents filed with the SEC. U.S. investors should also understand that “inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “inferred mineral resource” will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimated “inferred mineral resources” may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an “inferred mineral resource” exists or is economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of “contained ounces” or "contained pounds" in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute “reserves” by SEC standards as in-place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures. The requirements of NI 43-101 for identification of “reserves” are also not the same as those of the SEC, and any reserves reported by us in the future in compliance with NI 43-101 may not qualify as “reserves” under SEC standards. Accordingly, information concerning mineral deposits set forth herein may not be comparable to information made public by companies that report in accordance with United States standards.

12

PART I

ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

3.A.1. and 3.A.2 Selected Financial Data

The selected financial data of the Company for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was derived from the financial statements of the Company that have been audited by Davidson and Company LLP, Independent Registered Public Accountants, as indicated in their audit report, which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

The Company has not declared any dividends since incorporation and does not anticipate that it will do so in the foreseeable future. The present policy of the Company is to retain all available funds for use in its operations and the expansion of its business.

Table No. 3 is derived from the financial statements of the Company, which have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

Table No. 3
Selected Financial Data
(C$)

|  | Year Ended |  |  | Year Ended |  |  | Year Ended |  |  | Year Ended |  |  | Year Ended |
|  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |  |  | December 31, 2015 |  |  | December 31, 2014 |  |  | December 31, 2013 |
IFRS |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Royalty income | $ | 2,857,927 |  | $ | 2,227,322 |  | $ | 1,609,553 |  | $ | 2,247,334 |  | $ | 3,102,888 |
Exploration expenditures (net) |  | 4,471,074 |  |  | 4,999,959 |  |  | 4,364,675 |  |  | 5,022,658 |  |  | 3,839,703 |
Loss from operations |  | (7,781,070 | ) |  | (8,267,563 | ) |  | (8,087,982 | ) |  | (8,681,619 | ) |  | (7,680,848 | )
Net loss for the year |  | (7,393,384 | ) |  | (2,683,482 | ) |  | (6,875,857 | ) |  | (17,448,041 | ) |  | (13,982,612 | )
Net loss per share-basic and diluted |  | (0.09 | ) |  | (0.04 | ) |  | (0.09 | ) |  | (0.24 | ) |  | (0.19 | )
Wtd. Avg. Shares |  | 78,002,082 |  |  | 73,874,415 |  |  | 73,480,833 |  |  | 73,154,139 |  |  | 72,509,793 |
Period-end Shares |  | 79,725,187 |  |  | 74,089,710 |  |  | 73,534,710 |  |  | 73,371,710 |  |  | 72,980,209 |
Working capital |  | 6,535,893 |  |  | 6,002,318 |  |  | 5,787,109 |  |  | 7,096,916 |  |  | 14,217,999 |
Exploration and evaluation assets (net) |  | 1,841,966 |  |  | 2,145,000 |  |  | 2,381,540 |  |  | 2,379,886 |  |  | 3,031,368 |
Royalty interest |  | 21,943,743 |  |  | 25,831,152 |  |  | 28,798,980 |  |  | 29,327,960 |  |  | 35,063,725 |
Total assets |  | 45,750,784 |  |  | 47,843,555 |  |  | 50,624,129 |  |  | 54,292,093 |  |  | 70,073,220 |
Share capital |  | 124,062,091 |  |  | 117,504,585 |  |  | 117,000,052 |  |  | 116,766,102 |  |  | 116,151,675 |
Deficit |  | (104,382,744 | ) |  | (96,989,360 | ) |  | (94,305,878 | ) |  | (87,430,021 | ) |  | (69,981,980 | )

3.A.3. Exchange Rates

In this Annual Report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in Canadian Dollars (“C$”, “CDN”). The Government of Canada permits a floating exchange rate to determine the value of the Canadian Dollar against the U.S. Dollar (“US$”).

Table No. 4 sets forth the exchange rates for the Canadian Dollar at the end of five most recent fiscal years ended December 31, the average rates for the period, and the range of high and low rates for the period. The data for each month during the most recent six months is also provided.

For purposes of this table, the exchange rate means the Bank of Canada noon rate. The table sets forth the number of Canadian Dollars required to buy one U.S. dollar. The average exchange rate means the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period.

13

Table No. 4
U.S. Dollar/Canadian Dollar

Last 6 months ended | Average | High | Low | Close
March 1 to 28, 2018 | 1.2926 | 1.3091 | 1.2804 | 1.2859
February 2018 | 1.2563 | 1.2790 | 1.2297 | 1.2791
January 2018 | 1.2436 | 1.2570 | 1.2301 | 1.2301
December 2017 | 1.2755 | 1.2819 | 1.2551 | 1.2551
November 2017 | 1.2756 | 1.2886 | 1.2677 | 1.2881
October 2017 | 1.2591 | 1.2865 | 1.2462 | 1.2865
September 2017 | 1.3244 | 1.3403 | 1.3097 | 1.3403
Last Quarter & Last 5 Years |  |  |  |
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017 | 1.2986 | 1.3743 | 1.2128 | 1.2944
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016 | 1.3251 | 1.4602 | 1.2533 | 1.3437
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015 | 1.2783 | 1.3955 | 1.1613 | 1.3869
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2014 | 1.1041 | 1.1643 | 1.0627 | 1.1627
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2013 | 1.0298 | 1.0703 | 0.9835 | 1.0694

On March 28, 2018, the exchange rate was C$1.2859 to US$1.

3.B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable

3.C. Reasons For The Offer And Use Of Proceeds

Not applicable

3.D. Risk Factors

Investment in the Common Shares involves a significant degree of risk and should be considered speculative due to the nature of the Company’s business and the present stage of its development. Prospective investors should carefully review the following factors together with other information contained in this Annual Report before making an investment decision.

Mineral Property Exploration Risks

The business of mineral exploration and extraction involves a high degree of risk. Few properties that are explored ultimately become producing mines. At present, none of the Company’s properties has a known commercial ore deposit. The main operating risks include ensuring ownership of and access to mineral properties by confirmation that option agreements, claims and leases are in good standing and obtaining permits for drilling and other exploration activities.

When EMX earns interests in properties through option agreements, the acquisition of title to the properties is only completed when the option conditions have been met. These conditions generally include making property payments, incurring exploration expenditures on the properties and can include the satisfactory completion of pre-feasibility studies. If the Company does not satisfactorily complete these option conditions in the time frame laid out in the option agreements, the Company’s title to the related property will not vest and the Company will have to write-off any previously capitalized costs related to that property.

The market prices for precious and base metals can be volatile and there is no assurance that a profitable market will exist for a production decision to be made or for the ultimate sale of the metals even if commercial quantities of precious and other metals are discovered.

Revenue and Royalty Risks

The Company cannot predict future revenues or operating results of the area of mining activity. Management expects future revenues from the Carlin Trend Royalty Claim Block, including the Leeville royalty property in Nevada, to fluctuate depending on the level of future production and the price of gold. Specifically, there is a risk that the operator of the property, Newmont Mining Corporation (“Newmont”), will cease to operate in the Company’s area of interest, therefore there can be no assurance that ongoing royalty payments will materialize or be received by EMX.

14

Financing and Share Price Fluctuation Risks

EMX has limited financial resources and has no assurance that additional funding will be available for further exploration and development of its projects. Further exploration and development of one or more of the Company’s projects may be dependent upon the Company’s ability to obtain financing through equity or debt financing or other means. Failure to obtain this financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration and development of its projects which could result in the loss of one or more of its properties.

The securities markets can experience a high degree of price and volume volatility, and the market price of securities of many companies, particularly those considered to be development stage companies, such as EMX, may experience wide fluctuations in share prices which may not necessarily be related to their operating performance, underlying asset values or prospects. There can be no assurance that share price fluctuations will not occur in the future, and if they do occur, the severity of the impact on EMX’s ability to raise additional funds through equity issues.

Foreign Countries and Political Risks

The Company operates in countries with varied political and economic environments. As such, it is subject to certain risks, including currency fluctuations and possible political or economic instability which may result in the impairment or loss of mineral concessions or other mineral rights, opposition from environmental or other non-governmental organizations, and mineral exploration and mining activities may be affected in varying degrees by political stability and government regulations relating to the mineral exploration and mining industry. Any changes in regulations or shifts in political attitudes are beyond the control of the Company and may adversely affect its business. Exploration and development may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to restrictions on future exploitation and production, price controls, export controls, foreign exchange controls, income taxes, expropriation of property, environmental legislation and mine and site safety.

Notwithstanding any progress in restructuring political institutions or economic conditions, the present administration, or successor governments, of some countries in which EMX operates may not be able to sustain any progress. If any negative changes occur in the political or economic environment of these countries, it may have an adverse effect on the Company’s operations in those countries. The Company does not carry political risk insurance.

Competition

The Company competes with many companies that have substantially greater financial and technical resources than it in the acquisition and development of its projects as well as for the recruitment and retention of qualified employees.

We do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

The Company has not declared or paid any dividends on our Common Shares. Our current business plan requires that for the foreseeable future, any future earnings be reinvested to finance the growth and development of our business. We do not intend to pay cash dividends on the Common Shares in the foreseeable future. We will not declare or pay any dividends until such time as our cash flow exceeds our capital requirements and will depend upon, among other things, conditions then existing including earnings, financial condition, restrictions in financing arrangements, business opportunities and conditions and other factors, or our Board determines that our shareholders could make better use of the cash.

No Assurance of Titles or Borders

The acquisition of the right to exploit mineral properties is a very detailed and time consuming process. There can be no guarantee that the Company has acquired title to any such surface or mineral rights or that such rights will be obtained in the future. To the extent they are obtained, titles to the Company’s surface or mineral properties may be challenged or impugned and title insurance is generally not available. The Company’s surface or mineral properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and title may be affected by, among other things, undetected defects. Such third party claims could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s operations.

15

Unknown Defects or Impairments in Our Royalty or Streaming Interests

Unknown defects in or disputes relating to the royalty and stream interests we hold or acquire may prevent us from realizing the anticipated benefits from our royalty and stream interests, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. It is also possible that material changes could occur that may adversely affect management’s estimate of the carrying value of our royalty and stream interests and could result in impairment charges. While we seek to confirm the existence, validity, enforceability, terms and geographic extent of the royalty and stream interests we acquire, there can be no assurance that disputes over these and other matters will not arise. Confirming these matters, as well as the title to mining property on which we hold or seek to acquire a royalty or stream interest, is a complex matter, and is subject to the application of the laws of each jurisdiction to the particular circumstances of each parcel of mining property and to the documents reflecting the royalty or stream interest. Similarly, royalty and stream interests in many jurisdictions are contractual in nature, rather than interests in land, and therefore may be subject to change of control, bankruptcy or the insolvency of operators. We often do not have the protection of security interests over property that we could liquidate to recover all or part of our investment in a royalty or stream interest. Even if we retain our royalty and stream interests in a mining project after any change of control, bankruptcy or insolvency of the operator, the project may end up under the control of a new operator, who may or may not operate the project in a similar manner to the current operator, which may negatively impact us.

Operators’ Interpretation of Our Royalty and Stream Interests; Unfulfilled Contractual Obligations

Our royalty and stream interests generally are subject to uncertainties and complexities arising from the application of contract and property laws in the jurisdictions where the mining projects are located. Operators and other parties to the agreements governing our royalty and stream interests may interpret our interests in a manner adverse to us or otherwise may not abide by their contractual obligations, and we could be forced to take legal action to enforce our contractual rights. We may or may not be successful in enforcing our contractual rights, and our revenues relating to any challenged royalty or stream interests may be delayed, curtailed or eliminated during the pendency of any such dispute or in the event our position is not upheld, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Disputes could arise challenging, among other things:

- the existence or geographic extent of the royalty or stream interest;
- methods for calculating the royalty or stream interest, including whether certain operator costs may properly be deducted from gross proceeds when calculating royalties determined on a net basis;
- third party claims to the same royalty interest or to the property on which we have a royalty or stream interest;
- various rights of the operator or third parties in or to the royalty or stream interest;
- production and other thresholds and caps applicable to payments of royalty or stream interests;
- the obligation of an operator to make payments on royalty and stream interests; and
- various defects or ambiguities in the agreement governing a royalty and stream interest.

Currency Risks

The Company’s equity financings are sourced in Canadian dollars but much of its expenditures are in local currencies or U.S. dollars. At this time, there are no currency hedges in place. Therefore, a weakening of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar or local currencies could have an adverse impact on the amount of exploration funds available and work conducted.

Exploration Funding Risk

The Company’s strategy is to seek exploration partners through options to fund exploration and project development. The main risk of this strategy is that the funding parties may not be able to raise sufficient capital in order to satisfy exploration and other expenditure terms in a particular agreement. As a result, exploration and development of one or more of the Company’s property interests may be delayed depending on whether EMX can find another party or has enough capital resources to fund the exploration and development on its own.

Insured and Uninsured Risks

In the course of exploration, development and production of mineral properties, the Company is subject to a number of risks and hazards in general, including adverse environmental conditions, operational accidents, labor disputes, unusual or unexpected geological conditions, changes in the regulatory environment and natural phenomena such as inclement weather conditions, floods, and earthquakes. Such occurrences could result in the damage to the Company’s property or facilities and equipment, personal injury or death, environmental damage to properties of the Company or others, delays, monetary losses and possible legal liability.

16

Although the Company may maintain insurance to protect against certain risks in such amounts as it considers reasonable, its insurance may not cover all the potential risks associated with its operations. The Company may also be unable to maintain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums or for other reasons. Should such liabilities arise, they could reduce or eliminate future profitability and result in increased costs, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results and a decline in the value of the securities of the Company.

Some work is carried out through independent consultants and the Company requires all consultants to carry their own insurance to cover any potential liabilities as a result of their work on a project.

Environmental Risks and Hazards

The activities of the Company are subject to environmental regulations issued and enforced by government agencies. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner that will require stricter standards and enforcement and involve increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. There can be no assurance that future changes in environmental regulation, if any, will not adversely affect the Company’s operations. Environmental hazards may exist on properties in which the Company holds interests which are unknown to the Company at present.

We or the mining properties in which we have an interest are subject to substantial government regulation in the United States and in the other jurisdictions in which we operate. Changes to regulation or more stringent implementation could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Mining and exploration activities are subject to various laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, such as the federal Clean Water Act and the Nevada Water Pollution Control Law. Although we currently believe that we are in compliance with existing environmental and mining laws and regulations and that our proposed exploration programs will also meet those standards, no assurance can be given that we will remain in compliance with applicable regulations or that new rules and regulations will not be enacted or that existing rules and regulations will not be applied in a manner that could limit or curtail production or development of our properties.

Reform of the General Mining Law could adversely impact our results of operations.

A majority of our mining properties in the United States consist of unpatented mining claims on federal lands. Legislation has been introduced regularly in the U.S. Congress over the last decade to change the General Mining Law of 1872, as amended (the "Mining Law"), under which we hold these unpatented mining claims. It is possible that the Mining Law may be amended or replaced by less favorable legislation in the future. Previously proposed legislation contained a production royalty obligation, new environmental standards and conditions, additional reclamation requirements and extensive new procedural steps which would likely result in delays in permitting. The ultimate content of future proposed legislation, if enacted, is uncertain. At present, there is no royalty payable to the United States on production from unpatented mining claims, although legislative attempts to impose a royalty have occurred in recent years. Amendments to current laws and regulations governing our operations and activities of exploration, development mining and milling or more stringent implementation thereof could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and cause increases in exploration expenses, capital expenditures or production costs or reduction in levels of production or require delays or abandonment in the development of new mining properties. If a royalty on unpatented mining claims were imposed, the profitability of our U.S. unpatented mining claims could be materially adversely affected.

Any such reform of the Mining Law could increase the costs of mining activities on unpatented mining claims, or could materially impair our ability to develop or continue operations which derive ore from federal lands, and as a result, could have an adverse effect on us and our results of operations.

Mineral reserves are only estimates which may be unreliable.

Although mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the mineralization can be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time the “reserve” determination is made, “mineral reserves” are estimates only, and no assurance can be given that the anticipated tonnages and grades will be achieved, that the indicated level of recovery will be realized or that mineral reserves can be mined or processed profitably. Mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing and other relevant issues. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating mineral reserves and mineral resources, including many factors beyond our control. Such estimation is a subjective process, and the accuracy of any mineral reserve or mineral resource estimate is a function of the quantity and quality of available data, the nature of the mineralized body and of the assumptions made and judgments used in engineering and geological interpretation. These estimates may require adjustments or downward revisions based upon further exploration or development work or actual production experience.

17

Fluctuations in metal prices, results of drilling, metallurgical testing and production, the evaluation of mine plans after the date of any estimate, permitting requirements or unforeseen technical or operational difficulties may require revision of mineral reserve estimates. Prolonged declines in the market price of precious and base metals may render mineral reserves containing relatively lower grades of mineralization uneconomical to recover and could materially reduce our mineral reserves. Should reductions in mineral reserves occur, we may be required to take a material write-down of our investment in mining properties, reduce the carrying value of one or more of our assets or delay or discontinue production or the development of new projects, resulting in increased net losses and reduced cash flow. Mineral reserves should not be interpreted as assurances of mine life or of the profitability of current or future operations. There is a degree of uncertainty attributable to the calculation and estimation of mineral reserves and corresponding grades being mined and, as a result, the volume and grade of mineral reserves mined and processed and recovery rates may not be the same as currently anticipated. Any material reductions in estimates of mineral reserves, or of our ability to extract these mineral reserves, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Fluctuating Metal Prices

Factors beyond the control of the Company have a direct effect on global metal prices, which have fluctuated widely, particularly in recent years, and there is no assurance that a profitable market will exist for a production decision to be made or for the ultimate sale of the metals even if commercial quantities of precious and other metals are discovered on any of the Company’s properties. Consequently, the economic viability of any of the Company’s exploration projects and its ability to finance the development of its projects cannot be accurately predicted and may be adversely affected by fluctuations in metal prices.

Extensive Governmental Regulation and Permitting Requirements Risks

Exploration, development and mining of minerals are subject to extensive laws and regulations at various governmental levels governing the acquisition of the mining interests, prospecting, development, mining, production, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety and other matters. In addition, the current and future operations of EMX, from exploration through development activities and production, require permits, licenses and approvals from some of these governmental authorities. EMX has obtained all government licenses, permits and approvals necessary for the operation of its business to date. However, additional licenses, permits and approvals may be required. The failure to obtain any licenses, permits or approvals that may be required or the revocation of existing ones would have a material and adverse effect on EMX, its business and results of operations.

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits may result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities requiring the Company’s operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment or remedial actions. EMX may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of its mineral exploration activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of such laws, regulations and permits. Any such events could have a material and adverse effect on EMX and its business and could result in EMX not meeting its business objectives.

In addition, we are required to expend significant resources to comply with numerous corporate governance and disclosure regulations and requirements adopted by U.S. federal and state and Canadian federal and provincial governments, as well as the TSX and NYSE American. These additional compliance costs and related diversion of the attention of management and key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Key Personnel Risk

The Company’s success is dependent upon the performance of key personnel working in management and administrative capacities or as consultants. The loss of the services of senior management or key personnel could have a material and adverse effect on the Company, its business and results of operations. The Company does not carry “key personnel” insurance.

18

Conflicts of Interest

In accordance with the laws of British Columbia and the United States, the directors and officers of a Company are required to act honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of the Company. EMX’s directors and officers may serve as directors or officers of other companies or have significant shareholdings in other resource companies and, to the extent that such other companies may participate in ventures in which the Company may participate, such directors and officers may have a conflict of interest in negotiating and concluding terms respecting the extent of such participation. If such a conflict of interest arises at a meeting of the Company’s directors, a director with such a conflict will abstain from voting for or against the approval of such participation or such terms.

Passive Foreign Investment Company

U.S. investors in common shares should be aware that based on current business plans and financial expectations, EMX currently expects that it will be classified as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for the tax year ending December 31, 2018 and expects to be a PFIC in future tax years. If EMX is a PFIC for any tax year during a U.S. shareholder’s holding period, then such U.S. shareholder generally will be required to treat any gain realized upon a disposition of common shares, or any so-called “excess distribution” received on its common shares, as ordinary income, and to pay an interest charge on a portion of such gain or distributions, unless the U.S. shareholder makes a timely and effective “qualified electing fund” election (“QEF Election”) or a “mark-to-market” election with respect to the common shares. A U.S. shareholder who makes a QEF Election generally must report on a current basis its share of the Company’s net capital gain and ordinary earnings for any year in which EMX is a PFIC, whether or not EMX distributes any amounts to its shareholders. For each tax year that EMX qualifies as a PFIC, EMX intends to: (a) make available to U.S. shareholders, upon their written request, a “PFIC Annual Information Statement” as described in Treasury Regulation Section 1.1295 -1(g) (or any successor Treasury Regulation) and (b) upon written request, use commercially reasonable efforts to provide all additional information that such U.S. shareholder is required to obtain in connection with maintaining such QEF Election with regard to EMX. EMX may elect to provide such information on its website www.EMXRoyalty.com. This paragraph is qualified in its entirety by the discussion below the heading “Taxation – Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations.” Each U.S. investor should consult its own tax advisor regarding the PFIC rules and the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares.

U.S. federal income tax reform could adversely affect us

On December 22, 2017, legislation commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or TCJA, was signed into law, significantly reforming the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. The TCJA, among other things, includes changes to U.S. federal tax rates, imposes significant additional limitations on the deductibility of interest, allows for the expensing of capital expenditures, puts into effect the migration from a “worldwide” system of taxation to a territorial system and modifies or repeals many business deductions and credits. We continue to examine the impact the TCJA may have on our business. We will evaluate the effect of the TCJA on our projection of minimal cash taxes or to our net operating losses. The estimated impact of the TCJA is based on our management’s current knowledge and assumptions and recognized impacts could be materially different from current estimates based on our actual results and our further analysis of the new law. Our net deferred tax assets and liabilities will be revalued at the newly enacted U.S. corporate rate, and the impact will be recognized in our tax expense in the year of enactment. The impact of the TCJA on holders of common shares is uncertain and could be adverse. This Annual Report does not discuss any such tax legislation or the manner in which it might affect purchasers of common shares. We urge our stockholders, including purchasers of common shares, to consult with their own legal and tax advisors with respect to such legislation and the potential tax consequences of investing in common shares.

Corporate Governance and Public Disclosure Regulations

The Company is subject to changing rules and regulations promulgated by a number of United States and Canadian governmental and self-regulated organizations, including the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the British Columbia and Alberta Securities Commissions, the NYSE American and the TSX-V. These rules and regulations continue to evolve in scope and complexity and many new requirements have been created, making compliance more difficult and uncertain. The Company’s efforts to comply with the new rules and regulations have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.

Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

Applicable securities laws require an annual assessment by management of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Company may, in the future, fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of its internal control over financial reporting, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, and the Company may not be able to ensure that it can conclude on an ongoing basis that it has effective internal control over financial reporting. Future acquisitions may provide the Company with challenges in implementing the required processes, procedures and controls in its acquired operations. Acquired Corporations may not have disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting that are as thorough or effective as those required by securities laws currently applicable to the Company.

19

No evaluation can provide complete assurance that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting will detect or uncover all failures of persons within the Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be reported. The effectiveness of the Company’s controls and procedures could also be limited by simple errors or faulty judgments. In addition, should the Company expand in the future, the challenges involved in implementing appropriate internal control over financial reporting will increase and will require that the Company continue to improve its internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

4.A. History and Development of the Company

General Background

EMX Royalty Corporation was incorporated under the laws of the Yukon Territory of Canada on August 21, 2001 as 33544 Yukon Inc. and, on October 10, 2001, changed its name to Southern European Exploration Ltd. On November 24, 2003, the Company completed the reverse take-over of Marchwell Capital Corp., a TSX-V-listed company incorporated in Alberta on May 13, 1996 and which subsequently changed its name to Eurasian Minerals Inc. On September 21, 2004, EMX continued into British Columbia from Alberta under the Business Corporations Act. On July 19, 2017, EMX changed its name to EMX Royalty Corporation to better reflect the nature of its business.

EMX is a reporting issuer under the securities legislation of British Columbia and Alberta, and is listed on the TSX-V Exchange as a Tier 1 issuer and the NYSE American Exchange, with both listings under the symbol “EMX”.

The Company’s corporate office is located at Suite 501, 543 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 1X8, and its telephone number is 604-688-6390. The Company’s registered and records office is located at Suite 704, 595 Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 2T5. The Company’s technical office is located at 10001 W. Titan Road, Littleton, Colorado, United States of America, 80125, and its telephone number is 303-973-8585. The contact person is Marien Segovia, Corporate Secretary.

Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2015

• | In February 2015, Mr. Paul H. Stephens was appointed to the Company’s advisory board.
• | In March 2015, Dr. M. Stephen Enders resigned from the position of Chief Operating Officer and as a Director of the Board. Dr. Enders continued as a consultant and was appointed to the Company’s advisory board.
• | On May 4, 2015 the Company announced the signing of an Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement (the "Superior West Agreement"), through its wholly owned subsidiary Bronco Creek Exploration Inc. ("BCE"), for the Superior West porphyry copper project (the "Superior West Project") with Kennecott Exploration Company (“Superior West Agreement”). The project is located nearby the Resolution porphyry copper project within the Superior Mining District, approximately 100 kilometers east of Phoenix, Arizona.
| Pursuant to the Superior West Agreement, Kennecott can earn a 100% interest in the Project by making a cash payment upon execution of the Agreement of US$149,187, and thereafter completing US$5,500,000 in exploration expenditures and paying annual option payments totaling US$1,000,000 before the fifth anniversary of the Superior West Agreement.
| Upon exercise of the option the Company will retain a 2% NSR royalty on the properties. Kennecott has the right to buy down 1% of the NSR royalty covering 14 claims which are optioned (the “Optioned Claims”) from underlying claim holders by payment of US$4,000,000 to EMX. Except with respect to the Optioned Claims, the royalty is not capped and not subject to buy-down.
| After exercise of the option, annual advanced minimum royalty (“AMR”) payments are due starting at US$125,000 and commencing on the first anniversary of the exercise of the option. The AMR payments will increase to US$200,000 upon completion of an Order of Magnitude Study ("OMS") or Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA"). Kennecott may make a one-time payment of US$4,000,000 to extinguish the obligation to make AMR payments. In addition, if not previously extinguished, total AMR payments after the OMS or PEA milestone payment are capped at US$4,000,000, and all AMR payments cease upon production from the Superior West Project.

20

In addition, Kennecott will make milestone payments consisting of:

| - | US$500,000 upon completion of an OMS or PEA;
| - | US$1,000,000 upon completion of a Prefeasibility Study; and
| - | US$2,500,000 upon completion of a Feasibility Study. The Feasibility Study payment will be credited against future royalty payments.

• | On May 26, 2015 the Company reported the initial NI 43-101 resource estimate and Russian Federation project approvals for the Malmyzh copper-gold porphyry project (see the Section 4D, Strategic Investments, IG Copper LLC for additional discussion). The Malmyzh exploration and mining licenses, located in the Russian Far East, are held by a Joint Venture between IG Copper LLC (“IGC”) (51%) and Freeport-McMoRan Exploration Corporation (“Freeport”) (49%), with IGC operating and managing the project. The Company is IGC’s largest shareholder. EMX’s investment in IGC is in recognition of the significant potential of the district-scale discovery at Malmyzh, as well as IGC’s success in acquiring additional exploration properties in a prospective region under-explored for its porphyry copper-gold potential.
• | On June 11, 2015 the Company announced that pursuant to the Company’s Stock Option Plan, an aggregate of 1,341,500 incentive stock options, exercisable at a price of $0.66 per share for a period of five years, had been granted to officers, directors, employees and consultants of the Company.
• | On July 13, 2015 the Company announced that the National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects technical report titled "NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Initial Mineral Resource Estimate for the Malmyzh Copper-Gold Project, Khabarovsk Krai, Russian Federation" (the "Report") dated July 10, 2015 was filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
• | On August 4, 2015 the Company announced the signing of an Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement, through its wholly owned subsidiary BCE, for the Aguila de Cobre porphyry copper project (the "Aguila de Cobre Project") with Kennecott (the “Aguila de Cobre Agreement”). The Aguila de Cobre Project is located approximately 120 kilometers west of Phoenix, Arizona in a relatively un-explored region of the Arizona porphyry copper belt.
| Pursuant to the Aguila de Cobre Agreement, Kennecott can earn a 100% interest in the Aguila de Cobre Project by making cash payments and performing exploration as follows (all amounts are US$):
| Cash Payments:

| - | $25,000 upon execution of the Aguila de Cobre Agreement (firm commitment);
| - | $25,000 on the first and second anniversaries of the Agreement;
| - | $50,000 on the third anniversary of the Aguila de Cobre Agreement; and
| - | $100,000 upon exercise of the Option.

| Exploration:

| - | Completing $250,000 of exploration expenditures (or paying the Company that amount) by the first anniversary of the Aguila de Cobre Agreement (firm commitment); and
| - | Completing an additional $3,750,000 of exploration expenditures (or paying the Company that amount) by the third anniversary of the Aguila de Cobre Agreement.

Upon exercise of the option, the Company will retain a 2% NSR royalty on the property. The royalty is not capped and not subject to buy-down. The Aguila de Cobre Agreement contains a one-mile area of interest provision.

After exercise of the option, AMR payments are due starting at $50,000 and commencing on the first anniversary of the exercise of the option. The AMR payments will increase to $100,000 upon completion of an OMS or PEA, after which Kennecott may make a one-time payment of $2,500,000 to extinguish the obligation to make future AMR payments. In addition, if not previously extinguished, total AMR payments after the OMS or PEA milestone payment are capped at $2,500,000, and all AMR payments cease upon production from the properties.

In addition, Kennecott will make milestone payments consisting of:

| - | $500,000 upon completion of an OMS or PEA;

21

| - | $500,000 upon completion of a Pre-Feasibility Study; and
| - | $1,000,000 upon completion of a Feasibility Study - this payment will be credited against future royalty payments.

• | On October 30, 2015 the Company announced that it had regained 100% control of the Akarca gold-silver project in Turkey (the “Property”). The Company had an agreement with Çolakoglu Ticari Yatirim A.S. ("Çolakoglu"), a privately owned Turkish company, for an option to acquire AES Turkey, a Turkish corporation that controls the property. Çolakoglu advised the Company that it decided to forego exercising the option. Çolakoglu made cash payments of US $350,000 to the Company while advancing the property through substantial exploration and drilling programs, as well as metallurgical and environmental studies.
| The Akarca project is a grassroots discovery highlighted by six separate gold-silver mineralized centers occurring within a district-scale area. Exploration completed at the time included 245 core and reverse circulation holes totaling about 26,400 meters of drilling and property-wide geologic mapping, geochemical sampling, and geophysical surveys. This work had been conducted primarily through partner-funded programs totaling over US $13 million that considerably advanced the project.
• | On November 2, 2015 the Company announced the sale of its interests in Haiti to joint venture partner Newmont Ventures Limited (“Newmont” or "NVL"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation, for a US $4 million (CDN $5.3 million) cash payment and a retained 0.5% NSR royalty interest.
| The now terminated EMX-Newmont joint ventures (the “Joint Ventures”) covered six designated exploration areas along a 130 kilometer trend of northern Haiti's Massif du Nord mineral belt. Since 2013, activities in the designated exploration areas were limited to care and maintenance only.
| Pursuant to the transaction, Newmont acquired all of the Company's interest in the Research Permit applications on the following terms:

| - | Newmont paid US $4 million (CDN $5.3 million) in cash to the Company at closing;
| - | The Joint Ventures were terminated;
| - | The Company retains a 0.5% NSR royalty on the 49 Research Permit applications covering the designated exploration areas; and
| - | The Company retains the right to acquire any properties proposed to be abandoned or surrendered by Newmont.

• | On November 16, 2015, the Company announced the resignation of Valerie Barlow as Corporate Secretary and the appointment of Kim Casswell in her place.

On November 23, 2015, the Company announced the signing of an Exploration and Option Agreement with Black Sea Copper & Gold Corp. (“Black Sea”), a privately-held British Columbia corporation (the “Black Sea Agreement”), for the Alankoy copper-gold property in northwestern Turkey. Black Sea's option to earn a 100% interest in the subsidiary companies that control the property required work commitments, payments, and annual advance royalties (“AARs”).The Company was to retain a production royalty of 3% for gold, silver, and other precious metals and 2% for all other minerals produced from the project.

• | On November 24, 2015 the Company announced the signing of an Exploration and Option Agreement (the “Hardshell Agreement”), through its wholly owned subsidiary BCE, for the Hardshell Skarn property (the "Hardshell Property") with Arizona Minerals Inc. (“AMI”). The Hardshell Property is located approximately 75 kilometers southeast of Tucson, Arizona within the Patagonia Mountains and is included in Arizona Minerals's Hermosa project.
| Pursuant to the Hardshell Agreement, AMI could earn a 100% interest in the Hardshell Property by making cash payments totaling $85,000 (all amounts are US$). Upon exercise of the option the Company will retain a 2% NSR royalty on the Hardshell Property and will receive AAR payments of $5,000 commencing on the first anniversary of the exercise of the option. The royalty is not capped and not subject to buy-down.
• | On December 10, 2015 the Company announced that IGC had advised that an additional license had been granted for the Malmyzh copper-gold porphyry project in Far East Russia. The Malmyzh licenses are held by IGC (51%) and Freeport (49%), with IGC operating and managing the project. The new "Malmzyh Flanks" exploration license expands the Joint Venture's land position covering the Malmyzh district for a total of 226.9 square kilometers, and includes additional areas for potential infrastructure development as well as extensions to known exploration targets. EMX is IGC's largest shareholder.

22

• | On December 23, 2015 the Company announced it had been advised of the initial shipment of material for processing from the Balya lead-zinc-silver royalty property by owner and operator Dedeman Balya Kursun Cinko Isletmeleri A.S. The Company retains an uncapped 4% net smelter return royalty on the Balya property, which is located in the historic Balya mining district of northwestern Turkey. The Dedeman group (collectively "Dedeman") includes privately-held Turkish mining companies with active operations that produce lead, zinc, silver, and chromite.

Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2016

• | On February 23, 2016 the Company announced the execution of a purchase agreement (the “Golden Predator Agreement”) for net smelter return royalty interests on the Maggie Creek and Afgan gold properties from Golden Predator US Holding Corp. (“Golden Predator”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Till Capital Ltd. ("TCL"). Golden Predator had a 2% NSR royalty on all precious metals and a 1% NSR royalty on all other minerals for the Maggie Creek property, which is located north-northeast of Newmont Mining Corporation's ("Newmont") Gold Quarry open pit operations on the Carlin Trend, and a 1% NSR royalty on all minerals for the Afgan property, which occurs on the Battle Mountain-Eureka Trend. The addition of these two royalty assets strengthened the Company's growing Nevada gold portfolio that includes the Leeville royalty property on the Northern Carlin Trend, as well as the Maggie Creek South royalty property located south-southeast of Gold Quarry.
| A summary of the Golden Predator Agreement's commercial terms includes:

| - | Purchase by the Company of Golden Predator’s NSR royalties covering the Maggie Creek (2% NSR on precious metals and 1% NSR royalty on all other minerals) and Afgan (1% NSR royalty) properties;
| - | Issuance by the Company of 250,000 EMX shares to TCL as consideration for the purchase; and
| - | Approval by the TSX-V and NYSE American as a condition precedent to closing the transaction.

• | On March 7, 2016 the Company announced that the purchase of net smelter return royalty interests had been completed for the Maggie Creek and Afgan gold properties from Golden Predator after receiving approvals from the TSX Venture and NYSE American Exchanges.
• | In Q1 2016, EMX sold its 100% controlled Grand Bois project in Haiti, which was outside the Joint Venture with Newmont, to a privately held Nevada corporation. EMX retained a 0.5% NSR royalty interest in the Grand Bois project and the right to acquire any properties proposed to be abandoned or surrendered from the Grand Bois project in the future.
• | On July 25, 2016 the Company reported that IGC advised that approval to advance the Malmyzh copper-gold project had been received from the Government Commission on Monitoring Foreign Investment (the "Commission") chaired by Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev. The Malmyzh exploration and mining licenses are held by IGC (51%) and Freeport- McMoRan Exploration Corporation (49%) (the "Joint Venture"), with IGC operating and managing the project. The Commission's approval marks a pivotal milestone in the development of the Malmzyh project. EMX is IGC’s largest shareholder.
| IGC advised that the Commission's approval represents the successful completion of the review process required for “strategically significant” deposits according to Russian law (i.e., the Law on Foreign Investments in Strategic Industries, also termed the Strategic Industries Law or "SIL"). The SIL approval process commenced after the Joint Venture, through its Russian subsidiary Amur Minerals LLC, received certified “on balance C1+C2 reserves” from the GKZ (State Reserves Committee) that exceeded thresholds for both copper and gold defining Malmyzh as a "strategically significant" mineral deposit. EMX emphasizes that the Malmyzh “C1+C2 reserves” were estimated according to the rules and regulations of the Russian Federation, and are not the same as reserves under NI 43-101 or SEC Industry Guide 7. According to IGC, highlights of the Commission's approval included:

| - | The Joint Venture, as a majority foreign owned business entity, has been approved to retain control of the Malmyzh project exploration and mining licenses.
| - | The Joint Venture, therefore, maintains mining and production rights for the Malmyzh and Malmyzh North exploration and mining licenses.
| - | The Joint Venture holds 100% of the rights for the Malmyzh and Malmyzh North exploration and mining licenses, and is entitled to recover all minerals of economic value including copper, gold and by- product minerals.

23

| The conclusion of the SIL process initiated a new, multi-year phase in the project's development, including additional technical work (i.e., drilling, exploration, metallurgy, engineering, and hydrology), as well as environmental, social, and economic assessments. This next phase of work will ultimately conclude as a detailed "TEO1 of Permanent Conditions" report, which is considered to be a precursor to commencement of exploitation and mining.
| 1 Technico-Economicheskiye Obosnovaniye (Technical-Economic Basis)
• | On August 3, 2016, the Company announced the sale of EBX Madencilik A.S., the wholly-owned EMX subsidiary that controls the Sisorta gold property (the “Sisorta Property”) in Turkey, to Bahar Madencilik Sinayi ve Ticaret Ltd Sti ("Bahar"), a privately owned Turkish company, pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement (the “Sisorta Agreement”) with Bahar.
| The Sisorta Agreement provides for Bahar's staged payments to EMX as summarized below (all amounts in USD):

| - | $250,000 cash payment to EMX upon closing of the sale.
| - | Annual cash payments of $125,000 (“Advance Cash Payments”) payable on each anniversary of the closing date until commencement of commercial production from the Sisorta Property.
| - | 3.5% of production returns after certain deductions (“NSR Payment") for ore mined from the Sisorta Property that is processed on-site (increased to 5% if the ore is processed off-site).
| - | The Advance Cash Payments will be credited at a rate of 80% against the NSR Payment payable after commercial production commences.
| - | The NSR Payment is uncapped and cannot be bought out or reduced.

| Bahar intends to conduct advanced exploration and development work on the Sisorta project.
• | On August 8, 2016 the Company announced the sale of AES Madencilik A.S., the wholly-owned EMX subsidiary that controls the Akarca gold-silver project (the “Akarca Property”) in western Turkey, to Çiftay Insaat Taahhüt ve Ticaret A.S. ("Çiftay"), a privately owned Turkish company. The Akarca Property is an EMX grassroots discovery highlighted by six separate gold-silver mineralized centers occurring within a district-scale area.
| The terms of the sale provide payments to EMX as summarized below (all dollar amounts in United States dollars and all gold payments can be as gold bullion or the cash equivalent):

| - | $2,000,000 cash payment to EMX upon closing of the sale (completed).
| - | 500 ounces of gold every six months commencing February 1, 2017 up to a cumulative total of 7,000 ounces of gold.
| - | 7,000 ounces of gold within 30 days after the commencement of commercial production from the Akarca Property provided that prior gold payments will be credited against this payment.
| - | 250 ounces of gold upon production of 100,000 ounces of gold from the Akarca Property.
| - | 250 ounces of gold upon production of an aggregate of 500,000 ounces of gold from the Akarca Property.
| - | A sliding-scale royalty in the amount of the following percentages of production returns after certain deductions (“Akarca Royalty”) for ore mined from the Akarca Property:
| - | For gold production: 1.0% on the first 100,000 ounces of gold; 2.0% on the next 400,000 ounces of gold; 3.0% on all gold production in excess of 500,000 ounces produced from the Akarca Property.
| - | For all production other than gold production: 3.0%.
| - | The Akarca Royalty is uncapped and cannot be bought out or reduced.

| In addition, Çiftay must conduct a drilling program of at least 3,000 meters on the Akarca Property during each 12- month period starting on August 5, 2016 until commencement of commercial production.
• | On September 8, 2016 the Company provided an update on exploration results from the Company's spring and summer programs in Norway and Sweden. EMX built a portfolio of exploration projects in Scandinavia, and compiled geologic information and generated drill targets on those properties. Reconnaissance drilling at the Gumsberg Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide (“VMS”) project, located in the prolific Bergslagen district of Sweden, yielded several shallow high grade intercepts of polymetallic mineralization along a > 2 kilometer trend of mineralization.
• | On October 17, 2016 the Company announced the sale of five patented mining claims comprising its Ophir property in Utah (the “Utah Property”), through its wholly owned subsidiary Bullion Monarch Mining Inc., to Kennecott.
| Upon closing of the sale of the Utah Property:

24

| - | Kennecott paid EMX US$75,000,
| - | EMX retained a 2% NSR royalty, and
| - | EMX retains the rights to exploration data generated from the Property.

| As a result of the sale, the Ophir property has been added to EMX's royalty portfolio.
• | On October 19, 2016 the Company announced the execution of an Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement (the "Copper King Agreement"), through its wholly owned subsidiary BCE, for the Copper King porphyry copper project (the “Copper King Project”) with Kennecott. The Copper King Project is located approximately 100 kilometers east of Phoenix, Arizona within the Superior Mining District, and approximately four kilometers northwest of the Resolution porphyry copper deposit.
| Pursuant to the Copper King Agreement, Kennecott can earn a 100% interest in the Copper King Project by (a) reimbursing the 2016 holding costs and making option payments, together totaling US$504,314 (US$29,314 related to holding costs received), and (b) completing US$4,000,000 in exploration expenditures before the fifth anniversary of the Copper King Agreement. Upon exercise of the option EMX will retain a 2% NSR royalty on the Copper King Project which is not capped or purchasable.
| After exercise of the option, AMR payments are due starting at US$100,000 and commencing on the first anniversary of the exercise of the option. The AMR payments will increase to US$150,000 upon completion of an Order of Magnitude Study ("OMS") or PEA. Kennecott may make a one-time payment of US$3,500,000 to extinguish the obligation to make AMR payments. In addition, if not previously extinguished, total AMR payments after the OMS or PEA milestone payment are capped at US$3,500,000, and all AMR payments cease upon commencement of production from the Project.
| In addition, Kennecott will make milestone payments consisting of:

| - | US$500,000 upon completion of an OMS or PEA;
| - | US$1,000,000 upon completion of a Prefeasibility Study; and
| - | US$2,000,000 upon completion of a Feasibility Study. The Feasibility Study payment will be credited against future royalty payments.

• | On October 27, 2016 the Company announced that it had entered into an exploration and option agreement (the “Coeur Agreement”), through its wholly-owned subsidiary BCE, with Coeur Explorations, Inc., a subsidiary of Coeur Mining, Inc. (“Coeur”) for the Mineral Hill gold-copper property (“Mineral Hill Property”) in Wyoming. EMX’s Mineral Hill project is held under a pooling agreement with a private group, Mineral Hill L.P. (“MHL”), with all proceeds split 50:50, except for the sale of surface rights associated with several patented mining claims.
| Pursuant to the Coeur Agreement, Coeur may acquire a 100% interest in the Mineral Hill Property by a) making yearly option payments, beginning upon execution of the Coeur Agreement, totaling US$435,000 (US$10,000 received upon execution), b) making exploration expenditures totaling US$1,550,000 on or before the fifth anniversary of the agreement, and c) paying US$250,000 upon exercise of the option.
| Upon exercise of the option, EMX and MHL will retain a 4% NSR royalty, of which Coeur may purchase up to 1.5% of the NSR royalty if, within sixty days after the completion of a PEA, Coeur purchases the first 0.5% for US$1,000,000. Coeur may purchase an additional 0.5% or 1% of the NSR royalty at any time thereafter for US$2,000,000 per 0.5% interest (maximum total buy down of 1.5%), with EMX and MHL retaining a 2.5% interest.
| After the option exercise, EMX and MHL will receive annual advance minimum royalties of US$150,000 and, upon completion of a feasibility study, a milestone payment of US$1,000,000.
• | On November 22, 2016 the Company announced the execution of a definitive agreement with Boreal Metals Corp. (“BMC”), a British Columbia corporation, pursuant to which BMC acquired two wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company that control the Gumsberg and Adak exploration assets in Sweden and the Tynset and Burfjord assets in Norway (the “Scandinavian Properties”). Closing occurred in Q1 2017.

| - | At closing, EMX transferred to BMC its entire interest in its wholly-owned subsidiary Iekelvare AB, which owns or will own that portion of the Scandinavian Properties located in Sweden, and its entire interest in its wholly-owned subsidiary EMX Exploration Scandinavia AB, which owns that portion of the Scandinavian Properties located in Norway.

25

| - | At closing, BMC issued to EMX that number of common shares of BMC that represents a 19.9% equity ownership in BMC; BMC had the continuing obligation to issue additional shares of BMC to EMX to maintain its 19.9% interest in BMC, at no additional cost to EMX, until BMC has raised CDN$5,000,000 in equity; thereafter EMX has the right to participate pro-rata in future financings at its own cost to maintain its 19.9% interest in BMC.
| - | EMX will receive an uncapped 3% NSR royalty on each of the Scandinavian Properties. Within five years of the closing date, BMC has the right to buy down up to 1% of the royalty owed to EMX on any given project (leaving EMX with a 2% NSR) by paying EMX US$2,500,000 in cash and shares of BMC. Such buy down is project specific.
| - | EMX will receive AAR payments of US$20,000 for each of the Properties commencing on the second anniversary of the closing, with each AAR payment increasing by US$5,000 per year until reaching US$60,000 per year, except that BMC may forgo AAR payments on two of the four Scandinavian Properties in years two and three. Once reaching US$60,000, AAR payments will be adjusted each year according to the Consumer Price Index (as published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics).
| - | EMX will receive a 0.5% NSR royalty on any new mineral exploration projects generated by BMC in Sweden or Norway, excluding projects acquired from a third party containing a mineral resource or reserve or an existing mining operation. These royalties are not capped and not subject to a buy down.
| - | EMX has the right to one seat on the Board of Directors of BMC.

• | On December 16, 2016 the Company announced that it was changing the ticker symbol of its common shares listed on the NYSE American from EMXX to EMX effective Monday, December 26, 2016. The Company trades on both the TSX Venture and NYSE American exchanges as EMX.

Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2017

• | On January 24, 2017 the Company announced initial results from IGC's fall-winter drill program at the Malmyzh copper- gold porphyry project, including the longest mineralized intercept drilled to date on the property. Drill hole AMM-213 intersected 747.4 meters (108.7-856.1 m) averaging 0.49% copper equivalent (0.41% copper and 0.17 g/t gold) principally hosted in phreatomagmatic breccias and diorite porphyries at the Freedom Northwest prospect (true width). The hole doubled the drilled vertical extent of the Freedom Northwest system, while bottoming in mineralization. In addition, reconnaissance drilling at the Sleeper West prospect intersected a shallow zone of 109 meters averaging 0.58% copper equivalent (0.53% copper and 0.09 g/t gold) starting at 13.5 meters in hole AMM-210 (true width). Freedom Northwest and Sleeper West are not included in the current Malmyzh resource estimate, which underscores the project's additional exploration upside. The Malmyzh exploration and mining licenses are held by IGC (51%) and Freeport- McMoRan Exploration Corporation (49%) (the "Joint Venture"), with IGC operating and managing the project. EMX is IGC’s largest shareholder.
• | On January 25, 2017 the Company provided an update on the Company's Leeville royalty property that covers portions of Newmont Mining Corporation's ("Newmont") underground mining operations in the Northern Carlin Trend. EMX has noted an increase in Leeville royalty revenue and equity gold ounces starting in mid-2016. In addition to royalty income from gold production, the Leeville property also provides the Company with upside exposure to Newmont's ongoing exploration advancements at the Rita K and Full House gold deposits. Newmont expects initial resources for Rita K in 2018, and has already outlined resources at Full House.
• | On February 8, 2017 the Company announced the receipt of a payment of US $601,825, the cash equivalent of 500 troy ounces of gold, from Çiftay Insaat Taahhüt ve Ticaret A.S. ("Çiftay"), as part of the payment schedule for the Akarca gold-silver project in western Turkey. The Akarca Property was transferred to Çiftay in August, 2016 for a combination of cash, future payment streams denominated in gold bullion, and a royalty interest. Çiftay informed EMX that it had completed an initial 49 hole diamond drill program comprising 6,032 meters on the Akarca Property in the 4th quarter of 2016.
• | On February 28, 2017 the Company announced the execution of an option agreement (the "Copper Springs Agreement"), through its wholly owned subsidiary BCE, for the Copper Springs porphyry copper project ("Copper Springs Project") with Anglo American Exploration (USA), Inc. (“Anglo American”). The Copper Springs Project is located approximately 120 kilometers east of Phoenix, Arizona within the Globe-Miami Mining District.
| Pursuant to the Copper Springs Agreement, Anglo American can earn a 100% interest in the Copper Springs Project by (a) reimbursing BCE’s 2016 holding and permitting costs and making annual option payments, together totaling US$447,000, and (b) completing US$5,000,000 in exploration expenditures before the fifth anniversary of the Agreement. Upon exercise of the option, Anglo American will pay EMX an additional US$110,000 and EMX will retain a 2% NSR royalty on the Copper Springs Project. The royalty is not capped or purchasable, except over two parcels of Arizona State Land where Anglo American can buy a 0.5% NSR royalty from EMX for US$2,000,000.

26

After exercise of the option, AMR Payments of US$100,000 are due, commencing on the first anniversary of the exercise of the option. The AMR Payments will increase to US$200,000 upon completion of a Scoping Study or PEA. Anglo American may make a one-time payment of US$3,500,000 to extinguish the obligation to make any post-Scoping Study AMR payments. All AMR Payments cease upon commencement of production from the project.

In addition, Anglo American will make milestone payments consisting of:

| - | US$500,000 upon completion of a Scoping Study or PEA;
| - | US$1,000,000 upon completion of a Prefeasibility Study; and
| - | US$2,000,000 upon completion of a Feasibility Study. The Feasibility Study payment will be credited against future royalty payments.

| Anglo American will manage and operate the Copper Springs Project.
• | On April 12, 2017 the Company announced the completion of a non-brokered private placement (all dollar amounts in CDN). The Company raised $7,000,000 by the issuance of 5,000,000 units at a price of $1.40 per unit. Each unit was comprised of one common share and one-half of one non-transferable common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase an additional common share for $2.00 until April 12, 2019. Fees were paid on a portion of the Private Placement. The fees consisted of 246,604 units (6% of the units sold to investors introduced by finders) issued to Sprott Global Resource Investments, Ltd. (219,424 units), Sprott Private Wealth LP (15,000 units), Haywood Securities Inc. (10,380 units) and Mackie Research Capital Corporation (1,800 units). Insiders of the Company purchased 89,230 units and Pro Group members a further 19,000 units.
• | On May 3, 2017 the Company announced the appointment of Mr. Thomas G. Mair as General Manager of Corporate Development.
• | On July 17, 2017 the Company announced a name change from Eurasian Minerals Inc. to EMX Royalty Corporation effective July 19, 2017 to better reflect the nature of its business.
• | On July 25, 2017 the Company announced IGC's 2017 drill results from the Malmyzh copper-gold porphyry project's Freedom Northwest prospect, including an intercept of 417.3 meters (219.4-636.7 m) averaging 0.60% copper equivalent (0.50% copper and 0.21 g/t gold), including a higher grade sub-interval of 142.6 meters (255.4-398.0 m) averaging 0.74% copper equivalent (0.62% copper and 0.26 g/t gold) from hole AMM-216 (true widths). The mineralization is principally hosted in magmatic-hydrothermal breccias. The ongoing exploration program at Freedom Northwest represents the first deep drill testing at Malmyzh, as previous drilling has been concentrated on shallow mineralization throughout the district. Freedom Northwest is not included in the current Malmyzh resource estimate, which further emphasizes the project's exploration upside. EMX is IGC’s largest shareholder.
• | On August 4, 2017, EMX received a payment of US$634,015, the cash equivalent of 500 troy ounces of gold as the second gold bullion payment, from Çiftay, as part of the payment schedule for the Akarca gold-silver project in western Turkey. The Akarca Property was transferred to Çiftay in August, 2016 for a combination of cash, future payment streams denominated in gold bullion, and a royalty interest.
• | On September 19, 2017 the Company announced that Koonenberry Gold Pty Ltd. (“KNB”) had completed the earn-in requirements under the Exploration and Option Agreement (the “Koonenberry Agreement”) dated January 31, 2014 between North Queensland Mining Pty Ltd. (“NQM”) and the Company, and had elected to acquire EMX’s Koonenberry exploration licenses (the "Koonenberry Project") in New South Wales, Australia. KNB is the successor in interest to NQM under the Koonenberry Agreement. In accordance with the Koonenberry Agreement, EMX has transferred its wholly-owned subsidiary EMX Exploration Pty Ltd, the holder of the Koonenberry licenses, to KNB, a private Australian company formed for the sole purpose of developing the project. EMX has retained a 3% production royalty on all future production from the Koonenberry licenses. As a result of this transaction, all of EMX’s interests in the Koonenberry Project have been converted to retained royalty interests.
• | On December 4, 2017 the Company announced the execution of an option agreement (the "Sienna Agreement") for the Slättberg project (the "Slättberg Project") with Sienna Resources Inc. (“Sienna”) (TSX Venture: SIE). The Sienna Agreement provides EMX with immediate share equity in Sienna, and upon Sienna's earn-in through work commitments, additional share equity and a 3% NSR royalty on the Slättberg Project. The Slättberg Project hosts nickel-copper-cobalt enriched massive sulfide mineralization and is located approximately 25 kilometers northwest of Falun, Sweden.

27

Pursuant to the Sienna Agreement, Sienna can earn 100% interest in the Slättberg Project by the issuance of shares to EMX and performance of work during the one-year option period, as described below:

| - | On signing the agreement, Sienna issued to EMX 3 million common shares of Sienna stock.
| - | As a condition to the exercise of the option, Sienna must undertake work commitments of at least $500,000 on the Project, including drilling of at least 750 meters.
| - | Upon exercise of the option, Sienna will issue to EMX an additional 3 million shares of Sienna stock, and EMX will receive a 3% NSR royalty on the properties comprising the Project.
| - | Within six years of the execution of the agreement, Sienna may purchase 0.5% of the NSR royalty for $1,500,000, leaving EMX with a 2.5% NSR royalty.
| - | After exercise of the option, Sienna will use commercially reasonable efforts to raise $3,000,000 for development of the project and other activities. Once Sienna has raised that amount, Sienna will issue an additional 4 million shares to EMX. Thereafter, EMX will have the right to participate pro-rata in future financings at its own cost to maintain its interest in Sienna.

• | On December 18, 2017 the Company announced the execution of an option agreement (the "Antofagasta Agreement") through its wholly owned subsidiary BCE, for the Greenwood Peak copper porphyry project (the "Greenwood Peak Project") with a wholly owned subsidiary of Antofagasta plc (“Antofagasta”). The Greenwood Peak Project, located approximately 175 kilometers northwest of Phoenix, Arizona, contains a copper porphyry target concealed beneath younger gravels and basin fill sediments.
| Pursuant to the Antofagasta Agreement, Antofagasta can earn 100% interest in the Greenwood Peak Project by a) Reimbursing BCE’s acquisition costs and making annual option payments, together totaling US$630,000; and b) Completing US$4,500,000 in work expenditures within the five year option period. BCE will be the operator of the Project for Antofagasta. Upon exercise of the option EMX will retain a 2% NSR royalty on the Project, which is not capped and not subject to buy-down. After exercise of the option, AAR payments are due starting at US$100,000 on the first anniversary of the exercise of the option, and will increase to US$175,000 upon completion of a scoping study for the Project. Antofagasta may make a one-time payment of US$4,000,000 to extinguish the obligation to make AAR payments after completion of the scoping study. All AAR payments are recoupable against royalty payments owed to EMX.
| Antofagasta will also make project milestone payments consisting of:

| - | US$500,000 upon completion of a scoping study;
| - | US$1,000,000 upon completion of a pre-feasibility study; and
| - | US$2,000,000 upon completion of a feasibility study.

The feasibility milestone payment is recoupable against royalty payments owed to EMX.

Subsequent to Year Ended 2017

• | •On January 16, 2018 EMX announced that the execution of a definitive agreement (the "Boreal Agreement") for the sale of the Modum cobalt project (the "Modum Project") in Norway to Boreal Metals Corp. (“Boreal”) (TSX Venture: BMX). The agreement provides EMX with additional share equity in Boreal, a 3% NSR royalty on the project, and advance annual royalty payments. The Modum Project is located in southern Norway’s Modum mining district, ~75 kilometers west of Oslo. The project partially surrounds the historic Skuterud mine property, which was Europe’s principal producer of cobalt from the late eighteenth through nineteenth centuries.
| Pursuant to the Boreal Agreement, Boreal can acquire 100% interest in the Modum Project according to the following terms:

| - | At closing, Boreal will issue to EMX 1,324,181 common shares of Boreal that will bring EMX’s share of equity ownership in Boreal to 19.9%. EMX will have the right to participate pro-rata in future financings at its own cost to maintain its 19.9% interest in Boreal.
| - | At closing, EMX will transfer its Modum exploration licenses to Boreal.

28

| - | EMX will retain a 3% NSR royalty on the Project, of which 1% may be purchased by Boreal on or before the fifth anniversary of the closing date in 0.5% increments for a total of US $2,500,000 in cash and common shares of Boreal stock.
| - | EMX will receive AAR payments, with an initial US $20,000 payment, commencing on the second anniversary of the closing, with each subsequent AAR payment increasing by US $5,000 per year until reaching US $60,000 per year. Once reaching US $60,000, AAR payments will be adjusted each year according to the Consumer Price Index (as published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics).

• | On February 5, 2018, EMX received a payment of US$665,525 as the cash equivalent to the third 500 ounce gold bullion payment from Çiftay, as part of the payment schedule for the Akarca gold-silver project in western Turkey. The Akarca Property was transferred to Çiftay in August, 2016 for a combination of cash, future payment streams denominated in gold bullion, and a royalty interest. Receipt of this third payment leaves a pre-production total of 5,500 ounces of gold (or the cash equivalent) to be paid to EMX.
• | On February 8, 2018 the Company announced the execution of an option agreement (the "Kennecott Agreement"), through its wholly owned subsidiary BCE, for the Buckhorn Creek copper porphyry project (the "Buckhorn Creek Project") with Kennecott. The Kennecott Agreement provides for work commitments as well as cash payments to EMX during Kennecott's earn-in period, and upon earn-in, a 2% NSR royalty interest in addition to pre-production and milestone payments to EMX's benefit. The Buckhorn Creek Project is located in north-central Arizona, approximately 70 kilometers north of Phoenix, and lies in the greater Castle Creek Mining District.
| Pursuant to the Kennecott Agreement, Kennecott can earn 100% interest in the Buckhorn Creek Project by: (a) making a US $30,000 payment upon execution of the agreement and making subsequent option payments, together totaling US $550,000, and (b) completing US $4,500,000 in exploration expenditures before the fifth anniversary of the agreement. Upon exercise of the option EMX will retain a 2% NSR royalty on the project which is not capped or purchasable.
| After exercise of the option, annual advance minimum royalty (“AMR”) payments are due starting at US $100,000 and increasing to US $150,000 upon completion of an Order of Magnitude Study ("OMS") or PEA. Kennecott may make a one-time payment of US $3,500,000 to extinguish the obligation to make AMR payments. All AMR payments cease upon commencement of production from the project.
| In addition, Kennecott will make milestone payments consisting of:

| - | US $500,000 upon completion of an OMS or PEA,
| - | US $1,000,000 upon completion of a Prefeasibility Study, and
| - | US $2,000,000 upon completion of a Feasibility Study. The Feasibility Study payment will be credited against future royalty payments.

• | On February 9, 2018 the Company announced the execution of a purchase agreement (the "BEMC Agreement") for the Guldgruvan cobalt project (the "Guldgruvan Project") in Sweden with Boreal Energy Metals Corporation (“BEMC”), a newly created and wholly owned subsidiary of Boreal Metals Corporation (“Boreal”) (TSX Venture: BMX). The BEMC Agreement provides EMX with immediate share equity in BEMC, a 3% NSR royalty on the Project, and annual advance royalty payments. The Guldgruvan Project is located in Sweden’s Los mining district, a significant historic producer of cobalt and nickel. The Los District was a key source of cobalt locally used for pigments in the 17th and 18th centuries, and is the discovery locality of nickel.
| Pursuant to the Agreement, the Guldgruvan nr 101 license will be transferred to BEMC in exchange for the issuance of shares of BEMC, a royalty interest on the Guldgruvan Project, and other considerations according to the terms described below:

| - | At closing, BEMC will issue to EMX that number of common shares of BEMC that represents a 5.9% equity ownership in BEMC. BEMC will have the continuing obligation to issue additional shares of BEMC to EMX to maintain its 5.9% interest, at no additional cost to EMX, until BEMC has raised CDN $3,000,000 in equity. Thereafter, EMX will have the right to participate pro-rata in future financings at its own cost to maintain its 5.9% interest in BEMC.
| - | EMX will receive an uncapped 3% NSR royalty on the project. Within five years of the closing date, BEMC has the right to buy down up to 1% of the royalty owed to EMX (leaving EMX with a 2% NSR) by paying EMX US $2,500,000 in cash and shares of BEMC.
| - | EMX will receive AAR payments of US $20,000 commencing on the second anniversary of the closing, with each AAR payment increasing by US $5,000 per year until reaching US $60,000 per year. Once reaching US $60,000, AAR payments will be adjusted each year according to the Consumer Price Index (as published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics).

29

| - | EMX will also be reimbursed for its acquisition costs and previous expenditures on the project.
| - | The issuance of BEMC shares to EMX, as set forth in the Agreement, is subject to TSX Venture Exchange approval.

4.B. BUSINESS OVERVIEW

EMX is principally in the business of exploring for, and generating royalties from minerals properties, as well as identifying mineral property royalty opportunities for purchase. Under the royalty generation business model, the Company acquires and advances early-stage mineral exploration projects and then sells the projects to, and thereby forms relationships with, other parties in consideration of a retained royalty interest, as well as annual advance royalty and other pre-production cash or share payments and work commitments. Through its various agreements, EMX may also provide technical and commercial assistance to such companies as the projects advance. By selling interests in its projects to third parties for a royalty interest, EMX:

| (a) | reduces its exposure to the costs and risks associated with mineral exploration and project development,
| (b) | receives near term cash flow from scheduled pre-production and milestone based bonus payments,
| (c) | maintains the opportunity to participate in exploration upside, and
| (d) | develops a pipeline for potential production royalty payments and associated greenfields discoveries in the future.

This approach helps preserve the Company’s treasury, which can be utilized for further project acquisitions and other business initiatives.

The Company’s royalty and royalty generation exploration portfolio consists of properties in North America, Turkey, Europe, Haiti, Australia, and New Zealand. EMX started receiving royalty income as of August 17, 2012 when it acquired Bullion Monarch Mining, Inc. (“Bullion Monarch” or “BULM”).

Strategic investments are an important complement to the Company’s royalty acquisition and royalty generation initiatives. These investments are made in under-valued exploration companies identified by the Company. EMX helps to develop the value of these assets, with exit strategies that can include royalty positions or equity sales.

Government Regulation and Environmental Protection

The Company’s current exploration activities are conducted in North America, Turkey, Europe, Australia and New Zealand. Such activities are affected in varying degrees by political stability and government regulations relating to foreign investment and the mining industry. Changes in these regulations or shifts in political attitudes are beyond EMX’s control and may adversely affect EMX’s business. Operations may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to restrictions on production, income taxes, expropriation of property, repatriation of funds, environmental legislation and mine safety.

The mining industry is also subject to extensive and varying environmental regulations in each of the jurisdictions in which EMX operates. Environmental regulations establish standards respecting health, safety and environmental matters and place restrictions on toxins resulting from mining activities. These regulations can have an impact on the selection of mining projects and facilities, potentially resulting in increased capital expenditures by EMX or its joint venture partners. In addition, environmental legislation may require certain projects to be abandoned and sites reclaimed to the satisfaction of local authorities. EMX is committed to complying with environmental and operation legislation wherever it operates.

The Company’s current or future operations, including exploration and development activities on its properties, require permits from various governmental authorities, and such operations are, and will be, governed by laws and regulations governing exploration, development, taxes, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection and other matters. Compliance with these requirements may prove to be difficult and expensive. While EMX has properties in numerous jurisdictions, its most advanced projects are located in Turkey and the United States.

30

Governmental Regulation in Turkey

Mining Regulation

The legal mining regime in Turkey is principally governed by the Turkish Mining Law No. 3213, as amended most recently on February 4, 20151 for the purpose of, among other things, avoiding labour accidents, and restating the mining license fees, governmental royalties, and sanctions in order to make it more compliant with the most recent global conditions. The Turkish Mining Activities Implementation Communiqué was adopted and amended during the amendment of Turkish Mining Law on June 10, 2010; however, this Implementation Communiqué has not been amended yet in accordance with the latest amendments of Turkish Mining Law dated February 4, 2015. Turkey is still awaiting the adoption of the amendment of Implementation Communiqué to comply with latest amended Turkish Mining Law. The mining sector is regulated under the umbrella of the General Directorate of Mining Affairs of the Republic of Turkey, a unit of the Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources of the Republic of Turkey. Mining rights and minerals are exclusively owned by the Turkish state, and the ownership of minerals in Turkey is not subject to the ownership of the relevant land. The state, under the Turkish Mining Law and secondary mining legislation, delegates its rights to explore and operate to Turkish individuals or legal entities established under Turkish law by issuing licenses for a determined period of time in return for the payment of a royalty. There is no distinction between the mining rights that may be acquired by local investors and those that may be acquired by foreign investors so long as foreign investors establish a company in Turkey under Turkish law.

The General Directorate of Mining Affairs, is the authorized body to regulate mining activities and to issue mining licenses in Turkey. In addition, local administrative bodies of Turkey also have a certain level of authority relating to licenses and the regulation of mining facilities. Transferring the mining license is subject to the prior approval of the Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources of the Republic of Turkey.

The Turkish Mining Law classifies underground resources into six different groups, and the licensing procedure for each group differs slightly. Briefly, the groups are as follows: (I) sand and gravel, (II) marble and other similar decorative stones, (III) mineral salts from seas, lakes and fresh waters, (IV) energy, metal and industrial minerals, including gold, silver, platinum, copper, lead, zinc, aluminum, uranium, thorium and radioactive minerals, (V) precious minerals such as gemstones, and (VI) a group of minerals which is not stated amongst these groups shall be identified by the Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources of Republic of Turkey under secondary legislation of Turkey.

There are two types of licenses granted for the exploration and operation of mines and one type of operation permit under the Turkish Mining Law, as follows: Group II (b), Group III, Group IV minerals at the first stage require general exploration licenses. Group V minerals require exploration certificates. Group I and Group II (a) and (c) are directly granted with operation licenses.

- Exploration License. Enables its holder to carry out general exploration activities (i.e., all mining activities other than those carried out for production) in a specific area issued for a period of two years for Group IV minerals including gold mining and one year for the other groups. If the license holder owning a group of minerals satisfies its obligations, the license holder owning Group IV minerals will have a right to an additional four years of detailed exploration; for Group II (b), Group III and Group V mines, the relevant license holder is obliged to meet the operation license’s requirements until the end of its general exploration period.
- Operation License. Enables its holder to carry out operational activities within the same area as stated in the exploration license for the proved, potential and feasible mine reserve area. The term of the operation license for Group I (a) minerals are five years. The other groups of minerals are at least ten years depending on the specific project. The terms of the operation licenses may generally be extended upon the application of the license holder with a new operation project provided that such extension request is accepted by the General Directorate of Mining Affairs of Turkey. The term of the operation license for Group I (a) minerals cannot exceed thirty years, for Group II minerals cannot exceed forty years, and for other groups of minerals cannot exceed fifty years. Extension requests for more than thirty years for Group I (a) minerals and forty years for Group II minerals are made directly to the Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources of the Republic of Turkey and for more than fifty years for other groups of minerals are made directly to Ministry of Council of Republic of Turkey.
- Operation Permit. Enables its holder to operate a specific mine as specified in the operation license and granted only for the proved mine reserves area that is determined during the prospecting period. The license holder, within three years following the issuance of the operation license shall obtain the required approvals, permits such as environmental impact assessment decision, ownership decision, land usage decision, workplace opening and operation permit and other permits stated under clause 7 of the Mining Law and then, accordingly, the license holder is granted the operation permit by the General Directorate of Mining Affairs of Turkey. The operation permit is required to be obtained until the end of the term of the operation license.

______________________________________________________
1 Turkish Mining Law No.3213 was first adopted on June 4, 1985 with several amendments on December 24, 1986, July 30, 1999, June 15, 2001, May 26 2004, June 3, 2007, June 10, 2010 and with the latest amendment on February 4, 2015.

31

The Turkish Mining Law provides for different royalty percentages for different groups of mines. The royalty percentages for Group IV minerals, including gold, silver, platinum, lead copper, zinc, aluminum and uranium oxide minerals are in the below chart.

The Royalty Percentages For Group IV Minerals under Turkish Mining Law

Royalty(%) | Gold $/oz | Silver $/oz | Platinum $/oz | Copper $/oz | Lead $/oz | Zinc $/oz | Chrome $/T | Aluminum $/T | Uranium Oxide $/lb
2 | <800 | <10 | <500 | <5000 | <1000 | <1000 | <100 | <1000 | <20
4 | 801-1250 | 11-20 | 501-1000 | 5001- 7500 | 1001- 2000 | 1001- 2500 | 101-300 | 1001-2000 | 20-40
6 | 1251-1500 | 21-25 | 1001- 1250 | 7501- 8000 | 2001- 2250 | 2501- 3000 | 301-500 | 2001-2350 | 41-80
8 | 1501-1750 | 25-30 | 1251- 1500 | 8001- 8500 | 2251- 2500 | 3001- 3500 | 501-700 | 2351-2600 | 81-110
10 | 1751-2000 | 31-35 | 1501- 1750 | 8501- 9000 | 2501- 3000 | 3501- 4000 | 701-900 | 2601-2850 | 111-140
14 | 2001-2250 | 36-40 | 1751- 2000 | 9001- 9500 | 3001- 3500 | 4001- 4500 | 901-1100 | 2851-3100 | 141-170
16 | >2251 | >41 | >2001 | >9501 | >3501 | >4501 | >1101 | >3101 | >171

Environmental Regulation

In Turkey, where EMX’s most advanced projects are located, both the level of environmental regulation and its enforcement have become more stringent in recent years. Mining operations are subject to environmental laws and regulations promulgated by the Turkish Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning, the Ministry of Forestry and Water Works and regional and local authorities. The Turkish Mining Law amended in 2015 has brought more detailed provisions to the mining activities for the compliance of environmental rules. The Regulation on Environmental Impact Assessments, for example, requires any entity that is involved in activities that could have an environmental impact to prepare a Report of Environmental Impact Assessment or a Project Information File. No approvals, permits, incentives, or construction and occupancy licenses may be granted, nor any investments made, nor any tenders awarded for these projects unless and until the Turkish Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning issues a positive assessment of the environmental impact of the subject activities. The Turkish environmental laws and regulations also require certain businesses to comply with ongoing requirements to reduce the environmental impact of certain operations and activities, which also include mining activities. In addition, in Turkey, the issue of allocation of environmentally sensitive areas such as forest areas, hunting areas, special protection areas, national parks and agriculture areas for the granting of licenses for activities to be carried out in such areas is also regulated and is under the supervision of the Turkish Ministry of Forestry and Water Works.

Under current Turkish environmental laws and regulations, regulatory authorities may suspend or terminate non-compliant operations, levy monetary penalties and require non-compliant entities to bear the cost of related remediation programs. For example, under Turkish environmental and criminal laws, non-compliant operations may be subject to private action and liable for damages arising from their activities, as well as subject to criminal penalties (such as imprisonment and monetary fines) for deliberately providing regulatory authorities with false or misleading information regarding regulated activities or otherwise failing to comply with certain regulations. In addition, a property owner may be held liable for the cost of the removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic wastes discovered on its property, the cost of which could be substantial, where generally such liability attaches regardless of whether the owner knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances.

Environmental laws, as they may be amended over time, can impose restrictions on the manner of use of properties, and compliance with these restrictions may require substantial expenditures. Environmental laws and regulations impose sanctions for non-compliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies. Third parties also may seek recovery from companies for personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to the release of hazardous substances.

32

Commercial Regulation

The Turkish Commercial Code numbered 6762, which was in effect as of 1957, has been amended substantially with the new Turkish Commercial Code numbered 6102 (the “New Turkish Commercial Code”). The New Turkish Commercial Code came into force on July 1, 2012. The New Turkish Commercial Code is intended to provide for institutionalization, increased competitive power and the establishment of increased public confidence, corporate governance and transparency, The code permits joint stock companies and limited liability companies to be established with only one shareholder and with one board member.

Some of the key features of the New Turkish Code include the following:

- Companies are generally obliged to have a website online and to allocate a part of this website to publish certain issues, documents, financial statements and resolutions whether publicly traded or not.
- For joint stock companies, it is sufficient for the board of directors to consist of solely one member. A legal entity can also be a board member; however in this case, a natural person must be designated to represent the legal entity. There is no restriction and mandatory requirement for the board members to reside in Turkey and to be a Turkish citizen.
- Board members of a joint stock company are no longer required to shareholders in the company.
- The financial tables of a joint stock company are to be prepared in accordance with the financial reporting standards determined by the Turkish Accounting Standards Board. These standards are expected to be amended to comply with the International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).
- The New Turkish Commercial Code enables the board members to attend and to vote in meetings via transfer of image and voice according to the provisions of the articles of association of the company. The provisions regarding the meeting and decision quorum of the board of directors shall also be applicable if the meetings of the board of directors are held in an electronic environment.
- The New Turkish Commercial Code stipulates the rights of shareholders to attend, give proposals, declare opinions and vote at the general assembly of joint stock company via electronic means.
- The management and representation of a limited company may be performed by one or more managers. For a limited liability company, it is sufficient to have at least one manager. If there is more than one manager then there is a board of managers. In this situation, one of the managers is appointed by general assembly as a chairman of the board of managers. The President of board of managers has an authority to make all statements and declarations on behalf of the company. In any case, at least one shareholder must be appointed as a manager who has a right to manage and represent the limited liability company.
- The limited liability company must keep a share ledger. The share ledger shall reflect the following; names/titles and addresses of the shareholders, number of shares held by each shareholder, share transfer details, nominal value of shares, class of shares, encumbrances over the shares and the names/titles and addresses of beneficiaries of such encumbrances created over the shares.
- The limited liability company is obliged to keep the commercial books indicating the commercial transactions and asset structure of the company. The LLC shall observe and apply Turkish Accounting Standards as announced by the Turkish Accounting Standards Board, including the conceptual framework of accounting principles and interpretations while keeping its commercial books. An important change however, is that the compulsory accounting standards will adopt IFRS. The opening and closing of the books must be certified by a notary public.
- The manager(s) of a limited liability company must prepare and submit to the attention of the general assembly the financial charts, appendices and the activity report of the company for the preceding accounting period. This must be done in accordance with the Turkish Accounting Standards and within the first three months of the relevant accounting period (fiscal year) following the balance sheet date. The relevant Turkish Accounting Standards have been applicable from January 1, 2013.

EMX cannot predict the outcome of each effect of the New Turkish Code, and compliance with these requirements may prove to be difficult and expensive.

33

Repatriation of Earnings

Currently, there are no restrictions on the repatriation of earnings or capital to foreign entities from Turkey, where the Company’s most advanced projects are located. However, there can be no assurance that any such restrictions on repatriation of earnings or capital from Turkey or any other country where we may invest will not be imposed in the future.

Governmental Regulation in the United States

Mining Regulation

Mining activities in the United States are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations. At the federal level, mines are subject to inspection and regulation by the United States Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) under provisions of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. The Occupation Safety and Health Administration also has jurisdiction over certain safety and health standards not covered by MSHA. Mining operations and all proposed exploration and development require a variety of permits. In addition, any mining operations occurring on federal property are subject to regulation and inspection by the United States Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”). The Company’s current projects are also subject to state and local laws and regulations in Arizona, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming.

Environmental Regulation

The Company’s exploration, mining and processing operations are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations governing prospecting, exploration, development, production, labor standards, occupational health, mine safety, control of toxic substances, and other matters involving environmental protection and employment. United States environmental protection laws address the maintenance of air and water quality standards, the preservation of threatened and endangered species of wildlife and vegetation, the preservation of certain archaeological sites, reclamation, and limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes, among other things.

Legislation and implementation of regulations adopted or proposed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the BLM and by comparable agencies in various states directly and indirectly affect the mining industry in the United States. These laws and regulations address the environmental impact of mining and mineral processing, including potential contamination of soil and water from tailings, discharges and other wastes generated by mining process. In particular, legislation such as the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and the National Environmental Policy Act require analysis and/or impose effluent standards, new source performance standards, air quality standards and other design or operational requirements for various components of mining and mineral processing. Mining projects also are subject to regulations under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, which regulates and establishes liability for the release of hazardous substances. In addition, statutes may impose liability on mine developers for remediation of waste they have created.

Our operations are also subject to laws and regulations governing protection of endangered and other specified species. In May 2015, the U.S. Department of the Interior released a plan to protect the greater sage grouse, a species whose natural habitat is found across much of the western United States, including Nevada. The U.S. Department of the Interior’s plan is intended to guide conservation efforts on approximately 70 million acres of national public lands. No assurances can be made that restrictions relating to conservation will not have an adverse impact on our operations in impacted areas.

Specialized Skill and Knowledge

All aspects of EMX’s business require specialized skills and knowledge. Such skills and knowledge include the areas of geology, finance, accounting and law.

Competitive Conditions

Competition in the mineral exploration industry is intense. EMX competes with other companies, many of which have greater financial resources and technical facilities, for the acquisition and exploration of mineral interests, as well as for the recruitment and retention of qualified employees and consultants.

34

Raw Materials (Components)

Other than water and electrical or mechanical power – all of which are readily available on or near its properties – EMX does not require any raw materials with which to carry out its business.

Intangible Property

EMX does not have any need for nor does it use any brand names, circulation lists, patents, copyrights, trademarks, franchises, licenses, software (other than commercially available software), subscription lists or other intellectual property in its business.

Business Cycle & Seasonality

The Company’s royalty and prospect generator business model is cyclical and is impacted by commodity prices and cycles; however, its business is not seasonal.

Economic Dependence

Other than the contracts disclosed in this Form 20-F, the Company’s business is not substantially dependent on any contract such as a contract to sell the major part of its products or services or to purchase the major part of its requirements for goods, services or raw materials, or on any franchise or license or other agreement to use a patent, formula, trade secret, process or trade name upon which its business depends.

Renegotiation or Termination of Contracts

It is not expected that the Company’s business will be affected in the current financial year by the renegotiation or termination of contracts or sub-contracts.

Environmental Protection

All phases of the Company’s exploration are subject to environmental regulation in the various jurisdictions in which it operates.

Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which requires stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. While manageable, EMX expects this evolution (which affects most mineral exploration companies) might result in increased costs.

Employees

At December 31, 2017, EMX had 39 employees and consultants working at various locations throughout the world.

Foreign Operations

Many of the Company’s properties are located outside of North America and many are located in areas traditionally considered to be risky from a political or economic perspective.

Bankruptcy Reorganizations

There have not been any voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings against EMX within the three most recently completed financial years or the current financial year.

Material Reorganizations

There has not been any material reorganization of EMX or its subsidiaries within the three most recently completed financial years or the current financial year.

35

Social or Environmental Policies

EMX has implemented various social policies that are fundamental to its operations, such as policies regarding its relationship with the communities where the Company operates.

1. Environmental Policy

The Company believes that good environmental management at every project it manages, whether in the exploration phase, feasibility stage, project construction or mine site operation, requires proactive health and safety procedures, transparent interaction with local communities and implementation of prudent expenditures and business performance standards that constitutes the foundation for successful exploration and subsequent development if the results warrant it.

EMX will develop and implement appropriate standard operating procedures for different stages of its ground technical surveys, prospecting and evaluation and development work which procedures will be designed to meet all applicable environmental requirements and best environmental practices in the mineral exploration industry.

2. Community Relations, Communication and Notification Policy

Proactive interaction with the stakeholders on whom the Company’s exploration and development programs may impact is considered an important part of the long-term investment that the Company is planning in its exploration programs in North America, Turkey, Europe, Australia, and the Asia-Pacific region.

EMX recognizes that from the inception of exploration activities or a new field work program, and as the exploration project progresses towards development, it will be important to:

♦ | communicate and proactively engage with all local communities and other stakeholders that may be affected by its exploration programs;
♦ | inform and obtain a consensus with the full range of stakeholders that may be impacted upon by exploration, evaluation and development; and
♦ | identify any vulnerable or marginalized groups within the affected communities (e.g. women, elders or handicapped) and ensure they are also reached by above information disclosure and consultation activities.

In these respects, EMX will work actively and transparently with governmental authorities, other elected parties, nongovernmental organizations, and the communities themselves to ensure that the communities are aware of the activities of the Company, and that the impact and benefits of such activities are a benefit to the communities.

When detailed or advanced exploration activities, including drilling, evaluation and other such programs, are implemented, the Company will endeavor to identify how the impacts of such work on communities can best be managed, and how benefits can best be provided to communities through its activities. This will be undertaken in consultation with the affected communities.

3. Labour, Health and Safety Policy

The health and safety of its employees, contractors, affected communities and any other role players that may participate and be affected by the activities of EMX are crucial to the long term success of the Company.

The Company will establish and maintain a constructive work-management relationship, promote the fair treatment, non-discrimination, and equal opportunity of workers.

Every effort will be made through training, regular reviews and briefings, and other procedures to ensure that best practice labor, health and safety and good international industry practices are implemented and maintained by EMX, including prompt and in-depth accident and incident investigation and the implementation of the conclusions thereof. The Company will take measures to prevent any child labor or forced labor.

The Company’s aim is at all times to achieve zero lost-time injuries and fatalities.

4. Development Stage Environmental and Social Management Policy

EMX will communicate and consult with local communities and stakeholders with a view to fostering mutual understanding and shared benefits through the promotion and maintenance of open and constructive dialogue and working relationships.

36

United States vs. Foreign Sales/Assets

At December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company’s assets were located in North America, Turkey, Europe, Haiti, Australia and New Zealand.

4.C. Organization Structure

The following table sets out the name, jurisdiction of incorporation and percentage ownership in each of the Company’s significant subsidiaries:

Name | Place of Incorporation | Ownership Percentage
Bullion Monarch Mining, Inc | Utah, USA | 100%
EMX (USA) Services Corp. | Nevada, USA | 100%
Bronco Creek Exploration Inc. | Arizona, USA | 100%
Eurasia Madencilik Ltd. Sirketi | Turkey | 100%
Azur Madencilik Ltd. Sirketi | Turkey | 100%
Eurasian Minerals Cooperatief U.A. | Netherlands | 100%
Eurasian Minerals Sweden AB | Sweden | 100%
Viad Royalties AB | Sweden | 100%
Waikato Gold Limited | NewZealand | 100%

4.D. Property, Plant and Equipment

The Company’s executive offices are located in rented premises of approximately 4,200 sq. ft., shared by seven other companies at 543 Granville Street, Suite 501, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6C 1X8. The Company began occupying these facilities on May 1, 2011.

The Company owns a house in Littleton, Colorado which serves as the Company’s office.

The Company’s royalty, exploration, and strategic investment portfolio mainly consists of properties in North America, Turkey, Europe, Haiti, Australia, New Zealand, the Russian Federation, and Chile.

37

The terms “measured resource”, “indicated resource” and “inferred resource” used in this report are Canadian geological and mining terms as defined in accordance with National Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators using the guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (the “CIM”) Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the CIM Council as may be amended from time to time by the CIM. We advise U.S. investors that while such terms are recognized and permitted under Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize them. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral deposits in the measured and indicated categories will ever be converted into reserves.

An inferred resource is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. Geological evidence is sufficient to imply, but not verify, geological and grade continuity. It is reasonably expected that the majority of inferred resources could be upgraded to indicated resources with continued exploration. Inferred resources must not be included in the economic analysis, production schedule, or estimated mine life in publicly disclosed Pre-Feasibility or Feasibility Studies, or in the Life of Mine plans and cash flow models of developed mines. Inferred mineral resources can only be used in economic studies as provided under NI 43-101. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.

Disclosure of gold and silver resources expressed in ounces, or copper, lead, and zinc resources expressed in pounds or tonnes in the mineral resource categories in this document is in compliance with Canadian NI 43-101, but does not meet the requirements of Industry Guide 7, Description of Property by Corporations Engaged or to be Engaged in Significant Mining Operations, of the SEC, which will accept only the disclosure of tonnage and grade estimates for non-reserve mineralization. See “Cautionary Note To United States Investors Regarding Reserve And Resource Information”.

EMX has been generating exploration projects for over fourteen years. Even if the Company completes its programs on its exploration properties and is successful in identifying mineral deposits, a substantial amount of capital will still have to be spent on each deposit for further drilling and engineering studies before management will know that the Company has a commercially viable mineral deposit (a reserve) on the property. In order to balance this risk, EMX focuses on entering into agreements with other parties to convert its royalty generation exploration assets into royalty interests with partners advancing the projects. EMX also looks to purchase royalty properties in the open market to help accelerate revenue streams.

EMX has built a portfolio of precious metal, base metal, and polymetallic mineral property and royalty interests that spans five continents and covers over 1.5 million acres. These assets provide revenue streams from royalty, advance royalty and success-based bonus payments, while maintaining exposure to exploration upside as projects are advanced by the operators and partners. The Company supplements mineral property revenue streams and value creation by making strategic investments in companies with under-valued mineral property assets that provide shareholders with upside potential from exit strategies can include royalty positions, equity sales, or a combination of both.

EMX has a material interest in the Leeville royalty property located in Nevada's Northern Carlin Trend. Additional property descriptions are included in this report, but the Company does not consider that individually these properties are material at this time. The Company also has a material equity investment in IG Copper LLC, a private company that has exploration property interests located in the Russian Far East.

Leeville and Royalty Property Overview

The Leeville royalty property is a material EMX asset acquired in the 2012 merger with Bullion Monarch that covers portions of Newmont Mining Corporation’s Leeville, Turf, and other underground gold mining operations and deposits in the Northern Carlin Trend. The Leeville 1% gross smelter return ("GSR") royalty paid approximately US$1.86 million during the 12 months ending December 31, 2017, which included settlement of prior year production payments due. Royalty production reported by Newmont for 2017 totaled 1,308 troy ounces of gold that were principally sourced from the Leeville (58%) and Turf underground operations (42%), with negligible contributions from other Newmont operations. The average realized gold price from the Leeville royalty in 2017 was approximately US$1,255 per troy ounce. Newmont has stated that its Turf Vent Shaft Project, which was commissioned in November 2015, will provide the ventilation required to “increase production” and “unlock” additional resources at “greater Leeville”. As understood by the Company, "greater Leeville" includes portions of EMX’s royalty property, and the Turf Vent Shaft Project as described by Newmont may potentially have a positive impact on the Leeville royalty. However, the Company does not have access to the information from Newmont in order to confidently assess what, if any, that impact has been or will be. Newmont also reported ongoing exploration successes at Four Corners, as well as along the Rita K and Full House gold mineralized corridor which is partially covered by the Leeville royalty. These ongoing Newmont exploration successes underscore the prospectivity of the Leeville royalty property.

Further Carlin Trend exploration upside is provided by EMX’s Maggie Creek South 3% NSR and Maggie Creek 2% NSR royalty properties. The Maggie Creek South royalty property was also acquired in the 2012 merger with Bullion Monarch. The Maggie Creek royalty property is one of two royalties acquired from Golden Predator Corp ("Golden Predator") (TSX-V: GPY) in 2016. The Maggie Creek South and Maggie Creek royalty properties collectively cover approximately 12.4 square kilometers of prospective ground within ~1.6 kilometers of Newmont’s Gold Quarry open pit mining operation.

38

In addition to EMX’s Carlin Trend royalty properties, the Company has important royalty property interests elsewhere in the western U.S., as well as in Turkey, Serbia, Norway, Sweden, and Haiti including:

- Arizona Mining Inc. ("AMI") (TSX: AZ) continued to advance the Hermosa property's Taylor discovery that is directly north of EMX's Hardshell Skarn royalty claim block. AMI released an updated mineral resource and PEA study for the Hermosa project in 2017 (see AMI news release dated April 3, 2017).

- EMX received pre-production and royalty payments from its Turkish portfolio in 2017, including the initial two pre- production payments from the Akarca project totaling US$1,235,840 (the cash equivalent of 1,000 troy ounces of gold). As a subsequent event, EMX received a payment of US$665,525 on February 5, 2018, as the cash equivalent to the third 500 ounce gold bullion payment to be made under the terms of the Akarca agreement. Receipt of this third payment leaves a pre-production total of 5,500 ounces of gold (or the cash equivalent) to be paid to EMX on a schedule of 500 ounces every six months. EMX also received the first royalty payment from the Balya property in 2017. The Company anticipates ongoing payments from Akarca and Balya, as well as advancement of the other Turkish assets in 2018.

- EMX’s portfolio in Serbia represents a combination of organically generated royalties complemented by a key royalty purchase that covers the Timok Project's Cukaru Peki copper-gold deposit, which is being advanced by Nevsun Resources Ltd. ("Nevsun") (TSX: NSU). Cukaru Peki's high grade massive sulfide Upper Zone had a positive PEA and updated resource completed in 2017 (see Nevsun news release dated October 26, 2017). According to Nevsun, "key activities" for 2018 include the completion of the Upper Zone prefeasibility study and commencement of an exploration decline once permits are received (see Nevsun news release dated January 31, 2018). Nevsun states that Lower Zone porphyry exploration drilling program will continue in 2018.

- In Scandinavia, EMX closed the sale of four exploration properties in Norway and Sweden in early 2017 to Boreal Metals Corp. ("Boreal") for a 3% NSR royalty, a 19.9% Boreal equity interest, and other considerations. Also in 2017, EMX optioned the Slättberg nickel-copper-cobalt project in Sweden to Sienna Resources Inc. (“Sienna”) (TSX-V: SIE) for immediate share equity in Sienna, and upon Sienna's earn-in through work commitments, additional share equity and a 3% NSR royalty on the project. The Viscaria copper royalty property in Sweden, acquired in 2010, was advanced by Sunstone Metals Ltd. (ASX: STM) (name changed from Avalon Minerals Ltd. in Q3 2017) with ongoing Environmental Impact Statement Assessment (“EISA”) studies and exploration drilling.

- All of EMX's interests in Haiti have been converted into NSR royalties, with the sale of joint venture interests to Newmont in 2015 for a US$4 million cash payment as well as a 0.5% NSR royalty, and the 2016 sale of the Grand Bois property to a privately held corporation for a retained 0.5% NSR royalty interest.

EMX’s other properties that are either optioned or have been sold include EMX royalty options. Many of these properties provide milestone and advance minimum royalty ("AMR") or advance annual royalty ("AAR") payments that generate early revenue streams to EMX’s benefit prior to production. Additional details on EMX’s royalty and royalty generation property portfolio are included in the following sections.

North America

EMX’s portfolio in North America totals 40 royalty and royalty generation properties covering more than 47,000 hectares. There are 16 royalty properties, including the producing Leeville royalty (see above section), that are being advanced by their respective operating companies, and 24 royalty generation properties available for partnership in Arizona, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming. The royalty generation properties are advanced through wholly-owned subsidiary BCE, and include porphyry copper-molybdenum, porphyry copper-gold, Carlin-type gold, and high-grade gold-silver vein projects.

The Company’s 2017 work focused on advancing partner funded projects, executing new agreements for available projects, generative exploration, identifying royalty assets for purchase, and growing the portfolio by acquiring new properties on open ground. EMX is in discussions with multiple potential partners for the available North American properties, as well as for regional exploration alliances.

39

Maggie Creek and Maggie Creek South Properties

The Maggie Creek gold property is located approximately two kilometers north-northeast of Newmont's Gold Quarry mining operation on the Carlin Trend. EMX purchased the Maggie Creek 2% NSR royalty on all precious metals and a 1% NSR royalty on all other minerals from Golden Predator in 2016. The Maggie Creek royalty property covers approximately 7.2 square kilometers and is controlled by Renaissance Gold Inc. Maggie Creek occurs along the northeast projection of the Gold Quarry fault zone, which is an important mineralizing control at the Gold Quarry mine. Renaissance did not report of any work completed on the project in 2017.

EMX's Maggie Creek South 3% NSR royalty was acquired in 2012. Maggie Creek South occurs approximately 1.5 kilometers south-southeast of Gold Quarry, and covers about 5.2 square kilometers of ground controlled by Newmont. Maggie Creek South occurs on the southeast projection of the Good Hope fault trend, which has an alignment of deposits along its length including Mike, Tusc, Mac, and Gold Quarry, as well as the down-dip projection of favorable host rocks (see EMX news release dated February 23, 2016). EMX is not aware of any work conducted by Newmont on the property during 2017.

Afgan Property

The Afgan gold property is located about 40 kilometers northwest of Eureka, Nevada on the Battle Mountain-Eureka Trend.

EMX purchased the Afgan 1% NSR royalty as part of the 2016 Golden Predator transaction that also included the Maggie Creek royalty (see above section). The Afgan unpatented lode mining claim block is controlled by McEwen Mining Inc. ("McEwen Mining") (TSX: MUX, NYSE: MUX). The property hosts a semi-continuous, 1,050 by 450 meter, north-northwest oriented zone of oxide gold mineralization delineated by historic drilling programs and hosting a historic resource (see EMX news release dated February 23, 2016). McEwen Mining did not report any work completed on the project in 2017.

40

Cathedral Well Property

The Cathedral Well gold project is located at the southern end of the Battle Mountain-Eureka gold trend and surrounds most of the historic Green Springs mine.

EMX executed an Option Agreement with Ely Gold Inc. for the Cathedral Well property in 2014 for staged option payments and a 2.5% NSR royalty interest, inclusive of an underlying 0.5% NSR. Ely Gold completed their earn-in for the property in November of 2016 through a trade with EMX, whereby a subsidiary of Ely Gold executed a quit claim deed for 36 mining claims adjacent to EMX’s Spring Canyon property in Nevada in lieu of its last US$25,000 option payment. In December 2016, Ely Gold announced it had optioned the property to Colorado Resources Ltd. (TSX-V: CXO). Both the property and agreement remained in good standing during 2017.

Hardshell Skarn Property

The Hardshell Skarn lead-zinc-silver property is located approximately 75 kilometers southeast of Tucson, Arizona. The property is included as part of Arizona Mining Inc.'s ("Arizona Mining" or "AMI”) Hermosa project. EMX's early stage exploration programs targeted base and precious metals mineralization hosted in skarn and replacement bodies within a series of Paleozoic limestones.

An Exploration and Option Agreement was executed in 2015 for the Hardshell Skarn project with Arizona Mining. In 2017, Arizona Mining earned 100% interest in the project under the agreement by accelerating and completing the required US$85,000 in cash payments. EMX now retains a 2% NSR royalty on the property that is not capped nor subject to buy-down, and also will receive annual advanced royalty payments.

During 2017, AMI continued to advance the Hermosa property's Taylor discovery that is directly north of EMX's Hardshell Skarn royalty claim block (the "royalty claim block"). AMI's work included exploration and drill programs at the Taylor Deeps discovery. In Q3, EMX announced results from two AMI angle diamond drill holes that intersected mineralization within the royalty claim block, including intercepts of 32 feet (3170-3202 ft) averaging 12.21% zinc, 8.19% lead, and 2.25 oz/ton silver in hole HDS-353 (true width) (last 3 feet of intercept within the claim block) and 25 feet (2948.5 -2973.5 ft) averaging 1.47% zinc, 1.95% lead, and 4.15 oz/ton silver in hole HDS-380 (true width ~90%) (intercept entirely within the claim block) (see EMX news release dated August 30, 2017). AMI describes the HDS-353 and HDS-380 intercepts as "Taylor Sulfide" mineralization. Also in 2017, AMI announced the results from its PEA for the Taylor Sulfide deposit (see AMI news release dated April 3, 2017).

Greenwood Peak Property

The Greenwood Peak copper porphyry project, located approximately 175 kilometers northwest of Phoenix, Arizona, contains a copper porphyry target beneath younger gravels and basin fill sediments.

EMX executed an Option Agreement with a wholly owned subsidiary of Antofagasta plc (“Antofagasta”) (LSE: Anto) in late 2017 for Greenwood Peak (see EMX news release dated December 18, 2017). Antofagasta can earn 100% interest in the project by: a) reimbursing EMX’s acquisition costs and making annual option payments, together totaling US$630,000, and b) completing US$4,500,000 in work expenditures within the five year option period. Upon exercise of the option EMX will retain a 2% NSR royalty on the project, which is not capped and not subject to buy-down. After exercise of the option, annual advance royalty and milestone payments will be due to EMX.

The Greenwood Peak project is fully permitted, and Antofagasta commenced a reconnaissance drill program in December, 2017 to test concealed supergene and hypogene copper porphyry targets.

Copper King Property

The Copper King porphyry copper-molybdenum project is located approximately four kilometers northwest of the Resolution porphyry copper deposit in the Superior (Pioneer) mining district of Arizona.

In 2016, EMX executed an Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement with Kennecott Exploration Company ("Kennecott"), part of the Rio Tinto Group, for Copper King (see EMX news release dated October 19, 2016). Pursuant to the agreement, Kennecott can earn 100% interest in the project by a) reimbursing the 2016 holding costs and making option payments, together totaling US$504,314, and b) completing US$4,000,000 in exploration expenditures before the fifth anniversary of the agreement. Upon exercise of the option, EMX will retain a 2% NSR royalty on the project which is not capped and not subject to buy-down. After exercise of the option, annual AMR and milestone payments will be due to EMX.

During 2017, Kennecott funded work at Copper King included geologic mapping, geochemical sampling, a magnetotelluric geophysical survey, and one drill hole to test the deep, western edge of a concealed porphyry copper target.

41

Superior West Property

The Superior West project is located west of the historic mining town of Superior, Arizona and Resolution Copper’s property. The project covers several porphyry copper targets, as well as the interpreted western extension of the historic Magma Vein.

EMX executed an Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement with Kennecott for the Superior West project in 2015. Kennecott may earn 100% interest in the project by completing US$5.5 million in exploration expenditures and making cash payments totaling US$1,149,187, after which EMX will retain a 2% NSR in addition to annual AMR and certain project milestone payments (see EMX news release dated May 4, 2015).

During 2017, Kennecott funded work included additional magnetotelluric geophysical surveys, further consolidating the project's land position, the identification of priority porphyry targets for follow-up, and completion of cultural (archaeological) and biological surveys to permit 15 additional drill sites that were added as options to the project's Plan of Operations.

Buckhorn Creek Property

The Buckhorn Creek project is located in north-central Arizona's greater Castle Creek Mining District. The project lies within a highly extended belt of rocks that include multiple outcrops of porphyry-related alteration and mineralization. EMX’s work on the property led to the recognition of an un-tested porphyry target situated to the east of altered outcrops, and concealed beneath volcanic and sedimentary cover rocks.

As a subsequent event in February 2018, EMX executed an Option Agreement with Kennecott. Kennecott can earn 100% interest in the project by: a) making annual option payments totaling US$550,000, and b) completing US$4,500,000 in exploration expenditures before the fifth anniversary of the agreement (see EMX news release dated February 8, 2018). Upon exercise of the option, EMX will retain a 2% NSR royalty on the project which is not capped or purchasable. After exercise of the option, annual advance minimum payments and milestone payments will be due to EMX.

Kennecott is currently conducting a geologic mapping and sampling program in anticipation of an initial drill test.

Copper Springs Property

The Copper Springs project is located in the southern part of Arizona's Globe-Miami mining district. EMX's work and geologic interpretations led to the recognition that the property covers a previously unrecognized porphyry trend that crosses largely untested, structurally down-dropped blocks concealed beneath younger basin fill.

In 2017, EMX executed an Option Agreement for Copper Springs with Anglo American Exploration (USA), Inc. (“Anglo American”) (see EMX news release dated February 28, 2017). Anglo American can earn 100% interest in the project by: a) reimbursing 2016 holding and permitting costs and making annual option payments, together totaling US$447,000, and b) completing US$5,000,000 in exploration expenditures before the fifth anniversary of the agreement. Upon exercise of the option, Anglo American will pay EMX an additional US$110,000 and EMX will retain a 2% NSR royalty on the project. The royalty is not capped or purchasable, except over two parcels of Arizona State Land where Anglo American can buy a 0.5% NSR royalty from EMX for US$2,000,000. After exercise of the option, annual AMR payments and milestone payments will be due to EMX.

Anglo American funded work during 2017 included expanding the project's land position, the completion of a property-wide aeromagnetic survey, and the commencement of a two-hole reconnaissance drill program in December to test concealed porphyry targets.

Mineral Hill Property

The Mineral Hill gold-copper project is located in the Black Hills of Wyoming, approximately 20 kilometers west of the Wharf mine in South Dakota. The project is centered on an Eocene age alkaline intrusive complex consisting of an outer ring complex, interior intrusive complex, and interior breccia zone. Historic small scale production in the project vicinity occurred between the 1870’s and 1930’s, and principally was sourced from alluvial gold in drainages, gold and silver mineralization at the Treadwell Mine, and gold and copper mineralization near the Interocean Mine.

42

EMX entered into an Exploration and Option Agreement with Coeur Explorations, Inc. (“Coeur”), a subsidiary of Coeur Inc. for Mineral Hill in 2016 (see EMX news release dated October 27, 2016). The project is held under a pooling agreement with Mineral Hill L.P. (“MHL”), with all proceeds split 50:50, except the sale of surface rights associated with patented mining claims held by MHL. Coeur may earn a 100% interest in the project by a) making option payments totaling US$435,000 (US$10,000 received upon execution), b) making exploration expenditures totaling US$1,550,000 and c) paying US$250,000 upon exercise of the option, with EMX and MHL retaining a 4% NSR royalty and receiving annual advance minimum royalty payments and a milestone payment upon completion of a feasibility study. Coeur may purchase up to 1.5% of the NSR royalty for US$5,000,000 if the first increment is purchased within 60 days of the completion of a PEA.

In 2017, Coeur expanded the property position by staking new claims, conducted geologic mapping and geochemical sampling work, and began permitting for an anticipated drill program on US Forest Service land.

Ophir Royalty Property

The Ophir property is located in the northern portion of Utah's Ophir mining district, approximately 15 kilometers southwest of Rio Tinto’s Bingham Canyon mine. The Ophir district is characterized by silver-lead-zinc-copper replacement deposits and fissure veins hosted within carbonate sedimentary rocks and associated with monzonitic stocks and dikes. The property contains several small-scale historic mines with dump material characterized by mineralization similar to other historic mines in the district. The district's silver and base metals mineralization may be a distal expression of associated porphyry copper mineralization at depth.

In 2016, EMX sold the five patented mining claims comprising the Ophir property to Kennecott. EMX received US$75,000 in cash upon closing and retained a 2% NSR royalty interest from the sale (see EMX news release dated October 17, 2016). Kennecott advises that in 2017 the claims were maintained and that the property is in good standing.

Yerington West Property

The Yerington West property, located in the Yerington mining district of west-central Nevada, contains porphyry copper-molybdenum and copper-iron skarn targets beneath post-mineral cover rocks. Yerington West is under a 2009 Option Agreement. The agreement was originally with Entrée Gold Inc. ("Entrée"), and now is with Mason Resources Corp. ("Mason") (TSX: MNR) as a result of a 2017 "spin out" whereby Entrée transferred the Ann Mason project, which includes EMX's Yerington West property, into Mason, a newly incorporated company.

Under the agreement, Mason can earn up to an 80% interest in the project by a) incurring expenditures, making cash payments, and issuing shares of the Company within three years (completed by Entrée), b) making advance royalty payments; and c) delivering a feasibility study before the tenth anniversary of the agreement. Under the agreement, once earn-in has been completed, EMX can convert its interest to a 2.5% NSR royalty. Mason has the option to buy down 1.5% of the NSR royalty for US$4.5 million.

An updated PEA for the Ann Mason project was announced in March 2017, with the Blue Hill and Ann Mason deposits outlined ~1.5 to 3 kilometers east-northeast of EMX's block of 216 unpatented claims (see Mason news release dated May 10, 2017 and SEDAR filed technical report). EMX's claims and the option agreement with Mason remained in good standing during 2017.

Red Top Property

The Red Top property is a porphyry copper-molybdenum project located in the Globe-Miami mining district of Arizona.

EMX executed an Option Purchase Agreement in 2013 with Desert Star Resources Ltd. ("Desert Star") whereby Desert Star could acquire a 100% interest in the project for cash, shares, and work commitments, after which EMX would retain a 2.5% NSR royalty. Desert Star advanced the project with geologic and alteration mapping, geophysical studies, and drill permitting. The project returned to 100% EMX control after Desert Star elected to terminate its option for the property in January of 2017.

The Red Top property is currently permitted for drill testing and available for partnership.

Other Work Conducted by EMX in the U.S.

EMX continued evaluation of property and royalty acquisition opportunities in North America, with generative work focused on gold opportunities in the Great Basin and porphyry copper targets in Arizona and Utah. EMX acquired the following properties in 2017 by staking on open ground: 1) the Swift and Selena gold projects in Nevada, and the 2) the Ripsey West, Dragon's Tail, Spike E Hills, and Midnight Juniper copper projects in Arizona. The Swift and Midnight Juniper projects represent large, highly prospective land positions and are located within world class mining districts (Cortez-Pipeline and Morenci districts, respectively).

43

Qualified Person

Dean D. Turner, CPG, a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101 and consultant to the Company, has reviewed, verified and approved the above technical disclosure on North America.

Turkey

EMX has royalty and royalty generation property interests in Turkey’s Western Anatolia and Eastern Pontides mineral belts. These properties include bulk tonnage gold, gold-silver vein, polymetallic carbonate replacement, and porphyry gold-copper targets. Five of the seven EMX projects in Turkey are operated by partner companies. EMX has retained Dama Muhendislik Proje ve Maden San.Tic. A.S (“Dama”), an internationally recognized Turkish engineering company based in Ankara, to manage EMX's interests in Turkey.

Akarca Property

The Akarca royalty property covers an epithermal gold-silver district located in the Western Anatolia mineral belt that was discovered by EMX in 2006. The project has six zones of gold-silver mineralization defined by drilling, geologic mapping, geochemical sampling, and geophysical survey programs principally funded by partner companies.

In 2016, EMX sold AES Madencilik A.S., the wholly-owned EMX subsidiary that controls the Akarca project, to Çiftay Insaat Taahhüt ve Ticaret A.S. ("Çiftay"), a privately owned Turkish company (see EMX news release dated August 8, 2016). Commercial terms of the sale provide payments to EMX as summarized below (gold payments can be as gold bullion or the cash equivalent):

- US$2,000,000 cash payment to EMX upon closing of the sale (completed).

- 500 ounces of gold every six months commencing February 2, 2017 up to a cumulative total of 7,000 ounces of gold. By year-end 2017, the following 500 ounce cash equivalent payment have been made to EMX: US$601,825 in February 2017, US$634,825 in July 2017, and US$665,525 in February 2018. Receipt of these payments leaves a pre-production total of 5,500 ounces of gold (or the cash equivalent) to be paid to EMX.

- 7,000 ounces of gold within 30 days after the commencement of commercial production from the property provided that prior gold payments will be credited against this payment.

- 250 ounces of gold upon production of 100,000 ounces of gold.

44

| • | 250 ounces of gold upon production of an aggregate of 500,000 ounces of gold.
| • | A sliding-scale royalty in the amount of the following percentages of production returns after certain deductions (“Royalty”):

| — | For gold production: 1.0% on the first 100,000 ounces of gold; 2.0% on the next 400,000 ounces of gold; 3.0% on all gold production in excess of 500,000 ounces.
| — | For all production other than gold production: 3.0%.

| • | The Royalty is uncapped and cannot be bought out or reduced.

Çiftay made its first two pre-production payments totaling US$1,235,840 to EMX (the cash equivalent of 1,000 troy ounces of gold) during 2017. As a subsequent event, EMX received a payment of US$665,525 on February 5, 2018, as the cash equivalent to the third 500 ounce gold bullion payment to be made under the terms of the agreement. Receipt of this payment leaves a pre-production total of 5,500 ounces of gold (or the cash equivalent) to be paid to EMX.

In addition, Çiftay has work requirements that include drilling at least 3,000 meters on the property during each 12-month period starting from August 5, 2016. Çiftay completed a 49 hole diamond drill program comprising 6,032 meters in 2016, a 67 hole diamond drill program comprising approximately 7,300 meters in 2017, and over 4,200 meters of trenches in 2017. Çiftay also advised it is undertaking various engineering and environmental base line studies on the property.

Sisorta Property

The Sisorta royalty property, located in the Eastern Pontides mineral belt, is a near-surface, volcanic-hosted, high sulfidation epithermal gold deposit. Exploration programs at Sisorta, principally funded by partner companies, have included diamond drilling, geologic and alteration mapping, geochemical sampling, and geophysical surveys. This work has outlined a 1000 by 600 meter zone of shallow oxide gold mineralization with underlying copper and gold porphyry potential at depth.

In 2016, EMX sold EBX Madencilik A.S., the wholly-owned EMX subsidiary that controls the Sisorta property, to Bahar Madencilik Sinayi ve Ticaret Ltd Sti ("Bahar"), a privately owned Turkish company (see EMX news release dated August 3, 2016). The terms of the sale provide for Bahar's staged payments to EMX as summarized below:

| • | US$250,000 cash payment to EMX upon closing of the sale (completed).
| • | Annual cash payments of US$125,000 (“Advance Cash Payments”) payable on each anniversary of the closing date until commencement of commercial production.
| • | 3.5% of production returns after certain deductions (“NSR Payment") for ore mined from the property that is processed on-site (increased to 5% if the ore is processed off-site).
| • | The Advance Cash Payments will be credited at a rate of 80% against the NSR Payment payable after commercial production commences.
| • | The NSR Payment is uncapped and cannot be bought out or reduced.

Bahar advised EMX that it concluded an initial 20 hole diamond drill program comprising 1,748 meters in 2016, and that environmental permitting continued in 2017 as a key step towards mine development.

Balya Property

The Balya royalty property is located in the historic Balya lead-zinc-silver mining district in northwestern Turkey. EMX holds an uncapped 4% NSR royalty that it retained from the sale of the property to Dedeman Madencilik San ve Tic. A.S. ("Dedeman"), a privately owned Turkish company, in 2006.

EMX understands that since acquiring the property, Dedeman has completed over 36,000 meters of diamond drilling in addition to commencing small scale underground development at the Hastanetepe deposit in 2015. Hastanetepe is a moderately dipping, 750 by 450 meter zone that extends from depths of 10-20 meters to 200-300 meters as multiple stacked horizons of lead-zinc-silver mineralization primarily developed along contacts between limestones and dacitic intrusions. Dedeman's development work has concentrated on an area of shallow, higher grade lead-zinc-silver mineralization on the northeast margin of Hastanetepe with a production shaft and two working levels. Dedeman advised EMX that it is continuing with production of lead-zinc-silver mineralized material at Hastanetepe.

The Balya royalty due to EMX from 2016 production totaled US$154,299, from which Dedeman's earlier advance royalty payment of US$100,000 was credited, resulting in an adjusted payment to EMX of US$54,299 completed in 2017. EMX will receive full royalty payments going forward, with additional payments expected for sales of materials as mining continues. Dedeman advised it had been selling both mineral concentrates and run-of-mine materials into the market during 2017.

45

Golcuk Property

The Golcuk royalty property is located in the Eastern Pontides metallogenic belt of northeast Turkey. The mineralization at Golcuk primarily occurs as stacked, stratabound horizons with disseminated copper and silver hosted in volcanic units, as well as in localized cross-cutting fault-controlled veins and stockworks of bornite, chalcopyrite and chalcocite.

Pasinex Resources Ltd. (“Pasinex”) (CSE:PSE) signed an agreement in 2012 granting Pasinex an option to acquire 100% interest in the Golcuk property for 3,000,000 common shares of PSE and work commitments. EMX retains a 2.9% NSR royalty, which Pasinex has the option of buying down to 0.9% within six years of the agreement date for US$1 million. In 2017 EMX received 224,150 shares of Pasinex and US $49,204 in cash for the advance royalty payment due in September, 2017.

Pasinex conducted limited (i.e., ~1000 m) reconnaissance drill testing on the Golcuk South copper target in 2017.

Trab-23 Property

The Trab-23 property is located in northeast Turkey. The project hosts both porphyry gold (copper-molybdenum) mineralization and epithermal quartz-barite-gold veins.

Tumad Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (“Tumad”), a privately owned Turkish company, executed an option agreement in February 2013 granting it an option to acquire Trab-23 from EMX. The Trab-23 agreement provided for in-ground spending requirements, a revenue stream of annual earn-in and pre-production payments, and a revenue stream based upon production. Tumad's payment and drill requirements have not been met. Tumad terminated the agreement in 2017, and is currently in the process of returning the property to 100% EMX control.

Alankoy Property

The Alankoy gold-copper property, located in the Biga Peninsula of northwestern Turkey, occurs in an area noted for discoveries characterized by alunite-rich epithermal alteration and the development of vuggy silica lithocaps. EMX's work has outlined a six square kilometer area of lithocaps and quartz–alunite and argillic alteration with gold-copper mineralization as well as skam and replacement style mineralization based upon geologic mapping, rock and soil sampling, spectral analyses, ground magnetics, and historic reconnaissance drill results.

EMX executed an Exploration and Option Agreement for Alankoy with Black Sea Copper & Gold Corp. (“Black Sea”), a privately-held British Columbia corporation, in November, 2015. In 2016, Black Sea conducted surface exploration programs, and met statutory requirements to keep the property in good standing. In 2017, Black Sea terminated the agreement, and EMX regained 100% control of the project. Alankoy is currently available for partnership.

Other Property Interests

EMX has a royalty interest in the Aktutan polymetallic project sold to Dedeman in 2007 for considerations that include a 4% uncapped NSR and annual advance royalty payments. Dedeman advises it is currently evaluating the next steps for the project, while awaiting approval for an operations permit.

Qualified Person

Eric P. Jensen, CPG, a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101 and employee of the Company, has reviewed, verified and approved the above technical disclosure on Turkey.

Europe

EMX has been actively exploring in Europe since 2003, and has assembled a diverse portfolio of copper, polymetallic, nickel and cobalt royalty and royalty generation properties in Scandinavia, as well as a portfolio of copper and gold royalty properties in Serbia. In Scandinavia, the Company continued to pursue strategic royalty partnerships for properties in the portfolio and add value through low cost generative exploration. These efforts have resulted in the conversion of five exploration properties to royalty and equity interests, as well as the addition of multiple gold, polymetallic, nickel and cobalt royalty generation properties to the portfolio. EMX also has important royalty interests in Serbia that include Nevsun's Timok Project and the Cukaru Peki copper-gold deposit located in the prolific Timok Magmatic Complex.

46

Scandinavia

Scandinavia is a favorable jurisdiction for mineral exploration and development, and EMX has been focused on organically generating and growing the royalty portfolio. The sale of core assets to Boreal Metals Corp. ("Boreal"), which closed in Q1 2017, included the Gumsberg and Adak properties in Sweden, and the Tynset and Burfjord properties in Norway. These properties were acquired by EMX between 2013 and 2015 by license application on open ground. Gumsberg, Adak, and Tynset host Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide (“VMS”) polymetallic mineralization, and Burfjord is characterized by Iron-Oxide-Copper-Gold (“IOCG”) mineralization. EMX identified multiple exploration targets on these properties based upon combinations of historic data compilations, geologic mapping, geochemical sampling, geophysical surveys, and reconnaissance drilling.

Commercial terms of the agreement with Boreal are summarized below (see EMX news release dated November 22, 2016):

- At closing, EMX transferred to Boreal its wholly-owned subsidiaries that owned the properties.

- At closing, Boreal issued to EMX common shares of Boreal representing a 19.9% equity ownership in Boreal. Boreal had the continuing obligation to issue additional shares of Boreal to EMX to maintain its 19.9% interest in Boreal, at no additional cost to EMX, until Boreal raised CDN $5,000,000 in equity (completed). Thereafter, EMX has the right to participate pro-rata in future financings at its own cost to maintain its 19.9% interest in Boreal.

- EMX will receive an uncapped 3% net smelter return (“NSR”) royalty on each of the properties. Within five years of the closing date, Boreal has the right to buy down up to 1% of the royalty on any given project by paying EMX US$2,500,000 in cash and shares of Boreal. Such buy down is project specific.

- EMX will receive annual advance royalty (“AAR”) payments of US$20,000 for each of the properties commencing on the second anniversary of the closing, with each AAR payment increasing by US$5,000 per year until reaching US$60,000 per year, except that Boreal may forgo AAR payments on two of the four Properties in years two and three. Once reaching $60,000, AAR payments will be adjusted each year according to the Consumer Price Index (as published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics).

47

- EMX will receive a 0.5% NSR royalty on any new mineral exploration projects generated by Boreal in Sweden or Norway, excluding projects acquired from a third party containing a mineral resource or reserve or an existing mining operation. These royalties are not capped and not subject to a buy down.

- EMX has the right to nominate one seat on the Board of Directors of Boreal (completed).

The conversion of the four properties in Sweden and Norway to royalty and equity interests marked the achievement of a major Company objective. Boreal subsequently raised over CDN $5,000,000 of capital via equity and private placement financings, and obtained an initial public listing on the TSX Venture Exchange as a Tier 2 issuer (TSX Venture: BMX). As of December 13, 2017 EMX held 9,205,882 common shares of Boreal representing ~18.1% on an issued and outstanding basis (see EMX news release dated December 13, 2017). The agreement with Boreal provides EMX with near-term AAR payments, potential royalty revenue in the future, and upside from a equity holding in a Scandinavian-focused resource company.

Following the Boreal transaction, EMX continued to aggressively acquire new properties in Scandinavia during 2017, with a focus on orogenic lode/intrusion-related gold, Iron-Oxide-Copper-Gold (“IOCG”), Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide (“VMS”), Carbonate Replacement Deposit ("CRD"), and nickel-copper-cobalt projects. The Company has acquired, or has pending applications for, over 120,000 hectares of prospective ground in Sweden and Norway that include:

- Intrusion-related gold projects along the Skellefteå area, most of which are located along the “Gold Line”, Sweden’s chief gold producing region. Additional base metal projects were also acquired in the Skellefteå district.

- Multiple acquisitions in the Bergslagen region of southern Sweden, including EMX’s Riddarhyttan IOCG/VMS project, as well as several polymetallic VMS, CRD, and nickel-copper-cobalt style targets.

- New acquisitions in Norway, including a prospective orogenic lode gold style project with outcropping gold mineralization, and a cobalt project along a trend of historic cobalt mines.

Most of these new royalty generation projects in Sweden and Norway are available for partnership (see discussion of subsequent events below), and have attracted interest from a number of potential partners.

In December 2017, EMX executed an option agreement for the sale of the Slättberg Project to Sienna Resources Inc. (“Sienna”) (TSX Venture: SIE) (see EMX news release dated December 4, 2017). The Slättberg Project hosts nickel-copper-cobalt enriched massive sulfide mineralization, and is located approximately 25 kilometers northwest of Falun, Sweden. Sienna can earn 100% interest in the Project during a one-year option period, with commercial terms of the agreement summarized below (all dollar amounts in CAD):

- On signing the agreement, Sienna issued EMX 3 million common shares of Sienna stock.

- As a condition to the exercise of the option, Sienna must undertake work commitments of at least $500,000 on the Project, including drilling of at least 750 meters.

- Upon exercise of the option, Sienna will issue to EMX an additional 3 million shares of Sienna stock, and EMX will receive a 3% NSR royalty on the Project.

- After exercise of the option, Sienna will use commercially reasonable efforts to raise $3,000,000 for development of the Project and other activities. Once Sienna has raised that amount, Sienna will issue an additional 4 million shares to EMX. Thereafter, EMX will have the right to participate pro-rata in future financings at its own cost to maintain its interest in Sienna.

- Within six years of the execution of the agreement, Sienna may purchase 0.5% of the NSR royalty for $1,500,000, leaving EMX with a 2.5% NSR royalty.

As a subsequent event in 2018, EMX executed a definitive agreement for the sale of the Modum cobalt project to Boreal (see EMX news release dated January 16, 2018). The Modum Project is located in southern Norway’s Modum mining district, ~75 kilometers west of Oslo. The Project partially surrounds the historic Skuterud mine property, which was Europe’s principal producer of cobalt from the late eighteenth through nineteenth centuries. Pursuant to the agreement, Boreal will acquire 100% interest in the Project according to the following commercial terms (all dollar amounts in USD):

- At closing, Boreal will issue to EMX 1,324,181 common shares of Boreal that will bring EMX’s share of equity ownership in Boreal to 19.9%. EMX will have the right to participate pro-rata in future financings at its own cost to maintain its 19.9% interest in Boreal.

48

- At closing, EMX will transfer its Modum exploration licenses to Boreal.

- EMX will retain a 3% NSR royalty on the Project, of which 1% may be purchased by Boreal on or before the fifth anniversary of the closing date in 0.5% increments for a total of $2,500,000 in cash and common shares of Boreal stock.

- EMX will receive AAR payments, with an initial $20,000 payment, commencing on the second anniversary of the closing, with each subsequent AAR payment increasing by $5,000 per year until reaching $60,000 per year. Once reaching $60,000, AAR payments will be adjusted each year according to the Consumer Price Index (as published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics).

EMX also holds an effective 0.5% NSR royalty interest in Sunstone’s (formerly Avalon) Viscaria copper project located in the Kiruna mining district of northern Sweden. The Viscaria royalty was acquired by EMX from the purchase of the Phelps Dodge Exploration Sweden AB assets in 2010. Upon receipt of US$12 million in royalty revenues, the royalty rate increases to a 1.0% NSR. Avalon completed a mineral resource estimate and "scoping study" based upon a combination open pit and underground scenario in 2015, and updated the scoping study in 2016 (see Sunstone news releases dated December 15, 2015 and April 5, 2016). During 2017, Sunstone continued to advance the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) and permitting process for the project, and conducted exploration drilling on the "D Zone South" target (see Sunstone's December 2017 Quarterly Activities Report).

Serbia

EMX's royalty portfolio in Serbia initially resulted from prospect generation and organic royalty growth via the 2006 sale of its properties, including Brestovac West, to Reservoir Capital Corp., for uncapped NSR royalties of 2% for gold and silver and 1% for all other metals. Reservoir Capital Corp. later transferred those interests to Reservoir Minerals Inc. (“Reservoir”). Subsequently, EMX acquired 0.5% NSR royalty interests (note: the royalty percentage is subject to reduction only as provided in the royalty agreement) covering the Brestovac and Jasikovo-Durlan Potok properties (see EMX news release dated February 4, 2014). On April 24, 2016, Reservoir announced a definitive agreement with Nevsun Resources Ltd. ("Nevsun") to combine their respective companies. On May 2, 2016 Reservoir and Nevsun reported that a ROFO on the project was successfully exercised, with Reservoir acquiring Freeport's interest in the Cukaru Peki deposit's Upper Zone, and increasing its interest in the Lower Zone joint venture with Freeport. Subsequently, Nevsun closed the acquisition of Reservoir as announced on June 23, 2016.

EMX's Brestovac and Brestovac West royalty properties are included in Nevsun's Timok Project, with Brestovac covering the Cukaru Peki deposit's Upper and Lower Zones. EMX notes that a) the original Brestovac and Brestovac West permits are now covered by the Brestovac Metonivca and Brestovac Zapad permits, and b) portions of a reconfigured Jasikovo-Durlan Potok permit (i.e., expanded in some areas and reduced in other areas) are not covered by the EMX royalty. Brestovac (Brestovac Metonivca) hosts high sulfidation epithermal and porphyry copper-gold mineralization at the Cukaru Peki deposit.

In 2017, Nevsun reported an updated PEA for the Timok Project's Upper Zone with measured and indicated resources of 28.7 million tonnes averaging 3.7% copper and 2.4 g/t gold, and inferred resources of 13.9 million tonnes averaging 1.6% copper and 0.9 g/t gold at a "Resource NSR" cutoff > US$35/tonne (based upon $3.49/lb Cu, $1565/oz Au, and technical and economic parameters given in the PEA study) (see Nevsun news release dated October 26, 2017 and SEDAR filed technical report). The PEA outlined a 15 year mine life producing over 2.1billion pounds of payable copper and 569 thousand ounces of payable gold, with an after tax NPV8 of US$1.5 billion. Nevsun's 2018 guidance stated that an in-progress Pre-Feasibility Study ("PFS") would be completed in Q1 2018, and a $15 million work program budgeted for the exploration decline was contingent on permitting by the State of Serbia (see Nevsun news release dated January 31, 2018). Nevsun further stated that it will invest US$50-60 million to advance development of the Timok Upper Zone Project in 2018.

49

In addition to Upper Zone development work, Nevsun has budgeted for Upper and Lower Zone exploration in 2018. This work will include follow-up on a new high grade zone of copper-gold mineralization drilled 500 meters east of the Upper Zone that occurs over an area of 250 by 250 meters and has reported intercepts that include 2.93% Cu and 2.54 g/t Au over 27 meters starting at 396 meters (true width estimated at 80-95%) (see Nevsun news release dated January 16, 2018). In addition, the ongoing 2017-2018 drill program for the Timok Lower Zone project, which is in a joint venture with Freeport, is anticipated to be completed in early 2018. Drill results for the Lower Zone, which outlines a 1,000 by 1,500 meter footprint of porphyry copper-gold mineralization, include 1.08% copper and 0.27 g/t Au over 747.4 meters starting at 1,341 meters (true width estimated to be ~50-60%) (see Nevsun news release dated December 4, 2017).

EMX's Timok royalty properties add significant upside potential from one of the world's top copper development projects.

Qualified Person

Eric P. Jensen, CPG, a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101 and employee of the Company, has reviewed, verified and approved the above technical disclosure on Europe.

Australia and New Zealand

The Company's programs in the Australia and New Zealand region continued to operate at a reduced expenditure rate, while continuing to evaluate generative royalty opportunities. The Koonenberry royalty property in New South Wales, Australia is being advanced by operator Koonenberry Gold Pty Ltd. In New Zealand, the Neavesville gold-silver royalty property is being advanced by operator E2 Metals Ltd. The QLD Gold property in Queesnland, Australia, was added to the Company's royalty generation portfolio in 2017. The Ohakuri and Muirs Reef gold projects, located on New Zealand's North Island, were dropped in 2017 due to concerns about acquiring social license to advance the properties.

50

Koonenberry Property

The Koonenberry royalty property hosts gold occurrences and gold geochemical anomalies coincident with prominent structural features related to the regional scale Koonenberry fault. In 2017, Koonenberry Gold Pty Ltd. (“KNB”) completed the earn-in requirements under the Exploration and Option Agreement (the “Agreement”) between North Queensland Mining Pty Ltd. (“NQM”) and the Company, and elected to acquire EMX’s Koonenberry exploration licenses (see EMX news release dated September 19, 2017). KNB, a private Australian company formed for the purpose of developing the project, is the successor in interest to NQM under the Agreement. The Company has now transferred its wholly-owned subsidiary, EMX Exploration Pty Ltd, the holder of the Koonenberry licenses, to KNB. EMX retains a 3% royalty on all future production from the Koonenberry licenses. As a result of this transaction, all of EMX’s interests in the Koonenberry gold project have now been converted to royalties. KNB has informed EMX of their intention to continue to explore and evaluate the development potential of both the eluvial/alluvial and bedrock sources of gold at Koonenberry.

Neavesville Property

The Neavesville property consists of a single exploration permit in the Hauraki Goldfield of New Zealand's North Island. EMX acquired Neavesville on open ground with minimal cost. The property hosts epithermal gold-silver mineralization that has geologic features similar to other deposits of the Hauraki Goldfield.

The project is under a definitive agreement with an Australian company, E2 Metals Ltd. (ASX: E2M), which acquired the EMX subsidiary that controls the Neavesville property. The agreement with E2M provides for work commitments, staged payments, milestone payments based upon JORC reserves, and a 3% NSR production payment, all to the benefit of EMX. E2M's February 23, 2017 Replacement Prospectus included results from a JORC (2012) inferred resource estimate for Trig's Bluff reported at a gold cut-off of 0.7 g/t gold as 1,489,500 tonnes averaging 2.58 g/t gold (123,600 oz Au contained) and 9.69 g/t Ag (509,100 oz Ag contained). The independent resource statement, provided by Mining Plus, was based upon drill results used for inverse distance squared block model grade estimation within constraining mineralization and alteration wireframes. In Q2, E2M commenced trading on the ASX Exchange following completion of an initial public offering that raised AUD $6 million (see E2M news release dated April 19, 2017).

During 2017, E2M conducted limited geologic work at Neavesville while remaining focused on fulfilling statutory and filing requirements to keep the license in good standing.

QLD Gold Property

EMX's license application for the QLD Gold project in southeastern Queensland, Australia, was granted for a period of five years on March 30, 2017. The project contains historic copper-zinc skarn prospects, as well as a number of diorite hosted gold mineralized prospects. The QLD Gold project is available for partnership.

Qualified Person

Eric P. Jensen, CPG, a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101 and employee of the Company, has reviewed, verified and approved the above technical disclosure on Australia and New Zealand.

Haiti

EMX's interests in Haiti have been converted into NSR royalties. These royalty properties principally resulted from EMX and Newmont Ventures Limited (collectively, the “JV” or "Joint Venture") exploring a land position along a 130 kilometer trend of Haiti’s Massif du Nord mineral belt starting in 2008, with Newmont funding and managing the Joint Venture. In 2015, EMX sold its Haiti Joint Venture interests, which covered six designated exploration areas, to Newmont. Pursuant to the transaction, Newmont acquired all of EMX's interest in the designated exploration areas on the following terms: a) Newmont paid US$4 million in cash to EMX at closing, b) the Joint Ventures were terminated, c) EMX retained a 0.5% NSR royalty on the 49 Research Permit applications covering the designated exploration areas, and d) EMX retains the right to acquire any properties proposed to be abandoned or surrendered by Newmont.

51

In 2016, EMX sold the Grand Bois project, which was outside the Joint Venture with Newmont, to Sono Global Holdings Inc. ("Sono"), a privately held Nevada corporation. EMX retained a 0.5% NSR royalty interest in the Grand Bois project and the right to acquire any properties proposed to be abandoned or surrendered from the Grand Bois project in the future. In Q3 2017, 3D Resources Inc., an ASX listed company, announced that it had executed a definitive agreement to acquire a 70% interest in Ayiti Gold Company SA, Sono's Haitian entity holding the Grand Bois license (see 3D Resources news release dated August 9, 2017). According to the agreement, 3D Resources must complete a positive feasibility study, as well as fulfill other obligations, by September 15, 2018.

As EMX understands, the Haitian government continued working on a new mining law during 2017, which has been under review since 2013 when the Mining Convention process was suspended.

Qualified Person

Dean D. Turner, CPG, a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101 and consultant to the Company, has reviewed, verified and approved the above technical disclosure on Haiti.

Strategic Investments

IG Copper LLC

EMX is a strategic investor in IGC, a privately held company with exploration properties in Khabarovsk Krai of Russia's Far East Russia region. IGC's projects include the Malmyzh copper-gold porphyry joint venture with Freeport (51% IGC, 49% Freeport), which is operated and managed by IGC. IGC’s other exploration properties are 100% controlled by IGC and not subject to the joint venture with Freeport. EMX was an early investor in IGC, and is its largest shareholder, with approximately 41% of the issued and outstanding shares (40% equity position on a fully-diluted basis) from investments totaling over US$11 million. IGC is a material investment to the Company.

52

Malmyzh Project

Malmyzh is a district-scale discovery with over 15 porphyry copper-gold centers identified within a 16 by 5 kilometer intrusive corridor. The project, which occurs 220 kilometers northeast of the Russia-China border at Khabarovsk, has excellent logistical characteristics and available infrastructure, including high voltage power lines, a natural gas pipeline, a paved national highway, the Amur River, and a rail line that are all nearby to the property.

The property’s 152.8 square kilometers (15,280 hectares) of exploration and mining licenses consist of: 1) HAB 02018 granted 9/18/2006 and expiring 12/31/2026, and 2) HAB 02334 granted 7/23/2010 and expiring 12/31/2030. The "Malmyzh Flanks" exploration license (HAB 02746 BP) was granted 10/26/2015, expires 12/31/2022, and covers 74.1 square kilometers (7,410 hectares). The total Malmyzh land position totals 226.9 square kilometers (22,690 hectares), and includes additional areas for potential project development as well as extensions to known exploration targets. IGC advises that the terms for the licenses can be granted extensions.

Copper-gold mineralization occurs in diorite porphyry intrusives, as well as in hornfels-altered and stockworked sedimentary wall rocks, and consists of near-surface zones (i.e., within 1 to 50 meters of the surface) of variable chalcocite enrichment grading into chalcopyrite-rich and chalcopyrite-bornite-magnetite mineralization to depth. The extent of the porphyry copper-gold mineralized systems has not been fully determined within the Malmyzh district. Much of the property has more than 15 meters of cover and is undrilled, thereby providing substantial exploration potential for additional discoveries.

In 2015, a statement of inferred resources for Malmyzh's Valley, Central, Freedom (Southeast), and Flats deposits under NI 43-101 and CIM definition standards was provided by Phil Newall, PhD, BSc, CEng, FIMMM, a Qualified Person under NI 43-101 and managing director of Wardell Armstrong International ("WAI"), an independent UK based consulting company. The open pit constrained inferred resources at a 0.30% copper equivalent cut-off are 1,661 million tonnes at average grades of 0.34% copper and 0.17 g/t gold, or 0.42% copper-equivalent, containing 5.65 million tonnes (12.45 billion pounds) copper and 9.11 million ounces gold, or 7.06 million tonnes (15.56 billion pounds) copper-equivalent. Copper equivalent (CuEq) was calculated as CuEq = Cu% + (Au g/t * 0.5) based on assumed prices of $3.25/lb Cu and $1400/oz Au, with recoveries of 90% for Cu and 70% for Au.

At the time of WAI's 2015 resource estimate, project drilling totaled about 70,500 meters in over 211 core holes, with the majority of the drilling (~55,000 m) concentrated on defining the four resource deposits at nominal 200 by 200 meter centers, and generally to less than 500 meters depth. See EMX's May 26, 2015 news release and SEDAR filed technical report titled "NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Initial Mineral Resource Estimate for the Malmyzh Copper-Gold Project, Khabarovsk Krai, Russian Federation" with an effective date of May 1, 2015 and dated July 10, 2015 for more information on the exploration results, QA/QC procedures, and methodology used to estimate the Malmyzh inferred resources.

53

The copper-gold mineralization in the Valley, Central, Freedom (Southeast), and Flats resource deposits have favorable open-pit geometries with potentially low stripping ratios. All four resource deposits are open at depth (> 350-600 m), and importantly, there are zones of shallow, higher grade copper-gold mineralization at the Valley and Freedom (SE) deposits, and high grade below the resource pit at Central. Furthermore, there is copper-gold mineralization at the Freedom Northwest prospect not currently included in the Malmyzh inferred resource estimate due to the need for in-fill drilling.

IGC advised that the Malmyzh joint venture had also advanced Malmyzh in 2015 by receiving approval of the “official on balance C1+C2 reserves” from the GKZ (State Reserves Committee), the government agency authorized to approve resources and reserves in the Russian Federation. The Malmyzh “official government approved reserves” were estimated according to the rules and regulations of the Russian Federation, and are not the same as reserves under NI 43-101 or SEC Industry Guide 7. The GKZ “official reserves” have been listed and added to the “State Balance of Reserves”. In addition, IGC advised that the “prospecting phase” of the Malmyzh exploration and mining licenses were successfully completed. Subsequently, the joint venture filed documents to continue to the advanced exploration and mining phase of the project's development as required for “strategically significant” deposits according to Russian law (i.e., the Law on Foreign Investments in Strategic Industries, also termed the Strategic Industries Law or "SIL").

In 2016, IGC advised that SIL approval to advance the Malmyzh project had been received from the Government Commission on Monitoring Foreign Investment (the "Commission") (see EMX news release dated July 25, 2016). According to IGC, highlights of the Commission's approval include:

- The Joint Venture, as a majority foreign owned business entity, has been approved to retain control of the Malmyzh project exploration and mining licenses.

- The Joint Venture, therefore, maintains mining and production rights for the Malmyzh and Malmyzh North exploration and mining licenses.

- The Joint Venture holds 100% of the rights for the Malmyzh and Malmyzh North exploration and mining licenses, and is entitled to recover all minerals of economic value including copper, gold and by-product minerals.

The conclusion of the SIL process initiated a new, multi-year phase in the project's development. The Malmyzh team outlined plans and programs which include additional technical work (i.e., drilling, exploration, metallurgy, engineering, and hydrology), as well as environmental, social, and economic assessments. This next phase of work will ultimately conclude as a detailed "TEO of Permanent Conditions" report, which is considered to be a precursor to commencement of exploitation and mining (TEO is the acronym for "Technico-Economicheskiye Obosnovaniye" which translates as Technical-Economic Basis).

After receiving SIL approval, IGC commenced a reconnaissance diamond drilling program in late 2016 at the Freedom Northwest, North, Sleeper West, and Sleeper prospects totaling ten holes for 3,474.8 meters. After final assays were received from IGC in early 2017, EMX announced the results in a January 24, 2017 news release. The last hole of the program (AMM-213), drilled at Freedom Northwest, provided particularly notable results, intersecting 747.4 meters (108.7 -856.1 m) averaging 0.49% copper equivalent (0.41% copper and 0.17 g/t gold) principally hosted in phreatomagmatic and magmatic hydrothermal breccias (approximate true width in porphyry style mineralization). AMM-213 was a vertical hole designed to commence in-fill of the 200 by 400 meter grid pattern at Freedom Northwest, which is not currently included as a resource deposit, to the 200 by 200 meter pattern used to delineate inferred resources. The 747.4 meter intercept is the longest mineralized interval drilled at Malmyzh to date. Further, the hole was terminated due to equipment limitations, and bottomed in mineralization (1.4 m interval from 854.7 -856.1 m of 0.46% copper equivalent from 0.32% copper and 0.29 g/t gold). The drilling at Sleeper West and North prospects also returned encouraging results.

IGC's 2017 follow-up diamond drilling program at the Freedom Northwest prospect totaled three holes (AMM-214, -215, and -216) for 2,437.6 meters. The results, as reported in an EMX news release dated July 25, 2017, included an intercept of 417.3 meters (219.4 -636.7 m) averaging 0.60% copper equivalent (0.50% copper and 0.21 g/t gold), with a higher grade subinterval of 142.6 meters (255.4 -398.0 m) averaging 0.74% copper equivalent (0.62% copper and 0.26 g/t gold) from hole AMM-216 (approximate true widths). The copper-gold mineralization in all three follow-up holes drilled in 2017 is principally hosted in magmatic-hydrothermal breccias, and combined with earlier Freedom Northwest drill results, suggests a broad, inferred outline of a pipe-like breccia body with approximate dimensions of 800 x 800 meters in plan view, and a vertical dimension of ~650 to over 850 meters. The interpreted breccia pipe footprint generally coincides with a nearly circular magnetic anomaly defined from IGC's high resolution ground magnetic surveys.

The 2017 exploration program at Freedom Northwest represents the first deep drill testing at Malmyzh, as previous drilling was concentrated on shallow mineralization throughout the district. In late 2017, IGC advised that it drilled one hole each at the Freedom Southeast and Valley deposits, totaling 1,045 meters, to provide sample material for proposed metallurgical test work. IGC is planning further follow-up at Freedom Northwest in 2018 based upon the encouraging results from the initial phase of deep targeted drilling.

54

EMX is an investor in IGC, and as a result there are no direct holding costs to the Company. Regarding the joint venture agreement, IGC and Freeport fund at their respective level of ownership interest, or dilute. Should either company dilute to less than a 10% interest, remaining ownership is converted to a US$0.005 (one-half cent) per pound copper equivalent reserve payment, which remains in effect through the life of mine. Freeport retains no claw-back or NSR provisions.

Other IGC Projects

At year-end 2017, IGC also had 100% control of the 390 square kilometer Shelekhovo and 260 square kilometer Salasinskaya exploration properties, as well as the more recent Okchonskaya and Medvedzhe acquisitions. At the Shelekhovo project, historic government exploration surveys identified multiple occurrences of gold, silver, and copper associated with quartz veining and alunite. IGC's 2017 reconnaissance exploration at Shelekhovo included geochemical sampling that identified broad gold-in-soil anomalies (+20 ppb Au) over the Predgornoe (~1500x1000 m) and Bistroe (400x400 m) prospects associated with silicified material, as well as arsenic and copper anomalies. Salasinskaya is considered to be the northern extension of the Shelekhovo anomaly cluster, and underwent limited evaluation in 2017 according to IGC. Okchonskaya is a 96 square kilometer property situated directly west-southwest of Shelekhovo that is characterized by gold anomalies and prospects identified from historic government work. The 71.5 square kilometer Medvedzhe property is located 25 kilometers southeast of Malmyzh, and contains historic Soviet era geochemical anomalies as well as host rocks similar to those at Malmyzh.

Further discussion of IGC’s exploration results and EMX’s due diligence data verification and QA and QC procedures can be found in the Company’s May 26, 2015, January 24, 2017, and July 25, 2017 news releases, as well as in the SEDAR filed Malmyzh Technical Report with an effective date of May 1, 2015.

Revelo Resources Corp.

EMX has a strategic investment in Revelo Resources Corp. ("Revelo") (TSX-V:RVL), a company focused on the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties in the prolific metallogenic belts of northern Chile. Revelo has a portfolio of 19 exploration projects prospective for copper, gold and silver, as well as royalty interests covering seven exploration properties.

Qualified Person

Dean D. Turner, CPG, a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101 and consultant to the Company, has reviewed, verified and approved the above technical disclosure on Strategic Investments.

GEOTHERMAL ROYALTIES

EMX initiated a geothermal energy program in 2010, and acquired assets in Slovakia and Peru. EMX subsequently sold its geothermal assets in 2013 to Starlight Geothermal Ltd. ("Starlight") for cash payments, an equity position in Starlight, and gross royalties from future geothermal energy production. In 2017, Starlight advised that the geothermal concessions in Peru had been dropped due to a lack of proactive government support to encourage development (i.e., favorable feed-in tariffs, etc.). Starlight also advised that the geothermal concessions in Slovakia were maintained in 2017, with the potential for advancement in 2018 assuming project financing is secured.

ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

GENERAL

This discussion and analysis of financial position and results of operations is prepared as at April 3, 2018 and should be read in conjunction with the audited annual consolidated financial statements of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 and the related notes thereto.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”).

55

The Company and its subsidiaries operate as a royalty and prospect generator engaged in exploring for, and generating royalties from, metals and minerals properties. The Company’s royalty and exploration portfolio mainly consists of properties in North America, Turkey, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. See Item 4.D. “Property, Plant and Equipment”.

The Company’s working capital position at December 31, 2017 was $6,535,893. With its current plans for the year and the budgets associated with those plans, in order to continue funding its administrative and royalty generation programs from the date of this Form 20-F, management believes it will require additional working capital to undertake it’s current business plan. The Company has incurred recurring losses and has an accumulated deficit of $104,382,744. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may issue new shares through public and/or private placements, sell assets, or return capital to shareholders. These uncertainties may cast doubt upon the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Some of the Company’s activities for exploration and evaluation assets are located in emerging nations and, consequently, may be subject to a higher level of risk compared to other developed countries. Operations, the status of mineral property rights and the recoverability of investments in emerging nations can be affected by changing economic, legal, regulatory and political situations.

At the date of these consolidated financial statements, the Company has not identified a known body of commercial grade mineral on any of its exploration and evaluation assets. The ability of the Company to realize the costs it has incurred to date on these exploration and evaluation assets is dependent upon the Company identifying a commercial mineral body, to finance its development costs and to resolve any environmental, regulatory or other constraints which may hinder the successful development of the exploration and evaluation assets.

These consolidated financial statements of the Company are presented in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted, which is the functional currency of the parent company and its subsidiaries except as to Bullion Monarch, the holder of a royalty income stream whose functional currency is the United States dollar.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

The Company is principally in the business of developing cash flows from a) organically generated royalties derived from a portfolio of mineral property interests and b) royalty acquisitions. These cash flows are supplemented by upside from strategic investments. EMX’s portfolio mainly consists of properties in North America, Turkey, Europe, Haiti, Australia, and New Zealand. These three key components of the Company's business model are briefly summarized as:

- Royalty Generation. EMX's fourteen year track record of successful exploration initiatives has developed into an avenue to organically generate mineral property royalty interests and cash flows. The strategy is to leverage in- country geologic expertise to acquire prospective properties on open ground through license application or claim staking, and to build value through low cost work programs and targeting. These properties are sold to partner companies for retained royalty interests, advance minimum royalty payments, project milestone payments, and other considerations that may include equity interests. Pre-production payments provide early-stage cash flows to EMX, while the operating companies build value through exploration and development. EMX participates in project upside at no additional cost, with the potential for future royalty payments upon the commencement of production.

- Royalty Acquisition. EMX has been pursuing the prudent acquisition of royalty property interests since 2011. The purchase of royalty interests allows EMX to choose quality assets for acquisition that range from producing mines to development properties. These purchases are designed to "jump start" the organic royalty portfolio growth process by providing EMX with immediate to near term royalty revenue. The timely identification of top tier acquisition candidates is often informed by the Company's in-country royalty generation initiatives.

- Strategic Investment. An important complement to EMX's royalty generation and royalty acquisition initiatives comes from strategic investment in opportunities with under-valued mineral assets and upside exploration potential. Exit strategies can include royalty positions, equity sales, or a combination of both. As well, these investments can lead to the Company's identification of candidates for acquisition or merger.

EMX is focused on increasing global revenue streams from royalties, advance royalties and other cash payments to balance overall company-wide expenditures. This approach provides a foundation for supporting EMX’s growth and increasing shareholder value over the long term.

56

5.A. Operating Results

Year ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015

The net loss for the year ended December 31, 2017 (“FY17”) was $7,393,384 compared to $2,683,482 for the prior year (“FY16”), and $6,875,857 for the year ended December 31, 2015 (“FY15”). The loss for FY17 was made up of a net royalty income of $455,033 (FY16 – Loss $47,265; FY15 – Loss $187,773) after depletion and related tax, net exploration expenditures of $4,471,074 (FY16 - $4,999,959; FY15 - $4,364,675), general and administrative expenditures of $3,765,029 (FY16 - $3,220,339; FY15 - $3,535,534) and other losses totaling $2,102,216 (FY16 – Gain $4,144,749; FY15 - $2,219,105) offset by a deferred income tax recovery of $2,489,902 (FY16 - $1,439,332; FY15 - $3,431,230). Key items in “other losses” include; an impairment of royalty intersts in FY17 of $Nil (FY16 - $Nil; FY15 - $3,973,699), a gain in FY17 on the sale of exploration and evaluation assets of $1,305,237 (namely sale of Sweden properties to Boreal), a gain of $6,834,999 (namely Akarca and Sisorta) in FY16, and a gain of $5,393,305 in FY15 (namely sale of Haiti operations), a dilution gain on associated companies of $503,543 (FY16 - $982,634; FY15 - $Nil), an equity loss in associated companies of $994,548 (FY16 - $1,295,568; FY15 - $1,062,146), and a write-down of goodwill of $2,709,239 (FY16 - $1,518,328; FY15 - $3,047,605).

Revenues

In FY17, the Company earned $2,857,927 (FY16 - $2,227,322; FY15 - $1,609,553) of royalty income. This included royalty income earned for 1,308 (FY16 - 1,361; FY15 – 1,096) ounces of gold totaling $2,114,236 (FY16 - $2,227,322; FY15 - $1,609,553) and the settlement of prior year production payments due totaling $298,132 (FY16 - $2,112; FY15 - $12,263) from the Company's Leeville royalty property, as well as AMRs received. In FY17, the average realized gold price for the Leeville royalty was US$1,255 per ounce, which is comparable to the US$1,250 received for FY16, and US$1,160 for FY15. Royalty income offset by gold tax and depletion of $2,402,894 (FY16 - $2,274,587; FY15 - $1,797,326) for a net royalty gain of $455,033 (FY16 - loss $47,265; FY15 – loss $187,773). The increase in royalty income for 2017 was mainly due to the settlement of prior year provisional gold ounces and AMR’s received from Turkish operations.

Exploration Expenditures

Exploration expenditures (gross) decreased by $81,414 in FY17 compared to FY16, and decreased by $466,731 in FY16 compared to FY15. Recoveries increased by $447,471 in FY17 compared to FY16, and decreased by $168,553 in FY16 compared to FY15 for a net decrease in exploration expenditures of $528,885 in FY17 compared to FY16, and a net increase in exploration expenditures of $635,284 in FY16 compared to FY15. Some of the differences between FY17 and FY16 are as follows:

- In Scandinavia, gross expenditures increased by $553,902 compared to the prior period, and recoveries and option payments increased by $989,088 in 2017. The increase was mainly due to additional land acquisition in the region. Recoveries and option payments related to recoveries from Boreal for work performed by EMX personnel, as well as $750,000 as the value of the Sienna shares (option payment related to sale of licenses).

- In the USA, gross expenditures increased from $3,342,206 to $3,878,815 and recoveries decreased from $886,872 to $666,932. The increase in expenditures is primarily a result of an increase in property holding costs.

- In Turkey, gross expenditures decreased by $974,765 due to the sale in FY16 of Akarca and Sisorta.

- In the Asia Pacific region, net expenditures for 2017 totaled $305,574 compared to net expenditures of $10,572 in 2016. The lower amount in FY16 resulted from Option Payments of $180,476.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses (“G&A”) of $3,765,029 were incurred compared to $3,220,339 in FY16, and $3,535,534 in FY15. G&A costs (before share-based payments) have decreased each year since 2012 as the Company found ways to streamline and reduce the G&A expenses of our business. Some changes between FY17 and FY16 to note are:

- Investor relations increased by $114,256 in FY17 compared to FY16, and increased by $56,235 in FY16 compared to FY15. With the increase in market activity and interest in the mining sector, the Company attended more industry trade shows in FY17. The Company also re-branded in 2017, which included a new name, logo, website and corresponding marketing materials.

57

- Professional fees increased by $153,762 in FY17 compared to FY16, and decreased by $63,534 from FY15 to FY16. Most of the increase in FY17 related to costs incurred on due diligence of potential royalty acquisitions.

- Salaries and consultants are one of the largest expense in G&A. It should be noted that many of our personnel expenditures companywide are denominated in United States dollars (“USD”) and an increase or decrease in the value of the USD compared to the Canadian dollar, which is our reporting currency, will increase or decrease expenditures. Salaries and consultants increased in 2017 by $129,665 compared to FY16, and decreased by $66,942 in FY16 compared to FY15. The Company added to its management team with the hiring of a General Manager of Corporate Development in 2017.

- Share-based payments included in general and administrative expenses increased by $208,115 in FY17 compared to FY16 mainly due to the issuance of shares pursuant to employment agreements and other compensation agreements, as well as the fair value of RSU’s vesting during FY17.

Other

- The Company recognized a net gain on the sale of certain exploration and evaluation assets during the year of $1,305,237 compared to $6,834,999 in the prior year, and $5,393,305 in FY15. In FY17, the gain on sale was the result of the Boreal transaction, offset by a small loss on the sale of EMX Australia Pty. In FY16 the gain resulted from the sale of two significant assets in Turkey including $6,683,560 related to the sale of AES to Çiftay, and the gain in FY15 resulted from the sale of certain Haitian interests to Newmont for a $5,277,542 (US $4,000,000).

- In FY15, as a result of the decline in the production of gold from the Carlin Trend Royalty Claim Block, and decrease in the realized gold prices, the Company revised its estimated annual gold production over the expected mine life and decreased its long term gold price forecast from US$1,300 to US$1,200 per ounce. As a result, the Company recorded $3,973,699 in impairment charges related to the Carlin Trend Royalty Claim Block and related assets that make up the same cash-generating unit (“CGU”). There was no comparable impairment recorded for FY17 or FY16.

- The Company applies a one-step approach to determine if the Carlin Trend Royalty Claim Block and the related assets within the same CGU are impaired. The impairment loss is the amount by which the CGU’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The loss is first applied to reduce the asset component if such indicators for impairment exist, and any excess to goodwill within the CGU. Since there was no impairment, the full amount went to Goodwill, and as a result, the Company has written down goodwill by $2,709,239 (FY16 - $1,518,328; FY15 - $3,047,605).

- The Company recorded a deferred income tax recovery of $2,489,902 compared to $1,439,332 in FY16, and $3,431,230 in FY15, and a net decrease in deferred tax liabilities of $2,933,017 (FY16 - $1,748,562; FY15 - $1,715,656). A significant component of the deferred tax recovery and decrease in the related liability is the result of any impairment of the royalty interest partially offset by a cumulative translation loss as a result of the strengthening $USD compared to $CAD. The increase in the deferred income tax recovery for FY17 compared to FY16 was mainly the result of a decrease in the long term expected federal tax rates for the US operations, which decreased from 35% to 21%. There was no impairment to the royalty interests in FY17 or FY16.

- The Company’s share of the net loss related to its 41% (FY16 – 39%; FY15 – 42%) equity investment in IGC for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $994,548 (FY16 - $1,295,568; FY15 - $1,062,146). In FY17, the Company also recorded a dilution gain of $503,543 (FY16 - $982,634; FY15 - $Nil) related to the Company’s change in ownership interest in IGC.

SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENTS ACCOUNTED FOR BY THE EQUITY METHOD

The Company has a 41% (2016 – 39%; 2015 – 42%) equity investment in IGC. At December 31, 2017, including the conversion of convertible notes, cash purchases of shares, and interest on any balances due from IGC, the Company has invested an aggregate of US$11,355,000 towards its investment (2016 - US$8,967,000; 2015 - $7,782,500). At December 31, 2017, the Company’s investment including dilution gains, less its share of accumulated equity losses was $7,578,989 (2016 - $4,992,823; 2015 - $3,333,491). The Company’s share of the net loss for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $994,548 (2016 - $1,295,568; 2015 - $1,062,146).

58

The Company has a minority position on the Board of IGC, and does not control operational decisions. The Company’s judgment is that it has significant influence, but not control and accordingly equity accounting is appropriate.

As at December 31, 2017, associated companies’ aggregate assets, aggregate liabilities and net loss for the year ended are as follows:

December 31, 2017 |  | IGC |
Aggregate assets | $ | 6,127,735 |
Aggregate liabilities |  | (1,108,694 | )
Loss for the year |  | (2,713,490 | )
The Company's ownership % |  | 41% |
The Company's share of loss for the year |  | (994,548 | )

As at December 31, 2016, associated companies’ aggregate assets, aggregate liabilities and net loss for the year are as follows:

December 31, 2016 |  | IGC |
Aggregate assets | $ | 6,884,378 |
Aggregate liabilities |  | (1,471,260 | )
Loss for the year |  | (3,216,120 | )
The Company's ownership % |  | 39% |
The Company's share of loss for the year |  | (1,295,568 | )

As at December 31, 2015, associated companies’ aggregate assets, aggregate liabilities and net loss for the year are as follows:

December 31,2015 |  | IGC |
Aggregate assets | $ | 6,980,045 |
Aggregate liabilities |  | (2,917,038 | )
Loss for the year |  | (2,515,741 | )
The Company's ownership % |  | 42% |
The Company's share of loss for the year |  | (1,062,146 | )

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized a dilution gain of $503,543 (2016 - $982,634; 2015 - $Nil) related to the Company’s change in ownership percentage as a result of IGC’s share issuance for cash proceeds and loan conversions.

SELECTED ANNUAL INFORMATION

As at |  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |  |  | December 31, 2015 |  |  | December 31, 2014 |
Financial positions |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Working capital | $ | 6,535,893 |  | $ | 6,002,318 |  | $ | 5,787,109 |  | $ | 7,096,916 |
Exploration and evaluation assets (net) |  | 1,841,966 |  |  | 2,145,000 |  |  | 2,381,540 |  |  | 2,379,886 |
Royalty interest |  | 21,943,743 |  |  | 25,831,152 |  |  | 28,798,980 |  |  | 29,327,960 |
Total assets |  | 45,750,784 |  |  | 47,843,555 |  |  | 50,624,129 |  |  | 54,292,093 |
Share capital |  | 124,062,091 |  |  | 117,504,585 |  |  | 117,000,052 |  |  | 116,766,102 |
Deficit |  | (104,382,744 | ) |  | (96,989,360 | ) |  | (94,305,878 | ) |  | (87,430,021 | )

|  | Year ended |  |  | Year ended |  |  | Year ended |  |  | Year ended |
|  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |  |  | December 31, 2015 |  |  | December 31, 2014 |
Financial results |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Royalty income | $ | 2,857,927 |  | $ | 2,227,322 |  | $ | 1,609,553 |  | $ | 2,247,334 |
Exploration expenditures (net) |  | 4,471,074 |  |  | 4,999,959 |  |  | 4,364,675 |  |  | 5,022,658 |
Loss from operations |  | (7,781,070 | ) |  | (8,267,563 | ) |  | (8,087,982 | ) |  | (868,619 | )
Net loss for the year |  | (7,393,384 | ) |  | (2,683,482 | ) |  | (6,875,857 | ) |  | (17,448,041 | )
Net loss per share-basic and diluted |  | (0.09 | ) |  | (0.04 | ) |  | (0.09 | ) |  | (0.24 | )

59

The year ended December 31, 2017 saw an impairment charge of $Nil (2016 - $Nil; 2015 - $3,973,699) on the royalty interests, a related write-down of goodwill of $2,709,239 (2016 - $1,518,328; 2015 - $3,047,605), and a recovery of $2,489,902 (2016 - $1,439,332; 2015 - $3,431,230) of deferred income taxes, offset by a gain of $1,305,237 (2016 - $6,834,999; 2015 - $5,393,305) on the acquisition and sale of exploration and evaluation assets, and a dilution gain on associated companies of $503,543 (2016 - $982,634; 2015 - $Nil) which have a significant impact on the net losses for the respective fiscal years.

OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA

As at April 3, 2018, the Company had 79,746,271 common shares issued and outstanding. There were also 5,247,500 stock options outstanding with expiry dates ranging from April 25, 2019 to August 28, 2022, and 2,623,306 warrants outstanding expiring on April 12, 2019.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Statement of Compliance

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”).

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for financial instruments classified as fair value through profit or loss or available for sale, which are stated at their fair value. In addition, these consolidated financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting except for cash flow information.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements comprise the accounts of EMX Royalty Corp., the parent company, and its controlled subsidiaries, after the elimination of all significant intercompany balances and transactions.

Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are all entities over which the Company has exposure to variable returns from its involvement and has the ability to use power over the investee to affect its returns. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether the Company controls another entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Company until the date on which control ceases.

The accounts of subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies. Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealized gains or losses on transactions are eliminated. The Company’s principal operating subsidiaries are as follows:

Name | Place of Incorporation | Ownership Percentage
Bullion Monarch Mining, Inc | Utah, USA | 100%
EMX (USA) Services Corp. | Nevada, USA | 100%
Bronco Creek Exploration Inc. | Arizona, USA | 100%
Eurasia Madencilik Ltd. Sirketi | Turkey | 100%
Azur Madencilik Ltd. Sirketi | Turkey | 100%
Eurasian Minerals Cooperatief U.A. | Netherlands | 100%
Eurasian Minerals Sweden AB | Sweden | 100%
Viad Royalties AB | Sweden | 100%
Waikato Gold Limited | New Zealand | 100%

60

Functional and Reporting Currency

The functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. The functional currency for the Company and its subsidiaries is the Canadian dollar except the functional currency of the operations of Bullion Monarch which is the US dollar. The functional currency determinations were conducted through an analysis of the consideration factors identified in IAS 21, The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates.

Translation of transactions and balances

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions or valuation where items are re-measured. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are re-measured at the rate of exchange at each financial position date. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at period end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in profit or loss.

On translation of the entities whose functional currency is other than the Canadian dollar, revenues and expenses are translated at the exchange rates approximating those in effect on the date of the transactions. Assets and liabilities are translated at the rate of exchange at the reporting date. Exchange gains and losses, including results of re-translation, are recorded in the foreign currency translation reserve.

Financial Instruments

All financial instruments are classified into one of the following four categories:

| (a) | Financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”)
|  | Financial assets and financial liabilities classified as FVTPL are acquired or incurred principally for the purpose of selling or repurchasing them in the near term. They are recognized at fair value based on market prices, with any resulting gains and losses reflected in profit or loss for the period in which they arise.
| (b) | Held-to-maturity financial assets
|  | Held-to-maturity financial assets are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity that an entity has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. They are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method less any impairment loss. A gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss when the financial asset is derecognized or impaired, and through the amortization process.
| (c) | Available for sale financial assets
|  | Available for sale (“AFS”) financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available for sale, or that are not classified as loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, or FVTPL. They are measured at fair value. Fair value is determined based on market prices. Equity instruments that do not have a quoted market price in an active market are measured at cost. Gains and losses are recognized directly in other comprehensive income (loss) until the financial asset is derecognized, at which time the cumulative gain or loss previously recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is recognized in profit or loss for the period.
| (d) | Loans and receivables and other financial liabilities
|  | Loans and receivables and other financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost, using the effective interest rate method less any impairment loss.

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, investments, receivables, restricted cash, reclamation bonds, notes receivable, strategic investments, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and advances from joint venture partners. Unless otherwise noted the fair value of these financial instruments approximates their carrying values.

Cash and cash equivalents are classified as loans and receivables. Cash equivalents are held for the purpose of meeting short-term cash commitments rather than for investment or other purposes.

Warrants held through investments are classified as derivative financial assets at FVTPL and are accounted for at fair value. For warrants that are not traded on an exchange, no market value is readily available. When there are sufficient and reliable observable market inputs, a valuation technique is used; if no such market inputs are available, the warrants are valued at intrinsic value, which is equal to the higher of the market value of the underlying security less the exercise price of the warrant, or zero.

61

Investments (Marketable securities) classified as FVTPL are measured at fair market value. Changes in fair value of FVTPL assets are reflected in profit or loss in the period in which they occur. Changes in fair value of AFS assets are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income on the statement of financial position until sold or if there is an other than temporary impairment in value.

Reclamation bonds are classified as financial assets held-to-maturity.

The Company classifies its restricted cash and certain receivables as loans and receivables and its accounts payable and accrued liabilities and advances from joint venture partners as other financial liabilities.

Certain receivables related to the sale of Akarca are considered to be derivative financial assets as they are subject to variations in gold price per ounce on record date and final price received and are accordingly classified as FVTPL. The derivative receivable is recorded at fair value each period until final settlement occurs, with changes in fair value reflected in profit or loss for the period in which they arise.

Impairment of Financial Assets

Financial assets are assessed for indicators of impairment at the end of each reporting period. Financial assets are impaired when there is objective evidence that, as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the financial assets, the estimated future cash flows of the financial assets have been impacted.

For all financial assets, objective evidence of impairment could include:

- Significant financial difficulty of the issuer or counterparty;
- Default or delinquency in interest or principal payments; or,
- It becoming probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or financial re-organization.

For certain categories of financial assets that are assessed not to be impaired individually, they are subsequently assessed for impairment on a collective basis. The carrying amount of financial assets is reduced by the impairment loss directly for all financial assets with the exception of receivables, where the carrying amount is reduced through the use of an allowance account. When a receivable is considered uncollectible, it is written off against the allowance account. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against the allowance account. Changes in the carrying amount of the allowance account are recognized in profit or loss.

With the exception of FVTPL marketable securities, if in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized, the previously recognized impairment loss is reversed through profit or loss to the extent that the carrying amount of the investment at the date the impairment is reversed does not exceed what the amortized cost would have been had the impairment not been recognized. In respect of AFS marketable securities, impairment losses previously recognized through profit or loss are not reversed through profit or loss. Any increase in fair value subsequent to an impairment loss is recognized directly in equity.

Convertible Notes Receivable

The notes receivable are hybrid financial assets that consist of a note receivable component and a separate equity conversion component. The conversion feature is measured at fair value on initial recognition by discounting the stream of future interest and principal payments at the rate of interest prevailing at the date of the issue for instruments of similar term and risk. Interest income based on the rate of the note will be receivable on maturity are recognized through profit and loss as interest income. The equity conversion option is an embedded derivative that has been separated from the notes receivable and is valued based on residual value.

Investments in Associated Companies

The Company accounts for its long-term investments in affiliated companies over which it has significant influence using the equity basis of accounting, whereby the investment is initially recorded at cost, adjusted to recognize the Company’s share of earnings or losses and reduced by dividends received.

62

The Company assesses its equity investments for impairment if there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the equity investment and that the event or events has an impact on the estimated future cash flow of the investment that can be reliably estimated. Objective evidence of impairment of equity investments includes:

- Significant financial difficulty of the associated companies;
- Becoming probable that the associated companies will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganization; or,
- National or local economic conditions that correlate with defaults of the associated companies.

Exploration and evaluation assets and exploration expenditures

Acquisition costs for exploration and evaluation assets, net of recoveries, are capitalized on a property-by-property basis. Acquisition costs include cash consideration and the value of common shares, based on recent issue prices, issued for exploration and evaluation assets pursuant to the terms of the agreement. Exploration expenditures, net of recoveries, are charged to operations as incurred. After a property is determined by management to be commercially feasible, an impairment test is conducted and subsequent development expenditures on the property will be capitalized.

When there is little prospect of further work on a property being carried out by the Company or its partners, when a property is abandoned, or when the capitalized costs are no longer considered recoverable, the related property costs are written down to management’s estimate of their net recoverable amount. The costs related to a property from which there is production, together with the costs of production equipment, will be depleted and amortized using the unit-of-production method.

An exploration and evaluation asset acquired under an option agreement, where payments are made at the sole discretion of the Company, is capitalized at the time of payment. Option payments received are treated as a reduction of the carrying value of the related acquisition cost for the mineral property until the payments are in excess of acquisition costs, at which time they are then credited to profit or loss. Option payments are at the discretion of the optionee and, accordingly, are accounted for when receipt is reasonably assured.

Revenue recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with IAS 18 Revenue and based upon amounts contractually due pursuant to the underlying royalty agreements. Specifically, royalty revenue is recognized in accordance with the terms of the underlying royalty agreements subject to (i) when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred; (iii) the royalty or stream being fixed or determinable; and (iv) the collectability of the royalty being reasonably assured. In some instances, the Company will not have access to sufficient information to make a reasonable estimate of revenue and, accordingly, revenue recognition is deferred until management can make a reasonable estimate. Royalty revenue may be subject to adjustment upon final settlement of estimated metal prices, weights, and assays. Adjustments to revenue from metal prices are recorded monthly and other adjustments are recorded on final settlement and are offset against revenue when incurred.

Royalty interests

Royalty interests in mineral properties include acquired royalty interests in production stage and exploration stage properties. In accordance with IAS 38 Intangible Assets, the cost of acquired royalty interests in mineral properties is capitalized as intangible assets.

Acquisition costs of production stage royalty interests are depleted using the units of production method over the life of the related mineral property, which is calculated using estimated reserves. Acquisition costs of royalty interests on exploration stage mineral properties, where there are no estimated reserves, are not amortized. At such time as the associated exploration stage mineral interests are converted to estimated reserves, the cost basis is amortized over the remaining life of the mineral property, using the estimated reserves. The carrying values of exploration stage mineral interests are evaluated for impairment at such time as information becomes available indicating that production will not occur in the future.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the price paid for the acquisition of a consolidated entity over the fair value of the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is allocated to the cash generating unit to which it relates.

63

Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually or more often if events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. Impairment is determined by assessing if the carrying value of a cash generating unit, including the allocated goodwill, exceeds its recoverable amount.

Property and equipment

Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Buildings are depreciated using a 5 year straightline method. Equipment is depreciated over its estimated useful life using the declining balance method at a rate of 20% per annum. Depreciation on equipment used directly on exploration projects is included in exploration expenditures for that mineral property.

Decommissioning liabilities

Decommissioning liabilities are recognized for the expected obligations related to the retirement of long-lived tangible assets that arise from the acquisition, construction, development or normal operation of such assets. A decommissioning liability is recognized in the period in which it is incurred and when a reasonable estimate of the fair value of the liability can be made with a corresponding decommissioning cost recognized by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The decommissioning cost is subsequently allocated in a rational and systematic method over the underlying asset’s useful life. The initial fair value of the liability is accreted, by charges to profit or loss, to its estimated future value.

Environmental disturbance restoration

During the operating life of an asset, events such as infractions of environmental laws or regulations may occur. These events are not related to the normal operation of the asset and are referred to as environmental disturbance restoration provisions. The costs associated with these provisions are accrued and charged to profit or loss in the period in which the event giving rise to the liability occurs. Any subsequent adjustments to these provisions due to changes in estimates are also charged to profit or loss in the period of adjustment. These costs are not capitalized as part of the long-lived assets’ carrying value.

Impairment of assets

Events or changes in circumstances can give rise to significant impairment charges or reversals of impairment in a particular year. The Company assesses its cash generating units annually to determine whether any indication of impairment exists. Where an indicator of impairment exists, an estimate of the recoverable amount is made, which is the higher of the fair value less costs to sell and value in use. The determination of the recoverable amount for value in use requires the use of estimates and assumptions such as long-term commodity prices, discount rates, future capital requirements, exploration potential and future operating performance. Fair value is determined as the amount that would be obtained from the sale of the asset in an arm’s length transaction between knowledgeable and willing parties.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, bank deposits and short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash.

Share-based payments

Share-based payments include option and stock grants granted to directors, employees and non-employees. The Company accounts for share-based compensation using a fair value based method with respect to all share-based payments measured and recognized, to directors, employees and non-employees. For directors and employees, the fair value of the options and stock grants is measured at the date of grant. For non-employees, the fair value of the options and stock are measured at the fair value of the goods or services received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, if it is determined the fair value of the goods or services cannot be reliably measured, and are recorded at the date the goods or services are received. For directors, employees and non-employees, the fair value of the options and stock grants is accrued and charged to operations, with the offsetting credit to share based payment reserve for options, and commitment to issue shares for stock grants over the vesting period. If and when the stock options are exercised, the applicable amounts are transferred from share-based payment reserve to share capital. When the stock grants are issued, the applicable fair value is transferred from commitment to issue shares to share capital. Option based compensation awards are calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model while stock grants are valued at the fair value on the date of grant.

The Company has granted certain employees and non-employees restricted share units (“RSUs”) to be settled in shares of the Corporation. The fair value of the estimated number of RSUs that will eventually vest, determined at the date of grant, is recognized as share-based compensation expense over the vesting period, with a corresponding amount recorded as equity.

64

The fair value of the RSUs is estimated using the market value of the underlying shares as well as assumptions related to the market and non-market conditions at the grant date.

Income taxes

Income tax expense consists of current and deferred tax. Income tax expense is recognized in profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to items recognized directly in equity. Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years. Deferred tax is calculated providing for temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes.

Deferred tax is not recognized on the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor taxable income nor loss. In addition, deferred tax is not recognized for taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill. Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to temporary differences when they reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset, and they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but they intend to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realized simultaneously.

A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that it is probable that future taxable income will be available against which the temporary difference can be utilized. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized.

Income (loss) per share

Basic income or loss per share is calculated by dividing the net income or loss for the year by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. Diluted income or loss per share is calculated whereby the weighted average number of shares outstanding used in the calculation of diluted income or loss per share assumes that the deemed proceeds received from the exercise of stock options, share purchase warrants and their equivalents would be used to repurchase common shares of the Company at the average market price during the year, if they are determined to have a dilutive effect.

Existing stock options and share purchase warrants have not been included in the current year computation of diluted loss per share as to do so would be anti-dilutive. For the years presented the basic and diluted losses per share are the same.

Valuation of equity units issued in private placements

The Company has adopted a residual value method with respect to the measurement of shares and warrants issued as private placement units. The residual value method first allocates value to the more easily measurable component based on fair value and then the residual value, if any, to the less easily measurable component.

The fair value of the common shares issued in the private placements was determined to be the more easily measurable component and were valued at their fair value, as determined by the closing quoted bid price on the day prior to the issuance date. The balance, if any, was allocated to the attached warrants. Any fair value attributed to the warrants is recorded in reserves.

Segment reporting

Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker. The chief operating decision-maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segment, has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer.

Accounting pronouncements not yet effective

The following standards and pronouncements have been issued by the IASB and have not yet been adopted by the Company.

IFRS 9 requires financial assets to be classified into three measurement categories on initial recognition: those measured at fair value through profit and loss, those measured at fair value through other comprehensive income and those measured at amortized cost. Measurement and classification of financial assets is dependent on the entity’s business model for managing the financial assets and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial asset. For financial liabilities, the standard retains most of the IAS 39 requirements.

65

In May 2014, the IASB issued IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("IFRS 15"), which supersedes IAS 11 Construction Contracts, IAS 18 Revenue, IFRIC 13 Customer Loyalty Programmes, IFRIC 15 Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate, IFRIC 18 Transfers of Assets from Customers, and SIC 31 Revenue - Barter Transactions involving Advertising Services. IFRS 15 establishes a single five-step model framework for determining the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from a contract with a customer. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted.

IFRS 16 Leases was issued in January 2016 (effective January 1, 2019) and provides a single lessee accounting model, requiring lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for all leases unless the lease term is 12 months or less or the underlying asset has a low value.

The Company expects that these new IFRS standards will have an insignificant effect on its consolidated financial statements other than increased note disclosure.

Critical Accounting Judgments and Significant Estimates and Uncertainties

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments and estimates and form assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported revenue and expenses during the periods presented therein. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its judgments and estimates in relation to assets, liabilities, royalty revenues and expenses. Management bases its judgments and estimates on historical experience and on other various factors it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

The Company has identified the following critical accounting policies in which significant judgments, estimates and assumptions are made and where actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions and may materially affect financial results or the financial position reported in future periods. Further details of the nature of these assumptions and conditions may be found in the relevant notes to the consolidated financial statements.

a) Royalty interest and related depletion
In accordance with the Company’s accounting policy, royalty interests are evaluated on a periodic basis to determine whether there are any indications of impairment. If any such indication exists, a formal estimate of recoverable amount is performed and an impairment loss recognized to the extent that carrying amount exceeds recoverable amount. The recoverable amount of a royalty asset is measured at the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. The determination of fair value and value in use requires management to make estimates and assumptions about expected production and sales volumes, the proportion of areas subject to royalty rights, commodity prices (considering current and historical prices, price trends and related factors), and reserves. These estimates and assumptions are subject to risk and uncertainty; hence there is a possibility that changes in circumstances will alter these projections, which may impact the recoverable amount of the assets. In such circumstances, some or all of the carrying value of the assets may be further impaired or the impairment charge reduced with the impact recorded in profit or loss.

b) Goodwill
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually or more often if events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. Impairment is determined by assessing if the carrying value of a cash generating unit, including the allocated goodwill, exceeds its recoverable amount. The assessment of the recoverable amount used in the goodwill impairment analysis is subject to similar judgments and estimates as described above for property and equipment and royalty interests.

c) Exploration and Evaluation Assets
Recorded costs of exploration and evaluation assets are not intended to reflect present or future values of exploration and evaluation assets. The recorded costs are subject to measurement uncertainty and it is reasonably possible, based on existing knowledge, that a change in future conditions could require a material change in the recognized amount.

d) Taxation
The Company’s accounting policy for taxation requires management’s judgment as to the types of arrangements considered to be a tax on income in contrast to an operating cost. Judgment is also required in assessing whether deferred tax assets and certain deferred tax liabilities are recognized on the statement of financial position.

Deferred tax assets, including those arising from unused tax losses, capital losses and temporary differences, are recognized only where it is considered probable that they will be recovered, which is dependent on the generation of sufficient future taxable profits. Deferred tax liabilities arising from temporary differences caused principally by the expected royalty revenues generated by the royalty property are recognized unless expected offsetting tax losses are sufficient to offset the taxable income and therefore, taxable income is not expected to occur in the foreseeable future. Assumptions about the generation of future taxable profits depend on management’s estimates of future cash flows. These depend on estimates of future production and sales volumes, commodity prices, and reserves. Judgments are also required about the application of income tax legislation in foreign jurisdictions. These judgments and assumptions are subject to risk and uncertainty, hence there is a possibility that changes in circumstances will alter expectations, which may impact the amount of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities recognized on the statement of financial position and the amount of other tax losses and temporary differences not yet recognized. In such circumstances, some or the entire carrying amount of recognized deferred tax assets and liabilities may require adjustment, resulting in a corresponding credit or charge to profit or loss.

66

Information about critical judgments in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, the following:

a) Functional Currencies
The functional currency of each of the Company’s subsidiaries is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. Determination of the functional currency may involve certain judgments to determine the primary economic environment and the Company reconsiders the functional currency of its entities if there is a change in events and conditions, which determined the primary economic environment.

b) Classification of investments as subsidiaries, joint ventures, associated company and portfolio investments
Classification of investments requires judgement as to whether the Company controls, has joint control of or significant influence over the strategic financial and operating decisions relating to the activity of the investee. In assessing the level of control or influence that the Company has over an investment, management considers ownership percentages, board representation as well as other relevant provisions in shareholder agreements. If an investor holds 20% or more of the voting power of the investee, it is presumed that the investor has significant influence, unless it can be clearly demonstrated that this is not the case. Conversely, if the investor holds less than 20% of the voting power of the investee, it is presumed that the investor does not have significant influence, unless such influence can be clearly demonstrated.

5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company considers items included in shareholders’ equity as capital. The Company’s objective when managing capital is to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, so that it can continue to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders.

As at December 31, 2017, the Company had working capital of $6,535,893 (2016 - $6,002,318). The Company has continuing royalty income that will vary depending on royalty ounces received, the price of gold, and foreign exchange rates on US royalty payments. The Company has granted 5,247,500 stock options and 2,623,306 warrants which could generate additional cash if exercised. The Company manages the capital structure and makes adjustments in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. The Company estimates it will need additional financing within the next 12 months to undertake its current business plan. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may issue new shares through public and/or private placements, sell assets, or return capital to shareholders. The Company is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements.

Operating Activities

Cash used in operations was $3,441,424 for the year ended December 31, 2017 (2016 - $5,315,543) and represents expenditures primarily on mineral property exploration and general and administrative expense for both periods, offset by royalty income received in the year.

Financing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement for gross proceeds of $7,000,000 through the sale of 5,000,000 units at a price of $1.40 per Unit. Each Unit will consisted of one common share and one-half of one non-transferable share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase one additional Share at a price of $2.00 for a period of two years. The Company received $85,700 (2016 - $127,800) from the exercise of stock option.

Investing Activities

Some of the significant investment activities during the year ended December 31, 2017 are:

67

| - | The Company sold certain exploration assets in Sweden to Boreal for a gain of $1,393,224.
| - | The Company advanced $1,405,277 to an associated company pursuant to a convertible loan agreement.
| - | The Company received $86,543 from interest on cash and cash equivalents.
| - | The Company purchased shares of an associated company in the amount of $2,059,631.

5.C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.

See subtopic “Exploration Expenditures” under “Item 5.A., Operating Results”.

5.D. Trend Information

See “Property Overview” under “Item 5, Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”, and “Other” under “Item 5.A., Operating Results”.

5.E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.

5.F Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

The Company has no Contractual Obligations.

ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT, AND EMPLOYEES

6.A. Directors and Senior Management

Directors and Senior Management

Name | Position | Age | Date of First Election Or Appointment
David M. Cole | President, CEO, Director | 56 | November 24, 2003
Brian E. Bayley (1)(2)(3) | Director | 65 | May 13, 1996
Brian K. Levet (1)(2) | Director | 65 | March 18, 2011
Larry M. Okada (1)(2)(3) | Director | 69 | June 11, 2013
Michael D. Winn (3) | Director and Chairman | 56 | November 24, 2003
Christina Cepeliauskas | Chief Financial Officer | 54 | September 18, 2008
Marien Segovia | Corporate Secretary | 50 | February 27, 2018

(1) | Member of Audit Committee
(2) | Member of the Compensation Committee
(3) | Member of Corporate Governance Committee

David M. Cole (President, CEO and Director)

Mr. Cole has over 25 years of industry experience, coming to EMX Royalty Corp. from Newmont Mining Company. At Newmont, he held a number of management and senior geologic positions, gaining extensive global experience as a project, mine, and generative exploration geologist in Nevada, Southeast Asia, South America, Europe, and Central Asia. Mr. Cole's success as part of Newmont's exploration team includes contributions at the world class Carlin Trend, Yanacocha, and Minahasa mines. Subsequently, he established and managed Newmont's exploration programs in Turkey while also identifying early-stage acquisition targets in Eastern Europe. Mr. Cole specializes in developing new exploration ideas and opportunities, based upon solid technical expertise coupled with a keen business sense. He studied under Dr. Tommy Thompson at Colorado State University, earning an M.S. in Geology.

68

Michael D. Winn (Director and Chairman)

Mr. Winn is President of Seabord Capital Corp., which provides investment analysis and financial services to companies operating in the energy and mining sectors. He is also President of Seabord Services Corp., a Canadian company that provides management, administrative, and regulatory services to private and public mining companies. Prior to starting Seabord Capital in January 2013, Mr. Winn was President of Terrasearch Inc. (1997 to 2012) a predecessor company to Seabord Capital. He also worked as an analyst for Global Resource Investments Ltd. (1993 to 1997) where he specialized in the evaluation of emerging oil and gas and mining companies. Mr. Winn has worked in the oil and gas industry since 1983 and the mining industry since 1992, and is currently a director and officer of several companies operating in Canada, Latin America, Europe and Africa. Mr. Winn received a B.Sc. in Geology from the University of Southern California.

Brian E. Bayley (Director)

Mr. Bayley is currently the President of Earlston Management Corp., (private management company) since December 1996 and Executive Chairman of Earlston Investments Corp., (private merchant bank) since January 2018. Previously he held the following positions with Quest Capital Corp. (a predecessor company to Sprott Resource Lending Corp.), a publicly traded resource lending company listed on the TSX and NYSE: Director from June 2003 to July 2013; Resource Lending Advisor from Sept. 2010 to June 2013; President and Chief Executive Officer from May 2009 to September 2010; Co-Chairman From January 2008 to May 2009; Chief Executive Officer from June 2003 to March 2008; and President from June 2003 to January 2008. Mr. Bayley is also a director and officer of several other public companies and holds an MBA from Queen’s University.

Brian K. Levet (Director)

Mr. Levet draws on over 40 years of diversified executive and management experience in mineral exploration, mine development and operations. He began his career with Rio Tinto Rhodesia and Zimbabwe Iron and Steel Company. The majority of Mr. Levet's career was with Newmont Mining Company (27 years), retiring in 2011 as the Group Executive for Worldwide Exploration. His distinguished career has been built upon a track record of team-oriented discovery success, with a number of these discoveries currently in production. He is recognized within the mining industry for exploration expertise and team leadership that resulted in a number of major discoveries, including the Batu Hijau and Elang copper-gold deposits in Indonesia, the North Lanut gold deposit in North Sulawesi, Indonesia, the McPhillamys gold deposit in New South Wales, Australia, as well as playing a significant role in the identification of Yanacocha as a world-class gold mining camp. Mr. Levet has a B.Sc. in Geology from the University of London.

Larry M. Okada (Director)

Mr. Okada is a Chartered Professional Accountant in British Columbia and Alberta, as well as a Certified Public Accountant in Washington State. He has been in public practice with Deloitte LLP, his own firm, Okada & Partners, and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for over 35 years. For more than 30 years, the majority of Mr. Okada's clients have been public mining companies listed on the TSX-V and TSE. Mr. Okada has extensive experience in accounting, finance, and corporate governance.

Christina Cepeliauskas (Chief Financial Officer)

Ms. Cepeliauskas is a CPA, CGA professional accountant with more than 20 years of financial accounting and treasury experience in the mineral exploration and mining industry. She also has her ICD.D designation from the Institute of Corporate Directors. She is currently the Chief Financial Officer of EMX Royalty Corp. and Reservoir Capital Corp. and was formerly a Director and Chairperson of the Audit Committee of Revelo Resources Corp. Ms. Cepeliauskas also holds the volunteer position of Chair of the Governance Committee of Fraserside Community Services Society, an organization committed to helping people overcome challenges.

Marien Segovia (Corporate Secretary)

Ms. Segovia has over 17 years of experience in the administration of public companies. Prior to joining EMX Royalty Corp., Ms. Segovia worked as Assistant Corporate Secretary at Great Panther Silver Limited for four years. Previously, she provided corporate secretarial services to several publicly traded companies and served as Corporate Secretary for Silvermex Resources Inc. (acquired by First Majestic Silver Corp. in 2012). Prior to that, Ms. Segovia spent 10 years at Silver Standard Resources providing support as corporate and legal administrator. Ms. Segovia has a BA degree in Business Information Systems and a Corporate & Securities Paralegal Certification. She is a Certified Spanish Translator and a Member of the B.C. Society of Translators & Interpreters.

69

The Directors have served in their respective capacities since their election and/or appointment and will serve until the next Annual General Meeting or until a successor is duly elected, unless the office is vacated in accordance with the Articles/ByLaws of the Company.

No Director and/or Senior Management had been the subject of any order, judgment, or decree of any governmental agency or administrator or of any court or competent jurisdiction, revoking or suspending for cause any license, permit or other authority of such person or of any Company of which he is a Director and/or Senior Management, to engage in the securities business or in the sale of a particular security or temporarily or permanently restraining or enjoining any such person or any Company of which he is an officer or director from engaging in or continuing any conduct/practice/employment in connection with the purchase or sale of securities, or convicting such person of any felony or misdemeanor involving a security or any aspect of the securities business or of theft or of any felony.

There are no family relationships between any two or more Directors or Senior Management.

There are no arrangements or understandings with major shareholders, customers, suppliers or others, pursuant to which any person referred to above was selected as a director or member of senior management.

6.B. Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Compensation Committee of the Board is responsible for ensuring that the Corporation has appropriate procedures for reviewing executive compensation and making recommendations to the Board with respect to the compensation of the Corporation’s executive officers. The Compensation Committee seeks to ensure that total compensation paid to all executive officers is fair and reasonable and is consistent with the Corporation’s compensation philosophy.

The Compensation Committee is also responsible for recommending compensation for the directors, stock options grants to the directors, officers, employees and consultants pursuant to the Corporation’s Stock Option Plan (the “Option Plan”) and issuances of Common Shares to directors and officers pursuant to the Corporation’s Incentive Restricted Share Unit Plan (the “RSU Plan”). Both the Option Plan and the RSU Plan assists the Corporation in employee retention and cash preservation, while encouraging Common Share ownership and entrepreneurship on the part of the Corporation’s Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”).

The Compensation Committee consists of Brian E. Bayley (Chairman up to October 24, 2017), Brian K. Levet (Chairman as of October 24, 2017), and Larry M. Okada, all of whom are independent (outside, non-management) directors. The Board is satisfied that the composition of the Compensation Committee ensures an objective process for determining compensation. Each of the members of the Committee has skills and direct experience relevant to his responsibilities as a member of the Committee as follows:

Brian E. Bayley: Mr. Bayley is experienced in the areas of natural resource and real estate lending, corporate restructuring and management and administration of public companies. He is the President of Earlston Management Corp. (formerly called Ionic Management Corp.), a private management company providing services to public and private companies. Mr. Bayley has held active senior management positions in both private and public natural resource companies and has over 30 years of public issuer experience as both a director and an officer.

Brian K. Levet: Mr. Levet has over 40 years of diversified executive and management experience in mineral exploration, project start-up and mine development and operation. He spent over 27 years with Newmont Mining Company, most recently as the Group Executive for Worldwide Exploration, from which he retired in 2011.

Larry M. Okada: Mr. Okada is a Chartered Professional Accountant in British Columbia and Alberta, as well as a Certified Public Accountant in Washington State. He has been in public practice with Deloitte LLP, his own firm, Okada & Partners, and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for over 35 years. For more than 30 years, the majority of Mr. Okada's clients have been public mining companies listed on the TSX-V and TSE. Mr. Okada has extensive experience in accounting, finance, and corporate governance.

Philosophy and Objectives

The philosophy used by the Compensation Committee and the Board in determining compensation is that the compensation should:

70

| (i) | assist the Corporation in attracting and retaining high caliber executives;
| (ii) | align the interests of executives with those of the Shareholders;
| (iii) | reflect the executive’s performance, expertise, responsibilities and length of service to the Corporation; and
| (iv) | reflect the Corporation’s current state of development, performance and financial status.

Risk Assessment

Under the direction of the Board, the Compensation Committee evaluates the potential risks associated with Corporation’s compensation policies and practices. The Committee has not identified any risks arising from the Corporation’s compensation policies and practices which would have a material adverse effect on the Corporation.

As outlined above in “Philosophy and Objectives” above, the Compensation Committee evaluates and recommends to the Board compensation strategies which align each NEO’s goals and values with those of the Shareholders and other stakeholders to ensure the Corporation’s short and long term goals are met without exposing the Corporation to unnecessary risk. The Compensation Committee considers a mix of base salary, short term incentives and long term incentives to attract high caliber executives sufficient to encourage behaviour that leads to creation of long term value while limiting incentives that might promote inappropriate risk-taking.

As part of the annual review of the compensation packages of the Corporation’s NEOs, the Compensation Committee identifies and if necessary changes strategies to mitigate risks. The Committee considers several factors as part of this review including retention of key employees; competitive salaries within the context of peer companies, short term incentives linked to specific goals as discussed below and long term incentives (stock options and Restricted Share Unit’s (“RSU’s”) which link executive pay to real value creation and long term share appreciation.

Compensation Hedging

No NEO or director is permitted to purchase financial instruments, including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, or units of exchange funds, designed to hedge or offset a decrease in market value of equity securities granted as compensation or held, directly or indirectly, by the NEO or director.

Compensation Components

The compensation of the Corporation’s NEOs is comprised primarily of (i) base salary, (ii) annual short-term incentives in the form of cash bonuses and stock grants under the RSU Plan, (iii) long-term incentives in the form of performance related stock grants under the RSU Plan and stock options granted under the Option Plan, and (iv) benefits related to health and pension plans, such as United States 401(k) plans.

In determining the amounts payable under the various compensation components, the Corporation also retains, from time to time, a compensation consultant.

Lane Caputo Compensation Inc. Independent Executive Compensation Report

In November 2016, the Compensation Committee retained Lane Caputo Compensation Inc., independent Executive Compensation Specialists based in Vancouver and Calgary to review and make recommendations regarding the Corporation’s compensation arrangements for its executive team and non-executive directors and to recommend required changes (if any) to align pay elements and/or strategy with both current market practices and the Company’s business strategy. The report containing Lane Caputo’s recommendations (the “Lane Caputo Report”) was used by the Compensation Committee to guide and assist it in 2017 in establishing short and long term equity incentive programs (“STIP” and “LTIP”) and compensation levels. To facilitate these programs, the Board has adopted, and approval received from disinterested Shareholders at the Corporation’s Annual General Meeting held on May 17, 2017, a Restricted Share Unit (“RSU”) plan.

The key components of the Lane Caputo Report are as follows:

Peer Group

Standard compensation methodology involves benchmarking compensation practices against a group of peer companies of similar size with relevant operations in the same regional geography; the resulting peer group then represents a realistic “market” against which to define the Company’s compensation strategy.

71

As the availability of cash flow tends to determine pay mix to a certain extent, matching the development stages of peer companies is particularly important. Whereas exploration-stage companies tend to rely more heavily on equity-based compensation in order to focus the majority of available cash on exploration activities, companies that have achieved a sustainable level of commercial production, and have associated predictable cash flow levels, gradually reduce their reliance on equity-based compensation in favor of cash compensation.

Geographical similarity of peer companies allows for a more accurate benchmarking of the skillsets required to manage international versus domestic operations and reflects the additional time commitment often associated with international operations. The inclusion of internationally-focused companies can have an influence on pay practices due to the risk/reward profile of international operations and the market for executives with international operating experience.

The magnitude of executive compensation is closely correlated to the size of organization the executive oversees; as such, compensation levels are compared to companies that would be considered of relevant size to EMX.

Lane Caputo developed a peer group of mining companies based on the parameters mentioned above against which they benchmarked the compensation competitiveness of EMX’s executive team members and non-executive directors. In order to reflect EMX’s unique business model, consideration was limited to companies that have an element of royalty income or project generation as part of their business strategy. The 19 companies in the peer group developed for the review are:

Abitibi Royalties Inc. | Marathon Gold Corp. | Riverside Resources Inc.
Almaden Minerals Ltd. | Millrock Resources Inc. | Sabina Gold & Silver Corp.
Altius Minerals Corp. | Mirasol Resources Ltd. | Sandstorm Gold Ltd.
ATAC Resources Ltd. | NexGen Energy Ltd. | Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp.
AuRico Metals Inc. | NGEx Resources Inc. | Strategic Metals Ltd.
Balmoral Resources Ltd. | Orex Minerals Inc. | Treasury Metals Inc.
Corvus Gold Inc. |  |

Compensation Philosophy

EMX’s compensation philosophy is based on the fundamental principles that the Company’s compensation program should assist the Company in attracting and retaining high caliber executives, align the interests of executives with those of the shareholders, reflect the executive’s performance, expertise, responsibilities and length of service to the Company and reflect the Company’s current state of development, performance and financial status. Given the skillsets required to execute the Company’s complex business strategy, the proposed positioning for each element of compensation under such a philosophy is as follows:

Salary: is based on relevant marketplace information, experience, past performance and level of responsibility. For a fully-qualified incumbent in a given position, EMX will target salary at the 75th percentile of the peer group to reflect the complexity of the multiple aspects of the Corporation’s business strategy. The Corporation may pay above or below this target to reflect each incumbent’s relative experience or performance versus the market, or to reflect competitive market pressures for a given skill set.

Short-Term Incentives: awards are based on the performance of the executive against predetermined individual performance objectives and the performance of the Company against predetermined annual corporate performance objectives. Target incentive levels (as a percentage of salary) are established to maintain total cash compensation (salary + bonus) at the 75th percentile of the market when performance is at target levels. Incentive opportunity will have sufficient leverage that total cash compensation (salary + bonus) can achieve top quartile levels of cash compensation when performance warrants. In an effort to manage cash flow and/or provide executives with more exposure to the company’s stock, EMX may consider paying annual incentives in Restricted Share Units, rather than cash.

As with any compensation plan, the Compensation Committee or the Board as a whole should always have discretion to reward above, or below, plan parameters when an individual or team has made an exceptional contribution to the performance of the Company, or conversely, if the financial performance of the company is above targeted levels for external market or economic conditions despite poor operational performance of the management team.

Long-Term Incentives: are a particularly important component of compensation in the mining industry, as executives and employees need to be aligned with the risk/reward profile of shareholders through participation in share price appreciation. The number of stock options and other equity-based incentives granted annually to each position is targeted at median levels in the peer group and should be sufficient that, when combined with each position’s other elements of compensation, will allow total direct compensation to achieve upper quartile positioning for superior share price performance.

72

Based on the Lane Caputo Report, the Compensation Committee established the following compensation components for its 2017 financial year:

Base Salary
In conjunction with the compensation review and the establishment of the STIP and LTIP programs, David M. Cole, CEO, agreed to decrease his annual cash salary from US$ 400,000 to US$ 325,000, to further align his interests with the overall success of the Corporation.

Annual/Short Term Incentives
A structured incentive program based on quantifiable corporate and personal goals and objectives that are tied to the overall success of the Corporation and that are closely aligned with the Corporation’s business strategy has been established. The Compensation Committee and the NEOs and other executive officers will develop meaningful, yet attainable, targets for the following key performance indicators, which will be measured over a one year period:

- Capital spent by third party partners
- Cash management
- Corporate Social Responsibility measures (both internal and 3rd party partner programs)
- New projects staked/acquired
- New exploration and option agreements

In conjunction with the adoption of a structured plan, annual incentive levels to achieve the stated compensation philosophy are proposed as follows: Minimum = 0% of base salary; Target = 15% of base salary; Maximum = 25% of base salary.

2017 incentives to by paid under the STIP have yet to be finalized. During the year, stock grants for 2016 success were granted to the CEO and CFO.

Long-term Incentives

As recommended in the Lane Caputo Report, a more robust LTIP was implemented, with both Stock Options and performance related RSU’s as key components of the LTIP. Lane Caputo recommended a fixed number of awards annually over the near-term, such that executives have maximum exposure to the upside in the stock through their efforts as possible (a fair value, or “Black-Scholes’ approach requires a reduction in the number of incentives awarded as the share price increases). EMX may ultimately need to move to a fair value approach as the company grows.

Stock Options are generally granted on an annual basis subject to the imposition of trading black-out periods, in which case options scheduled for grant will be granted subsequent to the end of the black-out period. All options granted to NEOs are recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board.

The Corporation adopted a RSU Plan with the following guidelines:

- Performance measured over a three year period, with the entire award vesting at the end of the performance period (known as “cliff-vesting”) to generate sufficient long-term incentive.

In order for RSUs to vest, the Participant must satisfy performance criteria set each year by the Compensation Committee. For 2017, the performance criteria were as follows:

- Half of the RSU award is subject to the Company achieving cash flow neutrality in three years from January 1, 2017.

- Half of the RSU award is subject to Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) performance relative to the S&P/Global Gold Index as recommended by Lane Caputo.

The following relative TSR performance versus payout multiple will apply to the 50% of RSU award that is subject to TSR:

73

| » | Below-median Performance (0 – 49th percentile): 0% of RSU’s vest
| » | 3rd Quartile Performance (50th percentile – 74th percentile): 100% of RSU’s vest
| » | Upper Quartile Performance (75th percentile – 100th percentile): 200% of RSU’s vest

On August 28, 2017, stock options and RSU’s were granted to NEOs of the Corporation. See Summary Compensation Table below for details.

The fees charged by Lane Caputo during the Company’s 2017, 2016 and 2015 financial years were as follows:

Nature of Fee | 2017 | 2016 | 2015
Executive Compensation-Related Fees | $48,000 | Nil | Nil
All Other Fees | Nil | Nil | Nil

Cash Compensation

The following table contains a summary of the compensation paid to the Directors and NEOs during the last three financial years.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position | Annual Compensation | Long-Term Compensation |
Awards | Payouts
Year | Salary $ | STIP Payouts | Other Annual Compensation $ | Securities Under Options/SARs Granted | Bonus Shares or Restricted Share Units | LTIP Payouts $ | All Other Comp. $
David M. Cole President & CEO | 2017 2016 2015 | 478,853 529,738 516,280 | Nil Nil Nil | 14,019(2) 14,046 2) 13,549(2) | 200,000 150,000 150,000 | 100,000(1) Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil
Michael D. Winn Chairman & Director | 2017 2016 2015 | 77,882 79,228 76,692 | Nil Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil | 100,000 75,000 75,000 | Nil Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil
Christina Cepeliauskas (3) CFO | 2017 2016 2015 | 86,250 86,250 86,250 | Nil Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil | 75,000 55,000 55,000 | 37,500 (1) Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil
Brian E. Bayley Director | 2017 2016 2015 | 24,000 24,000 24,000 | Nil Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil | 75,000 50,000 50,000 | Nil Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil
Brian K. Levet Director | 2017 2016 2015 | 24,000 24,000 24,000 | Nil Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil | 75,000 50,000 50,000 | Nil Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil
Larry M. Okada Director | 2017 2016 2015 | 24,000 24,000 24,000 | Nil Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil | 75,000 50,000 50,000 | Nil Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil
Kim Casswell(3)(4) Former Corporate Secretary | 2017 2016 2015 | 29,800 29,800 3,150 | Nil Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil | 30,000 30,000 Nil | Nil Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil | Nil Nil Nil

(1) | RSUs granted under the Company’s RSU Plan on August 28, 2017. The vesting date and payout date for RSUs is January 1, 2020, subject to performance criteria.
(2) | For officers and employees in the United States, the Company pays 4% of the annual salary each year to the officer or employees’ 401(k) retirement plan effective January 1, 2012.

74

(3) | Pursuant to a Management Services Agreement between the Company and Seabord Services Corp. (“Seabord”), Ms. Cepeliauskas’ and Ms. Casswell’s remuneration is paid by Seabord.
(4) | Ms. Casswell was Corporate Secretary of the Company from November 13, 2015 to February 27, 2018.

The following Stock Options were granted to directors and NEOs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017:

Name | Number Of Options Granted | % of Total Options Granted | Exercise Price Per Share | Grant Date | Expiration Date | Mkt. Value of Securities Underlying Options on Date of Grant
David M. Cole | 200,000 | 13.6% | $1.20 | August 28, 2017 | August 28, 2022 | $1.20
Michael D. Winn | 100,000 | 6.8% | $1.20 | August 28, 2017 | August 28, 2022 | $1.20
Christina Cepeliauskas | 75,000 | 5.1% | $1.20 | August 28, 2017 | August 28, 2022 | $1.20
Brian E. Bayley | 75,000 | 5.1% | $1.20 | August 28, 2017 | August 28, 2022 | $1.20
Brian K. Levet | 75,000 | 5.1% | $1.20 | August 28, 2017 | August 28, 2022 | $1.20
Larry M. Okada | 75,000 | 5.1% | $1.20 | August 28, 2017 | August 28, 2022 | $1.20
Kim Casswell | 30,000 | 2% | $1.20 | August 28, 2017 | August 28, 2022 | $1.20

The following RSUs were granted to NEOs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017:

Name | Number of RSUs Granted | Date of Grant | Vesting Period / Vesting Date | Expiration Date / Payout Date
David M. Cole | 100,000 | August 28, 2017 | 3 years / January 1, 2020 | January 1, 2020
Christina Cepeliauskas | 37,500 | August 28, 2017 | 3 years / January 1, 2020 | January 1, 2020

Outstanding Share-Based and Option-Based Awards

The following table sets out all option-based and share-based awards outstanding for each Director and NEO as at December 31, 2017.

75

Name | Option-based Awards | Share-based Awards (RSUs)
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised options (vested- unvested) | Option Exercise price ($ per share) | Option Expiration date (m/d/y) | Value of unexercised “in-the- money” options(1) ($) | Number of shares or units of shares that have not vested (#) | Market or payout value of share-based awards that have not vested(3) ($) | Market or payout value of shares vested but not paid out ($)
David M. Cole | 200,000 – 0 150,000 - 0 150,000 - 0 150,000 - 0 | 1.20 1.30 0.66 1.20 | 8/28/2022 10/18/2021 6/8/2020 4/25/2019 | 0 0 555,000 0 | 100,000(2) | 103,000 | Nil
Christina Cepeliauskas | 75,000 - 0 55,000 - 0 55,000 - 0 55,000 - 0 | 1.20 1.30 0.66 1.20 | 8/28/2022 10/18/2021 6/8/2020 4/25/2019 | 0 0 20,350 0 | 37,500(2) | 38,625 | Nil
Michael D. Winn | 75,000 - 0 75,000 - 0 75,000 - 0 100,000 - 0 | 1.20 1.30 0.66 1.20 | 8/28/2022 10/18/2021 6/8/2020 4/25/2019 | 0 0 27,750 0 | Nil | Nil | Nil
Brian E. Bayley | 50,000 - 0 50,000 - 0 50,000 - 0 75,000 - 0 | 1.20 1.30 0.66 1.20 | 8/28/2022 10/18/2021 6/8/2020 4/25/2019 | 0 0 18,500 0 | Nil | Nil | Nil
Brian K. Levet | 50,000 - 0 50,000 - 0 50,000 - 0 75,000 - 0 | 1.20 1.30 0.66 1.20 | 8/28/2022 10/18/2021 6/8/2020 4/25/2019 | 0 0 18,500 0 | Nil | Nil | Nil
Larry M. Okada | 50,000 - 0 50,000 - 0 50,000 - 0 75,000 - 0 | 1.20 1.30 0.66 1.20 | 8/28/2022 10/18/2021 6/8/2020 4/25/2019 | 0 0 18,500 0 | Nil | Nil | Nil
Kim Casswell | 5,000 - 0 30,000 - 0 30,000 - 0 | 1.20 1.30 1.20 | 8/28/2022 10/18/2021 4/25/2019 | 0 0 0 | Nil | Nil | Nil

(1) | The closing price of the Company’s common shares on the TSX-V on December 31, 2017 was $1.03.
(2) | RSUs granted under the Company’s RSU Plan on August 28, 2017. The vesting date and payout date for RSUs granted on August 28, 2017, is January 1, 2020, subject to performance criteria.
(3) | The Company valued the RSUs at the market value of the Company’s common shares on the TSX-V on December 31, 2017, being the closing price of $1.03 per share.

Director Compensation.

The fees payable to the independent directors of the Company are for their services as directors and as members of committees of the Board as follows:

Board or | Annual Retainer | Meeting Stipend | Per diem fees
Committee Name | ($) | ($) | ($)
Board of Directors | 24,000 | Nil | Nil

76

Directors are entitled to reimbursement for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors.

Change of Control Remuneration.

Chief Executive Officer

The Company is a party to an employment agreement with David M. Cole, President and CEO of the Company, effective June 1, 2017. Under the agreement, Mr. Cole receives US$ 325,000 per year. The agreement may be terminated by the Company without reason by written notice and a lump sum payment equal to 24 months of salary and benefits and all unvested stock options and grants. Mr. Cole may terminate the agreement for any reason upon two months’ notice to the Company during which time he will continue to receive his usual remuneration and benefits.

If Mr. Cole’s agreement is terminated or his duties and responsibilities are materially changed within 6 months following a change in control of the Company, he is entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to 24 months of his salary and benefits and all unvested stock options and grants.

Other Executive Officers

The Company has not entered into another employment or consulting contracts with its other Executive Officers.

For the purposes of this section, “Change of control” means an event occurring after the effective date of this agreement pursuant to which:

| a) | a merger, amalgamation, arrangement, consolidation, reorganization or transfer takes place in which securities of EMX possessing more than 50% of the total combined voting power of the EMX’s outstanding voting securities are acquired by a person or persons (other than one or more members of the EMX Group) different from the person holding those voting securities immediately prior to such event, and the composition of the Board of Directors of EMX or following such event is such that EMX’s directors prior to the transaction constitute less than 50% of the Board membership following the event; or
| b) | any person (other than a member of the EMX Group), or any combination of persons (none of which is a member of the EMX Group) acting jointly or in concert by virtue of an agreement, arrangement, commitment or understanding acquires, directly or indirectly, 50% or more of the voting rights attached to all outstanding voting securities or the right to appoint a majority of the directors of EMX ; or
| c) | EMX sells, transfers or otherwise disposes of all or substantially all of its assets, except that no Change of Control will be deemed to occur if such sale or disposition is made to a member of the EMX Group.

Bonus/Profit Sharing/Non-Cash Compensation. Except for the Company’s short-term and long-term incentive programs discussed in Item 6.B., the Company had no material bonus or profit sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to the Company's Directors or Senior Management.

Pension/Retirement Benefits. For the officers and employees in the United States, the Company pays 4% of the annual salary each year to the officer or employees’ 401(k) retirement plan effective January 1, 2012.

6.C. Board Practices

6.C.1. Terms of Office.
Refer to Item 6.A.1.

6.C.2. Directors’ Service Contracts.

Not applicable.

6.C.3. Board of Director Committees.

Audit Committee

The Company has an Audit Committee, which recommends to the Board of Directors the engagement of the independent auditors of the Company and reviews with the independent auditors the scope and results of the Company’s audits, the Company’s internal accounting controls, and the professional services furnished by the independent auditors to the Company. The current members of the Audit Committee are: Brian E. Bayley, Brian K. Levet and Larry M. Okada (Chairman). The Audit Committee met four times during Fiscal year 2017. The Company’s Audit Committee Charter sets out its mandate and responsibilities, and is attached as Exhibit 15.4 to this Annual Report. See Item 19 – “Exhibits”.

77

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is responsible for the review of all compensation paid (including stock options granted under the Option Plan and Common Shares issued under the Stock Grant Program) by the Company to the Board, officers and employees of the Company and any subsidiaries, to report to the Board on the results of those reviews and to make recommendations to the Board for adjustments to such compensation. The current members of the Compensation Committee are: Brian K. Levet (Chairman), Brian E. Bayley and Larry M. Okada.

Corporate Governance Committee

The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for advising the Board of the appropriate corporate governance procedures that should be followed by the Company and the Board and monitoring whether they comply with such procedures. The current members of the Corporate Governance Committee are: Michael Winn (Chairman), Brian E. Bayley and Larry M. Okada.

The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates the effectiveness of the Board and its committees. To facilitate this evaluation, each committee will conduct an annual assessment of its performance, consisting of a review of its Charter, the performance of the committee as a whole and will submit a Committee Annual Report to the Corporate Governance Committee, including recommendations. In addition, the Board will conduct an annual review of its performance.

6.D. Employees/ Consultants

As of December 31, 2017, EMX had 39 employees and consultants working at various locations throughout the world.

As of April 3, 2018, the Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary are based in Vancouver, Canada. The President & CEO is based in the Company’s office in Littleton, Colorado through the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, EMX USA. There are eight employees located in Arizona including seven geologists and one office manager. The Company has one consultant in Haiti, one consultant in Australia, 2 consultants in Turkey and 3 consultants in Scandinavia.

See Item 6 – “Directors, Senior Management & Employees” for a description of their job responsibilities.

6.E. Share Ownership

The table below lists, as of April 3, 2018, Directors and Senior Management who beneficially own the Company's voting securities, consisting solely of Common Shares, and the amount of the Company's voting securities owned by the Directors and Senior Management as a group.

Shareholdings of Directors and Senior Management Shareholdings of 5% Shareholders
Title of Class | Name of Beneficial Owner | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | Percent of Class(1)
Common | David M. Cole (2) | 2,757,496 | 3.46%
Common | Michael D. Winn (3) | 1,290,208 | 1.62%
Common | Christina Cepeliauskas (4) | 526,500 | 0.66%
Common | Brian E. Bayley (5) | 411,375 | 0.52%
Options | Brian K. Levet (6) | 425,000 | 0.53%
Common | Larry M. Okada (7) | 240,000 | 0.30%
Common | Paul H. Stephens (8) | 15,408,491 | 19.32%

(1) | Based on 79,746,271 shares outstanding as of April 3, 2018.
(2) | Of these shares, 1,065,015 are represented by currently exercisable share purchase options, warrants and RSUs.
(3) | Of these shares, 457,100 are represented by currently exercisable share purchase options and warrants.
(4) | Of these shares, 367,500 are represented by currently exercisable share purchase options and RSUs.

78

(5) | Of these shares, 225,000 are represented by currently exercisable share purchase options.
(6) | Of these shares, 425,000 are represented by currently exercisable share purchase options.
(7) | Of these shares, 230,000 are represented by currently exercisable share purchase options and warrants.
(8) | Of these shares, nil are represented by currently exercisable share purchase options.

Restricted Share Unit Plan

The RSU Plan was approved by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting of the Company on May 17, 2017.

The RSU Plan provides that restricted share units (“RSUs”) may be granted by the Board, based on the advice of the Compensation Committee, to officers, directors and employees of, and consultants to, the Corporation (“Eligible Persons”) as a discretionary payment in consideration for significant contributions to the short-term (one year or less) and long-term (one to three years) successes of the Corporation. The Board may, in its sole discretion, set vesting conditions on RSUs granted to Eligible Persons, which conditions will be primarily based on the performance criteria set by the Compensation Committee.

Pursuant to the RSU Plan, the aggregate maximum number of Common Shares reserved for issuance under the RSU Plan in combination with the aggregate number of Common Shares issuable under all of the Corporation’s other equity incentive plans in existence from time to time, including the Option Plan, shall not exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares.

In addition, the RSU Plan provides that the number of Common Shares which may be issuable under the RSU Plan and all of the Corporation's other previously established or proposed share compensation arrangements, including the Option Plan, within a 12 month period, to:

(a) | any one Eligible Person shall not exceed 5% of the total number of issued and outstanding Common Shares on the date of the grant on a non-diluted basis unless the Corporation has obtained the approval of Shareholders who are not Insiders (“Disinterested Shareholders”), which approval is not being sought;
(b) | Insiders as a group within a 12 month period shall not exceed 10% of the total number of issued and outstanding Common Shares on a non-diluted basis unless the Corporation has obtained the approval of Disinterested Shareholders, which approval is also not being sought; and
(c) | any one consultant, or Eligible Person engaged in providing investor relations services to the Corporation, shall not exceed 2% in the aggregate of the total number of issued and outstanding Common Shares on the date of the grant on a non-diluted basis.

Unless redeemed earlier in accordance with the RSU Plan, the RSUs of each Eligible Person will be redeemed on or within 30 days after the RSU Payment Date (as defined below) for cash or Common Shares, as determined by the Board, for an amount equal to the Fair Market Value (the closing market price of the Common Shares on the TSX-V on the day prior to redemption) of an RSU, less applicable withholding taxes, and as increased or decreased by a “performance factor” determined by the Board in its sole discretion. The “RSU Payment Date” in respect of any RSU means a date not later than December 15th of the third year following the year in which such RSU was granted to the Eligible Person, unless (i) an earlier date has been approved by the Board as the RSU Payment Date in respect of such RSU, or (ii) there is a “Change of Control” of the Corporation (as defined in the RSU Plan), the RSU Plan is terminated or upon an Eligible Person’s death or termination of employment.

Under the RSU Plan, the Board may from time to time amend or revise the terms of the RSU Plan or may discontinue the RSU Plan at any time. Subject to receipt of requisite Disinterested Shareholder, TSX-V and NYSE American approvals, the Board may make amendments to the RSU Plan to

- change the maximum number of Common Shares issuable under the RSU Plan,

- change the method of calculation of the redemption of RSUs held by Eligible Persons, and

- provide an extension to the term for the redemption of RSUs held by Eligible Persons.

All other amendments to the RSU Plan may be made by the Board without obtaining shareholder approval.

79

If an Eligible Person ceases to be an Eligible Person for any reason (excluding death), all of the Eligible Person’s RSUs which have vested at the time of such cessation shall be redeemed for cash or Common Shares and the remainder shall be cancelled. No amount shall be paid by the Corporation to the Eligible Person in respect of the RSUs so cancelled. If an Eligible Person ceases to be an Eligible Person due to death, any of the Eligible Person’s RSUs which would otherwise vest within the next year following the date of death shall be redeemed for cash or Common Shares as determined by the Board.

In the event of a Change of Control, then the Corporation may redeem, subject to prior approval of the TSX-V and NYSE American, all of the RSUs granted to the Eligible Persons and outstanding under the RSU Plan for that number of Common Shares equal to the number of RSUs then held by the Eligible Persons. If the employment of an Eligible Person is terminated within six months following a Change of Control, all RSUs held by such Eligible Person shall become vested and be redeemed for cash or Common Shares.

Stock Option Plan

The Board established the Option Plan to attract and motivate the directors, officers and employees of the Company (and any of its subsidiaries), employees of any management company and consultants to the Company (collectively the “Optionees”) and thereby advance the Company’s interests by providing them an opportunity to acquire an equity interest in the Company through the exercise of stock options granted to them under the Option Plan.

Pursuant to the Option Plan, the Board, based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, may grant options to Optionees in consideration of them providing their services to the Company or a subsidiary. The number of Common Shares subject to each option is determined by the Board within the guidelines established by the Option Plan. The options enable the Optionees to purchase Common Shares at a price fixed pursuant to such guidelines. The options are exercisable by the Optionee giving the Company notice and payment of the exercise price for the number of Common Shares to be acquired.

The Option Plan authorizes the Board to grant stock options to the Optionees on the following terms:

1. | The number of Common Shares subject to issuance pursuant to outstanding options, in the aggregate, cannot exceed 10% of the outstanding Common Shares.
2. | The number of Common Shares subject to issuance upon the exercise of options granted under the Option Plan by one Optionee or all Optionees providing investor relations services is subject to the following limitations

| (a) | no Optionee can be granted options during a 12 month period to purchase more than
|  | (i) | 5% of the issued Common Shares unless disinterested Shareholder approval has been obtained (such approval has not been sought), or
|  | (ii) | 2% of the issued Common Shares, if the Optionee is a consultant, and
| (b) | the aggregate number of Common Shares subject to options held by all Optionees providing investor relations services cannot exceed 2% in the aggregate.

3. | Unless the Option Plan has been approved by disinterested Shareholders (such approval has not been obtained), options granted under the Option Plan, together with all of the Company’s previously established and outstanding stock options, stock option plans, employee stock purchase plans or any other compensation or incentive mechanisms involving the issuance or potential issuance of Common Shares, shall not result, at any time, in
| (a) | the number of Common Shares reserved for issuance pursuant to stock options granted to insiders exceeding 10% of the outstanding Common Shares at the time of granting,
| (b) | the grant to insiders, within a one year period, of options to purchase that number of Common Shares exceeding 10% of the outstanding Common Shares, or
| (c) | the issuance to any one insider and such insider’s associates, within a one year period, of Common Shares totaling in excess of 5% of the outstanding Common Shares.

4. | The exercise price of the options cannot be set at less than the greater of $0.10 per Common Share and the closing trading price of the Common Shares on the day before the granting of the stock options. If the Optionee is subject to the tax laws of the United States of America and owns (determined in accordance with such laws) greater than 10% of the Common Shares, the exercise price shall be at least 110% of the price established as aforesaid.

80

5. | The options may be exercisable for up to 10 years.
6. | There are not any vesting requirements unless the Optionee is a consultant providing investor relations services to the Company, in which case the options must vest over at least 12 months with no more than one-quarter vesting in any three month period. However, the Board may impose additional vesting requirements and, subject to obtaining any required approval from the Exchange, may authorize all unvested options to vest immediately. If there is a potential “change of control” of the Company due to a take-over bid being made for the Company or a similar event, all unvested options, subject to obtaining any required approval from the Exchange, shall vest immediately.
7. | The options can only be exercised by the Optionee (to the extent they have already vested) for so long as the Optionee is a director, officer or employee of, or consultant to, the Company or any subsidiary or is an employee of the Company’s management Company and within a period thereafter not exceeding the earlier of:
| (a) | the original expiry date;
| (b) | 90 days after ceasing to be a director, officer or employee of, or consultant at the request of the Board or for the benefit of another director or officer to, the Company unless the Optionee is subject to the tax laws of the United States of America, in which case the option will terminate on the earlier of the 90th day and the third month after the Optionee ceased to be an officer or employee; and
| (c) | if the Optionee dies, within one year from the Optionee’s death.

| If the Optionee is terminated “for cause”, involuntarily removed or resigns (other than at the request of the Board or for the benefit of another director or officer) from any such positions, the option will terminate concurrently.
8. | The options are not assignable except to a wholly-owned holding company. If the option qualifies as an “incentive stock option” under the United States Internal Revenue Code, the option is not assignable to a holding company.
9. | No financial assistance is available to Optionees under the Option Plan.
10. | Any amendments to outstanding stock options are subject to the approval of the TSX-V and NYSE American and, if required by either exchange or the Option Plan, of the Shareholders of the Company, possibly with only “disinterested Shareholders” being entitled to vote. Disinterested Shareholder approval must be obtained for the reduction of the exercise price of options (including the cancellation and re-issuance of options within a one year period so as to effectively reduce the exercise price) of options held by insiders of the Company. The amendment to an outstanding stock option will also require the consent of the Optionee.
11. | Any amendments to the Option Plan are subject to the approval of the TSX-V and NYSE American and, if required by either exchange or the Option Plan, of the Shareholders of the Company, possibly with only “disinterested Shareholders” being entitled to vote.

No options have been granted under the Option Plan which are subject to Shareholder approval.

The Option Plan does not permit stock options to be transformed into stock appreciation rights.

81

Outstanding Stock Options

Name | Number of Shares of Common Stock | Exercise Price | Grant Date | Expiration Date
Officers & Directors: |  |  |  |
David M. Cole | 200,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 | $1.20 $1.30 $0.66 $1.20 | 08/28/2017 10/18/2016 06/08/2015 04/25/2014 | 08/28/2022 10/18/2021 06/08/2020 04/25/2019
Michael D. Winn | 100,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 | $1.20 $1.30 $0.66 $1.20 | 08/28/2017 10/18/2016 06/08/2015 04/25/2014 | 08/28/2022 10/18/2021 06/08/2020 04/25/2019
Christina Cepeliauskas | 75,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 | $1.20 $1.30 $0.66 $1.20 | 08/28/2017 10/18/2016 06/08/2015 04/25/2014 | 08/28/2022 10/18/2021 06/08/2020 04/25/2019
Brian E. Bayley | 75,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 | $1.20 $1.30 $0.66 $1.20 | 08/28/2017 10/18/2016 06/08/2015 04/25/2014 | 08/28/2022 10/18/2021 06/08/2020 04/25/2019
Brian K. Levet | 75,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 | $1.20 $1.30 $0.66 $1.20 | 08/28/2017 10/18/2016 06/08/2015 04/25/2014 | 08/28/2022 10/18/2021 06/08/2020 04/25/2019
Larry M. Okada | 75,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 | $1.20 $1.30 $0.66 $1.20 | 08/28/2017 10/18/2016 06/08/2015 04/25/2014 | 08/28/2022 10/18/2021 06/08/2020 04/25/2019
Kim Casswell | 30,000 30,000 5,000 | $1.20 $1.30 $1.20 | 08/28/2017 10/18/2016 04/25/2014 | 08/28/2022 10/18/2021 04/25/2019
Consultants/Employees | 842,500 814,500 752,500 60,000 17,500 822,500 | $1.20 $1.30 $0.66 $0.87 $0.88 $1.20 | 08/28/2017 10/18/2016 06/08/2015 12/22/2014 06/26/2014 04/25/2014 | 08/28/2022 10/18/2021 06/08/2020 12/22/2019 06/26/2019 04/25/2019

Total for all Officers and Directors | 1,955,000 |
Total for all Employees and Consultants | 3,309,500 |
Total for all Officers, Directors, Employees and Consultants | 5,264,500 |

Stock Grant Program.

The Board created the Incentive Stock Grant Program for the benefit of the President and CEO, Chairman of the Board, and COO in 2010. The grants have a two-year vesting period The purpose of the Stock Grant Program is as follows. Firstly, to reward and provide an incentive to such persons for the ongoing efforts towards the continuing successes and goals of the Company as many of its successes directly result from their very significant efforts. Secondly, to provide such persons with a long-term incentive to remain with the Company. Finally, from time to time, the Company may provide additional compensation in the form of stock grants as part of annual salaries.

The Stock Grant Program provides that, following the approval of the independent members of the Compensation Committee, up to 300,000 Common Shares may be awarded in each year. The Common Shares awarded will vest and be issued in three separate tranches over a two year period – on the date of grant, and on the first and second anniversaries of the initial grant. None of the 300,000 Common Shares not awarded in one year can be rolled over or awarded in subsequent years. If the recipient ceases to be a director or officer of the Company before the relevant anniversary, he or she will not be entitled to receive any further Common Shares under the Stock Grant Program, including Common Shares previously awarded for issuance on such anniversary (with the exception of historical stock grants to Mr. Michael Winn, who shall receive the Common Shares even if he ceases to be the director).

82

The actual number of Common Shares awarded in each year is that number recommended and approved by the independent members of the Compensation Committee or independent directors of the Company.

ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

7.A. Major Shareholders.

7.A.1.a. Holdings By Major Shareholders.

The Company is aware of one person who beneficially own 5% or more of the Registrant's voting securities. The table below lists as of April 3, 2018, persons and/or companies holding 5% or more beneficial interest in the Common Shares.

Title of Class | Name of Owner | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | Percent of Class(1)
Common | Paul H. Stephens | 15,408,491 | 19.32%

(1) | Based on 79,746,271 shares outstanding as of April 3, 2018.

7.A.1.b. Significant Changes in Major Shareholders’ Holdings.

Not applicable.

7.A.1.c. Different Voting Rights.

The Company’s major shareholders do not have different voting rights.

7.A.2. Canadian Share Ownership.

On April 3, 2018, the Company’s shareholders’ list showed 79,746,271 common shares outstanding and 341 registered shareholders. The Company has researched the indirect holdings by depository institutions and other financial institutions estimates that there are 17 “holders of record" resident in Canada representing 36,586,003 Common Shares, 290 “holders of record" resident in the USA representing 42,760,179 Common Shares, and 34 “holders of record” resident internationally representing 397,089 Common Shares.

The Company is a foreign private issuer for its current fiscal year. As of the last business day of the Company’s second fiscal quarter, the majority of the Company’s executive officers and directors were not US citizens or residents, the majority of the Company’s assets are not in the United States, and the Company is administered principally in Canada. The Company’s major shareholders in common shares have the same voting rights as other holders of common shares. The Company is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation, a foreign government or any other natural or legal persons severally or jointly. There are no arrangements known to the Company which may result in a change of control of the Company.

7.A.3. Control of the Company

The Company is a publicly owned Canadian Company, the shares of which are owned by U.S. residents, Canadian residents and other foreign residents. The Company is not controlled by any foreign government or other person(s) except as described in Item 4.A., “History and Growth of the Company”, and Item 6.E., “Share Ownership”.

7.A.4. Change of Control of Company Arrangements.

Not applicable.

7.B. Related Party Transactions

The aggregate value of transactions and outstanding balances relating to key management personnel and directors were as follows:

83

|  |  |  |  | Share-based |  |  |  |
For the year ended December 31, 2017 |  | Salary or Fees |  |  | Payments |  |  | Total |
Management | $ | 733,244 |  | $ | 361,865 |  | $ | 1,095,109 |
Outside directors * |  | 149,882 |  |  | 226,614 |  |  | 376,496 |
Seabord Services Corp. |  | 357,600 |  |  | - |  |  | 357,600 |
Total | $ | 1,240,726 |  | $ | 588,479 |  | $ | 1,829,205 |

|  |  |  |  | Share-based |  |  |  |
For the year ended December 31, 2016 |  | Salary or Fees |  |  | Payments |  |  | Total |
Management | $ | 803,033 |  | $ | 215,933 |  | $ | 1,018,966 |
Outside directors * |  | 151,228 |  |  | 167,534.00 |  |  | 318,762 |
Seabord Services Corp. |  | 357,600 |  |  | - |  |  | 357,600 |
Total | $ | 1,311,861 |  | $ | 383,467 |  | $ | 1,695,328 |

|  |  |  |  | Share-based |  |  |  |
For the year ended December 31, 2015 |  | Salary or Fees |  |  | Payments |  |  | Total |
Management | $ | 1,067,210 |  | $ | 108,637 |  | $ | 1,175,847 |
Outside directors * |  | 158,257 |  |  | 79,898 |  |  | 238,155 |
Seabord Services Corp. |  | 413,700 |  |  | - |  |  | 413,700 |
Total | $ | 1,639,167 |  | $ | 188,535 |  | $ | 1,827,702 |

* Directors fees include $5,000 per month paid to the Company’s non-Executive Chairman, who does not receive the fees paid to the other independent director’s.

Seabord Services Corp. (“Seabord”) is a management services company controlled by the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. Seabord provides a Chief Financial Officer, a Corporate Secretary, accounting and administration staff, and office space to the Company. The Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary are employees of Seabord and are not paid directly by the Company.

Included in the table above for the year ended December 31, 2015 is $247,660 in termination payments to a former officer of the Company. The amount has been included in Other expenses for that year.

Shareholder Loans

Not applicable.

Amounts Owing to Senior Management/Directors

Included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities at December 31, 2017 is $7,177 (2016 - $5,913; 2015 - $3,467) owed to key management personnel and $23,568 (2016 - $17,559; 2015 - $24,329) to other related parties.

Other than as disclosed above, there have been no transactions since December 31, 2017, or proposed transactions, which have materially affected or will materially affect the Company in which any director, executive officer, or beneficial holder of more than 5% of the outstanding common shares, or any of their respective relatives, spouses, associates or affiliates has had or will have any direct or material indirect interest. Management believes the transactions referenced above were on terms at least as favorable to the Company as the Company could have obtained from unaffiliated parties.

Other Related Party Transactions

In October 2017, the Company issued a note receivable to Revelo, a related party by way of a common director for the principal amount of $400,000. The note was due on December 31, 2017, together with accrued interest at a rate of 1% per month and a bonus of $20,000. As at December 31, 2017, the balance owed to the Company pursuant to the note was $429,973 including accrued interest and bonus fee. The Company is negotiating the terms of repayment.

Other than as disclosed above, there have been no transactions or loans between the Company and (a) enterprises that directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, control or are controlled by, or are under common control with, the company; (b) associates; (c) individuals owning, directly or indirectly, an interest in the voting power of the Company giving them significant influence over the Company, and close members of any such individual’s family; (d) key management personnel and close members of such individuals’ families; and (e) enterprises substantially owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by any person described in (c) or (d) or over which such a person is able to exercise significant influence.

84

7.C. Interests of Experts and Counsel

Not applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

8.A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

The Company's financial statements are stated in Canadian Dollars and are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

See ‘‘Item 18. Financial Statements’’ for our Annual Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, related notes and other financial information filed with this annual report on Form 20-F.

8.A.7. Legal/Arbitration Proceedings

The Directors and the management of the Company do not know of any material active or pending, legal proceedings; nor is the Company involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation.

8.A.8. Dividends.

The Company has not declared or paid any dividends on our Common Shares. Our current business plan requires that for the foreseeable future, any future earnings be reinvested to finance the growth and development of our business. We do not intend to pay cash dividends on the Common Shares in the foreseeable future. We will not declare or pay any dividends until such time as our cash flow exceeds our capital requirements and will depend upon, among other things, conditions then existing including earnings, financial condition, restrictions in financing arrangements, business opportunities and conditions and other factors, or our Board determines that our shareholders could make better use of the cash.

8.B. Significant Changes

There have been no significant changes to the Company’s financial condition since the end of the fiscal year.

ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING

9.A. Common Share Trading Information

The Common Shares began trading on the TSX-V on November 23, 2003 and the Common Shares began trading on the NYSE American on January 30, 2012.

The table below lists the high and low sales prices on the TSX-V and NYSE American for: each of the last six months; for the two most recent full financial years and subsequent period, each full financial quarter; and the last five fiscal years.

85

| NYSE American | TSX-V |
| High | Low | High | Low
| (in US$) | (in US$) | (in Cdn$) | (in Cdn$)
Prior Fiscal Years Ended |  |  |  |
December 31, 2017 | $1.24 | $0.67 | $1.60 | $0.85
December 31, 2016 | $ 1.40 | $ 0.35 | $ 1.84 | $ 0.50
December 31, 2015 | $ 0.81 | $ 0.35 | $ 0.97 | $ 0.48
December 31, 2014 | $ 1.23 | $ 0.63 | $ 1.93 | $ 0.90
December 31, 2013 | $ 2.20 | $ 0.78 | $ 2.15 | $ 0.86
Prior Quarters Ended |  |  |  |
Q4 - December 31, 2017 | $0.92 | $0.67 | $1.18 | $0.85
Q3 - September 30, 2017 | $1.04 | $0.82 | $1.32 | $1.02
Q2 - June 30, 2017 | $0.97 | $0.75 | $1.32 | $1.05
Q1 - March 31, 2017 | $1.24 | $0.92 | $1.60 | $1.22
Q4 - December 31, 2016 | $ 1.20 | $ 0.85 | $ 1.50 | $ 1.15
Q3 - September 30, 2016 | $ 1.40 | $ 0.62 | $ 1.84 | $ 0.86
Q2 - June 30, 2016 | $ 1.03 | $ 0.57 | $ 1.34 | $ 0.77
Q1 - March 31, 2016 | $ 0.65 | $ 0.35 | $ 0.85 | $ 0.50
Last 6 Months Ended |  |  |  |
February 28, 2018 | $0.95 | $0.86 | $1.17 | $1.11
January 31, 2018 | $0.97 | $0.81 | $1.23 | $1.02
December 31, 2017 | $0.86 | $0.72 | $1.09 | $0.91
November 30, 2017 | $0.92 | $0.70 | $1.18 | $0.91
October 31, 2017 | $0.86 | $0.67 | $1.08 | $0.85
September 30, 2017 | $1.00 | $0.82 | $1.24 | $1.02

ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

10.A. Share Capital

Not applicable.

10.B. Memorandum and Articles of Association

New British Columbia Corporations Act

Background

Effective March 29, 2004, the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) (the “New Act”) replaced the previous Company Act (British Columbia) (the “Old Act”). As a consequence, all British Columbia companies are now governed by the New Act. The New Act is intended to modernize and streamline company law in British Columbia.

Objects and Purposes

The Articles of EMX place no restrictions upon the type of business that the Company may engage in.

Disclosure of Interest of Directors, Part 17 of the Articles

17.1 A director or senior officer who holds a disclosable interest (as that term is used in the Business Corporations Act) in a contract or transaction into which the Company has entered or proposes to enter is liable to account to the Company for any profit that accrues to the director or senior officer under or as a result of the contract or transaction only if and the extent provided in the Business Corporations Act.

86

17.2 A director who holds a disclosable interest in a contract into which the Company has entered or proposes to enter is not entitled to vote on any directors’ resolution to approve that contract or transaction, unless all the directors have a disclosable interest in that contract or transaction, in which case any or all of those directors may vote on such resolution.

17.3 A director who holds a disclosable interest in a contract or transaction into which the Company has entered or proposes to enter and who is present at the meeting of directors at which the contract or transaction is considered for approval may be counted in the quorum at the meeting whether or not the director votes on any or all of the resolutions considered at the meeting.

17.4 A director of senior officer who holds any office or possesses any property, right or interest that could result, directly or indirectly, in the creation of a duty or interest that materially conflicts with that individual’s duty or interest as a director or senior officer, must disclose the nature and extent of the conflict as required by the Business Corporations Act.

17.5 A director may hold any office or place of profit with the Company, other than the office of auditor of the Company, in addition to their office of director for a period and on the terms (as to remuneration or otherwise)that the directors may determine.

17.6 No director or intended director is disqualified by their office from contracting with the Company either with regard to the holding or any office or place of profit the director holds with the Company or as vendor, purchaser or otherwise, and no contract or transaction entered into by or on behalf of the Company in which a director is in any way interested is liable to be voided for that reason.

17.7 A director or officer, or any person in which a director or officer has an interest, may act in a professional capacity for the Company, except as auditor of the Company, and the director or officer or such person is entitled to remuneration for professional services as if that director or officer were not a director or officer.

17.8 A director or officer may be or become a director, officer or employee of, or otherwise interested in, any person in which the Company may be interested as a shareholder or otherwise, and the director or officer is not accountable to the Company for any remuneration or other benefits received by them as director, officer or employee of, or from their interest in, such other person.

Powers and Duties of Directors Part 16 of the Articles

16.1 The directors must, subject to the Articles, manage or supervise the management of the business and affairs of the Company and have the authority to exercise all such powers of the Company as are not, by the Business Corporations Act or by the Articles, required to be exercised by the shareholders of the Company.

16.2 The directors may from time to time, by power of attorney or other instrument, under seal if so required by law, appoint any person to be the attorney of the Company for such purposes, and with such powers, authorities and discretions (not exceeding those vested in or exercisable by the directors under these Articles and excepting the power to fill vacancies in the board of directors, to remove a director, to change the membership of, or fill vacancies in, any committee of the directors, to appoint or remove officers appointed by the directors and to declare dividends)and for such period, and with such remuneration and subject to such conditions as the directors may think fit. Any such power of attorney may contain such provisions for the protection or convenience of persons dealing with such attorney as the directors think fit. Any such attorney may be authorized by the director to sub-delegate all or any of the powers, authorities and discretions for the time being vested in them.

Borrowing Powers of Directors, Part 8 of the Articles

8.1. The directors, if authorized by the directors, may:

(1) borrow money in such manner and amount, on the security, from the sources and upon the terms and conditions as they consider appropriate;

87

(2) issue bonds, debentures, and other debt obligations either outright or as security for any liability or obligation of the Company or any other person and at such discounts or premiums and on such other terms as they consider appropriate;

(3) guarantee the repayment of money by any other persons or the performance of any obligation of any other person; and

(4) mortgage, charge, whether by way of specific or floating charge, grant a security interest in, or give other security on, the whole or any part of the present and future assets and undertaking of the Company.

Remuneration of Directors Part 13 of the Articles

13.5 The directors are entitled to the remuneration for acting as directors, if any, as the directors may from time to time determine. If they so decide, the remuneration, if any, of the directors will be determined by the shareholders. That remuneration may be in addition to any salary or other remuneration paid to any officer of employee of the Company as such, who is also a director.

13.6 The Company must reimburse each director for the reasonable expenses they may incur in and about the business of the Company.

13.7 If any director performs any professional or other services for the Company that in the opinion of the directors are outside the ordinary duties of a director, or if any director is otherwise specially occupied in or about the Company’s business, they may be paid remuneration fixed by the directors, or, at the option of that director, fixed by ordinary resolution, and such remuneration may be either in addition to, or in substitution for, any other remuneration that they may be entitled to receive.

13.8 Unless otherwise determined by ordinary resolution, the directors on behalf of the Company may pay a gratuity or pension or allowance on retirement to any director who has held any salaried office or place of profit with the Company or to their spouse or dependants and may make contributions to any fund and pay premiums for the purchase or provision of any such gratuity, pension or allowance.

Required Ownership of Capital by Directors Part 13 of the Articles

13.4. A director is not required to hold a share in the capital of the Company as qualification for their office but must be qualified as required by the Business Corporations Act to become, act or continue to act as a director.

Dividend Rights Part 22 of the Articles

22.2 The directors may from time to time declare and authorize payment of such dividends as they may deem advisable.

Special Rights and Restrictions Part 9 and 10 of the Articles

9.2 The Company may by ordinary resolution:

(1) create special rights or restrictions for, and attach those special rights or restrictions to, the shares of any class or series of shares, unless any of those shares have been issued in which case the Company may do so only be special resolution; or

(2) vary or delete any special rights or restrictions attached to the shares of any class or series of shares, unless any of those shares have been issued in which case the Company may do so only be ordinary resolution.

Rules pertaining to annual general and special general meetings of shareholders are described in Sections Ten of the Company’s Articles. These rules are summarized as follows:

10.1 The Company must, unless an annual general meeting is deferred or waived in accordance with the Business Corporations Act, hold its first annual general meeting following incorporation, amalgamation or continuation within 18 months after the date on which it was incorporated or otherwise created and recognized, and after that must hold an annual general meeting at least once in each calendar year and not more than 15 months after the last annual reference date at such time and place as may be determined by the directors; and

88

10.2 If all the shareholders entitled to vote at an annual general meeting consent by unanimous resolution under the Business Corporations Act to all of the business required to be transacted at that annual general meeting, the meeting is deemed to have been held on the date of the unanimous resolution. The shareholders must, in any unanimous resolution passed under this Article 10.2, select the Company’s annual reference date a date that would be appropriate for the holding of the applicable annual general meeting.

10.3 The directors may, whenever they think fit, call a meeting of shareholders to be held in British Columbia, Calgary, Alberta or Toronto, Ontario or at such other location as may be approved by the Registrar of Companies at such time and place as may be determined by the directors.

10.4 The Company must send notice of the date, time and location of any meeting of shareholders, in the manner provided by these Articles, or in such other manner, if any, as may be prescribed by ordinary resolution (whether previous notice of the resolution has been give or not), to each shareholder entitled to attend the meeting, to each director and to the auditor of the Company, unless these Articles otherwise provide, at least the following number of days before the meeting:

| (1) | if and for so long the Company is a public company, 21 days;
| (2) | otherwise, 10 days.

10.5 The directors may set a date as the record date for the purpose of determining shareholders entitled to notice of any meeting of shareholders. The record date must not precede the date on which the meeting is to be held by more than two months or, in the case of a general meeting requisitioned by shareholders under the Business Corporations Act, by more than four months. The record date must not precede the date on which the meeting is held by fewer than:

| (1) | if and for so long as the Company is a public company, 21 days;
| (2) | otherwise, 10 days.

If no record date is set, it is 5:00 p.m. on the business day immediately preceding the first date on which the notice is sent or, if no notice is sent, the beginning of the meeting.

10.6 The directors may set a date as the record date for the purpose of determining shareholders entitled to vote at any meeting of shareholders. The record date must not precede the date on which the meeting is to be held by more than two months or, in the case of a general meeting requisitioned by shareholders under the Business Corporations Act, by more than four months. If no record date is set, the record date is 5:00 p.m. on the day immediately preceding the first date on which the notice is sent or, if no notice is sent, the beginning of the meeting.

10.7 The accidental omission to send notice of any meetings to, or the non-receipt of any notice by, any of the persons entitled to notice does not invalidate any proceedings at that meeting. Any person entitled to notice of such meeting of shareholders may, in writing or otherwise, waive or reduce the period of notice of such meeting.

10.8 If a meeting of shareholders is to consider special business within the meaning of Article 11.1, the notice of meeting must:

(1) state the general nature of the special business; and

(2) if the special business includes considering, approving, ratifying, adopting or authorizing any document or the signing of or giving of effect to any document, have attached to it a copy of the document or state that a copy of the document will be available for inspection by shareholders:

| (a) | at the Company’ records office, or at such other reasonably accessible location in British Columbia as is specified in such notice; and
| (b) | during statutory business hours o any one or more specified days before the day set for the holding of the meeting.

89

Proceedings at Meetings of Shareholders
Part 11 of the Articles

11.1 At a meeting of shareholders, the following business is special business:

| (1) | at a meeting of shareholders that is not an annual general meeting, all business is special business except business relating to the conduct of or voting at the meeting;
| (2) | at an annual general meeting, all business is special business except for the following:

| (a) | business relating to the conduct or voting at the meeting;
| (b) | consideration of any financial statements of the Company presented to the meeting;
| (c) | consideration of any reports of the directors or auditor;
| (d) | the setting or changing of the number of directors;
| (e) | the election or appointment of directors;
| (f) | the appointment of an auditor;
| (g) | the setting of the remuneration of the auditor;
| (h) | business arising out of a report of the directors not requiring the passing of a special resolution or an exceptional resolution; and
| (i) | any other business under which, under these Articles or the Business Corporations Act, may be transacted at a meeting of shareholders without prior notice of the business being given to the shareholders.

11.2 The majority of votes required for the Company to pass a special resolution at a meeting of shareholders are two-thirds of the votes cast on the resolution.

11.3 Subject to the special rights and restrictions attached to the shares of any class or series of shares, the quorum for the transaction of business at a meeting of shareholders is two shareholders present in person or represented by proxy.

11.4 If there is only one shareholder entitled to vote at a meeting of shareholders:

| (1) | the quorum of one person who is, or who represents by proxy, that shareholder; and
| (2) | that shareholder, present in person or by proxy, may constitute the meeting.

11.5 The directors, the president (if any), the secretary (if any), the assistant secretary (if any), any lawyer for the Company, auditor of the Company and any other persons invited by the directors are entitled to attend any meeting of shareholders, but if any of those persons does attend a meeting of shareholders, that person is not to be counted in the quorum and is not entitled to vote at the meeting unless that person is a shareholder or proxy holder entitled to vote at the meeting.

11.6 No business, other than the election of a chair of the meeting and the adjournment of the meeting, may be transacted at any meeting of shareholders unless a quorum of shareholders entitled to vote is present at the commencement of the meeting, but such quorum need not be present throughout the meeting.

11.7 If, within one-half hour from the time set for the holding of a meeting of shareholders, a quorum is not present:

| (1) | in the case of a general meeting requisitioned by shareholders, the meeting is dissolved, and
| (2) | in the case of any other meeting of shareholders, the meeting stands adjourned to the same day in the next week at the same time and place.

11.8 If, at the meeting to which the meeting referred to in Article 11.7(2) was adjourned, a quorum is not present within one-half hour from the time set for the holding of the meeting, the person or persons present and being, or representing by proxy, one or more shareholders entitled to attend and vote at the meeting constitute a quorum.

11.9 The following individuals are entitled to preside as chair at a meeting of shareholders:

| (1) | the chair of the board, if any; or
| (2) | if the chair of the board is absent or unwilling to act as chair of the meeting, the first of the following individuals to agree to act as chair: the president, if any.

90

11.10 If, at any meeting of shareholders, the chair of the board or president are not present within 15 minutes after the time set for holding the meeting, or if the chair of the board and the president are unwilling to act as chair of the meeting, or if the chair of the board and the president have advised the secretary, if any, or any director present at the meeting, that they will not be present at the meeting, one of the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer, a vice-president, the secretary or the Company’s legal counsel may act as chair of the meeting and, failing them, the directors present must choose one of their number to be chair of the meeting or if all of the directors present decline to take the chair or fail to so choose of if no director is present, the shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting who are present in person or by proxy may choose any person at the meeting to chair the meeting.

11.11 The chair of a meeting of shareholders may, and if so directed by the meeting must, adjourn the meeting from time to time and from place to place, but no business may be transacted at any adjourned meeting other than the business left unfinished at the meeting from which the adjournment took place.

11.12 It is not necessary to give any notice of an adjourned meeting or of the business to be transacted at any adjourned meeting of shareholders except that, when a meeting is adjourned for 30 days or more, notice of the adjourned meeting must be given as in the case of the original meeting.

11.13 Every motion put to a vote at a meeting of shareholders will be decided on a show of hands unless a poll, before or on the declaration of the result of the vote by show of hands, is directed by the chair or demanded by at least one shareholder entitled to vote who is present in person or by proxy.

11.14 The chair of a meeting of shareholders must declare to the meeting the decision on every question in accordance with the result of the show of hands or the poll, as the case may be, and that decision must be entered into the minutes of the meeting. A declaration of the chair that a resolution is carried by the necessary majority or is defeated is, unless a poll is directed by the chair or demanded under Article 11.13, conclusive evidence without proof of the number or proportion of the votes recorded in favor of or against the resolution.

11.15 No motion proposed at a meeting of shareholders need be seconded unless the chair of the meeting rules otherwise, and the chair of any meeting of shareholders is entitled to propose or second a motion.

11.16 In case of an equality of votes, the chair of a meeting of shareholders does not, either on a show of hands or on a poll, have a second or casting vote in addition to the vote or votes to which the chair may be entitled as a shareholder.

11.17 Subject to Article 11.18, if a poll is duly demanded at a meeting of shareholders:

| (1) | the poll must be taken:
|  | (a) | at the meeting, or within seven days after the date of the meeting, as the chair of the meeting directs; and
|  | (b) | in the manner, at the time and at the place that the chair of the meeting directs;
| (2) | the result of the poll is deemed to be the decision of the meeting at which the poll is demanded; and
| (3) | the demand for the poll may be withdrawn by the person who demanded it.

11.18 A poll demanded at a meeting of shareholders on a question of adjournment must be taken immediately at the meeting.

11.19 In the case of any dispute as to the admission or rejection of a vote given on a poll, the chair of the meeting must determine the dispute, and their determination made in good faith is final and conclusive.

11.20 On a poll, a shareholder entitled to more than one vote need not cast all the votes in the same way.

11.21 No poll may be demanded in respect of the vote by which a chair of a meeting of shareholders is elected.

11.22 The demand for a poll at a meeting of shareholders does not, unless the chair of the meeting so rules, prevent the continuation of a meeting for the transaction of any business other than the question on which a poll had been demanded.

11.23 The Company must, for at least three months after a meeting of shareholders, keep each ballot cast on a poll and each proxy voted at the meeting at its records office, and, during that period, makes them available for inspection during normal business hours by any shareholder or proxy holder entitled to vote at the meeting. At the end of such three month period, the Company may destroy such ballots and proxies.

91

Votes of Shareholders
Part 12 of the Articles

12.1 Subject to any special rights or restrictions attached to any shares and to the restrictions imposed on joint shareholders under Article 12.3:

| (1) | on a vote by a show of hands, every person present who is a shareholder or proxy holder and entitled to vote on the matter has one vote; and
| (2) | on a poll, every shareholder entitled to vote on the matter has one vote in respect of each share entitled to be voted on the matter and held by that shareholder and may exercise that vote either in person or by proxy.

Other Issues

Neither the Company’s articles nor British Columbia law permit: staggered terms for Directors; cumulative voting; shareholder approval of corporate matter by written consent; the adoption of various “poison pill” measures precluding shareholders from realizing a potential premium over the market value of their shares. Neither the Company’s articles nor British Columbia law require retirement or non-retirement of directors under an age limit requirement.

There are no limitations on the rights to own securities.

There is no provision of the Company’s articles that would have an effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company and that would operate only with respect to a merger, acquisition or corporate restructuring involving the Company (or any of its subsidiaries).

Shareholder ownership must be disclosed to the British Columbia Securities Commission and the TSX-V by any shareholder who owns more than 10% of the Company’s common stock.

10.C. Material Contracts

Pursuant to a management service agreement dated February 13, 2014 as amended December 1, 2015 between the Company and Seabord Services Corp. of Suite 501, 543 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, the Corporation pays $29,800 per month to Seabord in consideration of Seabord providing the services of the CFO and Corporate Secretary and office, reception, secretarial, accounting and corporate records services to the Company. The Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary are employees of Seabord and are not paid directly by the Company.

Seabord is a private company wholly-owned by Michael D. Winn, the Chairman and director of the Company.

10.D. Exchange Controls

Canada has no system of exchange controls. There are no Canadian restrictions on the repatriation of capital or earnings of a Canadian public company to non-resident investors. There are no laws in Canada or exchange restrictions affecting the remittance of dividends, profits, interest, royalties and other payments to non-resident holders of the Company’s securities, except as discussed in Item 10, ”Taxation" below.

Restrictions on Share Ownership by Non-Canadians - There are no limitations under the laws of Canada or in the organizing documents of the Company on the right of foreigners to hold or vote securities of the Company, except that the Investment Canada Act may require review and approval by the Minister of Industry (Canada) of certain acquisitions of "control" of the Company by a "non-Canadian". The threshold for acquisitions of control is generally defined as being one-third or more of the voting shares of the Company. "Non-Canadian" generally means an individual who is not a Canadian citizen, or a Company, partnership, trust or joint venture that is ultimately controlled by non-Canadians.

10.E. Taxation

Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations

The following is a brief summary of some of the principal Canadian federal income tax consequences to a holder of common shares of the Company (a "U.S. Holder") who deals at arm's length with the Company, holds the shares as capital property and who, for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the "Act") and the Canada – United States Income Tax Convention (the "Treaty"), is at all relevant times resident in the United States, is not and is not deemed to be resident in Canada and does not use or hold and is not deemed to use or hold the shares in carrying on a business in Canada. Special rules, which are not discussed below, may apply to a U.S. Holder that is an insurer that carries on business in Canada and elsewhere.

92

Under the Act and the Treaty, a U.S. Holder of common shares will generally be subject to a 15% withholding tax on dividends paid or credited or deemed by the Act to have been paid or credited on such shares. The withholding tax rate is 5% where the U.S. Holder is a Company that beneficially owns at least 10% of the voting shares of the Company and the dividends may be exempt from such withholding in the case of some U.S. Holders such as qualifying pension funds and charities.

In general, a U.S. Holder will not be subject to Canadian income tax on capital gains arising on the disposition of shares of the Company unless (i) at any time in the five-year period immediately preceding the disposition, 25% or more of the shares of any class or series of the capital stock of the Company was owned by (or was under option of or subject to an interest of) the U.S. holder or persons with whom the U.S. holder did not deal at arm's length, and (ii) the value of the common shares of the Company at the time of the disposition derives principally from real property (as defined in the Treaty) situated in Canada. For this purpose, the Treaty defines real property situated in Canada to include rights to explore for or exploit mineral deposits and other natural resources situated in Canada, rights to amounts computed by reference to the amount or value of production from such resources, certain other rights in respect of natural resources situated in Canada and shares of a Company the value of whose shares is derived principally from real property situated in Canada.

The US Internal Revenue Code provides special anti-deferral rules regarding certain distributions received by US persons with respect to, and sales and other dispositions (including pledges) of stock of, a passive foreign investment company. A foreign Company, such as the Company, will be treated as a passive foreign investment company if 75% or more of its gross income is passive income for a taxable year or if the average percentage of its assets (by value) that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income is at least 50% for a taxable year. The Company believes that it was a passive foreign investment company as at December 31, 2016.

Dividends

A Holder will be subject to Canadian withholding tax ("Part XIII Tax") equal to 25%, or such lower rate as may be available under an applicable tax treaty, of the gross amount of any dividend paid or deemed to be paid on common shares. Under the Canada-U.S. Income Tax Convention (1980) as amended by the Protocols signed on 6/14/1983, 3/28/1984, 3/17/1995, and 7/29/1997 (the "Treaty"), the rate of Part XIII Tax applicable to a dividend on common shares paid to a Holder who is a resident of the United States and who is the beneficial owner of the dividend, is 5%. If the Holder is a company that owns at least 10% of the voting stock of the Company paying the dividend, and, in all other cases, the tax rate is 15% of the gross amount of the dividend. The Company will be required to withhold the applicable amount of Part XIII Tax from each dividend so paid and remit the withheld amount directly to the Receiver General for Canada for the account of the Holder.

Disposition of Common Shares

A Holder who disposes of a common share, including by deemed disposition on death, will not normally be subject to Canadian tax on any capital gain (or capital loss) thereby realized unless the common share constituted "taxable Canadian property" as defined by the Tax Act. Generally, a common share of a public Company will not constitute taxable Canadian property of a Holder if the share is listed on a prescribed stock exchange unless the Holder or persons with whom the Holder did not deal at arm's length alone or together held or held options to acquire, at any time within the five years preceding the disposition, 25% or more of the shares of any class of the capital stock of the Company. The Canadian Venture Exchange is a prescribed stock exchange under the Tax Act. A Holder who is a resident of the United States and realizes a capital gain on a disposition of a common share that was taxable Canadian property will nevertheless, by virtue of the Treaty, generally be exempt from Canadian tax thereon unless (a) more than 50% of the value of the common shares is derived from, or from an interest in, Canadian real estate, including Canadian mineral resource properties, (b) the common share formed part of the business property of a permanent establishment that the Holder has or had in Canada within the 12 month period preceding the disposition, or (c) the Holder is an individual who (i) was a resident of Canada at any time during the 10 years immediately preceding the disposition, and for a total of 120 months during any period of 20 consecutive years, preceding the disposition, and (ii) owned the common share when he ceased to be resident in Canada.

A Holder who is subject to Canadian tax in respect of a capital gain realized on a disposition of a common share must include three quarters of the capital gain (taxable capital gain) in computing the Holder's taxable income earned in Canada. The Holder may, subject to certain limitations, deduct three-quarters of any capital loss (allowable capital loss) arising on a disposition of taxable Canadian property from taxable capital gains realized in the year of disposition in respect to taxable Canadian property and, to the extent not so deductible, from such taxable capital gains realized in any of the three preceding years or any subsequent year.

93

Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations

The following is a general summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to a U.S. Holder (as defined below) arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of common shares.

This summary is for general information purposes only and does not purport to be a complete analysis or listing of all potential U.S. federal income tax considerations that may apply to a U.S. Holder arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of common shares. In addition, this summary does not take into account the individual facts and circumstances of any particular U.S. Holder that may affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such U.S. Holder, including specific tax consequences to a U.S. Holder under an applicable tax treaty. Accordingly, this summary is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal or U.S. federal income tax advice with respect to any U.S. Holder. This summary does not address the U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and non-U.S. tax consequences to U.S. Holders of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of common shares. Except as specifically set forth below, this summary does not discuss applicable tax reporting requirements. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and non-U.S. tax consequences relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares.

No legal opinion from U.S. legal counsel or ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") has been requested, or will be obtained, regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of common shares. This summary is not binding on the IRS, and the IRS is not precluded from taking a position that is different from, and contrary to, the positions taken in this summary. In addition, because the authorities on which this summary is based are subject to various interpretations, the IRS and the U.S. courts could disagree with one or more of the positions taken in this summary.

Scope of this Summary

Authorities

This summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), Treasury Regulations (whether final, temporary, or proposed), published rulings of the IRS, published administrative positions of the IRS, the Treaty, and U.S. court decisions that are applicable and, in each case, as in effect and available, as of the date of this document. Any of the authorities on which this summary is based could be changed in a material and adverse manner at any time, and any such change could be applied on a retroactive or prospective basis which could affect the U.S. federal income tax considerations described in this summary. This summary does not discuss the potential effects, whether adverse or beneficial, of any proposed legislation that, if enacted, could be applied on a retroactive or prospective basis.

U.S. Holders

For purposes of this summary, the term "U.S. Holder" means a beneficial owner of common shares that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

- an individual who is a citizen or resident of the U.S.;

- a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) organized under the laws of the U.S., any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

- an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

- a trust that (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the U.S. and the control of one or more U.S. persons for all substantial decisions or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

Non-U.S. Holders

For purposes of this summary, a "non-U.S. Holder" is a beneficial owner of common shares that is not a U.S. Holder or is a partnership. This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences to non-U.S. Holders arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of common shares. Accordingly, a non-U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and non-U.S. tax consequences (including the potential application of and operation of any income tax treaties) relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of common shares.

94

U.S. Holders Subject to Special U.S. Federal Income Tax Rules Not Addressed

This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including, but not limited to, U.S. Holders that: (a) are tax-exempt organizations, qualified retirement plans, individual retirement accounts, or other tax-deferred accounts; (b) are financial institutions, underwriters, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, or regulated investment companies; (c) are broker-dealers, dealers, or traders in securities or currencies that elect to apply a mark-to-market accounting method; (d) have a "functional currency" other than the U.S. dollar; (e) own common shares as part of a straddle, hedging transaction, conversion transaction, constructive sale, or other arrangement involving more than one position; (f) acquired common shares in connection with the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for services; (g) hold common shares other than as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment purposes); (h) are required to accelerate the recognition of any item of gross income with respect to Securities as a result of such income being recognized on an applicable financial statement; or (i) own or have owned (directly, indirectly, or by attribution) 10% or more of the total combined voting power or value of the outstanding shares of EMX . This summary also does not address the U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to U.S. Holders who are: (a) U.S. expatriates or former long-term residents of the U.S.; (b) persons that have been, are, or will be a resident or deemed to be a resident in Canada for purposes of the Act; (c) persons that use or hold, will use or hold, or that are or will be deemed to use or hold common shares in connection with carrying on a business in Canada; (d) persons whose common shares constitute "taxable Canadian property" under the Act; or (e) persons that have a permanent establishment in Canada for the purposes of the Treaty. U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including, but not limited to, U.S. Holders described immediately above, should consult their own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and non-U.S. tax consequences relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares.

If an entity or arrangement that is classified as a partnership (or "pass-through" entity) for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds common shares, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such partnership and the partners (or owners) of such partnership generally will depend on the activities of the partnership and the status of such partners (or owners). This summary does not address the tax consequences to any such partnership or partner (or owner). Partners (or owners) of entities or arrangements that are classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of common shares.

Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules

If EMX were to constitute a "passive foreign investment company" (a “PFIC”), as defined below, within the meaning of Section 1297 of the Code, for any year during a U.S. Holder’s holding period, then certain different and potentially adverse rules will affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder resulting from the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares. In addition, in any year in which EMX is classified as a PFIC, such holder will be required to file an annual report with the IRS containing such information as Treasury Regulations or other IRS guidance may require. A failure to satisfy such reporting requirements may result in an extension of the time period during which the IRS can assess a tax. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the requirements of filing such information returns under these rules, including the requirement to file an IRS Form 8621.

PFIC Status of EMX

EMX generally will be a PFIC if, for a tax year, (a) 75% or more of the gross income of EMX is passive income (the "income test"), or (b) 50% or more of the value of EMX ’s assets either produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income, based on the quarterly average of the fair market value of such assets (the "asset test"). "Gross income" generally includes all sales revenues less the cost of goods sold, plus income from investments and from incidental or outside operations or sources, and "passive income" generally includes, for example, dividends, interest, certain rents and royalties, certain gains from the sale of stock and securities, and certain gains from commodities transactions.

Active business gains arising from the sale of commodities generally are excluded from passive income if substantially all (85% or more) of a foreign corporation’s commodities are stock in trade of such foreign corporation or other property of a kind which would properly be included in inventory of such foreign corporation, or property held by such foreign corporation primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business and certain other requirements are satisfied.

95

For purposes of the PFIC income test and asset test described above, if EMX owns, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of the total value of the outstanding shares of another corporation, EMX will be treated as if it (a) held a proportionate share of the assets of such other corporation and (b) received directly a proportionate share of the income of such other corporation. In addition, for purposes of the PFIC income test and asset test described above, and assuming certain other requirements are met, "passive income" does not include certain interest, dividends, rents, or royalties that are received or accrued by EMX from certain "related persons" (as defined in Section 954(d)(3) of the Code), to the extent such items are properly allocable to the income of such related person that is not passive income.

EMX currently expects that it will be classified as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for the tax year ending December 31, 2018 and expects to be a PFIC in future tax years. No opinion of legal counsel or ruling from the IRS concerning the status of EMX as a PFIC has been obtained or is currently planned to be requested. The determination of whether any corporation was, or will be, a PFIC for a tax year depends, in part, on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules, which are subject to differing interpretations. In addition, whether any corporation will be a PFIC for any tax year depends on the assets and income of such corporation over the course of each such tax year and, as a result, cannot be predicted with certainty as of the date of this document. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge any determination made by EMX concerning its PFIC status. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the PFIC status of EMX .

Default PFIC Rules Under Section 1291 of the Code

If EMX is a PFIC, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of common shares will depend on whether such U.S. Holder makes an election to treat EMX as a "qualified electing fund", or "QEF", under Section 1295 of the Code, or a "QEF Election", or a mark-to-market election under Section 1296 of the Code, or a "Mark-to-Market Election". A U.S. Holder that does not make either a QEF Election or a Mark-to-Market Election will be referred to in this summary as a "Non-Electing U.S. Holder".

A Non-Electing U.S. Holder will be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code with respect to, (a) any gain recognized on the sale or other taxable disposition of common shares, and (b) any excess distribution received on common shares. A distribution generally will be an "excess distribution" to the extent that such distribution (together with all other distributions received in the current tax year) exceeds 125% of the average distributions received during the three preceding tax years (or during a U.S. Holder’s holding period for common shares, if shorter).

Under Section 1291 of the Code, any gain recognized on the sale or other taxable disposition of common shares and any "excess distribution" received on common shares must be ratably allocated to each day in a Non-Electing U.S. Holder’s holding period for the respective common shares. The amount of any such gain or excess distribution allocated to the tax year of disposition or distribution of the excess distribution and to years before the entity became a PFIC, if any, would be taxed as ordinary income. The amounts allocated to any other tax year would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the highest tax rate applicable to ordinary income in each such year, and an interest charge would be imposed on the tax liability for each such year, calculated as if such tax liability had been due in each such year. A Non-Electing U.S. Holder that is not a corporation must treat any such interest paid as "personal interest", which is not deductible.

If EMX is a PFIC for any tax year during which a Non-Electing U.S. Holder holds common shares, EMX will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such Non-Electing U.S. Holder, regardless of whether EMX ceases to be a PFIC in one or more subsequent tax years. A Non-Electing U.S. Holder may terminate this deemed PFIC status by electing to recognize gain (which will be taxed under the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above), but not loss, as if such common shares were sold on the last day of the last tax year for which EMX was a PFIC.

QEF Election

A U.S. Holder that makes a timely and effective QEF Election for the first tax year in which its holding period of its common shares begins generally will not be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above with respect to its common shares. A U.S. Holder that makes a timely and effective QEF Election will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such U.S. Holder’s pro rata share of, (a) the net capital gain of EMX, which will be taxed as long-term capital gain to such U.S. Holder, and (b) the ordinary earnings of EMX, which will be taxed as ordinary income to such U.S. Holder. Generally, "net capital gain" is the excess of (i) net long-term capital gain over (ii) net short-term capital loss, and "ordinary earnings" are the excess of (i) "earnings and profits" over (ii) net capital gain. A U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such amounts for each tax year in which EMX is a PFIC, regardless of whether such amounts are actually distributed to such U.S. Holder by EMX. However, for any tax year in which EMX is a PFIC and has no net income or gain, U.S. Holders that have made a QEF Election would not have any income inclusions as a result of the QEF Election. If a U.S. Holder that made a QEF Election has an income inclusion, such U.S. Holder may, subject to certain limitations, elect to defer payment of current U.S. federal income tax on such amounts, subject to an interest charge. If such U.S. Holder is not a corporation, any such interest paid will be treated as "personal interest", which is not deductible.

96

A U.S. Holder that makes a timely and effective QEF Election with respect to EMX generally, (a) may receive a tax-free distribution from EMX to the extent that such distribution represents "earnings and profits" of EMX that were previously included in income by the U.S. Holder because of such QEF Election, and (b) will adjust such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in common shares to reflect the amount included in income or allowed as a tax-free distribution because of such QEF Election. In addition, a U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election generally will recognize capital gain or loss on the sale or other taxable disposition of common shares.

The procedure for making a QEF Election, and the U.S. federal income tax consequences of making a QEF Election, will depend on whether such QEF Election is timely. A QEF Election will be treated as "timely" if such QEF Election is made for the first year in the U.S. Holder’s holding period for common shares in which EMX was a PFIC. A U.S. Holder may make a timely QEF Election by filing the appropriate QEF Election documents at the time such U.S. Holder files a U.S. federal income tax return for such year. If a U.S. Holder does not make a timely and effective QEF Election for the first year in the U.S. Holder’s holding period for common shares, the U.S. Holder may still be able to make a timely and effective QEF Election in a subsequent year if such U.S. Holder also makes a "purging" election to recognize gain (which will be taxed under the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above) as if such common shares were sold for their fair market value on the day the QEF Election is effective.

A QEF Election will apply to the tax year for which such QEF Election is timely made and to all subsequent tax years, unless such QEF Election is invalidated or terminated or the IRS consents to revocation of such QEF Election. If a U.S. Holder makes a QEF Election and, in a subsequent tax year, EMX ceases to be a PFIC, the QEF Election will remain in effect (although it will not be applicable) during those tax years in which EMX is not a PFIC. Accordingly, if EMX becomes a PFIC in another subsequent tax year, the QEF Election will be effective and the U.S. Holder will be subject to the QEF rules described above during any subsequent tax year in which EMX qualifies as a PFIC.

For each tax year that EMX qualifies as a PFIC, EMX intends to: (a) make available to U.S. Holders, upon their written request, a “PFIC Annual Information Statement” as described in Treasury Regulation Section 1.1295 -1(g) (or any successor Treasury Regulation) and (b) upon written request, use commercially reasonable efforts to provide all additional information that such U.S. Holder is required to obtain in connection with maintaining such QEF Election with regard to EMX. EMX may elect to provide such information on its website, www.EMXRoyalty.com. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the availability of, and procedure for making, a QEF Election.

A U.S. Holder makes a QEF Election by attaching a completed IRS Form 8621, including a PFIC Annual Information Statement, to a timely filed U.S. federal income tax return. However, if EMX does not provide the required information with regard to EMX, U.S. Holders will not be able to make a QEF Election for such entity and will continue to be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above that apply to Non-Electing U.S. Holders with respect to the taxation of gains and excess distributions.

Mark-to-Market Election

A U.S. Holder may make a Mark-to-Market Election only if the common shares are marketable stock. Common shares generally will be "marketable stock" if the common shares are regularly traded on, (a) a national securities exchange that is registered with the SEC, (b) the national market system established pursuant to section 11A of the U.S. Exchange Act, or (c) a foreign securities exchange that is regulated or supervised by a governmental authority of the country in which the market is located, provided that, (i) such foreign exchange has trading volume, listing, financial disclosure, and meets other requirements and the laws of the country in which such foreign exchange is located, together with the rules of such foreign exchange, ensure that such requirements are actually enforced, and (ii) the rules of such foreign exchange ensure active trading of listed stocks. If EMX’s common shares are traded on such a qualified exchange or other market, the common shares generally will be "regularly traded" for any calendar year during which common shares are traded, other than in de minimis quantities, on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter.

A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election with respect to its common shares generally will not be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above with respect to such common shares. However, if a U.S. Holder does not make a Mark-to-Market Election beginning in the first tax year of such U.S. Holder’s holding period for common shares or such U.S. Holder has not made a timely QEF Election, the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above will apply to certain dispositions of, and distributions on, common shares.

97

A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will include in ordinary income, for each tax year in which EMX is a PFIC, an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the fair market value of common shares, as of the close of such tax year over (ii) such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in such common shares. A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will be allowed a deduction in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (i) such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in common shares, over (ii) the fair market value of such common shares (but only to the extent of the net amount of previously included income as a result of the Mark-to-Market Election for prior tax years).

A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election generally also will adjust such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in common shares to reflect the amount included in gross income or allowed as a deduction because of such Mark-to-Market Election. In addition, upon a sale or other taxable disposition of common shares, a U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will recognize ordinary income or ordinary loss (not to exceed the excess, if any, of (i) the amount included in ordinary income because of such Mark-to-Market Election for prior tax years over (ii) the amount allowed as a deduction because of such Mark-to-Market Election for prior tax years).

A U.S. Holder makes a Mark-to-Market Election by attaching a completed IRS Form 8621 to a timely filed U.S. federal income tax return. A Mark-to-Market Election applies to the tax year in which such Mark-to-Market Election is made and to each subsequent tax year, unless common shares cease to be "marketable stock" or the IRS consents to revocation of such election. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the availability of, and procedure for making, a Mark-to-Market Election.

Other PFIC Rules

Under Section 1291(f) of the Code, the IRS has issued proposed Treasury Regulations that, subject to certain exceptions, would cause a U.S. Holder that had not made a timely QEF Election to recognize gain (but not loss) upon certain transfers of common shares that would otherwise be tax-deferred (e.g., gifts and exchanges pursuant to corporate reorganizations). However, the specific U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder may vary based on the manner in which common shares are transferred.

Certain additional adverse rules will apply with respect to a U.S. Holder if EMX is a PFIC, regardless of whether such U.S. Holder makes a QEF Election. For example under Section 1298(b)(6) of the Code, a U.S. Holder that uses common shares as security for a loan will, except as may be provided in Treasury Regulations, be treated as having made a taxable disposition of such common shares.

Special rules also apply to the amount of foreign tax credit that a U.S. Holder may claim on a distribution from a PFIC. Subject to such special rules, foreign taxes paid with respect to any distribution in respect of stock in a PFIC are generally eligible for the foreign tax credit. The rules relating to distributions by a PFIC and their eligibility for the foreign tax credit are complicated, and a U.S. Holder should consult with their own tax advisor regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit with respect to distributions by a PFIC.

The PFIC rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the PFIC rules and how the PFIC rules may affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of common shares.

Ownership and Disposition of Common Shares

The following discussion is subject to the rules described above under the heading "Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules".

Distributions on Common Shares

Subject to the PFIC rules discussed above, a U.S. Holder that receives a distribution, including a constructive distribution, with respect to common shares will be required to include the amount of such distribution in gross income as a dividend (without reduction for any Canadian income tax withheld from such distribution) to the extent of the current or accumulated "earnings and profits" of EMX, as computed for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A dividend generally will be taxed to a U.S. Holder at ordinary income tax rates if EMX is a PFIC. To the extent that a distribution exceeds the current and accumulated "earnings and profits" of EMX, such distribution will be treated first as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of a U.S. Holder's tax basis in common shares and thereafter as gain from the sale or exchange of such common shares. See "Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of Common Shares" below. However, EMX may not maintain the calculations of earnings and profits in accordance with U.S. federal income tax principles, and each U.S. Holder should therefore assume that any distribution by EMX with respect to common shares will constitute ordinary dividend income. Dividends received on common shares generally will not be eligible for the "dividends received deduction". Subject to applicable limitations and provided EMX is eligible for the benefits of the Treaty, dividends paid by EMX to non-corporate U.S. Holders, including individuals, generally will be eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to long-term capital gains for dividends, provided certain holding period and other conditions are satisfied, including that EMX not be classified as a PFIC in the tax year of distribution or in the preceding tax year. The dividend rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the application of such rules.

98

Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of Common Shares

Subject to the PFIC rules discussed above, upon the sale or other taxable disposition of common shares, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount of cash plus the fair market value of any property received and such U.S. Holder's tax basis in such common shares sold or otherwise disposed of. Subject to the PFIC rules discussed above, gain or loss recognized on such sale or other disposition generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if, at the time of the sale or other disposition, common shares have been held for more than one year.

Preferential tax rates apply to long-term capital gain of a U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate, or trust. There are currently no preferential tax rates for long-term capital gain of a U.S. Holder that is a corporation. Deductions for capital losses are subject to significant limitations under the Code.

Additional Considerations

Additional Tax on Passive Income

Certain U.S. Holders that are individuals, estates or trusts (other than trusts that are exempt from tax) will be subject to a 3.8% tax on all or a portion of their "net investment income", which includes dividends on the common shares and net gains from the disposition of the common shares. Further, excess distributions treated as dividends, gains treated as excess distributions under the PFIC rules discussed above, and mark-to-market inclusions and deductions are all included in the calculation of net investment income.

Treasury Regulations provide, subject to the election described in the following paragraph, that solely for purposes of this additional tax, that distributions of previously taxed income will be treated as dividends and included in net investment income subject to the additional 3.8% tax. Additionally, to determine the amount of any capital gain from the sale or other taxable disposition of common shares that will be subject to the additional tax on net investment income, a U.S. Holder who has made a QEF Election will be required to recalculate its basis in the common shares excluding QEF basis adjustments.

Alternatively, a U.S. Holder may make an election which will be effective with respect to all interests in a PFIC for which a QEF Election has been made and which is held in that year or acquired in future years. Under this election, a U.S. Holder pays the additional 3.8% tax on QEF income inclusions and on gains calculated after giving effect to related tax basis adjustments. U.S. Holders that are individuals, estates or trusts should consult their own tax advisors regarding the applicability of this tax to any of their income or gains in respect of the common shares.

Receipt of Foreign Currency

The amount of any distribution paid to a U.S. Holder in foreign currency, or on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares, generally will be equal to the U.S. dollar value of such foreign currency based on the exchange rate applicable on the date of receipt (regardless of whether such foreign currency is converted into U.S. dollars at that time). A U.S. Holder will have a basis in the foreign currency equal to its U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt. Any U.S. Holder who converts or otherwise disposes of the foreign currency after the date of receipt may have a foreign currency exchange gain or loss that would be treated as ordinary income or loss, and generally will be U.S. source income or loss for foreign tax credit purposes. Different rules apply to U.S. Holders who use the accrual method. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own U.S. tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of receiving, owning, and disposing of foreign currency.

Foreign Tax Credit

Subject to the PFIC rules discussed above, a U.S. Holder that pays (whether directly or through withholding) Canadian income tax with respect to dividends paid on common shares generally will be entitled, at the election of such U.S. Holder, to receive either a deduction or a credit for such Canadian income tax paid. Generally, a credit will reduce a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability on a dollar-for-dollar basis, whereas a deduction will reduce a U.S. Holder’s income subject to U.S. federal income tax. This election is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign taxes paid (whether directly or through withholding) by a U.S. Holder during a year.

99

Complex limitations apply to the foreign tax credit, including the general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability that such U.S. Holder’s "foreign source" taxable income bears to such U.S. Holder’s worldwide taxable income. In applying this limitation, a U.S. Holder’s various items of income and deduction must be classified, under complex rules, as either "foreign source" or "U.S. source". Generally, dividends paid by a foreign corporation should be treated as foreign source for this purpose, and gains recognized on the sale of stock of a foreign corporation by a U.S. Holder should be treated as U.S. source for this purpose, except as otherwise provided in an applicable income tax treaty, and if an election is properly made under the Code. However, the amount of a distribution with respect to common shares that is treated as a "dividend" may be lower for U.S. federal income tax purposes than it is for Canadian federal income tax purposes, resulting in a reduced foreign tax credit allowance to a U.S. Holder. In addition, this limitation is calculated separately with respect to specific categories of income. The foreign tax credit rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own U.S. tax advisor regarding the foreign tax credit rules.

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

Under U.S. federal income tax law and Treasury Regulations, certain categories of U.S. Holders must file information returns with respect to their investment in, or involvement in, a foreign corporation. For example, U.S. return disclosure obligations (and related penalties) are imposed on individuals who are U.S. Holders that hold certain specified foreign financial assets in excess of certain threshold amounts. The definition of specified foreign financial assets includes not only financial accounts maintained in foreign financial institutions, but also, unless held in accounts maintained by a financial institution, any stock or security issued by a non-U.S. person, any financial instrument or contract held for investment that has an issuer or counterparty other than a U.S. person and any interest in a foreign entity. U.S. Holders may be subject to these reporting requirements unless their common shares are held in an account at certain financial institutions. Penalties for failure to file certain of these information returns are substantial. U.S. Holders should consult with their own tax advisors regarding the requirements of filing information returns, including the requirement to file an IRS Form 8938.

Payments made within the U.S. or by a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, of dividends on, and proceeds arising from the sale or other taxable disposition of, common shares will generally be subject to information reporting and backup withholding tax, at the rate of 24%, if a U.S. Holder, (a) fails to furnish such U.S. Holder’s correct U.S. taxpayer identification number (generally on IRS Form W-9), (b) furnishes an incorrect U.S. taxpayer identification number, (c) is notified by the IRS that such U.S. Holder has previously failed to properly report items subject to backup withholding tax, or (d) fails to certify, under penalty of perjury, that such U.S. Holder has furnished its correct U.S. taxpayer identification number and that the IRS has not notified such U.S. Holder that it is subject to backup withholding tax. However, certain exempt persons generally are excluded from these information reporting and backup withholding rules. Any amounts withheld under the U.S. backup withholding tax rules will be allowed as a credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, or will be refunded, if such U.S. Holder furnishes required information to the IRS in a timely manner.

The discussion of reporting requirements set forth above is not intended to constitute a complete description of all reporting requirements that may apply to a U.S. Holder. A failure to satisfy certain reporting requirements may result in an extension of the time period during which the IRS can assess a tax, and under certain circumstances, such an extension may apply to assessments of amounts unrelated to any unsatisfied reporting requirement. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisors regarding the information reporting and backup withholding rules.

10.F. Dividends and Paying Agents

Not applicable.

10.G. Statement by Experts

Not applicable.

10.H. Documents on Display

Copies of the documents referenced in this annual report are available at the Company’s office located at Suite 501, 543 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Credit Risk

The Company is exposed to credit risk by holding cash and cash equivalents and receivables. This risk is minimized by holding a significant portion of the funds in Canadian banks. The Company’s exposure with respect to its receivables is primarily related to royalty streams, recovery of exploration evaluation costs, and convertible promissory notes.

100

Interest Rate Risk

The Company is exposed to interest rate risk because of fluctuating interest rates. Management believes the interest rate risk is low given interest rates on promissory notes is fixed and the current low global interest rate environment. Fluctuations in market rates is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s operations due to the short term to maturity and no penalty cashable feature of its cash equivalents.

Market Risk

The Company is exposed to market risk because of the fluctuating values of its publicly traded marketable securities and other company investments. The Company has no control over these fluctuations and does not hedge its investments. Based on the December 31, 2017 portfolio values, a 10% increase or decrease in effective market values would increase or decrease net shareholders’ equity by approximately $334,000.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company is unable to meet its financial obligations as they come due. The Company manages this risk by careful management of its working capital to ensure the Company’s expenditures will not exceed available resources.

Commodity Risk

The Company’s royalty revenues are derived from a royalty interest and are based on the extraction and sale of precious and base minerals and metals. Factors beyond the control of the Company may affect the marketability of metals discovered. Metal prices have historically fluctuated widely. Consequently, the economic viability of the Company’s royalty interests cannot be accurately predicted and may be adversely affected by fluctuations in mineral prices.

Currency Risk

Foreign exchange risk arises when future commercial transactions and recognized assets and liabilities are denominated in a currency that is not the entity’s functional currency. The Company operates in Canada, Turkey, Sweden, Australia and the U.S.A. The Company funds cash calls to its subsidiary companies outside of Canada in US dollars and a portion of its expenditures are also incurred in local currencies.

ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable.

101

ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance that material information related to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to senior management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), by others within those entities on a timely basis so that appropriate decisions can be made regarding public disclosure.

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2017. The CEO and CFO concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017, were effective to give reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for designing, establishing and maintaining a system of internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) to provide reasonable assurance that the financial information prepared by the Company for external purposes is reliable and has been recorded, processed and reported in an accurate and timely manner in accordance with GAAP. The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its responsibilities. The Audit Committee fulfills its role of ensuring the integrity of the reported information through its review of the interim and annual financial statements. Management reviewed the results of their assessment with the Company’s Audit Committee.

Because of its inherent limitations, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all possible misstatements or frauds. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate.

To evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, Management has used the Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013), which is a suitable, recognized control framework established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and concluded that such internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2017.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

The Company's management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls or our Internal Controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

As a non-accelerated filer, the Company is not required to provide the registered public accounting firm’s attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Form 20-F, that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

102

ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

The Company’s Board has determined that Messrs. Levet, Bayley and Okada qualify as audit committee financial experts (as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K under the U.S. Exchange Act), are financially sophisticated (as determined in accordance with Section 803B(2)(iii) of the NYSE American Company Guide), and are independent (as determined under U.S. Exchange Act Rule 10A-3 and Section 803A of the NYSE American Company Guide).

ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS

The Board of Directors of the Company has responsibility for the stewardship of the Company including responsibility for strategic planning, identification of the principal risks of the Company’s business and implementation of appropriate systems to manage these risks, succession planning (including appointing, training and monitoring senior management), communications with investors and the financial community and the integrity of the Company’s internal control and management information systems. To facilitate meeting this responsibility, the Board of Directors seeks to foster a culture of ethical conduct by striving to ensure the Company carries out its business in line with high business and moral standards and applicable legal and financial requirements. In that regard, the Board has:

- adopted a written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) for its directors, officers, employees and consultants and a written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for its CEO and Senior Financial Officers.
- established a whistleblower policy which details complaint procedures for financial concerns.

Copies of the Code are available without charge to any person upon request from the Company’s CFO at www.EMXRoyalty.com or at the Company’s headquarters at Suite 501, 543 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 1X8.

The Board must also comply with the conflict of interest provisions of the British Columbia Business Corporations Act, as well as the relevant securities regulatory instruments, in order to ensure that directors exercise independent judgment in considering transactions and agreements in respect of which a director or Executive Officer has a material interest.

ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The following table discloses the fees billed to the Company by its external auditor during the last two financial years.

Financial Year Ending | Audit Fees (1) | Audit-Related Fees (2) | Tax Fees (3) | All Other Fees
December 31, 2017 | $117,000 | 0 | 0 | 0
December 31, 2016 | $130,000 | $14,000 | 0 | $450

| (1) | The aggregate fees billed by the Company’s auditor for audit fees.
| (2) | The aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services by the Company’s auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements and are not disclosed in the ‘Audit Fees’ column. These fees are related to the auditor’s reviews of the Company’s Form 20F and the Company’s first quarter interim financial statements in relation to the compliance and conversion to International Financial Reporting Standards.
| (3) | The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the Company’s auditor for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.

The audit committee has established policies and procedures that are intended to control the services provided by the Company’s external auditors and to monitor their continuing independence. Under these policies, no services may be undertaken by the auditors, unless the engagement is specifically approved by the audit committee or the services are included within a category which has been pre-approved by the audit committee. The maximum charge for services is established by the audit committee when the specific engagement is approved or the category of services pre-approved. Management is required to notify the audit committee of the nature and value of pre-approved services undertaken.

ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

Not applicable.

103

ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE COMPANY/AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 16F. CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

Not applicable.

ITEM 16G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Common Shares are listed on the NYSE American and the TSX-V. Under the rules of the NYSE American, listed companies are generally required to have a majority of their Board of Directors independent as defined by the NYSE American Company Guide Rules. Currently, as permitted under applicable Canadian regulations, the Company’s Board consists of 5 directors, of which 3 are considered to be independent.

Other than in the composition of the Board of Directors as described above, in the opinion of management the Company’s corporate governance practices do not differ in any significant way from those required of U.S. domestic companies listed on the NYSE American.

ITEM 16H. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company's financial statements are stated in Canadian Dollars and are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

This Form 20-FAnnual Report contains the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 with the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, comprised of:

| a) | Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
| b) | Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
| c) | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
| d) | Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
| e) | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

104

ITEM 19. EXHIBITS

1.1 | Articles of EMX Royalty Corporation (formerly Eurasian Minerals Inc.) – Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Form 6-K filed on July 16, 2014.
1.2 | Certificate of Change of Name and Notice of Articles dated July 19, 2017 – Previously filed with the SEC on Form 6-K on July 19, 2017.
4.1 | Services Agreement between the Company and Seabord Services Corp., dated December 1, 2015 - Previously filed with the SEC on Form 20-F Annual Report on April 30, 2015.
8.1 | List of Significant Subsidiaries - Included under Item 4.C, Organizational Structure.
12.1 | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
12.2 | Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
13.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
13.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
15.1 | Consent of Qualified Person – Eric P. Jensen
15.2 | Consent of Qualified Person - Dean D. Turner
15.3 | Consent of Qualified Person - Phil Newell
15.4 | Audit Committee Charter
EX-101.INS | XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101.SCH | XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA
EX-101.CAL | XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE
EX-101.DEF | XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE
EX-101.LAB | XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE
EX-101.PRE | XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE

105

SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on its behalf.

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION

/s/ Christina Cepeliauskas

Christina Cepeliauskas
Chief Financial Officer

DATED: April 3, 2018

106

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

December 31, 2017

Page 1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Directors of
EMX Royalty Corp. (formerly Eurasian Minerals Inc.)

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of EMX Royalty Corp. (formerly Eurasian Minerals Inc.) (the “Company”), which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the consolidated statements of loss, comprehensive loss, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31,2017, 2016, and 2015 and the related notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information (collectively referred to as the consolidated financial statements).

In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2017 and 2016 and its financial performance and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern

Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 1 in the consolidated financial statements, which indicates that the Company has recurring losses, an accumulated deficit of $104,382,744 and the Company anticipates it will require additional working capital to undertake its current business plan. As stated in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, these events or conditions, along with other matters as set forth in Note 1, indicate that a material uncertainty exists that casts substantial doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Basis for Opinion

Management’s Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors’ Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Those standards also require that we comply with ethical requirements, including independence. We are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the consolidated financial statements in Canada, the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB.

An audit includes performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatements of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures included obtaining and examining, on a test basis, audit evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on our judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the Company’s preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies and principles used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our audit opinion.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002.

| “DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP”
Vancouver, Canada | Chartered Professional Accountants
March 21, 2018 |

Page 3

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

|  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |
Current |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 3,533,611 |  | $ | 3,199,686 |
Investments (Note 3) |  | 1,139,447 |  |  | 262,756 |
Receivables (Note 4) |  | 3,376,411 |  |  | 3,430,006 |
Prepaid expenses |  | 45,194 |  |  | 28,496 |
Total current assets |  | 8,094,663 |  |  | 6,920,944 |
Non-current |  |  |  |  |  |
Restricted cash (Note 5) |  | 771,434 |  |  | 359,172 |
Receivables (Note 4) |  | - |  |  | 1,412,727 |
Property and equipment (Note 6) |  | 450,278 |  |  | 471,704 |
Notes receivable (Note 7) |  | 429,973 |  |  | - |
Investment in associated companies (Note 8) |  | 7,578,989 |  |  | 4,992,823 |
Strategic investments (Note 3) |  | 2,199,199 |  |  | 212,798 |
Exploration and evaluation assets (Note 9) |  | 1,841,966 |  |  | 2,145,000 |
Royalty interest (Note 10) |  | 21,943,743 |  |  | 25,831,152 |
Reclamation bonds (Note 11) |  | 515,748 |  |  | 639,427 |
Goodwill (Note 12) |  | 1,820,307 |  |  | 4,753,324 |
Other assets |  | 104,484 |  |  | 104,484 |
Total non-current assets |  | 37,656,121 |  |  | 40,922,611 |
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 45,750,784 |  | $ | 47,843,555 |
LIABILITIES |  |  |  |  |  |
Current |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 749,865 |  | $ | 577,265 |
Advances from joint venture partners (Note 13) |  | 808,905 |  |  | 341,361 |
Total current liabilities |  | 1,558,770 |  |  | 918,626 |
Non-current |  |  |  |  |  |
Deferred income tax liability (Note 15) |  | 1,820,307 |  |  | 4,753,324 |
TOTAL LIABILITIES |  | 3,379,077 |  |  | 5,671,950 |
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |  |  |  |  |  |
Capital stock (Note 14) |  | 124,062,091 |  |  | 117,504,585 |
Commitment to issue shares (Note 14) |  | 23,825 |  |  | - |
Reserves |  | 22,668,535 |  |  | 21,656,380 |
Deficit |  | (104,382,744 | ) |  | (96,989,360 | )
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |  | 42,371,707 |  |  | 42,171,605 |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | $ | 45,750,784 |  | $ | 47,843,555 |
Nature of operations and going concern (Note 1) |  |  |  |  |  |
Events subsequent to the reporting date (Note 20) |  |  |  |  |  |

Approved on behalf of the Board of Directors on March 21, 2018

Signed: | “David M Cole” | Director | Signed: | “Larry Okada” | Director

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page 4

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF LOSS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

|  | Year ended |  |  | Year ended |  |  | Year ended |
|  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |  |  | December 31, 2015 |
ROYALTY INCOME (Note 10) | $ | 2,857,927 |  | $ | 2,227,322 |  | $ | 1,609,553 |
Cost of sales |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gold tax |  | (120,618 | ) |  | (111,366 | ) |  | (80,478 | )
Depletion (Note 10) |  | (2,282,276 | ) |  | (2,163,221 | ) |  | (1,716,848 | )
Net royalty (loss) income |  | 455,033 |  |  | (47,265 | ) |  | (187,773 | )
EXPLORATION EXPENDITURES (Note 9) |  | 6,334,119 |  |  | 6,415,533 |  |  | 5,948,802 |
Less: recoveries |  | (1,863,045 | ) |  | (1,415,574 | ) |  | (1,584,127 | )
Net exploration expenditures |  | 4,471,074 |  |  | 4,999,959 |  |  | 4,364,675 |
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Administrative and office |  | 724,519 |  |  | 721,645 |  |  | 900,453 |
Depreciation (Note 6) |  | 28,622 |  |  | 114,489 |  |  | 116,119 |
Investor relations and shareholder information |  | 389,222 |  |  | 274,966 |  |  | 218,731 |
Professional fees |  | 664,295 |  |  | 510,533 |  |  | 574,067 |
Salaries and consultants (Note 16) |  | 1,023,831 |  |  | 894,166 |  |  | 961,108 |
Share-based payments (Note 14 and 16) |  | 676,054 |  |  | 467,939 |  |  | 470,116 |
Transfer agent and filing fees |  | 168,445 |  |  | 165,040 |  |  | 107,566 |
Travel |  | 90,041 |  |  | 71,561 |  |  | 187,374 |
Total general and administrative expenses |  | 3,765,029 |  |  | 3,220,339 |  |  | 3,535,534 |
Loss from operations |  | (7,781,070 | ) |  | (8,267,563 | ) |  | (8,087,982 | )
Change in fair value of fair value throught profit or loss investments |  | 122,191 |  |  | 258,702 |  |  | (427,022 | )
Permanent loss recorded in the fair value of available for sale investments (Note 3) |  | - |  |  | (697,675 | ) |  | - |
Gain on acquisition and sale of exploration and evaluation assets (Note 9) |  | 1,305,237 |  |  | 6,834,999 |  |  | 5,393,305 |
Equity loss in associated companies (Note 8) |  | (994,548 | ) |  | (1,295,568 | ) |  | (1,062,146 | )
Dilution gain in associated companies (Note 8) |  | 503,543 |  |  | 982,634 |  |  | - |
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |  | (659,473 | ) |  | (159,862 | ) |  | 1,220,085 |
Realized gain (loss) on sale of investments |  | 83,345 |  |  | (287,204 | ) |  | (58,360 | )
Interest and other gains on derivative instruments |  | 246,728 |  |  | 16,328 |  |  | (172,168 | )
Impairment of royalty interest (Note 10) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (3,973,699 | )
Write-off of exploration and evaluation assets (Note 9) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (56,085 | )
Impairment of accounts receivable |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (51,302 | )
Writedown of goodwill (Note 12) |  | (2,709,239 | ) |  | (1,518,328 | ) |  | (3,047,605 | )
Gain on derecognition and sale of property and equipment |  | - |  |  | 10,723 |  |  | 15,892 |
Loss before income taxes |  | (9,883,286 | ) |  | (4,122,814 | ) |  | (10,307,087 | )
Deferred income tax recovery (Note 15) |  | 2,489,902 |  |  | 1,439,332 |  |  | 3,431,230 |
Loss for the year | $ | (7,393,384 | ) | $ | (2,683,482 | ) | $ | (6,875,857 | )
Basic and diluted loss per share | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.09 | )
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |  | 78,002,082 |  |  | 73,874,415 |  |  | 73,480,833 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page 5

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

|  | Year ended December |  |  | Year ended December |  |  | Year ended December |
|  | 31, 2017 |  |  | 31, 2016 |  |  | 31, 2015 |
Loss for the year | $ | (7,393,384 | ) | $ | (2,683,482 | ) | $ | (6,875,857 | )
Other comprehensive income (loss) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Change in fair value of available-for-sale investments |  | 609,733 |  |  | 88,515 |  |  | (105,714 | )
Permanent loss on financial instruments |  | - |  |  | 697,675 |  |  | - |
Currency translation adjustment |  | (1,424,814 | ) |  | (862,335 | ) |  | 4,350,667 |
Comprehensive loss for the year | $ | (8,208,465 | ) | $ | (2,759,627 | ) | $ | (2,630,904 | )

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page 6

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

|  | Year ended |  |  | Year ended |  |  | Year ended |
|  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |  |  | December 31, 2015 |
Cash flows from operating activities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Loss for the year | $ | (7,393,384 | ) | $ | (2,683,482 | ) | $ | (6,875,857 | )
Items not affecting operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest income received |  | (254,261 | ) |  | (5,590 | ) |  | (22,270 | )
Unrealized foreign exchange effect on cash and cash equivalents |  | (173,740 | ) |  | (71,562 | ) |  | 290,504 |
Items not affecting cash: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Change in fair value of fair value throught profit or loss investments |  | (122,191 | ) |  | (258,702 | ) |  | 427,022 |
Commitment to issue shares |  | - |  |  | 27,462 |  |  | 66,089 |
Permanent loss on financial instruments |  | - |  |  | 697,675 |  |  | - |
Interest on notes receivable |  | (81,850 | ) |  | (58,342 | ) |  | (53,222 | )
Accretion interest on receivable |  | (167,718 | ) |  | (72,806 | ) |  | - |
Derivative loss on accounts receivable |  | - |  |  | 120,900 |  |  | - |
Share - based payments |  | 1,415,639 |  |  | 943,334 |  |  | 476,424 |
Deferred income tax recovery |  | (2,489,902 | ) |  | (1,439,332 | ) |  | (3,431,230 | )
Depreciation |  | 39,344 |  |  | 136,200 |  |  | 150,782 |
Depletion |  | 2,282,276 |  |  | 2,163,221 |  |  | 1,716,848 |
Impairment of royalty interest |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 3,973,699 |
Writedown of goodwill |  | 2,709,239 |  |  | 1,518,328 |  |  | 3,047,605 |
Impairment of receivables |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 51,302 |
Realized (gain) loss on sale of investments |  | (83,345 | ) |  | 287,204 |  |  | 58,360 |
Gain on acquistion and sale of exploration and evalution assets |  | (1,305,237 | ) |  | (6,834,999 | ) |  | (5,393,305 | )
Gain on derecognition and sale of property and equipment |  | (29,766 | ) |  | (10,723 | ) |  | (15,892 | )
Write-off of exploration and evaluation assets |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 56,086 |
Equity loss in associated companies |  | 994,548 |  |  | 1,295,568 |  |  | 1,062,146 |
Dilution gain in associated companies |  | (503,543 | ) |  | (982,634 | ) |  | - |
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss |  | 597 |  |  | (67,249 | ) |  | (466,587 | )
Shares received from joint venture partners included in exploration recoveries |  | (810,521 | ) |  | (134,738 | ) |  | (115,000 | )
Changes in non-cash working capital items: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Receivables |  | 1,908,945 |  |  | (6,343 | ) |  | 101,200 |
Prepaid expenses |  | (16,698 | ) |  | 3,848 |  |  | 21,366 |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  | 172,600 |  |  | (86,317 | ) |  | 83,056 |
Advances from joint venture partners |  | 467,544 |  |  | 203,536 |  |  | (291,350 | )
Total cash used in operating activities |  | (3,441,424 | ) |  | (5,315,543 | ) |  | (5,082,224 | )
Cash flows from investing activities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Acquisition and sale of exploration and evaluation assets, net of option |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
payments received |  | 161,048 |  |  | 3,005,280 |  |  | 5,297,357 |
Interest received on cash and cash equivalents |  | 86,543 |  |  | 5,590 |  |  | 22,270 |
Notes receivable |  | (1,405,277 | ) |  | (542,622 | ) |  | (973,236 | )
Proceeds from sale of fair value through profit and loss investments, net |  | 139,365 |  |  | 130,737 |  |  | 136,263 |
Proceeds of available-for-sale financial instruments |  | - |  |  | 17,375 |  |  | - |
Purchase of investments in associated companies |  | (2,059,631 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |
Restricted cash |  | (412,262 | ) |  | (89,402 | ) |  | - |
Purchase and sale of property and equipment, net |  | (24,784 | ) |  | (16,999 | ) |  | 2,403 |
Reclamation bonds |  | 123,679 |  |  | 171,307 |  |  | 71,964 |
Total cash provided by (used in) investing activities |  | (3,391,319 | ) |  | 2,681,266 |  |  | 4,557,021 |
Cash flows from financing activities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Proceeds received from private placement, net of share issue costs |  | 6,907,228 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Proceeds from exercise of options |  | 85,700 |  |  | 127,800 |  |  | - |
Total cash provided by financing activities |  | 6,992,928 |  |  | 127,800 |  |  | - |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |  | 173,740 |  |  | 71,562 |  |  | (290,504 | )
Change in cash and cash equivalents |  | 333,925 |  |  | (2,434,915 | ) |  | (815,707 | )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |  | 3,199,686 |  |  | 5,634,601 |  |  | 6,450,308 |
Cash and cash equivalents, ending | $ | 3,533,611 |  | $ | 3,199,686 |  | $ | 5,634,601 |
Supplemental disclosure with respect to cash flows (Note 19) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page 7

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Reserves |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accumulated other |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Number of common |  |  |  |  |  | Commitment to |  |  | Share-based |  |  | comprehensive gain |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | shares |  |  | Capital stock |  |  | issue shares |  |  | payments |  |  | (loss) |  |  | Deficit |  |  | Total |
Balance as at December 31, 2016 |  | 74,089,710 |  | $ | 117,504,585 |  | $ | - |  | $ | 11,607,230 |  | $ | 10,049,150 |  | $ | (96,989,360 | ) | $ | 42,171,605 |
Shares issued for exercise of stock options |  | 75,000 |  |  | 85,700 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 85,700 |
Shares issued for private placement |  | 5,000,000 |  |  | 6,200,000 |  |  | - |  |  | 800,000 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 7,000,000 |
Finder's fees in units |  | 246,604 |  |  | 305,789 |  |  | - |  |  | 39,457 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 345,246 |
Share-based payments |  | 313,873 |  |  | 358,490 |  |  | 23,825 |  |  | 1,033,324 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 1,415,639 |
Share issuance costs in units |  | - |  |  | (345,246 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (345,246 | )
Share issuance costs in cash |  | - |  |  | (92,772 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (92,772 | )
Reclass of reserves for exercise of options |  | - |  |  | 45,545 |  |  | - |  |  | (45,545 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (1,424,814 | ) |  | - |  |  | (1,424,814 | )
Change in fair value of financial instruments |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 609,733 |  |  | - |  |  | 609,733 |
Loss for the year |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (7,393,384 | ) |  | (7,393,384 | )
Balance as at December 31, 2017 |  | 79,725,187 |  | $ | 124,062,091 |  | $ | 23,825 |  | $ | 13,434,466 |  | $ | 9,234,069 |  | $ | (104,382,744 | ) | $ | 42,371,707 |

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Reserves |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accumulated other |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Number of common |  |  |  |  |  | Commitment to |  |  | Share-based |  |  | comprehensive gain |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | shares |  |  | Capital stock |  |  | issue shares |  |  | payments |  |  | (loss) |  |  | Deficit |  |  | Total |
Balance as at December 31, 2015 |  | 73,534,710 |  | $ | 117,000,052 |  | $ | 139,138 |  | $ | 10,362,229 |  | $ | 10,125,295 |  | $ | (94,305,878 | ) | $ | 43,320,836 |
Shares issued for acquisition of a royalty interest |  | 250,000 |  |  | 145,000 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 145,000 |
Shares issued as incentive stock grants |  | 140,000 |  |  | 166,600 |  |  | (166,600 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |
Shares issued from exercise of options |  | 165,000 |  |  | 127,800 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 127,800 |
Equity investment share-based payments |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 366,800 |  |  | - |  |  |  |  |  | 366,800 |
Commitment to issue shares |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 27,462 |  |  | 943,334 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 970,796 |
Reclassification of fair value of options exercised |  | - |  |  | 65,133 |  |  | - |  |  | (65,133 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (862,335 | ) |  | - |  |  | (862,335 | )
Change in fair value of financial instruments |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 88,515 |  |  | - |  |  | 88,515 |
Permanent loss on financial instruments |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 697,675 |  |  | - |  |  | 697,675 |
Loss for the year |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (2,683,482 | ) |  | (2,683,482 | )
Balance as at December 31, 2016 |  | 74,089,710 |  | $ | 117,504,585 |  | $ | - |  | $ | 11,607,230 |  | $ | 10,049,150 |  | $ | (96,989,360 | ) | $ | 42,171,605 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page 8

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Reserves |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accumulated other |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Number of common |  |  |  |  |  | Commitment to |  |  | Share-based |  |  | comprehensive gain |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | shares |  |  | Capital stock |  |  | issue shares |  |  | payments |  |  | (loss) |  |  | Deficit |  |  | Total |
Balance as at December 31, 2014 |  | 73,371,710 |  | $ | 116,766,102 |  | $ | 306,999 |  | $ | 9,562,905 |  | $ | 5,880,342 |  | $ | (87,430,021 | ) | $ | 45,086,327 |
Shares issued as incentive stock grants |  | 163,000 |  |  | 233,950 |  |  | (233,950 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |
Commitment to issue shares |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 66,089 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 66,089 |
Equity investment share-based payments |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 322,900 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 322,900 |
Share - based payments |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 476,424 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 476,424 |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 4,350,667 |  |  | - |  |  | 4,350,667 |
Change in fair value of financial instruments |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (105,714 | ) |  | - |  |  | (105,714 | )
Loss for the year |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (6,875,857 | ) |  | (6,875,857 | )
Balance as at December 31, 2015 |  | 73,534,710 |  | $ | 117,000,052 |  | $ | 139,138 |  | $ | 10,362,229 |  | $ | 10,125,295 |  | $ | (94,305,878 | ) | $ | 43,320,836 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page 9

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND GOING CONCERN

EMX Royalty Corporation (the “Company” or “EMX”) and its subsidiaries operates as a royalty and prospect generator engaged in the exploring for, and generating royalties from, metals and minerals properties. The Company’s royalty and exploration portfolio mainly consists of properties in North America, Turkey, Europe, Haiti, Australia, and New Zealand. The Company’s common shares are listed on the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSX-V”) and the NYSE MKT under the symbol of “EMX”. The Company’s head office is located at 501 - 543 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 1X8.

On July 19, 2017 the Company officially changed its name to EMX Royalty Corporation, formerly Eurasian Minerals Inc.

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared using International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) applicable to a going concern, which assumes that the Company will be able to realize its assets, discharge its liabilities and continue in operation for the following twelve months.

With its current plans for the year and the budgets associated with those plans, in order to continue funding its administrative and royalty generation programs from the date of these consolidated financial statements, management believes it will require additional working capital to undertake it’s current business plan. The Company has incurred recurring losses and has an accumulated deficit of $104,382,744. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may issue new shares through public and/or private placements, sell assets, or return capital to shareholders. These uncertainties may cast doubt upon the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Some of the Company’s activities for exploration and evaluation assets are located in emerging nations and, consequently, may be subject to a higher level of risk compared to other developed countries. Operations, the status of mineral property rights and the recoverability of investments in emerging nations can be affected by changing economic, legal, regulatory and political situations.

At the date of these consolidated financial statements, the Company has not identified a known body of commercial grade mineral on any of its exploration and evaluation assets. The ability of the Company to realize the costs it has incurred to date on these exploration and evaluation assets is dependent upon the Company identifying a commercial mineral body, to finance its development costs and to resolve any environmental, regulatory or other constraints which may hinder the successful development of the exploration and evaluation assets.

These consolidated financial statements of the Company are presented in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted, which is the functional currency of the parent company and its subsidiaries except as to Bullion Monarch Mining, Inc., the holder of a royalty income stream whose functional currency is the United States (“US”) dollar.

2. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Statement of Compliance

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”).

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for financial instruments classified as fair value through profit or loss or available for sale, which are stated at their fair value. In addition, these consolidated financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting except for cash flow information.

Page 10

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

2. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements comprise the accounts of EMX Royalty Corp., the parent company, and its controlled subsidiaries, after the elimination of all significant intercompany balances and transactions.

Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are all entities over which the Company has exposure to variable returns from its involvement and has the ability to use power over the investee to affect its returns. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether the Company controls another entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Company until the date on which control ceases.

The accounts of subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies. Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealized gains or losses on transactions are eliminated. The Company’s principal operating subsidiaries are as follows:

Name | Place of Incorporation | Ownership Percentage
Bullion Monarch Mining, Inc | Utah, USA | 100%
EMX (USA) Services Corp. | Nevada, USA | 100%
Bronco Creek Exploration Inc. | Arizona, USA | 100%
Eurasia Madencilik Ltd. Sirketi | Turkey | 100%
Azur Madencilik Ltd. Sirketi | Turkey | 100%
Eurasian Minerals Cooperatief U.A. | Netherlands | 100%
Eurasian Minerals Sweden AB | Sweden | 100%
Viad Royalties AB | Sweden | 100%
Waikato Gold Limited | New Zealand | 100%

Functional and Reporting Currency

The functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. The functional currency for the Company and its subsidiaries is the Canadian dollar except the functional currency of the operations of Bullion Monarch which is the US dollar. The functional currency determinations were conducted through an analysis of the consideration factors identified in IAS 21, The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates.

Translation of transactions and balances

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions or valuation where items are re-measured. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are re-measured at the rate of exchange at each financial position date. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at period end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in profit or loss.

On translation of the entities whose functional currency is other than the Canadian dollar, revenues and expenses are translated at the exchange rates approximating those in effect on the date of the transactions. Assets and liabilities are translated at the rate of exchange at the reporting date. Exchange gains and losses, including results of re-translation, are recorded in the foreign currency translation reserve.

Page 11

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

2. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Financial Instruments

All financial instruments are classified into one of the following four categories:

| (a) | Financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”)
|  | Financial assets and financial liabilities classified as FVTPL are acquired or incurred principally for the purpose of selling or repurchasing them in the near term. They are recognized at fair value based on market prices, with any resulting gains and losses reflected in profit or loss for the period in which they arise.
| (b) | Held-to-maturity financial assets
|  | Held-to-maturity financial assets are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity that an entity has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. They are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method less any impairment loss. A gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss when the financial asset is derecognized or impaired, and through the amortization process.
| (c) | Available for sale financial assets
|  | Available for sale (“AFS”) financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available for sale, or that are not classified as loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, or FVTPL. They are measured at fair value. Fair value is determined based on market prices. Equity instruments that do not have a quoted market price in an active market are measured at cost. Gains and losses are recognized directly in other comprehensive income (loss) until the financial asset is derecognized, at which time the cumulative gain or loss previously recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is recognized in profit or loss for the period.
| (d) | Loans and receivables and other financial liabilities
|  | Loans and receivables and other financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost, using the effective interest rate method less any impairment loss.

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, investments, receivables, restricted cash, reclamation bonds, notes receivable, strategic investments, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and advances from joint venture partners. Unless otherwise noted the fair value of these financial instruments approximates their carrying values.

Cash and cash equivalents are classified as loans and receivables. Cash equivalents are held for the purpose of meeting short-term cash commitments rather than for investment or other purposes.

Warrants held through investments are classified as derivative financial assets at FVTPL and are accounted for at fair value. For warrants that are not traded on an exchange, no market value is readily available. When there are sufficient and reliable observable market inputs, a valuation technique is used; if no such market inputs are available, the warrants are valued at intrinsic value, which is equal to the higher of the market value of the underlying security less the exercise price of the warrant, or zero.

Investments (Marketable securities) classified as FVTPL are measured at fair market value. Changes in fair value of FVTPL assets are reflected in profit or loss in the period in which they occur. Changes in fair value of AFS assets are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income on the statement of financial position until sold or if there is an other than temporary impairment in value.

Page 12

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

2. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Financial Instruments (Continued)

Reclamation bonds are classified as financial assets held-to-maturity.

The Company classifies its restricted cash and certain receivables as loans and receivables and its accounts payable and accrued liabilities and advances from joint venture partners as other financial liabilities.

Certain receivables related to the sale of Akarca (Note 4) are considered to be derivative financial assets as they are subject to variations in gold price per ounce on record date and final price received and are accordingly classified as FVTPL. The derivative receivable is recorded at fair value each period until final settlement occurs, with changes in fair value reflected in profit or loss for the period in which they arise.

Impairment of Financial Assets

Financial assets are assessed for indicators of impairment at the end of each reporting period. Financial assets are impaired when there is objective evidence that, as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the financial assets, the estimated future cash flows of the financial assets have been impacted.

For all financial assets, objective evidence of impairment could include:

| • | Significant financial difficulty of the issuer or counterparty;
| • | Default or delinquency in interest or principal payments; or,
| • | It becoming probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or financial re-organization.

For certain categories of financial assets that are assessed not to be impaired individually, they are subsequently assessed for impairment on a collective basis. The carrying amount of financial assets is reduced by the impairment loss directly for all financial assets with the exception of receivables, where the carrying amount is reduced through the use of an allowance account. When a receivable is considered uncollectible, it is written off against the allowance account. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against the allowance account. Changes in the carrying amount of the allowance account are recognized in profit or loss.

With the exception of FVTPL marketable securities, if in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized, the previously recognized impairment loss is reversed through profit or loss to the extent that the carrying amount of the investment at the date the impairment is reversed does not exceed what the amortized cost would have been had the impairment not been recognized. In respect of AFS marketable securities, impairment losses previously recognized through profit or loss are not reversed through profit or loss. Any increase in fair value subsequent to an impairment loss is recognized directly in equity.

Convertible Notes Receivable

The notes receivable are hybrid financial assets that consist of a note receivable component and a separate equity conversion component. The conversion feature is measured at fair value on initial recognition by discounting the stream of future interest and principal payments at the rate of interest prevailing at the date of the issue for instruments of similar term and risk. Interest income based on the rate of the note will be receivable on maturity are recognized through profit and loss as interest income. The equity conversion option is an embedded derivative that has been separated from the notes receivable and is valued based on residual value.

Page 13

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

2. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Investments in Associated Companies

The Company accounts for its long-term investments in affiliated companies over which it has significant influence using the equity basis of accounting, whereby the investment is initially recorded at cost, adjusted to recognize the Company’s share of earnings or losses and reduced by dividends received.

The Company assesses its equity investments for impairment if there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the equity investment and that the event or events has an impact on the estimated future cash flow of the investment that can be reliably estimated. Objective evidence of impairment of equity investments includes:

| • | Significant financial difficulty of the associated companies;
| • | Becoming probable that the associated companies will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganization; or,
| • | National or local economic conditions that correlate with defaults of the associated companies.

Exploration and evaluation assets and exploration expenditures

Acquisition costs for exploration and evaluation assets, net of recoveries, are capitalized on a property-by-property basis. Acquisition costs include cash consideration and the value of common shares, based on recent issue prices, issued for exploration and evaluation assets pursuant to the terms of the agreement. Exploration expenditures, net of recoveries, are charged to operations as incurred. After a property is determined by management to be commercially feasible, an impairment test is conducted and subsequent development expenditures on the property will be capitalized.

When there is little prospect of further work on a property being carried out by the Company or its partners, when a property is abandoned, or when the capitalized costs are no longer considered recoverable, the related property costs are written down to management’s estimate of their net recoverable amount. The costs related to a property from which there is production, together with the costs of production equipment, will be depleted and amortized using the unit-of-production method.

An exploration and evaluation asset acquired under an option agreement, where payments are made at the sole discretion of the Company, is capitalized at the time of payment. Option payments received are treated as a reduction of the carrying value of the related acquisition cost for the mineral property until the payments are in excess of acquisition costs, at which time they are then credited to profit or loss. Option payments are at the discretion of the optionee and, accordingly, are accounted for when receipt is reasonably assured.

Revenue recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with IAS 18 Revenue and based upon amounts contractually due pursuant to the underlying royalty agreements. Specifically, royalty revenue is recognized in accordance with the terms of the underlying royalty agreements subject to (i) when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred; (iii) the royalty or stream being fixed or determinable; and (iv) the collectability of the royalty being reasonably assured. In some instances, the Company will not have access to sufficient information to make a reasonable estimate of revenue and, accordingly, revenue recognition is deferred until management can make a reasonable estimate. Royalty revenue may be subject to adjustment upon final settlement of estimated metal prices, weights, and assays. Adjustments to revenue from metal prices are recorded monthly and other adjustments are recorded on final settlement and are offset against revenue when incurred.

Page 14

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

2. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Royalty interests

Royalty interests in mineral properties include acquired royalty interests in production stage and exploration stage properties. In accordance with IAS 38 Intangible Assets, the cost of acquired royalty interests in mineral properties is capitalized as intangible assets.

Acquisition costs of production stage royalty interests are depleted using the units of production method over the life of the related mineral property, which is calculated using estimated reserves. Acquisition costs of royalty interests on exploration stage mineral properties, where there are no estimated reserves, are not amortized. At such time as the associated exploration stage mineral interests are converted to estimated reserves, the cost basis is amortized over the remaining life of the mineral property, using the estimated reserves. The carrying values of exploration stage mineral interests are evaluated for impairment at such time as information becomes available indicating that production will not occur in the future.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the price paid for the acquisition of a consolidated entity over the fair value of the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is allocated to the cash generating unit to which it relates.

Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually or more often if events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. Impairment is determined by assessing if the carrying value of a cash generating unit, including the allocated goodwill, exceeds its recoverable amount.

Property and equipment

Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Buildings are depreciated using a 5 year straightline method. Equipment is depreciated over its estimated useful life using the declining balance method at a rate of 20% per annum. Depreciation on equipment used directly on exploration projects is included in exploration expenditures for that mineral property.

Decommissioning liabilities

Decommissioning liabilities are recognized for the expected obligations related to the retirement of long-lived tangible assets that arise from the acquisition, construction, development or normal operation of such assets. A decommissioning liability is recognized in the period in which it is incurred and when a reasonable estimate of the fair value of the liability can be made with a corresponding decommissioning cost recognized by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The decommissioning cost is subsequently allocated in a rational and systematic method over the underlying asset’s useful life.

The initial fair value of the liability is accreted, by charges to profit or loss, to its estimated future value.

Environmental disturbance restoration

During the operating life of an asset, events such as infractions of environmental laws or regulations may occur. These events are not related to the normal operation of the asset and are referred to as environmental disturbance restoration provisions. The costs associated with these provisions are accrued and charged to profit or loss in the period in which the event giving rise to the liability occurs. Any subsequent adjustments to these provisions due to changes in estimates are also charged to profit or loss in the period of adjustment. These costs are not capitalized as part of the long-lived assets’ carrying value.

Page 15

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

2. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Impairment of assets

Events or changes in circumstances can give rise to significant impairment charges or reversals of impairment in a particular year. The Company assesses its cash generating units annually to determine whether any indication of impairment exists. Where an indicator of impairment exists, an estimate of the recoverable amount is made, which is the higher of the fair value less costs to sell and value in use. The determination of the recoverable amount for value in use requires the use of estimates and assumptions such as long-term commodity prices, discount rates, future capital requirements, exploration potential and future operating performance. Fair value is determined as the amount that would be obtained from the sale of the asset in an arm’s length transaction between knowledgeable and willing parties.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, bank deposits and short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash.

Share-based payments

Share-based payments include option and stock grants granted to directors, employees and non-employees. The Company accounts for share-based compensation using a fair value based method with respect to all share-based payments measured and recognized, to directors, employees and non-employees. For directors and employees, the fair value of the options and stock grants is measured at the date of grant. For non-employees, the fair value of the options and stock are measured at the fair value of the goods or services received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, if it is determined the fair value of the goods or services cannot be reliably measured, and are recorded at the date the goods or services are received. For directors, employees and non-employees, the fair value of the options and stock grants is accrued and charged to operations, with the offsetting credit to share based payment reserve for options, and commitment to issue shares for stock grants over the vesting period. If and when the stock options are exercised, the applicable amounts are transferred from share-based payment reserve to share capital. When the stock grants are issued, the applicable fair value is transferred from commitment to issue shares to share capital. Option based compensation awards are calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model while stock grants are valued at the fair value on the date of grant.

The Company has granted certain employees and non-employess restricted share units (“RSUs”) to be settled in shares of the Corporation. The fair value of the estimated number of RSUs that will eventually vest, determined at the date of grant, is recognized as share-based compensation expense over the vesting period, with a corresponding amount recorded as equity. The fair value of the RSUs is estimated using the market value of the underlying shares as well as assumptions related to the market and non-market conditions at the grant date.

Income taxes

Income tax expense consists of current and deferred tax. Income tax expense is recognized in profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to items recognized directly in equity. Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years. Deferred tax is calculated providing for temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes.

Deferred tax is not recognized on the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor taxable income nor loss. In addition, deferred tax is not recognized for taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill. Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to temporary differences when they reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.

Page 16

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

2. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Income taxes (Continued)

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset, and they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but they intend to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realized simultaneously.

A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that it is probable that future taxable income will be available against which the temporary difference can be utilized. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized.

Income (loss) per share

Basic income or loss per share is calculated by dividing the net income or loss for the year by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. Diluted income or loss per share is calculated whereby the weighted average number of shares outstanding used in the calculation of diluted income or loss per share assumes that the deemed proceeds received from the exercise of stock options, share purchase warrants and their equivalents would be used to repurchase common shares of the Company at the average market price during the year, if they are determined to have a dilutive effect.

Existing stock options and share purchase warrants have not been included in the current year computation of diluted loss per share as to do so would be anti-dilutive. For the years presented the basic and diluted losses per share are the same.

Valuation of equity units issued in private placements

The Company has adopted a residual value method with respect to the measurement of shares and warrants issued as private placement units. The residual value method first allocates value to the more easily measurable component based on fair value and then the residual value, if any, to the less easily measurable component.

The fair value of the common shares issued in the private placements was determined to be the more easily measurable component and were valued at their fair value, as determined by the closing quoted bid price on the day prior to the issuance date. The balance, if any, was allocated to the attached warrants. Any fair value attributed to the warrants is recorded in reserves.

Segment reporting

Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker. The chief operating decision-maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segment, has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer.

Accounting pronouncements not yet effective

The following standards and pronouncements have been issued by the IASB and have not yet been adopted by the Company.

IFRS 9 requires financial assets to be classified into three measurement categories on initial recognition: those measured at fair value through profit and loss, those measured at fair value through other comprehensive income and those measured at amortized cost. Measurement and classification of financial assets is dependent on the entity’s business model for managing the financial assets and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial asset. For financial liabilities, the standard retains most of the IAS 39 requirements.

Page 17

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

2. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

In May 2014, the IASB issued IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("IFRS 15"), which supersedes IAS 11 Construction Contracts, IAS 18 Revenue, IFRIC 13 Customer Loyalty Programmes, IFRIC 15 Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate, IFRIC 18 Transfers of Assets from Customers, and SIC 31 Revenue - Barter Transactions involving Advertising Services. IFRS 15 establishes a single five-step model framework for determining the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from a contract with a customer. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted.

IFRS 16 Leases was issued in January 2016 (effective January 1, 2019) and provides a single lessee accounting model, requiring lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for all leases unless the lease term is 12 months or less or the underlying asset has a low value.

The Company expects that these new IFRS standards will have an insignificant effect on its consolidated financial statements other than increased note disclosure.

Critical Accounting Judgments and Significant Estimates and Uncertainties

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments and estimates and form assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported revenue and expenses during the periods presented therein. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its judgments and estimates in relation to assets, liabilities, royalty revenues and expenses. Management bases its judgments and estimates on historical experience and on other various factors it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

The Company has identified the following critical accounting policies in which significant judgments, estimates and assumptions are made and where actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions and may materially affect financial results or the financial position reported in future periods. Further details of the nature of these assumptions and conditions may be found in the relevant notes to the consolidated financial statements.

a) | Royalty interest and related depletion

In accordance with the Company’s accounting policy, royalty interests are evaluated on a periodic basis to determine whether there are any indications of impairment. If any such indication exists, a formal estimate of recoverable amount is performed and an impairment loss recognized to the extent that carrying amount exceeds recoverable amount. The recoverable amount of a royalty asset is measured at the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. The determination of fair value and value in use requires management to make estimates and assumptions about expected production and sales volumes, the proportion of areas subject to royalty rights, commodity prices (considering current and historical prices, price trends and related factors), and reserves. These estimates and assumptions are subject to risk and uncertainty; hence there is a possibility that changes in circumstances will alter these projections, which may impact the recoverable amount of the assets. In such circumstances, some or all of the carrying value of the assets may be further impaired or the impairment charge reduced with the impact recorded in profit or loss.

b) | Goodwill

Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually or more often if events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. Impairment is determined by assessing if the carrying value of a cash generating unit, including the allocated goodwill, exceeds its recoverable amount. The assessment of the recoverable amount used in the goodwill impairment analysis is subject to similar judgments and estimates as described above for property and equipment and royalty interests.

Page 18

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

2. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Critical Accounting Judgments and Significant Estimates and Uncertainties (Continued)

c) | Exploration and Evaluation Assets

Recorded costs of exploration and evaluation assets are not intended to reflect present or future values of exploration and evaluation assets. The recorded costs are subject to measurement uncertainty and it is reasonably possible, based on existing knowledge, that a change in future conditions could require a material change in the recognized amount.

d) | Taxation

The Company’s accounting policy for taxation requires management’s judgment as to the types of arrangements considered to be a tax on income in contrast to an operating cost. Judgment is also required in assessing whether deferred tax assets and certain deferred tax liabilities are recognized on the statement of financial position.

Deferred tax assets, including those arising from unused tax losses, capital losses and temporary differences, are recognized only where it is considered probable that they will be recovered, which is dependent on the generation of sufficient future taxable profits. Deferred tax liabilities arising from temporary differences caused principally by the expected royalty revenues generated by the royalty property are recognized unless expected offsetting tax losses are sufficient to offset the taxable income and therefore, taxable income is not expected to occur in the foreseeable future. Assumptions about the generation of future taxable profits depend on management’s estimates of future cash flows. These depend on estimates of future production and sales volumes, commodity prices, and reserves. Judgments are also required about the application of income tax legislation in foreign jurisdictions. These judgments and assumptions are subject to risk and uncertainty, hence there is a possibility that changes in circumstances will alter expectations, which may impact the amount of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities recognized on the statement of financial position and the amount of other tax losses and temporary differences not yet recognized. In such circumstances, some or the entire carrying amount of recognized deferred tax assets and liabilities may require adjustment, resulting in a corresponding credit or charge to profit or loss.

Information about critical judgments in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, the following:

a) | Functional Currencies

The functional currency of each of the Company’s subsidiaries is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. Determination of the functional currency may involve certain judgments to determine the primary economic environment and the Company reconsiders the functional currency of its entities if there is a change in events and conditions, which determined the primary economic environment.

b) | Classification of investments as subsidiaries, joint ventures, associated company and portfolio investments

Classification of investments requires judgement as to whether the Company controls, has joint control of or significant influence over the strategic financial and operating decisions relating to the activity of the investee. In assessing the level of control or influence that the Company has over an investment, management considers ownership percentages, board representation as well as other relevant provisions in shareholder agreements. If an investor holds 20% or more of the voting power of the investee, it is presumed that the investor has significant influence, unless it can be clearly demonstrated that this is not the case. Conversely, if the investor holds less than 20% of the voting power of the investee, it is presumed that the investor does not have significant influence, unless such influence can be clearly demonstrated.

Page 19

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

3. INVESTMENTS

For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had the following investments:

|  |  |  |  | Accumulated |  |  |  |
December 31, 2017 |  | Cost |  |  | unrealized loss |  |  | Fair value |
Fair value through profit or loss |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Marketable securities | $ | 2,396,251 |  | $ | (1,256,804 | ) | $ | 1,139,447 |
Total Fair value through profit or loss |  | 2,396,251 |  |  | (1,256,804 | ) |  | 1,139,447 |
Available-for-sale |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Marketable securities |  | 2,287,141 |  |  | (87,942 | ) |  | 2,199,199 |
Total investments | $ | 4,683,392 |  | $ | (1,344,746 | ) | $ | 3,338,646 |

|  |  |  |  | Accumulated |  |  |  |
December 31, 2016 |  | Cost |  |  | unrealized loss |  |  | Fair value |
Fair value through profit or loss |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Marketable securities | $ | 1,641,751 |  | $ | (1,378,995 | ) | $ | 262,756 |
Total Fair value through profit or loss |  | 1,641,751 |  |  | (1,378,995 | ) |  | 262,756 |
Available-for-sale |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Marketable securities |  | 910,473 |  |  | (697,675 | ) |  | 212,798 |
Total investments | $ | 2,552,224 |  | $ | (2,076,670 | ) | $ | 475,554 |

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a loss of $Nil (2016 - $697,675) related to the permanent impairment of certain available-for-sale marketable securities. The Company had sustained significant unrealized losses for which there was no expectation of reversal in the forseable future.

4. RECEIVABLES

The Company’s receivables are related to the sale of foreign subsidiaries, royalty receivable, goods and services tax and harmonized sales taxes receivable from government taxation authorities, and recovery of exploration expenditures from joint venture partner.

As at December 31, 2017 and 2016, the current receivables were as follows:

Category |  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |
Sale of Akarca (Note 9) | $ | 2,447,595 |  | $ | 4,145,898 |
Royalty income receivable |  | 258,223 |  |  | 306,513 |
Refundable taxes |  | 151,163 |  |  | 142,857 |
Recoverable exploration expenditures and advances |  | 270,547 |  |  | 79,090 |
Other |  | 248,883 |  |  | 168,375 |
As at December 31, 2017 |  | 3,376,411 |  |  | 4,842,733 |
Less: Long term portion |  | - |  |  | (1,412,727 | )
Total | $ | 3,376,411 |  | $ | 3,430,006 |

Page 20

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

4. RECEIVABLES (Continued)

The carrying amounts of the Company’s current and non – current receivables are denominated in the following currencies:

Currency |  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |
Canadian Dollars | $ | 280,925 |  | $ | 48,448 |
US Dollars |  | 3,040,347 |  |  | 4,744,825 |
Turkish Lira |  | 24,535 |  |  | 41,785 |
Swedish Krona |  | 29,575 |  |  | 6,824 |
Other |  | 1,029 |  |  | 851 |
Total | $ | 3,376,411 |  | $ | 4,842,733 |

5. RESTRICTED CASH

At December 31, 2017, the Company classified $771,434 (2016 - $359,172) as restricted cash. This amount is comprised of $179,502 (2016 - $189,233) held as collateral for its corporate credit cards, $Nil (2016 - $65,706) held as a security deposit for the Company’s Haiti exploration program, and $591,932 (2016 – $104,233) cash held by wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company whose full amount is for use and credit to the Company’s exploration venture partners in USA pursuant to expenditure requirements for ongoing option agreements.

Page 21

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

During the year ended December 31, 2017 depreciation of $10,722 (2016 - $21,711; 2015 - $34,633) has been included in exploration expenditures.

|  | Computer |  |  | Field |  |  | Office |  |  | Vehicles |  |  | Building |  |  | Land |  |  | Total |
Cost |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
As at December 31, 2014 | $ | 91,713 |  | $ | 146,041 |  | $ | 6,635 |  | $ | 197,200 |  | $ | 572,443 |  | $ | 414,526 |  | $ | 1,428,558 |
Additions |  | 7,981 |  |  | 10,224 |  |  | 1,170 |  |  | 16,105 |  |  | 6,065 |  |  | - |  |  | 41,545 |
Disposals and derecognition |  | - |  |  | (2,152 | ) |  | (3,059 | ) |  | (165,888 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (171,099 | )
As at December 31, 2015 |  | 99,694 |  |  | 154,113 |  |  | 4,746 |  |  | 47,417 |  |  | 578,508 |  |  | 414,526 |  |  | 1,299,004 |
Additions |  | 10,549 |  |  | 6,450 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 16,999 |
Disposals and derecognition |  | - |  |  | (79,630 | ) |  | (2,365 | ) |  | (47,417 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (129,412 | )
As at December 31, 2016 |  | 110,243 |  |  | 80,933 |  |  | 2,381 |  |  | - |  |  | 578,508 |  |  | 414,526 |  |  | 1,186,591 |
Additions |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 20,447 |  |  | 4,337 |  |  | 24,784 |
Disposals and derecognition |  | - |  |  | (20,756 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (20,756 | )
As at December 31, 2017 | $ | 110,243 |  | $ | 60,177 |  | $ | 2,381 |  | $ | - |  | $ | 598,955 |  | $ | 418,863 |  | $ | 1,190,619 |
Accumulated depreciation |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
As at December 31, 2014 | $ | 91,713 |  | $ | 106,850 |  | $ | 3,958 |  | $ | 157,625 |  | $ | 317,183 |  | $ | - |  | $ | 677,329 |
Additions |  | 7,981 |  |  | 8,161 |  |  | 1,832 |  |  | 15,595 |  |  | 117,213 |  |  | - |  |  | 150,782 |
Disposals and derecognition |  | - |  |  | (1,680 | ) |  | (1,656 | ) |  | (140,231 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (143,567 | )
As at December 31, 2015 |  | 99,694 |  |  | 113,331 |  |  | 4,134 |  |  | 32,989 |  |  | 434,396 |  |  | - |  |  | 684,544 |
Additions |  | 7,438 |  |  | 12,601 |  |  | - |  |  | 671 |  |  | 115,490 |  |  | - |  |  | 136,200 |
Disposals and derecognition |  | - |  |  | (70,444 | ) |  | (1,753 | ) |  | (33,660 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (105,857 | )
As at December 31, 2016 |  | 107,132 |  |  | 55,488 |  |  | 2,381 |  |  | - |  |  | 549,886 |  |  | - |  |  | 714,887 |
Additions |  | 3,111 |  |  | 7,104 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 29,129 |  |  | - |  |  | 39,344 |
Disposals and derecognition |  | - |  |  | (13,890 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (13,890 | )
As at December 31, 2017 | $ | 110,243 |  | $ | 48,702 |  | $ | 2,381 |  | $ | - |  | $ | 579,015 |  | $ | - |  | $ | 740,341 |
Net book value |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
As at December 31, 2016 | $ | 3,111 |  | $ | 25,445 |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | 28,622 |  | $ | 414,526 |  | $ | 471,704 |
As at December 31, 2017 | $ | - |  | $ | 11,475 |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | 19,940 |  | $ | 418,863 |  | $ | 450,278 |

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company sold fully amortized equipment to an associated entity and recorded a gain on sale of $29,766 and a corresponding receivable due from the investment in the associated entity. The sale value of the equipment was determined to be market value. Included in gain (loss) on acquisition and sale of exploration and evaluation assets was field equipment in Australia with a book value of $6,866.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company sold certain foreign operations for a gain of $6,834,999. Included in this gain was property and equipment with a net book value of $23,555.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company acquired and sold certain exploration and evaluation assets for a net gain of $5,393,305. Included in this gain was the acquisition of property and equipment with a net book value of $7,013. Also, during the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company sold property and equipment with a net book value of $21,041 for total proceeds of $36,933 for a net gain of $15,892, and included in exploration and evaluation expenditures is a loss on disposal of property and equipment with a net book value of $6,490.

Page 22

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

7. NOTES RECEIVABLE

On February 5, 2015, the Company entered into a convertible loan agreement with IG Copper, LLC (“IGC”), an associated company of EMX (Note 8) allowing IGC to borrow up to a maximum of US$500,000. The loan carried an interest rate of 8% per annum and the full amount of the principal and interest was due January 3, 2017. The full US$ 500,000 had been drawn and during the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company entered into an amended and restated loan agreement with IGC such that the IGC Loan shall include any additional sums that were advanced by the Company to, or paid by the Company on behalf of IGC from time to time prior to January 3, 2017. As such, US$198,953 of expenses paid by the Company on behalf of IGC were added to the IGC Loan.

At any time prior to the maturity date, the Company had the right to convert all or any part of the outstanding amount of the loan into membership units at US$6.00 per unit. If IGC completed a financing at less than US$6.00 per unit, the conversion price will be adjusted to the price used in the financing. Each membership unit represents a single membership interest in IGC. Additionally, if subsequent to the date of the Amended Agreement, IGC completes a financing and, as part of that financing, issues warrants to purchase Units or other securities of IGC, then the Company shall be entitled, upon conversion of the IGC Loan and accrued and unpaid interest, to also receive warrants to purchase Units or other securities of IGC on the same terms as the warrants issued in such financing.

During fiscal 2016, the Company advanced an additional US$400,000. On August 15, 2016, the Company converted the full amount of the outstanding loan, US$1,184,511 inclusive of accrued interest of US$85,558, at US$5.00 per unit, which was the unit price of the most recently completed financing, into 236,902 membership units and 236,902 warrants of IGC.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued convertible notes to IGC allowing IGC to borrow up to US$750,000. The notes carried an interest rate of 8% per annum and the full amount of the principal and interest is due 12 months from the date of the note. The full US$750,000 was drawn. At any time prior to the maturity date, the Company had the right to convert all or any part of the principal sums and accrued interest into membership Units of IGC at US$5.00 per Unit. Each membership Unit consists of one Membership Interest and one warrant to purchase one Membership Interest for US$6.00 during a period of 12 months from the conversion date.

The notes receivable consisted of two components: the note receivable component and the equity conversion option. At initial recognition the fair value of the equity conversion option was estimated to be $79,220. The fair value of the note receivable component was estimated at $926,057. The note receivable component is accreted over its expected term using the effective interest method at an effective rate of approximately 18%. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded $51,877 of interest income, as well as a foreign exchange loss of $38,401. On November 30, 2017, the Company converted the full amount of the outstanding loans, $1,017,540 (US$789,967) inclusive of accrued interest of $51,877 (US$39,967), at US$5.00 per unit, which was the unit price of the most recently completed financing, into 157,993 membership units and 157,993 warrants of IGC.

On October 16, 2017, the Company issued notes receivable to Revelo Resources Corp., a related party by way of a common director for the principal amount of $400,000. The note was due on December 31, 2017, together with accrued interest at a rate of 1% per month and a bonus of $20,000. As at December 31, 2017, the balance owed to the Company pursuant to the note was $429,973 including accrued interest and bonus fee. The Company is negotiating the terms of repayment.

8. INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATED COMPANIES

The Company has a 41% (2016 – 39%; 2015 – 42%) equity investment in IGC. At December 31, 2017, including the conversion of convertible notes, cash purchases of shares, and interest on any balances due from IGC, the Company has invested an aggregate of US$11,354,977 towards its investment (2016 - US$8,967,010; 2015 - US$7,782,500). At December 31, 2017, the Company’s investment including dilution gains, less its share of accumulated equity losses was $7,578,989 (2016 - $4,992,823). The Company’s share of the net loss for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $994,548 (2016 - $1,295,568; 2015 - $1,062,146).

Page 23

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

8. INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATED COMPANIES (Continued)

The Company has a minority position on the Board of IGC, and does not control operational decisions. The Company’s judgment is that it has significant influence, but not control and accordingly equity accounting is appropriate.

As at December 31, 2017, associated companies’ aggregate assets, aggregate liabilities and net loss for the year ended are as follows:

December 31, 2017 |  | IGC |
Aggregate assets | $ | 6,127,735 |
Aggregate liabilities |  | (1,108,694 | )
Loss for the year |  | (2,713,490 | )
The Company's ownership % |  | 41% |
The Company's share of loss for the year |  | (994,548 | )

As at December 31, 2016, associated companies’ aggregate assets, aggregate liabilities and net loss for the year are as follows:

December 31, 2016 |  | IGC |
Aggregate assets | $ | 6,884,378 |
Aggregate liabilities |  | (1,471,260 | )
Loss for the year |  | (3,216,120 | )
The Company's ownership % |  | 39% |
The Company's share of loss for the year |  | (1,295,568 | )

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized a dilution gain of $503,543 (2016 - $982,634) related to the Company’s change in ownership percentage as a result of IGC’s share issuance for cash proceeds and loan conversions.

9. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS

Acquisition Costs

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company has capitalized the following acquisition costs on its exploration and evaluation assets:

Region | Properties |  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |
Asia Pacific | Various | $ | - |  | $ | 81,124 |
Sweden | Various |  | 16,671 |  |  | 16,671 |
| Viad royalties |  | 421,084 |  |  | 421,084 |
Turkey | Alankoy |  | 153,960 |  |  | 153,960 |
| Sisorta |  | - |  |  | - |
| Trab |  | 78,587 |  |  | 78,587 |
United States | Superior West, Arizona |  | 867,096 |  |  | 1,000,479 |
of America | Yerington, Nevada |  | 304,568 |  |  | 393,095 |
Total |  | $ | 1,841,966 |  | $ | 2,145,000 |

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company received a $133,383 (US$100,000) annual option payment related to an exploration and option to purchase agreement for the Superior West project with Kennecott Exploration Company (“Kennecott”). The Company also received the annual option payment related to an option agreement with Mason Resources Corp (“Mason”) for $88,527 (US$75,000) and applied against the Yerington project. Also during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company sold the wholly owned Australian subsidiary that held the Koonenberry licences in Australia. As part of the sale, the Company transferred the ownership of the Koonenberry property which had a capitalized cost of $81,124.

Page 24

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

9. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS (continued)

During the year ended Dececmber 31, 2016, the Company received a $129,820 (US$100,000) annual option payment related to an exploration and option to purchase agreement for the Superior West project with Kennecott Exploration Company (“Kennecott”) applied against the Superior West capitalized costs. Also during the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company sold its Sisorta project in Turkey and all capitalized costs were recovered.

During the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company wrote-off $56,085 of capitalized exploration costs related to the termination of a 1% net smelter returns royalty (“NSR”) agreement on one of its interests in Haiti.

Sweden and Norway Licenses

The Company holds certain exploration permits in Sweden and Norway. There are no specific spending commitments on the Swedish licenses and permits.

On February 14, 2017, the Company completed an agreement to sell certain wholly owned subsidiaries in Sweden previously announced in November 2016, to Boreal Metals Corp. (“BMC”)(TSX-V: BMX), a British Columbia corporation. Pursuant to the agreement BMC acquired two wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company that control the Gumsberg and Adak exploration assets in Sweden and the Tynset and Burfjord assets in Norway. In exchange for the transfer of its wholly-owned subsidiary Iekelvare AB, which owns the Gumsberg and Adak properties, and its entire interest in its wholly-owned subsidiary EMX Exploration Scandinavia AB, which owns the Tynset and Burfjord properties BMC must complete the following:

| • | BMC issued 1,713,390 common shares to EMX representing a 19.9% equity ownership in BMC. BMC had thecontinuing obligation to issue additional shares of BMC to EMX to maintain its 19.9% interest in Boreal, at no additional cost to EMX, until BMC raised CAD $5,000,000 in equity (completed). EMX now has the right to participate pro-rata in future financings at its own cost to maintain its 19.9% interest in Boreal.
| • | BMC also agreed to reimburse SEK 550,000 ($81,996, received) to the Company for license fees related to the Adak license.
| • | As part of the agreement, EMX will receive an uncapped 3% NSR royalty on each of the properties. Within five years of the closing date, BMC has the right to buy down up to 1% of the royalty on any given project by paying EMX US$2,500,000 in cash and shares of BMC. Such buy down is project specific.
| • | Additionally, EMX will receive annual advance royalty (“AAR”) payments of US$20,000 for each of the properties commencing on the second anniversary of the closing, with each AAR payment increasing by US$5,000 per year until reaching US$60,000 per year, except that BMC may forgo AAR payments on two of the four Properties in years two and three.
| • | EMX will also receive a 0.5% NSR royalty on any new mineral exploration projects generated by BMC in Sweden or Norway, excluding projects acquired from a third party containing a mineral resource or reserve or an existing mining operation. These royalties are not capped and not subject to a buy down.
| • | As part of the agreement, EMX also has the right to nominate one seat on the Board of Directors of BMC.

Pursuant to the sale agreement, the Company received 1,713,390 shares of BMC on signing and valued the shares received at $0.05 per share or $85,670, and paid a US$12,000 ($15,862) finders fee. Subsequent to signing, pursuant to equity and private placements completed by BMC, BMC issued EMX a further 7,492,492 shares to EMX valued at $1,290,998. Pursuant to the sale agreement, EMX has recorded a total gain on sale of $1,393,224. As at December 31, 2017, EMX held 9,205,882 shares of BMC representing approximately a 17.8% interest.

Page 25

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

9. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS (Continued)

Sweden and Norway Licenses (continued)

In December 2017, the Company executed an option agreement for the sale of the Slättberg licenses in Sweden to Sienna Resources Inc. (“Sienna”) (TSX-V: SIE). As part of the agreement, Sienna can earn a 100% interest in the project during a one-year option period by completing the following:

| • | On signing the agreement, Sienna issued EMX 3,000,000 common shares of Sienna stock valued at $750,000;
| • | As a condition to the exercise of the option, Sienna must undertake work commitments of at least $500,000 on the project, including drilling of at least 750 meters.
| • | Upon exercise of the option, issue to EMX an additional 3,000,000 common shares of Sienna, and EMX will receive a 3% NSR royalty on the project.
| • | After exercise of the option, Sienna will use commercially reasonable efforts to raise $3,000,000 for development of the project and other activities. Once Sienna has raised that amount, Sienna will issue an additional 4,000,000 common shares to EMX. Thereafter, EMX will have the right to participate pro-rata in future financings at its own cost to maintain its interest in Sienna.
| • | Within six years of the execution of the agreement, Sienna may purchase 0.5% of the NSR royalty for $1,500,000, leaving EMX with a 2.5% NSR royalty.

United States

Aguila de Cobre, Arizona

On July 30, 2015, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Bronco Creek Exploration Inc. (“BCE”), entered into an option agreement to sell the Aguila de Cobre property for a combination of cash payments and work commitments. The agreement grants Kennecott Exploration Company (“KEX”), part of the Rio Tinto Group, the option to acquire a 100% interest in the property.

During April 2016, KEX terminated its option to aquire the interest in the property.

Cathedral Well, Nevada

In June 2014, the Company signed an exploration and option agreement through its wholly-owned subsidiary BCE, with Ely Gold and Minerals Inc. (“Ely Gold”) (TSX Venture: ELY) to earn a 100% interest in the Cathedral Well project by paying EMX a total of US$100,000 over the next three years after which the Company will retain a 2.5% NSR royalty, inclusive of an underlying 0.5% NSR royalty. Ely Gold completed their earn-in for the property in November of 2016 through a trade with EMX, whereby a subsidiary of Ely Gold executed a quit claim deed for certain mining claims adjacent to EMX’s Spring Canyon property in Nevada in lieu of its last US$25,000 option payment. In December 2016, Ely Gold announced it had optioned the property to Colorado Resources Ltd. (TSX-V: CXO).

Hardshell Skarn, Arizona

The Company holds a 100% interest in the Hardshell Skarn property comprised of certain unpatented federal lode mining claims.

In October 2015, the Company signed an exploration and option agreement through its wholly-owned subsidiary FOBC LLC, with Arizona Mining Inc, to earn a 100% interest in the project by paying the Company a total of US$85,000 as follows: US$25,000 (received) upon execution of the agreement and US$60,000 (received) over the next three years. In 2017, Arizona Mining earned a 100% interest in the project under the agreement by accelerating and completing the required US$85,000 in cash payments. The Company now retains a 2% NSR. After exercise of the option, annual advanced royalty payments of US$5,000 commence on the first anniversary of the exercise of the option. After commencement of commercial production, the Company is due payments of US$5,000 or the royalty coming due that year, whichever is greater.

Page 26

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

9. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS (Continued)

United States (continued)

Greenwood Peak, Arizona

In November 2017, EMX executed an Option Agreement with a wholly owned subsidiary of Antofagasta plc (“Antofagasta”) (LSE: Anto) wherby Antofagasta can earn a 100% interest in the Greenwood Peak project by: a) reimbursing EMX’s acquisition costs and making annual option payments, together totaling US$630,000 ($30,000 received), and b) completing US$4,500,000 in work expenditures within the five year option period. Upon exercise of the option EMX will retain a 2% NSR royalty on the project, which is not capped and not subject to buy-down. After exercise of the option, annual advance royalty and milestone payments will be due to EMX.

Copper Springs, Copper King, and Red Top Properties, Arizona

In September 2013, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary BCE, entered into option agreements to sell the Copper Springs, Copper King, and Red Top projects for a combination of cash payments, work commitments, and common shares. The agreements grant Desert Star Resources Ltd. (“Desert Star”), a TSX-V listed company, the option to acquire a 100% interest in each of the projects.

Desert Star delivered 1,050,000 common shares of Desert Star and is required to incur a minimum of US$5,000,000 in exploration expenditures by the seventh anniversary of the signing date, and making additional milestone payments to the Company.

Copper Springs, Arizona

In January, 2015, Desert Star terminated its interest in the Copper Springs project and the Company regained 100% control of the project.

On February 25, 2017, through BCE, the Company executed an Option Agreement for Copper Springs with Anglo American Exploration (USA), Inc. (“Anglo American”). Anglo American can earn a 100% interest in the project by: a) reimbursing 2016 holding and permitting costs and making annual option payments, together totaling US$447,000 ($82,000 received), and b) completing US$5,000,000 in exploration expenditures before the fifth anniversary of the agreement. Upon exercise of the option, Anglo American will pay EMX an additional US$110,000 and EMX will retain a 2% NSR royalty on the project. The royalty is not capped or purchasable, except over two parcels of Arizona State Land where Anglo American can buy a 0.5% NSR royalty from EMX for US$2,000,000. After exercise of the option, annual advanced minimum royalty (“AMR”) payments and milestone payments will be due to EMX.

Copper King, Arizona

On September 1, 2014, and July 21, 2015 the Copper King agreement was amended, extending the 2nd anniversary payments and work commitments into 2016. On March 1, 2016, Desert Star terminated its option on the Copper King project. In October 2016, the Company, through BCE, entered into an option agreement to sell the Copper King property for a combination of cash payments and work commitments. The agreement grants Kennecott the option to acquire a 100% interest in the property.

Pursuant to the Agreement, Kennecott can earn a 100% interest in the Project by (a) reimbursing the 2016 holding costs and making option payments, together totaling US$504,314 (US$79,314 received), and (b) completing US$4,000,000 in exploration expenditures before the fifth anniversary of the Agreement Upon exercise of the option EMX will retain a 2% NSR royalty on the project which is not capped or purchasable.

After exercise of the option, AMR payments and milestone payments will be due to EMX.

Page 27

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

9. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS (Continued)

United States (continued)

Red Top, Arizona

On September 1, 2014, and July 31, 2015 the Red Top agreement was amended extending the 2nd anniversary payments and work commitments into 2016. In January 2017 Desert Star terminated its option on the Red Top project and returned 100% control of the project to BCE.

Buckhorn Creek and Frazier Creek Properties, Arizona and Nevada

In October 2013, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary BCE, entered into option agreements to sell the Frazier Canyon and Buckhorn Creek projects for a combination of cash payments, work commitments, and common shares. The agreements granted Savant Explorations Ltd. (“Savant”), a TSX-V listed company, the option to acquire a 100% interest in each of the projects.

On April 27, 2015, Savant terminated its option to acquire the Frazier Creek property and the Company relinquished all mineral rights on the Frazier Creek property. On September 24, 2015, Savant terminated its interest in the Buckhorn Creek property with the Company retaining 100% ownership of the property.

Superior West, Arizona

The Company holds a 100% interest in the mineral rights comprised of certain federal unpatented mining claims, located on Tonto National Forest lands and unpatented federal mining claims under option. The Company also may earn a 100% interest in additional adjacent claims under option from a third party for cash payments totaling US$1,000,000 on or before January 2017 and subject to a 2% NSR Royalty, 1% of which may be purchased for US$2,000,000 in 0.5% increments. The Company exercised the option in December 2016, and retains a 100% interest in the project.

On May 4, 2015, the Company entered into an exploration and option to purchase agreement, through its wholly owned subsidiary BCE, for the Superior West project with Kennecott. Pursuant to the agreement, Kennecott can earn a 100% interest in the project by making cash payment upon execution of the agreement of US$149,187 (received), and thereafter completing US$5,500,000 in exploration expenditures and paying annual option payments totaling US$1,000,000 (US $100,000 received in March 2016, and US$100,000 received in January 2017 ) before the fifth anniversary of the agreement. For the execution payment, US$50,000 ($52,500) was applied against the Superior West capitalized costs, and the balance of US$99,187 was a direct reimbursement to the Company for holding costs to maintain the property in good standing. Upon exercise of the option EMX will retain a 2% NSR royalty on the properties. Kennecott has the right to buy down 1% of the NSR royalty from underlying claim holders by payment of US$4,000,000 to EMX.

Kennecott has maintained or exceeded any minimum requirements for expenditures on the project and the agreement remains in good standing.

Mineral Hill, Wyoming

In October 2016, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary BCE, entered into an option agreement with Coeur Explorations, Inc., a subsidiary of Coeur Mining, Inc. (NYSE: CDE) (“Coeur”) to acquire a 100% interest in the property. The Company’s Mineral Hill project is held under a pooling agreement with a private group, Mineral Hill L.P. (“MHL”), with all proceeds split 50:50, except for the sale of surface rights associated with several patented mining claims.

Pursuant to the Agreement, Coeur may acquire a 100% interest in the Property by a) making yearly option payments, beginning upon execution of the Agreement, totaling US$435,000 (US$10,000 received upon execution, US$15,000 received in October 2017), b) making exploration expenditures totaling US$1,550,000 on or before the fifth anniversary of the agreement, and c) paying US$250,000 upon exercise of the option.

Page 28

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

9. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS (Continued)

United States (continued)

Upon exercise of the option, EMX and MHL will retain a 4% NSR royalty, of which Coeur may purchase up to 1.5% of the NSR royalty if, within sixty days after the completion of a PEA, Coeur purchases the first 0.5% for US$1,000,000. Coeur may purchase an additional 0.5% or 1% of the NSR royalty at any time thereafter for US$2,000,000 per 0.5% interest (maximum total buy down of 1.5%), with EMX and MHL retaining a 2.5% interest.

After the option exercise, EMX and MHL will receive annual advance minimum royalties of US$150,000 and, upon completion of a feasibility study, a milestone payment of US$1,000,000.

Ophir, Utah

In October 2016, the Company completed the sale of five patented mining claims comprising its Ophir property in Utah, through its wholly owned subsidiary Bullion Monarch Mining Inc., to Kennecott. The terms of the sale include a cash payment of US$75,000 (received) to EMX at closing, with the Company retaining a 2% NSR royalty on the property.

Yerington West, Nevada

The Yerington West property is comprised of certain unpatented federal mining claims located on lands administered by the BLM. Yerington West is under an Option Agreement, dated September 24, 2009 originally with Entrée Gold Inc. ("Entrée"), and now is with Mason Resources Corp. ("Mason") (TSX: MNR) as a result of a 2017 "spin out" whereby Entrée transferred the Ann Mason project, which includes EMX's Yerington West property, into Mason, a newly incorporated company.

Under the agreement, Mason can earn up to an 80% interest in the project by a) incurring expenditures of $1,000,000, making cash payments of $140,000, and issuing 85,000 shares within three years (completed by Entrée), b) making aggregate advance royalty payments totaling $375,000, being US$50,000 per year between the fifth and seventh anniversaries (received), and $75,000 per year between the eighth and tenth anniversaries ($75,000 received during the year ended Dececmber 31, 2017); and (c) delivering a feasibility study before the tenth anniversary of the agreement. Under the agreement, once earn-in has been completed, EMX can convert its interest to a 2.5% NSR. Mason has the option to buy down 1.5% of the NSR for US$4,500,000 million.

Various

The Company holds interests acquired by staking in several jurisdictions including Utah, Nevada, Arizona, Colorado and Wyoming.

Turkey

The Company has acquired numerous exploration licenses in Turkey for which there are no specific spending commitments.

Akarca Property

On June 20, 2013, the Company entered into an option agreement to sell its 100% interest in AES Madencilik A.S. ("AES Turkey"), a Turkish corporation that controls the Akarca property, for a combination of cash payments, gold bullion, work commitments, and a royalty interest to Çolakoglu, a privately owned Turkish company.

Colakoglu paid $350,000 and completed drilling requirements on the project and was required to pay additional amounts to earn its interest. In October, 2015, Çolakoglu advised EMX that it decided to forego exercising the option and the Company regained 100% control of the Akarca project.

Page 29

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

9. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS (Continued)

Turkey (continued)

Effective July 29, 2016, the Company entered into a share purchase agreement for the sale of AES Madencilik A.S. (“AES”), the wholly-owned EMX subsidiary that controls the Akarca gold-silver project in western Turkey, to Çiftay inşaat Taahhüt veTicaret A.Ş. ("Çiftay"), a privately owned Turkish company.

The terms of the sale provide payments to EMX as summarized below (gold payments can be made as gold bullion or the cash equivalent):

| • | US$2,000,000 cash payment ($2,630,760) to EMX upon closing of the sale (received);
| • | 500 ounces of gold every six months commencing February 2, 2017 up to a cumulative total of 7,000 ounces of gold. Received US$601,825 in February, 2017 and US$634,825 in July, 2017, and credited against accounts receivable. Receipt of these payments leaves a pre-production total of 6,000 ounces of gold (or the cash equivalent) to be paid to EMX.
| • | 7,000 ounces of gold within 30 days after the commencement of commercial production from the Property provided that prior gold payments will be credited against this payment;
| • | 250 ounces of gold upon production of 100,000 ounces of gold from the Property;
| • | 250 ounces of gold upon production of an aggregate of 500,000 ounces of gold from the Property;
| • | A sliding-scale royalty in the amount of the following percentages of production returns after certain deductions (“Royalty”) for ore mined from the Property:

| o | For gold production: 1.0% on the first 100,000 ounces of gold; 2.0% on the next 400,000 ounces of gold; 3.0% on all gold production in excess of 500,000 ounces produced from the Property, and;
| o | For all production other than gold production: 3.0%.

| • | The Royalty is uncapped and cannot be bought out or reduced.

In addition, Çiftay must conduct a drilling program of at least 3,000 meters on the Property during each 12-month period commencing on August 5, 2016 until commencement of commercial production.

Pursuant to the agreement, Çiftay has guaranteed the future payments of 2,500 ounces of gold, or cash equivalent. As at December 31, 2017, the Company has recorded a receivable of $2,447,595 (including $167,718 of accreted interest income) related to the guaranteed payments which was estimated using a valuation model that requires significant judgments and assumptions, including to future metal prices and discount rates. Included in the calculation for the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company used a long term gold price of US$1,332 per ounce and a discount rate of 6%.

The sale of AES resulted in a gain of $6,683,560, resulting from proceeds of $6,737,452, less the net assets of AES of $53,892 which is included in the gain on acquisition and sale of exploration and evaluation assets for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Subsequent to December 31, 2017, EMX received a payment of US$665,525 on February 5, 2018, as the cash equivalent to the third 500 ounce gold bullion payment to be made under the terms of the agreement.

Sisorta Property

On April 2, 2012, the Company and Chesser Resources Ltd (“Chesser”) executed an agreement to sell the Sisorta property to Çolakoglu Ticari Yatrim A.S. (“Çolakoglu”) for a combination of option payments and expenditure requirements. Çolakoglu terminated the option effective March 21, 2013, leaving Chesser and the Company with a 51% and 49% interest in the Sisorta project, respectively. Until March 2015, the Company accounted for its 49% interest as an Investment in Associated Company and had written down the value of the investment to $Nil due to the pick-up of its share of net losses in the associated company. On March 20, 2015, Chesser and the Company signed definitive agreements pursuant to which the Company acquired all of Chesser’s interest in the Sisorta project for a total purchase price of $156,800 (AUD$162,092). As a result of the purchase, the Company recorded a gain on acquisition of $26,407, and $131,440 of the purchase price was allocated to exploration and evaluation assets.

Page 30

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

9. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS (Continued)

Turkey (continued)

Effective July 1, 2016, the Company entered into a share purchase agreement for the sale of EBX Madencilik A.S. (“EBX”), a wholly-owned subsidiary that controlled the Sisorta gold property in Turkey, to Bahar Madencilik Sinayi ve Ticaret Ltd Sti ("Bahar"), a privately owned Turkish company.

The agreement provides for Bahar's staged payments to EMX as summarized below:

| • | US$250,000 cash payment ($332,969) to EMX upon closing of the sale (received).
| • | Annual cash payments of US$125,000 (received) beginning on July 1, 2017 until commencement of commercial production from the Property.
| • | 3.5% of production returns after certain deductions (“NSR Payment") for ore mined from the Property that is processed on-site (increased to 5% if the ore is processed off-site).
| • | The Advance Cash Payments will be credited at a rate of 80% against the NSR Payment payable after commercial production commences.
| • | The NSR Payment is uncapped and cannot be bought out or reduced.

Pursuant to the sale of Sisorta, during the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company paid a finders fee of US$48,740 ($63,549) and recorded a gain on the sale of EBX of $86,041 which is included in the gain (loss) on acquisition and sale of exploration and evaluation assets. The future annual cash payments are not accrued as there is no guarantee of payment, and the shares of EBX could be returned if the payments are not made.

Balya Property

EMX holds an uncapped 4% NSR royalty that it retained from the sale of the property to Dedeman Madencilik San ve Tic. A.S. ("Dedeman"), a privately owned Turkish company, in 2006. The Balya royalty due to EMX from 2016 production totaled US$154,299, from which Dedeman's earlier advance royalty payment of US$100,000 was credited, resulting in an adjusted payment to EMX of US$54,299 . Including applicable taxes in Turkey, $40,217 (US$30,762) has been included in royalty income. The AMR’s and net royalty payments have been included in Royalty income.

Golcuk Transfer and Royalty Agreement

On July 17, 2012, amended on January 29, 2013, and amended again by a second amending agreement dated as of November 8, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with Pasinex Resources Limited (“PRL”) to transfer a 100% interest in the Golcuk property in exchange for PRL issuing shares to the Company as follows,

| • | 500,000 PRL shares on the initial issuance date (received during the year ended December 31, 2013 and valued at $27,500 or $0.055 per share);
| • | An additional 500,000 PRL shares on or before the first anniversary of the initial issuance date (received during the year ended December 31, 2014 and valued at $25,000 or $0.05 per share);
| • | An additional 1,000,000 PRL shares on or before the second anniversary of the initial issuance date (received in February 2015 and valued at $115,000 or $0.115 per share); and,
| • | An additional 1,000,000 PRL Shares on or before the third anniversary of the initial issuance date (received in February 2016 and valued at $55,000 or $0.055 per share).

In addition to the transfer of shares, Pasinex will then pay the Company a 2.9% NSR royalty from production. Pasinex may pay the first minimum royalty payment by delivering 664,483 common shares in the capital of PRL to the Royalty Holder on or before November 30, 2016 (received valued at $79,738). Pasinex has the option of purchasing 0.9% of the royalty for US$1,000,000 prior to the 6th anniversary of the effective date of the agreement. In 2017 EMX received 224,150 shares of Pasinex and US$49,204 in cash for the advance royalty payment due in September, 2017.

Page 31

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

9. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS (Continued)

Turkey (continued)

Tumad Agreement - Trab-23

The Trab-23 property is located in northeast Turkey. In February 2013 Tumad Madencilik San.Ve TIC, A.S. (“Tumad”), executed an option agreement (the “Trab-23 Agreement”) to acquire Trab-23 from the Company. The Trab-23 Agreement provides an upfront transfer of the two licenses to Tumad, in-ground spending requirements, a revenue stream of annual earn-in and pre-production payments, and a revenue stream based upon production. The Trab-23 Agreement is contingent upon approval by Turkey’s General Directorate of Mining Affairs ("MIGEM") to combine the two licenses into a single exploitation license. This license combination and transfer occurred on September 11, 2014 (the “Transfer Date”). Provided that Tumad has made the payments and performed the work described in the Trab-23 Agreement, on or before September 11, 2017 Tumad may exercise its option to retain the property, and after such election, shall pay annual minimum royalties of US$100,000 commencing upon the first anniversary of such exercise. Upon production from the Trab-23 licenses, Tumad will pay the Company a 3% NSR royalty from production. The annual minimum royalties will be credited to 80% of the NSR royalty then payable.

Tumad's payment and drill requirements have not been met and Tumad terminated the agreement in 2017, and is currently in the process of returning the property to 100% EMX control.

Ferrite Agreement - Alankoy

On December 20, 2013, the Company signed an Exploration and Option Agreement (the “Alankoy Agreement”) with Ferrite Resources Ltd. (“Ferrite”), a privately-held Australian company, whereby Ferrite had the option to acquire the Company’s subsidiaries that hold the Alankoy project, with the Company retaining a 3% NSR. To do so, Ferrite paid US$35,000 upon signing and must expend at least US$200,000 on exploration activities each year for the three years after June 3, 2014 (the Effective Date). In addition, Ferrite is required to make annual deliveries of gold bullion to the Company as Advanced Annual Royalties (AARs) on each anniversary of the Effective Date.

In October 2015, Ferrite informed the Company they would not continue with the option agreement and paid to EMX US$25,000 ($33,205) related to reimbursement of expenditures owed by Ferrite.

Alankoy Property – Black Sea Copper & Gold Agreement

On November 23, 2015, the Company signed an Exploration and Option Agreement with Black Sea Copper & Gold Corp. (“Black Sea”), a privately-held British Columbia corporation, for the Alankoy copper-gold property in northwestern Turkey, whereby Black Sea has the option to acquire the Company’s subsidiaries that hold the Alankoy project, with the Company retaining a 3% production royalty. To do so, Black Sea paid US$25,000 (received $35,408 in January 2016) upon signing and must incur certain exploration expenditure milestones.

In February 2017, the Company received notification that 0955767 B.C Ltd (Formerly Black Sea) was terminating the Alankoy agreement and paid US$16,439 to EMX for reimbursement of costs. EMX has regained 100% control of the project.

Aktutan Property

EMX has a royalty interest in the Aktutan polymetallic project sold to Dedeman in 2007 for considerations that include a 4% uncapped NSR and annual advance royalty payments. During the year ended December 31, 2017, EMX received two advanced royalty payments on its Aktutan property for $261,473 (US$200,000) from Dedeman.

Page 32

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

9. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS (Continued)

Australia exploration licenses

The Company’s Australian properties are comprised of contiguous exploration licenses along the Koonenberry gold belt in New South Wales, Australia. The Australian properties are acquired either directly through staking or through agreements with license holders.

Koonenberry Property

In February 2014, the Company signed an exploration and option agreement with North Queensland Mining Pty Ltd. (“NQM”), a privately-held Australian company, giving NQM the right to acquire the Company’s Koonenberry exploration licenses in New South Wales, Australia. NQM will bear responsibility of satisfying all existing work commitments and honoring all underlying property agreements during the term of the agreement. NQM has the option to earn a 100% interest in the EMX subsidiary that holds the licenses, with EMX retaining a 3% production royalty.

In 2017, Koonenberry Gold Pty Ltd. (“KNB”) completed the earn-in requirements under the exploration and option Agreement between NQM and the Company, and elected to acquire EMX’s Koonenberry exploration licenses. KNB, a private Australian company, is the successor in interest to NQM under the agreement. The Company transferred its wholly-owned subsidiary, EMX Exploration Pty Ltd, the holder of the Koonenberry licenses, to KNB. EMX retains a 3% royalty on all future production from the Koonenberry licenses. As a result of this transaction, all of EMX’s interests in the Koonenberry gold project have now been converted to royalties. As a result of the sale, the Company recorded a loss of $87,987 being the capitalized costs of the Koonenberry property and field equipment with a book value of $6,866 transferred to KNB at the time of sale.

New Zealand exploration licenses

In September 2014, and amended in December 2015 the Company signed an option agreement with Land & Mineral Limited (“L&M”), a privately-held Australian company, giving L&M the right to acquire Hauraki Gold Ltd. (“Hauraki”), the wholly-owned EMX subsidiary that controls the Neavesville gold-silver property located in the Hauraki goldfield of New Zealand’s North Island. The purchase and sale agreement included an execution payment of $100,000 ($50,000 received on signing in 2015, and $50,000 received in May 2016, being the balance of the execution payment) and a series of anniversary and milestone payments equal to a certain amount of troy ounces of gold. Pursuant to the agreement, In September 2016, the Company received a $129,562 payment equivalent to a required payment of 75 troy ounces of gold.

Haiti exploration permits

Eurasian and joint venture partner Newmont Ventures Limited (“Newmont”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation (collectively, the “JV”), had the right to establish specific exploration areas along the trend of Haiti’s Massif du Nord mineral belt. Newmont was funding and managing six joint venture Designated Projects (“DP’s”) across the exploration areas. The Company’s work on the 100% controlled Grand Bois gold-copper project is outside of the JV with Newmont.

On November 2, 2015, the Company terminated the EMX –Newmont JV that covered the six designated exploration areas and sold its interest in Haiti to Newmont for a $5,277,542 (US$4,000,000) cash payment and a retained 0.5% NSR royalty interest.

Page 33

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

9. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS (Continued)

Exploration Expenditures

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company incurred the following exploration expenditures by projects, which were expensed as incurred:

|  | Scandinavia |  |  | USA |  |  | Turkey |  |  | Asia Pacific |  |  | Other |  |  | Total |
| Kennecott Exploration |  |  | Anglo American |  |  | Other USA |  |  | Total |  |  | New Zealand |  |  | Other |  |  | Total |
Administration Cost | $ | 67,159 |  | $ | 74 |  | $ | 292 |  | $ | 185,833 |  | $ | 186,199 |  | $ | 65,877 |  | $ | 40,765 |  | $ | 10,669 |  | $ | 51,434 |  | $ | 6,073 |  | $ | 376,742 |
Assays |  | 24,972 |  |  | 7,727 |  |  | - |  |  | 6,031 |  |  | 13,758 |  |  | 940 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 39,670 |
Drilling / Trenching |  | 13,509 |  |  | 370 |  |  | - |  |  | 89,142 |  |  | 89,512 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 103,021 |
Land and Legal |  | 73,870 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 198,126 |  |  | 198,126 |  |  | 23,062 |  |  | 3,511 |  |  | 15,334 |  |  | 18,845 |  |  | 9,534 |  |  | 323,437 |
Logistics |  | 26,040 |  |  | 8,326 |  |  | 6,168 |  |  | 187,423 |  |  | 201,917 |  |  | 1,379 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 229,336 |
Personnel |  | 566,367 |  |  | 35,565 |  |  | 18,052 |  |  | 1,593,930 |  |  | 1,647,547 |  |  | 175,649 |  |  | 13,606 |  |  | 106,659 |  |  | 120,265 |  |  | 44,619 |  |  | 2,554,447 |
Property Cost |  | 347,792 |  |  | 363 |  |  | 39,396 |  |  | 901,022 |  |  | 940,781 |  |  | 27,130 |  |  | 3,965 |  |  | 25,238 |  |  | 29,203 |  |  | - |  |  | 1,344,906 |
Professional Services |  | 77,768 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 6,498 |  |  | 6,498 |  |  | 93,506 |  |  | - |  |  | 72,497 |  |  | 72,497 |  |  | 27,180 |  |  | 277,449 |
Share Based Payments |  | 111,887 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 476,569 |  |  | 476,569 |  |  | 52,362 |  |  | 5,318 |  |  | 28,456 |  |  | 33,774 |  |  | 64,993 |  |  | 739,585 |
Technical Studies |  | 17,921 |  |  | 10,370 |  |  | - |  |  | 2,554 |  |  | 12,924 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 34,506 |  |  | 34,506 |  |  | 31,873 |  |  | 97,224 |
Travel |  | 118,904 |  |  | 735 |  |  | - |  |  | 104,249 |  |  | 104,984 |  |  | 11,584 |  |  | 1,567 |  |  | 6,844 |  |  | 8,411 |  |  | 4,419 |  |  | 248,302 |
Total Expenditures |  | 1,446,189 |  |  | 63,530 |  |  | 63,908 |  |  | 3,751,377 |  |  | 3,878,815 |  |  | 451,489 |  |  | 68,732 |  |  | 300,203 |  |  | 368,935 |  |  | 188,691 |  |  | 6,334,119 |
Recoveries |  | (239,088 | ) |  | (69,812 | ) |  | (167,690 | ) |  | (166,028 | ) |  | (403,530 | ) |  | (21,338 | ) |  | (26,434 | ) |  | (31,578 | ) |  | (58,012 | ) |  | - |  |  | (721,968 | )
Operator fees |  | - |  |  | (7,451 | ) |  | - |  |  | (22,319 | ) |  | (29,770 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (29,770 | )
Option Payments & Shares Received |  | (750,000 | ) |  | (64,901 | ) |  | - |  |  | (110,333 | ) |  | (175,234 | ) |  | (122,326 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (1,047,560 | )
Other Property Income |  | - |  |  | (2,090 | ) |  | (714 | ) |  | (55,594 | ) |  | (58,398 | ) |  | - |  |  | (5,349 | ) |  | - |  |  | (5,349 | ) |  | - |  |  | (63,747 | )
Total Recoveries |  | (989,088 | ) |  | (144,254 | ) |  | (168,404 | ) |  | (354,274 | ) |  | (666,932 | ) |  | (143,664 | ) |  | (31,783 | ) |  | (31,578 | ) |  | (63,361 | ) |  | - |  |  | (1,863,045 | )
Net Expenditures | $ | 457,101 |  | $ | (80,724 | ) | $ | (104,496 | ) | $ | 3,397,103 |  | $ | 3,211,883 |  | $ | 307,825 |  | $ | 36,949 |  | $ | 268,625 |  | $ | 305,574 |  | $ | 188,691 |  | $ | 4,471,074 |

During the year ended December 31, 2017, The Company:

| • | Received or accrued $239,088 in expenditures recovered from Boreal in Sweden;
| • | Received 3,000,000 common shares of Sienna valued at $750,000;
| • | Received a $65,368 (US$50,000) option payment related to an exploration and option to purchase agreement for the Copper King project with Kennecott;
| • | Received as part of the Copper Springs option agreement with Anglo American, US$ 82,000 ($106,436) as reimbursement of previously paid land holding costs; and
| • | Recorded an option payment from Pasinex pursuant to a property agreement on the Company’s Golcuk property for the equivalent to 75 ounces of gold in the form of $61,805 (US$49,204) cash and 224,150 shares of Pasinex valued at $60,521.

Page 34

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

9. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS (Continued)

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred the following exploration expenditures by projects, which were expensed as incurred:

|  | Scandinavia |  |  | USA |  |  | Turkey |  |  | Asia Pacific |  |  | Other |  |  | Total |
| Kennecott Exploration |  |  | Desert Star Resources |  |  | Other USA |  |  | Total |  |  | Akarca |  |  | Other |  |  | Total |  |  | New Zealand |  |  | Other |  |  | Total |
Administration Cost | $ | 37,498 |  | $ | 109 |  | $ | 25 |  | $ | 157,106 |  | $ | 157,240 |  | $ | 27,055 |  | $ | 92,397 |  | $ | 119,452 |  | $ | 2,220 |  | $ | 9,520 |  | $ | 11,740 |  | $ | 24,650 |  | $ | 350,580 |
Assays |  | 8,596 |  |  | 845 |  |  | - |  |  | 6,635 |  |  | 7,480 |  |  | 676 |  |  | - |  |  | 676 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 16,752 |
Drilling / Trenching |  | 76,687 |  |  | 314,972 |  |  | - |  |  | 91 |  |  | 315,063 |  |  | 44,283 |  |  | 14,679 |  |  | 58,962 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 450,712 |
Land and Legal |  | 48,632 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 182,160 |  |  | 182,160 |  |  | 39,603 |  |  | 160,831 |  |  | 200,434 |  |  | - |  |  | 23,778 |  |  | 23,778 |  |  | 40,384 |  |  | 495,388 |
Logistics |  | 14,535 |  |  | 57,164 |  |  | 1,822 |  |  | 70,590 |  |  | 129,576 |  |  | 13,810 |  |  | 5,708 |  |  | 19,518 |  |  | - |  |  | 9,155 |  |  | 9,155 |  |  | 5,282 |  |  | 178,066 |
Personnel |  | 195,223 |  |  | 118,679 |  |  | 12,676 |  |  | 1,420,907 |  |  | 1,552,262 |  |  | 297,586 |  |  | 264,527 |  |  | 562,113 |  |  | - |  |  | 99,751 |  |  | 99,751 |  |  | 171,881 |  |  | 2,581,230 |
Property Cost |  | 165,640 |  |  | 2,677 |  |  | 39,460 |  |  | 485,365 |  |  | 527,502 |  |  | 154,526 |  |  | 32,426 |  |  | 186,952 |  |  | 37,230 |  |  | 47,219 |  |  | 84,449 |  |  | - |  |  | 964,543 |
Professional Services |  | 135,527 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 13,664 |  |  | 13,664 |  |  | 61,577 |  |  | 22,029 |  |  | 83,606 |  |  | 496 |  |  | 1,772 |  |  | 2,268 |  |  | 17,625 |  |  | 252,690 |
Share Based Payments |  | 40,285 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 295,008 |  |  | 295,008 |  |  | 32,805 |  |  | 69,020 |  |  | 101,825 |  |  | - |  |  | 17,673 |  |  | 17,673 |  |  | 48,066 |  |  | 502,857 |
Technical Studies |  | 106,093 |  |  | 42,666 |  |  | - |  |  | 16,107 |  |  | 58,773 |  |  | 38,383 |  |  | 6,544 |  |  | 44,927 |  |  | - |  |  | 11,397 |  |  | 11,397 |  |  | 163,444 |  |  | 384,634 |
Travel |  | 63,571 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 103,478 |  |  | 103,478 |  |  | 16,310 |  |  | 31,479 |  |  | 47,789 |  |  | - |  |  | 6,861 |  |  | 6,861 |  |  | 16,382 |  |  | 238,081 |
Total Expenditures |  | 892,287 |  |  | 537,112 |  |  | 53,983 |  |  | 2,751,111 |  |  | 3,342,206 |  |  | 726,614 |  |  | 699,640 |  |  | 1,426,254 |  |  | 39,946 |  |  | 227,126 |  |  | 267,072 |  |  | 487,714 |  |  | 6,415,533 |
Recoveries |  | - |  |  | (555,217 | ) |  | (51,833 | ) |  | (21,938 | ) |  | (628,988 | ) |  | (43,550 | ) |  | - |  |  | (43,550 | ) |  | - |  |  | (48,781 | ) |  | (48,781 | ) |  | - |  |  | (721,319 | )
Operator fees |  | - |  |  | (56,271 | ) |  | (1,263 | ) |  | - |  |  | (57,534 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (57,534 | )
Option Payments * |  | - |  |  | (24,720 | ) |  | - |  |  | (125,890 | ) |  | (150,610 | ) |  | - |  |  | (170,146 | ) |  | (170,146 | ) |  | (180,476 | ) |  | - |  |  | (180,476 | ) |  | - |  |  | (501,232 | )
Other Property Income |  | - |  |  | (9,720 | ) |  | (265 | ) |  | (39,755 | ) |  | (49,740 | ) |  | - |  |  | (56,466 | ) |  | (56,466 | ) |  | (27,243 | ) |  | - |  |  | (27,243 | ) |  | (2,040 | ) |  | (135,489 | )
Total Recoveries |  | - |  |  | (645,928 | ) |  | (53,361 | ) |  | (187,583 | ) |  | (886,872 | ) |  | (43,550 | ) |  | (226,612 | ) |  | (270,162 | ) |  | (207,719 | ) |  | (48,781 | ) |  | (256,500 | ) |  | (2,040 | ) |  | (1,415,574 | )
Net Expenditures | $ | 892,287 |  | $ | (108,816 | ) | $ | 622 |  | $ | 2,563,528 |  | $ | 2,455,334 |  | $ | 683,064 |  | $ | 473,028 |  | $ | 1,156,092 |  | $ | (167,773 | ) | $ | 178,345 |  | $ | 10,572 |  | $ | 485,674 |  | $ | 4,999,959 |

*The Company received a $129,820 (US$100,000) annual option payment related to an exploration and option to purchase agreement for the Superior West project with Kennecott applied as to $105,100 to the Superior West capitalized costs, and $24,720 to exploration recoveries.

Significant components of “Other” total exploration expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2016 were Haiti - $148,455; Austria - $48,767; and other general exploration costs in Europe totalling - $146,159.

Page 35

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

9. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS (Continued)

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company incurred the following exploration expenditures by projects, which were expensed as incurred:

|  | Scandinavia |  |  | USA |  |  | Turkey |  |  | Asia Pacific |  |  | Other * |  |  | Total |
| Kennecott Exploration |  |  | Desert Star Resources |  |  | Other USA |  |  | Total |  |  | Akarca |  |  | Other |  |  | Total |  |  | New Zealand |  |  | Other |  |  | Total |
Administration Cost | $ | 61,523 |  | $ | 676 |  | $ | 1,271 |  | $ | 127,873 |  | $ | 129,820 |  | $ | 16,296 |  | $ | 43,532 |  | $ | 59,828 |  | $ | 4,767 |  | $ | 2,932 |  | $ | 7,699 |  | $ | 44,763 |  | $ | 303,633 |
Assays |  | 5,307 |  |  | 1,825 |  |  | 142 |  |  | 22,472 |  |  | 24,439 |  |  | - |  |  | 5,509 |  |  | 5,509 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 1,480 |  |  | 36,735 |
Drilling / Trenching |  | 11,874 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 7,111 |  |  | 7,111 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 18,985 |
Land and Legal |  | 39,518 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 132,178 |  |  | 132,178 |  |  | 23,208 |  |  | 45,957 |  |  | 69,165 |  |  | 4,914 |  |  | 10,136 |  |  | 15,050 |  |  | 31,480 |  |  | 287,391 |
Logistics |  | 26,978 |  |  | 32,211 |  |  | 2,646 |  |  | 98,391 |  |  | 133,248 |  |  | 12,014 |  |  | 40,408 |  |  | 52,422 |  |  | 499 |  |  | 4,475 |  |  | 4,974 |  |  | 48,472 |  |  | 266,094 |
Personnel |  | 423,697 |  |  | 154,004 |  |  | 24,500 |  |  | 1,261,865 |  |  | 1,440,369 |  |  | 205,665 |  |  | 561,082 |  |  | 766,747 |  |  | 45,557 |  |  | 101,586 |  |  | 147,143 |  |  | 201,162 |  |  | 2,979,118 |
Property Cost |  | 60,369 |  |  | 87,771 |  |  | 75,530 |  |  | 415,594 |  |  | 578,895 |  |  | 176,773 |  |  | 116,132 |  |  | 292,905 |  |  | 8,921 |  |  | 44,322 |  |  | 53,243 |  |  | 43,094 |  |  | 1,028,506 |
Professional Services |  | 86,874 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 13,813 |  |  | 13,813 |  |  | 42,381 |  |  | 117,062 |  |  | 159,443 |  |  | 28,938 |  |  | 10,410 |  |  | 39,348 |  |  | 161,232 |  |  | 460,710 |
Share Based Payments |  | 7,103 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 75,468 |  |  | 75,468 |  |  | - |  |  | 12,430 |  |  | 12,430 |  |  | - |  |  | (1,793 | ) |  | (1,793 | ) |  | (20,811 | ) |  | 72,397 |
Technical Studies |  | 28,083 |  |  | 77,485 |  |  | 5,151 |  |  | 68,265 |  |  | 150,901 |  |  | - |  |  | 17,183 |  |  | 17,183 |  |  | 3,508 |  |  | 25,407 |  |  | 28,915 |  |  | 112,739 |  |  | 337,821 |
Travel |  | 59,934 |  |  | 128 |  |  | - |  |  | 27,107 |  |  | 27,235 |  |  | - |  |  | 28,263 |  |  | 28,263 |  |  | 3,781 |  |  | 10,609 |  |  | 14,390 |  |  | 27,590 |  |  | 157,412 |
Total Expenditures |  | 811,260 |  |  | 354,100 |  |  | 109,240 |  |  | 2,250,137 |  |  | 2,713,477 |  |  | 476,337 |  |  | 987,558 |  |  | 1,463,895 |  |  | 100,885 |  |  | 208,084 |  |  | 308,969 |  |  | 651,201 |  |  | 5,948,802 |
Recoveries |  | - |  |  | (426,190 | ) |  | (118,065 | ) |  | (93,549 | ) |  | (637,804 | ) |  | (295,024 | ) |  | (33,305 | ) |  | (328,329 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (96,675 | ) |  | (1,062,808 | )
Operator fees |  | - |  |  | (44,067 | ) |  | (4,258 | ) |  | (9,457 | ) |  | (57,782 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (57,782 | )
Option Payments |  | - |  |  | (31,955 | ) |  | - |  |  | (127,820 | ) |  | (159,775 | ) |  | - |  |  | (242,820 | ) |  | (242,820 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (402,595 | )
Other Property Income |  | - |  |  | (13,102 | ) |  | - |  |  | (32,922 | ) |  | (46,024 | ) |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | (14,918 | ) |  | - |  |  | (14,918 | ) |  | - |  |  | (60,942 | )
Total Recoveries |  | - |  |  | (515,314 | ) |  | (122,323 | ) |  | (263,748 | ) |  | (901,385 | ) |  | (295,024 | ) |  | (276,125 | ) |  | (571,149 | ) |  | (14,918 | ) |  | - |  |  | (14,918 | ) |  | (96,675 | ) |  | (1,584,127 | )
Net Expenditures | $ | 811,260 |  | $ | (161,214 | ) | $ | (13,083 | ) | $ | 1,986,389 |  | $ | 1,812,092 |  | $ | 181,313 |  | $ | 711,433 |  | $ | 892,746 |  | $ | 85,967 |  | $ | 208,084 |  | $ | 294,051 |  | $ | 554,526 |  | $ | 4,364,675 |

*Significant components of “Other” total exploration expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2015 were Haiti - $359,827; Germany - $107,899; Austria - $69,667; and Russia - $32,137.

Page 36

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

10. ROYALTY INTEREST

Changes in royalty interest for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015:

Balance, December 31, 2014 | $ | 29,327,960 |
Adjusted for: |  |  |
Depletion |  | (1,716,848 | )
Impairment charge |  | (3,973,699 | )
Cumulative translation adjustments |  | 5,161,567 |
Balance, December 31, 2015 |  | 28,798,980 |
Adjusted for: |  |  |
Acquisition |  | 145,000 |
Depletion |  | (2,163,221 | )
Cumulative translation adjustments |  | (949,607 | )
Balance, December 31, 2016 |  | 25,831,152 |
Adjusted for: |  |  |
Depletion |  | (2,282,276 | )
Cumulative translation adjustments |  | (1,605,133 | )
Balance, December 31, 2017 | $ | 21,943,743 |

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company acquired a 2% NSR royalty on all precious metals and a 1% NSR royalty on all other minerals for the Maggie Creek property (non-producing) in Nevada, and a 1% NSR royalty on all minerals for the Afgan property (non-producing) in Nevada from Golden Predator US Holdings Corp, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Till Capital Ltd. (“TCL”). In consideration of the acquisition, the Company issued 250,000 of its common shares to TCL valued at $145,000.

Carlin Trend Royalty Claim Block

The Company holds an interest in the Carlin Trend Royalty Claim Block in Nevada which includes the following Royalty Properties:

Leeville Mine: Located in Eureka County, Nevada, the Company is receiving a continuing 1% gross smelter return royalty (“GSRR”).

East Ore Body Mine: Located in Eureka County, Nevada, the property is currently being mined and the Company is receiving a continuing 1% GSRR.

North Pipeline: Located in Lander County, Nevada. Should the property become producing, the Company will receive a production royalty of US$0.50 per yard of ore processed or 4% of net profit, whichever is greater.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, $2,857,927 (2016 - $2,227,322; 2015 - $1,609,553) in royalty income was included in operations offset by a 5% direct gold tax and depletion.

Impairment of Non-Current Assets

The Company’s policy for accounting for impairment of non-current assets is to use the higher of the estimates of fair value less cost of disposal of these assets or value in use. The Company uses valuation techniques that require significant judgments and assumptions, including those with respect to future production levels, future metal prices and discount rates.

Non-current assets are tested for impairment when events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company continuously reviews the production of gold from the Carlin Trend Royalty Claim Block, expected long term gold prices to be realized, foreign exchange, and interest rates. As a result, periodically the Company revises its estimated annual gold production over the expected mine life and adjusts it’s long term gold price. As a result of these adjustments, the Company recorded $Nil (2016 - $Nil, 2015 - $3,973,699) in impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2017 related to the Carlin Trend Royalty Claim Block.

Page 37

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

11. RECLAMATION BONDS

Reclamation bonds are held as security towards future exploration work and the related future potential cost of reclamation of the Company’s land and unproven mineral interests. Once reclamation of the properties is complete, the bonds will be returned to the Company.

|  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |
Australia - various properties | $ | - |  | $ | 67,694 |
Sweden - various properties |  | 12,625 |  |  | 8,043 |
Turkey - various properties |  | 5,669 |  |  | 26,362 |
U.S.A - various properties |  | 497,454 |  |  | 537,328 |
Total | $ | 515,748 |  | $ | 639,427 |

12. GOODWILL

The Company’s goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid during fiscal 2012 for the acquisition of Bullion Monarch Mining Inc. over the fair value of the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired.

Changes in goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015:

Balance, December 31, 2014 | $ | 8,217,542 |
Adjusted for: |  |  |
Impairment charge |  | (3,047,605 | )
Cumulative translation adjustment |  | 1,331,949 |
Balance, December 31, 2015 |  | 6,501,886 |
Adjusted for: |  |  |
Impairment charge |  | (1,518,328 | )
Cumulative translation adjustment |  | (230,234 | )
Balance, December 31, 2016 |  | 4,753,324 |
Adjusted for: |  |  |
Impairment charge |  | (2,709,239 | )
Cumulative translation adjustment |  | (223,778 | )
Balance, December 31, 2017 | $ | 1,820,307 |

The Company applies a one-step approach to determine if the Carlin Trend Royalty Claim Block and the related assets within the same Cash Generating Unit (“CGU”) are impaired (Note 10). The impairment loss is the amount by which the CGU’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. There was no impairment for the royalty interest and goodwill has been written down in conjunction with the decline of $2,709,239 (2016 - $1,518,328, 2015 - $3,047,605) of the related deferred income tax liability.

Page 38

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

13. ADVANCES FROM JOINT VENTURE PARTNERS

Advances from joint venture partners relate to unspent funds received pursuant to approved exploration programs by the Company and its joint venture partners. The Company’s advances from joint venture partners consist of the following:

|  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |
U.S.A. | $ | 808,905 |  | $ | 341,361 |
Total | $ | 808,905 |  | $ | 341,361 |

14. CAPITAL STOCK

Authorized

As at December 31, 2017, the authorized share capital of the Company was an unlimited number of common and preferred shares without par value.

Common Shares

During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company:

| • | Completed a non-brokered private placement raising $7,000,000 by the issuance of 5,000,000 units at a price of $1.40 per Unit. Each Unit was comprised of one common share and one-half of one non-transferable common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase an additional common share for $2.00 until April 12, 2019.
|  | The Company incurred share issue costs totaling $438,018. Included in this amount was 246,604 Units (6% of the Units sold to investors introduced by finders) valued at $345,246 and $92,772 in cash. The units paid as finders fees included the same terms as the private placement Units.
|  | The gross proceeds of the private placement were allocated using a residual value method with respect to the measurement of shares and warrants issued as private placement units. This resulted in $6,200,000 recorded as share capital and $800,000 being allocated to reserves. For the finders fees paid in Units, $305,789 was allocated to capital and $39,457 was allocated to reserves .
| • | Issued 75,000 (2016 - 165,000; 2015 - Nil) shares valued at $85,700 (2016 - $127,800; 2015 - $Nil) pursuant to the exercise of stock options.
| • | Issued 68,873 shares valued at $79,190 pursuant to employment and consulting agreements, of which the full amount has been included in exploration expenditures. Included in commitment to issue shares is $23,825 for accruals in exploration expenditures for shares approved to be issued pursuant to an employment and consulting agreement for shares issued in January 2018.
| • | Issued 245,000 (2016 - 140,000; 2015 – 163,000) shares valued at $279,300 (2016 - $166,600; 2015 – $233,950) pursuant to an incentive stock grant program to employees of the Company. The shares issued for 2016 and 2015 were applied against commitment to issue as they related to prior period accruals.
| • | Issued Nil (2016 - 250,000; 2015 – Nil) shares valued at $Nil (2016 - $145,000; 2015 - $Nil) pursuant to a purchase agreement for the Maggie Creek and Afgan royalties (Note 10).

Page 39

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

14. CAPITAL STOCK (Continued)

Stock Options

The Company adopted a stock option plan (the “Plan”) pursuant to the policies of the TSX-V. The maximum number of shares that may be reserved for issuance under the plan is limited to 10% of the issued common shares of the Company at any time. The vesting terms are determined at the time of the grant, subject to the terms of the plan.

During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the change in stock options outstanding is as follows:

|  |  |  |  | Weighted Average |
|  | Number |  |  | Exercise Price |
Balance as at December 31, 2014 |  | 5,493,200 |  | $ | 2.03 |
Granted |  | 1,341,500 |  |  | 0.66 |
Expired |  | (1,406,200 | ) |  | 2.12 |
Balance as at December 31, 2015 |  | 5,428,500 |  |  | 1.67 |
Granted |  | 1,277,500 |  |  | 1.30 |
Exercised |  | (165,000 | ) |  | 0.77 |
Expired |  | (1,729,500 | ) |  | 2.66 |
Balance as at December 31, 2016 |  | 4,811,500 |  |  | 1.24 |
Granted |  | 1,472,500 |  |  | 1.20 |
Exercised |  | (75,000 | ) |  | 1.14 |
Expired |  | (961,500 | ) |  | 1.97 |
Balance as at December 31, 2017 |  | 5,247,500 |  |  | 1.10 |
Number of options exercisable as at December 31, 2017 |  | 5,235,000 |  | $ | 1.10 |

The following table summarizes information about the stock options which were outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2017:

Date Granted |  | Number of Options |  |  | Exercisable |  |  | Exercise Price $ |  |  | Expiry Date |
April 25, 2014 |  | 1,290,500 |  |  | 1,290,500 |  |  | 1.20 |  |  | April 25, 2019 |
June 26, 2014 |  | 17,500 |  |  | 17,500 |  |  | 0.88 |  |  | June 26, 2019 |
December 22, 2014 |  | 60,000 |  |  | 60,000 |  |  | 0.87 |  |  | December 22, 2019 |
June 8, 2015 |  | 1,167,500 |  |  | 1,167,500 |  |  | 0.66 |  |  | June 8, 2020 |
October 18, 2016 |  | 1,239,500 |  |  | 1,239,500 |  |  | 1.30 |  |  | October 18, 2021 |
August 28, 2017* |  | 1,472,500 |  |  | 1,460,000 |  |  | 1.20 |  |  | August 28, 2022 |
Total |  | 5,247,500 |  |  | 5,235,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |

*25,000 Options granted for investor relations services vest 25% every 3 months from the date of grant.

The weighted average remaining useful life of stock options is 3.10 years (2016 – 2.92 years; 2015 – 3.56 years).

Restricted share units

In 2017, the Company introduced a long-term restricted share unit plan (“RSUs”). The RSU’s entitle employees, directors, or officers to common shares of the Company upon vesting based on vesting terms determined by the Company’s Board of Directors at the time of grant.

Page 40

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

14. CAPITAL STOCK (Continued)

Restricted share units (continued)

Expiry Date |  | December 31, 2016 |  |  | Granted |  |  | Vested |  |  | Expired/Cancelled |  |  | December 31, 2017 |
December 31, 2019 |  | - |  |  | 312,500 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 312,500 |

The total RSU share-based expense recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss was $27,575 for the year ended December 31, 2017. The RSU’s had a a fair value of $1.01 per unit on grant date.

Share-based Payments

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded aggregate share-based payments of $1,415,639 (2016 - $970,796; 2015 - $542,513) as they relate to the fair value of stock options granted or vested during the period, fair value of incentive stock grants, the fair value of RSU’s vested during the period, and the accrual for the fair value of stock granted. Share-based payments for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 are allocated to expense accounts as follow:

|  | General and |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Administrative |  |  | Exploration |  |  |  |
Year ended December 31, 2017 |  | Expenses |  |  | Expenditures |  |  | Total |
Shares issued for services | $ | 85,500 |  | $ | 272,990 |  | $ | 358,490 |
Commitment to issue shares |  | - |  |  | 23,825 |  |  | 23,825 |
RSU's vested |  | 27,575 |  |  | - |  |  | 27,575 |
Fair value of stock options granted |  | 562,979 |  |  | 442,770 |  |  | 1,005,749 |
| $ | 676,054 |  | $ | 739,585 |  | $ | 1,415,639 |

|  | General and |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Administrative |  |  | Exploration |  |  |  |
Year ended December 31, 2016 |  | Expenses |  |  | Expenditures |  |  | Total |
Commitment to issue shares | $ | 27,462 |  | $ | - |  | $ | 27,462 |
Fair value of stock options granted |  | 440,477 |  |  | 502,857 |  |  | 943,334 |
| $ | 467,939 |  | $ | 502,857 |  | $ | 970,796 |

|  | General and |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Administrative |  |  | Exploration |  |  |  |
Year ended December 31, 2015 |  | Expenses |  |  | Expenditures |  |  | Total |
Commitment to issue shares | $ | 100,233 |  | $ | (34,144 | ) | $ | 66,089 |
Fair value of stock options granted |  | 369,883 |  |  | 106,541 |  |  | 476,424 |
| $ | 100,233 |  | $ | (34,144 | ) | $ | 542,513 |

The weighted average fair value of the stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2017 was $0.70 per stock option (2016 - $0.74; 2015 - $0.36) . The fair value of stock options granted was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with weighted average assumptions as follows:

|  | Year ended |  |  | Year ended |  |  | Year ended |
|  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |  |  | December 31, 2015 |
Risk free interest rate |  | 1.53% |  |  | 0.73% |  |  | 1.02% |
Expected life (years) |  | 5 |  |  | 5 |  |  | 5 |
Expected volatility |  | 70.81% |  |  | 69.80% |  |  | 62.33% |
Dividend yield |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | - |

Page 41

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

14. CAPITAL STOCK (Continued)

Warrants

During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the change in warrants outstanding is as follow:

|  |  |  |  | Weighted Average |
|  | Number |  |  | Exercise Price |
Balance as at December 31, 2014 |  | 9,175,533 |  | $ | 4.56 |
Expired |  | (9,175,533 | ) |  | 4.56 |
Balance as at December 31, 2015 and 2016 |  | - |  |  | - |
Issued |  | 2,623,306 |  |  | 2.00 |
Balance as at December 31, 2017 |  | 2,623,306 |  | $ | 2.00 |

The following table summarizes information about the warrants which were outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2017:

|  | Number of Warrants |  |  | Exercise Price |  |  | Expiry Date |
Private placement, April 12, 2017 |  | 2,500,004 |  | $ | 2.00 |  |  | April 12, 2019 |
Finders warrants, April 12, 2017 |  | 123,302 |  | $ | 2.00 |  |  | April 12, 2019 |
Total |  | 2,623,306 |  |  |  |  |  |  |

15. INCOME TAXES

Deferred Income Tax Liability

The tax effects of temporary differences between amounts recorded in the Company’s accounts and the corresponding amounts as computed for income tax purposes gives rise to deferred tax liabities as follows:

|  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |  |  | December 31, 2015 |
Royalty interest | $ | (4,159,013 | ) | $ | (8,090,497 | ) | $ | (9,053,435 | )
Tax loss carryforwards |  | 2,261,886 |  |  | 3,212,368 |  |  | 2,433,008 |
Other |  | 76,820 |  |  | 124,805 |  |  | 118,541 |
| $ | (1,820,307 | ) | $ | (4,753,324 | ) | $ | (6,501,886 | )

As at December 31, 2017, no deferred tax assets are recognized on the following temporary differences as it is not probable that sufficient future taxable profit will be available to realize such assets:

|  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |  |  | December 31, 2015 |  |  | Expiry Date Range |
Tax loss carry forwards | $ | 42,094,000 |  | $ | 39,318,000 |  | $ | 37,728,000 |  |  | 2026-2037 |
Exploration and evaluation assets |  | 1,485,000 |  |  | 2,137,000 |  |  | 10,022,960 |  |  | No expiry |
Other | $ | 10,425,000 |  | $ | 11,371,000 |  | $ | 8,385,770 |  |  | No expiry |

Income Tax Expense

|  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |  |  | December 31, 2015 |
Current tax expense | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |
Deferred tax recovery |  | (2,489,902 | ) |  | (1,439,332 | ) |  | (3,431,230 | )
| $ | (2,489,902 | ) | $ | (1,439,332 | ) | $ | (3,431,230 | )

Page 42

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

15. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

The provision for income taxes differs from the amount calculated using the Canadian federal and provincial statutory income tax rates of 27.00% (2016 – 26%; 2015 – 26.00%) as follows:

|  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |  |  | December 31, 2015 |
Expected income tax (recovery) | $ | (2,569,654 | ) | $ | (886,149 | ) | $ | (2,679,842 | )
Effect of lower tax rates in foreign jurisdictions |  | (1,534,592 | ) |  | (474,971 | ) |  | (2,393,803 | )
Permanent differences |  | 1,007,427 |  |  | 1,010,562 |  |  | 2,594,459 |
Change in unrecognized deductible temporary differences and other |  | 260,595 |  |  | (1,428,442 | ) |  | (60,006 | )
Foreign exchange |  | 346,322 |  |  | 339,668 |  |  | (892,038 | )
| $ | (2,489,902 | ) | $ | (1,439,332 | ) | $ | (3,431,230 | )

In September 2017, the British Columbia (BC) Government proposed changes to the general corporate income tax rate to increase the rate from 11% to 12% effective January 1, 2018 and onwards. This change in tax rate was substantively enacted on October 26, 2017. The relevant deferred tax balances have been remeasured to reflect the increase in the Company's combined Federal and Provincial (BC) general corporate income tax rate from 26% to 27%.

In December 2017, the United States Government proposed changes to the Federal corporate income tax rate to reduce the rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018 and onwards. This change in tax rate was substantively enacted on December 22, 2017. The relevant deferred tax balances have been remeasured to reflect the decrease in the Company's Federal income tax rate from 35% to 21% applicable to the Company's US subsidiaries.

16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The aggregate value of transactions and outstanding balances relating to key management personnel were as follows:

|  |  |  |  | Share-based |  |  |  |
For the year ended December 31, 2017 |  | Salary or Fees |  |  | Payments |  |  | Total |
Management | $ | 733,244 |  | $ | 361,865 |  | $ | 1,095,109 |
Outside directors * |  | 149,882 |  |  | 226,614 |  |  | 376,496 |
Seabord Services Corp. |  | 357,600 |  |  | - |  |  | 357,600 |
Total | $ | 1,240,726 |  | $ | 588,479 |  | $ | 1,829,205 |

|  |  |  |  | Share-based |  |  |  |
For the year ended December 31, 2016 |  | Salary or Fees |  |  | Payments |  |  | Total |
Management | $ | 803,033 |  | $ | 215,933 |  | $ | 1,018,966 |
Outside directors * |  | 151,228 |  |  | 167,534.00 |  |  | 318,762 |
Seabord Services Corp. |  | 357,600 |  |  | - |  |  | 357,600 |
Total | $ | 1,311,861 |  | $ | 383,467 |  | $ | 1,695,328 |

|  |  |  |  | Share-based |  |  |  |
For the year ended December 31, 2015 |  | Salary or Fees |  |  | Payments |  |  | Total |
Management | $ | 1,067,210 |  | $ | 108,637 |  | $ | 1,175,847 |
Outside directors * |  | 158,257 |  |  | 79,898 |  |  | 238,155 |
Seabord Services Corp. |  | 413,700 |  |  | - |  |  | 413,700 |
Total | $ | 1,639,167 |  | $ | 188,535 |  | $ | 1,827,702 |

* Directors fees include US$5,000 per month paid to the Company’s non-Executive Chairman, who does not receive the fees paid to the other independent director’s.

Page 43

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Continued)

Seabord Services Corp. (“Seabord”) is a management services company controlled by the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. Seabord provides a Chief Financial Officer, a Corporate Secretary, accounting and administration staff, and office space to the Company. The Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary are employees of Seabord and are not paid directly by the Company.

Included in the table above for the year ended December 31, 2015 is $247,660 in termination payments to a former officer of the Company. The amount has been included in Other expenses for that year.

Included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities at December 31, 2017 is $7,177 (2016 - $5,913) owed to key management personnel and $23,568 (2016 - $17,559) to other related parties. By way of a common director, included in Notes receivable (Note 7) are certain balances owing from a related party.

17. SEGMENTED INFORMATION

The Company operates within the resource industry. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had equipment and exploration and evaluation assets located geographically as follows:

EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS |  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |
Asia Pacific | $ | - |  | $ | 81,124 |
Sweden |  | 437,755 |  |  | 437,755 |
Turkey |  | 232,547 |  |  | 232,547 |
U.S.A |  | 1,171,664 |  |  | 1,393,574 |
Total | $ | 1,841,966 |  | $ | 2,145,000 |

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |
Asia Pacific | $ | - |  | $ | 8,376 |
Haiti |  | - |  |  | - |
Sweden |  | 26,159 |  |  | 3,110 |
Turkey |  | - |  |  | 1,091 |
U.S.A |  | 424,119 |  |  | 459,127 |
Total | $ | 450,278 |  | $ | 471,704 |

The Company’s royalty interest, goodwill, deferred income tax liability and royalty income and depletion are from a CGU located in the U.S.A, except for a $200,000 royalty interest held in Serbia.

18. RISK AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT: FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company considers items included in shareholders’ equity as capital. The Company’s objective when managing capital is to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, so that it can continue to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders.

As at December 31, 2017, the Company had working capital of $6,535,893 (2016 - $6,002,318). The Company has continuing royalty income that will vary depending on royalty ounces received, the price of gold, and foreign exchange rates on US royalty payments. The Company manages the capital structure and makes adjustments in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. The Company estimates it will need additional financing within the next 12 months to undertake it’s current business plan. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may issue new shares through public and/or private placements, sell assets, or return capital to shareholders. The Company is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements.

Page 44

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

18. RISK AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT: FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued)

Fair Value

The Company characterizes inputs used in determining fair value using a hierarchy that prioritizes inputs depending on the degree to which they are observable. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

| • | Level 1: inputs represent quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Active markets are those in which transactions occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
| • | Level 2: inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 valuations are based on inputs, including quoted forward prices for commodities, market interest rates, and volatility factors, which can be observed or corroborated in the market place.
| • | Level 3: inputs that are less observable, unavoidable or where the observable data does not support the majority of the instruments’ fair value.

As at December 31, 2017, there were no changes in the levels in comparison to December 31, 2016. Financial instruments measured at fair value on the statement of financial position are summarized in levels of the fair value hierarchy as follows:

Assets |  | Level 1 |  |  | Level 2 |  |  | Level 3 |  |  | Total |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 3,533,611 |  | $ | - |  | $ | - |  | $ | 3,533,611 |
Restricted cash |  | 771,434 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 771,434 |
Fair value through profit or loss investments |  | 1,139,447 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 1,139,447 |
Strategic investments |  | 2,199,199 |  |  | - |  |  | - |  |  | 2,199,199 |
Accounts receivable |  | - |  |  | 3,376,411 |  |  | - |  |  | 3,376,411 |
Total | $ | 7,643,691 |  | $ | 3,376,411 |  | $ | - |  | $ | 11,020,102 |

The carrying value of receivables (excluding the receivable related to the sale of certain Turkish subsidiaries in the year ended December 31, 2016), notes receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and advances from joint venture partners approximate their fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

Accounts receivable, including both long and current portions related to the sale of certain Turkish subsidiaries in the year ended December 31, 2016 were valued using a pricing model which require a variety of inputs, such as expected gold prices and foreign exchange rates. Included in the calculation for the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company used a long term gold price of US$ 1,332 per ounce and a discount rate of 6%. These receivables are valued using observable market commodity prices and thereby classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Company’s financial instruments are exposed to certain financial risks, including credit risk, interest rate risk, market risk, liquidity risk and currency risk.

Credit Risk

The Company is exposed to credit risk by holding cash and cash equivalents and receivables. This risk is minimized by holding a significant portion of the funds in Canadian banks. The Company’s exposure with respect to its receivables is primarily related to royalty streams, recovery of exploration evaluation costs, and the sale of AES (Note 9).

Interest Rate Risk

The Company is exposed to interest rate risk because of fluctuating interest rates. Management believes the interest rate risk is low given interest rates on promissory notes is fixed and the current low global interest rate environment. Fluctuations in market rates is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s operations due to the short term to maturity and no penalty cashable feature of its cash equivalents.

Page 45

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

18. RISK AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT: FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued)

Market Risk

The Company is exposed to market risk because of the fluctuating values of its publicly traded marketable securities and other company investments. The Company has no control over these fluctuations and does not hedge its investments. Based on the December 31, 2017 portfolio values, a 10% increase or decrease in effective market values would increase or decrease net shareholders’ equity by approximately $334,000.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company is unable to meet its financial obligations as they come due. The Company manages this risk by careful management of its working capital to ensure the Company’s expenditures will not exceed available resources.

Commodity Risk

The Company’s royalty revenues are derived from a royalty interest and are based on the extraction and sale of precious and base minerals and metals. Factors beyond the control of the Company may affect the marketability of metals discovered. Metal prices have historically fluctuated widely. Consequently, the economic viability of the Company’s royalty interests cannot be accurately predicted and may be adversely affected by fluctuations in mineral prices.

Currency Risk

Foreign exchange risk arises when future commercial transactions and recognized assets and liabilities are denominated in a currency that is not the entity’s functional currency. The Company operates in Canada, Turkey, Sweden, Australia and the U.S.A. The Company funds cash calls to its subsidiary companies outside of Canada in US dollars and a portion of its expenditures are also incurred in local currencies.

The exposure of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, convertible notes receivable, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities to foreign exchange risk as at December 31, 2017 is as follows:

Accounts |  | US dollars |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,286,117 |
Restricted cash |  | 615,636 |
Receivables |  | 2,442,545 |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  | (446,604 | )
Advances from joint venture partners |  | (644,497 | )
Net exposure |  | 4,253,198 |
Canadian dollar equivalent | $ | 5,338,027 |

The balances noted above reflect the US dollar balances held within the parent company and any wholly owned subsidiaries. Balances denominated in another currency other than the functional currency held in foreign operations are considered immaterial.

Based on the above net exposure as at December 31, 2017, and assuming that all other variables remain constant, a 10% depreciation or appreciation of the Canadian dollar against the US dollar would result in an increase/decrease of approximately $534,000 in the Company’s pre-tax profit or loss.

Page 46

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

19. SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE WITH RESPECT TO CASH FLOWS

|  | December 31, 2017 |  |  | December 31, 2016 |  |  | December 31, 2015 |
Cash | $ | 3,354,109 |  | $ | 3,132,480 |  | $ | 5,365,271 |
Short-term deposits |  | 179,502 |  |  | 67,206 |  |  | 269,330 |
Total | $ | 3,533,611 |  | $ | 3,199,686 |  | $ | 5,634,601 |

The significant non-cash investing and financing transactions during the year ended December 31, 2017 included:

| a. | Recorded a gain through accumulated other comprehensive income of $609,733 related to the fair value adjustments on AFS financial instruments;
| b. | Adjusted non-current assets and liabilities for $1,424,814 related to cumulative translation adjustments (“CTA”), of which $1,605,133 relates to CTA loss on royalty interest, $223,778 relates to CTA loss on goodwill, $443,115 relates to a CTA gain on deferred tax liability and $39,018 relates to CTA loss in the net assets of a subsidiary with a functional currency different from the presentation currency;
| c. | Reclass of reserves on exercise of options for $45,545;
| d. | Recorded the movement of $1,017,540 from a convertible loan to an investment in associated company upon conversion of the loan (Note 8); and
| e. | Recorded through reserves $39,457 related to the value of warrants issued as finders fees as part of a private placement (Note 14).

The significant non-cash investing and financing transactions during the year ended December 31, 2016 included:

| a. | Recorded a gain through accumulated other comprehensive income of $88,515 related to the fair value adjustments on AFS financial instruments;
| b. | Issuance of 140,000 incentive stock grants valued at $166,600 applied to commitment to issue shares;
| c. | Adjusted reserves and investment in associated companies for $366,800 related to share-based payments made by an associated company;
| d. | Adjusted non-current assets and liabilities for $862,335 related to cumulative translation adjustments (“CTA”), of which $949,607 relates to CTA loss on royalty interest, $230,234 relates to CTA loss on goodwill, $309,230 relates to a CTA gain on deferred tax liability and $8,276 relates to CTA gain in the net assets of a subsidiary with a functional currency different from the presentation currency; and
| e. | Recorded the movement of $1,605,466 from a convertible loan to an investment in associated company upon conversion of the loan (Note 8).

The significant non-cash investing and financing transactions during the year ended December 31, 2015 included:

| a. | Recorded a loss through accumulated other comprehensive income of $105,714 related to the fair value adjustments on available-for-sale (“AFS”) financial instruments;
| b. | Issuance of 163,000 bonus shares valued at $233,950 applied to commitment to issue shares;
| c. | Adjusted reserves and investment in associated companies for $322,900 related to share-based payments made by an associated company; and
| d. | Adjusted non-current assets and liabilities for $4,350,667 related to cumulative translation adjustments (“CTA”), of which $5,161,567, relates to CTA gain on royalty interest, $1,331,949 relates to CTA gain on goodwill, $1,715,574 relates to a CTA loss on deferred tax liability and $427,275 relates to a CTA loss in the net liabilities of a subsidiary with a functional currency different from the presentation currency.

Page 47

EMX ROYALTY CORPORATION (FORMERLY EURASIAN MINERALS INC.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

20. EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO THE REPORTING DATE

Subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company,

Sweden

a) | executed a definitive agreement for the sale of the Guldgruvan cobalt project to Boreal Energy Metals Corporation (“BEMC”), subsidiary of BMC in southern Norway. Pursuant to the agreement, BEMC will acquire 100% interest in the project according to the following terms (all dollar amounts in USD):

| • | At closing, BEMC will issue to EMX that number of common shares of BEMC that represents a 5.9% equity ownership in BEMC. BEMC will have the continuing obligation to issue additional shares of BEMC to EMX to maintain its 5.9% interest, at no additional cost to EMX, until BEMC has raised $3,000,000 in equity. Thereafter, EMX will have the right to participate pro-rata in future financings at its own cost to maintain its 5.9% interest in BEMC.
| • | At closing, EMX will transfer its Guldgruvan exploration licenses to BEMC.
| • | EMX will retain a 3% NSR royalty on the Project, of which 1% may be purchased by BEMC on or before the fifth anniversary of the closing date in 0.5% increments for a total of $2,500,000 in cash and common shares of BEMC stock.
| • | EMX will receive AAR payments, with an initial $20,000 payment, commencing on the second anniversary of the closing, with each subsequent AAR payment increasing by $5,000 per year until reaching $60,000 per year. Once reaching $60,000, AAR payments will be adjusted each year according to the Consumer Price Index (as published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics).

b) | amended the sale agreement with BMC (Note 9) to include the Modum project in Norway in exchange for an additional 1,324,181 common shares of BMC. EMX now holds 10,530,063 common shares of BMC representing 19.9% of the outstanding common shares.

Buckhorn Creek Property

c) | executed an Option Agreement with Kennecott whereby Kennecott can earn a 100% interest in the project by: a) making annual option payments totaling US$550,000, and b) completing US$4,500,000 in exploration expenditures before the fifth anniversary of the agreement. Upon exercise of the option, EMX will retain a 2% NSR royalty on the project which is not capped or purchasable. After exercise of the option, annual advance minimum payments and milestone payments will be due to EMX.

Turkey

d) | received a payment of US$665,525 on February 5, 2018, as the cash equivalent to the third 500 ounce gold bullion payment to be made under the terms of the agreement (Note 10).

Page 48