XML 49 R40.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.1
Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2023
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Off-Balance Sheet Commitments

Off-balance sheet commitments consist of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

March 31,
2023

 

 

December 31,
2022

 

Commitments to extend credit

 

$

1,326,003

 

 

$

1,435,323

 

Standby letters of credit

 

 

15,576

 

 

 

17,181

 

Schedule of Credit Loss Expense Benefit for Unfunded Commitments The credit loss expense for unfunded commitments was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three months ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Credit loss expense for unfunded commitments

 

$

11

 

 

$

241

 

 

(14.) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

Contingent Liabilities and Litigation

In the ordinary course of business, there are various threatened and pending legal proceedings against the Company. Management believes that the aggregate liability, if any, arising from such litigation, except for the matter described below, would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

As previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 as filed with the SEC on March 9, 2023 and as disclosed in Part II, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company is party to an action filed against it on May 16, 2017 by Matthew L. Chipego, Charlene Mowry, Constance C. Churchill and Joseph W. Ewing in the Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Plaintiffs sought and were granted class certification to represent classes of consumers in New York and Pennsylvania seeking to recover statutory damages, interest and declaratory relief. The plaintiffs specifically claim that the notices the Bank sent to defaulting consumers after their vehicles were repossessed did not comply with the relevant portions of the Uniform Commercial Code in New York and Pennsylvania. The Company disputes and believes it has meritorious defenses against these claims and plans to vigorously defend itself.

On September 30, 2021, the Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and certified four different classes (two classes of New York consumers and two classes of Pennsylvania consumers). There are approximately 5,200 members in the New York classes and 300 members in the Pennsylvania classes.

On September 26, 2022, the lower Court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment for most of the relief they seek and found that there were questions of fact as to whether the members of the class had purchased the subject vehicles for “consumer use” within the meaning of the relevant statutes. The Court also denied the Company’s motion for partial summary judgment and seeking an offset in the form of recoupment reducing any liability that may be imposed against the Company by the amounts that the borrowers owe for failing to repay their motor vehicle loans, determining that the Court could not enter a judgment on recoupment – which is a set off from liability – without first determining whether there was liability. Also pending with the lower Court is the Company’s motion to compel discovery.

On October 7, 2022, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania granted the Company’s December 20, 2021 Request for an Interlocutory Appeal of the denial of the Company’s motion to dismiss the claims brought by New York borrowers for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and lack of standing. The case is stayed until the appeal is decided by the Superior Court.

The Company has not accrued a contingent liability for this matter at this time because, given its defenses, it is unable to conclude whether a liability is probable to occur nor is it able to currently reasonably estimate the amount of potential loss.

If the Company settles these claims or the action is not resolved in its favor, the Company may suffer reputational damage and incur legal costs, settlements or judgments that exceed the amounts covered by its insurer. The Company can provide no assurances that its insurer will cover the full legal costs, settlements or judgments it incurs. If the Company is unsuccessful in defending itself from these claims or if its insurer does not cover the full amount of legal costs it incurs, the result may materially adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.