<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.77E LEGAL
<SEQUENCE>3
<FILENAME>dex9977e.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.77E
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                                                                   SUB-ITEM 77E

                               LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
                 INVESCO TRUST FOR INVESTMENT GRADE MUNICIPALS

   A shareholder demand letter dated August 6, 2010, contains allegations that
the Board and certain individuals breached their fiduciary duties to the
Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals and wasted Trust assets by
causing the Trust to redeem Auction Rate Preferred Securities (ARPS) at par
value at the expense of the Trust and common shareholders. The shareholders
claimed that the Trust was not obliged to provide liquidity to preferred
shareholders, the redemptions were improperly motivated to benefit the Adviser,
and the market value and fair value of the ARPS were less than par at the time
they were redeemed. The shareholders demand that 1) the Board take action
against the Adviser and the individuals named to recover damages and 2) the
Board refrain from authorizing further redemptions of repurchases of ARPS by
the Trust at prices in excess of fair value or market value at the time of the
transaction. According to the demand letter, if the Trust does not take
appropriate action, the shareholders will commence a shareholder derivative
action on behalf of the Trust. The Board formed a Special Litigation Committee
("SLC") to investigate these claims and to make a recommendation to the Board
regarding whether pursuit of these claims is in the best interests of the
Trusts. Upon completion of its evaluation, the SLC recommended that the Board
reject the demands specified in the shareholder demand letters, after which the
Board publicly announced on June 24, 2011, that it had adopted the SLC's
recommendation and voted to reject the demands.

   The Trust received a different shareholder demand letter on July 5, 2011
regarding similar allegations. An original derivative shareholder complaint was
filed by common shareholders on behalf of Invesco Trust for Investment Grade
Municipals and was served on October 3, 2011 in Averbuch v. Arch. The complaint
contained allegations that certain Trustees, Van Kampen Asset Management, and
Morgan Stanley (collectively, "Defendants") breached their fiduciary duties by
wasting Trust assets. More specifically, the Plaintiff alleged that the
Defendants caused the Trust to redeem Auction Rate Preferred Securities
("ARPS") at their liquidation value, which was allegedly higher than market
value. The Plaintiff further contended that the redemption was at the expense
of the Trust and its common shareholders, unfairly benefitted preferred
shareholders and Defendants, unjustly enriched Defendants, and was financed by
the sale of Trust assets. Additionally, the Plaintiff claimed that the ARPS
were replaced with less favorable financing. The Plaintiffs seek 1)
declarations that the Defendants breached their fiduciary duties and were
unjustly enriched; 2) an injunction against the advisors from serving as
advisor to the Trust and collecting fees; 3) an injunction against individual
Defendants from further breaches of fiduciary duties; and 4) monetary relief,
expenses, and punitive damages. The Board informed Plaintiffs of the existing
Special Litigation Committee ("SLC") and its investigation into the Trust's
redemption of ARPS. On August 30, 2011, a quorum of the Independent Trustees
adopted the SLC's recommendation and voted to reject the plaintiffs July 2011
demands underlying the Complaint. After the Plaintiffs filed an amended
complaint, the Trust filed a motion to dismiss on April 1, 2013. On August 27,
2013 the motion to dismiss was granted with prejudice. On September 25, 2013,
the Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal.

   Management of Invesco and the Trust believe that the outcome of the
proceedings described above will not have a material adverse effect on the
Trust or on the ability of Invesco to provide ongoing services to the Trust.
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
