<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.77E
<SEQUENCE>3
<FILENAME>d707864dex9977e.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.77E
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                                                                   SUB-ITEM 77E

                               LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

                 INVESCO TRUST FOR INVESTMENT GRADE MUNICIPALS

   A shareholder demand letter dated August 6, 2010, contains allegations that,
prior to the tenure of the current adviser, the Board and certain individuals
breached their fiduciary duties to the Invesco Trust for Investment Grade
Municipals and wasted Trust assets by causing the Trust to redeem Auction Rate
Preferred Securities ("ARPS") at par value at the expense of the Trust and
common shareholders. The shareholders claimed that the Trust was not obliged to
provide liquidity to preferred shareholders, the redemptions were improperly
motivated to benefit the Adviser, and the market value and fair value of the
ARPS were less than par at the time they were redeemed. The shareholders demand
that 1) the Board take action against the Adviser and the individuals named to
recover damages and 2) the Board refrain from authorizing further redemptions
of repurchases of ARPS by the Trust at prices in excess of fair value or market
value at the time of the transaction. According to the demand letter, if the
Trust does not take appropriate action, the shareholders will commence a
shareholder derivative action on behalf of the Trust. The Board formed a
Special Litigation Committee ("SLC") to investigate these claims and to make a
recommendation to the Board regarding whether pursuit of these claims is in the
best interests of the Trusts. Upon completion of its investigation, the SLC
recommended that the Board reject the demands specified in the shareholder
demand letters, after which the Board publicly announced on June 24, 2011, that
the Independent Trustees had adopted the SLC's recommendation and voted to
reject the demands. The Trust is not the subject of a lawsuit in connection
with this demand letter.

   Also, the Trust received a different shareholder demand letter on July 5,
2011 regarding similar allegations. An original derivative shareholder
complaint was filed by common shareholders on behalf of Invesco Trust for
Investment Grade Municipals and was served on October 3, 2011 in Averbuch v.
Arch. The complaint contained allegations that certain Trustees, Van Kampen
Asset Management, and Morgan Stanley (collectively, "Defendants") breached
their fiduciary duties by wasting Trust assets. More specifically, the
Plaintiff alleged that, prior to the tenure of the current adviser, the
Defendants caused the Trust to redeem Auction Rate Preferred Securities
("ARPS") at their liquidation value, which was allegedly higher than market
value. The Plaintiff further contended that the redemption was at the expense
of the Trust and its common shareholders, unfairly benefitted preferred
shareholders and Defendants, unjustly enriched Defendants, and was financed by
the sale of Trust assets. Additionally, the Plaintiff claimed that the ARPS
were replaced with less favorable financing. The Plaintiffs seek 1)
declarations that the Defendants breached their fiduciary duties and were
unjustly enriched; 2) an injunction against the advisors from serving as
advisor to the Trust and collecting fees; 3) an injunction against individual
Defendants from further breaches of fiduciary duties; and 4) monetary relief,
expenses, and punitive damages. The Board informed Plaintiffs of the existing
Special Litigation Committee ("SLC") and its investigation into the Trust's
redemption of ARPS. On August 30, 2011, a quorum of the Independent Trustees
adopted the SLC's recommendation and voted to reject the plaintiffs July 2011
demands underlying the Complaint. After the Plaintiffs filed an amended
complaint, the Trust filed a motion to dismiss on April 1, 2013. On August 27,
2013 the motion to dismiss was granted with prejudice. The plaintiffs
determined to dismiss their appeal on December 11, 2013 and the stipulation for
dismissal was filed on January 7, 2014. This matter is closed.

   Management of Invesco and the Trust believe that the outcome of the
proceedings described above will not have a material adverse effect on the
Trust or on the ability of Invesco to provide ongoing services to the Trust.
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
