ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for an estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by the provision charged to operating expense and reduced by net charge-offs. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when the Company believes collectability has declined to a point where there is a distinct possibility of some loss of principal and interest. While the Company uses the best information available to make the evaluation, future adjustments may be necessary if there are significant changes in conditions.

The allowance is comprised of four distinct reserve components: (1) specific reserves related to loans individually evaluated; (2) quantitative reserves related to loans collectively evaluated; (3) qualitative reserves related to loans collectively evaluated; and (4) a temporal estimate is made for incurred loss emergence period for each loan category within the collectively evaluated pools.

A summary of the methodology employed on a quarterly basis with respect to each of these components in order to evaluate the overall adequacy of the Company's allowance for loan losses is as follows:

Specific Reserve for Loans Individually Evaluated

First, the Company identifies loan relationships having aggregate balances in excess of $150 thousand with potential credit weaknesses. Such loan relationships are identified primarily through the Company's analysis of internal loan evaluations, past due loan reports, TDRs and loans adversely classified. Each loan so identified is then individually evaluated for impairment. Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the original loan agreement. Substantially all impaired loans have historically been collateral dependent, meaning repayment of the loan is expected or is considered to be provided solely from the sale of the loan's underlying collateral. For such loans, the Company measures impairment based on the fair value of the loan's collateral, which is generally determined utilizing current appraisals. A specific reserve is established in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the recorded investment in each impaired loan over the fair value of its underlying collateral, less estimated costs to sell. The Company's policy is to re-evaluate the fair value of collateral dependent loans at least every twelve months unless there is a known deterioration in the collateral's value, in which case a new appraisal is obtained.

Purchase credit impaired (“PCI”) loans are collectively evaluated, but are not included in the general reserve as described below. The evaluation of the PCI loans requires continued quarterly assessment of key assumptions and estimates similar to the initial fair value estimate, including changes in the severity of loss, timing and speed of payments, collateral value changes, expected cash flows and other relevant factors. The quarterly assessment is compared to the initial fair value estimate and a determination is made if an adjustment to the allowance for loan loss is deemed necessary.

Quantitative Reserve for Loans Collectively Evaluated

Second, the Company stratifies the loan portfolio into two general business loan pools: substandard (7 risk-rated) and pass-rated (0 to 6 risk-rated) by loan type. Substandard rated loans are subject to higher credit loss rates in the allowance for loan loss calculation. The Company utilizes historical loss rates for commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans assessed by internal risk rating. Historical loss rates on residential real estate and consumer loans are not risk graded. Residential real estate and consumer loans are considered as part of the pass-rated portfolio unless removed due to specific reserve evaluation based on past due status and/or other indications of credit deterioration. Quantitative reserves relative to each loan pool are established as follows: for all loan segments an allocation equaling 100% of the respective pool's average 3-year historical net loan charge-off rate (determined based upon the most recent 12 quarters) is applied to the aggregate recorded investment in the pool of loans. Purchased performing loans are collectively evaluated as their own separate category within each loan pool.

Qualitative Reserve for Loans Collectively Evaluated

Third, the Company considers the necessity to adjust the average historical net loan charge-off rates relative to each of the above two loan pools for potential risks factors that could result in actual losses deviating from prior loss experience. Such qualitative risk factors considered are: (1) lending policies and procedures, (2) business conditions, (3) volume and nature of the loan portfolio, (4) experience, ability and depth of lending management, (5) problem loan trends, (6) quality of the Company’s loan review system, (7) concentrations in the loan portfolio, (8) competition, legal, and regulatory environment and (9) collateral coverage and loan-to-value.

Loss Emergence Period for Loans Collectively Evaluated

Fourth, the general allowance related to loans collectively evaluated includes an estimate of incurred losses over an estimated loss emergence period ("LEP"). The LEP is generated utilizing a charge-off look-back analysis, which evaluates the time from the first indication of elevated risk of repayment (or other early event indicating a problem) to eventual charge-off to support the LEP considered in the allowance calculation. This reserving methodology establishes the approximate number of months of LEP that represents incurred losses for each loan portfolio within each portfolio segment in addition to the qualitative reserves.

Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 are, as follows:



Business Activities Loans	At or for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
(in thousands)	Commercial real estate			Commercial and industrial			Residential real estate			Consumer			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	6,575		$	2,778		$	3,953		$	396		$	13,702
Charged-off loans	—			(13		)	—			(22		)	(35		)
Recoveries on charged-off loans	114			1			—			2			117
(Releases) provision for loan losses	517			(18		)	(11		)	18			506
Balance at end of period	$	7,206		$	2,748		$	3,942		$	394		$	14,290
Individually evaluated for impairment	449			39			75			1			564
Collectively evaluated	6,757			2,709			3,867			393			13,726
Total	$	7,206		$	2,748		$	3,942		$	394		$	14,290


Business Activities Loans	At or for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
(in thousands)	Commercial real estate			Commercial and industrial			Residential real estate			Consumer			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	6,811		$	2,380		$	3,982		$	408		$	13,581
Charged-off loans	(57		)	(13		)	—			(75		)	(145		)
Recoveries on charged-off loans	130			1			18			6			155
(Releases) provision for loan losses	322			380			(58		)	55			699
Balance at end of period	$	7,206		$	2,748		$	3,942		$	394		$	14,290
Individually evaluated for impairment	449			39			75			1			564
Collectively evaluated	6,757			2,709			3,867			393			13,726
Total	$	7,206		$	2,748		$	3,942		$	394		$	14,290



Acquired Loans	At or for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
(in thousands)	Commercial real estate			Commercial and industrial			Residential real estate			Consumer			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	161		$	29		$	105		$	—		$	295
Charged-off loans	—			—			(65		)	(4		)	(69		)
Recoveries on charged-off loans	—			—			—			—			—
(Releases) provision for loan losses	(2		)	(7		)	61			4			56
Balance at end of period	$	159		$	22		$	101		$	—		$	282
Individually evaluated for impairment	12			—			35			—			47
Collectively evaluated	147			22			66			—			235
Total	$	159		$	22		$	101		$	—		$	282


Acquired Loans	At or for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
(in thousands)	Commercial real estate			Commercial and industrial			Residential real estate			Consumer			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	173		$	35		$	77		$	—		$	285
Charged-off loans	—			(15		)	(170		)	(5		)	(190		)
Recoveries on charged-off loans	—			—			—			—			—
(Releases) provision for loan losses	(14		)	2			194			5			187
Balance at end of period	$	159		$	22		$	101		$	—		$	282
Individually evaluated for impairment	12			—			35			—			47
Collectively evaluated	147			22			66			—			235
Total	$	159		$	22		$	101		$	—		$	282



Business Activities Loans	At or for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
(in thousands)	Commercial real estate			Commercial and industrial			Residential real estate		Consumer			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	5,998		$	2,612		$	3,304	$	500		$	12,414
Charged-off loans	(156		)	(27		)	—		(216		)	(399		)
Recoveries on charged-off loans	46			4			—		2			52
Provision (releases) for loan losses	479			(80		)	150		107			656
Balance at end of period	$	6,367		$	2,509		$	3,454	$	393		$	12,723
Individually evaluated for impairment	682			34			80		—			796
Collectively evaluated	5,685			2,475			3,374		393			11,927
Total	$	6,367		$	2,509		$	3,454	$	393		$	12,723


Business Activities Loans	At or for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
(in thousands)	Commercial real estate			Commercial and industrial			Residential real estate		Consumer			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	6,037		$	2,373		$	3,357	$	386		$	12,153
Charged-off loans	(156		)	(111		)	—		(386		)	(653		)
Recoveries on charged-off loans	61			6			1		4			72
Provision for loan losses	425			241			96		389			1,151
Balance at end of period	$	6,367		$	2,509		$	3,454	$	393		$	12,723
Individually evaluated for impairment	682			34			80		—			796
Collectively evaluated	5,685			2,475			3,374		393			11,927
Total	$	6,367		$	2,509		$	3,454	$	393		$	12,723



Acquired Loans	At or for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
(in thousands)	Commercial real estate			Commercial and industrial			Residential real estate			Consumer			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	83		$	124		$	58		$	—		$	265
Charged-off loans	—			(37		)	(64		)	(17		)	(118		)
Recoveries on charged-off loans	18			6			—			82			106
Provision (releases) for loan losses	99			(11		)	91			(65		)	114
Balance at end of period	$	200		$	82		$	85		$	—		$	367
Individually evaluated for impairment	—			77			—			—			77
Collectively evaluated	200			5			85			—			290
Total	$	200		$	82		$	85		$	—		$	367


Acquired Loans	At or for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
(in thousands)	Commercial real estate			Commercial and industrial			Residential real estate			Consumer			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	97		$	16		$	59		$	—		$	172
Charged-off loans	(106		)	(95		)	(64		)	(60		)	(325		)
Recoveries on charged-off loans	18			6			—			82			106
Provision (releases) for loan losses	191			155			90			(22		)	414
Balance at end of period	$	200		$	82		$	85		$	—		$	367
Individually evaluated for impairment	—			77			—			—			77
Collectively evaluated	200			5			85			—			290
Total	$	200		$	82		$	85		$	—		$	367

Loan Origination/Risk Management: The Company has certain lending policies and procedures in place designed to maximize loan income within an acceptable level of risk. The Company’s Board of Directors reviews and approves these policies and procedures on a regular basis. A reporting system supplements the review process by providing management and the Company's Board of Directors with frequent reports related to loan production, loan quality, concentration of credit, loan delinquencies, non-performing loans and potential problem loans. The Company seeks to diversify the loan portfolio as a means of managing risk associated with fluctuations in economic conditions.

Credit Quality Indicators/Classified Loans: In monitoring the credit quality of the portfolio, management applies a credit quality indicator and uses an internal risk rating system to categorize commercial loans. These credit quality indicators range from one through nine, with a higher number correlating to increasing risk of loss. These ratings are used as inputs to the calculation of the allowance for loan losses. Consistent with regulatory guidelines, the Company provides for the classification of loans which are considered to be of lesser quality as special mention, substandard, doubtful, or loss (i.e. risk-rated 6, 7, 8 and 9, respectively).

The following are the definitions of the Company’s credit quality indicators:

Pass: Loans the Company considers in the commercial portfolio segments that are not adversely rated, are contractually current as to principal and interest, and are otherwise in compliance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Management believes there is a low risk of loss related to these loans considered pass-rated.

Special Mention: Loans the Company considers having some potential weaknesses, but are deemed to not carry levels of risk inherent in one of the subsequent categories, are designated as special mention. A special mention loan has potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the institution’s credit position at some future date. This might include loans which may require a higher level of supervision or internal reporting because of: (i) declining industry trends; (ii) increasing reliance on secondary sources of repayment; (iii) the poor condition of or lack of control over collateral; or (iv) failure to obtain proper documentation or any other deviations from prudent lending practices. Economic or market conditions which may, in the future, affect the obligor may warrant special mention of the asset. Loans for which an adverse trend in the borrower's operations or an imbalanced position in the balance sheet which has not reached a point where the liquidation is jeopardized may be included in this classification. Special mention loans are not adversely classified and do not expose the Company to sufficient risks to warrant classification.

Substandard: Loans the Company considers as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard loans have a well-defined weakness that jeopardizes liquidation of the debt. Substandard loans include those loans where there is the distinct possibility of some loss of principal, if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful: Loans the Company considers as doubtful have all of the weaknesses inherent in those loans that are classified as substandard. These loans have the added characteristic of a well-defined weakness which is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any, and calls into question the collectability of the full balance of the loan. The possibility of loss is high but because of certain important and reasonably specific pending factors which may work to the advantage and strengthening of the loan, its classification as loss is deferred until its more exact status is determined. Pending factors include proposed merger, acquisition, or liquidation procedures, capital injection, perfecting liens on additional collateral and refinancing plans. The entire amount of the loan might not be classified as doubtful when collection of a specific portion appears highly probable. Loans are generally not classified doubtful for an extended period of time (i.e., over a year).

Loss: Loans the Company considers as losses are those considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as an asset is not warranted and the uncollectible amounts are charged-off. This classification does not mean the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this worthless asset even though partial recovery may be affected in the future. Losses are taken in the period in which they are determined to be uncollectible.

The following tables present the Company’s loans by risk rating at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

Business Activities Loans

Commercial Real Estate

Credit Risk Profile by Creditworthiness Category



	Construction and land development				Commercial real estate other				Total commercial real estate
(in thousands)	Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018		Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018		Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018
Grade:
Pass	$	33,450	$	23,680	$	589,926	$	532,386	$	623,376	$	556,066
Special mention	73		73		11,959		8,319		12,032		8,392
Substandard	—		—		12,337		13,914		12,337		13,914
Doubtful	1		1		1,521		1,361		1,522		1,362
Total	$	33,524	$	23,754	$	615,743	$	555,980	$	649,267	$	579,734

Commercial and Industrial

Credit Risk Profile by Creditworthiness Category



	Commercial				Agricultural				Tax exempt loans				Total commercial and industrial
(in thousands)	Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018		Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018		Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018		Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018
Grade:
Pass	$	225,251	$	226,353	$	20,905	$	21,680	$	67,374	$	56,588	$	313,530	$	304,621
Special mention	13,512		6,730		358		215		—		—		13,870		6,945
Substandard	5,037		924		384		422		—		—		5,421		1,346
Doubtful	715		750		—		—		—		—		715		750
Total	$	244,515	$	234,757	$	21,647	$	22,317	$	67,374	$	56,588	$	333,536	$	313,662

Residential Real Estate and Consumer Loans

Credit Risk Profile Based on Payment Activity



	Residential real estate				Home equity				Other consumer				Total residential real estate and consumer
(in thousands)	Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018		Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018		Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018		Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018
Performing	$	727,420	$	665,976	$	59,738	$	57,652	$	10,596	$	9,324	$	797,754	$	732,952
Nonperforming	4,023		4,213		585		246		82		90		4,690		4,549
Total	$	731,443	$	670,189	$	60,323	$	57,898	$	10,678	$	9,414	$	802,444	$	737,501

Acquired Loans

Commercial Real Estate

Credit Risk Profile by Creditworthiness Category



	Commercial construction and land development				Commercial real estate other				Total commercial real estate
(in thousands)	Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018		Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018		Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018
Grade:
Pass	$	2,579	$	2,626	$	220,959	$	236,393	$	223,538	$	239,019
Special mention	—		—		1,964		1,574		1,964		1,574
Substandard	279		264		6,263		6,009		6,542		6,273
Doubtful	—		—		168		99		168		99
Total	$	2,858	$	2,890	$	229,354	$	244,075	$	232,212	$	246,965

Commercial and Industrial

Credit Risk Profile by Creditworthiness Category



	Commercial				Agricultural				Tax exempt loans				Total commercial and industrial
(in thousands)	Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018		Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018		Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018		Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018
Grade:
Pass	$	38,554	$	46,120	$	—	$	—	$	37,322	$	38,738	$	75,876	$	84,858
Special mention	5,819		4,825		—		—		—		—		5,819		4,825
Substandard	1,153		1,222		—		—		—		—		1,153		1,222
Doubtful	341		303		—		—		—		—		341		303
Total	$	45,867	$	52,470	$	—	$	—	$	37,322	$	38,738	$	83,189	$	91,208

Residential Real Estate and Consumer Loans

Credit Risk Profile Based on Payment Activity



	Residential real estate				Home equity				Other consumer				Total residential real estate and consumer
(in thousands)	Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018		Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018		Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018		Jun 30, 2019		Dec 31, 2018
Performing	$	433,244	$	470,497	$	39,941	$	45,090	$	1,139	$	1,356	$	474,324	$	516,943
Nonperforming	3,072		4,012		194		201		—		1		3,266		4,214
Total	$	436,316	$	474,509	$	40,135	$	45,291	$	1,139	$	1,357	$	477,590	$	521,157

The following table summarizes total classified and criticized loans as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:



	June 30, 2019						December 31, 2018
(in thousands)	Business Activities Loans		Acquired Loans		Total		Business Activities Loans		Acquired Loans		Total
Non-accrual	$	12,886	$	3,069	$	15,955	$	14,111	$	4,124	$	18,235
Substandard accruing	11,799		8,401		20,200		7,810		7,987		15,797
Doubtful accruing	—		—		—		—		—		—
Total classified	24,685		11,470		36,155		21,921		12,111		34,032
Special mention	25,902		7,783		33,685		15,337		6,399		21,736
Total Criticized	$	50,587	$	19,253	$	69,840	$	37,258	$	18,510	$	55,768