XML 77 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
9. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS:

Assets/Liabilities Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The Company records its financial assets and liabilities at fair value, which is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability, in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance for fair value measurements also applies to nonrecurring fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities.

The authoritative guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. These levels are: Level 1 (inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities); Level 2 (inputs are other than quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly through corroboration with observable market data); and Level 3 (inputs are unobservable, with little or no market data that exists, such as internal financial forecasts). The Company is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

The following table summarizes information regarding the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

 

     Balance at
December 31,
2013
    Level 1      Level 2     Level 3  

Description

         

Financial Assets

         

Non – qualified retirement savings plan assets

   $ 6,000      $ 4,944       $ 1,056      $ —     

Derivatives

     1        —           1        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Assets

   $ 6,001      $ 4,944       $ 1,057      $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financial Liabilities

         

Contingent consideration

   $ (4,425   $ —         $ —        $ (4,425

Derivatives

     (1     —           (1     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

   $ (4,426   $ —         $ (1   $ (4,425
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 
     Balance at
December 31,
2012
    Level 1      Level 2     Level 3  

Description

         

Financial Assets

         

Escrow account

   $ 898      $ 898       $ —        $ —     

Non – qualified retirement savings plan assets

     5,280        5,280         —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Assets

   $ 6,178      $ 6,178       $ —        $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financial Liabilities

         

Derivatives

   $ (353   $ —         $ (353   $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

The deferred compensation plan assets consist of cash and several publicly traded stock and bond mutual funds, valued using quoted market prices in active markets classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy, as well as securities that are not actively traded on major exchanges, valued using the NAV of the underlying investments classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. The Company’s derivatives consist of foreign currency forward contracts, which are accounted for as cash flow hedges, and are valued using various pricing models or discounted cash flow analyses that incorporate observable market parameters, such as interest rate yield curves and currency rates, classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy. Derivative valuations incorporate credit risk adjustments that are necessary to reflect the probability of default by the counterparty or the Company. The escrow account at December 31, 2012 consisted of a money market mutual fund and was valued using quoted market prices in active markets classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy.

The contingent consideration liability represents the probability weighted contingent payment as a percentage of high, mid, and low revenue projections for the following three fiscal years. Our fair value estimate of this liability was $4.4 million on the acquisition date of Permalok. The inputs used to measure contingent consideration are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. The valuation is not supported by market criteria and reflects the Company’s internal revenue forecasts. The discount rate used in the analysis was 5.3%. Changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration payment will be reflected in earnings during the period which the change in the estimated fair value is calculated.

The net carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade and other receivables, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and note payable to financial institution approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The Company is obligated to repay the carrying value of the Company’s long term debt. The fair value of the Company’s debt is calculated using a coupon rate on borrowings with similar maturities, current remaining average life to maturity, borrower credit quality, and current market conditions all of which are classified as Level 2 inputs within the valuation hierarchy. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, including the current portion, was $6.3 and the carrying value was $6.4 million at December 31, 2013. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, including the current portion, was $11.5 million and the carrying value was $12.1 million at December 31, 2012.

Financial Assets Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

The Company measures its financial assets, including loans receivable and non-marketable equity method investments, at fair value on a non-recurring basis when they are determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired. The fair value of these assets is determined using Level 3 unobservable inputs due to the absence of observable market inputs and the valuations requiring management judgment. During 2013, there were $0.3 million of impairment charges recorded on investments. The impairment charges were included in other expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. During 2012, there were no impairment charges taken.