XML 18 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
General
6 Months Ended
Jun. 29, 2017
General [Abstract]  
General
1. General
 
Accounting Policies - Refer to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements (including footnotes) for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2016, contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for such year, for a description of the Company’s accounting policies.
 
Basis of Presentation - The unaudited consolidated financial statements for the 13 and 26 weeks ended June 29, 2017 and June 30, 2016 have been prepared by the Company. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the unaudited interim financial information at June 29, 2017, and for all periods presented, have been made. The results of operations during the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the entire year or other interim periods. However, the unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2016.
 
Restricted Cash - Restricted cash consists of bank accounts related to capital expenditure reserve funds, sinking funds, operating reserves and replacement reserves and may include amounts held by a qualified intermediary agent to be used for tax-deferred, like-kind exchange transactions. At June 29, 2017, approximately $3,058,000 of net sales proceeds were held with a qualified intermediary. Restricted cash is not considered cash and cash equivalents for purposes of the statement of cash flows.
 
Depreciation and Amortization - Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment are provided using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or any related lease terms. Depreciation expense totaled $12,250,000 and $24,422,000 for the 13 and 26 weeks ended June 29, 2017, respectively, and $10,486,000 and $20,677,000 for the 13 and 26 weeks ended June 30, 2016, respectively.
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss – Accumulated other comprehensive loss presented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets consists of the following, all presented net of tax:
 
 
 
 
Available
for Sale
Investments
 
 
 
Pension
Obligation
 
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
Balance at December 29, 2016
 
$
3
 
 
$
(5,069
)
 
$
(5,066
)
Change in unrealized gain on available for sale investments
 
 
(14
)
 
 
-
 
 
 
(14
)
Amortization of net actuarial loss and prior service credit
 
 
-
 
 
 
107
 
 
 
107
 
Net other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
(14
)
 
 
107
 
 
 
93
 
Balance at June 29, 2017
 
$
(11
)
 
$
(4,962
)
 
$
(4,973
)
 
 
 
 
Swap
Agreements
 
 
 
Available
for Sale
Investments
 
 
 
Pension
Obligation
 
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
Balance at December 31, 2015
 
$
9
 
 
$
(11
)
 
$
(5,219
)
 
$
(5,221
)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications
 
 
(143
)
 
 
-
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
(143
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss (1)
 
 
134
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
134
 
Net other comprehensive loss
 
 
(9
)
 
 
-
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
(9
)
Balance at June 30, 2016
 
$
-
 
 
$
(11
)
 
$
(5,219
)
 
$
(5,230
)
 
(1) Amounts are included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of earnings.
 
Earnings Per Share - Net earnings per share (EPS) of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock is computed using the two class method. Basic net earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, adjusted for the effect of dilutive stock options using the treasury method. Convertible Class B Common Stock is reflected on an if-converted basis. The computation of the diluted net earnings per share of Common Stock assumes the conversion of Class B Common Stock, while the diluted net earnings per share of Class B Common Stock does not assume the conversion of those shares.
 
Holders of Common Stock are entitled to cash dividends per share equal to 110% of all dividends declared and paid on each share of Class B Common Stock. As such, the undistributed earnings for each period are allocated based on the proportionate share of entitled cash dividends. The computation of diluted net earnings per share of Common Stock assumes the conversion of Class B Common Stock and, as such, the undistributed earnings are equal to net earnings for that computation.
 
The following table illustrates the computation of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock basic and diluted net earnings per share for net earnings and provides a reconciliation of the number of weighted-average basic and diluted shares outstanding:
 
 
 
13 Weeks
Ended
June  29, 2017
 
 
13 Weeks
Ended
June 30, 2016
 
 
26 Weeks
Ended
June 29, 2017
 
 
26 Weeks
Ended
June 30, 2016
 
 
 
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
Numerator:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net earnings attributable to
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Marcus Corporation
 
$
10,124
 
 
$
9,336
 
 
$
19,577
 
 
$
14,788
 
Denominator:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Denominator for basic EPS
 
 
27,784
 
 
 
27,498
 
 
 
27,746
 
 
 
27,496
 
Effect of dilutive employee stock options
 
 
702
 
 
 
316
 
 
 
689
 
 
 
299
 
Denominator for diluted EPS
 
 
28,486
 
 
 
27,814
 
 
 
28,435
 
 
 
27,795
 
Net earnings per share - basic:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stock
 
$
0.38
 
 
$
0.35
 
 
$
0.73
 
 
$
0.55
 
Class B Common Stock
 
$
0.34
 
 
$
0.33
 
 
$
0.66
 
 
$
0.50
 
Net earnings per share - diluted:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stock
 
$
0.36
 
 
$
0.34
 
 
$
0.69
 
 
$
0.53
 
Class B Common Stock
 
$
0.33
 
 
$
0.33
 
 
$
0.64
 
 
$
0.50
 
 
Equity – Activity impacting total shareholders’ equity attributable to The Marcus Corporation and noncontrolling interests for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2017 and June 30, 2016 was as follows:
 
 
 
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
Attributable to
The Marcus
Corporation
 
 
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
Balance at December 29, 2016
 
$
390,112
 
 
$
1,535
 
Net earnings attributable to The Marcus Corporation
 
 
19,577
 
 
 
 
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
(335
)
Cash dividends
 
 
(6,741
)
 
 
 
Exercise of stock options
 
 
1,241
 
 
 
 
Savings and profit sharing contribution
 
 
1,024
 
 
 
 
Treasury stock transactions, except for stock options
 
 
52
 
 
 
 
Share-based compensation
 
 
1,269
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 
 
93
 
 
 
 
Balance at June 29, 2017
 
$
406,627
 
 
$
1,200
 
 
 
 
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
Attributable to
The Marcus
Corporation
 
 
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
Balance at December 31, 2015
 
$
363,352
 
 
$
2,346
 
Net earnings attributable to The Marcus Corporation
 
 
14,788
 
 
 
 
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
(162
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
(448
)
Cash dividends
 
 
(6,001
)
 
 
 
Exercise of stock options
 
 
1,199
 
 
 
 
Savings and profit sharing contribution
 
 
905
 
 
 
 
Treasury stock transactions, except for stock options
 
 
(5,139
)
 
 
 
Share-based compensation
 
 
921
 
 
 
 
Other
 
 
39
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
 
 
(9
)
 
 
 
Balance at June 30, 2016
 
$
370,055
 
 
$
1,736
 
 
Fair Value Measurements - Certain financial assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value in the consolidated financial statements. Some are measured on a recurring basis while others are measured on a non-recurring basis. Financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis are those that are adjusted to fair value each time a financial statement is prepared. Financial assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis are those that are adjusted to fair value when a significant event occurs. A fair value measurement assumes that a transaction to sell an asset or transfer a liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability.
 
The Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified in one of the following categories:
 
Level 1 - Assets or liabilities for which fair value is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments as of the reporting date. At June 29, 2017 and December 29, 2016, respectively, the Company’s $70,000 and $93,000 of available for sale securities were valued using Level 1 pricing inputs and were included in other current assets. At June 29, 2017 and December 29, 2016, respectively, the Company’s $3,267,000 and $1,927,000 of trading securities were valued using Level 1 pricing inputs and were included in other current assets.
 
Level 2 - Assets or liabilities for which fair value is based on pricing inputs that were either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. At June 29, 2017 and December 29, 2016, respectively, the $46,000 and $6,000 asset related to the Company’s interest rate swap contract was valued using Level 2 pricing inputs.
 
Level 3 - Assets or liabilities for which fair value is based on valuation models with significant unobservable pricing inputs and which result in the use of management estimates. At June 29, 2017 and December 29, 2016, none of the Company’s fair value measurements were valued using Level 3 pricing inputs.
 
Defined Benefit Plan – The components of the net periodic pension cost of the Company’s unfunded nonqualified, defined-benefit plan are as follows:
 
 
 
13 Weeks
Ended
June 29, 2017
 
 
13 Weeks
Ended
June 30, 2016
 
 
26 Weeks
Ended
June 29, 2017
 
 
26 Weeks
Ended
June 30, 2016
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
Service cost
 
$
191
 
 
$
216
 
 
$
382
 
 
$
432
 
Interest cost
 
 
339
 
 
 
352
 
 
 
678
 
 
 
704
 
Net amortization of prior service cost and actuarial loss
 
 
89
 
 
 
91
 
 
 
178
 
 
 
182
 
Net periodic pension cost
 
$
619
 
 
$
659
 
 
$
1,238
 
 
$
1,318
 
 
New Accounting Pronouncements - In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of Effective Date (ASU 2015-14), to defer the effective date of the new revenue recognition standard by one year to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The guidance may be adopted using either a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach. The Company has performed a review of the requirements of the new revenue standard and related ASUs and is monitoring the activity of the FASB as it relates to specific interpretive guidance. The Company is reviewing customer contracts and is in the process of applying the five-step model of the new revenue standard to each of its key identified revenue streams and is comparing the results to its current accounting practices. While the Company continues to assess all potential impacts of adopting this new revenue standard, it currently believes the new standard will not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which primarily affects the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements of financial instruments. The new standard is effective for the Company in fiscal 2018, with early adoption permitted for certain provisions of the statement. Entities must apply the standard, with certain exceptions, using a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
 
 In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), intended to improve financial reporting related to leasing transactions. ASU No. 2016-02 requires a lessee to recognize on the balance sheet assets and liabilities for rights and obligations created by leased assets with lease terms of more than 12 months. The new guidance will also require disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from the leases. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements, providing additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. The new standard is effective for the Company in fiscal 2019 and early application is permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that the guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
 
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. The new standard is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2018, with early adoption permitted. The standard must be applied using a retrospective transition method for each period presented. The Company is evaluating the effect that the guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
 
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Restricted Cash. ASU No. 2016-18 requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. As such, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of period and ending of period total amount shown on the statement of cash flows. The new standard is effective for the Company in fiscal 2018 and must be applied on a retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company reported a $2,086,000 investing cash outflow and a $11,266,000 investing cash inflow, respectively, related to a change in restricted cash for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2017 and June 30, 2016. Subsequent to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-18, the change in restricted cash would be excluded from the change in cash flows from investing activities and included in the change in total cash, restricted cash and cash equivalents as reported in the statement of cash flows.
 
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805) - Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance and providing a more robust framework to assist reporting organizations with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The new standard is effective for the Company in fiscal 2018 and must be applied prospectively, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect the new standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
 
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) - Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which eliminates Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test that had required a hypothetical purchase price allocation. Rather, entities should apply the same impairment assessment to all reporting units and recognize an impairment loss for the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, without exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Entities will continue to have the option to perform a qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. ASU No. 2017-04 is effective for the Company in fiscal 2020 and must be applied prospectively. The Company does not believe the new standard will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
 
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Benefit Cost. The ASU requires the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost to be presented in the same income statement line item as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. Other components of the net periodic benefit cost are to be presented separately, in an appropriately titled line item outside of any subtotal of operating income or disclosed in the footnotes. The standard also limits the amount eligible for capitalization to the service cost component. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and the Company is currently assessing the impact this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
 
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting, to provide clarity and reduce both the diversity in practice and cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. The amendments in this update provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. ASU No. 2017-09 is effective for the Company in fiscal 2018 and must be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.