Summary Accounting Policies	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Summary Accounting Policies
Summary Accounting Policies	Note 2 — Summary Accounting Policies Principles of Consolidation/Basis of Preparation The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and include all of the information and disclosures required by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for interim reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statement disclosures. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for fair presentation (including normal recurring accruals) have been included. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in OLP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of OLP, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and its investment in six joint ventures in which the Company, as defined, has a controlling interest. OLP and its consolidated subsidiaries are hereinafter referred to as the “Company”. Material intercompany items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Disposals of Properties In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which changes the criteria for determining which future disposals can be presented as discontinued operations and modifies related disclosure requirements. Under the new guidance, a discontinued operation is defined as a disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed of or is classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. The guidance is effective for calendar year public companies beginning in the first quarter of 2015 and is to be applied on a prospective basis for new disposals. Early adoption of this guidance is permitted but only for disposals (or classifications as held-for-sale) that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2014. It is expected that most of the Company’s future dispositions will not meet the criteria for being treated as a discontinued operation under this guidance. This guidance was applied for 2014 disposals with the exception of the two properties that were sold in February 2014 because these properties were previously classified as properties held-for-sale as of December 31, 2013. These properties will continue to be accounted for as discontinued operations for the periods presented. Investment in Joint Ventures The Company assesses the accounting treatment for each joint venture investment. This assessment includes a review of each joint venture or limited liability company agreement to determine the rights of each party and whether those rights are protective or participating. The agreements typically contain certain protective rights such as the requirement of partner approval to sell, finance or refinance the property and to pay capital expenditures and operating expenditures outside of the approved budget or operating plan. In situations where the Company and its partner, among other things, (i) approve the annual budget, (ii) approve certain expenditures, (iii) prepare or review and approve the joint venture’s tax return before filing, and (iv) approve each lease at each property, the Company does not consolidate the joint venture as the Company considers these to be substantive participation rights that result in shared power over the activities that most significantly impact the performance of the joint venture. The FASB’s guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity, or VIE, requires the determination of whether the entity’s equity investment at risk is sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support and whether the entity’s at-risk equity holders have a controlling financial interest. Under this guidance, an entity would be required to consolidate a VIE if the entity is determined to be the primary beneficiary — the entity is considered to be the primary beneficiary when it has the (i) power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (ii) obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. Additionally, the Company assesses the accounting treatment for any interests pursuant to which the Company may have a variable interest as a lessor. Leases may contain certain protective rights such as the right of sale and the receipt of certain escrow deposits. In situations where the Company does not have the power over tenant activities that most significantly impact the performance of the property, the Company would not consolidate tenant operations. In June 2014, the Company purchased land for $6,510,000 in Sandy Springs, Georgia improved with a 196 unit apartment complex, and simultaneously entered into a long-term triple net ground lease with the owner/operator of this complex (see Note 4). The Company determined that it has a variable interest through its ground lease and the owner/operator is a VIE because its equity investment at risk is not sufficient to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. The Company’s fee interest in the land is collateral for the owner/operator’s loan on the buildings located at this property. The Company further determined that it is not the primary beneficiary because the Company does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the owner/operator’s economic performance such as management, operational budgets and other rights, including leasing of the units and therefore, will not consolidate the VIE for financial statement purposes. Accordingly, the Company will account for its investment as land and the revenue from the ground lease as Rental Income, net. At September 30, 2014, the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of the ground lease is an aggregate of $6,626,000, representing the $6,516,000 carrying value of the land, included in Real estate investments, net, on the consolidated balance sheets and the unbilled rent receivable of $110,000. In June 2014, the Company entered into a joint venture, in which the Company has a 95% equity interest, and acquired a property located in Joppa, Maryland (see Note 4). The Company also made a senior preferred equity investment in the joint venture. The Company has determined that this joint venture is a VIE as the Company’s voting rights are not proportional to its economic interests and substantially all of the joint venture’s activities are conducted by the Company. The Company further determined that it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE as it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the joint venture’s performance including management, approval of expenditures, and sale of the property, as well as the obligation to absorb the losses or rights to receive benefits from the VIE. Accordingly, the Company consolidates the operations of this joint venture for financial statement purposes. For the consolidated VIE, the carrying amounts and classification in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets were assets (none of which are restricted) consisting of land of $3,805,000, building and improvements (net of depreciation) of $8,081,000, cash of $318,000, prepaid expenses and receivables of $38,000, accrued expenses and other liabilities of $123,000 and non-controlling interest in joint ventures of $309,000. The joint venture’s creditors do not have recourse to the assets of the Company other than those held by the joint venture. With respect to five consolidated joint ventures in which the Company has between an 85% to 95% interest, the Company has determined that (i) such ventures are not VIE’s and (ii) the Company exercises substantial operating control and accordingly, such ventures are consolidated for financial statement purposes. The Company accounts for its investments in five unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting. All investments in these joint ventures have sufficient equity at risk to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support and, as a group, the holders of the equity at risk have power through voting rights to direct the activities of these ventures. As a result, none of these joint ventures are VIE’s. In addition, although the Company is the managing member, it does not exercise substantial operating control over these entities, and therefore the entities are not consolidated. These investments are recorded initially at cost, as investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, and subsequently adjusted for their share of equity in earnings, cash contributions and distributions. None of the joint venture debt is recourse to the Company, subject to standard carve-outs. Tenant Reimbursements Tenant reimbursements represent contractually obligated reimbursements from tenants for recoverable real estate taxes and operating expenses. Reclassifications Certain amounts previously reported in the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified in the accompanying consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period’s presentation, primarily to break out tenant reimbursements that had been included in rental income, net, for all periods presented. In addition, the operations of two properties that were sold in February 2014 were reclassified to discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Note 2 — Summary Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation/Basis of Preparation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and include all of the information and disclosures required by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for interim reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statement disclosures. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for fair presentation (including normal recurring accruals) have been included. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in OLP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of OLP, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and its investment in six joint ventures in which the Company, as defined, has a controlling interest. OLP and its consolidated subsidiaries are hereinafter referred to as the “Company”. Material intercompany items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Disposals of Properties

In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which changes the criteria for determining which future disposals can be presented as discontinued operations and modifies related disclosure requirements. Under the new guidance, a discontinued operation is defined as a disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed of or is classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. The guidance is effective for calendar year public companies beginning in the first quarter of 2015 and is to be applied on a prospective basis for new disposals. Early adoption of this guidance is permitted but only for disposals (or classifications as held-for-sale) that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2014. It is expected that most of the Company’s future dispositions will not meet the criteria for being treated as a discontinued operation under this guidance. This guidance was applied for 2014 disposals with the exception of the two properties that were sold in February 2014 because these properties were previously classified as properties held-for-sale as of December 31, 2013. These properties will continue to be accounted for as discontinued operations for the periods presented.

Investment in Joint Ventures

The Company assesses the accounting treatment for each joint venture investment. This assessment includes a review of each joint venture or limited liability company agreement to determine the rights of each party and whether those rights are protective or participating. The agreements typically contain certain protective rights such as the requirement of partner approval to sell, finance or refinance the property and to pay capital expenditures and operating expenditures outside of the approved budget or operating plan. In situations where the Company and its partner, among other things, (i) approve the annual budget, (ii) approve certain expenditures, (iii) prepare or review and approve the joint venture’s tax return before filing, and (iv) approve each lease at each property, the Company does not consolidate the joint venture as the Company considers these to be substantive participation rights that result in shared power over the activities that most significantly impact the performance of the joint venture.

The FASB’s guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity, or VIE, requires the determination of whether the entity’s equity investment at risk is sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support and whether the entity’s at-risk equity holders have a controlling financial interest. Under this guidance, an entity would be required to consolidate a VIE if the entity is determined to be the primary beneficiary — the entity is considered to be the primary beneficiary when it has the (i) power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (ii) obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. Additionally, the Company assesses the accounting treatment for any interests pursuant to which the Company may have a variable interest as a lessor. Leases may contain certain protective rights such as the right of sale and the receipt of certain escrow deposits. In situations where the Company does not have the power over tenant activities that most significantly impact the performance of the property, the Company would not consolidate tenant operations.

In June 2014, the Company purchased land for $6,510,000 in Sandy Springs, Georgia improved with a 196 unit apartment complex, and simultaneously entered into a long-term triple net ground lease with the owner/operator of this complex (see Note 4). The Company determined that it has a variable interest through its ground lease and the owner/operator is a VIE because its equity investment at risk is not sufficient to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. The Company’s fee interest in the land is collateral for the owner/operator’s loan on the buildings located at this property. The Company further determined that it is not the primary beneficiary because the Company does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the owner/operator’s economic performance such as management, operational budgets and other rights, including leasing of the units and therefore, will not consolidate the VIE for financial statement purposes. Accordingly, the Company will account for its investment as land and the revenue from the ground lease as Rental Income, net. At September 30, 2014, the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of the ground lease is an aggregate of $6,626,000, representing the $6,516,000 carrying value of the land, included in Real estate investments, net, on the consolidated balance sheets and the unbilled rent receivable of $110,000.

In June 2014, the Company entered into a joint venture, in which the Company has a 95% equity interest, and acquired a property located in Joppa, Maryland (see Note 4). The Company also made a senior preferred equity investment in the joint venture. The Company has determined that this joint venture is a VIE as the Company’s voting rights are not proportional to its economic interests and substantially all of the joint venture’s activities are conducted by the Company. The Company further determined that it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE as it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the joint venture’s performance including management, approval of expenditures, and sale of the property, as well as the obligation to absorb the losses or rights to receive benefits from the VIE. Accordingly, the Company consolidates the operations of this joint venture for financial statement purposes.

For the consolidated VIE, the carrying amounts and classification in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets were assets (none of which are restricted) consisting of land of $3,805,000, building and improvements (net of depreciation) of $8,081,000, cash of $318,000, prepaid expenses and receivables of $38,000, accrued expenses and other liabilities of $123,000 and non-controlling interest in joint ventures of $309,000. The joint venture’s creditors do not have recourse to the assets of the Company other than those held by the joint venture.

With respect to five consolidated joint ventures in which the Company has between an 85% to 95% interest, the Company has determined that (i) such ventures are not VIE’s and (ii) the Company exercises substantial operating control and accordingly, such ventures are consolidated for financial statement purposes.

The Company accounts for its investments in five unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting. All investments in these joint ventures have sufficient equity at risk to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support and, as a group, the holders of the equity at risk have power through voting rights to direct the activities of these ventures. As a result, none of these joint ventures are VIE’s. In addition, although the Company is the managing member, it does not exercise substantial operating control over these entities, and therefore the entities are not consolidated. These investments are recorded initially at cost, as investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, and subsequently adjusted for their share of equity in earnings, cash contributions and distributions. None of the joint venture debt is recourse to the Company, subject to standard carve-outs.

Tenant Reimbursements

Tenant reimbursements represent contractually obligated reimbursements from tenants for recoverable real estate taxes and operating expenses.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts previously reported in the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified in the accompanying consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period’s presentation, primarily to break out tenant reimbursements that had been included in rental income, net, for all periods presented. In addition, the operations of two properties that were sold in February 2014 were reclassified to discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.