XML 18 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3.a.u2
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 29, 2019
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements Fair Value Measurements 
Trade accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, accrued payroll and related taxes and short-term borrowings approximate their fair values due to the short-term maturities of these assets and liabilities. 

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following tables present assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of year-end 2019 and 2018 in the consolidated balance sheet by fair value hierarchy level, as described below. 

Level 1 measurements consist of unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.  Level 2 measurements include quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. Level 3 measurements include significant unobservable inputs. 
 Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis As of Year-End 2019
DescriptionTotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
 (In millions of dollars)
Money market funds$4.9  $4.9  $—  $—  
Investment in Persol Holdings173.2  173.2  —  —  
Total assets at fair value$178.1  $178.1  $—  $—  

 Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis As of Year-End 2018
DescriptionTotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
 (In millions of dollars)
Money market funds$4.6  $4.6  $—  $—  
Investment in Persol Holdings135.1  135.1  —  —  
Total assets at fair value$139.7  $139.7  $—  $—  
 
Money market funds as of year-end 2019 and 2018 represent investments in money market accounts, all of which are restricted as to use and are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. The money market funds that are restricted as to use account for the majority of our restricted cash balance and represents cash balances that are required to be maintained to fund disability claims in California. The valuations of money market funds were based on quoted market prices of those accounts as of the respective period end. 

The valuation of the investment in Persol Holdings is based on the quoted market price of Persol Holdings stock on the Tokyo Stock Exchange as of the period end, and the related changes in fair value are recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings (see Investment in Persol Holdings footnote). In 2017, changes in fair value were recorded in other comprehensive income, and in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of stockholders' equity. The cost of this yen-denominated investment, which fluctuates based on foreign exchange rates, was $18.9 million at year-end 2019 and $18.8 million at year-end 2018. 

Equity Investments Without Readily Determinable Fair Value

The Company has a minority investment in Business Talent Group, LLC, which is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. This investment is measured using the measurement alternative for equity investments without a readily determinable fair value. The carrying amount of $5.0 million as of year-end 2019 and 2018 represents the purchase price. There have been no adjustments to the carrying amount or impairments on the investment.

During the second quarter of 2019, the Company made an additional $1.0 million minority investment in Kenzie Academy Inc., which is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. This investment is also measured using the measurement
alternative for equity investments without a readily determinable fair value as described above. As of year-end 2019, the investment totaled $1.3 million, representing total cost plus observable price changes to date.

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

We completed our annual impairment test of goodwill for all reporting units in the fourth quarter for the fiscal years ended 2019 and 2018 and determined that goodwill was not impaired. 

In 2019 and 2018, we performed a step one quantitative test for all of our reporting units with goodwill. For both years, the estimated fair value of each reporting unit tested exceeded its related carrying value. As a result of these quantitative assessments, we determined it was more likely than not that the fair value of each of the reporting units was more than its carrying value.