XML 24 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.22.0.1

Other events | 3 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jan. 31, 2022
Other events |
Other events |
7. | Other events
​ Dividend payment ​ On December 3, 2021, we paid a $1.15 per share dividend in the aggregate amount of $20.3 million to shareholders of record on November 12, 2021. Litigation ​ From time to time, we are involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business that we do not believe will have a material adverse impact on our financial statements. Mexico tax audits ​ We conduct business both domestically and internationally and, as a result, one or more of our subsidiaries files income tax returns in U.S. federal, U.S. state and certain foreign jurisdictions. Accordingly, in the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities, primarily in Mexico and the United States. ​ 2011 Assessment ​ During our third quarter of fiscal 2016, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Calavo de Mexico (CDM) received a written communication from the Ministry of Finance and Administration of the government of the State of Michoacan, Mexico (MFM) containing preliminary observations related to a fiscal 2011 tax audit of such subsidiary. As a result, in April 2019, the MFM issued a final tax assessment to CDM (the “2011 Assessment”) totaling approximately $2.2 billion Mexican pesos related to Income Tax, Flat Rate Business Tax, and value added tax, corresponding to the fiscal year 2011 tax audit. ​ On June 16, 2021, Calavo reached a settlement agreement with the MFM regarding the 2011 Assessment. Under the terms of the settlement, Calavo agreed to pay approximately $47.8 million Mexican pesos (approximately $2.4 million USD) as a full and final settlement of all taxes, fines and penalties asserted by the MFM. The settlement included $1.5 million USD of income taxes and $0.9 million USD of value added taxes, with both amounts including penalties and interest and inflationary adjustments, which have been recorded in the financial statements as a discrete item in Income Tax Provision and in Expenses related to Mexican tax matters, respectively. ​ 2013 Assessment ​ In January 2017, we received preliminary observations from the Servicio de Administracion Tributaria in Mexico (the “SAT”) related to an audit for fiscal year 2013 outlining certain proposed adjustments primarily related to intercompany funding, deductions for services from certain vendors/suppliers and IVA. We provided a written rebuttal to these preliminary observations during our second fiscal quarter of 2017. During the period from our third fiscal quarter of 2017 through our third fiscal quarter of 2018, we attempted to resolve our case with the SAT through the conclusive agreement submitted before PRODECON, having several working meetings attended by representatives of the SAT, CDM and the PRODECON. However, we were unable to materially resolve our case with the SAT through the PRODECON process. ​ As a result, in July 2018, the SAT’s local office in Uruapan issued to CDM a final tax assessment (the “2013 Assessment”) totaling approximately $2.6 billion Mexican pesos (which includes annual adjustments for inflation, and equals approximately $126.6 million USD at January 31, 2022) related to Income Tax, Flat Rate Business Tax, and value added tax, related to this fiscal 2013 tax audit. This amount has been adjusted for inflation as of January 31, 2022 to the amount of $3.08 billion Mexican pesos (approx. $148.6 million USD). Additionally, the tax authorities have determined that we owe our employee’s profit-sharing liability, totaling approximately $118 million Mexican pesos (approx. $5.7 million USD at January 31, 2022). ​ We have consulted with both an internationally recognized tax advisor as well as a global law firm with offices throughout Mexico, and we continue to believe that this tax assessment is without merit. In August 2018, we filed an Administrative Appeal on the 2013 Assessment, appealing our case to the SAT’s central legal department in Michoacan. Furthermore, in August 2018, we received a favorable ruling from the SAT’s central legal department in Michoacan on another tax matter (see Note 11 regarding IVA refunds) indicating that they believe that our legal interpretation is accurate on a matter that is also central to the 2013 Assessment. We believe this recent ruling significantly undermines the 2013 Assessment. ​ On June 25, 2021, we became aware that the Administrative Appeal had been resolved by the SAT against CDM on March 12, 2021, and that we had allegedly failed to timely respond to and challenge the SAT’s notification of such resolution, therefore rendering the 2013 Assessment as definitive. Based on legal counsel from our tax advisory firm, we and our tax advisory firm have concluded that the March notification was not legally communicated. In addition, the SAT has placed liens on the fixed assets of CDM, with a net book value of approximately $26 million USD, and on bank accounts of CDM totaling approximately $1 million USD in order to guaranty the 2013 Assessment. For reasons explained below, we do not believe that these liens pose a risk to the ongoing business operations of CDM. ​ We strongly disagree with above actions taken and conclusions reached by the SAT. We have taken several measures in vigorous defense of our position, as explained below. ​ On August 27, 2021, we filed a formal complaint, or queja, (the Complaint) before the PRODECON to request its assistance with having the SAT act upon the Reconsideration. This complaint was withdrawn in September, but may still be reinstated if deemed appropriate in the future. It should be noted that although the SAT is not obligated to act upon the Reconsideration, however, we believe that having the option of re-filing the PRODECON Complaint makes it likely that the SAT will respond to the Administrative Reconsideration and be open to settlement discussions. ​ On August 18, 2021, we filed an Administrative Reconsideration (the Reconsideration) before the Central Legal Department of the SAT located in Mexico City, asserting that the resolution in March of the Administrative Appeal was wrongly concluded, in particular with respect to the following matters:
| o | Failure to recognize CDM as a “maquiladora”
| o | Considering the Company to have a permanent establishment in Mexico,
| o | Including fruit purchase deposits transferred by the Company to CDM as taxable,
| o | Application of 16% IVA tax to fruit purchase deposits
| o | Imposing double-taxation on the fruit purchase transactions
​ On September 22, 2021, we had an initial in-person meeting with the SAT in Mexico City to formally present and discuss the Reconsideration. The SAT agreed to review our Reconsideration in more detail; however, on January 3, 2022, the SAT formally rejected our request for the Reconsideration. In response to this rejection, on January 21, 2022, we filed an Injunction Suit (Juicio de Amparo) with a federal district court seeking to nullify the arguments against the Reconsideration made by the SAT on constitutional grounds. On February 25, 2022, we filed a supplemental Injunction Suit in which we seek to have the liens against the bank accounts of CDM lifted. The injunction suits have been accepted by the court and we are expecting a response by September 2022. The main purpose of the Amparo was to challenge the response issued to the Reconsideration, and with that, to keep the Reconsideration alive until the Amparo is decided. This would allow time to continue the discussions with SAT at the administrative level and would give SAT the legal basis to issue a new resolution in terms of what may be agreed in the ongoing discussions with SAT. This Amparo represents a further opportunity as well for a Court of Law to analyze this matter from a constitutional perspective. ​ On February 4, 2022, we had a follow-up meeting with the SAT in Mexico City to begin a dialog with the objective of reaching a settlement of the 2013 Assessment. The SAT agreed in principle to continue this dialog, but requested that we provide a financial guaranty to secure the related tax as a pre-requisite to these discussions. On March 10, 2022, we met with the SAT and offered an Administrative Guaranty (Embargo en Via Administrativa) to secure the 2013 Assessment, which provides the SAT with certain administrative rights to CDM assets in the unlikely event we do not prevail in our actions through the Federal Tax Court (see below) or in the Reconsideration process. Once the Administrative Guaranty is in place, the existing liens over the assets of CDM will be removed and the SAT collection process will be suspended. ​ On August 20, 2021 we filed an Annulment Suit (the Annulment Suit) with the Federal Tax Court, which among other things, strongly contends that the notifications made by the SAT to CDM and its designated advisors of the resolution of the Administrative Appeal in March 2021 were not legally communicated. In addition, the Annulment Suit asserts the same matters central to the Reconsideration, as described above, as wrongly concluded in the resolution of the Administrative Appeal. ​ On March 4, 2022, the Annulment Suit was formally accepted by the Federal Tax Court, which simultaneously granted a provisional suspension of the collections proceedings by the SAT. The acceptance by the court of the Annulment Suit renders the 2013 Assessment as non-definitive, until such time as the suit is resolved. The Company has presented the Federal Tax Court with evidence of the above offer of the Administrative Guaranty to the SAT, and in connection therewith, expects that the Federal Tax Court will issue a definitive suspension of collections proceedings. ​ While we continue to believe that the 2013 Assessment is completely without merit, and that we will prevail on the Annulment Suit in the Tax Court, we also believe it is in the best interest of CDM and the Company to settle the 2013 Assessment as quickly as possible. Furthermore, we believe that the above actions taken by CDM will encourage the SAT agree to reach a settlement. In accordance with our cumulative probability analysis, based on factors such as recent settlements made by the SAT in other cases, the 2011 Assessment settlement reached by CDM with the MFM, and the value of CDM assets, we recorded a provision of $11 million USD, in the third quarter of fiscal 2021, as a discrete item in Income Tax Provision. The provision includes estimated penalties, interest and inflationary adjustments. We believe that this provision remains appropriate as of January 31, 2022 based on or cumulative probability analysis. We incurred $0.4 million of related professional fees for the three months ended January 31, 2022, which have been recorded in Expenses related to Mexican Tax matters. ​

X
- Definition Other Events [Abstract] + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | cvgw_OtherEventsAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | cvgw_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Other Events Disclosure [Text Block] + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | cvgw_OtherEventsDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | cvgw_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration