XML 49 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT (TAT Technologies Ltd [Member])
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
TAT Technologies Ltd [Member]
 
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
NOTE 5 -
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The Group measures fair value and discloses fair value measurements for financial assets and liabilities. Fair value is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

The Company's financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding accrued interest components, consisted of the following types of instruments:

   
December 31, 2011
 
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
Assets:
                       
Money Market
  $ 1,025     $ -     $ -     $ 1,025  
Auction Rate Securities
    -       -       1,900       1,900  
Total
    1,025       -       1,900       2,925  
                                 
Liabilities:
                               
Derivatives
  $ -     $ 372     $ -     $ 372  
       
   
December 31, 2010
 
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
Assets:
                               
Money Market
  $ 962     $ -     $ -     $ 962  
Derivatives
    -       100       -       100  
Auction Rate Securities
    -       -       1,950       1,950  
Trust funds
    583       -       -       583  
Total
  $ 1,545     $ 100     $ 1,950     $ 3,595  
 
Consistent with the Company's investment policy guidelines, the ARS investments held by the Company all had AA credit ratings at the time of purchase.

The carrying amounts of financial instruments, include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate fair value because of their generally short maturities.

The fair values of long-term liabilities were estimated by discounting the future cash flows, using the rate currently available for liabilities of similar terms and maturity. The carrying amount of TAT's long-term liabilities approximates their fair value.

The following table includes a roll-forward of the amounts in the balance sheet for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (including the change in fair value) for auction rate securities classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Balance as of January 1, 2010
  $ 2,200  
         
Other -than-temporary impairment loss
    (200 )
Realized
    (50 )
         
Balance as of December 31, 2010
    1,950  
         
Realized
    (50 )
         
Balance as of December 31, 2011
  $ 1,900  

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The following table presents the Group's assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:

         
Fair value measurements using
 
   
Year ended December 31, 2011
   
Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
   
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
   
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
   
Total
losses
 
Property and equipment (1)
  $ 1,325     $ -     $ -     $ 1,325     $ 1,865  
License for service center (1)
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 1,100  
Customer relationships (1)
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 298  
               
           
Fair value measurements using
 
   
Year ended December 31, 2010
   
Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
   
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
   
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
   
Total
losses
 
Goodwill (2)
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 4,223  
Customer relationships (3)
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ 481  
Investment in affiliated company (4)
  $ 4,449     $ -     $ -     $ 4,449     $ 1,813  

 
(1)
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company reviewed the MRO services for Aviation Components' long lived assets for impairment by estimating the fair value of this segment's operations and the fair value of its specific long lived assets, and comparing those values to the carrying value of the assets. The Company concluded, based on this valuation, that certain fixed assets and intangible asset 'License for Service Center' amounting to $1,865 and $1,100, respectively at its MRO services for Aviation Components operating segment were impaired. In addition, due to management estimates of a continuing decline in sales levels in the OEM of Electric Motion Systems operating segment, resulting from the weakness in the Israeli defense market, the Company reviewed indications for impairment of certain identifiable assets in this segment. Accordingly, the Company reviewed these assets for impairment by estimating their fair value based on their net selling price and comparing those values to the carrying value of the assets.  As a result the Company concluded that the intangible asset 'Customer Relations' at its OEM of Electric Motion Systems operating segment in the amount of $298 was impaired.

Accordingly, the Company recorded a total of $3,263 impairment charges in the year ended December 31, 2011 to reflect the fair value of the long lived assets mention above.

 
(2)
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company performed its annual impairment test of goodwill. During this year, the Company encountered adverse changes in the business climate including a weak U.S. and global economy which resulted in a reduction in demand for the MRO services for aviation components. As a result of these factors, management revised its future cash flow expectations, which lowered the fair value estimates of a certain reporting unit. The Company determined under the first step of its annual test that the fair value of goodwill at its MRO services for aviation components reporting unit was less than the carrying value for this reporting unit. The Company recorded a $4,223 goodwill impairment charge (which was the entire remaining goodwill for the MRO services for aviation components reporting unit) in the third quarter of 2010, to reflect the implied fair value of goodwill for the MRO services for aviation components reporting unit. Calculating the fair value of the MRO services for aviation components reporting unit requires the input of significant estimates and assumptions, some of which are unobservable. The significant estimates and assumptions include business assumptions, historical gross profit, weighted average cost of capital, terminal growth rate.

 
(3)
The Company also reviewed its other intangible assets for impairment, in accordance with ASC 360. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company estimated the fair value of its other intangible assets using a discounted cash flow analysis and compared those values to the carrying value of the assets. The Company concluded, based on this comparison, that Customer relationship intangible asset was impaired at its MRO services reporting unit. The Company recorded a $481 impairment charge and wrote off this asset in the year ended December 31, 2010.

 
(4)
As of December 31, 2010, The Company recognized an impairment charge of $1,813 of its 37% then interest in FAvS' that was based on an appraisal performed by management with the assistance of an independent valuation. This valuation was done based on a discounted cash flow analysis, requiring the input of significant estimates and assumptions, some of which are unobservable.