XML 47 R39.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.24.3
Fair Value Information
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2024
Fair Value Information [Abstract]  
Fair value information

34. Fair value information

 

A.The different levels that the inputs to valuation techniques are used to measure fair value of financial and non-financial instruments have been defined as follows:

 

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the measurement date. A market is regarded as active where a market in which transactions for the asset or liability take place with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

 

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

 

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. The fair value of the Group’s investment in a rent-a-captive company without active market is included in Level 3.

 

B.The carrying amounts of the Group’s financial assets and financial liabilities not measured at fair value are approximate to their fair values which are provided in Note 33.

 

C.The related information of financial instruments measured at fair value by level on the basis of the nature, characteristics and risks of the assets and liabilities at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 is as follows:

 

(a)The related information of natures of the assets and liabilities is as follows:

 

June 30, 2024  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 
Assets               
Recurring fair value measurements                
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss                
Investment in a rent-a-captive company  $-   $        -   $1,544,045   $1,544,045 
                     
Liabilities                    
Recurring fair value measurements                    
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss    
       
Warrant liabilities   $

506,846

    $-     $

4,984,057

    $

5,490,903

 
Convertible preference share liabilities   -    -    14,570,968    14,570,968 
   $506,846   $-   $19,555,025  $
20,061,870
 

 

December 31, 2023  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 
Assets                
Recurring fair value measurements                
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss                
Investment in a rent-a-captive company  $
-
   $
          -
   $995,101   $995,101 
                     
Liabilities                    
Recurring fair value measurements                    
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss        
 
           
Warrant liabilities  $287,482   $
-
   $5,934,000   $6,221,482 
Convertible preference share liabilities  $-   $
-
   $7,767,238   $7,767,238 
   $287,482   $-   $13,701,238   $13,988,720 

 

(b)The methods and assumptions the Group used to measure fair value of warrant liabilities categorized within Level 1 are based on market quoted closing price.

 

(c)The methods and assumptions the Group used to measure fair value of investment in a rent-a-captive company categorized within Level 3 are based on net asset value.

 

(d)The output of valuation model is an estimated value and the valuation technique may not be able to capture all relevant factors of the Group’s financial and non-financial instruments. Therefore, the estimated value derived using valuation model is adjusted accordingly with additional inputs, for example, model risk or liquidity risk and etc. In accordance with the Group’s management policies and relevant control procedures relating to the valuation models used for fair value measurement, management believes adjustment to valuation is necessary in order to reasonably represent the fair value of financial and non-financial instruments at the consolidated balance sheet. The inputs and pricing information used during valuation are carefully assessed and adjusted based on current market conditions.

 

(e)The Group takes into account adjustments for credit risks to measure the fair value of financial and non-financial instruments to reflect credit risk of the counterparty and the Group’s credit quality.

 

(f)For the six months period ended June 30, 2024, there was no transfer between Level 1 and Level 2.

 

D.The following table represents the changes in Level 3 instrument for the six months period ended June 30, 2024 and 2023:

 

   2024   2023 
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss        
At January 1  $995,101   $1,073,229 
Losses recognized in profit or loss   548,944    (78,128)
At June 30 and December 31  $1,544,045   $995,101 

 

   2024   2023 
Private warrant liabilities at fair value        
At January 1  $5,934,000   $
-
 
Granted in the year   3,642,663    9,222,288 
Losses recognized in profit or loss   (4,592,606)   (3,288,288)
At June 30 and December 31  $4,984,057   $5,934,000 

 

   2024   2023 
Convertible preference share liabilities at fair value        
At January 1  $7,767,238   $
-
 
Granted in the year   6,007,337    14,067,712 
Exercised in the year   (6,855,259)   (5,214,962)
Losses recognized in profit or loss   7,651,652    (1,085,512)
At June 30 and December 31   14,570,968   $7,767,238 

 

The Group is in charge of valuation procedures for fair value measurements being categorized within Level 3, which is to verify independent fair value of financial instruments. Such assessment is to ensure the valuation results are reasonable by applying independent information to make results close to current market conditions, confirming the resource of information is independent, reliable and in line with other resources and represented as the exercisable price, and frequently calibrating valuation model, performing back-testing, updating inputs used to the valuation model and making any other necessary adjustments to the fair value. Finance Department of the Group set up valuation policies, valuation processes and rules for measuring fair value of financial instruments and ensure compliance with the related requirements in IFRS.

 

E.The following is the qualitative information of significant unobservable inputs and sensitivity analysis of changes in significant unobservable inputs to valuation model used in Level 3 fair value measurement:

 

   Fair value at
June 30,
2024
   Valuation
technique
  Significant
unobservable input
  Range
(weighted
average)
   Relationship of inputs to fair value
Investment in a rent-a-captive company  $1,544,045   Net asset value  Not applicable   
Not applicable
   Not applicable
           Risk free rate-series A   4.46%  The higher the risk free rate, the higher the fair value
           Risk free rate-series B   4.44%  The higher the risk free rate, the higher the fair value
Warrant liabilities  $4,984,058   Black-Scholes Model  Price volatility-series A   105.29%  No certain positive and negative relationship between stock price volatility and fair value
           Price volatility-series B   100.32%  No certain positive and negative relationship between stock price volatility and fair value
           Dividend yield   0.00%  The higher the dividend rate, the lower the fair value
           Risk free rate   4.42%  The higher the risk free rate, the higher the fair value
Convertible preference share liabilities  $14,570,968   Black-Scholes Model  Price volatility   97.33%  No certain positive and negative relationship between stock price volatility and fair value
       Dividend yield   0.00%  The higher the dividend rate, the lower the fair value

 

    Fair value at
December 31,
2023
   Valuation
technique
  Significant
unobservable
input
   Range
(weighted average)
   Relationship
of inputs to
fair value
Investment in a rent -a- captive company  $995,101   Net asset value  Not applicable   
Not applicable
   Not applicable
Warrant liabilities  $5,934,000   Black-Scholes Model  Risk free rate   3.90%  The higher
           Price volatility   93.45%  No certain
           Dividend yield   0.00%  The higher
           Risk free rate   3.90%  The higher
Convertible preference share liabilities  $7,767,238   Black-Scholes Model  Price volatility   93.23% 

No certain positive and negative relationship between stock price

volatility and fair value
           Dividend yield   0.00%  The higher the dividend rate, the lower the fair value

 

The Group has carefully assessed the valuation models and assumptions used to measure fair value, and the expected changes in fair value are insignificant even if there are reasonably possible changes in inputs.