XML 50 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v2.4.0.6

Management Agreements and Leases | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2011
Management Agreements and Leases |
Management Agreements and Leases |
5. Management Agreements and Leases As of December 31, 2011, we owned 288 hotels and 185 travel centers which are included in one of eight operating agreements. We do not operate any of our properties. As of December 31, 2011, 233 of our hotels are leased to our TRSs and managed by an independent hotel operating company and 55 are leased to third parties. As of December 31, 2011, our hotel properties are managed by or leased to separate subsidiaries of InterContinental, Marriott, Host, Hyatt, and Carlson under six agreements. Such hotel agreements have initial terms expiring between 2012 and 2036. Each of these agreements is for between 1 and 130 of our hotels. The agreements contain renewal options for all, but not less than all, of the affected properties, and the renewal terms total range between 20 to 60 years. Each agreement generally requires the third party manager or tenant to: (1) make payments to us of minimum returns or minimum rents; (2) deposit a percentage of total hotel sales into reserves established for the regular refurbishment of our hotels, or FF&E reserves; and (3) for certain leased hotels, make payments to us of percentage rent of 5% of increases in gross hotel revenues over threshold amounts and, for our managed hotels, make payments to our TRSs of additional returns to the extent of available cash flow after payment of operating expenses, funding of the FF&E reserve, payment of our minimum return, payment of certain management fees and replenishment of security deposits. Some of the third party managers or tenants or their affiliates have provided deposits or guarantees to secure their obligation to pay us. Our 185 travel centers are leased to and operated by separate subsidiaries of TA under two agreements. Our lease for 145 travel centers expires in 2022. Our lease for 40 travel centers expires in 2024 and has two 15 year renewal options. TA has guaranteed its subsidiary tenants' obligations under the leases. On January 31, 2011, we entered into an amendment agreement with TA which modified the terms of our two leases with TA. See Note 8 for further information regarding our leases with TA. Marriott agreement. On June 14, 2011, we entered an agreement to re-align three of our contracts with Marriott. The three affected contracts (which we have historically referred to as our Marriott Nos. 2, 3 and 4 Contracts) concern 71 hotels and provide for payments of minimum returns and rents to us totaling $98,404 per year as of the effective date. Among other terms the new agreement provides as follows: • All 71 hotels have been combined for purposes of determining the distribution of hotel cash flows so that any excess cash flows from any of the hotels are available to pay our minimum returns for all 71 hotels. • One of the contracts which was re-aligned by the new agreement (our historical Marriott No. 4 Contract) concerns our hotels which were leased to Barceló Crestline Corporation, or Barceló Crestline, and are managed by Marriott. Simultaneously with the re-alignment of the agreement between us and Marriott, Marriott arranged with Barceló Crestline to terminate that lease. Accordingly, all 71 affected hotels are owned by us, leased to one of our TRSs, and managed by Marriott. • The new agreement was effective retroactively to January 1, 2011. • The combined annual minimum returns due to us were $98,404 per year as of the effective date, which was equal to the previous annual amounts of minimum returns and rents due to us under the historical contracts. In addition, we will participate in the net cash flows from hotel operations after payment of management fees to Marriott, which fees continue to be subordinated to our minimum returns. • The historical contracts were scheduled to expire beginning in 2015 through 2020. The new agreement extends through 2025. In addition, Marriott has the option to renew for two consecutive ten year terms for all, but not less than all, the properties. • The cash security deposits which secured the minimum returns and rents to us under two of the three historical contracts have been combined and continue to secure the minimum return payments under the new agreement for all 71 hotels. These security deposits originally totaled $64,700. As of December 31, 2011, the amounts of these deposits have been fully exhausted to fund shortfalls in the operating results of the hotels from 2009 through December 31, 2011. The new agreement provides that the combined security deposit is to be replenished up to the original amount of $64,700 from 70% of the cash flows realized from operations of the 71 hotels, after payment of our minimum returns and working capital advances, if any, by us or Marriott, while 30% of the cash flows is paid to Marriott toward agreed amounts for management fees. The security deposit is non-interest bearing and is not held in escrow. • In addition to this security deposit, Marriott has provided a limited guaranty for 90% of the minimum returns due to us. The Marriott guaranty is limited to total payments by Marriott to us of $40,000 and it expires on December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2011, the guaranty balance was $30,873. • The new agreement continues to require that 5% to 6% of annual gross revenues from hotel operations be escrowed as FF&E reserves. • In addition to amounts available in the FF&E reserve, we agreed to fund approximately $102,000 for renovation of the hotels during the next two years. As we fund these renovations, the amount of the minimum returns due to us under the new agreement will increase by 9% per annum of the amounts we fund. • We and Marriott identified 21 hotels of the 71 hotels in the new agreement to be offered for sale. The 21 hotels had a net book value, after previously reported impairment writedowns, of approximately $123,025 at December 31, 2011. In February 2012, we entered an agreement to sell our full service Marriott hotel in St. Louis, Missouri for $35,000 excluding closing costs. We expect to complete this sale in the second quarter of 2012. This pending sale is subject to buyer's completion of due diligence and other customary closing conditions; accordingly, we cannot provide any assurance that we will sell this hotel. Subsequent to December 31, 2011, we entered discussions with Marriott about retaining certain of the remaining 20 hotels in the Marriott No. 234 Contract. If certain of these hotels are sold, we will retain the net sales proceeds from the sales and the amount of minimum returns due from Marriott under the agreement will be reduced by 9% per annum of the net sales proceeds; and if we determine to retain certain of these hotels in the agreement, we will invest previously agreed amounts to improve these hotels and the amount of minimum returns due from Marriott under the agreement will be increased by 9% per annum of the amounts funded. However, because discussions with Marriott are ongoing and because we have not yet contracted for any sales, we cannot provide any assurance that we will retain or sell any of these 20 hotels. See Note 12 for further information relating to these hotels. After giving effect to the January 1, 2011 effective date of the new agreement with Marriott, the payments we received were $29,762 less than the minimum amounts contractually due to us during the twelve months ended December 31, 2011. The retroactive effective date of the new agreement had the net effect of increasing the amount of payment shortfalls that were covered by the security deposit by $4,081 through June 14, 2011, the execution date of the agreement. We applied the remaining $18,392 of available security deposit to partially cover these shortfalls and Marriott provided $9,127 of guaranty payments to us. Also, during the period from December 31, 2011 to February 28, 2012, the minimum return payments we received for these hotels were $1,505 less than the contractual minimum returns due to us. Marriott provided $5,236 of guaranty payments to us. The balance of this guaranty was $25,637 as of February 28, 2012. InterContinental agreement. On July 25, 2011, we entered an agreement to re-align all four of our hotel contracts with InterContinental. The four affected contracts (which we have historically referred to as our InterContinental Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 Contracts) for 130 hotels provide for payments of minimum returns and rents to us totaling $153,129 per year as of the effective date. Among other terms the new agreement provides as follows: • All 130 hotels have been combined for purposes of determining the distribution of hotel cash flows under the agreement so that cash flows from all of the hotels are available to pay our minimum returns and rents for all 130 hotels. • The combined annual minimum returns and rents due to us from the 130 hotels were $153,129 per year as of the effective date, which was the same amount that was due to us under the historical contracts. • The historical contracts were scheduled to expire beginning in 2028 through 2031. The new agreement extends to 2036. In addition, InterContinental has options to renew for two consecutive 15 year terms for all, but not less than all, the properties. • The original security deposit we held for the historical InterContinental contracts was $36,872. In addition, pursuant to the new agreement, InterContinental delivered to us an additional $37,000 to supplement this security deposit. As of December 31, 2011, the amount of the available deposit totaled $55,820, as the deposit has been reduced to fund shortfalls of approximately $18,052 in the operating results of the hotels during 2011. • The security deposit may be further increased up to $100,000 from 50% of the cash flows realized from operations of the 130 hotels after payment of our minimum returns and rents. The security deposit is non-interest bearing and is not required to be held in escrow. • The cash flows in excess of amounts used to pay our minimum returns and rents and to fund the security deposit up to $100,000 are available to pay InterContinental's management fees up to agreed amounts, which continue to be subordinated to our minimum returns and rents. • Available cash flows after our minimum returns and rents, funding for the security deposit and the agreed management fees are available to pay us additional returns and to pay incentive fees to InterContinental, as provided under the agreement. • We and InterContinental have identified 42 hotels of the 130 hotels in the new agreement which we may remove from the contract and rebrand or offer for sale. If the hotels are removed from the agreement and rebranded, our minimum returns and rents will be reduced by amounts which we have agreed with InterContinental pursuant to the new agreement. If these hotels are sold, our minimum returns and rents will be reduced by 8% per annum of the net sales proceeds we receive. In addition to these 42 hotels, we sold one hotel previously managed by InterContinental on July 19, 2011 (which is excluded from the 130 hotels subject to the new agreement). We received net sales proceeds of approximately $6,905 from this sale and our minimum returns and rents were reduced by 8% per annum of the sales proceeds to $153,129 per year as of the effective date. We continue to evaluate plans to either sell or rebrand these hotels, including the conversion of certain hotels to the Sonesta brand and management. • We and InterContinental have committed to a renovation program for all of the hotels included in the agreement pursuant to which we expect to invest approximately $300,000. The final amounts invested will be adjusted to reflect the number of hotels which we determine to rebrand or sell and remove from the agreement; however, if we determine to rebrand certain properties, we expect to be required to fund amounts for rebranding and renovations to the rebranded hotels. As we fund these renovations, the amounts of our minimum returns and rents will increase by 8% per annum of the amount we fund. • The new agreement requires that a portion of annual gross revenues from all the hotels be escrowed for FF&E reserves after the planned renovations are completed. These escrows will be funded beginning in 2014 and will increase to 5% of gross revenues in 2016. These escrowed funds will be available to fund renovations for any of the hotels included in the agreement. The new agreement was effective as of July 1, 2011. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2011, the payments we received under our agreements with InterContinental were $18,052 less than the minimum amounts contractually required. We applied the available security deposit to cover these shortfalls. Also, during the period from December 31, 2011 to February 28, 2012, the minimum return payments we received under our InterContinental agreement were $13,933 less than the minimum amounts due to us. We applied the available security deposit to cover these amounts. The remaining balance of the security deposit was $41,887 as of February 28, 2012. When we reduce the amounts of the security deposits we hold for these agreements or any other operating agreements for payment deficiencies, we record income equal to the amounts by which these deposits are reduced up to the minimum return or minimum rent due to us. However, these deposits are not escrowed and reducing the security deposits does not result in additional cash flow to us of the deficiency amounts. Reducing amounts of security deposits does reduce the refunds due to the respective lessees or managers who have provided us with these deposits upon expiration of the respective management agreement. Under all of our hotel contracts that include security deposits, any amount of the security deposits which are applied to payment deficits may be replenished from future cash flows under the respective contracts. Other hotel management agreement and lease matters. As of February 28, 2012, all other payments due to us from our hotel managers and hotel tenants under our operating agreements were current. In November 2010, Host notified us that it will not exercise its renewal option at the end of the current lease term for 53 hotels which we have historically referred to as our Marriott No. 1 Contract. In the absence of any default by Host, upon expiration of the agreement on December 31, 2012, we expect to return the $50,540 security deposit to Host using existing cash balances and borrowings under our revolving credit facility, to lease these hotels to one of our TRSs and to continue the existing hotel brand and management agreements with Marriott with respect to these hotels. In June 2011, Marriott provided notice to us that it intends to exercise its option to renew these management agreements for an additional 12 years to 2024. As of December 31, 2011, our management agreements and leases provide for minimum return payments or minimum rents to be paid to us during the remaining current terms as follows:
2012 |  | $ | 571,956 |
2013 |  |  | 504,598 |
2014 |  |  | 504,400 |
2015 |  |  | 504,245 |
2016 |  |  | 504,297 |
Thereafter |  |  | 5,984,581 |
Total |  | $ | 8,574,077 |
As of December 31, 2011, the average remaining current terms of our leases and management agreements, from parties other than our TRSs, weighted based on minimum returns or rents was approximately 14.9 years. Our hotel operating agreements generally provide that, if necessary, we will provide our managers and tenants with funding for capital improvements to our hotels in excess of amounts otherwise available in escrowed FF&E reserves. To the extent we make such additional fundings, our annual minimum returns or minimum rents generally increase by a percentage of the amount we fund. At December 31, 2011, we expected to provide funding for capital improvements at our hotels pursuant to the terms of our new Marriott and InterContinental agreements described above of approximately $302,000 in 2012. Our travel center leases with TA do not require FF&E escrow deposits. However, TA is required to maintain the leased travel centers, including structural and non-structural components. Under both our leases with TA, TA may request that we fund additional amounts for capital improvements to the leased facilities in return for minimum rent increases. However, TA is not obligated to request and we are not obligated to fund any such improvements. As we fund these improvements, the minimum rents payable to us increase. At December 31, 2011, we expect to fund approximately $75,000 for capital improvements to our travel center properties during 2012. We settled all our outstanding claims with Prime Hospitality Corp., or Prime, a former manager, arising from its July 2003 lease default by entering a management agreement for our 24 AmeriSuites® hotels effective on January 1, 2004. We are amortizing the $44,281 balance of the retained deposits and the value of other property received from Prime pursuant to this settlement, into our income on a straight line basis over the initial 15 year term of the management contract for the affected hotels. The unamortized balance of $20,665 at December 31, 2011 is included in accounts payable and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. In October 2004, Prime was sold to the Blackstone Group, or Blackstone. In January 2005, Blackstone sold the AmeriSuites® brand and transferred operating responsibility for these hotels to Hyatt. We estimate that future amortization of the retained deposits and the value of other property as of December 31, 2011 will be approximately $2,952 per year through 2018.

X
- Details
Name: | us-gaap_LeasesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for lessor entity's leasing arrangements for operating, capital and leveraged leases. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 840 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6454179&loc=d3e41551-112718 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 840 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6452767&loc=d3e37045-112695 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 840 -SubTopic 30 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6952072&loc=d3e45377-112738 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 840 -SubTopic 20 -Section 45 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6453916&loc=d3e41457-112716 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 13 -Paragraph 23 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 840 -SubTopic 30 -Section 50 -Paragraph 6 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6952072&loc=d3e45437-112738 Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 840 -SubTopic 30 -Section 50 -Paragraph 5 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6952072&loc=d3e45424-112738 Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 840 -SubTopic 10 -Section 55 -Paragraph 47 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6584217&loc=d3e38847-112698 Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 840 -SubTopic 20 -Section 45 -Paragraph 3 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6453916&loc=d3e41460-112716 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_LeasesOfLessorDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration