The Company has minimum commitments related to the Company’s license agreements and endorsement agreements with brand ambassadors. The Company sources, distributes, advertises and sells watches pursuant to its exclusive license agreements with unaffiliated licensors. Royalty amounts under the license agreements are generally based on a stipulated percentage of revenues, although most of these agreements contain provisions for the payment of minimum annual royalty amounts. The license agreements have various terms, and some have additional renewal options, provided that minimum sales levels are achieved. Additionally, the license agreements require the Company to pay minimum annual advertising amounts. As of January 31, 2019, the total amount of the Company’s minimum commitments related to its license agreements and endorsement agreements was $144.3 million.

The Company leases office, distribution, retail and manufacturing facilities, and office equipment under operating leases, which expire at various dates through June 2030. Certain leases include renewal options and the payment of real estate taxes and other occupancy costs. Some leases also contain rent escalation clauses (step rents) that require additional rent amounts in the later years of the term. Rent expense for leases with step rents is recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term. Likewise, capital funding and other lease concessions that are occasionally provided to the Company are recorded as deferred rent and amortized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term as adjustments to rent expense. Rent expense for equipment and distribution, factory and office facilities under operating leases was $20.2 million, $17.8 million and $14.2 million in fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Minimum annual rentals under noncancelable operating leases as of January 31, 2019, excluding real estate taxes and operating costs, are as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal Year Ending January 31,
2020	$	14,036
2021		11,325
2022		10,135
2023		8,279
2024		7,683
Thereafter		35,020
	$	86,478

The Company had outstanding purchase obligations of $60.8 million with suppliers at the end of fiscal 2019 primarily for raw materials, finished watches and packaging in the normal course of business. These purchase obligation amounts do not represent total anticipated purchases but represent only amounts to be paid for items required to be purchased under agreements that are enforceable, legally binding and specify minimum quantity, price and term.

Due to the enactment of the 2017 Tax Act, the Company recorded an obligation associated with the Transition Tax of $28.2 million, which will be paid in installments over eight years, with the first payment having been made in fiscal 2019.

The Company believes that income tax reserves are adequate; however, amounts asserted by taxing authorities could be greater or less than amounts accrued and reflected in the consolidated balance sheet. Accordingly, the Company could record adjustments to the amounts for federal, state, and foreign liabilities in the future as the Company revises estimates or settles or otherwise resolves the underlying matters. In the ordinary course of business, the Company may take new positions that could increase or decrease unrecognized tax benefits in future periods.

The purchase consideration for the MVMT business includes two future contingent payments that combined could total up to $100 million. Although the Company has established appropriate reserves for this liability based on its current estimate of the amounts that will eventually become payable, the exact amount of the future payments will be determined by MVMT's financial performance through the end of fiscal 2023. The Company expects to recognize gains/losses, as the case may be, as the Company’s estimate of the amount payable is updated from time to time. See Note 3 (Acquisitions).

The Company is involved in legal proceedings and claims from time to time, in the ordinary course of its business. Legal reserves are recorded in accordance with the accounting guidance for contingencies. Contingencies are inherently unpredictable and it is possible that results of operations, balance sheets or cash flows could be materially and adversely affected in any particular period by unfavorable developments in, or resolution or disposition of, such matters. For those legal proceedings and claims for which the Company believes that it is probable that a reasonably estimable loss may result, the Company records a reserve for the potential loss. For proceedings and claims where the Company believes it is reasonably possible that a loss may result that is materially in excess of amounts accrued for the matter, the Company either discloses an estimate of such possible loss or range of loss or includes a statement that such an estimate cannot be made.

On October 23, 2018, Swiss Time Watch & Jewellry GmbH (“ST Germany”) filed a lawsuit against the Company in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles. The lawsuit, which was subsequently removed to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, primarily alleged that the Company, as legal successor to MVMT Watches, Inc., failed to perform its obligations under the parties’ August 1, 2018 distribution agreement (the “ST Germany Agreement”). Under this agreement, ST Germany was granted the right, subject to certain limitations, to distribute a curated collection of MVMT watch styles in Germany. ST Germany also alleged various related torts and statutory violations and sought specific performance of the ST Germany Agreement as well as unspecified monetary damages. In February 2019, the parties settled the matter and the lawsuit was subsequently dismissed. The settlement terms included an immaterial cash payment by the Company and certain amendments to the ST Germany Agreement, including an extension of the agreement through early fiscal 2023.

In December 2016, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“U.S. Customs”) issued an audit report concerning the methodology used by the Company to allocate the cost of certain watch styles imported into the U.S. among the component parts of those watches for tariff purposes. The report disputes the reasonableness of the Company’s historical allocation formulas and proposes an alternative methodology that would imply $5.1 million in underpaid duties over the five-year period covered by the statute of limitations, plus possible penalties and interest. The Company believes that U.S. Customs’ alternative duty methodology and estimate are not consistent with the Company’s facts and circumstances and is disputing U.S. Customs’ position. On February 24, 2017, the Company provided U.S. Customs with supplemental analyses and information supporting the Company’s historical allocation formulas and thereafter provided additional information for U.S. Customs’ review. Although the Company disagrees with U.S. Customs’ position, it cannot predict with any certainty the outcome of this matter. The Company intends to continue to work with U.S. Customs to reach a mutually-satisfactory resolution.

In addition to the above matters, as of January 31, 2019, the Company is involved in other legal proceedings and contingencies, the resolution of which is not expected to materially affect its financial condition, future results of operations or cash flows.