XML 58 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Goodwill and Intangibles (Notes)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 29, 2012
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangibles
The Company’s goodwill balance is as follows: 
 
Fiscal Year Ended
 
December 29, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
Beginning Balance
$
1,664,457

 
$

Additions from acquisitions
684,789

 
4,604,459

Impairment of FDD goodwill
(1,704,770
)
 
(2,964,114
)
Translation adjustments
40,313

 
24,112

Ending Balance
$
684,789

 
$
1,664,457


The Company performs impairment tests of goodwill at its reporting unit level. The Company conducts its annual goodwill impairment test on the last day of each fiscal year unless factors indicate that an impairment may have occurred. The Company has impaired a total of $4.7 million of goodwill.
On December 31, 2011, the Company performed an impairment analysis of its finite-lived intangible assets based on a comparison of the undiscounted cash flows to the recorded carrying value of the intangible assets. This analysis resulted in the determination that a potential impairment was present. As a result of this analysis, the Company was required to determine the fair value of its finite-lived intangible assets and compare their respective fair values to their carrying values. The fair value of the acquired customer relationships is based on the benefit derived from the incremental revenue and related cash flows as a direct result of the customer relationships. The fair values of the acquired developed technology and trademark portfolio were determined by estimating the royalty expense that would be expected to be paid for the technology and trade name portfolio had they not been owned by the Company using market participant royalty rates and discounting the expected expense that is avoided given the Company’s ownership of these intangible assets. These forecasted cash flows are discounted to present value using an appropriate discount rate. As of December 31, 2011 it was determined that the carrying values of the finite-lived intangible assets exceeded their fair values and the Company recorded impairments of $1.5 million related to customer relationships, $0.4 million related to developed technology, and $57,000 related to trademark portfolio during the year ended December 31, 2011.
After completing its finite-lived intangible asset impairment test, the Company completed its impairment analysis of the goodwill derived from the FDD acquisition and determined the goodwill was impaired. The Company’s impairment analysis for goodwill consisted of comparing the implied fair value of goodwill to its carrying value as of December 31, 2011. Determining the fair value of goodwill required determining the fair value of the FDD reporting unit using certain assumptions, including the consideration of two generally accepted valuation methodologies: (i) the income approach and (ii) the market approach. The income approach is based upon the present value of the expected income that can be generated through the ownership of the property. The market approach is a process by which the market value estimate is derived analyzing similar assets that have been recently sold or licensed and then comparing them to the subject. The Company concluded that, given the size of FDD and its relatively niche business, the income approach provided the most accurate method of valuation. Based on this analysis, during the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $3.0 million, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011.
During the period ended June 30, 2012, the Company determined that FDD was not achieving the operating results identified in the model that was used to determine the goodwill impairment at December 31, 2011. The Company performed the goodwill impairment test discussed above and determined that the remaining goodwill was impaired and accordingly the Company recorded a $1.7 million goodwill impairment charge in the year ended December 29, 2012. The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test on Ikanos goodwill using the income approach. At December 29, 2012 no impairment of Ikanos goodwill was indicated.
The discount rate used was the value-weighted average of the Company’s estimated cost of equity and debt (“cost of capital”) derived using both known and estimated customary market metrics.
The identified intangible assets will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the following lives:
 
Years
Customer relationships
7
Developed technology
7
Trademark portfolio
7

 
The Company recognized $0.3 million and $0.7 million in amortization for the fiscal years ended December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, related to its intangible assets.