XML 26 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Derivatives and Hedging-Disclosures and Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Derivatives and Hedging-Disclosures and Fair Value Measurements

5) Derivatives and Hedging—Disclosures and Fair Value Measurements

The Company uses derivative instruments such as futures, options and swap agreements in order to mitigate exposure to market risk associated with the purchase of home heating oil for price-protected customers, physical inventory on hand, inventory in transit, priced purchase commitments and internal fuel usage. The Company has elected not to designate its derivative instruments as hedging derivatives, but rather as economic hedges whose change in fair value is recognized in its statement of operations in the line item (Increase) decrease in the fair value of derivative instruments. Depending on the risk being economically hedged, realized gains and losses are recorded in cost of product, cost of installations and services, or delivery and branch expenses.

 

As of September 30, 2017, to hedge a substantial majority of the purchase price associated with heating oil gallons anticipated to be sold to its price-protected customers, the Company held the following derivative instruments that settle in future months to match anticipated sales: 15.6 million gallons of swap contracts with a notional value of $25.5 million and a fair value of $2.3 million, 6.1 million gallons of call options with a notional value of $13.6 million and a fair value of $0.1 million, 8.1 million gallons of put options with a notional value of $8.8 million and a fair value of $2 thousand, and 79.0 million net gallons of synthetic call options with an average notional value of $134.3 million and a fair value of $4.1 million. To hedge the inter-month differentials for its price-protected customers, its physical inventory on hand and inventory in transit, the Company, as of September 30, 2017, had 1.3 million gallons of purchased swap contracts with a notional value of $2.2 million and a fair value of $0.2 million, and 16.8 million gallons of sold swap contracts with a notional value of $28.5 million and a fair value of $(1.9) million that settle in future months, 5.2 million gallons of purchased future contracts that settle daily with a notional value of $8.5 million, and 11.3 million gallons of sold future contracts that settle daily with a notional value of $18.0 million. To hedge its internal fuel usage and other related activities for fiscal 2018, the Company, as of September 30, 2017, had 6.3 million gallons of swap contracts with a notional value of $9.9 million and a fair value of $1.1 million that settle in future months.

As of September 30, 2016, to hedge a substantial majority of the purchase price associated with heating oil gallons anticipated to be sold to its price-protected customers, the Company held the following derivative instruments that settle in future months to match anticipated sales: 9.9 million gallons of swap contracts with a notional value of $14.3 million and a fair value of $1.2 million, 6.8 million gallons of call options with a notional value of $13.8 million and a fair value of $0.3 million, 6.2 million gallons of put options with a notional value of $6.5 million and a fair value of $0.02 million, and 84.9 million net gallons of synthetic call options with an average notional value of $133.5 million and a fair value of $1.3 million. To hedge the inter-month differentials for its price-protected customers, its physical inventory on hand and inventory in transit, the Company, as of September 30, 2016, had 1.2 million gallons of purchased swap contracts with a notional value of $1.7 million and a fair value of $0.2 million, 4.4 million gallons of purchased future contracts with a notional value of $6.7 million and a fair value of $0.5 million, and 21.8 million gallons of sold future contracts with a notional value of $32.2 million and a fair value of $(2.1) million that settle in future months. In addition to the previously described hedging instruments, to lock-inthe differential between high sulfur home heating oil and ultra low sulfur diesel, the Company as of September 30, 2016, had 7.9 million gallons of spread contracts (simultaneous long and short positions) with an average notional value of $10.8 million and a net fair value of $(0.04) million. To hedge its internal fuel usage and other related activities for fiscal 2017, the Company, as of September 30, 2016, had 5.7 million gallons of swap contracts with a notional value of $7.7 million and a fair value of $1.1 million that settle in future months.

The Company’s derivative instruments are with the following counterparties: Bank of America, N.A., Bank of Montreal, Cargill, Inc., Citibank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Key Bank, N.A., Munich Re Trading LLC, Regions Financial Corporation, Societe Generale, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. The Company assesses counterparty credit risk and considers it to be low. We maintain master netting arrangements that allow for the non-conditionaloffsetting of amounts receivable and payable with counterparties to help manage our risks and record derivative positions on a net basis. The Company generally does not receive cash collateral from its counterparties and does not restrict the use of cash collateral it maintains at counterparties. At September 30, 2017, the aggregate cash posted as collateral in the normal course of business at counterparties was $0.5 million. Positions with counterparties who are also parties to our credit agreement are collateralized under that facility. As of September 30, 2017, $0.1 million of hedge positions and payable amounts were secured under the credit facility.

FASB ASC 815-10-05 Derivatives and Hedging, established accounting and reporting standards requiring that derivative instruments be recorded at fair value and included in the consolidated balance sheet as assets or liabilities, along with qualitative disclosures regarding the derivative activity. To the extent derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges are effective and the standard’s documentation requirements have been met, changes in fair value are recognized in other comprehensive income until the underlying hedged item is recognized in earnings. The Company has elected not to designate its derivative instruments as hedging instruments under this standard and the change in fair value of the derivative instruments is recognized in our statement of operations in the line item (Increase) decrease in the fair value of derivative instruments. Depending on the risk being hedged, realized gains and losses are recorded in cost of product, cost of installations and services, or delivery and branch expenses.

 

FASB ASC 820-10 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which classified the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. The Company’s Level 1 derivative assets and liabilities represent the fair value of commodity contracts used in its hedging activities that are identical and traded in active markets. The Company’s Level 2 derivative assets and liabilities represent the fair value of commodity contracts used in its hedging activities that are valued using either directly or indirectly observable inputs, whose nature, risk and class are similar. No significant transfers of assets or liabilities have been made into and out of the Level 1 or Level 2 tiers. All derivative instruments were non-trading positions and were either a Level 1 or Level 2 instrument. The Company had no Level 3 derivative instruments. The fair market value of our Level 1 and Level 2 derivative assets and liabilities are calculated by our counter-parties and are independently validated by the Company. The Company’s calculations are, for Level 1 derivative assets and liabilities, based on the published New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”) market prices for the commodity contracts open at the end of the period. For Level 2 derivative assets and liabilities the calculations performed by the Company are based on a combination of the NYMEX published market prices and other inputs, including such factors as present value, volatility and duration.

 

The Company had no assets or liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to their initial recognition. The Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are listed on the following table.

 

(In thousands)               Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:  

Derivatives Not Designated

as Hedging Instruments

Under FASB ASC 815-10

  

Balance Sheet Location

   Total     Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
Level 1
    Significant Other
Observable Inputs
Level 2
 
Asset Derivatives at September 30, 2017  

Commodity contracts

   Fair asset and fair liability value of derivative instruments    $ 7,729     $ —       $ 7,729  

Commodity contracts

   Long-term derivative assets included in the deferred charges and other assets, net balance      996       —         996  
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commodity contract assets at September 30, 2017

      $ 8,725     $ —       $ 8,725  
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
Liability Derivatives at September 30, 2017  

Commodity contracts

   Fair liability and fair asset value of derivative instruments    $ (2,086   $ —       $ (2,086

Commodity contracts

   Cash collateral      —         —         —    

Commodity contracts

   Long-term derivative liabilities included in the deferred charges and other assets, net and other long-term liabilities balances      (731     —         (731
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commodity contract liabilities at September 30, 2017

      $ (2,817   $ —       $ (2,817
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
Asset Derivatives at September 30, 2016  

Commodity contracts

   Fair asset and fair liability value 
of derivative instruments
   $ 11,692     $ —       $ 11,692  

Commodity contracts

   Long-term derivative assets included in the other long-term liabilities balance      1,369       481       888  
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commodity contract assets at September 30, 2016

      $ 13,061     $ 481     $ 12,580  
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
Liability Derivatives at September 30, 2016  

Commodity contracts

   Fair liability and fair asset value
of derivative instruments
   $ (9,990   $ (1,603   $ (8,387

Commodity contracts

   Cash collateral      —         —         —    

Commodity contracts

   Long-term derivative liabilities included in the other long-term liabilities balance      (565     (484     (81
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commodity contract liabilities at September 30, 2016

        $(10,555)       $(2,087)       $(8,468)  

 

The Company’s derivative assets (liabilities) offset by counterparty and subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement are listed on the following table.

 

(In thousands)                       Gross Amounts Not Offset in the
Statement of Financial Position
 

Offsetting of Financial Assets (Liabilities)

and Derivative Assets (Liabilities)

   Gross
Assets
Recognized
     Gross
Liabilities
Offset in the
Statement
of Financial
Position
    Net Assets
(Liabilities)
Presented in
the
Statement of
Financial
Position
    Financial
Instruments
     Cash
Collateral
Received
     Net
Amount
 

Fair asset value of derivative instruments

   $ 6,023      $ (91   $ 5,932     $ —        $ —        $ 5,932  

Long-term derivative assets included in other long-term assets, net

     996        (730     266       —          —          266  

Fair liability value of derivative instruments

     1,706        (1,995     (289     —          —          (289

Long-term derivative liabilities included in other long-term liabilities, net

     —          (1     (1     —          —          (1
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total at September 30, 2017

   $ 8,725      $ (2,817   $ 5,908     $ —        $ —        $ 5,908  
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Fair asset value of derivative instruments

   $ 7,716      $ (3,729   $ 3,987     $ —        $ —        $ 3,987  

Long-term derivative assets included in other long-term assets, net

     888        (81     807       —          —          807  

Fair liability value of derivative instruments

     3,976        (6,261     (2,285     —          —          (2,285

Long-term derivative liabilities included in other long-term liabilities, net

     481        (484     (3     —          —          (3
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total at September 30, 2016

   $ 13,061      $ (10,555   $ 2,506     $ —        $ —        $ 2,506  
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)                        

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations

 
          Amount of (Gain) or Loss Recognized
Years Ended September 30,
 

Derivatives Not

Designated as Hedging

Instruments Under FASB ASC 815-10

  

Location of (Gain) or Loss Recognized in

Income on Derivative

   2017     2016     2015  

Commodity contracts

   Cost of product (a)    $ 6,386     $ 16,977     $ 13,368  

Commodity contracts

   Cost of installations and service (a)    $ (526   $ 949     $ 1,831  

Commodity contracts

   Delivery and branch expenses (a)    $ (422   $ 2,405     $ 2,098  

Commodity contracts

   (Increase) / decrease in the fair value of derivative instruments (b)    $ (2,193   $ (18,217   $ 4,187  

 

(a) Represents realized closed positions and includes the cost of options as they expire.
(b) Represents the change in value of unrealized open positions and expired options.