10-Q 1 d419677d10q.htm FORM 10-Q

##### Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017

OR

☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-14129

STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.

(Exact name of registrants as specified in its charters)

Delaware |  | 06-1437793
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
9 West Broad Street Stamford, Connecticut |  | 06902
(Address of principal executive office) |  |

(203) 328-7310

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer |  | ☐ |  | Accelerated filer |  | ☒
Non-accelerated filer |  | ☐ |  | Smaller reporting company |  | ☐
|  |  |  | Emerging growth company |  | ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

At July 31, 2017, the registrant had 55,887,832 Common Units outstanding.

##### Table of Contents

STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

|  | Page |
Part I Financial Information |  |  |  |
Item 1 - Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |  |  |  |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2017 (unaudited) and September 30, 2016 |  |  | 3 |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016 |  |  | 4 |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (unaudited) for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016 |  |  | 5 |
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Partners’ Capital (unaudited) for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 |  |  | 6 |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016 |  |  | 7 |
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) |  |  | 8-19 |
Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |  |  | 20-35 |
Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |  |  | 35 |
Item 4 - Controls and Procedures |  |  | 36 |
Part II Other Information: |  |  |  |
Item 1 - Legal Proceedings |  |  | 36 |
Item 1A - Risk Factors |  |  | 37 |
Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |  |  | 37 |
Item 6 - Exhibits |  |  | 38 |
Signatures |  |  | 39 |

2

##### Table of Contents

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. | Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

|  | June 30, |  |  | September 30, |
(in thousands) |  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |
|  | (unaudited) |  |  |  |
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |
Current assets |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 94,574 |  |  | $ | 139,188 |
Receivables, net of allowance of $6,577 and $4,419, respectively |  |  | 116,646 |  |  |  | 78,650 |
Inventories |  |  | 42,422 |  |  |  | 45,894 |
Fair asset value of derivative instruments |  |  | — |  |  |  | 3,987 |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |  |  | 24,409 |  |  |  | 27,139 |
Total current assets |  |  | 278,051 |  |  |  | 294,858 |
Property and equipment, net |  |  | 74,491 |  |  |  | 70,410 |
Goodwill |  |  | 215,262 |  |  |  | 212,760 |
Intangibles, net |  |  | 94,520 |  |  |  | 97,656 |
Deferred tax assets, net |  |  | 255 |  |  |  | 5,353 |
Restricted cash |  |  | 250 |  |  |  | — |
Investments (1) |  |  | 11,686 |  |  |  | — |
Deferred charges and other assets, net |  |  | 9,782 |  |  |  | 11,074 |
Total assets |  | $ | 684,297 |  |  | $ | 692,111 |
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable |  | $ | 20,354 |  |  | $ | 25,690 |
Fair liability value of derivative instruments |  |  | 4,760 |  |  |  | 2,285 |
Current maturities of long-term debt |  |  | 10,000 |  |  |  | 16,200 |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |  |  | 130,776 |  |  |  | 103,855 |
Unearned service contract revenue |  |  | 55,759 |  |  |  | 56,971 |
Customer credit balances |  |  | 40,340 |  |  |  | 84,921 |
Total current liabilities |  |  | 261,989 |  |  |  | 289,922 |
Long-term debt |  |  | 68,155 |  |  |  | 75,441 |
Other long-term liabilities |  |  | 25,082 |  |  |  | 25,255 |
Partners’ capital |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Common unitholders |  |  | 349,554 |  |  |  | 322,771 |
General partner |  |  | (672 | ) |  |  | (516 | )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes |  |  | (19,811 | ) |  |  | (20,762 | )
Total partners’ capital |  |  | 329,071 |  |  |  | 301,493 |
Total liabilities and partners’ capital |  | $ | 684,297 |  |  | $ | 692,111 |

(1) | See Note 2 – Investments

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

##### Table of Contents

STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

|  | Three Months Ended |  |  | Nine Months Ended |
|  | June 30, |  |  | June 30, |
(in thousands, except per unit data - unaudited) |  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |  |  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |
Sales: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Product |  | $ | 158,531 |  |  | $ | 156,229 |  |  | $ | 950,307 |  |  | $ | 813,519 |
Installations and services |  |  | 67,270 |  |  |  | 61,965 |  |  |  | 191,664 |  |  |  | 185,755 |
Total sales |  |  | 225,801 |  |  |  | 218,194 |  |  |  | 1,141,971 |  |  |  | 999,274 |
Cost and expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost of product |  |  | 104,268 |  |  |  | 103,568 |  |  |  | 592,802 |  |  |  | 473,534 |
Cost of installations and services |  |  | 58,224 |  |  |  | 53,272 |  |  |  | 183,137 |  |  |  | 175,042 |
(Increase) decrease in the fair value of derivative instruments |  |  | 3,135 |  |  |  | (11,283 | ) |  |  | 7,026 |  |  |  | (20,071 | )
Delivery and branch expenses |  |  | 67,640 |  |  |  | 64,052 |  |  |  | 240,987 |  |  |  | 218,755 |
Depreciation and amortization expenses |  |  | 7,418 |  |  |  | 6,468 |  |  |  | 20,705 |  |  |  | 19,959 |
General and administrative expenses |  |  | 6,235 |  |  |  | 6,017 |  |  |  | 18,144 |  |  |  | 17,525 |
Finance charge income |  |  | (1,308 | ) |  |  | (945 | ) |  |  | (3,288 | ) |  |  | (2,480 | )
Operating income (loss) |  |  | (19,811 | ) |  |  | (2,955 | ) |  |  | 82,458 |  |  |  | 117,010 |
Interest expense, net |  |  | (1,619 | ) |  |  | (1,731 | ) |  |  | (5,118 | ) |  |  | (5,481 | )
Amortization of debt issuance costs |  |  | (336 | ) |  |  | (307 | ) |  |  | (972 | ) |  |  | (934 | )
Income (loss) before income taxes |  |  | (21,766 | ) |  |  | (4,993 | ) |  |  | 76,368 |  |  |  | 110,595 |
Income tax expense (benefit) |  |  | (8,434 | ) |  |  | (1,755 | ) |  |  | 31,721 |  |  |  | 46,566 |
Net income (loss) |  | $ | (13,332 | ) |  | $ | (3,238 | ) |  | $ | 44,647 |  |  | $ | 64,029 |
General Partner’s interest in net income (loss) |  |  | (79 | ) |  |  | (19 | ) |  |  | 259 |  |  |  | 362 |
Limited Partners’ interest in net income (loss) |  | $ | (13,253 | ) |  | $ | (3,219 | ) |  | $ | 44,388 |  |  | $ | 63,667 |
Basic and diluted income (loss) per Limited Partner Unit (1): |  | $ | (0.24 | ) |  | $ | (0.06 | ) |  | $ | 0.70 |  |  | $ | 0.95 |
Weighted average number of Limited Partner units outstanding: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic and Diluted |  |  | 55,888 |  |  |  | 57,188 |  |  |  | 55,888 |  |  |  | 57,237 |

(1) | See Note 13 Earnings Per Limited Partner Unit.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

##### Table of Contents

STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

|  | Three Months Ended |  |  | Nine Months Ended |
|  | June 30, |  |  | June 30, |
(in thousands - unaudited) |  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |  |  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |
Net income (loss): |  | $ | (13,332 | ) |  | $ | (3,238 | ) |  | $ | 44,647 |  |  | $ | 64,029 |
Other comprehensive income: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Unrealized gain on pension plan obligation (1) |  |  | 532 |  |  |  | 647 |  |  |  | 1,598 |  |  |  | 1,943 |
Tax effect of unrealized gain on pension plan |  |  | (215 | ) |  |  | (267 | ) |  |  | (647 | ) |  |  | (802 | )
Total other comprehensive income |  |  | 317 |  |  |  | 380 |  |  |  | 951 |  |  |  | 1,141 |
Total comprehensive income (loss) |  | $ | (13,015 | ) |  | $ | (2,858 | ) |  | $ | 45,598 |  |  | $ | 65,170 |

(1) | This item is included in the computation of net periodic pension cost.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

##### Table of Contents

STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

|  | Number of Units |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accum. Other |  |  | Total |
(in thousands - unaudited) |  | Common |  |  | General Partner |  |  | Common |  |  | General Partner |  |  | Comprehensive Income (Loss) |  |  | Partners’ Capital |
Balance as of September 30, 2016 |  |  | 55,888 |  |  |  | 326 |  |  | $ | 322,771 |  |  | $ | (516 | ) |  | $ | (20,762 | ) |  | $ | 301,493 |
Net income |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 44,388 |  |  |  | 259 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 44,647 |
Unrealized gain on pension plan obligation |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,598 |  |  |  | 1,598 |
Tax effect of unrealized gain on pension plan |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (647 | ) |  |  | (647 | )
Distributions |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (17,605 | ) |  |  | (415 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (18,020 | )
Balance as of June 30, 2017 |  |  | 55,888 |  |  |  | 326 |  |  | $ | 349,554 |  |  | $ | (672 | ) |  | $ | (19,811 | ) |  | $ | 329,071 |

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

##### Table of Contents

STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

|  | Nine Months Ended June 30, |
(in thousands - unaudited) |  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 44,647 |  |  | $ | 64,029 |
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(Increase) decrease in fair value of derivative instruments |  |  | 7,026 |  |  |  | (20,071 | )
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 21,677 |  |  |  | 20,893 |
Provision (recovery) for losses on accounts receivable |  |  | 2,261 |  |  |  | (140 | )
Change in deferred taxes |  |  | 4,451 |  |  |  | 13,299 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(Increase) decrease in receivables |  |  | (40,524 | ) |  |  | 647 |
Decrease in inventories |  |  | 3,761 |  |  |  | 13,402 |
Decrease in other assets |  |  | 3,443 |  |  |  | 968 |
Decrease in accounts payable |  |  | (3,468 | ) |  |  | (2,173 | )
Decrease in customer credit balances |  |  | (45,757 | ) |  |  | (2,026 | )
Increase in other current and long-term liabilities |  |  | 25,693 |  |  |  | 21,357 |
Net cash provided by operating activities |  |  | 23,210 |  |  |  | 110,185 |
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Capital expenditures |  |  | (9,348 | ) |  |  | (7,230 | )
Proceeds from sales of fixed assets |  |  | 171 |  |  |  | 303 |
Purchase of investments (1) |  |  | (11,538 | ) |  |  | — |
Acquisitions |  |  | (14,504 | ) |  |  | (8,829 | )
Net cash used in investing activities |  |  | (35,219 | ) |  |  | (15,756 | )
Cash flows used in financing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Term loan repayment |  |  | (13,700 | ) |  |  | (5,000 | )
Distributions |  |  | (18,020 | ) |  |  | (17,097 | )
Unit repurchases |  |  | — |  |  |  | (707 | )
Customer retainage payments |  |  | (575 | ) |  |  | (680 | )
Payments of debt issuance costs |  |  | (60 | ) |  |  | (297 | )
Net cash used in financing activities |  |  | (32,355 | ) |  |  | (23,781 | )
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash |  |  | (44,364 | ) |  |  | 70,648 |
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period |  |  | 139,188 |  |  |  | 100,508 |
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period |  | $ | 94,824 |  |  | $ | 171,156 |

(1) | See Note 2 – Investments

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

7

##### Table of Contents

STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1) Partnership Organization

Star Gas Partners, L.P. (“Star Gas Partners,” the “Partnership,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is a full service provider specializing in the sale of home heating products and services to residential and commercial customers. The Partnership also services and sells heating and air conditioning equipment to its home heating oil and propane customers and to a lesser extent, provides these offerings to customers outside of our home heating oil and propane customer base. In certain of our marketing areas, we provide home security and plumbing services primarily to our home heating oil and propane customer base. We also sell diesel fuel, gasoline and home heating oil on a delivery only basis. These products and services are offered through our home heating oil and propane locations. The Partnership has one reportable segment for accounting purposes. We are the nation’s largest retail distributor of home heating oil based upon sales volume. Including our propane locations, we serve customers in the more northern and eastern states within the Northeast, Central and Southeast U.S. regions.

The Partnership is organized as follows:

| • |  | The Partnership is a master limited partnership, which as of June 30, 2017, had outstanding 55.9 million Common Units (NYSE: “SGU”), representing 99.4% limited partner interest in Star Gas Partners, and 0.3 million general partner units, representing 0.6% general partner interest in Star Gas Partners. The general partner of the Partnership is Kestrel Heat, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Kestrel Heat” or the “General Partner”). The Board of Directors of Kestrel Heat (the “Board”) is appointed by its sole member, Kestrel Energy Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Kestrel”).

| • |  | The Partnership owns 100% of Star Acquisitions, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“SA”) that owns 100% of Petro Holdings, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“Petro”) and 100% of Woodbury Insurance Co., Inc., a Connecticut captive insurance corporation formed in July 2016 to insure large deductibles for certain insurance policies carried by Petro. SA and its subsidiaries are subject to Federal and state corporate income taxes. The Partnership’s operations are conducted through Petro and its subsidiaries. Petro is primarily a Northeast, Central and Southeast region retail distributor of home heating oil and propane that as of June 30, 2017, served approximately 441,000 full-service residential and commercial home heating oil and propane customers. Petro also sold diesel fuel, gasoline and home heating oil to approximately 73,000 customers on a delivery only basis. We installed, maintained, and repaired heating and air conditioning equipment and to a lesser extent provided these services outside our customer base including 14,900 service contracts for natural gas and other heating systems. In addition, we provided home security and plumbing to approximately 29,100 customers.

| • |  | Petroleum Heat and Power Co., Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“PH&P”) is a 100% owned subsidiary of the Partnership. PH&P is the borrower and the Partnership is the guarantor of the third amended and restated credit agreement’s $100 million five-year senior secured term loan and the $300 million ($450 million during the heating season of December through April of each year) revolving credit facility, both due July 30, 2020. (See Note 9—Long-Term Debt and Bank Facility Borrowings).

2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Star Gas Partners and its subsidiaries. All material inter-company items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The financial information included herein is unaudited; however, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair statement of financial condition and results for the interim periods. Due to the seasonal nature of the Partnership’s business, the results of operations and cash flows for the nine month period ended June 30, 2017, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

These interim financial statements of the Partnership have been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2016.

8

##### Table of Contents

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) consists of the unrealized gain (loss) amortization on the Partnership’s pension plan obligation for its two frozen defined benefit pension plans and the corresponding tax effect.

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

At June 30, 2017, the $94.8 million of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash on the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows is composed of $94.6 million of cash and cash equivalents and $0.3 million of restricted cash. Restricted cash represents deposits held by our captive insurance company that are required by state insurance regulations to remain in the captive insurance company as cash.

Investments

The investments are held by our captive insurance company in an irrevocable trust as collateral for workers’ compensation and automobile liability claims incurred and expected to be incurred in fiscal 2017. The collateral is required by a third party insurance carrier that insures per claim amounts above a set deductible. Due to the expected timing of claim payments, the nature of the collateral agreement with the carrier, and our captive insurance company’s source of other operating cash, the collateral is not expected to be used to pay obligations within the next twelve months.

Investments are currently comprised of $10.3 million of Level 1 debt securities and $1.4 million of mutual funds measured at net asset value.

Weather Hedge Contract

To partially mitigate the effect of weather on cash flows, the Partnership has used weather hedge contracts for a number of years. Weather hedge contracts are recorded in accordance with the intrinsic value method defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815-45-15 Derivatives and Hedging, Weather Derivatives (EITF 99-2). The premium paid is included in the caption prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying balance sheets and amortized over the life of the contract, with the intrinsic value method applied at each interim period.

For fiscal years 2016 and 2017, the Partnership had weather hedge contracts that cover the five month period from November 1, through March 31, taken as a whole, for each respective fiscal year. The ultimate amount due to the Partnership (if any) was based on the entire five month accumulated calculation for the hedge period and had a maximum payout of $12.5 million for each respective fiscal year. In accordance with ASC 815-45-15, as of December 31, 2015, the Partnership recorded a credit of $12.5 million during fiscal 2016 under this contract that reduced delivery and branch expenses. No credit was recorded during the nine months ended June 30, 2017.

New England Teamsters and Trucking Industry Pension Fund (“the NETTI Fund”) Liability

As of June 30, 2017, we had $0.2 million and $17.4 million balances included in the captions accrued expenses and other current liabilities and other long-term liabilities, respectively, on our condensed consolidated balance sheet representing the remaining balance of the NETTI Fund withdrawal liability. Based on the borrowing rates currently available to the Partnership for long-term financing of a similar maturity, the fair value of the NETTI Fund withdrawal liability as of June 30, 2017 was $22.2 million. We utilized Level 2 inputs in the fair value hierarchy of valuation techniques to determine the fair value of this liability.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The update requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability instead of being presented as an asset. The Partnership retrospectively adopted the ASU effective December 31, 2016. As a result of the adoption, certain prior year balances (September 30, 2016) changed to conform to the current year presentation as follows: deferred charges and other assets, net decreased from $11.9 million to $11.1 million and long-term debt decreased from $76.3 million to $75.4 million.

9

##### Table of Contents

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments, which requires an acquiring entity to recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The acquiring entity is required to record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. In addition, the acquiring entity is to present separately on the face of its income statement or disclose in the notes the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods as if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. The Partnership adopted the ASU effective December 31, 2016. The adoption of ASU No. 2015-16 did not have an impact on the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flow (Topic 230): Restricted cash. The update requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The Partnership adopted the ASU effective December 31, 2016. The adoption of ASU No. 2016-18 did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The FASB has also issued several updates to ASU 2014-09. This ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective. This new guidance is effective for our annual reporting period beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, with early adoption permitted beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Partnership is in the process of evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on its revenue streams, consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Partnership has not yet selected a transition method, nor does it intend to early adopt.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. The update changes the measurement principle for inventory from the lower of cost or market to the lower of cost and net realizable value. This new guidance is effective for our annual reporting period beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Partnership does not expect ASU No. 2015-11 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. The update requires all leases with a term greater than twelve months to be recognized on the balance sheet by calculating the discounted present value of such leases and accounting for them through a right-of-use asset and an offsetting lease liability, and the disclosure of key information pertaining to leasing arrangements. This new guidance is effective for our annual reporting period beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Partnership does not intend to early adopt. The Partnership is continuing to evaluate the effect that ASU No. 2016-02 could have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, but has not yet selected a transition method. The new guidance will materially change how we account for operating leases for office space, trucks and other equipment. Upon adoption, we expect to recognize discounted right-of-use assets and offsetting lease liabilities related to our operating leases of office space, trucks and other equipment. As of June 30, 2017, the undiscounted future minimum lease payments through 2032 for such operating leases are approximately $131.8 million, but what the range of reasonable discount rates will be at the time of adoption and what amount of leasing activity is expected between June 30, 2017, and the date of adoption, are currently unknown. For this reason we are unable to estimate the discounted right-of-use assets and lease liabilities as of the date of adoption.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses. The update broadens the information that an entity should consider in developing expected credit loss estimates, eliminates the probable initial recognition threshold, and allows for the immediate recognition of the full amount of expected credit losses. This new guidance is effective for our annual reporting period beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2021, with early adoption permitted in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. The Partnership is evaluating the effect that ASU No. 2016-13 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, but has not yet determined the timing of adoption.

10

##### Table of Contents

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flow (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The update addresses the issues of debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, proceeds from the settlement of corporate owned life insurance policies, distributions received from equity method investees, beneficial interests in securitization transactions, and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. This new guidance is effective for our annual reporting period beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Partnership has not determined the timing of adoption, but does not expect ASU 2016-15 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the definition of a business. The update clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. This new guidance is effective for our annual reporting period beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Partnership has not determined the timing of adoption, but does not expect ASU 2017-01 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 230): Simplifying the test for goodwill impairment. The update simplifies how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, but not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. This new guidance is effective for our annual reporting period beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2021, with early adoption permitted. The Partnership has not determined the timing of adoption, but does not expect ASU 2017-04 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

3) Common Unit Repurchase and Retirement

In July 2012, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to 3.0 million of the Partnership’s Common Units (“Plan III”). In July 2013, the Board authorized the repurchase of an additional 1.9 million Common Units under Plan III. The authorized Common Unit repurchases may be made from time to time in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or in such other manner deemed appropriate by management. There is no guarantee of the exact number of units that will be purchased under the program and the Partnership may discontinue purchases at any time. The program does not have a time limit. The Board may also approve additional purchases of units from time to time in private transactions. The Partnership’s repurchase activities take into account SEC safe harbor rules and guidance for issuer repurchases. All of the Common Units purchased in the repurchase program will be retired.

Under the Partnership’s third amended and restated credit agreement dated July 30, 2015, in order to repurchase Common Units we must maintain Availability (as defined in the amended and restated credit agreement) of $45 million, 15.0% of the facility size of $300 million (assuming the non-seasonal aggregate commitment is in effect) on a historical pro forma and forward-looking basis, and a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.15 measured as of the date of repurchase. The Partnership was in compliance with this covenant as of June 30, 2017.

The following table shows repurchases under Plan III.

(in thousands, except per unit amounts) Period |  | Total Number of Units Purchased (a) |  |  | Average Price Paid per Unit (b) |  |  | Maximum Number of Units that May Yet Be Purchased |
Plan III - Number of units authorized |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4,894 |
Private transaction - Number of units authorized |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,450 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7,344 |
Plan III - Fiscal years 2012 to 2016 total (c) |  |  | 5,137 |  |  | $ | 5.78 |  |  |  | 2,207 |
Plan III - Fiscal year 2017 total |  |  | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  |  | 2,207 |

(a) | Units were repurchased as part of a publicly announced program, except as noted in a private transaction.

(b) | Amounts include repurchase costs.

(c) | Includes 2.45 million common units acquired in a private transaction.

11

##### Table of Contents

4) Derivatives and Hedging—Disclosures and Fair Value Measurements

FASB ASC 815-10-05 Derivatives and Hedging, established accounting and reporting standards requiring that derivative instruments be recorded at fair value and included in the consolidated balance sheet as assets or liabilities, along with qualitative disclosures regarding the derivative activity. The Partnership uses derivative instruments such as futures, options and swap agreements in order to mitigate exposure to market risk associated with the purchase of home heating oil for price-protected customers, physical inventory on hand, inventory in transit, priced purchase commitments and internal fuel usage. The Partnership has elected not to designate its derivative instruments as hedging derivatives, but rather as economic hedges whose change in fair value is recognized in its statement of operations in the line item (increase) decrease in the fair value of derivative instruments. Depending on the risk being economically hedged, realized gains and losses are recorded in cost of product, cost of installations and services, or delivery and branch expenses.

As of June 30, 2017, to hedge a substantial majority of the purchase price associated with heating oil gallons anticipated to be sold to its price-protected customers, the Partnership held the following derivative instruments that settle in future months to match anticipated sales: 9.0 million gallons of swap contracts, 3.6 million gallons of call options, 5.0 million gallons of put options, and 55.0 million net gallons of synthetic call options. To hedge the inter-month differentials for its price-protected customers, its physical inventory on hand and inventory in transit, the Partnership, as of June 30, 2017, had 1.3 million gallons of long swap contracts, 53.3 million gallons of long future contracts, and 67.7 million gallons of short future contracts that settle in future months. In addition to the above, to lock-in the differential between high sulfur home heating oil and ultra low sulfur diesel, the Partnership as of June 30, 2017, had 0.4 million gallons of spread contracts (simultaneous long and short positions). To hedge its internal fuel usage and other related activities for fiscal 2017, the Partnership, as of June 30, 2017, had 6.5 million gallons of swap contracts that settle in future months.

As of June 30, 2016, to hedge a substantial majority of the purchase price associated with heating oil gallons anticipated to be sold to its price-protected customers, the Partnership held the following derivative instruments that settle in future months to match anticipated sales: 6.6 million gallons of swap contracts, 4.5 million gallons of call options, 4.1 million gallons of put options, and 60.0 million net gallons of synthetic call options. To hedge the inter-month differentials for its price-protected customers, its physical inventory on hand and inventory in transit, the Partnership, as of June 30, 2016, had 1.1 million gallons of long swap contracts, 54.0 million gallons of long future contracts, and 70.1 million gallons of short future contracts that settle in future months. In addition to the previously described hedging instruments, to lock-in the differential between high sulfur home heating oil and ultra low sulfur diesel, the Partnership as of June 30, 2016, had 0.7 million gallons of spread contracts (simultaneous long and short positions). To hedge its internal fuel usage and other related activities for fiscal 2016, the Partnership, as of June 30, 2016, had 5.9 million gallons of swap contracts that settle in future months.

The Partnership’s derivative instruments are with the following counterparties: Bank of America, N.A., Bank of Montreal, Cargill, Inc., Citibank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Key Bank, N.A., Munich Re Trading LLC, Regions Financial Corporation, Societe Generale, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. The Partnership assesses counterparty credit risk and considers it to be low. We maintain master netting arrangements that allow for the non-conditional offsetting of amounts receivable and payable with counterparties to help manage our risks and record derivative positions on a net basis. The Partnership generally does not receive cash collateral from its counterparties and does not restrict the use of cash collateral it maintains at counterparties. At June 30, 2017, the aggregate cash posted as collateral in the normal course of business at counterparties was $0.5 million, which was recorded in prepaid expenses and other current assets. Positions with counterparties who are also parties to our credit agreement are collateralized under that facility. As of June 30, 2017, $4.9 million of hedge positions were secured under the credit facility.

FASB ASC 820-10 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which classified the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. The Partnership’s Level 1 derivative assets and liabilities represent the fair value of commodity contracts used in its hedging activities that are identical and traded in active markets. The Partnership’s Level 2 derivative assets and liabilities represent the fair value of commodity contracts used in its hedging activities that are valued using either directly or indirectly observable inputs, whose nature, risk and class are similar. No significant transfers of assets or liabilities have been made into and out of the Level 1 or Level 2 tiers. All derivative instruments were non-trading positions and were either a Level 1 or Level 2 instrument. The Partnership had no Level 3 derivative instruments. The fair market value of our Level 1 and Level 2 derivative assets and liabilities are calculated by our counter-parties and are independently validated by the Partnership. The Partnership’s calculations are, for Level 1 derivative assets and liabilities, based on the published New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”) market prices for the commodity contracts open at the end of the period. For Level 2 derivative assets and liabilities the calculations performed by the Partnership are based on a combination of the NYMEX published market prices and other inputs, including such factors as present value, volatility and duration.

12

##### Table of Contents

The Partnership had no assets or liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to their initial recognition. The Partnership’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are listed on the following table.

(In thousands) |  |  |  |  |  |  | Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using: |
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |  |  |  |  |  |  | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets |  |  | Significant Other Observable Inputs |
Under FASB ASC 815-10 |  | Balance Sheet Location |  | Total |  |  | Level 1 |  |  | Level 2 |
Asset Derivatives at June 30, 2017 |
Commodity contracts |  | Fair asset and fair liability value of derivative instruments |  | $ | 8,378 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 8,378 |
Commodity contracts |  | Long-term derivative assets included in the deferred charges and other assets, net and other long-term liabilities balances |  |  | 1,096 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1,096 |
Commodity contract assets at June 30, 2017 |  | $ | 9,474 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 9,474 |
Liability Derivatives at June 30, 2017 |
Commodity contracts |  | Fair liability and fair asset value of derivative instruments |  | $ | (13,138 | ) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | (13,138 | )
Commodity contracts |  | Cash collateral |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Commodity contracts |  | Long-term derivative liabilities included in the deferred charges and other assets, net and other long-term liabilities balances |  |  | (1,232 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | (1,232 | )
Commodity contract liabilities at June 30, 2017 |  | $ | (14,370 | ) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | (14,370 | )
Asset Derivatives at September 30, 2016 |
Commodity contracts |  | Fair asset and fair liability value of derivative instruments |  | $ | 11,692 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 11,692 |
Commodity contracts |  | Long-term derivative assets included in the other long-term liabilities balance |  |  | 1,369 |  |  |  | 481 |  |  |  | 888 |
Commodity contract assets at September 30, 2016 |  | $ | 13,061 |  |  | $ | 481 |  |  | $ | 12,580 |
Liability Derivatives at September 30, 2016 |
Commodity contracts |  | Fair liability and fair asset value of derivative instruments |  | $ | (9,990 | ) |  | $ | (1,603 | ) |  | $ | (8,387 | )
Commodity contracts |  | Cash collateral |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |
Commodity contracts |  | Long-term derivative liabilities included in the other long-term liabilities balance |  |  | (565 | ) |  |  | (484 | ) |  |  | (81 | )
Commodity contract liabilities at September 30, 2016 |  | $ | (10,555 | ) |  | $ | (2,087 | ) |  | $ | (8,468 | )

13

##### Table of Contents

The Partnership’s derivative assets (liabilities) offset by counterparty and subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement are listed on the following table.

(In thousands) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Position |
Offsetting of Financial Assets (Liabilities) and Derivative Assets (Liabilities) |  | Gross Assets Recognized |  |  | Gross Liabilities Offset in the Statement of Financial Position |  |  | Net Assets (Liabilities) Presented in the Statement of Financial Position |  |  | Financial Instruments |  |  | Cash Collateral Received |  |  | Net Amount |
Fair asset value of derivative instruments |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |
Long-term derivative assets included in deferred charges and other assets, net |  |  | 174 |  |  |  | (165 | ) |  |  | 9 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 9 |
Fair liability value of derivative instruments |  |  | 8,378 |  |  |  | (13,138 | ) |  |  | (4,760 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (4,760 | )
Long-term derivative liabilities included in other long-term liabilities, net |  |  | 922 |  |  |  | (1,067 | ) |  |  | (145 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (145 | )
Total at June 30, 2017 |  | $ | 9,474 |  |  | $ | (14,370 | ) |  | $ | (4,896 | ) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | (4,896 | )
Fair asset value of derivative instruments |  | $ | 7,716 |  |  | $ | (3,729 | ) |  | $ | 3,987 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 3,987 |
Long-term derivative assets included in other long-term assets, net |  |  | 888 |  |  |  | (81 | ) |  |  | 807 |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 807 |
Fair liability value of derivative instruments |  |  | 3,976 |  |  |  | (6,261 | ) |  |  | (2,285 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (2,285 | )
Long-term derivative liabilities included in other long-term liabilities, net |  |  | 481 |  |  |  | (484 | ) |  |  | (3 | ) |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | (3 | )
Total at September 30, 2016 |  | $ | 13,061 |  |  | $ | (10,555 | ) |  | $ | 2,506 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 2,506 |

(In thousands) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations |
|  |  |  | Amount of (Gain) or Loss Recognized |
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments Under FASB ASC 815-10 |  | Location of (Gain) or Loss Recognized in Income on Derivative |  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 |  |  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 |  |  | Nine Months Ended June 30, 2017 |  |  | Nine Months Ended June 30, 2016 |
Commodity contracts |  | Cost of product (a) |  | $ | 1,092 |  |  | $ | 8,177 |  |  | $ | 4,073 |  |  | $ | 16,978 |
Commodity contracts |  | Cost of installations and service (a) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 72 |  |  | $ | (526 | ) |  | $ | 848 |
Commodity contracts |  | Delivery and branch expenses (a) |  | $ | 27 |  |  | $ | 150 |  |  | $ | (422 | ) |  | $ | 1,029 |
Commodity contracts |  | (Increase) / decrease in the fair value of derivative instruments (b) |  | $ | 3,135 |  |  | $ | (11,283 | ) |  | $ | 7,026 |  |  | $ | (20,071 | )

(a) | Represents realized closed positions and includes the cost of options as they expire.

(b) | Represents the change in value of unrealized open positions and expired options.

5) Inventories

The Partnership’s product inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market computed on the weighted average cost method. All other inventories, representing parts and equipment are stated at the lower of cost or market using the FIFO method. The components of inventory were as follows (in thousands):

|  | June 30, 2017 |  |  | September 30, 2016 |
Product |  | $ | 21,364 |  |  | $ | 25,419 |
Parts and equipment |  |  | 21,058 |  |  |  | 20,475 |
Total inventory |  | $ | 42,422 |  |  | $ | 45,894 |

14

##### Table of Contents

6) Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the depreciable assets using the straight-line method (in thousands):

|  | June 30, 2017 |  |  | September 30, 2016 |
Property and equipment |  | $ | 195,181 |  |  | $ | 184,079 |
Less: accumulated depreciation |  |  | 120,690 |  |  |  | 113,669 |
Property and equipment, net |  | $ | 74,491 |  |  | $ | 70,410 |

7) Business Combinations

Through the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the Partnership acquired three heating oil dealers, a propane dealer and a plumbing service provider for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $16.0 million; $14.5 million in cash and $1.5 million of deferred liabilities (including $0.6 million of contingent consideration). The gross purchase price was allocated $9.3 million to intangible assets, $2.5 million to goodwill, $5.0 million to fixed assets and received credit for a negative working capital position of $0.8 million. The acquired companies’ operating results are included in the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements starting on their respective acquisition dates, and are not material to the Partnership’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

8) Goodwill and Intangibles, net

Goodwill

A summary of changes in the Partnership’s goodwill is as follows (in thousands):

Balance as of September 30, 2016 |  | $ | 212,760 |
Fiscal year 2017 business combinations |  |  | 2,502 |
Balance as of June 30, 2017 |  | $ | 215,262 |

Intangibles, net

The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of intangible assets subject to amortization are as follows (in thousands):

|  | June 30, 2017 |  |  | September 30, 2016 |
|  | Gross |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Gross |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Carrying |  |  | Accum. |  |  |  |  |  | Carrying |  |  | Accum. |  |  |  |
|  | Amount |  |  | Amortization |  |  | Net |  |  | Amount |  |  | Amortization |  |  | Net |
Customer lists |  | $ | 334,605 |  |  | $ | 261,017 |  |  | $ | 73,588 |  |  | $ | 327,388 |  |  | $ | 250,427 |  |  | $ | 76,961 |
Trade names and other intangibles |  |  | 29,210 |  |  |  | 8,278 |  |  |  | 20,932 |  |  |  | 27,134 |  |  |  | 6,439 |  |  |  | 20,695 |
Total |  | $ | 363,815 |  |  | $ | 269,295 |  |  | $ | 94,520 |  |  | $ | 354,522 |  |  | $ | 256,866 |  |  | $ | 97,656 |

Amortization expense for intangible assets was $12.4 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $11.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2016.

15

##### Table of Contents

9) Long-Term Debt and Bank Facility Borrowings

The Partnership’s debt is as follows (in thousands):

|  | June 30, |  |  | September 30, |
|  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |
|  | Carrying |  |  |  |  |  | Carrying |  |  |  |
|  | Amount |  |  | Fair Value (a) |  |  | Amount |  |  | Fair Value (a) |
Revolving Credit Facility Borrowings |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |
Senior Secured Term Loan (b) |  | $ | 78,155 |  |  | $ | 78,800 |  |  | $ | 91,641 |  |  | $ | 92,500 |
Total debt |  | $ | 78,155 |  |  | $ | 78,800 |  |  | $ | 91,641 |  |  | $ | 92,500 |
Total short-term portion of debt |  | $ | 10,000 |  |  | $ | 10,000 |  |  | $ | 16,200 |  |  | $ | 16,200 |
Total long-term portion of debt |  | $ | 68,155 |  |  | $ | 68,800 |  |  | $ | 75,441 |  |  | $ | 76,300 |

(a) | The face amount of the Partnership’s variable rate long-term debt approximates fair value.

(b) | Carrying amounts are net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $0.6 million as of June 30, 2017, and $0.9 million as of September 30, 2016.

On July 30, 2015, the Partnership entered into a third amended and restated asset-based credit agreement with a bank syndicate comprised of thirteen participants, which enables the Partnership to borrow up to $300 million ($450 million during the heating season of December through April of each year) on a revolving credit facility for working capital purposes (subject to certain borrowing base limitations and coverage ratios), provides for a $100 million five-year senior secured term loan (the “Term Loan”), allows for the issuance of up to $100 million in letters of credit, and has a maturity date of July 30, 2020.

The Partnership can increase the revolving credit facility size by $100 million without the consent of the bank group. However, the bank group is not obligated to fund the $100 million increase. If the bank group elects not to fund the increase, the Partnership can add additional lenders to the group, with the consent of the Agent (as defined in the credit agreement), which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Obligations under the third amended and restated credit facility are guaranteed by the Partnership and its subsidiaries and are secured by liens on substantially all of the Partnership’s assets including accounts receivable, inventory, general intangibles, real property, fixtures and equipment.

All amounts outstanding under the third amended and restated revolving credit facility become due and payable on the facility termination date of July 30, 2020. The Term Loan is repayable in quarterly payments of $2.5 million, plus an annual payment equal to 25% of the annual Excess Cash Flow as defined in the agreement (an amount not to exceed $15 million annually), less certain voluntary prepayments made during the year, with final payment at maturity.

The interest rate on the third amended and restated revolving credit facility and the Term Loan is based on a margin over LIBOR or a base rate. At June 30, 2017, the effective interest rate on the Term Loan was approximately 4.01%.

The Commitment Fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility is 0.30% from December through April, and 0.20% from May through November.

The third amended and restated credit agreement requires the Partnership to meet certain financial covenants, including a fixed charge coverage ratio (as defined in the credit agreement) of not less than 1.1 as long as the Term Loan is outstanding or revolving credit facility availability is less than 12.5% of the facility size. In addition, as long as the Term Loan is outstanding, a senior secured leverage ratio at any time cannot be more than 3.0 as calculated during the quarters ending June or September, and at any time no more than 4.5 as calculated during the quarters ending December or March.

Certain restrictions are also imposed by the agreement, including restrictions on the Partnership’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, to pay distributions to unitholders, to pay certain inter-company dividends or distributions, make investments, grant liens, sell assets, make acquisitions and engage in certain other activities.

At June 30, 2017, $78.8 million of the Term Loan was outstanding, no amount was outstanding under the revolving credit facility, $4.9 million of hedge positions were secured under the credit agreement, and $48.2 million of letters of credit were issued and outstanding. At September 30, 2016, $92.5 million of the Term Loan was outstanding, no amount was outstanding under the revolving credit facility, $0.3 million of hedge positions were secured under the credit agreement, and $50.6 million of letters of credit were issued and outstanding.

16

##### Table of Contents

At June 30, 2017, availability was $160.3 million, and the Partnership was in compliance with the fixed charge coverage ratio and the senior secured leverage ratio. At September 30, 2016, availability was $163.4 million, and the Partnership was in compliance with the fixed charge coverage ratio and the senior secured leverage ratio.

10) Income Taxes

Since Star Gas Partners is organized as a master limited partnership, it is not subject to tax at its entity level for Federal and state income tax purposes. However, Star Gas Partners’ income is derived from its corporate subsidiaries, and these entities do incur Federal and state income taxes relating to their respective corporate subsidiaries, which are reflected in these financial statements. For the corporate subsidiaries of Star Gas Partners, a consolidated Federal income tax return is filed.

Income and losses of Star Gas Partners are allocated directly to the individual partners. Even though Star Gas Partners will generate non-qualifying Master Limited Partnership income through its corporate subsidiaries, cash received by Star Gas Partners from its corporate subsidiaries is generally included in the determination of qualified Master Limited Partnership income. All or a portion of such cash could be taxable as dividend income or as a capital gain to the individual partners. This could be the case even if Star Gas Partners used the cash received from its corporate subsidiaries for purposes such as the repurchase of Common Units, other types of capital transactions, or paying its own expenses rather than for distributions to its individual partners.

The accompanying financial statements are reported on a fiscal year; however, Star Gas Partners and its corporate subsidiaries file Federal and state income tax returns on a calendar year.

The current and deferred income tax expenses (benefits) for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2017, and 2016, are as follows:

|  | Three Months Ended |  |  | Nine Months Ended |
|  | June 30, |  |  | June 30, |
(in thousands) |  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |  |  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |
Income (loss) before income taxes |  | $ | (21,766 | ) |  | $ | (4,993 | ) |  | $ | 76,368 |  |  | $ | 110,595 |
Current tax expense (benefit) |  |  | (5,764 | ) |  |  | (6,759 | ) |  |  | 27,270 |  |  |  | 33,268 |
Deferred tax expense (benefit) |  |  | (2,670 | ) |  | $ | 5,004 |  |  |  | 4,451 |  |  | $ | 13,298 |
Total tax expense (benefit) |  | $ | (8,434 | ) |  | $ | (1,755 | ) |  | $ | 31,721 |  |  | $ | 46,566 |

As of January 1, 2017, Star Acquisitions, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership, had an estimated Federal net operating loss carry forward (“NOLs”) of approximately $1.6 million. The Federal NOLs, which will expire between 2018 and 2024, are generally available to offset any future taxable income but are also subject to annual limitations of between $1.0 million and $2.2 million.

At June 30, 2017, we did not have unrecognized income tax benefits.

Our continuing practice is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense. We file U.S. Federal income tax returns and various state and local returns. A number of years may elapse before an uncertain tax position is audited and finally resolved. For our Federal income tax returns we have four tax years subject to examination. In our major state tax jurisdictions of New York, Connecticut, Pennsylvania we have four years that are subject to examination. In the state tax jurisdictions of New Jersey we have five tax years that are subject to examination. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position, based on our assessment of many factors including past experience and interpretation of tax law, we believe that our provision for income taxes reflect the most probable outcome. This assessment relies on estimates and assumptions and may involve a series of complex judgments about future events.

17

##### Table of Contents

11) Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information

|  | Nine Months Ended |
|  | June 30, |
(in thousands) |  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |
Cash paid during the period for: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income taxes, net |  | $ | 4,116 |  |  | $ | 15,411 |
Interest |  | $ | 6,002 |  |  | $ | 5,082 |
Non-cash operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Increase in interest expense—amortization of deferred charges on senior secured term loan |  | $ | 225 |  |  | $ | 214 |

12) Commitments and Contingencies

On February 18, 2016, a civil action was filed in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey, entitled M. Norman Donnenfeld v. Petro Home Services, Petro Holdings Inc. and Petro, Inc., Civil Action Number 2:16-cv-00882 JMV-JBC, against Petro Home Services which is a brand name, Petro Holdings Inc. and Petro, Inc. Plaintiff alleged he did not receive expected contractual benefits under his protected price plan contract when oil prices fell and asserted various claims for relief including breach of contract, violation of the New York General Business Law and fraud. The Plaintiff also sought to have a class certified of all customers of the defendants in the United States who entered into protected price plan contracts and were denied the same contractual benefits and to be appointed to represent them. The Plaintiff sought compensatory, punitive and other damages in unspecified amounts. On May 9, 2016, the Partnership filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim for relief and to strike the class action allegations. On March 24, 2017, the motion to dismiss the complaint was granted, for failure to state a claim and for lack of personal jurisdiction but Plaintiff was given 30 days to attempt to replead.

Instead of filing an amended complaint, on April 18, 2017, Plaintiff commenced a new putative class action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, entitled M. Norman Donnenfeld v. Petro, Inc., Civil Action Number 2:17-cv-02310-JFB-SIL. The new complaint names Petro, Inc. d/b/a Petro Home Services as the sole defendant. The allegations and claims in the new complaint are substantially similar to those in the prior complaint filed in the District of New Jersey. No class has yet been certified in this action. The Partnership believes the allegations lack merit and intends to vigorously defend the action; at this time we cannot assess the potential outcome or materiality of this matter.

The Partnership’s operations are subject to the operating hazards and risks normally incidental to handling, storing and transporting and otherwise providing for use by consumers hazardous liquids such as home heating oil and propane. In the ordinary course of business, the Partnership is a defendant in various legal proceedings and litigation. The Partnership records a liability when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount is reasonably estimable. We do not believe these matters, when considered individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

The Partnership maintains insurance policies with insurers in amounts and with coverages and deductibles we believe are reasonable and prudent. However, the Partnership cannot assure that this insurance will be adequate to protect it from all material expenses related to current and potential future claims, legal proceedings and litigation, including the above mentioned action, as certain types of claims may be excluded from our insurance coverage. If we incur substantial liability and the damages are not covered by insurance, or are in excess of policy limits, or if we incur liability at a time when we are not able to obtain liability insurance, then our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

18

##### Table of Contents

13) Earnings Per Limited Partner Unit

Income per limited partner unit is computed in accordance with FASB ASC 260-10-05 Earnings Per Share, Master Limited Partnerships (EITF 03-06), by dividing the limited partners’ interest in net income by the weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding. The pro forma nature of the allocation required by this standard provides that in any accounting period where the Partnership’s aggregate net income exceeds its aggregate distribution for such period, the Partnership is required to present net income per limited partner unit as if all of the earnings for the periods were distributed, regardless of whether those earnings would actually be distributed during a particular period from an economic or practical perspective. This allocation does not impact the Partnership’s overall net income or other financial results. However, for periods in which the Partnership’s aggregate net income exceeds its aggregate distributions for such period, it will have the impact of reducing the earnings per limited partner unit, as the calculation according to this standard result in a theoretical increased allocation of undistributed earnings to the General Partner. In accounting periods where aggregate net income does not exceed aggregate distributions for such period, this standard does not have any impact on the Partnership’s net income per limited partner unit calculation. A separate and independent calculation for each quarter and year-to-date period is performed, in which the Partnership’s contractual participation rights are taken into account.

The following presents the net income allocation and per unit data using this method for the periods presented:

|  | Three Months Ended |  |  | Nine Months Ended |
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Limited Partner: |  | June 30, |  |  | June 30, |
(in thousands, except per unit data) |  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |  |  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |
Net income (loss) |  | $ | (13,332 | ) |  | $ | (3,238 | ) |  | $ | 44,647 |  |  | $ | 64,029 |
Less General Partner’s interest in net income |  |  | (79 | ) |  |  | (19 | ) |  |  | 259 |  |  |  | 362 |
Net income (loss) available to limited partners |  |  | (13,253 | ) |  |  | (3,219 | ) |  |  | 44,388 |  |  |  | 63,667 |
Less dilutive impact of theoretical distribution of earnings under FASB ASC 260-10-45-60 |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 5,420 |  |  |  | 9,313 |
Limited Partner’s interest in net income (loss) under FASB ASC 260-10-45-60 |  | $ | (13,253 | ) |  | $ | (3,219 | ) |  | $ | 38,968 |  |  | $ | 54,354 |
Per unit data: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic and diluted net income (loss) available to limited partners |  | $ | (0.24 | ) |  | $ | (0.06 | ) |  | $ | 0.79 |  |  | $ | 1.11 |
Less dilutive impact of theoretical distribution of earnings under FASB ASC 260-10-45-60 |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 0.09 |  |  |  | 0.16 |
Limited Partner’s interest in net income (loss) under FASB ASC 260-10-45-60 |  | $ | (0.24 | ) |  | $ | (0.06 | ) |  | $ | 0.70 |  |  | $ | 0.95 |
Weighted average number of Limited Partner units outstanding |  |  | 55,888 |  |  |  | 57,188 |  |  |  | 55,888 |  |  |  | 57,237 |

14) Subsequent Events

Quarterly Distribution Declared

In July 2017, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.11 per unit, or $0.44 per unit on an annualized basis, on all Common Units with respect to the second quarter of fiscal 2017, payable on August 8, 2017, to holders of record on July 31, 2017. In accordance with our Partnership Agreement, the amount of distributions in excess of the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.0675, are distributed 90% to Common Unit holders and 10% to the General Partner unit holders (until certain distribution levels are met), subject to the management incentive compensation plan. As a result, $6.1 million will be paid to the Common Unit holders, $0.2 million to the General Partner unit holders (including $0.1 million of incentive distribution as provided in our Partnership Agreement) and $0.1 million to management pursuant to the management incentive compensation plan which provides for certain members of management to receive incentive distributions that would otherwise be payable to the General Partner.

19

##### Table of Contents

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Disclosure

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements” which represent our expectations or beliefs concerning future events that involve risks and uncertainties, including those associated with the effect of weather conditions on our financial performance, the price and supply of the products that we sell, the consumption patterns of our customers, our ability to obtain satisfactory gross profit margins, our ability to obtain new customers and retain existing customers, our ability to make strategic acquisitions, the impact of litigation, our ability to contract for our current and future supply needs, natural gas conversions, future union relations and the outcome of current and future union negotiations, the impact of current and future governmental regulations, including environmental, health, and safety regulations, the ability to attract and retain employees, customer credit worthiness, counterparty credit worthiness, marketing plans, general economic conditions and new technology. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Report including, without limitation, the statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere herein, are forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “expect,” “seek,” “estimate,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct and actual results may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those set forth in this Report under the headings “Risk Factors” and “Business Strategy.” Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations (“Cautionary Statements”) are disclosed in this Report. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Partnership or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the Cautionary Statements. Unless otherwise required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise after the date of this Report.

Seasonality

The following matters should be considered in analyzing our financial results. Our fiscal year ends on September 30. All references to quarters and years respectively in this document are to the fiscal quarters and years unless otherwise noted. The seasonal nature of our business has resulted, on average, during the last five years, in the sale of approximately 30% of our volume of home heating oil and propane in the first fiscal quarter and 50% of our volume in the second fiscal quarter, the peak heating season. We generally realize net income in both of these quarters and net losses during the quarters ending June and September. In addition, sales volume typically fluctuates from year to year in response to variations in weather, wholesale energy prices and other factors.

Degree Days

A “degree day” is an industry measurement of temperature designed to evaluate energy demand and consumption. Degree days are based on how far the average daily temperature departs from 65°F. Each degree of temperature above 65°F is counted as one cooling degree day, and each degree of temperature below 65°F is counted as one heating degree day. Degree days are accumulated each day over the course of a year and can be compared to a monthly or a long-term (multi-year) average to see if a month or a year was warmer or cooler than usual. Degree days are officially observed by the National Weather Service.

Every ten years, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”) computes and publishes average meteorological quantities, including the average temperature for the last 30 years by geographical location, and the corresponding degree days. The latest and most widely used data covers the years from 1981 to 2010. Our calculations of “normal” weather are based on these published 30 year averages for heating degree days, weighted by volume for the locations where we have existing operations.

20

##### Table of Contents

Home Heating Oil Price Volatility

Volatility, which is reflected in the wholesale price of home heating oil, has a larger impact on our business when prices rise, as consumer price sensitivity to heating costs increases, often leading to increased gross customer losses. As a commodity, the price of home heating oil is generally impacted by many factors, including economic and geopolitical forces. The price of home heating oil is closely linked to the price refiners pay for crude oil, which is the principal cost component of home heating oil. The volatility in the wholesale cost of home heating oil, as measured by the New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”), for the fiscal years ending September 30, 2013, through 2017, on a quarterly basis, is illustrated in the following chart (price per gallon):

|  | Fiscal 2017 |  |  | Fiscal 2016 |  |  | Fiscal 2015 |  |  | Fiscal 2014 |  |  | Fiscal 2013 (1) |
|  | Low |  |  | High |  |  | Low |  |  | High |  |  | Low |  |  | High |  |  | Low |  |  | High |  |  | Low |  |  | High |
Quarter Ended |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
December 31 |  | $ | 1.39 |  |  | $ | 1.70 |  |  | $ | 1.08 |  |  | $ | 1.61 |  |  | $ | 1.85 |  |  | $ | 2.66 |  |  | $ | 2.84 |  |  | $ | 3.12 |  |  | $ | 2.90 |  |  | $ | 3.26 |
March 31 |  |  | 1.49 |  |  |  | 1.70 |  |  |  | 0.87 |  |  |  | 1.26 |  |  |  | 1.62 |  |  |  | 2.30 |  |  |  | 2.89 |  |  |  | 3.28 |  |  |  | 2.86 |  |  |  | 3.24 |
June 30 |  |  | 1.37 |  |  |  | 1.65 |  |  |  | 1.08 |  |  |  | 1.57 |  |  |  | 1.68 |  |  |  | 2.02 |  |  |  | 2.85 |  |  |  | 3.05 |  |  |  | 2.74 |  |  |  | 3.09 |
September 30 |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 1.26 |  |  |  | 1.53 |  |  |  | 1.38 |  |  |  | 1.84 |  |  |  | 2.65 |  |  |  | 2.98 |  |  |  | 2.87 |  |  |  | 3.21 |

(1) | Beginning April 1, 2013, the NYMEX contract specifications were changed from high sulfur home heating oil to ultra low sulfur diesel. Ultra low sulfur diesel is similar in composition to ultra low sulfur home heating oil.

Impact on Liquidity of Wholesale Product Cost Volatility

Our liquidity is adversely impacted in times of increasing wholesale product costs, as we must use more cash to fund our hedging requirements and a portion of the increased levels of accounts receivable and inventory. Our liquidity is also adversely impacted at times by sudden and sharp decreases in wholesale product costs due to the increased margin requirements for futures contracts and collateral requirements for options and swaps that we use to manage market risks.

Weather Hedge Contract

Weather conditions have a significant impact on the demand for home heating oil and propane because customers depend on these products principally for space heating purposes. Actual weather conditions may vary substantially from year to year, significantly affecting the Partnership’s financial performance. To partially mitigate the adverse effect of warm weather on cash flow, we have used weather hedging contracts for a number of years.

The Partnership has weather hedge contracts for fiscal years 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 with several providers. Under these contracts, the Partnership is entitled to a payment if the total number of degree days within the hedge period is less than the ten year average. The “payment thresholds,” or strikes, are set at various levels. In addition, for fiscal years 2018 and 2019, the Partnership will be required to make a payment if degree days exceed the ten year average. The hedge period runs from November 1 through March 31, taken as a whole, for each respective fiscal year. For each fiscal year, the maximum that the Partnership can receive is $12.5 million and for fiscal years 2018 and 2019, the maximum that the Partnership can pay is $5.0 million. During the first quarter of fiscal 2016, the Partnership recorded a credit of $12.5 million under this contract that reduced delivery and branch expenses. This amount was subsequently collected in April 2016. The Partnership did not realize any benefit under its weather hedge contract for the nine months ended June 30, 2017.

Per Gallon Gross Profit Margins

We believe home heating oil and propane margins should be evaluated on a cents per gallon basis, before the effects of increases or decreases in the fair value of derivative instruments, as we believe that realized per gallon margins should not include the impact of non-cash changes in the market value of hedges before the settlement of the underlying transaction.

A significant portion of our home heating oil volume is sold to individual customers under an arrangement pre-establishing a ceiling price or fixed price for home heating oil over a fixed period of time, generally twelve to twenty-four months (“price-protected” customers). When these price-protected customers agree to purchase home heating oil from us for the next heating season, we purchase option contracts, swaps and futures contracts for a substantial majority of the heating oil that we expect to sell to these customers. The amount of home heating oil volume that we hedge per price-protected customer is based upon the estimated fuel consumption per average customer per month. In the event that the actual usage exceeds the amount of the hedged volume on a monthly basis, we may be required to obtain additional volume at unfavorable costs. In addition, should actual usage in any month be less than the hedged volume, our hedging costs and losses could be greater, thus reducing expected margins.

21

##### Table of Contents

Derivatives

FASB ASC 815-10-05 Derivatives and Hedging requires that derivative instruments be recorded at fair value and included in the consolidated balance sheet as assets or liabilities. To the extent derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges are effective, as defined under this guidance, changes in fair value are recognized in other comprehensive income until the forecasted hedged item is recognized in earnings. We have elected not to designate our derivative instruments as hedging instruments under this guidance and, as a result, the changes in fair value of the derivative instruments are recognized in our statement of operations. Therefore, we experience volatility in earnings as outstanding derivative instruments are marked to market and non-cash gains and losses are recorded prior to the sale of the commodity to the customer. The volatility in any given period related to unrealized non-cash gains or losses on derivative instruments can be significant to our overall results. However, we ultimately expect those gains and losses to be offset by the cost of product when purchased.

Income Taxes

Book Versus Tax Deductions

The amount of cash flow that we generate in any given year depends upon a variety of factors including the amount of cash income taxes that our corporate subsidiaries are required to pay, which will increase as tax depreciation and amortization decreases. The amount of depreciation and amortization that we deduct for book (i.e., financial reporting) purposes will differ from the amount that our subsidiaries can deduct for tax purposes. The table below compares the estimated depreciation and amortization for book purposes to the amount that our subsidiaries expect to deduct for tax purposes based on currently owned assets. Our subsidiaries file their tax returns based on a calendar year. The amounts below are based on our September 30 fiscal year.

Estimated Depreciation and Amortization Expense

|  | Book |  |  | Tax |
2017 |  | $ | 28,872 |  |  | $ | 28,592 |
2018 |  |  | 26,813 |  |  |  | 24,135 |
2019 |  |  | 23,816 |  |  |  | 20,052 |
2020 |  |  | 20,088 |  |  |  | 16,863 |
2021 |  |  | 15,502 |  |  |  | 14,620 |
2022 |  |  | 12,216 |  |  |  | 12,926 |

Non-Deductible Partnership Expenses

The Partnership incurs certain expenses at the Partnership level that are not deductible for Federal or state income tax purposes by our corporate subsidiaries. As a result, our effective tax rate could differ from the statutory rate that would be applicable if such expenses were deductible.

Customer Attrition

We measure net customer attrition on an ongoing basis for our full service residential and commercial home heating oil and propane customers. Net customer attrition is the difference between gross customer losses and customers added through marketing efforts. Customers added through acquisitions are not included in the calculation of gross customer gains. However, additional customers that are obtained through marketing efforts or lost at newly acquired businesses are included in these calculations. Customer attrition percentage calculations include customers added through acquisitions in the denominators of the calculations on a weighted average basis. Gross customer losses are the result of a number of factors, including price competition, move-outs, credit losses and conversion to natural gas. When a customer moves out of an existing home, we count the “move out” as a loss and, if we are successful in signing up the new homeowner, the “move in” is treated as a gain.

22

##### Table of Contents

Customer gains and losses of home heating oil and propane customers

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |  |  | 2015 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Net |
|  | Gross Customer |  |  | Gains / |  |  | Gross Customer |  |  | Gains / |  |  | Gross Customer |  |  | Gains / |
|  | Gains |  |  | Losses |  |  | (Attrition) |  |  | Gains |  |  | Losses |  |  | (Attrition) |  |  | Gains |  |  | Losses |  |  | (Attrition) |
First Quarter |  |  | 24,300 |  |  |  | 19,100 |  |  |  | 5,200 |  |  |  | 22,800 |  |  |  | 24,200 |  |  |  | (1,400 | ) |  |  | 27,400 |  |  |  | 23,100 |  |  |  | 4,300 |
Second Quarter |  |  | 13,200 |  |  |  | 16,400 |  |  |  | (3,200 | ) |  |  | 13,700 |  |  |  | 19,300 |  |  |  | (5,600 | ) |  |  | 16,000 |  |  |  | 18,200 |  |  |  | (2,200 | )
Third Quarter |  |  | 8,000 |  |  |  | 12,700 |  |  |  | (4,700 | ) |  |  | 7,400 |  |  |  | 14,100 |  |  |  | (6,700 | ) |  |  | 7,400 |  |  |  | 14,000 |  |  |  | (6,600 | )
Fourth Quarter |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | 11,400 |  |  |  | 21,200 |  |  |  | (9,800 | ) |  |  | 13,900 |  |  |  | 17,900 |  |  |  | (4,000 | )
Total |  |  | 45,500 |  |  |  | 48,200 |  |  |  | (2,700 | ) |  |  | 55,300 |  |  |  | 78,800 |  |  |  | (23,500 | ) |  |  | 64,700 |  |  |  | 73,200 |  |  |  | (8,500 | )

Customer gains (attrition) as a percentage of home heating oil and propane customer base

|  | Fiscal Year Ended |
|  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |  |  | 2015 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Net |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Net |
|  | Gross Customer |  |  | Gains / |  |  | Gross Customer |  |  | Gains / |  |  | Gross Customer |  |  | Gains / |
|  | Gains |  |  | Losses |  |  | (Attrition) |  |  | Gains |  |  | Losses |  |  | (Attrition) |  |  | Gains |  |  | Losses |  |  | (Attrition) |
First Quarter |  |  | 5.6 | % |  |  | 4.4 | % |  |  | 1.2 | % |  |  | 5.0 | % |  |  | 5.3 | % |  |  | (0.3 | %) |  |  | 6.2 | % |  |  | 5.2 | % |  |  | 1.0 | %
Second Quarter |  |  | 3.0 | % |  |  | 3.7 | % |  |  | (0.7 | %) |  |  | 3.0 | % |  |  | 4.2 | % |  |  | (1.2 | %) |  |  | 3.6 | % |  |  | 4.1 | % |  |  | (0.5 | %)
Third Quarter |  |  | 1.8 | % |  |  | 2.9 | % |  |  | (1.1 | %) |  |  | 1.6 | % |  |  | 3.1 | % |  |  | (1.5 | %) |  |  | 1.7 | % |  |  | 3.1 | % |  |  | (1.4 | %)
Fourth Quarter |  |  | — | % |  |  | — | % |  |  | — | % |  |  | 2.5 | % |  |  | 4.6 | % |  |  | (2.1 | %) |  |  | 3.1 | % |  |  | 4.0 | % |  |  | (0.9 | %)
Total |  |  | 10.4 | % |  |  | 11.0 | % |  |  | (0.6 | %) |  |  | 12.1 | % |  |  | 17.2 | % |  |  | (5.1 | %) |  |  | 14.6 | % |  |  | 16.4 | % |  |  | (1.8 | %)

For the nine months ended June 30, 2017, the Partnership’s net customer attrition improved by 11,000 accounts as we lost 2,700 accounts (net), or 0.6%, of our home heating oil and propane customer base, compared to 13,700 accounts lost (net), or 3.0% of our home heating oil and propane customer base, during the prior year’s comparable period. (The net customer attrition rate improved by 2.4 %.) Our gross customer gains were 1,600 higher than the prior year’s comparable period and more importantly, our gross customer losses were lower by 9,400 accounts. The majority of the improvement in fiscal 2017 (6,600 accounts, net) occurred during the first fiscal quarter due to a return to more normal weather conditions, as we believe that customers did not see a need during the prior fiscal year first quarter (an unusually warm period) for the higher level of service that we can provide, and competitive margin management. During the second and third quarters of fiscal 2017, net customer attrition improved by 4,400 compared to the prior year periods. Gross customer gains were higher by 100 accounts, and gross customer losses improved by 4,300 accounts. We believe that the lower level of gross customer losses is the result of our increased expenditures in the customer experience area and our focus on customer satisfaction and retention efforts.

For the nine months ended June 30, 2017, we estimate that we lost 0.9% of our home heating oil accounts to natural gas conversions versus 1.0% for the nine months ended June 30, 2016 and 1.3% for the nine months ended June 30, 2015. Losses to natural gas in our footprint for the heating oil industry as a whole could be greater or less than the Partnership’s estimates. Conversions to natural gas may continue as it remains less expensive than home heating oil on an equivalent BTU basis.

Consolidated Results of Operations

The following is a discussion of the consolidated results of operations of the Partnership and its subsidiaries and should be read in conjunction with the historical financial and operating data and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.

23

##### Table of Contents

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017

Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2016

Volume

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the retail volume of home heating oil and propane sold decreased by 4.2 million gallons, or 9.4%, to 40.5 million gallons, compared to 44.7 million gallons for the three months ended June 30, 2016. For those locations where the Partnership had existing operations during both periods, which we sometimes refer to as the “base business” (i.e., excluding acquisitions), temperatures (measured on a heating degree day basis) for the three months ended June 30, 2017 were 19.7% warmer than the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 17.6% warmer than normal, as reported by NOAA. For the twelve months ended June 30, 2017, net customer attrition for the base business was 2.8%. The impact of fuel conservation, along with any period-to-period differences in delivery scheduling, the timing of accounts added or lost during the fiscal years, equipment efficiency, and other volume variances not otherwise described are included in the chart below under the heading “Other.” While temperatures for the three months ended June 30, 2017 were warmer than the prior year’s comparable quarter, we believe the impact on volume is much less during this springtime period than during the winter heating season. In addition, only a portion of the Partnership’s customer base normally receives a delivery during the third fiscal quarter which mutes the impact of any volume change due to a change in temperatures. An analysis of the change in the retail volume of home heating oil and propane sold, which is based on management’s estimates, sampling and other mathematical calculations and certain assumptions, is found below:

(in millions of gallons) |  | Heating Oil and Propane |
Volume - Three months ended June 30, 2016 |  |  | 44.7 |
Acquisitions |  |  | 0.8 |
Impact of warmer temperatures |  |  | (9.2 | )
Net customer attrition |  |  | (1.1 | )
Other |  |  | 5.3 |
Change |  |  | (4.2 | )
Volume - Three months ended June 30, 2017 |  |  | 40.5 |

The following chart sets forth the percentage by volume of total home heating oil sold to residential variable-price customers, residential price-protected customers and commercial/industrial/other customers for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016:

|  | Three Months Ended |
Customers |  | June 30, 2017 |  |  | June 30, 2016 |
Residential Variable |  |  | 40.2 | % |  |  | 40.4 | %
Residential Price-Protected |  |  | 46.9 | % |  |  | 47.5 | %
Commercial/Industrial/Other |  |  | 12.9 | % |  |  | 12.1 | %
Total |  |  | 100.0 | % |  |  | 100.0 | %

Volume of other petroleum products sold increased slightly to 27.5 million gallons for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 27.2 million gallons for the three months ended June 30, 2016, as a decline in the base business of 0.3 million gallons, or 1.2%, was more than offset by the impact of acquisitions which contributed 0.6 million gallons.

Product Sales

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, product sales increased $2.3 million, or 1.5%, to $158.5 million, compared to $156.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, as an increase in wholesale product costs of $0.0929 per gallon, or 6.5%, and an increase in per gallon margins more than offset a decline in total volume of 5.4%.

Installations and Services

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, installation and service sales increased $5.3 million, or 8.6%, to $67.3 million, compared to $62.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, primarily due to higher air conditioning installation and service, sales growth in other services and acquisitions.

24

##### Table of Contents

Cost of Product

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, cost of product increased $0.7 million, or 0.7%, to $104.3 million, compared to $103.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, reflecting a $0.0929 per gallon, or 6.5%, increase in wholesale product costs, somewhat offset by a 5.4% decline in total volume.

Gross Profit—Product

The table below calculates the Partnership’s per gallon margins and reconciles product gross profit for home heating oil and propane and other petroleum products. The third quarter of the Partnership’s fiscal year is a non-heating season quarter and thus the per gallon margins realized are not as impactful on the Partnership’s annual results as the per gallon margins realized during the heating season, due to the low volume sold in the third fiscal quarter. We believe the change in home heating oil and propane margins should be evaluated before the effects of increases or decreases in the fair value of derivative instruments, as we believe that realized per gallon margins should not include the impact of non-cash changes in the market value of hedges before the settlement of the underlying transaction. On that basis, home heating oil and propane margins for the three months ended June 30, 2017 increased by $0.1382 per gallon, to $1.1455 per gallon, from $1.0073 per gallon during the three months ended June 30, 2016. Product sales and cost of product include home heating oil, propane, other petroleum products, and liquidated damages billings.

|  | Three Months Ended |
|  | June 30, 2017 |  |  | June 30, 2016 |
Home Heating Oil and Propane |  | Amount (in millions) |  |  | Per Gallon |  |  | Amount (in millions) |  |  | Per Gallon |
Volume |  |  | 40.5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44.7 |  |  |  |  |
Sales |  | $ | 108.1 |  |  | $ | 2.6665 |  |  | $ | 109.1 |  |  | $ | 2.4403 |
Cost |  | $ | 61.7 |  |  | $ | 1.5210 |  |  | $ | 64.1 |  |  | $ | 1.4330 |
Gross Profit |  | $ | 46.4 |  |  | $ | 1.1455 |  |  | $ | 45.1 |  |  | $ | 1.0073 |
Other Petroleum Products |  | Amount (in millions) |  |  | Per Gallon |  |  | Amount (in millions) |  |  | Per Gallon |
Volume |  |  | 27.5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27.2 |  |  |  |  |
Sales |  | $ | 50.4 |  |  | $ | 1.8325 |  |  | $ | 47.1 |  |  | $ | 1.7288 |
Cost |  | $ | 42.6 |  |  | $ | 1.5483 |  |  | $ | 39.5 |  |  | $ | 1.4494 |
Gross Profit |  | $ | 7.8 |  |  | $ | 0.2842 |  |  | $ | 7.6 |  |  | $ | 0.2794 |
Total Product |  | Amount (in millions) |  |  |  |  |  | Amount (in millions) |  |  |  |
Sales |  | $ | 158.5 |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 156.2 |  |  |  |  |
Cost |  | $ | 104.3 |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 103.6 |  |  |  |  |
Gross Profit |  | $ | 54.3 |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 52.7 |  |  |  |  |

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, total product gross profit was $54.3 million, which was $1.6 million, or 3.0%, higher than the three months ended June 30 2016 as an increase in home heating oil and propane margins ($5.6 million) and higher gross profit from other petroleum products ($0.2 million) was reduced by a decline in home heating oil and propane volume ($4.2 million).

Cost of Installations and Service

Installation costs for the three months ended June 30, 2017 were $20.2 million, $2.5 million higher than the three months ended June 30, 2016 largely due to higher air conditioning installations. Installation costs as a percentage of installation sales for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and the three months ended June 30, 2016 were 82.0% and 83.2%, respectively.

25

##### Table of Contents

Service expenses increased $2.4 million, or 6.8%, to $38.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, or 89.2% of service sales, versus $35.5 million, or 87.4% of service sales, for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase of $2.4 million was due to the expense needed to support the rise in air conditioning service revenue, higher cost attributable to the growth in other services, expansion of our propane business, training costs for our new service platform as well as normal expense increases. We experienced a combined gross profit from service and installation of $9.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $8.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Management views the service and installation department on a combined basis because many overhead functions cannot be separated or precisely allocated to either service or installation billings.

(Increase) Decrease in the Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the change in the fair value of derivative instruments resulted in a $3.1 million charge due to a decrease in the market value for unexpired hedges (a $3.8 million charge) and a $0.7 million credit due to the expiration of certain hedged positions.

During the three months ended June 30, 2016, the change in the fair value of derivative instruments resulted in an $11.3 million credit due to an increase in the market value for unexpired hedges (an $11.2 million credit) and a $0.1 million credit due to the expiration of certain hedged positions.

Delivery and Branch Expenses

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, delivery and branch expenses increased $3.6 million, or 5.6%, to $67.6 million, compared to $64.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, due to an acquisition-related increase of $0.8 million and higher delivery and branch expenses in the base business of $2.7 million, or 4.2%. The increase in the base business was largely due to additional staffing in the areas of information technology, customer service, operations management, sales and marketing and the costs related to implementing new technology which aggregated $2.2 million. We believe that this expense increase contributed to and positively impacted our net customer attrition.

Depreciation and Amortization

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, depreciation and amortization expense increased by $1.0 million, or 14.7%, to $7.4 million, compared to $6.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 as a result of accelerated amortization of certain tradenames related to rebranding.

General and Administrative Expenses

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, general and administrative expenses increased $0.2 million, to $6.2 million, from $6.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 due to higher legal expenses.

Finance Charge Income

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, finance charge income increased by $0.4 million, or 38.4%, to $1.3 million compared to $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in the wholesale cost of product and in volume during the heating season led to higher product sales and thus an increase in accounts receivable balances subject to a finance charge.

Interest Expense, Net

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, interest expense decreased $0.1 million, or 6.5%, to $1.6 million compared to $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 as an increase in income earned in cash balances and a reduction in debt of $16.2 million was largely offset by an increase in long-term borrowing rates.

Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, amortization of debt issuance costs was $0.3 million, unchanged from the three months ended June 30, 2016.

26

##### Table of Contents

Income Tax Benefit

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, income tax benefit increased by $6.7 million to $8.4 million, from $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, primarily due to a decrease in income before income taxes of $16.8 million. The Partnership’s effective income tax rate was 38.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 35.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2016.

Net Loss

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Partnership’s net loss increased $10.1 million, or 311.7%, to $13.3 million, from $3.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, largely due to the after-tax impact of the non-cash change in the fair value of derivative instruments.

Adjusted EBITDA Loss

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Adjusted EBITDA loss increased by $1.5 million, or 19.2%, to $9.3 million as the decline in home heating oil and propane volume and an increase in certain operating expenses was partially offset by the additional gross profit provided by higher home heating oil and propane margins and an improvement in service and installation profitability.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income (as an indicator of operating performance) or as an alternative to cash flow (as a measure of liquidity or ability to service debt obligations), but each provides additional information for evaluating our ability to make the Minimum Quarterly Distribution.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are calculated as follows:

|  | Three Months Ended June 30, |
(in thousands) |  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |
Net loss |  | $ | (13,332 | ) |  | $ | (3,238 | )
Plus: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income tax benefit |  |  | (8,434 | ) |  |  | (1,755 | )
Amortization of debt issuance cost |  |  | 336 |  |  |  | 307 |
Interest expense, net |  |  | 1,619 |  |  |  | 1,731 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 7,418 |  |  |  | 6,468 |
EBITDA |  |  | (12,393 | ) |  |  | 3,513 |
(Increase) / decrease in the fair value of derivative instruments |  |  | 3,135 |  |  |  | (11,283 | )
Adjusted EBITDA |  |  | (9,258 | ) |  |  | (7,770 | )
Add / (subtract) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income tax benefit |  |  | 8,434 |  |  |  | 1,755 |
Interest expense, net |  |  | (1,619 | ) |  |  | (1,731 | )
Provision for losses on accounts receivable |  |  | 736 |  |  |  | 308 |
Decrease in accounts receivables |  |  | 71,107 |  |  |  | 38,425 |
Decrease in inventories |  |  | 3,119 |  |  |  | 3,159 |
Increase in customer credit balances |  |  | 8,116 |  |  |  | 13,191 |
Change in deferred taxes |  |  | (2,670 | ) |  |  | 5,004 |
Decrease in weather hedge contract receivable |  |  | — |  |  |  | 12,500 |
Change in other operating assets and liabilities |  |  | (18,879 | ) |  |  | (28,891 | )
Net cash provided by operating activities |  | $ | 59,086 |  |  | $ | 35,950 |
Net cash used in investing activities |  | $ | (8,376 | ) |  | $ | (2,913 | )
Net cash used in financing activities |  | $ | (8,967 | ) |  | $ | (8,495 | )

27

##### Table of Contents

a) | EBITDA (Earnings from continuing operations before net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) and Adjusted EBITDA (Earnings from continuing operations before net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, (increase) decrease in the fair value of derivatives, multiemployer pension plan withdrawal charge, gain or loss on debt redemption, goodwill impairment, and other non-cash and non-operating charges) are non-GAAP financial measures that are used as supplemental financial measures by management and external users of our financial statements, such as investors, commercial banks, and research analysts, to assess:

| • |  | our compliance with certain financial covenants included in our debt agreements;

| • |  | our financial performance without regard to financing methods, capital structure, income taxes, or historical cost basis;

| • |  | our operating performance and return on invested capital compared to those of other companies in the retail distribution of refined petroleum products, without regard to financing methods and capital structure;

| • |  | our ability to generate cash sufficient to pay interest on our indebtedness and to make distributions to our partners; and

| • |  | the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects and the overall rates of return of alternative investment opportunities.

The method of calculating Adjusted EBITDA may not be consistent with that of other companies, and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA both have limitations as analytical tools and, as such, should not be viewed in isolation but in conjunction with measurements that are computed in accordance with GAAP. Some of the limitations of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are:

| • |  | EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect our cash used for capital expenditures

| • |  | Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated or amortized often will have to be replaced and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the cash requirements for such replacements;

| • |  | EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital requirements;

| • |  | EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the cash necessary to make payments of interest or principal on our indebtedness; and

| • |  | EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the cash required to pay taxes.

28

##### Table of Contents

Nine Months Ended June 30, 2017

Compared to the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2016

Volume

For the nine months ended June 30, 2017, retail volume of home heating oil and propane sold increased by 12.4 million gallons, or 4.4%, to 294.3 million gallons, compared to 281.9 million gallons for the nine months ended June 30, 2016. For those locations where the Partnership had existing operations during both periods, which we sometimes refer to as the “base business” (i.e., excluding acquisitions), temperatures (measured on a heating degree day basis) for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 were 7.0% colder than the nine months ended June 30, 2016 and 12.4% warmer than normal, as reported by NOAA. For the twelve months ended June 30, 2017, net customer attrition for the base business was 2.8%. The impact of fuel conservation, along with any period-to-period differences in delivery scheduling, the timing of accounts added or lost during the fiscal years, equipment efficiency, and other volume variances not otherwise described, are included in the chart below under the heading “Other.” An analysis of the change in the retail volume of home heating oil and propane, which is based on management’s estimates, sampling, and other mathematical calculations and certain assumptions, is found below:

(in millions of gallons) |  | Heating Oil and Propane |
Volume - Nine months ended June 30, 2016 |  |  | 281.9 |
Acquisitions |  |  | 2.7 |
Impact of colder temperatures |  |  | 18.6 |
Net customer attrition |  |  | (10.0 | )
Other |  |  | 1.1 |
Change |  |  | 12.4 |
Volume - Nine months ended June 30, 2017 |  |  | 294.3 |

The following chart sets forth the percentage by volume of total home heating oil sold to residential variable-price customers, residential price-protected customers, and commercial/industrial/other customers for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2016:

|  | Nine Months Ended |
Customers |  | June 30, 2017 |  |  | June 30, 2016 |
Residential Variable |  |  | 42.6 | % |  |  | 40.8 | %
Residential Price-Protected |  |  | 45.1 | % |  |  | 46.6 | %
Commercial/Industrial/Other |  |  | 12.3 | % |  |  | 12.6 | %
Total |  |  | 100.0 | % |  |  | 100.0 | %

Volume of other petroleum products sold increased by 1.8 million gallons, or 2.3%, to 83.4 million gallons for the nine months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 81.6 million gallons for the nine months ended June 30, 2016, due to an increase in the base business of 0.6 million gallons, or 0.7%, and acquisitions which contributed an additional 1.2 million gallons.

Product Sales

For the nine months ended June 30, 2017, product sales increased $136.8 million, or 16.8%, to $950.3 million, compared to $813.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2016, reflecting an increase in wholesale product costs of $0.2668 per gallon, or 20.5%, and an increase in total volume of 3.9%.

Installations and Service

For the nine months ended June 30, 2017, installation and service sales increased $5.9 million, or 3.2%, to $191.7 million, compared to $185.8 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2016, largely due to higher air conditioning installation and service, sales growth in other services and acquisitions.

29

##### Table of Contents

Cost of Product

For the nine months ended June 30, 2017, cost of product increased $119.3 million, or 25.2%, to $592.8 million, compared to $473.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2016, due largely to a $0.2668 per gallon, or 20.5%, increase in wholesale product cost and an increase in total volume of 3.9%.

Gross Profit—Product

The table below calculates the Partnership’s per gallon margins and reconciles product gross profit for home heating oil and propane and other petroleum products. We believe the change in home heating oil and propane margins should be evaluated before the effects of increases or decreases in the fair value of derivative instruments, as we believe that realized per gallon margins should not include the impact of non-cash changes in the market value of hedges before the settlement of the underlying transaction. On that basis, home heating oil and propane margins for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 increased by $0.0141 per gallon, or 1.3%, to $1.1360 per gallon, from $1.1219 per gallon during the nine months ended June 30, 2016. Product sales and cost of product include home heating oil, propane, other petroleum products and liquidated damages billings.

|  | Nine Months Ended |
|  | June 30, 2017 |  |  | June 30, 2016 |
Home Heating Oil and Propane |  | Amount (in millions) |  |  | Per Gallon |  |  | Amount (in millions) |  |  | Per Gallon |
Volume |  |  | 294.3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 281.9 |  |  |  |  |
Sales |  | $ | 795.5 |  |  | $ | 2.7034 |  |  | $ | 681.3 |  |  | $ | 2.4166 |
Cost |  | $ | 461.3 |  |  | $ | 1.5674 |  |  | $ | 365.0 |  |  | $ | 1.2946 |
Gross Profit |  | $ | 334.2 |  |  | $ | 1.1360 |  |  | $ | 316.3 |  |  | $ | 1.1219 |
Other Petroleum Products |  | Amount (in millions) |  |  | Per Gallon |  |  | Amount (in millions) |  |  | Per Gallon |
Volume |  |  | 83.4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 81.6 |  |  |  |  |
Sales |  | $ | 154.8 |  |  | $ | 1.8548 |  |  | $ | 132.2 |  |  | $ | 1.6205 |
Cost |  | $ | 131.5 |  |  | $ | 1.5766 |  |  | $ | 108.6 |  |  | $ | 1.3296 |
Gross Profit |  | $ | 23.3 |  |  | $ | 0.2782 |  |  | $ | 23.7 |  |  | $ | 0.2909 |
Total Product |  | Amount (in millions) |  |  |  |  |  | Amount (in millions) |  |  |  |
Sales |  | $ | 950.3 |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 813.5 |  |  |  |  |
Cost |  | $ | 592.8 |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 473.5 |  |  |  |  |
Gross Profit |  | $ | 357.5 |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 340.0 |  |  |  |  |

For the nine months ended June 30, 2017, total product gross profit was $357.5 million, which was $17.5 million, or 5.2%, more than the nine months ended June 30, 2016, due to an increase in home heating oil and propane volume ($13.8 million) sold at slightly higher margins ($4.1 million), partly offset by a $0.4 million lower gross profit from other petroleum products.

Cost of Installations and Service

Total installation costs for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 increased by $2.4 million, or 4.2%, to $58.8 million, compared to $56.4 million in installation costs for the nine months ended June 30, 2016, largely due to higher air conditioning installations. Installation costs as a percentage of installation sales for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and the nine months ended June 30, 2016, were 82.9% and 83.7%, respectively.

30

##### Table of Contents

Service expense increased $5.7 million, or 4.8% to $124.3 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2017, or 103.0% of service sales, versus $118.7 million, or 100.3% of service sales, for the nine months ended June 30, 2016. Service expenses were higher due to the increased need to service our customer base during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 in response to 33.6% colder temperatures versus the first quarter of fiscal 2016 (which was unusually warm). Service expenses also increased due to the cost required to support the rise in air conditioning service revenue, expense attributable to the growth in other services, expansion of our propane business, training costs for our new service platform as well as normal expense increases. We realized a combined gross profit from service and installation of $8.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 compared to a combined gross profit of $10.7 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2016. The Partnership is currently evaluating its pricing and staffing models for its service offerings in several markets to increase the overall service profitability. Management views the service and installation department on a combined basis because many overhead functions cannot be separated or precisely allocated to either service or installation billings.

(Increase) Decrease in the Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

During the nine months ended June 30, 2017, the change in the fair value of derivative instruments resulted in a $7.0 million charge as a decrease in the market value for unexpired hedges (a $1.5 million charge) added to a $5.5 million charge due to the expiration of certain hedged positions.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2016, the change in the fair value of derivative instruments resulted in a $20.1 million credit due to an increase in the market value for unexpired hedges (a $6.5 million credit) and a $13.6 million credit due to the expiration of certain hedged positions.

Delivery and Branch Expenses

For the nine months ended June 30, 2017, delivery and branch expenses increased $22.2 million, or 10.2%, to $241.0 million, compared to $218.8 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2016, due to the absence of a $12.5 million credit as was recorded in the first quarter of 2016 under the Partnership’s weather hedge contract, higher delivery expense of $2.5 million, or 1.3%, due in part to the weather-related increase in home heating oil and propane volume of 4.4%, $1.9 million due to acquisition related increases, and an increase in spending of $5.3 million largely due to additional staffing in the areas of information technology, customer service, operations management, sales and marketing, and the costs related to implementing new technology. We believe that the $5.3 million expense increase contributed to and positively impacted the 11,000 account improvement in net customer attrition.

Depreciation and Amortization

For the nine months ended June 30, 2017, depreciation and amortization expense increased by $0.7 million, or 3.7%, to $20.7 million, compared to $20.0 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2016 as a result of accelerated amortization of certain tradenames related to rebranding.

General and Administrative Expenses

For the nine months ended June 30, 2017, general and administrative expenses increased $0.6 million, to $18.1 million, from $17.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2016, primarily due to higher legal and professional expense.

Finance Charge Income

For the nine months ended June 30, 2017, finance charge income increased by $0.8 million, or 32.6%, to $3.3 million compared to $2.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in the wholesale cost of product and the increase in volume led to higher product sales and thus an increase in accounts receivable balances subject to a finance charge.

Interest Expense, Net

For the nine months ended June 30, 2017, interest expense decreased $0.4 million, or 6.6%, to $5.1 million compared to $5.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2016 as a reduction in debt of $16.2 million and an increase in income earned on cash balances was somewhat offset by an increase in long-term borrowing rates.

Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs

For the nine months ended June 30, 2017, amortization of debt issuance costs was $1.0 million unchanged from the nine months ended June 30, 2016.

31

##### Table of Contents

Income Tax Expense

For the nine months ended June 30, 2017, the Partnership’s income tax expense decreased by $14.8 million to $31.7 million, from $46.6 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2016, primarily due to a decrease in income before income taxes of $34.2 million. The Partnership’s effective income tax rate was 41.5% for the nine months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 42.1% for the nine months ended June 30, 2016.

Net Income

For the nine months ended June 30, 2017, net income decreased $19.4 million, or 30.3%, to $44.6 million, from $64.0 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2016 largely due to the after tax impact of the non cash change in the fair value of derivative instruments.

Adjusted EBITDA

For the nine months ended June 30, 2017, Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $6.7 million, or 5.7%, to $110.2 million as the impact of higher home heating oil and propane volume and slightly higher home heating oil and propane margins were more than offset by the absence of a $12.5 million credit that was recorded in the first quarter of 2016 under the Partnership’s weather hedge contract, lower services and installations gross profit and additional staffing in the areas of information technology, customer service, operations management and sales and marketing.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income (as an indicator of operating performance) or as an alternative to cash flow (as a measure of liquidity or ability to service debt obligations), but each provides additional information for evaluating our ability to make the Minimum Quarterly Distribution.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are calculated as follows:

|  | Nine Months Ended June 30, |
(in thousands) |  | 2017 |  |  | 2016 |
Net income |  | $ | 44,647 |  |  | $ | 64,029 |
Plus: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income tax expense |  |  | 31,721 |  |  |  | 46,566 |
Amortization of debt issuance cost |  |  | 972 |  |  |  | 934 |
Interest expense, net |  |  | 5,118 |  |  |  | 5,481 |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 20,705 |  |  |  | 19,959 |
EBITDA |  |  | 103,163 |  |  |  | 136,969 |
(Increase) / decrease in the fair value of derivative instruments |  |  | 7,026 |  |  |  | (20,071 | )
Adjusted EBITDA |  |  | 110,189 |  |  |  | 116,898 |
Add / (subtract) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income tax expense |  |  | (31,721 | ) |  |  | (46,566 | )
Interest expense, net |  |  | (5,118 | ) |  |  | (5,481 | )
Provision (recovery) for losses on accounts receivable |  |  | 2,261 |  |  |  | (140 | )
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivables |  |  | (40,524 | ) |  |  | 647 |
Decrease in inventories |  |  | 3,761 |  |  |  | 13,402 |
Decrease in customer credit balances |  |  | (45,757 | ) |  |  | (2,026 | )
Change in deferred taxes |  |  | 4,451 |  |  |  | 13,299 |
Change in other operating assets and liabilities |  |  | 25,668 |  |  |  | 20,152 |
Net cash provided by operating activities |  | $ | 23,210 |  |  | $ | 110,185 |
Net cash used in investing activities |  | $ | (35,219 | ) |  | $ | (15,756 | )
Net cash used in financing activities |  | $ | (32,355 | ) |  | $ | (23,781 | )

32

##### Table of Contents

| • |  | EBITDA (Earnings from continuing operations before net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) and Adjusted EBITDA (Earnings from continuing operations before net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, (increase) decrease in the fair value of derivatives, multiemployer pension plan withdrawal charge, gain or loss on debt redemption, goodwill impairment, and other non-cash and non-operating charges) are non-GAAP financial measures that are used as supplemental financial measures by management and external users of our financial statements, such as investors, commercial banks and research analysts, to assess:

| • |  | our compliance with certain financial covenants included in our debt agreements;

| • |  | our financial performance without regard to financing methods, capital structure, income taxes or historical cost basis;

| • |  | our operating performance and return on invested capital compared to those of other companies in the retail distribution of refined petroleum products, without regard to financing methods and capital structure;

| • |  | our ability to generate cash sufficient to pay interest on our indebtedness and to make distributions to our partners; and

| • |  | the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects and the overall rates of return of alternative investment opportunities.

The method of calculating Adjusted EBITDA may not be consistent with that of other companies, and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA both have limitations as analytical tools and so should not be viewed in isolation but in conjunction with measurements that are computed in accordance with GAAP. Some of the limitations of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are:

| • |  | EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect our cash used for capital expenditures.

| • |  | Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated or amortized often will have to be replaced and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the cash requirements for such replacements;

| • |  | EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital requirements;

| • |  | EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the cash necessary to make payments of interest or principal on our indebtedness; and

| • |  | EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the cash required to pay taxes.

DISCUSSION OF CASH FLOWS

We use the indirect method to prepare our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Under this method, we reconcile net income to cash flows provided by operating activities by adjusting net income for those items that impact net income but do not result in actual cash receipts or payment during the period.

Operating Activities

Due to the seasonal nature of our business, cash is generally used in operations during the winter (our first and second fiscal quarters) as we require additional working capital to support the high volume of sales during this period, and cash is generally provided by operating activities during the spring and summer (our third and fourth quarters) when customer payments exceed the cost of deliveries.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2017, cash provided by operating activities decreased by $87.0 million to $23.2 million, when compared to $110.2 million of cash provided by operating activities during the nine months ended June 30, 2016, as an unfavorable change in cash relating to accounts receivable of $84.9 million (including customer credit balances), and an increase in the cash used to purchase inventory of $9.6 million was reduced by an increase of $2.1 million in cash generated from operations and the timing of cash used to fund accounts payable, income taxes, and other cash payments of $5.4 million. The impact of colder weather and an increase in per gallon product cost drove increases in accounts receivable and product purchases and resulted in a much greater but expected use of cash.

33

##### Table of Contents

Investing Activities

Our capital expenditures for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 totaled $9.3 million, as we invested in computer hardware and software ($3.0 million), refurbished certain physical plants ($2.0 million), expanded our propane operations ($2.0 million) and made additions to our fleet and other equipment ($2.3 million). We also completed five acquisitions for $16.0 million; $14.5 million in cash and $1.5 million of deferred liabilities (including $0.6 million of contingent consideration). The gross purchase price was allocated $9.3 million to intangible assets, $2.5 million to goodwill and $5.0 million to fixed assets and received credit for a negative working capital position of $0.8 million.

Our capital expenditures for the nine months ended June 30, 2016 totaled $7.2 million, as we invested in computer hardware and software ($2.0 million), refurbished certain physical plants ($0.9 million), expanded our propane operations ($2.3 million) and made additions to our fleet and other equipment ($2.0 million). We also completed three acquisitions for $8.8 million and allocated $5.2 million of the gross purchase price to intangible assets, $1.6 million to goodwill, $2.2 million to fixed assets and received credit for a negative working capital position of $0.2 million.

Financing Activities

During the nine months ended June 30, 2017, we paid distributions of $17.6 million to our Common Unit holders and $0.4 million to our General Partner unit holders (including $0.3 million of incentive distributions as provided in our Partnership Agreement) and repaid $13.7 million of our term loan.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2016, we paid distributions of $16.7 million to our Common Unit holders and $0.4 million to our General Partner unit holders (including $0.3 million of incentive distributions as provided in our Partnership Agreement) and repaid $5.0 million of our term loan. We also repurchased 0.95 million units for $0.7 million in connection with our unit repurchase plan.

FINANCING AND SOURCES OF LIQUIDITY

Liquidity and Capital Resources Comparatives

Our primary uses of liquidity are to provide funds for our working capital, capital expenditures, distributions on our units, acquisitions, and unit repurchases. Our ability to provide funds for such uses depends on our future performance, which will be subject to prevailing economic, financial, business and weather conditions, the ability to pass on the full impact of high product costs to customers, the effects of high net customer attrition, conservation, and other factors. Capital requirements, at least in the near term, are expected to be provided by cash flows from operating activities, cash on hand as of June 30, 2017 ($94.6 million) or a combination thereof. To the extent future capital requirements exceed cash on hand plus cash flows from operating activities, we anticipate that working capital will be financed by our revolving credit facility, as discussed below, and repaid from subsequent seasonal reductions in inventory and accounts receivable. As of June 30, 2017, we had no borrowings under our revolving credit facility and $48.2 million in letters of credit were outstanding, primarily for current and future insurance reserves. Our ability to borrow was reduced by $4.9 million to secure hedges with the bank group.

Under the terms of the third amended and restated credit agreement, we must maintain at all times Availability (borrowing base less amounts borrowed and letters of credit issued) of 12.5% of the maximum facility size and a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.1. We must also maintain a senior secured leverage ratio that at any time cannot be more than 3.0 as calculated during the quarters ending June or September, and at any time no more than 4.5 as calculated during the quarters ending December or March. As of June 30, 2017, Availability, as defined in the credit agreement, was $160.3 million and we were in compliance with the fixed charge coverage ratio and senior secured leverage ratio.

Maintenance capital expenditures for the remainder of fiscal 2017 are estimated to be approximately $1.2 million, excluding the capital requirements for leased fleet. In addition, we plan to invest an additional $0.5 million in our propane operations and make a $1.0 million pension contribution. Distributions for the balance of fiscal 2017, at the current quarterly level of $0.11 per unit, would result in an aggregate of approximately $6.1 million to Common Unit holders, $0.2 million to our General Partner (including $0.1 million of incentive distribution as provided for in our Partnership Agreement), and $0.1 million to management pursuant to the management incentive compensation plan which provides for certain members of management to receive incentive distributions that would otherwise be payable to the General Partner. Under the terms of our credit facility, our term loan is repayable in quarterly payments of $2.5 million, and depending on our fiscal 2017 results, we may be required to make an additional payment. (see Note 9-Long-Term Debt and Bank Facility Borrowings). In addition, we intend to continue to repurchase Common Units pursuant to our unit repurchase plan and seek attractive acquisition opportunities within the Availability constraints of our revolving credit facility and funding resources.

34

##### Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There has been no material change to Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements since our September 30, 2016 Form 10-K disclosure and therefore, the table has not been included in this Form 10-Q.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The following new accounting standards were recently adopted by the Partnership, and are more fully described in Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements, of the consolidated financial statements:

| • |  | ASU No. 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs

| • |  | ASU No. 2015-16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments

| • |  | ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flow (Topic 230): Restricted cash

The following new accounting standards are currently being evaluated by the Partnership, and are more fully described in Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements, of the consolidated financial statements:

| • |  | ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers

| • |  | ASU No. 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory

| • |  | ASU No. 2016-02, Leases

| • |  | ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses

| • |  | ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flow

| • |  | ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations, Clarifying the definition of a business

| • |  | ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, Simplifying the test for goodwill impairment

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk primarily through our bank credit facilities. We utilize these borrowings to meet our working capital needs.

At June 30, 2017, we had outstanding borrowings totaling $78.8 million, which are subject to variable interest rates under our credit agreement. In the event that interest rates associated with this facility were to increase 100 basis points, the after tax impact on annual future cash flows would be a decrease of $0.5 million.

We regularly use derivative financial instruments to manage our exposure to market risk related to changes in the current and future market price of home heating oil and vehicle fuels. The value of market sensitive derivative instruments is subject to change as a result of movements in market prices. Sensitivity analysis is a technique used to evaluate the impact of hypothetical market value changes. Based on a hypothetical ten percent increase in the cost of product at June 30, 2017, the potential impact on our hedging activity would be to increase the fair market value of these outstanding derivatives by $4.0 million to a negative fair market value of $1.2 million; and conversely a hypothetical ten percent decrease in the cost of product would decrease the fair market value of these outstanding derivatives by $3.4 million to a negative fair market value of $8.7 million.

35

##### Table of Contents

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

The General Partner’s chief executive officer and its chief financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of June 30, 2017. Based on that evaluation, such chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2017, at the reasonable level of assurance. For purposes of Rule 13a-15(e), the term disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its chief executive and chief financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

b) Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

c) Other

The General Partner and the Partnership believe that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a Partnership have been detected. Therefore, a control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide such reasonable assurances of achieving our desired control objectives, and the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of our General Partner have concluded, as of June 30, 2017, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in achieving that level of reasonable assurance.

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

On February 18, 2016, a civil action was filed in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey, entitled M. Norman Donnenfeld v. Petro Home Services, Petro Holdings Inc. and Petro, Inc., Civil Action Number 2:16-cv-00882 JMV-JBC, against Petro Home Services which is a brand name, Petro Holdings Inc. and Petro, Inc. Plaintiff alleged he did not receive expected contractual benefits under his protected price plan contract when oil prices fell and asserted various claims for relief including breach of contract, violation of the New York General Business Law and fraud. The Plaintiff also sought to have a class certified of all customers of the defendants in the United States who entered into protected price plan contracts and were denied the same contractual benefits and to be appointed to represent them. The Plaintiff sought compensatory, punitive and other damages in unspecified amounts. On May 9, 2016, the Partnership filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim for relief and to strike the class action allegations. On March 24, 2017, the motion to dismiss the complaint was granted, for failure to state a claim and for lack of personal jurisdiction but Plaintiff was given 30 days to attempt to replead.

Instead of filing an amended complaint, on April 18, 2017, Plaintiff commenced a new putative class action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, entitled M. Norman Donnenfeld v. Petro, Inc., Civil Action Number 2:17-cv-02310-JFB-SIL. The new complaint names Petro, Inc. d/b/a Petro Home Services as the sole defendant. The allegations and claims in the new complaint are substantially similar to those in the prior complaint filed in the District of New Jersey. No class has yet been certified in this action. The Partnership believes the allegations lack merit and intends to vigorously defend the action; at this time we cannot assess the potential outcome or materiality of this matter.

36

##### Table of Contents

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this Report, investors should carefully review and consider the information regarding certain factors which could materially affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows set forth in Part I Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Fiscal 2016 Form 10-K. We may disclose changes to such factors or disclose additional factors from time to time in our future filings with the SEC.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

37

##### Table of Contents

Item 6.

Exhibits

(a) | Exhibits Included Within:

31.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Star Gas Partners, L.P., pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
31.2 |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer, Star Gas Partners, L.P., pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
32.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101 |  | The following materials from the Star Gas Partners, L.P. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Capital, (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) related notes.
101.INS |  | XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LAB |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

38

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf of the undersigned thereunto duly authorized:

Star Gas Partners, L.P.
(Registrant)
By: |  | Kestrel Heat LLC AS GENERAL PARTNER

Signature |  | Title |  | Date
/s/ Richard F. Ambury Richard F. Ambury |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary Kestrel Heat LLC (Principal Financial Officer) |  | July 31, 2017
Signature |  | Title |  | Date
/s/ Cory A. Czekanski Cory A. Czekanski |  | Vice President – Controller Kestrel Heat LLC (Principal Accounting Officer) |  | July 31, 2017

39