XML 67 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v2.3.0.15

Commitments And Contingencies | 9 Months Ended
--- | ---
Sep. 30, 2011
Commitments And Contingencies [Abstract] |
Commitments And Contingencies | Note 13: Commitments and Contingencies The following commitments and contingencies provide an update of those discussed in "Note 24: Commitments and Contingencies" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the SEC on March 1, 2011, and should be read in conjunction with the complete descriptions provided in the aforementioned Form 10-K. Corporate Litigation In re MBIA Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 08-CV-264 (S.D.N.Y.) In July 2011, the parties reached a settlement agreement in principle pursuant to which the plaintiffs will receive $68 million in exchange for the dismissal with prejudice of the litigation. The Company's Director and Officer insurance carriers have agreed to cover in full the settlement payment. On September 20, 2011, the court entered a preliminary order approving the settlement agreement reached by the parties. A settlement hearing is scheduled for December 15, 2011. Trustees of the Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. Clapp et al. , No. 08-CV-1515 (S.D.N.Y.) On June 3, 2011, Plaintiff filed an amended derivative complaint against certain of the Company's present and former officers and directors, and against the Company, as nominal defendant. The Company's response is due December 1, 2011. Ambac Bond Insurance Coverage Cases, Coordinated Proceeding Case No. JCCP 4555 (Super. Ct. of Cal., County of San Francisco) On August 8, 2011, plaintiffs filed amended versions of their respective complaints. These amended complaints name as defendants, among others, MBIA Inc., MBIA Corp., National, and renew claims alleging breach of contract, fraud, unfair business practices and violation of California's Cartwright Act. On October 20, 2011, the court overruled the Company's demurrers to plaintiffs' fraud and Cartwright Act claims. In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation , M.D.L. No. 1950 (S.D.N.Y.) As of May 31, 2011, the Company has answered all of the existing complaints. Tri-City Healthcare District v. Citibank. et al.; Case No. 30-2010-00359692 (Super. Ct. of Cal., County of Orange) On June 13, 2011, Tri-City Healthcare District filed its Fourth Amended Complaint against MBIA Inc., MBIA Corp. and National (collectively for this paragraph, "MBIA"), which purports to state seven causes of action against MBIA for fraud in the inducement, concealment, negligent misrepresentation, negligence, breach of contract, duress, and breach of the covenant of good faith arising from Tri-City Healthcare District's investment in auction rate securities. On September 8, 2011, the court granted in part and denied in part MBIA's demurrer to Tri-City's Fourth Amended Complaint. On October 4, 2011, MBIA filed its answer to the remaining causes of action. Recovery Litigation MBIA Insurance Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al.; Index No. 602825/08 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. County) On June 30, 2011, the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's denial of Countrywide's motion to dismiss MBIA Corp.'s fraud claim. On October 5, 2011, a hearing was held on MBIA Corp.'s motion for partial summary judgment regarding proof of causation and Bank of America's motion to consolidate and/or sever successor liability claims in four separate actions by monoline insurers. On October 31, 2011, the court denied Bank of America's motion to consolidate and/or sever the successor liability claims (allowing deposition and expert discovery on the successor liability claim to proceed but reserving decision on whether to sever and consolidate the successor liability claim). On November 3, 2011, Bank of America filed a Notice of Appeal of the court's October 31 decision. A decision on MBIA Corp.'s motion for partial summary judgment regarding proof of causation is pending. MBIA Insurance Corp. v. Bank of America, et al.; Case No. BC417572 (Super. Ct of Cal., County of Los Angeles) On July 14, 2011, the court lifted the discovery stay in order for the parties to negotiate depositions and coordinate same with the New York Countrywide action. On October 3, 2011, the case was reassigned to Judge John Shepard Wiley. MBIA Insurance Corp. v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al.; Index No. 603751/09E (N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. County) On June 1, 2011, the court reversed its prior ruling issued on August 9, 2010, and dismissed MBIA Corp.'s fraudulent inducement cause of action. On October 13, 2011, the court granted MBIA Corp.'s motion to renew consideration of the court's June 1 revised opinion and reinstated MBIA Corp.'s claim for fraudulent inducement but struck its demand for a jury trial. On November 4, 2011, Credit Suisse filed a Notice of Appeal of the court's ruling granting MBIA Corp.'s motion to renew. MBIA Insurance Corp. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (in its corporate capacity and as conservator and receiver for IndyMac Federal Bank, F.S.B.); Civil Action No. 09-01011 (ABJ) (D.C. Dist.) On October 6, 2011, the court issued a ruling granting the FDIC's motion to dismiss. On November 4, 2011, MBIA Corp. filed a Notice of Appeal. MBIA Insurance Corp. v. Morgan Stanley et al.; Index No. 29951-10 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Westchester County) On May 26, 2011, the court denied Morgan Stanley's motion to dismiss, allowing MBIA Corp. to proceed on its fraud and breach-of-contract claims. On June 20, 2011, Morgan Stanley filed its answer to the complaint. On June 26, 2011, Morgan Stanley filed a Notice of Appeal with respect to the court's denial of its motion to dismiss. MBIA Insurance Corp. et al. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith Inc. et al.; Index No. 601324/09E (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County) On July 12, 2011, the parties filed a joint stipulation voluntarily dismissing the case with prejudice. MBIA Insurance Corp. et al. v. Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. ; Case No. 09 Civ. 10093 (S.D.N.Y.) On August 17, 2011, the parties filed a joint stipulation voluntarily dismissing the case with prejudice. Transformation Litigation Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. et al. v. MBIA Inc. et al., 09-cv-2242 (R.S.) (S.D.N.Y.) In light of the June 28, 2011 Court of Appeals decision referenced below, on July 27, 2011, the court entered an amended case management plan and scheduling order setting a discovery cut-off of November 9, 2012. On August 8, 2011, Fir Tree Value Master Fund, L.P., Fir Tree Capital Opportunity Master Fund, L.P., and Fir Tree Mortgage Opportunity Master Fund, L.P. voluntarily dismissed all claims against defendants without prejudice. Third Ave Trust et al. v. MBIA Inc. et al.; Index No. 650756/2009 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. County) On October 20, 2011, the parties filed a stipulation of discontinuance dismissing the litigation without prejudice. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. et al. v. MBIA Inc. et al.; Index No. 601475/09 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. County) On June 28, 2011, the New York State Court of Appeals reversed the Appellate Division's decision and allowed all of the plaintiffs' claims to proceed, with the exception of plaintiffs' claim for unjust enrichment. Ten of the original twenty plaintiffs have dismissed their claims, several of which dismissals were related to the commutation of certain of their MBIA-insured exposures. On August 15, 2011, the court entered a scheduling order coordinating discovery in the plenary action with the Aurelius case in federal court and setting a discovery cut-off of November 9, 2012. On September 6 and 12, 2011 and on October 31, 2011, respectively, KBC Investments Cayman Islands V Ltd., Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (f/k/a Wachovia Bank, N.A.) withdrew from the litigation. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. et al. v. Eric Dinallo et al.; Index no. 601846/09 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. County) On September 6 and 12, 2011 and on October 31, 2011, respectively, KBC Investments Cayman Islands V Ltd., Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (f/k/a Wachovia Bank, N.A.) withdrew from the litigation. On October 28, 2011, MBIA sought and obtained an extension of time on the submission of its sur-reply papers until November 16, 2011, in part to address certain errors it discovered in the record relating to Transformation. The NYDFS obtained an extension as well and will submit its sur-reply papers on November 23, 2011. Submission of all papers relating to the original petition is scheduled to be completed by February 2012. A trial is scheduled for February 27 - March 23, 2012. Barclays Bank PLC., et al. v. Wrynn et al.; Index No. 651811/2010 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. County) The proceeding is currently stayed. The Company is defending against the aforementioned actions in which it is a defendant and expects ultimately to prevail on the merits. There is no assurance, however, that the Company will prevail in these actions. Adverse rulings in these actions could have a material adverse effect on the Company's ability to implement its strategy and on its business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. There are no other material lawsuits pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened, to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party.

X
- Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6952336&loc=d3e14435-108349 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 460 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 8 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6398077&loc=d3e12565-110249 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name FASB Interpretation (FIN) -Number 14 -Paragraph 3 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6394976&loc=d3e25287-109308 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 5 -Paragraph 9, 10, 11, 12 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 210 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.5-02.25) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6877327&loc=d3e13212-122682 Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6449706&loc=d3e16207-108621 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration