XML 33 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Fair Value of Financial Instruments [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
9. Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, short-term trade receivables, derivative instruments, accounts payable and debt instruments. For short-term instruments, other than those required to be reported at fair value on a recurring basis and for which additional disclosures are included below, management concluded the historical carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization.

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is an exit price concept that assumes an orderly transaction between willing market participants. Valuation techniques must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. To measure fair value, the Company applies a fair value hierarchy that is based on three levels of input, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, as follows:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2 – Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market date for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

During 2011 and 2010, there were no transfers of financial assets between Levels 1, 2 or 3 fair value measurements. There have been no changes in the methodologies used at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

Nickel swaps and embedded customer derivatives – Determined by using inputs that include the price of nickel indexed to the London Metal Exchange (LME). The fair value is determined based on quoted market prices and reflects the estimated amounts the Company would pay or receive to terminate the nickel swaps.

Interest rate swap – Based on the present value of the expected future cash flows, considering the risks involved, and using discount rates appropriate for the maturity date. Market observable Level 2 inputs are used to determine the present value of future cash flows.

 

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company:

 

                                 

December 31, 2011

   Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
         

Assets:

                                

Embedded customer derivatives

   $ —       $ 55     $ —       $ 55  
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

  
         

Liabilities:

                                

Nickel swaps

     —         55       —         55  

Interest rate swap

     —         492       —         492  
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

  

Total liabilities at fair value

   $ —       $ 547     $ —       $ 547  
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

  
         

December 31, 2010

                        
         

Assets:

                                

Embedded customer derivatives

   $ —       $ 123     $ —       $ 123  
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

  
         

Liabilities:

                                

Nickel swaps

   $ —       $ 127     $ —       $ 127  
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

  

Long-Term Financial Instruments

The carrying value and the fair value of the IRB that qualify as financial instruments are both $5,125 at December 31, 2011. The carrying value of the revolver and the term loan were $170,405 and $57,604, at December 31, 2011, respectively. As the revolver and long-term debt were refinanced in both 2011 and 2010, management believes that the amounts are carried at fair value at December 31, 2011 and 2010. Because the revolveing Credit Facility was refinanced on June 30, 2010, management believes that the amount was carried at fair value.