XML 58 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Note 7 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]
7.           Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, short-term trade receivables, derivative instruments, accounts payable and debt instruments. For short-term instruments, other than those required to be reported at fair value on a recurring basis and for which additional disclosures are included below, management concluded the historical carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization.

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  Fair value is an exit price concept that assumes an orderly transaction between willing market participants.  Valuation techniques must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.  To measure fair value, the Company applies a fair value hierarchy that is based on three levels of input, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, as follows:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2 – Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, there were no transfers of financial assets between Levels 1, 2 or 3 fair value measurements.  There have been no changes in the methodologies used at March 31, 2013 since December 31, 2012.  Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Nickel swaps and embedded customer derivatives – Determined by using Level 2 inputs that include the price of nickel indexed to the LME.  The fair value is determined based on quoted market prices and reflects the estimated amounts the Company would pay or receive to terminate the nickel swaps.

Interest rate swap – Based on the present value of the expected future cash flows, considering the risks involved, and using discount rates appropriate for the maturity date.  Market observable Level 2 inputs are used to determine the present value of future cash flows.

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company:

   
Value of Items Recorded at Fair Value
As of March 31, 2013
 
(in thousands)
 
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
Assets:
                       
Embedded customer derivatives (Nickel swaps)
  $ -     $ 144     $ -     $ 144  
Total assets at fair value
  $ -     $ 144     $ -     $ 144  
                                 
Liabilities:
                               
Nickel swaps
    -       199       -       199  
Interest rate swap (CTI)
    -       404       -       404  
Fixed interest rate swap (ABL)
            937               937  
Total liabilities at fair value
  $ -     $ 1,536     $ -     $ 1,536  

   
Value of Items Not Recorded at Fair Value
As of March 31, 2013
 
(in thousands)
 
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
Liabilities:
                       
IRB
  $ 5,125     $ -     $ -     $ 5,125  
Term loan
    -       55,417       -       55,417  
Revolver
    -       174,955       -       174,955  
Total liabilities not recorded at fair value
  $ 5,125     $ 230,372     $ -     $ 235,497  

The value of the items not recorded at fair value represent the carrying value of the liabilities.

   
Value of Items Recorded at Fair Value
As of December 31, 2012
 
(in thousands)
 
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
Assets:
                       
Embedded customer derivatives (nickel swaps)
  $ -     $ 113     $ -     $ 113  
Total assets recorded at fair value
  $ -     $ 113     $ -     $ 113  
                                 
Liabilities:
                               
Nickel swaps
    -       168       -       168  
Interest rate swap (CTI)
    -       446       -       446  
Fixed interest rate swap (ABL)
    -       941       -       941  
Total liabilities recorded at fair value
  $ -     $ 1,555     $ -     $ 1,555  

   
Value of Items Not Recorded at Fair Value
As of December 31, 2012
 
(in thousands)
 
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
Liabilities:
                       
IRB
  $ 5,125     $ -     $ -     $ 5,125  
Term loan
    -       57,604       -       57,604  
Revolver
    -       177,575       -       177,575  
Total liabilities not recorded at fair value
  $ 5,125     $ 235,179     $ -     $ 240,304  

The value of the items not recorded at fair value represent the carrying value of the liabilities.

The fair value of the IRB is determined using Level 1 inputs.  The carrying value and the fair value of the IRB that qualify as financial instruments were $5.1 million at both March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

The fair values of the revolver and term loan are determined using Level 2 inputs. The carrying values of the revolver and the term loan were $175.0 million and $55.4 million, respectively, at March 31, 2013.  The carrying value of the revolver and the term loan were $177.6 million and $57.6 million, respectively, at December 31, 2012.  The Level 2 fair value of the Company's long-term debt was estimated using prevailing market interest rates on debt with similar credit worthiness, terms and maturities.