<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.77E LEGAL
<SEQUENCE>3
<FILENAME>h863689977e.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EXHIBIT
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                                                                    SUB-ITEM 77E

             INVESCO VAN KAMPEN ADVANTAGE MUNICIPAL INCOME TRUST II

                                LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Clifford T. Rotz, Jr., et. al. v. Van Kampen Asset Management, et. al.

On January 17, 2011, a Consolidated Amended Shareholder Derivative Complaint was
filed on behalf of (1) Invesco Van Kampen Advantage Municipal Income Trust II;
(2) Invesco Van Kampen Municipal Opportunity Trust; (3) Invesco Van Kampen
Municipal Trust; (4) Invesco Van Kampen High Income Trust II; (5) Invesco Van
Kampen Senior Income Trust (the "Trusts") against Van Kampen Asset Management,
Morgan Stanley, and certain current and former officers and employees
(collectively, the "Defendants"). The Plaintiffs alleged that Defendants
breached their fiduciary duties to common shareholders by causing the Trusts to
redeem Auction Rate Preferred Securities ("ARPS") at their liquidation value,
which was at a discount from market value, and by not having adequate procedures
to deal with potential conflicts of interest. The Plaintiffs alleged that the
redemption of the ARPS wasted Trust assets, occurred at the expense of the
Trusts and the common shareholders, and was improperly motivated to benefit
preferred shareholders and Defendants. Additionally, the Plaintiffs claimed that
the ARPS were replaced with less favorable financing. Plaintiffs seek judgment
that: 1) orders Defendants to refrain from redeeming any ARPS at their
liquidation value using Trusts assets; 2) awards monetary damages against all
Defendants, individually, jointly or severally, in favor of the Trusts, for all
losses and damages allegedly suffered as a result of the redemptions of ARPS at
their liquidation value; 3) grants appropriate equitable relief to remedy the
Defendants' alleged breaches of fiduciary duties; and 4) awards to Plaintiffs
the costs and disbursements of the action. On August 10, 2010, the Board of
Trustees formed a Special Litigation Committee ("SLC") to investigate the claims
made in the April 2010 demand letters with the assistance of independent
counsel. After reviewing the findings of the SLC's and a vote by Independent
Trustees,, the Board announced on June 24, 2011, that it had adopted the SLC's
recommendation to seek dismissal of the lawsuit. The Trusts filed a motion to
dismiss on October 4, 2011, which remains pending. Plaintiffs filed a motion on
November 28, 2011 asking the court to hold the motion to dismiss in abeyance
while plaintiffs conduct limited discovery. The Plaintiffs' request for
discovery has been briefed and the court's decision whether Plaintiffs are
entitled to discovery is pending. This matter is pending.

Management of Invesco and the Trust believe that the outcome of the proceedings
described above will not have a material adverse effect on the Trust or on the
ability of Invesco to provide ongoing services to the Trust.
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
