XML 61 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
Goodwill and Intangible Assets  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Note 5.  Goodwill and Intangible Assets

 

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Biological
Indicators

 

Instruments

 

Total

 

April 1, 2011

 

$

9,279

 

$

5,171

 

$

14,450

 

Acquisitions

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2012

 

9,279

 

5,171

 

14,450

 

Acquisitions

 

 

9,190

 

9,190

 

March 31, 2013

 

$

9,279

 

$

14,361

 

$

23,640

 

 

Other intangible assets are as follows:

 

 

 

March 31, 2013

 

(In thousands)

 

Carrying
Amount

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

Net

 

Useful Life
(Years)

 

Intellectual property

 

$

4,991

 

$

1,037

 

$

3,954

 

10-16

 

Trade names

 

2,296

 

248

 

2,048

 

10

 

Customer relationships

 

14,485

 

5,345

 

9,140

 

7-8.5

 

Non-compete agreements

 

823

 

547

 

276

 

3-5

 

 

 

$

22,595

 

$

7,177

 

$

15,418

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2012

 

 

 

Carrying
Amount

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

Net

 

Useful Life
(Years)

 

Intellectual property

 

$

4,091

 

$

542

 

$

3,549

 

10-16

 

Trade names

 

1,596

 

27

 

1,569

 

10

 

Customer relationships

 

8,185

 

3,555

 

4,630

 

7-8.5

 

Non-compete agreements

 

523

 

452

 

71

 

3-5

 

 

 

$

14,395

 

$

4,576

 

$

9,819

 

 

 

 

The following is estimated amortization expense for the years ending March 31:

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

2014

 

$

2,355

 

2015

 

2,324

 

2016

 

2,304

 

2017

 

2,186

 

2018

 

2,043

 

 

Amortization expense for the years ended March 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011was $2,601,000, $1,490,000 and $1,183,000, respectively.

 

For the year ended March 31, 2012, we determined that the carrying value of an indefinite-lived trade name intangible asset was greater than its estimated fair value and recorded an impairment loss of $350,000, which is disclosed separately on the accompanying statements of income.  Fair value was estimated using the royalty replacement approach, whereby a royalty percentage is applied to forecasted revenues and discounted to determine the present value.  While gross profit and cash flows showed improvement since the intangible asset was acquired, revenues did not grow at the level originally used to value the intangible asset.  This impairment impacted the Instruments segment.